From paper to electronic data



Similar documents
Clinical database/ecrf validation: effective processes and procedures

MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry January 2015

MHRA GMP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry March 2015

This interpretation of the revised Annex

GCP INSPECTORS WORKING GROUP <DRAFT> REFLECTION PAPER ON EXPECTATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS

GCP - Records Managers Association

Computerised Systems. Seeing the Wood from the Trees

GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE (GLP)

OECD SERIES ON PRINCIPLES OF GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING NUMBER 10 GLP CONSENSUS DOCUMENT

Testing Automated Manufacturing Processes

Guidance for Industry COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS

A Guide to Archiving of Electronic Records

Reflection paper on expectations for electronic source data and data transcribed to electronic data collection tools in clinical trials

Supplement to the Guidance for Electronic Data Capture in Clinical Trials

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. EudraLex The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union

Guidance for Industry

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENT

Validation Consultant

Computerized System Audits In A GCP Pharmaceutical Laboratory Environment

Stockholm, September 22 nd Rules, Regulations and Requirements

Eclipsys Sunrise Clinical Manager Enterprise Electronic Medical Record (SCM) and Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 11 (21CFR11)

Manual 074 Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures 1. Purpose

Managing & Validating Research Data

Welcome Computer System Validation Training Delivered to FDA. ISPE Boston Area Chapter February 20, 2014

How To Manage An Electronic Standard Operating Procedure

OECD DRAFT ADVISORY DOCUMENT 16 1 THE APPLICATION OF GLP PRINCIPLES TO COMPUTERISED SYSTEMS FOREWARD

The Concept of Quality in Clinical Research. Dorota Śwituła Senior Clinical Quality Assurance Advisor

Clinical Data Management (Process and practical guide) Nguyen Thi My Huong, MD. PhD WHO/RHR/SIS

Considerations for Management of Laboratory Data

Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations

Nova Southeastern University Standard Operating Procedure for GCP. Title: Electronic Source Documents for Clinical Research Study Version # 1

QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN CLINICAL RESEARCH

Auditing Chromatographic Electronic Data. Jennifer Bravo, M.S. QA Manager Agilux Laboratories

Services Providers. Ivan Soto

Z.A.S. Archive- and informationsmanagement

Barnett International and CHI's Inaugural Clinical Trial Oversight Summit June 4-7, 2012 Omni Parker House Boston, MA

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

What is the correct title of this publication? What is the current status of understanding and implementation?

Assuring E Data Integrity and Part 11 Compliance for Empower How to Configure an Empower Enterprise

GLP vs GMP vs GCP Dominique Pifat, Ph.D., MBA The Biologics Consulting Group

GLP Records Storage and Retrieval

EMA Clinical Laboratory Guidance - Key points and Clarifications PAUL STEWART

Using SharePoint 2013 for Managing Regulated Content in the Life Sciences. Presented by Paul Fenton President and CEO, Montrium

Clinical Data Management (Process and practical guide) Dr Nguyen Thi My Huong WHO/RHR/RCP/SIS

What is necessary to provide good clinical data for a clinical trial?

PKI Adoption Case Study (for the OASIS PKIA TC) ClinPhone Complies with FDA Regulations Using PKIbased Digital Signatures

Declaration of Conformity 21 CFR Part 11 SIMATIC WinCC flexible 2007

Sponsor Site Questionnaire FAQs Regarding Maestro Care

DATA MANAGEMENT IN CLINICAL TRIALS: GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCHERS

TIBCO Spotfire and S+ Product Family

DAIDS Appendix 2 No.: DWD-POL-DM-01.00A2. Data Management Requirements for Central Data Management Facilities

Oracle WebCenter Content

Good Documentation Practices

Risk-Based Approach to 21 CFR Part 11

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR DATA RETENTION

Implement best practices by using FileMaker Pro 7 as the backbone of your 21 CFR 11 compliant system.

Electronic records and electronic signatures in the regulated environment of the pharmaceutical and medical device industries

ScreenMaster RVG200 Paperless recorder FDA-approved record keeping. Measurement made easy

Assessment of Vaisala Veriteq vlog Validation System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements

Final Guidance on Electronic Source Data in Clinical Investigations Promoting esource Data Capture

Guidance for Industry. 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures. Electronic Copies of Electronic Records

CONTENTS. List of Tables List of Figures

Compliance Response Edition 07/2009. SIMATIC WinCC V7.0 Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures. simatic wincc DOKUMENTATION

Data Governance Planning PDA 12 May 2015

IT General Controls Domain COBIT Domain Control Objective Control Activity Test Plan Test of Controls Results

Data Management Unit Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University

Use of Electronic Health Record Data in Clinical Investigations

Life Cycle of Records

Qualification Guideline

Data Management and Good Clinical Practice Patrick Murphy, Research Informatics, Family Health International

21 CFR Part 11 Checklist

THE ROLE OF WATERS NUGENESIS SDMS IN 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE

Full Compliance Contents

Adoption by GCP Inspectors Working Group for consultation 14 June End of consultation (deadline for comments) 15 February 2012

Guidance for Industry Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Scope and Application

Reflection paper for laboratories that perform the analysis or evaluation of clinical trial samples

GLP Compliance in Digital Pathology. Curtis Adams Ph.D. Sr. Product Manager Life Sciences

Compliance Response SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.1. Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures (ERES) Edition 03/2015. Answers for industry.

How Industry Can Partner with FDA in Defining a Risk- Based Monitoring Program

The use of computer systems

Risk-Based Validation of Computer Systems Used In FDA-Regulated Activities

Empower TM 2 Software

Guidance for Industry

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records & Signatures

Reflection paper on GCP compliance in relation to trial master files (paper and/or electronic) for management, audit and inspection of clinical trials

21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Using STATISTICA

FDA Regulation of Electronic Source Data in Clinical Investigations

REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT

Regulated Applications in the Cloud

Validating Enterprise Systems: A Practical Guide

Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) An international quality system for laboratories which undertake the analysis of samples from clinical trials

Designing a CDS Landscape that Ensures You Address the Latest Challenges of the Regulatory Bodies with Ease and Confidence

LabChip GX/GXII with LabChip GxP Software

21 CFR Part 11 White Paper

Organization Profile. IT Services

Overview. Disasters are happening more frequently and Recovery is taking on a different perspective.

INTRODUCTION. This book offers a systematic, ten-step approach, from the decision to validate to

Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/007 Page 1 of 17 Version 2.0

ASTRAZENECA GLOBAL POLICY QUALITY AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Considerations When Validating Your Analyst Software Per GAMP 5

Transcription:

From paper to electronic data Bioindustrypark, October 10, 2013 Dr Alessandra Grande Ivrea GxP Test Facility QA Manager, Head Global BMT QA Research & Development Quality Assurance MerckSerono RBM

Outline Kind of data Requisites Applications Conclusions

Outline Kind of data Requisites Applications Conclusions

Guideline evolution OECD Monogr aph No. 10; The Applicat ion of the Principl es of GLP to CS 1995 EPA GALPs Good Automat ed Laborato ry Practice 1995 21 CFR 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures final rule, 1997 FDA Guidance for Industry, Part 11 Scope and Applicatio n, 2003. AGIT, Guidelines For The Acquisition And Processing Of Electronic Raw Data In a GLP Environment, 2005. ISPE GAMP Good Practice Guide, Part 11 Compliant Electronic Records and Signatures 2006. FDA Guidance for Industry; CS used in Clinical Trials Updated May 2007 Red Apple II CS in Nonclinical Safety Assessment: Current Concepts in Validation and Compliance 2007 Peach EU CS in GMP Clinical Annex Research: 11 CS, Current 2011 Quality and Data Integrity Concepts 2008 ISPE GAMP Good Practice Guide: Risk-Based Approach to GxP Compliant Laboratory CS, 2012. Paper homogeneous Paper and electronic system hybrid Electronic homogeneous

Paper vs e-data At the beginning of 2000, after the FDA 21 Part 11 publication moving from paper to electronic seemed to have some pro and some cons: Lack of - confidence - CS knowledge - guideline interpretation Trendy Costs Space

Paper vs e-data Paper Methodologies well established and stable Electronic Computer technologies & languages change frequently Information can be read without any tools e-management requires the use of computer languages & technology Paper records are understandable without the use of additional records. e-record is not self contained & requires other records to understand its meaning

Data definition in regulated environment GLP OECD Raw data means all original test facility records and documentation, or verified copies thereof, which are the result of the original observations and activities in a study. Raw data also may include, for example, photographs, microfilm or microfiche copies, computer readable media, dictated observations, recorded data from automated instruments, or any other data storage medium that has been recognised as capable of providing secure storage of information.. GCP ICH Source Data: all information in original records and certified copies of original records of clinical findings, observations, or other activities in a clinical trial necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the trial EU GMP Chapter 4 Documentation may exist in a variety of forms, including paperbased, electronic or photographic media. The term 'written' means recorded, or documented on media from which data may be rendered in a human readable form. Records include the raw data which is used to generate other records. For electronic records regulated users should define which data are to be used as raw data. At least, all data on which quality decisions are based should be defined as raw data

Raw Data/Source Data - Meta Data Raw data: original observations/activities recorded contemporaneously Raw/source data collected on a computer system can be: Electronic records Computer generated printouts Other media Meta Data: information held in the computer system which translates and/or supports the data (e.g Instrument settings). - Must be maintained for as long as the data is required - Specific to the software application - Integrity of data requires integrity of metadata

Data in the e-environment In computer science, data is anything in a form suitable for use with a computer. If a program is a set of instructions that detail a task for the computer to perform; data is everything that is not program code. Data is what the users and regulators are interested in. Binary files (which are not human-readable) are sometimes called "data" as distinguished from human-readable text

e-data systems in drug development Pre-clinical Laboratory Information Management Systems, Clinical pathology Phase I Safety and tolerance CRF data management, EDC (Electronic Data Capture) Phase II - Safety and Efficacy Phase III Study enrolment, Drug supply, Data capture, Clinical records Statistics, Regulatory Submissions, Health Economics Pharmacovigilance Adverse Events Reporting Documentation management Change control (TW), Procedures (EDMS) E&V/Maintenance SAP, Building Management System

Outline Kind of data Requisites Applications Conclusions

Data requisites Independently of the support, the data must be ALCOA Attributable Legible Contemporaneous Original Accurate

E-data requisite In particular e-data must guarantee data integrity. Data without integrity is not worth keeping Must for GxP compliance Business needs Integrity from collection to submission From cradle to grave

Data integrity Data integrity depends on these attributes Reliable Available Accurate Attributable Accountable Data Integrity Legible Contemp Original Secure

Data Must be Accurate and Reliable In order to ensure reliable data: Computerised systems must be validated to current standards Validation status must be maintained - change control - periodic review IT infrastructure must be controlled and qualified through - maintenance - IT continuity - disaster recovery

Data Must be Accountable/Attributable Data must be: Authenticated I did it Attributable He did it Who recorded the original data and when? Who s worked on derived data and when? Who is responsible for the data?

Data Must be Accountable/Attributable Data Audit Trail Proof of data authenticity Allows study/trial reconstruction May also contain details of computer system configuration Reports changes made, who made them, when and their reason (not obscuring original data) Reports date and time of data (controlled by the Server) Users must not be able to change audit trail information

Data Must be Available Data must be available for all the data life. - after their recording and before archiving - after archiving - after system retirement

Data Must be Available Back-up and Recovery Agreed frequency Suitable media Secure storage of back-ups Routine testing to verify accuracy Procedure for handling failures Documentary evidence Backup is NOT archival!

Data Must be Available Data Archiving Assurance that archiving information in an electronic medium will be usable (readable and extractable) in many years Hardware, software and algorithms evolve is data integrity maintained during technology change? GLP principles require study material to be archived after the final report signature. This applies also to electronic data. For other GxP principles the archival requirement is not statute even if they do archive

Data Must be Available System Retirement Ensure e-data continue to be available and are humanly readable Consideration of Regulatory retention period Business needs IT issues Practicalities. Solutions to keep data available Migration of e-data to a new system Transform data into common format Systems are not available forever, however data may need to be!

Data Must be Secure There are 2 kinds of security Physical Logical

Data Must be Secure Physical security Records: restricted access to records and materials People: proof of authentication, e.g. staff ID badges Area: restricted access to buildings, laboratories, server

Data Must be Secure Logical security Data entry Passwords Biometrics: User ID authenticated by unique body part (e.g. retinal scans, finger prints) 21 CFR Part 11. Concept not usually implemented in GxP environment Different access rights (Who manages and maintains access controls) Infrastructure Control receipt of transmission through Firewall Monitor network for viruses and isolation of detected viruses Update of antivirus & firewall software.

QA involvement in Computerised Systems Computerised systems are no different from any other system/process QA may encounter (but require special considerations) QA are required to indicate the extent of their involvement in computer activities. GLP regulations mention auditing of computerised systems OECD Monograph No 10 The Application of the Principles of GLP to Computerised Systems specifically indicates: QA responsibilities must be defined by management and described in written policies and procedures QA personnel are required to audit and monitor the compliance of computerised systems. GCP and GMP do not mention any QA activities specific to computerised systems

Outline Kind of data Requisites Applications Conclusions

electronic Common Technical Document (ectd) The ectd is an interface for industry-to-agency transfer of regulatory information and documents in a regulatory submission The specification of the ectd is based up on the content defined in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) M4 expert working group (EWG)

Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data SEND (Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data), is an implementation of the Standard Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) for nonclinical studies. It specifies the format for reporting non-clinical study to the FDA. Past/now Report and tables Now/Future Report and tables SEND files

EudraCT EUDRACT is the European Clinical Trials Database of all clinical trials of investigational medicinal products with at least one site in the EU (since 1 May 2004). This database has been established to: Facilitate communication between competent authorities Link with other databases such as EudraVigilance and EU Clinical Trials Register. Facilitate communication on trials between authorities Improve oversight of medicinal product development Enhance protection of clinical trail subjects Legal basis is Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC

Outline Kind of data Requisites Applications Conclusions

Conclusion To move to e-data is no longer a choice for various reasons: Business Regulatory

Business Requirements Intellectual property issues, establish ownership Most information generated today is in electronic format Logistics: 250,000 pages can be stored on a single DVD ROM Templates: Data manipulation requires standard formats for efficiency Electronic data capture obviates the need for paper (e.g. Patients can enter their own results using a PDA) Statistical analyses can be validated, automated calculation eliminates the human factor

Compliance/regulatory Requirements Raw data definition: for hybrid systems, it has to be demonstrated that both the signed paper printout and the electronic records that generated it are defined as raw data / electronic records and they are maintained and protected throughout the record retention period. Process more transparent to inspectors Approval: Regulatory authority queries can be answered immediately

Paper vs e-data Lack of - confidence - CS knowledge - guideline interpretation Trendy Costs Space

Paper vs e-data Costs of validation maintenance Confidence CS knowledge guidelines interpretation Space Susteinability Compliance

Some open issues Data availability: how can you demonstrate that your data will be readable in 20 years data reliability in hybrid systems: how do you keep electronic and paper records synchronised so that they say the same thing? data reliability: how to manage manual entry (retrospectively) of critical data; checked by a second person or a validated process using the computer itself?

Thanks for your attention