AdvancED is dedicated to creating a world of opportunities for every learner. The North Central Association
|
|
|
- Bethany Parrish
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 School Accreditation A Handbook for Schools April 2015 AdvancED is dedicated to creating a world of opportunities for every learner. The North Central Association Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement (NCA CASI), the Northwest Accreditation Commission (NWAC) and the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement (SACS CASI) are accreditation divisions of AdvancED. Copyright 2015 AdvancED
2 Table to Contents Welcome 3 Resources 4 Introduction to School Accreditation 5 Overview 5 The School Accreditation Process: Responsibilities of the School 6 Role of the School Facilitator 7 Steps to School Accreditation 7 Chapter 1: Beginning the Accreditation Process 8 Applying 8 Preparing for and Hosting the Readiness Review 8 Moving to Candidacy 8 ASSIST 9 Chapter 2: Engaging in Internal Review 10 Understanding and Completing the ASSIST Diagnostics 10 Preparing the Executive Summary & Updating the School's Demographics 11 Chapter 3: Preparing for the External Review 13 Working with the Managing Office and External Review Team 13 Developing the Review Schedule 13 Preparing the Principal's Overview 14 Preparing Brief Presentations on the Standards 14 Setting up Interviews 15 Understanding and Planning for the Facility Tour 17 Understanding the Role and Purpose of Classroom Observations 18 Preparing for the Presentation of the Team's Findings 18 Coordinating Team Logistics 20 Hosting the Pre-Review with the Lead Evaluator 21 Making Final Preparations 21 Chapter 4: Hosting the External Review 22 Attending to the Details 22 Keys to Success 23 Chapter 5: Continuing the Journey 24 Receiving the Written Report of the External Review Team 24 Receiving Notice of Accreditation, IEQ, and Celebrating with the Community 24 Acting on the External Review Team s Findings 25 Completing the Accreditation Progress Report 25 Maintaining Momentum 26 Conclusion 27 Appendix Resources AdvancED 2
3 Welcome This brief handbook is designed to help you with the steps and logistics of the AdvancED School Accreditation Process from beginning the process to preparing for and hosting the External Review to continuing the journey after the review. The AdvancED Performance Accreditation represents the unified accreditation process for the North Central Association Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement (NCA CASI), the Northwest Accreditation Commission (NWAC) and the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement (SACS CASI). Schools seeking to earn and maintain NCA CASI, NWAC, and SACS CASI accreditation follow the AdvancED Accreditation Process. If you have question or need assistance during the process, please contact your AdvancED managing office. A directory of managing offices can be found at under the Contact Us tab. Copyright 2015 AdvancED Users may reproduce these materials for noncommercial, educational purposes only, provided all copyright and other proprietary notices contained on the materials are retained. Unauthorized use of the AdvancED logo is not permitted AdvancED 3
4 Resources AdvancED provides a range of support and resources to assist schools in their pursuit and maintenance of accreditation. Standards AdvancED Accreditation Standards for Quality Schools The Standards are the foundation of the accreditation process and can be downloaded at under the Improvement Services tab. Processes, Steps and Procedures Visit under the Improvement Services tab for an overview of the School Accreditation Process. Scroll to the bottom of the page and click on Accreditation where you will find: View the Accreditation Process Map Download Policies and Procedures Download the Accreditation Application Resources and Tools A wide range of useful resources and tools for schools can be accessed online at and Products and Services AdvancED offers a range of products and services to schools. Visit under the Online Store link for a current listing of publications, resources and tools. Managing Office Support Managing offices provide hands-on support and technical assistance to schools as they engage in the School Accreditation Process. Many take advantage or request the expertise of trained Field Consultants to support schools. Schools can contact their managing office to learn more about the range of services and support available to them. A complete directory of managing offices can be found at under the Contact Us tab AdvancED 4
5 Introduction to School Accreditation Overview Accreditation is a voluntary method of quality assurance developed more than 100 years ago by American universities and secondary schools and designed primarily to distinguish schools adhering to a set of educational standards. Today, the accreditation process is used at all levels of education and is recognized for its ability to effectively drive student performance and continuous improvement in education. AdvancED Accreditation is not about earning a label for a one-time evaluation. Rather, it recognizes and supports the journey of continuous improvement. The power of AdvancED Performance Accreditation lies in the connections and linkages between and among the conditions, processes, and practices within an institution that impact student performance and organizational effectiveness. Institutions seeking to gain or retain accreditation must meet AdvancED Standards specific to their institution type, adhere to AdvancED Accreditation Policies and Procedures, and Assurances; demonstrate acceptable levels of student performance and the continuous improvement of student performance, and provide evidence of stakeholder engagement and satisfaction. Through the External Review process, conducted by a team of highly-qualified external peer evaluators who examine the institution s adherence and commitment to AdvancED Standards and continuous improvement, institutions will continue to receive a comprehensive report of the team s findings with recognition of Powerful Practices, Opportunities for Improvement, and Improvement Priorities. The External Review is a rigorous process that includes the in-depth examination of evidence and relevant data, interviews with all stakeholder groups, and extensive observations of learning, instruction, and operations. It is an integral component of AdvancED Performance Accreditation and provides the institution with a comprehensive evaluation guided by the results of diagnostic instruments, in-depth review of data and documentation, and the professional judgment of a team of qualified and highlytrained evaluators. The results of this evaluation are represented in the Index of Education Quality (IEQ ) and through critical observations, namely, Powerful Practices, Opportunities for Improvement, and Improvement Priorities. If an institution fails to meet established criteria at an acceptable level, the institution has the ongoing responsibility to make improvements and be re-evaluated by AdvancED and, in doing so, improve its effectiveness AdvancED 5
6 The School Accreditation Process: Responsibilities of the School The accreditation process is based on a five-year term accreditation. It is an ongoing process of meeting Standards, engaging in continuous improvement and demonstrating quality assurance. The following chart outlines how the process unfolds and the responsibilities of the school over the five-year term. Timing School s Responsibilities Every Year Adhere to the AdvancED Standards for Quality for Schools Review and adhere to the AdvancED Accreditation Policies and Procedures Engage in ongoing self assessment and continuous improvement Document results of improvement efforts Update school demographic and contact information Notify AdvancED of any substantive changes in the school s ability to meet the Standards Year of External Review Prepare for the External Review Team, working with the Lead Evaluator to establish the review schedule and make arrangements for the team. Gather evidence and documentation in preparation for the team s review of the school s adherence to the Standards. Host the External Review Team. Share the findings from the External Review report with the school community. Begin acting on the team s improvement priorities. Administer AdvancED surveys Between four weeks and six Self Assessment months before External Improvement Plan Review all completed and Executive Summary submitted in ASSIST Assurances Student Performance Diagnostic Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic Following the External Review Review and discuss the findings from the External Review with all stakeholders. Ensure that plans are in place to embed and sustain the strengths noted in the commendations section to maximize their impact on the school. Develop action plans to address the improvement priorities made by the team. Include methods for monitoring progress toward the Improvement Priorities. Use the report to guide and strengthen the school s efforts to improve student performance and school effectiveness. Following the External Review, submit the Accreditation Progress Report (APR) detailing progress made toward addressing the Improvement Priorities. Schools are required to respond to all Improvement Priorities. The Improvement Priorities should be completed before the APR is submitted. The report will be reviewed at the state and national level to ensure that significant progress is being made toward the Improvement Priorities. Lack of progress can result in a change in accreditation status AdvancED 6
7 Role of the School Facilitator Often the Principal of the school assigns a senior staff member to facilitate the accreditation process for the school. The School Facilitator: Serves as the key point of contact between AdvancED and the school; Works with the External Review Lead Evaluator to prepare for and host the External Review; Oversees the accreditation process for the school; Supports school stakeholders throughout the accreditation process; answers questions and provides guidance; Ensures that all requirements of the accreditation process are met; and Manages the logistics and oversees the schedule of the External Review. Steps to School Accreditation Corresponding chapters from this handbook address each step of the process: Chapter 1: Beginning the Accreditation Process Chapter 2: Engaging in Internal Review Chapter 3: Preparing for the External Review Chapter 4: Hosting the External Review Chapter 5: Continuing the Journey 2015 AdvancED 7
8 Chapter 1: Beginning the Accreditation Process Applying The school begins the accreditation process by reviewing the AdvancED Standards for Quality Schools, Assurances, Policies and Procedures and determining that it has both the school-wide commitment and the capacity to meet the Standards. The school then completes and submits an application and accreditation fees to AdvancED. The managing office is notified of the application and sends the school a Readiness Letter describing the expectations for the Readiness Review, along with a Self Assessment for Readiness for Accreditation tool. Preparing for and Hosting the Readiness Review Purpose: The Readiness Review is designed to reflect the institution s readiness for accreditation through a validation of the school s Self Assessment of Readiness and examination of its practices in relation to the AdvancED Standards. By assessing the institution s readiness, a determination can be made regarding its capacity to meet the AdvancED Standards and requirements for student performance, stakeholder perception data and Assurances. For information regarding preparation for the Readiness Review and completion of the Self Assessment of Readiness, please go to Based on the review, the managing office representatives make a determination as to the school s readiness for accreditation. If the representatives believe the school would benefit from more time to address specific areas of need, they will recommend that the school remain in Applicant status. If this is the case, the school will receive specific instructions regarding necessary next steps. If the representatives believe the school is ready for accreditation, they will recommend that the school be moved to Candidate status. Moving to Candidacy If the school is recommended for candidacy, the managing office sends the school a Letter of Candidacy that outlines the next steps of the accreditation process which include: Addressing any actions noted in the Readiness report; Ensuring that the school has the capacity to meet all the Standards; Identifying dates for the External Review; and Preparing for the External Review The candidacy letter includes an External Review Date and Team Member Expertise Request Form. The form asks the school to: Identify three preferred dates to host the External Review. The review needs to be scheduled within two years of the Readiness Review. Review date requests must be made at least six 2015 AdvancED 8
9 months prior to the preferred dates. Indicate any specific expertise the school would like members of the External Review Team to have based on the needs of the school. Most schools identify and submit their preferred review dates and desired expertise shortly after receiving their candidacy letter. This provides the school with a targeted timeframe for the review and helps begin preparations for the External Review. Upon receiving the school s preferred dates and desired team member expertise, the managing office sends an External Review confirmation letter confirming the dates for the External Review to the school. The letter provides further instructions for preparing for the review. ASSIST The Adaptive System of School Improvement Support Tools (ASSIST ) has been created to function as a school improvement planning framework and an accreditation manager. AdvancED accreditation and school improvement are two processes built upon systems thinking and therefore require schools to use a systems thinking approach. The ASSIST system provides resources and tools for schools and systems in developing informed improvement plans and to manage the accreditation process from beginning to end. Institutions in the AdvancED network have access to ASSIST and may use ASSIST all the time, not just in preparation for an External Review. Schools and systems can assign multiple users to access their institution s ASSIST account. The technology tools in ASSIST have been created to guide schools and systems through this continuous improvement process that includes: data collection, analysis, goal setting, planning, implementation and evaluation. The ASSIST system also provides tools for completing the required documents that are part of the accreditation process AdvancED 9
10 Chapter 2: Engaging in Internal Review To prepare for the External Review, the school engages in a comprehensive internal review and submits an Accreditation Report in ASSIST. The Accreditation Report includes the AdvancED Self Assessment, Executive Summary, Student Performance Diagnostics, Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostics, Assurances and a School Improvement Plan. Internal and external diagnostics results are an important part of the AdvancED Accreditation Process, but the intent is for education institutions to use diagnostic tools as part of their ongoing data collection and improvement process. Understanding and Completing the ASSIST Diagnostics The Adaptive System of School Improvement Support Tools (ASSIST ) offers a suite of diagnostic tools, designed to offer a comprehensive, yet simplistic way of identifying an organization s strengths and challenges. Self Assessment is a diagnostic based on the AdvancED Standards for Quality, which serve as the foundation of the accreditation and continuous improvement process. The Self Assessment is designed to facilitate the inclusive and collaborative process of internal reflection and assessment of the institution's current reality. It should be used to engage staff members and stakeholders in purposeful and honest dialogue; to serve as a reflection in order to evaluate the institution s adherence to the Standards and guide continuous improvement. The Self Assessment includes the institution's self-ratings of and the evidence cited for each of the Indicators. Upon completion of the diagnostic, an overall assessment summary is provided in graphic form. While the Self Assessment is a required component of the Accreditation Report, schools are encouraged to use it as often as needed as a reflective process and ongoing support tool. Executive Summary is a narrative diagnostic tool that allows the school to capture and tell its unique story, providing the organizational context for the school s Self Assessment. Comprised of four sections, the Executive Summary includes: 1) Description of the School; 2) School's Purpose; 3) Notable Achievements and Areas of Improvement; and 4) Additional Information. Guiding questions assist the school in crafting each section. Upon completion, institutions are asked to publish the Executive Summary, which is published under the institution s profile at under Find Accredited Institutions. Institutions are encouraged to update the Executive Summary as often as needed to ensure a current profile AdvancED 10
11 Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic facilitates the process of analyzing stakeholder feedback data (survey data) in order to identify areas of achievement as well as areas in need of improvement. In preparation of the External Review, intuitions are required to administer AdvancED surveys, through ASSIST. Completion of this diagnostic requires the submission of the Stakeholder Feedback Data Document, as an attachment through ASSIST, in order to effectively-respond to the evaluative criteria and diagnostic questions. The document is intended to summarize the institution s stakeholder feedback results, with the understanding that additional, in-depth information will be available during the on-site External Review. Student Performance Diagnostic facilitates the process of collecting and analyzing student performance data in order to identify areas of achievement and in need of improvement. The Student Performance Data Document is the first requirement in completing this diagnostic in ASSIST. Completion requires the submission of the data, as an attachment through ASSIST, in order to effectively-respond to the evaluative criteria and diagnostic questions. There are two purposes of the Student Performance Data Document. First, the Data Document serves as a summary of the data the institution uses for decisionmaking. This brief summary can also be used to provide the student performance data in a meaningful way to various stakeholder groups. The second purpose is to provide the External Review Team with a summary of student performance prior to the on-site review. The summary will also provide the team with a better understanding of the institution s responses to the Student Performance Diagnostic. Additional, in-depth information may be provided upon arrival of the team. AdvancED Assurances provides a streamlined process for certifying adherence with accreditation, compliance and/or accountability statements that are applicable to your institution. All Assurances require a simple Yes or No certification response, and offer the ability to upload supporting documentation (e.g. school improvement plan, crisis management plan) as well as provide additional narrative comments. School Improvement Plan may be an attachment through the Assurances, in Word, PDF or similar program, or institutions may take advantage of the Goals and Plans diagnostic in ASSIST. This diagnostic provides a step-by-step process by which schools can identify goals, construct measureable objectives, identify strategies and define activities. ASSIST takes the guesswork out of planning by allowing the user to respond to a series of guiding questions that result in a quality measurable objective; it also serves as the home for all activity past, present and future. The system then allows the user to identify strategies and activities to meet each objective. This is a thorough process by which the user assigns resources, establishes timelines and identifies staff responsible for implementation. Once goals are built in ASSIST, the user can assign goals to create various improvement plans and print working documents. This component of ASSIST is dynamic and supports the continuous improvement process by allowing schools and school systems to reuse the goals to construct various plans as needed, as well as track the implementation of goals and plans while allowing for the ongoing modification and addition of goals based on new data and information. Demographics updates are essential for AdvancED and the school to maintain communication and data collection. Go to and under the Demographics Update, click on the link to Access and Complete Demographics Update Online AdvancED 11
12 Resources Go to for access to technical guides, worksheets, tutorials and so much more AdvancED 12
13 Chapter 3: Preparing for the External Review Working with the Managing Office and External Review Lead Evaluator Having a general understanding of the purpose and functions of the External Review helps the school prepare for a successful review. In addition, the school has the ongoing support of the AdvancED managing office and assigned Lead Evaluator. The managing office is available to support the school with all aspects of the school accreditation process from informing and engaging stakeholders to completing required reports to providing technical assistance in responding to the team s Improvement Priorities. Schools are encouraged to use their managing offices as a resource and partner in their accreditation and continuous improvement efforts. The Lead Evaluator is also available to support the school. As the review date approaches, the school works closely with the Lead Evaluator to: Establish the review schedule; Coordinate logistics for the team; Address any questions and/or concerns related to review preparation; Host a Pre-Review with the school approximately four weeks prior to the review, if applicable Organize and provide artifacts (i.e. Google Docs, Drop Box) in advance of team s arrival; and Ensure the school is ready for the review. Developing the Review Schedule The School Facilitator works with the External Review Lead Evaluator to develop the review schedule. School reviews are a minimum of two full days. A sample schedule is available at under the Tools category, click on Sample Schedule. The following is an overview of key components of a school External Review. Evening Before Review (or early morning of the review) External Review Team Preparation (two-three hours) Activities During Review School Overview and Standards Preparations Principal provides general orientation to the team School personnel provide brief presentation on the school s adherence to each of the five Standards and highlight key artifacts related to the Standards Interviews Team interviews school leadership and improvement team, teachers, parents and community members, support staff and students (each interview lasts approximately 45 minutes AdvancED 13
14 Artifact Review Team reviews school artifacts (this occurs on an ongoing basis) Observations Principal and/or designee provides an instructional tour of the school Team conducts classroom observations Team makes general observations throughout the review Professional Deliberations Team meets to examine the data collected and reach consensus regarding the team s findings Meeting with the Principal Prior to the delivery of the Oral Exit Report, the Lead Evaluator meets with the Principal to review the team s findings and discuss the team s improvement priorities Oral Exit Report Lead Evaluator provides Oral Exit Report to school stakeholders at the conclusion of the External Review. Preparing the Principal s Overview At the beginning of the External Review, the Principal welcomes the External Review Team and provides an overview of the school. The purpose of the Principal s remarks is to set the tone and context for the review. The following questions are designed to assist the Principal in thinking about the type of content to include in his/her remarks: What will help the team quickly gain an understanding of the school s challenges, strengths and opportunities? What information will best convey what the school is trying to accomplish for students? How is the school meeting the needs of its students currently and over time? What does the school want the team to look for? What advice/support would the school like the team to provide over the course of the review? Team members find it helpful when the Principal s comments include an overview of the school s vision, basic demographic information about the school, a description of challenges, an overview of key programs and improvement initiatives and a snapshot of student performance results using multiple measures over time. The Principal s overview typically lasts between 30 and 45 minutes. It is helpful to provide team members with a copy of the Principal s comments for use and reference during the review. Preparing Brief Presentations on the Standards Typically, following the Principal s overview, the School Improvement Team provides a briefing on each of the AdvancED Standards, Student Performance Diagnostic and Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic. The presentations provide the External Review Team with a general overview and description of how the 2015 AdvancED 14
15 school is meeting each Standard. The overview lasts between 30 and 45 minutes. The following questions are designed to help school personnel as they develop the presentation for the overview: What does the school most want the team to know about each Standard as the team begins its work? What information about each Standard does the school wish to highlight and/or clarify from the Self Assessment? What artifacts does the school wish to bring to the team s attention that helps demonstrate the school s adherence to one or more Standards? What processes and practices does the school wish to explain that demonstrates how the school is meeting the Standards? What does the school want the team to look for and/or clarify with regard to each Standard as it conducts its review? Setting up Interviews Purpose and coordination. A critical component of the External Review is interviews of school stakeholders. The purpose of the interviews is to provide an opportunity for the External Review Team to gather information from a variety of stakeholders about the school s adherence to the AdvancED accreditation requirements. The Principal and/or School Facilitator, with support from the school leadership team, invite and schedules stakeholders to be interviewed by the External Review Team. Structure of the interviews and questions asked. The interviews last between 45 minutes and one hour. They begin with a brief overview of the purpose of the interviews and the role of the External Review Team. The team members and the interviewees then introduce themselves. Following these introductory activities, the team asks broad questions which are prepared by the team members as they review the school s Accreditation Report. Stakeholder groups to be interviewed The team interviews the following stakeholder groups: School leadership and improvement team Teachers and support staff Parents and community and board members Students The school and Lead Evaluator may add to and/or adapt the groups as appropriate for the school setting AdvancED 15
16 Selecting Interviewees The following guidelines are designed to help the School Facilitator in identifying stakeholders to be interviewed. Stakeholders should collectively: Reflect the school s broader community (socio-economic levels, race and ethnicity, neighborhoods served by the school, etc.) Provide a range of viewpoints and perspectives (strong and active supporters of the school, critics of the school, those who are less involved, etc.) Represent all levels and departments in the school (e.g., different grade levels and different subject areas) Represent all major categories of positions in the school (e.g., leadership, administrative, teaching, guidance and support functions) Include individuals who can discuss the school s strengths and challenges The overarching questions to ask when identifying stakeholders to be interviewed are: Will the stakeholders collectively provide an accurate assessment of the school for the External Review Team? Do the stakeholders collectively have enough knowledge of the school s practices with regard to the AdvancED Standards to yield meaningful information? Will the stakeholders collectively yield information that will prove valuable to the school in its continuous improvement efforts? While it may be tempting to identify only those stakeholders who are active and strong supporters of the school, it does not maximize the insights and richness of the findings that can emerge from these interviews that ultimately benefit the school s improvement efforts. Inviting Interviewees The Principal and/or School Facilitator should begin inviting stakeholders to be interviewed as soon as it has finalized the review schedule (approximately six weeks prior to the review). The following is sample language that can be adapted and used as appropriate when inviting stakeholders to participate in the interviews AdvancED 16
17 Sample Invitation Letter to Potential Interviewees Dear (Insert Name), You are cordially invited to participate in (Insert name of School) s upcoming External Review by serving on a stakeholder interview team. (Insert name of School) s External Review will take place (Insert Dates). The review is led by a team of peer professionals. During the review, the External Review Team conducts interviews with a range of school stakeholder, reviews school documents, student performance data, and makes professional observations to determine the degree to which the school meets Standards for accreditation. The team shares its findings in oral and written formats and makes an accreditation recommendation for state and national review. The school uses the findings from the team to further its continuous improvement efforts. On (Insert day), the External Review Team will be interviewing several stakeholder groups. We would like the team to interview you as part of the (Insert Interview Group) at (Insert time) in (Insert location). The interview will last approximately (Insert allotted time) minutes. We believe that you have experience, knowledge and insights that would enhance the team s understanding of our school. Please reply to this invitation by (Insert date). I hope you can participate in this exciting and valuable process. Sincerely, (Principal) Preparing Interviewees After stakeholders accept the invitation to serve on an interview team, the school sends a brief note to confirm the interview date, time and location. The note should emphasize the importance of being on time. The note should repeat some of the information from the invitation letter that highlights the purpose and activities of the team. Depending on the stakeholder being interviewed, the school may wish to include supporting materials such as a copy of the school s Self Assessment and a list of the sample questions that may be asked in the interview (As noted earlier, these can be obtained from the Lead Evaluator.). Understanding and Planning for the Facility Tour The Principal or his/her designee should lead the facility tour, which typically last 15 minutes or less, and should last no more than 30 minutes. The tour should occur when classes are in session and should be scheduled to avoid the start of school, passing periods and lunch. The primary purpose of the tour is to allow the External Review Team to see the layout of the facility so that they can easily find the classrooms they are to observe. During this time, however, the principal may discuss special programs or initiatives in the school and particular instructional strategies the Team should look for AdvancED 17
18 During the facility tour, the External Review Team looks and listens for: The nature of the overall learning environment How welcoming is it? Does it support student learning? Are teachers and students actively engaged in the learning process? The use of a variety of instructional and assessment methods The role all staff plays in the teaching and learning process Understanding the Role and Purpose of Classroom Observations During the External Review, team members will observe a variety of classrooms using the Effective Learning Environments Observation Tool (eleot ). The purpose of this tool is to help the team identify and document observable evidence of classroom environments that are conducive to student learning. Results of the observations will be used to corroborate information obtained from interviews, artifacts and student performance data. Lasting a minimum of 20 minutes, the observations provide an opportunity to see how improvement initiatives are translated into the classroom and to view the impact on students. The observations allow the team to check for alignment from the administrative to the classroom level. The Principal and/or School Facilitator should notify teachers that the team may observe their classrooms during the review. The Principal and/or School Facilitator should explain the purpose of the observations, emphasizing that the team is observing processes and activities in the classroom; they are not evaluating teachers. Team members are instructed to be as unobtrusive as possible and to not disrupt the learning process. Teachers should conduct class as usual. Preparing for the Presentation of the Team s Findings Meeting with the Principal. When the team has finished its deliberations and solidified its findings, the Lead Evaluator meets with the Principal and any staff members he/she designates to participate in the meeting to hear the team s findings. The School Facilitator schedules the meeting time and location and ensures all participants are informed of the meeting. The meeting provides an opportunity for the Lead Evaluator to discuss the team s findings with the Principal, answer questions and address any concerns. The Lead Evaluator reviews the Oral Exit Report with the Principal prior to it being shared with the broader staff and school community. Planning for the Oral Exit Report. At the conclusion of the External Review, the Lead Evaluator presents the team s findings in the Oral Exit Report, which is typically delivered to school staff and community members. Questions are not taken during the Oral Exit Report (the meeting with the Principal and Lead Evaluator, prior to the presentation of the Oral Exit Report, is the venue for questions). The Principal and/or School Facilitator schedules the time for the Oral Exit Report and ensures all desired participants are informed of the meeting. Schools find that the more stakeholders they involve in hearing the Oral Exit Report, the greater buy-in they achieve in acting on the team s findings. The school should consider inviting all faculty and staff members, parent and community groups, district leadership (if applicable) and board member AdvancED 18
19 Logistics for Oral Exit Report The Principal and/or School Facilitator coordinate the logistics pertaining to the meeting, including: Agenda Inviting participants Preparing a room for the meeting to occur with appropriate seating and audio/visual Providing a computer, LCD projector and screen for the Oral Exit Report presentation which will be delivered via PowerPoint slides Providing a podium and/or table from which the Lead Evaluator can deliver the findings Providing a microphone, if needed The Principal typically begins the meeting with welcoming comments that last approximately five minutes. The Principal explains the work the school has undertaken as part of the accreditation process and provides an overview of the External Review Team s role and activities. The Principal then introduces the Lead Evaluator who introduces the rest of the team and begins the Oral Exit Report. The Lead Evaluator s report lasts minutes. Following the report, the Principal thanks the team and concludes the meeting AdvancED 19
20 Coordinating Team Logistics The school is responsible for coordinating the logistics associated with the External Review. The following checklist is intended to assist with this task. Please communicate with your managing office and Lead Evaluator for specifics related to your External Review. Coordinate transportation, if necessary, to and from the school for the team members for each day of the review. Provide team members with school or district reimbursement forms to pay for any meals paid out-of-pocket and mileage, if applicable. Prompt reimbursement, within 14 business days, is appreciated. Collect the completed forms at the end of the review. Secure hotel room reservations for team members, if necessary. Make all meal arrangements for the team for each day of their stay (and coordinate any necessary transportation to meals, such as dinner in the evenings). Reserve meeting space at the hotel and school for each night of the review. The meeting room should be organized as a hollow square, with enough chairs to accommodate all members of the team. Reliable internet access (required), a screen, LCD projector, power cords (2-3), and flip chart paper (at least one full pad), markers (at least one for every member of the team), masking tape and sticky notes (standard square size, at least one pad for each member of the team) should be provided. Water and light refreshments are appreciated. Reserve a team meeting room at the school where the team can work, discuss their findings and review artifacts. The room should include power cords for multiple computers. Secure rooms for the interviews. Ensure the logistics pertaining to the presentation of the Oral Exit Report (outlined earlier) are addressed. Make name badges for the team members and ensure that school personnel wear their name badges. Prepare information packets for the team s arrival (often including a hard copy of the school s Self Assessment, the final schedule and other school-specific materials). Please note that team members are not allowed to accept gifts from the school (school pens, pads of papers and other items to assist the team with their work are acceptable to provide) AdvancED 20
21 Hosting the Pre-Review with the Lead Evaluator Approximately four weeks prior to the External Review, if applicable, the Lead Evaluator and/or Associate Lead Evaluator conducts a Pre-Review with the school to ensure that the school is ready to host a successful External Review. This review usually occurs through a conference call, but can be an on-site review. During the review, the Lead Evaluator/Associate Lead Evaluator meets with and/or contacts the Principal and School Facilitator to: Ensure the school has completed and submitted all required reports Review artifacts assembled for the team Discuss the interview schedule and confirm interviewees. Ensure interviewees include a broad and representative cross section of the school community Ensure the schedule and necessary logistics to accommodate the team have been finalized Answer any questions the school has with regard to the External Review Making Final Preparations The following is a checklist to help the school address final preparation for the External Review Team. At least a week prior to the External Review, confirm all details related to the schedule. Ensure that all stakeholders involved in the review have a copy of the External Review Team schedule. and/or send a reminder to all interviewees. Make sure that artifacts are accessible and ready for review. Confirm flight details, and airport transportation, if applicable. Confirm lodging reservations for the team, if applicable. Confirm transportation arrangements for each day of the review, if applicable. Confirm meals and dinner reservations for the team AdvancED 21
22 Chapter 4: Hosting the External Review By following the guidelines outlined in Chapter 2, the school should find that it is well prepared for the External Review. Chapter 2 provides a detailed overview of each component of the review and how to prepare for it. This chapter provides brief tips to help the school host a successful External Review. The review schedule serves as the primary guide for the review. A sample External Review schedule is available at The Principal and/or School Facilitator manage the schedule and ensure all activities of the review occur as planned. The Principal and/or School Facilitator should maintain the schedule and extra copies at all times during the review. He/she should be available for questions and to help the team access needed information throughout the review. It is a good idea for the Principal and School Facilitator to provide the Lead Evaluator and members with his/her contact information (including cell phone number) and the names and contact information of other school staff should questions or emergencies arise. Attending to the Details Once the External Review Team has arrived, the School Facilitator ensures all details unfold as planned. Arrival and Orientation: Confirm lodging, dinner reservations and other logistics (e.g. transportation, visas) for the team, if applicable. Provide team members with hard copies of any information needed for the review. Often, the school supplies name badges, a hard copy of its Self Assessment, a final schedule and additional school-specific materials. Please note that team members cannot accept gifts from the school (school name/logo items of nominal value such as pens and notepads designed for use during the review is acceptable). Check to see that the meeting room for the team s evening orientation is properly set-up (hollow square, with enough chairs to accommodate all members of the team), reliable internet service, a screen, LCD projector, power cords (2-3), flip chart paper (at least one full pad), markers (at least one for every member of the team, masking tape, sticky notes (standard square size), any school artifacts that the school wants in the team s work room, water and refreshments. Day One: Ensure all team members have transportation to the school. Make sure the team s meeting room at the school is ready and meets the team s needs. Ensure easy access to artifacts the team will need. Manage the schedule and ensure that all activities stay on schedule. Provide lunch for the team. Make available coffee, water and light refreshments throughout the day for the team AdvancED 22
23 Provide transportation to the hotel, if needed. Ensure dinner reservations are confirmed and transportation is provided, if needed. Ensure that the team s meeting room at the hotel (if applicable) is ready for the team. Day Two and Day Three, if applicable Ensure all team members have transportation to the school Make sure the team s meeting room at the school is ready and meets the team s needs. Ensure easy access to artifacts the team will need. Manage the schedule and ensure that all activities stay on schedule. Provide lunch for the team. Make available coffee, water and light refreshments throughout the day for the team. Prepare for the final meeting between the Lead Evaluator, Principal and any designated staff. Set up the room for the presentation of the Oral Exit Report (see details in Chapter 2). Ensure team members transportation needs are addressed. Keys to Success Schools that have hosted External Reviews offer the following advice to their colleagues: Be open and honest with the team. The more authentic and accurate your responses are to the team, the better able the team is to assess the strengths and needs of the school. Stay on schedule. Use the schedule to guide the review. Communicate with all stakeholders about the review. The more people who know about the review and the activities of the team, the better. Be as open and transparent about the process as possible. Use and refer to the Self Assessment. The Self Assessment is perhaps the most valuable component of the review process. The Self Assessment represents the work and thinking of a broad range of stakeholders. Reference it regularly with the team so that it is used to maximize the team s time and their ability to provide meaningful feedback to the school. Share and encourage the team to review specific artifacts that you feel are critical to the team s understanding of your school. Highlight the areas where you need the team s assistance. The earlier in the process that the team discovers the challenges the school is facing, the more time the team has to consider and craft powerful required actions to support the school in addressing those challenges. Remember, you get out of a process what you put into it. The school has the ability through its own commitment to the process to make the most out of the External Review. The more committed the school is to gaining valuable support and feedback from peers, the more likely the school is to receive a meaningful External Review AdvancED 23
24 Chapter 5: Continuing the Journey While the majority of this handbook is devoted to preparing for the External Review, the majority of the school s time is spent following the review, acting on the team s findings and continuing the journey of the accreditation process. This chapter reviews the key activities that occur on an ongoing basis as schools seek to maintain their accreditation and continuously improve. Receiving the Written Report of the External Review Team At the conclusion of the External Review, the Lead Evaluator works with the team to finalize the written report of the team s findings. The report is submitted for review and acceptance to the state office. The school receives the report within about 30 working days of the review. Upon receipt of the written report, the school communicates the External Review Team s findings to internal and external stakeholders. Sharing the results of the review with a wide range of stakeholders helps educate the school community about the school s accreditation and garners buy-in with regard to next steps that the school will take to address the findings in the report. Receiving Notice of Accreditation, IEQ and Celebrating with the Community The External Review Team s report is submitted to AdvancED for state and national review and action. Consistent with the modern focus of accreditation on continuous improvement with an emphasis on student success, AdvancED has introduced an innovative and state-of-the-art framework for diagnosing and revealing institutional performance called the Index of Education Quality (IEQ ). The IEQ is comprised of three domains of performance: 1) the impact of teaching and learning on student performance; 2) the leadership capacity to govern; and 3) use of resources to support and optimize learning. Your institution will be accredited with an IEQ score. In the case where an institution is failing to meet established criteria, the accreditation will be Under Review thereby requiring frequent monitoring. You will receive more information about the IEQ through the Dashboard that will appear as the landing page (i.e. Portfolio) in ASSIST after your report has final approval. The AdvancED Accreditation Commission, the body that grants accreditation, reviews and acts on all accreditation recommendations. After the Commission has taken action on the team s recommendation, a letter is sent to the school confirming its accreditation. Upon receipt of the accreditation letter, the school communicates its final accreditation to internal and external stakeholders. The school receives and displays a certificate of accreditation. Press releases, flags, Q&A guides and more are available to help schools share and celebrate their accreditation with their community. Practices that many schools find useful include: sharing information about their accreditation with parents at every Back to School Night through brochures and/or handouts; including the accreditation seal on their website, school stationery and student transcripts; posting information about accreditation in a regular column of their school newsletters; and including a section on accreditation in their annual reports to the community AdvancED 24
25 Acting on the External Review Team s Findings The External Review Team report serves as a resource to the school as it furthers its continuous improvement efforts. The school celebrates and strengthens the successes and accomplishments noted in the team s commendations. The school builds on these accomplishments, enhancing their impact across the school. The team s Improvement Priorities identify areas of needed action designed to enhance school effectiveness and improve student learning. The school is held accountable for making progress on each of the team s Improvement Priorities. Following the review, the school submits a report (discussed in the next section) which details the progress made on the Required Actions. To begin acting on the team s findings, the school reviews the full team report with school stakeholders. In addition to spending time discussing the team s Powerful Practices and Improvement Priorities, the school studies the detailed description of strengths and opportunities for improvement provided in each of the Standard reports. These reports provide greater clarity, guidance, and direction on the Powerful Practices and Improvement Priorities. Should questions arise during this process, the school seeks clarity from the External Review Lead Evaluator and/or AdvancED Managing Office. After thorough review of the External Review Team s findings, the school establishes a plan of action, engaging a representative group of stakeholders in the process. The school determines what this plan looks like and how it puts the plan into action to ensure ongoing progress. The plan typically outlines next steps related to the team s findings, including actions to strengthen Powerful Practices and clear strategies for addressing Improvement Priorities. In addition, the plan includes implementation strategies and methods for monitoring, documenting and analyzing results. The school implements its strategies for responding to the team s finding, tracks the progress it is making and is prepared to answer the questions, What steps have been taken? What progress has been made? How do you know you ve made an impact? Completing the Accreditation Progress Report Following the External Review, an AdvancED Accreditation Progress Report (APR) will be generated through ASSIST. The APR is a critical component of the accreditation and continuous improvement process. It engages the school in a detailed review and analysis of the steps that have been taken to address the Improvement Priorities. To maintain accreditation status, it is the responsibility of the school to address each of the priorities. Deadlines for completion of the report are based on the school s accreditation status (dates may be found in ASSIST). The purpose of the APR is to provide an institution the opportunity to engage in a structured continuous improvement process to review, analyze, reflect, and report on progress it has made in meeting with Improvement Priorities. The report summarizes the institution s focused efforts, actions and activities in relation to the priorities. It also allows AdvancED to reassess the institution s progress and Indicator performance level scores, which may be updated to reflect a revised IEQ score and accreditation status AdvancED 25
26 The institution will be asked to create a plan, using the Goal and Plan Diagnostics in ASSIST, and provide narrative responses, which summarize the implementation of the plan and its impact. Involve stakeholders in the development of the plan. Keep the answers concise, and attach evidence in support of the responses. Remember that it is the quality of evidence, supportive of the Indicators, not the quantity. Make sure that any descriptions or evidence that is provided directly relates to the appropriate Improvement Priority. Upon completion and submission of the APR, the AdvancED managing office will review the APR and provide feedback, which will be available in ASSIST. Should a revised IEQ score be generated, information related to the score will be available in the school s ASSIST portfolio. For a complete technical guide on completing and submitting the APR, please visit Maintaining Momentum Accredited schools understand and honor the concept of continuous improvement. They are dynamic, in motion and continuously evolving with an unrelenting focus on becoming better on behalf of the students they serve. Quality schools operate as learning communities by possessing healthy cultures where individuals collectively analyze practices and results, engage in professional learning and dialogue, take meaningful action and assume responsibility for results. When the review concludes and progress reports are filed, the commitment and action continues. Schools remain focused on improving organizational effectiveness and student learning. Strengthening Accreditation. On an ongoing basis, accredited schools adhere to the AdvancED Standards, and engage in review of student performance and stakeholder feedback. As schools continuously improve, they monitor, build capacity and grow more effective in each of these activities. AdvancED is available to support schools as they further their improvement efforts. Schools are encouraged to take advantage of AdvancED s web-based resources, publications, workshops, conferences and on-site technical assistance as they continue on their journey of improvement. Sustaining Interest and Commitment. Competent and committed educators are the key to sustained improvement. Schools recognize the importance of enhancing the capacity of staff through continued professional learning that is aligned with organizational purpose, improvement goals and Improvement Priorities. Staff confidence comes from having the knowledge, understanding and skills to thrive while engaging in professional practice. School leaders who create conditions and provide resources to optimize performance and professional growth find the most success in sustaining improvement. Successful schools shape a culture of learning, collaboration and high expectations for staff and students and weave it into the fabric of the school. All staff members are encouraged to grow through action, experimentation and reflection. Successes are identified, celebrated and embedded into practice. Educators are motivated by their collective mission to impact students and make a difference in their 2015 AdvancED 26
27 lives. Schools that find the most success with the accreditation process ensure that the connection between accreditation initiatives and student learning is established and understood by all stakeholders. Conclusion Congratulations on your commitment to accreditation. As you engage in the accreditation process, you will find that all elements of your school become stronger. Your school will become more sophisticated as a system, as its understanding of systems improvement increases. The entire school community and, most importantly, students benefit, as the school works to improve its systems and processes to increase school-wide effectiveness and enhance student learning. AdvancED looks forward to supporting you throughout the school accreditation process. We hope this handbook has been helpful, and we welcome any feedback you have on improving its usefulness. Please feel free to share your comments with us at [email protected]. Appendix Resources: AdvancED 27
SACSCASI. August 21-22, 2007. Joe Smith, Principal, Sample School Mary Anderson, Chairperson, SAIS - SACS Team
Note: This is a sample report designed to provide team chairs with a quick review of the components of the web-based report. The formatting of the report is done automatically through the web-based system.
Report of the Quality Assurance Review Team for Big A Elementary School Route 2, Box 384 Sorrells Road Eastanollee, Georgia 30538 United States
Report of the Quality Assurance Review Team for Big A Elementary School Route 2, Box 384 Sorrells Road Eastanollee, Georgia 30538 United States Ms Gail S Fry Review Dates: 11/19/2008-11/20/2008 North Central
Accreditation: A Guide for Teachers
Accreditation: A Guide for Teachers What is accreditation? Accreditation is a voluntary method of quality assurance developed more than 100 years ago by American universities and secondary schools. Today,
About AdvancED and NCA CASI/SACS CAS I
About AdvancED and NCA CASI/SACS CAS I Background. Founded in 1895, the North Central Association Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement (NCA CASI) and the Southern Association of Colleges
At the conclusion of this activity, the participant will be able to explain or describe:
Trainer s Module NOTE TO INSTRUCTORS: The Trainer s Module is intended for training individuals who will be training other trainers. Module Goal/Aim The goal of this module is to provide trainers an overview
Stakeholder Engagement Working Group
Stakeholder Engagement Working Group Stakeholder Engagement: Planning and Budget Resource December 2015 Purpose: This resource was developed as part of the Society of Practitioners of Health Impact Assessment
TRAINING AND RESOURCES TOOLKIT
TRAINING AND RESOURCES TOOLKIT Welcome to the training and resource toolkit. The Training Overview recommended a five step process to develop training and resources. In addition to following the process,
Guide to school authorization: Diploma Programme
Diploma Programme Guide to school authorization: Diploma Programme Diploma Programme Guide to school authorization: Diploma Programme Published October 2010 Updated February 2015 International Baccalaureate
Onboarding New Teachers: What they Need to Succeed. HISD Staffing Training and Support Spring 2012
Onboarding New Teachers: What they Need to Succeed HISD Staffing Training and Support Spring 2012 Objectives Identify and discuss why onboarding/induction is an integral part of teacher retention Identify
Guide for Performance Review of Educator Preparation in Rhode Island (PREP-RI)
i Guide for Performance Review of Educator Preparation in Rhode Island (PREP-RI) This Guide has been prepared to introduce Educator Preparation Providers to the Process by which their programs will be
Weber State University Information Technology
Current as of March 12, 2012 Weber State University Information Technology Program Review Handbook March 12, 2012 Table of Contents WSU and Information Technology Mission Statements...3 Purpose & Goals
Questions and Answers About AdvancED Accreditation, Standards for Quality and ASSIST. About the Standards
Questions and Answers About AdvancED Accreditation, Standards for Quality and ASSIST The new AdvancED Standards for Quality and Accreditation Protocol will be implemented beginning with the 2012-13 school
Academic Program Review Handbook
Handbook Continuously Improving Programs and Student Learning Revised July 2014 Original Issue: December 6, 2010 Approved: Derry Connolly, President Current Issue: July 3, 2014 Effective: July 3, 2014
LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO
LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO Part I Purpose Principles to Be Addressed Required Documentation Directions Entry 1: Analyzing the School Counseling Environment Candidates analyze the school counseling environment
Working With Patient and Families as Advisors
Working With Patient and Families as Advisors Implementation Handbook Guide to Patient and Family Engagement Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Overview of the Working With Patients and Families as Advisors
Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final
Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final Section 1: Course Overview and Introduction Addresses
CBIE S 49 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE
CALL FOR PROPOSALS CBIE S 49 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 22-25, 2015 HILTON HOTEL & SUITES AND FALLSVIEW CASINO RESORT NIAGARA FALLS, ON, CANADA Deadline for submissions: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 GLOBAL
Consultation process. Guidelines for consultants. Global school services. January 2015
Consultation process Guidelines for consultants Global school services January 2015 International Baccalaureate Organization 2015 Page 1 International Baccalaureate Organization 2015 Purpose The purpose
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE S The Framework of Supports are a set of Practice Profiles that serve as an implementation overview of Support for Personalized Learning (SPL). Practice
Assessment Techniques and Tools for Documentation
Assessment Techniques and Tools for Documentation 47 Assessing the Kindergarten Student s Learning Assessment and evaluation are fundamental components of teaching and learning. Assessment is the process
CANDIDACY FOR ACCREDITATION
CANDIDACY FOR ACCREDITATION The Meaning of Candidacy The Candidate for Accreditation program offers certain postsecondary institutions the opportunity to establish a formal, publicly recognized relationship
Leadership Portfolio
California State University, Fresno Education Administration Program Developing Your Leadership Portfolio September 2005 Table of Contents What is the Leadership Portfolio?........... 1 Why develop the
Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
How To Improve A School
Accreditation and School Improvement Policy Handbook Table of Contents Purpose of this Document...1 AdvancED Accreditation...1 AdvancED Standards...2 School Improvement Leadership...3 Purpose and Direction...4
Certified Records Manager (CRM) Examination Preparation Product Agreement and Terms of Use Between (Name) User and ICRM
Certified Records Manager (CRM) Examination Preparation Product Agreement and Terms of Use Between (Name) User and ICRM This Agreement (the Agreement ) is made as of this day of, 20 by and between the
Hosting Information Student Hosted Colloquia 2014-2015
Hosting Information ed Colloquia 2014-2015 Thank you very much for hosting an SHC speaker! This packet contains a checklist of duties to complete, hints on completing the necessary duties, and sample announcements
Georgia Department of Education School Keys: Unlocking Excellence through the Georgia School Standards
April 17, 2013 Page 2 of 77 Table of Contents Introduction... 5 School Keys History...5 School Keys Structure...6 School Keys Uses...7 GaDOE Contacts...8 Curriculum Planning Strand... 9 Assessment Strand...
M.S. in Education Assessment in the Major Report 2010. By Dr. Renee Chandler, Program Director Submitted: October 2011
M.S. in Education Assessment in the Major Report 2010 By Dr. Renee Chandler, Program Director Submitted: October 2011 Table of Contents 1. Outcomes of Previous Assessments... 2 2. Questions To Be Answered
... and. Uses data to help schools identify needs for prevention and intervention programs.
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School Psychologists Standard 1: School psychologists demonstrate leadership. School psychologists demonstrate leadership by promoting and enhancing the overall academic
Boston University. 2015 Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt
Boston University 2015 Performance Evaluation Program Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt (excludes staff covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements and Certain Contracts) October 2015 TABLE
Evaluation Reminders. For Team Chairs Evaluators, Financial Reviewers, And Generalists Institutions being Reviewed
Evaluation Reminders For Team Chairs Evaluators, Financial Reviewers, And Generalists Institutions being Reviewed Middle States Commission on Higher Education Published by the Middle States Commission
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & PLANNING GUIDE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & PLANNING GUIDE FOR EMPLOYEES Rev. 2015 1 P age THE PURPOSE & PRINCIPLES OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Each employee of Baylor University serves an important role in furthering the mission
Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs
THE FRAMEWORK FOR PRINCIPAL PREPARATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 1 Purpose Of all the educational research conducted over the last 30 years in the search to improve student
Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders
Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders To realize the mission of enhancing school leadership among principals and administrators in Alabama resulting in improved academic achievement for all students,
NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs
NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs Institutional Standards Institutional standards address the organization's vision, mission, philosophy and beliefs. The institutional standards define
NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
Viet Nam: Technical Training Manuals for Microfinance Institutions in Vietnam. Basic Course in Human Resource Management
Project Number: 42492-012 November 2011 Viet Nam: Technical Training Manuals for Microfinance Institutions in Vietnam Basic Course in Human Resource Management 1 COURSE OUTLINE Course Name Target Participants
INSTITUTIONAL REPORT FOR CONTINUING ACCREDITATION: CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PATHWAY. Name of Institution Dates/Year of the Onsite Visit
INSTITUTIONAL REPORT FOR CONTINUING ACCREDITATION: CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PATHWAY Name of Institution Dates/Year of the Onsite Visit Insert Name(s) of Unit Head/Author(s) NCATE IR Template for Continuing
Guidelines for External Reviews of Academic Departments and Programs
Guidelines for External Reviews of Academic Departments and Programs This document contains information for departments and programs conducting external reviews, including: 1. Guidelines for external reviews
MSW Portfolio Documents
MSW Table of Contents Portfolio Checklist for Advisors...2 This checklist is a guide with tips and a timeline to help advisors support students in the portfolio process. Students may also find this document
Guide to school authorization: Primary Years Programme
Primary Years Programme Guide to school authorization: Primary Years Programme Primary Years Programme Guide to school authorization: Primary Years Programme Published October 2010 International Baccalaureate
Self Assessment. Introduction and Purpose of the Self Assessment Welcome to the AdvancED Self Assessment.
Self Assessment Introduction and Purpose of the Self Assessment Welcome to the AdvancED Self Assessment. The Self Assessment is designed to serve as a valuable tool to help schools assess and maintain
Accreditation Progress Report
Accreditation Progress Report Green Hope High School Dr James E Hedrick 2500 Carpenter-Upchurch Road Cary, North Carolina, United States 27519 Prepared for the AdvancED Quality Assurance Review Report
The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) was founded in 1987 in order to achieve the following mission:
t INTRODUCTION The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) was founded in 1987 in order to achieve the following mission: To advance the quality of teaching and learning by maintaining
SALEM AREA ONE COMMUNITY INITIATIVE
SALEM AREA ONE COMMUNITY INITIATIVE Mission Statement To develop a safe, respectful, all-inclusive community through education, advocacy, and coordinated actions that include an effective response to prejudice
Course Sponsorship and Logistics
Updated September 3, 2013 (MPSA section) Course Sponsorship and Logistics What you ll find in this section: I M LOOKING FOR INFORMATION ON What are my Chapter s responsibilities for administering a course?
Performance Planning And Evaluation A guide for employees, supervisors and managers
THE LIVE IT EVERY DAY Performance Planning And Evaluation A guide for employees, supervisors and managers 1 INTEGRITY We live Integrity by Telling the truth. Being consistent. Doing the right thing even
Planning and Conducting an Effective Meeting
Planning and Conducting an Effective Meeting The Top Ten Reminders for Running an Effective Meeting 1. First decide if you need to have a meeting. Often times there are more efficient ways to meet objectives
Vice President Education CLUB OFFICER TRAINING
Vice President Education CLUB OFFICER TRAINING TOASTMASTERS INTERNATIONAL P.O. Box 9052 Mission Viejo, CA 92690 USA Phone: +1 949-858-8255 Fax: +1 949-858-1207 www.toastmasters.org/members 2015 Toastmasters
Sample Conference Planning Timeline
Planning a conference requires a lot of work and responsibility. It s also a great way to get involved with your organization, meet new people, and produce an event that will provide valuable information
Delivered in an Online Format. Revised November 1, 2014. I. Perspectives
1 Prospectus of the Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction Delivered in an Online Format Revised November 1, 2014 I. Perspectives The online Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) in Curriculum is a graduate degree
Sincerely, Dr. Gary Filan, Executive Director The Chair Academy Mesa, AZ
The New Jersey Council of County Colleges and the Academy for Leadership and Development want to extend an invitation to your college to participate in the Northeast Leadership Academy to be held at Hudson
360 Feedback HR Representative - Initiation
360 Feedback HR Representative - Initiation Presented by: Kristin Chapman Janet Taggart Why 360 Feedback? Increases self-awareness Clarifies behaviors Measures the how Raises accountability Promotes dialogue
The Internship for the. Masters in Educational Administration. Maryville University School of Education
The Internship for the Masters in Educational Administration Maryville University School of Education www.maryville.edu/edgrad Revised 1/13 Page 1 MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNSHIP HANDBOOK
LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CANDIDATES: The assessment information in this document is aligned with NBPTS Literacy: Reading Language Arts Standards, Second Edition (for teachers of students ages 3 12). If you
Doctor of Nursing Practice The Practice Improvement Project Guidelines: Requirements to Complete the DNP
Doctor of Nursing Practice The Practice Improvement Project Guidelines: Requirements to Complete the DNP Introduction All Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) School of Nursing Doctor of Nursing
Transcript: What Is Progress Monitoring?
Transcript: What Is Progress Monitoring? Slide 1: Welcome to the webinar, What Is Progress Monitoring? This is one of 11 webinars developed by the National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI). This
Invitation template. Date. Time. Venue RSVP. Dear <client s first name>
Header Seminar Pack This pack contains templates to help you create a simple and effective client seminar aimed at prospective Self Managed Super Fund (SMSF) clients. The pack gives you the basic tools
DESIGNING OUR FUTURE
MIDDLE STATES ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS COMMISSIONS ON ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS An Introduction to DESIGNING OUR FUTURE A Protocol for Self Study and Accreditation 3624 Market Street
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation Teacher Consultant: Evaluator: Date: Domain 1: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning The teacher consultant uses a wide
New Mexico 3-Tiered Licensure System
New Mexico 3-Tiered Licensure System Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Professional Development Dossier (PDD) for Teachers Prepared by the New Mexico Public Education Department
Course Mapping: Instructions and Template
Course Mapping: Instructions and Template Course Mapping: Instructions and Template Objectives After reading these instructions, you should be able to: Describe why you are being asked to map out your
CONFERENCE PLANNING ebook How to organize a research conference your delegates will love
CONFERENCE PLANNING ebook How to organize a research conference your delegates will love Ex Ordo - Phone: +353 (91) 394 545 - [email protected] - www.exordo.com Research Conference Planner A research conference
Master Scheduling for Inclusive Practices Voices Over
Master Scheduling for Inclusive Practices Voices Over Slide # 1 Master Scheduling for Inclusive Practices Introduction 2 Goals for Inclusive Scheduling 3 Needs Assessment 4 Continuum of Services 5 Organizing
Performance Evaluation Workshop February/March 2015
February/March 2015 Overview Core Curriculum 2 Preparing Meaningful Performance Evaluations 3 1 February/March 2015 Training Topics: Conducting Performance Evaluations What is the purpose of performance
CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)
Education Code section 44270.5 allows an examination alternative to the Administrative Services preparation program as long as the examination is aligned with the current Administrative Services Program
Sergeant at Arms CLUB OFFICER TRAINING
Sergeant at Arms CLUB OFFICER TRAINING TOASTMASTERS INTERNATIONAL P.O. Box 9052 Mission Viejo, CA 92690 USA Phone: +1 949-858-8255 Fax: +1 949-858-1207 www.toastmasters.org/members 2015 Toastmasters International.
Model District Governor Advisory Committee Meetings. also known as zone meetings
Model District Governor Advisory Committee Meetings also known as zone meetings Often considered the most important meeting for club officers, the District Governor Advisory Committee meeting, or zone
UTeam Onboarding Essentials
UTeam Onboarding Essentials Onboarding Essentials Table of Contents Onboarding Essentials Overview Page 3 RISE Values Page 4 Timeline Of Activities Page 5 Hire For Fit Page 9 Overview Role of the Hiring
Board Development PARTICIPANT WORKBOOK
Board Development (Not bored of development) PARTICIPANT WORKBOOK Created and facilitated by: Lynda Gerty, Engagement Director Last update March 2014 2014 Property of Vantage Point Not to be reproduced
ACTIVITIES. SECTION 3 Company Tours
ACTIVITIES 29 SECTION 3 Company Tours Beyond occasionally visiting parents at work, many students have very little idea about the day-to-day rhythms and requirements of the workplace. Providing opportunities
EDUC 1235 - SPECIAL EDUCATION: PART I (Six-Credit Course) Additional Qualification Course Distance Study Revised: May, 2011
EDUC 1235 - SPECIAL EDUCATION: PART I (Six-Credit Course) Additional Qualification Course Distance Study Revised: May, 2011 COURSE DESCRIPTION The underlying purpose of Special Education, Part I is to
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University A. A description of how the proposed program has been revisioned to reflect
Getting your Game On! Tips and tools for easy web site navigation
Game On! The Ultimate Wellness Challenge prepares schools for success by providing step-bystep instructions to assemble a team to put your wellness policy to work. It also includes information to engage
Parent Teacher Conference Tip Sheets for Principals, Teachers, and Parents
Parent Teacher Conference Tip Sheets for Principals, Teachers, and Parents Harvard Family Research Project October 2010 For questions or comments about this paper, email [email protected] 2010
R ESOURCES FOR. chapter eleven E VENT P LANNING. contents
R ESOURCES FOR chapter eleven E VENT P LANNING contents Sample learning day format...1 Sample community meetings format...5 Event planning workshop...9 Sample event timeline... 13 S AMPLE L EARNING D
The Process Below are the steps for creating and presenting digital short courses:
Guidance on Proposing, Organizing, and Presenting a SETAC Digital Short Course: Best Practices and Things to Consider Version 1: March 2015 Updated: July 2015 SETAC is planning to launch digitally recorded
Certificate of Leadership Program.
Certificate of Leadership Program. An initiative with UBC Peer Programs that engages students in a reflective practice through the use of educational technologies with the aims of developing greater awareness
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook For Teacher Professional Development Offerings Modified for use by the District and School
ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES
ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES The Performance Appraisal Process at Madison College is designed to accomplish the following objectives: Encourage meaningful communication between the employee
Barrington Public Schools Strategic Communication Plan
Introduction The 2012-2017 Barrington Public Schools Plan was adopted in December, 2012 with the following mission statement to define the district s path for the future: The Barrington Public Schools
August 2009. Page 1 PSA-2014-00177
August 2009. Page 1 Page 2 Citizens' Services (Kim Henderson) Introduction to Employee Engagement Engagement Scores at a Glance Your work unit Your organization 76 72 Employee engagement is a concept that
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Licensed Employee Appraisal System Enhancing Professional Practice Professional Domain Standards and Indicators Levels of Performance Rubric
Take One! Implementation Guide
Take One! Implementation Guide 2009 National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. All rights reserved. NBPTS, NBCT, National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, National Board Certified Teacher,
PROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus
PROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus Self Study Elements for Academic Program Review for Doctoral Programs Program Improvement from Last Academic Program
SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNICATION GUIDELINES
SECTION E: COMMUNICATION SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNICATION GUIDELINES INDIVIDUAL TRUSTEE SCHOOL STAFF MEMBER PARENT SCHOOL COUNCIL TEACHER PRINCIPAL AREA SUPERINTENDENT CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT BOARD OF TRUSTEES
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric Exclusive partners with Dr. Robert J. Marzano for the Teacher Evaluation Model and School Leader Evaluation Model Learning Sciences International 175
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002
Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002 Revised August 2008 Model for Practitioner Evaluation Guidelines and Process for Traditional Evaluation
Dr. Ryan McLawhon Texas A&M University
Dr. Ryan McLawhon Texas A&M University Introduction to Assessment Components of an Assessment Plan Mission Outcomes Measures Achievement Targets Question and Answer Session NCAAA Standard 4 (&5, etc.)
