ARENA DISTRICT MASTER PLAN APPENDIX STUDY

Transcription

1 ARENA DISTRICT MASTER PLAN APPENDIX STUDY FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY January 2015

2 1. PARKING OPTIONS 2. PREFERRED PARKING OPTIONS & COST ESTIMATE 3. FINAL PREFERRED PARKING OPTION 4. BASKETBALL TRAINING CENTER LOCATION 5. ARENA WRAPPING STRATEGIES

3 PARKING OPTIONS 1. Macomb Lane 2. Half Plinth 3. Full Plinth

4 12 sp. 990 Xxx sp. 730 Xxx sp. 617 sp. 47 sp. 54 sp. Existing parking Subtotals

5 Option 1 Macomb Lane 570 TOTAL SPACES

6 Macomb Macomb Walk Pensacola St Augustine Madison Gaines Option 1 Macomb Lane upper level 570 TOTAL SPACES

7 Macomb Macomb Walk St Augustine Madison Gaines Option 1 Macomb Lane lower level 570 TOTAL SPACES

8 Pros - Shared Street concept on Macomb Lane allows for pedestrian and vehicle use this will support retail uses within overall parcel - Continuous north/south pedestrian movement along Macomb Lane not interrupted by stairs (universal access + good public realm design) - Good connectivity to All Saints neighborhood to the south - Retail concentration along Macomb Lane at heart of project - Dual access to hotel parking entry from Hotel plaza and from Macomb Street - Generous drop off for hotel guests - Conference Center Parking access from Macomb Lane (proximate) - Stormwater main NOT relocated (location to be provided by Osteen) - Parking able to be phased; tied to each development (Hotel and Conf. Center) - Gateway Park maintained on ground full landscape possible Cons - No Parking for potential FSU student housing at SW corner (they can use the Turnbull garage) - Upper part of Macomb Lane lined by parking on both sides Option 1 Macomb Lane

9 Option 2 Half Plinth 660 TOTAL SPACES

10 Macomb Macomb Walk Pensacola St Augustine Madison Gaines Option 2 Half Plinth upper level 660 TOTAL SPACES

11 Macomb Macomb Walk St Augustine Madison Gaines Option 2 Half Plinth lower level 660 TOTAL SPACES

12 Pros - Macomb Walk fully pedestrian - Good connectivity to All Saints neighborhood to the south - Dual access to hotel parking entry from Hotel plaza and from Macomb Street - Generous drop off for hotel guests - Access to parking from service yard maintained - Gateway Park maintained on ground full landscape possible Cons - Stormwater main to be relocated = substantial cost implication - Parking plinth challenging to phase - Cost of plinth over Macomb Lane - Conference Center Parking access from Macomb Street (distant from Conf. Center dropoff) - Retail concentration along Macomb Lane at heart of project: pedestrian access only = substantial challenge for retail - No Parking for potential FSU student housing at SW corner (they can use the Turnbull garage) - Landscape (trees, lawns) on plinth challenging Option 2 Half Plinth

13 Option 3 Full Plinth 790 TOTAL SPACES

14 Macomb Macomb Walk Pensacola St Augustine Madison Gaines Option 3 Full Plinth upper level 790 TOTAL SPACES

15 Macomb Macomb Walk St Augustine Madison Gaines Option 3 Full Plinth middle level 790 TOTAL SPACES

16 Macomb Macomb Walk St Augustine Madison Gaines Option 3 Full Plinth Lower level 790 TOTAL SPACES

17 Pros - Macomb Walk fully pedestrian - Substantial amount of parking provided - Dual access to hotel parking entry from Hotel plaza and from Macomb Street - Generous drop off for hotel guests - Access to parking from service yard maintained - Parking for potential FSU student housing (or other use) provided Cons - Stairs at all entry points to site and upper level plazas detrimental to pedestrian connectivity - Universal access difficult to achieve - Stormwater main to be relocated = substantial cost implication - Very large parking plinth challenging to phase - Conference Center Parking access from Macomb Street (distant from Conf. Center dropoff) - Retail concentration along Macomb Lane at heart of project: pedestrian access only = substantial challenge for retail - Landscape (trees, lawns) on plinth challenging Option 3 Full Plinth

18 Traditional paths for vehicles and pedestrians Special pavement Flush curbs Bollards/planters often delineate sidewalks Hybrid Streets Macomb Lane Concept

19 Hybrid Streets Macomb Lane Concept

20 PREFERRED PARKING OPTIONS & COST ESTIMATE

21

22 5.5 Levels 160 / lvl 880 total

24

25 St. Augustine 5.5 Levels 160 / lvl 880 total

27 93 total 5.5 Levels 160 / lvl 880 total

28

29

30 Parking Deck Cost Analysis

31

32 Feasibility Considerations Moss Construction Cost Estimating, Inc. has completed a parking deck cost analysis as part of the FSU Arena District Master Plan. The cost analysis evaluated the preferred parking option selected by FSU, as described in the plans and sections on the preceding pages. The following parcels/components were included in the cost analysis: Parcel 1 Conference Hotel 380 spaces Parcel 2 Conference Center 190 spaces Parcel 3 Gateway Development (Options 1a) 108 spaces Parcel 4 O Connell Garage 880 spaces Assumptions Comprehensive assumptions are noted in the cost estimate spreadsheet (included separately). Select assumptions are noted below. Half of the cost of the parking deck lid over Parcels 1, 2, and 3 is included in the cost estimate of the garages. Half of the cost of hardscape / landscape on the lids for Parcels 1 and 3 is included in the cost estimate. It is assumed that the cost of these elements will be shared by a parking developer and hotel/conference developer. All elevated structures are included as cast in place concrete other than Parcel 4 which is included as precast double tees with in-laid brick spandrel panels. HVAC ventilation / carbon monoxide monitoring is included only in Parcel 1 garage. Cost estimate assumes that the other parcels can achieve 50% or greater natural ventilation. Soft costs are not included in the cost estimate. Summary of Findings Parking at Parcels 1, 2, and 3 (lower levels covered by plazas and buildings) is approximately $30,000 per space. Parking at Parcel 4 (above grade structured parking) is approximately $16,000 per space. The high cost of structured parking on Parcels 1, 2, and 3 will be a significant factor impacting the financial feasibility of projects on those parcels, particularly in the near-term given the availability of surface parking in the district and at competing development sites. FSU anticipates that the first phase of the Arena District redevelopment will focus on the conference hotel (Parcel 1). As integrated structured parking with the hotel is not expected to be financially feasible, the parking solution in the first phase could include a combination of locations: Turnbull Garage (with skybridge connection over Macomb), surface spaces in hotel courtyard, and potential partial deck parking below hotel and courtyard. The analysis points toward the development of a larger parking hub at Parcel 4 in the form of an above-ground parking structure which could serve the redevelopment of the district.

33 FINAL PREFERRED PARKING OPTION

34 PREFERRED PARKING OPTION WITH EXISTING ALIGNMENT OF CITY STREETS PREFERRED PARKING OPTION WITH POTENTIAL LONG-TERM RESTORATION OF CITY GRID

35 60 spaces - plaza level

36

37

38 60 spaces - plaza level

39

40

41 Arena District Parking Count Summary 4 sp. 3 sp. 792 sp. 205 sp. 55 sp. Xxx Xxx Xxx (80% of 990) (includes 60 under surface spaces in conference 5 sp. hotel plaza) center St. Augustine 9 sp. 47 Xxx sp Xxx sp. Existing parking Proposed parking 240

42 Walking times to Arena District Parking 510 = 2 min walk 180 =.7 min walk 792 Xxx sp. (80% of 990) 980 = 3.7 min walk 840 =3.2 min walk St. Augustine 945 = 3.6 min walk 820 = 3.1 min walk UPHILL (APPROX 5% SLOPE) Walking Distances Based on 20 minute mile (~ 3.1 mph) Xxx 1175 sp. 150 =.6 min walk Existing parking Proposed parking

43 Existing Structured Parking Supply within.25 Mile 1, FSU Garage State Garages City Garages 500 FSU: State: City: Total: 990 spaces 1,600 spaces 1,300 spaces 3,890 spaces in parking structures N ft

44 BASKETBALL TRAINING FACILITY

45

46

47

48 ARENA WRAPPING STRATEGIES

49 Entry integrated with roof structure Retail venue at ground floor / lack of transparency Plaza to be renovated Auto focused / Poor pedestrian access Concrete structure integral to structure of Arena Concrete structure integral to structure of Arena Assumed that bus and auto access will remain

50 Concrete structures (north, east, and south) integral to structure of Arena No new construction within drip line of trees Preserve existing trees Entry integrated with roof structure Assumption: Character of the Park to be enhanced

51 145 ALIGN 165 ALIGN Possible Egress Zone at ground Development potential: Plan Potential development* Approx. 42,000 gsf / lvl ALIGN ALIGN 2 Existing Tree Canopies 2 3 To preserve existing live oaks & Chain of Parks building footprint not feasible BBall Practice or other development* Approx. 60,000 gsf / lvl ALIGN Service Drive Bus Drive Egress width required * Depends on subsurface structure / deadmen

52 Development potential: Detail Plan North side Pensacola 1 Potential development* Approx. 42,000 gsf / lvl Preferred massing: 1. Ground level / civic entry porch 2. Potential skylight 3. Potential interior renovation combined with addition 4. Setback east and west sides to expose existing east and west concrete trellises 5. Bus access lane to remain 6. Marquee event signage 7. Tighten drop off plaza 8. Landscaped terraces See reference images next pages Egress width required

53 Wrapping Elements / Transparent Entries Marquee signage

54 Lighting elements

55 Stepped landscape

56 Development potential: Section 1 Potential development Approx. 50,000 gsf / lvl Potential for FSU Admin. / Office space Pensacola College of Law

57 Development potential: Section 2 To preserve existing live oaks & Chain of Parks building footprint not feasible Suggest landscape treatment at New Chain of Parks: planted terraces, retaining walls, etc. 32 Vertical elements along east façade: lighting, screening, flagpoles, etc. Bus Drop-off MLK State Library of Florida

58 Development potential: Section 3 BBall Practice or other development* Approx. 60,000 gsf / lvl Most development potential pending design study by LWA 112 Future CoB Madison Smoking Porch