Jack-in Piling Environmental Friendly Piling System
|
|
- Cameron Harrison
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Jack-in Piling Environmental Friendly Piling System Part 1 - Chris Loh 7 Nov 12 CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
2 Gracious Piling Environmental Friendly Low Noise No Vibration Jack-in Piling
3 How Many Decibels? Permissible Leq 75dB (12 hours) within 15m
4 How Far Have We Gone Since 24? length of piles installed Singapore To Jakarta
5 Contents Method of Jack-in Piling System Installation Process Machine Movement and Installation Process (Video) Advantages of Jack-in Piling Mitigating Measures Jack-in Piling Machines Completed High Rise Buildings Projects Some Valued Clients To Conclude
6 Method of Jack-in Piling System CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
7 Method of Jack-in Piling System A modern technique by which pre-formed piles (e.g. Prestressed Spun Piles, Precast RC Piles, H-Piles, Steel Pipe Piles) are hydraulically jacked into the ground as displacement piles
8 Installation Process CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
9 Installation Process Pile is jacked into the ground with a jack-in force adjusted in steps up to between 1.8 times times working load Jacking will continue until practical refusal where jack-in force is released and reapplied twice Downward movement of the pile between the two cycles is then measured and checked against the set criteria
10 Machine Movement and Installation Process (Video) CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
11 Machine Movement (Video)
12 Installation Process (Video)
13 Advantages of Jack-in Piling CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
14 Advantages of Jack-in Piling Environmental Friendly - Low Noise - Vibration Free - Minimal Spoils Disposal Able to achieve Good Verticality Lower Risk of machine toppling as compared with conventional leader type machines Every pile is jacked up to between 1.8 times times working load
15 Mitigating Measures CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
16 Mitigating Measures Relief Boring Pre-Boring at Piling Point
17 Jack-in Piling Machines CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
18 Jack-in Piling Machines Low Capacity Machines - 1 to 13 tons
19 Jack-in Piling Machines Medium Capacity Machines - 24 to 42 tons
20 Jack-in Piling Machines High Capacity Machines - 6 to 8 tons
21 Completed High Rise Building Projects CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
22 Completed High Rise Building Projects Livia Condominium 17 Storey 151 RC Piles & Spun Piles RC Piles 25mm, 3mm, 35mm and 4mm Spun Piles 5mm and 6mm Piles Capacity 6tons, 85tons, 1tons, 16tons, 125tons and 17tons
23 Completed High Rise Building Projects Twin Waterfalls 17 Storey 15 Spun Piles Spun Piles 4mm, 5mm and 6mm Piles Capacity 1tons, 15tons and 215tons
24 Completed High Rise Building Projects Austville Residences 18 Storey 115 Spun Piles RC Piles 25mm Spun Piles 5mm and 6mm Piles Capacity 13tons, 187tons and 25tons
25 Completed High Rise Building Projects AMK Street 52 3 Storey 1293 Spun Piles Spun Piles 4mm, 5mm and 6mm Piles Capacity 118tons, 169tons and 231tons
26 Some Valued Clients CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
27 Some Valued Clients
28 To Conclude Environmental Friendly Suitable for all types of Pre-formed piles Proven to be viable foundation system for high rise buildings Piles are load tested during installation
29 Thank You CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
30 Jack-in Piling Environmental Friendly Piling System Part 2 Gwee Boon Hong 7 Nov 212 CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
31 Contents. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS DESIGN PARAMETERS EVALUATION BASED ON INSTRUMENTATION RESULTS (Case Study : Old Alluvium Formation) JACK-IN PILE PERFORMANCE USING DIFFERENT JACK-IN FORCE DURING INSTALLATION (Case Study : Tuas South Avenue - Jurong Formation)
32 JACK-IN PILING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
33 Jack-in Pile Design Structural Considerations Qa =.25 (fcu fpe) * Ac Qa : Allowable structural axial capacity fcu : Compressive strength of concrete at 28 days fpe : Effective prestress in concrete Ac : Cross-sectional area of concrete Geotechnical Considerations Ultimate geotechnical capacity is determined by : Static formula on the basis of soil test Termination criteria using resistance measured during pile installation Verify performance of piles designed by above methods using static load test For quality control purpose, PDA and PIT are also carried out
34 Design Parameters In Accordance with CP4:23 Ultimate geotechnical axial capacity Qu = fs x As + qb x Ab Shaft Resistance : fs = Ks.N; Ks = 2 to 5 ; (limiting to 2kPa) Base Resistance: qb= Kb.4.N; Kb = 6 to 9 ; (limiting to 18,kPa for soil) For rock, qb = lesser of strength of pile material and unconfined compressive strength of rock Factor of Safety : Shaft Resistance = 2.5 Base Resistance = 2.5 Ks and Kb are related to the characteristics of soil & method of installation Higher value of Ks and Kb may be adopted if substantiated by sufficient instrumented load test in similar soil condition
35 Set / Termination Criteria Wide variations in termination ( set ) criteria for jacked piles Min jacked force = K x design working load (K varies between 1.8 to 2.5) Holding time = 3~6 seconds Max allowable settlement of 2mm for 2 or more consecutive cycles In Singapore context, termination criteria using min jacked force of 2 x WL and set criteria of 2mm between two jack cycles is commonly adopted Final acceptance criteria for the installed piles need to be verified by static pile load test
36 CASE STUDY 1 DESIGN PARAMETERS EVALUTION BASED ON INSTRUMENTATION RESULTS
37 Case Study 1 - Punggol View Pri Sch (Old Alluvium) 2 4 Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) Actual Back Analysis Ultimate Pile Capacity (kn) CS 2-5 Unit End Bearing (kpa) MS JIF=2.1xWL 443 (2.1xWL) SPT-N Design Pile did not fail at 3xWL Depth (m) SM Design SM SF>2.5 CS MS 1m difference in pile length = $$ SM q (Spun Pile diam. 6mm) q fs -6 q qb q F.O.S Qb - Design Geotechnical Capacity q -6 Qs - Design Structural Capacity = 21 kn = Ks.N, Ks = 2. to-62.5 (limited to 12 kpa) = 4.N.Kb Kb = 5 (limited to 75 kpa ) -65 = Qult - Design -6 JIF Qult - Back Analysis (Based on Ins Result)
38 Load Distribution CS MS SM 1177 SM SM 4 4 SPT 1 MS 28 MS Force Reading CS CS SM 4.7 Depth (m) Depth (m) SM D ep th (m ) CS MS Ks (fs/nav) fs (kpa) Loads (kn) Soil Layer Layer 59 1 SM 5 Low unit end bearing (152 kpa), Not fully mobilized fs 45 SPT Soil Layer Layer 5 CP4 Ks = 2N Average Ks = 4.4N CP4 Ks = 5N
39 Load Settlement Curve 8 Cycle-1 Cycle-2 Cycle ; 634 Load at Top (kn) ; ; Settlement at Pile Head (mm) 25 3
40 Displacement Vs Mobilized Resistance 2 2-6m End Bearing 6-12m 12-18m 18-24m m m m 1 5 Unit End Bearing (kpa) Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) m Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) Max unit shaft friction is mobilized at average pile displacement between soil stratum of 12mm or 2% of pile diameter. Mobilized unit end bearing was 152 kpa at pile toe displacement of 5.89mm or.9% of pile diameter.
41 Design Parameters Evaluation, Ks & Kb Assumed Ks 2 to 2.5 Kb 5 Measured kpa CP-4 2 to 5 2 kpa kpa ** 6 to 9 18 kpa ** Not fully mobilized
42 Mobilized Shaft Resistance (Old Alluvium) 45 Non-displacement Pile (NDP) 4 Displacement Pile (DP) 35 Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) CP-4 Ks= 5N 3 CP-4 Ks=3N 25 2 CP-4 Ks=2N 15 CP-4 Ks=1.5N N-SPT Compilation of ULT (Instrumented) results from different piling systems within Punggol sites
43 CASE STUDY 2 EFFECT OF JACK-IN FORCE ON JACK-IN PILE PERFORMANCE AT TUAS SOUTH AVENUE - In collaboration with NUS (29) -
44 Pile & Instrumentation Layout Plan m (25D) TP2 CPT1 CPT1b CPT3a CPT2a CPT1a CPT3 CPT2 CPT1 CPT1b CPT1a CPT2 CPT2a CPT3 TP3 P1' 3 3 CPT3a 3 CPT4a CPT3a CPT4 CPT1, CPT1a, CPT1b, m CPT2a (14 D) CPT1a CPT1b CPT3 CPT2 CPT1 TP1 8.4 m D 4 1 ( ) : 2r (.6m) from center of spun pile CPT2, CPT2a, : 3r (.9m) from center of spun pile Before pile installation CPT3, CPT3a, : 5r (1.5m) from center of spun pile After pile installation CPT4, CPT4a After load test ; 1r (3.m) from center of spun pile
45 Soil Stratigraphy TP2 (JIF = 2xWL=586kN) 12m 4m TP1 (JIF=1.5xWL=4395kN) FILL (Loose to Medium Dense SAND) SPT-N of 5 to 12 KALLANG FORMATION (Very Soft to Soft Marine CLAY) SPT-N of 2 to 4 Residual Soil S VI (Stiff to Very Stiff Sandy CLAY) JURONG FORMATION 4m SPT-N of 1 to 2 1m Completely Weathered Siltstone/Sandstone S V (Stiff to Very Stiff Sandy CLAY) JURONG FORMATION SPT-N of 2 to m TP3 (JIF=2.25xWL=6592.5kN) 28.7m 31.7m JURONG FORMATION, Completely Weathered Siltstone/Sandstone S V (Hard Sandy CLAY, N>6)
46 Installation Record TP1 (1.5xWL=4395kN) Jack-In Force (kn) Depth (m) TP-2 CS (S-V) TP-3 CS (S-V) 19 set at 28.7m CS (S-V) MS (S-V) TP MS (S-V) MS (S-V) MS (S-V) MS (S-V) 25 3 CS (S-VI) CS (S-VI) 28-2 marine CLAY m arine CLAY 4 MS (S-VI) m arine CLAY 6 SM (Fill) SM (Fill) SM (Fill) TP3 (2.25xWL=6592.5kN) TP2 (2xWL=586kN) set at 29.9m set at 31.7m
47 Test program and Test Arrangement Kentledge reaction system (TP1 and TP3) Jack-in rig counter-weight reaction system (TP2)
48 Load Test Results Load LoadSettlement SettlementCurve Curve(Combine (CombinePlot) Plot) 2.5xWL (7325 kn) 1 1 TP1=29.9mm TP2=26.mm 9 9 TP3=26.5mm 98.24mm 98.24mm 8 8 (at 2.99xWL (At 2.99xWL = 8762kN) = 8762kN) 85.9mm Load at at Top Top (kn) (kn) Load mm (at 2.62xWL (At 2.62xWL = 769kN) = 769kN) 6 6 2xWL (586 kn) 5 5 TP1=18.8mm TP1' TP1' TP2=18.3mm 4 4 TP2 TP2 TP3=18.mm 3 3 1xWL (293 kn) TP3 TP3 TP1=7.5mm 2 2 TP2=6.2mm 1 1 Allowable Allowable Settlement Settlement (CP4) (CP4) TP3=7.4mm Settlement Settlementat attop Top(mm) (mm)
49 JIF, Qtot, Qs, and Qb 1 Qtot Qtot Qtot* (kn) (JIF) 593 (JIF) Force (JIF) Qtot 4475 Qs Qb TP1', L=28.7m (Failure test) TP2*, L=29.9m TP3, L=31.7m (Non failure test) (Failure test)
50 Unit Shaft Resistance Vs Displacement Lev A to Lev B Lev B to Lev C 25 Le v A to Lev B ( 1.4 m t o 6.4 m ) N - a ve = TP1 TP1' N - av etp1' = 1 Le v A t o Le v BN -(av1.4 m Lev A t o Le v B e = 11 ( 1.2m to t8o. 4 56m.4m ) ) N - a v etp3 = 9 Le v A t o Le v B ( 1.2 m t o m ) N - a v e = 11 TP2 TP2 TP3 TP3 1 N -a v e = 7 Le v B t o Le v C ( 6.4m t o 14.9 m ) N - a v e = 1 Le v C ( 6.45 m t o m) 25 TP2 Le v B t o Le v C t o) (6.4 5 Lev m t o 1B 4.2m Le v B t o Lev C Le v B t o Le v C -a v e ( 6.4m t o 14.9N m) 2 TP1' TP2 N - a v e = 1 =5 TP2 TP2 TP3 ( 8.4 5m t o m ) Le v B t o Lev C ( 8.4 5m t o m ) 15 N - a ve = TP3 TP N -a ve = 25 TP1' 1 N - av e = 16 TP N -ave = 25 Le v D t o Le v E ( 2.9 m t o m ) N -ave = 29 Le v D t o Le v E ( m t o m ) N - a v e = 16 TP1 TP1' TP2 TP2 TP3 TP3 TP3 TP Lev F to Lev G 25 2 Le v E to Le v F (2 3.2 m to 2 6.2m ) N -a v e = 2 4 Le v E to Le v F (2 4.4 m to 2 7.4m ) N -a v e = 3 Le v E to Le v F (2 8.2 m to 2 9.2m ) N - a ve = 19 TP1' TP2 TP Lev F to Lev G (2 6.2 m to m ) N -a v e = 3 5 Lev F to Lev G (2 7.4 m to m ) N -a v e = 3 5 TP2 Lev F to Lev G ( m t o m) N -a v e = 2 9 TP3 TP1' Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) Le v D t o Le v E ( 19.7 m t o m ) 1 N -ave = 24 3 TP2 TP2 TP3 Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) 5 TP3 = 24 1 UnitShaft Shaft Resistance (kpa) (kpa) Unit Resistance Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) 2 Lev D to Lev E ( 22.7m t o 28.2 m) Le v C t o Le v D ( m t o m ) Lev E to Lev F 25 TP2 N -ave = 24 ( m to 22.7 m ) N -a ve = 29 Le v C t o Le v D ( 14.9 m t o 2.9 m) Le v C t o Le v D N -a v e 2 TP1' N -a v e = 24 Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) Lev D to Lev E Lev D to Lev E ( 2.9m t o 24.4 m) Le v C t o Le v D ( 14.9 m to 2.9 m ) 1 Displacement(mm) (mm) Displacement Lev D to Lev E ( 19.7 m to 23.2m ) TP1 N - a v e =TP1' 11 ( 14.2 m t o 19.7 m ) U nit Shaft R esistan ce (kpa) Le v C t o Le v D N - av e = 11 t om) Le v D ( 14 Le.2 mvt oc19.7 TP1 N - a vetp1' = 7 ShaftResistance Resistance (kpa) UnitUnit Shaft (kpa) N - a ve = 1 Le v B ( 1.7 m t o m ) Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) Le v A t o Lev B ( 1.7Le m to.4 5 tmo ) v 6A 5 Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) Lev C to Lev D 3 Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) 3 Le v E t o Le v F ( m t o m ) N -ave = 24 Le v E t o Le v F ( m t o m ) N -ave = 3 Le v E t o Le v F ( m t o m ) N - a v e = Displacement (mm) Displacement (mm) TP1 TP1' TP2 TP2 TP3 TP3 Lev F t o Lev G ( m t o m ) N - a ve = 3 5 Lev F t o Lev G ( m t o m ) N - a ve = 3 5 Lev F t o Lev G ( m t o m ) N - a ve = 2 9 TP1' TP2 TP3
51 Mobilized Shaft Resistance & End Bearing (Jurong Formation) 1 25 CP-4 Ks= 5N TP2 225 TP1 9 8 UnitU nend it En dbearing B earin g (kpa) (kpa) Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) Unit Shaft Resistance (kpa) TP3 125 CP-4 Ks= 2N TP1' TP TP N-SPT SPT-N SPT-N Base Settlement (mm) (mm) PilePile Base Settlement Combined Plot TP1, TP2 and TP
52 Preload Effect 23 Rankine Lecture (Prof M.F. Randolph) Bored Pile No residual pressure at pile base during installation End-bearing could only be mobilized at relatively large displacement Jack-In Pile Significant residual pressure at pile base during installation (higher than driven pile) Higher end bearing could be mobilized at small displacement Bored pile Jack-in pile
53 Conclusions (1) Instrumented load tests have verified that : Qu of pile > Calculated Qu adopted from driven pile Qu of pile > JIF Piles installed by JIF of 1.5~2.25 x WL have adequate Qu & settlement within allowable criteria. Qu of Jack-in pile is a function of JIF and increases as JIF increases. All 3 test piles showed similar load-settlement behaviour up to 2xWL. Higher JIF could result in higher Qu but the use of JIF 1.5xWL is enough to ensure satisfactory pile performance up to 2xWL.
54 Conclusions (2) JIF > 2xWL could be better but may not be necessarily needed. An appropriate JIF shall be established with the use of static load test. Subsequently all piles could be installed using this termination criteria. Jack-in pile installation results in a preloaded pile toe condition, hence better displacement performance. More future research would help to provide accurate design in the use of jack-in pile.
55 THANK YOU! CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
56 Q & A CSC HOLDINGS LIMITED
Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples
Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples Prof. V.S.Raju (Formerly: Director, IIT Delhi & Professor and Dean, IIT Madras) Email: rajuvs_b@yahoo.com
More informationFigure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate
Addendum HELICAL PULLDOWN Micropile (HPM) Introduction The HPM is a system for constructing a grout column around the shaft of a standard Helical Screw Foundation (see Figure A1). To begin the process,
More informationPILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134
C H A P T E R 6 PILE FOUNDATIONS Section I. GROUP BEHAVIOR 6-1. Group action. Piles are most effective when combined in groups or clusters. Combining piles in a group complicates analysis since the characteristics
More informationStep 11 Static Load Testing
Step 11 Static Load Testing Test loading is the most definitive method of determining load capacity of a pile. Testing a pile to failure provides valuable information to the design engineer and is recommended
More informationDead load (kentledge) A structure over the test pile. Ground anchorage either by tension piles or ground anchors. Bi-directional (Osterberg-cell)
Introduction Fugro LOADTEST Overview STATIC LOAD TESTING O-cell Bi-directional testing State of the art Dr Melvin England Fugro LOADTEST Static load tests Previous/existing technology Developments O-cell
More informationDynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles
Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles ANNUAL KANSAS CITY SPECIALTY SEMINAR 2014 JANUARY 10, 2014 Jorge Beim JWB Consulting LLC Pile Dynamics, Inc. Main Topics Brief description of the Dynamic Load Test
More informationGeotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Lecture No. # 13 (Refer Slide Time: 00:18) So last class, it was
More informationDesign of pile foundations following Eurocode 7-Section 7
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 Workshop Eurocodes: background and applications Brussels, 18-20 Februray 2008 Design of pile foundations following Eurocode 7-Section
More informationDesign and Construction of Auger Cast Piles
Design and Construction of Auger Cast Piles 101 th Annual Road School 2015 3/11/2015 Malek Smadi, Ph.D., P.E. Principal Engineer - GEOTILL - Fishers, IN msmadi@geotill.com - www.geotill.com CONTENTS 1.
More informationMETHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST
Compression Test, METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST Tension Test and Lateral Test According to the American Standards ASTM D1143 07, ASTM D3689 07, ASTM D3966 07 and Euro Codes EC7 Table of Contents
More informationAnirudhan I.V. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai
Anirudhan I.V. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai Often inadequate In some cases, excess In some cases, disoriented Bad investigation Once in a while good ones Depends on one type of investigation, often
More informationUSE OF CONE PENETRATION TEST IN PILE DESIGN
PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA SER. CIV. ENG. VOL. 47, NO. 2, PP. 189 197 (23) USE OF CONE PENETRATION TEST IN PILE DESIGN András MAHLER Department of Geotechnics Budapest University of Technology and Economics
More informationDESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION
DESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION Introduction Bengt H. Fellenius, Dr.Tech., P.Eng. Background Notes for Demo Example for UniPile at www.unisoftltd.com
More informationSUGGESTION ABOUT DETERMINATION OF THE BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES ON THE BASIS OF CPT SOUNDING TESTS
SUGGESTION ABOUT DETERMINATION OF THE BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES ON THE BASIS OF CPT SOUNDING TESTS JóZSEF PUSZTAI About the authors Pusztai József Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department
More informationLaterally Loaded Piles
Laterally Loaded Piles 1 Soil Response Modelled by p-y Curves In order to properly analyze a laterally loaded pile foundation in soil/rock, a nonlinear relationship needs to be applied that provides soil
More informationALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE
C H A P T E R 5 ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE Section I. BASICS 5-1. Considerations. For safe, economical pile foundations in military construction, it is necessary to determine the allowable load capacity
More informationInstrumentations, Pile Group Load Testing, and Data Analysis Part II: Design & Analysis of Lateral Load Test. Murad Abu-Farsakh, Ph.D., P.E.
Instrumentations, Pile Group Load Testing, and Data Analysis Part II: Design & Analysis of Lateral Load Test Murad Abu-Farsakh, Ph.D., P.E. Louisiana Transportation Research Center Louisiana State University
More informationA case study of large screw pile groups behaviour
Jongerenforum Geotechniek 5 juni 2015 A case study of large screw pile groups behaviour Alice Manzotti Content of the presentation 2 Introduction General soil conditions at the site Foundation design -
More informationCHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE
CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE 9.1 INTRODUCTION An important reason that composite piles have not gained wide acceptance in the civil engineering practice is the lack of a long
More informationSPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT
SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT 1.0 SOIL IMPROVEMENT 1.1 General Soil Investigation Information are provided in Part B1 annex as a guide to the Contractor for his consideration
More informationFOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples
FOUNDATION DESIGN Proportioning elements for: Transfer of seismic forces Strength and stiffness Shallow and deep foundations Elastic and plastic analysis Foundation Design 14-1 Load Path and Transfer to
More informationDesign, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils
Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils Stephen W. Lacz 1, M. ASCE, P.E. and Richard C. Wells 2, F. ASCE, P.E. 1 Senior Professional, Trigon Kleinfelder, Inc., 313 Gallimore
More informationMethod Statement FOR. Soil Investigation
Method Statement FOR Soil Investigation PREPARED BY JUNE 2010 Infratech ASTM CO., LTD. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page Table of Contents..1 List of Appendix... 2 List of Table... 2 List of Figures...
More informationMethod Statement for Static Load Testing (Compression) for Micropiles
Method Statement for Static Load Testing (Compression) for Micropiles 1. INTRODUCTION This vertical compression pile maintained load test is usually carried out to ensure the structural and geotechnical
More informationLymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load
Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load Nature of Services The company has a long history of performance of tests of piles and pile groups under a variety
More informationTHE EFFECT OF IMPROVEMENT SURROUNDING SOIL ON BORED PILE FRICTION CAPACITY
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 1, Jan-Feb 2016, pp. 260-273, Article ID: IJCIET_07_01_022 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=1
More informationThe advantages and disadvantages of dynamic load testing and statnamic load testing
The advantages and disadvantages of dynamic load testing and statnamic load testing P.Middendorp & G.J.J. van Ginneken TNO Profound R.J. van Foeken TNO Building and Construction Research ABSTRACT: Pile
More informationAPPENDIX A PRESSUREMETER TEST INTERPRETATION
APPENDIX A PRESSUREMETER TEST INTERPRETATION PRESSUREMETER TEST INTERPRETATION Description of test The pressuremeter test, discussed in great detail by Martin (1977), Baguelin et al. (1978), Barksdale
More informationCEEN 162 - Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests
PURPOSE: The parameters of the shear strength relationship provide a means of evaluating the load carrying capacity of soils, stability of slopes, and pile capacity. The direct shear test is one of the
More informationField tests using an instrumented model pipe pile in sand
Field tests using an instrumented model pipe pile in sand D. Igoe University College Dublin K. Gavin University College Dublin B. O Kelly Trinity College Dublin Reference: Igoe D., Gavin K., and O'Kelly
More informationvulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net since 1997, your source for engineering information for the deep foundation and marine construction industries, and the historical site for Vulcan Iron Works
More informationHow To Design A Foundation
The Islamic university - Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department CHAPTER (2) SITE INVESTIGATION Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad Definition The process of determining the layers of natural
More informationComprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility
Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility Problem The project consists of building several dry product storage silos near an existing rail siding in an open field presently
More informationTable of Contents 16.1 GENERAL... 16.1-1. 16.1.1 Overview... 16.1-1 16.1.2 Responsibilities... 16.1-1
Table of Contents Section Page 16.1 GENERAL... 16.1-1 16.1.1 Overview... 16.1-1 16.1.2 Responsibilities... 16.1-1 16.1.2.1 Geotechnical Section/Bridge Bureau Coordination... 16.1-1 16.1.2.2 Geotechnical
More informationDesign of pile foundations following Eurocode 7
Design of pile foundations following Eurocode 7 R. Frank CERMES (Institut Navier, ENPC-LCPC), Paris ABSTRACT After a short introduction about the programme of 'Structural Eurocodes', the two parts of Eurocode
More informationEurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing Dr.-Ing. Bernd Schuppener, Federal Waterways Engineering
More informationEVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES FROM CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA
EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES FROM CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA by Hani H. Titi, Ph.D., P.E. Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh, Ph.D., P.E. Louisiana Transportation Research Center 4101 Gourrier Avenue Baton
More informationINSITU TESTS! Shear Vanes! Shear Vanes! Shear Vane Test! Sensitive Soils! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:!
In-situ Testing! Insitu Testing! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:! To allow the determination of shear strength or penetration resistance or permeability of soils that would be difficult or impossible
More informationPDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions
PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions This document is available for free download at piledrivers.org. Preferred terms are descriptively defined. Potentially synonymous (but not preferred) terms are identified
More information2009 Japan-Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata S2-6 TANAKA ERINA
Importance of the Site Investigation for Development of Methane Hydrate Hokkaido University Hiroyuki Tanaka Civil Engineer My Background Site Investigation Soil Parameters for Design Very Soft Clay and
More informationPage B-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 LOAD TESTS
Page B-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 Appendix B CONTENTS STATIC (TIEBACKS)... B-3 STATIC AXIAL (COMPRESSION/TENSION)... B-6 STATIC (LATERAL)... B-9 CAPACITY VERIFICATION
More informationImprovement in physical properties for ground treated with rapid impact compaction
International Journal of the Physical Sciences Vol. 6(22), pp. 5133-5140, 2 October 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/ijps ISSN 1992-1950 2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research
More informationENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design
This image cannot currently be displayed. ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design Shallow Foundations Total and Differential Settlement Schmertmann s Method This image cannot currently be displayed. Strength
More informationPile test at the Shard London Bridge
technical paper Pile test at the Shard London Bridge David Beadman, Byrne Looby Partners, Mark Pennington, Balfour Beatty Ground Engineering, Matthew Sharratt, WSP Group Introduction The Shard London Bridge,
More informationEFFECT OF GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT ON LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF A COARSE SAND BED
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 7, Issue 3, May June 2016, pp. 01 06, Article ID: IJCIET_07_03_001 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?jtype=ijciet&vtype=7&itype=3
More informationFINITE ELEMENT STUDY ON STATIC PILE LOAD TESTING
FINITE ELEMENT STUDY ON STATIC PILE LOAD TESTING LI YI (B.Eng) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2004 Dedicated
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Test Report
Geotechnical Investigation Test Report Report No. htsc/rcd/ 3457 Dated: - 20/03/2010 Asphalt Standard Penetration Test as per IS 2131 ------------- IS 6403 Soil Job Card No - 1649 Cement Client/Department
More informationSAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS
Page 1 of 9 SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Description of Work: This work consists of furnishing all materials, equipment and
More informationSTATIC CONE PENETRATION TEST CPT1
Report No:CPT STATIC CONE PENETRATION TEST CPT Cheked by: Date: / / Cone Resistane, q [ MPa ] Frition Ratio, R [ % ]........... Sleeve Frition, s [ MPa ]..... MADE GROUND (Very dense sand) MADE GROUND
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction The design and construction of foundations require a good knowledge of the mechanical behaviour of soils and of their spatial variability. Such information can be
More informationTYPES OF PIERS USED IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION REPAIR
TYPES OF PIERS USED IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION REPAIR If you listen to the hype, it sounds like there must be 20 or 30 different types of piers out there. Company A says they have an
More informationRECENT EXPERIENCES WITH BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING
RECENT EXPERIENCES WITH BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING M. England BSc, MSc, PhD, MIC, P.F. Cheesman. Loadtest, 14 Scotts Avenue, Sunbury on Thames, TW16 7HZ, United Kingdom. Keywords: Bi-directional
More informationCE-632 Foundation Analysis and Design
CE-63 Foundation Analysis and Design Pile Foundations 1 Indian Standards on Piles IS 911 : Part 1 : Sec 1 : 1979 Driven cast in-situ concrete piles IS 911 : Part 1 : Sec : 1979 Bored cast-in-situ piles
More informationMETHOD STATEMENT HIGH STRIAN DYNAMIC TESTING OF PILE. Prepared by
METHOD STATEMENT HIGH STRIAN DYNAMIC TESTING OF PILE Prepared by Infratech ASTM CO., LTD. Contents Chapter Description Page Contents...... 1 List of Appendix. 1 1. Introduction.. 2 2. Test Method..2 3.
More informationTreasure s report of 1 st Lizzi Scholarship
Treasure s report of 1 st Lizzi Scholarship IWM2006 in Schrobenhausen, Germany: May 5th, 2006 Shingo MORIMASA Graduate Student, GeoMechanics Group, Toyohashi University of Technology Treasure s Report
More informationAn Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test
An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test Yongyuth Sirisriphet 1, Kitidech Santichaianant 2 1 Graduated student: Faculty of Industrial Education in and Technology. King Mongkut's University of Technology
More informationComparison Between Dynamic and Static Pile Load Testing
Comparison Between Dynamic and Static Pile Load Testing Dr. Mohamed A. Osman Partner Engineering Services & Design (ESD)-Khartoum, Sudan e-mail: drmao@hotmail.com Dr. Elfatih Mohamed Ali Ahmed Partner
More informationvulcanhammer.net Visit our companion site http://www.vulcanhammer.org
this document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net Since 1997, your complete online resource for information geotecnical engineering and deep foundations: The Wave Equation Page for Piling Online books on
More informationSite Investigation. Some unsung heroes of Civil Engineering. buried right under your feet. 4. Need good knowledge of the soil conditions
This is an attempt to create a stand alone self learning module on site investigation. Fasten your seat belts. Sit back, relax and enjoy. 1 2 Site Investigation Some unsung heroes of Civil Engineering
More informationLocal Authority Building Control Technical Information Note 3 Driven and In-situ Piled Foundations
Local Authority Building Control Technical Information Note 3 Driven and In-situ Piled Foundations Cambridge City Council - East Cambridgeshire District Council - Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SOIL CLASSIFICATION...3 1.1 USCS: Unified Soil Classification System...3 1.1.1
More informationGUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST
GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST NZ GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY INC August 2001 CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Background 2 3.0 Recommended Practice 3 4.0 Undrained Shear Strength 3 5.0 Particular
More informationUse and Application of Piezocone Penetration Testing in Presumpscot Formation
Use and Application of Piezocone Penetration Testing in Presumpscot Formation Craig W. Coolidge, P.E. Summit Geoengineering Services, Rockland, Maine ABSTRACT: This paper examines the advantages and limitations
More informationPractice of rapid load testing in Japan
Chapter 4 Practice of rapid load testing in Japan T. Matsumoto Department of Civil Eng., Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Japan SUMMARY This paper reviews the research activities for standardisation
More informationKWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD
KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD 1. INTRODUCTION This report represents the soil investigation works at Aljunied Road / Geylang East Central. The objective of the soil investigation is to obtain soil parameters
More informationStandard Test Method for Mechanical Cone Penetration Tests of Soil 1
Designation: D 3441 98 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428 Reprinted from the Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Copyright ASTM Standard Test Method
More informationDYNAMIC TESTING OF MICROPILES. COMPARISON OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC TEST RESULTS
DYNAMIC TESTING OF MICROPILES. COMPARISON OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC TEST RESULTS D. Carlos Oteo 1, D. José Luis Arcos 2, D. Rafael Gil 3, D. Carlos Fdez. Tadeo 4 ABSTRACT Micropiles are used for many applications,
More informationProceedings of the ASME 28 TH International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2009 May 31 June 5, 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Proceedings of the ASME 28 TH International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2009 May 31 June 5, 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA OMAE2009-80163 CAPWAP AND REFINED WAVE EQUATION ANALYSES
More informationINDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode
INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT) Reference can be made to IS 2131 1981 for details on SPT. It is a field edtest to estimate e the penetration e resistance
More informationToe Bearing Capacity of Piles from Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Data
Toe Bearing Capacity of Piles from Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Data Abolfazl Eslami University of Ottawa, Civil Engineering Department PREPRINT International Symposium on Cone Penetrometer Testing, CPT
More informationDrained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength
Drained and Undrained Conditions Undrained and Drained Shear Strength Lecture No. October, 00 Drained condition occurs when there is no change in pore water pressure due to external loading. In a drained
More informationStandard penetration test (SPT)
Standard penetration test (SPT) Evolution of SPT Test methods and standards Influence of ground conditions on penetration resistance SPT energy measurement and corrections for SPT Use of SPT results Profiling
More informationCone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. Tom Lunne Peter K. Robertson John J.M. Powell
Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice Tom Lunne Peter K. Robertson John J.M. Powell BLACKIE ACADEMIC & PROFESSIONAL An Imprint of Chapman & Hall London Weinheim New York Tokyo Melbourne Madras
More informationDESIGNING STRUCTURES IN EXPANSIVE CLAY
DESIGNING STRUCTURES IN EXPANSIVE CLAY A GUIDE FOR A RCHITECTS AND E NGINEERS Table of Contents 1. Introduction Page 1 2. Common Foundation Systems Page 2 3. Drilled Piers Page 3 a. Skin Friction Piers
More informationMicropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation
Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation Jeff R. Hill, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. 111 W. Port Plaza Drive Suite 600 St. Louis, MO 63146 314-542-3040 JRHill@HaywardBaker.com
More informationCE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions)
CE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions) P. 1) LOAD UNDER A RECTANGULAR AREA (1) Question: The footing shown in the figure below exerts a uniform pressure of 300 kn/m 2 to the soil. Determine vertical
More informationPROVA DINAMICA SU PALI IN ALTERNATIVA ALLA PROVA STATICA. Pile Dynamic Load test as alternative to Static Load test
PROVA DINAMICA SU PALI IN ALTERNATIVA ALLA PROVA STATICA Pile Dynamic Load test as alternative to Static Load test Gorazd Strnisa, B.Sc.Civ.Eng. SLP d.o.o. Ljubljana ABSTRACT Pile Dynamic test is test
More informationINTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1
INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI By Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1 The modulus of a soil is one of the most difficult soil parameters to estimate because it depends on so many factors. Therefore when one says for example:
More informationDesign and installation of steel open end piles in weathered basalt. Luc Maertens*
Design and installation of steel open end piles in weathered basalt Luc Maertens* * Manager Engineering Department Besix, Belgium, lmaertens@besix.com Associate Professor Catholic University Leuven, luc.maertens@bwk.kuleuven.ac.be
More informationDetermination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils
Proceedings World Geothermal Congress Bali, Indonesia, - April Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils Indra Noer Hamdhan 1 and Barry G. Clarke 2 1 Bandung National of Institute
More informationThe design of foundations for high-rise buildings
Proceedings of ICE Civil Engineering 163 November 2010 Pages 27 32 Paper 10-00005 doi: 10.1680/cien.2010.163.6.27 Keywords buildings, structures & design; foundations; piles & piling The design of foundations
More informationFederation of Piling Specialists Testing Datasheet No 1
Testing Datasheet No 1 Guidance for the Principal Contractor It is an essential requirement that the specialist testing contractor is allowed to work in a safe way and fully in accordance with their own
More informationGround improvement using the vibro-stone column technique
Ground improvement using the vibro-stone column technique A. Kosho 1 A.L.T.E.A & Geostudio 2000, Durres, Albania ABSTRACT The vibro stone columns technique is one of the most used techniques for ground
More informationValidation of methods for assessing tunnelling-induced settlements on piles
Validation of methods for assessing tunnelling-induced settlements on piles Mike Devriendt, Arup Michael Williamson, University of Cambridge & Arup technical note Abstract For tunnelling projects, settlements
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS
July 14, 2015 1.0 GENERAL BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS This work shall consist of furnishing all materials, equipment, labor, and incidentals necessary for conducting bi-directional
More informationMethod Statement. Static Pile Load Test
Method Statement FOR Static Pile Load Test (Compression Test,Tension Test and Lateral Test) PREPARED BY 1 METHOD STATEMENT FOR COMPRESSION, TENSILE AND LATERAL PILE LOAD TEST PROJECT INFORMATION Owner
More informationDriven Concrete Pile Foundation Monitoring With Embedded Data Collector System
Driven Concrete Pile Foundation Monitoring With Embedded Data Collector System Rodrigo Herrera 1, P.E., Lawrence E. Jones 2, P.E., Peter Lai 3, P.E. 1 Florida Department of Transportation, Geotechnical
More informationModule 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives
Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives In this section you will learn the following Penetrometer Tests Standard penetration test Static cone penetration test Dynamic cone
More informationHow To Model A Shallow Foundation
Finite Element Analysis of Elastic Settlement of Spreadfootings Founded in Soil Jae H. Chung, Ph.D. Bid Bridge Software Institute t University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Content 1. Background 2.
More informationEnglish version Version Française Deutsche Fassung. Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2: Ground investigation and testing
EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM EN 1997-2:2007/AC June 2010 Juin 2010 Juni 2010 ICS 91.120.20; 91.060.01 English version Version Française Deutsche Fassung Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical
More informationATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems
ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems Foundation Repair Systems for Civil Construction Applications: Residential, Commercial, Industrial Atlas Resistance Piers have been used to restore and/or stabilize
More informationASSESSMENT OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM INDIRECT INSITU TESTS
Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference IGC-2014 December 18-20, 2014, Kakinada, India ASSESSMENT OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM INDIRECT INSITU TESTS Kant, L., M. Tech Student, Department of Earthquake
More informationRECENT ADVANCES IN THE DESIGN OF PILES FOR AXIAL LOADS, DRAGLOADS, DOWNDRAG, AND SETTLEMENT
RECENT ADVANCES IN THE DESIGN OF PILES FOR AXIAL LOADS, DRAGLOADS, DOWNDRAG, AND SETTLEMENT ASCE and Port of NY&NJ Seminar 1), April 22 and 23, 1998 Bengt H. Fellenius Urkkada Technology Ltd. Ottawa, Ontario
More informationNew construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations
from New construction foundations don t have to be a headache. The CHANCE Helical Pier Foundation System gives you the performance of concrete without the drawbacks and liabilities of driven piles and
More informationNEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION AND SETTLEMENT OF PILES. Dr. Bengt H. Fellenius, P. Eng. University of Ottawa, Canada
Fellenius, B. H., 1984. Negative skin friction and settlement of piles. Second International Seminar, Pile Foundations, Nanyang Technological Institute, Singapore, November 28-30, 12 p. NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION
More informationHAULBOWLINE, CORK STATIC CONE PENETRATION TESTS FACTUAL REPORT
HAULBOWLINE, CORK STATIC CONE PENETRATION TESTS FACTUAL REPORT CONE PENETRATION TESTS Cone resistance Local friction Porewater pressure Dissipations REPORT NO: RRM CONTRACT NO: GLOVER SITE INVESTIGATIONS
More informationFRANKIPILE. High Pile Loads Optimum Adaptation to Foundation Soil Low-noise Manufacturing Process
FRANKIPILE High Pile Loads Optimum Adaptation to Foundation Soil Low-noise Manufacturing Process The FRANKIPILE Application possibilities The FRANKIPILE can be used in a wide range of foundation soil conditions
More informationGeotechnical Testing Methods II
Geotechnical Testing Methods II Ajanta Sachan Assistant Professor Civil Engineering IIT Gandhinagar FIELD TESTING 2 1 Field Test (In-situ Test) When it is difficult to obtain undisturbed samples. In case
More informationc. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.
Design Manual Chapter 6 - Geotechnical 6B - Subsurface Exploration Program 6B-2 Testing A. General Information Several testing methods can be used to measure soil engineering properties. The advantages,
More information