Assessment of Vaisala Veriteq vlog Validation System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements



Similar documents
21 CFR PART 11 ELECTRONIC RECORDS, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES CFR Part 11 Compliance PLA 2.1

Electronic records and electronic signatures in the regulated environment of the pharmaceutical and medical device industries

Self-Assessment of eresearch Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11, Electronic Record; Electronic Signatures

InfinityQS SPC Quality System & FDA s 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements

rsdm and 21 CFR Part 11

Implementation of 21CFR11 Features in Micromeritics Software Software ID

21 CFR Part 11 Implementation Spectrum ES

The Impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on Product Development

Compliance Matrix for 21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records

Implement best practices by using FileMaker Pro 7 as the backbone of your 21 CFR 11 compliant system.

A ChemoMetec A/S White Paper September 2013

FILEHOLD DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE WHITE PAPER

InfoCenter Suite and the FDA s 21 CFR part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Using STATISTICA

ScreenMaster RVG200 Paperless recorder FDA-approved record keeping. Measurement made easy

DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management

Full Compliance Contents

21 CFR Part 11 White Paper

FDA Title 21 CFR Part 11:Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures; Final Rule (1997)

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic records and signatures solutions for the Life Sciences Industry

DeltaV Capabilities for Electronic Records Management

Oracle WebCenter Content

POLICY ISSUES IN E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS: ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE FDA 21 CFR 11 ALPHATRUST PRONTO ENTERPRISE PLATFORM

Implementing Title 21 CFR Part 11 (Electronic Records ; Electronic Signatures) in Manufacturing Presented by: Steve Malyszko, P.E.

Software Manual Part IV: FDA 21 CFR part 11. Version 2.20

Declaration of Conformity 21 CFR Part 11 SIMATIC WinCC flexible 2007

Compliance Response Edition 07/2009. SIMATIC WinCC V7.0 Compliance Response Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures. simatic wincc DOKUMENTATION

21 CFR Part 11 Checklist

Enabling SharePoint for 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance - Electronic Signature Use Case

Using the Thermo Scientific Dionex Chromeleon 7 Chromatography Data System (CDS) to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11. Compliance Guide

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records & Signatures

Agilent MicroLab Software with Spectroscopy Configuration Manager and Spectroscopy Database Administrator (SCM/SDA)

How To Control A Record System

Meeting the FDA s Requirements for Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11)

SolidWorks Enterprise PDM and FDA 21CFR Part 11

Tools to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance with EZChrom Elite Chromatography Data System. White Paper. By Frank Tontala

Electronic Document and Record Compliance for the Life Sciences

Thermal Analysis. Subpart A General Provisions 11.1 Scope Implementation Definitions.

AutoSave. Achieving Part 11 Compliance. A White Paper

Using Chromeleon Chromatography Management Software to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11

For technical assistance, please contact: Thermo Nicolet Corporation 5225 Verona Road Madison WI

Nova Southeastern University Standard Operating Procedure for GCP. Title: Electronic Source Documents for Clinical Research Study Version # 1

Guidance for Industry. 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures. Electronic Copies of Electronic Records

Guidance for Industry. 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures. Maintenance of Electronic Records

Compliance in the BioPharma Industry. White Paper v1.0

Intland s Medical Template

Spectroscopy Configuration Manager (SCM) Software. 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Booklet

Guidance for Industry. 21 CFR Part 11; Electronic. Records; Electronic Signatures. Time Stamps

Manual 074 Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures 1. Purpose

Empower TM 2 Software

Compliance Response SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.1. Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures (ERES) Edition 03/2015. Answers for industry.

TIBCO Spotfire and S+ Product Family

Implementing CitectSCADA to meet the requirements of FDA 21 CFR Part 11

Eclipsys Sunrise Clinical Manager Enterprise Electronic Medical Record (SCM) and Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 11 (21CFR11)

21 CFR Part 11 Deployment Guide for Wonderware System Platform 3.1, InTouch 10.1 and Historian 9.0

Guidance for Industry Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Scope and Application

Supplement to the Guidance for Electronic Data Capture in Clinical Trials

21 CFR Part 11 LIMS Requirements Electronic signatures and records

LabChip GX/GXII with LabChip GxP Software

Data Management PACT Workshop: Design & Operation of GMP Cell Therapy Facilities April 10 th -11 th, 2007

Waters Empower 2 Software Seamlessly Manages Regulated Data to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance

Good Electronic Records Management (GERM) Using IBM Rational ClearCase and IBM Rational ClearQuest

Waters Empower Software Seamlessly Manages Regulated Data to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance

Guidance for Industry Computerized Systems Used in Clinical Investigations

Electronic Records and Signatures: Compliance with Title 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements

Guidance for Industry COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS USED IN CLINICAL TRIALS

CoSign for 21CFR Part 11 Compliance

Guidance for Industry

Software. For the 21 CFR Part 11 Environment. The Science and Technology of Small Particles

testo Saveris 21CFR Part 11 Software Instruction manual

epblue GxP oftware manual Software version

9 Things you need to know about Continuous Monitoring Systems in FDA-Regulated Environments

Sympatec GmbH System-Partikel-Technik WINDOX 4. Electronic Records/ Electronic Signatures Compliance Assessment Worksheet for 21 CFR Part 11

Considerations for validating SDS Software v2.x Enterprise Edition for the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System per the GAMP 5 guide

Alfresco CoSign. A White Paper from Zaizi Limited. March 2013

SIMATIC SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.0. Electronic Records / Electronic Signatures. Compliance Response. Answers for industry.

Rackspace Archiving Compliance Overview

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Procedures Chapter 5 Administration Procedures associated with Board Policy 5.22

Guidance for Industry

Guidance for electronic trial data capturing of clinical trials

Signature Authentication

AuthentiMax Software for GloMax -Multi+

REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT

INTRODUCTION. This book offers a systematic, ten-step approach, from the decision to validate to

Auditing Chromatographic Electronic Data. Jennifer Bravo, M.S. QA Manager Agilux Laboratories

Achieving 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance with Appian

Signature Requirements for the etmf

ELECTRONIC RECORD AND SIGNATURE COMPLIANCE. NASD Rules 3010(d) and 3110(c)(1)(C) SEC Rule 17a-4 15 USC 7001 et. seq. (E-SIGN)

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Guideline Chapter 5 Administration

5 FAM 140 ACCEPTABILITY AND USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES

Vaisala Veriteq vlog. Installation and Operational Qualification Protocol

THE ROLE OF WATERS NUGENESIS SDMS IN 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE

Union County. Electronic Records and Document Imaging Policy

Shiny Server Pro: Regulatory Compliance and Validation Issues

The biggest challenges of Life Sciences companies today. Comply or Perish: Maintaining 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance

This interpretation of the revised Annex

U.S. FDA Title 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Assessment of SAP Records Management

Transcription:

/ WHITE PAPER Assessment of Vaisala Veriteq vlog Validation System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements The 21 CFR Part 11 rule states that the FDA view is that the risks of falsification, misinterpretation, and change (without leaving evidence) within the GMP environment are higher with electronic records than paper records, and therefore specific controls are required. Vaisala system is a hybrid system that employs the use of both electronic records and signed paper records. The electronic records in the Veriteq system are controlled such that, once created, they cannot be modified. This unmodifiable nature of the electronic records allows them to be printed and signed with full assurance that they represent a true representation of collected data. This white paper is a clause-byclause analysis of the requirements of 21 CFR Part 11 and how the Vaisala system responds to and helps users meet these requirements. Subpart A - General Provisions Section 11.1 Scope (a) The regulations in this part set forth the criteria under which the agency considers electronic records, electronic signatures, and written signatures executed to electronic records to be trustworthy, reliable, and generally equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures executed on paper. Note that although the Vaisala system complies with 21 CFR Part 11 requirements where applicable, ultimate responsibility for 21 CFR Part 11 rests with persons responsible for electronic record content, just as the responsibility for compliance with paper records requirements generally lies with those responsible for the record s content.

(b) (c) (d) (e) This part applies to records in electronic form that are created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or transmitted, under any records requirements set forth in agency regulations. This part also applies to electronic records submitted to the agency under requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act, even if such records are not specifically identified in agency regulations. However, this part does not apply to paper records that are, or have been, transmitted by electronic means. Where electronic signatures and their associated electronic records meet the requirements of this part, the agency will consider the electronic signatures to be equivalent to full handwritten signatures, initials, and other general signings as required by agency regulations, unless specifically excepted by regulation(s) effective on or after August 20, 1997. Electronic records that meet the requirements of this part may be used in lieu of paper records, in accordance with Sec. 11.2, unless paper records are specifically required. Computer systems (including hardware and software), controls, and attendant documentation maintained under this part shall be readily available for, and subject to, FDA inspection. The electronic records created by the Vaisala system are used to create signed paper records. The electronic records are not intended to form part of an FDA submission but, rather, must be archived to back up submitted data. Not applicable. The Vaisala system does not employ electronic signatures and, consequently, signed paper records are required. The electronic records generated by the Vaisala system must be backed up and maintained by the user. Vaisala maintains backward compatibility in its vlog software. Records created by older versions of vlog can be read by newer versions of the software. However, users may want to archive a copy of the version used to create the electronic records as a backup reference. Section 11.2 Implementation (a) For records required to be maintained but not submitted to the agency, persons may use electronic records in lieu of paper records or electronic signatures in lieu of traditional signatures, in whole or in part, provided that the requirements of this part are met. Users may decide to archive the Vaisala system s printed records using a PDF (Adobe Acrobat) printer system and, under such circumstances, the responsibility for maintaining the electronic signature system is the responsibility of the user. (b) For records submitted to the agency, persons may use electronic records in lieu of paper records or electronic signatures in lieu of traditional signatures, in whole or in part, provided that: (1) The requirements of this part are met and No comment. electronic signatures and, consequently, relies on printed records that must be signed. However, the Vaisala system can print signed electronic records using a PDF printer (Adobe Acrobat) and, under such circumstances, the user is responsible for setting up and maintaining such a printing system.

Section 11.2 Implementation - continued (2) The document or parts of a document to be submitted have been identified in public docket No. 92S-0251 as being the type of submission the agency accepts in electronic form. This docket will identify specifically what types of documents or parts of documents are acceptable for submission in electronic form without paper records and the agency receiving unit(s) (e.g., specific center, office, division, branch) to which such submissions may be made. Documents sent to the agency receiving unit(s) not specified in the public docket will not be considered as official if they are submitted in electronic form; paper forms of such documents will be considered as official and must accompany any electronic records. Persons are expected to consult with the intended agency receiving unit for details on how (e.g., method of transmission, media, file formats, and technical protocols) and whether to proceed with the electronic submission. No comment. Section 11.3 Definitions (a) The definitions and interpretations of terms contained in section No comment. 201 of the act apply to those terms when used in this part. (b) The following definitions of terms also apply to this part: No comment. (1) Act means the Federal Food, Drug, No comment. and Cosmetic Act (secs. 201-903 (21 U.S.C. 321-393)). (2) Agency means the Food and Drug No comment. Administration. (3) Biometrics means a method of verifying an individual's identity based on measurement of the individual's physical feature(s) or repeatable action(s) where those features and/or actions are both unique to that individual and measurable. Not applicable. (4) Closed system means an environment in which system access is controlled by persons who are responsible for the content of electronic records that are on the system. (5) Digital signature means an electronic signature based upon cryptographic methods of originator authentication, computed by using a set of rules and a set of parameters such that the identity of the signer and the integrity of the data can be verified. (6) Electronic record means any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial, or other information representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or distributed by a computer system. The Vaisala system is closed in that no access is permitted to alter the data on electronic records. electronic or digital signatures. Rather, the system outputs printed records which must be signed. electronic or digital signatures. Rather, the system outputs printed records which must be signed.

(7) Electronic signature means a computer data compilation of any symbol or series of symbols executed, adopted, or authorized by an individual to be the legally binding equivalent of the individual's handwritten signature. (8) Handwritten signature means the scripted name or legal mark of an individual handwritten by that individual and executed or adopted with the present intention to authenticate a writing in a permanent form. The act of signing with a writing or marking instrument such as a pen or stylus is preserved. The scripted name or legal mark, while conventionally applied to paper, may also be applied to other devices that capture the name or mark. (9) Open system means an environment in which system access is not controlled by persons who are responsible for the content of electronic records that are on the system. electronic signatures. Rather, the system outputs printed records which must be signed. The Vaisala system requires that users employ handwritten signatures on printed graphs and documents. Vaisala's system is a closed system due to required security levels using Windows authentication. An audit trail documents all interactions with the Vaisala system. Subpart B Electronic Records Section 11.10 Controls for closed systems (a) Validation of systems to ensure accuracy, reliability, consistent intended performance, and the ability to discern invalid or altered records. Although validation is a customer responsibility, Vaisala offers validation assistance in the form of Installation (IQ) and Operation Qualification (OQ) protocols. Computer files generated by the Vaisala system are in a proprietary (to Vaisala only) format 1 using a checksum technique to detect invalid or altered records. 1 The vlog data logger system utilizes distributed encryption to protect files from modification of any type. The Logger (.spl) files contain a 32 bit encryption key (4.3 Billion combinations). The Graph (.spg) files also contain a separate (and different) 32 bit encryption key. The Download password has a separate 160 bit key (1.46E+48 combinations). The Calibration data has a separate 96 bit key (7.92E+28 combinations) stored in the loggers itself. Also, the data is stored in the logger files and graph files as raw binary values - not in a human readable format. All of the keys must be correct before vlog will display VERIFIED and SECURE. See www.vaisala.com/veriteq for more information.

Section 11.10 Controls for closed systems - continued (b) (c) The ability to generate accurate and complete copies of records in both human readable and electronic form suitable for inspection, review, and copying by the agency. Persons should contact the agency if there are any questions regarding the ability of the agency to perform such review and copying of the electronic records. Protection of records to enable their accurate and ready retrieval throughout the records retention period. Complete and accurate electronic copies of records are available by copying the raw data files or by setting up a PDF printer (requires Adobe Acrobat or similar) in order to export graphs in PDF format. Note that the Vaisala system is a hybrid system that generates electronic records that must be printed and signed. On the data logger, electronic data is held internally in nonvolatile EEPROM memory. Once data has left the data logger, the media it is stored on, the backup strategy, and retrieval procedures are the responsibility of the user. Note that the data on the logger is considered to be transient data and is thus excluded from 21 CFR Part 11. This is because although the data logger initially acquires the data, it only temporarily stores it before passing it onto a PC and a printer to complete the task. For reference, refer to Complying with 21 CFR Part 11, Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; Appendix 4; Key Areas for Guidance; Section 4.5 Transient Data (published by ISPE and PDA, 2001). (d) Limiting system access to authorized individuals. There is no provision or system access for any users to modify electronic records. The Vaisala system provides access control using Windows authentication. (e) Use of secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails to independently record the date and time of operator entries and actions that create, modify, or delete electronic records. Record changes shall not obscure previously recorded information. Such audit trail documentation shall be retained for a period at least as long as that required for the subject electronic records and shall be available for agency review and copying. The Vaisala system is based on the creation of secure data logger files that cannot be modified (without rendering the files completely unusable). Because of the unmodifiable files, there are no operations that are possible to be performed on the electronic data logger record after, or during, file creation. A complete "audit trail" is available with a Vaisala Veriteq vlog/ VL data logger files. All data associated with the electronic data logging record is captured in the data logger file. This data includes: the time and date the file was created the ID of the creator of the file a description of the data logger file the serial and model number of the data logger the status of the logger file (secure and verified) when the logger was last calibrated who the logger was last calibrated by when the logger is next due for calibration Users cannot disable or modify the content or the way data is written to the electronic record nor can the information be edited or deleted any time during or after the record is created. In addition, any changes made to data logger operating parameters in the middle of a recording session results in the creation of a completely new electronic record. Data in the logger is cleared.

Section 11.10 Controls for closed systems - continued (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) Use of operational system checks to enforce permitted sequencing of steps and events, as appropriate. Use of authority checks to ensure that only authorized individuals can use the system, electronically sign a record, access the operation or computer system input or output device, alter a record, or perform the operation at hand. Use of device (e.g. terminal) checks to determine, as appropriate, the validity of the source of data input or operational instruction. Determination that persons who develop, maintain, or use electronic record/electronic signature systems have the education, training, and experience to perform their assigned tasks. The establishment of, and adherence to, written policies that hold individuals accountable and responsible for actions initiated under their electronic signatures, in order to deter record and signature falsification (k) Use of appropriate controls over systems documentation including: (1) Adequate controls over the distribution of, access to, and use of documentation for system operation and maintenance. (2) Revision and change control procedures to maintain an audit trail that documents time-sequenced development and modification of systems documentation. The Vaisala system does not allow modification of electronic records under any circumstances or sequence of steps taken by the user. The Vaisala system does not allow modification of original electronic records by any individual, authorized or not. The Vaisala system follows a proprietary protocol for communicating with its data logger devices that serves to positively identify each device and determine whether the data from that device is valid or invalid. Training requirements are the responsibility of the user. electronic signatures. However, the user can print signed electronic records using a PDF printer (Adobe Acrobat) and, under such circumstances, the responsibility for managing and controlling such a system is the responsibility of the user. Operational procedures are the responsibility of the user.

Section 11.30 Controls for open systems Persons who use open systems to create, modify, maintain, or transmit electronic records shall employ procedures and controls designed to ensure the authenticity, integrity, and, as appropriate, the confidentiality of electronic records from the point of their creation to the point of their receipt. Such procedures and controls shall include those identified in Sec. 11.10, as appropriate, and additional measures such as document encryption and use of appropriate digital signature standards to ensure, as necessary under the circumstances, record authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality. The Vaisala system is a closed system in that data files, once created, cannot be modified under any circumstances. The audit trail captures all interactions with the Vaisala system including the clearing of a data logger. Section 11.70 Signature / Record linking Electronic signatures and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records shall be linked to their respective electronic records to ensure that the signatures cannot be excised, copied, or otherwise transferred to falsify an electronic record by ordinary means. In accordance with current good practice, the Vaisala system generates a unique checksum value, called a Logger File ID number, every time data is downloaded from a data logger. This number is then included and referenced in the following: Logger File Creation Reports Logger Files Graph files that contain inserted logger file data Tabular listings and printouts The method in which Logger File ID Numbers are generated ensures that it is virtually impossible (one chance in 4.3 billion 1 ) that any two logger files can have the same ID number. In addition, any alteration of the electronic record renders the file completely unusable. The combination of these two features provides the non-refutable link between the original electronic record and the printed and signed reports. All interaction with the Veriteq system is tracked in the audit trail.

Subpart C - Electronic Signatures The Vaisala validatable data logging system is a hybrid system that incorporates both electronic and paper records. Data is measured and recorded in electronic form then printed onto paper to form the permanent record. The electronic records cannot be modified without rendering the files completely unusable. Once a paper record has been generated, it would be subject to the audit trail requirements for equivalent paper records. For more information, visit www.vaisala.com or contact us at veriteqsales@vaisala.com Ref. B211051EN-A Vaisala 2010 This material is subject to copyright protection, with all copyrights retained by Vaisala and its individual partners. All rights reserved. Any logos and/or product names are trademarks of Vaisala or its individual partners. The reproduction, transfer, distribution or storage of information contained in this brochure in any form without the prior written consent of Vaisala is strictly prohibited. All specifications technical included are subject to change without notice.