Empower TM 2 Software

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Empower TM 2 Software"

Transcription

1 Empower TM 2 Software 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

2 Note: Information presented in this document assumes that the appropriate Empower 2 System Policies have been configured for Electronic Record (ER) and Electronic Signature (ES) support. Overview Is the system a Closed System, where system access is controlled by the persons who are responsible for the content of the electronic records that are on the system? Is the system an Open System, where system access is not controlled by the persons who are responsible for the content of the electronic records that are on the system? (e.g. A service provider controls and maintains access of the contents of the system, etc.). Does the system use an ID/ password combination? Does the system use tokens? Does the system use biometrics? /No/ No No No Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

3 Ref. /No/ Explanation Subpart B Electronic Records Controls for Closed Systems (a) Is the system validated? Waters Corporation has structurally validated Empower 2 software and supplies a certificate of structural validation with the Empower 2 software (a) Does the validation documentation show that Part 11 requirements have been met and are functioning correctly? (a) Is the system able to detect invalid records where applicable (e.g. invalid field entries, fields left blank that should contain data, values outside of limits)? (b) Is it possible to view the entire contents of the records? (b) Is it possible to print the entire contents of the records? (b) Is it possible to generate all the records electronically in a format that can be put on a portable medium (e.g. diskette or CD) or transferred electronically? Empower 2 software allows users to be compliant with 21 CFR Part 11, but complete compliance can only occur within a validated electronic records environment. Validation documentation is available for examination during an audit of the Waters quality system for data products development. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

4 Ref. /No/ Explanation (c) Are records protected against intentional or accidental modification or deletion? (c) Is data archived off the system? If so, is the meta data (including the audit trail) archived as well? Can all the archived data be accurately retrieved after system upgrades? (d) Are there different levels of access based on user responsibilities (e.g. user, administrator) (if appropriate)? Is this documented and controlled? (d) Are user access levels approved by management or the system owner before assignment to a user? (d) Is there is a controlled, documented process for granting access to a new user, for changing privileges for an existing user and for deleting user accounts? The abilities to modify or delete data within the Empower 2 software application are specifically assigned privileges. All actions involving a creation, deletion or modification of data is audit trailed and requires user confirmation before changes are committed to the database. Meta data can be archived off the system and includes all information that is part of the electronic record, including audit trails. Archived data can be retrieved after system upgrades and procedures for this are defined in the documentation for each software release. User access is based on the concept of User Types. A user type defines a specific level of access based on allowed activities/responsibilities. Changes to user types are documented in the system audit trail. The ability to create, modify or delete user types are discrete privileges that may be assigned to specific individuals. User access levels are set and approved during the process of creating a user. Only an individual who has explicitly been given the privilege to create or alter a user account can change the access level for a particular user. User creation, modification and deletion are controlled through a software wizard, and is only accessible to appropriately privileged users. In addition, Empower 2 System Policies can be used to predefine specific aspects of the user creation process to ensure compliance with Part 11. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

5 Ref. /No/ Explanation (d) Is there physical security and procedures to protect the server, database and system components from unauthorized access? (e) Is an electronic audit trail function automatically generated for all operator entries? (e) Is the audit trail completely outside the control and access of users (except for read-only access of the audit trail file)? Each organization must develop a controlled, documented procedure for managing system security and protection. A designated system administrator may configure audit trail settings on a per project basis. All activities for all users in projects with full audit trail turned on will be audit trailed, with no user types or activities treated differently. A designated system administrator may configure audit trail settings, no other users will have control over audit trails (e) Is it impossible to disable the audit trail function? The system audit trail cannot be disabled. Empower 2 data is stored in Projects and it is impossible to disable or modify audit trail settings for a project after its creation. A designated system administrator may configure audit trail settings (e) Is the system date and time protected from unauthorized change? (e) When data is changed or deleted, are all previous values still electronically available? The system date and time are taken from the server. The ability to change the system date and time is a privilege that is controlled through the computer operating system and not through the Empower 2 software. All previous values are stored in the embedded database. When data is changed, new values are added to the database, and previous information is not overwritten or obscured. The privileges to change or delete data may be assigned only to specific users. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

6 Ref. /No/ Explanation (e) Is the audit trail data protected from accidental or intentional modification or deletion (read-only access)? (e) Are the electronic audit trails maintained and retrievable for at least as long as its respective electronic records? (e) Are the electronic audit trails readily available for inspections and audits? (e) Can selected portions of the audit trail be viewed and printed by inspectors? (e) Can selected portions of the audit trail be extracted in a transportable electronic format that can be read by regulatory agencies? Project audit trails cannot be modified or deleted. The system audit trail can be archived and removed and requires the active collaboration of 2 system administrators to sign off on this archival and removal before the process can begin. A binary archived system audit trail can be retrieved into the Empower 2 Offline System Audit Trail view for review and analysis. Audit trail are maintained either as part of project archives and database backups. In addition, the system audit trail may be specifically archived in either ASCII or binary format. Binary archives may be restored into the software at a later date for review. Audit trails are available both online in Empower 2 and can be archived for storage or offsite inspection. A binary archived system audit trail can be retrieved into the Empower 2 Offline System Audit Trail view for review and analysis. Full searching and filtering capabilities are available with the Empower 2 audit trails. The audit trail can be backed up to an ASCII file (.txt) or to a binary file. The ASCII file can be viewed in any file viewer, while the binary file can be restored into another Empower 2 system for searching and analysis in the Empower 2 Offline System Audit Trail view. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

7 Ref. /No/ Explanation (e) If no audit trail is available, can the system detect that a record was altered since its last approval? (e) Are operator name, date, time, and indication of record (or file) creation, modification or deletion recorded in audit trail? (e) If the predicate regulation requires it, is the reason for a change included in the audit trail? (f) If the system requires sequenced steps, does it ensure that the actions are performed in the correct sequence? (g) Does the system ensure that only authorized individuals can use the system? (g) Does the system (or procedure) verify that an individual has the authority to electronically sign a record before allowing them to do so? (h) If it is a requirement of the system that data input or instructions can only come from specific input devices (e.g. instruments, terminals); does the system check for the correct device? Audit trails are available in the database. Alteration of information creates new values that are stored in the database. Records are not overwritten and full audit trails are available to document changes. This will require calling Waters and help from the Waters development team. Assuming the Empower 2 System Policies have been appropriately configured. Empower 2 software uses Wizards to ensure proper sequencing. In order to access the Empower 2 system, individuals must have a user account. This account will define the capabilities that user will have on the system. Without an account, no access to the system is allowed. The right to sign-off is a specifically assigned privilege. Users who have not been assigned this privilege may not electronically sign a record. Empower 2 designates appropriate input based on user authentication, and not device authentication. Raw data may only come from a device on which Empower 2 acquisition software has been configured. Other instructions may only come from devices on which Empower 2 database access has been configured and enabled. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

8 Ref. /No/ Explanation (i) Is there documentation to show that persons who develop the system have the education, training and experience to perform their assigned tasks (including temporary and contract staff)? (i) Is there documentation to show that persons who maintain or use the system have the education, training and experience to perform their assigned tasks (including temporary and contract staff)? (i) Is there documentation to show that persons who use the system have the education, training and experience to perform their assigned tasks (including temporary and contract staff)? (j) Is there a written policy in place and enforced that holds individuals fully accountable and responsible for actions initiated under their electronic signatures? (k)(1) Is the distribution of, access to, and use of systems operation and maintenance documentation controlled? (k)(1) Is access to sensitive systems documentation restricted e.g., network security documentation, system access documentation? (k)(2) Is there a Change Control (or equivalent) SOP governing revisions to system documentation? Controls for Open Systems What controls ensure record authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality? Full documentation is available as part of an audit of Waters software development process. Empower 2 software is a closed system Is data encrypted? Empower 2 software is a closed system Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

9 Ref. /No/ Explanation Are digital signatures used? Empower 2 software is a closed system Signature Manifestations (a)(1) Do all electronically signed records contain the following information associated with the signing: Full printed name of the signer (a)(2) Do all electronically signed records contain the following information associated with the signing: Date and time of signing (a)(3) Do all electronically signed records contain the following information associated with the signing: Meaning of signature (e.g. review, approval)? (a) Are the date and time stamps applied automatically (vs. being keyed in by the user)? (a) Are date and time stamps derived in a consistent way in order to be able to reconstruct the sequence of events? (b) Is the above information subject to the same controls as electronic records? (audit trail, access control etc.) (b) Are changes to signatures included in the audit trail? (b) Do the printed name, date, time, and signature meaning appear in every human readable form of the electronic record? (e.g. all screens and printed reports) The user must configure the full name of the signer for it to appear on the report. Default meanings in the Empower 2 software include: review, approval, responsibility and authorship. Other signature meanings may be added to accommodate corporate requirements. Date and time stamps are the local date and time at the location where the signature was executed. The user must turn on Full audit Trail in the project for this to occur. Signatures may not be altered; new signatures may be added to a record and are fully audit trailed. Electronic records are shown in human readable form in the Preview section of Empower 2 and in printed reports. A table of electronic signatures can be placed on reports that are used to view electronic records. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

10 Ref. /No/ Explanation Signature/Record Linking If handwritten signatures are executed to electronic records, are the handwritten signatures linked to the electronic record(s)? If the electronic record is changed, is the signer prompted to re-sign (via either manual procedures (SOP) or technical means)? Are the E-signatures linked (via technology, not procedures) to their corresponding electronic records to ensure that the signature cannot be excised, copied, or otherwise transferred to falsify an electronic record by ordinary means? Subpart C Electronic Signatures General Requirements (a) Is each E-signature unique to one individual? Handwritten signatures are not executed to electronic records. Handwritten signatures may be executed to a printed report, and such a report may include information identifying (and providing a link to) the original electronic record. All changes to an electronic record are audit trailed in the Empower 2 project in which the record is stored. The audit trail will include information on the user making the change, the date and time of the change, what was changed and the reason for the change. If electronic record information is modified, the electronic record can be re-signed in the Preview section of Empower 2. Each organization must develop a controlled, documented procedure to determine when a re-signing is required (a) Are E-signatures ever reused by, or reassigned to, anyone other than the original owner? (b) Is the individual identified adequately verified prior to issuance of an electronic signature? No Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

11 Ref. /No/ Explanation (b) Is there a procedure for reissuing forgotten passwords that verifies the requestor's identity? (c)(1) Has certification of the intent to use electronic signatures been submitted to the agency in paper form with a traditional handwritten signature? (c)(2) Can additional certification or testimony be supplied to show that an electronic signature is the legally binding equivalent of the signers handwritten signature? Electronic Signature Components and Controls (a)(1) Is the signature made up of at least two distinct identification components, such as an identification code and password? (a)(1)(i) If continuous signing sessions are used, are two (or more) E-signature components required for the initial signing? Each organization must submit their written intent for compliance with this Each organization must develop their controlled, documented procedure for compliance with this A signature comprises a user name and a password. The user name and password are required for the initial signing. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

12 Ref. /No/ Explanation (a)(1)(i) If only one E-signature component is required for subsequent signings: Is the private component, known to and only useable by its owner, used for each subsequent signing? Is the user required to stay in close proximity to the workstation for the entire session? Is there an automatic logoff, or password protected screen saver that launches, after a short period of inactivity (with the password known only by one user)? (a)(1)(i) If a user leaves the workstation, do procedures and/or automatic controls ensure that it is treated as a non-continuous session? (a)(1)(ii) Are two (or more) E-signature components required for each signing during a noncontinuous signing session? (a)(2) Are non-biometric signatures only used by their genuine owners (e.g. by procedures or training reinforcing that non-biometric E-signatures are not "loaned" to co-workers or supervisors for overrides)? (a)(3) Are non-biometric signatures administered and executed so that unauthorized use requires the collaboration of two or more individuals? The account password is the private component Empower 2 software automatically ends the session after a period of time specified in Empower 2 System Policies Other Polices Section. An inactivity period can be set in the Empower 2 system policies. If this period is exceeded, the signoff session is terminated and the signoff window is closed. Empower 2 software automatically ends the signing session after a period of time specified in Empower 2 System Policies. The user name and password are required for each signature during a non-contiguous signing session. Each organization must develop its own controlled, documented procedure for compliance with this Each organization must develop their controlled, documented procedure for compliance with this Individual users cannot view any information on other user accounts unless they are explicitly given the Alter User privilege. Under no circumstances is access to another user s password available to any user. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

13 Ref. /No/ Explanation (b) Are biometric E-signatures designed to ensure that they can be used only by their genuine owners? Controls for Identification Codes/Passwords (a) Are controls in place to maintain the uniqueness of each combined identification code and password, such that no two individuals can have the same combination of identification code and password? (a) Are controls (procedural or technical) in place to prevent the re-use of identification codes? (b) Is the issuance of identification codes and passwords periodically checked, recalled, or revised (e.g. to cover such events as password aging)? (b) Do passwords periodically expire and need to be revised? (b) Is there a procedure for recalling identification codes and passwords if a person leaves or is transferred? (c) Is a SOP in place directing action to be taken to electronically deauthorize lost, stolen, missing, or otherwise potentially compromised tokens, cards, and other devices used to carry or generate e- signature components? Empower 2 software does not use biometric E- signatures Empower 2 System Policies can be set to ensure that there must be unique combination of user names and passwords used on the system. Empower 2 System Policies can be used to ensure that passwords may not be reused for individual user accounts, and that user names cannot be reused for multiple users. Empower 2 System Policies can be used to set password aging based on corporate policies. Empower 2 System Policies can be used to set password aging based on corporate policies. Empower 2 allows a user account to be removed from active use. Each organization must develop controlled, documented procedures to ensure proper notification of user status changes. Empower 2 does not use tokens, cards or other devices to carry E-signature components. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

14 Ref. /No/ Explanation (c) Does this SOP contain procedures for managing and controlling temporary or permanent token/ card replacements? (d) Are any attempts to unauthorized use detected and reported immediately to the system security unit (e.g. a system administrator is notified automatically by console message or paper) and, as appropriate, to organizational management? (e) Are there procedures covering the initial and periodic testing of devices, such as tokens or cards that bear or generate identification code or password information? (e) Does the testing include checks for proper functioning, performance degradation, and possible unauthorized alteration? Empower 2 does not use tokens, cards or other devices to carry e-signature components. When an invalid login attempt is made, an immediate notification is displayed on the consoles of all system administrators currently logged into the system. In addition, all system administrators not currently logged in will be informed when they next access the Empower 2 system. This information is also stored in the software message log and System Audit Trail. Empower 2 does not use tokens, cards or other devices to carry e-signature components. Empower 2 does not use tokens, cards or other devices to carry e-signature components. Revision A, December, of 14 Waters Corporation

Tools to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance with EZChrom Elite Chromatography Data System. White Paper. By Frank Tontala

Tools to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance with EZChrom Elite Chromatography Data System. White Paper. By Frank Tontala Tools to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance with EZChrom Elite Chromatography Data System White Paper By Frank Tontala Agilent Technologies Software & Informatics Life Sciences & Chemical Analysis Group

More information

Implementation of 21CFR11 Features in Micromeritics Software Software ID

Implementation of 21CFR11 Features in Micromeritics Software Software ID Implementation of 21CFR11 Features in Micromeritics Software Software ID PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES Subpart A General Provisions Sec. 11.1 Scope. 11.2 Implementation. 11.3 Definitions.

More information

Oracle WebCenter Content

Oracle WebCenter Content Oracle WebCenter Content 21 CFR Part 11 Certification Kim Hutchings US Data Management Phone: 888-231-0816 Email: khutchings@usdatamanagement.com Introduction In May 2011, US Data Management (USDM) was

More information

FILEHOLD DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE WHITE PAPER

FILEHOLD DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE WHITE PAPER FILEHOLD DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE WHITE PAPER Copyright 2012 FileHold Systems Inc. All rights reserved. For further information about this manual or other FileHold Systems products,

More information

Full Compliance Contents

Full Compliance Contents Full Compliance for and EU Annex 11 With the regulation support of Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. The regulations 2 3. FDA 3 Subpart B Electronic records 3 Subpart C Electronic Signatures 9 4. EU GMP Annex

More information

Compliance Matrix for 21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records

Compliance Matrix for 21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records Compliance Matrix for 21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records Philip E. Plantz, PhD, Applications Manager David Kremer, Senior Software Engineer Application Note SL-AN-27 Revision A Provided By: Microtrac,

More information

Self-Assessment of eresearch Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11, Electronic Record; Electronic Signatures

Self-Assessment of eresearch Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11, Electronic Record; Electronic Signatures Self-Assessment of eresearch Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11, Electronic Record; Electronic Signatures Subpart A General Provisions Sec. 11.1 Scope. (a) The regulations in this part set forth the criteria

More information

Agilent MicroLab Software with Spectroscopy Configuration Manager and Spectroscopy Database Administrator (SCM/SDA)

Agilent MicroLab Software with Spectroscopy Configuration Manager and Spectroscopy Database Administrator (SCM/SDA) Agilent MicroLab Software with Spectroscopy Configuration Manager and Spectroscopy Database Administrator (SCM/SDA) Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 Introduction Part 11 in Title 21 of the Code of Federal

More information

InfoCenter Suite and the FDA s 21 CFR part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

InfoCenter Suite and the FDA s 21 CFR part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures InfoCenter Suite and the FDA s 21 CFR part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Overview One of the most popular applications of InfoCenter Suite is to help FDA regulated companies comply with

More information

21 CFR PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES 21.11.2013. 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance PLA 2.1

21 CFR PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES 21.11.2013. 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance PLA 2.1 21 CFR PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES Compliance of PLA 2.1 21.11.2013 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance PLA 2.1 SEC. 11.2 IMPLEMENTATION. (a) For records required to be maintained but not submitted

More information

POLICY ISSUES IN E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS: ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE FDA 21 CFR 11 ALPHATRUST PRONTO ENTERPRISE PLATFORM

POLICY ISSUES IN E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS: ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE FDA 21 CFR 11 ALPHATRUST PRONTO ENTERPRISE PLATFORM W H I T E P A P E R POLICY ISSUES IN E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS: ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE FDA 21 CFR 11 ALPHATRUST PRONTO ENTERPRISE PLATFORM This white paper is written for senior executives

More information

A ChemoMetec A/S White Paper September 2013

A ChemoMetec A/S White Paper September 2013 NucleoCounter NC-3000, NucleoView NC-3000 Software and Code of Federal Regulation 21 Part 11; Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11) A ChemoMetec A/S White Paper September 2013 ChemoMetec

More information

21 CFR Part 11 Implementation Spectrum ES

21 CFR Part 11 Implementation Spectrum ES 21 CFR Part 11 Implementation Spectrum ES INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY T E C H N I C A L N O T E Introduction Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 is mandatory for pharmaceutical companies and their suppliers to sell

More information

Electronic records and electronic signatures in the regulated environment of the pharmaceutical and medical device industries

Electronic records and electronic signatures in the regulated environment of the pharmaceutical and medical device industries White Paper No 01 I December 2010 Implementation of 21 CFR Part 11 in the epmotion Software Electronic records and electronic signatures in the regulated environment of the pharmaceutical and medical device

More information

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records & Signatures

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records & Signatures Gap Analysis - Checklist 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records & Signatures his document is a proposal and starting point only. he type and extent of documentation depends on the process environment. he proposed

More information

InfinityQS SPC Quality System & FDA s 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements

InfinityQS SPC Quality System & FDA s 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements InfinityQS SPC Quality System & FDA s 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements www.infinityqs.com Copyright InfinityQS International Table of Contents Overview... FDA s 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements... PART 11 ELECTRONIC

More information

The Impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on Product Development

The Impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on Product Development The Impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on Product Development Product development has become an increasingly critical factor in highly-regulated life sciences industries. Biotechnology, medical device, and pharmaceutical

More information

SolidWorks Enterprise PDM and FDA 21CFR Part 11

SolidWorks Enterprise PDM and FDA 21CFR Part 11 T E C H N I C A L P A P E R SolidWorks Enterprise PDM and FDA 21CFR Part 11 This Technical Paper discusses the technical solutions provided by SolidWorks Enterprise PDM to address the FDA 21 CFR Part 11

More information

21 CFR Part 11 Checklist

21 CFR Part 11 Checklist 21 CFR Part 11 Checklist GUIDE NOTOCORD - 113 Chemin de Ronde - 78290 Croissy-sur-Seine www.notocord.com my.notocord.com support@notocord.com +33 (0)1 34 80 00 00 1. Preliminary information 1.1. Purpose

More information

FDA Title 21 CFR Part 11:Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures; Final Rule (1997)

FDA Title 21 CFR Part 11:Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures; Final Rule (1997) www.qadata.co.za Introduction FDA Title 21 CFR Part 11:Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures; Final Rule (1997) INITIAL REGULATION RELEASED High profile audit findings Industry complaints to wasting

More information

Compliance Response Edition 07/2009. SIMATIC WinCC V7.0 Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures. simatic wincc DOKUMENTATION

Compliance Response Edition 07/2009. SIMATIC WinCC V7.0 Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures. simatic wincc DOKUMENTATION Compliance Response Edition 07/2009 SIMATIC WinCC V7.0 Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures simatic wincc DOKUMENTATION Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures

More information

DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management

DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management January 2013 Page 1 DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management This paper describes DeltaV s integrated solution for meeting FDA 21CFR Part 11 requirements in process automation applications

More information

AutoSave. Achieving Part 11 Compliance. A White Paper

AutoSave. Achieving Part 11 Compliance. A White Paper AutoSave Achieving Part 11 Compliance A White Paper Synopsis This whitepaper provides information related to FDA regulation 21 CFR Part 11 (Part 11) for organizations considering MDT software solutions.

More information

Intland s Medical Template

Intland s Medical Template Intland s Medical Template Traceability Browser Risk Management & FMEA Medical Wiki Supports compliance with IEC 62304, FDA Title 21 CFR Part 11, ISO 14971, IEC 60601 and more INTLAND codebeamer ALM is

More information

21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Using STATISTICA

21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Using STATISTICA 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Using STATISTICA Last Updated: April 2003 This document was updated to reflect the FDA s latest guidance (released February, 2003) and the withdrawal of previous guidance.! STATSOFT

More information

DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management

DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management September 2004 Page 1 An integrated solution for meeting FDA 21CFR Part 11 requirements in process automation applications using a configurable off-the-shelf (COTS) solution Emerson Process Management.

More information

Software Manual Part IV: FDA 21 CFR part 11. Version 2.20

Software Manual Part IV: FDA 21 CFR part 11. Version 2.20 Software Manual Part IV: FDA 21 CFR part 11 Version 2.20 OPTIMA Software Manual Part IV: FDA 21 CFR part 11 BMG LABTECH This manual was designed to guide OPTIMA users through the software features related

More information

How To Control A Record System

How To Control A Record System Thermo Scientific Qtegra Intelligent Scientific Data Solution (ISDS) Software for 21 CFR Part 11 Compliant Laboratories Technical Note 43106 Key Words Compliance, Electronic Records, 21 CFR Part 11 Goal

More information

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic records and signatures solutions for the Life Sciences Industry

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic records and signatures solutions for the Life Sciences Industry FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic records and signatures solutions for the Life Sciences Industry The Rule 21 CFR Part 11 Handwritten signature means the scripted name or legal mark of an individual handwritten

More information

Enabling SharePoint for 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance - Electronic Signature Use Case

Enabling SharePoint for 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance - Electronic Signature Use Case Enabling SharePoint for 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance - Electronic Signature Use Case Sudeep Nambiar Technical Strategist www.linkedin.com/in/sudeepnambiar/ Thanks to our Sponsors! Platinum: Gold: Silver:

More information

Implementing CitectSCADA to meet the requirements of FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Implementing CitectSCADA to meet the requirements of FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Implementing CitectSCADA to meet the requirements of FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Version 2.0 July 2008 FDA 21 CFR Part 11 READY Reversed out on solid background colour Background In 1991, members of the pharmaceutical

More information

Declaration of Conformity 21 CFR Part 11 SIMATIC WinCC flexible 2007

Declaration of Conformity 21 CFR Part 11 SIMATIC WinCC flexible 2007 Declaration of Conformity 21 CFR Part 11 SIMATIC WinCC flexible 2007 SIEMENS AG Industry Sector Industry Automation D-76181 Karlsruhe, Federal Republic of Germany E-mail: pharma.aud@siemens.com Fax: +49

More information

21 CFR Part 11 White Paper

21 CFR Part 11 White Paper 21 CFR Part 11 White Paper Version V8.00 SR1 ProLeiT AG Einsteinstrasse 8, D-91074 Herzogenaurach, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 9132 777-0 Fax: +49 (0) 9132 777-150 E-Mail: info@proleit.com Internet: http://www.proleit.com

More information

21 CFR Part 11 Deployment Guide for Wonderware System Platform 3.1, InTouch 10.1 and Historian 9.0

21 CFR Part 11 Deployment Guide for Wonderware System Platform 3.1, InTouch 10.1 and Historian 9.0 Deployment Guide 21 CFR Part 11 Deployment Guide for Authors: Invensys Operations Management and TSD (Total System Design, an Optimation Company) Table of Contents by Section 1 Before you Begin...............................................................................................

More information

Implement best practices by using FileMaker Pro 7 as the backbone of your 21 CFR 11 compliant system.

Implement best practices by using FileMaker Pro 7 as the backbone of your 21 CFR 11 compliant system. 21 CRF 11 Electronic Records and Signatures Implement best practices by using FileMaker Pro 7 as the backbone of your 21 CFR 11 compliant system. By Todd Duell What does Title 21 of the Code of Federal

More information

Implementing Title 21 CFR Part 11 (Electronic Records ; Electronic Signatures) in Manufacturing Presented by: Steve Malyszko, P.E.

Implementing Title 21 CFR Part 11 (Electronic Records ; Electronic Signatures) in Manufacturing Presented by: Steve Malyszko, P.E. Implementing Title 21 CFR Part 11 (Electronic Records ; Electronic Signatures) in Manufacturing Presented by: Steve Malyszko, P.E. President & CEO Agenda Introduction Who is Malisko Engineering? Title

More information

Using the Thermo Scientific Dionex Chromeleon 7 Chromatography Data System (CDS) to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11. Compliance Guide

Using the Thermo Scientific Dionex Chromeleon 7 Chromatography Data System (CDS) to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11. Compliance Guide Using the Thermo Scientific Dionex Chromeleon 7 Chromatography Data System (CDS) to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Guide Table of Contents Introduction... 3 PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS; ELECTRONIC

More information

Sympatec GmbH System-Partikel-Technik WINDOX 4. Electronic Records/ Electronic Signatures Compliance Assessment Worksheet for 21 CFR Part 11

Sympatec GmbH System-Partikel-Technik WINDOX 4. Electronic Records/ Electronic Signatures Compliance Assessment Worksheet for 21 CFR Part 11 Sympatec GmbH System-Partikel-Technik WINDOX 4 Electronic Records/ Electronic Signatures Compliance Worksheet for 21 CFR Part 11 Note Complete or partial duplication of the present documentation and

More information

rsdm and 21 CFR Part 11

rsdm and 21 CFR Part 11 rsdm and 21 CFR Part 11 Meeting the 21 CFR Part 11 Burden without Overburdening The right solutions for smaller biopharma. Nothing more. Nothing less. Prepared by: Ken VanLuvanee www.virtualregulatorysolutions.com

More information

Waters Empower Software Seamlessly Manages Regulated Data to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance

Waters Empower Software Seamlessly Manages Regulated Data to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance THE ROLE OF WATERS EMPOWER SOFTWARE IN ASSISTING IN 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE Waters Empower Software Seamlessly Manages Regulated Data to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Summary The objective of this

More information

Using Chromeleon Chromatography Management Software to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11

Using Chromeleon Chromatography Management Software to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11 Technical Note 54 Using Chromeleon Chromatography Management Software to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11 The Electronic Records and Signatures Rule 1, known as 21 CFR Part 11, was established by the U.S. Food

More information

Waters Empower 2 Software Seamlessly Manages Regulated Data to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance

Waters Empower 2 Software Seamlessly Manages Regulated Data to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance THE ROLE OF WATERS EMPOWER 2 SOFTWARE IN ASSISTING IN 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE Waters Empower 2 Software Seamlessly Manages Regulated Data to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Summary The objective of

More information

Spectroscopy Configuration Manager (SCM) Software. 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Booklet

Spectroscopy Configuration Manager (SCM) Software. 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Booklet Spectroscopy Configuration Manager (SCM) Software 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Booklet Notices Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2015 No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form or by any means (including

More information

Meeting the FDA s Requirements for Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11)

Meeting the FDA s Requirements for Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11) Meeting the FDA s Requirements for Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11) Executive Summary...3 Background...4 Internet Growth in the Pharmaceutical Industries...4 The Need for Security...4

More information

Manual 074 Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures 1. Purpose

Manual 074 Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures 1. Purpose 1. Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide an interpretation of FDA 21 CFR Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures (ER/ES) and to provide guidance for acceptable practices in the

More information

Compliance Response SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.1. Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures (ERES) Edition 03/2015. Answers for industry.

Compliance Response SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.1. Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures (ERES) Edition 03/2015. Answers for industry. SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.1 Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures (ERES) Compliance Response Edition 03/2015 Answers for industry. Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures (ERES)

More information

Compliance in the BioPharma Industry. White Paper v1.0

Compliance in the BioPharma Industry. White Paper v1.0 in the BioPharma Industry White Paper v1.0 July 2005 I. Introduction...3 II. Overview of Regulations...3 III. Overview of Validation...4 a. Validation...4 b. Security s Part Within Validation...6 IV. Introduction

More information

ScreenMaster RVG200 Paperless recorder FDA-approved record keeping. Measurement made easy

ScreenMaster RVG200 Paperless recorder FDA-approved record keeping. Measurement made easy Information INF13/147 EN ScreenMaster RVG200 Paperless recorder FDA-approved record keeping Measurement made easy Guidance on the use of the RVG200 paperless recorder for electronic record keeping in FDA-approved

More information

Thermal Analysis. http://www.fda.gov. Subpart A General Provisions 11.1 Scope. 11.2 Implementation. 11.3 Definitions.

Thermal Analysis. http://www.fda.gov. Subpart A General Provisions 11.1 Scope. 11.2 Implementation. 11.3 Definitions. Thermal Analysis 21 CFR 11 Compliance 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures General concept The U.S. Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued regulations that provide criteria

More information

Achieving 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance with Appian

Achieving 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance with Appian Achieving 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance with Appian Executive Summary Software performance in the life sciences industry has extremely high standards. The FDA and other regulatory bodies require software used

More information

For technical assistance, please contact: Thermo Nicolet Corporation 5225 Verona Road Madison WI 53711-4495

For technical assistance, please contact: Thermo Nicolet Corporation 5225 Verona Road Madison WI 53711-4495 The information in this publication is provided for reference only. All information contained in this publication is believed to be correct and complete. Thermo Nicolet Corporation shall not be liable

More information

Assessment of Vaisala Veriteq vlog Validation System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements

Assessment of Vaisala Veriteq vlog Validation System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements / WHITE PAPER Assessment of Vaisala Veriteq vlog Validation System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements The 21 CFR Part 11 rule states that the FDA view is that the risks of falsification, misinterpretation,

More information

REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT

REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT ALIX is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation. REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT BUSINESS

More information

Sponsor Site Questionnaire FAQs Regarding Maestro Care

Sponsor Site Questionnaire FAQs Regarding Maestro Care Sponsor Site Questionnaire FAQs Regarding Maestro Care Data Security and Validation 1. Are the electronic source documents or computer systems specific to the site and/or developed by the site? a. Developed

More information

Considerations for validating SDS Software v2.x Enterprise Edition for the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System per the GAMP 5 guide

Considerations for validating SDS Software v2.x Enterprise Edition for the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System per the GAMP 5 guide WHITE PAPER SDS Software v2.x Enterprise Edition Considerations for validating SDS Software v2.x Enterprise Edition for the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System per the GAMP 5 guide This white paper describes

More information

SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.0. Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures. Compliance Response. Answers for industry.

SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.0. Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures. Compliance Response. Answers for industry. SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.0 Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures Compliance Response Edition 09/2012 Answers for industry. Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures for SIMATIC

More information

PREPARED BY: AUDIT PROGRAM Author: Lance M. Turcato. APPROVED BY: Logical Security Operating Systems - Generic. Audit Date:

PREPARED BY: AUDIT PROGRAM Author: Lance M. Turcato. APPROVED BY: Logical Security Operating Systems - Generic. Audit Date: A SYSTEMS UNDERSTANDING A 1.0 Organization Objective: To ensure that the audit team has a clear understanding of the delineation of responsibilities for system administration and maintenance. A 1.1 Determine

More information

Life sciences solutions compliant with FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Life sciences solutions compliant with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Life sciences solutions compliant with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 System 800xA facilitates regulatory compliance As part of ABB s strategy we have invested considerably in the development of advanced solutions

More information

Electronic Document and Record Compliance for the Life Sciences

Electronic Document and Record Compliance for the Life Sciences Electronic Document and Record Compliance for the Life Sciences Kiran Thakrar, SoluSoft Inc. SoluSoft, Inc. 300 Willow Street South North Andover, MA 01845 Website: www.solu-soft.com Email: solusoftsales@solu-soft.com

More information

Supplement to the Guidance for Electronic Data Capture in Clinical Trials

Supplement to the Guidance for Electronic Data Capture in Clinical Trials Supplement to the Guidance for Electronic Data Capture in Clinical Trials January 10, 2012 Drug Evaluation Committee, Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association Note: The original language of this

More information

epblue GxP oftware manual Software version 20.4.1 075 900.874

epblue GxP oftware manual Software version 20.4.1 075 900.874 ee ab. pblue n. ig. p. manual GxP oftware manual epblue GxP Software manual Software version 20.4.1 075 900.874 Copyright 2012 Eppendorf AG, Hamburg. No part of this publication may be reproduced without

More information

Nova Southeastern University Standard Operating Procedure for GCP. Title: Electronic Source Documents for Clinical Research Study Version # 1

Nova Southeastern University Standard Operating Procedure for GCP. Title: Electronic Source Documents for Clinical Research Study Version # 1 Nova Southeastern University Standard Operating Procedure for GCP Title: Electronic Source Documents for Clinical Research Study Version # 1 SOP Number: OCR-RDM-006 Effective Date: August 2013 Page 1 of

More information

THE ROLE OF WATERS NUGENESIS SDMS IN 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE

THE ROLE OF WATERS NUGENESIS SDMS IN 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE THE ROLE OF WATERS NUGENESIS SDMS IN 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE The objective of this article is to discuss the 21 CFR Part 11 compliance utility of the Waters NuGenesis Scientific Data Management System

More information

CoSign for 21CFR Part 11 Compliance

CoSign for 21CFR Part 11 Compliance CoSign for 21CFR Part 11 Compliance 2 Electronic Signatures at Company XYZ Company XYZ operates in a regulated environment and is subject to compliance with numerous US government regulations governed

More information

AuthentiMax Software for GloMax -Multi+

AuthentiMax Software for GloMax -Multi+ TECHNICAL MANUAL AuthentiMax Software for GloMax -Multi+ Instruc ons for use of Product E8946. TM403 Revised 9/13 AuthentiMax Software for GloMax -Multi+ All technical literature is available on the Internet

More information

SOLAARsecurity. Administrator Software Manual. 010508 Issue 2

SOLAARsecurity. Administrator Software Manual. 010508 Issue 2 SOLAARsecurity Administrator Software Manual 9499 400 40011 010508 Issue 2 2008. All rights reserved. SOLAAR House, 19 Mercers Row, Cambridge CB5 8BZ.United Kingdom. Telephone +44 (0) 1223 347400, Fax

More information

Information Systems Access Policy

Information Systems Access Policy Information Systems Access Policy I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to maintain an adequate level of security to protect data and information systems from unauthorized access. This

More information

HIPAA Security. 4 Security Standards: Technical Safeguards. Security Topics

HIPAA Security. 4 Security Standards: Technical Safeguards. Security Topics HIPAA Security S E R I E S Security Topics 1. Security 101 for Covered Entities 2. Security Standards - Administrative Safeguards 3. Security Standards - Physical Safeguards 4. Security Standards - Technical

More information

Data Management PACT Workshop: Design & Operation of GMP Cell Therapy Facilities April 10 th -11 th, 2007

Data Management PACT Workshop: Design & Operation of GMP Cell Therapy Facilities April 10 th -11 th, 2007 Data Management PACT Workshop: Design & Operation of GMP Cell Therapy Facilities April 10 th -11 th, 2007 Data Management Discuss Database Development Design Process Tips Data Normalization Reporting Ideas

More information

Estate Agents Authority

Estate Agents Authority INFORMATION SECURITY AND PRIVACY PROTECTION POLICY AND GUIDELINES FOR ESTATE AGENTS Estate Agents Authority The contents of this document remain the property of, and may not be reproduced in whole or in

More information

Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations

Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Office of the Commissioner (OC) May 2007 Guidance

More information

FairWarning Mapping to PCI DSS 3.0, Requirement 10

FairWarning Mapping to PCI DSS 3.0, Requirement 10 FairWarning Mapping to PCI DSS 3.0, Requirement 10 Requirement 10: Track and monitor all access to network resources and cardholder data Logging mechanisms and the ability to track user activities are

More information

User Bulletin. 8200 Cellular Detection System Analysis Software v4.0. Introduction. 21 CFR Part 11 Software Console - Administrators Guide

User Bulletin. 8200 Cellular Detection System Analysis Software v4.0. Introduction. 21 CFR Part 11 Software Console - Administrators Guide . User Bulletin 8200 Cellular Detection System Analysis Software v4.0 August 14, 2007 SUBJECT: 21 CFR Part 11 Software Console - Administrators Guide In This User Bulletin This user bulletin covers: Introduction.......................................................

More information

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Enterprise Compliance Auditing & Reporting ECAR for HIPAA Technical Product Overview Whitepaper

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Enterprise Compliance Auditing & Reporting ECAR for HIPAA Technical Product Overview Whitepaper Regulatory Compliance Solutions for Microsoft Windows IT Security Controls Supporting DHS HIPAA Final Security Rules Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Enterprise Compliance Auditing &

More information

ILLINOIS GAMING BOARD MINIMUM INTERNAL CONTROL STANDARDS SECTION A - GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS

ILLINOIS GAMING BOARD MINIMUM INTERNAL CONTROL STANDARDS SECTION A - GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS General A-1 Management Information System (MIS) A-2 Remote Access A-4 Voucher System Security A-6 Problem and Underage Gambling A-8 Property Based Self-Exclusion Program A-8 IGB Statewide

More information

3.11 System Administration

3.11 System Administration 3.11 The functional area is intended to contribute to the overall flexibility, efficiency, and security required for operating and maintaining the system. Depending on the architecture of the system, system

More information

HOW IT WORKS E-SIGNLIVE 1 INTRODUCTION 2 OVERVIEW

HOW IT WORKS E-SIGNLIVE 1 INTRODUCTION 2 OVERVIEW HOW IT WORKS E-SIGNLIVE 1 INTRODUCTION With e-signlive, Silanis hosted service, you can invite other people to conveniently and securely sign documents over the web. Your documents can be easily signed

More information

Xcalibur. Foundation. Administrator Guide. Software Version 3.0

Xcalibur. Foundation. Administrator Guide. Software Version 3.0 Xcalibur Foundation Administrator Guide Software Version 3.0 XCALI-97520 Revision A May 2013 2013 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. LCquan, Watson LIMS, and Web Access are trademarks,

More information

Introduction. Editions

Introduction. Editions Introduction TRAIN TRACK Employee Training Management Software gives you the tools you need to make sure employee training requirements are met. Assign required training for groups or individuals. Easily

More information

SUBJECT: SECURITY OF ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 (HIPAA)

SUBJECT: SECURITY OF ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 (HIPAA) UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICY SUBJECT: SECURITY OF ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 (HIPAA) DATE: March 18, 2005 I. SCOPE This

More information

Guidance for Industry. 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures. Electronic Copies of Electronic Records

Guidance for Industry. 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures. Electronic Copies of Electronic Records Guidance for Industry 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Electronic Copies of Electronic Records Draft Guidance This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

More information

Software. For the 21 CFR Part 11 Environment. The Science and Technology of Small Particles

Software. For the 21 CFR Part 11 Environment. The Science and Technology of Small Particles Software For the 21 CFR Part 11 Environment The Science and Technology of Small Particles 21 CFR Part 11 Solution confirm Software The Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 11, was implemented by

More information

Review and Approve Results in Empower Data, Meta Data and Audit Trails

Review and Approve Results in Empower Data, Meta Data and Audit Trails Review and Approve Results in Empower Data, Meta Data and Audit Trails 2013 Waters Corporation 1 What is an audit trail? Systematic story of the data from creation, through interpretation and final assessment

More information

HIPAA Security Alert

HIPAA Security Alert Shipman & Goodwin LLP HIPAA Security Alert July 2008 EXECUTIVE GUIDANCE HIPAA SECURITY COMPLIANCE How would your organization s senior management respond to CMS or OIG inquiries about health information

More information

Technical Safeguards is the third area of safeguard defined by the HIPAA Security Rule. The technical safeguards are intended to create policies and

Technical Safeguards is the third area of safeguard defined by the HIPAA Security Rule. The technical safeguards are intended to create policies and Technical Safeguards is the third area of safeguard defined by the HIPAA Security Rule. The technical safeguards are intended to create policies and procedures to govern who has access to electronic protected

More information

Access Control and Audit Trail Software

Access Control and Audit Trail Software Varian, Inc. 2700 Mitchell Drive Walnut Creek, CA 94598-1675/USA Access Control and Audit Trail Software Operation Manual Varian, Inc. 2002 03-914941-00:3 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Access Control

More information

Central Agency for Information Technology

Central Agency for Information Technology Central Agency for Information Technology Kuwait National IT Governance Framework Information Security Agenda 1 Manage security policy 2 Information security management system procedure Agenda 3 Manage

More information

Guidance for Industry COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS

Guidance for Industry COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS Guidance for Industry COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologic Evaluation and Research (CBER) Center for

More information

Signature Authentication

Signature Authentication Signature Authentication aka: How to stop chasing after your clinical staff for signatures Elizabeth Nista, CQIA The Written Signature as a Validation Tool Signature is a requirement of multiple accrediting

More information

U.S. Department of the Interior's Federal Information Systems Security Awareness Online Course

U.S. Department of the Interior's Federal Information Systems Security Awareness Online Course U.S. Department of the Interior's Federal Information Systems Security Awareness Online Course Rules of Behavior Before you print your certificate of completion, please read the following Rules of Behavior

More information

21 CFR Part 11 LIMS Requirements Electronic signatures and records

21 CFR Part 11 LIMS Requirements Electronic signatures and records 21 CFR Part 11 LIMS Requirements Electronic signatures and records Compiled by Perry W. Burton. Version 1.4, 8 Sept 2014 Table of contents 1. Purpose of this document 1 1.1 Notes to version 1.4 1 1.2 About

More information

DHHS Information Technology (IT) Access Control Standard

DHHS Information Technology (IT) Access Control Standard DHHS Information Technology (IT) Access Control Standard Issue Date: October 1, 2013 Effective Date: October 1,2013 Revised Date: Number: DHHS-2013-001-B 1.0 Purpose and Objectives With the diversity of

More information

FINAL DoIT 04.01.2013- v.8 APPLICATION SECURITY PROCEDURE

FINAL DoIT 04.01.2013- v.8 APPLICATION SECURITY PROCEDURE Purpose: This procedure identifies what is required to ensure the development of a secure application. Procedure: The five basic areas covered by this document include: Standards for Privacy and Security

More information

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Information Security Standard Title: Scope: Data Handling and Storage Standard This standard is applicable to all VCU School of Medicine personnel. Approval

More information

MAXIMUM DATA SECURITY with ideals TM Virtual Data Room

MAXIMUM DATA SECURITY with ideals TM Virtual Data Room MAXIMUM DATA SECURITY with ideals TM Virtual Data Room WWW.IDEALSCORP.COM ISO 27001 Certified Account Settings and Controls Administrators control users settings and can easily configure privileges for

More information

6. AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR NETWORK ADMINISTRATION AND SECURITY AUDITING

6. AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR NETWORK ADMINISTRATION AND SECURITY AUDITING 6. AUDIT CHECKLIST FOR NETWORK ADMINISTRATION AND SECURITY AUDITING The following is a general checklist for the audit of Network Administration and Security. Sl.no Checklist Process 1. Is there an Information

More information

Analyst 1.6 Software. Laboratory Director s Guide

Analyst 1.6 Software. Laboratory Director s Guide Analyst 1.6 Software Laboratory Director s Guide Release Date: August 2011 This document is provided to customers who have purchased AB SCIEX equipment to use in the operation of such AB SCIEX equipment.

More information

HIPAA Security. 2 Security Standards: Administrative Safeguards. Security Topics

HIPAA Security. 2 Security Standards: Administrative Safeguards. Security Topics HIPAA Security SERIES Security Topics 1. Security 101 for Covered Entities 5. 2. Security Standards - Organizational, Security Policies Standards & Procedures, - Administrative and Documentation Safeguards

More information

March 2012 www.tufin.com

March 2012 www.tufin.com SecureTrack Supporting Compliance with PCI DSS 2.0 March 2012 www.tufin.com Table of Contents Introduction... 3 The Importance of Network Security Operations... 3 Supporting PCI DSS with Automated Solutions...

More information

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH)

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) Table of Contents Introduction... 1 1. Administrative Safeguards...

More information