The Department of Interior Five Level Performance Management System. Participant Guide
|
|
|
- Reynold Bell
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Department of Interior Five Level Performance Management System Participant Guide
2 Welcome Welcome to this TEL (Technology Enhanced Learning) training event. We are excited that you will be joining us today for The Department of the Interior Five-Level Performance Management System, and we look forward to helping you to get as much out of this time as possible. How To Interact with the Instructor We encourage you to ask questions and share your comments with the instructors in this TELNPS course. The instructors may ask that questions be held until designated question and answer periods due to the volume of material to be covered and the large number of students in the classroom for this broadcast. The instructors will let you know when the designated question and answer periods are so you can ask your questions then. If you were physically in the classroom with the instructor and wanted to ask a question, you would raise your hand to let her/him know you had a question or comment. Then you would wait for the instructor to recognize you and ask for your question. We are all familiar with that protocol for asking questions or making comments. With TELNPS courses there is also a protocol to follow to ensure that you can easily ask questions and others can participate as well. It may seem a little strange at first asking a question of a TV monitor. Remember, it is the instructor you are interacting with and not the monitor. As you ask more questions and participate in more TELNPS courses, you will soon be focusing only on the content of your question and not the equipment you are using to ask it. As part of the TEL station equipment at your location, there are several push-to-talk microphones. Depending on the number of students at your location, you may have one directly in front of you or you may be sharing one with other students at your table. When you have a question, press and hold down the push-to-talk button, maintaining a distance of inches, and say, Excuse me [instructor s first name], this is [your first name] at [your location]. I have a question (or I have a comment). Then release the push-to-talk button. This is important. Until you release the button, you will not be able to hear the instructor. The instructor will acknowledge you and then ask for your question or comment. Stating your name and location not only helps the instructor, but also helps other students who are participating at different locations to get to know their classmates. TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 2 of 12
3 Course Overview Why a program on the DOI 5-Level Performance management System? One of the most important roles you have as a supervisor is to manage the performance of your employees. The Department of the Interior and all of the Bureaus are implementing a new Five-Level Performance Management System. For the National Park Service this will be implemented effective January 1, You need to be familiar with the new plan and what is required of you, the supervisor, in implementing this new plan and operating within the framework established by the plan. This program is designed to brief you on the differences between the Pass/Fail System and the new Five-Level System, to give you information on establishing critical elements and performance standards, and to prepare you to implement the new plan with your employees effective January 1, Target Audience Any NPS employee with supervisory responsibilities, or who serves as an advisor to supervisors, such as an HR Specialist should attend. This training counts towards your 40- hour supervisory training requirement. Program Timing This program is a 2 and ½ -hour TELNPS course. Learning Objectives After completing this course, you will be able to: Discuss the differences between the Pass/Fail and the Five-Level System Describe the purpose of critical elements and performance standards Understand how to complete the new Employee Performance Appraisal Form (EPAP) Site Point-of-Contact Responsibilities The TEL Station Site Point-of-Contact must reserve the training room, notify employees that the park will be participating in this TEL training event, make sure the Participant Guide is available to students, set up the TEL Station on the day of the training, make sure students sign in on the Student Roster form, and fax the form to the designated number. TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 3 of 12
4 Timeline for the Performance Appraisal System 5-Level Performance System Or as otherwise approved by the DOI Office of Human Resources October 1 to September 30 Appraisal Period The appraisal period coincides with the fiscal year, October 1 to September 30. Or 30 days after the end of the Performance Appraisal Period October 1 to 31 Complete the performance appraisal for prior fiscal year that ended on September 30. Or 60 calendar days from beginning of appraisal cycle October 1 to November 30 Maximum time to finalize performance standards Timeframe in which performance standards are finalized and approved. The maximum time a rating official has to put an employee under elements and standards, i.e., establish an Employee Performance Appraisal Plan (EPAP). 90 Calendar Days Minimum Appraisal Period The length of time, 90 calendar days, that the employee must be performing under an approved EPAP in a given position in order to be eligible for an interim or annual rating. Or approximately midway through Performance Appraisal period March through May Progress Review Discussion with the employee at least once during the appraisal period to review the employee s progress and communicate performance as compared to the established standards; to make any recommended revisions to critical elements/performance standards; and to consider/identify any developmental needs or performance improvement required. As Required Interim Appraisal Required when an employee has worked under standards in the position for 90 days and if one or more of the following occurs: Employee changes position (i.e., reassignment, promotion, change to lower grade, transfer), completes a temporary assignment of 120 days or more (i.e., detail, temporary promotion, etc.), the rating official leaves a supervisory position, or to document a level of competence determination for withingrade increase purposes when the employee s most recent rating of record is not consistent with the level of competence determination. TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 4 of 12
5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Employee Performance Appraisal Plan Employee Name and Social Security Number: Title/Series/Grade: Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Part A: Notification of Standards: Signatures certify that critical elements and performance standards were discussed. Critical elements and performance standards are contained in Part E. Employee: Rating Official: Reviewing Official (if applicable*): Date: Date: Date: *If determined by Bureau/Office Part B: Progress Review: Signatures certify that performance was discussed. Employee: Date: Rating Official: Date: Part C: Summary Rating Determination: To determine a summary rating, assign one of the numerical rating levels that accurately reflects the employee s performance for each of the critical elements (Use only whole numbers: Exceptional = 5 points; Superior = 4 points, Fully Successful = 3 points, Minimally Successful = 2 points, and Unsatisfactory = 0 points.) See reverse for complete instructions for assigning a Summary Rating. Element Number Total: Numerical Rating Total Numerical Rating Number of Elements = Numeric Summary Rating Part D: Overall Summary Rating: Use conversion chart below to determine Summary Rating. Check the appropriate box: Exceptional AND No critical element rated lower than Superior. Superior AND No critical element rated lower than Fully Successful. Fully Successful AND No critical element rated lower than Fully Successful. Minimally Successful AND No critical element rated lower than Minimally Successful. Unsatisfactory One or more critical elements rated Unsatisfactory. Employee: Rating Official: Reviewing Official: (if applicable): Date: Date: Date: Check here if Interim Rating: Employee s Signature above certifies that the overall summary rating was discussed. Reviewing Official s signature is required for Exceptional, Minimally Successful and Unsatisfactory ratings, and otherwise if determined by Bureau/Office. TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 5 of 12
6 Department of the Interior Benchmark Employee Performance Standards Exceptional: Employee demonstrates particularly excellent performance that is of such high quality that organizational goals have been achieved that would not have been otherwise. The employee demonstrates mastery of technical skills and a thorough understanding of the mission of the organization and has a fundamental impact on the completion of program objectives. The employee exerts a major positive influence on management practices, operating procedures and/or program implementation, which contributes substantially to organizational growth and recognition. The employee plans for the unexpected and uses alternate ways of reaching goals. Difficult assignments are handled intelligently and effectively. The employee has produced an exceptional quantity of work, often ahead of established schedules and with little supervision. The employee s oral and written communications are exceptionally clear and effective. He/she improves cooperation among participants in the workplace and prevents misunderstandings. Complicated or controversial subjects are presented or explained effectively to a variety of audiences so that desired outcomes are achieved. Superior: Employee demonstrates unusually good performance that exceeds expectations in critical areas and exhibits a sustained support of organizational goals. The employee shows a comprehensive understanding of the objectives of the job and the procedures for meeting them. Effective planning by the employee improves the quality of management practices, operating procedures, task assignments and/or program activities. The employee develops and/or implements workable and cost-effective approaches to meeting organizational goals. The employee demonstrates an ability to get the job done well in more than one way while handling difficult and unpredicted problems. The employee produces a high quantity of work, often ahead of established schedules with less than normal supervision. The employee writes and speaks clearly on difficult subjects to a wide range of audiences and works effectively with others to accomplish organizational objectives. Fully Successful: The employee demonstrates good, sound performance that meets organizational goals. All critical activities are generally completed in a timely manner and supervisor is kept informed of work issues, alterations and status. The employee effectively applies technical skills and organizational knowledge to get the job done. The employee successfully carries out regular duties while also handling any difficult special assignments. The employee plans and performs work according to organizational priorities and schedules. The employee communicates clearly and effectively. Minimally Successful: The employee s performance shows serious deficiencies that requires correction. The employee s work frequently needs revision or adjustments to meet a minimally successful level. All assignments are completed, but often require assistance from supervisor and/or peers. Organizational goals and objectives are met only as a result of close supervision. On one or more occasions, important work requires unusually close supervision to meet organizational goals or needs so much revision that deadlines were missed or imperiled. Employee shows a lack of awareness of policy implications or assignments; inappropriate or incomplete use of programs or services; circumvention of established procedures, resulting in unnecessary expenditure of time or money; reluctance to accept responsibility; disorganization in carrying out assignments; incomplete understanding of one or more important areas of the field of work; unreliable methods for completing assignments; lack of clarity in writing and speaking; and/or failure to promote team spirit. Unsatisfactory: The employee s performance is unsatisfactory. The quality and quantity of the employee s work are not adequate for the position. Work products do not meet the minimum requirements expected. The employee demonstrates little or no contribution to organizational goals; failure to meet work objectives; inattention to organizational priorities and administrative requirements; poor work habits resulting in missed deadlines and/or incomplete work products; strained work relationships; failure to respond to client needs; and/or lack of response to supervisor s corrective efforts. TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 6 of 12
7 Exercise 1: Writing Performance Standards to Supplement the Benchmark Standards Below and on the following pages are four sample Critical Elements and Supplemental Performance Standards we have developed for the Fully Successful Level. Please choose one to work on and, either individually or in groups at your location, try to write a supplemental performance standard at either the Exceptional or Unsatisfactory level. You have 5-10 minutes to do this. Example 1: Custodial Worker Part E: Critical Elements and Performance Standards: List below each of the employee s critical elements (at least one, but no more than 5) and their corresponding performance standards. If Benchmark Standards are used, indicate Benchmark Standards are attached in the space below, and ensure they are attached to this form. Critical Element 1: Park restrooms are maintained in a clean, sanitary and well-stocked manner. Facilities are in compliance health and safety standards, which contributed to visitor satisfaction. NPS Strategic Plan Goals IIa1A Visitor Satisfaction with Facilities, Services and Recreation, and IVa10A&B Facility Condition of Historic and Non- Historic Buildings. Performance Standards Exceptional Superior Fully Successful Minimally Successful Refer to attached benchmark and in addition: Generally keeps to cleaning schedules in a manner that avoids obvious deterioration of facilities or allows the cleaning schedule to fall obviously behind. Overall appearance very seldom reflects adversely on the park. Unsatisfactory TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 7 of 12
8 Example 2: Visitor Use Assistant Part E: Critical Elements and Performance Standards: List below each of the employee s critical elements (at least one, but no more than 5) and their corresponding performance standards. If Benchmark Standards are used, indicate Benchmark Standards are attached in the space below, and ensure they are attached to this form. Critical Element 1: Fees are collected and processed in accordance with NPS guidelines and policies, which contributes to preservation of park resources and visitor understanding and appreciation of park resources. NPS Strategic Plan Goal IV4b, Fee Receipts. Performance Standards Exceptional Superior Fully Successful Minimally Successful Refer to attached benchmark and in addition: Employee regularly assures that individuals required to pay entrance and camping fees do so and demonstrates good skills in remaining calm and professional even when visitors are angry or frustrated. Generally takes steps to resolve visitor problems and occasionally calls on others for assistance. Issues and records park passes at time of issuance in general accordance with NPS guidelines and policies. Generally handles monies, passports, and records with adequate security to avoid theft or misplacement. Generally maintains reports and records for accountable property (government passes), entrance fees, and camping fees in accordance with NPS guidelines and policies. Infrequently experiences shortages, overages or unnecessary voids. Unsatisfactory TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 8 of 12
9 Example 3: Interpreter Part E: Critical Elements and Performance Standards: List below each of the employee s critical elements (at least one, but no more than 5) and their corresponding performance standards. If Benchmark Standards are used, indicate Benchmark Standards are attached in the space below, and ensure they are attached to this form. Critical Element 1: Facilitated programs for visitors are researched, developed, and presented. These programs contribute to visitor understanding and appreciation of the significances (meanings) of park resources and are designed to reach a wide variety of audiences. NPS Strategic Plan Goals IIb1 and IVb2 Performance Standards Exceptional Superior Fully Successful Refer to attached benchmark and in addition: Programs are researched using the most accessible and current sound scholarship available to the park; generally little in-depth research is completed. Research encompasses at least two viewpoints to accommodate a wider audience. Most programs developed are generally in line with the park s primary themes, demonstrate a developed theme and are commonly successful as a catalyst in creating opportunities for the audience to form their own connections with the meanings and significance inherent in the resource. Programs exhibit some of the professional techniques in public speaking and presentation skills and exhibit good delivery of formal interpretive programs. Minimally Successful Unsatisfactory TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 9 of 12
10 Example 4: Program Assistant (timekeeper) Part E: Critical Elements and Performance Standards: List below each of the employee s critical elements (at least one, but no more than 5) and their corresponding performance standards. If Benchmark Standards are used, indicate Benchmark Standards are attached in the space below, and ensure they are attached to this form. Critical Element 1: Time and attendance records are processed and maintained appropriately, which contributes to organizational effectiveness. NPS Strategic Plan Goal Category IV Organizational Effectiveness. Performance Standards Exceptional Superior Fully Successful Minimally Successful Refer to attached benchmark and in addition: Timesheets are generally coded correctly, with only infrequent corrections necessary due to timekeeper error. Timesheets are normally submitted to payroll by the deadline. Time and attendance records are generally maintained in accordance with FPPS guidelines. Timesheets are generally maintained in an acceptable manner assuring that all leave taken is recorded. Situations seldom occur in which the normal workflow and routine processing of time sheets is interrupted or employees are adversely affected as a result of improper or ineffective coding or maintenance of timesheets. Unsatisfactory TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 10 of 12
11 Narrative Summary Describe the employee s performance for each critical element. A narrative summary must be written for each element assigned a rating of Exceptional, Minimally Successful, or Unsatisfactory. Rating for Critical Element 2: [ ] Exceptional-5 [ ] Superior-4 [ ] Fully Successful-3 [ ] Minimally Successful-2 [ ] Unsatisfactory-0 TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 11 of 12
12 RECOMMENDED NEXT STEPS Complete DOI s web-based training on EPAP Complete Employee Performance Plan and Results Report for Rating Period of 10/1/03 through 12/31/04 Establish Critical Elements for new Performance Plan (EPAP) Define at a minimum the fully successful level of each Critical Element Share draft with employee and get feedback Finalize and implement EPAP by January 1, 2005 MY NEXT STEPS DATE ACCOMPLISHED TEL Technology Enhanced Learning 12 of 12
Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Employee: Rating Official: Reviewing Official (if applicable*): Employee: Date: Rating Official: Date:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Employee Performance Appraisal Plan Employee Name and Social Security Number: Title/Series/Grade: Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Part A-1: Notification of Standards:
Performance Appraisal Handbook
Working Smarter for America The Department of the Interior s Performance Appraisal Handbook A Guide for Managers/Supervisors and Employees Office of the Secretary Office of Human Resources 10/4/04 #370DM430HB-1
Performance Appraisal Handbook (370 DM 430)
U.S. Department of the Interior Performance Appraisal Handbook (370 DM 430) A Guide for Managers/Supervisors and Employees Performance Appraisal Handbook Table of Contents Timeline for the Performance
Resolving Employee Performance Issues. Participant Guide
Resolving Employee Performance Issues Participant Guide National Park Service TEL Training August 6, 2007 Table of Contents Welcome 1 Course Overview and Learning Objectives 2 Why Correct Employee Problems?
Communication: The Key to Performance Management. Participant Guide
Communication: The Key to Performance Management Participant Guide Table of Contents Welcome... 1 Course Overview... 2 Why a Communication: The Key to Performance Management program?... 2 Target Audience...
Performance Management for DOI General Workforce. Nancy Miller Chief of Labor and Employee Relations Department of the Interior
Performance Management for DOI General Workforce Nancy Miller Chief of Labor and Employee Relations Department of the Interior 202-208 208-6754 Background FY07 Marks the third year under DOI s five-level
Guidance for Completing the Supervisory Employee Performance Appraisal Plan
Guidance for Completing the Supervisory Employee Performance Appraisal Plan Establishing Critical Elements and Performance Standards Critical elements (at least one, but not more than five) must be established
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS)
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS) 1. DATE ISSUED CHAPTER S430_1 2. EMPLOYEES COVERED 3. LAW AND REGULATION 4. SSA DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY 5. SSA POLICY 5.1. Introduction 5.2. Overview
How to Write a Performance Improvement Plan. Participant Guide
How to Write a Performance Improvement Plan Participant Guide National Park Service TEL Training August 7, 2007 Table of Contents Welcome How to Interact with the Instructor Course Objectives..1 Understanding
3 FAM 2820 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE AND PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES
3 FAM 2820 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE AND PREVAILING RATE EMPLOYEES 3 FAM 2821 GENERAL 3 FAM 2821.1 Authorities (Office of Origin: HR/CSHRM) The authorities cited for this subchapter
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees PART I PURPOSE DePauw University s performance appraisal process is based upon the belief that employees are our most critical resource,
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW
TYPE OF APPRAISAL Employee Name First Annual Second Additional Supervisor/Manager Name Appraisal Review Period: Classification Month/Year Month/Year From to Department Date of Appraisal Complete the following
Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors
Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors Performance reviews are like compasses They give your exact position and provide direction Office of Human
NRCS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR NEW 5 LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
NRCS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR NEW 5 LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INTRODUCTION This is an at-a-glance tool for establishing hardcopy performance plans, conducting midyear
Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013
Performance Evaluation Discussion Points for University Support Staff August 20, 2013 Performance Evaluations method to assess job performance. A PSU system would include the following: 1. University Support
Employee Development Plan
Form A Employee Development Plan Fiscal Year: EMPLOYEE NAME: TIME IN CURRENT POSITION: DEPARTMENT: This section should be completed by the supervisor and employee as part of the final performance evaluation
US Geological Survey. Office of Human Resources Customer Service Plan
US Geological Survey Office of Human Resources Customer Service Plan Table of Contents Human Resources Customer Service Plan... 3 Introduction - Vision and Mission Statements... 3 Codes of Conduct... 3
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES The City of Corpus Christi's Performance Management Process is designed to: 1. Communicate performance expectations
Performance Management
Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1
SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM
SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 September 30, 2010 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Purpose 1 Policy 1 Coverage 2 Exclusions 2 Definitions 3 Responsibilities
Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP
Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: *Supervisor is the person delivering the review From To INSTRUCTIONS
DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION
U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington, D.C. 20250 DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION SUBJECT: Performance Management NUMBER: 4040-430 DATE: September 30, 2013 OPI: Office of Human Resources Management Section
Utica College Performance Review Form
Utica College Performance Review Form EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: From To *Supervisor is the person delivering the review INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING
ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Page 1 The performance appraisal of employees in the AFGE bargaining unit shall he in accordance with this Article and VA Directive 5013 and VA handbook 5013. In the
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 Name: Position: Anniversary Date in Position: Department: Supervisor: Appraisal Period: from to PURPOSE Communication about performance between
Graduate Student Handbook
Graduate Student Handbook College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences 2015-2016 2 Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences This brief handbook specifies
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES DATE: Name: Position: Department: Annual Performance Review COPY MUST BE RETURNED TO HR FOR FILE Part 1: of General Performance
Performance Evaluation Workshop February/March 2015
February/March 2015 Overview Core Curriculum 2 Preparing Meaningful Performance Evaluations 3 1 February/March 2015 Training Topics: Conducting Performance Evaluations What is the purpose of performance
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP)
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) Revised April 2015 1 Introduction Performance management is an ongoing process of communication between a supervisor and an employee that occurs throughout the year,
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009 Background This document provides details of the Department of Regulatory Agencies Performance
Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees
Client Company Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees Employee Name Department Title Date Started Current Position Date of Review Current Supervisor Instructions Review employee s performance
COLORADO DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2016
STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN JANUARY 2016 Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: JOB TITLE: REVIEWED BY: UNIT: DATE OF REVIEW: REVIEW PERIOD:
SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES
NIPISSING UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE EVALUATION The purpose of this employee evaluation is to assess performance/skill levels, improve communication and pin-point strengths and weaknesses identified
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee
Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)
Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees) Name: Department: Campus ID Number: Title: Review Period: - Job Description Review: I. Essential Job Requirements: (Consider employee s knowledge of duties, responsibilities
The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM GENERAL INFORMATION In accordance with Public Service System Rules and Regulations Part 9.1 The performance evaluation system is designed
AD-AUDITING ACCOUNTANT, ASSISTANT
Page 1 AD-AUDITING ACCOUNTANT, ASSISTANT CHARACTERISTICS OF WORK: This is entry-level work as a state auditing accountant. During the period of orientation and training, the minimum educational requirements
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff Department of Human Resources May 2013 Introduction Performance management
CHAPTER 9 TECHNICIAN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM. Section I General. 1-2. Basic Requirements. This chapter requires that Performance Plans:
CHAPTER 9 TECHNICIAN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM Section I General 1-1. Purpose. This chapter establishes the Performance Appraisal Program for National Guard Technicians and is consistent with Title
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING Performance management is an ongoing process rather than a once a year occurrence. It s a way for you as the supervisor to motivate and develop your employees, and to assist
Position Classification Standard for Supply Clerical and Technician Series, GS-2005. Table of Contents
Position Classification Standard for Supply Clerical and Technician Series, GS-2005 Table of Contents SERIES DEFINITION... 2 EXCLUSIONS... 2 OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION... 2 DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN SUPPLY
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia POLICY STATEMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM I. COVERAGE This Policy Statement covers all Court Services and Offender Supervision
PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW
GENERAL INFORMATION PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form Applies to AFSCME, NURSES, POLICE & PHYSICIANS TYPE REPORT INTERIM PROBATIONARY ANNUAL EMPLOYEE NAME JOB
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Date Last Name MI First Name Position/Title Current Pay Grade Department/Division or Section Original Hire Date Performance Review Period Date Appointed to Current Position From: Supervisor
Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2.
Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS Department of the Navy Handbook Version 2.0 September 2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 BACKGROUND 3 WHO IS COVERED?
ADS Chapter 461 Employee Evaluation Program, Foreign Service and Senior Foreign Service
Employee Evaluation Program, Foreign Service and Senior Foreign Service Document Quality Check Date: 11/09/2012 Partial Revision Date: 09/16/2011 Responsible Office: OHR/ELR File Name: 461_110912 Functional
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS Poway Unified School District Teaching Standards Domain I Domain II Domain III Domain IV Domain V Planning and Designing Instruction Element
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SENIOR LEVEL AND SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM.
` U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SENIOR LEVEL AND SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM Table of Contents Page Section I. Authority and Purpose 1 Section II. Coverage
CHAPTER 3. FILLING A POSITION THROUGH MERIT STAFFING PROCEDURES
Merit Staffing Policy 335.1 CHAPTER 3. FILLING A POSITION THROUGH MERIT STAFFING PROCEDURES 3-1 Position Management and Classification Considerations When a position is to be vacated, managers have the
United States Department of the Interior
United States Department of the Interior IN REPLY REFER TO: 1400-451 (953) P BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Wyoming State Office P.O. Box 1828 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009-1828 October 8, 2014 EMS Transmission:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE
BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE Performance management is the methodical and organized system for monitoring the results of work activities, collecting information and evaluating performance,
COMM 286S: Business & Professional Communication
COMM 286S: Business & Professional Communication Course Syllabus Fall 2014 Instructor: Katherine M. Castle Email [email protected] Office Hours-See BlackBoard Course Description and Objectives Employers
Contact Center Operations Manager
Career Service Authority Contact Center Operations Manager Page 1 of 6 GENERAL STATEMENT OF CLASS DUTIES Supervises customer service agents working in a contact center environment while managing continuous
Chapter 6. Performance Management Program
Chapter 6 Performance Management Program This publication supersedes MSNG-HRR, Chapter 6, dated 1 October 2011. Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction 6-1. Purpose 6-2. Explanation of Terms 6-3. Responsibilities
GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL Job Description. JOB TITLE: Client Relationship Manager
GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL Job Description JOB TITLE: Client Relationship Manager Reports To: Financial Advisor Exempt Prepared by: ADP Resource June 10, 2014 SUMMARY This position is primarily responsible
Performance Evaluation
Competency Exceptional Above Meets Partially Meets Overview of Ratings TRANSFORMATIVE work. In addition to exceeding performance goals, the organization (department, unit or program) is fundamentally better
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Performance Management and Appraisal Program (PMAP)
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Performance Management and Appraisal Program (PMAP) Section 1.0 The Agency retains the right to determine how much of its budget will be allocated for performance awards. Should
Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon
Performance Management Handbook City of American Canyon 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background on performance management City Core competencies Performance management model Development of the Core
RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
60L-35.001 Scope and Purpose 60L-35.002 Definitions 60L-35.003 Minimum Requirements 60L-35.004 Career Service 60L-35.005 Selected Exempt Service 60L-35.006 Transitional Provision (Repealed) 60L-35.001
Instruction Manual. May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees
Instruction Manual May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees Human Resources May, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL Performance Appraisal Instructions
Graduate Student Handbook. College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
Graduate Student Handbook College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences 2014-2015 Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences This brief handbook specifies
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Mission Statement: There is hereby established a University at Pueblo, to be known as Colorado State University Pueblo, which shall be
Evaluating Performance. A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation
Evaluating Performance A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation Training Agenda Why do Performance Evaluations? Employee and Supervisor Roles in Performance
Date Started Current Position. Instructions
Client Company Performance Appraisal Review for Non-Exempt Employees Employee Name Title of Review Department Started Current Position Current Supervisor Instructions Review employee s performance for
AD-AUDITING ACCOUNTANT, SENIOR
Page 1 AD-AUDITING ACCOUNTANT, SENIOR CHARACTERISTICS OF WORK: This is professional accounting work of an "in-charge" nature characterized by an attitude of independence, self-reliance with analytical
Classified Staff and Service Professional Performance Appraisal
Classified Staff and Service Professional Performance Appraisal EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Employee Name:Dana Jones NAU ID (not SSN): 1234567 Date: 7/30/08 Title: Fiscal Operations Manager Department: Graduate
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW
363L (Rev. 8/2005) GENERAL INFORMATION EMPLOYEE NAME Ernest CLASS TITLE County Caseworker II ORGANIZATION CYS SUPERVISOR NAME Michael EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW TYPE REPORT EPR Factor Links PROBATIONARY
Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed
The staff appraisal process is an on-going communications process that begins with the identification of performance goals by the supervisor in the fall. During the spring semester, a formal appraisal
Oregon University System
Oregon University System COMPLETING A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL For Employees in Classified Information Technology Positions Represented by the Oregon Public Employees Union Instructions for Supervisors INTRODUCTION
Quality Handbook. Part D: Regulations. Section 16E: Professional Doctorate Degrees. Section16E. Nottingham Trent University
Nottingham Trent University Quality Handbook Part D: Regulations Section 16E: Professional Doctorate Degrees Contents Preface... 3 Scope of the regulations... 3 Changes to the regulations... 3 Consultation...
Performance Appraisal
PURPOSE Performance Appraisal 90-day Evaluation 180-day Evaluation Annual Evaluation The purpose of any performance appraisal program is employee development. The value of performance appraisal is in the
VOLUNTARY SUPPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
VOLUNTARY SUPPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The primary objectives of employee performance evaluations are: 1. An orderly effort designed to improve supervisor and staff communication; 2. To achieve
Perform service for clients and customers as requested in the form of service tickets, service projects, and research.
Systems Engineer Primary Relationships Internal: Reports to Service Manager Team: Service Team External: Existing Clients & Customers Summary Perform service for clients and customers as requested in the
Employee Support and Development. 8.02 Performance Management Planning. Government Departments and Agencies
Employee Support and Development 8.02 Performance Management Planning AUTHORITY Civil Service Act ADMINISTRATION PEI Public Service Commission Government Departments and Agencies Sub-Section 8.02 Performance
Performance Management. Fitting the Pieces of Success Together
Performance Management Fitting the Pieces of Success Together Session Overview: Current performance review process Documentation Ratings Determining the overall rating New Performance plan document Review
ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES
ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES The Performance Appraisal Process at Madison College is designed to accomplish the following objectives: Encourage meaningful communication between the employee
University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide
University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees 1. Purpose 2. Overview 3. Performance Planning Supervisor Guide 4. Monitoring Employee Performance: Ongoing
OPERATIONAL AREA FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION SECTION Function Specific Handbook
STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APPROVED COURSE OF INSTRUCTION EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER COURSE G611 OPERATIONAL AREA FINANCE/ADMINISTRATION SECTION Function Specific Handbook CHAPTER THREE
BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION
BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION Summer Institute 2012 Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive & Progressive Leadership BIE SUMMER INSTITUTE 2012 WRITING EFFECTIVE & MEASURABLE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Why
Interim Performance Management System. Performance Appraisal Form. User Manual
Interim Performance Management System Performance Appraisal Form User Manual Table of Contents Introduction 2 The Performance Appraisal Cycle 2 Timeline 3 Process Overview 4 Approval Process 5 Sections
Performance Evaluation System (PES) Instruction Guide
Performance Evaluation System (PES) Instruction Guide The State of New Jersey Performance Evaluation System (PES) Program Completion Instructions INTRODUCTION Performance assessment is an important part
Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised 7-22-15. I. Introduction
Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised 7-22-15 I. Introduction The purpose of the Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for classified
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor review key responsibilities (from the job
Policies and Procedures Manual
University of Cincinnati Division of Administration and Finance Policies and Procedures Manual Broadband Program For Project Management Architects Planners Engineers Project Managers Directors Contents
Grade Level Guide for Clerical and Assistance Work
Grade Level Guide for Clerical and Assistance Work TABLE OF CONTENTS COVERAGE... 2 USING THIS GUIDE... 3 SUMMARY CHART OF GRADE LEVEL CONCEPTS... 4 GRADE LEVEL CRITERIA... 6 GS-1... 6 GS-2... 7 GS-3...
HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:
HUMAN RESOURCES Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10 Policy Statement 3: Performance Management Performance Management Program 1. Purpose To establish a Policy for implementing and managing
Table of Contents Performance Management Process Schedule II Levels 7-12 1 P age
Table of Contents Management Process Schedule II Levels 7-12 1 P age TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Statement of Purpose.. 3 Guiding Principles and Values 4 KEY COMPONENTS OF THE PERFORMANCE
Performance Appraisal System
SUPERVISORY MANUAL Performance Appraisal System For a New Century State Workforce State of Hawaii Department of Human Resources Development July 1, 2001 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM POLICY STATEMENT Public
SPA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL COMPARISON OF EXPECTATION LEVELS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES
(N) (M) (E) Performance consistently does not meet documented expectations and measurements in this area. Performance consistently meets documented expectations and measurements in this area. Performance
EVALUATION OF MSW STUDENT FIELD WORK FOUNDATION FIELD PLACEMENT
EVALUATION OF MSW STUDENT FIELD WORK School of Social Work University of Pittsburgh FOUNDATION FIELD PLACEMENT Date of Evaluation: 4/24/10 Term: Spring Year: 2010 Student's Name: FOUNDATION STUDENT Term
Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014
Page: 1 Policy The performance review process is a formal communication which is an integral part of performance management and is tied to compensation. All exempt and management employees will have an
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE
PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,
