Acute Hip Fracture Rehabilitation

Transcription

1 Acute Hip Fracture Rehabilitation Michelle Fitzgerald BSc, MSc, MISCP Senior Physiotherapist, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 4 th National Irish Hip Fracture Conference RCSI 18th November 2015

2 Mobilise with physio

3

4 Overview 1. Why mobility is important 2. The evidence base 3. Research study 4. The plan for 2016

5 Background Senior Physiotherapist, Tallaght Hospital MSc Neuromusculoskeletal Physiotherapy UCD Hip fracture research, audit & quality improvement National hip fracture steering group member Irish National Orthopaedic Register Global Fragility Fracture Network Clinical interest group orthopaedics (CPO, IPONG)

6 The Hip Attack 10% Die within a month Stretch Health System Hip Fractures 33% Die within a year 25% Long Term Care 50% Unable to walk unaided (British Orthopaedic Association 2007, Cummings and Melton., 2002, Department of Health 2013, Hall et al., 2000, Keen, 2003, McGowan et al., 2013)

7 What predicts mortality?

8 What predicts hip fracture mortality? Age Gender Medical fitness Comorbidities Cognition Etc Etc

9 Anything else?

10 What else predicts mortality? Early mobility

11 Early Mobility is Important Post-Op Long-Term Mobility Survival + Function (Boonen et al., 2004, Dubljanin-Raspopovic et al., 2013, Hirose et al., 2010)

12 Active Acute Rehabilitation Maximises recovery Successful discharge home Decreases length of stay Reduce overall cost (Laflamme et al 2012, Kristenson et al 2007, NICE 2010, Beaupre et al 2013, BOA 2010)

13 Rehabilitation of hip fractures is the central challenge for trauma services (British Orthopaedic Association 2007)

14 Review of Rehabilitation Amount of rehab varies widely in acute hospitals Confidence in rehabilitation progression More intense post-operative physio Barriers identified No data in Ireland Time for change (British Orthopaedic Association 2015, Health Service Executive, 2012, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2011, Ranhoff et al., 2010, Svensson et al., 1996, Thomas et al., 2007)

15 Time for Change in Ireland In order to get better we need to measure what we are currently doing. First step in effecting change: Add function specific data-fields to the IHFD Functional progress Rehabilitation service provision Effect of hospital approaches

16 Irish Hip Fracture Physio Working Group Irish Physiotherapy Hip Fracture Working Group Edel Callanan (Orthopaedic QCCD therapy lead) Dr C Blake & Dr C Cunningham (UCD) Michelle Fitzgerald (Senior Physiotherapist) ADPATE framework for guideline adaptation

17 Databases International Guidelines Direct Communication

18 (ANZHFR 2014, NICE 2011, Waddell 2011, SIGN 2009, BOA 2007) Care Standard Guideline Synopsis Physio assessment First postoperative day Frequency of mobilisation Daily (7days) Rehabilitation Early, MDT Discharge planning Early, MDT, individualised Type of physiotherapy Multidimensional

19 Standardised Outcome Measures Hip fracture mobility measures vary widely Feasible in clinical practice Valid and reliable Hip fracture population Predict outcome Comparison and research (Foss et al., 2006, Farag et al., 2012, Hollman et al., 2008, Laflamme et al., 2012, Kristensen et al., 2009b, Kristensen et al., 2007)

20 New Mobility Score NMS Category Score Functional ability 0 Not at all 1 Assistance of one person 2 With an aid 3 No difficulty/no aid Indoor walking, outdoor walking, shopping

21 New Mobility Score NMS Category Score Functional ability 0 Not at all 1 Assistance of one person 2 With an aid 3 No difficulty/no aid Overall Score: 0-9

22 Cumulated Ambulatory Score (CAS) CAS Category Score Functional Ability 0 Not at all 1 Assistance 1-2 people 2 Independent Bed mobility, STS, mobilisation

23 Cumulated Ambulatory Score (CAS) CAS Category Score Functional Ability 0 Not at all 1 Assistance 1-2 people 2 Independent Overall Score: 0-6

24 Predictors of Mobility Outcome at One Week Post Hip Fracture Surgery Michelle Fitzgerald 1, Blake, C 2. Askin, D 3. Coughlan, T 3. Quinlan, J 3. Cunningham, C 2. 1 Physiotherapy Department & Bone and Joint Unit 2, Tallaght Hospital 3 School Of Public Health, Physiotherapy & Population Science, UCD

25 What should we do? Optimise early mobility Influencing factors Rehabilitation Planning (Health Service Executive, 2012, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2011, Ranhoff et al., 2010, Svensson et al., 1996, Thomas et al., 2007)

26 Study Aim Identify independent predictors of mobility at one week post hip fracture surgery

27 Methods 6 month study period Prospective observational cohort study 77 patients included (age 77.4±10.2 years) Low trauma hip fractures Routine physiotherapy Chi-square, fischer exact, regression analysis

28 Data Collection Time-Points Day 1 Patient Demographics Fracture-Specific Characteristics Day 7 Mobility Outcome Measures Cumulated Ambulatory Score (CAS) Timed up and Go (TUG) Discharge Discharge Details

29 Age Sex Premorbid place of residence Demographics Fall location New Mobility Score

30 ASA Ability to stand day one Fracture- Specific Fracture Type Time to Surgery Operation

31 Data Collection Time-Points Day 1 Patient Demographics Fracture-Specific Characteristics Day 7 Mobility Outcome Measures Cumulated Ambulatory Score (CAS) Timed up and Go (TUG) Discharge Discharge Details

32 Results: One Week Postoperatively Mobility Outcome Result Median CAS score 3 Independent mobility 31% (n=24) Mean (SD) TUG 61.7 (±21.1) secs

33 Rehabilitation Needs Low functional ability Rehabilitation to achieve pre-morbid function Early stratification for rehabilitation pathways (Laflamme et al 2012, Kristenson et al 2007, NICE 2010, Beaupre et al 2013, BOA 2010)

34 Predictor variable Univariate analysis OR (CI) Multivariate analysis OR (CI) Fall Location Outdoor Indoor p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.042 ASA 2 3 p value ( ) p=0.039 Time to Surgery <36hours 36hours p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.041 NMS p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.043

35 Predictor variable Univariate analysis OR (CI) Multivariate analysis OR (CI) Fall Location Outdoor Indoor p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.042 ASA 2 3 p value ( ) p=0.039 Time to Surgery <36hours 36hours p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.041 NMS p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.043

36 Predictor variable Univariate analysis OR (CI) Multivariate analysis OR (CI) Fall Location Outdoor Indoor p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.042 ASA 2 3 p value ( ) p=0.039 Time to Surgery <36hours 36hours p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.041 NMS p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.043

37 Predictor variable Univariate analysis OR (CI) Multivariate analysis OR (CI) Fall Location Outdoor Indoor p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.042 ASA 2 3 p value ( ) p=0.039 Time to Surgery <36hours 36hours p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.041 NMS p value ( ) p= ( ) p=0.043

38 Total CAS Score at Day 7 Ability to stand day 1 (p=0.018) Age (p=0.018) Fall location (p=0.005) Premorbid place of residence (p=0.014) ASA (p=0.005) Time to surgery (p=0.002) NMS (p=0.002)

39 3 Predictors Prefracture function Clinical Implications Mobility Measures Modifiable variables

40 CAS & NMS Feasible clinical indicators for early rehabilitation planning

41 IHFD Rehabilitation Data-fields 2016 Baseline function First postoperative day Longer term Discharge

42 Baseline New Mobility Score (0-9 + individual sections) 1 st post-op Day Physio assessment (Yes/No) Mobilisation (Yes physio/yes other/no) Cumulated Ambulatory Score (0-6) Discharge Cumulated Ambulatory Score (0-6) 30day & 120 day New Mobility Score (0-9 + individual sections)

43 Guideline adherence Irish data Service provision Leading hip fracture care No extra work Ideal outcome measures

44 Guideline adherence Irish data Service provision Leading hip fracture care No extra work Ideal outcome measures

45 Exciting Times Ahead!! Advocate Site visits Future data-fields Encourage AHP reps

46 Acknowledgements National hip fracture steering group Physiotherapy hip fracture working group Integrated care pathway work to date by physios/ots

47 Thank You!

48 s (1) Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry (ANZHFR) Steering Group. Australian and New Zealand Guideline for Hip Fracture Care: Improving Outcomes in Hip Fracture Management of Adults Sydney British Orthopaedic Association (2007) The Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures. London, United Kingdom British Orthopaedic Association (2015) Getting it Right First Time Report: A national review of adult elective orthopaedic services in England. London, United Kingdom. Boonen, S. Autier, P. Barette, M. Vanderschueren, D. Lips, P. and Haentjens, P. (2004) 'Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective controlled study'. Osteoporos International, 15(2): Cummings, S. R. and Melton, L. J. (2002) 'Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures'. The Lancet, 359: Department of Health (2013) health Care Quality Indicators in the Irish Health System; Examining the Potential of Hospital Discharge Data using the Hospital Inpaitent Enquiry System. Available at (accessed on 21/04/2014)

49 s (2) Dubljanin-Raspopovic, E. Markovic-Denic, L. Marinkovic, J. Nedeljkovic, U. Bumbasirevic, M. (2013) Does Early Functional Outcome Predict 1-year Mortality in Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471: Foss, N. B. Kristensen, M. T. and Kehlet, H. (2006) 'Prediction of postoperative morbidity, mortality and rehabilitation in hip fracture patients: the cumulated ambulation score'. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20(8): Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh MC, Latreille J, Mlika-Cabanne N, Paquet L, Coulombe M, Poirier M, Burnand B. Adaptation of clinical guidelines: literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18(3): Fitzgerald M, Cunningham C. Prediction of mobility outcome at one week post hip fracture surgery. MSc Thesis 2014, UCD. Fitzgerald M, Askin D, Coughlan T, Quinlan J, Blake C, Cunningham C. Predicting mobility one week after hip fracture surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. Presented at the 3 rd Fragility Fracture Network Global Congress 2014; Madrid, Spain. Freter, SH and Fruchter, N. (2000) Relationship between timed 'up and go' and gait time in an elderly orthopaedic rehabilitation population. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14:

50 s (3) Green, C. Molony, D. Fitzpatrick, C. and O'Rourke, K. (2010) 'Age-specific incidence of hip fracture in the elderly: a healthy decline'. The Surgeon, Journal of the royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 8: Guccione, A. A. Fagerson, T. L. and Anderson, J. J. (1996) 'Regaining functional independence in the acute care setting following hip fracture'. Physical Therapy, 76(8): Hall, S. E. Williams, J. A. Senior, J. A. Goldswain, P. R. and Criddle, R. A. (2000) 'Hip fracture outcomes: quality of life and functional status in older adults living in the community'. Australian and New Zealand Medical Journal, 30(3): Kristensen M T, Bandholm T, Foss N B, Ekdahl C and Kehlet H. High intertester reliability of the new mobility score in patients with hip fracture. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40(7): Handoll, H. H. Cameron, I. D. Mak, J. C. and Finnegan, T. P. (2009) 'Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures'. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, (4):CD Health Service Executive (2012) National Service Plan Dublin, Ireland. Available at: (accessed 03 February 2013).

51 s (4) Hirose, J. Ide, J. Yakushiji, T. Abe, Y. Nishida, K. Maeda, S. Anraku, Y. Usuku, K. and Mizuta, H. (2010) 'Prediction of postoperative ambulatory status 1 year after hip fracture surgery'. Archives of Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 91: Hollman, J. H., Beckman, B. A., et al. (2008). "Minimum detectable change in gait velocity during acute rehabilitation following hip fracture." J Geriatr Phys Ther 31(2): Keen, R. W. (2003) 'Burden of osteoporosis and fractures', Current Osteoporosis Reports. 1(2): Kristensen, M. T. Bandholm, T. Bencke, J. Ekdahl, C. and Kehlet, H. (2009a) 'Knee-extension strength, postural control and function are related to fracture type and thigh edema in patients with hip fracture'. Clinical Biomechanics, Kristensen M T, Foss N B, Ekdahl C and Kehlet H. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(3): Kristensen M T, Bandholm T, Foss N B, Ekdahl C and Kehlet H. High intertester reliability of the new mobility score in patients with hip fracture. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40(7):

52 s (5) Kristensen, M. T. Foss, N. B. and Kehlet, H. (2007) 'Timed "up & go" test as a predictor of falls within 6 months after hip fracture surgery'. Physical Therapy, Kristensen, M. T. Foss, N. B. and Kehlet, H. (2009b) 'Factors with independent influence on the 'timed up and go' test in patients with hip fracture', Physiotherapy Research International.14(1): Kristensen, M. T. Jakobsen, T. L. Nielsen, J. W. Jorgensen, L. M. Nienhuis, R. J. and Jonsson, L. R. (2012) 'Cumulated Ambulation Score to evaluate mobility is feasible in geriatric patients and in patients with hip fracture'. Danish Medical Bulletin,July:1-5. Laflamme, G. Y. Rouleau, D. M. Leduc, S. Roy, L. and Beaumont, E. (2012) 'The Timed Up and Go test is an early predictor of functional outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture' Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery America, Latham, N., Mehta, V., et al. (2008). "Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients?" Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 89(11): McGowan, B. Casey, M. C. Silke, C. Whelan, B. and Bennett, K. (2013) 'Hospitalisations for fracture and associated costs between 2000 and 2009 in Ireland: a trend analysis'. Osteoporosis International, 24(3):

53 s (6) Michel, J. P. Klopfenstein, C. Hoffmeyer, P. Stern, R. and Grab, B. (2002) 'Hip fracture surgery: is the pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score a predictor of functional outcome?', Ageing Clincial and Experimental Research. 14(5): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) The management of hip fractures in adults [CG124]. London. National Office of Clincial Audit (NOCA). Irish Hip Fractre Database Preliminary Report 2013; Dublin, Ireland. Accessed % pdf on 2 nd October Parker M J and Palmer C R. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75(5): Parker, M. J. and Palmer, C. R. (1995) 'Prediction of rehabilitation after hip fracture', Age and Ageing, 24(2): Podsiadlo, D. and Richardson, S. (1991) The Timed Up & Go: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 39:

54 s (7) Ranhoff, A. H. Holvik, K. Martinsen, M. I. Domaas, K. and Solheim, L. F. (2010) 'Older hip fracture patients: three groups with different needs'. BMC Geriatrics, 10(65):1-7 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of hip fracture in older people: a natioanl clinical guidline Edinburgh Svensson, O. Stromberg, L. Ohlen, G. and Lindgren, U. (1996) 'Prediction of the outcome after hip fracture in elderly patients', Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Britian, 78(1): Thomas, S. Mackintosh, S. and Halbert, J. (2011) 'Determining current physical therapist management of hip fracture in an acute care hospital and physical therapists' rationale for this management'. Physical Therapy, 91(10): Waddell J. National Hip Fracture Toolkit 2011; accessed on 24 November 2014