Purdue Research Foundation
|
|
|
- Colin Richards
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 PQRS: Leveraging Technology to Improve Quality and Ease Reporting Burdens Tara Hatfield RN, BSN, CHTS-CP Managing Advisor MU/PQRS Purdue Healthcare Advisors
3 Objectives Understand the impact of the PQRS program on their practice Identify strategies to fully utilize their EHR to improve quality Identify methods of aligning different quality reporting programs to ease the administrative burden of annual data submissions
4 What is PQRS? PQRS is a quality reporting program designed to promote reporting of quality data from eligible providers (EP) to CMS Identifies areas for quality improvement and clinical excellence
5 Who is eligible for PQRS Any provider who has Medicare Part B claims is eligible for PQRS Payment adjustments (penalties) and should report PQRS List includes: physicians, NP, PA, therapists, dieticians, social workers, etc.
6 PQRS Payment Adjustment
7 What is required to report PQRS? To report PQRS successfully, 9 measures of 3 NQS domains must be reported for at least 50% of all Medicare Part B beneficiaries Performance rate must be greater than 0%
8 What are the methods to report PQRS? Individual Reporting Claims-based PQRS Registry Direct EHR Data Submission Vendor Clinical Quality Data Registry GPRO reporting PQRS Registry Direct EHR Data Submission Vendor Clinical Quality Data Registry Web Interface (groups of 25+) CG-CAHPS Survey plus one other reporting method
9 Direct EHR Submission and Data Submission Vendor Direct EHR Submit PQRS quality measure data directly from the CEHRT (certified electronic health record technology) to CMS via QRDA file Measures must be from June 2013 ecqmmeasures specifications Data Submission Vendor Submission Vendor is an entity that collects an individual EP s or group practice s clinical quality data directly from the EP s or group practice s CEHRT
10 Documentation is Key PQRS measures are dependent on patients diagnosis (denominator) and the clinical action performed (numerator) Accurate and timely documentation is imperative Problem lists, med list, orders, etc
11 Documentation is Key If it wasn t documented it wasn t done PQRS performance rates are based on clinical actions Cpt codes, G-codes, quality data codes (QDC) When a clinical action is documented in structured format, it will count in the numerator in your PQRS report
12 Example: Lab focused measure Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control (PQRS #1) Description: Percentage of patients years of age with diabetes who had hemoglobin A1c > 9.0% during the measurement period
13 Denominator Criteria (Eligible Cases): Patients 18 through 75 years of age on date of encounter (Demographics) AND Diagnosis for diabetes (ICD-9-CM) [for use 1/1/2015-9/30/2015]: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 357.2, , , , , , , , , , , , , (Problem list) AND Patient encounter during reporting period (CPT or HCPCS): 97802, 97803, 97804, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99211,99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, 99217, 99218, 99219, 99220, 99221, 99222, 99223, 99231, 99232, 99233, 99238, 99239, 99281(E&M, RFV)
14 NUMERATOR: Patients whose most recent HbA1c level (performed during the measurement period) is > 9.0% Patient is numerator compliant if most recent HbA1c level >9% or is missing a result or if an HbA1c test was not done during the measurement year. Numerator Quality-Data Coding Options for Reporting Satisfactorily: Most Recent Hemoglobin A1c Level > 9.0% Performance Met: CPT II 3046F: Most recent hemoglobin A1c level > 9.0% OR Hemoglobin A1c not Performed, Reason not Otherwise Specified Append a reporting modifier (8P) to CPT Category II code 3046F to report circumstances when the action described in the numerator is not performed and the reason is not otherwise specified. ***Lab results entered as structure data (manual or via interface) is key!
15 Example: Medication focused measure Osteoporosis: Pharmacologic Therapy for Men and Women Aged 50 Years and Older (PQRS # 41) Description: Percentage of patients aged 50 years and older with a diagnosis of osteoporosiswho were prescribed pharmacologic therapy within 12 months
16 Denominator Criteria (Eligible Cases): Patients aged 50 years on date of encounter (Demographics) AND Diagnosis for osteoporosis (ICD-9-CM) [for use 1/1/2015-9/30/2015]: , , , , Diagnosis for osteoporosis (ICD-10-CM) [for use 10/01/ /31/2015]: M80.00XA, M80.00XD, M80.00XG, M80.00XK, M80.00XP, M80.00XS, M80.011A, M80.011D, M80.011G, M80.011K, M80.011P, M80.011S, M80.012A, M80.012D, M80.012G, M80.012K, M80.012P, M80.012S, M80.019A, M80.019D, M80.019G, M80.019K, M80.019P, M80.019S, M80.021A, M80.021D, M80.021G, M80.021K, M80.021P, M80.021S, M80.022A, M80.022D, M80.022G, M80.022K, M80.022P, M80.022S, M80.029A, M80.029D, M80.029G, M80.029K, M80.029P, M80.029S, M80.031A, M80.031D, M80.031G, M80.031K, M80.031P, M80.031S, M80.032A, M80.032D, M80.032G, M80.032K, M80.032P, M80.032S, M80.039A, M80.039D, M80.039G, M80.039K, M80.039P, M80.039S, M80.041A, M80.041D, M80.041G, M80.041K, M80.041P, M80.041S, M80.042A, M80.042D, M80.042G, M80.042K, M80.042P, M80.042S, M80.049A, M80.049D (Problem List) AND Patient encounter during the reporting period (CPT or HCPCS): 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, G0402 (E&M, RFV)
17 NUMERATOR: Patients who were prescribed pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis within 12 months Numerator Quality-Data Coding Options for Reporting Satisfactorily: Pharmacologic Therapy Prescribed Performance Met: CPT II 4005F: Pharmacologic therapy (other than minerals/vitamins) for osteoporosis prescribed (CPOE, historical meds) OR Pharmacologic Therapy not Prescribed for Medical, Patient, or System Reasons Append a modifier (1P, 2P or 3P) to CPT Category II code 4005F to report documented circumstances that appropriately exclude patients from the denominator. Medical Performance Exclusion: 4005F with 1P: Documentation of medical reason(s) for not prescribing pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis
18 Example: Clinical action measure Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization (PQRS # 110) Description: Percentage of patients aged 6 months and older seen for a visit between October 1 and March 31who received an influenza immunization OR who reported previous receipt of an influenza immunization.
19 Denominator Criteria (Eligible Cases): Patients aged 6 months seen for a visit between October 1 and March 31 AND (Demographics) Patient encounter during the reporting period (CPT or HCPCS): 90945, 90947, 90951, 90952, 90953, 90954, 90955, 90956, 90957, 90958, 90959, 90960, 90961, 90962, 90963, 90964, 90965, 90966, 90967, 90968, 90969, 90970, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, 99304, 99305, 99306, 99307, 99308, 99309, 99310, 99315, 99316, 99324, 99325, 99326, 99327, 99328, 99334, 99335, 99336, 99337, 99341, 99342, 99343, 99344, 99345, 99347, 99348, 99349, 99350, G0438, G0439 (E&M, RFV)
20 NUMERATOR: Patients who received an influenza immunization OR who reported previous receipt of an influenza immunization Numerator Quality-Data Coding Options for Reporting Satisfactorily: Influenza Immunization Administered Performance Met: G8482: Influenza immunization administered or previously received (Ordered and documented as administered or documented in historical immunizations) OR Influenza Immunization not Administered for Documented Reasons Other Performance Exclusion: G8483:Influenza immunization was not administered for reasons documented by clinician (eg, patient allergy or other medical reasons, patient declined or other patient reasons, vaccine not available or other system reasons) (documented in results or check with vendor) (ordered and documented as not administered with reason)
21 Clinical Decision Support Rules Provider s Medical Knowledge Patient Data from the EHR CDSR Inference Engine Patient Specific Advice
22 Clinical Decision Support Rules Use your EHR s CDSR technology to help you remember to take appropriate clinical action Increase quality of care Increase performance rates for PQRS measures
23 Alignment with Meaningful Use Reporting PQRS via Direct EHR or DSV method will satisfy the MU Clinical Quality Measure reporting requirement and PQRS 9 measures across 3 NQS domains Get more use out of your CDSR functionality
24 Summary Get in the habit of consistently documenting as structured data Use your EHR functionality to help you Run your PQRS measure reports regularly Get all staff on board
25 Questions? Tara Hatfield RN, BSN, CHTS-CP, CPHPA Managing Advisor MU/EHR Purdue Healthcare Advisors Pha.purdue.edu
Measure #41: Osteoporosis: Pharmacologic Therapy for Men and Women Aged 50 Years and Older National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care
Measure #41: Osteoporosis: Pharmacologic Therapy for Men and Women Aged 50 Years and Older National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY
2016 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Claims and Registry Reporting of Individual Measures
2016 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Claims and Registry Reporting of Individual Measures Utilized by Individual Eligible Professionals for Claims
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Agenda A look at the CMS Website Finding your EMR version Certification Number Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare
12/5/2014. What is PQRS? Performance Measurement Committee Practical Theater. Historical concerns with the program (continued)
What is PQRS? Navigating CMS Quality Initiatives: How to Successfully Report and Avoid Payment Adjustments Performance Measurement Committee Practical Theater A federally mandated Medicare Part B quality
CMS PQRS and VBPM Incentive/Penalty Programs. Devin Detwiler Manager Quality Improvement Telligen
CMS PQRS and VBPM Incentive/Penalty Programs Devin Detwiler Manager Quality Improvement Telligen Free Resource to you Join our Network Engage providers and stakeholders in improvement initiatives through
2015 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide
2015 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide 1/15/2015; Revised Table of Contents Introduction... 3 PQRS Measure Selection Considerations... 6 Satisfactorily Report Measures...
How to Avoid 2016 Negative Payment Adjustments for CMS Medicare Quality Reporting Programs. September 17, 2014
How to Avoid 2016 Negative Payment Adjustments for CMS Medicare Quality Reporting Programs September 17, 2014 The Medicare Learning Network This MLN Connects National Provider Call (MLN Connects Call)
2014 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide 12/13/2013
2014 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS): Implementation Guide 12/13/2013 CPT only copyright 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 41 Table of Contents Page Introduction
Overview of the Development and Implementation of CAHPS for ACOs and PQRS. Sandra Adams, RN, BSN Lauren Fuentes, MPH.
CAHPS for ACOs and PQRS Overview of the Development and Implementation of CAHPS for ACOs and PQRS Sandra Adams, RN, BSN Lauren Fuentes, MPH July 10-11, 2014 Agenda Overview of the Medicare Shared Savings
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) And VBM (Value Based Modifier) A Primer on Present and Future Requirements
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) And VBM (Value Based Modifier) A Primer on Present and Future Requirements Brett Bernstein, MD, AGAF Chief Quality Officer, Beth Israel Ambulatory Endoscopy Services
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future. Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs- Past, Present, & Future Travis Broome, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 12/18/2012 Medicare-only Eligible Professionals Medicaid-only Eligible Professionals
Measure #1 (NQF 0059): Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care
Measure #1 (NQF 0059): Diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c Poor Control National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY DESCRIPTION: Percentage
DENOMINATOR: All female patients aged 65 years and older with a diagnosis of urinary incontinence
Measure #50: Urinary Incontinence: Plan of Care for Urinary Incontinence in Women Aged 65 Years and Older National Quality Strategy Domain: Person and Caregiver-Centered Experience and Outcomes 2016 PQRS
Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) What are CQMs?
Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) What are CQMs? What are CQMs? Clinical quality measures, or CQMs, are tools that help eligible providers (EPs) measure and track the quality of health care services provided
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.
CMS EHR Incentive Programs:
CMS EHR Incentive Programs: An Overview Meaningful Use Stages Vidya Sellappan Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of E-Health Standards and Services HIT Initiatives Group August 13, 2014 Table
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012 Overview CMS recently published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical
2015 PQRS Requirements: What Eligible Professionals Need to Know to Avoid the PQRS Penalty in 2017
2015 PQRS Requirements: What Eligible Professionals Need to Know to Avoid the PQRS Penalty in 2017 Presented by: Camille Bonta, MHS Summit Health Care Consulting Physician Quality Reporting System What
CPT Coding Update And Other Issues
CPT Coding Update And Other Issues Robert E. Smith, M.D. Alison Lynch, M.D. November 13, 2013 1 Disclaimer This information is for educational and informational purposes only, and represents the understanding
Understanding Meaningful Use. Review of Part 1 and Part 2
Understanding Meaningful Use Review of Part 1 and Part 2 Understanding Meaningful Use Pat Wise RN, MA, MS, FHIMSS COL (USA ret'd) Vice President, Healthcare Information Systems Meaningful Use Financial
Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program. Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2
Office of Medical Assistance Programs Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program Stage 2 Final Rule Update Part 2 November 7, 2012 Medical Assistance HIT Initiative 1 Office of Medical Assistance
Meaningful Use Qualification Plan
Meaningful Use Qualification Plan Overview Certified EHR technology used in a meaningful way is one piece of a broader Health Information Technology infrastructure intended to reform the health care system
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2015
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2015 The chart below lists the measures (and specialty exclusions) that eligible providers must
Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013
New York State-Health Centered Controlled Network (NYS HCCN) Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013 January 31, 2014 Ekem Merchant-Bleiberg, Director of Implementation Services
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) QCDR Reporting Overview. Program Year 2014
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) QCDR Reporting Overview Program Year 2014 Disclaimers This presentation was current at the time it was published or uploaded
STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs
EHR Incentive Programs A program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Eligible Professional s Guide to STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS...
0 What is Meaningful Use and where are we? 0 What is the Physician Quality Reporting System and where stage are we on?
Outline 0 What is Meaningful Use and where are we? 0 What is the Physician Quality Reporting System and where stage are we on? 0 How can we leverage the EMR to demonstrate the quality of our care? Meaningful
INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW
SPECIFICATION F MEASURES GROUP REPTING ONLY INFLAMMATY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD) MEASURES GROUP OVERVIEW 2012 PHYSICIAN QUALITY REPTING OPTIONS F MEASURES GROUPS: REGISTRY ONLY 2012 PHYSICIAN QUALITY REPTING
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3 Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015 Stage 2 Requirements 2015 EPs beyond 1st year of MU must report on a full year of data EPs in 1 st year
CMS s framework for Value Modifier
CMS s framework for Value Modifier Relationship between quality of care, cost composites and the Value Modifier Clinical Care Patient Experience Population/ Community Health Patient Safety Care Coordination
Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) 2015 2017 Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs. Updated November 2015
Minnesota EHR Incentive Program (MEIP) 2015 2017 Program Year Timeline for EPs, EHs and CAHs Updated November 2015 Glossary CAH Critical access hospitals CEHRT Certified electronic health record technology
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible and Eligible Professionals (EPs) Under the Electronic Health Record (EHR) meaningful use final rules established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Proposed Rule for Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Old The Changes The New Continuing Medical Education Disclaimer hi i if h i i S d Ch i This is to certify that Marnivia Spencer and Chris Hudson have disclosed
1/16/2015 HOW CLINICAL EDUCATORS CAN DISCLOSURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES MAKE MEANINGFUL USE MEANINGFUL. We have no financial disclosures
HOW CLINICAL EDUCATORS CAN MAKE MEANINGFUL USE MEANINGFUL Daryl Wieland, MD Tammy Gruenberg, MD Michelle Giannone, MD Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY DISCLOSURE We have no financial disclosures
9/9/2015. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program. Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits
Meaningful Use, Penalties and Audits SHERI SMITH, FACMPE STATE VOLUNTEER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Copyright 2014 State Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company Medicare/Medicaid Incentive Program Medicare/Medicaid
Clinical Quality Measures Physician Quality Reporting System 2014
Clinical Quality Measures Physician Quality Reporting System 2014 Marcela Reyes, CHTS- CP Sevocity Product Manager 877-777-2298!! www.sevocity.com! 2014 CQMs CQMs are no longer a core objective of the
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012 CORE OBJECTIVES (17 total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Stage 2 Objective Stage 2 Measure Use CPOE for medication
Aligning Meaningful Use CQM and PQRS Reporting for 2015
Aligning Meaningful Use CQM and PQRS Reporting for 2015 August 19, 2015 Introductions Marni Anderson Project Specialist, MetaStar [email protected] 608-441-8253 Laura Sawyer Clinical Application Coordinator,
Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society
Presented by Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce errors Engage
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Meaningful Use Stage 1 Focuses on Functional & Interoperability
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2014
DEMONSTRATING MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EHR TECHNOLOGY IN 2014 The chart below lists the measures (and specialty exclusions) that eligible providers must
Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide Stage 1 2013 Edition
Ophthalmology Meaningful Use Attestation Guide Stage 1 2013 Edition Ophthalmologists can register for the Medicare electronic health record (EHR) incentive program on the CMS website: https://ehrincentives.cms.gov
Regulations Overview
Meaningful Use - Stage 2 Regulations Overview Brought to you by Presented by: Travis Broome, MPH, MBA September 18, 2012 Objectives Specific regulatory changes and requirements based on the CMS Stage 2
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals
Stage 1 vs. Comparison for Eligible Professionals CORE OBJECTIVES (17 Total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Objective Measure Use CPOE for Medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare
CMS is requesting information to aid in the planning and implementation of the MIPS in the following areas:
Summary of Medicare s Request for Information on the Provisions in MACRA which Allow for Implementation of Alternative Payment Models and a Merit-Based Incentive Payment System On September 28, 2015, the
Auditing PQRS & Meaningful Use To Maintain Compliance. Standard Disclaimer. Learning Objectives 12/2/2014
2014 NAMAS Conference Asheville, NC December 9, 2014 Auditing PQRS & Meaningful Use To Maintain Compliance Presented by David J. Zetter, PHR, CHCC, CPCO, CPC, CPC-H, PCS, FCS, CHBC, CMUP Standard Disclaimer
LOOKING FORWARD TO STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE. 2012 Louisiana HIPAA & EHR Conference Presenter: Kathleen Keeley
LOOKING FORWARD TO STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE 2012 Louisiana HIPAA & EHR Conference Presenter: Kathleen Keeley Topics of Discussion Stage 2 Eligibility Stage 2 Meaningful Use Clinical Quality Measures Payment
Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2015 Reporting Year
Medicare Shared Savings Program Quality Measure Benchmarks for the 2015 Reporting Year Release Notes/Summary of Changes (February 2015): Issued correction of 2015 benchmarks for ACO-9 and ACO-10 quality
Meaningful Use: Terms & Timelines, Changes to Stage 1, and Stage 2 Overview
Meaningful Use: Terms & Timelines, Changes to Stage 1, and Stage 2 Overview NYC REACH Primary Care Information Project NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene 1 Agenda Terms & Timelines of Meaningful
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
QUALITY BEGINNER. PQRS Training Module: QUALITY MEASUREMENT 101. Last Updated: August 2014
QUALITY 01 BEGINNER PQRS Training Module: QUALITY MEASUREMENT 101 Last Updated: August 2014 TRAINING MODULE OBJECTIVES Quality Measurement 101 is a training module for providers who are interested in learning
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)
Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Presenter: Alexandra Mugge 4 PQRS Overview CY2018 payment adjustments, based on PY2016 reporting: -2.0% MPFS Changes to PQRS Definition of eligible professional
Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations
AQAF Health Information Technology Forum Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Considerations Marla Clinkscales & Mike Bice Alabama Regional Extension Center (ALREC) August 13, 2013 0 Agenda What is Meaningful
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now 1 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Adoption Rates of HIT 4. Overview of Stage 2 Rules 5. Overview of Issues 6. Trend in Standards: Recommendations v.
HCCN Meaningful Use Review. October 7 th, 2015 Louisiana Public Health Institute Kelly Maggiore Jack Millaway
HCCN Meaningful Use Review October 7 th, 2015 Louisiana Public Health Institute Kelly Maggiore Jack Millaway What is Meaningful Use? Federal and State incentive payment program for Eligible Professionals
Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center 3601 4 th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas 79424 806-743-1338
Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center 3601 4 th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas 79424 806-743-1338 http://www.wtxhitrec.org/ Grant award - $6.6m Total number
Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Specialists. NYC REACH Primary Care Information Project NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene
Stage 1 Meaningful Use for Specialists NYC REACH Primary Care Information Project NYC Department of Health & Mental Hygiene 1 Today s Agenda Meaningful Use Overview Meaningful Use Measures Resources Primary
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY On August 24, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the much anticipated final rule for Stage
STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1
STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1 Requirement CPOE Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed health care professional who can enter orders into the
E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS
E Z BIS ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS CERTIFICATION AND THE HITECH INCENTIVE PROGRAM The Incentives On July 13, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services finalized the Electronic Health Record
The Future of Meaningful Use
The Future of Meaningful Use Stage 3 Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager 2015 CORHIO All Rights Reserved CORHIO Proprietary Not For Redistribution 1 Agenda Stage 3
The EP/eligible hospital has enabled this functionality. At least 80% of all unique patients. seen by the EP or admitted to the
EMR Name/Model EMR Vendor Allscripts Stage 1 objectives Eligible professionals Hospitals Use CPOE Use of CPOE for orders (any type) directly entered by authorizing provider (for example, MD, DO, RN, PA,
A Deep Dive Into MU Stage 2
A Deep Dive Into MU Stage 2 A Complimentary Webinar From healthsystemcio.com, Sponsored By Hyland Software, Developers of OnBase Your Line Will Be Silent Until Our Event Begins Thank You! Housekeeping