Performance Management. Fitting the Pieces of Success Together
|
|
|
- Gwenda Henry
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Performance Management Fitting the Pieces of Success Together
2 Session Overview: Current performance review process Documentation Ratings Determining the overall rating New Performance plan document Review of performance management techniques Performance log The importance of accurate PDQ s Important deadlines
3 Current Performance Evaluation Reminders: Evaluation period is April 1, 2006 March 31, 2007 Evaluation must be signed by supervisor and 2 nd level supervisor or appointing authority before presenting to the employee Meritorious ratings require written justification by the Supervisor All evaluations and plans are due by April 13 th
4 Documentation Why is this a critical piece of the puzzle: Justifies the performance ratings Documents the employee achievements and areas that need improvement Is another form of communication with the employee besides verbal Encourage your employee to self evaluate they may remember accomplishments earlier in the performance year or identify areas they would like to improve Please utilize the space available under each rating to add documentation.
5 Documentation puzzle keys to effective documentation: Documentation should be: Specific Clear Useful Fact (not impressions) Include performance highlights and challenges throughout the year
6 Rating Goals: How to determine the ratings: What stage of completion is the goal? Goal is completed in the performance year rate on the success of the completion Goal is in progress but not yet complete rate on the progress of the goal and determine if the goal should be added to next years performance plan Goal is not complete due to unforeseen circumstances or no longer valid or needed rating can be left blank but documentation in space provided is mandatory to identify the reason for no rating
7 Rating Goals: Critical puzzle piece to successful rating: Factors to consider when rating the goal: Determine if the goal is achievable and/or realistic Determine what the roadblock is to successfully completing the goal Does the goal require more than a year to complete Determine if the goal is still valid have there been changes in your department that no longer require the goal Does the goal need an action plan to complete Whatever the rating Document!!! Document!!!
8 Determining the overall rating the final evaluation puzzle piece: Reminder of ratings and definitions: Needs Improvement: This rating level encompasses those employees whose performance does not consistently and independently meet expectations set forth in the performance plan as well as those employees whose performance is clearly unsatisfactory and consistently fails to meet requirements and expectations. Marginal performance requires substantial monitoring to achieve consistent completion of work and requires more constant, close supervision. Though these employees do not meet expectations, they may be progressing satisfactorily toward a Proficient rating and need to demonstrate improvement in order to satisfy the core expectations of the position. Fully Competent: This rating level encompasses a range of expected performance. It includes those employees who exhibit competency in the work behaviors, skills, and assignments for the job as well as those employees who are successfully developing in the job. These employees are meeting all the expectations, standards, requirements, and objectives on their performance plan and, on occasion, may exceed them. This is the employee who reliably performs the job assigned.
9 Determining the overall rating the final evaluation puzzle piece: Reminder of ratings and definitions: Exceeds Expectations: This rating level encompasses the accomplished performers who consistently exhibit the desired competencies effectively and independently while frequently exceeding expectations, standards, requirements, and objectives of the job assigned. Their work has a documented impact beyond the regular assignments and performance objectives that directly supports the mission of the organization. Meritorious: This rating represents consistently exceptional and documented performance or consistently superior achievement beyond the regular assignment. Employee makes exceptional contribution(s) that have a significant and positive impact on the performance of the unit or the organization. The employee provides a model for excellence and helps others to do their jobs better. Peers, immediate supervision, higher-level management and others can readily recognize such a level of performance. Supervisors must provide written justification for a Meritorious rating.
10 Determining the overall rating the final evaluation puzzle piece: What factors to consider when determining the overall rating: Significant employee achievements or accomplishments Areas in need of improvement or growth Performance through the entire year Identify key areas that might carry more weight than others The new process allows the supervisor to determine the overall rating by factoring major job duties, goals and accomplishments of the employee instead of calculating factors to determine a rating.
11 Determining the overall rating the final evaluation puzzle piece: Employee Involvement: Allow the employee to play an active role in the evaluation process Encourage the employee to self evaluate Have the employee identify their strengths and weaknesses Have employee develop goals and design action plans Employee involvement prevents surprises during the review process Performance management should be a collaborative process between the employee and supervisor.
12 New Performance Plan document the new puzzle piece: In Accordance with rule 6-4, three rating levels will be used instead of four effective for the performance cycle beginning April 1, The definitions of each rating is below. Level 1: This rating level encompasses those employees whose performance does not consistently and independently meet expectations set forth in the performance plan as well as those employees whose performance is clearly unsatisfactory and consistently fails to meet requirements and expectations. Marginal performance requires substantial monitoring and close supervision to ensure progression toward a level of performance that meets expectations. Although these employees are not currently meeting expectations, they may be progressing satisfactorily toward a level 2 rating and need coaching/direction in order to satisfy the core expectations of the position.
13 New Performance Plan document the new puzzle piece: Level 2: This rating level encompasses a range of expected performance. It includes employees who are successfully developing in the job, employees who exhibit competency in work behaviors, skills, and assignments, and accomplished performers who consistently exhibit the desired competencies effectively and independently. These employees are meeting all the expectations, standards, requirements, and objectives on their performance plan and, on occasion, exceed them. This is the employee who reliably performs the job assigned and may even have a documented impact beyond the regular assignments and performance objectives that directly supports the mission of the organization.
14 New Performance Plan document the new puzzle piece: Level 3: This rating represents consistently exceptional and documented performance or consistently superior achievement beyond the regular assignment. Employees make exceptional contribution(s) that have a significant and positive impact on the performance of the unit or the organization and may materially advance the mission of the organization. The employee provides a model for excellence and helps others to do their jobs better. Peers, immediate supervision, higherlevel management and others can readily recognize such a level of performance. Supervisors must provide written justification for a level 3 rating.
15 Review of performance management techniques fitting the puzzle pieces together with one key word COMMUNICATION: C Clear communication easy for the employee to understand O Open discussions Allow the employee to talk also - Listen M Measure performance by being consistent, fair and clear M Motivate employees and encourage professional development U Utilize the performance log to document the employees performance N Notify the employee of their performance through out the year I Identify employees accomplishments and areas that need development C Communicate both positive and negative A Accurate PDQ s ensure that the employee has an accurate PDQ T Talk to employee about goals, direction and opportunities for success I Involve the employee to prevent surprise evaluations O Ongoing communication and documentation Continuous feedback N Notify the employee of your expectations
16 Review of performance management techniques Employee Log: Employee Performance Log Employee Name: Evaluation Period: Date Performance Item Feedback Provided to Employee (Yes/No) If Yes, Date 6/6/05 9/1/05 9/9/05 Completed system conversion ahead of schedule. This increases department efficiency Involved in conflict with purchasing department (see attached ) Complete certification training in FrontPage Yes, 6/7/05 Provided copy of Kudos Yes, 9/1/05 Described professional expectations and directed to apologize to purchasing Yes, 9/8/05 Completes goal #2 in Performance Plan The employee log assists the supervisor in documenting performance throughout the year. This ensures the supervisor considers the full year of performance. The log also helps document performance deficiencies and challenges.
17 Performance Management The importance of accurate PDQ s: Accurate PDQ s help define the major job duties and expectations of the position PDQ s should be updated when there has been a permanent and substantial change to the position Many PDQ s have not been updated since 1994 when the state mandated all PDQ s be updated PDQ Statistics at CSU-Pueblo: 95 PDQ s have been submitted and audited since October % of all our PDQ s for classified employees have been updated Coming Soon: Human Resources will be conducting training on how to write effective and accurate PDQ s.
18 Performance Management Key deadline to remember: All evaluations and plans are due to Human Resources by Friday, April 13 th ***Please remember to utilize the planning comment section and/or include attachments to set expectations.
ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation
ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation (For performance planning, performance progress reviews and final performance evaluations) I. Identification Section: Employee
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Mission Statement: There is hereby established a University at Pueblo, to be known as Colorado State University Pueblo, which shall be
Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised 7-22-15. I. Introduction
Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised 7-22-15 I. Introduction The purpose of the Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for classified
Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan
Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration on October 2014 I. INTRODUCTION COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
MANAGING & EVALUATING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE. A Guide to Classified Employee Performance Management & Evaluation
MANAGING & EVALUATING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE A Guide to Classified Employee Performance Management & Evaluation OUTLINE Why do performance evaluations? Supervisor s role in performance management Employee
Evaluating Performance. A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation
Evaluating Performance A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation Training Agenda Why do Performance Evaluations? Employee and Supervisor Roles in Performance
COLORADO DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2016
STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN JANUARY 2016 Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES The City of Corpus Christi's Performance Management Process is designed to: 1. Communicate performance expectations
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP)
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) Revised April 2015 1 Introduction Performance management is an ongoing process of communication between a supervisor and an employee that occurs throughout the year,
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009 Background This document provides details of the Department of Regulatory Agencies Performance
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor review key responsibilities (from the job
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: JOB TITLE: REVIEWED BY: UNIT: DATE OF REVIEW: REVIEW PERIOD:
Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial
Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial Under the State of Missouri s PERforM employee appraisal system, each employee must have at least one (1) performance objective for each
Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15
Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15 Employee Name: Position: Evaluator: Department: Date of Evaluation: Date of Hire: 1. Summary of departmental mission and customer service philosophy:
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 Name: Position: Anniversary Date in Position: Department: Supervisor: Appraisal Period: from to PURPOSE Communication about performance between
Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide
Employee Performance Review Reference Guide Oklahoma Baptist University Office of Human Resources March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Why Review?... 1 The Ratings... 1 Managerial Elements... 1 Leadership...
EMPLOYEE REVIEW SYSTEM
DA 230 EMPLOYEE REVIEW SYSTEM EMPLOYEE NAME (Last, First, MI) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER/EMPLOYEE ID REVIEW PERIOD From: No. of Feedback Sessions: To: AGENCY NAME AND NUMBER REVIEW TYPE Probationary CLASS
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL AND NON-TEACHING PROFESSIONAL STAFF
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL AND NON-TEACHING PROFESSIONAL STAFF For Evaluation Period Ending: Employee Name: Department: Title: Manager KEY
Performance Management Manual AUBMC
Manual 6. Reward Performance 1. Mutually develop performance plan 5. Communicate the evaluation AUBMC 2. Monitor and document performance 4. Evaluate Performance 3. Provide Coaching and Development 1 SECTION
Position Title: ID #: Evaluation Type: Annual Bi-Annual Other PERFORMANCE RATINGS:
Mission To conduct education, research and clinical services in the context of community engagement to train health professionals who promote wellness, provide care with excellence and compassion, and
For State Classified Employees and Supervisors
Performance Management Program User Guide For State Classified Employees and Supervisors April 2013 CSU/PMP User Guide Page 1 of 37 04/23/13 Table of Contents I. Overview 3 Introduction Colorado State
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY 2014-2015
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY 2014-2015 Employee Last Name Employee First Name Employee ID Department Position Title Supervisor Name Review Date Self-Evaluation Supervisor Evaluation
Sample Internship Forms
Sample Internship Forms Contents STUDENT INTERNSHIPS APPLICATION FORM... 2 STUDENT INTERN WORK SCHEDULE/REPORT... 3 MONTHLY STATUS REPORT (Student)... 5 STUDENT INTERNSHIP PROGRAM... 7 QUARTERLY STUDENT
Online Performance Reviews with PeopleAdmin
Online Performance Reviews with PeopleAdmin Employee Handbook This handbook is designed to help you, the employee, navigate the online Performance Appraisal Process using the PeopleAdmin portal. Your information
Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed
The staff appraisal process is an on-going communications process that begins with the identification of performance goals by the supervisor in the fall. During the spring semester, a formal appraisal
TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Prepared by the Division of Human Resources in the Department of Personnel & Administration. Issued March 17, 2014. GENERAL This document is for use by human resources
GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form
GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form (For RANK and FILE) (Rating Period) (Name) (Position) PART 1 QUANTITATIVE GOALS (60%) INSTRUCTIONS This part is for setting and evaluating the performance of your
Staff Performance Evaluation
Staff Performance Evaluation This form, and any attachment, becomes part of the employee's official personnel file. Employee Name: Position Title: UIN: Department: Review Type: Annual Job At Risk Probationary
Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors
Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors Performance reviews are like compasses They give your exact position and provide direction Office of Human
ACC Performance Excellence Program (PEP)
ACC Performance Excellence Program (PEP) Performance Review for Classified, Professional-Technical, Administrative Employees Employee Evaluation of Supervisor s Work Performance (An Upward Evaluation)
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES SPRING 2014 Employee Performance Review Guidelines The performance review process helps individual employees and organizations throughout
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee
5.2 Performance Management Policy
Policy Statement The is committed to supporting the growth and development of employees through effective performance management. A key element of performance management is the translation of government
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees PART I PURPOSE DePauw University s performance appraisal process is based upon the belief that employees are our most critical resource,
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Planning & Goal Setting
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Planning & Goal Setting To whom much is given, much is expected. Leadership Development Series Summer 2011 Areas We Will Cover Today 1. Discuss our collective lessons and learnings
Performance Appraisal System
SUPERVISORY MANUAL Performance Appraisal System For a New Century State Workforce State of Hawaii Department of Human Resources Development July 1, 2001 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM POLICY STATEMENT Public
DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) Section I Introduction 1-2 Section
Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon
Performance Management Handbook City of American Canyon 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background on performance management City Core competencies Performance management model Development of the Core
Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES DATE: Name: Position: Department: Annual Performance Review COPY MUST BE RETURNED TO HR FOR FILE Part 1: of General Performance
Sul Ross State University Performance Planning and Appraisal Policy
Sul Ross State University Performance Planning and Appraisal Policy.13 A. Purpose: The purpose of this Sul Ross State University Performance Planning and Appraisal Policy is to establish staff performance
HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:
HUMAN RESOURCES Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10 Policy Statement 3: Performance Management Performance Management Program 1. Purpose To establish a Policy for implementing and managing
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS POLICY. Purpose: To provide feedback, coaching and development plans for employees on a regularly scheduled basis.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS POLICY Purpose: To provide feedback, coaching and development plans for employees on a regularly scheduled basis. Policy: Regular, annual performance evaluations are completed for
MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff
MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff EMPLOYEE NAME: JOB TITLE: DEPARTMENT: PERIOD OF EVALUATION: FROM: TO: TIME IN CURRENT POSITION: TIME WITH THE COLLEGE:
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS Number 100.16 EXEMPT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY POLICY: All exempt District staff shall have their performance reviewed 1) twice during any probationary period
Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x
Employee s Name: Susan Jones Title: Administrative Officer Descriptive Performance Review Form Job Definition Supervisor: Marcia Meadows Date: April 2, 200x 1. Attach a current position description; if
FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
APPENDIX C FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Philosophy and Policy The performance of all Foothill-De Anza Community College District administrators
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff and Service Personnel Employee s Name (Last, First, MI): Position Title: Department: Period Covered: From: To: Type of Report: Probationary
Oregon University System
Oregon University System COMPLETING A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL For Employees in Classified Information Technology Positions Represented by the Oregon Public Employees Union Instructions for Supervisors INTRODUCTION
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES A MEMBER OF THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Name of Employee: Position Title: Department: _ of Employment Into Current Position: TYPE OF EVALUATION
Annual Employee Performance Review
Performance Excellence Program Annual Employee Performance Review Must be completed in ink. Please PRINT. Employee s Name & J- Number Title Classified Department Prof/Tech Administrator Supervisor s Name
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE
PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,
Administrative Instruction
Administrative Instruction Date: To: From: 26 July 2011 All UNOPS Personnel Pierre Moreau-Peron, Director, HRPG J 1-r AI Reference: Subject: AUHRPG/2011/04 Performance Management and Appraisal for staff
EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT
An evaluation of performance and accomplishments for Year Ending December 2007 Employee Name: Employee ID #: Position Title Grade: Annual Appraisal Schedule TASK COMPLETION DATE SUPERVISOR S INITIALS EMPLOYEE
Employee Performance Evaluation System
Employee Performance Evaluation System Evaluator Handbook (June 2015) Personnel Cabinet Department of Human Resources Administration Performance Management Program State Office Building 501 High Street
3300 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 3301 PROBATIONARY SYSTEM. A. Policy
3300 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 3301 PROBATIONARY SYSTEM A. Policy The probationary system ensures that newly hired or promoted employees are aware of the expectations of their supervisors and are apprised
Classified Employee Performance Assessment
Classified Employee Performance Assessment Evaluation for: Employee name Job classification title Internal position title Department School, College, Division Employment date for current position Most
The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions
Performance Appraisal Instructions Instructions: A current job description is needed to complete this performance appraisal. Essential tasks are numbered on the job description, and these task numbers
ONLINE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM (OPAS AT Staff) USER MANUAL (APPRAISER/HOD)
ONLINE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM (OPAS AT Staff) USER MANUAL (APPRAISER/HOD) This User- Manual introduces the functionalities related directly to creating, completing, editing and routing the performance
Online Performance Management System
Online Performance Management System Review: Performance Management A process in which UAB Medicine involves employees in: Improving effectiveness Accomplishing mission and goals Performance Management
Performance Management
Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1
Course Number: PTH 515 Course Title: Clinical Internship I. Number of Credits: 7 credits
CARROLL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NATURAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES AND BUSINESS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCES ENTRY-LEVEL PHYSICAL THERAPY PROGRAM Syllabus Course Number: PTH 515 Course Title:
RN EVALUATION PROCESS
RN EVALUATION PROCESS 3/30/15 MONTH PRIOR TO EVAULATION (Seniority) MONTH: The month prior to a staff member s evaluation month (seniority month), staff will receive an e-mail notice from the unit s AA
TBUS 568 Processes and Procedures
TBUS 568 MBA Internship (3-5 credits) No course syllabus exists for TBUS 568 as the nature of the work and its academic content will vary for each student. However, TBUS 568 internships are guided by the
Job Description. Essential Duties and Responsibilities include the following. Other duties may be assigned.
Job Description Job Title: FLSA Status: Exempt Level: 1 Department: Technical Reports To: Help Desk Supervisor Date: February 2012 Overview: River Run is seeking to hire a full-time to assist with the
College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System
College of Design Merit Pay Rating System Merit Rating System The College of Design will use the Performance Only model of merit pay. Merit rating system and definition a. Merit pay matrix if defined at
IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide
IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide Example of a Supervisor of Internship Rubric International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education 11374 Strang Line Road Lenexa, Kansas
Computer Science Graduate Degree Requirements
Computer Science Graduate Degree Requirements Duke University Department of Computer Science 1 Introduction 2 General Requirements This document defines the requirements set forth by the Department of
Faculty Performance Appraisal System Akamai University
Faculty Performance Appraisal System Akamai University A. University Position Statement Akamai faculty supervisors and the administration conduct periodic performance appraisals of all members of the faculty
PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE
LANGSTON U NIVERSITY Performance Management System Clerical, Craft, Maintenance, Technical, and Service Employees Use for Employees Who Do Not Supervise Others PART I Langston University s performance
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: JOB TITLE: REVIEWED BY: UNIT: DATE OF REVIEW: REVIEW
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review SECTION 1 Personal Information (Please print clearly and provide complete & accurate information) Employee Name: Current Review Period: to Job Title: Department
Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013
Performance Evaluation Discussion Points for University Support Staff August 20, 2013 Performance Evaluations method to assess job performance. A PSU system would include the following: 1. University Support
Employee Evaluation. 5= Outstanding: Performance is extraordinary and exceptional. (Outstanding ratings should only be awarded on rare occasions.
Employee Evaluation Name of Employee: Date of Review: Evaluator Name: Job Title: Years in Job: Performance Evaluation s: 5= Outstanding: Performance is extraordinary and exceptional. (Outstanding ratings
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL NURSE PRACTITIONER/PHYSICIAN ASST
EMPLOYEE: PRINTED NAME: REPORTS TO: DEPARTMENT: FLSA STATUS: Date: Emergency Department Medical Director Emergency Department Non-exempt PURPOSE: Provides care to Emergency Department Patients within a
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff Department of Human Resources May 2013 Introduction Performance management
VPQ Level 6 Business, Management and Enterprise
VPQ Level 6 Business, Management and Enterprise VPQ Level 6 Certificate in Business, Management and Enterprise The VPQ Level 6 Certificate in Business, Management and Enterprise is a 30 credit qualification.
Employee Performance Evaluation UConn Professional Staff (UCPEA) Unit
The period for annual evaluations for UCPEA employees is May 1 st - April 30 th. Employees are to sign the form within 7 calendar days of receipt of evaluation to indicate it has been read. Employees may
Performance Evaluation
Competency Exceptional Above Meets Partially Meets Overview of Ratings TRANSFORMATIVE work. In addition to exceeding performance goals, the organization (department, unit or program) is fundamentally better
Performance Appraisal
PURPOSE Performance Appraisal 90-day Evaluation 180-day Evaluation Annual Evaluation The purpose of any performance appraisal program is employee development. The value of performance appraisal is in the
Performance Evaluation Senior Leadership
Performance Evaluation Senior Leadership Employee Name: Position: Program/Dept.: Supervisor Name: Review Date: For each of the valuation standards, bullet points have been provided to assist you with the
PeopleAdmin 7 Performance Management PRESENTER: LABRATTA EPTING - HR SPECIALIST, PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & TRAINING
PeopleAdmin 7 Performance Management PRESENTER: LABRATTA EPTING - HR SPECIALIST, PERFORMANCE EVALUATION & TRAINING AGENDA Performance Evaluation Process Brief Overview Supervisor Role Employee Role Reviewing
Performance Appraisal Handbook
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Civil Service Employees Human Resources Performance Appraisal Definition - 3 Uses - 3 Performance Standards - 4 Rating Definitions - 5 Performance Goals - 5 Rating Errors
Computer Science Graduate Degree Requirements
Computer Science Graduate Degree Requirements Duke University Department of Computer Science 1 Introduction This document defines the requirements set forth by the Department of Computer Science for a
TITLE: Employee Performance Evaluations
Courage Responsibility Ethics Dedication - CREDibly serving the public safety of New Mexico ISSUE DATE: 11/08/85 REVIEW/REVISED: 02/23/15 EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/22/85 CD-032100 TITLE: Employee Performance
RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
60L-35.001 Scope and Purpose 60L-35.002 Definitions 60L-35.003 Minimum Requirements 60L-35.004 Career Service 60L-35.005 Selected Exempt Service 60L-35.006 Transitional Provision (Repealed) 60L-35.001
Performance Management S TA F F D E V E L O P M E N T & T R A I N I N G
Performance Management S TA F F D E V E L O P M E N T & T R A I N I N G Performance Objectives Identify the definition of Performance Management. Identify the Performance Management process. Identify the
Delaware County Human Resources Department Performance Review System Supervisor Guide
Supervisors, Managers and Directors, Thank you for reviewing the. This guide is an important source of information regarding the administration of the Performance Review System. The proper application
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM PART 1. Basic Information (To be completed by the supervisor) Name Title of Post Level At this post since Grade of post Since employed Appointment type Department Period
