(TECO) First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-8) and First Request for Production of Docunients
|
|
|
- Marylou Maud Simpson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In re: Review of Tampa Electric Company s waterborne transportation contract with TECO Transport and associated benchmark ) Docket No E1 L ) ) Filed February 16,2004 RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO TAMPA ELECRTIC COMPANY S FIRST SET OF I ERROGAT0RIES (1-8) AND FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (1-17) Pursuant to the Order Establishing Procedure, Order No. PSC PCU-EI, issued December 1 1,2003 (Procedural Order), Rule of the Florida Administrative Code, and Rules 1.280, and of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Catherine L. Claypool, Helen Fisher, William Page, Edward A. Wilson, Sue E. Strohm, Mary Jane Williamson, Betty J. Wise, Carlos Lissabet, and Lesly A. Diaz (the Residential Electric customers ), by and through their undersigned attorney, submit their Preliminary Objections to Tampa Electric Company s (TECO) First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-8) and First Request for Production of Docunients (NOS. 1-17). The Residential Electric Customers file these objections to comply with the ten (1 0) day requirement set forth in the Procedural Order. These objections are preliminary in nature. Should additional grounds for objection be discovered as the Residential Electric Custoniers prepares their responses to any discovery, the Residential Electric Custoiiiers reserve the right to supplement these objections. Should the Residential Electric Customers detemiine that a protective order is necessary with respect to any of the information requested by TECO, the Residential Electric Customers reserve the right to file a motion with the Commission seeking 1
2 such an order at the time it serves its written responses to TECO. GENERAL OBJECTIONS The Residential Electric Customers make the following general objections to TECO s interrogatories and requests for production: 1. The Residential Electric Customers object to the interrogatories and requests for production to the extent they are overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or excessively time consuming as written. 2. The Residential Electric Customers object to and each and every request insofar as it is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and is not relevant to the subject matter of this action. The Residential Electric Customers will attempt to note in their responses each instance where this objection applies. 3. The Residential Electric Custoniers object to the interrogatories and requests for production insofar as they are vague, ambiguous, overly broad, imprecise, or utilize terms that are subject to multiple interpretations but are not properly defined or explained for purposes of these interrogatories and requests for production. Any answers the Residential Electric Customers provide in response to the interrogatories and requests for production will be provided subject to, and without waiver, of the foregoing objection. 4. The Residential Electric Customers object to the interrogatories and requests for production to the extent that they purport to impose discovery obligations on the Residential Electric Customers that exceed the scope of discovery allowed by the applicable Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. By way of example and not of limitation, the Residential Electric Customers object to any interrogatory or request for production that calls for the creation of information as 2
3 opposed to the reporting of presently existing information. 5. The Residential Electric Customers object to each and every interrogatory and request for production to the extent that such interrogatory or request for production calls for information that is exempt from discovery by virtue of the attorney-client privilege, work product privilege, or other applicable privilege. 4. The Residential Electric Customers object to each and every interrogatory and request for production to the extent that the information requested constitutes trade secrets pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes. To the extent that TECO requests proprietary confidential business information, the Residential Electric Customers will make such information available in accordance with a protective agreement, subject to other general or specific objections contained herein. 7. The Residential Electric Customers object to all interrogatories and requests for production that would require the Residential Electric Customers to provide information that is already in TECO s possession or is in the public record before the Commission. To duplicate information that TECO already has or is readily available to TECO would be unduly burdensome and oppressive. 8. The Residential Electric Customers object to any interrogatory or request for production that seeks to obtain all or particular documents, items, or information to the extent that such interrogatory or request is overly broad and unduly burdensome. Any answers the Residential Electric Customers provide in response to this discovery will be provided subject to, and without waiver of, the foregoing objection. 9. The Residential Electric Customers object to the definition of the Residential 3
4 Customers set out in the interrogatories and requests for production as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or 10. The Residential Electric Customers object to the definitions of Documents set out in the requests for production as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or excessively time consuniing. 11. For each specific objection made below, the Residential Electric Customers incorporate by reference all of the foregoing general objections into each of its specific objections as though pleaded therein. SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO TECO S INTERROGATORTES 12. The Residential Electric Customers object to TECO s Interrogatory No. 1 as it is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and is not relevant to the subject matter of this action. The Residential Electric Custoniers further object to Interrogatory No. 1 as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or 13. The Residential Electric Customers object to Interrogatory No. 2 as it is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and is not relevant to the subject matter of this action. The Residential Electric Customers flirther object to Interrogatory No. 2 as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or excessively time consuming. 14. The Residential Electric Custoniers object to Interrogatory No. 3 to the extent that it requests materials and/or information protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. The Residential Electric Customers further 4
5 object to Interrogatory No. 3 as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or 15. The Residential Electric Customers object to Interrogatory No. 4 to the extent that it requests materials and/or information protected by the attorney-client privilege,. the work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. The Residential Electric Customers further object to Interrogatory No. 4 as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or 16. The Residential Electric Custoiners object to Interrogatory No. 8 as it is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and is not relevant to the subject matter of this action. SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO TECO'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION 17. The Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 1 as it is overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or 18. Tlie Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 2 as it is overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or 19. The Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 3 to the extent that it is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and is not relevant to the subject matter of this action. Tlie Residential Electric Customers further object to this request because it requests materials and/or information protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other applicable 5
6 privilege. 20. The Residential Electric Custoiners object to Request for Production of Documents No. 4 to the extent that it requests materials and/or information protected by the attoriiey/client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. 21. The Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 5 to the extent that the request seeks discovery of materials and/or information protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. The Residential Electric Customers further object to this request for production as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or 22. The Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 6 to the extent that the request seeks discovery of materials and/or information protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. The Residential Electric Customers further object to this request for production as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or excessively tinie consuming. 23. The Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 7 to the extent that the request seeks discovery of materials and/or information protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. The Residential Electric Customers further object to this request for production as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or 24. The Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 15 as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or Notwithstanding these objections, and without waiving them, the 6
7 Residential Electric Custoniers will attempt to respond to this request. 25. The Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 14 as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or Notwithstanding these objections, and without waiving them, the Residential Electric Customers will attempt to respond to this request. 26. The Residential Electric Customers object to Request for Production of Documents No. 17 as overly broad, unduly burdensome, expensive, oppressive, and/or Notwithstanding these objections, and without waiving them, the Residential Electric Customers will attempt to respond to this request. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael B. Twomey Michael B. Twomey Attorney for Petitioner Residential Customers of Tampa Electric Company Post Office Box 5256 Tallahassee, Florida Telephone:
8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this petition has been served by US. Mail or this 16th day of February, 2004 on the following: Wm. Cochran Keating, Esq. Robert Vandiver, Esq. Senior Attomey Associate Public Counsel Division of Legal Services Office of Public Counsel Florida Public Service Conmission 1.11 West Madison Street, Rm Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida Tallahassee, Florida Joseph A. McGlothlin, Esq. Vicki Gordon Kaufnian McWhirter, Reeves 117 South Gadsden Street Tallahassee, Florida Lee L. Willis, Esq. James D. Beasley, Esq. Ausley & McMullen Post Office Box 391 Tallahassee, Florida Robert Scheffel Wright, Esq. Landers and Parsons Post Office Box 271 Tallahassee, Florida /s/ Michael B. Twomey Attorney 8
How To Defend Yourself Against A Power Plant Claim In A Court Of Law
STEEL. ORIGINAL Steel Hector & Davis LLP 215 South Monroe, Suite 601 HECTOR Tallahassee, Florida 32301-1804 IDA V IS'" 850.222.2300 850.222.8410 Fax www.steelhector.com Elizabeth C. Daley August 29, 2002
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: ESTATE OF SHIRLEY BERNSTEIN, Deceased. PROBATE DIVISION CASE NO: 502011CP000653XXXXSB SUCCESSOR PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S OBJECTIONS TO FIRST
Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No. 0299461 Special Projects
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORID SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Petitioner, VS. Case No. 82,399 J. Terry Deason, et al., as members of THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent. ATTORNEY
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Colonial Manor West Apartments Condominium
(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp
Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Robert L. Prawdzik, Petitioner, v. Fee
How To Get The Court To Set Out A Rule On The Cost Of A Medical Malpractice Claim
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC05-1150 IN RE: PETITION TO AMEND RULE 4-1.5(f)(4)(B) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT / COMMENT OF GLENN KLAUSMAN, ESQ., TO PETITION The undersigned attorney
Case 15-12054-KG Doc 373 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
Case 15-12054-KG Doc 373 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: CITY SPORTS, INC., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 15-12054 (KG) Debtors. 1 Jointly Administered
Friday 31st October, 2008.
Friday 31st October, 2008. It is ordered that the Rules heretofore adopted and promulgated by this Court and now in effect be and they hereby are amended to become effective January 1, 2009. Amend Rules
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. Chapter 11 Jointly Administered
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re: LOUIS J. PEARLMAN, et al., Debtor. / Case No. 6:07-bk-00761-ABB Chapter 11 Jointly Administered DEFENDANTS 1 OBJECTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM SUMMERS, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2007 CA 5232 WS/H SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. /
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682. Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Attached is a form to convert an Other Business Entity into a Florida Limited Liability Company pursuant to section 608.439, Florida Statutes. These
Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5
Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5 An act to amend Sections 2016.020, 2031.010, 2031.020, 2031.030, 2031.040, 2031.050, 2031.060, 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, 2031.250, 2031.260, 2031.270, 2031.280,
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Steve Greye and Dawn Mackenzie, Petitioners,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION
1 1 1 1 1 BOURNE INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, CHET STOLER; SOUTH SEAS TRADING CO., Defendants. STIPULATION NO. C0-0RJB PROTECTIVE ORDER
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 7
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION GLENN HUNTER BROWN SR, Plaintiff, vs. REGIONS BANK, Defendant. Case No. :0-bk-00-KSJ Chapter MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY CITY OF FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA, ) et nl., Plaintiffs, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FAlRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, et al., ) CASE NO. CL 2012--3411 Defendants. MOTION FOR PIZOTECTIVE
SUBCHAPTER 10L INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION FORMS SECTION.0100 WORKERS COMPENS ATION FORMS
SUBCHAPTER 10L INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION FORMS SECTION.0100 WORKERS COMPENS ATION FORMS 04 NCAC 10L.0101 FORM 21 AGREEMENT FOR COMPENSATION FOR DISABILITY (a) (Effective until July 1, 2015) The parties to
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY COURT USE ONLY Counsel for Plaintiff: Marc R. Levy, #11372
GRANTED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: May 27, 2010 DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND
Case 6:13-cv-01168-EFM-TJJ Document 157 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 6:13-cv-01168-EFM-TJJ Document 157 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, PREMIUM BEEF FEEDERS,
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GOVERNING EXPERT DISCOVERY
This is the sample expert discovery stipulation referenced at Section II(4(h(ii(d of the Guidelines on Best Practices for Litigating Cases Before the Court of Chancery. It should be modified to fit the
(Before a Refe REPORT OF REFEREE
(Before a Refe THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, ) 5M12, lll84m93, v, L85M69, lll84m90, L85M17, lll85m91, L85M92, lll85m46 WALTER F, MCQUADE, ) Supreme Court Case Respondent. No. 67,749 REPORT OF REFEREE I.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION - HOA CARLA BONTEN, SHIRLEY BARRICK, and
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION THE MARINA CLUB OF TAMPA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
Dulaney L. O Roark III Vice President & General Counsel, Southeast Region Legal Department 5055 North Point Parkway Alpharetta, Georgia 30022
Dulaney L. O Roark III Vice President & General Counsel, Southeast Region Legal Department 5055 North Point Parkway Alpharetta, Georgia 30022 Phone 678-259-1449 Fax 678-259-1589 [email protected] July
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Division of Insurance, Petitioner v. Lester Williams, Respondent. Docket No.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation DIVISION OF INSURANCE One South Station Boston, MA 02110-2208 (617) 521-7794 FAX (617) 521-7475 TTY/TDD (617) 521-7490 http://www.mass.gov/doi
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:12-cv-01996-TWT Document 15 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
1 1 [attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Defendant Mary Hinds Note: all names have been changed. Ted
AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM
CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement
CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement Please complete all fields on page 1 of the Solicitor Application and Agreement. Some general guidelines are set forth below.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Attached are the forms and instructions to form a Florida Limited Liability Company pursuant to Chapter 608, Florida Statutes. All information included
Recommended Chapter Title and Rule. Current Montana Chapter Title and Rule V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY
Current Montana Chapter Title and Rule V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY RULE 26. GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISCOVERY Recommended Chapter Title and Rule V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY RULE 26. GENERAL PROVISIONS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, v. KATHERINE HARRIS, as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, as Attorney General
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Wood Street Condominium Association, Inc.,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION LISA COINER, STEPHEN COINER, and JARED COINER, a minor under the age of 18 years, who sues by his father,
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC13-30 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES. [September 26, 2013] PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION SOUTH BAY CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Case 6:07-bk-00761-KSJ Doc 4110 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re: LOUIS J. PEARLMAN, et al. / Case No. 6:07-bk-00761-KSJ Chapter
Case 2:14-cv-02159-KHV-JPO Document 12 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:14-cv-02159-KHV-JPO Document 12 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KYLE ALEXANDER, and DYLAN SYMINGTON, on behalf of themselves and all those
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION THE PRESERVE AT LANSBROOK ASSOCIATION,
Case 1:13-cv-00586-AWI-SAB Document 41 Filed 02/20/14 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-00-awi-sab Document Filed 0// Page of 0 DALE L. ALLEN, JR., SBN KEVIN P. ALLEN, SBN 0 ALLEN, GLAESSNER & WERTH, LLP 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, California 0 Telephone: () -00
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC11-1542 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. PER CURIAM. [July 5, 2012] The Florida Bar s Civil Procedure Rules Committee (Committee)
Case 6:66-cv-06639-MV-WPL Document 9411-1 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 6:66-cv-06639-MV-WPL Document 9411-1 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. STATE ENGINEER, Plaintiff, v. R. LEE
RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
v. CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO.: 2006-CA-387-O HUMAN RELATIONS BOARD OF WRIT NO.: 06-05 THE CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA NORTHBRIDGE APARTMENT HOMES/ CONCORD MANAGEMENT LIMITED, Petitioner, CASE NO.: 2006-CA-386-O WRIT NO.: 06-04 v. CONSOLIDATED
U.S. Department of Justice. [Type text] United States Attorney Southern District of New York. February 9, 2016. By Electronic Mail
[Type text] U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew s Plaza New York, New York 10007 February 9, 2016 By Electronic
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE Proposed Recommendation No. 237 Proposed Amendment of Rule 3111.1 et seq. Governing Exemption from Levy and Attachment The Civil Procedural
$150.00 ($25 for Articles of Conversion and $125 for Articles of Organization)
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Attached is a form to convert an Other Business Entity into a Florida Limited Liability Company pursuant to section 605.1045, Florida Statutes. These
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery.
Published on Arkansas Judiciary (https://courts.arkansas.gov) Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery. (a) Discovery Methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS. Filing Fees: $105 ($35 Conversion Fee and $70 for Florida Profit Articles of Incorporation)
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS Attached is a form to convert an Other Business Entity into a Florida Profit Corporation pursuant to section 607.1115, Florida Statutes. These forms
Case 1:13-cv-23656-JJO Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:13-cv-23656-JJO Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 6 FRANCISCO RENE MARTY, SETH GOLDMAN, and FERNANDO MARQUET on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v.
RULE 26(a)(1) DISCLOSURES OF OPPOSER, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY
DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 5, COLORADO 109 8 th Street, Suite 104 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601-3361 EFILED Document CO Garfield County District Court 9th JD Filing Date: Feb 1 2012 1:30PM MST
ORDER I. COURT ADMINISTRATION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, BLOUNT COUNTY, TENNESSEE, DIVISIONS I AND II AND FOR THE CHANCERY COURT FOR BLOUNT COUNTY, TENNESSEE (BLOUNT COUNTY, CASES ONLY) ORDER PURSUANT TO
CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA KHASAN GRACE, individually and as parent and natural guardian of ANDREW MASON GRACE, a minor, Plaintiff, CIVIL DIVISION
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION The Waterview Towers Condominium Association,
15-30784-hcm Doc#81 Filed 06/13/15 Entered 06/13/15 16:35:54 Main Document Pg 1 of 12
15-30784-hcm Doc#81 Filed 06/13/15 Entered 06/13/15 16:35:54 Main Document Pg 1 of Louis R. Strubeck, Jr., (SBT 19425600 Elizabeth N. Boydston (SBT 24053684 NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 2200 Ross Avenue,
Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365
Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR RECALL ARBITRATION GLENEAGLES COMDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
Case 1:08-cv-05722-LTS-DCF Document 264 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : :
Case 108-cv-05722-LTS-DCF Document 264 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. ERISA LITIGATION II This Document
CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES
CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES Section 1. Authority. These Uniform County Board of Equalization Practice and Procedure Rules are promulgated by authority of
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF RULES OF COURT FOR THE COMMON PLEAS COURT PROBATE DIVISION ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO JUDGMENT ENTRY Pursuant to Superintendence
Case 8:15-bk-11311-MGW Doc 18 Filed 01/22/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:15-bk-11311-MGW Doc 18 Filed 01/22/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE: Case No.: 8:15-bk-11311-MGW Robert C. Hannan Chapter 7 DEBTORS.
Case 8:13-cv-01060-EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:13-cv-01060-EAK-TBM Document 14 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 49 SUZANNE RAWLINS, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION v. Case No.: 8:13-cv-1060-EAK-TBM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, v. Petitioner, KATHERINE HARRIS, as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, as Attorney General
How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Flat Fee From Being Charged In Florida
MICHAEL BARFIELD, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, Case No.: IMMEDIATE HEARING v. REQUESTED PURSUANT TO Fla. Stat. 119.11 (2009) BERNADETTE DIPINO,
May 23, 1996 AGO 96-039. Mr. James D. Palermo Tampa City Attorney 315 East Kennedy Boulevard Fifth Floor Tampa, Florida 33602. Dear Mr.
May 23, 1996 AGO 96-039 Mr. James D. Palermo Tampa City Attorney 315 East Kennedy Boulevard Fifth Floor Tampa, Florida 33602 Dear Mr. Palermo: You ask substantially the following question: Which value
ON REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF PETITIONERS, JAMIE BARDOL AND LORI BARDOL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC00-600 DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 4th DISTRICT NO. 98-2918 JAMIE BARDOL AND LORI BARDOL, v. MARY MARTIN, Petitioners, Respondent. / ON REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT
NOW COMES Defendant, Daniel W. Tuttle ( Mr. Tuttle ), by and through counsel, and
NORTH CAROLINA DAVIDSON COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 06 CVS 948 AZALEA GARDEN BOARD & CARE, INC., Plaintiff, v. MEREDITH DODSON VANHOY, Personal Representative of the
Case 1:14-mc-00190-P1 Document 28 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 5. Petitioner Franck Berlamont commenced the instant proceeding on
Case 1:14-mc-00190-P1 Document 28 Filed 08/04/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x In re Application of FRANCK BERLAMONT for
Case 4:12-cr-00141-WTM-GRS Document 153 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION
a / Case 4:12-cr-00141-WTM-GRS Document 153 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION minimum mandatory No 5K1.1 No 35(b)No Appeal Waiver No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF STATEWIDE ELECTRONIC FILING STANDARDS AND RULES. ADKT 404 ORDER ADOPTING NEVADA ELECTRONIC FILING RULES WHEREAS, this court
Read the attached order carefully. It applies to you and you will be responsible for complying with the order.
Read the attached order carefully. It applies to you and you will be responsible for complying with the order. Highlights No relocation of child(ren) page 4 Shared parenting and time sharing page 3 Parenting
PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process Generally, discovery is conducted freely by the parties without court intervention. Disclosure can be obtained through depositions, interrogatories,
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION BERMUDA CLUB MANAGEMENT COUNSEL, INC.,
(702) 388-6s77 (Fax) 388-6261
Case :08-cv-00-PMP-GWF Document 0 Filed 0/0/0 Page of Nevada State ar 000 RICHARD F. OULWARE Assistant E. onneville Ave, Suite 0 Las Vegas, Nevada 80 (70) 88-s77 (Fax) 88- Attomey for JAMES KIMSEY LTNITED
Rule 6 Adopted at a joint meeting of the District and County Court at Law Judges of Webb County on December 2, 2009
Rule 6 Adopted at a joint meeting of the District and County Court at Law Judges of Webb County on December 2, 2009 Committee Members Pete Garza Hugo Martinez Richard Gonzalez Fernando Sanchez Eduardo
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUTNY, WEST VIRGINIA (JUNE 2015 TRIAL GROUP)
PLAINTIFFS THOMAS R. WHELAN AND WILMA LEE WHELAN S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF JANICE M. SAVINIS Now comes the plaintiff, by counsel, Brian A. Prim, and moves the Court for an Order granting the
