SH 183 MANAGED LANES PROJECT



Similar documents
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PRESIDIO PARKWAY FINANCIAL PROPOSAL FINANCIAL PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GOLDEN LINK PARTNERS

Selection Results 8/21/2015

Public Works Financing

Dallas-Fort Worth Area Major Transportation Projects

P.O. Box 578, Deer Park, TX Home Equity Loans

December Project Report. Stanton Territorial Hospital

Public-Private Partnerships Forum PPP Law, Structures and Contracting

I-595 Corridor Roadway Improvements Value for Money Analysis

LBJ Freeway in Dallas

Implementation of PPPs for Transit: The Request for Proposal Process ADVISORY

INNOVATIONS AND CHALLENGES IN TOLLING MANAGED AND EXPRESS LANES

IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2

Asset Management Policy for Major PFI Projects

11 th National Renewable Energy Marketing Conference REC Asset Management for Project Developers in an Opaque Market

Clark County Public Works SOQ LIST

Lone Star Regional Rail Project - Update. Joseph Black Rail Director, Lone Star Rail District Joseph Lessard Planning Director, Knudson LP

MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF UPTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

TAB 1: QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

Clark County Public Works SOQ

Official Form 201 Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing for Bankruptcy 12/15

State of Illinois Medical RFP Analysis

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT INSPECTOR OF RECORD SERVICES

Risk Management in the Development of a Penta-P Project

Questions and Answers

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Worth District Regulatory Division Consultant List March 2015

SAN ANTONIO MOBILITY COALITION, INC.

CHAPTER 6 Project Cost, Scope, and Schedule Changes Table of Contents

Procurement Management. Scott Coplan, PMP David Masuda, M.D.

TxDOT: Open For Business

4.3.3 Project Management Plan

Public/Private Partnerships and the Public Procurement Process

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SASKBUILDS SASKATCHEWAN JOINT-USE SCHOOLS PROJECT PROJECT #2

RFP # Building and Construction Management Services

The UK solar gold rush: Navigating the end of the RO regime and preparing for CfDs ORRICK 1. In association with

Project : Monitoring and Evaluation of SH 130 Project Construction

DEALER REFERRAL LIST TEXAS ADDISON AMARILLO ARLINGTON BEAUMONT AUSTIN

9 Award of Request for Proposal P Consulting Retainer Services York Region Transit/Viva Fleet Projects

Decision. Matter of: DJW Consulting, LLC. File: B Date: December 18, 2013

Request for Proposal CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

P3 Value for Money Assessment and Project Report. Evan Thomas Water and Wastewater Treatment Facility Project

HRTAC Regional Financial Planning. October 29, 2015

AIPLA Trade Secret Committee Report

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

The Value of Public-Private Partnerships

Massachusetts Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Oversight Commission Introduction to Public-Private Partnerships

OUTSOURCING. The Original Agreement provided for an optional 3-year extension to the original 10-year term.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ADVISOR SERVICES TO THE CAMINO REAL REGIONAL MOBILITY AUTHORITY. October 29, 2014

LBJ Express Project (LBJ Managed Lanes Project)

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) FOR PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES FOR Fiscal Years

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Program Management. APWA North Carolina Chapter. Design-Build: Will it Work for You? William Palmieri, P.E.

Dallas Office Dallas Parkway Suite 1100 Dallas, TX

Infrastructure Banking

Contracting for Services

Project Risk Identification. IH 635 Managed Lanes Project Exhibit A to Project Development Plan 1

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER-AT-RISK (CMAR)

Availability Payment Mechanisms For Transit Projects ADVISORY

The Top 100 Professional Service Firms

CITY OF LAKE WORTH 7 North Dixie Highway Lake Worth, Florida Phone: Fax:

New Bridges LA BAJADA. New Roadway Pavement. TxDOT s Horseshoe Project to Fix the. Singleton Blvd. LA L ACEATE EAST KESSLER PARK

Design Build Procurement Guide

Case Doc 4432 Filed 03/16/15 Entered 03/16/15 09:10:55 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

Chapter Name Here D.4.9 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY PLAN

A closed executive session may be held with respect to a posted agenda item if the discussion concerns one of the following:

La Joya Independent School District Special Education Related & Appraisal Related Services Competitive Sealed Proposal # Tabsheet

New York Supreme Court

Request for Qualifications Construction Management at Risk Services. Bismarck Public Schools Bismarck, North Dakota

Power Purchase Agreement Financial Models in SAM

IDALIA SCHOOL DISTRICT RJ-3 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT/GENERAL CONTRACTING (CM/GC) SERVICES DECEMBER 14, 2011

Introduction to Project Finance Analytic Methods

Transcription:

SH 183 MANAGED LANES PROJECT Texas Transportation Commission

Project Scope Design, Build Finance and Maintain 27.8 miles of managed lanes Minimum Base Scope (19.6 Miles) SH 183 from SH 121 to IH 35E (14.8 Miles) LP 12 from SH 183 to I35E (2.5 Miles) SH 114 from SH 183 to Rochelle (2.3 Miles) Additional Scope Components 1-4 (8.2 miles) $850M Available Public Funds. $600M paid prior to Substantial Completion $250M paid over 5 years after Substantial Completion Routine and Lifecycle Operations and Maintenance (O&M) for 25 years, with handback requirements. 2

Project Components 3

Project Scope (Continued) Operations and Maintenance SH 183, plus Components 1 and 2 SH 114 SH 183 to Rochelle Blvd. Loop 12 SH 183 to IH-35E 25 year obligation with fixed prices Prices bid in 2014 dollars Automatically escalated by inflation Includes: Roadway operations and maintenance Preventative Maintenance Capital Maintenance and Renewal Handback requirements at Termination 4

Procurement history February 20, 2013 issued request for qualifications (RFQ). August 22, 2013 short-listed four proposers. November 7, 2013 issued final request for proposals (RFP). April 14, 2014 received three proposals. recommend conditional award 5

Submitted Proposals* Airport Expressway Partners Equity Owners: SH 183 Constructors (Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Inc., The Lane Construction Corporation). SH 183 Operators (Fluor Enterprises Inc., DBi Services LLC). Major non-equity members and other team members: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. K Strategies Group LLC Aguirre & Fields LP Kleinfelder Central Inc. Applied Research Associates Inc. Lane Industries Incorporated Arredondo, Zepeda, & Brunz LLC Maldonado-Burkett Intelligent AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Transportation Systems Balfour Beatty LLC Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP The Bank of Nova Scotia Parsons Brinkerhoff Inc. DeAngelo Brothers LLC Raba Kistner Infrastructure Fluor Corporation Rios Engineering LLC Transportation Systems LLP *alphabetical order 6

Submitted Proposals* SH 183 Mobility Partners Equity Owners: Cintra Infraestructuras, SA Major non-equity members and other team members: AIA Engineers Ltd. Alliance Geotechnical Group Inc. Bird Advocacy & Consulting Inc. CivilTech Engineering Inc. Cox McLain Environmental Consulting Inc. Ferrovial Agroman USA Fugro Consultants Inc. Granite Construction Company Lockwood, Andrews & Newman Inc. The Louis Berger Group Inc. Professional Services Industries Inc. Solaray Engineering Inc. Webber, LLC *alphabetical order 7

Submitted Proposals* - Southgate Mobility Partners Equity Owners: Kiewit Development Company Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. Major non-equity members and other team members: ARS Engineers Inc. Austin Bridge & Road L.P. Burgess Engineering and Testing Inc. Corsair Consulting LLC CP&Y Inc. Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. Lamb-Star Engineering LP Infrastructure Corporation of America Innovative Engineering Associates Inc. Parson Transportation Group Plenary Group USA SouthGate Constructors JV The Transtec Group *alphabetical order 8

Evaluation of proposals Implemented a pre-established and rigorous procedure to evaluate and select the proposal that offers the best value. Separate pass/fail, technical and price evaluations. Evaluation subcommittees provided scoring recommendations to the Evaluation Selection Recommendation Committee (ESRC). ESRC provided scoring recommendations to the Project Steering Committee. Project Steering Committee reviewed ESRC recommendations and made final recommendation to Commission. 9

Tier approach Objective: Most scope for $850 million consistent with technical provisions Objective: Obtain bid prices for additional scope not in Base Scope bid by developer. Base bid equals: Minimum Base Scope, plus Zero to four Alternative Scope Components bid in order Tiers defined by number of alternative scope components in base bid. Proposers in same tier evaluated against each other. Apparent best value proposer selected from tier with the most alternative scope components. 10

Evaluation results summary Detailed evaluations resulting in. 11

Best value recommendation Equity owner: Kiewit Development Company Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. Southgate Mobility Partners Major non-equity members and other team members: ARS Engineers Inc. Austin Bridge & Road L.P. Burgess Engineering and Testing Inc. Corsair Consulting LLC CP&Y Inc. Kiewit Infrastructure Group Inc. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co. Lamb-Star Engineering LP Infrastructure Corporation of America Innovative Engineering Associates Inc. Parsons Transportation Group Plenary Group USA SouthGate Constructors JV The Transtec Group 12

Evaluation results summary Tier 1 Proposal Evaluations Southgate Mobility Partners Base Minimum Scope, plus Components 1, 2, 3, & 4 90.57 Pts. Tier 3 Proposal Evaluations Airport Expressway Partners SH 183 Mobility Partners Base Minimum Scope, plus Components 1 & 2 Base Minimum Scope, plus Components 1 & 2 93.52 Pts. 82.76 Pts. 13

Evaluation results summary Southgate Mobility Partners Base Bid (Min Base plus Components 1-4) $ 847,600,000 O&M w/handback (25 years): $ 171,800,000 * Project completed 1,260 days (3.5 years) * Un-escalated 2014 dollars 14

Next steps Negotiate final terms of development agreement. Final Third Party Approvals Execute contract for development, design, construction, operations and maintenance of the project. NTP 1 is expected Fall 2014 Begin Construction late 2014 or early 2015 Substantial Completion expected Spring 2018 15

Evaluation team TxDOT Strategic Projects Division Ed Pensock Katie Nees Randy Redmond Dan Peden Joel Mallard Dieter Billek Lucio Vasquez Scott Spradlin Dawn Scheel David Leavell Bill Reichert TxDOT Office of General Counsel Claire McGuinness Jim Bailey Jack Ingram TxDOT Debt Management Office Benjamin Asher Jennifer Wright Jonathan Hurst Sara Chapa TxDOT District Offices Bill Hale Brian Barth Kelly Selman Ray Fisher Gordon Moodie TxDOT Division Offices Marcy Saenz (Toll Operations) Geetha Chandar (Bridge) Tim Powers (General Services 16

Questions? Staff recommends and requests Commission approval of this minute order. 17