Quality Manual. 1-QUAL Rev. G , Cirrus Logic, Inc.
|
|
|
- Eugene Cameron
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Quality Manual , Cirrus Logic, Inc. Cirrus Logic and Cirrus are trademarks of Cirrus Logic, Inc. All other product names herein may be the trademarks of their respective holders. 1-QUAL Rev. G
2 A. Introduction Approvals: January 10, 2013 Revision G: Elvira Palmeda, V.P. Quality and Reliability January 10, A2-1-QUAL Rev. G
3 A. Introduction Table of Contents page A2 A4 A5 A6 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C5 D1 D2 D4 D5 E1 E3 E7 E11 E15 E18 E19 E20 E22 E23 F1 F2 F4 F7 F9 F12 Approvals Business Process Sequence And Interaction Chart: Quality Management System Processes Chart: QMS Organization Chart: Product Planning and Delivery Quality Management System Scope and Exclusions Quality Policy and Management Objectives Administration Business Process Procedures Management Responsibility Management Review Document Control Records Control Resource Management Annual Plan Capital Equipment Facilities, Communication, Data Processing Human Resources and Training Product Realization Design and Development Market Requirements/ Business Plan Product Development Processes Product Qualification and Readiness Production Planning Processes Configuration, Information, Traceability Contract and Order Entry Administration Business Planning Supplier Planning Logistics & Inventory Control Manufacturing Purchasing Supplier Management Measurement, Analysis, and Continual Improvement Customer Satisfaction Internal Audit Product and Process Monitor Nonconformance Control Corrective Action Preventive Action - A3-1-QUAL Rev. G
4 A. Introduction Sequence/ Interactions of Quality Management System Processes Management Planning/ Control Products A Q U,O,N X QMS Scope and Exclusions Material Review Board (MRD) Z Market Requirements Customer Waiver Requests B Certificates of Compliance U Y Quality Policy & Objectives Change Action Board (CAB) Market Requirements Product/ Process Change Notice C Product End-Of-Life Notice System Architecture Spec Management Responsibility ABD Table Maintenance Management Representative Qualified Products List Table Design Facilitating Quality System Product and Lot Identification System QMS Administration Configuration Management Verification D K-P Customers First Fabrication Management Review R Validation E Contract and Order Entry Document Control Qualification S PPDP F Forecasts Bookings Records Control U Z Demand Plan Characterization G SXU Strategic Technology Roadmap Production Plan Capacity Reliability Testing Headcount Needs By Job Grade Department Budgets Pick Orders Order Commitments Test Software Annual Planning Business Planning Test Hardware H T Infrastructure Inventory Tracking Production Flows Work Environment Finished Goods Facilities Pick Orders Production Standards Shipping/ Receiving I Carriers ABD Table Inputs Capital Equipment Customs Product Qualification/ Readiness Logistics J Job Qualifications By Job Grade U Z Wafer Fabrication Personnel Qualifications Supplier Profiles & Selection Training Effectiveness Procurement Specifications Probe Human Resources Acceptance Criteria Critical Materials/ Approved Vendors Assembly K Supplier Audits Customer Satisfaction Supplier Data Monitors Final Test Supplier Rating System L Supplier Management Tape and Reel Internal Audit V SU Finished Goods M U, Z Supplier Scheduling Product/ Process Monitor Pick Order Supplier Purchase Orders N Supplier Planning Shipping Nonconformance Control Suppliers W Production & Distribution O Purchase Requisitions RMA/ FACR Systems Customers Corrective Action Purchase Orders Purchasing P D Accounts Receivable Preventive Action K-O Quality System Mgmt Responsibility Resource Mgmt Product Realization Measurement / Improvement - A4-1-QUAL Rev. G
5 A. Introduction QMS Organization Chart Supplier Interaction Quality System Activities Customer Interaction Business Units Marketing Market Requirements Strategic Planning Contracts Applications Engineering Product Support Publications Engineering Product Specification Program Management Product Validation Integrated Circuits Dev Software Development Firmware Development Printed Wiring Board Dev Product/Test Engineering Wafer Technology Technology Engineering Mask Fabrication Computer Aided Design Operations Business Planning Inside Sales Purchase Orders Demand Planning Return Requests Production Planning Order Commitments Inventory Tracking Distribution Centers Logistics Shipments Configuration Data Wafer Fabrication Manufacturing Operations Assembly Supplier Planning Tape and Reel - Wafer Fabrication External Testing Supplier Contracts - Assembly/ Test Assembly Engineering Test Operations Quality Voice of The Customer QMS Registration Quality System Admin Customer Service Failure Analysis Quality Engineering Questionnaires Reliability Testing Reliability Engineering Product Qualification Burn-In Central Document Control FA Services Device Physics Lab Information Technology (ERP) Facilities Administration Sales Sales Temporary Help Human Resources PWB Suppliers Finance Legal Supplier Orders Purchasing - A5-1-QUAL Rev. G
6 A. Introduction Product Planning and Delivery Wafer Suppliers Wafers Assembly/ Test Suppliers Units Customers Purchase Information Delivery Data Purchase Information Delivery Data Sales Information Delivery Data Operations Planning and Control Capacity Annual Plan & Authorization Funding, Resource, and Financial Performance Management Business Administration Demand Annual Plan & Authorization Strategic And Tactical Planning And Control Market Req ts Project Business Plans Schedules Budgets Design And Development Market & Product Customer Data & Research Goals Marketing Roadmap Product Plans Customers Designs Solutions - A6-1-QUAL Rev. G
7 B. Quality Management System Scope Exclusions Scope and Exclusions The Cirrus Logic Quality management system applies to the design and development of integrated circuits and related systems, and to the supply of integrated circuits through subcontracted manufacturing, test and delivery. Cirrus Logic Management intends that the business objectives, strategies, tactics, and processes used to realize this scope always satisfy statutory, and regulatory requirements applicable to the product, and the organization's own requirements. Applicable location Cirrus Logic, Inc. 800 W. 6 th Street Austin, Texas The Cirrus Logic Quality management system excludes two requirements of ISO 9001:2008 section 7: a) Implementation of post-delivery activities: Cirrus Logic products do not require post-delivery servicing. Software update and release after the delivery of integrated circuits is classified as initial delivery of a new release rather than as a post delivery activity. b) Customer property: At no time is Customer property used by or under the control of Cirrus Logic. These exclusions do not affect ability or responsibility to provide product that meets applicable Customer, statutory and regulatory requirements a f B1-1-QUAL Rev. G
8 B. Quality Management System Quality Policy and Management Objectives Quality Quality is the degree to which Customer requirements for Cirrus products and services are identified and satisfied. Quality Policy Management s policy for Quality: Satisfy Customers first. Provide competitive solutions for Customers. Comply with Customer and regulatory requirements. Measure and improve continuously a 5.1 b 5.3 a-c Quality Objectives Top management shall ensure that Quality objectives, including those needed to meet requirements for product, are established at relevant functions and levels within Cirrus. The Quality objectives shall be measurable and consistent with the Quality policy B2-1-QUAL Rev. G
9 B. Quality Management System Planning Delegation Administration Administration Top management is responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this chapter are implemented and administered. The management representative for Quality may delegate administrative duties (but not responsibility) of the Quality system to the Quality Department. Each business process in this manual is assigned to a specific department(s) for administration. Managers may designate process owners to facilitate. Executive management retains authority to ensure establishment and ownership of the processes in this manual. Management Representative, acting for top management shall: - document the Quality policy and explain how management sets Quality performance objectives for products and the business processes, - determine the business processes used to meet Customer, regulatory, and statutory requirements, and - define the sequence and interactions that allow Quality manual processes to function as a system. Business process owners shall: - ensure their business process is controlled and effective, - monitor, measure (where applicable), and analyze their processes to ensure achievement of planned results and continual improvement, - assess and provide the resources and information needed to operate, monitor and control each business process, and - ensure compliance with ISO9001: a a b 4.1 c c 4.1 b 4.1 d e 4.1 f a, b 5.3 a-e - B3-1-QUAL Rev. G
10 B. Quality Management System Documentation Requirements Document a Quality manual that defines scope, exclusions, and procedures for the Quality management system, and interaction between the Quality system processes. Document Cirrus Quality policy in the Quality manual. Utilize the business processes used to determine Customer, regulatory, and statutory requirements in the Quality manual. Include processes needed to fulfill the Quality policy, meet the Quality objectives, meet Customer requirements, and implement the requirements of ISO9001:2008. Six documented procedures are specifically required by ISO9001:2008. Document these as business processes in the Quality manual. They are: 1. Document Control process 2. Records Control process 3. Internal Audit process 4. Nonconformance Control process 5. Corrective Action process 6. Preventive Action process The Quality manual is designated as tier 1 (policy level) of the Quality management system documentation. Designate cross-functional process flow descriptions as tier 2. Work instructions are tier 3. Documents that relate to specific product, manufacturing processes, forms, software, Customers, suppliers, records, and so forth, are designated tier a-d - B4-1-QUAL Rev. G
11 B. Quality Management System Record Requirements Management Commitment Ensure that records specifically required by ISO9001:2008 are required by the appropriate Quality manual chapters. These include: 1. Evidence of conformity to requirements (4.2.4) a. For product (at development and production) b. For Quality system processes 2. Evidence of effective Quality system operation (4.2.4) 3. Management reviews (5.6.1) 4. Personnel education, training, skills, experience (6.2.2e) 5. Product realization planning (7.1d) (see 6 thru ) 6. Review of Customer-specified requirements (7.2.2) 7. Product design requirements (7.3.2) 8. Review of design results versus requirements (7.3.4) 9. Design and development verification (7.3.5) 10. Design and development validation (7.3.6) 11. Design and development changes (7.3.7) 12. Supplier evaluation, selection, performance (7.4.1) 13. Validation of non-verifiable production processes (7.5.2) 14. Validity of measurement on uncalibrated equipment (7.6) 15. Internal audit results (8.2.2) 16. Authorized release of nonconforming product (8.2.4) 17. Nonconforming product and subsequent actions (8.3) 18. Corrective actions 19. Preventive actions Top management shall provide evidence of its commitment to the development and implementation of the Quality management system and continually improving its effectiveness by: 1. communicating organization-wide the importance of Customer, statutory, and regulatory requirements, 2. establishing the Quality policy, 3. ensuring that Quality objectives are established, 4. conducting management reviews, and 5. ensuring the availability of resources e a-e - B5-1-QUAL Rev. G
12 B. Quality Management System Customer Focus Top management shall ensure that Customer requirements are determined and are met with the aim of enhancing Customer satisfaction. 5.2 Quality Policy Top management shall ensure that the Quality policy: 5.3 a-e Responsibility and Authority 1. is appropriate to the purpose of Cirrus Logic, 2. includes a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve Quality system effectiveness, 3. provides a framework for establishing and reviewing Quality objectives, 4. is communicated and understood within the organization, and 5. is reviewed for continuing suitability. Responsibilities for the Quality system are assigned functionally in the QMS Organizational Chart. The Quality manual is used to communicate these responsibilities. Authority for review and approval follows normal departmental hierarchy. Signature authority defined and used by management for financial approval applies (i.e same signoff as in the purchase order system). For specific business processes, such as design and development programs (PDP chapter), responsibility and authority are specified within the process. A department(s) is assigned as process owner for each process in the Quality manual. The owning department(s) maintains the process documentation, and is accountable for implementation, operation, control, effectiveness, corrections, and continuous improvement B6-1-QUAL Rev. G
13 B. Quality Management System Management Representative Top management shall appoint a member of the organization's management who, irrespective of other responsibilities, shall have responsibility/duties listed below Cirrus Logic Vice President of Quality and Reliability is appointed as the executive Management Representative for Quality. This manager has overall responsibility, authority, and accountability for the Quality system. Duties include ensuring that: Quality system processes are appropriately documented, implemented, and operated, performance and opportunities for improvement are reported to top management, and awareness of Customer requirements is promoted throughout the organization Internal Communication Top management ensures that communication takes place regarding the effectiveness of the Quality system in top level reviews, such as Quality system management reviews, quarterly business reviews (QBR), and product development process reviews. Top management ensures that appropriate internal communication processes are established within the Quality system business processes B7-1-QUAL Rev. G
14 C. Management Responsibility Process Management Review Function Review and improve effectiveness of the Quality system and in meeting Customer requirements. Facilitator Management Representative for Quality Input Documented reports of: Quality objectives and metrics, results of audits, Customer feedback, process performance, product conformity, status of corrective and preventive actions, follow-up actions from previous reviews, changes affecting the Quality system, and recommendations for improvement. Output Documented decisions and actions related to: improving effectiveness of the Quality system, improving product in relation to requirements, and resource needs. Procedure The Quality department participates in each Quarterly Business Review where all aspects of the quality system are presented for review. Any actions pertaining to the quality system are assigned and documented at this review An annual summary of internal audits is published by the quality department, distributed to top management, and findings are reviewed with each department manager for necessary corrective actions based upon observations and/or findings.. Quality consolidates documentation of the required inputs. Examples could include review materials previously presented to management at quarterly business reviews, operations reviews, development project reviews, and/or interim Quality system reviews (if any). Top management assesses continuing suitability, adequacy, effectiveness, and needed improvements for specific Quality system processes, the Quality policy, the Quality manual, and/or Quality objectives. - C1-1-QUAL Rev. G
15 C. Management Responsibility Process Document Control Function Document control and engineering change control. Facilitator Quality Department Local Document and Records Control Centers Applications Engineering data sheets CAD CLI system, product configuration and IC design Central Document Control general Quality system documents Contract Administration - Customer contracts and specifications Finance annual operating plan, resources Human Resources training, human resources Information Technology - database systems and contents IT/ Test Applications - production test programs Program Management PDP templates PWB group demo boards, evaluation boards PWB Layout -production test hardware Design Engineering software/firmware Sales - order entry Input controlled documents, files, data bases, and revisions of these Output review, approval, maintenance and revision control Procedure Application This procedure applies to the maintenance of controlled documents. These are the documents, electronic files, and databases used to control configuration and conformance for products or processes. Examples include policies, procedures, work instructions, forms, specifications, software, firmware, test programs, product layout, schematics, and PDP templates. Revision control of these items is the means for reviewing and approving configurations (versions) of the items they define. Document Control Centers Local document control centers maintain specific document types (rather than having all departments use a centralized document control activity). - C2-1-QUAL Rev. G
16 C. Management Responsibility Relevant department managers assign an administrator over each document control center. Administrators document control procedures for their centers within the on-line Released DOCCON Library template. Documentation Tiers In this section the word documents refers to controlled procedures, specifications, templates, work instructions, data files, and data bases. The Quality manual and other management policy statements are designated tier 1 documents. They take precedence over lower tier documents. Top level procedures are designated tier 2. Tier 2 documents were created when Cirrus Logic had it s own manufacturing entity. Process work instructions and documents that apply to multiple products, suppliers, or Customers are designated tier 3. Documents that apply to a specific product, material, supplier, or Customer are designated tier 4. Forms are designated tier 4. Released DOCCON Library The Released DOCCON Library is an on-line template for implementing the requirements of ISO 9001:2008 clauses and Typically, tier 3 work instructions and tier 4 forms for document and records control centers are not needed. But they may be created and used at the local administrator s discretion. - C3-1-QUAL Rev. G
17 C. Management Responsibility Authorizing Local Document Control Centers Department managers that have the option of using the Central Document Control center (operated by the Quality department) should do so. Where use of the Central Document Control activity would result in duplicate file storage locations, difficulty arises in keeping the Document Control copy current with the original copy. Department managers should opt to operate the original storage location as a local document control center in this case. The Quality Department reviews and endorses this decision through the act of approving procedures in the Released DOCCON Library. Released DOCCON Library a-g The Quality Department maintains the Released DOCCON Library system and templates. The Released DOCCON Library template requires that procedures be created to define methods to meet the following requirements: Library Properties: Required for document and records control: - document approval before intended use - periodic review, update, and re-approval - identifying changes and revision status - availability of relevant versions at points of use - identity and distribution of documents of external origin - identify and prevent use of obsolete documents - identification (of items and revisions) - storage - protection (e.g. backup) - retrieval and master listing - retention time - disposition - document types maintained - administering department - legibility assurance - identifying tier 3 work instructions (if any) C4-1-QUAL Rev. G
18 C. Management Responsibility Process Records Control Function Maintenance of Quality system records. Facilitator Quality Department Centers Applications Engineering data sheets CAD CLI system, product configuration and IC design Central Document Control general Quality system documents Contract Administration - Customer contracts and specifications Finance - annual plan, resources Human Resources training, human resources Information Technology - database systems and contents IT/ Test Applications - production test programs Program Management PDP templates PWB group demo boards, evaluation boards PWB Layout -production test hardware Design Engineering software/firmware Sales - order entry Input records, files, and data relevant to products and Quality system process results Output maintenance and retrieval Procedure Application Records established to provide evidence of conformity to requirements, and of the effective operation of the Quality management system shall be controlled. These are the documents, electronic files, and data used to record minutes, decisions, actions, transactions and results. Records shall remain legible, readily identifiable, and retrievable.. Records Control Centers Records control centers are usually synonymous with local document control centers. However, records must be maintained separately from controlled documents, using separate procedures. Local records control centers maintain specific record types (rather than having all departments use a centralized records control activity). - C5-1-QUAL Rev. G
19 C. Management Responsibility Relevant department managers assign an administrator over each records control center. Administrators document control procedures for their centers within the on-line Released DOCCON Library template. Documentation Tiers Forms are designated tier 4. Released DOCCON Library See and apply the Released DOCCON Library section in the Document Control procedure. Authorizing Local Records Control Centers See and apply the Authorizing Local Document Control Centers section in the Document Control procedure. Released DOCCON Library See and apply the Released DOCCON Library section in the Document Control procedure. - C6-1-QUAL Rev. G
20 D. Resource Management Process Annual Planning Function Assess what business activities and resources are needed to determine and meet Customer requirements. Facilitator Finance Input strategic plans, revenue and cash flow plans, technical roadmaps, Quality system processes Output budgeted business activities Procedure Top Management aligns strategic objectives and technical roadmaps to market direction, and determines what business activities are needed to realize these. 6.1 a-b Quality management activities needed to determine and meet Customer requirements are included. Basically, these are the processes described in the Quality manual. Finance facilitates an annual budgeting process to determine what resources are needed to implement and operate the business. Department heads submit budgets to the annual budgeting process. Resource budgeting includes determination of the human resources needed to perform Quality system processes. Top management oversees the adjustment and finalization of these budgets. The annual plan budgets are adjusted as needed throughout the fiscal year in response to changing Customer and business conditions. Department managers use budgets and personnel assignments to provide evidence of resource planning and implementation. - D1-1-QUAL Rev. G
21 D. Resource Management Process Capital Equipment Planning Function Assess and provide the equipment needed to operate the business. Facilitator Finance Input annual planning process Output determination of equipment needs budgets and evidence for provision of those needs Procedure Equipment 6.3 a-c Capital equipment is equipment with property value in excess of limits designated by Finance. The designation is in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices. Managers identify equipment needed to carry out their departmental business processes and place these requirements on the annual plan (budget). Managers create capital equipment purchase requisitions and submit them for financial approval through the purchase order system. Purchase requisitions include or refer to procurement specifications for the equipment. The executive management team reviews and approves the capital equipment purchase requisitions. Executive management approves equipment purchases based on needed market strategy, timing, capability, and effect of depreciation in planned financial performance. Assessment of alternatives is part of this decision process. Once approved, the originating department and/or purchasing group orders the equipment, and accepts it upon delivery. Acceptance is based on compliance with purchase orders and procurement specifications. Executive management approves requests to remove depreciated and/or inactive equipment from equipment inventory through its regular capital equipment review. Disposition is by sale, storage, or scrapping. - D2-1-QUAL Rev. G
22 D. Resource Management Supplier management activities assess capital equipment needed at external supplier locations and ensure its provision through vendor profile and supplier audit procedures. On occasion Cirrus Logic will direct and assist suppliers in the procurement of capital equipment. Work Environment 6.4 Work environment for manufacturing processes and equipment is specified and controlled by suppliers. Cirrus confirms these controls through supplier audits and verification of ISO9001 registration. [See the Supplier Management process.] - D3-1-QUAL Rev. G
23 D. Resource Management Process Facilities, Communication, Data Processing Function Assess and provide the facilities and work environment needed. Facilitator Facilities, Information Technology Input annual planning process Output determination of facility and work environment needs budgets and evidence for provision of those needs Procedure Facilities and Communication 6.3 a-c Facilities budgets the buildings, utilities, equipment, related services, and maintenance needed to operate essential business activities. Related services include transportation. Information Technology budgets the communication and data processing equipment and services needed to operate business processes. The activities above are performed within the scope of the annual budget plan, as adjusted. Infrastructure and work environment needs for manufacturing are determined by Cirrus Logic suppliers. Adequacy is verified through Supplier Management. Work Environment 6.4 Facilities group determines workspace standards and supports other groups by providing furniture, assigned workspace, and necessary utilities for individuals. - D4-1-QUAL Rev. G
24 D. Resource Management Process Human Resources and Training Function Apply appropriate education, training, skills, and experience to work affecting product Quality Facilitator Human Resources Input Quality objective / metrics, job requirements, new technologies, techniques, and Customer or market requirements Output Ensure work affecting "conformity to product requirements" are performed by personnel that are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills and experience. Procedure Determine Needs a Department Managers specify human resource requirements in department budgets and the annual plan. Needed competencies are specified by assigning an appropriate job grade to each position. Each job grade has defined competencies based on appropriate education, training, skills, and experience needed for the job type and level of responsibility. Human Resources group provides these generic definitions. They are derived from competitive industry standards. Department managers define position-specific requirements in addition to the generic competencies (i.e. job descriptions). Employee training is needed to stay current with new technologies, techniques, or requirements. For example, design training seminars occur throughout the year. Sales personnel are trained in new product characteristics. Human Resources group conducts benefits, supervisory, and management seminars. Take Actions to Satisfy Needs b Managers hire, promote, and transfer personnel in accordance with the positions approved in department budgets. Executive management may require justification for deviations. - D5-1-QUAL Rev. G
25 D. Resource Management Human Resources group verifies an individual s qualifications against the generic job grade and position-specific job description when they are hired, promoted, or transferred into a position. In addition, managers re-evaluate the needs of the position and the match with individual qualifications during performance reviews. This is the venue for determining if an individual needs development or training, and planning that action. Department managers determine if training is needed and take necessary action to initiate. Evaluate Effectiveness of the Actions c Performance review is used to evaluate effectiveness in meeting competency requirements for job grades. This information is reported statistically. These data provide evidence that the review process is implemented and effective. Effectiveness of individual development and/or training is evaluated and documented by the manager in the individual s performance review. These are not available for auditing. However, the results contribute to the statistical data described above. Effectiveness of group training may be evaluated through posttraining surveys or other methods that provide feedback to the trainer. This practice is encouraged but not mandatory as there are generally other Quality objective metrics that will indicate whether the training has had an effect. For example, meeting sales goals for a new product can be used to indicate whether new product training was effective. Awareness of Contribution d Managers are encouraged to ensure their employees remain aware of the contribution their work makes toward satisfying Customer and business objectives and requirements. The primary means for doing this is the all-hands meeting - D6-1-QUAL Rev. G
26 D. Resource Management conducted by the executive staff to review achievements versus objectives at the end of each fiscal quarter. Secondarily, awareness of individual contribution is emphasized in performance reviews and during promotion of the Quality policy. Maintain Records e Human Resources group maintains appropriate records to indicate whether individuals fulfill the education, training, skills, and experience qualifications required for their assigned job grades. - D7-1-QUAL Rev. G
27 E. Product Realization Process Marketing Requirements/ Business Plan Design and Development Function Determine requirements and objectives for products. Input As applicable: Customer specifications and contracts market research and analysis Cirrus strategic roadmap analysis of competing products supplier technologies and tolerances Output As applicable: product requirements specified by the Customer product requirements necessary for intended use functional and performance requirements information derived from previous similar designs requirements necessary to meet industry standards applicable statutory and regulatory requirements requirements determined by the organization manufacturability requirements and goals Procedure Marketing personnel in each business unit prepare a marketing requirements document (MRD) and business plan (BP) for each product development project. The purpose of the MRD/BP is to document product requirements and objectives and provide a baseline for subsequent project progress and design reviews a-d a-d 7.1 a 7.1 d A template for the MRD/BP is provided in the Product Development process (PDP). Within the framework of the PDP, the MRD/BP is reviewed and approved by Senior Management prior to the organization s commitment to design and supply the product. The PDP defines approval authority and provides for subsequent revision of the MRD/BP as the development project progresses. Each revision is reviewed, approved, and communicated to the design team. Records of MRD/BP reviews and resulting actions are maintained within the development project records by the program manager. - E1-1-QUAL Rev. G
28 E. Product Realization Typically, Cirrus Logic designs and develops build-to-stock catalog products, and no Customer specifications or development contracts apply. Instead, the MRD/BP serves in lieu of Customer specifications and represents Cirrus determination of the product features and requirements that best serve the targeted Customers. MRD/BP review and approval serves to confirm the determination. Cirrus design teams may confer with selected Customers in determining product objectives and requirements. [These communications typically do not result in contracted design commitments or specifications.] In the event contracted arrangements are made, Cirrus design team is accountable to the Customer to demonstrate that Customer-specified requirements are satisfied. Verification, validation, and review activities for this purpose are included in the PDP framework. The PDP provides for subsequent Customer communication arrangements as part of the program plan. Chiefly, these are oriented toward launching the product in the marketplace. NOTE: In some projects, design innovation rather than market assessment and MRD/BP will define the product features, functionality, and/or performance. These should not conflict with MRD/BP (i.e. revise the MRD/BP or revise the design). Such items should be documented in product specifications as requirements by project end. - E2-1-QUAL Rev. G
29 E. Product Realization Process Product Development Process Design and Development Function Plan and manage product development projects so as to meet MRD/BP requirements and objectives. Facilitator Business Unit General Managers PDP framework Business Unit Program Managers each development project Development Teams design, verification, validation activities Input Marketing Requirements Document/ Business Plan (See outputs of) Output Program Plans/Schedules System Architecture Specifications Product Designs Design Verification and Validation Design and Program Reviews (Results vs. Requirements) Procedure Design and Development Planning Cirrus business units maintain and use a common project management template to plan and manage product development. This template is called the Product Development Process, or PDP. 7.1 a-d a-c In planning product realization, the PDP Process determines the following: Quality objectives and requirements for the product; b) the need to establish processes, and documents, and to provide resources specific to the product; c) required verification, validation, monitoring, measurement, inspection and test activities specific to the product and the criteria for product acceptance; d) and records affirming the aforementioned This creates a common language, culture, and set of expectations for designers, and facilitates communication between design and management. Some variation is allowed in how the different business units apply the PDP to accommodate the different types of products developed. The PDP specifies separate development flows for marketing, system design, hardware design, integrated circuit design, and firmware/software design. - E3-1-QUAL Rev. G
30 E. Product Realization Each project uses only the development flows that are applicable. For instance, many integrated circuits do not require software development. The flows are synchronized to product life cycle phases. In this way development is staged to define and coordinate interfaces, communication, and responsibilities. The PDP defines required development activities, milestones, and deliverables at appropriate stages in each development flow. Program managers ensure that PDP-required activities, milestones, deliverables, and approval authority are applied in each project plan. Project plans are updated at phase exit milestones, minimally. Required activities include determination of requirements, design steps, reviews, verification, and validation. Minimal deliverables include defined requirements, specifications, designs, manuals, analysis, decisions, resourcing, schedules, budgets, and records that products meet requirements. The PDP provides numerous templates and checklists for deliverables. Milestones include phase exit reviews, approvals, releases, and starts or completions of development activities. Design and Development Inputs a-d Design and development inputs are determined and documented through the Marketing Requirements/ Business Plan process. Design and Development Outputs a-d The person(s) who presents PDP deliverables for approval and release is responsible for presenting these in a format that compares results to requirements. Authorized reviewers approve deliverables on the basis of these comparisons. For product release, products should be shown to meet specified requirements, to be ready for purchasing and manufacturing, and to have complete data sheets and acceptance criteria. - E4-1-QUAL Rev. G
31 E. Product Realization The Product Qualification and Readiness process describes how these requirements are satisfied for integrated circuits. Design and Development Verification Verification is defined as confirmation through test or examination that an item meets its design inputs. The PDP requires a product verification plan for each development flow (system, integrated circuits, hardware, firmware/software, but not the marketing flow). Consequently each project plan should include verification plans and verification for the items being developed. Verification results should be retained in the project records in a format that compares results to specifications. Design and Development Validation Validation is defined as confirmation through test or examination that an item works in its intended application. The PDP requires a product validation plan for each development flow (system, integrated circuits, hardware, firmware/software, but not the marketing flow). [One plan may suffice for all of these flows if the items should be integrated to perform the validation testing.] Consequently each project plan should include validation plans and validation for the items being developed. Validation should occur prior to releasing the product for Customer use in end products. Validation results should be retained in the project records in a format that compares results to expected performance. Design and Development Review The PDP requires reviews for each development flow to evaluate whether designs meet requirements at each life cycle stage and to identify any problems and necessary actions. Consequently each project plan should include design reviews and product qualification reviews for the items being developed. - E5-1-QUAL Rev. G
32 E. Product Realization Phase exit reviews ensure that requirements for each life cycle phase are satisfied or disposed before releasing the design to the next phase. Project reviews are conducted to confirm schedules, budgets, and/or completion of milestones. Reviews should compare results to planned requirements. The PDP provides standard review checklists to facilitate checking applicable requirements. The PDP specifies required participants and approval authority for the various reviews. This ensures participation by appropriate functions concerned with the stage(s) being reviewed. Review summaries and actions should be retained in the project records in a format that compares results to expected performance. Design and Development Change Control Engineering change control for designed items shall be implemented in a way that satisfies the requirements of the Document Control process. Formal engineering change control begins at the point that integrated circuits are released to the mask shop, and at alpha release for software. [Both occur at the end of Phase 2 in the PDP.] Change review and approval shall include evaluation of the effect of the change on manufacturing and the Customer. Design changes are verified, validated, reviewed, and approved in accordance with applicable PDP requirements for original design. - E6-1-QUAL Rev. G
33 E. Product Realization Process Product Qualification and Readiness Design and Development Function Qualify products, release to production, and sustain. Facilitator Product/test Engineering Input Industry standards for integrated circuit qualification Product verification and validation results Output New or Revised Product Release characterization data vs. data sheet limits qualification (reliability) test results test programs test conditions and limits test hardware designs production test flows yield and cost standards QPL Release Reviews and Records Sustaining [See Process and Product Monitor process] process monitoring and trends nonconformance disposition, causes, and trends failure analysis reports Procedure The product qualification procedure is called the QPL process, which stands for qualified products list. QPL is the back end of the PDP process. QPL s job is to concurrently qualify manufacturing readiness, product reliability, manufacturing processes, and facilities for Cirrus and the Customer. Product/Test Engineering is responsible for seven QPL deliverables for each new or revised product: characterization data vs. data sheet limits - qualification (reliability) test results - test programs - test conditions and limits - test hardware - production test flows - yield and cost standards Review and approval of the above items is a condition for - E7-1-QUAL Rev. G
34 E. Product Realization releasing products to production. QPL, Characterization, and Release-To-Production procedures are maintained at the tier 3 work instruction level. These documents specify requirements and acceptance criteria for product release. The PDP template requires that QPL plans be created, approved, and implemented for each new or revised product. QPL forms are maintained to document QPL review records, decisions, and actions. QPL reviews have the same importance as design reviews in that they verify and authorize new and revised products for release to production. The PDP template synchronizes QPL reviews with product life cycle phases. Product/Test Engineering is also responsible for product monitoring, nonconformance disposition, and failure analysis of returns for datasheet compliance problems after release to production. [See Process and Product Monitor process, and Nonconformance process.] Product Characterization and Qualification Characterization and qualification testing are the means for verifying product conformance to data sheet and reliability specifications. Characterization also qualifies test programs, test conditions and limits, and test equipment capability. Product qualification is the means for validating supplier technologies, processes, and facilities. Production Test Programs Test programs, conditions, and parametric limits, including yield limits, provide the standards of acceptance for electrical testing. These items are verified against product data sheet specifications for function and performance. This is the means for ensuring that manufacturing testing correlates to product data sheets Needed measurements are verified for compatibility with equipment capability during the Hardware Advisory Group process review, where test equipment and test hardware requirements are determined for new designs. At this point provisions for specified but un-testable requirements are decided. They may be guaranteed by design simulation or characterization correlated to testable parameters. - E8-1-QUAL Rev. G
35 E. Product Realization Qualified test programs are maintained and distributed to production test facilities by the Information Technology activity. This group is responsible for meeting document and records control requirements. Production Test Hardware Test fixtures are referred to as test hardware. These fixtures provide an interface between electrical measurement equipment and each specific product type Test hardware is developed by Product/Test Engineering or by subcontracted suppliers. Product/Test Engineers qualify the initial hardware, using production setup and correlation procedures. Test suppliers maintain test hardware, including procuring and qualifying additional copies, and records of qualification for use. Test setups, including test hardware, are qualified for each use. Printed Circuit Board Layout activity maintains documentation for test hardware, including records of Product/Test Engineering review and approval. Where test hardware is developed and provided by external suppliers, design documentation and approval records are maintained by the hardware supplier. Production Flows Production flows document the sequence of manufacturing steps for specific product types. They provide the Quality plan for controlling product fabrication, work instructions, and records for each production lot. Suppliers maintain and follow production flows for wafer fabrication and assembly activities, including test and measurement steps. This is verified through the Supplier Management process. Product/Test Engineering specifies production flows for testing finished wafers and units. Production flows specify the procedures, test programs, and test hardware needed to perform each manufacturing step. These flows are communicated to test suppliers by the Test Operations group. - E9-1-QUAL Rev. G
36 E. Product Realization Yield and Cost Standards Product/Test Engineering develops cost and performance standards necessary for production control planning. These standards are compared to theoretical results for continuous improvement purposes. - E10-1-QUAL Rev. G
37 E. Product Realization Production Planning Processes Process Configuration, Information, Traceability Function To identify the product status with respect to monitoring and measurement requirements throughout product realization. Facilitator CAD Group CLI number database and product data Marketing FE and BE Product Marketing numbers on SAP Information Technology SAP systems Business Planning SAP production configuration Quality QPL, CAB, and MRB processes Input Product versions and production options. Output Documentation tracing production lots to the version of product, tools, technologies, firmware, software, and facilities used. Procedure Product Identification CLI numbers identify engineering drawings and electronic data for integrated circuits. A new CLI number is assigned for each version. Front End and Back End Product Marketing numbers identify the integrated product types for marketing and sales purposes. FE numbers refer to the product in wafer or die form. BE number refers to the packaged units and includes characters to indicate information related to the package type. The revision letter ties the Product Marketing number to a specific CLI number. Product Marketing numbers and CLI numbers are associated in the SAP (business and finance) database with unique numbers for sales orders, invoices, delivery numbers, and return authorization numbers. Product Marketing numbers and CLI numbers are associated with production lot numbers, location, and test status in the SAP (inventory tracking) database. The CLI number and Product Marketing number systems comply with the Document Control process. - E11-1-QUAL Rev. G
38 E. Product Realization Procedures are maintained at the tier 3 work instruction level by the Quality department to explain the coded characters embedded in Product Marketing numbers. Product Configuration The electronic data that documents integrated circuits is maintained by the CAD group and identified by CLI number. This data includes such things as floor plan, layout, schematic, and pattern generation layers, that define the product configuration. Each CLI number lists the applicable electronic file versions in the data base. CAD maintains the relevant files. Each version of the same product receives a unique CLI number. Version control begins at the pattern generation release milestone in the PDP, with the proviso that prior verification and reviews should be repeated if subsequent changes are made in the circuit design. Results of design rule checks, simulation, modeling and so forth should reference the applicable CLI version. CLI data base should document the applicable technologies, layout rules, sizing, CAD tools, simulation models, et al, used with each CLI version, as well as listing the product configuration files. - E12-1-QUAL Rev. G
39 E. Product Realization Production Lot Identification and Traceability Front end lot numbers are assigned in SAP to each wafer lot by Supplier Planning group. The Cirrus FE lot numbers are traceable to the supplier wafer lot numbers, FE Product Marketing number, and wafer purchase requisition number in SAP. FE lot numbers are converted to back end lot numbers in SAP at the time wafers are sent to assembly suppliers for dicing and assembly. BE lot numbers are traceable to assembly and test purchase requisition numbers in the SAP databases. Ultimately, BE lot numbers are traceable to Customer purchase orders in SAP. Package marking codes are uniquely associated in SAP with root BE lot numbers. (BE lots may be split into numerous sub lots, each identified by the root number and a dash number.) Package mark codes identify the wafer fab, assembly site, and assembly date code. Procedures are maintained at the tier 3 work instruction level to explain the package mark and lot identification code formats. Production Configuration Control The Assembly Build Data (ABD) table assigns assembly work orders, build sheets, mount and bond diagrams, and labeling instructions to specific Product Marketing numbers. It is maintained on SAP by Business Planning. The inputs are provided and authorized by Product/Test and Assembly Engineering. Supplier planning groups then use this table to specify assembly instructions for suppliers. The Change Action Board (CAB) approves/disapproves applications for Process Change Notice (PCN), and End-Of-Life (EOF) notice. The Quality department facilitates CAB meetings, forms, and records. Sales group is responsible for Customer notification. The Material Requirements Board (MRB) reviews and approves/disapproves applications for movement or end use of nonconforming product, for Customer Waiver requests, and for Certificates of Compliance. The Quality department facilitates MRB meetings, forms, and records. - E13-1-QUAL Rev. G
40 E. Product Realization Product/test Engineers define Production Flow requirements for test and inspection operations. Flows list the sequence of testing and inspection activities. They designate test programs, hardware, acceptance criteria, procedures, and/or special instructions for each step. Test Operations provides these instructions to test suppliers. Data and Information Systems Information Technology group maintains the data base systems and data storage used by the other departments for product configuration and production traceability. Data in these systems functions either as records or as specifications. As such the systems and data are subject to the requirements of the Document Control and Records Control processes. - E14-1-QUAL Rev. G
41 E. Product Realization Production Planning Processes Process Contract and Order Entry Administration Function Accept Customer purchase orders and provide commitments for fulfilling them. Convert orders into internal instructions. Facilitator Marketing Quotation Pricing Standards Sales Order Entry Contract Administration Contract Review Input Customer purchase orders, contracts, specifications Output agreed contract exceptions backlog in SAP original commitment dates conversion of Customer requirements to internal instructions Procedure Contract Administration Process Methods for identification of requirements related to products: Delivery/Handling Technical Technical All Products Build-To-Stock Customer-Specific Purchase Orders Cirrus Data Sheets Customer Contracts or Specifications Methods for review of requirements related to products: Delivery/Handling Technical Technical All Products Build-To-Stock Customer-Specific Order Entry Process Not Reviewed. Contract (No deviations to Administration data sheets allowed) Process As a rule, Cirrus supplies build-to-stock products, also known as commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS). For these products the Customer purchase orders, Cirrus terms and conditions, and Cirrus data sheets suffice to specify the product requirements. This arrangement allows Customer-specified labels, packing, and shipping instructions, within limits. - E15-1-QUAL Rev. G
42 E. Product Realization For deviations to this arrangement the Contract Administration office facilitates the review of Customer contracts and specifications by relevant functions within the organization. The contract administrator conducts or arranges direct communication with affected Customers to identify and resolve product information, contract or specification related enquiries, determination of ability to meet agreed requirements, and changes. Once contract or Customer specifications are reviewed and exceptions resolved, Customer purchase orders citing the agreed requirements may be accepted. Product/Test Engineering is responsible to implement technology-based Customer-specific processing or testing requirements through the Product Qualification and Readiness process. The Finance maintains reviewed and approved contracts and Customer specifications in compliance with the Records Control process. Customer Requirements Related To Product Development Refer to the Marketing Requirements/ Business Plan process. Order Entry Process The Sales organization authorizes and trains personnel to enter Customer purchase order requirements into SAP. Subsequent change orders are handled identically to original purchase orders. Marketing originates quotation standards. Sales uses these to respond to requests for quotations prior to receiving purchase orders. Sales group maintains records of the quotation standards and quotations. Order entry personnel determine Customer requirements directly from purchase orders. The entered data is reviewed against the purchase order prior to submitting. The purchase order is initialed and dated to record the review. - E16-1-QUAL Rev. G
43 E. Product Realization Original purchase orders and change orders are maintained as records in accordance with the Records Control process at all locations where order entry occurs. The Sales group manager responsible for the Order Entry process conducts training and, when possible, visits Sales offices to verify conformance to the Order Entry process and records maintenance. However, the SAP system provides the primary record of purchase orders, commitments, and performance. Data entry includes requested product types, versions, quantities, delivery dates, carriers, and billing and delivery locations. Customer-specified handling and labeling requirements, if any, are entered in a SAP table called Customer master data. Customer purchase orders and change orders are treated as contracts. Purchase order data is entered into SAP backlog. The Business Planning process generates production control plans and actions to fulfill the purchase orders. Business Planning generates commitment dates to fulfill backlog after analyzing ability to deliver. The commitment dates are communicated to the Sales organization and ultimately to Customers to signify acceptance of the orders. Returned Material Authorization +++ Customer requests to return product are processed in SAP as Returned Material Authorization (RMA) requests. The personnel who are authorized to enter purchase orders also enter returned materials requests. RMA requests provide for documentation of Customer complaints as well as review and approval of the requests before returns are authorized. A return authorization (RE) number is communicated to the Customer. The number is used for inventory tracking in SAP when the goods are received. Refer to the Corrective Action process. - E17-1-QUAL Rev. G
44 E. Product Realization Production Planning Processes Process Business Planning Function Translate demand into production plan. Deliver Customer orders. Facilitator Business Planning Input Demand forecasts, Customer order backlog, WIP, finished goods inventory, supplier capability and capacity, QPL status Output Demand plan, build plan schedules, pick orders Procedure The demand plan consolidates orders and forecasts into shipments needed to satisfy Customers and business goals. Marketing and Sales activities are responsible for demand forecasts. 7.1 a-b f Marketing and operations personnel meet at least quarterly to compare and adjust demand and demand response plans as goods are shipped against Customer orders. Adjustments to demand and response plans occur as needed throughout the fiscal quarter. Results are converted to supplier plans and purchase requisitions. [See Supplier Planning process.] Demand plans and response plans are transitional documents and not subject to records control. Performance is measured by ontime delivery against Customer orders, and by quarterly business performance against forecasts. Business Planning also schedules Customer shipments, based on the backlog of Customer purchase orders. Assignment of the shipment commit date constitutes official acceptance of a Customer purchase order. Business planning generates pick orders to fill Customer purchase orders from finished goods at the time orders should be shipped. These orders authorize shipments to Customers. - E18-1-QUAL Rev. G
45 E. Product Realization Production Planning Processes Process Supplier Planning Function Authorize suppliers to manufacture, test, inspect, and deliver Cirrus products. Facilitator Supplier Planning Input Build plan from Business Planning Process Output Supplier purchase order releases Supplier deliveries Procedure Supplier Planning groups schedule and order production and testing services in response to the production control plans generated by the Business Planning process. Purchase requisitions are released against large purchase orders in the SAP system. In this way suppliers carry out production control plans. [SAP data comprises the records.] 7.1 a-b f Purchase requisitions contain or reference the Product Marketing number and technical and delivery requirements for products. A procurement specification or contract is listed on each purchase requisition. [See Supplier Management process.] The SAP system automates the process of supplier selection by allowing only authorized suppliers for each service being purchased. Supplier response is ensured by scheduling work and by tracking capacities, work-in-progress and deliveries. Supplier planning activities exist for wafer orders, assembly orders, and test/inspection orders. - E19-1-QUAL Rev. G
46 E. Product Realization Process Logistics & Inventory Control Production Planning Processes Function Direct inventory tracking, movement, storage, labeling, packing, shipping, and receiving services. Management customs, carriers, and distribution suppliers. Ensure proper handling and preservation of inventory in storage and transit. Facilitator Logistics/Inventory Control. These are actually two different supply chain groups who work together on the activities described below. For ease of reading in this document, these two groups are referred to as The logistics group or simply as Logistics. Input pick orders labeling, packing, shipping instructions returned material authorization Output inventory identification and tracking records inventory storage and preservation shipments satisfaction of customs requirements returned material receipt and disposition Procedure The Logistics group manages outsourced finished goods, shipping, and receiving activities as a Supplier Management group. Logistics ensures that procedures exist and are followed for product handling, packaging, storage, preservation, receiving and delivery of products, their constituent parts, and materials. [See procurement specifications in Supplier Management process.] 7.1 a-b f Preservation procedures include methods for ESD protection, moisture protection, safe handling, and monitoring shelf life to prevent shipment of product with expired shelf life without Customer waiver or Cirrus re-qualification. Preservation requirements apply through delivery to intended destinations. Logistics also manages the lot identification, tracking, and status system (SAP). [See the Configuration Management process.] - E20-1-QUAL Rev. G
47 E. Product Realization Logistics group follows the Supplier Management process to select, qualify, and manage outsourced storage, distribution, and shipping/receiving services. Logistics group manages the process for ensuring compliance with customs regulations required for international trade, with oversight from the Legal department. Logistics manages the methodology and processes for implementing Customer-specific packaging, labeling, and bar code instructions originated by the Order Entry process. Logistics manages the receipt and disposition of returned products with direction from Quality and Product/Test Engineering. Returned products are identified as such and segregated from other goods until and unless re-qualified for sale and delivery. - E21-1-QUAL Rev. G
48 E. Product Realization Manufacturing Process Purchasing Function Submit purchase order releases to manufacturing suppliers. Facilitator Purchasing Input Purchase requisitions from Supplier Planning process Output Placement of purchase orders with suppliers. Procedure The SAP system includes automated workflow for review and approval of purchase requisitions Purchasing activity oversees the purchasing activity in the SAP system. Purchasing communicates purchase orders to suppliers. Purchasing also performs vendor selection and buying for items and services not directly relevant to product conformance. The Critical Materials system identifies part numbers, relevant specifications, and approved suppliers for items and services that affect product conformance. SAP is configured so that this information appears correctly on purchase orders. The system only allows selection of suppliers on the approved list. Purchasing enters the critical materials data into SAP, but does not originate it. [See Supplier Management process.] Purchasing accepts purchase requisitions for critical materials from the Supplier Planning and processes them in SAP. Other purchasing requirements for critical materials are met through the Supplier Planning process, including requirements for purchasing information, controls, verification of the adequacy of purchase requirements before submitting the order, and verification of purchased product, and records. Purchase requisition and purchase order records are maintained within the SAP system. - E22-1-QUAL Rev. G
49 E. Product Realization Manufacturing Process Supplier Management Function Ensure conformance of purchased goods and services. Facilitator Fabrication Technology group wafer fabrication, mask Assembly Engineering assembly, piece parts, tape and reel, et al Test Operations probe, final test and inspection Reliability Engineering - burn-in and reliability testing Logistics Distribution, shipping and receiving Input Product and technology requirements Output Conforming product Procedure Cirrus integrated circuit products are subject to the Supplier Management process since wafer fab, assembly and test are outsourced. Supplier Management groups manage the technical aspects for purchasing wafer fab, assembly and test services. 7.1 a-d Supplier Management groups: a) ensure purchased items and services conform to specified purchase requirements, b) evaluate and select suppliers, c) specify purchasing requirements d) ensure verification of purchased items Generic templates for meeting these criteria are maintained at the tier 2 flow-chart level. Supplier Management groups follow these procedures. Product evaluation boards and demonstration boards are exempt from Supplier Management audits because they are not incorporated into end products. Test hardware is similarly exempt because it gets re-qualified with each use. [See the Product Qualification and Readiness process.] - E23-1-QUAL Rev. G
50 E. Product Realization Purchasing Data Procurement specifications or their contractual equivalent are created to define the technical requirements for suppliers. The generic template for procurement specifications are defined in a tier 2 procedure. In addition, tier 4 documents may be needed. For example, Assembly Engineering provides build sheets, mount and bond diagrams, assembly work orders, and marking diagrams as well as procurement specifications. Technology baseline information is required by procurement specifications, as needed to ensure process control. Cirrus Supplier Management groups review and authorize supplier technologies, procedures, and controls for use on Cirrus products. Baseline includes identification of supplier technologies, processes, and/or procedures sufficient to establish process change control and notification from the supplier. This applies to technologies that affect physical configuration or performance of products. The critical materials/purchase order system ensures that procurement specifications are referenced on SAP purchase orders. For automotive products, suppliers are required to maintain process control plans and process FMEAs. Supplier Selection and Qualification Supplier selection and qualification is normally based on technology, vendor profiles, certification, supplier audits, monitoring of supplierprovided data, delivery performance, acceptance results, and results of process and product qualification. Supplier scorecards are maintained to summarize this information for management review, supplier comparison, corrective action, and continual improvement. Verification of Purchased Items Outsourced product processing is verified and accepted through subsequent incoming acceptance and intermediate and final testing in the manufacturing flow. This is a verification of the product against the product data sheet. [See the Product Qualification and Readiness process.] - E24-1-QUAL Rev. G
51 E. Product Realization Process Controls Cirrus Supplier Management Groups ensure that suppliers implement process controls in compliance with ISO9001:2008 paragraphs: control of production and service provision validation of processes for production and service provision identification and traceability Customer property preservation of product 7.6 control of monitoring and measuring devices 8 measurement, analysis, and improvement Supplier Management groups require this compliance in procurement specifications and associated contracts. Ensuring control over outsourced processes does not absolve Cirrus Logic of the responsibility of conformity to Customer, statutory, and regulatory requirements. Supplier management groups monitor and enforce this compliance through supplier profiles, supplier audits, and monitoring data required by procurement specifications. Validation of Processes Suppliers processes and locations are not fully qualified as approved vendors until QPL qualification of product occurs. [See product Qualification and Readiness.] - E25-1-QUAL Rev. G
52 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Process Customer Satisfaction Function Monitor and employ Customer perception to improve products and services. Facilitator Quality Department Input Customer-originated information concerning: - Customer report cards - awards - complaints - Quality returns - Customer satisfaction surveys - market analysis - delivery performance Output improvement actions concerning: - product conformity to specifications - conformity of Quality system to ISO9001: effectiveness of the Quality management system in meeting Customer requirements Procedure Collect and document the relevant input (where available) and summarize for management review, as follows: Categorize incidents as applying to one of the following areas: product, development, fabrication, detection, delivery, application, qualification, supplier, or Quality system. Classify each incident as compliment or complaint. Rank and determine which issues to improve (for example, a risk priority number based on frequency, ability to detect, and impact may be assigned to each complaint). Assign action items, and obtain commitments to correct or improve from the assignees. Follow up until the action is complete and effect is verified. Summarize the findings and present for management review at least annually. - F1-1-QUAL Rev. G
53 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Process Internal Audit Function Assess the conformity and effectiveness of the Quality management system processes. Effectiveness relates to meeting Customer requirements. Facilitator Quality Department Input - ISO9001:2008 requirements - product specifications - Quality Manual - specified Customer requirements, if accepted - internal audit findings and observations - supplier profiles, audit findings, and observations Output Actions to correct or improve conformity or performance of products, services, or processes. Internal audit records Management review summaries and presentations Procedure Internal audits are scheduled annually so as to assess each Quality system process against the ISO9001:2008 standard at least once every eighteen months Executive management is the primary client of the internal audit. Department managers are clients of the results for their audited activities. The order of importance for internal audits is: a) verify that Quality system processes defined in the Quality manual are in use b) verify that they conform to the requirements of the Quality manual c) assess effectiveness of Quality system processes in satisfying Customer requirements d) assess the regular maintenance of the Quality system processes and procedures e) verify that the Quality manual processes meet ISO 9001:2008 requirements - F2-1-QUAL Rev. G
54 The Quality Department maintains audit schedules for each calendar year and conducts internal audits using qualified internal and/or subcontracted auditors. F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Select auditors and conduct audits so as to ensure objectivity and impartiality. Auditors do not audit their own work. Adjust scope, method, and criteria for each internal audit to take the following into consideration: a) coverage of each Quality system process in the prescribed eighteen month cycle b) coverage of each Quality system-relevant department in the prescribed eighteen month cycle c) target agenda for the upcoming registrar audit d) Customer feedback e) results of previous audits, corrective and preventive actions f) direction of management reviews Managers of audited departments are responsible for taking appropriate actions within an agreed time frame. Managers report action follow-up to the Quality Department. The Quality Department is responsible for follow-up to verify the action is implemented and effective. Verification results are part of the internal audit record. The Quality department is responsible to summarize internal audit results and present them for management review. Internal audit records are originated by the Quality Department and maintained in central Document Control. Supplier audits are conducted by the responsible supplier management organizations in conformance to the Supplier Management Process in this Quality manual. Written procedures and work instructions for internal auditing are maintained at the tier two and tier three levels. These are followed to adjust the scope, criteria, and methods to be used for each internal audit. - F3-1-QUAL Rev. G
55 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Process Product and Process Monitor Function Monitor conformity of products and services. Monitor effectiveness of processes. Facilitator Quality System Processes Relevant Facilitators Manufacturing Processes Relevant Supplier Mgmt Groups Products Product/Test Engineering Input product test and inspections data, manufacturing data, delivery data, Quality policy, Quality objectives, audit results, analysis of data, corrective and preventive actions, management review Output Production Flows Test and Inspection Steps Acceptance Criteria Data Analysis Quality Objectives and Metrics. Continual Improvement actions. Procedure Processes In the Quality Manual The facilitator(s) for each Quality manual process is responsible to define and maintain a Quality objective(s) and metric(s) suitable to monitor the effectiveness of the process in achieving planned results. Planned results should be related to meeting Customer requirements Facilitators use the Quality objective(s) results to indicate when the process needs corrective, preventive, or continual improvement action, and take action when indicated. Make Quality objectives and metrics available for internal audits and management review. Production and Delivery Process Monitoring At Suppliers Supplier management groups authorize production and product handling flows used by suppliers for Cirrus products. [See Supplier Management process.] - F4-1-QUAL Rev. G
56 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Supplier Management procurement specifications should ensure that suppliers: a) define and implement production flows containing test and/or inspection steps for process and product conformity b) define, implement, and monitor acceptance criteria for the test and inspection steps c) monitor and analyze the resulting data for needed corrective, preventive, and continual improvement actions d) specify data that should be reported and/or available to Cirrus e) process conformity includes conformity to ISO9001:2008. Supplier management groups ensure that suppliers maintain or provide lot records indicating conformity with acceptance criteria at in-process and final test operations. Supplier management groups ensure that yield limits are used to indicate conformity with acceptance criteria for electrical and mechanical tests and inspections. Supplier management groups ensure that supplier procedures require lot records to indicate the person authorizing release of product from the manufacturing step when yield limits are met. Supplier management groups ensure that supplier procedures require that production lots be put on hold for engineering disposition if yield limits are not met. Customer waivers are required to ship any product that does not meet data sheet requirements. This does not apply to units that pass data sheet requirements in a lot that fails yield limits, if engineering disposition indicates such units are reliable. Final Test Operation The purpose of final test is to verify that each unit of each product type meets the specified data sheet. - F5-1-QUAL Rev. G
57 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Product/Test Engineering and Assembly Engineering define and authorize the production flows and related items used at Final Test (test programs, test hardware, test conditions, test limits, lot acceptance criteria). These are provided to test subcontractors by the Test Operations group. Test Operations is responsible to ensure that the suppliers implement and use the authorized items for final test. Process Effectiveness Monitoring at Cirrus Each supplier management department is responsible to monitor product conformity and/or delivery performance as the method for measuring process effectiveness. Each supplier management group maintains supplier scorecards for active suppliers. Scorecards serve as the Quality objectives and metrics for supplier management. [See Supplier Management process.] Supplier management groups use the scorecards to indicate needed corrective, preventive, or continual improvement actions and to take action when indicated. Supplier management groups make scorecards available for internal audits and management review. Product Conformity Monitoring At Cirrus Product/Test Engineering reports electrical yield variance (from standards) for internal audits and management review. Yield variance serves as the top Quality objective metric for product conformity. Product/Test Engineering also reports nonconformance trends for internal audits and management review. Nonconformance trends should indicate the frequency of lots that get put on hold for failing yield limits, and the Pareto of reasons for putting these lots on hold. Product/Test Engineering uses product yield variance and nonconformance trends to indicate when fabrication, test, and inspection processes need corrective, preventive or continual improvement action. Take action as indicated. - F6-1-QUAL Rev. G
58 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Process Nonconformance Control Function Detection, handling and disposition of nonconforming product. Prevention of unauthorized movement, processing, or delivery of nonconforming product. Facilitator Foundry Engineering Wafer Processing Criteria Product/Test Engineering Electrical and Functional Criteria Assembly Engineering Mechanical Criteria Supplier Management Groups Implementation Input Production Flows Test and Inspection Steps Acceptance Criteria Output Identification and disposition of nonconforming product Procedure Supplier management groups authorize supplier technologies and production flows for use on Cirrus products. Production flows are verified to have adequate test/inspection steps, acceptance criteria, and nonconformance controls. [See Supplier Management process.] 8.3 Yield limits are the primary nonconformance control for Cirrus Products. They are used as lot acceptance criteria during test/inspection steps during final test operations. Units that fail final production tests and inspections are classified as nonconforming yield drop-out. Such units are identified and segregated from untested and passing products. Cirrus procurement procedures shall require this, and Test Supplier procedures shall define the methods. Failing units are disposition by the supplier scrap process with permission from Cirrus planning group. Production Lots that fail yield limits are classified as nonconforming product until disposed. Such lots are identified and segregated from untested and passing product. Cirrus procurement procedures shall require this, and Test Supplier procedures shall define the methods. - F7-1-QUAL Rev. G
59 After detection of a failing lot, the test setup is then verified. If the test setup is found to function correctly the lot is placed on hold for engineering notification and disposition. Cirrus Product/Test Engineering or Assembly Engineering is responsible to determine the cause and disposition. F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement The options for engineering disposition are: a) correct and qualify the test/inspect setup and repeat the test b) confirm the reliability of passing units and move/ship the low-yielding lot c) screen the product to eliminate a specific nonconformity from the population of units; then move/ship the passing units d) confirm reliability and obtain Customer waiver for the nonconformance e) scrap the lot or otherwise prevent its movement and use Where Customer waiver is to be used, a Material Review Board must first review and approve the engineering disposition. When necessary, sample units from failing production lots are provided to Product/Test Engineering for failure analysis. - F8-1-QUAL Rev. G
60 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Process Corrective Action Function Eliminate the causes of nonconformities. Facilitator Quality Department Input Any information source regarding product or process conformity, or process effectiveness. Especially Customer complaints, returned material, failure analysis, audits, process monitors, product monitors, nonconformance control, management reviews, material review boards, change action board, and supplier scorecards. Output Problem description, effect ranking, team identification, containment action, root cause analysis, corrective action plan, implementation, and verification of effect (8D process) or replacement of errant material, process, or technology Procedure Corrective action applies to revising or replacing processes so that they will produce conforming products or services Correction and segregation of nonconforming product (process results) is called containment. Containment and corrective action should never be confused with each other. Action intended to correct a process so as to eliminate or reduce the cause of nonconformities may be classified as a corrective action and used for audit evidence. Information streams that regularly result in corrective action include audits, management reviews, change action board (CAB), material review board (MRB), returned material authorization (RMA) system, and failure analysis (FACR) system. In general, the Quality Department administers, assigns, reviews, and records these. Supplier Management groups originate, review, and administer corrective actions needed from suppliers. - F9-1-QUAL Rev. G
61 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Facilitators of processes in this Quality manual are responsible to originate, review, and administer corrective actions needed to correct effectiveness and conformity of their respective processes. Effectiveness should be assessed through Quality objectives and their metrics. The Quality Department provides guidance to other groups concerning corrective and preventive action and continual improvement of the Quality system. Reviewing Nonconformities and Customer Complaints Review process effectiveness and conformity at least annually to determine if corrective action is needed. Customer complaint based information should be reviewed when received. This includes RMA and FACR requests. Determination of need shall be based on assessment of the effect on achievement of Customer and business requirements, and shall be documented as a Quality record. Determining Causes of Nonconformities The person or team assigned to implement corrective action is responsible to determine root cause. Root cause analysis may require failure analysis of products. Cirrus Logic operates a Device Physics Laboratory to support failure analysis. FACR reports are used to report failure analysis and root cause findings to Customers. Evaluating The Need For Action The person or team assigned to implement corrective action is responsible to assess effect and opportunity to improve. One effective method, where nonconforming product is involved, is to assign a score for frequency, effect, and ability to detect the nonconformity. - F10-1-QUAL Rev. G
62 The Quality department, through oversight of corrective and preventive action systems and of Customer interests, has authority to intervene and require action. Management may direct that action be taken as a result of management review. Determining And Implement Needed Actions F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement A corrective action plan should be documented as a sequence of steps to be taken. The assigned individual or team is responsible for creating, recording, implementing, and evaluating the action plan. Reviewing Corrective Actions Taken The corrective action plan should include steps for evaluating the effects of the action, once taken, in eliminating the nonconformity. The assigned individual or team is responsible for reviewing and recording the effect of the actions taken. The assignee(s) must determine if the actions were effective. Records of Results of Actions Taken The assigned individual or team is responsible for recording problem description, effect ranking, team identification, containment action, root cause analysis, corrective action plan, implementation, and verification of effect. Such records must be maintained in an authorized records center compliant with the requirements of the Records Control process. Management Review The Quality department reports corrective action summaries for Management Review. - F11-1-QUAL Rev. G
63 F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement Process Preventive Action Function Eliminate the causes of potential nonconformities to prevent their occurrence. Reduce dependence on detection to deliver conforming product. Facilitator Development Program managers for Design and Development Supplier Management groups for production processes Input Any information source regarding product or process conformity, or process effectiveness - especially design inputs, reviews, verification, validation, technology specifications, process limits, simulation results, process and product monitors, Customer feedback. Output Problem description, effect ranking, team identification, root cause analysis, preventive action plan, implementation, and verification of effect (8D process) - or replacement of errant process, or technology Procedure Preventive action applies to designing products and processes so as to enhance manufacturability and product conformance Design project teams are responsible for administering preventive action to products under development. Program managers ensure this is part of the project agenda. Supplier Management groups are responsible for ensuring that suppliers administer acceptable preventive action programs for manufacturing processes. Determine Potential Nonconformities And Their Causes Any formal problem solving or analysis approach may be used to identify potential nonconformities and determine the need for preventive action. Design FMEA should be used for automotive product design of build-to-stock products to the extent possible. [For Customerspecified designs FMEA may be a mandatory part of the contract.] Process control charts and Process FMEA should exist for supplier manufacturing processes supporting automotive products. - F12-1-QUAL Rev. G
64 Another acceptable method is to apply the corrective action for one product to similar products that are not (yet) experiencing nonconformities. Regardless of the approach used, records should be generated that compare potential nonconformities with their root causes. Evaluate The Need For Action To Prevent Nonconformity Preventive action is needed when potential nonconformity frequency is high, ability to detect is low, and effect is strong. Together, these factors define risk for the nonconformity. F. Measurement, Analysis, Continual Improvement The responsible design team or supplier management department makes this evaluation and records it. (Alternately, Supplier Management reviews and authorizes preventive action by the supplier.) Determine and Implement Needed Action Once the risk for preventive action is known and a decision for preventive is made, an individual or team is assigned to define and implement the preventive action. From this point forward, preventive action for processes is administered in exactly the same way as corrective action. [See Corrective Action process.] For products under development, preventive action is documented as a design requirement. [See Product Development process.] Record and Review Results For Product Development: Preventive action decisions are recorded in approved Marketing Requirements Documents (MRD) and architecture specifications (SAS) for projects. Subsequent design and development work is verified against MRD and SAS during reviews. [See Product Development ] For Product Fabrication: See Corrective Action process. - F13-1-QUAL Rev. G
ISO 9001:2008 Audit Checklist
g GE Power & Water ISO 9001:2008 Audit Checklist Organization Auditor Date Page 1 Std. 4.1 General s a. Are processes identified b. Sequence & interaction of processes determined? c. Criteria for operation
ISO 9001 Quality Systems Manual
ISO 9001 Quality Systems Manual Revision: D Issue Date: March 10, 2004 Introduction Micro Memory Bank, Inc. developed and implemented a Quality Management System in order to document the company s best
FMC Technologies Measurement Solutions Inc.
Table of Contents 1 Revision History... 4 2 Company... 5 2.1 Introduction... 5 2.2 Quality Policy... 6 2.3 Quality Organization... 6 2.4 Company Processes... 7 3 Scope and Exclusions... 8 3.1 Scope...
Specialties Manufacturing. Talladega Castings & Machine Co., Inc. ISO 9001:2008. Quality Manual
Specialties Manufacturing Talladega Castings & Machine Co., Inc. ISO 9001:2008 This document is the property of TMS and may not be reproduced, wholly, or in part, without the express consent of TMS. Rev.
CENTRIS CONSULTING. Quality Control Manual
CENTRIS CONSULTING Quality Control Manual ISO 9001:2008 Introduction Centris Consulting developed and implemented a Quality Management System in order to document the company s best business practices,
Cartel Electronics. AS 9100 Quality Systems Manual
Cartel Electronics AS 9100 Quality Systems Manual 1900 C Petra Lane Placentia, California 92870 Introduction Cartel Electronics, as a global supplier to the aviation, space, and space industries, has developed
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL
The online version of this document is controlled. Therefore, all printed versions of this document are unofficial copies. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL 6901 Charles Street Towson, Maryland 21204 Manual
FINE LOGISTICS. Quality Manual. Document No.: 20008. Revision: A
FINE LOGISTICS Quality Manual Document No.: 20008 Revision: A 20008 Rev. A FINE LOGISTICS, Quality Manual Page 1 of 24 Quality Manual: Table of contents Number Section Page 1. GENERAL 3 1.1 Index and revision
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Corporate
Page 1 of 12 4 Quality Management System 4.1 General Requirements The Peerless Pump Quality Management System shall include: Documented statements of a quality policy and of quality objectives; A quality
CORPORATE QUALITY MANUAL
Corporate Quality Manual Preface The following Corporate Quality Manual is written within the framework of ISO 9001:2008 Quality System by the employees of CyberOptics. CyberOptics recognizes the importance
Quality Management System Manual
Quality Management System Manual This manual has been reviewed and approved for use by: Jack Zazulak President, Aurora Machine Limited March 07, 2011 Date - Copyright Notice - This document is the exclusive
Supplier Quality Management System Audit Checklist (ISO 9000:2000, TS 16949:2002)
Supplier Quality Management System Audit Checklist (ISO 9000:2000, TS 16949:2002) Supplier: Plant/Location: Date: Audit Team: Scope of Audit: Number of C.A.R. s: Corrective Action Due: Potential suppliers
Exar Corporation Quality Manual
Exar Corporation Quality Manual Exar Corporation 48720 Kato Road Fremont, CA 94538 Tel: (510) 668-7000 Fax: (510) 668-7001 Executive Quality Improvement Team Commitment This quality manual provides a statement
Rev: Issue 4 Rev 4 Quality Manual AOP0101 Date: 10/07/13. Quality Manual. CBT Technology, Inc. 358 North Street Randolph, MA 02368
Quality Manual CBT Technology, Inc. 358 North Street Randolph, MA 02368 Issue 4 Revision 4 Note: updates are in italics Page 1 of 18 1.0 Scope and Exclusions Scope This Quality Manual contains policies
Turbo Resources International Quality Procedure
TURBO RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL APPROVALS: Revision : 46 Page : 1 of 53 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 1. SCOPE 4 1.1 GENERAL 4 1.2 APPLICATION 5 2. NORMATIVE REFERENCE
ISO 9001:2000 AUDIT CHECKLIST
ISO 9001:2000 AUDIT CHECKLIST No. Question Proc. Ref. Comments 4 Quality Management System 4.1 General Requirements 1 Has the organization established, documented, implemented and maintained a quality
Micro Plastics, Inc. Quality Manual
ISO 9001:2008 11 Industry Lane Flippin, Arkansas 72634 QM-001-2008-F Page 2 of 39 Introduction Micro Plastics, Inc. developed and implemented a Quality Management System in order to document the company
Quality Systems Manual
Quality Systems Manual This manual was developed to support ISO 9001 elements Revision Description of Change Author Effective Date 5-28-02 Initial Release Support ISO 9001: 2000 L. Hook 5-28-02 7-01-02
AS 9100 Rev C Quality Management System Manual. B&A Engineering Systems, Inc. 3554 Business Park Drive, Suite A-1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626
AS 9100 Rev C Quality Management System Manual B&A Engineering Systems, Inc. 3554 Business Park Drive, Suite A-1 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Doc. No. AS9100C Rev E Effective Date: 01 JAN 2013 Page 2 of 45 CONTROLLED
ISO 9001:2008 QUALITY MANUAL. Revision B
ISO 9001:2008 QUALITY MANUAL Revision B Because we want you to achieve the highest levels of performance, we connect care Because with leading we want science you to achieve continuously the highest improve,
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL JPM OF MISSISSIPPI, INC.
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL JPM OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. Hattiesburg, MS Revision E 01/19/11 Revised to ISO 9001:2008 on July 9, 2009 JPM OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. MANAGEMENT QUALITY POLICY It is the goal of JPM of
Quality Management System General
Audit Date: Quality Management System General Requirement: 4.1 and 4.2.2-QMS General Verify Scope Comments/Evidence/Findings: Verify the Exclusions is applicable and justified How are the processes in
QMS Manual 2350 Helen Street, N. St. Paul, MN 55109 Page 1 of 5. Quality Management System Manual
2350 Helen Street, N. St. Paul, MN 55109 Page 1 of 5 AETRIUM Quality Management System Manual 2350 Helen Street, N. St. Paul, MN 55109 Page 2 of 5 Introduction It is a strategic decision by Aetrium management
Quality Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS APPROVAL SIGNATURE PAGE 1.1 1 AMENDMENT RECORD 1.2 2 SCOPE 2.0 3 EXCLUSIONS 2.1 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION 1.0 1 APPROVAL SIGNATURE PAGE 1.1 1 AMENDMENT RECORD 1.2 2 SCOPE 2.0 3 EXCLUSIONS 2.1 3 CORPORATE POLICY 3.0 3 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 4.0 4 GENERAL
QUALITY MANUAL ISO 9001. Quality Management System
Page 1 of 20 QUALITY MANUAL ISO 9001 Quality Management System Printed copies are not controlled unless marked "CONTROLLED". Upon receipt of this document, discard all previous copies. Page 2 of 20 Approval
Quality Manual. UK Wide Security Solutions Ltd. 1 QM-001 Quality Manual Issue 1. January 1, 2011
Quality Manual 1 QM-001 Quality Manual Issue 1 January 1, 2011 This document is uncontrolled when printed. Please verify with Quality Management Representative 16 Dukes Close, West Way, Walworth Industrial
Quality Management System Manual
Quality Management System Manual Assurance ISO / AS Manual Quality Management System EXCEEDING ALL EXPECTATIONS Since our inception in 1965, Swiss-Tech has supplied the medical, aerospace, hydraulic, electronic
QUALITY MANUAL 3 KENDRICK ROAD WAREHAM, MA 02571 508-295-9591 FAX 508-295-6752
QUALITY MANUAL 3 KENDRICK ROAD WAREHAM, MA 02571 508-295-9591 FAX 508-295-6752 Section 1. REVISION STATUS Revision 01 Initial Issue 02/13/95 Revision 02 ECO No.Q-0032 05/07/96 Revision 03 ECO No.97171
Quality, Environmental, Health and Safety Manual Toshiba International Corporation
Quality, Environmental, Health and Safety Manual Toshiba International Corporation Doc. No. QEHS 001 Rev. 19 (12/12) Title: Prepared By: Revision No.: Table of Contents and Cross Reference Ken Mori/Homer
Quality System Manual
Quality System Manual Joe Coatter 9/23/15 President - Joe Coatter Date Bill Gareis ISO/TS Management Representative - Bill Gareis 9/23/15 Date Revision Status: Revision # 7 (9-23-15) QUA-0003 4.2.2 SECTION
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS General Requirements. Documentation Requirements. General. Quality Manual. Control of Documents
Chapter j 38 Self Assessment 729 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS General Requirements 1. Establishing and implementing a documented quality management system 2. Implementing a documented quality
ISO 9001:2000 Gap Analysis Checklist
ISO 9001:2000 Gap Analysis Checklist Type: Assessor: ISO 9001 REQUIREMENTS STATUS ACTION/COMMENTS 4 Quality Management System 4.1 General Requirements Processes needed for the quality management system
Karas Engineering AS9100 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL
Karas Engineering AS9100 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL Revision D October 27, 2015 Statement of Commitment and Authority Commitment This Quality Management System Manual (QMSM) delineates the processes,
Revision Date Author Description of change. 10 07Jun13 Mark Benton Removed Admin. Manager from approval
Page 2 of 15 Document Revision History Revision Date Author Description of change 10 07Jun13 Mark Benton Removed Admin. Manager from approval 12Feb13 Mark Benton 08 01Oct12 Mark Benton 07 8/30/2012 Refer
Row Manufacturing Inc. Quality Manual ISO 9001:2008
Row Manufacturing Inc. Quality Manual ISO 9001:2008 Row Manufacturing 210 Durham Drive Athens, Alabama 35611 Phone:256.232.4151 Fax:256.232.4133 Page 2 of 33 This Page intentionally left Blank Page 3 of
ALL PRODUCTS MFG & SUPPLY
ALL PRODUCTS MFG & SUPPLY 618 ANDERSON DRIVE ROMEOVILLE, IL 60446 PHONE: 877-255-8700 FAX: 877-255-8701 WWW. APGASKET.COM QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL DATE: 11/20/12 REVISION 9.1 UNCONTROLLED COPY
ISO 9001 (2000) QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REPORT SUPPLIER/ SUBCONTRACTOR
Page 1 of 20 ISO 9001 (2000) QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REPORT SUPPLIER/ SUBCONTRACTOR SUPPLIER/ SUBCONTRACTOR NAME: ADDRESS: CITY AND STATE: ZIP CODE: SUPPLIER/MANUFACTURER NO PHONE: DIVISION:
Camar Aircraft Products Co. QUALITY MANUAL Revision D
QUALITY MANUAL Revision D Gujll'y Manual Introduction The purpose of this manual is to describe the Quality Assurance Program implemented by Camar Aircraft Products Co. (hereafter referred to as C.A.P.C.)
AEROSPACE STANDARD. Quality Management Systems - Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organizations RATIONALE
AEROSPACE STANDARD AS9100C Issued 1999-11 Revised 2009-01 Superseding AS9100B Quality Management Systems - Requirements for Aviation, Space and Defense Organizations RATIONALE This standard has been revised
Control No: QQM-02 Title: Quality Management Systems Manual Revision 10 07/08/2010 ISO 9001:2008 Page: 1 of 22
ISO 9001:2008 Page: 1 of 22 Central Technologies has developed a Quality Management System, and the associated procedures and work instructions, to be compliant to ISO 9001:2008. Utilizing this Quality
Uncontrolled Document
SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL July 2015 Revision 5 Quality System Manual Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE... 1 2.0 SCOPE... 1 3.0 TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 2 4.0 QUALITY MANAGEMENT
QUALITY OPERATING PROCEDURE QOP-00-02 QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM MANUAL
PAGE 1 OF 40 QUALITY Note: The revision level of this document and any referenced documents must be verified for latest issue before use QOP-00-02 TITLE QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM MANUAL APPROVALS DATE REVISIONS
Contents. Management Policy Manual SEM USA Page 2 of 12
SEM USA Page 2 of 12 Contents 1. The Schneider Electric Motion USA Management Policy... 3 2. PROCESS INTERACTION... 4 3. COMPANY OBJECTIVES:... 5 4. MANAGEMENT SYSTEM... 6 4.1. General Requirements...
Quality Assurance System Manual
The online version of this procedure is official. Therefore, all printed versions of this document are unofficial copies. St. Louis Public Schools Quality Assurance System Manual 801 North 11 th Street
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) MANUAL
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) MANUAL This document and the data contained herein are the property of ISOLINK, and shall not, without prior written permission, be reproduced or used for any unintended
NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS. (Fairmont and Montreal Facilities) QUALITY MANUAL. Prepared to comply with the requirements of ISO 9001:2008
WEIGH-TRONIX CANADA ULC NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS (Fairmont and Montreal Facilities) QUALITY MANUAL Prepared to comply with the requirements of ISO 9001:2008 Meets or exceeds the requirements for design,
ED FAGAN INC. QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL
ED FAGAN INC. QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL APPROVED BY: Ed Fagan President ED FAGAN INC. January 13, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2 2. PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND CAPABILITIES 2 3. REVISION HISTORY
Eagle Machining, Inc. Quality Management System
Eagle Machining, Inc. Quality Management System 1 of 10310 Antoine Drive Bldg D, Houston, Texas 77086 BUSINESS OPERATING MANUAL (QUALITY MANUAL) Revision Date: 08/01/2014 Approved By: Joseph Vu Date: 08/01/2014
Quality Management System Quality Manual
1788 Northpointe Rd. Columbia, TN 38401 & 5456 E. McDowell Rd. Suite 109 Mesa, AZ 85215 & 647 Westport Pkwy Grapevine, TX 76051 USA 1-800-635-5342 www.wiremasters.net Quality Management System TABLE OF
074-8432-552 Page 1 of 7 Effective Date: 12/18/03 Software Supplier Process Requirements
Page 1 of 7 Software Supplier Process Requirements 1.0 QUALITY SYSTEM FRAMEWORK 1.1 QUALITY POLICY The Seller shall document and implement a quality program in the form of Quality manual or detailed Quality
Quality Management System Manual QM-QUA-001
Quality Management System Manual QM-QUA-001 Nelson-Miller Inc. 2800 Casitas Avenue Los Angeles, Ca 90039 P a g e 2 Revision Date Description of the Change N/C 10/10/79 Initial release of documented inspection
14620 Henry Road Houston, Texas 77060 PH: 281-447-3980 FX: 281-447-3988. WEB: www.texasinternational.com QUALITY MANUAL
14620 Henry Road Houston, Texas 77060 PH: 281-447-3980 FX: 281-447-3988 WEB: www.texasinternational.com QUALITY MANUAL ISO 9001:2008 API Spec Q1, 9th Edition API Spec 8C 5 Th Edition MANUAL NUMBER: Electronic
0. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUALITY MANUAL Conforming to ISO 9001:2000 0. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Description ISO 9001 Clause Page 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS n/a 2 1 PIMA VALVE, INC. DESCRIPTION n/a 3 2 QUALITY MANUAL DESCRIPTION 4.2.2
ONTIC UK SUPPLIER QUALITY SURVEY
MAIL-IN / ONSITE This report is intended to furnish data relative to the Suppliers capability to control the quality of supplies and services furnished to Ontic UK. Please complete this Survey and return
Free Download ISO/TS 16949:2009. Requirements Checklist. 29 of 57 pages (PDF) For additional information see www.rcglobal.com
RCGLOBAL.COM Free Download ISO/TS 16949:2009 Requirements Checklist 29 of 57 pages (PDF) For additional information see www.rcglobal.com RCGLOBAL(Canada), for internal use only. Page 1 of 57 Review performed
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL IMS. Based on ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 14001:2004 Standards
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MANUAL IMS Based on ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 14001:2004 Standards Approved by Robert Melani Issue Date 30 December 2009 Issued To Management Representative Controlled Y N Copy
The President of Inductors Inc. is the senior executive responsible for operations.
Title: Quality Management System Manual Page: 1 of 20 INTRODUCTION Inductors Inc., founded in 1991, specializes in the distribution of inductive components, including but not limited to standard and custom
SUPPLIER QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM QUESTIONNAIRE
Company Name Street Address City, State, Zip code Phone Number Fax Company Website Email Address ORGANIZATION NAME PHONE NUMBER EMAIL ADDRESS President/CEO General Manager Engineering Manager Production
Quality. Manual. Advanced Monolithic Systems, Inc. Document #00-0001 Rev A. Advanced Monolithic Systems, Inc.
Advanced Monolithic Systems, Inc. Quality Manual Document #00-0001 Rev A Advanced Monolithic Systems, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Quality Manual Table of Contents Name Page # 1.0 Scope... 5 1.1 Introduction... 5
CUSTOMER SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
CUSTOMER SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS For Use With ISO 9001:2008 & ISO/TS 16949:2009 Page 1 SYSTEMS POLICY MANUAL CONTENTS Revision History Approval Document Distribution and Control General Application Background
MEDFORD FABRICATION CSC, INC. Quality System Manual. Date of issue: 03/25/2010 Revision : F
MEDFORD FABRICATION CSC, INC Quality System Manual Date of issue: 03/25/2010 Revision : F Table of Contents System Description 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Company Quality Policy 3.0 Organization Charts 4.0 Quality
Quality System Manual
Quality System Manual Document: QM Issue: 3 Revision: 1 Date: July 24, 2014 General Introduction ISS: 3 REV: 1 Page: 2 of 56 Section 1.2 Document Revision Page REV REV DETAILS LEVEL DATE Page Para. DESCRIPTION
Quality Management System Manual
Effective Date: 03/08/2011 Page: 1 of 17 Quality Management System Manual Thomas C. West Eric Weagle Stephen Oliver President ISO Management General Manager Representative Effective Date: 03/08/2011 Page:
Quality Manual. ISO/TS 16949:2009 Quality Management System. Sensing and Control
Sensing and Control ISO/TS 16949:2009 Quality Management System CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS: OPTEK Technology 1645 Wallace Drive Carrollton, TX 75006 MANUFACTURING: Optron de Mexico Avenue Rio Bravo #1551 Parque
UNCONTROLLED COPY FOR REFERENCE ONLY
CLOVER MACHINE AND MFG. 800 MATHEW ST. #101 SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 727-3380 727-7015 fax REVISION: DATE: PAGE 1 OF 45 QUALITY POLICY MANUAL DISTRIBUTION LIST: President Purchasing Manager Vice President
Quality Management System MANUAL. SDIX, LLC Headquarters: 111 Pencader Drive Newark, Delaware 19702
Quality Management System MANUAL SDIX, LLC Headquarters: 111 Pencader Drive Newark, Delaware 19702 Doc. No. G5500 Rev. 9.1 Status : APPROVED Effective: 12/11/2014 Page 2 of 23 Quality Manual Table of Contents
Quality Manual ISO9001:2008
Quality Manual ISO9001:2008 Connor Winfield Corp. Date: 4/26/10 Revision: 3 Quality Manual Quality Manual Connor Winfield GENERAL Section 0.1 Section Rev.: 2 Rev. Date: 4/26/10 Section Page 1 Index and
ISO 9001 : 2008 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDIT CHECK LIST INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION What auditors should look for: the items listed in these headings that the ISO requirement is met that the requirement is met in the manner described in the organization's documentation Page
ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System Requirements (Third Revision)
ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System Requirements (Third Revision) Contents Page 1 Scope 1 1.1 General. 1 1.2 Application.. 1 2 Normative references.. 1 3 Terms and definitions. 1 4 Quality management
QUALITY MANUAL REVISION RECORD
Page 2 of 31 REVISION RECORD Date Rev Description Jun 18, 2007 N/C Original Issue Sep 16, 2009 A Update to ISO 9001:2008 Standard. Feb 04, 2010 B Revised exclusions, removed (Except 7.3.7 from the exclusion
ABC COMPANY INC ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANUAL
Page 1 of 25 ABC COMPANY INC QUALITY MANUAL Page 2 of 25 DOCUMENT INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THIS MANUAL This describes the quality management system at ABC Company Ltd, Buffalo, USA described as the Organization,
Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 3 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS... 4 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 4 4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM...4-8
Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 3 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS... 4 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 4 4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM...4-8 5. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY...8-9 6. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT... 10 7. PRODUCT
The Prophotonix (UK) Ltd Quality manual
The Prophotonix (UK) Ltd Quality manual Date: March 2014 Revision: D Sparrow lane, Hatfield Broad Oak, Herts, UK, CM22 7BA Tel: +44 (0)1279 717170 Fax: +44 (0)1279 717171 e-mail: [email protected] Page
AVNET Logistics & EM Americas. Quality Manual
AVNET Logistics & EM Americas Quality Manual Avnet is committed to ensuring customer satisfaction while meeting all customer and applicable legal, statutory and regulatory requirements. This is accomplished
Quality Management System MANUAL. SDIX, LLC Headquarters: 111 Pencader Drive Newark, Delaware 19702
Quality Management System MANUAL SDIX, LLC Headquarters: 111 Pencader Drive Newark, Delaware 19702 Doc. No. G5500 Rev. 9.2 Status : APPROVED Effective: 9/25/2015 Page 2 of 23 Quality Manual Table of Contents
Mossfiel Electrical & Safety Management Pty Ltd
ISO 9001:2008 QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Be warned. Any reproduction of this quality management system or associated documents without the express permission of the company and
ISO 9001:2008 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES MANUAL
8200 Brownleigh Drive Raleigh, NC 27617-7423 Phone: (919) 510-9696 Fax: (919) 510-9668 ISO 9001:2008 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES MANUAL ALLIANCE OF PROFESSIONALS & CONSULTANTS, INC. - 1 - Table of Contents
This Business Management System Manual is based on ISO 9001:2008 requirements
Page 1 of 19 (Formerly: Quality Management System Manual) When the ISO 9001:2008 standard is identifying the Quality Manual or Quality Management System, Turbonetics is representing this requirement with
ISO-9001:2000 Quality Management Systems
ISO-9001:2000 Quality Management Systems REQUIREMENTS 10/10/2003 ISO-9001:2000 Requirements 1 Process Based Approach C U S MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT C U S T O M Requirements PRODUCT
DNV GL Assessment Checklist ISO 9001:2015
DNV GL Assessment Checklist ISO 9001:2015 Rev 0 - December 2015 4 Context of the Organization No. Question Proc. Ref. Comments 4.1 Understanding the Organization and its context 1 Has the organization
AS9100 Quality Manual
Origination Date: August 14, 2009 Document Identifier: Quality Manual Revision Date: 8/5/2015 Revision Level: Q AS 9100 UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED Page 1 of 17 1 Scope Advanced Companies (Advanced) has established
Rockwell Automation Quality Management System
Rockwell Automation Quality Management System Our Quality Policy Rockwell Automation is committed to a global quality system focused on customer solutions. We achieve this through superior products and
GARDNER AEROSPACE SUPPLIER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS MANUAL
GARDNER AEROSPACE SUPPLIER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS MANUAL Issue Number: 1 Issue Date: 12/9/14 1 of 19 Contents Revision Summary... 4 1.0 Introduction... 5 2.0 Supplier Quality System Requirements... 6 3.0
Quality Systems Manual
Hardy Machine & Design, Inc. Quality Systems Manual Meeting ISO9001:2008 Requirements Ankur Goel August 21, 2015 Quality Systems Manual Hardy Machine & Design Rev. 015 Page 2 AS 9100 Quality Management
Contents of the ISO 9001:2008 Quality System Checklist
Contents of the ISO 9001:2008 Quality System Checklist Page Hyperlinks (click underlines) This SAMPLE document includes 4 clauses of the standard. You receive the Windows.doc file (with hyperlinks). You
Company Quality Manual Document No. QM Rev 0. 0 John Rickey Initial Release. Controlled Copy Stamp. authorized signature
Far West Technology, Inc. ISO 9001 Quality Manual Document No.: QM Revision: 0 Issue Date: 27 August 1997 Approval Signatures President/CEO Executive Vice President Vice President/CFO Change Record Rev
Quality Management Systems Manual
Washington Division Quality Management Systems Manual ISO 13485:2003 DOCUMENT NUMBER 01-QM-MED REVISION LEVEL 01 PAGE 1 of 40 This manual describes the quality management systems structure at GM Nameplate
SNAP-ON INCORPORATED QUALITY FORWARD SYSTEM MANUAL OF PRACTICE
QUALITY FORWARD SYSTEM MANUAL OF PRACTICE Approval: Date: 05/01/05 QFSSystem.doc QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. Quality Policy...For display purposes 0.0 Introduction and
This procedure applies to all aspects of Specialized Turning, Inc. s Aerospace Quality Management System.
P 4.0 Page 1 Document Number and Title: P 4.0 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Originator: MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE Revision: 8 1. Scope and Purpose: This procedure applies to
Micron Quality Manual
Micron Quality Manual The Quality Management System (QMS) is an integral component in allowing Micron to achieve the next level in Quality Control and in delivering Total Quality Excellence to our customers.
Quality Manual PA3-01-001
Rev 01C February 2008 2008, PhaseLink Corporation PhaseLink is the trademark of PhaseLink Corporation, www.phaselink.com CONTENTS 1. Purpose and scope:...3 1.1. Purpose:...3 1.2. Scope:...3 2. Introduction
Quality Management System Policy Manual
Quality Management System Burns Engineering, Inc. 10201 Bren Road East Minnetonka, MN 55343 4. 4.1 General Requirements The Quality Manual consists of the quality system policy documents and the quality
Quality Manual Printed copy valid for 24 hours from time of printing unless stamped CONTROLLED COPY in red. Page
Quality Manual Page 1 of 20 Change Log Document Revision Date Description of Change 15/04/09 Initial Release Page 2 of 20 1.0 Scope and Exclusions Scope This Quality Manual contains policies that have
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
QM-1 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS MANUAL Revision 7 Page: 1 of 57 This document contains proprietary information and is not lo be distributed to or copted for a third party without the express written permission
Quality Management System Manual Revision L
This Page 1 of 35 of the Quality Management System Manual If issued as a controlled copy, the serial number of this copy is Quality Management System Manual Certified to AS9100 Revision C Printed copies
Quality Manual. DuraTech Industries, Inc. 3216 Commerce Street La Crosse, WI 54603 MANUAL SERIAL NUMBER 1
Quality Manual Approval Page Document: QA1000 Issue Date: 5/29/1997 Page 1 of 17 Revision Date: 5/20/2013 DuraTech Industries, Inc. 3216 Commerce Street La Crosse, WI 54603 MANUAL SERIAL NUMBER 1 This
Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information
इ टरन ट म नक Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information
ISO/IEC 17025 QUALITY MANUAL
1800 NW 169 th Pl, Beaverton, OR 97006 Revision F Date: 9/18/06 PAGE 1 OF 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS Quality Manual Section Applicable ISO/IEC 17025:2005 clause(s) Page Quality Policy 4.2.2 3 Introduction 4
