RMBS Transparency Through Enhanced Loan-Level Data



Similar documents
Four Ratings Raised From GreatAmerica Leasing Receivables Funding L.L.C.; 10 Ratings Affirmed

Criteria Structured Finance RMBS: Updated Assumptions For Liquidation Timelines In The U.S. Residential Mortgage Market.

Workshop B: Credit Spread Trends In The Energy Sector

RBS Citizens Financial Group Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Remains Negative; Stand-Alone Credit Profile Lowered To 'a-'

Evaluating Insurers Enterprise Risk Management Practice

S&P Takes Rating Actions On Section 15 Bonds Issued By Various Danish Mortgage Banks

China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

Lake Oswego, Oregon; Water/Sewer

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CCC+' On Weak Earnings And Delays In Customer Payments; Outlook Negative

R.V.I. Guaranty Co. Ltd. And Subsidiaries 'BBB' Ratings Affirmed After Insurance Criteria Change; The Outlook Is Stable

Residential Real Estate Company Deutsche Wohnen 'BBB+' Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Conwert Takeover Offer

Research Update: Iceland-Based Utility Landsvirkjun Rating Raised To 'BB+' On Improved Stand-Alone Credit Profile; Outlook Negative.

Constellium Holdco B.V. Recovery Rating Profile

Guardian Life Insurance, Core Operating Subsidiaries 'AA+' Ratings Affirmed On Criteria Review, Outlook Negative

Gemini Securitization Corp., LLC (As Of May 2014)

New York Life Insurance Co. 'AA+/A-1+' Rating Affirmed On Criteria Review; Outlook Stable

AEG Power Solutions Downgraded To 'CCC-' On Heightened Risk Of Missing An Interest Payment; Outlook Negative

Lear Corp.'s Recovery Rating Profile

Research Update: Danish Mortgage Bank DLR Kredit A/S Assigned 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings. Table Of Contents

Largest South African Non-Life Insurer, Santam Ltd., Assigned 'A-' Long-Term And 'zaaa' National Scale Ratings

FWD Life Insurance Co. (Bermuda) Ltd. Assigned 'A-' And 'cnaa' Ratings; Outlook Stable

Revised Criteria for Rating Nonbank Financial Institutions And Financial Services Companies

Market Data Analysis - Pacific Life

Spain-Based IT Service Provider Amadeus IT Holding Rating Raised To 'BBB/A-2' On Strong Financials, Outlook Stable

Methodology: Business Risk/Financial Risk Matrix Expanded

Standard & Poor's Base-Case Scenario. Related Criteria And Research

Standard & Poor's Puts Ratings On Eurozone Sovereigns On CreditWatch With Negative Implications

Interactive Brokers LLC

Criteria Insurance General: Summary Of Standard & Poor's Enterprise Risk Management Evaluation Process For Insurers

Mounting Student Debt Is Reshaping The U.S. Student Loan Market

Dogus Holding 'BB/B' Ratings Affirmed On Sustained Investments And Expected Completion Of Garanti Sale; Outlook Negative

Lloyds Banking Group Life Insurance Operations 'A' Ratings Affirmed And Removed From CreditWatch; Outlook Stable

Russia-Based EvrazHolding Finance And Sibmetinvest Rated 'B+', Unsecured Notes Rated 'B+'; Outlook Stable

Danish Bank DLR Kredit Affirmed At 'BBB+/A-2'; Junior Subordinated Debt Downgraded To 'BB'; Outlook Remains Stable

Interest-Only Loans Could Destabilize Denmark's Mortgage Market

Criteria Structured Finance RMBS: Criteria for Rating U.K. Reverse Mortgage-Backed Securities. Table Of Contents

Research Update: Banco Monex S.A. Rated Global Scale 'BB+/B', National Scale 'mxa+/mxa-1' Rating Affirmed. Table Of Contents

Spanish Multi-Cedulas Rating Actions As Of Aug. 2, 2012

Electricity Transmission System Operator TenneT's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To Intermediate; 'A-' Ratings Affirmed

Kuwait Projects Co. (Holding) Affirmed At 'BBB-/A-3'; Outlook Stable

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA's Hybrid Equity Content Revised To "Intermediate"; 'BBB+/A-2' Ratings Affirmed

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority; Toll Roads Bridges

Six Russian Real Estate Companies On CreditWatch Amid Higher Interest Rates, Weakening Demand, Sharp Ruble Depreciation

Turkey-Based Appliance Manufacturer Vestel Outlook Revised To Positive; 'B-' Rating Affirmed

Stand-Alone Credit Profiles: One Component Of A Rating

Sirius International Group Outlook Revised To Stable On Plans To Retain Its Strategy Post Acquisition; Ratings Affirmed

China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

Tri-Township Consolidated School Building Corp., Indiana Tri-Township Consolidate School Corp.; School State Program

South Padre Island, Texas; General Obligation

Volkswagen Bank Ratings Lowered To 'A-/A-2'; Outlook Negative

Duke Energy International Geracao Paranapanema 'BBB-' Global And 'braaa' National Scale Ratings Affirmed

Highlands Ranch Metropolitan District, Colorado; General Obligation

Sul America Upgraded To 'BBB-' And Sul America Companhia Nacional de Seguros To 'BBB+' Under New Criteria Review

Lloyds Banking Group Life Insurance Operations 'A' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Negative

Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Colorado; Water/Sewer

International Finance Corp. 'AAA/A-1+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Remains Stable

Research Update: Ratings Lowered On Netherlands-Based SNS REAAL N.V. Group And Core Subs On Slower Recovery Prospects; Outlook Stable

Pohjola Non-Life Insurance Downgraded To 'A+' After Government Support Review Of Pohjola Bank; Outlook Remains Negative

Transcription:

RMBS Transparency Through Enhanced Loan-Level Data Suzanne Carter, Associate Director, Standard & Poor s Jim Elder, Solutions Architect, Standard & Poor s Thursday, March 31, 2011 Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s. Copyright 2011 Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The statements and opinions expressed by non-standard & Poor s employees are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Standard & Poor s.

Topics RMBS Loan-Level Analysis Workshop Overview of differing levels of sophistication Current approaches in the market place Case study analyzing a prime adjustable RMBS transaction Four valuation frameworks Comparison of results Additional data sets to consider 2. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Differing Levels of Sophistication RMBS Analysis Deal level Historical trends, rolling delinquencies Loan level Focus on troubled loans Predictive analysis Loan level with enhanced data Sophisticated property analysis Updated borrower credit analysis 3. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Deal Level Analysis RMBS Analysis Practiced less frequently Limited insight into collateral Limited predictive ability Available via: Trustee reports Major RMBS platforms 4. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Deal-Level Information The Starting Point GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Prime jumbo residential mortgage loan pool Closing date January 30, 2006 Deal original balance $1,350,386,698 Underwriter Goldman, Sachs & Co. (primary) Trustee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Current information Deal current balance $693,274,163 4.22% of the current pool is 180+ days delinquent or bankrupt and has not been foreclosed upon 1 2.81% transaction cumulative losses to-date 2 1. Source: Standard & Poor s Global Data Solutions U.S. RMBS Edition as of December 27, 2010. 2. Source: Wells Fargo Trustee Report on GS Mortgage Securities Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR1 as of December 27, 2010. 5. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Sample Collateral Statistics GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Current Delinquency Status as per Trustee Report (MBA Method) 1 30 Days delinquent 2.81% 60 Days delinquent 1.45% 90 Days delinquent 1.04% 120-180 Days delinquent 4.75% Foreclosure 7.62% REO (Real-Estate Owned) 2.09% Bankrupt 1.00% Loss Severity 1 Current Month (cumulative) 40.18% 3 Month Average (cumulative) 40.10% 12 Month Average (cumulative) 39.80% CDR 1 Current Month 3.47% 3 Month Average 5.57% 12 Month Average 5.33% CPR 1 Current Month 9.45% 3 Month Average 14.81% 12 Month Average 15.54% Purpose of Mortgage Loans 2 Purchase 54.63% Rate Term Refinance 23.02% Cash Out Refinance 22.35% Credit Score Distribution of the Mortgage Loans 2 600-649 1.09% 650-699 19.45% 700-749 34.85% 750-799 40.19% 800-849 4.11% Original Principal Balances 2 $350-500K 26.62% $500-650K 33.98% $650-800K 14.26% $800-950K 8.13% $950-$1.1M 7.15% $1.1M and above 9.87% 1. Source: Wells Fargo Trustee Report on GS Mortgage Securities Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR1 as of December 27, 2010. 2. Source: Deal Prospectus Supplement for GS Mortgage Securities Corp. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR1 6. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Loan Level Analysis RMBS Analysis Increasingly common Can be either labor or system intensive Large amounts of data Facilitates custom analysis of collateral Utilization of credit models Available via: Servicer websites 3 rd party sources 7. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Sample Collateral Statistics GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Current Delinquency Status (MBA Method) 1 30 Days delinquent 2.81% 60 Days delinquent 1.45% 90 Days delinquent 1.16% 120-180 Days delinquent 5.62% Foreclosure 7.62% REO (Real-Estate Owned) 2.09% Property Type Single-family residence 66.0% Planned unit development (PUD) 20.5% Condominium 11.9% Two-family residence 1.6% State CA 49.2% VA 7.2% IL 5.0% FL 4.0% AZ 4.0% Occupancy Status Owner occupied 91.8% Second home 7.1% Investor owned 1.1% Loan Purpose Purchase 53.5% Cash-out refinance 23.4% Rate/Term refinance 23.1% Loan Type 5/1 or 5/6 mos. ARM 82.7% 7/1 or 7/6 mos. ARM 9.3% 3/1 or 3/6 mos. ARM 8.0% Documentation Type 24 Months or more income verification and employment verification 50.0% 11 Months or less income verification and employment verification 20.9% 12 to 23 Months income verification and employment verification 13.9% Verbal verification of employment (VVOE) 12.7% No employment/income verification (or unknown) 2.5% Source: Standard & Poor s Global Data Solutions U.S. RMBS Edition as of December 27, 2010. 8. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Loan-Level Property Analysis Loan-to-Value Ratios Amortized LTV based upon current loan balance and original property appraisal Index-Adjusted HPI LTV based upon current loan balance and original property appraisal, adjusted via home price index (HPI) at the CBSA 1 level, to approximate current property value Challenges include mapping each zip code to just one CBSA Identifying appropriateness of index Potential sources include: S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index FHFA 2 (formerly OFHEO 3 ) 3 rd party sources 1 CBSA = Core-based Statistical Area 2 FHFA = Federal Housing Finance Agency 3 OFHEO = Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight 9. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Loan-Level Property Analysis Loan-to-Value Ratios Adjusting LTV via an index starts to distinguish problem mortgages 140% Loan-to-Value (LTV) by Home Valuation Type Amortized LTV Index-Adjusted HPI LTV (FHFA) 120% 100% 80% LTV 60% 40% 20% 0% Current 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days 120 Days 150 Days 180 Days Foreclosure REO Delinquency Status 10. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Loan-Level Borrower Analysis Assessing Credit Quality Credit Score Typically FICO of borrower at origination Debt-to-Income ratio Typically front-end DTI at origination Front-end DTI combines mortgage debt and housing related payments with borrower reported income at origination Updated metrics difficult to attain through public sources 11. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Loan Level Analysis with Enhanced Data RMBS Analysis Desired by more investors and structured product analysts Requires confidence in data sets Decisions increasingly reliant on this data Can allow for greater predictive capacity Available via: Internal models 3 rd party sources 12. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Loan-Level Property Analysis Loan-to-Value Ratios Update property values through BPO Broker Price Opinion AVM Automated Valuation Model Index, Hedonic, Hybrid AVM LTV based upon current loan balance and AVM property appraisal, to approximate current property value Identifying confidence of valuation Potential sources include: 3 rd party sources e.g. Veros Internal Models Discovery of second liens and HELOCs 1 1 HELOC = Home Equity Line of Credit. 13. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Loan-Level Property Analysis Loan-to-Value Ratios Adjusting LTV via an AVM further separates problem mortgages Loan-to-Value (LTV) by Home Valuation Type Amortized LTV Index-Adjusted HPI LTV (FHFA) AVM LTV (Veros) 160% 140% 120% 100% LTV 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Current 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days 120 Days 150 Days 180 Days Foreclosure REO Delinquency Status 14. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Changing Property Profile Overview GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 100% Distribution of Difference Between AVM LTVs and Index HPI LTVs 90% 80% 70% Within +/-10% of FHFA HPI >10% above FHFA HPI 60% % of loans 50% 40% 30% >10% below FHFA HPI 20% 10% 0% -0.5--0.3-0.3--0.1-0.1-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.7-0.9 0.9-1.1 1.1-1.3 1.3-1.5 1.5-1.7 1.9-2.1 2.3-2.5 2.7-2.9 3.5-3.7 3.7-3.9 4.3-4.5 Range of difference between AVM LTV and Index LTV Although 46% of LTVs derived from AVMs are within 10% of the LTV derived from the FHFA House Price Index 54% are either below or above that level 10% of LTVs derived from AVMs are >10% below the LTV derived from the FHFA House Price Index 44% of LTVs derived from AVMs are >10% above the LTV derived from the FHFA House Price Index Source: Veros data as of Q2 2010, Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010. FHFA = Federal Housing Finance Agency. AVM = Automated Valuation Model. HPI = House Price Index. 15. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Loan-Level Borrower Analysis Assessing Credit Quality Credit Score Updated to reflect current credit performance Debt-to-Income ratio Can reflect back-end DTI Back-end DTI combines mortgage debt and housing related payments and all other debt payments with modeled borrower income Access to other debts, payment performance and utilization rates 16. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Second Liens Declining Slightly But, Drawn Home Equity Balance Remains Elevated GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Average Second Mortgage Balance and Home Equity Lines Drawn $90,000 $80,000 Average Balance Home Equity Line of Credit Average Balance Open Second Mortgage $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Performance Date Source: Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010 and Experian credit information as of November 2010. 17. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Credit Scores Declining Capturing Shifting Borrower Risk GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Credit Score Migrations 900 880 860 840 820 800 780 760 740 720 700 Average Current FICO Score Average Current Vantage Score Performance Date Source: Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010 and Experian credit information as of November 2010. 18. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

On Average, Number Of Accounts Past Due Still Rising GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Number of Borrowers With Credit Concerns Number of Borrowers with Credit Concerns 60+ Delinquency on Another Account Is Past Due on Another Account 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Performance Date Source: Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010 and Experian credit information as of November 2010.. 19. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Case Study Four Valuation Frameworks 20. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Increasing Levels Of Valuation Sophistication 1. Deal-level analysis based upon aggregate statistics 2. Loan-level analysis based upon house price indices applied at the CBSA level 3. Loan-level analysis based upon updated property-specific information 4. Loan-level analysis based upon updated property-specific information and updated borrower information 21. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

LTVs As A Potential Indicator Of Performance GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Delinquency status is related to LTV, and we believe combining property and consumer data shows the most complete picture Loan-to-Value (LTV) by Home Valuation Type 180% Amortized LTV AVM LTV (Veros) Poly. (Current Combined LTV (Veros/Experian)) Index-Adjusted HPI LTV (FHFA) Current Combined LTV (Veros/Experian) 160% 140% 120% LTV 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Current 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days 120 Days 150 Days 180 Days Foreclosure REO Delinquency Status Source: Veros data as of Q2 2010, Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010. 22. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Performance Differs Significantly By DTI Buckets 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Debt-to-Income Ratio by Delinquency Status and FICO Score Migration Original Total DTI Ratio Current Total DTI Ratio Current FICO Score (Right) Original FICO Score (Right) Current 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days 120 Days 150 Days 180 Days Foreclosure REO Delinquency Status 60+ delinquency Delinquency status Status by by DTI DTI range Range DTI<=25% DTI:25%-32% DTI: 32%-39% DTI:>39% 850 800 750 700 650 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 9/1/2008 10/1/2008 11/1/2008 12/1/2008 1/1/2009 2/1/2009 3/1/2009 Source: Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010 and Experian credit information as of November 2010. DTI = Debt to income. 4/1/2009 5/1/2009 6/1/2009 7/1/2009 8/1/2009 9/1/2009 10/1/2009 Performance Date 11/1/2009 12/1/2009 1/1/2010 2/1/2010 3/1/2010 4/1/2010 5/1/2010 6/1/2010 7/1/2010 8/1/2010 9/1/2010 10/1/2010 23. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Borrowers At Risk GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Borrowers who exhibit risk characteristics in their credit profiles, exclusive of their mortgages 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Number of Borrowers Current on Mortgage with Credit Concerns With Credit Concerns Total number of troubled borrowers 0 Is Past Due 60+ In Other Account DTI > 39 FICO < 600 Total Troubled Source: Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010 and Experian credit information as of November 2010.. 24. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

At Risk Borrowers By Risk Category Defaulting Under Four Hypothetical Valuation Scenarios % of Current Balance 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Borrowers by Risk Category 30+ Days Delinquency, to Default in Hypothetical Valuation At Risk, To Default in Hypothetical Valuation To Remain Current in Hypothetical Valuation Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 30+ Days Delinquent Index-Adjusted HPI LTV > 110 Risk Category CLTV > 110 CLTV > 110 and Troubled Borrower Source: Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010, Experian credit information as of November 2010 and Veros data as of Q2 2010. AVM = Automated Valuation Model. 25. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Scenario Assumptions Four Possibilities Increasing Granularity Provides Investor Insight Into The Security Scenarios (1-4) 1. Deal-level 2. Loan-level with HPI -adjusted LTVs 3. Loan-level with current CLTVs 4. Loan-level with current CLTVs and borrower information Delinquency ($ amount) $144.3 mm $144.3 mm $144.3 mm $144.3 mm # of mortgages and $ amount outstanding of mortgage LTV>110 0/$0 137/$79.4mm 458/$276.2mm 458/$276.2mm # of mortgages and $ amount outstanding of troubled mortgages 0/$0 0/$0 0/$0 59/$39.6mm Total default amount $144.3 mm $223.7mm $420.4mm $460.0mm Constant prepayment rate (CPR) 14.812% 14.812% 14.812% 14.812% Loss severity 40.772% 43.28% 43.28% 43.28% Source: Experian credit information as of November 2010; Veros data as of Q2 2010; and Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010. HPI = House Price Index. CLTV = Current loan-to-value. 26. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Comparison Of Different Valuation Approaches GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Tranche 2A4 CUSIP 3623414D8 Original Standard & Poor s AAA Rating 1 Current Standard & Poor s B+ (sf) Rating 1 Original support (%) 9.00 Current support (%) 7.74 Deal-level Loan-level with HPI-adjusted LTVs Loan-level with current CLTVs Loan-level with current CLTVs and borrower information Price (%) 87.4% 79.0% 58.3% 54.0% Weighted-average life 8.01 6.76 3.67 3.04 Modified duration 6.27 5.76 3.62 2.92 Modified convexity 0.56 0.50 0.24 0.15 Principal write-down ($) 4.4mm (2.91%) 20.8mm (13.84%) 62.6mm (41.53%) 71.1mm (47.21%) Total collateral liquidation ($) 136.2mm (20.19%) 215.7mm (31.96%) 412.4mm (61.11%) 452.0mm (66.97%) Total collateral loss ($) 55.6mm (8.23%) 93.3mm (13.83%) 178.5mm (26.45%) 195.6mm (28.98%) AVM = Automated Valuation Model. Source: Intex Solutions, Inc. Deal data as of January, 21 2011, priced to a spread of 348bps. 1. Source: Standard & Poor s Global Credit Portal as of January 21, 2011. 27. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Next Steps Additional Datapoints for consideration Forecast home values Default/REO valuation Credit and mortgage inquiries Auto loan/lease balances Number of publicly filed bankruptcies Number of bankcards with utilization 50% Loan modifications/recidivism rates 28. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Distressed Properties Likely To Display Increasing LTVs In One Year GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Current AVM LTV and 12 -month Forecast LTV AVM LTV 12 month Forecast LTV 155% 145% 135% 125% 115% 105% 95% 85% 75% Current 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days 120 Days 150 Days 180 Days Foreclosure REO Source: Veros data and forecast as of Q2 2010, Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010. Delinquency Status 29. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Borrowers Have More Mortgage Debt Than Originally Disclosed GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Percent of Borrowers in Pool with Multiple First Mortgages 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2008Q3 2008Q4 2009Q1 2009Q2 2009Q3 2009Q4 2010Q1 2010Q2 2010Q3 2010Q4 Quarter Source: Experian and Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010 credit information as of November 2010. 30. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Looking To Other Accounts For Payment Issues GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 $20,000 Average Balance of Accounts 60+ Days Delinquent $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 Performance Date Source: Experian and Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010 credit information as of November 2010. 31. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Numerous Borrowers With High Credit Utilization GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR1 Borrowers by Number of Bankcards With 50% Utilization Rate 4 Bankcards 2.7% 3 Bankcards 4.5% 2 Bankcards 10.6% 1 Bankcard 20.7% 5 Bankcards 1.5% 6 Bankcards 0.8% 7 Bankcards 0.3% 8 Bankcards 0.5% 10 Bankcards 0.1% 0 Bankcards 58.3% Number of Bankcards with 50% Utilization Rate Percentage of Borrowers 0 58.3% 1 20.7% 2 10.6% 3 4.5% 4 2.7% 5 1.5% 6 0.8% 7 0.3% 8 0.5% 9 0.0% 10 0.1% Source: Experian and Standard & Poor s analysis as of December 2010 credit information as of November 2010. 32. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Modification Levels Remain Consistent Have Become Relatively Flat In The Past Year 0.50% Actual Modifications Administered 0.40% Percentage of Loans 0.30% 0.20% 0.10% 0.00% Performance Date Source: Standard & Poor s Global Data Solutions U.S. RMBS Edition; 1010data, Inc. as of January 31, 2011. 33. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Performance Differences Between Modification Types Principal Forgiveness A Defining Factor Modifications administered March 2009 July 2010 100% 90% 80% Modification Performance by Type Loans Becoming Delinquent (Left) Loans Remaining Current (Left) Months to Become Delinquent (Right) 6 5 Percentage of Loans 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 4 3 2 1 Months to Become Delinquent 10% 0% Rate Capitalization Multiple Attributes Multiple Attributes w/o w/principal Forgiveness Principal Forgiveness Other 0 Modification Type Source: Standard & Poor s Global Data Solutions U.S. RMBS Edition; 1010data, Inc. as of January 31, 2011. 34. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Performance Of Modifications Showing Improvement Number Of Loans Becoming Delinquent After Modification Are Declining Modifications administered March 2009 March 2010 Performance of Modified Loans Percent Becoming Delinquent within 9 Months (Leftt) Median Months to Become Delinquent (Right) Average Months to Become Delinquent (Right) 100% 7 Percentage of Loans 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Months to Become Delinquent Modification Date Source: Standard & Poor s Global Data Solutions U.S. RMBS Edition; 1010data, Inc. as of January 31, 2011. 35. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

RMBS Loan-Level Analytics Workshop Key Takeaways Increased transparency via loan-level data allows insight into credit patterns, delinquency, default and borrower payment behavior Updated property valuation assessments and forecasts allow for sophisticated loan-level analysis Combining current borrower data with loan-level and property specific valuation information provides the most insight into mortgage risk and facilitates decision making Credit models incorporate multiple attributes with increasing sophistication 36. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Speakers Jim Elder, Solutions Architect, Standard & Poor s james_elder@standardandpoors.com Suzanne Carter, Associate Director, Standard & Poor s suzanne_carter@standardandpoors.com 37. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Appendix: Global Data Solutions U.S. RMBS Edition Data Sets To Facilitate Analysis 38. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

U.S. RMBS Edition: Coverage, Granularity, Timeliness Delivering A Solution To End Users Broad and deep coverage including Subprime, Alt-A, and prime jumbo collateral types Loan-, class- and deal- level data More than 5,000 deals based on Standard & Poor s credit-rated U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), approximately 90+% of the total universe 1 S&P loan-level identifier uniquely identifies each mortgage loan from origination to maturity Standard & Poor s Global Data Solutions third-party agreements VEROS agreement provides dynamic property valuation, forecasting and market risk data Experian agreement provides current borrower credit information Robust methodology and data Extensive quality controls to strive for consistency, completeness and timeliness Loan modification data Actual as-reported loan modification performance data is available in U.S. RMBS Edition, spanning various collateral types (subprime, Alt-A, prime jumbo, HELOC, etc.) Flexible subscription options Access entire universe of transactions, specific portfolio of securities, criteria-based data package 1. Source: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Investor Fact Book 2008-2009. P.40, Mortgage-Backed. 39. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Dynamic Property Valuation Data From Veros Robust Methodology And Data, 10 Years Of History Veros provides critical and unique valuation data and analytics including 13 data elements available in the U.S. RMBS Edition that are updated and delivered quarterly Global Data Solutions agreement with Veros provides the U.S. RMBS Edition with dynamic property valuation data Veros utilizes multiple proprietary Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) to perform each property valuation, including Hedonic models based on comparable sales, and emphasize valuation accuracy over breadth of property coverage Index models emphasize breadth of property coverage over specific valuation accuracy Hybrid models utilize attributes of hedonic and index models to provide more balanced result sets The data set includes Available Data Current valuation Current LTV Current CLTV Home Price Index (HPI) Default/REO Valuation Home price forecast Market risk scores Analytical Value-Add Determine baseline collateral values using current property valuations Project defaults and losses using updated LTV ratios Analyze the risk of additional liens outside of the securitized pool with updated CLTV ratios Track home prices for a property for an additional estimate of the current value Project loss severity on distressed properties using default/reo valuations Project future risk exposure with home price forecasts more than 18 months forward Identify markets at risk for high pre-foreclosure, foreclosure, price volatility and fraud 40. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Property Valuation Forecasts From Veros Higher Is Better R 2 100% VEROS Competitor 75% 50% 25% 0% April 2003* April/June 2004 April/June 2005 Feb/April 2006 April 2007 April/May 2008 April 2009 Date of One-Year Forecasts Source: Veros Real Estate Solutions. *Denotes plotting of competitor 1998-2002 information. Slight differences exist for the time when each forecast was made (Feb. vs. April vs. May vs. June). For further information regarding calculations of Veros forecasts, please contact Adrienne Kimble, Veros Real Estate Solutions at akimble@veros.com. 41. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

Consumer Credit Data From Experian Capital Markets Increased Transparency Into Credit Risk Migration Experian Capital Markets CreditHorizons for Securities matches consumer credit information to the collateral data files backing each deal Offers unique insight into the credit behavior patterns that foreshadow delinquency, default and prepayment statistics Provides the critical consumer behavior data needed to determine a realistic valuation of mortgage-backed securities portfolios Experian s CreditHorizons for Securities and S&P Valuation and Risk Strategies now offer Consumer Credit Credit scores 10 Credit attributes Debt-to-income ratio Historical data Delivery Data set Analytical Value-Add Forecast of potential delinquent payments Eearly signals of credit payment changes Pre-calculated total DTI using Experian s Income Insight SM model 24 months of history available Direct data feed or through 1010data Full data set or customizable to your securities portfolio 42. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s.

www.standardandpoors.com Copyright 2011 by Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an as is basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Standard & Poor's has no input into the analysis presented by Veros in this document and Standard & Poor's makes no representation about the accuracy or completeness of the analysis. The statements and opinions expressed by non-standard & Poor s employees are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Standard & Poors. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P s opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. STANDARD For institutional & POOR S, S&P use and only. GLOBAL CREDIT PORTAL and RatingsDirect are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC. 43. CUSIP is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CREDITHORIZONS, INCOME INSIGHT and EXPERIAN are service marks or registered trademarks of Experian Information Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the prior written approval of Standard & Poor s. Solutions, Inc. FICO is a registered trademark of Fair Isaac Corporation. VEROS is a trademark of VEROS Software.