COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO C

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1083-C"

Transcription

1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WORCESTER, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT CIVIL ACTION NO C ) PHILIPPE E. GUT AND GWEN PRATT GUT, ) on behalf of themselves and all ) others similarly situated, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) JOSEPH F. MACDONOUGH, ) JOHN L. CASAGRANDE, JAMES N. BALL, ) NELSON P. BALL, EDWARD S. BILZERIAN, ) NANCY M. CARLSON, ) DAVID E. CARLSTROM, ) BENJAMIN J. COLONERO, Jr., ) ROBERT A. KLUGMAN, ) JEFFREY B. LELAND, PAUL F. MCGRATH, ) CHARLOTTE C. SPINNEY, ) PHYLLIS A. STONE, JAMES E. TASHJIAN, ) WESTBOROUGH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ) WESTBOROUGH BANCORP MHC, ) THE WESTBOROUGH BANK, ) ASSABET VALLEY BANCORP, ) HUDSON SAVINGS BANK, and ) HUDWEST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ) Defendants. ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING TO: ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES WHO OWNED THE PUBLIC COMMON STOCK OF WESTBOROUGH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ON JUNE 22, 2007 (THE SETTLEMENT CLASS ). THIS NOTICE WAS SENT TO YOU BY ORDER OF THE COURT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF THIS CLASS ACTION AND, IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION AS TO YOUR RIGHTS CONCERNING THE SETTLEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. IF THE COURT APPROVES THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, YOU WILL BE FOREVER BARRED FROM CONTESTING THE FAIRNESS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OR FROM PURSUING THE SETTLED CLAIMS (DEFINED HEREIN). IF YOU HELD SHARES OF WESTBOROUGH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. STOCK FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER, PLEASE CONTACT THE SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR LISTED IN PARAGRAPH 34 OF THIS NOTICE IMMEDIATELY.

2 WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE? 1. This Notice relates to a proposed settlement (the Settlement ) of a class action lawsuit entitled Gut v. MacDonough, et al., Case No C., currently pending in the Trial Court of Massachusetts, Superior Court Department for the County of Worcester ( Worcester Superior Court ) (the Action ). The Action was filed by the Plaintiffs, Philippe E. Gut and Gwen Pratt Gut, on behalf of themselves and as representatives of the Class, against Defendants Joseph F. MacDonough, John L. Casagrande, James N. Ball, Nelson P. Ball, Edward S. Bilzerian, Nancy M. Carlson, David E. Carlstrom, Benjamin J. Colonero, Jr., Robert A. Klugman, Jeffrey B. Leland, Paul F. McGrath, Charlotte C. Spinney, Phyllis A. Stone, James E. Tashjian, Westborough Financial Services, Inc, Westborough Bancorp, MHC, The Westborough Bank, Assabet Valley Bancorp, Hudson Savings Bank and Hudwest Financial Services, Inc. (collectively, the Defendants ). The Plaintiffs and Defendants are referred to herein as the Parties. 2. This Notice describes the rights that you may have pursuant to the Settlement and what steps you may, but are not required to, take in relation to the Settlement. 3. This Notice also serves to inform you of the pendency and proposed settlement of the Action (the Settlement ), and the Court s conditional certification of a Settlement Class for purposes of the Settlement, and to notify you of a hearing to be held on March 26, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. before the Worcester Superior Court, 225 Main Street, Worcester, Massachusetts (the Settlement Hearing ) for the purpose of determining (i) whether the proposed Settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; (ii) whether the Settlement Class should be finally certified and whether the Settlement Class Representatives and the Settlement Class Counsel have adequately represented the interests of the Settlement Class with respect to the Action and the claims asserted therein; (iii) whether judgment should be entered pursuant to the Stipulation, inter alia, dismissing the Action with prejudice; and (iv) other matters relating to the proposed Settlement. WHY DID I GET THIS NOTICE? 4. In a class action, one or more people, called Class Representatives (in this case Philippe E. Gut and Gwen Pratt Gut), sue on behalf of people who have similar claims and have suffered damages. All these people are Class Members and collectively comprise a Class. One court, in this case the Worcester Superior Court in Worcester, Massachusetts, resolves the issues for all Class Members. The people who sued are called Plaintiffs, and the individuals and companies they sued are called the Defendants. 2

3 5. The Plaintiffs and other Class Members are all persons or entities who owned the public common stock of Westborough Financial Services, Inc. ( Westborough ) on June 22, 2007, the record date for the shareholder vote on the proposed merger of Westborough and Assabet Valley Bancorp. Excluded from the Class are all defendants named in this action, as well as: (a) the Individual Defendants, 1 the members of their immediate families, their legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns, and any entity in which they have or had a controlling interest; and (b) the Entity Defendants, 2 their officers, directors, corporators, trustees, affiliates, legal representatives, parents, subsidiaries, predecessors, successors or assigns, and any entity in which they have or had a controlling interest. 6. The Court sent you this Notice because, as a Class Member, you have a right to know about the proposed Settlement of the claims asserted in the Action and about your options before the Court determines whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, after objections and appeals are resolved, payments will be made pursuant to the terms of the Settlement. 7. This package explains the Action, the Settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible to receive them, and how to receive them. 8. The issuance of this Notice is not an expression of the Court s opinion on the merits of any claim in the Action, and the Court still has to decide whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, payments will be made after the Final Judgment is entered, all appeals, if any, are exhausted, and the processing of all claims is complete. Please be patient. WHAT IS THIS LAWSUIT ABOUT? 9. On November 13, 2006, the Westborough Board unanimously voted to approve a Merger Agreement with Assabet. The terms of the Merger Agreement provided that Westborough MHC, which owned 64.4% of the outstanding shares of Westborough, would merge into Assabet, with Assabet as the surviving entity. Similarly, the Westborough Bank would merge into Hudson Savings Bank. Finally, Westborough s minority shareholders would be cashed out at $35.00 per share and would not retain any interest in the newly merged Assabet entity. 10. On June 4, 2007, Plaintiffs filed their Verified Class Action Complaint, in which they alleged that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Westborough shareholders by approving the merger with Assabet and asked the Court to prevent the merger from being completed. The lawsuit claimed that the merger between Westborough Financial Services, Inc. and Assabet Valley Bancorp was the result of an unfair process that did not adequately protect the rights of Westborough s public shareholders. In part, Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants agreed to the merger with Assabet without adequately considering potential offers from other bidders which would have resulted in a higher 1 Individual Defendants include: Joseph F. MacDonough, John L. Casagrande, James N. Ball, Nelson P. Ball, Edward S. Bilzerian, Nancy M. Carlson, David E. Carlstrom, Benjamin J. Colonero, Jr., Robert A. Klugman, Jeffrey B. Leland, Paul F. McGrath, Charlotte C. Spinney, Phyllis A. Stone, and James E. Tashjian. 2 The Entity Defendants include: Westborough Financial Services, Inc., Westborough Bancorp MHC, The Westborough Bank, Assabet Valley Bancorp, Hudson Savings Bank and HudWest Financial Services, Inc. 3

4 payment per share to the shareholders because the merger with Assabet provided the greatest benefit to the Defendants. 11. Defendants answered the Complaint on June 29, 2007 in which they denied the claims made in Plaintiffs Class Action Complaint. 12. Plaintiffs were granted expedited discovery on June 12, 2007 to support their motion for a preliminary injunction to stop or enjoin the proposed merger. Counsel for Plaintiffs reviewed over 113,000 pages of documents related to the merger and conducted and/or defended 13 depositions of many individuals with knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the merger. Based on the facts learned through discovery, the parties prepared legal briefs on the issue of whether the Court should stop the merger or allow it to proceed. 13. The Court heard oral arguments on Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction on August 9, On August 14, 2007, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiffs motion to enjoin the merger. 15. The merger between Westborough and Assabet was completed on August 24, On October 19, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Class Certification which Defendants opposed on November 19, Plaintiffs then filed a Reply on December 6, 2007 and Defendants filed a Sur-Reply on January 3, The Motion for Class Certification was pending at the time the parties reached this settlement. 17. On July 31, 2008, the parties participated in a mediation before an impartial mediator. As a result of the mediation, the parties reached an agreement regarding the settlement of this action as set forth in the Stipulation. WHAT RECOVERY DOES THE SETTLEMENT PROVIDE? 18. The Settlement, which is described in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, will create a Settlement Fund to pay claims of all persons or entities who owned the public common stock of Westborough Financial Services, Inc. ( Westborough ) on June 22, 2007, the record date for the shareholder vote on the proposed merger of Westborough and Assabet Valley Bancorp (the Class ). The total value of the Settlement with the Defendants is $500,000 in cash, including damages, interest, attorneys fees and expenses. The Net Settlement Fund (the Settlement Fund less notice and administration costs, attorneys fees and litigation expenses awarded to Plaintiffs counsel by the Court) will be distributed to Class Members as follows: a. For all record shareholders who voted in favor of the merger between Westborough and Assabet, the recovery will be their pro rata share of 10% of the Net Settlement Fund; b. For all record shareholders who voted against the merger, formerly abstained from the vote, or did not return their proxy, the recovery will be their pro rata share of 90% of the Net Settlement Fund;. Shareholders whose shares were counted against the merger are entitled to greater recovery than those shareholders who voted in favor of the merger. This is because, under Massachusetts 4

5 caselaw, shareholders voting in favor of a corporate action in this case the merger have a limited ability to assert claims against the corporation for that action because they have acquiesced, or agreed, to the corporate action. In recognition of this, the claims of shareholders who voted in favor of the merger are not as strong as those voting against the merger and they are entitled to less compensation under this settlement agreement. WHY IS THERE A SETTLEMENT? 19. The Settlement resulted from arm s length negotiations among counsel for Plaintiffs and the Defendants as well as a mediation that was conducted before an impartial mediator on July 31, Detailed settlement discussions took place, which ultimately resulted in an agreement to settle the claims and forego further appeals, as memorialized in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement. 20. Under the proposed Settlement, the Court will not decide in favor of either the Plaintiffs or the Defendants. By agreeing to the Settlement, both the Plaintiffs and the Defendants avoid the costs and risks of protracted litigation and appeals, including the risk of reversal. Rather, by accepting the Settlement, Class Members will be compensated immediately after there is a Final Judgment. 21. The Defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing or the violation of any law. The Defendants believe there is a substantial basis for challenging the validity of the underlying findings in this matter. Plaintiffs continue to believe that the claims asserted in the Action have merit. Nevertheless, the Parties are entering into this Settlement, and foregoing appeal, to eliminate the burden, expense, and uncertainty of further litigation. Plaintiffs, aided by Class Counsel, have considered carefully the risks, burden and expense of further litigation and the inevitable difficulties and uncertainties of further litigation. Plaintiffs believe that the recovery contemplated by the Settlement provides an immediate benefit to Class Members that is superior to the risks of proceeding with the Action. Furthermore, after weighing these factors, Class Counsel has determined that the terms and conditions of this Settlement are fair, reasonable and adequate to Plaintiffs and the Class, and in their best interests. WHAT RIGHTS AM I GIVING UP UNDER THE SETTLEMENT? 22. If the Settlement is approved, the Court will enter a Final Judgment (the Judgment ). The Judgment will (i) dismiss the claims against the Defendants with prejudice; and (ii) provide that the Class Representatives and all other Class Members, shall, upon the settlement Effective Date (as defined in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement), be deemed to have and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally and forever released, waived, discharged and dismissed any and all Settled Plaintiffs and Defendants Claims (defined below) against the Released Plaintiff and Defendant Parties, as those persons are defined in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement. 23. Settled Plaintiffs Claims means any and all claims, rights or causes of action or liabilities whatsoever, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law or any other law, rule or regulation, including both known claims and Unknown Claims, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or any forum by the Class or any Class Member(s) as against the Released Defendants (a) arising out of or relating to the November 13, 2006 merger agreement between Westborough and Assabet Valley Bancorp and/or (b) arising out of or relating in any way to the institution, prosecution, defense, or settlement of the Action, except claims relating to the enforcement 5

6 of the settlement of the Action. 24. Settled Defendants Claims means any and all claims, rights or causes of action or liabilities whatsoever, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law or any other law, rule or regulation, including both known claims and Unknown Claims, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or any forum by the Released Defendants or any of them or the successors and assigns of any of them against the Released Plaintiffs or their attorneys, or any of their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns (a) arising out of or relating to the November 13, 2006 merger agreement between Westborough and Assabet Valley Bancorp and/or (b) arising out of or relating in any way to the institution, prosecution, defense, or settlement of the Action, except claims relating to the enforcement of the settlement of the Action. HOW WILL THE LAWYERS BE PAID? 25. To date, Class Counsel has not received any payment for their services in prosecuting the Action on behalf of the Class, nor have counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses. The fee requested by Class Counsel would compensate Plaintiffs counsel for their efforts in achieving the Settlement for the benefit of the Class and for their risk in undertaking this representation on a contingency basis. The fee requested is within the range of fees awarded to plaintiffs counsel under similar circumstances in litigation of this type. 26. At the Final Approval Hearing, Class Counsel will make an application for an award by the Court attorneys fees in an amount not to exceed 10% of the fund, and reimbursement of expenses in an amount not to exceed $75,000, excluding costs of notice and administration. The application for attorneys fees and reimbursement of expenses will be determined by the Court. All amounts awarded by the Court shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund. HOW DO I PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT? WHAT DO I NEED TO DO? 27. The Court has certified this Action as a class action for purposes of the Settlement only. If you owned the public common stock of Westborough Financial Services, Inc. on June 22, 2007, the record date for the shareholder vote on the proposed merger of Westborough and Assabet Valley Bancorp, then you are a Class Member. 28. As a Class Member you are represented by Plaintiffs and Class Counsel unless you enter an appearance through counsel of your own choice at your own expense. You are not required to retain your own counsel, but if you choose to do so, such counsel must file an appearance on your behalf and must serve copies of such appearance on the attorneys listed in the section entitled, When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? below. 29. If you object to the Settlement or any of its terms, or Class Counsel s application for attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses, you must present your objections to the Court and deliver a copy to counsel for the parties no later than March 19, 2009 in the manner and form set forth in the section entitled, When and Where Will the Court Decide Whether to Approve the Settlement? below. 30. If you do not object to the Settlement, you do not have to take any additional steps and 6

7 will receive your share of the Settlement if the Court grants final approval of the Settlement. WHEN AND WHERE WILL THE COURT DECIDE WHETHER TO APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT? DO I HAVE TO COME TO THE HEARING? MAY I SPEAK AT THE HEARING IF I DON T LIKE THE SETTLEMENT? If you do not wish to object to the proposed Settlement and/or the application for attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses, you need not attend the Settlement Fairness Hearing. 31. A SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE WORCESTER SUPERIOR COURT ON March 26, 2009, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 26 on the 4th floor, 225 Main Street, Worcester, MA Any Class Member may appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing and be heard on any of the matters to be considered at the Settlement Fairness Hearing; provided, however, that no such person shall be heard unless his or her objection or opposition is made in writing, is filed, together with copies of any supporting papers upon which he or she intends to rely and a sworn statement attesting to his or her status as a Class Member, with the Clerk s Office at 225 Main Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, seven days prior to the date of the Settlement Fairness Hearing, which is Thursday, March 19, 2009, and is served on the same day by hand or overnight delivery to each of the following: Counsel for Plaintiffs: BERMAN DEVALERIO PATRICK T. EGAN One Liberty Square Boston, MA Counsel for the Defendants: FOLEY HOAG LLP MATTHEW C. BALTAY Seaport World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts You may file an objection without having to appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing. Class Members who approve of the Settlement need not appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing or file any concurrence. 32. While attendance at the Settlement Fairness Hearing is not necessary, persons wishing to be heard orally in opposition to the approval of the Settlement and/or the request for attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses are required to indicate in their written objections their intention to appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing. Persons who intend to object to the Settlement and/or the application for an award of attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses, and desire to present evidence at the Settlement Fairness Hearing must include in their written objections the identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and any exhibits they may seek to introduce into evidence at the Settlement Fairness Hearing. 33. The Settlement Fairness Hearing may be delayed from time to time by the Court without further written notice to the Class. If you intend to attend the Settlement Fairness Hearing, you should confirm the date and time with Berman DeValerio. 7

8 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any Class Member who does not object in the manner described herein will be deemed to have waived any objection and shall be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the proposed Settlement and the application for attorneys fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses, and shall be bound by all the terms and provisions of the Stipulation and by all proceedings, orders and judgments in the Action. Class Members do not need to appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing or take any other action to indicate their approval. CAN I SEE THE COURT FILE? WHOM SHOULD I CONTACT IF I HAVE QUESTIONS? 34. This Notice contains only a summary of the terms of the proposed Settlement. For a more detailed statement of the matters involved in the Action, including copies of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, or any inquiries concerning this Notice, please contact, either: Counsel for Plaintiffs: BERMAN DEVALERIO Patrick T. Egan One Liberty Square Boston, MA Tel: Settlement Administrator: STRATEGIC CLAIMS SERVICES 600 North Jackson Street, Suite 3 Media, PA Tel: DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT OR THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE. Dated: January 8, 2009 By Order of the Clerk of the Court Worcester Superior Court 8

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION JAMES MAGIDSON and CHRISTOPHER MILLSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ERISA Action No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP

More information

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM United States District Court, District of Minnesota Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING A court

More information

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid money to Microsoft for an MSN account established in your name at a Best Buy store, never logged

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount

More information

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NCSPLUS

More information

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds.

SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO Lori Davis, Michelle Smith and Paul Stockman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public,

More information

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12 Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER

More information

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT Case 12-30885-hdh7 Doc 72 Filed 11/22/13 Entered 11/22/13 11:07:32 Page 15 of 27 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT ALL PERSONS WHO PAID MONEY FOR A MEMBERSHIP IN LULLY S, INC. d/b/a THE RIGHT

More information

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you paid an

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL The Superior Court has authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS

TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS This Notice Is Given To Inform You Of The Proposed Settlement Of A Class Action. If The Settlement Is Approved By The Court, Certain Benefits

More information

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT KELLY MINICH AND DEBBIE MINICH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego v. Plaintiffs, Case No.

More information

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT The Records of Trina Turk reflect that you may be part of the proposed FACTA and/or Song Beverly Settlement Classes described as follows: All individuals

More information

Case No. CV-08-00810 R NOTICE TO CLASS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case No. CV-08-00810 R NOTICE TO CLASS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN STETSON, SHANE LAVIGNE, CHRISTINE LEIGH BROWN-ROBERTS, VALENTIN YUI KARPENKO, and JAKE JEREMIAH FATHY, individually and on behalf of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP. : Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-01811-JOF : : This Document Relates To: : : Miller v. Anthony, et al.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044 If you purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded common

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO: All persons and entities which have paid the City of Ferndale (the City ) for water and sanitary sewage disposal services between January 22, 2008 and December

More information

IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY

IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY If you paid for food purchases between January 1, 2000 and August 1, 2014 at an Iowa-based prekindergarten, elementary school, middle school, or high school that,

More information

Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/15/2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF

More information

Case 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RICHARD MEYER and KATHLEEN LEONE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly

More information

Case 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

Case 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : : Case 111-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- 6/8/15 X In re SHENGDATECH,

More information

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE MARGERY ROBERTSON, et al., On Behalf of Themselves Master Case No. 793247 and All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated with 793468 and 795190

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STEVEN BABCOCK, on behalf of the Computer Management Sciences Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust, and himself and all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND LAKE COUNTY AND VICINITY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. GENOPTIX, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS If you are a current or former installation technician of Cable Communications, Inc. and worked in Oregon, please read this Notice carefully.

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1 1 In re LONGS DRUG STORES CORP. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Lead Case No. C-0-0 CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT

More information

This Notice applies to you if you have had a parking ticket issued at one of the MBTA s Honor Box Parking Lots.

This Notice applies to you if you have had a parking ticket issued at one of the MBTA s Honor Box Parking Lots. NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION PROVIDING RELIEF TO THOSE WITH UNPAID PARKING TICKETS ISSUED AT ONE OR MORE OF THE MBTA S HONOR BOX PARKING LOTS This Notice applies to you if you have had

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- In re WORLDSPACE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ---------------------------------------------------------------- x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING MYSPINE, PS, a Washington professional services corporation; BODY RECOVERY CLINIC LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; and YAROSLAV KUTSY, Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants, Nominal Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants, Nominal Defendant. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re ORACLE CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION SCOTT OZAKI, derivatively and on behalf of ORACLE CORPORATION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 2:03-cv-01500-KOB -TMP Document 1718 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 9 FILED 2010 Jul-26 PM 02:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) IMPORTANT: You are not being sued. Please read this Notice carefully.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are a current or former user of PayPal in the United States who had an active PayPal account between April 19, 2006 and November

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN RE MICROSTRATEGY INC. SECURITIES ) Civil Action No. 00-473-A LITIGATION ) ) TO: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: In re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA Litig., No. 2:08-cv-2192-SHM-dvk Case

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA X EUGENIA REBAR-TRICH and MICHAEL TRICH, and DAVID PENICH, Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL

More information

Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A Case 109-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x FORT WORTH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly

More information

Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10:100353-48 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL Document 437 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

More information

Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery.

Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x : IN RE: NEVSUN RESOURCES LTD. : Civil Action No. 12 Civ. 1845 (PGG) :

More information

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION,etal., Plaintiffs, v. WELLSFARGO&CO.,and WELLSFARGOBANK,N.A.,

More information

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing Minor, et al. v. Congoleum Corporation United States District Court District Of New Jersey Case No.: 3:13-cv-07727-PGS-LHG This is a Notice

More information

Case 8:13-cv-00662-GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 8:13-cv-00662-GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Case 8:13-cv-00662-GJH Document 71 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JAY CLOGG REALTY GROUP, INC., Plaintiff vs. BURGER KING CORPORATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-cv-00662

More information

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT

FINAL JUDGMENT BY CONSENT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. /3-6) 7W--1-1- 2-- ) TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE

More information

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P.

MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY. Appearing on behalf of the Named Plaintiff and the Class were attorneys Daniel P. ,5SEPV Wl0: 3ii /"'LCD JCOURT MONTANA EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CASCADE COUNTY Robert Jacobsen, -vs- Allstate Insurance Company, Plaintiff, Defendant. Cause No.: ADV-03-201(d) Final Order Approving

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT TO: All persons who are domiciled or reside in the United States or its territories and whose

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Roger Krueger, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 11-cv-2781 Judge Susan Richard Nelson NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION

More information

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you are or were employed by U.S. BANK, N.A. as an In-Store Banker 1, In-Store Banker 2, Senior In-Store Banker 1, and/or Senior In-Store Banker 2 at In-Store

More information

Case 2:06-cv-00532-FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:06-cv-00532-FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11 Case :0-cv-00-FCD-KJM Document 0 Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 EDMUND G. BROWN JR., State Bar No. 00 Attorney General of California PAUL REYNAGA, State Bar No. Supervising Deputy Attorney General ELIZABETH A.

More information

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE: STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT LITIGATION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE: STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE: STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT LITIGATION Richard M. Stuber, et al. v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, et al. Action No. BC244111

More information

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. A federal court authorized this

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Aliano et al. v. Templeton Rye Spirits, LLC, Case No. 2014-CH-15667 (Cir. Ct. Cook Cnty., Ill.) IF YOU PURCHASED TEMPLETON RYE WHISKEY FROM JANUARY 1, 2006 TO

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re MiMedx Group, Inc. Securities Litigation Civil Action No 1:13-cv-03074 Hon. Thomas W. Thrash CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS LAWSUIT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS LAWSUIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Bradley Y. Schorr and Lori A. Schorr, Individually, and on behalf

More information

Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All

More information

EXHIBIT A Proposed Notice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN You have been identified as a member of a class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may

More information

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

United States District Court for the Northern District of California United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased a Tour from Viator between October 16, 2008 and June 7, 2014 that Was Advertised as Discounted with No Text Describing

More information

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Clark v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Case No.: 3:13-cv-0485-JM-JMA Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action A settlement

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT IF YOU USED A CHECK PROVIDED BY CAPITAL ONE TO TRANSFER A BALANCE ON YOUR CAPITAL ONE CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT IN APRIL OR MAY 2009, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE LEON RASACHACK, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and ) Case No. 796083 All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, ) ) Assigned

More information

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If You Bought Mario Badescu Healing Cream or Control Cream At Any Time Since February 15, 2009 You Could Get One or Two $45 Certificates

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JULIO TARDIO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-cv-06619-JGK NEW ORIENTAL EDUCATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS THOMAS U. KENNEY, on Behalf of Himself and A Class of Persons Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 09-10750-DJC STATE STREET CORPORATION,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM G. MAYFIELD, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2009-CA-002245

More information

Notice of Class Action Settlement

Notice of Class Action Settlement IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION KOTA OF SARASOTA, INC. individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GLENN FREEDMAN, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-CV-2121 (LAK) WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Case :0-cv-0-DLR Document Filed 0// Page of 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Local Teamsters Pension and Welfare Funds, et al., v. Plaintiffs, Apollo Group Incorporated,

More information

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement A federal court authorized this notice. This

More information

~[PR~] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR CLASS NOTICE

~[PR~] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR CLASS NOTICE Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 103 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NCSPLUS

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE TOWER GROUP INTERNATIONAL, LTD. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 1:13-cv-5852-AT NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE JEFFERIES GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8059-CB NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. NATHAN J. BUXTON, GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ, LES L. UNGER and LOUIS RUBINS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Soutter v. Equifax Information Services, LLC Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-107

More information

Case: 1:13-cv-02115 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/12/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:662

Case: 1:13-cv-02115 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/12/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:662 Case: 1:13-cv-02115 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/12/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:662 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CORPORATION SECURITIES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CITY OF LAKELAND EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JOSEPH WHITE, Plaintiff, Case No. 00-C-13 88 v. Hon. J. P. Stadtmueller HEARTLAND HIGH-YIELD MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, et al. Defendants. AMENDED ORDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid a practice assessment to the American Psychological Association Practice Organization, you

More information

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned, occupied and/or resided within residential property located within the Class Addresses on June 5-6,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF SETTLEMENT OF ACTION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF SETTLEMENT OF ACTION IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHAILE STEINBERG, Derivatively on Behalf of CELGENE CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, MICHAEL D. CASEY, JAMES J. LOUGHLIN, RICHARD W. BARKER, CARRIE S. COX, MICHAEL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION TEAMSTERS LOCAL 617 PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. APOLLO GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

More information

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 13, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT.

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 23, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Grant Barfuss, et al, v. DGSE Companies, Inc., et al. No. 12 Civ. 3664 (JJB) ECF

More information

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Must be Postmarked No Later Than September 12, 2004 PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Claim Number: Control Number: The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims

More information

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION In the Matter of the Arbitration Between JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D., P.A., on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, Claimant, -v- AAA No.: 18 20 0202 0593 OXFORD

More information

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement:

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement: Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement If you subpoenaed or requested pharmacy records of another person from Rite Aid, and you were charged and paid a fixed, flat-fee $50 or $85 invoice for their

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Patricia Buzenes v. Nuvell Financial Services LLC, et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC407366 The Court ordered this Notice This is not a solicitation from a lawyer and You are not being

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED-CV-08-01249-GW(JCx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED-CV-08-01249-GW(JCx) CLASS ACTION MARCELO CUNHA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, HANSEN NATURAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN

More information

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: GENTIVA SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 10-CV-05064 (ADS)(SIL) ECF CASE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, FINAL

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB)

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB) PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT

More information

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 3:07-cv-01886-JAG-SCC Document 473 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO SAMUEL HILDENBRAND, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly

More information

CASE 0:99-md-01309-PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:99-md-01309-PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:99-md-01309-PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Lutheran Brotherhood Variable Insurance Products Company Sales Practices Litigation

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Anthony Abbott, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lockheed Martin Corp., et al., Defendants. Case No. 06-cv-701 Chief Judge Michael J. Reagan NOTICE OF CLASS

More information