WEST OF THE BOULEVARD DESIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT BACKGROUND AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
|
|
|
- Merilyn Cole
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WEST OF THE BOULEVARD DESIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT BACKGROUND AND DESIGN GUIDELINES ADOPTED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 9, 1996 PREPARED BY THE WEST OF THE BOULEVARD CIVIC ASSOCIATION
2
3 Resolution of the Richmond City Planning Commission Adopting Design Guidelines for the West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District December 9, 1996 WHEREAS, the Richmond City Planning Commission and the Urban Design Committee are charged with the responsibility of adopting design guidelines for particular Design Overlay Districts, as set forth in the Charter of the City of Richmond, Sec (a1); and WHEREAS, the proposed design guidelines for the proposed West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District were developed by residents of the proposed District for the specific purpose of preventing new building construction which is incompatible with the prevailing unique architectural characteristics found within the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the residents and property owners within the proposed West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District have had numerous opportunities to express their views and contribute to the drafting of these design guidelines, and the views expressed and suggestions put forth by residents and property owners were instrumental in developing these proposed design guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Urban Design Committee has reviewed and unanimously recommended approval of the proposed design guidelines for the West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District in a resolution of support dated October 14, 1996; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has held a public hearing on the proposed design guidelines and has taken into consideration any comments received at the hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Richmond City Planning Commission hereby adopts the design guidelines included in the West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Proposal, effective upon City Council approval of the West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District. Chairman Secretary
4 The following document was created in 2006 from copies of documents produced by the West of the Boulevard Civic Association, in 1995 and The West of the Boulevard Civic Association changed it name to the Museum District Association on October 13, Public access to an electronic version of the Guidelines was felt to be desirable, and is now available on the City web site, RichmondGov.com. Minor format changes have been made and the district map is from an ArcView map created at this time. 2/03/06
5 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Page 1 Background and Design Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Justification Page 2 2. Goals Page 3 3. Neighborhood Description Page 4 4. Inventory Page 6 5. Map Page 7 6. Design Guidelines Page 8 7. Statement of Neighborhood Support Page Neighborhood Activities Page 14 Appendix A - Samples of Neighborhood Architectural Styles Appendix B - District Map
6 Page 2 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Background and Design Guidelines JUSTIFICATION The West of the Boulevard Historic District is one of the most well preserved examples of early 20th century suburbs in Richmond. This District figures prominently in the historical development of Richmond and was placed on the National Register for Historic Places in 1994 as a registered Historic District. The district is made up predominately of single family and duplex dwellings intermixed with small apartment buildings and small commercial buildings. The variety of architectural styles in the area include Tudor Revival, Colonial Revival, Romanesque Revival, Mediterranean Revival, Queen Anne and Craftsman. Recent infill buildings have not matched the unique architectural fabric existing within the neighborhood. The risk of future non-compatible buildings and features threatens to destroy the unique character of this Historic District.
7 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Page 3 Background and Design Guidelines GOALS Our goal is to preserve the unique architectural fabric and character of this Historic District by adopting a Design Overlay District establishing guidelines for new construction in Residential Zoning Districts. These guidelines will assure all new residential structures blend appropriately with the historic buildings and thus: 1. Preserve the unique architectural fabric; 2. Promote a sense of pride among property owners resulting in improved building and land maintenance; 3. Protect property values and the City tax base; and 4. Present a positive appearance appealing to new residents as a desirable place to live and work.
8 Page 4 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Background and Design Guidelines NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Unique Established Neighborhood Character* In 1893, the West End Land Company was the first to engage in large scale suburban planning by developing the West of the Boulevard area. Streetcars were the form of urban transportation first sparking the growth of the West of the Boulevard neighborhood and then shaping its development. Initially, this development followed Floyd Avenue and subsequently along Belmont Avenue. One of Richmond s most significant collections of early 20th century architecture, the district features compact clusters of brick rowhouses, detached townhouses, apartment buildings, small commercial structures, three churches, a synagogue, and five schools. These buildings represent a panoply of architectural styles: Queen Anne, Romanesque Revival, Colonial Revival, Craftsman, Mediterranean Revival, and Tudor Revival. The District includes 22 properties individually listed on the National Register for Historic Places and 1763 contributing members of the West of the Boulevard Historic District, including 6 carriage houses, 340 garages and outbuildings. The dense population of the neighborhood, close proximity to a shopping district and sidewalks with mature shade trees help define the West of the Boulevard as a flourishing pedestrian district. *Excerpt from Richard Mercer s West of the Boulevard Exhibition at the Virginia Historical Society, 1995 Architectural Coherence and Harmony The West of the Boulevard District has architectural significance as a well-preserved collection of residential, commercial, ecclesiastical, and educational buildings dating from c to the mid 1940 s. The District s buildings not only convey a uniformity in scale, materials, setback, and detail, but they also represent a rich variety of architectural styles of the era. As one of Richmond s most popular early 20th century neighborhoods, the West of the Boulevard District is also significant as an early example of planned community development of a middle-class streetcar suburb closely linked with Richmond s westward expansion.
9 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Page 5 Background and Design Guidelines Vulnerability To Deterioration Each block within the District has the unique qualities of scale, uniform setback, building proportion, and the uninterrupted rhythm of the streetscape. The combination of these blocks into a single neighborhood creates the distinct urban fabric of the West of the Boulevard Historic District. Much of the recent new construction has disregarded the qualities found within the District. These contemporary buildings lack the appropriate scale, proportion, and detail which make new construction compatible with the historic structures. These non-compatible infills diminish the overall cohesiveness of the neighborhood. Future insensitive and non-compatible infill buildings threaten the streetscape and integrity of the District as a whole. The Design Overlay District Guidelines will guide the design of distinguishing architectural elements of new construction. By following these guidelines, new construction can fit harmoniously within the existing context thus helping the maintain the integrity of the entire District.
10 Page 6 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Background and Design Guidelines INVENTORY Numerous styles of the early 20th Century work together to create the character which is the West of the Boulevard Historic District. The Appendix A shows samples of each residential style found within the District. A complete and detailed inventory of each of the 1763 contributing members of the West of the Boulevard Historic District can be found in the National Register for Historic Places nomination form.
11 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Page 7 Background and Design Guidelines MAP The boundaries for the West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District include the area designated as the West of the Boulevard Historic District as listed on the National Register for Historic Places. Additionally, the Overlay District includes the areas designated on the National Register s Monument Avenue Historic District but not included in the City s Monument Avenue Old and Historic District. The area designated as the Monument Avenue Old and Historic District by the City of Richmond is excluded from the Overlay District since this area is under the control the City s more restrictive Old & Historic Overlay District zoning. Only properties zoned for residential use within the district will be affected by the guidelines. Properties in non-residential zoned areas, such zoned B-1 and B-2, will not be subject to these guidelines. See Appendix B for a map.
12 Page 8 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Background and Design Guidelines DESIGN GUIDELINES These guidelines were developed to guide the distinguishing architectural elements of new residential construction, including garages and outbuildings. The purpose of these guidelines is to prevent new residential construction which is incompatible with the prevailing architectural characteristics found within the District. The following guidelines are in addition to all prevailing laws and are in no way to be construed to supersede existing building codes or zoning ordinances. In developing these guidelines, the characteristics of the contributing members of the West of the Boulevard Historic District were carefully considered. Through a visual survey, 9 prominent building features which most effectively characterize and define the District were identified. The street facade has the greatest impact on the District, therefore, the guidelines only affect the street facades. The 9 features are: Height of Cornice Front Setback Building Material First Floor Elevation (height above ground) Front Porch Width of Building Roof Form Fenestrations Front Door Additionally, should a residential building be destroyed (i.e. by fire), a new building with a facade matching the historic building should automatically be allowed. Buildings within the District vary greatly. These guidelines attempt to distinguish the most prominent aspect found of each feature. For each guideline, there may be an existing exception. The goal of the guidelines is to define the characteristics based on the majority of buildings. It is important to allow a range within each characteristic for new construction allowing for the individuality of each new building. How guidelines relate to the inventory characteristics is indicated in italics following each guideline.
13 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Page 9 Background and Design Guidelines Definitions 1. Contributing Member - A building identified as a Contributing Member to the West of the Boulevard Historic District or the Monument Avenue Historic District on the nomination form for the National Register for Historic Places. 2. Cornice - A projecting ornamental molding at the top of the exterior wall and below the roof. 3. Street Facade - The face or elevation of a building adjacent to a street. 4. Front Facade - The primary face or elevation of a building facing the primary street adjacent to the lot. 5. Grade - Ground level at the exterior wall of the building. 6. Fenestrations - Windows and other exterior openings on a building. Guidelines 1. If a Contributing Member is destroyed, a building with Street Facade(s) matching the Street Facade(s) of the destroyed Contributing Member will be acceptable. The purpose of these Guidelines is to maintain continuity between existing Contributing Members and new construction, therefore, matching the facade of an existing contributing member is, by definition, acceptable. 2. Height of Cornice - Top of Cornice shall be: a. Where the new building is within 30 feet of a Contributing Member on one side only, the Top of Cornice shall match that of the adjacent Contributing Member. b. Where the new building is within 30 feet of Contributing Members on two sides, the Top of the Cornice shall not be higher than the top of the higher cornice of the adjacent Contributing Members and shall not be lower than the top of the lower cornice of the adjacent Contributing Members. c. Where the new building is not within 30 feet of a Contributing Member, the Top of the Cornice shall be no less than 23 feet above grade and no greater than 30 feet above grade.
14 Page 10 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Background and Design Guidelines d. Under no circumstance shall the Top of the Cornice be greater than 30 feet above grade. Continuity of Cornice lines within a block, or segment of a block, is a defining characteristic of scale within the District. By defining the height of a cornice based on adjacent Contributing Members, this continuity is maintained. Where an adjacent Contributing Member is not available or a unique situation exists making a match impractical, 23 ft. and 30 ft. is established as a minimum and maximum cornice height. 23 and 30 feet represent an average minimum and maximum height, respectively, throughout the District as well as realistic height based on contemporary construction techniques and standard materials. 3. Width of the building - The width of the Front Facade shall be: a. For lot widths of 30 feet or less, the width of the building shall be greatest allowed by the Zoning Ordinance (minimum side setbacks maintained). b. For lot widths greater than 30 feet, building width shall be not less than 20 feet and not greater than 30 feet. A defining feature of the District is compact clusters of rowhouses and detached townhouses. The building width is a distinctive feature of a row or townhouse. 20 and 30 feet represent an average minimum and maximum building width, respectively, throughout the District. 4. Front Setback - The setback of the Front Facade, excluding front porches, shall match a contributing member on an adjacent side, but not be less than allowable by the Zoning Ordinance. Continuity of building setbacks within a block, or block segment, is a defining characteristic within the district. By defining the front setback of the main building mass based on adjacent Contributing Members, this continuity is maintained. 5. The Front Facade shall have a pitched main building roof visible from the street. Flat main building roofs visible on the Front Facade shall not be allowed. The roof form is a defining feature of any structure, particularly within this District. The vast majority of Contributing Members have a pitched roof above the cornice visible from the street. 6. The prominent building material on a Street Facade(s) shall be standard size brick, horizontal siding, or stucco. The main exterior building material is a defining feature of any structure, particularly with this District. Brick, horizontal siding and stucco are the most prominent building materials found throughout the District.
15 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Page 11 Background and Design Guidelines 7. Fenestrations - Fenestrations of the Front Facade shall conform to: a. No sliding glass doors or windows. b. First and second floor windows shall not be less than 15 square feet each, rough frame size. c. Head height, top of window, of first and second floor windows shall be not less than 7-6 above finish floor. d. One decorative/accent window less than 15 square feet shall be allowed. e. Windows, except decorative/accent windows, shall have operational sashes. The proportion of the fenestrations to the building is a defining feature throughout the district. Maintaining minimum fenestration sizes and head heights ensures proper proportion with building height and width (defined above) consistent with buildings throughout the District. 8. First Floor Elevation - First floor finish elevation shall be: a. Where the new building is within 30 feet of Contributing Members on one or two sides, the floor elevation shall match one adjacent Contributing Member. b. Where the new building is not within 30 feet of a Contributing Member, the first floor elevation shall be minimum 2-6 above grade. Continuity of first floor elevations within a block, or segment of a block, is a defining characteristic of scale within the District. By defining the first floor elevation based on adjacent Contributing Members, this continuity is maintained. Where an adjacent Contributing Member is not available or a unique situation exists making a match impractical, 2-6 is established as a minimum height above grade. The first floor of Contributing Members throughout the District is raised above grade a minimum of 2-6. This height is also realistic based on contemporary construction techniques and the potential need for handicap access. 9. Front Door - The main entrance (front) door shall face the street and be in the Front Facade. The entrance sequence from the street into a building throughout the District is: street, sidewalk, small yard with walkway. porch or stoop, front door. Locating the front door in the Front Facade facing the street, this sequence is preserved.
16 Page 12 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Background and Design Guidelines 10. Front Porches - Front porches on the Front Facade are not required. However, if a front porch is provided: a. No treated lumber shall be visible. b. Porch columns shall have a minimum size of 8 wide x 8 deep or 8 diameter. c. Top of Porch Cornice: 1) Where the new building is within 30 feet of a Contributing Member on one side only, the Top of Porch Cornice shall match that of the adjacent Contributing Member. 2) Where the new building is within 30 feet of Contributing Members on two sides, the Top of Porch Cornice shall be no higher than the top of the higher cornice of the adjacent Contributing Members and not lower than the top of the lower cornice of the adjacent Contributing Members. Front porches, or evidence of an original front porch, is consistently found throughout the District. The materials, height and column size define the character and proportion of the porch in relationship to the adjacent Contributing Members. Cornice height guidelines are defined in a similar fashion to Guideline #2. Column width is established to maintain proper proportion and scale consistent to existing porches within the District. Although material of porches throughout the District varies, visible treated lumber is a contemporary material incompatible with the historic materials of the District. 11. Where a garage or accessory building faces a street, the prominent building material on a Street Facade(s) of a garage or accessory building shall be standard size brick, horizontal siding, or stucco. The main exterior building material is a defining feature of any structure, particularly with this District. Brick, horizontal siding and stucco are the most prominent building materials found throughout the District. - End of Guidelines -
17 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Page 13 Background and Design Guidelines STATEMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT Neighborhood support for the Design Overlay District as expressed through the West of the Boulevard Civic Association has been strong and continuing. The Board directed the Zoning/Land Use Committee to design and implement a Design Overlay District in the spring of 1994, following the granting of the National Register Historic Designation, and has supported the Committee s work with enthusiasm. Neighborhood residents have shown support for the Design Overlay District at the Virginia Historical Society Exhibit on the history of the area, at the Belmont Library exhibit and during a informational meeting held at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts on March 4, No negative comment have been received by the Committee, either in person or as a result of requesting comments to the WOBCA mailing address at the Historical Society or Belmont Library exhibits. A list of buildable vacant lots was compiled by WOBCA members with the help of City staff. All property owners of buildable lots within the District were mailed the attached letter, first class mail, informing them of our intentions and inviting them to the informational meeting. Additionally, City Council members of the 1st, 2nd and 5th Districts, the City Manager, the Mayor and Department of Community Development Staff were given draft copies of the DOD proposal along with an invitation to attend this meeting. The meeting was publicized at the Belmont Library and through the WOBCA newsletter with a circulation of 5,000. The information meeting was conducted by WOBCA members Barbara Rose, Jonathan Spodek and Steve Kadar. The developmental history of these guidelines and a detailed discussion of each guideline were presented. Kathryn Farmer, Senior Planner for the City of Richmond, discussed the process the City is proposing for implementation of Design Overlay Districts. The group discussion and response following the presentation was overwhelmingly positive. The attached surveys were distributed at the March 4th meeting. The surveys returned at the meeting and subsequently by mail, indicate a 95% support rate for the guidelines. 60% of the respondents reported either owning a vacant lot or living on a block where there is a vacant lot. The reasons given for favoring the DOD were of two sorts: To protect property values and To maintain and protect the architectural integrity of the neighborhood. Usually the respondents mentioned both factors in their responses. To most, this meant maintaining the old style of architecture. In addition, one person wrote, If I want to be around ugly housing, I ll move back to the suburbs. The non-positive response neither indicated support or opposition to the DOD. They simply favored a less restrictive guidelines.
18 Page 14 West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District Background and Design Guidelines NEIGHBORHOOD ACTIVITIES This Design Overlay District proposal was developed solely by volunteers made up of residents of the proposed District. The residents and property owners of the District have been given numerous opportunities to express their views and contribute to the planning process for the Design Overlay District. The views expressed and suggestions put forth were instrumental in developing the goals and guidelines of this Design Overlay District. Initially, a display regarding the Design Overlay District was located during a reception for the WOBCA at the Virginia Historical Society in February 1995 held in conjunction with an exhibit on the history with the West of the Boulevard Historic District. The display was staffed by volunteers explaining the purpose and goals of the Design Overlay District. The presentation boards were again displayed at the Belmont Branch of the Richmond Public Library in May These boards outline the basic goals of the Design Overlay District. Through the use of photographs and architectural sketches, examples of appropriate and inappropriate new construction were illustrated. A second display was set up at the Belmont Library in February and continues at this time. The West of the Boulevard Civic Association Newsletter, with a circulation of 5,000, has carried extensive coverage of the development of the Design District Overlay process. The March issued summarized the Design District Overlay goals and guidelines. Through a network of diligent volunteers, the Newsletter is distributed to all households within the West of the Boulevard Civic Association boundaries, which encompass the proposed boundaries of the Design Overlay District. The information meeting was conducted by WOBCA members Barbara Rose, Jonathan Spodek and Steve Kadar. The developmental history of these guidelines and a detailed discussion of each guideline were presented. Kathryn Farmer, Senior Planner for the City of Richmond, discussed the process the City is proposing for implementation of Design Overlay Districts. The group discussion and response following the presentation was overwhelmingly positive.
19 Appendix A 3125 & 3127 Stuart Avenue 3125 Stuart Avenue: Rowhouse, Craftsman, Ca Brick (9-course American); 2 stories with low basement; hipped roof with a parapet (slate); 2 asymmetrical front bays; 1-story, 1-level, 1-bay wood, brick, & concrete porch with square wood columns Stuart Avenue: Rowhouse, Craftsman, Ca Brick (9-course American); 2 stories with low basement; hipped roof with a parapet (slate); 2 asymmetrical front bays; 1-story, 1-level, 1-bay wood, brick, & concrete porch with square wood columns.
20 Appendix A 3323 & 3325 Stuart Avenue 3323 Stuart Avenue: Rowhouse, Craftsman, ca Brick (English); 2-1/2 stories with single shed dormer; false mansard roof (slate); 3 asymmetrical front bays; 1-story, 2-bay wood and brick porch with round Doric columns, square wooden balustrade and brick pier foundation Stuart Avenue: Rowhouse, Colonial Revival, ca Brick (English) 2-1/2 stories with double pedimented gable dormers; false mansard roof (slate); 3 asymmetrical front bays; 1-story, 2-bay wood and brick porch with round Doric columns, and square wooden balustrade.
21 Appendix A 3220 Stuart Avenue 3220 Stuart Avenue: Rowhouse, Colonial Revival, Ca Brick (stretcher); 2 1/2 stories with 1 gable dormer and 1 shed dormer; false mansard roof (glazed pan tile); 3 asymmetrical front bays; 1-story, 1-level, 1-bay wood and brick porch with square wooden columns atop brick piers.
22 Appendix A 2821 Floyd Avenue 2821 Floyd Avenue: Detached dwelling, Romanesque Revival, ca Brick (stretcher); 2 stories: tile mansard roof; 4 front bays; asymmetrical; 1-story, 1-level, 1-bay porch with square stone columns, brick-arched opening with stone keystone, brick spandrels, and stone quoins; second story balcony with double-arched brick and stone motif and stone balustrade; decorative stone cornice; corner, square, 2 story tower with 2-stage pyramidal roof; stone quoins and belt courses.
23 Appendix A 2904 Floyd Avenue 2904 Floyd Avenue: Detached dwelling, Romanesque Revival, Brick (stretcher) 2 stories; slate mansard roof with asymmetrical front gables and projecting hipped section; 5 front bays, asymmetrical; 1-story, 1-level, 1-bay entrance porch with brick and stone arched opening and stone balustrade above; round-arched second story windows; decorative brick cornice; gables flanked by brick pinnacles. Architect: D. Wiley Anderson.
24 Appendix A 3500 & 3502 Hanover Avenue 3500 Hanover Avenue: Rowhouse, Tudor Revival, Brick (English) and stucco on 2nd story; 2 stories; gable roof with an asymmetrical clipped gable (slate): 2 asymmetrical front bays; 1-story, 2-bay wood, brick, & concrete porch with square columns; built by Muhleman and Kayhoe Hanover Avenue: Rowhouse, Tudor Revival, Brick (English) and stucco on 2nd story; 11/2 stories; clipped end gable roof (slate); 1 front gable dormer; 2 asymmetrical front bays; 1-story, 1-level, 2-bay porch with square brick columns; casement windows; built by Muhleman & Kayhoe.
25 Appendix A 3521 Grove Avenue 3521 Grove Avenue: Detached dwelling, Tudor Revival, Brick (6-course American); 2 stories; 2-front bays; slate gable roof with asymmetrical front gables; 1-story, 2-bay porch; leaded casement windows; built by Muhleman & Kayhoe.
26 Appendix A 3523 Grove Avenue 3523 Grove Avenue: Detached dwelling, Spanish Colonial Revival, Brick and stucco; 2 stories; 2 front bays; pan tile gable roof; 1-story, 3-bay porch; exterior brick chimney; built by Muhleman & Kayhoe.
27 Appendix A 305 Roseneath Road 305 Roseneath Road: Detached dwelling, Spanish Colonial Revival, Ca Brick (stuccoed); 2-stories; 3-front bays; pan tile gable roof with a central front gable; 1-story, 3-bay porch with arched bays and rondels.
28 Appendix A 3143 Grove Avenue 3143 Grove Avenue: Detached dwelling, Queen Anne, Ca Brick (stretcher); 2-1/2 stories with square tower; cross gable roof (standing seam metal); 4 front bays; 1- story, 7-bay wrap-a-round porch with Corinthian columns and turned wooden balustrade; 2/2 double hung windows with decorative trim and pediments.
29 Appendix A 102 North Sheppard Street 102 North Sheppard Street: Detached dwelling, Queen Anne, Ca Brick (stretcher); slate cross gable roof with a pyramidal-roofed side tower; 2 stories; 3 front bays; 1-story, 1-bay entrance porch with bracketed turned posts, and a spindle frieze; large corbelled interior brick chimney.
30
31 Appendix B Proposed West of the Boulevard Design Overlay District W FRANKLIN ST PARK AVE REVEILLE ST W CARY ST KENT ROAD N HAMILTON ST I 195 N THOMPSON ST N NANSEMOND ST PATTERSON AVE STUART AVE HANOVER AVE GRAYLAND AVE DOWNTOWN EXPY I 195 N CRENSHAW AVE N DOOLEY AVE N AUBURN AVE PARKWOOD AVE MCCLOY ST WYTHE AVE TILDEN ST FLOYD AVE ELLWOOD AVE ROSENEATH ROAD PARK AVE MONUMENT AVE KENSINGTON AVE N CLEVELAND ST N BELMONT AVE N SHEPPARD ST CUTSHAW AVE N TILDEN ST N COLONIAL AVE W MARSHALL ST W BROAD ST W BROAD ST W GRACE ST HANOVER AVE GROVE AVE N BOULEVARD HIGH POINT AVE WAYNE ST MONUMENT AVE PATTERSON AVE N MULBERRY ST N BOULEVARD W CLAY ST N ROBINSON ST W LEIGH ST STUART AVE N DAVIS AVE
32
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Planning and Development Department, Neighborhood Services
Owner: Midas Equity, LLC. Applicant: Nine Lite Construction Time Frame Date Accepted April-12-2011 90-day Waiver N/A SITE INFORMATION: Lot 7, Block 247, Houston Heights Subdivision,, Harris County, Texas.
Spring Garden Historic District. Inventory. Philadelphia Historical Commission
1 Spring Garden Historic District Inventory Designated 11 October 2000 Philadelphia Historical Commission 2 NORTH BOUVIER STREET - 600 Block Paving: granite block Sidewalks: concrete Curbs: concrete Light
City of Fort Lauderdale Historic Preservation Design Guidelines
City of Fort Lauderdale Historic Preservation Design Guidelines New Construction & Additions When considering the construction of a new building within a historic context, property owners are encouraged
Certificate of Appropriateness Applications
Certificate of Appropriateness Applications Huntsville Historic Preservation Commission August 10, 2015 Applicant: Philip Buzzetta Submission Date: 07/07/15 Architectural Style: Dutch Colonial Status:
2.1. Architectural Character. Mountain. Agrarian. Craftsman. Gold Rush
2 A r c h i t e c t u r a l C h a r a c t e r 2.1 Introduction Development within the corridor is not required to be any one architectural style but should incorporate elements from one of the following
Atkins Park Historic District Regulations (Chapter 20O) The intent of the regulations for the Atkins Park Historic District is as follows:
Sec. 16-20O.001. Statement of Intent Atkins Park Historic District Regulations (Chapter 20O) The intent of the regulations for the Atkins Park Historic District is as follows: (1) To recognize and maintain
3. TOWN/NEAREST TOWN: Millsboro vicinity? 4. MAIN TYPE OF RESOURCE: building structure site object landscape district
DELAWARE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 15 THE GREEN, DOVER, DE 19901 CULTURAL RESOURCE SURVEY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION FORM CRS # S-12215 SPO Map 16-17-08 Hundred Dagsboro Millsboro Quad Other 1. HISTORIC
Architectural Precedents of Style Facade Diagrams, Image Influences
120' - 2" 23' - 8" 66' - 10" 121' - 2 1/4" 29' - 8" 23' - 8" 12' - 0" 14' - 0" 19' - 4" 21' - 6" 29' - 8" 36' - 8" 13' - 0" 20' - 4" 21' - 6 1/4" 99' - 5 1/4" 41' - 3 1/4" 58' - 2" 29' - 0" 10' - 8" 1'
Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments
Epstein s Rehabilitation Plan Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments MORRISTOWN REDEVELOPMENT ENTITY March 14, 2013 Epstein s Rehabilitation Plan Presentation Part 1: Morristown Planning Division Neighborhood
A site plan or floor plan clearly identifying the location(s) of all new replacement window(s)
WINDOW REPLACEMENT GUIDELINES Community Development Planning & Building 2263 Santa Clara Ave., Rm. 190 Alameda, CA 94501-4477 alamedaca.gov 510.747.6800 F: 510.865.4053 TDD: 510.522.7538 Hours: 7:30 a.m.
CITY COUNCIL PACKET MEMORANDUM
CITY COUNCIL PACKET MEMORANDUM DOCUMENT: Final Plan and Final Plat SUBJECT: City Center Lenexa The Domain at City Center CONTACT PERSON: Beccy Yocham, Director of Community Development DATE: December 3,
Industrial Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations
16.20.110 - Industrial Suburban District ( IS ) Figure REFERENCE Typical Buildings in the IS District Figure REFERENCE Site Plan of a typical development in the IS District Sections: 16.20.110.1 Composition
2.2 College Street Historic District
2.2 College Street Historic District 2.2.1 A BRIEF HISTORY OF COLLEGE STREET The College Street Historic District consists of residential and commercial buildings in a continuous streetscape of 12 blocks,
MANAGEMENT PLAN STONE BAY RIFLE RANGE HISTORIC DISTRICT MCB CAMP LEJEUNE
MANAGEMENT PLAN STONE BAY RIFLE RANGE HISTORIC DISTRICT MCB CAMP LEJEUNE This management plan is to be used in association with procedures outlined in Chapter of the Historic Buildings Management Handbook.
Historic Preservation Certification Application Part 2 343-345 Main Street West South Haven, Vermont NPS Project No. 12345
Exterior Features 1 site and drainage 2 foundation 3 wood siding and trim 4 exterior doors 5 windows / storm windows 6 porches front and rear 7 chimneys 8 roofing Interior Features 9 frame 10 basement
Bungalow. Essential Elements. Prominent porch columns,
Bungalow Essential Elements Prominent porch columns, especially square or battered piers Deep porches One or one and a half stories Roof that is either hipped with low pitch or gabled with moderate to
ARCHITECTURAL STYLES. Turn of the Century Styles American Foursquare UNIVERSITY PARK HPOZ PRESERVATION PLAN - JULY 14, 2005
American Foursquare The American Foursquare style dates from 1900-1920. It was common in Los Angeles from the turn of the last century through the nineteen-teens. The American Foursquare is a residential
Division 51-4.400. Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations.
Division 51-4.400. Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations. SEC. 51-4.401. MINIMUM FRONT YARD. (a) General provisions. (1) Required front yards must be open and unobstructed except for fences. Except as otherwise
Architectural Design Standards Example Guide DESIGN STANDARDS EXAMPLE GUIDE
Architectural Design Standards Example Guide DESIGN STANDARDS EXAMPLE GUIDE Commercial, Professional Office, and Public Facility Developments Purpose This Guide offers examples to clarify and explain the
CITY OF MIAMI FIRE TRAINING TOWER 3700 NW 7 TH AVENUE
CITY OF MIAMI FIRE TRAINING TOWER 3700 NW 7 TH AVENUE Designation Report City of Miami REPORT OF THE CITY OF MIAMI PRESERVATION OFFICER TO THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD ON THE POTENTIAL
Postcard showing East Ridgewood Avenue looking east from Broad Street, c. 1940 s.
Introduction Postcard showing East Ridgewood Avenue looking east from Broad Street, c. 1940 s. Ridgewood s Village Center Historic District is a wonderful place to walk, shop, and meet friends. To a large
Architectural Control Guidelines
Architectural Control Guidelines The following Architectural Control Guidelines have been customized for 386 Beaverbrook and are intended to maintain a minimum standard of new construction within the development.
TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION COA SUBCOMMITTEE - STAFF REPORT Thursday, July 2, 2015 COA-15-028 COA NUMBER: COA-15-028 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1008 N. DENVER AVE. DISTRICT: BRADY HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT APPLICANT:
MINUTES. Date: March 24, 2010 LPC 50/10 Location: 728 St. Helens, Tacoma Municipal Bldg North, Room 16
Members Mark McIntire, Chair Ross Buffington, Vice Chair Edward Echtle Ken House Imad Al Janabi, PhD. Fred King Megan Luce Bret Maddox, S.E. Ha Pham Pamela Sundell Kathryn Longwell, North Slope Ex-Officio
GUIDELINES FOR REHABILITATION OF TRADITIONAL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS DESIGN GUIDELINES
GUIDELINES FOR REHABILITATION OF TRADITIONAL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE 13 DESIGN GUIDELINES The following design guidelines have been developed to guide appropriate design in the Downtown
DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST Chapter 6 Special Consideration Design Guidelines
DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST Chapter 6 Special Consideration Design Guidelines A. Offices a. Office buildings should be built to the minimum required setback. b. Surface parking should be located towards the
An ordinance pertaining to the Maya Angelou Birthplace, located at 3130 Hickory Street (the
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 BOARD BILL NO. 76 INTRODUCED BY ALDERWOMAN MARLENE DAVIS, ALDERMAN TERRY KENNEDY ALDERMAN MARLENE DAVIS, ALDERMAN TERRY KENEDY, ALDERMAN FREEMAN
HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT. Application Guidelines
HEATING, VENTILATING, AND Application Guidelines The Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) is the Mayoral agency charged with designating and regulating individual landmarks and historic districts. The
R 1 Design Review Application
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel. (310) 285 1141 Fax. (310) 858 5966 R 1 Design Review Application Design Review Overview Beverly Hills residential
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1. PURPOSE The Southeast Area Plan Architectural Style Guide (ASG) is intended to enhance the quality, consistency, and compatibility of all building designs in the Southeast Policy Area. The ASG requires
When a homeowner decides to replace the windows in their home it is advantageous that they thoroughly consider all options available.
When a homeowner decides to replace the windows in their home it is advantageous that they thoroughly consider all options available. Many times it is common place to sell the homeowner just a window,
d. Building permits may only be approved if consistent with the approved development plan and land division for all units with common walls.
Section 20.920.060 Tier 2 Infill Standards. In addition to the Tier 1 standards and incentives, Tier 2 infill parcels and land divisions and the subsequent development on those Tier 2 infill parcels shall
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND MIXED-USE BUILDINGS
CITY OF CHICAGO DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND MIXED-USE BUILDINGS WALL MATERIALS Original wall materials such as brick, stone and terra cotta should be repaired and maintained. Dry-vit
Residential Decks. Planning and Development Services Department
Building Safety Division 8500 Santa Fe Drive Overland Park, KS 66212 (913) 895-6225 Fax (913) 895-5016 Email: [email protected] Planning and Development Services Department Residential Decks
PHASE 1 NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION(S) PROJECT COLLEGE PARK/IDLEWILD NEIGHBORHOODS RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA. Submitted by
PHASE 1 NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION(S) PROJECT COLLEGE PARK/IDLEWILD NEIGHBORHOODS RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Submitted by Mattson, Alexander and Associates, Inc. 309 E. Park Avenue, No.4 Charlotte, N.C.
Georgian Dates/Era: Late 1760s- 1790s Location: England/Colonial America, USA Significance: - General buildings were 5 bays with 2 stories and a
Eras/Styles to Know: Romanesque Dates/Era: 900s - end of 1100 s Location: Medieval Europe Significance: - Round headed arches, arcades, symbolism, sometimes squished elements to fit into tight spaces Gothic
UDRB APPLICATION URBAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
UDRB APPLICATION CITY OF MIAMI VISION STATEMENT: To Be an International City that Embodies Diversity, Economic Opportunity, Effective Customer Service and a Highly Rated Quality of Life OBJECTIVE: The
Prior to submission of drawings for building permit, the architectural control process will be undertaken for the developer and/or builders.
6.0 Design Review process 6.0 Design Review Process The design review process will coordinate the public and private realm architecture for the community, i.e., the site planning, streetscape, and architecture
Kirkland Zoning Code 113.25
Kirkland Zoning Code 113.25 Chapter 113 COTTAGE, CARRIAGE AND TWO/THREE-UNIT HOMES Sections: 113.05 User Guide 113.10 Voluntary Provisions and Intent 113.15 Housing Types Defined 113.20 Applicable Use
Memorandum WORK PROPOSED
TO: Scott Albright, City of Santa Monica DATE: November 9, 2011 CC: FROM: Jon L. Wilson, M.Arch, LEED AP RE: SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR S STANDARDS REVIEW: 2009 LA MESA DRIVE, SANTA MONICA, CA PCR has conducted
City of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania South Bethlehem Historic Conservation Commission
City of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania South Bethlehem Historic Conservation Commission D ESIGN G UIDELINES The historic Kreidler Buildings have been adapted for use by new businesses. Even though the new businesses
FORM B BUILDING MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125.
FORM B BUILDING MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125 Photograph Assessor s Number USGS Quad Area(s) Form Number 73-116
28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)
28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District) Goals and Objectives To provide a guide for infill and new development in the Neighbourhood District. To outline the nature, form and character
Building Condition Assessment: 109-111 North Howard Street Baltimore, Maryland
KPA The Joint Venture of EBA Engineering, Inc. and Kennedy Porter & Associates, Inc. 4813 Seton Drive, Baltimore, MD 21215 Phone: (410-358-7171) Fax: (410)358-7213 Building Condition Assessment: Baltimore,
Residential design guidance: Roof extensions
Residential design guidance: Roof extensions Introduction Conversions of roof-space to useable accommodation can be a relatively cheap and effective way to extend residential property. However, roof alterations
TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION COA SUBCOMMITTEE - STAFF REPORT
TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION COA SUBCOMMITTEE - STAFF REPORT Tuesday, June 16, 2015 COA-15-028 COA NUMBER: COA-15-028 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1008 N. DENVER AVE. DISTRICT: BRADY HEIGHTS HISTORIC DISTRICT APPLICANT:
II. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER...
Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 3 Why Do We Have Residential Design Guidelines?...3 Legal Basis...3 How are the Guidelines used?...4 Applicability...4 Organization...5 Design Principles...5 Further Information
Planning & Building Control Division. Development. East Ayrshire Planning. Design Guidance
Planning & Building Control Division Design Guidance 1 East Ayrshire Planning Design Guidance Householder Development 1 EAST AYRSHIRE PLANNING: DESIGN GUIDANCE Design of the built environment can affect
City of Glendale Window Replacement Information and Submittal Requirements
City of Glendale Window Replacement Information and Submittal Requirements General Information Do not buy or install any windows before you get a permit! A building permit is required for all window replacements
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR UTILITY METERS D.C. HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR UTILITY METERS D.C. HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD Introduction Utility meters are a necessary component for any building. When older buildings were originally provided with utility
M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION
M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION DATE: September 10, 2007 TO: FROM: The Honorable Landmarks Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: 11A.
Exempted Development - Frequently Asked Questions
Exempted Development - Frequently Asked Questions Important Pre-Conditions Please note all exempted development is subject to certain restrictions as set out in Articles 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Regulations.
Nomination Application & Instructions
Nomination Application & Instructions City of Austin Founded by Congress, Republic of Texas, 1839 Historic Preservation Office Planning and Development Review Department One Texas Center, 505 Barton Springs
Title 33, Planning and Zoning Chapter 33.110 8/29/14 Single-Dwelling Zones
Title 33, Planning and Zoning Chapter 33.110 8/29/14 Single-Dwelling Zones CHAPTER 33.110 SINGLE-DWELLING ZONES (Amended by: Ord. No.165376, effective 5/29/92; Ord. No. 165594, effective 7/8/92; Ord. No.
to encourage high quality tropical vernacular Queensland architecture throughout the Shire;
9.1 BUILDING DESIGN & ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS Intent The intent of this Policy is to specify and illustrate the architectural elements and building design features considered appropriate for residential
DESIGN GUIDANCE NOTE: 11 PORCHES
DESIGN GUIDANCE NOTE: 11 PORCHES 1. INTRODUCTION This guidance note is one of a series giving advice on various types of development within Barnet. It advises on designing porch extensions including canopies.
Chapter 11: Demolition
City of Independence Chapter 11: Demolition In this chapter you will find: Demolition Mothballing Treatment Types of Demolition By Neglect and Recommended Corrective Measures DEMOLITION Photograph on cover
CHAPTER 5 - "R1" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
CHAPTER 5 - "R1" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 5-1. Regulations: The regulations set forth in this chapter, or set forth elsewhere in this ordinance when referred to in this chapter, are the
BENTON PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT REHABILITATION AND NEW CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
BENTON PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT REHABILITATION AND NEW CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS PART III HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION ONE. These (the "Standards") have been developed to establish a clear and
Central West End Historic District Standards
Central West End Historic District Standards I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. DEFINITIONS...2 III. RESIDENTIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN STANDARDS...7 Alterations to Existing Structures: Repairs and Rehabilitation
II. Rehabilitation...9 Rehabilitation... 9 Commercial Rehabilitation... 10 Residential Rehabilitation... 14
TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...1 Introduction to Standards... 1 Creation of District... 3 Preservation in General... 4 Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation... 4 Goals for Rehabilitation...
Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CS Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 6 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) 1101 Sutter Street
HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3CS Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 6 *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) 1101 Sutter Street P1. Historic name of building (if
City of Saco. Historic District Design Guidelines
City of Saco Historic District Design Guidelines 2010 City of Saco Historic District Design Guidelines 2010 Prepared by: Sara K. Martin Architectural Historian 75 Leighton Street Bangor, ME 04401 Credits
VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD ORDINANCE NO. 3491
VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD ORDINANCE NO. 3491 AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD CHANGING THE ZONE CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM THE C ZONE DISTRICT TO A NEW C-R ZONE DISTRICT AND ADOPTING
18 Church Street. This building adjoins number 16 and is again a grade II listed building. The building has a ground floor shop with a flat above.
10 18 Church Street This building adjoins number 16 and is again a grade II listed building. The building has a ground floor shop with a flat above. Replacement of original sash windows and a new scantle
Village of Oak Park Chicago & Harlem Neighborhood Plan. Architectural and Historical Survey. Prepared by:
Village of Oak Park Chicago & Harlem Neighborhood Plan Architectural and Historical Survey Prepared by: Thomason and Associates P.O. Box 121225 Nashville, TN 37212 January 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE STANDARDS
Article 25 COMMUNITY APPEARANCE STANDARDS 25.01 Applicability 25.01.01 This Article is applicable to the publicly visible portions of building elements, as defined herein. A. An element of a building shall
City of Gardner S i g n a g e a n d Fa c a d e D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s
City of Gardner S i g n a g e a n d Fa c a d e D e s i g n G u i d e l i n e s Submitted to: The City of Gardner Submitted by: The Cecil Group October 24, 2007 Contents 1. Introduction and Purpose...2
II. CASTLE HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT
I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE The Castle Hill Historic District Design Standards (Standards) provide a guide for decisionmaking regarding changes in the exterior appearance of buildings and sites within the
PROPERTY East Wetumpka Commercial Historic District (Boundary Increas NAME: e)
REQUESTED ACTION: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE EVALUATION/RETURN SHEET NOMINATION PROPERTY East Wetumpka Commercial Historic District (Boundary Increas NAME: e) MULTIPLE
Physician s Residence. Historic Structure Report IV. Building Treatment Approach
Physician s Residence Historic Structure Report Building Treatment Approach IV. Building Treatment Approach IV A. Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings The Physician s Residence is listed as
CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR S OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR S OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MICHAEL F. GLAVIN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JOSEPH A. CURTATONE MAYOR PLANNING DIVISION STAFF GEORGE PROAKIS, DIRECTOR
How To Find Out What Happened To Slave Housing
Slave Housing Data Base Building Name: Presquisle Brick Duplex 2 (northern building) Evidence Type: Extant Site ID: Historical Site Name: City or Vicinity: County: Culpeper State: Virginia UTM: Easting:
29 Broadway- 14 th Fl Tel: 212.888.8334 New York NY 10006 Fax: 212.419.1939. Due Diligence Report. New York, New York
Due Diligence Report New York, New York Prepared for Mr. On February 8, 2010 P a g e 1 Table of Contents PAGE 3.. GENERAL INFORMATION PAGE 4 FILINGS PERMITS AND ENCUMBRANCES PAGE 6. CORE AND SHELL PAGE
University of Texas Medical School Building HABS No. TX-292 914-916 Strand Galveston H^B3 Galveston County IBx Texas <g<+_ ^^
m University of Texas Medical School Building HABS No. TX-292 914-916 Strand Galveston H^B3 Galveston County IBx Texas
SOULARD NEIGHBORHOOD HISTORIC DISTRICT REHABILITATION AND NEW CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
SOULARD NEIGHBORHOOD HISTORIC DISTRICT REHABILITATION AND NEW CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS ARTICLE 1: INTRODUCTION The character, size and quantity of the relatively unaltered historic buildings contained within
ROOFS - Guidance for Repair, Maintenance and Replacement
ROOFS - Guidance for Repair, Maintenance and Replacement Guilford Association Architectural Committee ROOFING Slate and tile roofs are a critical design feature of Guilford homes. The homes were designed
CITY OF BELOIT REPORT TO THE BELOIT LANDMARKS COMMISSION
CITY OF BELOIT REPORT TO THE BELOIT LANDMARKS COMMISSION Meeting Date: May 19, 2009 Agenda Item: 5 File Number: COA-2009-09 Applicant: Lisa Anderson-Levy & Robert Levy Existing Zoning: R-1B, Single-Family
Cable Building HABS No. ILL-1003 57 East Jackson Boulevard at Wabash Avenue Chicago Cook County Illinois
# Cable Building HABS No. ILL-1003 57 East Jackson Boulevard at Wabash Avenue Chicago Cook County Illinois HABS ILL, 16-CHIG, PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA i \- i < # Historic American
CITY OF VAUGHAN SCHEDULE O LOT GRADING DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 1 CITY OF VAUGHAN SCHEDULE O LOT GRADING DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CIVIC CENTRE 2141 MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE MAPLE ONTARIO L6A 1T1 905-832-2281 Page 2 SECTION 1 - GENERAL OBJECTIVES To provide
guide to rehabilitation, restoration and new construction
FAIRMOUNT SOUTHSIDE HISTORIC DISTRICT guide to rehabilitation, restoration and new construction (including demolition and removal) Introduction This guide has been compiled for the residents and property
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION OFFICIAL USE ONLY CASE NUMBER: SUBJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS: DATE RECEIVED: ACCEPTED BY: APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (please
A description of the Listed Buildings in the Parish of Lower Penn
A description of the Listed Buildings in the Parish of Lower Penn The following listed building descriptions use the same standard format NAME C.P. (Civil Parish) AREA WITHIN PARISH (Optional where relevant)
PRESERVATION PLANNING ASSOCIATES 519 Fig Avenue, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Telephone (805) 450-6658 Email: [email protected]
PRESERVATION PLANNING ASSOCIATES 519 Fig Avenue, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Telephone (805) 450-6658 Email: [email protected] June 17, 2015 Ms. Kimberley Heaton McCarthy Supervising Planner Building and Safety
Katharine Teats House HABS No. CA-2162 3560 Seventh Avenue San Diego San Diego County /J/Vf# <? California /WtO
Katharine Teats House 3560 Seventh Avenue San Diego San Diego County /J/Vf#
941 Key Street HPO File No. 140817 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Application Date: August 6, 2014 Applicant: Mary S Beaver, owner CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Property:, lot 10, block 220, East Subdivision. The property includes a historic 1,200 square foot one story
16 2 10.3 Materials and Colors
16 2 10.3 Materials and Colors To create a harmonious and coherent image for each development, building designs shall pay close attention to choice of materials and colors. Building construction shall
For Historically Designated Homes & Buildings
Ninth Street Historic Park Acknowledgements This project was paid for in part by a State Historical Fund grant from the Colorado Historical Society. The contents contained herein do not necessarily reflect
R&S. August 2014 Prepared by RandS Associated Srl. 1. Introduction
Building Engineer UK Registration Board n.075077h Design and Access Statement for Application for Planning Permission for demolition of a garage and construction of an extension to an existing Victorian
ARCHITECTURE 101. This is a reading is designed to give architectural empowerment and increases your comfort using building vocabulary.
ARCHITECTURE 101 How many times have you tried to describe a building to someone and ended up saying, And it has one of those curly thingamajigs under the eave? This is a reading is designed to give architectural
Residential Window Replacement Design Guidelines
Residential Window Replacement Design Guidelines Community Development Department Planning Division This page intentionally left blank Residential Window Replacement Design Guidelines 2 Table of Contents
