Website: http://www.acq.osd.mil/ic/cwp.html Email: osd.coalition.warfare@mail.mil



Similar documents
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #159

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UNTIL RELEASED BY THE COMMITTEE TESTIMONY OF MR. ANDRE GUDGER DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Information Systems Agency Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #131

UNCLASSIFIED FY Prior Years FY 2013 FY Total Cost. COST ($ in Millions) The FY 2015 OCO Request will be submitted at a later date.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

AF C2 Capability Modernization Leveraging Architectures to Achieve Warfighting Integration

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Defense Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Information Exchange Program (IEP)

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Management of the Department of Defense Information Enterprise

Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 President's Budget Submission

Accurate Risk Assessment Using Multi-Relational Hazard/Mishap Pairings

ENTERPRISE COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT. Creating connections THROUGH SERVICE & WORKFORCE EXCELLENCE


Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. SUBJECT: Information Assurance (IA) in the Defense Acquisition System

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 9 R-1 Line #139

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3700 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

National Initiative for Cyber Security Education

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION. Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT)

Foreign Military Sales (FMS) National Defense Industrial Association 11th National Small Business Conference

DCAA / DCMA: Progress or Status Quo? Presented By: Christine Williamson, CPA, Member Kristen Soles, CPA, Member

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Medical Research for Prevention, Mitigation, and Treatment of Blast Injuries

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

JOINT STATEMENT COMMISSION ON WARTIME CONTRACTING

The Joint Staff Overseas Contingency Operations Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), Defense-Wide Budget Activity 01: Operating Forces

Information Technology

BETTER BUYING POWER 2.0 INITIATIVES DESCRIPTIONS

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

APPENDIX J INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT GOALS

UNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions

(1) Acquisition Professional of the Year. (3) Major Acquisition Activity Award. (4) Field Acquisition Activity Award

NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY FY06.1 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS. Further Refinements Needed to Guide the Investment Management Process

The U.S. President s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) PPP Incentive Fund Round 3 Guidance & Application Packet

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

SEC.. GRANTS OF NON-LETHAL EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES BY. " 166c. Geographic combatant commander's authority to transfer excess defense articles

Joint Interoperability Certification

Health Solutions. Mission-Critical Support Across the Health Spectrum

2014 Spring Session I (7.5 Week Courses) 1/2/2014 2/22/2014

Forecast to Industry 2015

The first thing you notice about Judith Dawson is her enthusiasm for the acquisition

Office of Small Business Programs

SPAWAR HQ ARCHITECTURE AND HUMAN SYSTEMS GROUP Human-Systems Integration/Systems Engineering Support Performance Work Statement

UNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

How To Improve The Defense Communications System

DOD BUSINESS SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION. Additional Action Needed to Achieve Intended Outcomes

Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Schedule Delays and Reengineering Weaknesses Increase Risks to DoD's Auditability Goals

Supporting Dissemination and Implementation for the PCORI Pilot Projects and Learning Network (PPPLN)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Setting Goals and Objectives

Defense Business Systems Investment Management Process Guidance. June 2012

Air Force SOA Enterprise Service Bus Study Using Business Process Management Workflow Orchestration for C4I Systems Integration

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Defense Logistics Agency INSTRUCTION

Defense Contract Management Agency

International cooperation in defense acquisition programs is an important but complex undertaking.

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Strategic Planning: from idea to execution

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Winning Proposals: Understanding the Basics of Federal and Foundation Grants

Professional Military Education

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 6 R-1 Line #165

Information Assurance Workforce (IAWF) Contracting Officer Representative (COR) & Project Manager (PM) Workshop

International Acquisition Career Path

Financial Management

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

The JB Fernandes Award for NGO Excellence in Trinidad and Tobago

Department of Defense. SUBJECT: Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology (IT) and National Security Systems (NSS)

Followup Audit: Enterprise Blood Management System Not Ready for Full Deployment

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Status of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Cost, Schedule, and Management Actions Taken to Address Prior Recommendations

UNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Defense Health Program Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #9

Report No. D July 30, Data Migration Strategy and Information Assurance for the Business Enterprise Information Services

Cybersecurity. Cybersecurity 331

Statement. Ms. Nancy E. Weaver. Department of Defense. Senior Language Authority. Before the. House Armed Services Committee

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FORENSIC CAPABILITIES. Larry C. Chelko Director U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory (USACIL)

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Transcription:

Overview CWP provides funding on a competitive basis to DoD organizations to conduct cooperative research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) projects with foreign partners. The goals of the CWP program are to: Collaboratively address strategic technology gaps for current and future missions Develop interoperability solutions for coalition operations Strengthen current defense partnerships and develop new relationships Through this annual, competitive process, CWP selects projects that enhance and increase coalition capabilities in support of technological or political objectives. CWP projects enable project teams to move a technology into the next stage of development or prepare for transition to operational forces. Cooperative RDT&E Cooperative RDT&E is any project or program with U.S. and foreign government partners committed to accomplishing a common objective. In these projects: Work can be done jointly and/or separately to achieve a common goal Each government has equitable project manager and execution duties/participation in the research and development aspects Each government gains defense benefits from engaging in the project Each government provides contributions to execute the effort, to include: government labor, equipment, facility use, national industrial and academic participation Tests and demos to prove out the overarching research and development efforts

History CWP, established in 2000, began funding projects in FY01. To date, CWP has funded 167 projects. CWP projects support DoD acquisition by: Helping program offices convert U.S.-only projects into coalition solutions for the U.S. warfighter Influencing coalition interoperability in major programs that will have far-reaching use by U.S. forces Addressing requirements of combined operations early in a program s development cycle to avert risks to joint/coalition operations and avoid costs associated with adding requirements later in the acquisition process Gaining U.S. DoD access to leading-edge global technology Providing significant cost savings to the DoD while maintaining a strong research and development base Getting Started Nomination templates and deadlines change annually. Anyone considering submitting a proposal should review the documents on the CWP website (CWP Management Plan, FAQs, etc) and contact the CWP office as soon as possible for assistance and guidance. The CWP Team and the CWP POCs within the Service and Agencies, are happy to help turn ideas into competitive project nominations. We will help refine the proposal, work through specific issues or questions, help with coordination and work toward gaining Combatant Command advocacy for proposals.

CWP Competition Cycle Summer Call for nominations; CWP outreach events; meetings with interested project leads Fall Service and Agency initial submission dates January Initial nominations due to CWP Team February Final nominations due to CWP Team March DoD review and final grading April/May CWP selections announced June Initial documentation due December/January or later Projects begin (based on project schedule) CWP Requirements A CWP nomination must: Have a U.S. DoD-led Project Team managing and executing project Have foreign government defense partner(s)-led Project Team(s) equally committed to managing and executing the project with equitable contributions Show legitimate use for RDT&E funding Clearly identify R&D activities that will be completed by each partner Respond to one or more documented DoD needs Meet stated CWP funding requirements Have the ability to establish the appropriate international agreements in time to execute project Show reasonable plan for delivering tangible product (report, study, prototype, end-item) Identify transition path and show commitment to transition in writing if project completes successful demonstration(s) Responsiveness to DoD Needs The CWP Team works closely with experts within the DoD to make sure projects respond to identified CCMD or DoD needs. In most cases, technologies or outcomes developed under CWP projects are not region-specific, but rather benefit the DoD in multiple theaters.

CWP Funding Requirements CWP will provide 1 to 3 years of RDT&E seed funding. Maximum project length is 3 years. Maximum request is $2M. Requests for maximum funding have to be clear game changers CWP funds pay for U.S. tasks only As a source of support funding, CWP requires at least matching contributions from the U.S. Project Team and foreign partners. These contributions can be a mix of financial and in-kind resources dedicated to executing the project. Financial contributions show project team commitment to the technology/outcome and transition. Other (non-cwp) U.S. contributions have to be equal to or exceed the CWP request. U.S. regulations require equitable contributions from each partner. In most cases, that means equal to the total U.S. contribution.