The Newport Group s Investment and Fiduciary Consulting practice has
|
|
- Corey Loraine Price
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Prudent Approach to Evaluating Target Date Funds Julie Leinenbach, CFA, FSA Director of Asset Allocation The Newport Group November 2015 The Newport Group s Investment and Fiduciary Consulting practice has developed a robust methodology for evaluating and monitoring targetdate funds. It is designed to be a prudent process that lives up to the rigorous demands of ERISA. This paper describes the details behind our evaluation and monitoring process, and provides an understanding of why such specialized due diligence is essential for target date strategies. Fiduciary Responsibility In 2007, the Department of Labor established target date funds as a suitable Qualified Default Investment Alternative (QDIA). This status offers plan fiduciaries the protection of a safe-harbor provision, so that sponsors are not liable for losses occurring as a result of participants being defaulted into a target date fund option within their retirement plan. However, the market turmoil in 2008 and the resulting investor losses within target date funds led to extra attention on these investment vehicles. Investors and plan sponsors have since learned that there is an alarming amount of variation in risk composition from one target date fund manager to the next. We believe that prudent selection of a target date manager must consider many factors beyond the basic intention of the strategy. These factors are explored in greater detail in this paper.
2 Target Date Fund Evaluation and Selection Target Date funds are diverse, and are therefore difficult to compare. For instance, some series are designed with a glidepath to take an investor to the year of retirement, and therefore focus on capital preservation for several years prior to retirement. The rationale for these to series is that investors face the greatest amount of risk at the retirement date, and risk actually decreases during the drawdown years since the account value is decreasing. When the target date is reached, the portfolio shifts to a conservative, static mixture so that a participant will potentially have a consistent drawdown during retirement. To the contrary, other series are designed with the philosophy that an investor is not going to remove their assets as soon as they hit that golden year. An investor still has a fairly long time horizon and can still handle some degree of risk. These strategies are designed to gradually scale down the equity exposure over 20 or 30 years post-retirement. It is imperative for a plan sponsor to understand which of these investment objectives is being followed by the chosen series. Even after filtering through the tos and throughs and comparing only the strategies with the same objective, there are still significant differences between philosophies on risk management. Some managers will choose the conservative path and dial down equity exposure early. Other managers will take into account the risk of underfunding and outliving retirement assets and will maintain an aggressive posture in their portfolios for years after retirement. Essentially, these managers are making different risk management choices, with some managers putting more emphasis on market risk, while other managers are more focused on longevity risk. The level of equity exposure built into the glidepath contributes significantly to relative performance versus peers. As in most investment planning situations, this asset allocation decision typically outweighs all other decisions made by the series management team as a driver of relative performance. Ideally, an investor s success in achieving their retirement goals would be a key component in the evaluation process. However, not only do investor goals and expectations vary greatly, these strategies are also too young to use such a metric. Even with longer history, success of one strategy over another is extremely marketdependent. We cannot know in advance if the more conservative or more aggressive glidepath will be the winner in any particular market climate. Rather than judging these strategies based on a personal opinion of the proper amount of equity exposure at each point in the glidepath, it s a good idea to compare performance to peers with similar philosophies and with the same target dates over as long of a period as possible. As with the evaluation of any active manager, historical performance should only represent a small portion of the overall evaluation process. Besides performance, many other, more qualitative factors must be taken into account. We have summarized these criteria into a scorecard which we use in the target date manager selection process. 1
3 Series Selection Scorecard We find it helpful to make relative comparisons between target date series, so we gather information from all of the prevalent series into the form of peer universes. We group the funds by target retirement year so that each fund in a series can be compared to funds with the same objective. We develop a quantitative score for each series with a range from 1 (unacceptable) to 5 (outstanding), which is a composite of seven separate segments. To arrive at the overall score, seven segments are evaluated separately on a scale of 1 to 5, and then the total score is computed as an equally weighted average. A sample of our selection scorecard is shown in Exhibit A. The seven segments are described individually below. I. Investment Methodology and Portfolio Construction Factor 1: Portfolio Construction What is the methodology used to arrive at the asset allocation? Is there sufficient diversification across asset classes and sub asset classes? Are nontraditional and lower correlated asset classes such as REITs, commodities, emerging markets and inflation-linked bonds included? Is the capitalization weighting and style orientation appropriate given the target retirement date? What is the level of overlap between the underlying funds? Construction of the portfolios within the series must be evaluated by viewing the strategies from different perspectives. The majority of series operate as funds of funds, so we view each fund as it breaks down into underlying funds. We check to see if there are any major asset overlaps. If overlaps do exist, we confirm that the asset allocation process considers these exposures and risks are being managed from an overall level by the person or group responsible for the asset allocation decisions. The next perspective to consider is a breakdown of the strategies by asset class. In the case of a series that does not use the fund of funds structure, this will be the only perspective possible. Even with the fund of funds structure, some underlying strategies may span more than one asset class, so this may result in different slices than the fund view. We feel that at a minimum, a portfolio needs exposure to the basic asset classes: Large Cap Value and Growth Mid and Small Cap Value and Growth International Equities Aggregate Bonds Global Bonds A passively managed component REITs, commodities, emerging markets, and inflation-protected bonds can significantly enhance the diversification of each portfolio, allowing for either risk reduction with equivalent return, or higher expected return with equivalent risk. Some managers of collective trust series may include a stable value component in place of cash which has the advantage of adding to portfolio stability with a higher 2
4 return expectation than a money market strategy. Some managers may also use derivatives to provide some downside protection, or as a way to limit or obtain exposure to equity markets. The additional cost and liquidity risk must be evaluated when considering the use of these tools. Also of note is whether or not the manager employs a tactical allocation strategy within the series. Tactical allocation, which allows managers the freedom to search for the best opportunities across asset classes, has the potential to drive up expenses and leads to unpredictable results. We believe a modest allowance for tactical management is acceptable, but for the bulk of the portfolio, it s more appropriate to employ a long-term strategic allocation philosophy when dealing with retirement savings. In addition to utilizing a wide breadth of asset classes, the portfolio construction needs to be appropriate for the risk tolerance level based on the time remaining to the target date. Although this decision requires some subjectivity from the management team, portfolio construction still needs to follow certain patterns. For instance, our research shows that the value style of investing is generally less risky than growth, large caps are less risky than small caps, and developed international markets are less risky than emerging markets. Therefore, we like to see that we can detect a shift from the risky assets to their less risky counterparts as the target date nears. Factor 2: Manager Selection Does the provider use an objective approach in selecting best-in-class managers, or is there a proprietary bias? Is the process for selecting and monitoring the underlying managers well defined and adhered to on a consistent basis? What is the quality of the underlying holdings? To what extent have these offerings provided competitive returns? Most series employ a closed architecture, where underlying strategies are chosen exclusively from the same fund family. The main motivation of this approach is that the advisor retains all of the funds management fees. In some cases, the benefits of fee retention are seen by investors in the form of expense savings. As further justification to this approach, the management team has more knowledge of their own in-house strategies than those managed externally. And to some extent, the management team may have some input or control over the mandates of in-house underlying strategies. However, there is a danger that the target date fund series may be used to promote inferior managers by increasing their assets under management. In the case of a closed architecture, it s important to evaluate whether the series management is using an objective selection criteria or a biased approach. We examine the asset allocation to underlying strategies very closely. Do all of the assignments make sense from a diversification standpoint, or is there a substantial overlap in investment styles and objectives? If low-quality managers are being utilized, are better options available within the fund family? 3
5 In the Manager Selection category, we tend to give higher scores to providers who use an open architecture approach, where the manager can seek best-in-class strategies from any organization. This flexible mandate eliminates single-firm risk and brings a wider variety of management approaches and ideas to the table, resulting in a higher overall level of diversification. The Manager Selection criterion also include an assessment of the quality of the due diligence from the top level, asset allocation management, since this team must have the resources to track each manager closely and implement changes when necessary. For a fiduciary, some analysis of the underlying strategies is prudent to properly evaluate the series. For instance, is a strategy with a recent management change being closely monitored? Are low-quality strategies being held for too long? And equally damaging, are highquality strategies being replaced too quickly due to short-term performance blips? Factor 3: Glidepath/Risk Management What is the methodology by which the asset allocation is adjusted over time? Is the percentage of equities in the glidepath appropriate given the targeted retirement date? Is there an appropriate balance between maximizing long-term growth and managing risk? It is critical to gain comfort that the management team has a well thought-out process for constructing the glidepath. Preferably, the glidepath construction is based on modeling and scenario testing and is supported by a robust asset allocation framework. Judging the appropriate level of equities is challenging because those who stray from the norm could be the most successful in retrospect. It s not advisable to score a series low due to a deviation from the average peer in terms of risk philosophy, because target date managers take vastly different approaches to balancing the risks of longevity and markets. However, if the management team is taking an extreme stance on risk positioning and giving considerably more priority to either longevity risk or market risk, this decision should result in a lower score for the series in this category. The variance from peers adds some uncertainty and risk to the plan sponsor which should be accounted for in the scoring criteria. II. Organizational Strengths Factor 4: Manager Experience How long has the firm been managing lifecycle funds? What are the assets under management in the series? What are the average industry experience and tenure of the investment professionals responsible for managing the series? Are there sufficient resources available to assist in this process? These questions all characterize the expertise of the management team in performing this type of analysis. Investors want to rely on a seasoned group of professionals with a proven track record in asset allocation decisions and managing retirement savings. In our practice, we score this criterion on a relative basis by comparing assets under management, tenure, and resource availability to the other target date series in our peer group. 4
6 III. Quantitative Measures Factor 5: Expenses Is the fund s annual expense ratio below the median for its peer group? Are the expenses reasonable given the investment strategy (i.e. active versus passive, tactical asset allocation versus strategic)? We compare the average expense ratio of a series to our peer group. Our peer group is broken into quintiles, and a manager s score is implied by its quintile. For example, if the fund s expense ratio is in the 60-80% quintile, the series scores a 4. To judge the reasonableness of the expense ratio, we also qualitatively consider whether the underlying strategies are actively managed or index funds. We also take into account whether the target allocations are tactical or strategic. Another consideration is whether or not the structure is based on proprietary management versus open-architecture. An open-architecture approach may justify higher expense ratios because of the greater role due diligence plays in the process, and because the asset allocation function is less likely to be paid from underlying fund management fees. Our overall expenses score is computed as the average of the rankingsbased and qualitative scores. Factor 6: Up/Down Market Capture To what extent has the fund outperformed its appropriate benchmark in rising markets? How effective has the strategy been in protecting capital in market downturns? We convert these two questions into a single metric by dividing the up market capture by the down market capture. The value is compared to peers, and the final score for this criterion is based on the fund s quintile. Factor 7: Risk-Adjusted Returns/Sharpe Ratio Has the fund outperformed its appropriate benchmark or peer group on a risk-adjusted basis for the trailing 60-month period? Although target date fund strategies are still fairly new to the investment world, most have accumulated enough historical performance data to be compared on a 60-month basis. While it is prudent to analyze performance on as long of a timeframe as possible, our process focuses on a 60-month timeframe so that we can evaluate strategies against a reasonably-sized peer group. This score is computed as excess return over 60-months divided by standard deviation, and then compared to the quintile rank versus peers. Quarterly Monitoring Scorecard and Beyond Even after a thorough evaluation and selection of a target date series, quarterly monitoring is necessary to ensure the series continues to meet the standards of a plan fiduciary. We evaluate each target date series held by our clients on a quarterly basis. Unlike the selection criteria where scores can range from 1 to 5, our monitoring scorecard is a collection of pass/fail scores. A brief explanation of the monitoring criteria is detailed below: Risk-Adjusted Performance on Income Fund On a risk-adjusted basis, has the Income Fund outperformed its peer group over the last 60 months? 5
7 This criterion is meant to measure performance at the conservative end of the risk spectrum, and may be replaced by a 2010 fund or similar strategy in cases where an Income fund does not exist or is not representative of a conservative allocation. We believe that measuring performance against peers on a riskadjusted basis helps to account for variations in glide paths. Risk-Adjusted Performance on 2040 Fund On a risk-adjusted basis, has the 2040 fund outperformed its peer group over the last 60 months? The 2040 Fund is typically chosen to represent the more aggressive end of the risk spectrum, since longer dated strategies tend to be newer and will not yet have sufficient history to satisfy our 60-month monitoring period. Expenses Is the series average annual expense ratio below the median for the peer group? Are the expenses reasonable given the investment strategy (active versus passive, tactical asset allocation versus strategic)? Expenses are examined at selection, and re-visited relative to peers on a quarterly basis. For expenses and other quantitative criteria, we use the same peer groups we developed during the target date selection process. Glidepath Stability Are the asset class weightings appropriate given the manager s target and does an appropriate balance exist between maximizing long term growth and managing risk? Have there been minimal changes to the glidepath structure in recent history? Many target date managers have made changes to their glide paths. If changes are substantial, a series would fail the stability criterion which would trigger close monitoring and discussions with the management team. The review with management gives us a chance to understand their perspective and glide path review process. The impact the new glide path will have on suitability for existing clients will also be taken into consideration. Manager and Organizational Stability Have the portfolio management team and firm been stable for the last 12 months? Have any changes occurred to the firm s ownership, control or management? Is the firm subject to any regulatory action, investigation or litigation by a government agency? Management changes must be considered just as they are for all strategies, however, it should be noted that for the funds-of-funds structure, there are two management levels. If there is significant turnover within management of the underlying strategies, the size of the allocations must be taken into account to determine their true impact on the total portfolio. Similarly, the top level management team controls the asset allocation decisions and performs underlying manager due diligence, so this team must be monitored for management continuity as well. If a series passes fewer than four criteria, it is placed on our Watch List, and must resume passing at least four criteria in the subsequent eight-quarter period to be removed from the Watch List. If a series fails to improve its score, we would issue a replacement recommendation. Of course, there are circumstances where we will recommend replacement without the eight-quarter waiting period if we have good reason to expect that a series has been permanently impaired. There are also times when a series may join the Watch List even with a score above 3. Exhibit B demonstrates our standard quarterly scorecard. 6
8 In addition to providing quarterly scores, it is important for plan sponsors to remain aware of any risks inherent in the series they have chosen for their plans participants. For instance, the T. Rowe Price Retirement series is known to be on the aggressive side when compared to their peers when it comes to the equity exposure taken at each point along the glidepath, in particular near retirement. We demonstrate this risk by including a chart within our clients quarterly reports that compares equity exposure to its peers at select points along the glidepath (see Exhibit C). In addition, we include quarterly commentary that highlights any changes made to the management team or process, asset allocation, or underlying strategies over the course of the quarter. Conclusion Asset allocation strategies can play an important role in a defined contribution retirement plan menu and can provide extra security to plan participants in the form of professional investment advice. Indeed, we believe that the majority of participants are best served by investing in target-date or risk-based asset allocation funds, as they are less likely to chase the performance of the most recently hot asset class or style. For plan sponsors, however, evaluating and monitoring asset allocation portfolios and target-date series in particular carries special challenges. We believe that the prudent process we have developed for the evaluation and monitoring of target-date series ensures a high quality investment selection for participants while minimizing fiduciary liability for plan sponsors. For More Information For more information about plan solutions provided by The Newport Group, please contact: Amy K. Parker, AIF Managing Director, Investment and Fiduciary Consulting The Newport Group 300 International Parkway Suite 270 Heathrow, FL amy.parker@newportgroup.com 7
9 Exhibit A: Sample Selection Scorecard Scoring Criteria I. Investment Methodology in Constructing the Funds Portfolio Construction What is the methodology used to arrive at the asset allocation? Is there sufficient diversification across asset classes and sub asset classes? Are nontraditional and lower correlated asset classes such as REITs, commodities, emerging markets and real return bonds included? Is the capitalization weighting and style orientation appropriate given the target retirement date? What is the level of overlap between the underlying funds? Manager Selection Does the provider use an objective approach in selecting multiple, best in class managers, or is there a proprietary bias? Is the process for selecting and monitoring the underlying managers well defined and adhered to on a consistent basis? What is the quality of the underlying holdings? If proprietary funds are used, to what extent have these offerings provided competitive returns across a number of asset classes and styles? Glide Path/Risk Management What is the methodology by which the asset allocation is adjusted over time? Is the percentage of equities in the glide path appropriate given the targeted retirement date? Is there an appropriate balance between maximizing long-term growth and managing risk? How frequently are the portfolios rebalanced to the targeted allocations? Score II. Organizational Strengths Manager Experience How long has the firm been managing lifecycle funds? What are the assets under management in the series? What is the average industry experience and tenure of the investment professionals responsible for managing the series? Are there sufficient resources available to assist in this process? 4.8 III. Fund Expenses Is the fund s annual expense ratio below the average for its peer group? Are the expenses reasonable given the investment strategy (active versus passive; tactical asset allocation versus strategic)? 4.3 IV. Performance Up/Down Market Capture To what extent has the fund outperformed its appropriate benchmark in rising markets? How effective has the strategy been in protecting capital in market downturns? Risk-Adjusted Returns Has the fund outperformed its appropriate benchmark or peer group on a riskadjusted basis for the trailing 60-month period? Overall Score: 4.2 Target Date Fund Series are evaluated based on the following criteria Portfolio Construction, Manager Selection, Glide Path/Risk Management, Manager Experience, Expenses, Up/Down Market Capture and Risk-Adjusted Returns. Each of these measures will be rated on a scale of 1 to 5, and the cumulative score will then be averaged to determine a total score as defined as follows: Scoring Key 5 = Outstanding 4 = Very Good 3 = Average 2 = Needs Improvement 1 = Unacceptable *The sample evaluation scorecard is for example purposes only and should not be utilized or relied upon for any other purpose. 8
10 INVESTMENT CONSULTING PHILOSOPHY AND PROCESS QIMR Executive Summary Asset Allocation Exhibit B: Quarterly Scorecard If any manager fails two (2) or more of the five (5) criteria, the fund will be placed on the Watchlist. Source: Newport Group Exhibit C: Glidepath Comparison Chart 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Equity Allocation along the Glide Path 30 Years Before Retirement 20 Years Before Retirement 10 Years Before Retirement At Retirement Source: Newport Group, Morningstar 9
11 About The Newport Group Founded in 1984, The Newport Group is a leading financial services firm specializing in the creative design and administration of retirement and executive benefit plans, as well as investment and fiduciary consulting services. Through its innovative and customized solutions, Newport is uniquely positioned to satisfy the distinct financial needs of employers and employees, and has done so for hundreds of the country s largest and best-known companies. 10
12 300 International Parkway, Suite 270 Heathrow, Florida p f IMPORTANT INFORMATION For Institutional Investors Only. Not intended for redistribution or public use. Newport Group Securities, Inc. (d/b/a The Newport Group) is dually registered as a registered investment advisor and broker-dealer, and Member FINRA ( 300 International Parkway, Suite 270 Heathrow, Florida All investment consulting services are provided through its registered investment advisor while all securities transactions are provided through the broker-dealer. The Newport Group, Inc., Newport Retirement Services, Inc., and Newport Group Securities, Inc. are affiliated entities. For more information about our services, please visit or refer to our Form ADV Part 2, which is available by contacting us at The format and substance of the material contained in this report were developed by and constitute the confidential work product of The Newport Group. Any discussions concerning investments should not be considered a solicitation or recommendation by Newport Group Securities, Inc. This presentation is being provided for informational purposes only. Any information presented in connection with this communication is general in nature and is not intended to provide personal investment advice and is not intended to be used as the sole basis for any investment decision. Prior to making any investment decision, an investor should independently evaluate the relevant risks involved and ensure that such investment is appropriate and suitable for the investor in light of their investment objectives, trading experience, time horizon, financial resources, risk tolerance and other relevant circumstances. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The information contained in this report has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, either express or implied is made by Newport or any person as to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. All opinions and estimates contained herein constitute judgment as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice. This report may not be reproduced, distributed or published in whole or in part by any recipient hereof for any purpose IA-14 FOR PLAN SPONSOR AND FINANCIAL PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY. NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC THE NEWPORT GROUP
Retirement Plans Investment Policy Statement
Retirement Plans Investment Policy Statement Adopted on August 18, 2015 Effective Date: August 1, 2015 INTRODUCTION Central Michigan sponsors a 403(b) and a 457(b) Retirement Plan (the Plans ) for the
More informationEvaluating Target Date Funds. 2003 2013 Multnomah Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
2003 2013 Multnomah Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Scott Cameron, CFA Scott is the Chief Investment Officer for the Multnomah Group and a Founding Principal of the firm. In that role, Scott leads Multnomah
More informationEvaluating Target Date Funds. 2003 2015 Multnomah Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
2003 2015 Multnomah Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Scott Cameron, CFA Scott is the Chief Investment Officer for the Multnomah Group and a Founding Principal of the firm. In this role, Scott leads Multnomah
More informationTARGET DATE COMPASS SM
TARGET DATE COMPASS SM METHODOLOGY As of April 2015 Any and all information set forth herein and pertaining to the Target Date Compass and all related technology, documentation and know-how ( information
More informationPortfolio Management Consultants Perfecting the Portfolio
Portfolio Management Consultants Perfecting the Portfolio Envestnet PMC is the ultimate advisor to the advisor. Our goal is to help advisors strengthen relationships with their clients and improve outcomes
More informationConsiderations for Plan Sponsors: CUSTOM TARGET DATE STRATEGIES
PRICE PERSPECTIVE April 2015 Considerations for Plan Sponsors: CUSTOM TARGET DATE STRATEGIES In-depth analysis and insights to inform your decision making. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Defined contribution plan sponsors
More informationTarget Date Fund Selection: More Than Simply Active vs. Passive
Target Date Fund Selection: More Than Simply Active vs. Passive White Paper October 2015 Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction
More informationAre You in the Wrong Target-Date Fund?
Insights August 2014 Are You in the Wrong Target-Date Fund? Now Is a Good Time to Reevaluate TDFs may have different investment strategies, glide paths, and investment-related fees. Because these differences
More informationNavigating the Target Date Fund Evaluation Process
Navigating the Target Date Fund Evaluation Process A Primer for Retirement Plan Sponsors Benjamin J. Smith, CFA Principal, Chief Investment Officer Contents Introduction. Understanding the Core Attributes
More informationSample Client FIDUCIARY INVESTMENT REVIEW. January 15, 2010
Sample Client FIDUCIARY INVESTMENT REVIEW January 5, 2 FIDUCIARY INVESTMENT REVIEW Sample Client presented by: Michael E. Morris Director Institutional Consulting Ross, Sinclaire & Associates 7 Walnut
More informationSAMPLE OF INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT
investment services SAMPLE OF INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT FOR THE (PLAN NAME) OUR HISTORY We are TIAA-CREF. We re a full-service financial services organization that has dedicated itself to helping those
More informationTarget-Date Funds: It s Time to Take a Closer Look
Target-Date Funds: It s Time to Take a Closer Look Executive summary Over the past few years, retirement plans have seen significant changes in their investment structures, as well as the level of fiduciary
More informationTarget-Date Funds: The Search for Transparency
Target-Date Funds: The Search for Transparency Presented by: Joachim Wettermark, Treasurer Salesforce.com, inc. Linda Ruiz-Zaiko, President Financial, Inc. Qualified Default Investment Alternative (QDIA)
More informationINVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT. For. The Animation Guild 401(k) Plan
INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT For The Animation Guild 401(k) Plan Effective TABLE OF CONTENTS Investment Policy Statement Page Purpose...1 Statement of Plan Investment Objectives...2 Roles & Responsibilities...3
More informationTHE DUE DILIGENCE PROCESS FOR SUB-ADVISED INVESTMENT OPTIONS
THE DUE DILIGENCE PROCESS FOR SUB-ADVISED INVESTMENT OPTIONS Our proprietary due diligence process provides a rigorous and disciplined framework for identifying, hiring, and retaining premier investment
More informationTarget-date funds: the to versus through dilemma
November 14 Target-date funds: the to versus through dilemma Leo M. Zerilli, CIMA Head of Investments John Hancock Investments Recent U.S. Department of Labor guidance on target-date funds provides helpful
More informationSophisticated investments. Simple to use.
Russell LifePoints INSTITUTIONAL TARGET DATE FUNDS Sophisticated investments. Simple to use. INVESTED. TOGETHER. Now your default option can be your best option. If your target date funds are projected
More informationBest Practices for Investment Committee Members
Best Practices for Investment Committee Members Brightscape Erisamyliability.com Eric Weiss, CFP, AIF This paper identifies best practices for 401(k) investment committee members in order to reduce potential
More informationManaging risk in DC plan lineups The new alpha?
PERSPECTIVES Managing risk in DC plan lineups The new alpha? October 2013 IN BRIEF Defined contribution (DC) plan participants face a broad range of risks when investing for retirement but, historically,
More informationInvestment Policy Statement University of Texas System Retirement Program
Office of Employee Benefits Administrative Manual Investment Policy Statement University of Texas System Retirement Program EFFECTIVE DATE: MARCH 1, 2010 REVISION DATE: 840 PURPOSE: To establish the investment
More informationAsset Management Portfolio Solutions Disciplined Process. Customized Approach. Risk-Based Strategies.
INSTITUTIONAL TRUST & CUSTODY Asset Management Portfolio Solutions Disciplined Process. Customized Approach. Risk-Based Strategies. As one of the fastest growing investment managers in the nation, U.S.
More informationTVA Savings and Deferral Retirement Plan. Investment Policy Statement
TVA Savings and Deferral Retirement Plan Investment Policy Statement Amended March 16, 2012 TVA Savings and Deferral Retirement Plan Investment Policy Statement The TVA Savings and Deferral Retirement
More informationBuild your investment program on a strong foundation
A MassMutual Investment Program Guide for Financial Professionals Build your investment program on a strong foundation Smart Architecture SM offers retirement plan sponsors and advisors Diversification
More informationUniversity of Washington Investment Policy Statement of the Fund Review Committee
University of Washington Investment Policy Statement of the Fund Review Committee Approved May 25, 2010 Page 1 University of Washington Investment Policy Statement of the Fund Review Committee Goal of
More informationRedefining the safety option Target date funds and risk management
PERSPECTIVES Redefining the safety option Target date funds and risk management September 2013 IN BRIEF Defined contribution (DC) plan participants face a broad range of risks when investing for retirement
More informationSample Investment Policy Statement
Sample Investment Policy Statement Part I. THE PLAN The sponsors (The Plan) for the benefit of its employees. The Plan is intended to provide eligible employees with the
More informationSocial Security Alternative Retirement Income Security Program for Other Personal Service Employees
EXHIBIT 1 Social Security Alternative Retirement Income Security Program for Other Personal Service Employees Investment Procedures for Product Selection and Retention TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PURPOSE... 3
More informationProposal for: COMPANY NAME. Presented by: NAME TITLE SAMPLE DATE AFN32087_0209 MUGC7797B
Proposal for: COMPANY NAME Presented by: NAME TITLE DATE SAMPLE AFN32087_0209 MUGC7797B Mutual of Omaha Retirement Services Proven Retirement Product Expertise Mutual of Omaha s subsidiary companies, United
More informationDefensive equity. A defensive strategy to Canadian equity investing
Defensive equity A defensive strategy to Canadian equity investing Adam Hornung, MBA, CFA, Institutional Investment Strategist EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Over the last several years, academic studies have shown
More informationINVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT
INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT Investment Options Dated : August 2015 Profile Name United Bank of Michigan 900 East Paris Avenue SE Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Primary Contact Eric Soya 616.559.4534 Advisor Devenir
More informationGlossary of Investment Terms
online report consulting group Glossary of Investment Terms glossary of terms actively managed investment Relies on the expertise of a portfolio manager to choose the investment s holdings in an attempt
More informationScore. Stifel CONQUEST Portfolios. Research-Driven Portfolios PORTFOLIO STRATEGY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS. Ease of Diversification
Stifel CONQUEST Portfolios PORTFOLIO STRATEGY The Washington Crossing Advisors Stifel CONQUEST Portfolios seek to add value by actively allocating assets among U.S. equities, bonds, commodities, and foreign
More informationStrategic Advisers Fundamental Research Process: A Unique, Style-Based Approach
STRATEGIC ADVISERS, INC. Strategic Advisers Fundamental Research Process: A Unique, Style-Based Approach By Jeff Mitchell, Senior Vice President, Director of Research, Strategic Advisers, Inc. KEY TAKEAWAYS
More informationThoughtCapital. Investment Strength and Flexibility
Investment Strength and Flexibility Principal Trust SM Target Date Funds The Principal Trust SM Target Date Funds (Target Date Funds) are designed to capitalize on the growing popularity of Do-It-For-Me
More informationAH&T FIDUCIARY INVESTMENT REVIEW. December 31, 2011
AH&T FIDUCIARY INVESTMENT REVIEW December 3, 2 FIDUCIARY INVESTMENT REVIEW AH&T presented by: Jim Maulfair Financial Services Director Armfield, Harrison & Thomas, Inc. 2 S. King St. Leesburg, VA 275 Phone:
More informationMERCER WEBCAST MEETING TODAY S CHALLENGES FOR 401(K) SPONSORS OCTOBER 22, 2014. Liana Magner Amy Reynolds
MEETING TODAY S CHALLENGES FOR 401(K) SPONSORS OCTOBER 22, 2014 Liana Magner Amy Reynolds Today s speakers Liana Magner, CFA Partner US Delegated DC Leader MERCER W EBCAST Amy Reynolds, ASA Partner US
More informationA Primer for Investment Trustees (a summary)
A Primer for Investment Trustees (a summary) Jeffrey V. Bailey, CFA, Jesse L. Phillips, CFA, and Thomas M. Richards, CFA Investment trustees oversee the investments and investment process for a variety
More informationAsset Management. Why Cidel? Our risk approach.
Asset Management Global Why Cidel? Our risk approach. At Cidel, our primary focus is managing risk. Our proactive risk approach ensures that as risks in the market change we manage these changes to help
More informationDeep Experience. Thoughtful Innovation. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price
Deep Experience. Thoughtful Innovation. Target date solutions from T. Rowe Price troweprice.com/dc Investment solutions designed for a complex retirement landscape Today, defined contribution plan sponsors
More informationRetirement Connections: A Professionally Managed Solution
Retirement Connections: A Professionally Managed Solution Expand your practice and build loyalty with an easy-to-use retirement plan for your small business clients For Financial Advisor use only. Not
More informationINVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT Valued Client
INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT Valued Client August 17, 2010 PREPARED BY: John Ohl Bay Colony Advisors 91 Main St STE 308 Concord, Massachusetts 01742 (978) 369-7200 John@baycolonyadvisors.com www.baycolonyadvisors.com
More informationDefined Contribution Plans Investment Policy Statement
Defined Contribution Plans Investment Policy Statement Adopted April 29, 2003 Amended June 8, 2004 Amended July 19, 2005 Amended June 17, 2008 Amended September 22, 2009 Amended April 23, 2013 Amended
More informationExchange Traded Funds A Brief Introduction
Exchange Traded Funds A Brief Introduction spdrs.com What You Need to Know about ETFs ETF Basics Potential Benefits of ETFs ETFs versus Mutual Funds The Role of ETFs in Your Portfolio Our Next Steps Frequently
More informationInvestment Policy Statement
Investment Policy Statement Prepared on: February 04, 2013 Prepared for: Sample Individual Client 432 Elm St Chicago IL 60630 Executive Summary Client Name: Sample Individual Client Client Type: Individual
More informationRequest for Information. Northern York County Regional Police Pension Fund. Pension Fund Investment Consulting Services
. York County, Pennsylvania Request for Information Northern York County Regional Police Pension Fund Pension Fund Investment Consulting Services September 12, 2014 York County, Pennsylvania Northern York
More informationCI LifeCycle Portfolios
Portfolios Portfolios Portfolios are sophisticated multi-asset class, multi-manager target date retirement funds offered exclusively by CI Institutional Asset Management as an option for pension plan sponsors
More informationTarget Date Funds. [CODE] [Expiration Date]
Target Date Funds Investments and services offered through Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, and accounts carried by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated; members SIPC. 2009 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney [CODE]
More informationwhite paper Challenges to Target Funds James Breen, President, Horizon Fiduciary Services
Challenges to Target Funds James Breen, President, Horizon Fiduciary Services Since their invention in the early 1990 s Target Date Funds have become a very popular investment vehicle, particularly with
More informationINVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT. Creighton University 403(b) Retirement Plan
INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT For Creighton University 403(b) Retirement Plan November 2008 Cornerstone Advisors Asset Management, Inc. 74 West Broad Street, Suite 340 Bethlehem, PA 18018 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSTATEMENT OF POLICY AND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES. The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Endowment Board. and
STATEMENT OF POLICY AND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Endowment Board and The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Foundation, Inc. December 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationInvestment Policy Statement
Investment Policy Statement Prepared on: January 30, 2013 Prepared for: Sample 401k Client 1300 Liberty Ave Pittsburgh PA 15222 Executive Summary Client Name: Sample 401k Client Client Type: Retirement
More informationCFA Institute Contingency Reserves Investment Policy Effective 8 February 2012
CFA Institute Contingency Reserves Investment Policy Effective 8 February 2012 Purpose This policy statement provides guidance to CFA Institute management and Board regarding the CFA Institute Reserves
More informationTo have the ability to pay all benefits obligations when requested.
INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT FOR: Alliance Benefit Group Health Savings Account Program I. GENERAL Purpose and Overview The Alliance Benefit Group Health Savings Account Program ( Program ) was established
More informationFiduciary Management at BNP Paribas Investment Partners A true partnership approach. For Professional Investors
Fiduciary Management at BNP Paribas Investment Partners A true partnership approach For Professional Investors By taking the fiduciary journey with us, you are engaging in a true working partnership,,
More informationTarget Date Funds & Asset Allocation Theory
Target Date Funds & Asset Allocation Theory John Rekenthaler, CFA Vice President, Research 2012 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. Target Date Funds The biggest news in U.S. mutual funds over the
More informationPERSI Choice 401(k) Plan Investment Policy
PERSI Choice 401(k) Plan Investment Policy I. Plan Objective The Public Employee Retirement System of Idaho (PERSI) sponsors the PERSI Choice Plan (the "Choice Plan" or "Plan") for the benefit of its members.
More informationThe Master Statement of Investment Policies and Objectives of The Lower Colorado River Authority Retirement Plan and Trust. Amended June 16, 2015
The Master Statement of Investment Policies and Objectives of The Lower Colorado River Authority Retirement Plan and Trust Amended June 16, 2015 Introduction The Lower Colorado River Authority ( LCRA )
More informationCHOOSING YOUR INVESTMENTS
CHOOSING YOUR INVESTMENTS FOR ASSISTANCE GO ONLINE For more information on your retirement plan, investment education, retirement planning tools and more, please go to www.tiaa-cref.org/carnegiemellon.
More informationThoughtCapital. Strategic Diversification for a Lifetime Principal LifeTime Portfolios
Strategic Diversification for a Lifetime Principal LifeTime Portfolios The Principal LifeTime portfolios were launched in response to participants increasing interest in having Do It For Me investment
More informationInvestment Policy For the 457(b) and 401(a) Deferred Compensation Plans
SACRAMENTO COUNTY Investment Policy For the 457(b) and 401(a) Deferred Compensation Plans Approved by the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors September 15, 2015 Resolution No. 2015-0686 Table of Contents
More informationWealth Management Redefined. Lifetime Wealth Portfolios SM
Wealth Management Redefined Lifetime Wealth Portfolios SM Innovative Asset Allocation Professional Investment Management Lifetime Wealth Portfolios SM Objective Insurance Selection Lifetime Wealth Portfolios
More informationNow newly enhanced new functionality, new analytics, more intuitive design
TARGET DATE COMPASS SM EVALUATE AND SELECT TARGET DATE FUNDS WITH GREATER KNOWLEDGE AND CONFIDENCE SM Now newly enhanced new functionality, new analytics, more intuitive design Target date funds have quickly
More informationFiduciary Assure SM Fiduciary support for your retirement plan
Retirement Plans Group Fiduciary Assure SM Fiduciary support for your retirement plan NOT FOR USE WITH PARTICIPANTS Professional Advice for Plan Sponsors As the sponsor of a retirement plan, it is your
More informationA RETIREMENT DATE IS NOT A COMPLETE STRATEGY Target Date Funds are only Part of the Solution
A RETIREMENT DATE IS NOT A COMPLETE STRATEGY Target Date Funds are only Part of the Solution By Robert L. Padgette, CFA, CIMA and Ted Ponko, CFA, CEBS Retirement plan assets in target date funds increased
More informationThe unique value of Target-Date Funds
The unique value of Target-Date Funds By Jake Gilliam, Senior Multi-Asset Class Portfolio Strategist supporting Charles Schwab Investment Management September, 2015 Target-Date Funds are excellent low-maintenance
More informationNevada Public Employees Deferred Compensation Program. Statement of Investment Policy. Amended June 2011
Nevada Public Employees Deferred Compensation Program Statement of Investment Policy Amended June 2011 Adopted March 2006 Nevada Public Employees Deferred Compensation Program Statement of Investment Policy
More informationThe essential Guide To TarGeT date Funds
The Essential Guide to Target Date FundS ALL TARGET DATE FUNDS ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL Target date funds are a revolutionary idea: A single investment that evolves over time according to the changing needs
More informationCustom Target Date Options: A Higher Hurdle
INSIGHTS Custom Target Date Options: A Higher Hurdle April 2015 203.621.1700 2015, Rocaton Investment Advisors, LLC Given the high utilization of target date options in defined contribution plans, target
More informationTarget Date Funds: Debating To Versus Through
Target Date Funds: Debating To Versus Through Glenn Dial, Sr. VP, Head of Retirement Product Business Development, Allianz Global Investors Distributors LLC Scott Brooks, Head of US Retail Client Relations
More informationNorthCoast Investment Advisory Team 203.532.7000 info@northcoastam.com
NorthCoast Investment Advisory Team 203.532.7000 info@northcoastam.com NORTHCOAST ASSET MANAGEMENT An established leader in the field of tactical investment management, specializing in quantitative research
More informationBRINKER CAPITAL OVERVIEW. Helping You Invest with Confidence
BRINKER CAPITAL OVERVIEW Helping You Invest with Confidence PARTIALLY INVESTED PERIODIC INVESTMENT FULLY INVESTED Unwavering Focus on Investment Excellence For more than 25 years, Brinker Capital has been
More informationAugust 2010. State of Nevada Deferred Compensation Plan. Manager Due Diligence Education Session
August 2010 State of Nevada Deferred Compensation Plan Manager Due Diligence Education Session Fiduciary Responsibility Investment prudence relies on process, not investment results Three investment principles
More informationInterest Rates and Inflation: How They Might Affect Managed Futures
Faced with the prospect of potential declines in both bonds and equities, an allocation to managed futures may serve as an appealing diversifier to traditional strategies. HIGHLIGHTS Managed Futures have
More informationWealth Management Solutions
Wealth Management Solutions Invest in the Future Life has significant moments. Making sure you re prepared for them is important. But what can you do when the pace of your life leaves you little time to
More informationInvestment Management for Non-Profit Organizations
Investment Management for Non-Profit Organizations Bradley, Foster & Sargent has worked with non-profit organizations for many years managing their endowments and helping them achieve their mission, long
More informationDCIIA Guide To U.S. Department Of Labor Tips On Selecting Target Date Funds
Defined Contribution Institutional Investment Association DCIIA Guide To U.S. Department Of Labor Tips On Selecting Target Date Funds Public Policy Committee Introduction In February of 2013 the US Department
More informationCustom or off-the-shelf target date strategies?
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE Custom or off-the-shelf target date strategies? The choice requires careful consideration July 2015 AUTHOR Daniel Oldroyd, CFA, CAIA Head of Target Date
More information5Strategic. decisions for a sound investment policy
5Strategic decisions for a sound investment policy 1 An investment policy sets your course for the long term. Managers of billion-dollar pension and endowment funds know it s nearly impossible to beat
More informationVRS Investment Policy Statement for the Optional Retirement Plan for Employees of Institutions of Higher Education
VRS Investment Policy Statement for the Optional Retirement Plan for Employees of Institutions of Higher Education Approved by the Board of Trustees: February 16, 2012 Updated November 14, 2013 This Investment
More informationMilliman Investment Consulting Services. Clear solutions for your investment needs
Clear solutions for your investment needs Milliman investment consulting services The current investment environment demands that fiduciaries exercise their responsibilities with the utmost diligence.
More informationWHOLE OF LIFE SUPERANNUATION
WHOLE OF LIFE SUPERANNUATION Challenging the status quo NOVEMBER 2012 INTRODUCTION There is no question that Australia is one of the most mature Defined Contribution markets in the world. But while Australia
More informationCustom Target Date Funds
Custom Target Date Funds Assessing the Best Fit IN BRIEF October 2013 Authored by Fred Reish and Joan Neri Target date funds are a popular plan investment option. The recent DOL guidance says that plan
More informationReal Asset Funds. What Are They and Should I Use Them? 2003 2014 Multnomah Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Real Asset Funds What Are They and Should I Use Them? 2003 2014 Multnomah Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Scott Cameron, CFA Scott is the Chief Investment Officer for the Multnomah Group and a Founding
More informationCHOOSING YOUR INVESTMENTS
CHOOSING YOUR INVESTMENTS FOR ASSISTANCE CONTACT US TODAY FOR MORE INFORMATION, ADVICE OR HELP OPENING AN ACCOUNT, IT S EASY TO REACH US: BY PHONE Call us at 800 TIAA-CREF (800 842-2273) to speak with
More informationINVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY
INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY BOARD APPROVED: DECEMBER 27, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE I. Purpose... 1 II. Policy Roles and Responsibilities... 1 III. Risk Guidelines... 2 IV. Measurement and
More informationMANAGER SELECT. live your. dream. By Implementing Sophisticated Investment Strategies
MANAGER SELECT live your dream By Implementing Sophisticated Investment Strategies Maximize the Value of Your Assets Your Total Wealth Management Strategy Full-time professional supervision Disciplined
More informationJPMorgan SmartRetirement SM
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE JPMorgan SmartRetirement SM Target date strategies designed to address retirement investment realities HELPING ADDRESS THE RETIREMENT CHALLENGES OF TODAY
More informationDALBAR Due Diligence: Trust, but Verify
2013 September 28, 2013 The (TDF Facts) is an annual compilation of of key information about these funds that are necessary to understand and evaluate these investment vehicles. TDF Facts is intended for
More informationInvestment Implications for UK DC Schemes in Light of Tax and Regulatory Changes
Investment Implications for UK DC Schemes in Light of Tax and Regulatory Changes November 19, 2014 by William Allport of PIMCO With greater flexibility and choices available to DC savers in the latter
More informationS&P 500 Low Volatility Index
S&P 500 Low Volatility Index Craig J. Lazzara, CFA S&P Indices December 2011 For Financial Professional/Not for Public Distribution There s nothing passive about how you invest. PROPRIETARY. Permission
More informationAMERICAN REGISTRY OF INTERNET NUMBERS INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT January 2014
AMERICAN REGISTRY OF INTERNET NUMBERS INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT January 2014 Introduction This statement of investment policy has been adopted by the Board of Trustees of the American Registry of Internet
More informationPost-Modern Asset Management: The Credit Crisis and Beyond. Target Date Investing by Anne Lester
Post-Modern Asset Management: The Credit Crisis and Beyond Target Date Investing by Anne Lester :: Anne Lester Impact of Credit Crisis on Target Date Funds 2008 is memorable for many reasons the credit
More informationDiversified Managed Allocations
Diversified Managed Allocations Multi-strategy portfolios with a focus on flexibility Is this program right for you? DMA is designed for investors who: Want experienced, professional money managers to
More informationSmartRetirement Mutual Fund Commentary
SmartRetirement Mutual Fund Commentary J.P.Morgan Asset Management 3 rd Quarter 2014 Performance Highlights SmartRetirement s Performance Objectives The JPMorgan SmartRetirement Mutual Funds are designed
More informationAre you in the wrong target-date fund? Now is a good time to reevaluate
Insights August 2014 Are you in the wrong target-date fund? Now is a good time to reevaluate TDFs may have different investment strategies, glide paths, and investment-related fees. Because these differences
More informationA portfolio that matches your plans.
A portfolio that matches your plans. Amerivest Core Portfolios powered by Morningstar Associates Expert investment management Tailored portfolio recommendations Straightforward, competitive pricing Dedicated
More informationCapturing Equity Risk Premium Revisiting the Investment Strategy
Capturing Equity Risk Premium Revisiting the Investment Strategy Introduction: Equity Risk without Reward? Institutions with return-oriented investment portfolios have traditionally relied upon significant
More informationAdvanced Support Services for Your Personal Portfolio
P O R T F O L I O S U P P O R T S E R V I C E S Advanced Support Services for Your Personal Portfolio Advanced technology, investment research, and administrative services to support your advisor A Foundation
More informationCalPERS 457 Plan Target Retirement Date Funds
CalPERS 457 Plan Target Retirement Date s September 30, 2015 Overview Target Retirement Date s (the "" or "s") are a series of diversified funds, each of which has a predetermined underlying asset mix
More information