CERTIFICATION REPORT
|
|
|
- Eleanor Oliver
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REF: INF-808 v4 Target: Expediente Date: Created by: CERT3 Revised by: CALIDAD Approved by: TECNICO CERTIFICATION REPORT File: Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100 Applicant: W HUAWEI References: [EXT1114] Certification request of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100 [EXT1493] Evaluation Technical Report of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100. The product documentation referenced in the above documents. Certification report of the product Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100, as requested in [EXT1114] dated 21/12/2010, and evaluated by the laboratory EPOCHE & ESPRI, as detailed in the Evaluation Technical Report EXT1493 received on 16/12/2011. Página 1 de 16
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS MINISTERIO DE LA PRESIDENCIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 TOE SUMMARY... 3 SECURITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS... 4 SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS... 5 IDENTIFICATION... 6 SECURITY POLICIES... 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT... 6 CLARIFICATIONS ON NON-COVERED THREATS... 7 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FUNCTIONALITY... 8 ARCHITECTURE DOCUMENTS PRODUCT TESTING PENETRATION TESTING EVALUATED CONFIGURATION EVALUATION RESULTS COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE EVALUATION TEAM CERTIFIER RECOMMENDATIONS GLOSSARY BIBLIOGRAPHY SECURITY TARGET Página 2 de 16
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document constitutes the Certification Report for the certification file of the product Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100. Developer/manufacturer: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Sponsor: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Certification Body: Centro Criptológico Nacional (CCN) del Centro Nacional de Inteligencia (CNI). ITSEF: EPOCHE & ESPRI S.L. Protection Profile: No conformance to a Protection Profile is claimed. Evaluation Level: Common Criteria EAL3+ (ALC_CMC.4; ALC_CMS.4). Evaluation end date: 16/12/2011. All the assurance components required by the evaluation level EAL3 (augmented with ALC_CMC.4; ALC_CMS.4) have been assigned a PASS verdict. Consequently, the laboratory EPOCHE & ESPRI assigns the PASS VERDICT to the whole evaluation due all the evaluator actions are satisfied for the EAL3+ (ALC_CMC.4; ALC_CMS.4), as defined by the [CC-P3] and the [CEM]. Considering the obtained evidences during the instruction of the certification request of the product Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100, a positive resolution is proposed. TOE SUMMARY The 3900 series LTE enodeb can be widely used to support the broadband wireless access of home and enterprise users. Besides, it is used to support mobile broadband access. In Huawei LTE solution, the 3900 series LTE enodeb adopts a star topology, in which the transmission equipment is directly connected to the BS through FE or GE ports. The 3900 series LTE enodeb networking supports various access modes, including the FE, GE, optical fibber, x digital subscriber line (xdsl), passive optical network (PON), microwave access, and satellite. The 3900 series LTE enodeb possesses the following features: Eight-antenna MIMO, increasing coverage with fewer sites; High integration, reducing the overall size; On an all-ip platform, thus supporting smooth upgrade; Industry-leading technologies, delivering excellent performance; Easy maintenance through the Web LMT; Flexible networking. The major security features implemented by 3900 series LTE enodeb and subject to evaluation are: Página 3 de 16
4 Authentication. Operators using the WebLMT to access the TOE in order to execute device management functions are identified by individual user names and authenticated by passwords. Access control series LTE enodeb implements role-based access control, limiting access to different management functionality to different roles as defined in administrator-defined access control associations. Auditing. Audit records are created for security-relevant events related to the use of 3900 series LTE enodeb. Communications security series LTE enodeb offers SSL/TLS channels for FTP, MML (man-machine language, which is a kind of Command Line Interface), and BIN (Huawei s private binary message protocol) access to the TOE. UU Interface encryption. LTE air interface support AES and SNOW 3G service data encryption, which ensures the privacy of user session. S1 Interface encryption. The IPSec protocol is used in the communication with the MME/S-GW. X2 Interface encryption. The IPSec protocol is used in the communication with other LTE enodebs. Resource management. VLAN (Virtual Local Area Network) are implemented to separate the traffic from different flow planes, which reduce traffic storms and avoid resource overhead. ACL (Access Control List) implements packet filtering features to restrict resource use via IP address, ports, etc. Those features protect the 3900 series LTE enodeb against various unauthorized access from unauthorized NEs. Security function management. The TOE offers management functionality for its security functionality. Digital signature. In the production and distribution phases, the digital signature scheme, protect the software package by message digest and signature. SECURITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The product was evaluated with all the evidence required to fulfil the evaluation level EAL3 and the evidences required by the additional components ALC_CMC.4 and ALC_CMS.4, according to [CC-P3]. Assurance Assurance Components Class Security Target ASE_CCL.1, ASE_ECD.1, ASE_INT.1, ASE_OBJ.2, ASE_REQ.2, ASE_SPD.1, ASE_TSS.1 Development ADV_ARC.1, ADV_FSP.3, ADV_TDS.2 Guidance AGD_OPE.1, AGD_PRE.1 Life Cycle ALC_CMC.4, ALC_CMS.4, ALC_DEL.1, ALC_DVS.1, ALC_LCD.1 Tests ATE_COV.2, ATE_DPT.1, ATE_FUN.1, ATE_IND.2 Vulnerability AVA_VAN.2 Analysis Página 4 de 16
5 SECURITY FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS The product security functionality satisfies the following functional requirements, as stated by its Security Target, and according to [CC-P2]. Identification and Authentication (FIA) Security (FMT) Management User Data Protection (FDP) Trusted path/channels (FTP) TOE Access (FTA) Cryptographic (FCS) Support Security Audit (FAU) FIA_AFL.1 Authentication failure handling FIA_ATD.1 User attribute definition FIA_SOS.1 Verification of secrets FIA_UID.1 Timing of identification FIA_UAU.1 Timing of authentication FIA_UAU.5 Multiple authentication mechanisms FMT_MSA.1 Management of security attributes FMT_MSA.3 Static attribute initialization FMT_SMR.1 Security roles FMT_SMF.1 Specification of Management Functions FDP_ACC.1/Local Subset access control FDP_ACF.1/Local Security attribute based access control FDP_ACC.1/Domain Subset access control FDP_ACF.1/ Domain Security attribute based access control FDP_ACC.1/EMSCOMM Subset access control FDP_ACF.1/EMSCOMM Security attribute based access control FTP_ITC.1/ IntegratedPort Inter-TSF trusted channel FTP_TRP.1/WebLMT Trusted path FTA_TSE.1/SEP TOE session establishment FTA_TSE.1/Local TOE session establishment FCS_COP.1 /Sign Cryptographic operation FCS_COP.1 /SSL Cryptographic operation FCS_COP.1 /S1 Cryptographic operation FCS_COP.1 /X2 Cryptographic operation FCS_COP.1 /UU Cryptographic operation FCS_CKM.1 /SSL Cryptographic key generation FCS_CKM.1 / S1 Cryptographic key generation FCS_CKM.1 / X2 Cryptographic key generation FCS_CKM.1 / UU Cryptographic key generation FAU_GEN.1 Audit data generation FAU_GEN.2 User identity association FAU_SAR.1 Audit review FAU_SAR.3 Selectable audit review FAU_STG.1 Protected audit trail storage FAU_STG.3 Action in case of possible audit data loss Página 5 de 16
6 IDENTIFICATION MINISTERIO DE LA PRESIDENCIA Product: Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100 Security Target: Security Target of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software, v2.6; October 17th, Protection Profile: No conformance to a Protection Profile is claimed. Evaluation Level: CC v3.1 r3 - EAL3+ (ALC_CMC.4; ALC_CMS.4). SECURITY POLICIES The use of the product Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100 shall implement a set of security policies assuring the fulfilment of different standards and security demands. The detail of these policies is documented in the Security Target. In short, it establishes the need of implementing organisational policies related to the following aspects. P1.Audit. The TOE shall provide the following audit functionality: Generation of audit information. Storage of audit log. Review of audit records. P2.S1_Encryption. The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the S1 interface. P3.X2_Encryption. The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the X2 interface. P4.UU_Encryption. The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the UU interface. ASSUMPTIONS AND OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT The following assumptions are constraints to the conditions used to assure the security properties and functionalities compiled by the security target. These assumptions have been applied during the evaluation in order to determine if the identified vulnerabilities can be exploited. In order to assure the secure use of the TOE, it is necessary to start from these assumptions for its operational environment. If this is not possible and any of them could not be assumed, it would not be possible to assure the secure operation of the TOE. A.PhysicalProtection. It is assumed that the TOE is protected against unauthorized physical access. A.TrustworthyUsers. It is assumed that the organization responsible for the TOE and its operational environment has measures in place to establish trust into and train users of the TOE commensurate with the extent of authorization that these users are given on the TOE. Página 6 de 16
7 For example, super users and users that are assigned similar privileges are assumed to be fully trustworthy and capable of operating the TOE in a secure manner abiding by the guidance provided to them. A.NetworkSegregation. It is assumed that the network interfaces that allow access to the TOE s user interfaces are in a management network that is separated from the UU, S1 and X2 interface networks. A.Support. The operational environment must provide the following supporting mechanisms to the TOE: Reliable time stamps for the generation of audit records. A.SecurePKI. There exists a well managed protected public key infrastructure. The certificates used by the TOE and its client are managed by the PKI. CLARIFICATIONS ON NON-COVERED THREATS The following threats do not suppose a risk for the product Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100, although the agents implementing attacks have the attack potential according to the BASIC of CC-EAL3 and always fulfilling the usage assumptions and the proper security policies satisfaction. For any other threat not included in this list, the evaluation results of the product security properties and the associated certificate, do not guarantee any resistance. The threat agents can be categorized as either: Agent Description An eavesdropper from the management network served Eavesdropper by the TOE is able to intercept, and potentially modify or re-use the data that is being sent to the TOE. Internal An unauthorized agent who is connected to the attacker management network. An authorized user of the TOE who has been granted Restricted authority to access certain information and perform authorized user certain actions. In the first and second cases, the users are assumed to be potentially hostile with a clear motivation to get access to the data. In the last case, all authorized users of the TOE are entrusted with performing certain administrative or management activities with regard to the managed device. Consequently, organizational means are expected to be in place to establish a certain amount of trust into these users. However, accidental or casual attempts to perform actions or access data outside of their authorization are expected. The assumed security threats are listed below. Threats by Eavesdropper Threat: T1. InTransitConfiguration An eavesdropper in the management network succeeds in Attack accessing the content of the BS file while transferring, violating its confidentiality or integrity. Página 7 de 16
8 Asset Agent A3. In transit configuration data Eavesdropper Threat: T2. InTransitSoftware An eavesdropper in the management network succeeds in Attack accessing the content of the BS software/patches while transferring, violating its confidentiality or integrity. Asset A1.Software and patches Agent Eavesdropper Threats by Internal Attacker Threat: T3.UnwantedNetworkTraffic Unwanted network traffic sent to the TOE will cause the TOE s processing capacity for incoming network traffic to be consumed thus failing to process legitimate traffic. Attack This may further causes the TOE fails to respond to system control and security management operations. The TOE will be able to recover from this kind of situations. Asset A4. Service Agent Internal Attacker Threat: T4.UnauthenticatedAccess An attacker in the management network gains access to the TOE Attack disclosing or modifying the configuration data stored in the TOE in a way that is not detected. Asset A2.Stored configuration data Agent Internal Attacker Threats by restricted authorized user Threat: T5.UnauthorizedAccess An user of the TOE authorized to perform certain actions and Attack access certain information gains access to commands or information he is not authorized for. Asset A2.Stored configuration data Agent Restricted authorized user OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FUNCTIONALITY The product requires the cooperation from its operational environment to fulfil the requirements listed in its Security Target. This section identifies the IT security objectives that are to be satisfied by the imposing of technical or procedural requirements on the TOE operational environment. These security objectives are assumed by the Security Target to be permanently in place in the TOE environment. Página 8 de 16
9 With this purpose, the security objectives declared for the TOE operational environment are the following: OE. PhysicalProtection. The TOE (i.e., the complete system including attached interfaces) shall be protected against unauthorized physical access. OE.NetworkSegregation. The TOE environment shall assure that the network interfaces that allow access to the TOE s user interfaces are in a management network that is separated from the networks that the TOE serves over the UU and S1 and X2 interfaces. OE.TrustworthyUsers. Those responsible for the operation of the TOE and its operational environment must be trustworthy, and trained such that they are capable of securely managing the TOE and following the provided guidance. OE.Support. Those responsible for the operation of the TOE and its operational environment must ensure that the operational environment provides the following supporting mechanisms to the TOE: Reliable time stamps for the generation of audit records. OE. SecurePKI. There exists a well managed protected public key infrastructure. The certificates used by the TOE and its client are managed by the PKI. Página 9 de 16
10 ARCHITECTURE MINISTERIO DE LA PRESIDENCIA The TOE is pure software. OS and other software provided by particular products is TOE environment. The software architecture of the TOE is indicated in the following figure: Página 10 de 16
11 From the Logical point of view, the following figure includes the TOE Logical Scope, where all the connections to the TOE are indicated, and also the way the TOE is deployed in the different boards of the product. In the above diagrams, the content of the blue areas (excluding the grey boxes) are parts of the TOE. The TOE includes Operation and Maintenance (OM), Product Service, Transport Management, TRAN, CPBSP, Dopra SSP and HERT platform. Página 11 de 16
12 DOCUMENTS MINISTERIO DE LA PRESIDENCIA The product includes the following documents that shall be distributed and made available together to the users of the evaluated version: Security Target of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software v2.6 Oct 2011 Undocumented MML Description LTE v0.3 Nov 2011 Installation Guide of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb (AGD_PRE) v0.22 Undocumented MML Description HERT-BBU v0.1 Oct 2011 HERT-BBU MML Command Reference V200R007 LTE MML Command Reference V100R004C00SPC100 Security Management Guide of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software v0.1 Functional Specification of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software (ADV_FSP) v0.50 Nov 2011 Functional Specification of Huawei BS Annexes v0.3 Nov 2011 PRODUCT TESTING The evaluator, as part as the independent tests, has: repeated a sample of the developer tests, following his procedures in order to gain confidence in the results obtained. executed their own test scenarios to operate the TOE. The main objective when repeating the developer tests is to execute enough tests to confirm the validity of their results. The evaluator has repeated the whole set of the test cases specified in the developer testing documentation and has compared the obtained results with those obtained by the developer and documented in each associated report. For all the test cases, the obtained results were consistent with those obtained by the developer, obtaining in all of them a positive result. The evaluator considers that both the TSFIs and subsystem tests defined by the developer are correct having checked that the results obtained when repeating the tests are the same than the results obtained by the developer. Regarding the independent tests, the evaluator has designed a set of tests following a suitable strategy for the TOE type taking into account: increasing test coverage of each interface varying the input parameters: search for critical parameters in the TSFIs interactions, incorrect behaviour suspicion with specific input values; complete coverage of all the SFRs defined in the security target. Página 12 de 16
13 The evaluator has designed his TSFIs and subsystems independent test cases including all the external interfaces. Moreover, the evaluator has carried out tests with parameters of the TSFIs and subsystems that could have special importance in the maintenance of the TOE security. The evaluator has designed his TSFIs and subsystems independent test cases including all the security requirements defined in the security target. The process has verified each unit test, checking that the security functionality that covers is been identified and also that the kind of test is appropriate to the function that is intended to test. The TOE configuration or setup is described in each test. Evaluator devised test results are consistent with the expected results. All the tests have been developed using the testing scenario appropriate to the established architecture in the security target. It has also been checked that the obtained results during the tests fit or correspond to the previously estimated results. The evaluator examined the design specification and test documentation, concluding that all the modules functionality are tested. Therefore, all TSFIs are fully tested. The evaluator verified that TSFI were tested in test plan. The test procedures mapped all TSFI to SFRenforcing modules. The result of independent tests was successfully performed and there were neither inconsistencies nor deviations between the actual and the expected results. PENETRATION TESTING The approach of the penetration testing focused on testing the weakest points of the TOE by design or by technologies that are commonly known to be easy to exploit. The independent penetration testing devised attack vector and performed test cases covering the following attacks categories for this TOE: Audit, Covert channels, security mechanisms bypass, code injection, protocol attacks EVALUATED CONFIGURATION The TOE is defined by its name and version number: Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100. The hardware platform used to deploy the TOE is BBU3900 (environment, not evaluated). The following components were used as environment during the evaluation: An M2000 server providing access to the management functions of the TOE via SSL. M2000 version must be imanager M2000 Version 2 Release11 C01 CP1301. (Common Criteria EAL3+ALC_CMC.4+ALC_CMS.4 evaluated version). LTE enodeb Operating System: Vxworks, version (environment, not evaluated). Página 13 de 16
14 EVALUATION RESULTS MINISTERIO DE LA PRESIDENCIA The product Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software, version V100R004C00SPC100 has been evaluated against the Security Target of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software, v.2.6 ; October 17 th, All the assurance components required by the level EAL3+ (ALC_CMC.4; ALC_CMS.4) have been assigned a PASS verdict. Consequently, the laboratory EPOCHE & ESPRI assigns the PASS VERDICT to the whole evaluation due all the evaluator actions are satisfied for the EAL3+ (ALC_CMC.4; ALC_CMS.4) methodology, as define by of the Common Criteria [CC-P3] and the Common Methodology [CEM]. COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE EVALUATION TEAM In this section, several important aspects that could influence the use of the product, taking into account the scope of the findings of the evaluation and its security target, are listed. The TOE usage is recommended given that there are not exploitable vulnerabilities in the operational environment. Nonetheless, the following usage recommendations are given: The management network shall be a secure network, free of attackers. The fulfilment of the OE.SecurePKI must be strictly observed due to the intensive use of TLS/SSL to ensure the communications security. It is very important the adequate fulfilling of the installation procedures; the installation procedure may be vulnerable if those procedures are not followed. The operators of the product shall perfectly know the contents of all the products manuals, including the functional specification which contains the use details of the BIN interfaces and the recommended secure values. The functional specification provides an access control table specifying the BIN and MML commands available to each user group. According to the assumption A.TrustworthyUsers described in the security target, each user will be trusted commensurate with their privileges. As the privileges of a user are given by the above mentioned rights table, it is assumed that each user will behave correctly in the use of its allowed commands. It should be noted that, for example, a user from the group G_1 (role USER), has enough rights to disable some security features of the TOE, moving the TOE to an unsecured state (e.g. SET FTPSCLT, SET SSLAUTHMODE, DLD SOFTWARE ). Moreover, a user from the group G_20 (role GUEST), has enough rights to connect to the underlying operating system using Serial Port Operation commands. This problem is although covered with the assumption A.TrustworthyUsers which supposes highly qualified and trustworthy TOE users. CERTIFIER RECOMMENDATIONS Considering the obtained evidences during the instruction of the certification request of the product Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software V100R004C00SPC100, a positive resolution is proposed. Página 14 de 16
15 Additionally, the Certification Body recommends potential users to observe the following recommendations extracted from the TOE s user guidance: The TOE s consuming organizations should develop and implement a Security Policy to review and delete TOE s expired user accounts. The TOE is not able to deny access to users whose accounts have an expired password. This SFR is not declared within the TOE s Security Target. The TOE s consuming organizations should develop and implement a Security Policy to notify and force users to reset their user password in case changes are made in the TOE s Password Policy. The TOE is not able to notify users or enforce modifications in the user accounts if a modification in the password policy is made after a user password is created. This SFR is not declared within the TOE s Security Target. The TOE s consuming organizations should develop and implement a Security Policy to force OS to lock user sessions in those terminals which are left unattended while sessions are established with the TOE from the client side, or force TOE s users to disconnect the client from the TOE before leaving their terminal unattended. This certification is recognised under the terms of the [CCRA] for components up to EAL3+ (ALC_CMC.4; ALC_CMS.4) and it is also covered by the [SOGIS], but only for components until EAL2. GLOSSARY CCN Centro Criptológico Nacional CNI Centro Nacional de Inteligencia EAL Evaluation Assurance Level OS Operating System TOE Target Of Evaluation BIBLIOGRAPHY The following standards and documents have been used for the evaluation of the product: [CC_P1] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 1: Introduction and general model, Version 3.1, R3 Final, July [CC_P2] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security functional components, Version 3.1, R3 Final, July [CC_P3] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security assurance components, Version 3.1, R3 Final, July [CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation: Version 3.1, R3 Final, July Página 15 de 16
16 SECURITY TARGET MINISTERIO DE LA PRESIDENCIA Along with this certification report, the complete security target of the evaluation is available in the Certification Body: Security Target of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Software, v2.6 ; October 17th, Página 16 de 16
CERTIFICATION REPORT
REF: 2010-24-INF-831 v1 Target: Público Date: 07.03.2012 Created by: CERT3 Revised by: CALIDAD Approved by: TECNICO CERTIFICATION REPORT File: 2010-24 Huawei BSC6900 Multimode Base Station Controller (MBSC)
MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA CENTRO NACIONAL DE INTELIGENCIA CENTRO CRIPTOLÓGICO NACIONAL ORGANISMO DE CERTIFICACIÓN
REF: 2010-22-INF-764 V1 Distribution: Expediente Date: 21.11.2011 Created: CERT3 Reviewed: CALIDAD Approbed: TECNICO CERTIFICATION REPORT FOR FOR HUAWEI INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT APPLICATION PLATFORM VERSION
MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA CENTRO NACIONAL DE INTELIGENCIA CENTRO CRIPTOLÓGICO NACIONAL ORGANISMO DE CERTIFICACIÓN CERTIFICATION REPORT
REF: 2010-15-INF-681 v1 Difusión: Expediente Fecha: 05.07.2011 Creado: CERT2 Revisado: TECNICO Aprobado: JEFEAREA CERTIFICATION REPORT Expediente: 2010-15 Datos del solicitante: 440301192W HUAWEI References:
MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA CENTRO NACIONAL DE INTELIGENCIA CENTRO CRIPTOLÓGICO NACIONAL ORGANISMO DE CERTIFICACIÓN CERTIFICATION REPORT
REF: 2010-16-INF-682 v2 Difusión: Expediente Fecha: 13.07.2011 Creado: CERT2 Revisado: TECNICO Aprobado: JEFEAREA CERTIFICATION REPORT Expediente: 2010-16 Datos del solicitante: 440301192W HUAWEI References:
MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA CENTRO NACIONAL DE INTELIGENCIA CENTRO CRIPTOLÓGICO NACIONAL ORGANISMO DE CERTIFICACIÓN
REF: 2010-12-INF-626 V1 Distribution: Public Date: 29.04.2011 Created: CERT3 Reviewed: TECNICO Approved: JEFEAREA CERTIFICATION REPORT FOR EADS GROUND SEGMENT SYSTEMS PROTECTION PROFILE (GSS-PP) ISSUE
CERTIFICATION REPORT
REF: 2011-11-INF-837 v1 Target: Público Date: 17.04.2012 Created by: CERT8 Revised by: CALIDAD Approved by: TECNICO CERTIFICATION REPORT File: 2011-11 KONA 102J1 epassport EAC v1.1 Applicant: KEBTechnology
Mobile Billing System Security Target
Mobile Billing System Security Target Common Criteria: EAL1 Version 1.2 25 MAY 11 Document management Document identification Document ID Document title Product version IDV_EAL1_ASE IDOTTV Mobile Billing
Huawei BSC6900 Multimode Base Station Controller Software Security Target
Huawei BSC6900 Multimode Base Station Controller Software Security Version: 1.07 Last Update: 2011-12-20 Author: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Page 1/ 58 Index 1 Introduction... 5 1.1 Security Reference...
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report TM HP Network Node Management Advanced Edition Software V7.51 with patch PHSS_35278 Report
CERTIFICATION REPORT
REF: 2011-12-INF-1089 v1 Target: Expediente Date: 17.12.2012 Created by: CERT8 Revised by: CALIDAD Approved by: TECNICO CERTIFICATION REPORT File: 2011-12 POLYMNIE LDS BAC applet Applicant: B340709534
Microsoft Forefront UAG 2010 Common Criteria Evaluation Security Target Microsoft Forefront Unified Access Gateway Team
Microsoft Forefront UAG 2010 Common Criteria Evaluation Security Target Microsoft Forefront Unified Access Gateway Team Author: Microsoft Corp. Version: 1.0 Last Saved: 2011-03-10 File Name: MS_UAG_ST_1.0.docx
SAMSUNG SDS FIDO Server Solution V1.1 Certification Report
KECS-CR-15-73 SAMSUNG SDS FIDO Server Solution V1.1 Certification Report Certification No.: KECS-ISIS-0645-2015 2015. 9. 10 IT Security Certification Center History of Creation and Revision No. Date Revised
Firewall Protection Profile V2.0 2008. 4. 24
Firewall Protection Profile V2.0 2008. 4. 24 (This page left blank on purpose for double-side printing) Protection Profile Title Firewall Protection Profile for Government Evaluation Criteria Version This
CA CA, Inc. Identity Manager 12.5 Identity Manager r12.1 Security Target
CA CA, Inc. Identity Manager 12.5 Identity Manager r12.1 Security Target Version 2.0 June Version 21, 2010 0.6 December 29, 2008 Prepared for: Prepared CA for: 100 Staples CA, Inc. Drive Framingham, 100
Certification Report StoneGate FW/VPN 5.2.5
Ärendetyp: 6 Diarienummer: 11FMV3127-87:1 Dokument ID HEMLIG/ enligt Offentlighets- och sekretesslagen (2009:400) 2012-01-23 Country of origin: Sweden Försvarets materielverk Swedish Certification Body
Security Target of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Access control Software. Version: 3.0 Last Update: 2014-11-24 Author: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Security Target of Huawei 3900 Series LTE enodeb Access control Software Version: 3.0 Last Update: 2014-11-24 Author: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 7 1.1. ST Reference
Huawei WCDMA NodeB Software Security Target
Huawei WCDMA NodeB Software Version: 1.19 Last Update: 2011-11-11 Author: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 7 1.1. ST REFERENCE...7 1.2. TOE REFERENCE... 7 1.3. TOE OVERVIEW...
EMC Corporation Data Domain Operating System Version 5.2.1.0. Security Target. Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL): EAL2+ Document Version: 0.
EMC Corporation Data Domain Operating System Version 5.2.1.0 Security Target Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL): EAL2+ Document Version: 0.11 Prepared for: Prepared by: EMC Corporation 176 South Street Hopkinton,
MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA CENTRO NACIONAL DE INTELIGENCIA CENTRO CRIPTOLÓGICO NACIONAL ORGANISMO DE CERTIFICACIÓN
REF: 2009-3-INF-512 V1 Distribution: Public Date: 24.08.2010 Created: CERT8 Reviewed: TECNICO Approved: JEFEAREA CERTIFICATION REPORT FOR TRUSTEDX v3.0.10s1r1_t (virtual and HW appliance versions) Dossier:
Secuware Virtual System (SVS)
Secuware Virtual System (SVS) SECURITY TARGET EAL2 Copyright 2008 by SECUWARE All rights reserved. The information in this document is exclusive property of SECUWARE and may not be changed without express
C038 Certification Report
C038 Certification Report TAXSAYA Online File name: Version: v1a Date of document: 15 August 2013 Document classification: For general inquiry about us or our services, please email: [email protected]
Security Target. NetIQ Access Manager 4.0. Document Version 1.13. August 7, 2014. Security Target: NetIQ Access Manager 4.0
Security Target NetIQ Access Manager 4.0 Document Version 1.13 August 7, 2014 Document Version 1.13 NetIQ Page 1 of 36 Prepared For: Prepared By: NetIQ, Inc. 1233 West Loop South Suite 810 Houston, TX
Build a CC assurance package dedicated to your risk assessment. Francois GUERIN Security Program Manager francois.guerin@gemalto.
Build a CC assurance package dedicated to your risk assessment Francois GUERIN Security Program Manager [email protected] Gemplus & Axalto merge into Gemalto 1.7 billion in combined pro-forma
JMCS Northern Light Video Conferencing System Security Target
JMCS Northern Light Video Conferencing System Security Target Common Criteria: EAL2 Version 1.2 22 FEB 12 Document management Document identification Document ID Document title Product version NLVC_ST_EAL2
Protection Profile for Server Virtualization
Protection Profile for Server Virtualization 29 October 2014 Version 1.0 i 0 Preface 0.1 Objectives of Document This document presents the Common Criteria (CC) Protection Profile (PP) to express the fundamental
How To Understand The Toe
Rapid7 Nexpose Vulnerability Management and Penetration Testing System V.5.1 Security Target Version 1.7 May 11, 2012 Prepared for: Rapid7 LLC 545 Boylston Street, Suite 400 Boston, MA 02116 Prepared By:
EPASSPORT WITH BASIC ACCESS CONTROL AND ACTIVE AUTHENTICATION
COMMON CRITERIA PROTECTION PROFILE EPASSPORT WITH BASIC ACCESS CONTROL AND ACTIVE AUTHENTICATION Draft Version 1.0 TURKISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Common Criteria Protection Profile...
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 3+ Evaluation of Rapid7 Nexpose Vulnerability Management and Penetration Testing System V5.1 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian
Security Target. Symantec TM Network Access Control Version 12.1.2. Document Version 0.12. February 14, 2013
Security Target Symantec TM Network Access Control Version 12.1.2 Document Version 0.12 February 14, 2013 Document Version 0.12 Symantec Page 1 of 39 Prepared For: Prepared By: Symantec Corporation 350
Security Target. Astaro Security Gateway V8 Packet Filter Version 1.000. Assurance Level EAL4+ Common Criteria v3.1
Astaro Security Gateway V8 Packet Filter Version 1.000 Assurance Level EAL4+ Common Criteria v3.1 This Security Target also covers the secunet wall 2 packet filter Version : 1.03 Date: 2011-05-20 Author:
Joint Interpretation Library. Guidance for smartcard evaluation
Joint Interpretation Library Guidance for smartcard evaluation Version 2.0 February 2010 Table of content 1. REFERENCES 5 2. OBJECTIVE 6 3. SMARTCARD PRODUCT PRESENTATION AND DEFINITIONS 7 3.1. Glossary
Marimba Client and Server Management from BMC Software Release 6.0.3
Marimba Client and Server Management from BMC Software Release 6.0.3 Version 2.3.0 4 June, 2007 Prepared by: BMC Software, Inc. 2101 City West Blvd. Houston, Texas 77042 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...
Xceedium GateKeeper Version 5.2.1 Security Target
ceedium GateKeeper Version 521 Security Target February 3, 2011 Prepared for: ceedium, Inc 30 Montgomery Street Jersey City, NJ 07302 Prepared By: Science Applications International Corporation Common
imanager M2000 Security Target Version: 1.20 Last Update: 2011-09-08 Author: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
imanager M2000 Security Target Version: 1.20 Last Update: 2011-09-08 Author: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Table of contents Table of Contents IMANAGER M2000... 1 SECURITY TARGET... ERROR! MARCADOR NO
Security Target. McAfee Enterprise Mobility Management 9.7. Document Version 0.9. July 5, 2012
Security Target McAfee Enterprise Mobility Management 9.7 Document Version 0.9 July 5, 2012 Document Version 0.9 McAfee Page 1 of 39 Prepared For: Prepared By: McAfee, Inc. 2821 Mission College Blvd. Santa
McAfee Web Gateway Version 7.2.0.1 EAL 2 + ALC_FLR.2 Security Target
McAfee Web Gateway Version 7.2.0.1 EAL 2 + ALC_FLR.2 Release Date: 5 October 2012 Version: 1.0 Prepared By: Primasec Ltd. Prepared For: McAfee Inc. 3965 Freedom Circle Santa Clara, CA 95054 Document Introduction
Security Target. Securonix Security Intelligence Platform 4.0. Document Version 1.12. January 9, 2015
Security Target Securonix Security Intelligence Platform 4.0 Document Version 1.12 January 9, 2015 Document Version 1.12 Copyright Securonix Page 1 of 41 Prepared For: Prepared By: Securonix 5777 W. Century
Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation. Part 3: Security assurance components. September 2012. Version 3.
Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 3: Security assurance components September 2012 Version 3.1 Revision 4 CCMB-2012-09-003 Foreword This version of the Common Criteria
gateprotect Firewall Packet-Filtering-Core v10.3 Security Target Version:
Version: Status: Last Update: Classification: 1.0 Release 2013-02-08 public Legal tice This document is provided AS IS with no express or implied warranties. Use the information in this document at your
Korean National Protection Profile for Voice over IP Firewall V1.0 Certification Report
KECS-CR-16-36 Korean National Protection Profile for Voice over IP Firewall V1.0 Certification Report Certification No.: KECS-PP-0717-2016 2016. 6. 10 IT Security Certification Center History of Creation
BMC Real End User Experience Monitoring and Analytics 2.5. Security Target
BMC Real End User Experience Monitoring and Analytics 2.5 Security Target Version 0.07 5 March 2015 Copyright 2015 BMC Software, Inc. All rights reserved. BMC, BMC Software, and the BMC Software logo
Common Criteria Evaluation for a Trusted Entrust/PKI
Common Criteria Evaluation for a Trusted Entrust/PKI Author: Marc Laroche Date: March 2000 Version: 2.0 2000, Entrust, Inc. Entrust is a registered trademark of Entrust Technologies Inc. in the United
Security Target. McAfee Enterprise Mobility Management 12.0. Document Version 1.16
Security Target McAfee Enterprise Mobility Management 12.0 Document Version 1.16 September 17, 2014 Prepared For: Prepared By: McAfee, Inc. 2821 Mission College Blvd. Santa Clara, CA 95054 Primasec Ltd
How To Evaluate A Security Target Of Evaluation (Toe)
Security Target McAfee Enterprise Security Manager with Event Receiver, Enterprise Log Manager, Advanced Correlation Engine, Application Data Monitor and Database Event Monitor 9.1 Document Version 1.1
C015 Certification Report
C015 Certification Report NexCode National Security Suite Release 3 File name: Version: v1a Date of document: 15 June 2011 Document classification: For general inquiry about us or our services, please
SECURITY TARGET FOR FORTIANALYZER V4.0 MR3 CENTRALIZED REPORTING
SECURITY TARGET FOR FORTIANALYZER V4.0 MR3 CENTRALIZED REPORTING Document No. 1735-005-D0001 Version: 1.0, 3 June 2014 Prepared for: Fortinet, Incorporated 326 Moodie Drive Ottawa, Ontario Canada, K2H
Guidelines for Developer Documentation
Guidelines for Developer Documentation according to Common Criteria Version 3.1 Version 1.0 Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik Postfach 20 03 63 53133 Bonn Phone: +49 (0)3018 9582-111
Extreme Networks, Inc. ExtremeXOS Network Operating System v12.3.6.2
Extreme Networks, Inc. ExtremeXOS Network Operating System v12.3.6.2 Security Target Evaluation Assurance Level: EAL3+ Document Version: 0.9 Prepared for: Prepared by: Extreme Networks, Inc. 3585 Monroe
Trust Technology Assessment Program. Validation Report
Trust Technology Assessment Program Validation Report U.S. Government Traffic Filter Firewall Protection Profile for Low-Risk Environments version 1.1 TTAP Report Number: TTAP-VR-0007 June, 1999 Mutual
C033 Certification Report
C033 Certification Report Mobile Billing System File name: Version: v1a Date of document: 15 June 2011 Document classification: For general inquiry about us or our services, please email: [email protected]
U.S. Government Protection Profile for Database Management Systems
U.S. Government Protection Profile for Database Management Systems Information Assurance Directorate Version 1.3 December 24, 2010 Protection Profile Title: 1 U.S. Government Protection Profile for Database
Extended Package for Mobile Device Management Agents
Extended Package for Mobile Device Management Agents 31 December 2014 Version 2.0 REVISION HISTORY Version Date Description 1.0 21 October 2013 Initial Release 1.1 7 February 2014 Typographical changes
SenSage, Inc. SenSage 4.6.2. Security Target. Evaluation Assurance Level: EAL2+ Document Version: 1.2
SenSage, Inc. SenSage 4.6.2 Security Target Evaluation Assurance Level: EAL2+ Document Version: 1.2 Prepared for: Prepared by: SenSage, Inc. 55 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 United States of
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 4+ Evaluation of Entrust Authority Security Manager and Security Manager Administration v8.1 SP1 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian
Supporting Document Guidance. Security Architecture requirements (ADV_ARC) for smart cards and similar devices. April 2012. Version 2.
Supporting Document Guidance Security Architecture requirements (ADV_ARC) for smart cards and similar devices April 2012 Version 2.0 CCDB-2012-04-003 Foreword This is a supporting document, intended to
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 4 Evaluation of SecureDoc Disk Encryption Version 4.3C Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification
Security Target. Symantec Data Loss Prevention 11.1.1. Document Version 1.0. January 23, 2012
Security Target Symantec Data Loss Prevention 11.1.1 Document Version 1.0 January 23, 2012 Document Version 1.0 Symantec Corporation Page 1 of 40 Prepared For: Prepared By: Symantec Corporation 350 Ellis
Enterasys Networks, Inc. Netsight/Network Access Control v3.2.2. Security Target
Enterasys Networks, Inc. Netsight/Network Access Control v3.2.2 Security Target Evaluation Assurance Level: EAL2+ Document Version: 0.7 Prepared for: Prepared by: Enterasys Networks, Inc. Corsec Security,
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 3+ Evaluation of Extreme Networks ExtremeXOS Network Operating System v12.3.6.2 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria
EAL4+ Security Target
EAL4+ Security Target Common Criteria: EAL4 augmented with ALC_FLR.3 Version 1.0 21-DEC-10 Document management Document identification Document ID Document title Release authority E14_EAL4_ASE Microsoft
Fingerprint Spoof Detection Protection Profile
Fingerprint Spoof Detection Protection Profile based on Organisational Security Policies FSDPP_OSP v1.7 Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik Postfach 20 03 63 53133 Bonn Tel.: +49 228 99
FOR EAL2 AUGMENTED WITH ALC_FLR.1. Version: 1.2 November 20, 2013
SECURITY TARGET FOR A10 NETWORKS THUNDER 5430S AND 6430S APPLICATIONS DELIVERY CONTROLLERS EAL2 AUGMENTED WITH ALC_FLR.1 Version: 1.2 November 20, 2013 DENMARK FINLAND NORWAY SWEDEN THE NETHERLANDS www.secode.no
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 3+ Evaluation of AccessData Cyber Intelligence and Response Technology v2.1.2 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 4+ Evaluation of WatchGuard Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme Government of
Supporting Document Guidance. Smartcard Evaluation. February 2010. Version 2.0 CCDB-2010-03-001
Supporting Document Guidance Smartcard Evaluation February 2010 Version 2.0 CCDB-2010-03-001 Foreword This is a supporting document, intended to complement the Common Criteria and the Common Evaluation
Certification Report
Certification Report HP Network Automation Ultimate Edition 10.10 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme Government
Joint Interpretation Library
for smart cards and similar devices Document purpose: provide requirements to developers and guidance to evaluators to fulfill the Security Architecture requirements of CC V3 ADV_ARC family. Version 2.0
Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation. Evaluation methodology. September 2012. Version 3.1 Revision 4 CCMB-2012-09-004
Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation Evaluation methodology September 2012 Version 3.1 Revision 4 CCMB-2012-09-004 Foreword This version of the Common Methodology for Information
How To Evaluate Watchguard And Fireware V11.5.1
Certification Report EAL 4+ Evaluation of WatchGuard and Fireware XTM Operating System v11.5.1 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation
Protection Profile for Portable Storage Media (PSMPP) Common Criteria Protection Profile BSI-CC-PP-0081-2012 Version 1.0
Protection Profile for Portable Storage Media (PSMPP) Common Criteria Protection Profile BSI-CC-PP-0081-2012 Version 1.0 German Federal Office for Information Security PO Box 20 03 63 D-53133 Bonn Tel.:
GuardianEdge Data Protection Framework 9.0.1 with GuardianEdge Hard Disk Encryption 9.0.1 and GuardianEdge Removable Storage Encryption 3.0.
GuardianEdge Data Protection Framework 9.0.1 with GuardianEdge Hard Disk Encryption 9.0.1 and GuardianEdge Removable Storage Encryption 3.0.1 Security Target Version 2.01 Common Criteria EAL4 augmented
Trustwave DbProtect Version 6.4.3 Security Target
Trustwave DbProtect Version 6.4.3 Security Target Version 1.8 July 21, 2015 Trustwave 70 West Madison Street Suite 1050 Chicago, IL 60602 Prepared By: Common Criteria Consulting LLC 15804 Laughlin Lane
Security Target: Symantec Endpoint Protection Version 11.0
Security Target: Symantec Endpoint Protection Version 11.0 ST Version 1.6 June 2, 2008 Document Version 1.6 Symantec Corporation Page 1 of 68 Prepared For: Prepared By: Symantec Corporation 20330 Stevens
Certification Report
Certification Report McAfee Network Security Platform v7.1 (M-series sensors) Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification
Teradata Database Version 2 Release 6.1.0 (V2R6.1.0) Security Target
Teradata Database Version 2 Release 6.1.0 (V2R6.1.0) Security Target Version 2.0 February 2007 TRP Number: 541-0006458 NCR, Teradata and BYNET are registered trademarks of NCR Corporation. Microsoft, Windows,
DataPower XS40 XML Security Gateway and DataPower XI50 Integration Appliance Version 3.6. Security Target Version 0.75
DataPower S40 ML Security Gateway and DataPower I50 Integration Appliance Version 3.6 Security Target Version 0.75 10/09/2008 Prepared for: IBM SOA Appliance Group One Rogers St Cambridge, MA 02142 Prepared
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 2 Evaluation of Revenue Administration Department of Turkey/Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı Common Criteria Protection Profile for New Generation Cash Register Fiscal Application Software-2
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 3+ Evaluation of RSA envision platform v4.0 SP 1 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification
Forefront Identity Manager (FIM) 2010
Forefront Identity Manager (FIM) 2010 Security Target Common Criteria: EAL4 augmented with ALC_FLR.3 Version 1.0 24-MAR-2012 Document history Version Date Description 0.1 28-APR-11 Initial draft for review.
Certification Report
Certification Report HP Universal CMDB and Universal Discovery v10.21 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme Government
McAfee Web Gateway Version 7.0.1.1 EAL 2 + ALC_FLR.2 Security Target
McAfee Web Gateway Version 7.0.1.1 EAL 2 + ALC_FLR.2 Security Target Release Date: September 2010 Document ID: Version: Draft J Prepared By: Primasec Ltd. Prepared For: McAfee Inc. 3965 Freedom Circle
U.S. Government Protection Profile for Application-level Firewall In Basic Robustness Environments
U.S. Government Protection Profile for Application-level Firewall In Basic Robustness Environments Information Assurance Directorate Version 1.1 July 25, 2007 Forward This Protection Profile US Government
Check Point Endpoint Security Media Encryption Security Target
Check Point Endpoint Security Media Encryption Security Target Version 1.0 June 23, 2010 Prepared for: 5 Ha Solelim St. Tel Aviv, Israel 67897 Prepared By: Science Applications International Corporation
Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation. Part 2: Security functional components. September 2007. Version 3.
Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Part 2: Security functional components September 2007 Version 3.1 Revision 2 CCMB-2007-09-002 Foreword This version of the Common Criteria
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 2+ Evaluation of Symantec Endpoint Protection Version 12.1.2 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and
