The Quality Code. A Brief Guide
|
|
|
- Brendan Holt
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Quality Code A Brief Guide
2 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education (Quality Code) is used to assure the standards and quality of UK higher education. It is owned, maintained and published by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) and has been developed in consultation with the higher education sector. Individual higher education providers use the Quality Code to ensure students have a high quality educational experience. It consists of a series of separate Chapters grouped in three Parts.
3 How do we define standards and quality? Threshold academic standards are the minimum acceptable level of achievement that a student has to demonstrate to be eligible for the award of academic credit or a qualification. For equivalent qualifications, the threshold level of achievement is agreed across the UK. Academic standards are the standards that individual degree-awarding bodies set and maintain for the award of their academic credit or qualifications. These may exceed the threshold academic standards. They include the standards of performance that a student needs to demonstrate to achieve a particular classification of a qualification, such as a first-class honours degree classification in a certain subject or the award of merit or distinction in a master s degree. Academic quality refers to how and how well the higher education provider supports students to enable them to achieve their award. It covers learning, teaching and assessment, and all the different resources and processes a provider puts in place to help students progress and fulfil their potential. Quality assurance is the process for checking that the academic standards and quality of higher education provision meet agreed expectations. Who is responsible for academic standards and quality? Individual universities and other organisations that are legally entitled to award degrees are ultimately responsible for the academic standards and quality of higher education programmes leading to their qualifications. These degree-awarding bodies are independent and self-governing. They remain responsible for their qualifications regardless of where a programme is delivered or who provides it on their behalf.
4 What are higher education providers? Universities and colleges, whatever their source of funding, and other organisations involved in the delivery of UK higher education programmes, are known collectively as higher education providers. Who publishes the Quality Code? The Quality Code is owned and maintained by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. QAA s mission is to safeguard academic standards and improve the quality of UK higher education wherever it is delivered around the world. We support higher education providers in meeting their responsibilities for academic standards and quality, and check that they are doing so by conducting reviews. The Quality Code is the primary resource for these activities. We also publish other guidance to promote a better quality experience for students.
5 What are the key features of the Quality Code? The Quality Code sets out the formal Expectations that all UK higher education providers reviewed by QAA are required to meet. It is the nationally agreed, definitive point of reference for all those who deliver or support UK higher education programmes. Why is the Quality Code important? The Quality Code gives individual higher education providers a shared starting point for: setting and maintaining the academic standards of their higher education programmes and awards assuring the quality of the learning opportunities they provide for students. This makes it possible to ensure that higher education provision and learning outcomes are comparable and consistent at a threshold level across the UK. The purpose of the Quality Code is to: safeguard the academic standards of UK higher education assure the academic quality of learning opportunities that UK higher education offers promote continuous and systematic improvement in UK higher education ensure that information about UK higher education is fit for purpose, accessible and trustworthy.
6 How is the Quality Code used? Higher education providers use the Quality Code to help them maintain the academic standards of programmes and awards, assure and enhance the quality of learning opportunities, and to provide information about their higher education provision. Student representatives and students unions can use the Quality Code in their discussions with their higher education provider, as it sets out the minimum expectations for academic standards and the quality of the learning opportunities and information the provider makes available to its students. QAA reviewers use the Quality Code as a benchmark for judging whether a higher education provider meets UK expectations for academic standards, the quality of learning opportunities, improvement or enhancement, and information.
7 What are the key values of the Quality Code? Every student is treated fairly and with dignity, courtesy and respect. Every student has the opportunity to contribute to the shaping of their learning experience. Every student is properly and actively informed at appropriate times of matters relevant to their programmes of study. All policies and processes relating to study and programmes are clearly explained and transparent. Strategic oversight of academic standards and academic quality is at the highest level of academic governance of the provider. All policies and processes are regularly and effectively monitored, reviewed and improved. Sufficient and appropriate external involvement exists for the maintenance of academic standards and the quality of learning opportunities. All staff are supported, enabling them in turn to support students learning experiences. What does the Quality Code contain? The Quality Code has a General Introduction which explains its purpose and nature. The main body of the Quality Code consists of three Parts (A, B and C) which address academic standards, academic quality, and information respectively.
8 General Introduction This document provides a technical introduction for users of the Quality Code. Part A: Setting and Maintaining Academic Standards Part A consists of three Chapters which describe the various aspects of how academic standards are set and maintained for higher education qualifications awarded by UK degree-awarding bodies. Chapter A1: UK and European Reference Points for Academic Standards Chapter A2: Degree-Awarding Bodies Reference Points for Academic Standards Chapter A3: Securing Academic Standards and an Outcomes-Based Approach to Academic Awards.
9 Part B: Assuring and Enhancing Academic Quality Part B consists of 11 Chapters which look at a distinct aspects of academic quality. Chapter B1: Programme Design, Development and Approval Chapter B2: Recruitment, Selection and Admission to Higher Education Chapter B3: Learning and Teaching Chapter B4: Enabling Student Development and Achievement Chapter B5: Student Engagement Chapter B6: Assessment of Students and the Recognition of Prior Learning Chapter B7: External Examining Chapter B8: Programme Monitoring and Review Chapter B9: Academic Appeals and Student Complaints Chapter B10: Managing Higher Education Provision with Others Chapter B11: Research Degrees Part C: Information about Higher Education Provision Part C is shorter and is not subdivided. It addresses how providers produce information that is fit for purpose, accessible and trustworthy.
10 What are Expectations? Expectations express key matters of principle that the higher education sector has identified as essential. They make clear what UK higher education providers are required to do, what they expect of themselves and each other, and what students and the general public can therefore expect of providers. Part A contains seven Expectations. Each of the 11 Chapters of Part B contains a single Expectation, as does Part C. Individual providers should be able to demonstrate that they are meeting the relevant Expectations effectively, through their own management and organisational processes, taking account of the unique needs, traditions, culture and decision-making processes of their organisation. What are Indicators of sound practice? Indicators of sound practice help higher education providers reflect on how they might meet the relevant Expectations. They describe actions or approaches that providers have agreed illustrate sound practice. What is explanatory text? Each Expectation in Part A and each Indicator in Parts B and C is accompanied by explanatory text which explains why it is important and describes a range of ways in which the Expectation or Indicator might be addressed and demonstrated. How has the Quality Code been developed? The Quality Code has been developed in consultation with the UK higher education sector and is owned, maintained and published by QAA. QAA works with the sector to ensure that the Quality Code remains up to date, through an ongoing process of review and revision.
11 What doesn t it cover? The Quality Code relates to the learning and teaching activities of higher education providers, including research degrees. Among the areas it does not cover are other forms of research activity and non-academic provision such as accommodation and estates management. What if I m concerned about the quality of a programme? If you are a student you may find it helpful to discuss the matter with your student representative body, such as a students union, if there is one. Your university or college will have an internal complaints process which you should follow. If you remain dissatisfied having completed all stages of the internal process, you may be able to take the matter to an external complaints body. In England and Wales this is the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education ( and in Scotland it is the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman ( In Northern Ireland the universities each have a Board of Visitors, details of which can be obtained from the relevant university. If you are a member of staff you may find it helpful to discuss the matter with the quality assurance office. There will also be an internal complaints procedure for staff. If you are a member of the public you should contact the relevant university or college to raise your concern. Whether you are a student, member of staff or member of the public, if you believe that your concern relates to a serious systemic failing in the way a higher education provider manages the standards or quality of its higher education provision, you may be able to raise the matter through QAA s Concerns Scheme:
12 Find out more about the Quality Code The Quality Code is available on the QAA website along with guidance, good practice and other resources. If you have any questions you can talk to your students union, your university or college s quality assurance office, or contact QAA. Contact us WWW qaa.ac.uk [email protected] +44 (0) QAA February 2015 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2015 Southgate House, Southgate Street, Gloucester, GL1 1UB Registered charity numbers and SC037786
The UK Quality Code for Higher Education: A brief guide
UK Quality Code for Higher Education The UK Quality Code for Higher Education: A brief guide The UK Quality Code for Higher Education: A brief guide The UK Quality Code for Higher Education (the Quality
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part A: Setting and maintaining threshold academic standards Chapter A2: The subject and qualification level Chapter A2: The subject and qualification level Contents
The Right to Award UK Degrees
The Right to Award UK Degrees Guidance 1 Introduction At the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) we take very seriously our responsibility for securing the academic standards of UK higher
QAA Recognition Scheme for Access to Higher Education. The Access to Higher Education Diploma specification 2013
QAA Recognition Scheme for Access to Higher Education The Access to Higher Education Diploma specification 2013 Contents Preface 1 Using this document 1 The Access to HE Diploma 2 Qualification characteristics
London College of Business Management. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
London College of Business Management Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education November 2012 Key findings about London College of Business Management As a result
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part B: Assuring and enhancing academic quality Chapter B1: Programme design and approval Contents Introduction 1 The Quality Code 1 About this Chapter 1 Introduction
Quality assurance in UK higher education: A guide for international readers
Quality assurance in UK higher education: A guide for international readers I Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2005 ISBN 1 84482 140 4 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk
Adapted Review for Specific Course Designation by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Adapted Review for Specific Course Designation by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Empire College London Ltd May 2014 Contents Key findings about Empire College London Ltd... 1 Good practice...
Review for Specific Course Designation by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Review for Specific Course Designation by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Kaplan Open Learning (Essex) Ltd November 2013 Contents Key findings about Kaplan Open Learning (Essex) Ltd...
Met Film School Ltd Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Met Film School Ltd Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education September 2014 Key findings about Met Film School Ltd As a result of its Review for Educational
Academic Staff Induction: Quality Assurance and Enhancement
Academic Staff Induction: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Wednesday 8 th October, 2014 10.00am-12.00pm, Room JD13 Ormskirk Campus Tony Turjansky Director of Quality Assurance Academic Quality & Development
London School of Theology. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
London School of Theology Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Key findings about London School of Theology As a result of its Review for Educational
Establishing and operating HEA accredited provision policy
Page 1 of 13 Establishing and operating HEA accredited provision policy 1. Introduction The Higher Education Academy (HEA) accredits initial and continuing professional development provision delivered
Anglo-European College of Chiropractic. Institutional Review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Anglo-European College of Chiropractic Institutional Review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Contents Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about the Anglo-European College of
Higher Education Review. A handbook for QAA subscribers and providers with access to funding from HEFCE undergoing review in 2014-15
Higher Education Review A handbook for QAA subscribers and providers with access to funding from HEFCE undergoing review in 2014-15 June 2014 Contents Higher Education Review: Summary... 1 Part 1: Introduction
SAE Institute UK. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
SAE Institute UK Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education June 2012 Key findings about SAE Institute UK As a result of its Review for Educational Oversight
How To Find Out What You Know About The College Of Accountancy
London College of Accountancy Ltd t/a Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education October 2012 Key findings about London College of Accountancy Ltd t/a As a result
FACTSHEET RECOGNITION CAM QUALIFICATIONS
FACTSHEET ON RECOGNITION OF CAM QUALIFICATIONS First Edition September 2010 RECOGNITION OF THE CAM FOUNDATION QUALIFICATIONS Current Recognition Situation for the syllabi introduced in 2009 There are four
AN OVERVIEW OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SCQF CREDIT RATING BODIES
AN OVERVIEW OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SCQF CREDIT RATING BODIES ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 1 PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDE
UK College of Business and Computing Ltd. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
UK College of Business and Computing Ltd Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Key findings about UK College of Business and Computing Ltd As a
Tech Music Schools Ltd trading as BIMM London Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Tech Music Schools Ltd trading as BIMM London Review for Educational Oversight by the Agency for Higher Education November 2014 Key findings about Tech Music Schools Ltd trading as BIMM London As a result
London College of International Business Studies. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
London College of International Business Studies Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education November 2012 Key findings about London College of International Business
Concerns about standards and quality in higher education AA Hamilton College Ltd, April 2015
Concerns about standards and quality in higher education AA Hamilton College Ltd, April 2015 Introduction and background 1 The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS) sent to the Quality Assurance
Severn Business College. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Severn Business College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education November 2012 Key findings about Severn Business College As a result of its Review for Educational
National Film and Television School. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
National Film and Television School Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education June 2012 Key findings about National Film and Television School As a result of
Fees & Funding Guide. For English, Welsh & Northern Irish Students
Fees & Funding Guide For English, Welsh & Northern Irish Students Thank you for your interest in the University of Aberdeen. In order to help you make an informed decision about your future, we want to
Higher Education Review: Themes for 2015-16. 1 Background and introduction. 2 The themes for 2015-16. 3 Rationale for the themes identified
Higher Education Review: Themes for 2015-16 1 Background and introduction Higher Education Review has a core element and a thematic element. The core element focuses on academic standards, quality of learning
Architectural Association School of Architecture. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Architectural Association School of Architecture Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Key findings about Architectural Association School of Architecture
Subject Benchmark Statement. Accounting: Draft for Consultation
Subject Benchmark Statement Accounting: Draft for Consultation January 2015 Contents How can I use this document?... 1 About Subject Benchmark Statements... 2 About this Subject Benchmark Statement...
Business School. Accounting. June 2007
Business School 1 Awarding body: Oxford Brookes University 2 Teaching institution: Oxford Brookes University 3 Programme accredited/approved by: N/A 4 Final and intermediate awards: BSc (Hons) 5 Programme
London Campuses of UK Universities. Overview report of a thematic enquiry by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
London Campuses of UK Universities Overview report of a thematic enquiry by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education December 2014 Contents About this report... 1 Executive summary... 2 Features
West London Business College. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
West London Business College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education March 2012 Key findings about West London Business College As a result of its Review for
Annex to subject benchmark statement. Mathematics, statistics and operational research
Annex to subject benchmark statement Mathematics, statistics and operational research 2009 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2009 ISBN 978 1 84482 909 5 All QAA's publications are available
EDI Level 3 Assessing Qualifications. EDI Level 4 Internal Quality Assurance Qualifications. EDI Level 4 External Quality Assurance Qualifications
Vocational Qualifications EDI Level 3 Assessing Qualifications EDI Level 4 Internal Quality Assurance Qualifications EDI Level 4 External Quality Assurance Qualifications Candidate Pack Effective from:
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2007 ISBN 978 1 84482 665 0. All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.
Finance 2007 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2007 ISBN 978 1 84482 665 0 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk Printed copies of current publications are available
How To Write A Benchmarking Statement For Accounting
Accounting 2007 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2007 ISBN 978 1 84482 672 1 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk Printed copies of current publications are
Covenant Fund (Families In Stress) Expression of Interest
Covenant Fund (Families In Stress) Expression of Interest 1. What is the full legal name as shown on your governing document? Please check this - if the full name is incorrect it may delay your application
Academic Staff Induction: Quality Assurance and Enhancement
Academic Staff Induction: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Monday 16 th May 2016 3.00-5.00pm, Room JD13 Ormskirk Campus Tony Turjansky Director of Quality Assurance Academic Quality & Development Unit
Principles of Good Administration
Principles of Good Administration Principles of Good Administration Good administration by public bodies means: 1 Getting it right 2 Being customer focused 3 Being open and accountable 4 Acting fairly
Responding to feedback from students. Guidance about providing information for students
Responding to feedback from students Guidance about providing information for students Contents Introduction... 1 Policy developments since 2011... 3 How student feedback is used... 3 QAA findings of good
IHEEM WORKING WITH YOU TO DEVELOP YOUR CAREER
TO DEVELOP www.iheem.org.uk Joint letter by President and CEO Joint letter by President and CEO Shaping the healthcare engineering and estate management landscape The Institute of Healthcare Engineering
The Diploma Supplement is issued as two elements by the University of Central Lancashire as follows:
Diploma Supplement The Diploma Supplement issued by the University of Central Lancashire follows the model developed by the European Commission, Council of Europe and UNESCO/CEPES. The purpose of the supplement
Qualification Information Profiles (QIPs) for Access to HE Diploma and Scottish Wider Access Programme (SWAP)
2015 Qualification Information Profiles (QIPs) for Access to HE Diploma and Scottish Wider Access Programme (SWAP) Published by: UCAS Rosehill New Barn Lane Cheltenham GL52 3LZ UCAS 2015 All rights reserved.
Regulations for Research Programmes of Study (including new route PhD programmes)
Regulations for Research Programmes of Study (including new route PhD programmes) Note: These Regulations are adapted from the general Regulations for Research Programmes of Study for the University of
Statement on Quality Assurance Policies and Processes
Statement on Quality Assurance Policies and Processes Contents Background... 2 Purpose Statement... 2 Applicability and Scope... 2 Responsibilities... 2 Quality assurance principles... 3 Student engagement
Insolvency practitioner regulation regulatory objectives and oversight powers
Insolvency practitioner regulation regulatory objectives and oversight powers Legislative changes introduced on 1 October 2015 December 2015 1 Contents Introduction Part 1: Overview of regulatory objectives
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part A: Setting and Maintaining Academic Standards The Frameworks for Higher Education Qualifications of UK Degree-Awarding Bodies October 2014 PART A Contents List
Post-accreditation monitoring report: The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. June 2007 QCA/07/3407
Post-accreditation monitoring report: The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development June 2007 QCA/07/3407 Contents Executive summary... 4 Accreditation conditions... 4 Observations... 5 Introduction...
Please read the questions below before contacting either the recruiting organisations or the Director of the programme.
Weston Jerwood Creative Bursaries FAQS April 2015 Please read the questions below before contacting either the recruiting organisations or the Director of the programme. You will find details of the information
University of Lincoln. Institutional Review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
University of Lincoln Institutional Review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education November 2012 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about the University of
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part B: Assuring and enhancing academic quality Chapter B11: Research degrees Contents About the Quality Code 1 About this Chapter 2 Research degrees 2 Understanding
ESRC International Co-Investigators Policy: Guidance on the inclusion of International Co-Investigators ESRC proposals
ESRC International Co-Investigators Policy: Guidance on the inclusion of International Co-Investigators ESRC proposals Background Many major issues requiring research evidence (eg the global economic crisis,
University of Reading Postgraduate Research Programmes Admissions Policy
University of Reading Postgraduate Research Programmes Admissions Policy 1 General Statement 1.1 The University Senate is responsible for the admission of postgraduate research students to the University
Introduction 5. Section 1: Who is eligible to apply? 7. Section 2: The pre-application criteria 8. Section 3: Submitting an application 9
TAUGHT DEGREE AWARDING POWERS AND RESEARCH DEGREE AWARDING POWERS Guidance for Higher Education Providers: Criteria and Process for applying for Taught Degree Awarding Powers and Research Degree Awarding
Review of UK Transnational Education in the United Arab Emirates: University of Exeter
Review of UK Transnational Education in the United Arab Emirates: University of Exeter February 2014 Executive summary The University of Exeter (the University) has delivered a Doctorate in Education (EdD)
Higher Education Review of Guildford College of Further and Higher Education
Guildford College of Further and Higher Education September 2014 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about... 2 Good practice... 2 Recommendations... 2 Theme: Student Employability...
INDEPENDENT HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION
INDEPENDENT HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION SCHEME DOCUMENT BRITISH ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR INDEPENDENT FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION COLLEGE ACCREDITATION SCHEME CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. ELIGIBILITY
COLLEGE SCHEME DOCUMENT BRITISH ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR INDEPENDENT FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION COLLEGE ACCREDITATION SCHEME
COLLEGE SCHEME DOCUMENT BRITISH ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR INDEPENDENT FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION COLLEGE ACCREDITATION SCHEME CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR ACCREDITATION...2 3. ACCREDITATION
Personal development planning: guidance for institutional policy and practice in higher education
Personal development planning: guidance for institutional policy and practice in higher education The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2009 ISBN 978 1 84482 914 9 All QAA publications are
Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MSc Work Based Learning (Professional Network Engineering)
Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MSc Work Based Learning (Professional Network Engineering) 1. Programme title MSc Work Based Learning (Professional Network Engineering) 2. Awarding institution
Regulations for the award of Taught Master s Degrees, Postgraduate Diplomas and Postgraduate Certificates
Regulations for the award of Taught Master s Degrees, Postgraduate Diplomas and Postgraduate Certificates 1 General Regulations 1.1 Definition 1.1.1 The Master s degree is intended for award on the satisfactory
Master's degree characteristics
Master's degree characteristics March 2010 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2010 ISBN 978 1 84979 094 9 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk Registered charity
International Benchmarking. Report of the Scottish Higher Education Enhancement Committee
Report of the Scottish Higher Education Enhancement Committee International Benchmarking Shaping the Twenty-First Century Doctorate: Learning from international practice Executive Summary March 2012 QAA
Funding Guide for new Undergraduate Students who normally live in England, Wales and Northern Ireland 2013-2014
Funding Guide for new Undergraduate Students who normally live in England, Wales and Northern Ireland 2013-2014 This guide explains sources of financial support available to full-time undergraduate students
Memorandum of Understanding between the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) and the General Medical Council (GMC)
Memorandum of Understanding between the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) and the General Medical Council (GMC) Purpose and basis of the memorandum of understanding This Memorandum of Understanding
THE COMBINED CODE PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CODE OF BEST PRACTICE
THE COMBINED CODE PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CODE OF BEST PRACTICE Derived by the Committee on Corporate Governance from the Committee s Final Report and from the Cadbury and Greenbury Reports.
Your Options. A simple guide to available debt options
Your Options A simple guide to available debt options Contents Welcome 3 Our Customer Service Charter 3 Protected Trust Deeds 4 Debt Arrangement Scheme 6 Sequestration 8 Debt Management Plan 10 Minimal
Consumer Code for Home Builders
Consumer Code for Home Builders This document contains the mandatory Consumer Code requirements that Home Builders are required to follow Clear Print Edition Third Edition April 2013 Contents Meaning of
Devolution of Policing & Criminal Justice to Northern Ireland. An Aid for Dialogue. European Union
European Union European Regional Development Fund Investing in your future Devolution of Policing & Criminal Justice to Northern Ireland An Aid for Dialogue Devolution of Policing & Criminal Justice to
Paternity Leave and Pay
Paternity Leave and Pay some of the questions you may want the answers to The Men s Project Parents Advice Centre [ www.mensproject.org and www.parentsadvicecentre.org ] Last Updated: January 2009 Introduction
How to Make a Claim. Guide. The Equality Act 2010
working with Guide The Equality Act 2010 The TAEN Guides to the age related provisions of the Equality Act 2010 are primarily for employees, jobseekers and learners and aim to give a simple, clear explanation.
OSCr. SCIOs: A Guide. Guidance on the Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation for charities and their advisers
SCIOs: A Guide Guidance on the Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation for charities and their advisers Page : 02 SCIOs: A Guide 2011 Page : 03 SCIOs: A Guide 2011 Contents Page 1. What is a SCIO?
Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England
Summary of the role and operation of NHS Research Management Offices in England The purpose of this document is to clearly explain, at the operational level, the activities undertaken by NHS R&D Offices
