Human Resource Management Report



Similar documents
Human Resource Management Report 7/1/ /31/2006

State of Washington. Guide to Developing Strategic Workforce Plans. Updated December 2008

State of Washington Supervisors Guide to Developing Operational Workforce Plans. Updated December 2008

OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY PAY PRACTICES ADMINISTRATION FOR AP FACULTY

2014 Washington State Employee Engagement Survey

HUMAN RESOURCES IN PUBLIC EDUCATION Where are we? Where should we be? Where HR Divisions should be. Where most HR Divisions are

Defining Human Resources Moving to Strategic HR

Policies and Procedures Manual

Organization and Operations. Metric Name Formula Description

Human Resources FY Performance Plan

DEVELOPING AN INTEGRATED TALENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. A Human Resource Management Framework

HUMAN RESOURCES. Management & Employee Services Organizational Development

July 1, 2015 COMPENSATION SYSTEM GUIDELINES FOR EXEMPT & NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES

Department of Human Resources FY Strategic Plan

DMA POLICY: NAME: PAY PLAN POLICY

Compensation Manual: Non-Represented Pay Practices

Supervisor s Introduction to the Performance Management Process: Pre-Class Study Materials

How To Pay A Vrs

DoDEA Personnel Center HR Competency Definitions

2009 State Workforce Report

James Madison University Salary Administration Plan

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

Human Resources and Education Functional Leadership Plan

RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. Office of Human Resources Program Work Plan Draft - August 1999

Human Capital Update

Human Resources. General Government 209. Prince William County FY 2014 Budget MISSION STATEMENT. Human Resources; 3.7%

July/August and Beyond. Old Form. New Form. Employee. Manager

NEW YORK STATE SUCCESSION PLANNING

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Workforce Management Plan

Succession Planning Process

Economic Development Administration Technology Administration

BC Public Service Agency Annual Report 2014/15

Revised Body of Knowledge And Required Professional Capabilities (RPCs)

Business Plan June 2006

HR Strategic Plan

Iowa State University University Human Resources Classification and Compensation Unit 3810 Beardshear Hall

Policy on Classification & Compensation

Metropolitan Community College (MCC) recognizes

Career Management. Succession Planning. Dr. Oyewole O. Sarumi

SUCCESSION PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT GUIDE

When Completed: This procedure is performed whenever personnel actions are needed.

Subpart D Executive Development

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Human Resources Report 2014 and People Strategy

Roadmap for the Development of a Human Resources Management Information System for the Ukrainian civil service

USDA New Supervisor Training Standard

Career Development and Succession Planning. Changing Landscape of HR 2012 Conference

HR Metrics Report. Reporting Period 2013 Q1 - January 1 to March 31, Sample Report. Province: Industry: Workforce Change:

Human Resources Department

October 17, HRBP Version Preparing for Talent Review: Updating imap Succession

Career Management. Making It Work for Employees and Employers

WORKFORCE AND SUCCESSION PLANNING

The HR Image Makeover: From Cost Center to Profit Maker

07/18/2011. sodexousa.com

Yale University Performance Management Guide

Human Resources Annual Report

San Mateo County Workforce and Succession Management Program

Certificate Program Course Summary and Assessment Sample

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

B UILDING A T O R ONTO PUBLIC S E R V ICE

State Personnel Board Rules

RECORDS MANAGEMENT MANUAL STATE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

IBH continued to struggle with four critical areas of special focus:

State of Colorado SUCCESSION PLANNING. Introduction

How To Understand Organizational Power And Politics

REE Position Management and Workforce/Succession Planning Checklist

Job Market 2013: The New Trends

Human Resources Division The Executive Office for Administration and Finance Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Department of Human Resources Strategic Plan

CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY WORKFORCE PLANNING FRAMEWORK

Sample Human Resource Metrics

State of Louisiana s Workforce Planning Model Right People, Right Skills, Right Jobs, Right Time

HIRING & COMPENSATION. An approach for supervisors

H E A L T H W E A L T H C A R E E R 重 塑 整 体 报 酬 致 胜 March 4th Beijing. China

Human Resources: Recruitment/Selection

Board of Directors Meeting in Public: 15 May 2014

HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR PROJECT SERVICES. ORGANIZATIONAL DIRECTIVE No. 39. Talent Management Framework

TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING

Human Resources Department Recruitment Process

Five Year Strategic Plan

Report to: Trust Board Agenda item: 13 Date of Meeting: 25 April 2012

Right: People Roles Recognition - Culture

Human Resources Business Plan 2008/09

This paper is a compilation of resources and ideas pertaining to employee turnover. The

What s On the Minds of HR Directors? Neil Reichenberg Executive Director International Public Management Association for Human Resources

Overview of the Executive Core Qualifications: Preparing for the Senior Executive Service (SES)

Symbiosis Institute of Business Management (SIBM) - Pune. Research Conference on Innovative Business Strategies. Research Paper on

Branch Human Resources

ABT Program High Level Business Design (HLBD) Recruit/Hire Business Process

WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ONLINE CAMPUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS SYLLABUS

Chapter 2 Theoretical Framework JOB SATISFACTION OF EMPLOYEES

National Transportation Safety Board Strategic Human Capital Plan FY

NHS BLOOD AND TRANSPLANT MARCH 2009 RESPONDING EFFECTIVELY TO BLOOD DONOR FEEDBACK

Workforce Planning, Succession Planning and Capability Planning. 13

Human Resource Secretariat Business Plan to

Missouri Department of Natural Resources Administrative Policies and Procedures

COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. These policies may be amended at any time and do not constitute an employment contract.

HRM. Human Resource Management Rapid Assessment Tool. A Guide for Strengthening HRM Systems. for Health Organizations. 3rd edition

Transcription:

Washington State Human Resource Management Report Prepared by: Department of Personnel April 2006 (rev 6/06) Updated through FY 2006 1 st & 2 nd Quarters 1

Human Resource Management Report - Reporting Process GMAP Agency director communicates workforce management and HR Management Report expectations & measures to managers Managers collect and report data for HR Management Report performance measures Agency HR Office assists managers in data collection, analysis, report preparation Base set of data Quarterly statewide updates Special request data DOP provides agency with centrally available data analysis queries & consultation Managers evaluations includes HR Management Report results Agency Director has agency-wide data analysis and reports prepared Quarterly reporting to DOP of agency-tracked standard measures Copy to DOP of agency-internal GMAP reports on HR management as they are done DOP collects statewide data and conducts overall analysis Agency internal GMAP sessions include HR Management Report presentation Agency Director presents selected portions of HR Management Report at agency s assigned Governor s GMAP forums DOP presents enterprisewide HR Management Report at Governor s GMAP forums on Government Efficiency DOP submits annual comprehensive statewide status report to Governor & Directors 2

Human Resource Management Report - Reporting Timeline DOP provides with base set of centrally available data & queries for standard performance measures DOP sends statewide data update to agencies Government Efficiency GMAP on enterprise HR Management Report DOP sends statewide data update to agencies Government Efficiency GMAP on enterprise HR Management Report DOP sends statewide data update to agencies Government Efficiency GMAP on enterprise HR Management Report Government Efficiency GMAP on enterprise HR Management Report DOP sends statewide data update to agencies Dec 05 Jan 06 Feb 06 Mar 06 Apr 06 May 06 June 06 July 06 Aug 06 Sept 06 Oct 06 Nov 06 Dec 06 Agency Directors communicate workforce management performance expectations, measures, and reporting process requirements to their managers Agencies report selected agencytracked HR Mgmt Report standard measures to DOP* Agency-internal GMAP sessions on HR Management Report * Agency-tracked means certain HR Management Report data that must be tracked by each agency because it is not available in the central system. ** In addition, agencies send copies of their internal GMAP reports on HR Management Report to DOP as they are completed. Agencies report selected agencytracked HR Mgmt Report standard measures to DOP* DOP delivers comprehensive first annual report statewide human management status to Governor 3

Priorities of Government Mobilize Resources Manage Financial Resources Manage Human Resources Plan the Organization Manage Business Processes Strategic Plan Deliver Services Manage Relationships Managers Accountability for Strategic Management Achieve Public Value & Benefit Managers have five primary workforce management functions: Manage Human Resources Plan & Align Hire Deploy Reinforce Performance Develop 4

Agency Managers Logic Model for Management Key Outputs Initial Outcomes Intermediate Outcomes Plan & Align Articulation of managers HR performance accountabilities. HR policies. Job & competency analyses. plan. Positions classified, salaries assigned. levels, competencies, & strategies are aligned with agency priorities Managers accountabilities are communicated & understood Foundation in place to build and sustain a productive, high performing workforce Hire Qualified candidate pools, interviews & backgrounding. Job offers. Appointments and initial performance monitoring. Best qualified hired & reviewed during appointment period The right people are in the right job at the right time Deploy Work assignments& requirements defined. Positive workplace environment & relations created. Coaching, feedback, corrections. Workplace is safe, gives capacity to perform, fosters productive relations Employees know job requirements, how they re doing, & are supported Time & talent is used effectively. Employees are motivated & productive. Develop Individual development plans. Time/ resources for training. Continuous learning environment created. Learning environment created. Employees are engaged in development opportunities & seek to learn. Employees have competencies for present job & career advancement Reinforce Performance Clear performance expectations linked to organizational goals & measures. Regular performance appraisals. Recognition. Discipline. Employees know how their performance contributes to success of organization. Strong performance rewarded; poor performance eliminated Successful performance is differentiated & strengthened. Employees are held accountable. Ultimate Outcomes Agencies have workforce depth & breadth needed for present and future success Employees are committed to the work they do & the goals of the organization Productive, successful employees are retained Agency is enabled to successfully carry out its mission. The citizens receive efficient, cost-effective government services. 5

Human Resource Management Report Standard Performance Measures Plan & Align Hire Deploy Develop Reinforce Performance Ultimate Outcomes Percent current position/competencies descriptions [agency tracking system] Percent supervisors with current performance expectations for workforce management [agency tracking system] Time-to-fill funded vacancies [agency tracking system] Percent satisfaction with candidate quality [agency tracking system] New Hire-to-Promotional ratio [DOP Data/Business Warehouse] Percent turnover during review period [DOP Data/Business Warehouse] Percent employees with current performance expectations [agency tracking system] Employee survey ratings on productive workplace questions [DOP standard survey] Leave usage (sick, LWOP, unscheduled leave) [DOP Data/Business Warehouse] Overtime usage [DOP Data/Business Warehouse] Number & type of non-disciplinary grievances [agency tracking system] Percent employees with current annual individual development plans [agency tracking system] Employee survey ratings on learning/development questions [DOP standard survey] Percent current performance evaluations [agency tracking system] Employee survey ratings on performance accountability questions [DOP standard survey] Number/type of disciplinary issues, actions, appeals disposition [agency tracking system] Turnover rates and types (e.g., retirement, resignation, etc.) [DOP Data/Business Warehouse] Turnover rate of key occupational categories and of workforce diversity [DOP Data/Business Warehouse] Employee survey ratings on commitment questions [DOP standard survey] Measures to add in the future: Current workforce plans that align staff with business priorities Safety and Workers Compensation measures Competency gap analysis measure Recognition/reward measure Others to be determined 6

HR Management Report category: Plan & Align Overall foundation & management accountability system to build & sustain high performing workforce HR Management Report (preliminary standard measures) Percent current position/competency descriptions Percent supervisors with current performance expectations for workforce management N u m b e r o f A g e n cie s 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Plan & Align - Slide 1 of 1 Percent Current Position/Competency Descriptions 7 5 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0-10% 11-20% 21-30% 31-40% 41-50% 51-60% 61-70% 71-80% 81-90% 91-100% Percent Current Position/Competency Descriptions Percent supervisors with current performance expectations for workforce management This data will be reported by agencies to DOP on October 15, 2006 7

HR Management Report category: Hire Right People in the Right Job at the Right Time HR Management Report (standard measures) Days to fill vacancies (from requisition to appointment) % satisfaction with candidate quality % new hires; % promotional hires % separation during review period Days to Fill Vacancies This data will be reported by agencies to DOP on October 15, 2006 Candidate Quality (managers satisfaction rating) This data will be reported by agencies to DOP on October 15, 2006 Hire - Slide 1 of 1 Hiring Balance - 2003-05 Biennium Hiring Balance - FY 2006 First Half 47% 51% Other Other (14,782) (3,926) 8% Exempt Appts (2,584) 7% Exempt Appts (581) Inter-agency Promotions (1,026) 22% Intra-agency Promotions (6,925) 20% New Hires (6,170) Intra-agency Promotions (136) Inter-agency Promotions (176) 2% 19% Intra-agency Promotions (1,441) 21% New Hires (1,635) Separation during Review Period * Separation during Review Period New Hire Separations Promotional Separations 9% ** 6% ** 1% * ** 5% * * Released ** Voluntary New Hire Separations Promotional Separations Data pending * * Released ** Voluntary Other = transfers, demotions, reassignments, movement in lieu of RIF, etc. Source: DOP Data Warehouse 8

HR Management Report category: Deploy Employee time and talent is used effectively. Employees motivated. HR Management Report (standard measures) Percent employees with current performance expectations Employee survey ratings on productive workplace questions Overtime usage Sick leave usage (and unscheduled leave if available) Number & type of non-disciplinary grievances and disposition Deploy - Slide 1 of 4 Percent employees with current performance expectations This data will be reported by agencies to DOP on October 15, 2006 Do employees have day-to-day support to enable successful job performance? NOTE: The productive workplace questions from the statewide employee survey are shown below. This survey was conducted in Spring 2006. I know what is expected of me at work. (4.3) 2% 8% 37% 47% I have opportunity to give input on decisions affecting my work. (3.5) 8% 12% 2 32% 22% 2% I receive the information I need to do my job effectively. (3.8) 2% 7% 19% 48% 21% 2% I have the tools and resources I need to do my job effectively. (3.8) 8% 18% 45% 22% My supervisor treats me with dignity and respect. (4.3) 4% 5% 8% 2 57% My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback that helps me improve my performance. (3.7) 7% I receive recognition for a job well done. (3.3) 11% 10% 14% 19% 24% 29% 26% 3 22% Never Seldom Occasionally Usually Always No Response 9

HR Report Card category: Employee time and talent is used effectively. Deploy Employees motivated. Overtime: Is employee time well managed? Deploy - Slide 2 of 4 Average Overtime Hours per Employee per Quarter* 10 8 6 4 Statewide Overtime Costs In Millions (all agencies except DNR) 2 $49 $50.0 $47 $45 $40.0 2001 Oct 2002 Jan 2002 Apr 2002 July 2002 Oct 2003 Jan 2003 Apr 2003 July 2003 Oct 2004 Jan 2004 Apr 2004 July 2004 Oct 2005 Jan 2005 Apr 2005 July 2005 Oct 0 Quarter Statewide minus DNR $30.0 $27 35 Average Percent Employees Receiving Overtime $20.0 30 25 20 15 10 $10.0 $0.0 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 06 (Q 1 & 2) 5 2001 Oct 2002 Jan 2002 Apr 2002 July 2002 Oct 2003 Jan 2003 Apr 2003 July 2003 Oct 2004 Jan 2004 Apr 2004 July 2004 Oct 2005 Jan 2005 Apr 2005 July 2005 Oct Percent Employees 0 Quarter Statewide minus DNR * Per capita Source: DOP Data Warehouse 10

HR Report Card category: Employee time and talent is used effectively. Deploy Employees motivated. Leave: Do employees come to work as scheduled? Deploy - Slide 3 of 4 30 25 20 Average Sick Leave Hours per Employee per Quarter Notes: It is unknown whether the sick leave usage shown was planned or unplanned. For the most part, only actual leave time gone from work is shown. Leave hours donated and most cashed out leave hours have been removed from this display. 15 10 5 Quarter 0 2001 Oct 2002 Jan 2002 Apr 2002 July 2002 Oct 2003 Jan 2003 Apr 2003 July 2003 Oct 2004 Jan 2004 Apr 2004 July 2004 Oct 2005 Jan 2005 Apr 2005 July 2005 Oct Statewide Ave. Sick Leave Hours Used per Quarter Percent of Earned Sick Leave Per Capita Sick Leave Use* 17.7 hours 74% Just Those Who Took Sick Leave* 22.8 hours 95% *Average since 10/01 Source: DOP Data Warehouse 11

HR Management Report category: Deploy Employee time and talent is used effectively. Employees motivated. Employee relations: Are contracts/policies applied appropriately? Deploy - Slide 4 of 4 Number of Grievances Filed Since 7-1-05 95 116 80 91 86 98 61 69 Notes: The data shown in these charts is for represented employees as reported monthly by agencies to the State Labor Relations Office (LRO). July 05 Aug 05 Sept 05 Oct 05 Nov 05 Dec 05 Jan 06 Feb 06 Discipline 26.0% Compensation 17. Overtime 12.7% Work Hours 4.1% Bid System 5. Leave 5.1% Hiring/Appts 2.9% Non-discrimination 4.1% Management Rights 0.4% All other 22.0% Source: State Labor Relations Office 12

HR Management Report category: Develop Employees have competencies for present job and future advancement Develop - Slide 1 of 1 HR Management Report (standard measures) Percent employees with current annual individual development plans Employee survey ratings on learning & development questions Percent employees with current annual individual development plans This data will be reported by agencies to DOP on October 15, 2006 Employee perceptions on learning and development: NOTE: The learning & development questions from the statewide employee survey are shown below. This survey was conducted in Spring 2006. I have the opportunities at work to learn and grow. (3.6) 7% 12% 21% 30% 27% My supervisor gives me ongoing feedback that helps me improve my performance. (3.7) 7% 10% 19% 29% 3 Never Seldom Occasionally Usually Always No Response 94% 13

HR Management Report category: Reinforce Performance Successful performance is differentiated & strengthened. Employees are held accountable. Reinforce Performance - Slide 1 of 3 HR Management Report (standard measures) Percent employees and managers with current annual performance evaluations Employee survey ratings on performance and accountability questions Number and type of disciplinary issues, actions, appeals disposition Percent employees and managers with current annual performance evaluations This data will be reported by agencies to DOP on October 15, 2006 Do employees see a meaningful linkage between their performance and the success of the organization? NOTE: The performance and accountability questions from the statewide employee survey are shown below. This survey was conducted in Spring 2006. I know how my work contributes to the goals of my agency. (4.1) 5% 12% 36% 42% My performance evaluation provides me with meaningful information about my performance. (3.4) 11% 1 19% 30% 21% 6% My supervisor holds me and my co-workers accountable for performance. (4.1) 5% 11% 3 44% I receive recognition for a job well done. (3.3) 11% 14% 24% 26% 22% Never Seldom Occasionally Usually Always No Response 14

HR Management Report category: Reinforce Performance Successful performance is differentiated & strengthened. Employees are held accountable. Disciplinary action: Is poor performance dealt with? Reinforce Performance - Slide 2 of 2 Formal Disciplinary Actions, Appeals, Grievances FY 2006 to date (July 1, 2005- February 28, 2006) Issues Leading to Disciplinary Action and Disciplinary Grievances # Actions Taken 190 26 91 79 Placeholder. DOP will be developing list of categories for disciplinary-related issues. # Appeals* 21 Disciplinary Grievances** 182 Dismissal Demotion Suspension Salary Reduction Disposition of Disciplinary-related Grievances and Appeals Placeholder. Too early in new process for reliable disposition data. * Non-represented employees ** Represented employees (data on type of disciplinary grievance not yet collected) 15

HR Management Report category: Ultimate Outcomes State has workforce breadth & depth for present & future success. Employees are committed to the work they do and the goals of the organization. Successful, productive employees are retained. HR Management Report (standard measures) Ultimate Outcomes - Slide 1 of 3 Employee survey ratings on commitment questions Turnover rates and types (e.g., retirement, resignation, etc.) Turnover rate of key occupational categories and of workforce diversity Indicators of Employee Commitment NOTE: The employee commitment questions from the statewide employee survey are shown below. This survey was conducted in Spring 2006. I know how my agency measures its success. (3.4) 11% 1 21% 32% 20% I know how my work contributes to the goals of my agency. (4.1) 5% 12% 36% 42% I receive recognition for a job well done. (3.3) 11% 14% 24% 26% 22% Never Seldom Occasionally Usually Always No Response 16

HR Management Report category: Ultimate Outcomes continued Ultimate Outcomes - Slide 2 of 3 Statewide Turnover * 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 11. 10.9% 11.0% 11.6% 6.4% *Note: All but ~2% of the turnover is employees leaving state government. The ~2% is workforce movement across agency lines. 2.0% 0.0% FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 1st Half 18.0% Turnover Breakdown 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 Total State Resignation Retirement Dismissal RIF/Other To another agency Source: DOP Data Warehouse 17

HR Report Card category: Ultimate Outcomes continued Diversity Ultimate Outcomes - Slide 3 of 3 State Government Diversity Profile (as of 1-1-06) Women 52.0% WA State Government Native American 2.0% Caucasian 82.4% Persons w/ disabilities 5.2% Vietnam Veterans 7. Disabled Veterans 1. Hispanic 4.4% Asian/Pacific Islander 6.2% African Am erican 5.0% Persons over 40 73.1% People of color 7.6% WA Labor Force Native American 2.4% Caucasian 81.1% Hispanic 6.4% African American Asian/Pacific 3. Islander 6.8% Source: DOP Data Warehouse 18