BiMP and Network Interperformance - A Review
|
|
- Tyler Whitehead
- 3 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 An Implementation Study of a Dynamic Inter-Domain Bandwidth Management Platform in Diffserv Networks Junseok Hwang a c Steve J. Chapin b Haci A. Mantar b Ibrahim T. Okumus b Rajesh Revuru a Aseem Salama a School of Information Studies, Syracuse University b L.C. Smith College of Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University c College of Engineering, Seoul National University Abstract In this paper, we assess the scalability and efficiency of a scalable Bandwidth Management Point (BMP) for guaranteed Quality-of-Service in Diffserv networks. Our BMP uses centralized network state maintenance and pipe-based intra-domain resource management schemes that significantly reduce the admission control time and minimize the scalability problems present in prior research. We have designed, developed and implemented an enhanced Simple Inter-Domain Bandwidth Broker Signaling (SIBBS) protocol for interdomain communication. The BMP uses dynamic inter-domain pipes to handle inter-domain provisioning and dynamic provisioning schemes to increase signaling scalability. To assess our BMP implementation in terms of signaling scalability and effective resource utilization, Preprint submitted to noms 9 August 2003
2 we conducted experiments on a test-bed demonstrating how a BMP substantially increases resource utilization and scalability while requiring minimum changes in the underlying infrastructure. Key words: Bandwidth Broker, Internet Interconnection, Differentiated Services, Middleware 1 Introduction The importance of providing quality-of-service (QoS) services through seamless interconnection networks is fueling an increasing interest in the next generation Internet. IETF working groups, such as Differentiated Services Working Group (DiffServ), have established frameworks for supporting end-to-end QoS [1] for the Internet. Important recent research questions for the next generation Internet include how to manage the bandwidth across interconnection network domains for services to assure end-to-end QoS support. Bandwidth management mechanisms for network interconnection will play a critical role in providing support for end-to-end QoS network services used by highperformance distributed applications, such as grid networks. Several interconnection mechanisms have been proposed to support multiple network services [1 4]. However, there has not been sufficient research on integrating network interconnection mechanisms with distributed and dynamic bandwidth management and open addresses: jhswang@syr.edu (Junseok Hwang), chapin@ecs.syr.edu (Steve J. Chapin), hamantar@syr.edu (Haci A. Mantar), iokumus@syr.edu (Ibrahim T. Okumus), vrrevuru@syr.edu (Rajesh Revuru). 1 This project is partially supported by NSF award NMI ANI
3 QoS provisioning controls. We designed and implemented a dynamic bandwidth management platform, the Bandwidth Management Point (BMP). The BMP architecture provides a scalable and transparent platform for cross-network open provisioning for resource management of bandwidth markets with computational grids. Our work significantly differs from existing Bandwidth Broker designs since the BMP is designed to support scalable dynamic provisioning over multiple domains. We achieve this goal through scalable interconnection setup, aggregation, and Service Level Specification (SLS) update mechanisms designed within our BMP communication protocol. The BMP is implemented in a distributed fashion that is independent of any particular grid system. In this paper we present the design and implementation details and evaluation results of scalable dynamic inter-domain resource provisioning capability of BMP s. In section 2, we briefly review related work. Section 3 provides inter-domain resource management focused BMP architecture. Actual inter-domain resource management mechanism is explained in section 4. Section 5 gives the evaluation results and section 6 presents the concluding remarks. 2 Background Work There have been two QoS models proposed in the Internet: a Per-Flow QoS model [5] and a Per-Class QoS model [6]. The major flow based Internet QoS model is the Intserv/RSVP model which aims at providing strong end-to-end QoS guarantees to end hosts by having explicit flow reservation in all the nodes along the path. However, due to the severe scalability problems in the core of this flow-based 3
4 model, an alternative model based on per-packet classes, Differentiated Services [6], is considered the de facto standard approach for large-scale Internet QoS. Although DiffServ has advantages of scalability and ease of implementation, it still lacks a standard signaling mechanism and admission control framework. Currently, end-to-end QoS guarantees can be provided only based on worst-case static SLA (with long time scales of days or weeks) between customers and providers. There is no dynamic service negotiation between customers and providers. Thus, a primary concern has been achieving end-to-end QoS in a Diffserv environment in a scalable, efficient, and effective way. Nichols et al. [7] proposed a model called the Bandwidth Broker (BB), a logical entity for Diffserv domains. Each domain has a BB, which is in charge of both intradomain and inter-domain resource management. Terzis [8] proposed a Two-Tier Resource Allocation Framework. The main idea is that a BB in each domain collects its users and applications requests for external resources and sets up an SLA with its neighboring domains based on aggregated traffic profiles. A BB dynamically readjusts the SLA between domains based on substantial changes in network traffic. Braun et al. proposed an application of BB for VPN in [11]. In their work, the role of the BB is to adjust dynamically the VPN between customers of the same domain by taking utilization and accounting issues into account. Another BB architecture is from the CADENUS project [17,18]. This project considers using a hierarchy of BBs where the domain is divided into small areas, with each area having its own BB and the domain itself having another BB which acts as a parent of the sublevel BBs. The Active Bandwidth Broker [20] project introduced the active networking concept into the network management area. In this architecture, SLA requests come to the border routers, which convert requests into COPS messages and communicate 4
5 to the BB. In this model, requests are refined before they reach the bandwidth broker, and the BB makes simple decisions based on the refined request received from the S-PDP. Zhang, et al. [21,22] describes a model with a centralized bandwidth broker that serves edge bandwidth brokers. The edge BBs use COPS to request a block of bandwidth from the centralized BB, and then serve reservation requests until the quota is exhausted. QBone Signaling Design Team developed a signaling mechanism called the Simple Inter-domain Bandwidth Broker Signaling (SIBBS) [9] protocol for inter-bb communication. A BB in an access domain is responsible to reserve end-to-end QoS across multiple domains either by using individual demand-based end-to-end notification or pre-established tunnels. However, the current version of the BB architecture does not address the issue of scalability and security of BB protocol signaling with dynamic provisioning. 3 BMP Middleware Platform 3.1 Architecture and Operation We have implemented the Bandwidth Management Point [12,13], which not only subsumes the capabilities of a traditional bandwidth broker [4] but also provides additional functionalities. We designed our Bandwidth Management Point to handle admission control, resource management, and resource negotiations for a Diffserv domain. The BMP interacts with multiple agents in a domain to provision intra-domain resources, and neighboring BMPs to provision inter-domain resources and to estab- 5
6 Fig. 1. Functional decomposition of BMP architecture lish end-to-end reservation requests. We achieve inter-domain resource provisioning by establishing a QoS tunnel between domains. The I-BMP (Internal BMP) and E-BMP (External BMP) are modules that handle intra-domain and inter-domain provisioning, respectively. The E-BMP processes high-level domain topology and network state information (e.g., information on pipes spanning multiple domains). It primarily deals with resource allocation and provisioning at the network boundary among multiple domains, solving a complex set of brokerage problems among alternative options. This layer also does not consider node-level functionality, detailed network state, or intra-domain topology information. The External BMP views the domain as if the domain consists of only border routers; from the External BMP s point-of-view, there is only one connection between each pair of border routers for a particular QoS class. The E-BMP is responsible for negotiating and maintaining resources 6
7 with the BMPs of neighboring domains in order to assure QoS support of traffic crossing its borders. It also performs admission control based on inter-domain resources (negotiated with peers, and stored in the internal pipe database) and intradomain resources provided by the I-BMP. Furthermore, the E-BMP performs policy control such as Service Level Agreement (SLA) and SLS checks and configures border routers with the appropriate traffic conditioning parameters. Therefore, the E-BMP provides a mechanism to manage the interconnection SLS with other BMP domains and interconnection points. As shown in Figure 1, both I-BMP and E-BMP have a number of functional and database components. Those include the inter-domain provisioning manager (IDPM), inter-bmp communication protocol in the E-BMP, and the intra-domain pipe maintenance in the I-BMP, which are most relevant to scalability and efficiency of the network. For a BMP to provision inter-domain resources, it needs to communicate with neighboring BMPs to negotiate for allocation of corresponding inter-domain capacity. We have chosen the Simple Inter-domain Bandwidth Broker Signaling (SIBBS) protocol as the external interface to the BMP for signaling inter-domain provision between neighboring BMPs. SIBBS is a product of the Internet2 QBone Signaling Design Team [9], and is the closest to an accepted standard in existence. Our research group is part of QBone Signaling Design Team and actively participated in the development of SIBBS protocol. 7
8 Fig. 2. SIBBS core tunneling (BMP inter-domain pipe) 4 Simple Inter-Domain Bandwidth Broker Signaling (SIBBS) The SIBBS protocol is designed for inter-bb communication. A BB can be implemented in different ways in terms of resource request handling. One possibility is for a BB to separately deal each request. This requires reserving resources for each request and keeping the state of that reservation. This is also known as microflow management. Another option is for a BB to aggregate the individual request into a single request. In this case, a BB establishes a tunnel to a destination and keeps a single state for that tunnel. All the reservation requests for that destination with a specific QoS class are aggregated into the same tunnel. The SIBBS protocol is designed to work with different BB implementations as described above. Among many challenges associated with resource management is efficient and scalable inter-domain resource management. As described above, if a BB handles microflow reservation, there will be a scalability problem, which will be worse than the one faced by RSVP. Recalling that Diffserv avoided the scalability problem of Intserv by introducing aggregated treatment, it is most reasonable to design a BB that handles reservation requests in an aggregated fashion for a Diffserv evironment. In our architecture, inter-domain resources are managed via inter-domain tunnels, called pipes, and we modified SIBBS to work with our inter-domain tun- 8
9 neling approach. SIBBS is a simple request-response protocol. Common SIBBS messages are Resource Allocation Requests (RAR), Resource Allocation Answers (RAA), cancel (CANCEL), and cancel acknowledgement (CANCEL ACK). In particular, SIBBS has two use cases: per-request reservations, and core tunneling. In per-request reservations, each individual request (initiated by an end host) is processed by all the BBs along the path toward destination end hosts (in similar fashion as how routers process RSVP requests in IntServ). In the core tunneling case, a tunnel is preestablished between every possible origin and destination domain which carries traffic of a single class. Individual reservations are then multiplexed into the tunnel. The destination-based tunnel concept here means that the end points of the reservation are not fully specified, but only the destination domain. Throughout this paper we assume that all supported QoS services are Globally Well Known Services (GWKS), which simplifies resource negotiation and complex mapping problems in inter-connection points. We assume that tunnels are between source and destination domains. We also assume that all policy issues (SLA, SLS) are satisfied. We will now explain how SIBBS works in our architecture for inter-domain resource provisioning. There are two different modes of operation upon receiving a request for a particular destination: 1)- If the request is the first request to that destination, the BMP needs to establish a tunnel to that destination. 2)- If another request has been received for that destination previously, the BMP already has a tunnel to that destination and operation will be quite different than the first case. The first case is known as tunnel establishment phase and the second case is termed as aggregation and provisioning phase. 9
10 4.1 Tunnel Establishment Phase Suppose the BMP of source domain 1 wants to establish a tunnel to destination domain 1 for a particular class (Figure 2). The procedure is outlined as following: The BMP of source domain 1 (BMPs1) builds an RAR message with appropriate parameters such as GWKSID, BW amount, duration, and destination domain IP prefix, and then sends it to the transit domain BMP (BMPt). Upon receiving the RAR message, BMPt verifies its intra-domain resource availability (between the ingress and egress routers for this path) and the capacity of its border links. If both checks succeed, BMPt builds an RAR message and sends it to BMPd1. BMPd1 checks its egress router link capacity. If sufficient capacity is available, it reserves bandwidth in its link, builds an RAA message, and then sends that message to BMPt. Upon getting the RAA message, BMPt reserves resources, builds an RAA message and then sends it to BMPs1. Upon receiving the RAA message, BMPs2 signals the completion of tunnel establishment phase. 4.2 Aggregation and Provisioning Phase Figure 3 depicts the operation of a BMP in response to an RAR message. At this point, we assume that such tunnels and pipes are pre-established and dynamically resized. In the following, we briefly explain the behavior of the BMP in each case as shown in Figure 3. There are four different cases a BMP takes into account: 10
11 Fig. 3. The activity diagram of BMP operation Both source and destination are in the same domain. The BMP will grant a reservation if the RAR passes all tests along the logic steps in the diagram. The source is in the BMP s domain and the destination is in different domain (steps ). For this case, the BMP first checks the egress SLS, then checks the availability of an inter-domain tunnel to that destination and finally checks its intra-domain pipe size. If all these tests succeed, the BMP grants the reservation. As we can see, although the destination is in another domain, the BMP does not go beyond its domain, making the admission control decision depend only on local knowledge of the domain. The source is in different domain and the destination is in the BMP s domain (steps ). In this case, the BMP first checks if the RAR complies with its ingress SLS, then checks intra-domain resource availability. If both tests succeed, the BMP accepts the request. Both source and destination are located in different domains ( ) in this case, we say the BMP is serving as a transit domain for this request. A BMP in a transit domain checks both ingress and egress SLS, then checks its intra-domain 11
12 pipe size. If the results are positive, the BMP builds an RAR message with its own ID and sends it to proceeding BMPs and waits for an RAA message. The above process is termed as tunnel establishment. When a BMP grants a reservation, it configures edge routers, and updates the reservation and path database and the inter-domain tunnel database. The BMP then builds a Resource Allocation Answer (RAA) message and sends it to the customer. The communication and configuration process between the BMP and edge routers are done using COPS-PR. Note that all the tasks that a BMP performs during aggregation have light-weight processing times. The complexity of managing tunnel sizes is performed in relatively longer time intervals, minimizing its impact on BMP performance. 5 Evaluation The traffic behavior used for validation and performance testing of the system has an important effect on the results. Therefore, we used real-time traffic traces collected from real networks for our experiments. We used traffic traces provided by CAIDA [16], which has advanced tools to collect and analyze data based on source and destination Autonomous Systems (AS) and traffic type for short time intervals (every 5 minutes). We used traces for TSRI-AS (2641) and SDSC-AS (195), which have high traffic demand, for 150 minutes. We evaluated the BMP prototype in terms of inter-domain protocol operation, scalability, and resource utilization in our test-bed. The experiments were performed for both QBone Premium Service (QPS) [9] ( Virtual Leased Line (VLL)), as well as delay- and loss-tolerant services. For the former we used the parameter-based 12
13 Fig. 4. BMP test-bed scheme where each host requests reservation with the peak rate. For the latter one, we applied the measurement-based scheme, where end hosts request reservations based on a token bucket scheme. In the measurement-based experiments, the delay and loss tolerances were set to 1 ms and 0.1% in each node. We define the Operation Region (OR) as the cushion between the high-threshold, where the pipe size is increased when the traffic rate reaches this value, and the low-threshold, where the pipe size is decreased when the traffic rate reaches this value. Figure 4 shows the testbed we used for these experiments. We configured domain 1 and domain 2 as source stub domains; domain 0 as transit domain; and domain 3 and domain 4 as destination stub domains. All experiments were run for 25 minutes. The duration of a reservation was exponentially distributed with a mean of 1 minute. The reservation average rates varied over the duration of the experiment based on the rate-profile generated from traced data. In source domains per-reservation conditioning was performed. In transit and destination domains perpipe based conditioning was applied. We also assumed that any traffic in excess of the profile was simply discarded (no remarking). Figures 5 and 6 show parameter-based experiment results in BMP1 for reservations 13
14 Fig. 5. Parameter-based Update Fig. 6. Parameter-based Utilization to destination domain 3 ( /16). Figure 5 shows the customer reservation demand, actual traffic rate, and the corresponding tunnel size. As depicted, there are two important enhancements we implemented for the BMP scheme. First, the BMP dynamically modifies the pipe size with respect to aggregated traffic change resulting in efficient resource utilization. Second, the number of pipe modifications is minimal compared to customer requests the number of messages exchanged between BMPs is minimized. In this experiment, while BMP1 receives 311 reservation set up or tear-down messages, the pipe size was modified only 23 times, meaning that the transit domain (BMP0), where scalability is the main concern, receives only 23 messages. This reduces both communication overhead and pro- 14
15 Fig. 7. Measurement-based Update cessing load, which are potential bottlenecks of traditional BBs and RSVP. Figure 6 compares the BMP scheme with a non-bmp scheme (static reservation, no modifications took place during the experiment), as in the original SIBBS [9] core tunneling scheme. For a no-bmp case, we set the tunnel size to the maximum contained in the traced data. As Figure 6 shows, the BMP significantly increased resource utilization comparing to the no-bmp case. On the other hand, when the tunnel size was set to the average value of historical data, 60% of the requests were rejected. However, as the figure shows, the actual utilization (the traffic rate measured at the interface) is still much lower than the reservation demand. The reason for this is that we are providing QPS, which requires peak rate based reservation in order to minimize queuing delay and losses. Figures 7 and 8 show the measurement-based experimental results of delay- and loss-tolerant of service, where the traffic rate is computed based on data samples collected from routers. The meter located in each router dynamically measures the priority traffic rate and reports the results to the BMP. The meter estimates the traffic rate based on delay and loss parameters. As shown in Figure 7, the pipe size modification timely follows the actual traffic rates and as seen in Figure 8, the 15
16 Fig. 8. Measurement-based Utilization average actual utilization is higher than the parameter-based case results. Similar to previous experiments, the number of pipe size modifications is significantly less than the number of incoming reservation messages. As shown in Figures 5,6,7, and 8 there is a clear trade-off between parameter-based and measurement-based schemes, and also between QPS (VLL) and loss=delaytolerant services. While the BMP achieves excellent QoS guarantees in the case of QPS (VLL), it results in poor resource utilization (Figure 6). On the other hand, as shown in Figure 8, it has high resource utilization with trade-off in delay and loss. Comparing Figures 6 with 8, we can clearly see that utilization is increased by 30% by using the measurement-based scheme, when chosen as a viable alternative for the service or application. As Figures 5,6,7, and 8 illustrate, although the BMP scheme decreases the number of inter-domain negotiation messages (tunnel size modification messages) and increases the utilization, the scheme suffers clear trade-offs. As shown in Figure 9, the operation region has a significant effect on the number of negotiation messages and utilization, regardless of service type. As expected, when the OR (Operation Region) approaches the average reservation size, the negotiation is performed for 16
17 Fig. 9. The effect of Operation Region almost every set up and tear-down (similar to RSVP), which in turn causes serious scalability problem. Large OR sizes, which ameliorate the scalability problem, result in inefficient resource utilization. Thus, an appropriate OR size should be carefully chosen. A good prediction scheme such as the Network Weather Service [15] can be used. 6 Conclusion and future work In this work we have presented the design and implementation of a scalable and efficient BB scheme called Bandwidth Management Point. A BMP uses centralized network state maintenance and pipe-based intra-domain resource management schemes that significantly reduce the admission control time and minimize scalability problems. We designed and implemented a scalable inter-domain communication scheme originating from SIBBS. We used a pipe-based scheme where each domain establishes pipes (core tunnels) to all possible destination domains. In addition to the pipe setup mechanism in SIBBS, we added dynamic provisioning and used different provisioning schemes. For traffic conditioning, we modified and implemented COPS-PR. These mechanisms embody a set of algorithms which can be 17
18 used for software agents that manage and control network devices dynamically. Our design, implementation, and experimental results show the significant role that bandwidth brokers can play for service providers, and address many outstanding questions about BB. The experimental results show that an ISP can substantially improve its resource utilization, thereby increasing its revenue, while requiring minimal changes in the underlying infrastructure. The scalability and utilization results give the basic guidelines that an ISP should consider in defining services and SLA. Currently, we are working on integration of the BMP with the Open Grid Services Architecture (OGSA), making it compatible with Globus and Legion. We will also investigate a dynamic inter-domain SLS negotiation scheme that provides possible service in other domains, and their pricing and usage rules. In this work we have relied on GWKS, however, it is clear for a potential need for other services, so we will enhance the SIBBS protocol to support additional services. Furthermore, we developed a region-based inter-domain QoS routing protocol to improve the effectiveness of BMP in Diffserv Internet. We also developed Transaction Management System to incorporate economic decisions into BMP. References [1] Y. Bernet et.al., A Framework for Integrated Services Operation over Diffserv Networks, RFC2998, Nov [2] M. Garrett, M. Borden, Interoperation of Controlled-Load Service and Guaranteed Service with ATM, RFC2381, Aug [3] Y. Bernet, R. Yavatkar, P. Ford, F. Baker, L. Zhang, K. Nichols, and M. Speer. A 18
19 Framework for Use of RSVP with Diffserv Networks IETF draft, November, [4] Internet2 Bandwidth Broker Working Group. QBone Bandwidth Broker Arhitecture. [5] J. Wroclawski, The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated Services, RFC 2210, Sep [6] S. Blake et.al. An Architecture for Differentiated Services, RFC 2475, Dec [7] K. Nichols, V. Jacobson, L. Zhang, A Two-bit Differentiated Services Architecture for the Internet, rfc2638, Jul [8] Andreas Terzis, Lan Wang, Jun Ogawa, Lixia Zhang, A Two-Tier Resource Management Model for the Internet. Global Internet 99, Dec [9] QBone Signaling Design Team, Simple Inter-domain Bandwidth Broker Signaling (SIBBS), work in progress. [10] X. Wang, H. Schulzrinne, Pricing Network Resources for Adaptive Applications in a Differentiated Services Network, In Proceeding of INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, Apr [11] T. Braun, M. Günter, I. Khalil. An Architecture for Managing QoS-enabled VPNs over the Internet, 24th IEEE Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN 99), Lowell/Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A., October 18-20, 1999, pp [12] Junseok Hwang, A Market-Based Model for the Bandwidth Management of Intserv- Diffserv QoS Interconnection: A Network Economic Approach, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pitssburg, [13] Haci ALi Mantar, Junseok Hwang, Ibrahim T. Okumus, Seteve J. Chapin; Inter- Domain Resource Reservation via Third PArty Agent, Fifth World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 2001, Jun
20 [14] K. Nichols, B. Carpenter, Definition of Differentiated Services Per Domain Behaviors and Rules for their Specification RFC 3086, April [15] Rich Wolski, Neil Spring, and Jim Hayes, The Network Weather Service: A Distributed Resource Performance Forecasting Service for Metacomputing Journal of Future Generation Computing Systems, Volume 15, Numbers 5-6, pp , October, [16] Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis, [17] CADENUS Public Deliverables 2.1 QoS Control in SLA Networks, 3.1Mediation Components. Release 1 Requirements and Architectures, 3.2Service Configuration and Provisioning Framework Requirements, Architecture, Design [18] Giovanni Cortese et.al. CADENUS: Creation and Deployment of End-User Services in Premium IP Networks, IEEE Communication Magazine Vol.41 No.1, January [19] Ibrahim Khalil and Torsten Braun; Implementation of a Bandwidth Broker for Dynamic End-to-End Capacity Reservation over Multiple Diffserv Domains, 4th IFIP/IEEEInternational Conference on Management of Multimedia Networks and Services (MMNS), Chicago, USA, Oct 29 - Nov 1, 2001 [20] K. Wong, K.L.E. Law, ABB: Active Bandwidth Broker, in Proc. SPIE ITCom 2001, Vol.4523, pp , Denver, August, 2001 [21] On Scalable Network Resource Management Using Bandwidth Brokers, [22] Z.-L. Zhang, Z. Duan, L. Gao, and Y. T. Hou, Decoupling QoS control from core routers: A novel bandwidth broker architecture for scalable support of guaranteed services, In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Sweden, August
An Analysis of the DiffServ Approach in Mobile Environments
1 An Analysis of the DiffServ Approach in Mobile Environments Torsten Braun, University of Berne, Switzerland. (braun@iam.unibe.ch) Claude Castelluccia, INRIA Rhône-Alpes, France. (claude.castelluccia@inrialpes.fr)
More informationA Prototype Implementation of the Two-Tier Architecture for Differentiated Services
A Prototype Implementation of the Two-Tier Architecture for Differentiated Services AndreasTerzis,JunOgawa,SoniaTsui,LanWang,LixiaZhang UCLA Computer Science Department {terzis, ogawa, sonia, lanw, lixia}@cs.ucla.edu
More informationHow To Provide Qos Based Routing In The Internet
CHAPTER 2 QoS ROUTING AND ITS ROLE IN QOS PARADIGM 22 QoS ROUTING AND ITS ROLE IN QOS PARADIGM 2.1 INTRODUCTION As the main emphasis of the present research work is on achieving QoS in routing, hence this
More informationA Policy Framework for Integrated and Differentiated Services in the Internet
A Policy Framework for Integrated and Differentiated Services in the Internet Raju Rajan Dinesh Verma Sanjay Kamat AT&T Labs IBM T. J. Watson Labs Bell Labs Eyal Felstaine Allot Communications Shai Herzog
More informationQoS in IP networks. Computer Science Department University of Crete HY536 - Network Technology Lab II 2000-2001. IETF Integrated Services (IntServ)
QoS in IP networks Computer Science Department University of Crete HY536 - Network Technology Lab II 2000-2001 IETF Integrated Services (IntServ) Connection-oriented solution (end-to-end) QoS guarantees
More informationHow To Make A Network Plan Based On Bg, Qos, And Autonomous System (As)
Policy Based QoS support using BGP Routing Priyadarsi Nanda and Andrew James Simmonds Department of Computer Systems Faculty of Information Technology University of Technology, Sydney Broadway, NSW Australia
More informationInternet Quality of Service
Internet Quality of Service Weibin Zhao zwb@cs.columbia.edu 1 Outline 1. Background 2. Basic concepts 3. Supporting mechanisms 4. Frameworks 5. Policy & resource management 6. Conclusion 2 Background:
More informationIncremental QoS Deployment based on Network Brokers
Incremental QoS Deployment based on Network Brokers Alfonso Gazo-Cervero, José Luis González-Sánchez Telematics Engineering Section. Computer Science Department. University of Extremadura Escuela Politécnica
More informationAnalysis of Delayed Reservation Scheme in Server-based QoS Management Network
Analysis of Delayed Reservation Scheme in Server-based QoS Management Network Takeshi Ikenaga Ý, Kenji Kawahara Ý, Tetsuya Takine Þ, and Yuji Oie Ý Ý Dept. of Computer Science and Electronics, Kyushu Institute
More informationA Review on Quality of Service Architectures for Internet Network Service Provider (INSP)
A Review on Quality of Service Architectures for Internet Network Service Provider (INSP) Herman and Azizah bte Abd. Rahman Faculty of Computer Science and Information System Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
More informationBuilding MPLS VPNs with QoS Routing Capability i
Building MPLS VPNs with QoS Routing Capability i Peng Zhang, Raimo Kantola Laboratory of Telecommunication Technology, Helsinki University of Technology Otakaari 5A, Espoo, FIN-02015, Finland Tel: +358
More informationAn Architecture for Managing QoS-enabled VPNs over the Internet
An Architecture for Managing QoS-enabled VPNs over the Internet Manuel Günter, Torsten Braun, Ibrahim Khalil Institute of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, University of Berne http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~rvs/
More informationDifferentiated Services
March 19, 1998 Gordon Chaffee Berkeley Multimedia Research Center University of California, Berkeley Email: chaffee@bmrc.berkeley.edu URL: http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee 1 Outline Architecture
More informationfor guaranteed IP datagram routing
Core stateless distributed admission control at border routers for guaranteed IP datagram routing Takahiro Oishi Masaaki Omotani Kohei Shiomoto NTT Network Service Systems Laboratories, NTT corporation
More informationA Novel QoS Framework Based on Admission Control and Self-Adaptive Bandwidth Reconfiguration
Int. J. of Computers, Communications & Control, ISSN 1841-9836, E-ISSN 1841-9844 Vol. V (2010), No. 5, pp. 862-870 A Novel QoS Framework Based on Admission Control and Self-Adaptive Bandwidth Reconfiguration
More informationEFFICIENT RESOURCE BROKER ARCHITECTURE TO PROVIDE GUARANTEED QoS. By E. Praveen Kumar, CEG, Anna University, Chennai, India.
EFFICIENT RESOURCE BROKER ARCHITECTURE TO PROVIDE GUARANTEED QoS By E. Praveen Kumar, CEG, Anna University, Chennai, India. ABSTRACT Rapid growth of Multimedia applications over Internet. Diverse traffic
More informationCS 268: Lecture 13. QoS: DiffServ and IntServ
CS 268: Lecture 13 QoS: DiffServ and IntServ Ion Stoica Computer Science Division Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1776 1
More informationImplement a QoS Algorithm for Real-Time Applications in the DiffServ-aware MPLS Network
Implement a QoS Algorithm for Real-Time Applications in the DiffServ-aware MPLS Network Zuo-Po Huang, *Ji-Feng Chiu, Wen-Shyang Hwang and *Ce-Kuen Shieh adrian@wshlab2.ee.kuas.edu.tw, gary@hpds.ee.ncku.edu.tw,
More informationConstructing End-to-End Traffic Flows for Managing Differentiated Services Networks
Constructing End-to-End Traffic Flows for Managing Differentiated Services Networks Jae-Young Kim 1, James Won-Ki Hong 1, Sook-Hyun Ryu 1, and Tae-Sang Choi 2 1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering
More informationAn Intelligent Agent Based QoS Provisioning and Network Management System
An Intelligent Agent Based QoS Provisioning and Network Management System ANGELOS MICHALAS 1, MALAMATI LOUTA 2, GEORGE KOUZAS 1 1 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering National Technical University
More informationCS/ECE 438: Communication Networks. Internet QoS. Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE
CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks Internet QoS Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE Introduction The Internet only provides a best effort service
More informationQuality of Service on the Internet: Evaluation of the IntServ Architecture on the Linux Operative System 1
Quality of Service on the Internet: Evaluation of the IntServ Architecture on the Linux Operative System 1 Elisabete Reis elreis@dei.uc.pt Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra Fernando Melo fmelor@dei.uc.pt
More informationInvestigation and Comparison of MPLS QoS Solution and Differentiated Services QoS Solutions
Investigation and Comparison of MPLS QoS Solution and Differentiated Services QoS Solutions Steve Gennaoui, Jianhua Yin, Samuel Swinton, and * Vasil Hnatyshin Department of Computer Science Rowan University
More informationPolicy Based Network Management of a Differentiated Services domain using the Common Open Policy Service protocol
Policy Based Network Management of a Differentiated Services domain using the Common Open Policy Service protocol Adam Burke, Neco Ventura Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town,
More informationQoS Parameters. Quality of Service in the Internet. Traffic Shaping: Congestion Control. Keeping the QoS
Quality of Service in the Internet Problem today: IP is packet switched, therefore no guarantees on a transmission is given (throughput, transmission delay, ): the Internet transmits data Best Effort But:
More informationSupporting End-to-End QoS in DiffServ/MPLS Networks
Supporting End-to-End QoS in DiffServ/MPLS Networks Ji-Feng Chiu, *Zuo-Po Huang, *Chi-Wen Lo, *Wen-Shyang Hwang and Ce-Kuen Shieh Department of Electrical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan
More informationQuality of Service in the Internet. QoS Parameters. Keeping the QoS. Traffic Shaping: Leaky Bucket Algorithm
Quality of Service in the Internet Problem today: IP is packet switched, therefore no guarantees on a transmission is given (throughput, transmission delay, ): the Internet transmits data Best Effort But:
More informationMENTER Overview. Prepared by Mark Shayman UMIACS Contract Review Laboratory for Telecommunications Science May 31, 2001
MENTER Overview Prepared by Mark Shayman UMIACS Contract Review Laboratory for Telecommunications Science May 31, 2001 MENTER Goal MPLS Event Notification Traffic Engineering and Restoration Develop an
More informationQuality of Service for MANETs connected to the Internet
Quality of Service for MANETs connected to the Internet Andreas J. Kassler 1, ChenShanShan 2 1 Karlstad University, Computer Science Department, Universitetgatan 2, 65188 Karlstad, Sweden, kassler@ieee.org
More informationAn Integrated Network Resource and QoS Management Framework
An Integrated Network Resource and QoS Management Framework Ewa Kusmierek, Baek-Young Choi, Zhenhai Duan, and Zhi-Li Zhang Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis,
More informationQuality of Service for VoIP
Quality of Service for VoIP WCS November 29, 2000 John T. Chapman Cisco Distinguished Engineer Broadband Products and Solutions Course Number Presentation_ID 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. 1 The QoS Matrix
More informationDifferentiated Services:
Differentiated Services: A Tutorial Overview with a Voice over IP Slant Kathleen Nichols kmn@cisco.com ETSI Workhop on Voice over IP June 9, 1999 1 of 24 Differentiated Services The differentiated services
More informationDistributed Measurement and Monitoring in IP Networks (CMToolset for AQUILA DiffServ)
SCI 2001 /ISAS 2001 Orlando 7/2001 Distributed Measurement and Monitoring in IP s (CMToolset for AQUILA DiffServ) Ulrich ofmann 1 Dept. of Telecommunications, Salzburg Polytechnical University A-5020 Salzburg,
More informationTwo Approaches to Internet Traffic Engineering for End-to-End Quality of Service Provisioning
Two Approaches to Internet Engineering for End-to-End Quality of Service Provisioning Kin-Hon Ho, Michael Howarth, Ning Wang, George Pavlou and Stylianos Georgoulas Centre for Communication Systems Research,
More informationNETWORK ISSUES: COSTS & OPTIONS
VIDEO CONFERENCING NETWORK ISSUES: COSTS & OPTIONS Prepared By: S. Ann Earon, Ph.D., President Telemanagement Resources International Inc. Sponsored by Vidyo By:S.AnnEaron,Ph.D. Introduction Successful
More information18: Enhanced Quality of Service
18: Enhanced Quality of Service Mark Handley Traditional best-effort queuing behaviour in routers Data transfer: datagrams: individual packets no recognition of flows connectionless: no signalling Forwarding:
More information4 Internet QoS Management
4 Internet QoS Management Rolf Stadler School of Electrical Engineering KTH Royal Institute of Technology stadler@ee.kth.se September 2008 Overview Network Management Performance Mgt QoS Mgt Resource Control
More informationQuality of Service Assurance for the Next Generation Internet
Quality of Service Assurance for the Next Generation Internet Dimitrios P. Pezaros and David Hutchison Computing Department Faculty of Applied Sciences Lancaster University Lancaster, UK LA1 4YR E-mail:
More informationFuzzy Active Queue Management for Assured Forwarding Traffic in Differentiated Services Network
Fuzzy Active Management for Assured Forwarding Traffic in Differentiated Services Network E.S. Ng, K.K. Phang, T.C. Ling, L.Y. Por Department of Computer Systems & Technology Faculty of Computer Science
More informationCS640: Introduction to Computer Networks. Why a New Service Model? Utility curve Elastic traffic. Aditya Akella. Lecture 20 QoS
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 QoS Why a New Service Model? Best effort clearly insufficient Some applications need more assurances from the network What is the basic
More informationA New Fault Tolerant Routing Algorithm For GMPLS/MPLS Networks
A New Fault Tolerant Routing Algorithm For GMPLS/MPLS Networks Mohammad HossienYaghmae Computer Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran hyaghmae@ferdowsi.um.ac.ir
More information6th WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, SYSTEMS, ELECTRONICS,CONTROL & SIGNAL PROCESSING, Cairo, Egypt, Dec 29-31, 2007 527
6th WSEAS International Conference on CIRCUITS, SYSTEMS, ELECTRONICS,CONTROL & SIGNAL ROCESSING, Cairo, Egypt, Dec 29-31, 2007 527 Using policy-based MLS management architecture to Improve QoS on I Network
More informationIntegrated Service (IntServ) versus Differentiated Service (Diffserv)
Integrated Service (IntServ) versus Differentiated Service (Diffserv) Information taken from Kurose and Ross textbook Computer Networking A Top- Down Approach Featuring the Internet ACN: IntServ and DiffServ
More informationAnalysis of IP Network for different Quality of Service
2009 International Symposium on Computing, Communication, and Control (ISCCC 2009) Proc.of CSIT vol.1 (2011) (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore Analysis of IP Network for different Quality of Service Ajith
More informationKing Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Computer Engineering g Dept
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Computer Engineering g Dept COE 543 Mobile and Wireless Networks Term 111 Dr. Ashraf S. Hasan Mahmoud Rm 22-148-3 Ext. 1724 Email: ashraf@kfupm.edu.sa 12/24/2011
More informationInter-Domain QoS Control Mechanism in IMS based Horizontal Converged Networks
Inter-Domain QoS Control Mechanism in IMS based Horizontal Converged Networks Mehdi Mani Wireless Networks and Multimedia Service Department GET-INT Evry, France mehdi.mani@int-evry.fr Noel Crespi Wireless
More informationQoS in VoIP. Rahul Singhai Parijat Garg
QoS in VoIP Rahul Singhai Parijat Garg Outline Introduction The VoIP Setting QoS Issues Service Models Techniques for QoS Voice Quality Monitoring Sample solution from industry Conclusion Introduction
More informationAddressing Inter Provider Connections With MPLS-ICI
Addressing Inter Provider Connections With MPLS-ICI Introduction Why migrate to packet switched MPLS? The migration away from traditional multiple packet overlay networks towards a converged packet-switched
More informationCourse Description. Students Will Learn
Course Description The next generation of telecommunications networks will deliver broadband data and multimedia services to users. The Ethernet interface is becoming the interface of preference for user
More informationBlue 102. IP Service Architecture Futures. Geoff Huston May 2000
Blue 102 IP Service Architecture Futures Geoff Huston May 2000 Next Wave IP Services Service Requirements Connectivity service for customer-operated routers Service payload is IP packet High peak carriage
More informationQuality of Service using Traffic Engineering over MPLS: An Analysis. Praveen Bhaniramka, Wei Sun, Raj Jain
Praveen Bhaniramka, Wei Sun, Raj Jain Department of Computer and Information Science The Ohio State University 201 Neil Ave, DL39 Columbus, OH 43210 USA Telephone Number: +1 614-292-3989 FAX number: +1
More informationHow To Provide Quality Of Service In Multiiservice Ip Networks
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS (NIŠ) SER.: ELEC. ENERG. vol. 17, August 2004, 261-274 A Novel Approach for Providing Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks Mirjana Stojanović and Vladanka Aćimović-Raspopović
More informationTOPOLOGIES NETWORK SECURITY SERVICES
TOPOLOGIES NETWORK SECURITY SERVICES 1 R.DEEPA 1 Assitant Professor, Dept.of.Computer science, Raja s college of Tamil Studies & Sanskrit,Thiruvaiyaru ABSTRACT--In the paper propose about topology security
More informationChapter 7 outline. 7.5 providing multiple classes of service 7.6 providing QoS guarantees RTP, RTCP, SIP. 7: Multimedia Networking 7-71
Chapter 7 outline 7.1 multimedia networking applications 7.2 streaming stored audio and video 7.3 making the best out of best effort service 7.4 protocols for real-time interactive applications RTP, RTCP,
More informationExperiences with Class of Service (CoS) Translations in IP/MPLS Networks
Experiences with Class of Service (CoS) Translations in IP/MPLS Networks Rameshbabu Prabagaran & Joseph B. Evans Information and Telecommunications Technology Center Department of Electrical Engineering
More informationNetwork Mobility Support Scheme on PMIPv6 Networks
Network Mobility Support Scheme on PMIPv6 Networks Hyo-Beom Lee 1, Youn-Hee Han 2 and Sung-Gi Min 1 1 Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea. sgmin@korea.ac.kr
More informationQuality of Service (QoS) EECS 122: Introduction to Computer Networks Resource Management and QoS. What s the Problem?
Quality of Service (QoS) EECS 122: Introduction to Computer Networks Resource Management and QoS The Internet s most contentious subject - Inside vs. Outside the Network (see P&D, pp. 519-520) Computer
More informationInter Domain Routing Working Group Chemnitz University of Technology Intended status: Standards Track July 7, 2008 Expires: January 8, 2009
Inter Domain Routing Working Group Th. Knoll Internet Draft Chemnitz University of Technology Intended status: Standards Track July 7, 2008 Expires: January 8, 2009 Status of this Memo BGP Class of Service
More informationAn Emulation Study on PCE with Survivability: Protocol Extensions and Implementation
1 An Emulation Study on PCE with Survivability: Protocol Extensions and Implementation Xiaomin Chen, Yuesheng Zhong, Admela Jukan Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig Email: chen@ida.ing.tu-bs.de,y.zhong@tu-bs.de,
More informationThroughput Guarantees for TCP Flows in a Network Based on Packet Classes Using Edge-to-Edge Per Flow Measurements
Throughput Guarantees for TCP Flows in a Network Based on Packet Classes Using Edge-to-Edge Per Flow Measurements Lluís Fàbrega Teodor Jové Pere Vilà José Marzo Institute of Informatics and Applications
More informationMultimedia Requirements. Multimedia and Networks. Quality of Service
Multimedia Requirements Chapter 2: Representation of Multimedia Data Chapter 3: Multimedia Systems Communication Aspects and Services Multimedia Applications and Transfer/Control Protocols Quality of Service
More informationClass of Service (CoS) in a global NGN
Class of Service (CoS) in a global NGN Zukunft der Netze Chemnitz 2009 8. Fachtagung des ITG-FA 5.2 Thomas Martin Knoll Chemnitz University of Technology Communication Networks Phone 0371 531 33246 Email
More informationHow To Share Bandwidth On A Diffserv Network
Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Telecommunications and Malaysia International Conference on Communications, 14-17 May 2007, Penang, Malaysia Bandwidth Sharing Scheme in DiffServ-aware
More informationChallenges and Approaches in Providing QoS Monitoring
Challenges and Approaches in Providing QoS Monitoring Yuming Jiang, Chen-Khong Tham, Chi-Chung Ko Department of Electrical Engineering National University of Singapore 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore
More informationIndustry s First QoS- Enhanced MPLS TE Solution
Industry s First QoS- Enhanced MPLS TE Solution Azhar Sayeed Manager, IOS Product Management, asayeed@cisco.com Contact Info: Kim Gibbons, kgibbons@cisco.com,, 408-525 525-4909 1 Agenda MPLS Traffic Engineering
More information16/5-05 Datakommunikation - Jonny Pettersson, UmU 2. 16/5-05 Datakommunikation - Jonny Pettersson, UmU 4
Multimedia Networking Principles Last time Classify multimedia Multimedia Networking Applications Streaming stored audio and video Identify the network Real-time Multimedia: Internet Phone services the
More informationManagement of Telecommunication Networks. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Tsenov akz@tu-sofia.bg
Management of Telecommunication Networks Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Tsenov akz@tu-sofia.bg Part 1 Quality of Services I QoS Definition ISO 9000 defines quality as the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics
More informationIP Quality of Service: Theory and best practices. Vikrant S. Kaulgud
IP Quality of Service: Theory and best practices Vikrant S. Kaulgud 1 Why are we here? Understand need for Quality of Service. Explore Internet QoS architectures. Check QoS best practices. Be vendor neutral,
More informationQuality of Service for IP Videoconferencing Engineering White Paper
Engineering White Paper Subha Dhesikan Cisco Systems June 1 st, 2001 Copyright 2002 Cisco Systems, Inc. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 WHY QOS? 4 3 QOS PRIMITIVES 5 4 QOS ARCHITECTURES 7 4.1 DIFFERENTIATED
More informationQoSIP: A QoS Aware IP Routing Protocol for Multimedia Data
QoSIP: A QoS Aware IP Routing Protocol for Multimedia Data Md. Golam Shagadul Amin Talukder and Al-Mukaddim Khan Pathan* Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Metropolitan University, Sylhet,
More informationMulticast Network Administration Control in Diff Services
MASURMNT-BASD MULTICAST ADMISSION CONTROL IN DIFFSRV NTWORKS Olli Alanen, Mikko Pääkkönen, Timo Hämäläinen, Mikko Ketola and Jyrki Joutsensalo Department of Mathematical Information Technology University
More information02-QOS-ADVANCED-DIFFSRV
IP QoS DiffServ Differentiated Services Architecture Agenda DiffServ Principles DS-Field, DSCP Historical Review Newest Implementations Per-Hop Behaviors (PHB) DiffServ in Detail DiffServ in other Environments
More informationSupporting Differentiated Services with Per-Class Traffic Engineering in MPLS
Supporting Differentiated Services with Per-Class Traffic Engineering in MPLS Melody Moh moh @IX. sjsu. edu Dept of Math. & Computer Science Belle Wei bwei@email.sjsu.edu Dept of Electrical Engineering
More informationInternational Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 9, September 2012 ISSN: 2277 128X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com An Experimental
More informationA Hybrid Electrical and Optical Networking Topology of Data Center for Big Data Network
ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference, April 3-5, 2014, University of Bridgeport, Bridgpeort, CT, USA A Hybrid Electrical and Optical Networking Topology of Data Center for Big Data Network Mohammad Naimur Rahman
More informationMultihoming and Multi-path Routing. CS 7260 Nick Feamster January 29. 2007
Multihoming and Multi-path Routing CS 7260 Nick Feamster January 29. 2007 Today s Topic IP-Based Multihoming What is it? What problem is it solving? (Why multihome?) How is it implemented today (in IP)?
More informationNetwork management and QoS provisioning - QoS in the Internet
QoS in the Internet Inernet approach is based on datagram service (best effort), so provide QoS was not a purpose for developers. Mainly problems are:. recognizing flows;. manage the issue that packets
More informationA Survey on Internet QoS Signaling
A Survey on Internet QoS Signaling Dimitra Vali*, Sarantis Paskalis+, Alexandros Kaloxylos^, Lazaros Merakos+ * OTE esearch Hellenic Telecommunications Organization - OTE S.A. Athens, Greece dvali@oteresearch.gr
More informationVIDEO STREAMING OVER SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKS WITH SERVER LOAD BALANCING. Selin Yilmaz, A. Murat Tekalp, Bige D. Unluturk
VIDEO STREAMING OVER SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKS WITH SERVER LOAD BALANCING Selin Yilmaz, A. Murat Tekalp, Bige D. Unluturk College of Engineering, Koç University, 34450 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey ABSTRACT
More informationPath Selection Analysis in MPLS Network Based on QoS
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi (CFD), Cilt:36, No: 6 Özel Sayı (2015) ISSN: 1300-1949 Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Science Science Journal (CSJ), Vol. 36, No: 6 Special
More informationQoS Unterstützung in der neuen Generation von Weitverkehrsnetzen und erste Erfahrungen im europaweiten Einsatz
QoS Unterstützung in der neuen Generation von Weitverkehrsnetzen und erste Erfahrungen im europaweiten Einsatz QUASAR Quality-of-Service Architectures 16. DFN-Arbeitstagung über Kommunikationsnetze Düsseldorf
More information6.6 Scheduling and Policing Mechanisms
02-068 C06 pp4 6/14/02 3:11 PM Page 572 572 CHAPTER 6 Multimedia Networking 6.6 Scheduling and Policing Mechanisms In the previous section, we identified the important underlying principles in providing
More informationMonitoring Performances of Quality of Service in Cloud with System of Systems
Monitoring Performances of Quality of Service in Cloud with System of Systems Helen Anderson Akpan 1, M. R. Sudha 2 1 MSc Student, Department of Information Technology, 2 Assistant Professor, Department
More informationImplementing Cisco Quality of Service QOS v2.5; 5 days, Instructor-led
Implementing Cisco Quality of Service QOS v2.5; 5 days, Instructor-led Course Description Implementing Cisco Quality of Service (QOS) v2.5 provides learners with in-depth knowledge of QoS requirements,
More informationA Power Efficient QoS Provisioning Architecture for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
A Power Efficient QoS Provisioning Architecture for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Didem Gozupek 1,Symeon Papavassiliou 2, Nirwan Ansari 1, and Jie Yang 1 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
More information"Charting the Course... ... to Your Success!" QOS - Implementing Cisco Quality of Service 2.5 Course Summary
Course Summary Description Implementing Cisco Quality of Service (QOS) v2.5 provides learners with in-depth knowledge of QoS requirements, conceptual models such as best effort, IntServ, and DiffServ,
More informationReal-time apps and Quality of Service
Real-time apps and Quality of Service Focus What transports do applications need? What network mechanisms provide which kinds of quality assurances? Topics Real-time versus Elastic applications Adapting
More informationSmart WWW Traffic Balancing
Smart WWW Traffic Balancing Erol Gelenbe Ricardo Lent Juan Arturo Nunez School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of Central Florida Introduction The Internet is one of the biggest
More informationQoS Switching. Two Related Areas to Cover (1) Switched IP Forwarding (2) 802.1Q (Virtual LANs) and 802.1p (GARP/Priorities)
QoS Switching H. T. Kung Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University November 4, 1998 1of40 Two Related Areas to Cover (1) Switched IP Forwarding (2) 802.1Q (Virtual LANs) and 802.1p
More informationThe Evolution of the Generalized Differentiated Services Architecture and the Changing Role of the Internet Engineering Task Force*
The Evolution of the Generalized Differentiated Services Architecture and the Changing Role of the Internet Engineering Task Force* Abstract: by Günter Knieps Discussion Paper Institut für Verkehrswissenschaft
More informationIMPLEMENTING CISCO QUALITY OF SERVICE V2.5 (QOS)
IMPLEMENTING CISCO QUALITY OF SERVICE V2.5 (QOS) COURSE OVERVIEW: Implementing Cisco Quality of Service (QOS) v2.5 provides learners with in-depth knowledge of QoS requirements, conceptual models such
More informationRecovery Modeling in MPLS Networks
Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Computer and Communication Engineering, ICCCE 06 Vol. I, 9-11 May 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Recovery Modeling in MPLS Networks Wajdi Al-Khateeb 1, Sufyan Al-Irhayim
More informationRouter Scheduling Configuration Based on the Maximization of Benefit and Carried Best Effort Traffic
Telecommunication Systems 24:2 4, 275 292, 2003 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Router Scheduling Configuration Based on the Maximization of Benefit and Carried Best Effort
More informationMaster Course Computer Networks IN2097
Chair for Network Architectures and Services Prof. Carle Department for Computer Science TU München Master Course Computer Networks IN2097 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Georg Carle Christian Grothoff, Ph.D. Chair for
More informationCS268 Exam Solutions. 1) End-to-End (20 pts)
CS268 Exam Solutions General comments: ) If you would like a re-grade, submit in email a complete explanation of why your solution should be re-graded. Quote parts of your solution if necessary. In person
More informationIP-Telephony Quality of Service (QoS)
IP-Telephony Quality of Service (QoS) Bernard Hammer Siemens AG, Munich Siemens AG 2001 1 Presentation Outline End-to-end OoS of VoIP services Quality of speech codecs Network-QoS IntServ RSVP DiffServ
More informationAdaptive Measurement Based QoS Management in DiffServ Networks
Adaptive Measurement Based QoS Management in DiffServ Networks Chamil P. W. Kulatunga, Paul Malone, Mícheál Ó Foghlú Telecommunications Software Systems Group (TSSG) Waterford Institute of Technology,
More informationCS 5480/6480: Computer Networks Spring 2012 Homework 4 Solutions Due by 1:25 PM on April 11 th 2012
CS 5480/6480: Computer Networks Spring 2012 Homework 4 Solutions Due by 1:25 PM on April 11 th 2012 Important: The solutions to the homework problems from the course book have been provided by the authors.
More informationQuality of Service Routing Network and Performance Evaluation*
Quality of Service Routing Network and Performance Evaluation* Shen Lin, Cui Yong, Xu Ming-wei, and Xu Ke Department of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P.R.China, 100084 {shenlin, cy, xmw,
More informationEXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR QUALITY OF SERVICE IN VOICE OVER IP
Scientific Bulletin of the Electrical Engineering Faculty Year 11 No. 2 (16) ISSN 1843-6188 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR QUALITY OF SERVICE IN VOICE OVER IP Emil DIACONU 1, Gabriel PREDUŞCĂ 2, Denisa CÎRCIUMĂRESCU
More information