Control Number : Item Number : 262. Addendum StartPage : 0
|
|
|
- Estella Peters
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Control Number : Item Number : 262 Addendum StartPage : 0
2 SOAH DOCKET NO DOCKET NO APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES AND TO RECONCILE FUEL AND PURCHASED POWER COSTS FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2010 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012 ^ PH 4: ^ r BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS' _FIR REQUEST-FOR-IM (1RM A TTf1N_ QUESTION NO (Filename: SPSRespTIEC 1 st(supp2).doc; Total Pages: 11) 1. WRITTEN RESPONSES...2 II. INSPECTIONS...3 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE...5 QUESTION NO. TIEC 1-27:...:... 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Exhibit SPS-TIEC 1-27(a)(SUPP2) (non-nativeformat)...7 Exhibit SPS-TIEC 1-27(b)V(SUPP2) (non-nativeformat) TIEC 1 (SUPP2)(CD)...10 Exhibit SPS-TIEC 1-27(b)V(SUPP2)(CONF) (non-nativeformat)...11 TIEC 1(SUPP2)(CD)(CONF)...11 PUC Docket No SOAH Docket No Southwestern Public Service Company's Second Supplemental Response to Texas Industrial Energy Consumers First Request for Information -1- ^^Y
3 SOAH DOCKET NO DOCKET NO APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES AND TO RECONCILE FUEL AND PURCHASED POWER COSTS FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2010 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012 BEFORE THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY'S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS' SECOND nuest FOR TTn z vn QUESTION NO Southwestern Public Service Company ("SPS") files this second supplemental response to Texas Industrial Energy Consumers ("TIEC") First Request for Information, Question No WRITTEN RESPONSES SPS's written supplemental responses to TIEC's First Request for Information are attached and incorporated by reference. Each response is stated on or attached to a separate page on which the request has been restated. SPS's responses are made in the spirit of cooperation without waiving SPS's right to contest the admissibility of any of these matters at hearing. Pursuant to P.U.C. PROC. R (c)(2)(A), each response lists the preparer or person under whose direct supervision the response was prepared and any sponsoring witness. When SPS provides certain information sought by the request while objecting to the provision of other information, it does so without prejudice to its objection in the interests of narrowing discovery disputes pursuant to P.U.C. PROC. R (d)(5). Pursuant to P.U.C. PUC Docket No SOAHDocket No Southwestern Public Service Company's Second Supplemental Response to Texas Industrial Energy Consumers First Request for Information - 2-
4 PROC. R (c)(2)(F), SPS stipulates that its responses may be treated by all parties as if they were made under oath. II. INSPECTIONS If responsive documents are more than 100 pages but less than eight linear feet in length, the response will indicate that the attachment is VOLUMINOUS and, pursuant to P.U.C. PROC. R (h)(2), the attachment will be provided on CD and made available for inspection at SPS's voluminous room at 401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2100, Austin, Texas 78701; telephone number (512) In addition, SPS will provide voluminous exhibits to all parties on CD. If a response or the responsive documents are provided pursuant to the protective order in this docket, the response will indicate that it or the attachment is either CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY SENSITIVE as appropriate under the protective order. Highly sensitive responses will be made available for inspection at SPS's voluminous room, unless they form a part of a response that exceeds eight linear feet in length; then they will be available at their usual repository in accordance with the following paragraph. Please call in advance for an appointment to ensure that there is sufficient space to accommodate your inspection. If responsive documents exceed eight linear feet in length, the response will indicate that the attachment is subject to the FREIGHT CAR DOCTRINE, and, pursuant to P.U.C. PROC. R (h)(3), the attachment will be available for inspection at its usual repository, SPS's offices in Amarillo, Texas, unless otherwise indicated. SPS requests that parties wishing to inspect this material provide at least 48-hours notice of their intent by contacting Ron Moss of Winstead, P.C., 401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2100, Austin, Texas 78701; PUC Docket No SOAH Docket No Southwestern Public Service Company's Second Supplemental Response to Texas Industrial Energy Consumers First Request for Information - 3-
5 telephone number (512) ; facsimile transmission number (512) ; address Inspections will be scheduled to accommodate all requests with as little inconvenience to the requesting party and to SPS's operations as possible. Respectfully submitted, XCEL ENERGY SERVICES INC. Stephen Fogel State Bar No Matthew P. Loftus State Bar No Congress Avenue, Suite 1650 Austin, Texas Office: (512) Facsimile: (512) WINSTEAD P.C. Ron H. Moss State Bar No Congress Avenue, Suite 2100 Austin, Texas Office: (512) GRAVES, DOUGHERTY, HEARON & MOODY P.C. Thomas B. Hudson, Jr. State Bar No Congress Avenue, Suite 2200 Austin, Texas Office: (512) Facsimile: (512) COURTNEY, COUNTISS, BRIAN & BAILEY, LLP Amy M. Shelhamer State Bar No S. Tyler, Suite 1700 Amarillo, Texas Office: (806) Facsimile: (806) BY: ATTORNEYS FOR SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY PUC Docket No SOAH Docket No Southwestern Public Service Company's Second Supplemental Response to Texas Industrial Energy Consumers First Request for Information - 4-
6 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES QUESTION NO. TIEC 1-27: Please provide the information described in Rule 194.2(f), (g) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE 2: The following supplements SPS's prior responses: Please refer to Exhibit SPS-TIEC 1-27(a)(SUPP2), which is a Witness Document Index that indicates additional documents received by specific witnesses. Please refer to Exhibit SPS-TIEC 1-27(b)V(SUPP2), provided on the enclosed CD ("TIEC 1(SUPP2)(CD)"), and SPS-TIEC , - provided on -- tlie enc ose CD ("TIEC 1(SUPP2)(CD)(CONF)"), for documents described in TRCP 194.2(f)(4)(A) that have not previously been produced. SPS is still compiling the documents responsive to this request and will provide a further supplemental response. Preparer: Sponsor: Wesley Berger Alice K. Jackson PUC Docket N4 SOAHDocket No Southwestern Public Service Company's Second Supplemental Response to Texas Industrial Energy Consumers First Request for Information -5-
7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the 18th day of January 2013, a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was served on all parties of record by electronic service and by either hand delivery, Federal Express, regular first class mail, certified mail, or facsimile transmission. ea M. Stover '^ - PUC Docket No SOAH Docket No Southwestern Public Service Company's Second Supplemental Response to Texas Industrial Energy Consumers First Request for Information - 6-
8 Exhibit TIEC 1-27(a)(SUPP2) Witness Document Index The following document was made available to all witnesses who testified to affiliate charges: SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC James L. Altman 2. Alan L. Bellinghausen SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC Teresa I. Donnelly 4. Stan P. Dufault SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC Jack S. Dybalski SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC S. Michelle Edwards 7. Kurtis J. Haeger SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC David C. Harkness I
9 9. Cathy J. Hart 10. Thomas A. Imbler 11. Gary N. Lakey SPS-TIEC Kim S. Locker 13. David A Low 14. Mark R. McCloskey SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC Confidential SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC Mark P. Moeller 16. Gary J. O'Hara SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC Janet Schmidt-Petree 18. Amy L. Stitt SPS-TIEC a - SPS-TIEC f 19. Matt W. Watson t
10 20. Bennie F. Weeks SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC 1-27 Confidential SPS-TIEC SPS-TIEC
11 Exhibit SPS-TIEC 1-27(b)V(SUPP2) ;,. ^. Iry_k 1 N:.. i;. f t t = -,i ti 10
12 Exhibit SPS-TIEC 1-27(b)V(SUPP2)(CONF) SOAH DOCKET NO PUCT DOCKET NO APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES AND TO RECONCILE FUEL AND PURCHASED POWER COSTS FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2010.,.rrn_u nn.tr F - 4 TIEC 1(SUPP2)(CONF)(CD) C-1 11
Control Number : 42004. Item Number: 239. Addendum StartPage: 0
Control Number : 42004 Item Number: 239 Addendum StartPage: 0 SOAR DOCKET NO. 473-14-1665 DOCKET NO. 42004 tia 12 Am11: 50 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES
Control Number : 41446. Item Number : 59. Addendum StartPage : 0
Control Number : 41446 Item Number : 59 Addendum StartPage : 0 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-13-4070 PUC DOCKET NO. 41446 APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN BEFORE THE*1'16)[E^^I PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY TO ^ ADJUST ITS
Control Number: 38339. Item Number : 301. Addendum StartPage : 0
Control Number: 38339 Item Number : 301 Addendum StartPage : 0 301 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-10-5001 DOCKET NO. 38339 APPLICATION OF CENTERPOINT BEFORE THE ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC STATE OFFICE OF,m{ FOR
Control Number : 44746. Item Number : 38. Addendum StartPage : 0
Control Number : 44746 Item Number : 38 Addendum StartPage : 0 2015JU[. _? PM 3: 14 APPLICATION OF WIND ENERGY BEFORE TW,,STATE OFFICE TRANSMISSION TEXAS, LLC FOR OPrLING CLERK AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Docket No. OP-1474
Department of the Treasury Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Docket ID OCC 2013 0020 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Docket No. OP-1474 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Proposed
Control Number : 42511. Item Number : 262. Addendum StartPage: 0
Control Number : 42511 Item Number : 262 Addendum StartPage: 0 PROJECT NO. 42511 $ _.. ;:^^... COMPLAINT OF CALPINE PUBLIC UTILITY C ^' O^P"'I A"& 2, 33 CORPORATION AND NRG ENERGY, INC. AGAINST THE ELECTRIC
Control Number : 38339. Item Number : 516. Addendum StartPage : 0
Control Number : 38339 Item Number : 516 Addendum StartPage : 0 SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-10-5001 DOCKET NO. 38339 APPLICATION OF CENTERPOINT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC FOR AUTHORITY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 93-0141L APPROVAL OF LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL OF THE 241ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY ORDERED: Pursuant to Rule 3a of the Texas Rules of Civil
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 OFFICE OF THE SAN DIEGO CITY ATTORNEY JAN I. GOLDSMITH, City Attorney (SBN 0) PAUL F. PRATHER, Deputy City Attorney (SBN ) CITY OF SAN DIEGO 0 Third Avenue # 10 San Diego, CA 1 Telephone:
FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES
FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES 1. Filing Pleadings: A Cover Sheet must be filed with the Complaint and any Cross-Complaint stating whether the case is contested or uncontested,
BEFORE THE IOWA BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY ARTS & SCIENCES
BEFORE THE IOWA BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY ARTS & SCIENCES IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NOS. 10-043,10-054,11-007, 11-010 and 11-118; 10-099; 13-023; 10-080; La'James International College, 10-087; 14-0018; 11-002;
JUDICIAL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES
JUDICIAL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE BRUCE FOX Judge Fox received a B.S. degree from the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 1971 and a J.D. degree from Harvard University Law
Case 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :
Case 111-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- 6/8/15 X In re SHENGDATECH,
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. âboclkct No. 01-9002 Appointment of a District Judge to Rule on a Motion to Recuse filed in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints
NO. C-1-PB-14-001245
NO. C-1-PB-14-001245 In Re: TEL Offshore Trust In the Probate Court No. 1 of Travis County, Texas ATTORNEY AD LITEM S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFFS TO: Plaintiffs, The Bank of New York Mellon
Addendum StartPage : 0
Control Number : 42946 Item Number : 26 Addendum StartPage : House Bill (HB) 16 and Senate Bill (SB) 567 83`a Legislature, Regular Session, transferred the functions relating to the economic regulation
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WORCESTER, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C ) PHILIPPE E. GUT AND GWEN PRATT GUT, ) on behalf of themselves and all ) others similarly
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid money to Microsoft for an MSN account established in your name at a Best Buy store, never logged
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION SHELTON CHARLES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. A-06CA158LY TEXAS LOTTERY COMMISSION AND GARY GRIEF IN HIS INDIVIDUAL
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO BENEFIT REVIEW CONFERENCES
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO BENEFIT REVIEW CONFERENCES The following practices and procedures are effective for all benefit review
Case 1:12-cv-02429-ADS-AKT Document 88-1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 56 of 64 PageID #: 1018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:12-cv-02429-ADS-AKT Document 88-1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 56 of 64 PageID #: 1018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: SINUS BUSTER PRODUCTS CONSUMER LITIGATION Civil Action
Information or instructions: Defendant s Cross-claims and counterclaims PREVIEW
Information or instructions: Defendant s Cross-claims and counterclaims 1. The purpose of counterclaims and cross-actions is to join persons and actions, as permitted by TRCP 39, 40, 41, 49, 50, and 51,
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. Respondent, Michael Malotz Skilled Nursing Pavilion 120 Odell Avenue Yonkers, New York 1070 1
STATE OF NEW YORK : DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IN THE MATTER ANTONIA C. NOVELLO, M.D., M.P.H., Dr. P.H., as Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, to determine the action to be taken with respect to:
RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
Case 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RICHARD MEYER and KATHLEEN LEONE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re: ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES GOVERNING : MEDIATION OF MATTERS AND THE
Case 16-20012 Document 619 Filed in TXSB on 05/27/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 16-20012 Document 619 Filed in TXSB on 05/27/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 SHERWIN ALUMINA COMPANY, LLC,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :0-cv-0-DLR Document Filed 0// Page of 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Local Teamsters Pension and Welfare Funds, et al., v. Plaintiffs, Apollo Group Incorporated,
(TECO) First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-8) and First Request for Production of Docunients
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In re: Review of Tampa Electric Company s waterborne transportation contract with TECO Transport and associated benchmark ) Docket No. 031033-E1 L ) ) Filed
Storm Damage Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx
Storm Damage Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # Insurance Claim # x I. Parties A. xxxxx B. xxxxx II., Time and Location of the Arbitration : Time: Location: III. Rules Governing the Arbitration Each
Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
lllll Ill II IIIIII IIII I) Control Number: 20366
lllll Ill II IIIIII IIII I) Control Number: 20366 IIIII Ill 11111111 I1 Item Number: 553 Addendum StartPage: 0 TXU Business Services 1601 Bryan Street Dallas TX 752013411 Tel, 214812 1255 Fax 214 8123221
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:07-CV-231-F PAMELA L. HENSLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) PROPOSED JOINT JOHNSTON COUNTY BOARD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) IMPORTANT: You are not being sued. Please read this Notice carefully.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION INSTITUTE FOR CREATION RESEARCH GRADUATE SCHOOL, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. A:09 CA 382 TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COODINATING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL Document 437 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.
Case 4:07-bk-01568-EWH Doc 96 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 11:20:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Michael M. Neal, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL M. NEAL, P.C. 1 S. Church Avenue, Suite Tucson, Arizona 01 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - E-Mail: [email protected] State Bar No.
The Public Defender cannot file these motions for you or represent you in your hearing unless the Court appoints us to do so.
Law Offices of JULIANNE M. HOLT Public Defender Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida 700 East Twiggs Street, Fifth Floor P.O. Box 172910 Tampa, Florida 33672-0910 RE: Pro se Motion to Modify (Change)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re: ) Jointly Administered ) Case No. 00-41584 N ) Chapter 11 CROWN VANTAGE, INC., ) ) ORDER ESTABLISHING Debtor. ) CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case No. 15-10416 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT RICHARD VAN HOUTEN, JR.; STEPHEN HALL,
Case: 15-10416 Document: 00513194448 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Case No. 15-10416 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT RICHARD VAN HOUTEN, JR.; STEPHEN HALL, v. Plaintiffs-Appellants,
TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS
TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS This Notice Is Given To Inform You Of The Proposed Settlement Of A Class Action. If The Settlement Is Approved By The Court, Certain Benefits
Sullivan v Lehigh Cement Co. 2014 NY Slip Op 30256(U) January 27, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 103161/10 Judge: Louis B.
Sullivan v Lehigh Cement Co. 2014 NY Slip Op 30256(U) January 27, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 103161/10 Judge: Louis B. York Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I (SCRU-13-0005988) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i As amended March 6, 1981 Effective March 6, 1981 With Further
Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12
Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Case 2:11-cv-00309-WCO Document 65 Filed 10/29/13 Page 1 of 5 JONATHAN ALFORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-2-15-.01 Definitions 0800-2-15-.10 Representation
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a Windmill Inn of Ashland, Defendant.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR ADAAA Case Repository Labor and Employment Law Program 11-30-2001 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Windmill Inns of America, d/b/a
Case 15-60070 Document 126 Filed in TXSB on 10/09/15 Page 1 of 5
Case 15-60070 Document 126 Filed in TXSB on 10/09/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION In re: HII TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Chapter 11 Debtor
Case 1:15-cv-23419-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2015 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:15-cv-23419-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2015 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2008 WI 37 NOTICE This order is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports. No. 07-12 In the matter
Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 2247 Filed 04/26/16 Entered 04/26/16 17:22:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7
Document Page 1 of 7 JONES DAY North Point 901 Lakeside Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Telephone: (216) 586-3939 Facsimile: (216) 579-0212 David G. Heiman (admitted pro hac vice) Carl E. Black (admitted
Respondent, Mercy Health and Rehab Center Nursing Home, Inc. 3 St. Anthony Street Auburn, New York 13021
STATE OF NEW YORK : DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH... IN THE MATTER ANTONIA C. NOVELLO, M.D., M.P.H., Dr. P.H., as Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, to determine the action to be taken with respect
F THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
F THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. = 9075 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Sid L. Harle,
HOMESELLERS/HOMEBUYERS DISPUTE RESOLUTION MEDIATION PROGRAM
HOMESELLERS/HOMEBUYERS DISPUTE RESOLUTION MEDIATION PROGRAM ---------------- A FAST, EASY, AND INEXPENSIVE ALTERNATIVE TO LITIGATION --------------- 5300 International Blvd.,Suite C-105 Charleston, SC
Case 8:13-cv-00662-GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 8:13-cv-00662-GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JAY CLOGG REALTY GROUP, INC., Plaintiff vs. BURGER KING CORPORATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-cv-00662
(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp
Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,
HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES
City of Seattle OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES Adopted May 8, 2014 Office of Hearing Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4000 Mailing: PO Box 94729 Seattle,
Case 15-10197-BLS Doc 1393 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 15-10197-BLS Doc 1393 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 8 In re: RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, et al., 1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 15-10197-KJC
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE In the Matter of a ) Uniform Pretrial Order ) ) Administrative Order 3AO-03-04 (Amended) UNIFORM PRETRIAL ORDER In order
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NOTICE OF MOTION
tr. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division In re: PATHNET OPERATING, INC., Case No. 0-2266-SSM DEBTOR Chapter 7 GORDON P. PEYTON, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR PATHNET
DWC FORM-152 (Application for Attorney's Fees)
DWC FORM-152 (Application for Attorney's Fees) The Division is authorized by the Texas Workers' Compensation Act, Texas Labor Code, Sections 408.221 and 408.222 to approve the fees paid to injured employees'
individually and as an officer of Safety Cell, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade
WILLIAM E. KOVACIC General Counsel BARBARA ANTHONY Regional Director Northeast Region RONALD L. WALDMAN (RW 2003) DARA J. DIOMANDE (DD 4304) DONALD G. D AMATO (DG 3008) Federal Trade Commission 1 Bowling
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-01156-LMM Document 34 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Steven L. Markos, Tiffany Davis, and Gregory Page,
RDER OF THE SUP R EME COURT OF TEXAS
RDER OF THE SUP R EME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. t9 66 Appointment of a District Judge to Rule on a Motion to Recuse filed in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:06-cv-02431-JTC Document 156 Filed 06/24/2009 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
RESERVED NAMES CHALLENGE POLICY
RESERVED NAMES CHALLENGE POLICY 1.0 Title: Reserve Names Challenge Policy Version Control: 1.0 Date of Implementation: 2015-03-16 2.0 Summary This Reserved Names Challenge Policy (the Policy ) has been
SECOND AMENDED ORDER DESIGNATING ALL CASES E-FILE AND SETTING FORTH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS IN E-FILE CASES
IN RE ALL CASES FILED IN THE 58 TH DISTRICT COURT (WITH EXCEPTIONS) AS OF JANUARY 7, 2004 IN THE 58 TH DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS 58 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SECOND AMENDED ORDER DESIGNATING
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11. Jointly Administered
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CD LIQUIDATION CO., LLC, f/ka CYNERGY DATA, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 09-13038 (KG) Jointly Administered Related
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GOVERNING EXPERT DISCOVERY
This is the sample expert discovery stipulation referenced at Section II(4(h(ii(d of the Guidelines on Best Practices for Litigating Cases Before the Court of Chancery. It should be modified to fit the
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AND NOW, the undersigned, in settlement of their dispute as described herein, hereby mutually covenant and agree as follows: WHEREAS, Jeffery Pendleton of
Case: 1:16-cv-04945 Document #: 21 Filed: 05/23/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:118
Case: 1:16-cv-04945 Document #: 21 Filed: 05/23/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:118 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STUDENTS AND PARENTS FOR PRIVACY, a voluntary unincorporated
Misc. Docket No. Il--------- Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action
ER OF T H E SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. Il---------.91. 88 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable
7 50-25. I Thomas Lumsden. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. 5 Accountants and Financial Advisors for Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors 6 83A
I Thomas Lumsden 2 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 199 Fremont Street FILED 3 San Francisco, CA 94105 SEP - 3 29 Z Telephone: (415) 498-5000 4 Facsimile: (415) 498-6699 una(d qttt, OfflUFTEY HOT 5 Accountants
Application Process for Juvenile Court Appointments
Application Process for Juvenile Court Appointments Applications are accepted once per year December 1 thru December 31 and can only be submitted during this time period. An attorney who is seeking approval
Instructions for Application for a Texas Permit to Operate an Automatic Dial Announcing Device (ADAD)
Permit Required Pursuant to PUC SUBSTANTIVE RULE 26.125 Instructions for Application for a Texas Permit to Operate an Automatic Dial Announcing Device (ADAD) General Instructions A person may not use an
OFFICIAL ORDER of the TEXAS COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE. Date: STATE FARM LLOYDS P.O. Box 799100 Dallas, Texas 75379-9100
No. OFFICIAL ORDER of the TEXAS COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE Date: Subject Considered: General remarks and official action taken: STATE FARM LLOYDS P.O. Box 799100 Dallas, Texas 75379-9100 CONSENT ORDER TDI
The Judicial Ethics Committee of the California Judges Association has issued the following formal opinions:
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: All CJA Members Stanley S. Bissey Executive Director & CEO DATE: May 2015 SUBJECT: Formal Ethics Opinion No. 69 The Judicial Ethics Committee of the California Judges Association has
10 20 ARBITRATION RULES
2010 ARBITRATION RULES MODEL ARBITRATION CLAUSE Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with this contract, or the breach, termination or invalidity thereof, shall be finally
2:14-mn-02502-RMG Date Filed 05/09/14 Entry Number 128 Page 1 of 3
2:14-mn-02502-RMG Date Filed 05/09/14 Entry Number 128 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: LIPITOR (ATORVASTATIN CALCIUM MARKETING,
Case 1:13-cv-00586-AWI-SAB Document 41 Filed 02/20/14 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-00-awi-sab Document Filed 0// Page of 0 DALE L. ALLEN, JR., SBN KEVIN P. ALLEN, SBN 0 ALLEN, GLAESSNER & WERTH, LLP 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, California 0 Telephone: () -00
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:13-cv-11396-AC-LJM Doc # 88 Filed 05/11/15 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 3457 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN MARILYN OVERALL, on behalf of herself, individually, and on behalf of
Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others
