14 million. 4th largest U.S. Who is HCSC 9/7/2015. Cultivating EDI into E-Solutions HEALTH DENTAL LIFE DISABILITY CONNECTIVITY PHARMACY HEALTH IT



Similar documents
Implementing Consolidated-Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) for Meaningful Use Stage 2. ONC Implementation and Testing Division April 5, 2013

The HL7 CIMI Workgroup: Creating Detailed Clinical Models to Support FHIR Interoperability. HIMSS March 2, 2016 Las Vegas Stanley M.

AGENDA INDUSTRY UPDATE

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Data Provenance. Functional Requirements Document: Developed in Response to the Data Provenance Task Force Recommendations. Version 1.

Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esmd) CDA Digital Signatures. January 8, 2013

uently Asked NextGen Questions Share Frequently Asked uently Asked Questions Frequently Asked FAQ Pre-General Release (April-June 2014)

Clinical Document Exchange Integration Guide - Outbound

The Continuity of Care Document. Changing the Landscape of Healthcare Information Exchange

Shelly Spiro, Executive Director, Pharmacy HIT Collaborative reports no relevant financial relationships.

Structured Data Capture (SDC) Update for Digital Learning Collaborative

How To Use A Pharmacy To Help Your Health Care System

Opportunities and challenges for public health surveillance: a new world of interoperability with electronic health records

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: August, 2015

Core services and the path to the future of the ILHIE

Implementation of a Population Health and Quality Reporting System for FQHCs

How To Connect Patient Summary Content To A Patient Summary On An Ehr System

Interoperability for Mobile applications: New IHE profiles

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Redwood&Mednet&Conference& Interoperability:&Past,&Present&and&Future& David&McCallie&Jr.&MD& SVP&Medical&InformaBcs& Cerner&

Setting the World on FHIR

New York ehealth Collaborative. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012

Introducing Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esmd) to Clearinghouses

Structured Data Capture (SDC) The Use of Structured Data Capture for Clinical Research

Navigating the Trends in Health Care Today. MEDITECH Solutions for Meaningful Use and Interoperability

MDHT Capabilities & Success Story

Presented by: IHE USA in collaboration with Greenway Medical Technologies and Epic March, 2013

TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proposal for Demonstrating at California Connects 2014

Public Health Reporting Initiative Functional Requirements Description

Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Meaningful Use Frequently Asked Questions Webinar

West Virginia Information Technology Summit. November 4, 2009

Structured Data Capture (SDC) Initiative

HL7 FHIR for Executives

HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011

SCENARIO: Integrating Clinical Documents into your EHR

The value MIE delivers can be summed up in two words:

Santa Cruz HIE Proposal for Demonstrating at California Connects 2014

MOSAIQ External Systems Interfaces (ESI) Product Offerings

Presented by: DV-NJ HIMSS Fall Event 10/22/2009. Colleen Woods, Chief Information Officer, State of NJ Department of Human Services

Building Regional and National Health Information Systems. Mike LaRocca

ConnectVirginia EXCHANGE Onboarding and Certification Guide. Version 1.4

IMS Meaningful Use Webinar

Presenters: Laura Zaremba, ILHIE Acting Executive Director Ivan Handler, Chief Technology Officer Kevin Ferriter, InterSystems Corp, Program Manager

Proposal for Demonstrating at California Connects 2014

Request for Public Comment on Voluntary 2015 Edition Electronic Health Record (EHR) Certification

Meaningful Use and Public Health

HL7 Personal Health Record System Functional Model and Standard & Industry Update

HIE Services & Pricing

The Madness Concludes: 2015 Certified Health IT APRIL 29, 2015

HIE Services & Pricing

Model-Driven Health Tools (MDHT) CDA Tools Overview.

IMPACT Act: Connecting Post-Acute Care Across the Care Continuum

Demonstrating Meaningful Use of EHRs: The top 10 compliance challenges for Stage 1 and what s new with 2

HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011

Work Product of the HITPC Meaningful Use Workgroup DRAFT Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations

Clinical Quality Improvement

Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT Proposed Rule Public Comment Template

From HITSP to HL7 EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 3.0 Interoperability Specifications a Ten Year Journey

FHIM Model Content Overview

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. Nonfederal Efforts to Help Achieve Health Information Interoperability

Illinois Health Information Exchange Client Readiness Technical Assessment Checklist

Reconciliation of Clinical Content and Care Providers (RECON) Draft for Public Comment

May 7, Re: RIN 0991-AB82. Dear Secretary Sebelius:

Quality Reporting Under Meaningful Use Stage 2. Crystal Kallem, Director of Business Analysis & Policy Lantana Consulting Group

This McKesson response was submitted electronically to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) on September 12, 2014.

Faculty Disclosure. Pharmacist Learning Objectives. Pharmacy e-hit: The Future of Pharmacy and Patient Care

Let s build a smarter health system. Patients, Partners & You.

A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives

Guide for Implementing ereferral Using Certified EHRs

Meaningful use glossary and requirements table

NCPDP Electronic Prescribing Standards

Imagining Seamless Information Flow: Bridging the HIE Gap and Making Care Coordination Reality AJ Peterson: GM, CareConnect Larry Seltzer: GM,

Using EHRs, HIE, & Data Analytics to Support Accountable Care. Jonathan Shoemaker June 2014

HEAL NY Phase 5 Health IT RGA Section 7.1: HEAL NY Phase 5 Health IT Candidate Use Cases Interoperable EHR Use Case for Medicaid

Patient Controlled Health Records Standards and Technical Track

HL7 CDA (Clinical Document Architecture) in Structured Diagnostic Reporting

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

Consolidated Clinical Data Architecture

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL AND DENTAL RECORD INTEGRATION OPTIONS

Personal Health Record and Patient Access

CDA for Common Document Types: Objectives, Status, and Relationship to Computer-assisted Coding

HIMSS Public Policy Initiatives in 2015: Using Health IT to Enable Healthcare Transformation Jeff Coughlin Senior Director Federal & State Affairs

Registry Technical Infrastructure and EHR Alignment

Work Product of the HITPC Meaningful Use Workgroup Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations

Committee on Operating Rules For Information Exchange (CORE )

Going beyond Meaningful Use with EMR solutions from the Centricity portfolio

DECIPHER architecture approach. Co-funded by the European Union

RPMS DIRECT Secure Messaging

Indiana Council of Community Mental Health Centers. October 14, 2013

IHE Patient Care Coordination (PCC) Technical Framework Supplement. Referral/Order Linking (ROL) Trial Implementation

Application for Demonstrating at California Connects 2014

Update on EU-US MoU on Interoperability and support from the Trillium Bridge Project

(e)(1) View, download, and transmit to 3rd party.

How To Prepare For A Patient Care System

I. RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO THE TIMING OF STAGE 2

Response to Revisions to the Permanent Certification Program for Health Information Technology NPRM (RIN 0991-AB82)

Adoption and Meaningful Use of EHR Technology in a Hospital

MITA to RHIO: Medicaid Enterprise as a Communication Hub. A CNSI White Paper

Transcription:

Cultivating EDI into E-Solutions HL7 Attachment Standards HL7 C-CDAr2 vs. CDP1 Blue Button Plus HL7 FHIR Durwin Day, Health Care Service Corporation September 14, 2015 1 Who is HCSC HEALTH DENTAL LIFE DISABILITY CONNECTIVITY PHARMACY HEALTH IT ILLINOIS 14 million members MONTANA NEW MEXICO OKLAHOMA TEXAS 4th largest U.S. health insurer Exceptional financial stability Moody s Investors Service = A1 (Good) Standard & Poor s = AA- (Very Strong) A.M. Best Company = A+ (Superior) 2 1

WHAT S HAPPENED TO ATTACHMENTS? ACA Administrative Simplification has a Compliance Date of January 1, 2016. We will cover: The status of the regulation on Attachments The proposed Standards Types of Attachment requested / sent Different uses for Attachments What s new or related to Attachments? Where can you learn more? 3 Status of the Regulation for Attachments? NCVHS Nov 2011 Testimony = Letter of Recommendation March 2012 Strong Industry Support for Adoption Be Consistent with Clinical Information Exchange Feb 2013 Testimony = Letter of Recommendation June 2013 Observations: Need Convergence of Clinical and Administrative Data Attachment Standard is the 1 st Bridge Need Roadmap to Align Clinical/Administrative Initiatives Continue Collaboration between Standards and Operating Rules Definition - supplemental documentation needed about a patient(s) to support a specific health care-related event (such as a claim, eligibility, prior authorization, referrals, and others) using a standardized format. 4 2

Status of the Regulation for Attachments? NCVHS Feb 2013 Testimony = Letter of Recommendation June 2013 Recommendations: Standards = 1) Query 2) Response 3) Acknowledgement HL7 Consolidated CDA 1.1 and HL7 Supplemental Guide; LOINC codes X12 275, 277, 278 and 999 NCPDP No Transport Solicited and Unsolicited (as recommended in 2004) TPA must define criteria for unsolicited No Unspecified Attachments Do not allow Continued Requests Repeating or Chaining (one at a time) Phased Implementation Defined Meta-data to re-associate NPRM (not IFR) Obey Minimum Necessary Industry Needs Education 5 Status of the Regulation for Attachments? NCVHS June 2014 Testimony = Letter of Recommendation Sept. 2014 Recommendations: Standards (same as 2013) = 1) Query 2) Response 3) Acknowledgement HL7 Consolidated CDA 1.1 and HL7 Supplemental Guide; LOINC codes X12 275, 277, 278 and 999 NCPDP No Transport Concerns: Level of maturity of the Standards Level of industry readiness New Medicare specification CDP1 Number of other initiatives mandated Industry Needs Education Sept 2015 NCVHS Agenda Review Committee Report from June November 2015 Agenda possible Attachments?, not for Full Comm. February 2016 next Standards Subcommittee probable Attachment agenda Recent publication for HL7 CDP1 and Consolidated-CDA R2.1 6 3

What s changed for Attachments? 2005 Attachment Standards align with 2009 Consolidated CDA To give providers one common standard to implement Health Story consolidates CCD, HITSP C32 and Attachment documents Changed to use CDA version 3 Templates Templates imposed at three levels within a CDA: Re-usable building blocks Document-level: applies to entire document Section-level: applies to the document section Entry-level: applies to entries within a document section Examples: Document level = Discharge Summary, CCD, Progress Note Section level = Payer, Medications, Allergies, Problem Lists, Providers Entry level = Name, Number, Address, Consolidated CDA is an IG of different Document Templates, and each Document Template has a defined set Sections CDA changed, C-CDA IG changed, and the publication of CDP1 7 What is CDA? C-CDA? CDP1?.LOINC? Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) XML based standard, constrained by HL7 Reference Information Model Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) Implementation guide that defines discrete data for specific clinical documents Documents built from templates of Sections Primarily developed for MU-EHRs and Attachments Clinical Documents for Payers Set1 (CDP1) Implementation guide that defines discrete data for specific clinical documents Requires provider to fill each and every element with the data or null value Primarily developed for Medicare Post Pay Audit process to move to e-determination for prior authorization Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) Code value set that identifies clinical document being requested/sent 8 4

CDA Structure Every CDA Document is composed of two parts: Header Contains information about the document, establishes context for the details found in the Body: Who: Participants such as patient, physician, author What: Document Title, encompassing encounter Where: Location When: Creation date And much more Body Contains clinically relevant information Either Unstructured; such as a pdf, jpg, tiff Or Structured, as defined in the Consolidated CDA or CDP1 (XML/CDA) 9 CDA Relationship CDP1 & Consolidated CDA 10 5

Document Types included in Consolidated CDA --------------------------------- 11 17 Domain Sections in CCD of Consolidated CDA Required Sections Optional Sections Allergies and Intolerances Immunizations Medications Problem Procedures Results Vital Signs Advance Directives Encounters Family History Functional Medical Equipment Mental Status Nutrition Payer Plan of Treatment Social History 12 6

Compare C-CDA and CDP1 Consolidated-CDA R1.1 Continuity of Care Document, Consultation Note, Diagnostic Imaging Report, Discharge Summary, History & Physical, Operative Note, Procedure Note, Progress Note, Unstructured C-CDA R2 Clinical Notes adds 4 docs: Care Plan Referral Note Transfer Summary Patient Generated Document Clinical Document for Payers 1 Re-packages C-CDA sections + Changes Conformance Statements to Required for all Sections in each document, Using Null values, if the provider has no information to report or choses not to report INTO 5 new document types: Enhanced Encounter, Enhanced Hospitalization, Enhanced Operative Note, Enhanced Procedure Note, Interval 13 esmd Project ~ CDP1 Business Case 1) Reduce administrative burden 2) Reduce improper payment (~$30B in Medicare, ~$20B Medicaid) 3) Move from post payment audit to prior-authorization or pre-payment review (e-determination of Coverage) Goals 1) Move from paper to electronic communication 2) Replace wet signatures with digital signatures 3) Migrate to structured data from unstructured data 7

esmd Project ~ CDP1 Phase 1 provider sends document images electronically to Medicare Unstructured documents (PDFs, jpg, tiff) Using NwHIN CONNECT through a Health Information Handler Phase 2 e-determination of Coverage work group (ONC) Medicare sending a secure emdr (Request for information) to a registered provider Provider Profile Authentication IG (IHE HDR or X12 274) emdr and Structured Content IG (IHE XD* or X12 277 and CORE 270) Digital signature for Author of Record Author of Record IG HL7 Digital Signature DSTU Define and support structured documentation Clinical Documents for Payers Set 1 (Balloted HL7 CDA based on C-CDA) Companion Guides for X12 275 and X12 278 CDP1 Documents 1) Enhanced Encounter Document requires all: a. C-CDA R2 Progress Note Document sections b. C-CDA R2 Consult Document sections c. C-CDA R2 History and Physical Document sections + New Sections: Additional Document, External Defined CDE, Orders Placed, Transportation 2) Enhanced Hospitalization Document requires all: a. C-CDA R2 Discharge Summary Document sections b. C-CDA R2 History and Physical Document sections + New Sections: Additional Document, External Defined CDE, Orders Placed, Transportation 3) Enhanced Procedure Document requires all: a. C-CDA R2 Procedure Document sections + New Sections: Additional Document, External Defined CDE, Orders Placed 4) Enhanced Operative Note Document requires all: a. C-CDA R2 Operative Note Document sections + New Sections: Additional Document, External Defined CDE, Orders Placed 5) Interval Document has no equivalent templates? 8

Descriptions of new CDP1 Documents (reference) Enhanced Encounter - support the entire contents of the medical record related to a specific encounter with a patient for the administrative or clinical exchange with a third party Enhanced Hospitalization - to support a complete synopsis of the admission and discharge portion of the medical record related to a specific admission of a patient for the administrative or clinical exchange with a third party Enhanced Op Note - to support the entire contents of the medical record related to a specific operative procedure performed on a patient for the administrative or clinical exchange with a third party Enhanced Proc. Note -to support the entire contents of the medical record related to a specific procedure performed on a patient for the administrative or clinical exchange with a third party Interval - to capture the complete activity for the period covered. It may exclude anything that is covered in one of the other Clinical Document Templates (e.g. Enhanced Procedure Note). Descriptions of added CDP1 Sections (reference) Additional Documentation - This section contains additional documentation captured by the provider related to care provided or planned for the patient that is not supported in any other section of the document. (example physicians rationale for decision) External Defined CDE- This section contains additional documentation captured by the provider related to care provided or planned for the patient that is not supported in any other section of the document. (example physicians rationale for decision) Placed Orders - This section contains data that defines orders for observations, interventions, encounters, services, and procedures for the patient. It includes orders that have been entered into an EHR. These are indicated by the @moodcode RQO and statuscode completed or active for the entries within this section. The entries in this section represent the details of the orders and not the acts involved in the processing and fulfilment of the order. The process of and fulfillment of the order is represented by other entries. Transportation - The Transportation Section describes in a narrative format the transportation method (such as emergency transport), other than the patient s or caregiver s personal transportation, that was used to bring the patient to the location for the current encounter. This information is normally provided as a summary by the entity that provides the transportation service. 9

WEDI EHR Vendor Survey What are the findings from the Survey to the EHRA? What CDA Documents are being created from C-CDA? About 30 members Most Vendors are producing CCDs Some are creating Dis-Summary What s Next Look for more details from WEDI Possible follow up survey Updates on the status of MU3 requirements Pilot from Medicare 19 Attachments on FHIR FHIR Standard Specification Uses Resources as modular building blocks Resources define XML for a common use (for reuse and interoperability) Combine Resources into Profiles Standalone Resource for messaging or document Specification has three parts General documentation on How to Define Resources Implementation How to use with REST, Messaging, as clinical documents Resource Lists Clinical, Administrative, and Infrastructure Possible Use Cases FHIR resources for building the Consolidated CDA document types FHIR / Structured Data Capture to create forms, such as consent forms, etc Use PHR Profile to push/pull PHR data Blue Button based on CCD, P2PPHR (HL7 Standard) Build Blue Button Plus collaboration with HL7 Financial Management WG Others? 20 10

NATE National Association of Trusted Exchange NATE initiatives: Task Force developing a Data Provenance Implementation Guide to improve workflow upon receipt of messages from consumers Governance of the Trust Bundle, revisiting the eligibility criteria of the NBB4C Discovery regarding Consumer sharing of clinical data with Qualified Research Organizations (PCORI related NATE users) Virtual Clipboard pilot support 21 (FHIR home) hl7.org/fhir 22 2015 Gevity Inc. FHIR & flame logo are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. 11

DSTU Resource List 2015 Gevity Inc. FHIR & flame logo are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. Procedure Resource This resource is referenced by CarePlan and Condition <Procedure xmlns="http://hl7.org/fhir"> doco <!-- from Resource: extension, modifierextension, language, text, and contained --> <identifier><!-- 0..* Identifier External Ids for this procedure --></identifier> <subject><!-- 1..1 Resource(Patient) Who procedure was performed on --></subject> <type><!-- 1..1 CodeableConcept Identification of the procedure --></type> <bodysite><!-- 0..* CodeableConcept Precise location details --></bodysite> <indication><!-- 0..* CodeableConcept Reason procedure performed --></indication> <performer> <!-- 0..* The people who performed the procedure --> <person><!-- 0..1 Resource(Practitioner) The reference to the practitioner --></person> <role><!-- 0..1 CodeableConcept The role the person was in --></role> </performer> <date><!-- 0..1 Period The date the procedure was performed --></date> <encounter><!-- 0..1 Resource(Encounter) The encounter when procedure performed --></encounter> <outcome value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 What was result of procedure? --> <report><!-- 0..* Resource(DiagnosticReport) Any report that results from the procedure --></report> <complication><!-- 0..* CodeableConcept Complication following the procedure --></complication> <followup value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Instructions for follow up --> <relateditem> <!-- 0..* A procedure that is related to this one --> <type value="[code]"/><!-- 0..1 caused-by because-of --> <target><!-- 0..1 Resource(AdverseReaction AllergyIntolerance CarePlan Condition DeviceObservationReport DiagnosticReport FamilyHistory ImagingStudy Immunization ImmunizationRecommendation MedicationAdministration MedicationDispense MedicationPrescription MedicationStatement Observation Procedure) The related item - e.g. a procedure --></target> </relateditem> <notes value="[string]"/><!-- 0..1 Additional information about procedure --> 24 </Procedure> 2015 Gevity Inc. FHIR & flame logo are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. 12

PHR Use Case 2.11.1 Personal Health Record (PHR) In the PHR scenario, an Electronic Medical Record system (EMR, though many other names and acronyms are also used) provides a RESTful API that allows patients to access their own medical record via a common web portal or mobile application, usually provided by a third party. In this scenario, the PHR 2.11.1 Personal Health Record (PHR) In the PHR scenario, an Electronic Medical Record system (EMR, though many other names and acronyms are also used) provides a RESTful API that allows patients to access their own medical record via a common web portal or mobile application, usually provided by a third party. In this scenario, the PHR provider: Provides the patient with a login that identifies them (or links the patient record to an external identity provided by OpenID, Facebook, Google, etc.) Authenticates the client using an appropriate OAuth server for the login (possibly their own) and restricts the client to viewing records associated with the specific patient (or patients, where appropriate access has been arranged) The EMR exposes a FHIR server that supports the search and read operations on the following resources: 1. the patient resource in order to provide demographics to the client. When a client searches patients with no search criteria, they get a list of all patients they have access to 2. search and read on the Document Reference resource to provide access to general patient documents in the form of PDFs etc. (PDFs are preferred) 3. search and read on a set of clinical resources provider: Provides the patient with a login that identifies them (or links the patient record to an external identity provided by OpenID, Facebook, Google, etc.) Authenticates the client using an appropriate OAuth server for the login (possibly their own) and restricts the client to viewing records associated with the specific patient (or patients, where appropriate access has been arranged) The EMR exposes a FHIR server that supports the search and read operations on the following resources: 1.the patient resource in order to provide demographics to the client. When a client searches patients with no search criteria, they get a list of all patients they have access to 2.search and read on the Document Reference resource to provide access to general patient documents in the form of PDFs etc. (PDFs are preferred) 3.search and read on a set of clinical resources 25 2015 Gevity Inc. FHIR & flame logo are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg. U.S. TM Office. Considerations What do payers need for Claim Payment, for Prior Authorization, for value based care?... Is the CDP1 re-packaging of the C-CDA sections into different documents a necessity for all payers? For all purposes? Are there any issues receiving both; the CDP1 and C-CDA? Which of the newly developed CDP1 Documents/Sections are of value over the C-CDA? With CDP1 named in the MU3 NPRM, will vendors produce both or just adopt one standard (CDP1)? Will providers (their vendors) be willing and able to produce the C-CDA and the CDP1? Would you want to have both the C-CDA and CDP1 named in the regulation for Attachments? 26 13

For Further Reference NCVHS.gov For Letters of Recommendation and future calendar events: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/subcommittees-work-groups/subcommittee-on-standards/ HL7.org To join or browse the HL7 Payer User Group activities http://www.hl7.org/special/committees/pug/ WEDI To review the webinar on CDA (and C-CDA) http://www.wedi.org/forms/store/commerceplusformpublic/search?action=feature Or contact Durwin Day: dayd@bcbsil.com 27 14