Harris County: PY Fair Housing Plan
|
|
|
- Patrick McLaughlin
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Harris County: PY Fair Housing Plan Prepared by the Harris County Community Services Department; Submitted to the U.S Department of Housing & Urban Development on January 15, 2013
2 Harris County Fair Housing Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Why is Fair Housing Important? Harris County at a Glance Fair Housing Plan Organization Community Profile Demographic Highlights Protected Classes Opportunity Areas Affordable Housing in Harris County Investment Environmental Justice Local Ordinances, Regulations, and Policy review Impediments and Strategies Matrix Citizen Participation Plan Encouragement of Citizen Participation Consultation with Outside Departments and Organizations Meetings and Public Hearings Access to Records Publication of Materials Public Grievances Performance Reports Citizen Participation in Creating the Fair Housing Plan Public Hearing/Public Review Period 66 Appendix A Survey Instruments and Contacts A
3 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Why is Fair Housing important? Housing plays a major role in defining a person's quality of life. Access to safe and affordable housing is a right of every American. Today, two-thirds of new households being formed are either racial or ethnic minorities or immigrants. In addition, now more than ever, individuals with disabilities are rightfully seeking greater access to opportunities in every sector. Equal opportunity in housing offers the chance to live, work, and interact in richly diverse settings and opens doors to other opportunities. Where a person lives affects their access to social, cultural, educational and many other community amenities such as schools, transportation, employment, medical services, retail and professional services, recreational and entertainment opportunities, and much more. The Analysis of Impediments (AI) serves as the basis for fair housing planning, provides essential information to policy makers, administrative staff, housing providers, lenders, fair housing advocates, and assists in building public support for fair housing efforts. Fair Housing Requirements Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair Housing Act), as amended prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of dwellings, and in other housing-related transactions, and provides equal access to housing. The Harris County Community Services Department (CSD), in consultation with local government agencies, housing and social service providers, and community advocacy organizations has prepared a Fair Housing Plan as a major component of the PY Consolidated Plan. This document outlines how Harris County will take steps to affirmatively further fair housing. The purpose of these actions is to ensure housing choice for all residents of Harris County by eliminating housing discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, and national origin (Protected Classes). As of 2012, the Fair Housing Act does not include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes, but equal access to housing in HUD programs for lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender persons is covered by 24 CFR Part 5, 200, 203, 236, 400, 570, 574, 882, 891, and 982. Required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), any community that administers Community Planning and Development (CPD) programs must produce a Fair Housing Plan. As a recipient of funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Harris County is required to be in compliance with the Consolidated Plan Final Rule, published in the Federal Register (24 CFR ). Harris County receives federal funds for the following CPD programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Home Investment Partnership (HOME) Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) 1
4 HUD program regulations require that jurisdictions certify that they will affirmatively further fair housing as part of the obligations assumed when they accept HUD funds. These certifications are included in the Harris County Consolidated Plan and each annual Action Plan. 1.2 Harris County at a Glance Harris County, Texas is the third largest county in the United States by population, ranking behind Los Angeles County (Los Angeles, CA) and Cook County (Chicago, IL). Harris County had an estimated population of 4,092,459 in 2010, up 20.3 percent from the 2000 Census (3,400,578). The county seat, Houston, Texas, is also the fourth largest city in the nation. Harris County sits on the Gulf Coast and is in the Houston-Galveston Area Council region of southeastern Texas. The county maintains relationships with the surrounding counties of Waller, Montgomery, Liberty, Chambers, Galveston, Brazoria and Fort Bend. These join with outlying Austin County and San Jacinto County to form the Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA, or MSA). 1.3 Fair Housing Plan Organization The Analysis of Impediments (AI) is a review of impediments or barriers that affect the rights of fair housing choice. It covers public and private policies, practices, and procedures affecting housing choice. HUD defines an impediment to fair housing choice as any action, omission, or decision taken because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, national origin, or sexual orientation that restricts or has the effect of restricting housing choice or the availability of housing choice. Since federal protected classifications (racial and ethnic minorities, families with children, persons with disabilities) are over-represented among lowincome households, actions that restrict the availability of affordable housing in a jurisdiction are also considered impediments to fair housing. The Fair Housing Plan comprises an Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice and a Fair Housing Action Plan. As outlined in HUD s Fair Housing Planning Guide, the Fair Housing Plan consists of the following: An Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) that identifies impediments to fair housing choice within Harris County; and A Fair Housing Action Plan that defines appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the AI; and A Records System that maintains records reflecting the analysis and actions taken. HUD interprets the broad obligations noted above to more specifically mean that a jurisdiction should: Analyze and eliminate housing discrimination in the jurisdiction, Promote fair housing choice for all persons, 2
5 Provide opportunities for inclusive patterns of housing occupancy, Promote housing that is structurally accessible to, and usable by, all persons, and Foster compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of the Fair Housing Act. Stakeholder Participation Input from key stakeholder groups was an important part of developing the AI. Surveys, interviews, and public meetings were used to gather information on public and private sector impediments for fair housing, the effectiveness of existing fair housing programs, and actions to address impediments. In particular, Harris County actively sought roundtable meetings with community organizations that work with fair housing issues. Harris County met with the Houston Area Urban League (a HUD sponsored Fair Housing organization) and the Houston Center for Independent Living in order to discuss major trends within the area, housing deficits, outreach efforts, and community partnerships. Harris County has established a Fair Housing Committee to review the AI, provide feedback, and help refine a list of impediments. The committee consists of local government officials, housing professionals, fair housing professionals, and community representatives. A full list of advocates, focus group participants, interviewees, and survey correspondence is included in Appendix B. Data Sources In preparing the AI, Harris County collected and analyzed a wide variety of information, including survey information from residents and key stakeholders, case and complaint data, demographic data, and public policies that may have an impact on housing choice. These sources are cited throughout the report and include: Local planning documents, including the Harris County Consolidated Plan and municipal ordinances; Local, state and federal organizations involved in housing finance, development, sale, regulation, enforcement, policy and advocacy; Census and demographic data; Fair housing complaint data maintained by HUD; Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), Home Mortgage Disclosure Act; Online survey of housing and social service professionals in the public and private sectors; and Literature and Internet research. Fair Housing Plan Outline The AI includes the following report sections: 3
6 1.0 Introduction. Describes HUD requirements for fair housing and outlines the components and methodology of the Fair Housing Plan. 2.0 Community Profile. Includes demographic, socioeconomic, and housing market analyses, providing quantitative data to complement the discussion of impediments. Includes fair housing complaint data and detailed sections on the protected classes. Also, includes an analysis of high opportunity areas, affordable housing, housing finance practices, and local ordinance and policy reviews. 3.0 Impediments to Housing Choice and Action Plan. Discusses a wide range of public and private sector impediments to fair housing, including overarching themes that cut across both sectors. Contains recommendations and timetables to address the impediments to fair housing identified in the AI and outlines the responsibilities of Harris County, as well as other key stakeholders. 4.0 Citizen Participation. Outlines the community engagement and stakeholder participation efforts carried out by Harris County, including consultations, survey results, and public comments. 4
7 2.0 Community Profile Section 2.0 describes the current demographic, socioeconomic, transportation, and housing characteristics of Harris County. The section also reviews fair housing complaints maintained by HUD, housing finance practices, and local zoning and municipal ordinances. 2.1 Demographic Highlights Four key demographics impact Harris County: the rate of population growth, the aging of the population, the growth in racial/ethnic minority populations, and the changes in household composition. Changing growth rates and composition characteristics can be attributed to increased immigration from other states and nations. Immigrants are migrating to the Houston area because of better employment opportunities and a lower cost of living compared to other major cities. The following sections highlight demographic factors of Harris County that comprehensively illustrate the challenges facing residents in achieving fair housing choice. For more detailed demographic information, please refer to the Community Profile and Housing Market Analysis sections of the PY Consolidated Plan (2013 ConPlan Section 3, pages 1-79). Population Trends A community s population size and location is dependent upon a number of factors. These include, but are not limited to, a community s ability to provide quality infrastructure (i.e. roads and bridges) and satisfactory levels of basic public services and facilities (i.e. police, fire, public health and emergency medical services, schools, and utilities). Harris County has a surplus of available land to absorb an expanding population, but this is changing as an increasing population is pushing growth to the outlying regions of the county where housing options are relatively cheaper. Harris County continues to gain population. The 2011 population of Harris County was 4,180,894, a 22.9 percent increase since During the same period, the State of Texas total population grew by 27.0 percent to a total of 25,674,681. This growth changed the regional distribution of population. Between 1990 and 2000 the incorporated areas experienced a much higher growth rate, accounting for 62.1 percent of all county growth. The 2010 Census showed that these growth figures reversed during 2000 to 2010, and unincorporated Harris County provided 73.1 percent of growth. In 2010, an estimated 1,793,358 persons resided in the CSD service area (all areas in Harris County outside of the Cities of Houston, Baytown, and Pasadena). The population of the CSD service area grew by about 44.9 percent between 2000 and 2010, and the service area population added 556,303 persons (CPMA 3-8). The population of the CSD service area grew over twice as 5
8 fast as it had during the prior decade, when it grew by an estimated 234,086 persons between 1990 and Age Harris County has a relatively young population. Out of the 10 most populous U.S. counties, Harris County had the highest percentage of persons below 18 years old (28.1 percent) and the lowest percentage of persons 65 years or older (8.2 percent) (Table 3.11, 2013 ConPlan Section 3-15). This trend can be contributed to the influx of younger immigrants and the fact that the baby boomer generation (those born between 1946 and 1964) is just beginning to turn 65 years old. Despite Harris County s relative youth, the population is clearly aging. The median age for Harris County was 32.2 in 2010, up from 30.5 in The baby boomer generation reached 21.7 percent of total population. It was this cohort that was primarily responsible for the increased median age over the last ten years. Income and Poverty In 2010, the median household income in Harris County was $50,422 (ACS 2010). HUD is required by law to set income limits to determine the eligibility of applicants for its assisted housing programs. The 2012 HUD-established median family income for a family of four for the Harris County was $66,900. The HUD income limit groupings are: Moderate Income: Income does not exceed 80% of the median - $53,500 Low Income: Income does not exceed 50% of the median - $33,450 Very Low Income: Income does not exceed 30% of the median - $20,050. According to the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS), approximately 30 percent of all families in Harris County met the HUD definition of Low-Income. Approximately 19 percent of households met the HUD definition of Extremely Low-Income, 22 percent were Moderate Income, and 39 percent of households earned an income of $75,000 or more. Low-income or lower households are projected to experience significant increases in Harris County, including the area serviced exclusively by the County. By 2012, HUD projected that 43.5 percent of all Harris County households will qualify as low-income or lower according to 2009 Consolidated Housing Affordability (CHAS) Table 1. This represented 590,260 total Low-Income Households, of which 22 percent contained members over the age of 65. During 2011, 20 percent of, or one in five, persons in Harris County fell below the poverty level (ACS 2011). This is a 4.6 percent increase, compared to poverty in 2008 where 15.4 percent of Harris County residents experienced poverty status and 16.4 percent in
9 There is a correlation between race and income levels among households. In 2010, the per capita income of black households in Harris County was approximately 46 percent of the household income of whites, while Hispanic households were 51 percent (Figure 2.1). Figure Median Household Income by Race and Ethnicity, ,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Source: 2011 ACS White Asian Hispanic Black Harris County Houston MSA Map 2.1, Median Household Income in 2010, shows the geographic distribution of household income in Harris County. It shows a concentration of higher income households in the West University and Bellaire areas, surrounded by lower income neighborhoods. This distinct pattern extends from inside I-610 outwards to Beltway 8. Higher income pockets are located in the lessdensely populated, county periphery, where residents can get more home for their money. The movement of upper income households to the exurbs and suburbs, creates very distinguishable lines of socioeconomic segregation, where lower-income areas are concentrated within Beltway 8 and closer to Houston s city center. 7
10 Map 2.1 Median Household Income in 2010 The poverty income for a family of four in 2011 was $23,021. According to the 2011 ACS, 19.6 percent of individuals in Harris County fell below the poverty level. Poverty affects minority populations disproportionately in Harris County. In 2010, the poverty rate for blacks was triple that of whites (non-hispanic) living in Harris County (26.5 and 7.3 percent, respectively). The Hispanic population is also disproportionately affected, with a poverty rate of 27.2 percent. Poverty rates in Harris County also differed by age and household type. Nearly one-third of children under 18 years living in Harris County were in poverty in 2010 (27.5 percent). Persons age 65 and over had one of the lowest poverty rates in Harris County (11.6 percent). The poverty rate for female-headed households in Harris County (34.6 percent) was more than double that of all families living in the county (16.2 percent), and approximately 1 out of every 2 female-headed households with children in Harris County were living below the poverty line (43.2 percent). When analyzing female individuals, the poverty rate increases to 46.9 percent. Married couple families had the lowest poverty rate in Harris County (10.0 percent). High child poverty percentages may be attributed to lower earnings for female head of household families, declining value and availability of public assistance, and the lack of affordable housing. 8
11 Employment and Education Changes in employment and education are telling characteristics in how an economy is diversifying to meet the labor force needs of its community. These indicators also show the capacity of a population to earn more income and thus overcome such conditions as poverty and homelessness. In the next two years the Texas State Data Center forecasts that the Houston Metro Area will gain over 160,000 jobs, with that trend likely to continue as population and the economy continue to grow (CPMA 3-27). The Greater Houston Partnership Employment Forecast and The Perryman Group see that from 2010 to 2035, Houston will lead the state in population growth, adding 3.37 million residents and accounting for almost one-fourth of Texas job growth, adding 1.43 million jobs. Analysis of 2010 ACS figures show that Harris County has experienced increases in the number of persons obtaining college degrees and the number of skilled professional and managerial jobs. The county has also seen continued growth in service sector employment. Educational attainment is an important indicator of potential economic growth. The Greater Houston Partnership (GHP) forecasts that over 84,000 new jobs will be added in 2013, with the greatest gains coming in manufacturing; professional, scientific and technical services; administrative support services; and health care. Educational attainment is an important determinant of the earning potential of individuals, and provides a strong indicator for an individual s ability to research and decide on appropriate housing options. Communities with higher concentrations of educated workers tend to have higher levels of income and are better able to contribute to the socio-economic well-being of the entire area. According to the 2010 ACS, the persons 25 years and older with an associate degree cohort increased by 61.8 percent from 2000 to 2010 (CPMA 3-32). Also, 27 percent of Harris County residents had a bachelor s degree or higher in 2000, increasing to 28 percent in Table 2.1 shows the correlation between race/ethnicity and educational attainment and occupation category. Whites and Asians are more likely to have bachelor s degrees and management positions compared to Blacks and Hispanics. Geographically, high education and low education concentrations occur throughout the county. Areas of high education occur mainly in the western portion of the county. Areas with low college degree attainment are concentrated in the north central and east central portions of the county, mirroring areas of low English language proficiency, minority concentration, and low- to moderate-income. 9
12 Table 2.1 Employment and Educational Attainment by Race and Ethnicity, 2011 White Asian Hispanic Black Percent with Bachelor's degree or more 42.8% 47.2% 11.2% 22.2% Occupation Category Management, business, science, or arts 50.6% 48.3% 17.0% 31.6% Service 8.6% 16.2% 24.2% 19.6% Sales and office 27.1% 19.0% 20.1% 28.7% Natural resources, construction, or maintenance 6.0% 5.5% 20.5% 5.2% Production, transportation, or material moving 7.7% 11.0% 18.2% 14.9% Percent of Labor Force Unemployed 5.9% 6.5% 9.2% 16.1% Source: 2011 ACS Transportation Profile The 2010 American Community Survey revealed that travel time to work slightly decreased by 26.9 minutes versus 28.1 minutes in This decrease may be attributed to more persons finding housing closer to employment centers. The 2010 American Community Survey also indicates that most residents in the county, 78.3 percent drive their own vehicle to work (CPMA 3-30). A fair number of residents, 12.0 percent, continue to use carpooling as their primary transportation, but the percentage of workers that use public transportation has decreased since 2000 (4.1 percent to 2.9 percent). Housing Profile The housing market in Harris County continues to experience growth in the development and construction of both single-family and multi-family housing units despite the recent housing market collapse. Between 2000 and 2010, total housing units in Harris County grew by 23.2 percent and occupied housing units grew at a lower rate of 19.0 percent. Over that same time period, population growth occurred at a slightly higher rate of 20.3 percent, which indicated a slight increase in the size of households. The housing unit density upsurge can be seen in the increase in the average household and family size in the county, 2.79 to The largest increase in occupied housing units occurred for households made up of 5 or more people. Household growth increased faster than occupied housing unit growth between 2000 and 2010 indicating that not only are more persons living in each housing unit, but there is consolidation amongst households, often times leading to overcrowding because of the deficit in larger housing units. Overall, housing in Harris County is becoming increasingly affordable. However, low-income individuals and families are finding it harder to obtain affordable housing because of the increasing gap between quality housing costs and household incomes. Housing is generally more available and affordable for individuals and smaller families (1 to 3 people), but income also plays an important role. To be considered affordable, the monthly rent or mortgage payment on an apartment or house must be less than or equal to 30 percent of the monthly household income. 10
13 The Texas Housing Affordability Index (THAI) gives a general picture of how affordable housing is for a person of median income. The THAI is the ratio of median household income to the income required to buy a median-priced home using currently available mortgage financing. According to the Real Estate Center, the Houston area s THAI has increased from 1.5 to 2.63 from 2006 to 2011, showing an increase in housing affordability (CPMA 3-52). Another way to show which families are most in need of housing assistance is to calculate the size of the gap (in dollars) between monthly income and monthly housing cost, also called an affordability deficit. The greater the affordability deficit, the more difficult it is for an individual or family to pay their monthly rent or mortgage payment (Refer to Table 3.45 in CPMA 3-45). There are substantial deficits between the monthly income of low-income levels and the fair market price of decent, safe, and sanitary housing. Households with the greatest affordability challenges are those of large families making 30 percent of MFI, small families making 30 percent of MFI, and large families making 31 to 50 percent of MFI, respectively. With over 1.6 million housing units and only 1.3 million occupied units, Harris County appears to have a surplus. However, the housing issues in Harris County are not explicitly questions of quantity, but rather those of quality and accessibility. Are there enough 3-plus bedroom units available at affordable prices? Are there enough accessible units available to persons on fixed incomes? For a more detailed examination of housing issues, please refer to the Community Profile and Market Analysis (CPMA) in the Consolidated Plan. Housing Quality The adequacy of housing is most simply explained by the physical condition of available housing units. In a jurisdiction as large as Harris County, with over 1.5 million housing units (approximately 1.4 million occupied), it is difficult to determine the precise number of substandard housing units without a house-by-house inspection. Housing quality depends in part on the age, characteristics, and location of the dwelling unit. The age of a housing unit is one of the factors that affect its value. In addition, the age of housing can also be a determinant to its condition. Older structures require more maintenance and overall upkeep; if repairs are not made, the condition and value of the unit may deteriorate rapidly. Harris County CSD relied on the 2012 Harris County Appraisal District (HCAD) housing annual inspection to determine the County s housing condition. The HCAD annual inspection measures the overall physical condition of the dwelling relative to its age, or the level of maintenance that you would normally expect to find in a dwelling of a given age. Eight alternatives are provided: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Average, Fair, Poor, Very Low, and Unsound. 11
14 According to the 2012 HCAD Housing Inspection, there were 894,074 single- and multi-family housing units inspected in the Harris County Service Area, with multi-family units being inspected as a complex and not as individual units. In general, the housing inventory is in good repair. Housing stock in need of replacement or rehabilitation (fair, poor, very poor, and unsound) accounts for 181,461 units or 20.3 percent of the county. The largest group of housing units at 53.8 percent (480,593) was those units in average condition or display only minor signs of deterioration. There were an additional 232,020 units or 26 percent of the housing stock that were in good, very good, or excellent condition (refer to Table 3.49 CPMA 3-66). Housing quality depends on the income of the occupants and their ability to pay for needed repairs. Many low-income households live in units that are at risk of loss because they cannot meet the basic costs of maintaining and operating standard housing. Low-income households are more likely to live in structurally inadequate housing and even when accounting for income differences, renters are more apt to reside in structurally inadequate units compared to homeowners. Based on the HCAD Housing Quality Survey, the highest concentration of housing units in need of repair are in the City of Houston, within Beltway 8, and the unincorporated portions of Harris County. Map Housing Quality, shows the geographical breakdown of housing quality in Harris County according to the Harris County Appraisal District s housing quality survey. Map Housing Quality 12
15 Harris County s Target Areas account for 13.6 percent of the housing units in need of repair (Fair, Poor, Very Poor, and Unsound quality) while the Cooperating Cities account for 7.3 percent. The cooperative cities with a high need of repair were identified as Jacinto City, La Porte, South Houston, Galena Park, Deer Park, and Tomball. While a higher number of block groups are classified as having poor housing quality in the Service Area, the largest number of parcels in need of repair lies in the City of Houston. This discrepancy is due to the increased housing density of the city. Overall, single family homes dominate the owner-occupied inventory. Unlike homeowners, rental property owners cut back substantially on repair and renovation activities. Depending on rent levels and the overall condition of the property, no expenditures on repair and remodeling are made. Small non-resident property owners appear to have the most difficulty keeping up with repairs. 2.2 Protected Classes The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, and financing of dwellings, and in other housing-related transactions, based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status (including children under the age of 18 living with parents or legal custodians, pregnant women, and people securing custody of children under the age of 18), and disability. These protections were first put into law in 1968 and then strengthened in 1988 by making families with children and those with disabilities a protected class. While the federal law sets the minimum protections, states and localities can expand the number of protected classes. Fair Housing Complaints Discrimination complaints provide an indication of the nature and degree of fair housing problems in a jurisdiction. The agency with the primary responsibility for handling fair housing discrimination complaints in Harris County is the Greater Houston Fair Housing Center (GHFHC). The Houston Area Urban League (HAUL), Harris County Housing Resource Center (HRC), Texas Low Income Housing Information Service (TXLIHIS), and HUD also handle fair housing discrimination complaints. Violations of the fair housing laws may include, depending on the specific facts: Refusing to rent housing to a member of a protected class; Refusing to sell a home to a member of a protected class; Providing false information to a member of a protected class; Evicting a member of a protected class; Refusing to make a loan, or charging a higher interest rate, to a member of a protected class; Refusing to allow persons with disabilities to make their housing physically accessible; 13
16 Refusing to adjust rules that inhibit the ability of people with disabilities to successfully use their housing; Having policies that make families with children unwelcome; Harassment, e.g. asking a tenant for sexual favors, or proselytizing the tenant, or calling members of protected classes insulting names; and Building new housing that is not accessible to persons with disabilities. From 2007 through 2011, there were 544 individual fair housing complaints in Harris County, and many of those complaints (164) carried additional discrimination claims. Within the county, housing discrimination based on disability was reported in 45.8 percent of complaints and race was reported in 40.8 percent of complaints (refer to Table 2.2). Table 2.2 Fair Housing Complaints by Protected Class, Primary Base Class (544) Secondary Base (133) Additional Base (31) Total % Race 40.8% 0.0% 0.0% 40.8% Disability 38.4% 27.1% 0.0% 45.0% Familial Status 6.8% 18.8% 12.9% 9.3% National Origin 11.9% 26.3% 32.3% 20.2% Sex 1.3% 12.0% 19.4% 5.3% Religion 0.6% 5.3% 6.5% 2.3% Color 0.0% 0.8% 3.2% 0.4% Retaliation 0.2% 9.8% 25.8% 4.1% Source: HUD According to the 2011 Fair Housing Trends Report produced by the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA), this breakdown is consistent with national data, which in 2010 showed that persons with disabilities continued to report the most claims of discrimination overall. The NFHA identifies several reasons why disability complaints tend to be higher than other types of housing complaints, such as apartment owners refuse to make reasonable accommodations or modifications and/or developers design and construct inaccessible apartment buildings that do not meet the Fair Housing Act s standards. Map 2.3 breaks down the number of complaints by zipcode. Many of the high complaint areas are located within the City of Houston, but there are a few clustered complaint areas in the western portion of the county in the City of Katy and southwest toward the City of Sugarland. Map 2.4 Fair Housing Complaint Type by Zipcode, shows the distribution of fair housing complaints by type. In Zipcodes with a variety of complaint types, the predominant type is represented. Race and disability complaints dominate the north central portion of the county, mirroring the spatial distribution of minority concentration and low-income areas. 14
17 Map 2.3 Fair Housing Complaints by Zipcode, Map 2.4 Fair Housing Complaint Type by Zipcode,
18 Race/Ethnicity, Color, and National Origin The Texas State Data Center (TSDC) projects that the population of the state of Texas will become increasingly ethnically diverse in coming years, with projections varying widely depending on migration patterns. Using the most recent migration patterns, the TSDC projects that by 2015 Texas will be about 42 percent Hispanic, 41 percent Anglo, 11 percent Black, and about 5 percent of the population being from other racial/ethnic groups, primarily Asian. For Harris County, population growth, particularly minority population growth, is expected to exceed state rates in specific demographics. The Asian and Hispanic populations are projected to continue rapid growth. However, other racial groups, particularly Anglos, will decline as a percentage of county population. In Harris County, the Hispanic cohort experienced substantial growth between the years 2000 and This group experienced a 49.3 percent change, increasing to 1,671,540 persons, representing 40.8 percent of the total county population. Likewise, the Asian population experienced a 44.4 percent change, increasing to 249,853 persons, representing 6.1 percent of the total county population. The White, not Hispanic or Latino population decreased from 1,432,264 to 1,349,646. The Black cohort grew at a significant pace, experiencing a 21.7 percent change, increasing from 619,694 to 754,258, and representing 18.6 percent of the total county population. For a complete table of race and ethnicity refer to Table 1.3 Race and Ethnicity in Harris County, (ConPlan Section 3-17). Growth in the minority population is a key factor in overall population growth of Harris County. According to 2010 Census numbers, the minority population represents more than half of the county population. Between 2000 and 2010 the minority portion (everyone except for those identifying as White, Not Hispanic) of the total population increased to 67.2 percent. Fair Housing complaints involving race are one of the major complaint types in Harris County, cited in 40.8 percent of all complaints. Race based complaints are widespread throughout the county, with major occurrences in the western and north central portions of the county. Taking into account, racial and ethnic segregation, concentration of moderate to low-income areas, and low housing quality, the minority population is disproportionately impacted in regards to fair housing choice and access to quality affordable housing. Racially (and ethnically) isolated and economically poor neighborhoods tend to have restricted employment options, contribute to poor health, expose residents to high crime rates, and contain some of the least-performing schools. These deficiencies not only limit the amount of quality housing within these areas, but access to pertinent housing information and education opportunities is often limited because of the lack of community resources. Maps 2.5 and 2.6 identify Race and Ethnicity by Census Tract in Individually, the maps 16
19 illustrate distinct concentrations of African-Americans and Hispanics, especially in the north central portions of Harris County. Together, the maps show minority concentrations marked by racial and ethnic segregation patterns. The north central and south central portions of the County have been home to historically African-American neighborhoods, but over the last decade have experienced a substantial increase in Hispanic population. Map - Race by Census Tract, Dot Density in 2010 Map - Ethnicity by Census Tract, Dot Density in
20 Map 2.7 Minority Concentration with Low to Moderate Income Areas in 2010 shows areas of Minority Concentration overlaid with Moderate- to Low-income census tracts. Every single moderate-income or lower census tract is located in an area that is at least 30 percent minority, and 90 percent of the moderate-income or lower census tracts are located in areas that are at least 65 percent minority. Map - Minority Concentration with Low to Moderate Income Areas in 2010 There was significant growth among other racial and ethnic groups in Harris County between 2000 and The impetus for this growth stems from an emerging foreign-born population, comprised primarily of people born in Asia and Latin America. In 2010, 25.4 percent of Harris County residents (1,044,010 persons) were born outside the United States. This figure represents a 38.0 percent increase in foreign-born residents since 2000 (756,548 persons). Fair Housing complaints involving national origin are one of the major complaint types in Harris County, cited in 20.2 percent of all complaints. According to the 2010 ACS, National origin based complaints are indicated in three north central and one eastern area. Language barriers, cultural differences, mistrust and fear of institutions, and lack of knowledge of the judicial system and Fair Housing protections greatly limit access to fair housing choice, housing quality, and affordable housing options 18
21 English language proficiency is an important determinant of the wage and educational disparities between immigrants and citizens and can produce significant barriers to housing choice. Non- English speakers and individuals with little English language skills are commonly employed in occupations that require little education and have minimal earning power. Lack of English proficiency can also negatively impact housing opportunities through limited access to housing choice, limited access to housing education, and exposure to housing discrimination. According to the 2010 ACS, there is a concentration of census tracts where 25 to 50 percent of the population does not speak English Very Well in the north central portion of the county. The 2010 ACS also shows a high concentration of persons from Latin America in the same area. Concentrating areas of poor English proficiency and high concentrations of foreign born residents in low to moderate income neighborhoods works to compound the challenges of accessing fair housing opportunities. Disability The 2010 American Community Survey indicated there were 2,804,621 persons in Texas with some kind of disability. Within Harris County, 349,781 residents or 8.7 percent of the total population reported a disability. Of those with a disability, 0.6 percent were under 5 years, 9.5 percent were 5 to 17 years, 55.9 percent were 18 to 64 years and 34 percent were 65 years and over. For Harris County persons under 18 years of age the most prevalent disability was cognitive difficulty. For those 18 and over ambulatory difficulty was the most prevalent disability followed by independent living difficulty. Additionally, affordability is also an issue in the availability of accessible housing. Persons with disabilities who are low-income often do not have the funds to obtain barrier free housing. Meeting the housing needs of persons with disabilities is a factor in analyzing housing availability and housing choice in an area. The availability of accessible housing units is difficult to determine because it is often up to the homeowner to provide modifications to housing to meet their needs for accessibility. Rental housing projects may offer accessible units, but the number of units is limited. Fair Housing complaints involving persons with disabilities are the highest number of complaint types in Harris County, cited in 45.0 percent of all complaints. The majority of those complaints center on denial of reasonable accommodations by landlords, lack of handicapped parking spaces, and denials of rental policy modifications for residents. Disability based complaints are concentrated in the north central portion of the county, with noticeable occurrences in the eastern portion as well. According to local advocate organizations, Harris County has large deficits in the quantity, quality, and affordability of accessible units. The combination of persons with disabilities on a fixed income and limited accessibility options creates major impediments in housing choice. 19
22 As of 2010, the percentage of disabled persons who earned incomes below the poverty level was approximately 8 percent higher than the percentage of persons without a disability below the poverty level. The median earnings of persons between 16 years of age and older with a disability is $21,949, compared to $29,316 for persons without a disability. Many disabled persons rely solely on Social Security Income (SSI) which is not enough on its own to reasonably pay for decent, safe, and sanitary housing. The SSI program provided an individual with a maximum monthly income of $698 in In 2011, the fair market rent for an efficiency apartment was $690 and for a one-bedroom unit was $767. This is over 98 percent of monthly SSI income which means a disabled individual whose sole income is SSI cannot even come close to affording an adequate housing unit. Persons with disabilities face numerous obstacles to securing housing, ranging from architectural barriers to economics. According to data from the 2000 U.S. Census, the census tracts with the highest concentration of persons with disabilities are the same tracts with high minority concentration, high concentrations of moderate to low-income populations, and low housing quality. The lack of more recent data is a major barrier in itself. This amalgamation of negative factors works to severely limit fair housing choice and opportunity for people with disabilities. In particular, poor housing quality disproportionately impacts persons with disabilities as it increases the cost of making reasonable accommodations. Familial Status The 2010 U.S. Census counted 1,435,155 households in Harris County, with a 19 percent increase between 2000 and Over that same time period, population growth occurred at a slightly higher rate of 20.3 percent, which indicated a slight increase in the size of households or the number of persons living in each housing unit. That housing unit density upsurge can be seen in the increase in the average household and family size in the county. In 2010, approximately 2.82 persons lived in the average Harris County household, a slightly larger size than the 2.79 persons in Fair Housing complaints involving familial status make up a smaller portion of complaint types in Harris County, 9.3 percent of all complaints. Many of those complaints center on discrimination against families with children. Familial status based complaints are concentrated in the east central and northern portions of the county, and are often grouped with complaints regarding national origin and/or race. According to local data detailed in the PY Harris County Consolidated Plan and advocate organizations, Harris County has large deficits in the quantity, quality, and affordability of 3 plus bedroom units. The combination of larger families (and the increased cost associated with them) and limited housing options creates major impediments in affirmatively furthering fair housing. Map 2.9 Persons per Household in 2010, shows concentrations of larger households located throughout Harris County. Exceptions include the pockets of areas showing concentrations of 20
23 smaller households denoted by the light blue and dark blue shading. These blue areas are concentrated mainly in the City of Houston where areas of denser housing development are more prevalent. The county, as a whole, is overwhelmingly made up of 3 to 4 person households, as suburban areas offer the chance to trade space and affordability for a longer commute. Map 2.9 Persons per Household in 2010 Generally speaking, the presence of married couple households, especially those with children, has been an indicator of community and household stability. The 2010 Census showed that Married couple families now make up almost half of all household types (47.4 percent), down from 50.6 percent in This change is partly due to the extended life expectancy in elderly singles, and an increase in non-traditional households. Other family households and non-family households single persons living alone or groups of unrelated individuals not only grew at a faster rate than total household growth but also faster than total family households. The ability to which the housing market is responding to specific household needs is often measured by overcrowding. HUD defines overcrowding as the condition where there are more than 1.01 persons per room. Overcrowding is often a problem for large and extended households (five or more persons) when the housing market fails to provide an adequate supply of housing units with three or more bedrooms. Affordability is also an issue that increases the 21
24 likelihood of overcrowding as the need for more bedrooms has a high housing cost. In attempting to meet the needs of smaller households, the market has created a void in addressing the needs of large households, thus enhancing the issue of overcrowding. In 2010, there were 85,484 overcrowded housing units in Harris County (57,122 Renter Occupied; 28,362 Owner Occupied) equating for 6.5 percent of the total housing stock. Many of these overcrowded units are in multifamily buildings. In Harris County, 4.7 percent of the renter-occupied housing stock has four or more bedrooms, compared to 22.9 percent of the total housing stock (Table 3.50 CPMA 3-70). Two to three bedroom units make-up 56.8 percent of the rental units, closely mirroring the overall county housing stock percent of Based on the lack of 4 or more bedroom units available in rental properties, overcrowding is expected to be much more prevalent in areas that are predominantly rental housing. In Harris County, overcrowding is more likely to occur within the centrally located incorporated areas as well as lower income, designated target areas (CPMA 3-70). According to the 2010 ACS, overcrowded units are concentrated in the north central and east central portions of the county. Overcrowding is much more prevalent in rental units, especially rental units in lower income, high minority areas. The limited number of larger affordable housing units greatly limits fair housing choice, especially when taking into consideration the concentration of lower income populations. Table 2.3, Owner and Renter Occupied Housing Units by Race and Ethnicity, 2010 shows the correlation between race and occupied housing units. Minority populations are much more likely to reside in renter-occupied units when compared to the white population in Harris County. Table 2.3 Owner and Renter Occupied Housing Units by Race and Ethnicity, 2010 Unit Type White Asian Hispanic Black Other Owner-Occupied Housing 50.8% 6.2% 27.5% 14.2% 1.3% Renter-Occupied Housing 29.2% 5.2% 36.4% 27.5% 1.7% Source: 2010 ACS According to the 2010 ACS, the census tracts where families with children make up at least 45 percent of the population are located in the north central and northwest areas of the county which have significant overcrowding, high minority concentrations, and low income concentrations. Gender The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex/gender. Fair Housing complaints involving gender make up a small portion of complaint types in Harris County, 5.3 percent of all complaints. Many of those complaints center on discriminatory terms and conditions, or outright refusal to rent based on sex. Gender based complaints are concentrated in a few census tracts in the southern portion of the county, with notable complaints in the far western areas as well. 22
25 According to the 2010 ACS, females make up 50.2 percent of the population. The male and female population is evenly distributed throughout the county. Females between the ages of 0 to 44 are significantly outnumbered by males in the same age range; however, as age increases past 45 years, the female population significantly outnumbers the male cohort. As referenced earlier, as of 2010, the population contingent with greatest percentage under the poverty level is single female headed households with children under the age of five. According to the 2010 ACS, females have a median income of $26,570 compared to a median income of $35,335 for males. Females are concentrated in education and social service occupations, where income is notably lower. Combine these income limitations with the added cost of children and the increasing cost of larger housing units, and the variables severely limit fair housing choice. Religion The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon religion, and covers instances of overt discrimination against members of a particular religion as well less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances designed to limit the use of private homes as a places of worship. Fair Housing complaints involving religion make up the smallest portion of complaint types in Harris County, 2.3 percent of all complaints. Many of those complaints are related to discrimination in terms and conditions, and discrimination in advertising and notices. Religious based complaints are concentrated in the north central portions of the county. While few in number, religion related fair housing complaints are often coupled with race and national origin based complaints. Many of the complaints are concentrated in areas with high concentrations of minorities and low incomes, which interact to limit housing choice. According to a 2010 Houston area survey by the Association of Religious Data Archives and Rice University, 58 percent of the respondents identified as Protestant, 24 percent as Catholic, 2 percent as Jewish, 5 percent as other, and 11 percent as no religion. While results from this survey are useful, the total lack of data involving religious concentrations, congregation distribution, and worship centers is a barrier to clearly understanding the challenges faced by certain religious groups or individual when searching for quality housing. LGBT The Fair Housing Act does not specifically include sexual orientation and gender identity as prohibited bases. However, a lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) person's experience with sexual orientation or gender identity housing discrimination is covered by 24 CFR Part 5, 200, 203, 236, 400, 570, 574, 882, 891, and 982. Under this regulation, housing providers that receive HUD funding, have loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), as well as lenders insured by FHA, must ensure equal access to their core programs for eligible individuals and families regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status. According to the study Hate crimes and stigma-related experiences among sexual minority adults in the United States: Prevalence estimates from a national probability sample, gays and 23
26 lesbians perceive themselves to be targets of discrimination in the housing market. In this 2009 study that analyzed internet survey responses from a national probability sample of gay, lesbian, and bisexual adults, 20 percent of respondents reported having experienced a person or property crime based on their sexual orientation; nearly half had experienced verbal harassment; and more than 10 percent reported having experienced employment or housing discrimination. A 2011 HUD report, Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs, recognized that there is evidence...that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals and families are being arbitrarily excluded from some housing opportunities in the private sector. In making this determination, HUD cited a study on transgender discrimination conducted by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the National Center for Transgender Equality as well as a 2007 study of sexual orientation discrimination conducted by the Michigan Fair Housing Commission. Currently, no Harris County-specific research has been completed that outlines the discrimination faced by the local LGBT community. Lack of data and the associated lack of LGBT and housing protection rights education to housing program staff, participants, and the housing provider community may present obstacles to the LGBT community in pursuing fair housing choice. Protected Class Summary Each protected class faces individual challenges when it comes to accessing safe, quality, affordable housing. In large part, housing choice is tied directly to household income and household size, where large families with low incomes are most restricted. Within Harris County, there is a noticeable concentration of low-income, high minority areas that display a number of other factors that limit housing choice and access to fair housing information, such as low English language proficiency, low quality housing, and low educational attainment. Race/Ethnicity, Color, and National Origin factors do not limit housing choice on their own. However, in examining these populations, these factors are highly correlated with having low- to moderate-incomes, low English proficiency, and low educational attainment. Those highlycorrelated variables denote neighborhoods of concentrated poverty that have major deficits in the tools needed to access housing information and appropriate housing options. Persons with disabilities face serious limitations in housing choice within Harris County. The supply of accessible and affordable units is significantly lower than the local demand. Also, the data identifying the number, size, and quality of accessible units is largely imprecise and almost completely unavailable in regards to the private sector. Taking into account that many persons with disabilities are on a fixed monthly income, finding options that meet affordability limits as well as accessibility limits compounds the deficit in quality housing choice. Also, living on a fixed income greatly impacts a person s ability to afford reasonable modifications to housing units. 24
27 Households with children face a number of factors that limit housing choice. Harris County has a shortage of affordable, larger housing units of at least three bedrooms (ConPlan Section 3 pg#). This shortage forces larger families into smaller units, creating the overcrowded living arrangements illustrated in Maps 1.12 and The census tracts with significant overcrowding (especially in rental units) are highly correlated with low-income and high minority areas. Also, as families grow, income rarely keeps up with the additional expense of another child. This inverse relationship dictates that larger families that need larger (and more expensive) housing are the families that are least likely to be able to afford such units. While these distinct demographic characteristics pose significant barriers, it is the combination of these negative factors that create the biggest obstacles in fair housing choice by concentrating poverty, racial and ethnic minorities, poor schools, and low quality housing in the same areas. 2.3 High Opportunity Areas Opportunity mapping provides a framework to measure the characteristics of designated census tracts in determining which areas provide increased quality of life. In general, opportunity mapping is an effective strategy for making a range of information accessible and facilitating comparisons among areas within Harris County. For this analysis, opportunity is defined as social and economic conditions or resources that are conducive to healthier, vibrant communities and are more likely to be conducive to helping residents in a community succeed. Through the designation of Opportunity Areas, spatial inequalities can be identified and patterns in racial and socioeconomic distribution can be illustrated. Mapping opportunity requires selecting variables that are indicative of higher and lower opportunity. For example, high opportunity indicators include the availability of accessible employment, high performing schools, and low poverty. Because these dimensions of opportunity are often interrelated, this method of mapping can be used to evaluate neighborhoods relative strength in providing residents with access to fuller, healthier, more productive housing options. Using factors derived from the 2010 U.S. Census and the 2010 ACS, Opportunity Areas were identified using a set of opportunity factors: Median income The census tracts were classified using Median Family Income. Poverty level Using ACS data, the census tracts were classified using the percentage of people falling below the poverty level during Commute time The census tracts were classified using mean travel time (in minutes). School quality The census tracts were classified on whther or not their centroid fell within a Recognized school district. Educational Attainment - The census tracts were classified using percent of census tract with a Bachelor s degree. English Proficiency - The census tracts were classified by the percentage of the tract that spoke English very well. 25
28 Unemployment The census tracts were classified based on unemployment rates. Higher opportunity areas reflect census tracts that rank favorable using the above framework. In contrast, lower opportunity areas, or revitalization target areas, are census tracts exhibiting characteristics that lead to the concentration of poverty, low to moderate income populations, and greater distance to employment centers. The following map shows the results of the normalizing and summing of the opportunity factora and how they interact to form opportunity census tracts. Map 2.10 Opportunity Map 26
29 2.4 Affordable Housing in Harris County Harris County has a number of programs and services that support affordable housing and its availability. Housing affordability is measured using two factors: income and price of housing. The Texas Housing Affordability Index (THAI) provides a general picture of how affordable housing is for a person of median income. The THAI is the ratio of median household income to the income required to buy a median-priced home using currently available mortgage financing. For example, a ratio of 1.00 indicates that the median household income is just enough to qualify for a loan sufficiently large enough to purchase a median-priced home. According to the TAMU Real Estate Center, the Houston area s THAI has increased from 1.5 to 2.63 from 2006 to 2011, showing an increase in housing affordability. In Harris County, affordability has been steadily increasing since 2006 (Table 3.38 CPMA 3-52). The lower affordability index measures generally reflect slower income growth throughout the area over the past couple of years, as well as the economic recession. The ability to which the housing market is responding to household income needs is another factor affecting housing availability. To adequately meet the housing needs of all households, housing products must be available at a wide variety of prices. Due to current market conditions and strong higher-end housing demands, housing development in Harris County primarily meets the needs of higher income households. For reasons such as, perception, low profit margins, and lack of financing products, the development and availability of low-income housing is not adequate to meet the needs of the low-income population. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) LIHTC program is a federal subsidy used to finance the development of affordable rental housing for low-income households, and used to increase the supply of affordable housing in Harris County. In total, approximately 39 percent of all the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties in Harris County are located in the CSD service area. Map 2.11 LIHTC and Minority Concentration denotes the locations of affordable multi-family and senior housing projects within the county. The sites are geographically well-distributed, but when overlaying minority concentration tracts, it is noticeable that the majority of sites in the CSD service area are located in tracts made up of at least a 65 percent minority concentration. Map 2.12 shows the LIHTC properties laid over MFI tracts, and it illustrates the spatial income diversity of the sites, with most being located in areas with a moderate or above income. 27
30 Map 2.11 Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and Minority Concentration by Census Tract Map 2.12 Multi-Family Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and MFI by Census Tract 28
31 HCHA Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) The Harris County Housing Authority (HCHA) administers the Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCVP), which provides affordable housing for more than 4,100 families and through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development s Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing Program (HUD-VASH) they provide 525 additional housing vouchers to homeless veterans. In addition to the voucher programs, they continue to develop housing tax-credit communities through public/private partnerships. The Section 8 HCVP assists low-income families to secure decent, safe, and sanitary housing through voucher programs. Each family pays a portion (30 percent) of its income for rent and the program pays the remainder of the contract amount. As of October 2012, there were 21,897 individuals and families on the waiting list for the Section 8 voucher program. Of those people, 68.0 percent were families with children, 20.3 percent were families with disabilities, 97.6 percent were low-income or lower, 88.4 percent were African-American, and 72.6 percent were Non-Hispanic. Based on these statistics, African-Americans, families with children, families with disabilities, and the very poor are disproportionately impacted by the lack of affordable and accessible housing options in Harris County. Based on the current vacancy list, only 28.0 percent were 3 plus bedroom units, but 80.5 percent were listed as handicap accessible. As described earlier, there is an obvious deficit between the need for larger units and the supply of larger units. In 2011, 276 households received subsidized multi-family, low-income rental housing in Harris County that was supported by HUD s Section 8 Project Based Housing and the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program (LIHTC). Map 2.13 HCHA Housing Choice Voucher Tenants illustrates the geographic variability of housing locations made by voucher recipients. The tenants appear to be mostly centrally dispersed, with pockets of concentration in the north central, west, and southwest portions of the county. Voucher recipients found housing in areas of high minority concentration, but were relatively dispersed in low-income areas and areas above 80 percent MFI. 29
32 Map 2.13 HCHA Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Tenants Housing for Elderly and Disabled Populations In order to ensure that persons with disabilities may live in community settings rather than in institutions, affordable and accessible housing is necessary. HUD operates a number of grant programs that provide housing for persons with disabilities and the elderly. The Section 811 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities program houses persons with physical or developmental disabilities or chronic mental illness and disabled families. The term "disabled family" may include two or more persons with disabilities living together, and one or more persons with disabilities living with one or more live-in aides. The Section 202 program provides funding to create and sustain housing for low-income elderly and elderly-disabled populations. The programs provide capital grants and project rental assistance to nonprofit developers of housing targeted specifically to persons with disabilities or the elderly. Prior to the creation of Section 811, persons with disabilities lived together with elderly residents in developments funded through the Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly program. The project-based Section 8 and Public Housing programs give project owners the option of dedicating facilities to elderly residents, residents with disabilities, or both populations together. Both the Section
33 and Section 8 programs set aside housing vouchers for persons with disabilities. Overall, there are 130 developments in the Houston/Harris County area that provide housing for seniors and persons with disabilities. Of those 130, there are 6 Section 811 properties, 25 section 202 properties, and 58 senior tax credit properties. Map 2.14 Housing for Elderly and Disabled shows the distribution of Section 811, Section 202, and Senior LIHTC properties. Map 2.14 Housing for Elderly and Disabled Waiting lists for Section 202 facilities are long, especially when compared to the number of housing units becoming vacant each year. The relatively high demand for this housing means that applicants frequently must wait over two years for a unit. According to the Houston Center for Independent Living (HCIL), disabled persons using a Section 8 voucher may have to wait longer for units because an accessible unit may be rented to the first person on the waiting list and not necessarily a person with a disability. In addition, there are some drawbacks to using 202 funding that include restrictions on eligible uses, as the funds cannot be used for property infrastructure and certain amenities are disallowed. Landlords are not required to pay for all modifications for an accessible unit and, if the 31
34 modifications would prevent a future tenant s enjoyment of the premises, the landlord may require tenants to restore the unit to its original state when moving out. These are important restrictions, as housing developers such as the Chavez Foundation reported having to walk away from deals because of infrastructure (roads, sewers, water, and electricity) deficits. They also noted that HUD can be slow in processing Section 202 projects, which creates a hardship on developers to maintain site control. Home Repair As stated in earlier sections, the housing inventory of Harris County is overall in good repair. Housing stock in need of replacement or rehabilitation (Fair, Poor, Very Poor, and Unsound quality) accounts for 181,461 units or 20.3 percent of the service area s housing. The largest group of housing units at 53.8 percent (480,593) was those units in average condition or display only minor signs of deterioration. Many low-income households live in units that are at risk of loss because they cannot meet the basic costs of maintaining and operating standard housing. Housing quality depends on the income of the occupants and their ability to pay for needed repairs. Low-income households are more likely to live in structurally inadequate housing and even when accounting for income differences, renters are more apt to reside in structurally inadequate units compared to homeowners. The Harris County Home Repair Program provides grants to low-income and elderly households. It provides up to $10,000 for minor home repairs or up to $40,000 for Septic System and/or Water Well Repairs that have a current health and safety code violation citation(s). The Home Repair Program alleviates specific life, health, and/or safety hazards resulting from substandard conditions in a home owned and occupied by a low income, elderly and/or disabled person. Harris County has provided home repair service to approximately 84 households since Map 2.15 shows the geographic distribution of the 2011 home repair sites. The gross majority of these sites are located in census tracts with over 65 percent minority population and classified as low to moderate income. The Home Repair program is an effective way to improve existing housing stock, as well as improve housing accessibility for low-income persons with disabilities. 32
35 Map 2.15 Housing Assistance Programs Downpayment Assistance Program (DAP) To assist low to moderate income households to improve their housing choice Harris County CSD has created a downpayment and closing cost program. The Harris County Downpayment Program (DAP) provides financial assistance in the form of a deferred, forgivable loan to eligible first time homebuyers for down payment and closing costs assistance in the purchase of new and pre-owned homes (built within the last 10 years) anywhere in the CSD service area. Assistance up to $14,400 is available to eligible homebuyers for the purchase of homes located in the unincorporated areas of Harris County, outside the cities of Houston, Baytown, and Pasadena, and within the 14 cooperating cities in Harris County. Harris County has provided approximately 486 households with downpayment assistance. Map 1.35 shows the geographic distribution of the 2011 DAP sites. The gross majority of these sites are located in census tracts with over 65 percent minority population. In contrast to the home repair program, the gross majority of DAP sites are located in census tracts with a MFI above the moderate level. 33
36 Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) The Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) stabilizes communities that have suffered from foreclosures and abandonment through the purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed and abandoned homes and residential properties. Since 2008 NSP has acquired 112 single-family, vacant, foreclosed homes of which 20 were acquired in The program sold 20 homes during 2011 to eligible NSP homebuyers of which 5 were acquired in 2009, 10 were acquired during 2010, and the remaining 5 were acquired in The program also assisted with the funding for the construction of an 88-unit affordable senior living LEED Platinum facility called Cypresswood Estates. Disaster Recovery Funding Hurricane Ike and Dolly Program The Disaster Recovery program provides relief for those people impacted by Hurricanes Ike or Dolly through a variety of housing activities including acquisition, rehabilitation, reconstruction, new construction, demolition, elevation, hazard mitigation, and storm hardening of homeowner and rental housing units as well as repairing infrastructure and community facilities damage by Hurricane Ike. The Housing assistance program, Harris County Homeowner s Disaster Recovery Program (HDRP) has (since 2009) worked with homeowners, predominately low-income homeowners. Since October 2012, HDRP has expended approximately $17 of the $36 million allocated for owner occupied single family rehabilitation and reconstruction and completed 307 projects with an additional 144 projects underway. The Non-housing program completed 4 infrastructure projects with 21 projects underway. Nuisance Abatement Program As reported in the Harris County Consolidated Plan, the Harris County Appraisal District reports that there are approximately 3,142 housing units whose condition approached unsoundness and are extremely undesirable and barely useable for habitation. These structures presence in a neighborhood, particularly a low income neighborhood can cause blight and a reduction of area opportunity. The Harris County Nuisance Abatement Program is carried out by Harris County Public Health and Environmental Services (PHES) in conjunction with Harris County CSD. The program promotes the health and safety of Harris County citizens by preventing, identifying, and eliminating public nuisances such as blighted housing units that negatively impact neighborhood opportunity, health and safety. Between , the nuisance abatement program cleared 124 abandoned houses in the Harris County CSD service area. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) In addition to the physical condition, adequacy of housing is also affected by the presence of environmental and health hazards related to the construction of the housing. The presence of lead-based paint in housing is one the most critical environmental hazards found in today s 34
37 housing both at the national and local levels. Low income homebuyers and renters, particularly those with children, often find their housing choices to include older housing units as these units are affordable. Because lead-based paint was used extensively before 1978, many older homes are potential health hazards, particularly to the low- and moderate-income persons who live in older housing but cannot afford the high costs of rehabilitation. The PHES Lead Hazard Control Program educates, identifies, and remediates lead so a more informed housing choice occurs and the program also reduces the presence of lead in homes for a safer housing market. In Harris County as a whole, slightly more than half of all housing units could potentially contain lead-based paint. The percentage of units projected to contain leadbased paint is substantially higher in urban areas, most notably in the older neighborhoods of inner-city Houston. In 2011, PHES abated 31 lead contaminated housing units occupied by lowincome persons. Map 2.16 shows the potential LBP occurrence (based on age of housing) and the disproportionate correlation between high minority concentrations. Map 2.16 Housing Likely to Contain Lead-Based Paint based on Year Built,
38 Since housing in the unincorporated area of Harris County is relatively new, only 31.1 percent of housing units are likely to contain lead-based paint. Based on estimates derived from HUD and data provided by PHES, approximately 20,300 houses in the Harris County service area are atrisk of containing lead-based paint. This figure represents 68.9 percent of the total number of houses built before 1978 in the County. Areas especially susceptible to the hazards of lead-based paint are located in the central and east central portions of the county. In these areas, risk factors associated with the hazards of lead-based paint are found in much of the housing stock. The housing in this area is among the oldest in the county, housing values in the area are among the lowest in the service area, and much of the housing is renter-occupied. Both low quality housing and housing most at risk for lead based paint contamination correlate highly with low-income areas and areas of high minority concentration. Additional Housing Programs To expand all Harris County s residents housing choice the CSD department created the Housing Resource Center. The Housing Resource Center is the first stop for housing resources and assistance programs in Harris County. In partnership with other government agencies, as well as non-profit and community organizations, the Housing Resource Center has built a network concerned with finding and maintaining safe, comfortable, and secure housing for Harris County residents. The HRC also collects fair housing complaints from within the CSD service area and directs people to other fair housing resources. Through its Agencies in Action Program, Center-Point (CNP) is making funds available annually to non-profit agencies that can provide energy efficiency improvements to the homes of incomeeligible customers in the CNP electric distribution service area. Energy-efficient measures will include efficient lighting, ENERGY STAR refrigerators and air conditioners, solar screens, and attic and wall insulation. The Harris County Housing Authority s (HCHA) Homeownership Program provides mortgage assistance to low-income households for the acquisition of newly constructed single-family properties. In conjunction with financial assistance, HCHA will offer counseling to prospective homebuyers including financial management, homeowner training, credit counseling and other educational information designed to create successful homeownership opportunities. According to the Harris County Housing Authority, the HCHA is aggressively building and operating innovative tax-credit housing developments by working with the region s best privatesector partners. These properties, many of which specialize in housing for senior citizens and persons with disabilities, are full service developments on par with even the nicest private sector properties. Harris County provides housing and essential services for homeless persons and families to improve their overall quality of life and assist in moving them to self-sufficiency such as, housing counseling, housing placement, and case management. Homeless prevention services 36
39 include emergency housing and utility assistance, security deposits, and mediation and legal assistance with the purpose of providing decent housing for the homeless population. The county also provides households with financial assistance, housing relocation and stabilization services, and data collection and evaluation. Outside Agencies who Assist with Fair Housing HUD has played a lead role in administering the Fair Housing Act and has greatly expanded its enforcement role. HUD collects, investigates, and assesses fair housing complaints throughout Harris County, reviews local AI s and provides public education on fair housing issues. The Greater Houston Fair Housing Center (GHFHC) is the only private fair housing investigative and enforcement agency in the region. The center is classified as a Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP) because they receive federal funding to assist people who believe they have been victims of housing discrimination. The center is tasked with conducting preliminary investigation of claims, including sending "testers" to properties suspected of practicing housing discrimination. The Houston Area Urban League (HAUL) and the Houston Volunteer Lawyer Program (HVLP) have partnered to advocate and provide direct assistance to victims of fair housing and fair lending laws discrimination. HAUL is tasked with fair housing outreach and education, allowing them to expand on their preexisting housing counseling and financial education programs. HVLP focus on fair housing rights issues. In conjunction with HAUL, the Houston Volunteer Lawyer Program (HVLP) is working to further investigate and counsel persons involved in potential housing discrimination issues. HVLP helps low-income citizens that other programs often cannot serve, such as those who may not meet the financial criteria of other legal assistance programs or non-us citizens. While there are a few agencies tasked with handling fair housing issues in Harris County and Greater Houston Area, the lack of community outreach and interagency communication creates a huge deficit in attempting to address the numerous fair housing challenges in the region. Many of the agencies are too understaffed and underfunded to educate and police a population of this size. The Texas Low Income Housing Information Service is a nonprofit corporation that carries out specific functions in helping low-income persons attain affordable housing, such as: assessing low-income housing and community development programs; supporting community outreach and educations initiatives in order to better educate the public about low-income housing and community issues; and organizing low-income communities to better address local problems. 37
40 NIMBYism NIMBY, or Not in my backyard, is a phrase used to describe local community opposition to a variety of public and private projects. While a project may be viewed by many as beneficial to the community, those closest to the development, residents or businesses, perceive the potential impact on their lives and surroundings as harmful and outweighing the potential benefits. A commonly opposed project is affordable multi-family developments, particularly tax-credit developments with the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA). Neighborhood opposition often cites a number of reasons for blocking development, such as traffic considerations, overcrowded schools, crime, or decreased property values. The TDHCA maintains a log of all letters received in support of and in opposition to proposed housing developments. Over the last two years ( ), numerous letters, testimonies, and petitions have cited any number of reasons for or against housing developments. Table 2.4 lists the most common reasons citizens or other groups cited for their stance on development. Table 2.4 TDHCA Housing Development Log Support Opposition The community is in need of affordable Development will bring increased crime. housing. The community is in need of senior housing. Development will overcrowd or lower the quality of education in schools. The development will benefit the local There are no resources (transportation, grocery economy. store) to support the development. The development coincides with the Development will decrease property values. Consolidated Plan s Revitalization Strategies. The developer garnered community support. The developer did not reach out for community input and support. Policymakers and developers of affordable housing often struggle to overcome NIMBYism and provide the option of affordable housing in areas with higher incomes, quality infrastructure and better schools. NIMBY attitudes cause a great barrier to housing choice as affordable housing development is pushed out to areas of less opportunity and opposition. Outreach, education and addressing local resident s concerns through dialogue and modification to the development are used to reduce opposition and create a better outcome for existing and future residents. 2.5 Investment The Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) require equal treatment in loan terms, conditions of housing, and credit regardless of race, religion, color, national origin, familial status or disability. This means that many of the practices of predatory lending can be considered a violation of these two acts. Targeting specific populations with high-priced loans, for example, is a violation. Treating minorities differently in lending practices is a violation as 38
41 well and when traditional credit agencies won't lend in particular neighborhoods leaving them to be serviced only by the predatory lender, that's a violation as well. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act Accessibility of housing is hindered by income limitations, credit problems, discriminatory lending and insurance practices, or blatant discrimination against an applicant. The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) provides the public loan data that can be used to assist: in determining whether financial institutions are serving the housing needs of their communities; public officials in distributing public-sector investments so as to attract private investment to areas where it is needed; and in identifying possible discriminatory lending patterns. According to the HMDA data, a correlation can be found between areas of high mortgage application rejection rates and minority concentration areas and persons of low- and moderateincome. As seen in Figure 2.2, the Black cohort had the highest denial rates among conventional home loans at 28 percent. White and Asian cohorts are tied for the lowest denial rates at 15 percent. While all denial rates were within 15 percentage points of one another, the largest discrepancy is on the sheer number of applications filed. Out of the 37,370 conventional home loan applications filed, over 80 percent were filed by whites. Couple that with an approval rate of 76 percent showing an immensely disproportionate number of loans received by the white cohort. Figure 2.2 Mortgage Approval and Denial Rates by Minority Concentration ASIAN BLACK OR AA WHITE 2+ Minorities JOINT (W/MINORITY) Denial rate Approval rate Applications Source: HMDA
42 This does not necessarily mean that all minority applications are rejected on the basis of race, because other factors such as low income or bad credit may be present. However, the correlation between race, applications filed, and high denial rates is strong. Map 2.17 shows the geographical breakdown of conventional home loan denial rates. The available data is geographically sparse, but there are noticeable pockets of high denial rates in the north central Harris County area, which correspond to high minority concentrations. Figure 2.3, also illustrates that income is a possible hindrance in mortgage application approval, with persons making less than 50 percent of the median family income (MFI) having the highest denial rates (42 percent). Again, there is a major discrepancy in the number of applications filed with families making 120 percent or more of the MFI, filing over 65 percent of the applications. Figure 2.3 Mortgage Approval and Denial Rates by Median Family Income LESS THAN 50% 50-79% 80-99% % 120% OR MORE Denial rate Approval rate Applications 40
43 Source: 2010 HMDA Map 2.17 Conventional Home Loan Denial Rates Foreclosures Source: HMDA The number of foreclosure filings in Harris County grew every year between 2007 and 2010 before experiencing a decline in 2011 (Figure 2.4). It is only in the most recent reporting year that the number of filings declined, and declined rather dramatically, by a full 24.7 percent. This may be attributed in part to the increasing health of the local economy and decreasing unemployment rate. Foreclosure filings were higher in areas like Spring, Tomball, La Porte, and Crosby. According a study by the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA), A Study of Residential Foreclosures in Texas, areas where foreclosures were more likely to have average incomes below the regional median, more likely to be minority neighborhoods, and were more likely to include households whose loans are characterized as higher rate. 41
44 Figure 2.4 Foreclosures in Harris County 15,000 10,000 5, Source: TAMU Real Estate Center Predatory Lending Predatory lending describes unfair, deceptive, or fraudulent practices of some lenders during the loan origination process. While there are no legal definitions in the United States for predatory lending, an audit report on predatory lending from the Office of Inspector General of the FDIC broadly defines predatory lending as "imposing unfair and abusive loan terms on borrowers." Though there are laws against many of the specific practices commonly identified as predatory, various federal agencies use the term as a catch-all term for many specific illegal activities in the loan industry. Predatory lending should not be confused with predatory mortgage servicing which is used to describe the unfair, deceptive, or fraudulent practices of lenders and servicing agents during the loan or mortgage servicing process, post loan origination. Other types of lending sometimes also referred to as predatory, including payday loans and overdraft loans, when the interest rates are considered unreasonably high. According to the Houston Chronicle, there are at least 550 payday loan facilities in the Houston area. According to the Texas Fair Lending Alliance, two recent Texas studies found that women and minorities were disproportionately impacted by payday loan activities. Women made up almost 60 percent of payday borrowers, with African Americans and Hispanics the most likely to take out payday loans. Although predatory lenders are most likely to target the less educated, the poor, racial minorities, and the elderly, victims of predatory lending are represented across all demographics. Predatory lending typically occurs on loans backed by some kind of collateral, such as a house, so that if the borrower defaults on the loan, the lender can repossess or foreclose and profit by selling the repossessed or foreclosed property. In the real-estate world, predatory lending is a terrible lending practice designed to take away home equity. According to the Houston ACORN Housing Corporation, many residents fall prey to predatory lending practices because of aggressive tactics, such as the offering of first-time mortgage loans, reverse mortgage loans, refinance loans, or home equity loans with high interest rates or excessive fees. Through false promises and outrageous fees, predatory lending can ruin credit and lead to foreclosure. Homeowners, especially the elderly, minorities, and low-income are most at risk, often targeted with abusive and exploitative practices. 42
45 Redlining Redlining is the practice of denying or limiting financial services to certain neighborhoods based on racial or ethnic composition without regard to the residents qualifications or creditworthiness. The term redlining refers to the practice of using a red line on a map to delineate the area where financial institutions would not invest. Some allege this disparity to be attributed to subprime lenders purposefully marketing to African-American communities what some have called reverse redlining. They allege lenders will provide loans to these communities, but at a higher cost and with less favorable conditions. HUD has released a study showing that the number of subprime home loans is skyrocketing in predominantly minority neighborhoods and low-income neighborhoods. While expanded access to credit is critical, there is growing evidence that some lenders may be engaged in predatory lending that is making homeownership far more costly for minority and poor families than for whites and middle-class families. To date, there are no Harris County specific studies addressing redlining practices and data. Map 2.17 (on page 42) shows varying concentrations of denial rates, but the overall lack of data makes it difficult to draw any concrete conclusions. Homeowners Insurance Discrimination in the homeowner s insurance industry occurs when an insurer unlawfully treats current or prospective homeowners' differently because of their race, sex, religion, color, national origin, because they are disabled, or because they have children in their family. These differences in treatment may include such things as: Charging higher rates, Offering policies with inferior coverage, Not returning calls for information, and Denying coverage altogether. Homeowners insurance "redlining" is a form of discrimination where an insurance agency or agent treats homeowners differently because of the minority composition of the neighborhood where their home is located. Discrimination of this nature may take the form of: Imposing different terms and conditions for coverage of homes in minority neighborhoods, Refusing/failing to write policies for applicants in minority neighborhoods, Refusing/failing to market its products in minority areas, and Discouraging applicants from minority neighborhoods. 43
46 In 2011, public and private fair housing groups reported 28 complaints of discrimination in the insurance market, reflecting a drop from the 35 in 2009 and the 68 insurance complaints in Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP) agencies and HUD reported no complaints in All insurance complaints investigated by private fair housing groups in 2011 were based on race discrimination. Discrimination related to homeowners insurance can be difficult to identify because it is rarely overt and as such makes it difficult to address discrimination in this transaction category. 2.6 Environmental Justice Environmental hazards and nuisances can range from the materials inside a home, to the location and use of the property in the past, to the actions of neighbors and businesses on nearby property that can affect the home. An environmental hazard within the home can include toxic materials or biological hazards, and the presence of either can be detrimental to the health of the homes occupants. Flooding and air quality are concerns throughout the county. The presence of numerous bayous, rivers and Galveston Bay subjects many areas to flooding from rainfall and possible storm surge. Precinct Two, in the eastern portion of the county, is often viewed as the most vulnerable since it is located on Galveston Bay, contains the ship channel and the mouth of the Trinity River, and contains most of the counties refineries and other petro-chemical processing plants. Some of the worst examples of contamination are Superfund Sites, selected from the National Priorities List, as designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Of those in Harris County, the majority of Superfund Sites are not located in the Harris County Service Area. Those that are in the service area are located in the more rural Crosby area and one in the suburban northwest side. Despite being examples of extreme contamination and requiring cleanup, many residents are not aware of their presence. Housing in hazard areas is cheaper than equivalent units located in safer, more convenient locations. This often results in low- to moderate-income popultaions being forced into highly vulnerable areas, with little to no warning of impending environmental concerns. 2.7 Local Ordinances, Regulations, and Policy Review Harris County government has a strong commitment to ensure there is an ample supply of affordable and suitable housing made available to all persons, regardless of their economic status or functional ability. The County has set forth a number of housing programs designed to provide decent, safe and sanitary housing affordable to low- and moderate-income households in its unincorporated communities and/or within its 14 cooperating cities. 44
47 Discriminatory Internet Advertising The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to make, print, or publish or cause to be made, printed, or published housing ads that discriminate, limit, or deny equal access to apartments or homes because of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, familial status, or disability. However, interactive internet providers like Craigslist, for example are not considered publishers under the Fair Housing Act and are therefore not liable if discriminatory ads are published on their sites. According to the National Fair Housing Alliance, discriminatory housing ads on sites like Craigslist have become increasingly common, and are particularly harmful to families with children. Thousands of housing ads that include phrases like no kids, adults only, and no teenagers are placed on these sites annually. In 2009, the National Fair Housing Alliance and 27 of its member organizations investigated numerous housing websites and identified 7,500 illegal ads within every state. Cooperating Cities Ordinance Review A cooperating city is one that has a cooperative agreement with Harris County to participate in U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entitlement programs administered through Harris County and is thus in the service area of the county. The Cooperating Cities Ordinance Review matrix (located in Appendix A) examines the zoning and building regulations of the cooperating cities. Factors such as minimum lot size, minimum front yard size, and mobile home/manufactured housing regulations can be used to make property too valuable to use for low-income housing. Zoning that requires expensive features such as large lots, elaborate architectural detail, or other features inherently exclude people who cannot afford those features. This practice, known as exclusionary zoning, is a method applied to local zoning measures that impose unnecessary or unjustifiable costs or requirements in order to exclude various groups of people. Requiring large minimum lot sizes is sometimes a tool municipalities use to make low-income housing development too expensive for most developers. Seven of the fourteen cooperating cities have residential zones that require a minimum lot size of at least 8,000 square feet, making affordable housing development very impractical. However, these cities also offer higher density zones more suitable for affordable housing development. These same seven cities also have the largest minimum lot depths, which is the measure between the right-of-way and the rear property boundary. Similar to minimum lot size, large minimum lot depths are often another tool that places additional expense for housing development when trying to enter specific neighborhoods. Mobile homes and manufactured housing can provide another affordable housing option for lowand moderate-income households who are unable to buy, rent, or build adequate, affordable housing. By imposing strict regulations on mobile home and mobile home park zoning, municipalities could limit housing choice if no other affordable options exist. For example, one cooperating city finds it unlawful to place any mobile home within the city. Another requires a 45
48 minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet per mobile home or manufactured housing unit. Consideration should be given to the need for affordable housing options and if manufactured housing can assist in providing affordable housing. Limits of County under State Law All local governments derive whatever power and authority they possess from the Texas State Constitutions and statutes. County governments are the oldest type of local government in the United States and were intended to be an administrative offshoot of state government. The county carries out state functions at the local level, such as issuing and keeping public records, running elections, handling automobile registration, operating state courts and jails, and collecting taxes. Another major responsibility that counties perform is the provision of limited local services such as law enforcement and road maintenance, particularly in unincorporated and rural areas where residents have no municipal government to provide these services. The governing body of Harris County is the Commissioner s Court, composed of a county judge elected countywide, and four county commissioners elected from commissioner precincts. The Commissioner s Court sets the county tax rate, determines the county budget, and passes ordinances. One of the major criticisms of county government in Texas is the lack of flexibility in county government structure. With few exceptions, all counties in Texas have the same county governmental structure, regardless of population and size. Also, counties cannot perform certain functions that urban counties provide in other states, these include water, sewage disposal, planning and zoning, building codes and enforcement, and fire protection. The uniformity of government at the county level produces a number of weaknesses and prevents counties from tailoring housing policies to address local needs. As per state law, county governments lack the power to pass specific ordinances, such as zoning regulations. Harris County uses funding discretion, consistency support for LIHTC projects, and the annual Request for Proposals (RFP) process to help support housing policies. However, the overall lack of land use enforcement power denied to county governments creates major obstacles in attempting to directly address fair housing deficits in Harris County. In contrast, cities in Texas are able to exercise more direct influence and policy control. Municipalities that have over 5,000 people can become home rule cities, such as the City of Houston. These cities can adopt their own city charter and can pass any ordinance not prohibited by state law or the state constitution. This power allows municipalities to better directly influence fair housing initiatives and related housing policies through zoning and other ordinances. Water/wastewater Regionalization Harris County and Harris County Public Infrastructure Department (HCPID) have developed the regionalization policy to affirm their position on the issue of water and wastewater 46
49 regionalization. With this policy the County and HCPID anticipate a reduction in the number of water and wastewater treatment plants. This applies to water and wastewater systems owned or operated by Harris County and/or HCPID and funded in full or part by Harris County, HCPID, or other grant funds administered by or received by Harris County or a county department. Harris County and HCPID recognize that water and wastewater regionalization, when properly applied, have the following advantages: Improved treatment efficiency; Improved unit cost for treatment; Reduced number of wastewater discharges; Reduced groundwater extraction; Improved water quality resulting from improved treatment; and Reduced overall maintenance costs. Through consolidation and regionalization, the county plans to make water and wastewater systems more accessible and efficient for all county residents. Regionalization can also have the added benefit to consolidate and reduce the maintenance and cost burden of smaller water and wastewater systems, which are prevalent in low- to moderate-income areas. Harris County Affordable Multi-unit Family and Senior Housing Concentration Policy Summary The Harris County Affordable Multi-unit Family and Senior Housing Concentration Policy (Concentration Policy) was created as a means of evaluating the dispersal of subsidized multiunit housing throughout the County. Its primary objective is to ensure the viability of proposed affordable housing projects and the sustainability of existing governmentally financed properties constructed within the past 10 years and avoid the concentration of several subsidized lowincome properties in a single area creating a pocket of poverty. A secondary objective is to encourage competition that will motivate older, subsidized properties and existing nonsubsidized properties to renovate and modernize. CSD is responsible for implementing the Concentration Policy and conducts a review of subsidized housing projects applying for Harris County HUD Entitlement funds and for organizations requesting Letters of Consistency with the Consolidated Plan/housing policies for activities that acquire or construct multi-unit housing such as tax-credit supported properties. CSD has established a threshold policy for the concentration of tax credit and HUD-funded multi-unit projects for seniors and low-income rental units, 5 and 3 mile buffers respectively. Each development is compared to an inventory of existing supported properties of the same type, that fall within the buffer area to determine if the current occupancy rate average is above 90 percent. The implementation and effectiveness of the Concentration Policy in evaluating the dispersal of subsidized multi-unit housing and ensuring their viability was supported in the findings of the February 2011, HUD Office of Policy Development and Research Report: 47
50 Exploring the Spatial Distribution of Low Income Housing Tax Credit Properties. The report explored whether the spatial distribution of LIHTC properties exhibit higher than expected patterns of clustering in the nation s ten largest metropolitan areas. The results of the analyses revealed that in all metropolitan areas, LIHTC properties were more highly clustered than nonsubsidized housing units, although the extent of clustering differed by metropolitan area. The Houston metropolitan area was found to be a clear outlier compared to the other areas. It exhibited lower levels of clustering, fewer clustered properties in Qualified Census Tracts and Difficult to Develop areas, few clustered properties in high-poverty areas, and few clustered properties in majority-black neighborhoods. The findings support compliance with HUD s goals to disperse housing assistance and de-concentrate poverty. Harris County CSD Affordable Housing Standards The Harris County CSD Affordable Housing Standards establish the Harris County minimum standards for the acquisition, rehabilitation and/or new construction of single family and multifamily properties that are federally funded through CSD. These standards are not intended to reduce or exclude the requirements of any local or state building or housing codes, standards or ordinances that may apply. The standards have been designed to include and expand on the requirements of HUD s Section 8 Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and meet the requirement to establish minimum property standards under the HOME Investment Partnerships Program. They apply to any housing projects that receive funding through the HOME Program, the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), or other HCCSD funds. Many of the requirements and standards in the Harris County standards exceed the requirements of the HUD Section 8 HQS and promote the creation of quality, energy efficient affordable housing. All single-family and multi family housing units, including senior and special needs, that receive federal assistance through CSD may be inspected prior to (design stage), during construction, and upon completion of construction for compliance with these requirements. Housing projects, to the extent possible under the law, should ensure all Americans have equal access to the quality housing of their choice. HUD funded grant recipients and subrecipients are obligated under various laws not to discriminate in housing or services directly or indirectly on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, familial status, or disability. Design and construction documents for each development shall comply with all Fair Housing Laws, including Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Housing construction/development projects are required to have a formal Affirmative Marketing Plan that specifically targets potential households who are least likely to apply for the housing in order to make them aware of available affordable housing opportunities. Affirmative Marketing Plans must be submitted as part of an application and will be reviewed to ensure compliance. The project sponsor shall also designate and maintain at a minimum, five percent of the dwelling units in the development (but not less than one unit) that must be accessible to individuals with 48
51 mobility impairments. An additional two percent of the dwelling units (but at a minimum not less than one unit) must be accessible to individuals with sensory impairments (i.e. hearing or vision impairments), unless HUD prescribes a higher number pursuant to 24 CFR & 8.22(c. Accessible units must be, to the maximum extent feasible, distributed throughout the development and must be available in a sufficient range of sizes and amenities so as not to limit choice. Designing and locating affordable housing with accessibility, sustainable design and green building in mind will ensure efficient use of land, reduce energy costs and add to the overall appeal of the property. Harris County and CSD recognize that developments have an impact on the environment and the families who live within them. It is important to the county that housing positively contributes to the human environment and health of residents and neighborhoods. 49
52 3.0 Impediments and Strategies Matrix This section includes recommendations for strategies to address impediments identified through the analysis conducted in Section 2 to affirmatively further fair housing in Harris County. These strategies are integrated with the goals of the Consolidated Plan, and reflect performance measures established in the Performance, Goals, and Objectives Matrix. Drawing from information provided in the preceding analysis, the following matrix identifies six impediments to housing choice in Harris County. These impediments are: 1. Need to combat overt discrimination and lack of fair housing knowledge Overt discrimination against protected classes, such as racial and ethnic minorities, persons with disabilities, families with children, persons with limited English proficiency, and the LGBT community inhibits housing choice and is associated with limited fair housing knowledge of residents, housing providers, financial and insurance providers, and local government entities. 2. Lack of quality affordable housing Harris County has insufficient quality, affordable housing that meet the diverse needs of low- to moderate-income individuals, especially persons with disabilities and families with children. 3. Need to reduce areas of segregation and concentration Limited housing choice has led to the segregation and concentration of poverty and minority populations. 4. Need to improve lack of quality community amenities Limited access to transportation services, infrastructure, and public facilities limits housing choice and prevents communities from improving the overall quality of life and opportunity for residents. 5. Presence of governmental and community opposition towards affordable housing Governmental and community opposition to affordable housing is often based on lack of information, misinformation, and unfounded suspicions that lead to highly desirable areas being completely shut off from affordable housing options thus limiting housing choice. 6. Barriers created by credit and financial institutions Predatory lending, concentrated foreclosures, and overt discrimination in credit and financial practices severely limits housing choice, especially for minority populations. In the following matrix, each impediment is subdivided into specific goals that address impediment components and specific strategies created to address fair housing barriers. Many of the impediments are interrelated and examined in more than one section of the matrix and their causes and impacts frequently overlap. While the impact of each barrier is felt by individuals, the construction of barriers was developed over time as a result of social and economic policies that led to the concentration of classes of people and poverty. The strategies recommended are geared toward directly helping individuals overcome housing choice barriers and to supporting the area s fair housing infrastructure in coordinating efforts and increased outreach. Due to the interrelated and comprehensive nature of fair housing impediments, many of the strategies are related to more than one impediment and should be considered holistically. Many of the strategies provided are integrated with the Harris County Consolidated Plan and address broader community needs. The limited power afforded to counties by the State of Texas, creates major obstacles in attempting to address fair housing deficits through county-wide land use policies or ordinances. Many of the strategies focus on education and training efforts that require coordination and collaboration efforts among local government agencies and community organizations. These partnerships will help solidify a much needed fair housing network that synthesizes data collection and organization, promotes regional communication, and thoughtfully informs policy decisions. 50
53 Impediments and Goals Strategies Impediment 1 Need to combat overt discrimination and lack of fair housing knowledge A. Provide fair housing outreach and marketing information Harris County will conduct fair housing activities at various times of the year and will continue to support or collaborate with public and private agencies, organizations and groups to plan and conduct fair housing activities, outreach, and education initiatives. CSD will address this goal in the following ways: Continue to mandate that housing subrecipients develop a fair housing marketing plan; Promote and conduct events to celebrate April as Fair Housing Month, and encourage subrecipients to do the same; Provide education on fair housing and general housing issues to 80 lending institutions, housing professionals, non-profits (including CHDOs and CBDOs) and recipients of CSD programs annually; Provide 100 landlords with fair housing information as a condition of registering with the Harris County Housing Resource Center (HRC); Distribute fair housing fliers at 10 community events and public meetings annually; Post fair housing posters in public buildings and community centers, as well as send posters to local community groups; Support the HRC in providing an online and phone-based housing search tool for homebuyers and renters; and Partner with local fair housing organizations to support training and outreach initiatives. B. Provide fair housing information and policies in additional languages C. Provide training and education to providers and staff CSD will, at a minimum, translate public notices and program brochures into Spanish and Vietnamese. The public notices will be posted on the CSD website, major regional newspaper, and local language-specific newspapers. Brochures will be published to the CSD website and in hardcopy. Through many of its programs, CSD educates lenders, real estate agents, housing developers, service providers, and the general public on general housing and fair housing issues. The county seeks to protect homebuyers from predatory lending practices and overt discrimination, and educate homebuyers and renters of their rights under the law. CSD will continue to address training barriers in the following ways: Conduct an annual fair housing training for CSD staff; Coordinate with local fair housing organizations to provide fair housing training to subrecipients and cooperative cities; and Provide a fair housing training session during the annual RFP workshop.
54 D. Coordinate fair housing activities within Harris County and the region E. Encourage expanded testing and data collection Impediment 2 - Lack of affordable housing development In order to better support fair housing related outreach and implementation, CSD will communicate with federal, state, and local governments, as well as community organizations, to coordinate fair housing activities. CSD will address this goal in the following ways: Participate in 2 regional fair housing or housing issues workgroups or meetings per year; Create and maintain an interested parties mailing list for fair housing and housing issues communications; and Review impediments and strategies to overcome impediments and other housing policies annually for reporting in each year s CAPER. In order to increase quality data collection and better inform fair housing policy, CSD will encourage local fair housing organizations to expand testing and data collection activities in the following ways: Maintain fair housing complaint data as obtained from the HRC and outside agencies; Provide spatial mapping and data analysis services for the HRC and local fair housing organizations; and Provide contact information and training opportunities to local fair housing organizations. A. Expand the supply of affordable housing options B. Preserve, rehabilitate, and increase the supply of quality affordable housing units CSD will continue to support the use of public-private partnerships to increase quality, affordable housing in the county. Harris County will expand the supply of affordable housing options by providing or funding local providers to provide housing services that supports housing choice to 1,000 households which include but are not limited to homeownership, construction of new affordable housing units, and rental assistance in the next five years. CSD will preserve and rehabilitate the supply of quality affordable housing units by providing or funding providers to provide housing services that supports housing choice to 300 households, which include but are not limited to minor home repair, reduction of lead hazards in housing, rehabilitation of housing units, and removal of dilapidated and unsafe housing structures.
55 C. Increase the availability of accessible and larger housing units CSD requires within its Minimum Property Standards that all common areas and facilities as well as mail areas and spaces be designed to be handicapped accessible with particular attention given to the needs of the elderly and other special needs individuals. Additionally, all contractual agreements between CSD and project sponsors contain language that ensures construction projects adhere to all federal, state and local laws regarding accessibility of all newly constructed facilities to persons with disabilities. CSD will address this goal in the following ways: Ensure that regulations are being followed through regular monitoring and compliance activities; Require adherence to Section 504 requirements and when possible require a greater set aside for persons with mobility disabilities and visual/auditory disabilities (stricter terms than Section 504 requirements); Require 5 percent of units contain at least three bedrooms in new construction rental housing projects funded in whole or in part by CSD targeted to families; and Petition the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs concerning the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) awards for new construction of rental properties in the county to require projects to construct and reserve a greater number of units for disabled persons, large families and the homeless. Impediment 3 Need to reduce areas of concentration A. Deconcentrate areas of poverty and minority concentration CSD will support affordable housing opportunities throughout the county, particularly in low poverty areas, limit subsidized housing concentrations, and encourage income diversity within subsidized developments and high poverty areas. CSD's Housing Concentration Policy encourages development of new subsidized affordable units for families and seniors in areas that are not saturated with subsidized units. CSD will address this goal in the following ways: Develop an opportunity map identifying high and low opportunity areas for affordable housing development and encourage new construction of affordable housing in those areas; Improve and create quality affordable housing opportunities in low poverty areas; Support affordable housing outreach and education activities that combats opposition to affordable housing in high opportunity areas; Continue instituting the Housing Concentration Policy to avoid the concentration of LIHTC and other types of HUD subsidized rental properties in any one area; and Support the de-concentration of poverty and the inclusion of mixed income affordable housing development into community plans.
56 Impediment 4 Need to improve lack of quality community amenities A. Encourage the expansion of transit services B. Ensure quality infrastructure In order to address housing choice needs comprehensively, Harris County will consider methods to increase a community s level of opportunity. CSD will work with Harris County Transit and other local and regional transportation organizations to support the provision of transportation services within the county, especially in low- to moderate-income areas. This strategy will be addressed in the following ways: Attend and participate in the Regional Transportation Plan workgroups and meetings; and Provide technical support and mapping to Harris County Transit and local transportation organizations in identifying low opportunity, low- to moderate-income and or other underserved areas in need of linkages to quality housing, jobs and community facilities; and Harris County Transit will provide services to 2,000 people that link low-income areas to employment centers, social and health networks/facilities, and other opportunities. CSD will work to increase housing choice and increase opportunity by providing funding to local cooperative cities and utility providers to ensure quality infrastructure in low- to moderate-income communities, including improvement and provision of adequate streets, sidewalks, water systems, wastewater systems, and storm drainage sufficient to eliminate severe flooding problems. CSD requires that all public facilities as well as common spaces be designed to be handicapped accessible where appropriate. This goal will be addressed in the following ways: Review infrastructure proposals to determine if they inadvertently results in disparate treatment of members of protected classes; Consider environmental justice issues when siting infrastructure facilities such as wastewater treatment, solid waste disposal, or similar projects; Construct and improve 15 miles of roadways benefiting low-income areas for the purpose of improving the living environment and quality of life of 10,000 low- to moderate-income persons over the next five years; Provide improvements to 90,000 linear feet of water/sewer lines and 4 water/sewer facilities benefiting low-income areas for the purpose of improving the living environment and quality of life of 20,000 low- to moderate-income persons over the next five years; Construct and improve 3 miles of sidewalks/pathways benefiting low-income areas for the purpose of improving the living environment and improving the quality of life for 5,000 low- to moderate-income persons over the next five years; Construct and improve 1,000 feet of flood drains and controls benefiting low-income areas for the purpose of improving the living environment and quality of life of 5,000 low- to moderate-income persons over the next five years; and
57 C. Ensure quality public facilities CSD will work to increase the opportunity of low- to moderate-income neighborhoods by providing funding to improve or increase the number and quality of local public facilities. Recognizing that community centers and social service facilities are neighborhood gathering sites and key points for information dissemination, CSD will improve these facilities in order to better serve the surrounding constituents. CSD will use these centers to post fair housing posters, disseminate fair housing literature, and hold fair housing outreach activities. CSD will address this goal by providing improvements and/or the construction of 10 neighborhood or social service facilities. Impediment 5 - Presence of community opposition towards affordable housing A. Provide education and outreach activities in order to counteract negative effects from NIMBYism and other community opposition B. Encourage the development of local ordinances that are more inclusive of affordable housing Many neighborhood based organizations and community groups have rallied against the idea of low-income developments because of the negative impressions often associated with the people living in these developments. Neighborhood opposition often cites a number of reasons for blocking affordable development, such as traffic considerations, overcrowded schools, crime, or decreased property values. CSD will work to mitigate the impacts of negative community opposition towards affordable housing development in the following ways: Provide proactive strategies for education, outreach and marketing in high opportunity areas in order to build support among community residents; Develop an anti-nimbyism Action Statement; and Require housing developers applying for CSD funding to conduct community engagement activities to educate the public and garner support for their housing proposal Zoning and subdivision regulations can be used to make property too valuable to use for lowincome housing and/or completely exclude affordable housing options. In order to make local ordinances more inclusive of affordable housing options, CSD will do the following: Maintain a log of local cooperative city ordinances, noting factors that contribute to disparate impacts among protected classes in order to identify patterns and tailor outreach and training efforts; Provide technical expertise to local municipalities; and Provide fair housing training and education opportunities that address the impacts that local ordinances can have on affordable housing development.
58 Impediment 6 - Barriers created by credit and financial institutions A. Provide financial education and outreach services B. Provide relief in areas of heavy foreclosure activity Through many of its programs, CSD educates lenders, real estate agents, housing developers, service providers, and the general public on general housing and fair housing issues. The county seeks to protect homebuyers from predatory lending practices and overt discrimination, and educate homebuyers and renters of their rights under the law. CSD will continue to this goal in the following ways: Maintain a log of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) activity in order to identify patterns and evidence of disparate impacts on protected classes; Distribute 250 Downpayment Assistance Program (DAP) information packets to potential clients over the next five years at community events and housing fairs, to housing providers and advocates and on the CSD website; Refer 500 persons to housing counseling programs for education on homeownership, financing and housing choice over the next five years; and Train 100 mortgage lenders on fair housing and housing choice issues over the next five years. The CSD Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) targets areas particularly affected by the foreclosure crisis, providing funding to acquire and redevelop abandoned and/or foreclosed homes and residential properties that otherwise might become sources of blight. CSD will address this goal in the following ways: Acquire 100 foreclosed homes in NSP target areas during the NSP program; Sell these homes to eligible NSP low-income homebuyers at an affordable amount; and Provide homeownership training and education to home buyers.
59 4.0 Citizen Participation Plan The participation of citizens and professionals is crucial to the process of planning for a community. Even after the adoption of a plan, it is important that avenues be made available for necessary changes or additions. Harris County residents will be encouraged to participate throughout all stages of planning, review, and execution of community development activities. The Citizen Participation Plan emphasizes the involvement of low-income residents including non-english speaking persons, as well as persons with mobility, visual or hearing impairments. The Plan outlines the process through which the public can access general information, receive technical assistance, provide comments on critical issues, and receive timely responses to questions raised. Following the adoption of the 5-Year Consolidated Plan and Fair Housing Plan, a minimum of two public hearings will be held during each program year. The public will have access to the Harris County Community Services Department (CSD) plans and records under the Texas Open Records Act. Plans will be amended as necessary throughout all stages of the planning and implementation process by proper amendment procedures. In addition, all public complaints will be documented and considered. Technical assistance will be made available through the CSD main office during regular business hours. 4.1 Encouragement of Citizen Participation Obtaining the input of citizens, professionals, and other governmental entities is of the utmost importance during the Fair Housing planning process. Affirmatively furthering fair housing would be difficult, if not impossible, without the support of county residents, especially low-income citizens directly affected by community development projects and programs. It is for these reasons that citizen participation is strongly encouraged throughout the processes of neighborhood revitalization planning, short and long range departmental planning, and plan implementation. The primary goal of this Citizens Participation Plan is to provide all citizens of the community with adequate opportunity to participate in an advisory role in the planning, implementation, and assessment of the Fair Housing Plan. The Plan also sets forth policies and procedures for citizen participation, which are designed to maximize the opportunity for citizen participation in the community development process. Special emphasis has been placed on encouraging participation by persons of low-incomes, residents in target areas, and residents of areas where community development funds are utilized. Additionally, emphasis shall be placed on obtaining participation from public housing authorities, residents of subsidized housing, non-english speaking persons, minorities, and persons with disabilities. Citizen participation efforts will be encouraged in the future through similar avenues as have been employed in the Fair Housing and Consolidated Planning process. 57
60 CSD used methods such as bilingual surveys and public notices, focus group meetings, workshops, the Housing Resource Center, and other more innovative approaches. In the future, due to the diversity of Harris County residents, when needed, translators will be made present at future public hearings and community meetings. 4.2 Consultation with Outside Departments and Organizations Based on requirements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Harris County must develop and submit its 3-5 year Consolidated Plan, containing the Fair Housing Plan. To assist CSD staff to develop these plans, outside departments and organizations will be contacted for consultation. These will include but are not limited to: non-profits, business organizations, public institutions, and for-profit developers. In the case of developing fair housing strategies, CSD will consult with: Public and private agencies that address housing, health, social services, victim services, employment, infrastructure, and or education needs for low-income individuals and families; Publicly funded institutions and systems of care that may discharge persons into homelessness (such as health-care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and Business and civic leaders. For housing strategies, CSD will consult with the local Public Housing Authority (PHA), non-profit housing providers, and for-profit housing developers, particularly those who serve low-income households in Harris County s services area. 4.3 Meetings and Public Hearings CSD will participate in a series of meetings, focus groups and a public hearing throughout the county as needed to publicize the Fair Housing Plan process by securing input from citizens, CDCs, CHDOs and other interested groups about the planning process. We also solicited information about community problems through a Needs Assessment Process, and assessed the progress of the department in securing improvements in low-income areas. Public hearings may be publicized: - Approximately one month in advance of meeting dates. - Provide a phone number on flyers and press releases to contact Harris County representatives for additional information and/or for special needs for the disabled persons wishing to attend the hearing. - In English, Spanish, and other languages, as necessary. - Through local newspaper(s) of wide distribution. - On CSD internet website. 58
61 The public hearing format will include a brief introduction by CSD and offer a forum for discussion of the Fair Housing Plan. Participants will have an opportunity to express their opinions on CSD activities, the housing and community development needs of Harris County, and any other community development related items. At all public hearings, an interpreter will be available for those who do not speak or understand English upon request of at least two business days prior to each hearing. A translator for the hearing impaired will be available upon the advanced request of at least three business days prior to each hearing. During the Consolidated and Fair Housing Planning processes, the public will have 30 days to make comments on the plans before they are submitted to Harris County Commissioners Court for approval. Comments will be recorded according to meeting or hearing date. Comments will be considered and changes will be made if and when necessary. A summary of these comments and any resulting changes will be included in the citizen participation component of the final plan. 4.4 Access to Records In accordance with the Texas Public Information Act, government records will be made available to the public. To ensure consistent cooperation with public requests, CSD employees will maintain awareness and knowledge of laws pertaining to open records. Guidelines for Obtaining Information 1. A written request must be submitted to the main office of the Harris County Community Services Department by mail, fax, , or in person. 2. The description of information requested must be written in enough detail to enable CSD employees to accurately identify and locate the items requested. 3. The requestor must cooperate with CSD s reasonable efforts to clarify the type or amount of information requested. Upon written request, information that is not confidential by law, or for which an exception to disclosure has been sought, will be promptly released (and translated when necessary). This includes all Fair Housing Plans, Consolidated Plans, Annual Action Plans, Performance Reports (CAPER s), neighborhood plans, and plan amendments. All requestors will be treated equally, including accommodation in accordance with ADA requirements. In the case that plans and reports cannot be promptly mailed to requestors, a date within a reasonable time will be established for delivery or pick-up of the document(s). If the request is for materials/plans exceeding $40, a cost estimate will be made and communicated to the requestor, who must make a written commitment to pay the costs prior to finalizing the request. A ruling from the Office of the Attorney General and County Attorney will determine if any information will be withheld from the public. Confidential documents will be set apart from public information, and any requestors of this information will be promptly informed of the ruling. Third parties will be informed if a request is made for their 59
62 proprietary information. Furthermore, CSD will respond in writing to all written communications from the General Services Commission or the Office of the Attorney General regarding complaints about violations of the Act. Procedures for Inspecting and Copying Public Information Any CSD information not withheld from the public by a ruling from the Office of the Attorney General will be available for the public to inspect or copy. If a copy request is made, the copies will be promptly sent by mail, fax, or . If, however, the copy request exceeds $40, a cost estimate will be made and communicated to the requestor, who must make a written commitment to pay the costs prior to finalizing the request. 4.5 Publication of Materials Upon finalization, departmental planning document summaries will be published in a major newspaper (Houston Chronicle-English and La Voz-Spanish) or made available via the internet. These include, but are not limited to, Fair Housing Plans, Consolidated Plans, Annual Action Plans, Performance Reports, Neighborhood Revitalization Strategies, and Public Housing Authority Plans. 4.6 Public Grievances In the case that a citizen or organization desires to file a formal complaint against a CSD action or decision, they will be informed of the following set of formal grievance procedures: 1. Submission of the complaint must be sent to the Director of CSD, with original signatures and letterhead (if applicable). The complaint must include details such as dates, procedures in question, history of the problem(s) and correspondence, and any relevant previous complaints. 2. The complaint will then be given to the staff for a formal investigation. 3. Staff will investigate the situation and draft a report to the Director, which will detail all findings related to the action or decision, such as historical background, persons involved in the action or decision, the reasoning behind the action or decision, and suggestions for reconciliation (if any). 4. The individual or organization that filed the original complaint will be contacted and informed of the findings and applicable plan for reconciliation within 15 business days of receipt of the complaint. 5. Any legal suits against CSD must be served to or filed with the County Judge at 1001 Preston Suite 911, Houston, Texas Grievances regarding housing discrimination should be reported to the Houston HUD Office at 1301 Fannin, Ste. 2200, Houston, TX
63 4.7 Performance Reports Per consolidated planning requirements, on an annual basis CSD will submit the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) which reports the county s performance in expending entitlement funds for the previous one year period. Citizens will be provided at least 15 days to comment on performance reports. Additionally, the CAPER will be reviewed at a public hearing held prior to its submission to HUD. Citizen comments received in writing during the public review period or orally at public hearings shall be attached to the CAPER. 4.8 Citizen Participation in Creating the Fair Housing Plan To assist with the identification of the type and level of needs within Harris County, a Consolidated Plan Survey was distributed to residents and organizations in our target areas, cooperative cities, citizen groups, service organizations, non-profit organizations, civic clubs, and citizen groups operating in Harris County. While focusing on a broad range of county needs, the survey contained a specific section dedicated to Fair Housing. The survey was sent by , handed out at meetings and community centers and posted on CSD s website from April 2012 to October It was completed by citizens and organizations throughout the county including all the county s precincts. A series of meetings and focus groups were also held in each precinct from March 2012 through September The Consolidated Plan Survey was created to evaluate existing conditions, concerns and opinions, and recorded the level of concern for issues in Housing, Fair Housing, Social Services, Transportation, Senior Services, Children/Youth Services, Parks, Homelessness, Pubic Facilities/Infrastructure, Health, and Education. Focus groups were held at the precinct level to help identify and evaluate characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of the four precincts and the county as a whole. The results of the meetings helped us recognize the needs, goals, and objectives of the services needed in Harris County. Meetings with community organizations were held to identify needs among Harris County s diverse populations, including persons with disabilities and racial and ethnic minorities. In an effort to broaden public participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan, CSD efforts for participation included personal and telephone interviews, focus groups, and surveys distributed at meetings, seminars, workshops and trainings. The combination of a paper and online version of the survey provided residents with more than one method of submitting their thoughts and concerns. Input was received on Fair Housing and other areas. For a complete list of all topics, refer to the Consolidated Plan Citizen Participation Plan. In addition to the organizations that Harris County is required to consult with by HUD as part of the Public Participation process (outlined in the Consolidated Plan Citizen Participation Plan), we consulted with organizations representing all of the protective 61
64 classes through a combination of the following methods: face-to-face interviews, focus groups, and phone consultations, and survey. All of the consultations occurred between February 2012 and January 2013, in order to further our efforts in identifying the Fair Housing needs within the county and incorporating those needs into the plan. Many of the below organizations provide services involving more than one protective class and may be listed multiple times. In addition, the Greater Houston Fair Housing Center (GHFHC) proved invaluable in outlining the region s fair housing deficits, major trends in housing, and providing consultation and information regarding all protected classes. Race, National Origin, and Color o Houston Area Urban League (HAUL) o NAACP o Tejano Center o Asian Chamber of Commerce o HCHA Persons with Disabilities o Houston Center for Independent Living o Harris Health Systems o MHMRA of Harris County o HCHA o Southwest ADA Center Gender o The Women s Home o Houston Area Women s Center o Texas Women and Children s Advocacy Services Familial Status o Texas Women and Children s Advocacy Services o HCHA o Children s Assessment Center o YWCA Houston Religion o Catholic Charities o Interfaith Caring Ministries o Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston o Northwest Assistance Ministries LGBT o Montrose Counseling Center o Houston GLBT Community Center 62
65 Outside of organizations that deal exclusively with the protected classes, Harris County also consulted with many other groups whose efforts impact housing, outreach, education, and community planning. Education o University of Houston o Texas Southern University o San Jacinto College o Lee College o Lone Star College o Harris County Public Education Department Health Services o Harris County Public Health and Environmental Services o Harris County Hospital District Senior Service Providers o Elder Services Provider Network o United Way Interagency Network Meeting o Harris County Housing Authority Senior Developments Youth Service Providers o East Harris County Youth o Street Olympics o Children s Assessment Center o YWCA Houston Housing o Houston Area Urban League o Harris County Housing Resource Center o Greater Houston Builders Association o Multi-family and Senior Housing Developers o Harris County Housing Authority o Gulf Coast Community Services Association (Fair Housing Program) Homelessness o Coalition for the Homeless of Houston/Harris County o Houston/Harris County Homeless Collaborative o Healthcare for the Homeless o SEARCH Infrastructure and Transportation o Harris County Public Infrastructure Department o Harris County CSD Office of Transit o Bay Area Transportation o METRO 63
66 Economic Development o Various Chambers of Commerce o Economic Development Organizations Public Facilities o Harris County Precinct s Parks Departments o Harris County Facilities and Property Management o Local Cities Intergovernmental Coordination and Partnerships o Harris County Precincts o Local Cities o Target Area CDCs o Various Harris County Departments o Houston-Galveston Area Council MPO o Houston-Galveston Area Council Sustainable Development Consortium The information obtained through this process was one of several primary considerations in the development of goals and objectives to address impediments to fair housing listed in Section 3.0 of the Fair Housing Plan. Once the Fair Housing Plan draft was completed, the draft plan was made available to the public for review through the internet and notices published in the Houston Chronicle and Spanish newspaper La Voz. Notice of the Consolidated Plan, complete with the Fair Housing Plan, was published in the Houston Chronicle on November 15, 2012, and La Voz on November 18, In addition to the English language notice, Spanish and Vietnamese translations of the public notice were posted to our website The public notice informed Harris County residents about the public hearing and opportunity to comment on the documents. The draft plan was also added to CSD s website and the link to the posting was ed to the required contacts and over 400 additional interested parties for comments. During the following 30-day public review period, comments and suggestions were recorded and considered for addition and/or revision to the plan. In addition, a public hearing was held on December 6, 2012 at 2:00 pm in which Harris County residents voiced their opinions on the Consolidated Plan and the Fair Housing Plan. All comments recorded during the public review period and public hearing were added to the Fair Housing Plan (see Appendix A). Consolidated Plan Survey One survey was developed and distributed from April 2012 to October 2012, as part of our citizen participation process for the Fair Housing and Consolidated Plans. This broad based survey included questions related to Fair Housing and many external factors that impact housing choice, such as Social Services, Transportation, Senior and Youth Services, Parks, Public Facilities, Public Services, Infrastructure, Homelessness, and 64
67 Education. It was developed to help identify the needs, goals, and objectives of the services needed in Harris County. The use of one survey, instead of having additional versions for service providers, was supported by the additional consultation efforts with various service providers to better capture their needs and opinions. The survey s secondary purpose was to assist in identifying and understanding the preferences of residents as they relate to what is seen by some as controversial activities like the development of affordable housing. Harris County CSD received over 100 responses to the survey. The opinions of Harris County residents regarding their community needs are of utmost importance when drafting goals, objectives, and strategies that address the comprehensive housing needs of the area. To this end, the survey was distributed to residents throughout the CSD service area, social service providers, homeless care providers, cooperative cities, developers and nonprofits. A complete description of survey responses by category can be found in the Consolidated Plan Citizen Participation Plan. The following results reveal the responses to the Fair Housing and Housing portions of the survey: Table 2.2 Consolidated Plan Survey Results Category Respondent Results Housing Most important/very important factor when choosing housing is shortening the distance to work Least important/somewhat unimportant factor is proximity to open space and trails Majority think down-payment assistance is needed in their neighborhood Most needed housing type is single-family Almost 70% think ideal lot size is less than ½ acre 65% think affordable single-family housing units should have 3 to 4 bedrooms Almost ½ think an affordable single family home is less than $100,000 90% think affordable multi-family complexes should be no larger than 250 units Fair Housing 14% think discrimination is an issue in neighborhood 13% claim to have experienced housing discrimination Person was presented with different terms and conditions most reported discrimination type Race is the most reported basis for discrimination Over ¾ of those that believe they were discriminated against did not report it Did not report because believed it was too much trouble or would not make a difference Focus Groups 65
68 As part of the citizen participation process, focus group meetings were held at the precinct level to help identify and evaluate characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of the four precincts in Harris County. The focus group meetings were held between March 2012 and June 2012 at four Harris County Housing Authority (HCHA) properties and three additional meetings were conducted as part of the Regional Plan for Sustainable Development (RPSD) outreach process. Harris County also utilized data collected as part of the RPSD outreach process for meetings within the City of Houston and those targeted at underrepresented groups. For a more complete description of meeting results, please refer to the Consolidated Plan Citizen Participation Plan. In August 2012, CSD also assisted in the facilitation, coordination and presentation of the Coalition for the Homeless of Houston/Harris County s Community Charrette to help create a Community Action Plan in compliance with the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act. This very large group of stakeholders discussed six distinct issue areas: 1. Integrating Housing and Services 2. Performance and Accountability 3. Right Sizing the Continuum of Care Housing Models 4. Prevention and Diversion 5. Coordinated Access 6. Political Will and Advocacy For a more complete list of meeting attendees, please refer to the Consolidated Plan Citizen Participation Plan. 4.9 Public Hearing/Public Review Period A Public Hearing was held on December 6, 2012 in which Harris County residents and organizations were encouraged to participate by asking questions and giving comments regarding the Consolidated Plan and the 2013 Action Plan. The public hearing was held during the 30 day public review period and was announced on the CSD website ( in the Houston Chronicle and the Spanish language La Voz newspaper. The notices were published in paper and posted on each publication s website. Public comments received during the 30-day public review period (including the public hearing) are listed below. Public Comments Organization: Coalition for the Homeless Houston/Harris County Date: December 18, 2012 Comment: The Coalition for the Homeless Houston/Harris County, as the Lead Agency of the HUD-defined Continuum of Care (CoC), greatly appreciates the leadership and commitment of the Harris County Community Services Department in preventing and 66
69 ending homelessness. Over the past couple of years, as the HEARTH Act is being implemented and our CoC worked to reinvigorate the community-wide structure by which plans are developed and implemented, Harris County CSD staff have played a critical leadership role. Through strategic coordination of Emergency Solutions Grant funds across area jurisdictions to prevent homelessness and rapidly re-housing vulnerable populations experiencing homelessness, committing to end chronic homelessness through development of permanent supportive housing, partnering with local housing authorities and service providers to ensure that no veteran is sleeping on the streets or outside in our community, and engaging funded agencies in implementing supportive services that will lead to housing stability, Harris County CSD has demonstrated its investment in our community s coordinated plans. The release of the new Consolidated Plan and its alignment with our community s priorities developed through the Continuum of Care charrette process and resulting CoC-wide Action Plan overseen by the CoC Steering Committee marks a milestone as our community moves to align resources and strategies. Harris County Response: No response necessary. Comment: The following areas outlined through the Consolidated Plan are particularly critical to the community s success in preventing and ending homelessness. Objective 5, 6 - Prioritizing construction and rehabilitation of multifamily properties for people who are homeless is key to insuring that people can sustain housing with low or extremely low incomes, knowing that 50% of people who are homeless in Houston/Harris County have zero income, and many people are dependent on SSI income. Street Outreach - Harris County s support of street outreach, and focus on linking people directly with housing is an important component of reaching people who have been homeless the longest, have the most difficulty navigating the housing intervention options, and often have complex health needs. As Coordinated Access is implemented in the community, it is anticipated that Street Outreach providers will play a major role in helping targeted populations access the assessment and housing placement system. Because our community has such a high rate of chronically homeless unsheltered people verses sheltered, this type of service is especially needed. Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing - The unprecedented partnership between ESG recipients Harris County, City of Houston, Fort Bend County, and City of Pasadena has lead to a more strategic use of homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing funds. Through use of common prioritization tools, coordinated program and system level outcome measures, service standards, and rental assistance strategies, our community is putting into place services that will help people who will most benefit from the limited ESG funding. Appendix Homeless Service Providers - Because agencies experience turnover in staff, we would like to help revise the appendix of Homeless Service Providers before the final Consolidated Plan is submitted to HUD. 67
70 Harris County Response: No response necessary. Organization: Houston Center for Independent Living Date: December 18, 2012 Comment: Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback to you regarding the Consolidated Plan and Fair Housing Plan. It is obvious that a great deal of effort has been exerted to get to this point. In reviewing the plans, we note that certain language needs clarification: While the word decent has certain connotations for sure, its use relative to Decent Housing needs more definition given the far-reaching ramifications of implementing a five-year community plan. It would be good to indicate some criteria by which housing can be deemed decent. Harris County Response: HUD defines decent, safe, and sanitary housing as those units meeting a minimum quality criterion by passing the following thirteen performance requirements: Sanitary facilities; Food preparation and refuse disposal; Space and security; Thermal environment; Illumination and electricity; Structure and materials; Interior air quality; Water supply; Lead-based paint; Access; Site and neighborhood; Sanitary condition; and Smoke Detectors. The previous statement was added to Appendix E Definitions in the Consolidated Plan under the name standard housing. Comment: The same comment is offered regarding the use of the term Suitable Living Environment. Criteria for what is considered suitable should be indicated so that there is no doubt as to the specifics which comprise such an environment. Harris County Response: Harris County defines suitable living environment as a living environment that is not substandard or dilapidated (running water, a bathroom, and heat must be available). The definition is included in Appendix E Definitions of the Consolidated Plan. Comment: We are pleased that the plans include language throughout to include people with disabilities. We are also pleased that value has been placed on providing training on independent living skills. Finally, we note that attention should be directed in the Consolidated Plan not only to the issue of affordable housing, but also to the issues of accessible and integrated housing. It is imperative that the Harris County remain diligent in its quest to provide its 68
71 citizens with affordable, accessible, and integrated housing along the continuum of objectives in the plans. If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to call on us. We look forward to working with all of you in our quest for affordable, accessible, and integrated housing for all of our citizens. Harris County Response: Harris County fully agrees that accessibility and integration, in addition to affordability, are essential in fostering healthy communities and providing quality housing options. Through our goals and objectives in the Consolidated Plan, Harris County addresses the need for more affordable units with the understanding that those units will meet all applicable ADA and Section 504 requirements. In addition, the Fair Housing Plan supports (when possible) a greater set aside for persons with mobility disabilities and visual/auditory disabilities. These strategies can be found in the Goals, Objective, and Performance Measurement Matrix of the Consolidated Plan and Section 3.0 Impediments and Strategies Matrix of the Fair Housing Plan. Organization: Houston Area Urban League Date: December 18, 2012 Comment: Page 1 - Explain the consultation process in more detail. Highlight specific organizations and how they were contacted. Describe if roundtables, surveys, and/or plan edits were used. Mention how CSD was proactive in contacting community organizations. Harris County Response: Harris County agrees with the comment and has amended Page 3 of the Fair Housing Plan to include the following statements: In particular, Harris County actively sought roundtable meetings with community organizations that work with fair housing issues. Harris County met with the Houston Area Urban League (a HUD sponsored Fair Housing organization) and the Houston Center for Independent Living in order to discuss major trends within the area, housing deficits, outreach efforts, and community partnerships. Also, Section 4.0 Citizen Participation Plan of the Fair Housing Plan outlines in more detail the community engagement and stakeholder participation efforts carried out by Harris County. Comment: Page 8 Mention the impact of the recent economic crisis, highlighting the positives within Harris County. 69
72 Harris County Response: Harris County agrees that the most recent economic crisis has played a significant role in the area s housing, employment, and educational opportunities. While the Fair Housing Plan does not address the economic crisis directly, it directs readers to specific sections of the Consolidated Plan. These sections provide a more thorough examination of the County s housing and socioeconomic trends over the last five to ten years, including trends related to the economic crisis. Comment: Page 9 Explain the statement low-income individuals and families are likely finding it harder to obtain affordable housing. Harris County Response: Harris County agrees with the comment and has amended Page 9 of the Fair Housing Plan to include the following statement: Overall, housing in Harris County is becoming increasingly affordable. However, lowincome individuals and families are finding it harder to obtain affordable housing because of the increasing gap between quality housing costs and household incomes. Comment: Impediments and Strategies Matrix Tie the goals within the matrix back into the Consolidated Plan. Harris County Response: Harris County agrees with the comment and has amended Section 3.0 Impediments and Strategies Matrix of the Fair Housing Plan to include the following statements: This section includes recommendations for strategies to address impediments identified through the analysis conducted in Section 2 to affirmatively further fair housing in Harris County. These strategies are integrated with the goals of the Consolidated Plan, and reflect performance measures established in the Performance, Goals, and Objectives Matrix. Drawing from information provided in the preceding analysis, the following matrix identifies six impediments to housing choice in Harris County. 70
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
Logan City. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing
Logan City Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing 2009-13 Consolidated Plan Page 36 of 92 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Analysis of Impediments The Analysis of Impediments (AI) is a comprehensive review of a jurisdiction
Executive Summary Community Profiles
Executive Summary Community Profiles The Community Profiles focus on four study areas in Waco and compare the demographics in those study areas to the overall city. The study areas are North Waco area,
Lloyd Potter is the Texas State Demographer and the Director of the Texas State Data Center based at the University of Texas at San Antonio.
Lloyd Potter is the Texas State Demographer and the Director of the Texas State Data Center based at the University of Texas at San Antonio. 1 2 Texas population in 2014 was just under 27 million and was
THE BASICS OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT. Presented by: Sarah Fisher Idaho Human Rights Commission [email protected].
THE BASICS OF THE FAIR HOUSING ACT Presented by: Sarah Fisher Idaho Human Rights Commission [email protected] 208-334-2873 Fair Housing Basics 1. What is Fair Housing? 2. What are the Federal
SUSTAINABLE HOUSTON: DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS, IMPACTS, AND FUTURE PLANS
SUSTAINABLE HOUSTON: DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS, IMPACTS, AND FUTURE PLANS Dr. Philip Berke Professor, UNC Chapel Hill Department of City & Regional Planning Deputy Director, UNC Institute for the Environment
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE 2008-2012 CONSOLIDATED PLAN FY 2008 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Prepared by the Community Services Department
Harris County Community Profile & Housing Market Analysis
Harris County Community Profile & Housing Market Analysis Introduction Harris County, Texas is the third largest county in the United States by population, ranking behind only Los Angeles County (Los Angeles,
Demographic Analysis of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Using 2010 Census and 2010 American Community Survey Estimates
Demographic Analysis of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Using 2010 Census and 2010 American Community Survey Estimates Completed for: Grants & Contract Office The Salt River Pima-Maricopa
Housing Markets in Six Metropolitan Areas and their Main Central Cities
Housing Markets in Six Metropolitan Areas and their Main Central Cities Rolf Pendall Director, Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center, The Urban Institute Housing issues and opportunities at
The goal is to transform data into information, and information into insight. Carly Fiorina
DEMOGRAPHICS & DATA The goal is to transform data into information, and information into insight. Carly Fiorina 11 MILWAUKEE CITYWIDE POLICY PLAN This chapter presents data and trends in the city s population
FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS: UPDATE FROM THE 2005 AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY
FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS: UPDATE FROM THE 2005 AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY In 2005, there were nearly 75 million homeowning households in the United States, representing nearly 69 percent of all households. During
A Geographic Profile of. Chicago Lawn, Gage Park, West Elsdon and West Lawn. Neighborhoods Served by. The Southwest Organizing Project
A Geographic Profile of Chicago Lawn, Gage Park, West Elsdon and West Lawn Neighborhoods Served by The Southwest Organizing Project The Southwest Organizing Project (SWOP) is a broad based community organization
SELECTED POPULATION PROFILE IN THE UNITED STATES. 2013 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates
S0201 SELECTED POPULATION PROFILE IN THE UNITED STATES 2013 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing
Appendix 11: AFFORDABLE HOUSING TERMS & CRITERIA
Appendix 11: AFFORDABLE HOUSING TERMS & CRITERIA (Provided by the Southampton Housing Authority March 18, 2013) What is Affordable Housing? There are a number of definitions of affordable housing as federal
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT Policy Document CHAPTER 3: HOUSING ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 3: HOUSING ELEMENT... 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES... 3 Goal: Housing... 3
An Equity Profile of the Kansas City Region. Summary. Overview. The Equity Indicators Framework. central to the region s economic success now and
An Equity Profile of the Kansas City Region PolicyLink and PERE An Equity Profile of the Kansas City Region Summary Overview Across the country, regional planning organizations, community organizations
Seattle Seniors. A Report prepared by the Seattle Office of Housing --- November 14, 2008
Seattle Seniors A Demographic Tidal Wave: numbers / needs Affordable Housing: today / looking ahead Strategies: addressing a significant demographic shift A Report prepared by the Seattle Office of Housing
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. May 29, 2012 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Midland FS&LA Charter Number 704475
SMALL BANK Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Washington, DC 20219 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE May 29, 2012 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Midland FS&LA Charter Number
WELCOME HOME: IMPROVING HOUSING SECURITY FOR LGBT OLDER ADULTS POLICY BRIEF
WELCOME HOME: IMPROVING HOUSING SECURITY FOR LGBT OLDER ADULTS POLICY BRIEF sageusa.org/lgbthousing ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SAGE would like to thank Squire Patton Boggs, LLP for their research and guidance on
ON LABOUR AND INCOME. JUNE 2002 Vol. 3, No. 6 HOUSING: AN INCOME ISSUE PENSIONS: IMMIGRANTS AND VISIBLE MINORITIES.
Catalogue no. 75-001-XIE ON LABOUR AND INCOME JUNE 2002 Vol. 3, No. 6 HOUSING: AN INCOME ISSUE PENSIONS: IMMIGRANTS AND VISIBLE MINORITIES Statistics Canada Statistique Canada Sophie Lefebvre HOUSING IS
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. March 02, 2009 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. First National Bank of Michigan Charter Number 24637
O SMALL BANK Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Washington, DC 20219 PUBLIC DISCLOSURE March 02, 2009 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION First National Bank of Michigan
Model Content Standards for Market Studies for Rental Housing
1400 16 th St. NW * Suite 420 Washington, DC 20036 (t)202-939-1750 (f) 202-265-4435 www.housingonline.com Model Content Standards for Market Studies for Rental Housing I. Purpose The purpose of these standards
Economic Development and Housing Challenge Program
Economic Development and Housing Challenge Program 8/6/2015 Minnesota Housing does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, religion, marital status, status with regard
SHIP LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN (LHAP)
CITY OF OCALA SHIP LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN (LHAP) FISCAL YEARS COVERED 2013/2014, 2014/2015 AND 2015/2016-1 - Table of Contents Title Page #. Section I. Program Description: 3 Section II. Strategies:
Familial Status Discrimination in the University Neighborhood
Familial Status Discrimination in the University Neighborhood A Report by CNY Fair Housing. October 2013 Funding for this study was provided by the City of Syracuse Community Development Block Grant Program
Policy Analysis Report
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUDGET AND LEGISLATIVE ANALYST 1390 Market Street, Suite 1150, San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 552-9292 FAX (415) 252-0461 Policy Analysis Report To:
City of Tuscaloosa Affirmative Marketing Policy for Affordable Housing Programs
City of Tuscaloosa Affirmative Marketing Policy for Affordable Housing Programs Note: Affirmative Marketing procedures do not apply to families with Section 8 tenant-based rental housing assistance or
Residential Rehabilitation Loan Program Guidelines
Residential Rehabilitation Loan Program Guidelines City of Middletown Department of Planning, Conservation and Development Community Development Division February 1999 Table of Contents Purpose 1 General
Barriers to Homeownership.
Who Could Afford to Buy a House in 995? 995 Issued August 999 Highlights In 995, about 56 (+/- 0.8) percent of American families (current owners as well as renters) could afford to purchase a modestly
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE February 22, 2010 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Community Bank of Bergen County RSSD No. 275509 18 Railroad Avenue Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662 FEDERAL RESERVE
Fact Sheet: Unequal Opportunity Disparate Mortgage Origination Patterns for Women in the Chicago Area
Fact Sheet: Unequal Opportunity Disparate Mortgage Origination Patterns for Women in the Chicago Area Introduction This fact sheet examines women s access to mortgages following the collapse of the housing
EASI Reseller Opportunities: Demographic Estimates and Forecasts; Life Stage Clusters; Major Merchandise Lines and Minor Store Groups
EASI Reseller Opportunities: Demographic Estimates and Forecasts; Life Stage Clusters; Major Merchandise Lines and Minor Store Groups Introduction Easy Analytic Software, Inc. (EASI) is a New York-based
How To Improve Housing In Seminole County
ELEMENT Introduction Issues and Concerns Goals, Objectives and Policies Exhibits 2020 ELEMENT INTRODUCTION Since populations group themselves into households, the socioeconomic makeup of those households
CITY OF MCKEESPORT, PENNSYLVANIA 500 Fifth Avenue, McKeesport, Pennsylvania 15132
CITY OF MCKEESPORT, PENNSYLVANIA 500 Fifth Avenue, McKeesport, Pennsylvania 15132 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE UPDATED: FEBRUARY 2011 Regis T. McLaughlin, Honorable Mayor City Council:
7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES
7.0 GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES The following Goals, Objectives and Policies specific to Housing are organized into broad categories including: 7.1: Housing Availability 7.2: Protection of Existing Neighborhoods
A Review of Rental Housing with Tax Credits
A Review of Rental Housing with Tax Credits A Review of Rental Housing with Tax Credits Contents Summer 2013 Contents Minnesota Housing Planning, Research & Evaluation CONTENTS Page Summary 1 Introduction
County Demographics, Economy & Housing Market
County Demographics, Economy & Housing Market County Demographics Palm Beach County is Florida's third most populous county with 7% of Florida's population. The county's total estimated population for
Section 4: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Data Analysis
Section 4: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Data Analysis Introduction The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) gathers data on home mortgage activity from the federal agencies
Houston-Galveston Area Council. Disaster Recovery Housing Needs Assessment. Round 2 Phase 2 Funding
Houston-Galveston Area Council Disaster Recovery Housing Needs Assessment Round 2 Phase 2 Funding Disaster Recovery Community Development Block Grant Funding DR-1791 Hurricanes Ike & Dolly Prepared by
Milwaukee s Housing Crisis: Housing Affordability and Mortgage Lending Practices
Milwaukee s Housing Crisis: Housing Affordability and Mortgage Lending Practices by John Pawasarat and Lois M. Quinn, Employment and Training Institute, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2007 This report
Lake County. Government Finance Study. Supplemental Material by Geography. Prepared by the Indiana Business Research Center
County Government Finance Study Supplemental Material by Geography Prepared by the Indiana Business Research www.ibrc.indiana.edu for Sustainable Regional Vitality www.iun.edu/~csrv/index.shtml west Indiana
Fair Housing Act. Reference Guide to Regulatory Compliance. 42 USC Ch 45 3601 through 3619
Reference Guide to Regulatory Compliance Fair Housing Act 42 USC Ch 45 3601 through 3619 Topics Coverage Requirements Enforcement Practical Application Self-Study Questions The Fair Housing Act was enacted
WHEREAS, Santa Monica is a coastal city in a prime location, being bordered by the City of Los Angeles to the north, east and south; and
City Council Meeting / /2013 ORDINANCE NUMBER (CCS) (City Council Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AMENDING SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 9.56.020, 9.56.030,
Metro Interfaith Housing Counseling. Tell Us About Yourself. General Information Primary
Metro Interfaith Housing Counseling 21 New St, Binghamton, NY 13903 Phone: 607.723.0582 Fax: 607.722.8912 Tell Us About Yourself Print clearly. Use additional sheets if necessary. Information provided
City of Madison 2010-2014 3-5 Year Strategic Plan
City of Madison 2010-2014 3-5 Year Strategic Plan This document includes Narrative Responses to specific questions that grantees of the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership, Housing
San Francisco Tenant Survey Summary Report
San Francisco Tenant Survey Summary Report Commissioned by: San Francisco Board of Supervisors Study Moderator: Joe Grubb August 2002 Headquarters 510.549.7310 2560 Ninth Street, Suite 211 fax 510.549.7028
City of Lynchburg, VA: Housing Assessment
City of Lynchburg, VA: Housing Assessment Prepared By: Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia, Inc. for the City of Lynchburg CITY OF LYNCHBURG, VA: HOUSING ASSESSMENT 2011 1 List of Maps Map 1.
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. February 3, 2011 MORTGAGE LENDER COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IFREEDOM DIRECT CORPORATION ML3122
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE February 3, 2011 MORTGAGE LENDER COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IFREEDOM DIRECT CORPORATION ML3122 2363 SOUTH FOOTHILL DRIVE SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84109 DIVISION OF BANKS
Who lives in New Orleans and the metro area now? Based on 2012 U.S. Census Bureau data
Who lives in New Orleans and the metro area now? Based on 2012 U.S. Census Bureau data Vicki Mack and Elaine Ortiz, Greater New Orleans Community Data Center September 26, 2013 This brief examines 2012
Questions and Answers on: F A I R H O U S I N G. Q: Do the fair housing laws apply to all. A: Yes, except for the following limited exemptions:
Questions and Answers on: F A I R H O U S I N G The purpose of the fair housing laws is to protect a person s right to own, sell, purchase, or rent housing of his or her choice without fear of unlawful
CHAPTER 2 - Population and Economy
CHAPTER 2 - Population and Economy Siler City is located in Western Chatham County West of Raleigh and the Triangle and South of Greensboro at the junction of US Highway 64 and US Highway 421. It was incorporated
City of Alhambra. Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. City of Alhambra 111 South First Street Alhambra, CA 91801
City of Alhambra Fair Housing Choice City of Alhambra 111 South First Street Alhambra, CA 91801 May 2013 Table of Contents Chapter Page Chapter 1: Introduction... 1 A. Background... 1 B. Fair Housing
Demography. Focus on the three contributors to population change: Fertility, mortality, and migration
1 Formal Demography Demography Focus on the three contributors to population change: Fertility, mortality, and migration Social Demography Focus on relationship between social, economic, and demographic
ATTACHMENT B STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT OF THE NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE AGAINST ALLSTATE CORPORATION
ATTACHMENT B STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT OF THE NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE AGAINST ALLSTATE CORPORATION This Complaint arises out of an investigation by the National Fair Housing Alliance ( NFHA
West Valley City Grants Department Rehabilitation Loan Program Policy & Information Packet
West Valley City Grants Department Rehabilitation Loan Program Policy & Information Packet Current Revision: 9/09 1 CONTENTS REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM (RLP) POLICY: Section I Section II Section III Section
HUD Housing Counselors Training
Module 3.2 Study Guide HUD Housing Counselors Training U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Table of Contents Module Introduction 4 Module Introduction 4 Lesson Objectives 4 Evidence of Fair
Fair Lending Overview. Division of Depositor and Consumer Protection
Fair Lending Overview Fair Lending Regulations Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) Prohibits discrimination in any aspect of a consumer or commercial credit transaction Fair Housing Act (FHA) Prohibits
Iowa School District Profiles. Central City
Iowa School District Profiles Overview This profile describes enrollment trends, student performance, income levels, population, and other characteristics of the Central City public school district. The
Health and Social Services Needs in Whitman County. 2015 Community Needs Assessment Results General Report COMMUNITY REPORT OF RESULTS
COMMUNITY REPORT OF RESULTS This report contains an overview of the results collected by the Health and Social Services Needs in Whitman County Survey. A description of Whitman County, the survey process,
Profile of Rural Health Insurance Coverage
Profile of Rural Health Insurance Coverage A Chartbook R H R C Rural Health Research & Policy Centers Funded by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy www.ruralhealthresearch.org UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN
Houston Region Grows More Racially/Ethnically Diverse, With Small Declines in Segregation
Houston Region Grows More Racially/Ethnically Diverse, With Small Declines in Segregation A Joint Report Analyzing Census Data from 1990, 2000, and 2010 Houston Region Grows More Racially/Ethnically Diverse,
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE January 07, 2014 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Lake Federal, FSB Charter Number 706128 7048 Kennedy Ave Hammond, IN 46323-2212 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Marriage and divorce: patterns by gender, race, and educational attainment
ARTICLE OCTOBER 2013 Marriage and divorce: patterns by gender, race, and educational attainment Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79), this article examines s and divorces
What Can We Learn about the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program by Looking at the Tenants?
MOELIS INSTITUTE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY BRIEF OCTOBER 2012 What Can We Learn about the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program by Looking at the Tenants? WWW.FURMANCENTER.ORG I. Introduction While
Who Could Afford to Buy a Home in 2009? Affordability of Buying a Home in the United States
Who Could Afford to Buy a Home in 200? Affordability of Buying a Home in the United States Current Housing Reports Ellen Wilson and Robert R. Callis Issued May 203 H2/3-02 IntroductIon This is the seventh
CITY OF TEMPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HOUSING SERVICES DIVISION www.tempe.gov
CITY OF TEMPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING STRATEGY DOCUMENT 1 CITY OF TEMPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HOUSING SERVICES DIVISION www.tempe.gov P.O. BOX 5002 21 E. Sixth Street,
Application for Housing
Application for Housing HELP Philadelphia IV consists of sixty 1-BEDROOM units. Applicant Information Last Name First Name MI Street Address Apt. # City State Zip Code Social Security# Home Phone: Date
APPENDIX B LINCOLN HIGHWAY/ROUTE 31 CORRIDOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT HOUSING IMPACT STUDY
APPENDIX B LINCOLN HIGHWAY/ROUTE 31 CORRIDOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT HOUSING IMPACT STUDY Village of North Aurora, Illinois May, 2009 DRAFT Prepared by: Teska Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS
ES 05 Executive Summary 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)
ES 05 Executive Summary 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) Incorporated in 1868, Redwood City is a growing and diversifying jobs center and residential community with many assets, including diverse geography,
TOWN OF AMHERST First-Time Homebuyers Program
Amherst Town of Amherst Planning Department Erie County, New York Barry A. Weinstein, MD Supervisor Eric W. Gillert, AICP Planning Director Gary Black, AICP Assistant Planning Director TOWN OF AMHERST
What you need to know about. Massachusetts Transgender Rights Law
What you need to know about Massachusetts Transgender Rights Law October 2013 On November 23, 2011, Governor Deval Patrick signed into law H3810, An Act Relative to Gender Identity. This law adds gender
GENERAL INFORMATION. INSTITUTION'S CRA RATING: This institution is rated ASatisfactory@.
GENERAL INFORMATION The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) requires each federal financial supervisory agency to use its authority when examining financial institutions subject to its supervision, to assess
Moving Beyond the Gap
Moving Beyond the Gap Racial Disparities in September 2014 Central Corridor St. Paul Hopkins Blake Rd Corridor Eastside St. Paul South Minneapolis September 2014 Overview This report is part of a larger
HOUSING DISCRIMINATION Get The Facts
Tom Horne Arizona Attorney General Always remain alert and prepared to protect you and your family Arizona Attorney General s Office 1275 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 602.542.5025 HOUSING
KANKAKEE COUNTY ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS
ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS March 2007 Prepared for Kankakee County Health Department Provena St. Mary s Hospital Riverside HealthCare Prepared by University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford
CITY OF KENOSHA 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan. for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs
CITY OF KENOSHA 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs Table of Contents Executive Summary...1 ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)...1
PLAYING THE HOUSING GAME
PLAYING THE HOUSING GAME Learning to Use HUD s Consolidated Plan to Expand Housing Opportunities for People with Disabilities PREPARED BY the Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc. Boston, MA DECEMBER
2016 Homeless Count Results Los Angeles County and LA Continuum of Care. Published by: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority May 4, 2016 1
2016 Homeless Count Results Los Angeles County and LA Continuum of Care Published by: Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority May 4, 2016 1 Why Do We Count? The Homeless Count seeks to answer key questions
Competitive Analysis Economic Vision for the City of Burlington
Competitive Analysis Economic Vision for the City of Burlington Burlington Economic Development Corporation DRAFT 1 Millier Dickinson Blais ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This report has been supported by the Ministry
