The UK Quality Code for Higher Education: A brief guide
|
|
|
- Marvin Caldwell
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UK Quality Code for Higher Education The UK Quality Code for Higher Education: A brief guide
2 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education: A brief guide The UK Quality Code for Higher Education (the Quality Code) is used to assure the standards and quality of UK higher education. It has been developed and is maintained by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) through consultation with the higher education sector. Individual higher education providers use the Quality Code to ensure students have a high quality educational experience. It consists of a General introduction and a series of separate Chapters grouped in three Parts. It is published online at How do we define standards and quality? Threshold academic standards are the minimum acceptable level of achievement that a student has to demonstrate to be eligible for the award of academic credit or a qualification. For equivalent qualifications, the threshold level of achievement is agreed across the UK. Academic standards are the standards that individual degree-awarding bodies set and maintain for the award of their academic credit or qualifications. These may exceed the threshold academic standards. They include the standards of performance that a student needs to demonstrate to achieve a particular classification of a qualification, such as a first-class honours degree classification in a certain subject or the award of merit or distinction in a master's degree. Academic quality refers to how and how well the higher education provider supports students to enable them to achieve their award. It covers learning, teaching and assessment, and all the different resources and processes a provider puts in place to help students progress and fulfil their potential. Quality assurance is the process for checking that the academic standards and quality of higher education provision meet agreed expectations.
3 Who is responsible for academic standards and quality? Individual universities and other organisations that are legally entitled to award degrees are ultimately responsible for the academic standards and quality of higher education programmes leading to their qualifications. These degree-awarding bodies are independent and self-governing. They remain responsible for their qualifications regardless of where a programme is delivered or who provides it on their behalf. What are higher education providers? Universities and colleges, whatever their source of funding, and other organisations involved in the delivery of UK higher education programmes are known collectively as higher education providers. Where does QAA come in? QAA's mission is to safeguard academic standards and improve the quality of UK higher education. Our role is to support higher education providers in meeting their responsibilities for academic standards and quality, and to check that they are doing so by conducting reviews. To this end, we publish guidance to help them develop effective systems. The Quality Code is the primary source of this guidance. What are the key features of the Quality Code? The Quality Code sets out the formal Expectations that all UK higher education providers reviewed by QAA are required to meet. It is the nationally agreed, definitive point of reference for all those who deliver or support UK higher education programmes.
4 Why is the Quality Code important? The Quality Code gives individual higher education providers a shared starting point for: setting and maintaining the academic standards of their higher education programmes and awards assuring the quality of the learning opportunities they provide for students. This makes it possible to ensure that higher education provision and learning outcomes are comparable and consistent at a threshold level across the UK. The purpose of the Quality Code is to: safeguard the academic standards of UK higher education assure the academic quality of learning opportunities that UK higher education offers promote continuous and systematic improvement in UK higher education ensure that information about UK higher education is fit for purpose, accessible and trustworthy. How is the Quality Code used? Higher education providers use the Quality Code to help them maintain the academic standards of programmes and awards, assure and enhance the quality of learning opportunities, and to provide information about their higher education provision. Student representatives and students' unions can use the Quality Code in their discussions with their higher education provider, as it sets out the minimum Expectations for the quality of the learning opportunities the provider makes available to its students.
5 QAA reviewers use the Quality Code as a benchmark for judging whether a higher education provider meets UK Expectations for academic standards, the quality of learning opportunities, enhancement and information. Reviews also take account of students' views on the performance of their higher education provider. What are the overarching values of the Quality Code? The Quality Code is based on a number of key values. Every student is treated fairly and with dignity, courtesy and respect. Every student has the opportunity to contribute to the shaping of their learning experience. Every student is properly and actively informed at appropriate times of matters relevant to their programmes of study. All policies and processes relating to study and programmes are clearly explained and transparent. Strategic oversight of academic standards and academic quality is at the highest level of academic governance of the provider. All policies and processes are regularly and effectively monitored, reviewed and improved. Sufficient and appropriate external involvement exists for the maintenance of academic standards and the quality of learning opportunities. All staff are supported, enabling them in turn to support students' learning experiences. What does the Quality Code contain? The Quality Code has a General introduction which explains the purpose and nature of the Quality Code. The main body of the Quality Code consists of three Parts (A, B and C) which address academic standards, academic quality and information respectively.
6 Part A Chapter A1: Chapter A2: Chapter A3: Part B Part A: Setting and maintaining academic standards Part A consists of three Chapters, which describe the various aspects of how academic standards are set and maintained for higher education qualifications awarded by degree-awarding bodies. UK and European reference points for academic standards Degree-awarding bodies' reference points for academic standards Securing academic standards and an outcomes-based approach to academic awards. Part B: Assuring and enhancing academic quality Part B consists of 11 Chapters which broadly follow the student life cycle. Chapter B1: Programme design, development and approval Chapter B2: Recruitment, selection and admission to higher education Chapter B3: Learning and teaching Chapter B4: Enabling student development and achievement Chapter B5: Student engagement Chapter B6: Assessment of students and the recognition of prior learning Chapter B7: External examining Chapter B8: Programme monitoring and review Chapter B9: Academic appeals and student complaints Chapter B10: Managing higher education provision with others Chapter B11: Research degrees Part Part C C: Information about higher education provision Part C is shorter and is not sub-divided into Chapters. It addresses how providers produce information that is fit for purpose, accessible and trustworthy.
7 What are Expectations? Expectations express key matters of principle that the higher education sector has identified as essential for assuring academic standards and quality. They make clear what UK higher education providers are required to do, what they expect of themselves and each other, and what students and the general public can therefore expect of providers. Part A contains seven Expectations. Each of the 11 Chapters of Part B contain a single Expectation, as does Part C. Individual providers should be able to demonstrate they are meeting the relevant Expectations effectively, through their own management and organisational processes, taking account of the unique needs, traditions, culture and decision-making processes of their own organisation. What are Indicators of sound practice? Indicators of sound practice help higher education providers reflect on how they might meet the relevant Expectations. They describe actions or approaches that higher education providers have agreed illustrate sound practice. What is explanatory text? Each Expectation in Part A and each Indicator in Parts B and C is accompanied by explanatory text which explains why it is important and describes a range of ways in which the Expectation or Indicator might be addressed and demonstrated. How has the Quality Code been developed? The Quality Code has been produced in consultation with the UK higher education sector and is published and maintained by QAA on their behalf. QAA works with the sector to ensure that the Quality Code remains up to date, through an ongoing process of review and revision. What doesn't it cover? The Quality Code relates to the learning and teaching activities of a higher education provider, including research degrees. Among the areas it does not cover are other forms of research activity, and estates management.
8 What if I'm concerned about the quality of a programme? If you are a student you may find it helpful to discuss the matter with your student representative body, such as a students' union, if there is one. Your university or college will have an internal complaints process which you should follow. If you remain dissatisfied having completed all stages of the internal process, you may be able to take the matter to an external complaints body. In England and Wales this is the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education ( and in Scotland it is the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman ( In Northern Ireland the universities each have a Board of Visitors, details of which can be obtained from the relevant university. If you are a member of staff you may find it helpful to discuss the matter with the quality assurance office. There will also be an internal complaints procedure for staff. If you are a member of the public you should contact the relevant university or college to raise your concern. Whether you are a student, member of staff or member of the public, if you believe that your concern relates to a serious systemic failing in the way a higher education provider manages the standards or quality of its higher education provision you may be able to raise the matter through the QAA's Concerns Scheme. Find out how to do this here: Find out more about the Quality Code The Quality Code is available on the QAA website along with guidance, good practice and other resources. If you have any questions you can talk to your students' union, your university or college's quality assurance office, or contact QAA. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2014 Southgate House, Southgate Street, Gloucester GL1 1UB Tel: [email protected] Website: ISBN Registered charity numbers and SC QAA Jan 14
The Quality Code. A Brief Guide
The Quality Code A Brief Guide The UK Quality Code for Higher Education (Quality Code) is used to assure the standards and quality of UK higher education. It is owned, maintained and published by the Quality
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part A: Setting and maintaining threshold academic standards Chapter A2: The subject and qualification level Chapter A2: The subject and qualification level Contents
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part B: Assuring and enhancing academic quality Chapter B1: Programme design and approval Contents Introduction 1 The Quality Code 1 About this Chapter 1 Introduction
London College of Business Management. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
London College of Business Management Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education November 2012 Key findings about London College of Business Management As a result
Quality assurance in UK higher education: A guide for international readers
Quality assurance in UK higher education: A guide for international readers I Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2005 ISBN 1 84482 140 4 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk
QAA Recognition Scheme for Access to Higher Education. The Access to Higher Education Diploma specification 2013
QAA Recognition Scheme for Access to Higher Education The Access to Higher Education Diploma specification 2013 Contents Preface 1 Using this document 1 The Access to HE Diploma 2 Qualification characteristics
Adapted Review for Specific Course Designation by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Adapted Review for Specific Course Designation by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Empire College London Ltd May 2014 Contents Key findings about Empire College London Ltd... 1 Good practice...
The Right to Award UK Degrees
The Right to Award UK Degrees Guidance 1 Introduction At the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) we take very seriously our responsibility for securing the academic standards of UK higher
Review for Specific Course Designation by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Review for Specific Course Designation by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Kaplan Open Learning (Essex) Ltd November 2013 Contents Key findings about Kaplan Open Learning (Essex) Ltd...
Met Film School Ltd Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Met Film School Ltd Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education September 2014 Key findings about Met Film School Ltd As a result of its Review for Educational
London College of International Business Studies. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
London College of International Business Studies Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education November 2012 Key findings about London College of International Business
SAE Institute UK. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
SAE Institute UK Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education June 2012 Key findings about SAE Institute UK As a result of its Review for Educational Oversight
Severn Business College. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Severn Business College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education November 2012 Key findings about Severn Business College As a result of its Review for Educational
London School of Theology. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
London School of Theology Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Key findings about London School of Theology As a result of its Review for Educational
Concerns about standards and quality in higher education AA Hamilton College Ltd, April 2015
Concerns about standards and quality in higher education AA Hamilton College Ltd, April 2015 Introduction and background 1 The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS) sent to the Quality Assurance
Anglo-European College of Chiropractic. Institutional Review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Anglo-European College of Chiropractic Institutional Review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Contents Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about the Anglo-European College of
How To Find Out What You Know About The College Of Accountancy
London College of Accountancy Ltd t/a Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education October 2012 Key findings about London College of Accountancy Ltd t/a As a result
Annex to subject benchmark statement. Mathematics, statistics and operational research
Annex to subject benchmark statement Mathematics, statistics and operational research 2009 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2009 ISBN 978 1 84482 909 5 All QAA's publications are available
Academic Staff Induction: Quality Assurance and Enhancement
Academic Staff Induction: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Wednesday 8 th October, 2014 10.00am-12.00pm, Room JD13 Ormskirk Campus Tony Turjansky Director of Quality Assurance Academic Quality & Development
Higher Education Review: Themes for 2015-16. 1 Background and introduction. 2 The themes for 2015-16. 3 Rationale for the themes identified
Higher Education Review: Themes for 2015-16 1 Background and introduction Higher Education Review has a core element and a thematic element. The core element focuses on academic standards, quality of learning
National Film and Television School. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
National Film and Television School Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education June 2012 Key findings about National Film and Television School As a result of
UK College of Business and Computing Ltd. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
UK College of Business and Computing Ltd Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Key findings about UK College of Business and Computing Ltd As a
Tech Music Schools Ltd trading as BIMM London Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Tech Music Schools Ltd trading as BIMM London Review for Educational Oversight by the Agency for Higher Education November 2014 Key findings about Tech Music Schools Ltd trading as BIMM London As a result
Higher Education Review. A handbook for QAA subscribers and providers with access to funding from HEFCE undergoing review in 2014-15
Higher Education Review A handbook for QAA subscribers and providers with access to funding from HEFCE undergoing review in 2014-15 June 2014 Contents Higher Education Review: Summary... 1 Part 1: Introduction
Architectural Association School of Architecture. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Architectural Association School of Architecture Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education May 2012 Key findings about Architectural Association School of Architecture
How To Write A Benchmarking Statement For Accounting
Accounting 2007 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2007 ISBN 978 1 84482 672 1 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk Printed copies of current publications are
West London Business College. Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
West London Business College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education March 2012 Key findings about West London Business College As a result of its Review for
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2007 ISBN 978 1 84482 665 0. All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.
Finance 2007 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2007 ISBN 978 1 84482 665 0 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk Printed copies of current publications are available
FACTSHEET RECOGNITION CAM QUALIFICATIONS
FACTSHEET ON RECOGNITION OF CAM QUALIFICATIONS First Edition September 2010 RECOGNITION OF THE CAM FOUNDATION QUALIFICATIONS Current Recognition Situation for the syllabi introduced in 2009 There are four
Subject Benchmark Statement. Accounting: Draft for Consultation
Subject Benchmark Statement Accounting: Draft for Consultation January 2015 Contents How can I use this document?... 1 About Subject Benchmark Statements... 2 About this Subject Benchmark Statement...
Establishing and operating HEA accredited provision policy
Page 1 of 13 Establishing and operating HEA accredited provision policy 1. Introduction The Higher Education Academy (HEA) accredits initial and continuing professional development provision delivered
Academic Staff Induction: Quality Assurance and Enhancement
Academic Staff Induction: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Monday 16 th May 2016 3.00-5.00pm, Room JD13 Ormskirk Campus Tony Turjansky Director of Quality Assurance Academic Quality & Development Unit
Responding to feedback from students. Guidance about providing information for students
Responding to feedback from students Guidance about providing information for students Contents Introduction... 1 Policy developments since 2011... 3 How student feedback is used... 3 QAA findings of good
Personal development planning: guidance for institutional policy and practice in higher education
Personal development planning: guidance for institutional policy and practice in higher education The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2009 ISBN 978 1 84482 914 9 All QAA publications are
Fees & Funding Guide. For English, Welsh & Northern Irish Students
Fees & Funding Guide For English, Welsh & Northern Irish Students Thank you for your interest in the University of Aberdeen. In order to help you make an informed decision about your future, we want to
Business School. Accounting. June 2007
Business School 1 Awarding body: Oxford Brookes University 2 Teaching institution: Oxford Brookes University 3 Programme accredited/approved by: N/A 4 Final and intermediate awards: BSc (Hons) 5 Programme
Master's degree characteristics
Master's degree characteristics March 2010 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2010 ISBN 978 1 84979 094 9 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk Registered charity
EDI Level 3 Assessing Qualifications. EDI Level 4 Internal Quality Assurance Qualifications. EDI Level 4 External Quality Assurance Qualifications
Vocational Qualifications EDI Level 3 Assessing Qualifications EDI Level 4 Internal Quality Assurance Qualifications EDI Level 4 External Quality Assurance Qualifications Candidate Pack Effective from:
International Benchmarking. Report of the Scottish Higher Education Enhancement Committee
Report of the Scottish Higher Education Enhancement Committee International Benchmarking Shaping the Twenty-First Century Doctorate: Learning from international practice Executive Summary March 2012 QAA
The Diploma Supplement is issued as two elements by the University of Central Lancashire as follows:
Diploma Supplement The Diploma Supplement issued by the University of Central Lancashire follows the model developed by the European Commission, Council of Europe and UNESCO/CEPES. The purpose of the supplement
Integrated quality and enhancement review. Summative review. November 2009. Boston College
Integrated quality and enhancement review Summative review November 2009 Boston College SR46/2009 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2010 ISBN 978 1 84979 061 1 All QAA s publications are
UK collaboration in India: institutional case studies. Kingston University
UK collaboration in India: institutional case studies Kingston University June 2009 c The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2009 ISBN 978 1 84482 949 1 All QAA's publications are available
UK collaboration in Malaysia: institutional case studies. University of Lancaster and Sunway University College, Malaysia
UK collaboration in Malaysia: institutional case studies University of Lancaster and Sunway University College, Malaysia January 2010 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2010 ISBN 978 1 84979
Foundation Degree qualification benchmark
Foundation Degree qualification benchmark May 2010 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2010 First published 2004 Second edition 2010 ISBN 978 1 84979 111 3 All QAA's publications are available
London Campuses of UK Universities. Overview report of a thematic enquiry by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
London Campuses of UK Universities Overview report of a thematic enquiry by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education December 2014 Contents About this report... 1 Executive summary... 2 Features
AN OVERVIEW OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SCQF CREDIT RATING BODIES
AN OVERVIEW OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SCQF CREDIT RATING BODIES ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 1 PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDE
Foundation Degree qualification benchmark
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Southgate House Southgate Street Gloucester GL1 1UB Tel 01452 557000 Fax 01452 557070 Email [email protected] Web www.qaa.ac.uk QAA 065 10/2004 Foundation Degree
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part B: Assuring and enhancing academic quality Chapter B11: Research degrees Contents About the Quality Code 1 About this Chapter 2 Research degrees 2 Understanding
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
UK Quality Code for Higher Education Part A: Setting and Maintaining Academic Standards The Frameworks for Higher Education Qualifications of UK Degree-Awarding Bodies October 2014 PART A Contents List
Review of UK Transnational Education in the United Arab Emirates: University of Exeter
Review of UK Transnational Education in the United Arab Emirates: University of Exeter February 2014 Executive summary The University of Exeter (the University) has delivered a Doctorate in Education (EdD)
General business and management
General business and management 2007 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2007 ISBN 978 1 84482 670 4 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk Printed copies of current
IHEEM WORKING WITH YOU TO DEVELOP YOUR CAREER
TO DEVELOP www.iheem.org.uk Joint letter by President and CEO Joint letter by President and CEO Shaping the healthcare engineering and estate management landscape The Institute of Healthcare Engineering
UK collaboration in Malaysia: institutional case studies. University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
UK collaboration in Malaysia: institutional case studies University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus March 2010 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2010 ISBN 978 1 84979 187 8 All QAA's publications
How to Make a Claim. Guide. The Equality Act 2010
working with Guide The Equality Act 2010 The TAEN Guides to the age related provisions of the Equality Act 2010 are primarily for employees, jobseekers and learners and aim to give a simple, clear explanation.
The University of Southampton Explanatory Notes on the Diploma Supplement
The University of Southampton Explanatory Notes on the Diploma Supplement This page is intentionally blank 2 Prologue This document is issued by the University of Southampton to accompany the official
Please read the questions below before contacting either the recruiting organisations or the Director of the programme.
Weston Jerwood Creative Bursaries FAQS April 2015 Please read the questions below before contacting either the recruiting organisations or the Director of the programme. You will find details of the information
University of Lincoln. Institutional Review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
University of Lincoln Institutional Review by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education November 2012 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about the University of
Review of UK transnational education in Greece: University of Sheffield and City College
Review of UK transnational education in Greece: University of Sheffield and City College November 2015 Executive summary City College in Thessaloniki is also known as the International Faculty of the University
Ann Other. Underwriter. Underwriter. Junior Underwriter. Year in industry. Bachelor of Science in Mathematics. Curriculum Vitae PERSONAL INFORMATION
Curriculum Vitae PERSONAL INFORMATION 1 The Street,London AB12 3CD United Kingdom +44 1234567890 +44 0987654321 [email protected] JOB APPLIED FOR Underwriter WORK EXPERIENCE July 2009 Present Underwriter
Subject benchmark statement: Criminology. Draft for consultation 2013
Subject benchmark statement: Criminology Draft for consultation 2013 Contents Contents... 2 Preface... 1 1 Introduction... 2 2 Defining principles... 3 3 Nature and extent of Criminology... 4 4 Subject
Higher Education Review of Guildford College of Further and Higher Education
Guildford College of Further and Higher Education September 2014 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about... 2 Good practice... 2 Recommendations... 2 Theme: Student Employability...
Covenant Fund (Families In Stress) Expression of Interest
Covenant Fund (Families In Stress) Expression of Interest 1. What is the full legal name as shown on your governing document? Please check this - if the full name is incorrect it may delay your application
Policy and Procedure for Postgraduate Admissions to the University of Edinburgh
Policy and Procedure for Postgraduate Admissions to the University of Edinburgh 1. Purpose 1.1 To set out policy governing the admission of postgraduate students to the University of Edinburgh. 1.2 The
Introduction 5. Section 1: Who is eligible to apply? 7. Section 2: The pre-application criteria 8. Section 3: Submitting an application 9
TAUGHT DEGREE AWARDING POWERS AND RESEARCH DEGREE AWARDING POWERS Guidance for Higher Education Providers: Criteria and Process for applying for Taught Degree Awarding Powers and Research Degree Awarding
Qualification Information Profiles (QIPs) for Access to HE Diploma and Scottish Wider Access Programme (SWAP)
2015 Qualification Information Profiles (QIPs) for Access to HE Diploma and Scottish Wider Access Programme (SWAP) Published by: UCAS Rosehill New Barn Lane Cheltenham GL52 3LZ UCAS 2015 All rights reserved.
Regulations for the award of Taught Master s Degrees, Postgraduate Diplomas and Postgraduate Certificates
Regulations for the award of Taught Master s Degrees, Postgraduate Diplomas and Postgraduate Certificates 1 General Regulations 1.1 Definition 1.1.1 The Master s degree is intended for award on the satisfactory
Qualifications Awarded by Two or More Degree-Awarding Bodies Characteristics
Qualifications Awarded by Two or More Degree-Awarding Bodies Characteristics Draft for consultation December 2014 UK Quality Code for Higher Education, Part A: Setting and Maintaining Academic Standards
Introduction... 1. Outcomes of the Institutional audit... 1
Liverpool John Moores University Institutional audit NOVEMBER 2009 Annex to the report Contents Introduction... 1 Outcomes of the Institutional audit... 1 Institutional approach to quality enhancement...
Subject benchmark statement. Engineering
Subject benchmark statement Engineering 2010 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2010 First published 2000 Second edition 2006 Revised edition 2010 ISBN 978 1 84979 224 0 All QAA's publications
