UC Merced Performance Appraisal Employee Information. Appraisal Ratings. Part One: Core Competencies. Competency Comments: Performance Assessment



Similar documents
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Reviewer has no direct knowledge of employee's behavior in this area. Job Knowledge Score: / 5.0

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines. With Behavioral Indicators

Performance Evaluation

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

User s Guide to Performance Management

INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS

1. Overall, how satisfied are you working for The Company? Extremely Dissatisfied. Very Dissatisfied. Somewhat Dissatisfied.

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & PLANNING GUIDE

Boston University Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt

Performance Management Review Process Draft for Management Consultation Review

Deliverable based project planning and control for Microsoft Dynamics AX

HIRING MANAGER ONBOARDING GUIDE

IC Performance Standards

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System Department of the Interior

UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)

Utica College Performance Review Form

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE

PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING

University of California, Berkeley

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES

Blueprints 3. Adapted From Step 6 of Workitect s Building Competency Models and HR Applications workshop

Amherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System. [Agency Name]

New and Prospective Managers: Competency Development and Learning Plan

Performance Management Guide

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

collaboration/teamwork and clinical knowledge and decision-making (attachment 4.1.b). The Staff Nurse position description links position

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

SMART GOALS. Franklin Public Schools. Fall 2012

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL APPRAISER S GUIDE

Employee Development Plan

JULY 1, 2010 JUNE 30, 2013 STRATEGIC PLAN

Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions

PERFORMANCE PLANNING WORKSHEET FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (PS-35LC)

The Performance & Learning Plan and Year End Performance Evaluation Process Overview: Employee Guide

CCAD Management Employee Performance Review

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

FY 2015 Senior Professional (SP) Performance Appraisal System Opening Guidance

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

Performance Management. Writing Performance Assessments and Goals 2014

Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal

Performance Evaluation Senior Leadership

Performance Management Manual AUBMC

Employee Evaluation. 5= Outstanding: Performance is extraordinary and exceptional. (Outstanding ratings should only be awarded on rare occasions.

General Staff Performance Review, Planning and Professional Development [HR.10/VHR.10]

Project Management Career Path Plan

Performance Management Guide For Managers

Libraries and Educational Technologies Professional & Performance Development Form Library Faculty Self Evaluation

Performance Communication Process Employee s Self-Evaluation

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

FBISD Performance Management Playbook

Results Based Performance Management System (RPMS) for DepEd. Lead, Engage, Align & Do! (LEAD)

Performance Evaluation for Exempt Employees Employer Instructions

How To Pay A Vrs

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDE

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT

Business & Administrative Services (BAS) Supervisor s Guide to Performance Appraisals. June 2015

Evaluation System for Classified & Management Support Staff

SMART Goals. Goals should be SMART - specific, measurable, agreed upon, realistic and time-based.

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

TOWN OF GREENWICH MANAGEMENT GOAL SETTING AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION UNREPRESENTED MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE SELF- EVALUATION FORM

SPA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL COMPARISON OF EXPECTATION LEVELS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES

HUMAN RESOURSES COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN ECOLOGY. Manager's Guide to Mid-Year Performance Management

GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC. Job Description. JOB TITLE: Compliance Director

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed

Cristo Rey High School Sacramento Student Employee Performance Review. Review Guide

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:

DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Evaluating Performance. A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation

Mental Health at Work - A Review

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION

Performance Appraisal & Reward System (PARS)

Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial

Executive Performance Management System

COLORADO DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2016

Transcription:

UC Merced Performance Appraisal Employee Information Name: Division: Job Title: Department: Supervisor's Name: Title Unit Code: Period Covered By This Appraisal: From: To: Appraisal Ratings Far Exceeds Expectations: Performance consistently far exceeds expectations in all competencies, and the quality of work was overall superior. Annual goals were completed earlier than anticipated. Made an exceptional or unique contribution in support of unit, department, or University objectives. This rating should be reserved for employees with strong, commendable performance. Concrete examples of these results must be given to issue this rating. This rating should be used sparingly and reserved for truly extraordinary performance throughout the performance cycle. Meets High Expectations: Performance consistently meets high expectations in all or almost all competencies, and the quality of work overall met high expectations. All or almost all goals were met. The employee is a dependable, competent, knowledgeable individual who meets and occasionally exceeds expectations of the position. The rating conveys solid, effective performance. Needs Improvement: Performance is adequate in most competencies, but needs improvement in one or more significant competencies that are critical to the position, and/or one or more of the most critical goals were not met. Work product requires improvement in one or more areas to meet the University s expectations. Such performance shortfalls may be attributable to newness on the job, missing or underdeveloped skills, and/or experience. This rating conveys that performance is below expectations in one or more areas and must be improved. A performance improvement plan must be outlined, including timelines and monitored to measure progress; Review from HR is required. Unacceptable: Performance was frequently below in all or almost all competencies, and/or reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in all or almost all competencies. A performance improvement plan must be outlined, including timelines and monitored to measure progress; Review from HR is required. Part One: Core Competencies This section is used to capture how well an employee performed in each competency. A competency is a measurable pattern of skills, knowledge, abilities, behaviors and other characteristics needed to perform and fulfill their job responsibilities successfully. Speak to how well an employee performed in each competency, including supporting evidence to justify the performance rating. Comments must be incorporated, the appraisal cannot be submitted/completed without a meaningful justification. Those in the role of Manager have an additional competency for which they are accountable. Competency Comments: Performance Assessment Communication Shares and receives information using clear oral, written and interpersonal communication skills.

Diversity and Inclusion Models and promotes the University of California Principles Of Community and complies with UC policies on Diversity and Non Discrimination. Employee Engagement Demonstrates commitment to the job, colleagues, the University and its mission by acting in ways that further the accomplishment of its goals. Innovation and Change Management Uses personal knowledge and professional experience to envision the future, anticipate change, capitalize on opportunities and develop innovative options that further the strategic direction of the organization Job Mastery and Continuous Learning Demonstrates responsibility for one s own career path and continues learning by identifying and applying new skills as needed to perform successfully on the job. Resources Management & Sustainability Demonstrates integrity, accountability and efficient stewardship of university resources in a manner consistent with the UC Standards of Ethical conduct and other policies. Models and promotes behavior and practices supporting and institutionalizing sustainability. Results Orientation and Execution Demonstrates the ability to analyze situations or problems, make timely and sound decisions, construct plans and achieve optimal results. Service Focus Values and delivers high quality, professional, responsive and innovative service. Teamwork and Collaboration Collaborates with colleagues in order to achieve results in alignment with the operations and mission of the University of California. Demonstrates a genuine interest in the thoughts, opinions, values and needs of co-workers and customers and views differences in these areas as both inevitable and acceptable. Avoids speaking, writing or doing other things that could be seen as disrespectful of people in their absence (or "behind their backs"). Recognizes and shows respect for the strengths and contributions of others.

sevitcejbo tnempoleved Solving Problems Takes a proactive approach to anticipating and preventing problems. When problems occur, defines those problems, investigates obstacles, gathers relevant information, decides whether solving the problem should be a group decision, generates and analyzes alternate solutions and arrives at a workable solution. Quality Assurance and Assessment Demonstrates involvement in the unit s annual and/or periodic assessment efforts, including the unit s efforts to improve the quality of its services. Makes sure that quality does not suffer as the quantity of work increases. Works effectively with peers to provide and/or improve the quality of service provided, and carries own share of team workload. People Management Leads and engages people to maximize organizational and individual performance through alignment with the University mission and attainment of strategic and operational goals. Development Plan Development Objectives Title: Due: Competency: Select Add Development Plan Part Two: Future Goals This section is completed by the supervisor in collaboration with the employee. A minimum of 3 goals to be completed during the performance cycle must be identified. Individual performance goals should align with those of the department and/or campus. Goals should be SMART: S - specific, significant, stretching M - measurable, meaningful, motivational A - agreed upon, attainable, achievable, acceptable, action-oriented R - realistic, relevant, reasonable, rewarding, results-oriented T - time-based, timely, tangible, trackable Add additional goals (to a maximum of five) by clicking the "Add New Goal" link below. For managers: To view goals suggested by your direct reports, please click the Split Screen icon above and select "Self-Appraisal". You can then copy and paste the information into this form if desired, and edit as appropriate.

Goals Title: Due: Title: Due: Add New Goal Part Three: Overall Rating This section requires a narrative that justifies the overall performance rating. Overall Rating Far Exceeds Expectations Meets High Expectations Needs Improvement Unacceptable Employee Comments At the completion of the final appraisal discussion between the supervisor and employee, the employee may use this section to discuss aspects of the appraisal. Succession Planning Potential for Promotion

High Potential - potential to move up 2-3 levels. Promotable - potential to move up 1 level. Rate this direct report on his/her potential for promotion by choosing the best option from the list. Well placed in current role. Needs development in current role. Not acceptable in current role. Timing of Next Promotion Immediate - ready for promotion. Rate this direct report on his/her readiness for promotion by choosing the best option from the list. Within 1 year. Within 2 years. Greater than 2 years. Risk of Leaving None - not likely to leave. Rate this direct report's risk of leaving the organization by choosing the best option from the list. Low - likely to leave within 5 years. Medium - likely to leave within 3 years. High - likely to leave within a year. Reason for Leaving Approaching retirement. Choose the best option from the list to describe why you think this direct report may leave the organization. Lack of growth opportunities. Returning to school. Dissatisfied with compensation. Other reason.