Operation TEAPOT. Historical Background
|
|
|
- Adam Paul
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Operation TEAPOT Note: For information related to claims, call the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) at or the Department of Justice (DOJ) at For all other information, call the Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) Program at Operation TEAPOT was the fifth series of atmospheric nuclear tests conducted by the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) within the continental United States. The series, which consisted of 14 nuclear tests and one non-nuclear detonation, was conducted at the Nevada Test Site (NTS) from February 18 to June 10, The operation involved an estimated 11,700 Department of Defense (DOD) personnel who participated in observer programs, tactical maneuvers, and scientific studies. The series was intended to test nuclear devices for possible inclusion in the weapons arsenal; improve military tactics, equipment, and training; and study civil defense requirements. Historical Background About 8,000 of the DOD participants at TEAPOT took part in Exercise Desert Rock VI. The remaining DOD personnel assisted in scientific experiments or administration and support activities for the Joint Test Organization (JTO). Exercise Desert Rock VI, an Army program involving members of the armed services, included observer activities, troop tests, and technical studies. Observer programs, conducted at Shots WASP, MOTH, TESLA, TURK, BEE, ESS, APPLE 1, and APPLE 2, generally involved instruction on the effects of nuclear weapons, observation of a nuclear detonation, and a subsequent tour of a display of military equipment exposed to the detonation. Troop tests were designed to demonstrate military tactics and doctrine and to train command and staff personnel in all phases of planning and conducting combat operations under the anticipated conditions of nuclear warfare. Troop tests included the maneuvers performed at Shots BEE and APPLE 2. Technical studies were conducted at Shots WASP, MOTH, TESLA, TURK, BEE, ESS, APPLE 1, WASP PRIME, MET, and APPLE 2. These projects were used to train armed services personnel and to study the ability of different types of military equipment and structures to withstand nuclear detonations. Scientific tests studying the effects of each nuclear detonation were conducted by the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project (AFSWP) Military Effects Group, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) Test Group, University of California Radiation Laboratory (UCRL) Test Group, and Federal Civil Defense Administration Civil Effects Test Group. Scientists and technicians from these groups placed gauges, detectors, and other instruments around the point of detonation in the days and weeks preceding each scheduled nuclear test. After each shot, when the Test Manager had determined that the area was safe for limited access, these participants returned to the test area to recover equipment and gather data.
2 Support services for both Exercise Desert Rock VI and the JTO included radiological safety, security, transportation, communications, engineering, and logistics. During TEAPOT, approximately 2,000 support troops were assigned to Camp Desert Rock to perform these duties for Exercise Desert Rock VI. The Desert Rock radiological safety section was comprised primarily of members of the 50th Chemical Service Platoon. Some other Desert Rock support elements included the 232nd Signal Company; 23rd Transportation Truck Company; 31st Transportation Truck Company; 2nd Transportation Company; Company A, 505th Military Police Battalion; and 94th Medical Detachment (Veterinary Food Inspection Service). In addition, the 12th Evacuation Hospital 1 provided medical and dental care for the military personnel at Camp Desert Rock and established aid stations for troops in the forward area. The Air Force Special Weapons Center (AFSWC) provided aircraft and pilots for airdrops, security sweeps, cloud sampling, cloud tracking, and aerial radiological surveys for the JTO. These missions were performed by the 4925th Test Group (Atomic), 4926th Test Squadron (Sampling), 4935th Air Base Squadron, and 4900th Air Base Group. AFSWC aircraft staged from Indian Springs Air Force Base, Nevada, and Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. Radiation Protection Standards Safety criteria were established to minimize the exposure of participants to the effects of nuclear detonations while allowing them to accomplish their missions. Separate criteria were established for participants in Exercise Desert Rock VI, the JTO, and AFSWC. DOD established an exposure limit for Desert Rock troops of 6.0 Roentgens (R) of gamma radiation during TEAPOT, with no more than 3.0 R of prompt radiation. The Desert Rock limit was higher than for JTO participants because the Exercise Desert Rock troops, unlike the JTO participants and some AFSWC personnel, were not likely to be exposed to radiation after the series. To protect participants from the thermal and blast effects of nuclear detonations, the following additional exposure limits for Desert Rock participants were established: Five pounds per square inch of overpressure One calorie per square centimeter of thermal radiation. The AEC authorized a maximum exposure for JTO personnel of 3.9 R of gamma radiation during TEAPOT. Since the TEAPOT operational period was approximately 13 weeks, this exposure limit was equivalent to the then-current 0.3 R per week occupational exposure limit recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection. AFSWC personnel were limited to the same exposure of 3.9 R of gamma radiation unless otherwise specified. In some instances, the Test Manager could authorize selected individual gamma radiation exposure limits higher than the standard 3.9 R for JTO participants or 6.0 R for Desert Rock participants. The Test Manager authorized a special exposure limit of 10.0 R of gamma radiation for the 10 Desert Rock volunteer officer observers at Shot APPLE 2, who observed the shot at 2,380 meters from ground zero (more than 800 meters closer than the other observers). All volunteer officer observers wore film badges and the average reading was 1.3 R. The Test Manager also authorized a limit of 15 R for the pilots of Military Effects Group Project 2.8b, Manned Penetrations of Atomic Clouds. Two film badge readings for participants in this project exceeded the limit of 15 R. One reading of 21.7 R was for a member of the 4926th Test Squadron, and the other of 21.8 R was for a member of AFSWC headquarters. Although the Test Manager was responsible for the radiological safety of all participants at TEAPOT, Exercise Desert Rock VI, the JTO, and AFSWC each had responsibility for implementing the radiological safety for its members. The 50th Chemical Service Platoon implemented procedures for Exercise Desert Rock VI. For the 1 Some subordinate units were not present. 2
3 safety of all JTO personnel, onsite radiological safety operations were performed for the Test Manager by the Onsite Radiological Safety Organization, headed by the Chief of the Radiological Safety Branch of AFSWP Field Command. The 1st Radiological Safety Support Unit, Fort McClellan, Alabama, provided the main support for the onsite organization and consisted entirely of DOD personnel. Radiological safety procedures for AFSWC personnel at Kirtland Air Force Base were implemented by the 4901st Air Base Wing. For personnel at Indian Springs Air Force Base, AFSWC radiological safety procedures were implemented by the Test Aircraft Branch. Although the missions of each organization required different types of activities and separate radiation protection plans and staffs, the general procedures were similar: Orientation and training preparing radiological monitors for their work and familiarizing participants with radiological safety procedures Personnel dosimetry issuing, processing, and developing film badges for participants, and analyzing gamma radiation exposures recorded on film badges Use of protective equipment providing anti-contamination equipment, including clothing and respirators Monitoring performing radiological surveys and controlling access to all contaminated areas Briefing informing observers and project personnel of radiological hazards and the current status of contamination in the test area Decontamination detecting, removing, and disposing of contaminated material from personnel and equipment Summaries of Operation TEAPOT Nuclear Weapons Tests The 15 shots at TEAPOT are summarized in the accompanying table; ground zeros are shown in the accompanying map. Eight shots WASP, TESLA, TURK, BEE, ESS, APPLE 1, MET, and APPLE 2 each included more than 500 DOD participants and are described below. Shot WASP, an airdropped device, was detonated at an altitude of 762 feet above Area 7 of Yucca Flat. It had a yield of one kiloton and occurred at noon on February 18, Onsite residual radiation greater than 0.01 per hour (R/h) was confined to a circular area extending about 2 kilometers (1.25 miles) from ground zero. As part of Exercise Desert Rock VI, the armed services conducted troop observer and technical service programs involving more than 900 exercise troops, primarily as observers. Troops were scheduled to view the detonation from trenches 4,500 meters (2.8 miles) south of ground zero, but these trenches were in the predicted path of fallout. Observers therefore viewed the detonation from News Nob, approximately 14 kilometers (8.75 miles) south of ground zero. Since the equipment display area was also in the path predicted for the fallout, the post-shot tour of the display area was canceled. Shot TESLA, a 300-foot tower detonation, was fired at 5:30 on March 1, 1955, in Area 9 of Yucca Flat. Although the predicted yield was 2 kilotons, the device detonated with a yield of 7 kilotons. As at Shot WASP, the armed services conducted troop observer, troop test, and technical service programs as part of Exercise Desert Rock VI. These programs involved almost 600 troops, primarily Camp Desert Rock support personnel, observing the shot. The closest troops witnessed the detonation from trenches 2,220 meters (1.4 miles) southwest of ground zero. Because of high radiation levels, the troops could inspect the display area only up to 900 meters (0.56 mile) from ground zero. Fallout intensities of up to 10 R/h were detected during the initial survey about 800 meters southwest and south of ground zero. Shot TURK, a 500-foot tower detonation, was fired with a yield of 43 kilotons at 5:20 on March 7, 1955, in Area 2 of Yucca Flat. Fallout of up to 10 R/h was detected about 2,100 meters (1.3 miles) southeast of ground zero during the initial survey, which was conducted from 6:30 to 9:15 Exercise Desert Rock included observer, troop test, and technical service programs. Most of the 500 Desert Rock troops were 3
4 support troops observing the shot. Trenches were constructed for TURK troop observers at a distance of 3,200 meters (2 miles) south of ground zero, but because these trenches were in the expected fallout path, they were not used. Instead, troops occupied the TESLA trenches, located about 5,000 meters (3.1 miles) southeast of ground zero. The post-shot tour of the display area was postponed until the day after the shot due to radiation levels in the display area on shot day. Shot BEE, a 500-foot tower detonation, was fired with a yield of 8 kilotons at 5:05 on March 22, 1955, in Area 7 of Yucca Flat. Fallout of 10 R/h was detected around ground zero during the initial survey. Fallout between 0.01 and 0.1 R/h extended east of ground zero. Almost 3,000 personnel performed Exercise Desert Rock troop observer, troop test, and technical service programs. About 2,300 officers and enlisted men of the Third Marine Corps Provisional Atomic Exercise Brigade participated in the largest single activity of the TEAPOT series, the Marine Brigade Exercise. The Marine Brigade was comprised of units from the 1st Marine Division and the 3rd Marine Air Wing. Air operations units for the exercise included Marine Helicopter Transport Group 36 and Marine Air Support Squadron 363. The Marine Brigade Exercise provided the opportunity for training personnel and for testing the tactics and techniques employed if a nuclear detonation were used in support of an air-ground task force. After the participants observed the shot, some from trenches 3,200 meters (2 miles) southwest of ground zero, they conducted a maneuver which consisted of an airlift and an assault on the objectives. They then toured the equipment display area. A total of 30 H-19 helicopters took part in the airlift, which began about 5 minutes after the detonation and was completed almost 4 hours later. After disembarking from the helicopters, the Marines seized objectives about 15 kilometers (9.4 miles) west of ground zero. This part of the maneuver ended at 3 p.m., at which time the Marines toured the display area, located from 460 to 2,560 meters (0.3 to 1.6 miles) southwest of ground zero. Observers had toured this area earlier. At 5:30 p.m., when the maneuver was completed, the Marines checked in at the decontamination station at Yucca Pass. Shot ESS, the only subsurface detonation of the TEAPOT series, was fired with a yield of 1 kiloton at 12:30 p.m. on March 23, 1955, in Area 10 of Yucca Flat. This shot was an operational test of an atomic demolition munition. Fallout greater than 0.01 R/h occurred mainly southeast of ground zero, but extended up to 2,500 meters (1.5 miles) southwest of ground zero. Because the device was buried 67 feet underground, tons of earth were blown upward by the detonation, creating a crater 88 meters wide and 96 feet deep. Exercise Desert Rock troop observer, troop test, and technical service programs engaged almost 800 troops during Shot ESS; approximately 350 were observers. The closest troops witnessed the detonation in the open, 8,230 meters (5.1 miles) southwest of ground zero. One of the other Exercise Desert Rock projects, Project 40.16, was designed to place and test the ESS demolition munition. Personnel of the 271st Engineer Combat Battalion excavated the shaft and placed the device. Project 40.9, Passive Defense Training, was conducted to train Navy civilian shipyard and laboratory personnel in establishing safe working conditions close to a nuclear detonation. A total of 168 individuals from Navy units all over the country participated in pre- and post-shot training, including monitoring techniques and practice rescue operations. Two other projects, Location of Atomic Bursts and Ordnance Vehicular Equipment Test, occupied the remainder of the Exercise Desert Rock participants at Shot ESS. Shot APPLE 1, a 500-foot tower detonation, was fired with a yield of 14 kilotons at 4:55 on March 29, 1955, in Area 4 of Yucca Flat. Onsite fallout of up to 10 R/h was detected during the initial survey. Exercise Desert Rock VI troop observer, troop test, and technical service projects engaged more than 600 troops, primarily Camp Desert Rock support troops observing the shot. Troops witnessed the detonation from trenches 3,200 meters (2 miles) south-southwest of ground zero. After the detonation, they toured the equipment display area at 900 to 2,250 meters (0.56 to 1.4 miles) southwest of ground zero. In another Exercise Desert Rock project (Sixth Army Passive Defense Training), about 24 persons conducted surveys of the ground zero area on the day after the shot, establishing the 1 and 5 R/h lines to within 100 meters of ground zero. 4
5 Shot MET, a 500-foot tower detonation, was fired with a yield of 22 kilotons at 11:15 on April 15, 1955, in Frenchman Flat. Fallout of up to 10 R/h was detected around ground zero, extending no farther than 1,500 meters (0.9 miles) southwest of ground zero. Shot MET, an acronym for Military Effects Test, involved the largest number of scientific experiments of any shot in the TEAPOT series. A total of 38 experiments were conducted by DOD personnel of the Military Effects Group. Because of the extensive preparation required for these experiments beforehand, MET was detonated in Frenchman Flat, away from other shots in the TEAPOT series, to allow project participants to work throughout the series unhampered by radioactivity from other shots. Desert Rock programs involved approximately 260 troops, primarily Camp Desert Rock support troops observing the shot. The troops witnessed the detonation from 10 kilometers (6.25 miles) southwest of ground zero. Shot APPLE 2, a 500-foot tower detonation, was fired with a yield of 29 kilotons at 5:10 on May 5, 1955, in Area 1 of Yucca Flat. Onsite fallout occurred northwest of ground zero; readings of 10 R/h were detected northwest of ground zero almost 2 hours after the detonation. In addition to troop observer, troop test, and technical service programs conducted as part of Exercise Desert Rock VI (which involved about 800 troops), one special troop test involved about 1,000 troops. The test of an Armored Task Force, RAZOR, was designed to demonstrate the capability of a reinforced tank battalion to seize an objective immediately after a nuclear detonation. This project was sponsored by the Army Armored School of Fort Knox, Kentucky. Task Force RAZOR was composed of the following armored units: Camp Irwin, California 723rd Tank Battalion. Fort Hood, Texas Company C, 510th Armored Infantry Battalion, 4th Armored Division Company B, 510th Armored Infantry Battalion, 4th Armored Division 1st Platoon, Battery A, 22nd Armored Field Artillery Battalion, 4th Armored Division 1st Platoon, Company C, 24th Armored Engineer Battalion, 4th Armored Division Provisional Aviation Company, 1st Armored Division. The armored test involved the following activities: A tactical march across open desert terrain from Camp Irwin to the NTS Participation in the APPLE 2 shot and the armored task force maneuver An overland march back to Camp Irwin A chemical warfare exercise at Camp Irwin. Vehicles employed in the maneuver included 55 M48 tanks, 2 M41 tanks, 5 M74 tank recovery vehicles, 1 M75 armored personnel carrier, 25 M59 armored personnel carriers, 4 M7B2 self-propelled 105mm howitzers, and about 150 wheeled vehicles. The 4-day overland march from Camp Irwin began April 18, From April 21 to May 4, 1955, the task force rehearsed the maneuver in the forward area of the NTS. Three times during this period, the task force camped in Yucca Flat in preparation for the shot, but in each instance, the shot was postponed due to poor weather. On May 4, 1955, the day before detonation, the task force vehicles were positioned northbound, from 3 to 5 kilometers (1.9 to 3.1 miles) south of ground zero. At the time of the shot, all tank turrets were rotated to the rear, all sight apertures were sealed with opaque tape, and all hatches were closed and secured. All personnel took protective measures appropriate to their distance from the shot. The detonation caused no significant damage to the task force, although most of the engine and fan access panels were 5
6 dislodged from the M59 personnel carriers. They were repositioned for the maneuver, which began upon clearance by the Test Director. About 8 minutes after the shot, all units were mobilized and moving toward ground zero, maintaining radio contact with the Task Force Commander. About 20 monitors from the 50th Chemical Service Platoon were provided to check radiation levels during the assault. When the tanks closest to ground zero obtained an inside reading of 1 R/h, about 890 meters (0.55 mile) from ground zero, the Task Force Commander ordered the formation to execute a partial left turn away from ground zero. Two M59s in the rear of the formation temporarily lost contact and moved to within 820 meters (0.51 mile) of ground zero before they recovered and joined the rest of the task force a few minutes later. After passing through a defile at Syncline Ridge, the task force attained its objective, about 6.4 kilometers (4 miles) from the pre-shot position, about 90 minutes after detonation. To bring realism to the maneuver, tank guns and coaxial machine-guns fired blanks in the final stages of the assault. After the maneuver, task force members were brushed with brooms to remove dust and debris, even though monitoring of both personnel and vehicles showed no significant contamination. Radiation Doses at Operation TEAPOT The average radiation dose to TEAPOT participants was less than 1 rem 2. However, despite all of the precautions, a limited number of individuals exceeded the authorized dose limits. Film badge data are available for JTO participants, but are generally unavailable for Desert Rock VI participants. However, some aggregate dose data for Desert Rock VI participants are available in the Final Report of Operations, Desert Rock VI. It states that, for Desert Rock personnel: 97 individuals received doses of over 3.0 rem, but less than 6.0 rem 15 individuals received between 6.0 and 20 rem 2 individuals received over 20 rem. These doses apparently were accrued by certain support personnel because the reconstructed doses for the observers and maneuver units are less than 3 rem. The largest reconstructed dose is 2.8 rem to the observers of Shot TESLA; half of the dose is from neutron radiation in the troop trenches. Most Task Force RAZOR personnel received less than 1 rem. The dose to members of the Marine Brigade is about 0.5 rem, in agreement with the limited film badge dosimetry data. Other Desert Rock documentation includes an average dose of 1.3 rem reported for the volunteer observers at Shot APPLE 2 and 1.52 rem for the Sixth Army Chemical, Biological, and Radiological Defense Teams who were training radiation monitors. Dosimetry records for JTO and AFSWC indicate that most of the doses exceeding the 3.9 rem limit were for AFSWC pilots and support personnel and for members of the radiological safety groups (the radsafe monitors). Two of the former received the highest recorded doses for any DOD participants at TEAPOT (21.8 and 21.7 rem). 2 A rem is a radiation protection unit of measure that quantifies the risk of biological effects resulting from exposure to ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation is any radiation (gamma, x-ray, beta, neutron, or alpha) capable of displacing electrons from atoms or molecules, thereby producing ions. According to the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP, Report No. 160, Table 1.1), the general U.S. population receives about 0.62 rem per year from natural background radiation sources (radon, cosmic rays, and rocks) and man-made radiation sources (medical diagnostic x-rays and consumer products). As a basis of comparison, a standard diagnostic chest x-ray delivers a radiation dose of about 0.02 rem. 6
7 The totals of reconstructed and film badge doses for DOD participants at TEAPOT are depicted below. For more information on dose reconstruction, see the reports Analysis of Radiation Exposure for Troop Observers (DNA 5354F); Analysis of Radiation Exposure, Task Force RAZOR (DNA-TR-83-07); and Analysis of Radiation Exposure, Third Marine Corps Provisional Atomic Exercise Brigade (DNA-TR-84-13). Also see the report Operation TEAPOT 1955 (DNA 6009F). These reports are available online at May
8 Summary of Operation TEAPOT Nuclear Weapons Tests (1955) a Shot WASP MOTH TESLA TURK HORNET BEE ESS High Altitude APPLE 1 WASP PRIME HA POST MET APPLE 2 ZUCCHINI Sponsor LASL LASL UCRL UCRL LASL LASL DOD DOD LASL LASL DOD UCRL Planned Date Feb 18 Feb 22 Feb 25 Feb 15 Mar 8 Mar 18 Mar 15 Mar 1 Mar 18 Mar 20 Mar 4 Mar 1 Mar 1 Apr 26 Apr 1 Actual Date Feb 18 Feb 22 Mar 1 Mar 7 Mar 12 Mar 22 Mar 23 Mar 25 Mar 29 Mar 29 Apr 6 Apr 9 Apr 15 May 5 May 15 Local Time NTS Location Type of Detonation Height of Burst (feet) noon 5:45 5:30 5:20 5:20 5:05 12:30 p.m. Area 7 Area 3 Area 9 Area 2 Area 3 Area 7 Area 10 9:00 Above Area 1 4:55 10:00 Area 4 Area 7 10:00 Above Area 1 4:30 LASL/ DOD 11:15 LASL 5:10 LASL 5:00 Area 9 Area 5 Area 1 Area 7 Airdrop Tower Tower Tower Tower Tower Shaft Airdrop Tower Airdrop Airdrop Tower Tower Tower Tower ,000 (mean sea level) Yield (kiloton) b (nonnuclear) a Source: United States Nuclear Tests, July 1945 through September 1992, DOE/NV-209 (Rev. 15), Dec b One kiloton equals the approximate energy release of one thousand tons of TNT ,
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Occupation Forces
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Occupation Forces Note: For information related to benefit claims, call the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) at 800-827-1000. For information related to participation or dose
OPERATIONS IN SOMALIA CAMPAIGN PARTICIPATION CREDIT
GENERAL ORDERS } NO. 2014 73 HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WASHINGTON, DC, 21 November 2014 OPERATIONS IN SOMALIA CAMPAIGN PARTICIPATION CREDIT OPERATIONS IN SOMALIA CAMPAIGN PARTICIPATION CREDIT.
US 5th Army 15th Army Group 23 April 1945
Headquarters, Fifth Army British Increment, Fifth Army 1 US 5th Army 15th Army Group 23 April 1945 92nd Infantry Division: 365th Infantry Regiment (Colored) 370th Infantry Regiment (Colored) 371st Infantry
MEDICAL PLATOON LEADERS HANDBOOK TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS
*FM 4-02.4 (FM 8-10-4) FIELD MANUAL HEADQUARTERS NUMBER 4-02.4 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 24 August 2001 MEDICAL PLATOON LEADERS HANDBOOK TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS
Nuclear Detonation Calculator
Nuclear Detonation Calculator In last month s newsletter, February 2007, I discussed the Fallout Radiation Dose Calculator that was a new feature in the in the latest version of the PEAC-WMD software released
United States of America Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards William F. Kane, Director
DD-01-01 United States of America Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards William F. Kane, Director In the Matter of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Docket No. 030-28641
Marine Corps Tank Employment MCWP 3-12 (CD) Appendix F. Scout and TOW Platoons
Appendix F Scout and TOW Platoons Section 1. Scout Platoon Section 2. TOW Platoon F - 1 Section 1. Scout Platoon. Mission. The battalion scout platoon performs reconnaissance, provides limited security,
Designation, Classification, and Change in Status of Units
Army Regulation 220 5 Field Organizations Designation, Classification, and Change in Status of Units Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 15 April 2003 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 220
Iowa Department of Public Defense Military Division
Iowa Department of Public Defense Military Division 2013 Justice System Appropriation Subcommittee Major General Timothy E. Orr, Iowa National Guard Adjutant General February 13, 2013 Iowa National Guard
Attachment 3: 1977 Department of Defense 3-Digit Enlisted Occupational Classification System
Attachment 3: 1977 Department of Defense 3-Digit Enlisted Occupational Classification System SOURCE: Department of Defense, Manpower, Reserve Affairs and Logistics. Occupational Conversion Manual. Defense
Curragh History Archives
Irish Army Units Stationed in the Command Area Curragh Camp 1923-2009 1923 The following is a list of units stationed at the Curragh in 1823 CURRAGH COMMAND 1923 29th Garrison Infantry Battalion 43rd Garrison
U.S. Forces in Iraq. JoAnne O Bryant and Michael Waterhouse Information Research Specialists Knowledge Services Group
Order Code RS22449 Updated April 7, 28 U.S. Forces in Iraq JoAnne O Bryant and Michael Waterhouse Information Research Specialists Knowledge Services Group Summary Varying media estimates of military forces
Nuclear Science Merit Badge Workbook
Merit Badge Workbook This workbook can help you but you still need to read the merit badge pamphlet. The work space provided for each requirement should be used by the Scout to make notes for discussing
Iraqi National Command
Iraqi Security Forces Order of Battle Published at The Long War Journal Written By DJ Elliott & CJ Radin email: [email protected] Iraqi Order of Battle (OOB) Page 3 (ICOD 30 April 2009) Bold is in-lead.
DEFENCE FORCE REMUNERATION TRIBUNAL
DEFENCE FORCE REMUNERATION TRIBUNAL DETERMINATION NO. 6 OF 2007 REMUNERATION REFORM PROJECT SALARY RATES FOR OTHER RANKS AMENDMENT The Defence Force Remuneration Tribunal makes the following Determination
ARMOR SCHOOL COLLECTION
ARMOR SCHOOL COLLECTION BOX 1 1 Booklet, Thompson Sub-Machine Gun M1928A1, The Armored Force School, Gunnery Department, 1941 2 Booklet, Instruction Guide 37mm Gun M5, The Armored Force School, Gunnery
CLASS U - MILITARY SCIENCE
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CLASSIFICATION OUTLINE CLASS U - MILITARY SCIENCE For military history, see D-F (Click each subclass for details) Subclass U Subclass UA Subclass UB Subclass UC Subclass UD Subclass
Duty Descriptions AS OF: 5/27/2006
Duty Descriptions AS OF: 5/27/2006 Introduction Duty Description Pamphlet by ArmyToolbag.com The purpose of this pamphlet is to compile various duty descriptions for NCOERs and OERs. This is a work in
THE BELGIAN ARMY IN 1940
THE BELGIAN ARMY IN 1940 Belgium announced its policy of Armed Independence in 1936. This policy was understood to go beyond strict neutrality (which had not kept Belgium out og World War I) and was accompanied
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) For the Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) SECTION 1: IS A PIA REQUIRED? a. Will this Department of Defense (DoD) information system
PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS EMPLOYMENT
PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION HENRY D. LESTER College of Engineering Systems Engineering Program 150 Jaguar Drive, Shelby Hall, Suite 4106 University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688 Phone: (251) 460-7993
Emergencies Involving Radiation
Page 1-1 Section 1 Emergencies Involving Radiation Contents A. Emergency Phone Numbers...1-2 1. Campus... 1-2 a. Radiation Safety Office 543-0463... 1-2 b. University Police 9-911... 1-2 2. Off Campus...
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND RADIATION SAFETY
Page 1 of 7 ISSUED: 5/00 REVISED: 08/06 1. Potential Releases of Radioactive Materials to Unrestricted Areas The Environmental Health and Safety Department (EHRS) must be notified immediately if an emergency
UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND
UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND Academia Day March 2015- Huntsville, Alabama Creating A Passion for Federal Service THE UNITED STATES ARMY IS A FORTUNE 100 COMPANY (RANKED WITH BEST BUY AND DISNEY)
David J. Berteau Senior Vice President and Director of International Security Program, Center for Strategic & International Studies
David J. Berteau Senior Vice President and Director of International Security Program, Center for Strategic & International Studies David J. Berteau is senior vice president and director of the CSIS International
Appendix D Logistics Support Element MISSION ORGANIZATION
Logistics Support Element Effective force projection logistics require a seamless logistics system operating across the strategic, operational, and tactical levels. Elements from CONUS and the theater
Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan
Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan Introduction: Ching-Chung Huang Radiation Monitoring Center, Atomic Energy Council 823, Cherng-Ching Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan cchuang @ trmc.aec.gov.tw Chemical,
Flexible, Life-Cycle Support for Unique Mission Requirements
Flexible, Life-Cycle Support for Unique Mission Requirements We Meet the Need Anytime, Anywhere, Any Mission The customers we serve are diverse and so are their requirements. Transformational logistics
Brigadier General Dana L. Mcdaniel Commander, Homeland response force. When Called, We Respond with Ready Units
Brigadier General Dana L. Mcdaniel Commander, Homeland response force Purpose Role of the Ohio National Guard Capabilities of the Ohio National Guard Capabilities of the CBRN Response Force Mission & Vision
Radiological Advisory Medical Teams
Army Regulation 40 13 Medical Services Radiological Advisory Medical Teams Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 1 October 2012 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 40 13 Radiological Advisory
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 1322.24 October 6, 2011 ASD(HA) SUBJECT: Reference: Medical Readiness Training (a) DoD Directive 5124.02, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness
The National Security Act of 1947 July 26, 1947
The National Security Act of 1947 July 26, 1947 Public Law 253, 80th Congress; Chapter 343, 1st Session; S. 758. AN ACT To promote the national security by providing for a Secretary of Defense; for a National
Simulation and Training Solutions
Simulation and Training Solutions Strong Learning Experiences Available Nowhere Else Advancing Operational Readiness with Leading-Edge Simulation and Training The rapid evolution of military missions,
Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources
Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources All living creatures, from the beginning of time, have been, and are still being, exposed to radiation. This chapter will discuss the sources of this radiation, which
Headquarters, Department of the Army
*ATP 3-09.70 PALADIN OPERATIONS September 2015 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. *This publication supersedes FM 3-09.70, dated 1 August 2000. Headquarters,
CHILE. I. Army. Density per sq. km... MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ARMED FORCES
58 CHILE Area.... 752,000 sq. km. Population (ix. i930)... 4,287,000 Density per sq. km... MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ARMED FORCES The armed forces of Chile consist of the army, the military air force
Management of Marine Corps Enlisted Personnel Assignments in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (D-2004-086)
June 16, 2004 Human Capital Management of Marine Corps Enlisted Personnel Assignments in Support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (D-2004-086) Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General Quality Integrity
APPENDIX R- Aerial Use of DU During the Gulf War
APPENDIX R- Aerial Use of DU During the Gulf War R.1 U.S. Air Force In the early 1970s, the U.S. Air Force developed the GAU-8/A air-to-surface gun system for the A-10 Thunderbolt ( Warthog or Tank Buster
Michael Watt, Logistics Maintenance Training Incorporated Founder President & Chief Executive Officer, Logistics Maintenance Training Inc.
Michael Watt, Logistics Maintenance Training Incorporated Founder President & Chief Executive Officer, Logistics Maintenance Training Inc. The company started in his home office Feb 2008. Mr. Michael Watt
GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WELL LOGGING OPERATIONS IN KENTUCKY
GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WELL LOGGING OPERATIONS IN KENTUCKY Radiation Control Cabinet for Human Resources 275 East Main Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40621 JANUARY
Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) Course Descriptions
The Transportation Emergency Preparedness Program (TEPP) offers a variety of training courses to prepare emergency responders for response to transportation accidents involving radioactive material. The
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS OFFICER CANDIDATES SCHOOL TRAINING COMMAND 2189 ELROD AVENUE QUANTICO, VA 22134-5003
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS OFFICER CANDIDATES SCHOOL TRAINING COMMAND 2189 ELROD AVENUE QUANTICO, VA 22134-5003 TACT 3020 APR 2011 TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVES. THE OPERATION ORDER PART 1 (S.M.E.A.C.)
Army Doctrine Update
Combined Arms Doctrine Directorate US Army Combined Arms Center Fort Leavenworth, Kansas Army Doctrine Update This document summarizes some doctrinal changes that have occurred or will occur in the near
Table of Contents ESF-3-1 034-00-13
Table of Contents Primary Coordinating Agency... 2 Local Supporting Agencies... 2 State, Regional, and Federal Agencies and Organizations... 3 Purpose... 3 Situations and Assumptions... 4 Direction and
Training with the ITE Capability
Training with the ITE Capability MAJ Scott Patton Shoot, move, and communicate is still a fundamental, albeit simplistic, means of describing warfare. By adding decide we account for the mental thought
Resources projected in the previous development plan and the reality
NATIONAL DEFENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2013-2022 Resources projected in the previous development plan and the reality 1. The previous 10-year development plan approved in 2009 (Military Defence Development
DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES Radiological Emergency Response Program Bob Free Emergency/Incident Hotline (512) 458 7460 Answered by DSHS Exchange Operators during normal working hours Answering
APPENDIX CC NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE
APPENDIX CC NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE APPENDIX CC NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE MICHIEL P.H. BRONGERS 1 SUMMARY Nuclear wastes are generated from spent nuclear fuel, dismantled weapons, and products such as radio
NORM MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES & PRINCIPLES
Introducing NORM NORM MANAGEMENT Three is glad to present some basic hints about NORM that should be taken onto consideration whilst dealing with these matters The acronym NORMmeans all Naturally Occurring
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-3000 MCO 3311.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3000 MARINE CORPS PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-3000 MCO 3311.2 PP&O MARINE CORPS ORDER 3311.2 From: Commandant of the Marine Corps To: Distribution
Sandia National Laboratories- Albuquerque Special Exposure Cohort Petition Evaluation Report 188
Sandia National Laboratories- Albuquerque Special Exposure Cohort Petition Evaluation Report 188 Samuel Glover, PhD Research Health Scientist National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Division
LAW STUDENTS AND THE MARINE CORPS
LAW STUDENTS AND THE MARINE CORPS The Marine Corps offers many opportunities to the undergraduate (PLC Law) and graduate law students (OCC Law). Students accepted into the Law Option of the Marine Officer
20, 1994. Service on Feb. 20, 1994.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Cooperative Service Agricultural Marketing Service Agricultural Research Service Agricultural Stabilization & Conservation Service Animal & Plant Health Inspection
UDENRIGSMINISTERIET, MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF DENMARK 2013 2022 TECHNICAL MODERNISATION PLAN OF THE POLISH ARMED FORCES
2013 2022 TECHNICAL MODERNISATION PLAN OF THE POLISH ARMED FORCES 1 A G E N D A Introduction Armaments and Modernisation Branch of Polish MOND Financial principles Operational (Armaments) Programs Conclusion
Veteran Exposure to Herbicides and Toxic Chemicals used at Korat Royal Thai Air Force Base during the Vietnam era 1967 to 1972
Veteran Exposure to Herbicides and Toxic Chemicals used at Korat Royal Thai Air Force Base during the Vietnam era 1967 to 1972 Information Compiled by: Larry Westin 21721 Verde Street Tehachapi, California
http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos053.htm
Lawyers The legal system affects nearly every aspect of our society, from buying a home to crossing the street. Lawyers form the backbone of this system, linking it to society in numerous ways. They hold
Dose Standards and Methods for Protection. Radiation and Contamination
Dose Standards and Methods for Protection Against Radiation and Contamination This section will discuss the NRC dose standards and the methods used to protect individuals from the harmful effects of radiation
Connecting Air-Ground Operators through the Upper Aerial Layer
Connecting Air-Ground Operators through the Upper Aerial Layer Jerry Knoblach, Chairman & CEO (480) 403-0032 www.spacedata.net 0 Wide Area Comm Platforms Near Space much closer than satellites 400 X Lower
SEARCH AND RESCUE STANDARDOPERATING PROCEDURES THEORIES OF SEARCH MANAGEMENT
SEARCH AND RESCUE STANDARDOPERATING PROCEDURES THEORIES OF SEARCH MANAGEMENT In all publications, articles, and case histories written about searching for lost or missing persons, there are some basic
The Army Safety Program
Army Regulation 385 10 Safety The Army Safety Program Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 23 August 2007 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 385 10 The Army Safety Program This major revision
In January 2012, the VetForce1 organization was formed in order to
In January 2012, the VetForce1 organization was formed in order to assist recently returning Veterans in their quest for a successful career with VetForce1 s cooperative efforts with educational institutions,
ORDER OF MARCH - ANZAC DAY 2015 AREA A
ORDER OF MARCH - ANZAC DAY 2015 MOUNTED POLICE CONTINGENT AREA A QLD MOUNTED INFANTRY HISTORICAL TROOP BAND PARADE COMMANDER DEPUTY PARADE COMMANDER COLOUR GUARD 9 RQR NZ Infantry BOER WAR 1899 1901 Banner
CHAPTER 2 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) NAVPERS 18068-2F CH-64
CHAPTER 2 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) NAVPERS 18068-2F CH-64 Updated: October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) SCOPE OF RATING GENERAL INFORMATION AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER CONTROL TOWER
Excavation Procedure. MIDGA Reviewed: 07/29/14 Effective: 06/20/09 Supersedes: Original Preparer: Owner: Approver: Safety Safety Safety
Procedure No.: SOP-0203 Page: 1 of 5 Preparer: Owner: Approver: Safety Safety Safety 1. PURPOSE The purposes of this procedure is to ensure safe excavation, reduce the potential of damaging underground
What if... A nuclear waste accident scenario in Los Angeles, CA. Richard Wiles James R. Cox. June 27, 2002 www.mapscience.org
What if... A nuclear waste accident scenario in Los Angeles, CA Richard Wiles James R. Cox June 27, 2002 www.mapscience.org Summary This report is the first attempt to utilize government data and computer
Safety Training Needs Assessment
Safety Needs Assessment Form Instructions: Please review each question and either check YES or NO. If a question is checked YES you will be required to complete the training topic before initial assignment
Facility Safety Plan State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Facility Safety Plan State University of New York Upstate Medical University A. Research Operations / Standard Operating Procedure The State University of New York Upstate Medical University maintains
Jack of All Trades, Master of None: Combat Engineer Officer Assignments in the Marine Corps. EWS Contemporary Issue Paper
Jack of All Trades, Master of None: Combat Engineer Officer Assignments in the Marine Corps Subject Area General EWS 2006 Jack of All Trades, Master of None: Combat Engineer Officer Assignments in the
California Association of Air Medical Services Landing Zone Set-up and Safety Guidelines
www.calaams.org PREPARATION FOR ARRIVAL ELZ SELECTION SHOULD BE GUIDED BY THE FOLLOWING CONSIDERATIONS: Emergency Landing Zone Setup: OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES The designated ground contact (referred to here
MAJOR PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS CHECKLIST
MAJOR PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS CHECKLIST The following checklist is provided as a guide to assure that relevant considerations are identified in the emergency management planning process. Use the blank
CHAPTER 6 NAVAL ORGANIZATION
CHAPTER 6 NAVAL ORGANIZATION Organization is the element of administration which entails the orderly arrangement of materials and personnel by functions in order to attain the objective of the unit. Organization
Hazardous Material Waller County ARES training material used with permission from Christine Smith, N5CAS.
Hazardous Material Waller County ARES training material used with permission from Christine Smith, N5CAS. This discussion is really just meant to be an introduction to Hazardous Materials (HazMat). I would
SAMPLE OPERATION ORDER WITH ANNEXES
APPENDIX I SAMPLE OPERATION ORDER WITH ANNEXES Copy No. of Copies GH, MED CMD/MED BDE TA Anywhere, USA 112200Z June 19XX MZ23 OPLAN 1234 References: a. Map series 1501, sheets NM 32-5 (FRANKFURT), edition
CHAPTER 7. AIRSPACE 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER 7. AIRSPACE 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 7.1.1 Definition of Resource Airspace management is defined as directing, controlling, and handling flight operations in the volume of air that overlies the
U.S. Armed Forces and Veterans
CB03-FF.04SE April 10, 2003 Quotes and Radio Sound Bites i Special Edition i U.S. Armed Forces and Veterans Active Duty and Reserves 1.4 million The number of active duty men and women in the U.S. armed
Statement of. Vice Admiral William A. Brown, United States Navy. Deputy Commander, United States Transportation Command
Statement of Vice Admiral William A. Brown, United States Navy Deputy Commander, United States Transportation Command Before the House Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces
Application Note. ipix A Gamma imager to support various applications
Application Note ipix A Gamma imager to support various applications Introduction ipix is a unique gamma imager that quickly locates low level radioactive sources from a distance and estimates the dose
GAO. MILITARY EDUCATION Information on Service Academies and Schools. Briefing Report to Congressional Requesters
GAO United States General Accounting Office Briefing Report to Congressional Requesters September 1993 MILITARY EDUCATION Information on Service Academies and Schools GAO/NSIAD-93-264BR GAO United States
THE ARMY S APPROACH TO LEADER DEVELOPMENT
ON FSI/FS TRAINING THE ARMY S APPROACH TO LEADER DEVELOPMENT A LOOK AT HOW THE ARMY S PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION SYSTEM DEVELOPS LEADERSHIP SKILLS OFFERS POSSIBLE LESSONS FOR THE FOREIGN SERVICE. BY JEFFREY
OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE FROM U.S. NAVAL NUCLEAR PLANTS AND THEIR SUPPORT FACILITIES
REPORT NT-11-2 MAY 2011 OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE FROM U.S. NAVAL NUCLEAR PLANTS AND THEIR SUPPORT FACILITIES NAVAL NUCLEAR PROPULSION PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350 This publication
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES Table of Contents Section 1 - Introduction Section 2 - The Emergency Response Team (ERT) Section 3 - Purpose of the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) Section 4 - The Incident
FUNDING FOR DEFENSE, MILITARY OPERATIONS, HOMELAND SECURITY, AND RELATED ACTIVITIES SINCE
FUNDING FOR DEFENSE, MILITARY OPERATIONS, HOMELAND SECURITY, AND RELATED ACTIVITIES SINCE 9/11 Steven Kosiak, Director of Budget Studies, Center for Strategic & Budgetary Assessments Since the terrorist
notes MERRTT IS-302 Radiological Survey Instruments and Dosimetry Devices
INTRODUCTION This module provides general information about radiological survey instruments. Basic functions and limitations are discussed. Because there are many models of survey instruments available,
Guam Fire Department. A Report to Our Citizens 2012-2013
Guam Fire Department A Report to Our Citizens 2012-2013 Mission Statement The Guam Fire Department will respond to and mitigate all threats to life, property, and the environment in the Territory of Guam
Command and Staff College Distance Education Program (CSCDEP)
Command and Staff College Distance Education Program (CSCDEP) By Gina Douthit U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) Security Cooperation Training and Education Center What do you do when you can only send 20% of Marine
EMS Aircraft Operations
Page 1 Policy: Field Care Patient Management EMS Aircraft Operations I. AUTHORITY California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 9, Chapter 8, Articles 1-5 II. PURPOSE A. To establish guidelines for
LAW STUDENTS AND THE MARINE CORPS
LAW STUDENTS AND THE MARINE CORPS The Marine Corps offers many opportunities to the undergraduate (PLC Law) and graduate law students (OCC Law). Students accepted into the Law Option of the Marine Officer
Schedule B.1 Senior officer salary rates
Schedule B.1 - Senior officer salary rates Schedule B.1 Senior officer salary rates Part 1: Senior officer of the Permanent Force pay grade salary Rank and increment Yearly salary rate for pay grade Navy
X-ray Radiation Safety Course. James Kane & Rob Deters Office of Radiological Control 545-7581
X-ray Radiation Safety Course James Kane & Rob Deters Office of Radiological Control 545-7581 About the Course X-ray Radiation Safety X-ray radiation safety training is mandatory for radiation workers
FACT SHEET. General Information about the Defense Contract Management Agency
FACT SHEET General Information about the Defense Contract Management Agency Mission: We are the independent eyes and ears of DoD and its partners, delivering actionable acquisition insight from the factory
MCSC PEO LS Small Business Conference
MCSC PEO LS Small Business Conference Dr. John D. Burrow, Executive 19 Nov 2009 1 Workforce Locations Updated 2 Sep 09 Overview Organization Acquisition Funding AVTB Camp Pendleton, CA Military 41 Civilian
What you should do if there is a NUCLEAR EMERGENCY at the Devonport Site
What you should do if there is a NUCLEAR EMERGENCY at the Devonport Site August 2014 Important Nuclear Safety Advice You should read this booklet carefully. The advice is summarised on the back page, which
Airport Scanner Safety
Scan for mobile link. Airport Scanner Safety Airport scanners When it comes to airport scanner safety, there are four questions you should consider, including: What are airport scanners? Are there different
CHAPTER 18. PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY
CHAPTER 18. PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY 18.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT This section discusses the potential public health and safety issues related to implementation of the proposed action and alternatives on
