PATIENT ACCESS POLICY VERSION 4.0
|
|
|
- Richard Harrell
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Type of Document Code Policy Sponsor Lead Executive Recommended by PATIENT ACCESS POLICY VERSION 4.0 Trust Policy STHK0075 Donna McLaughlin Donna McLaughlin Operational Team Date Recommended January 2012 Approved by Executive Team Date Approved 9 th February 2012 Author (s) Philip Nee Date Issued January 2012 Review date January 2014 Target Audience Document Purpose Training Requirements Trust Staff, Consultants, GP s CCG s, PCT Clusters, SHA s The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all patients requiring access to outpatient appointments, elective inpatient treatment, elective day case treatment and diagnostic tests are managed consistently, according to national and local frameworks and definitions. This policy defines those roles and responsibilities and establishes a number of good practice guidelines to assist staff with the effective management of elective patients. Knowledge and understanding of 18 week referral to treatment times and waiting list management. Page 1 of 38
2 Associated Documents and Key references Department of Health: NHS Referral to Treatment (RTT) Consultant-Led Waiting Times Rules National Clock Rules Department of Health publication:the Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2011/12, December 2010 (Gateway 15216) Revision to The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2010/11, June 2010 (Gateway 14374) The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2012/13, November 2011 (Gateway 16890). Key Words Other publications as outlined within the Bibliography / Reference Section of the policy Patient Access, Waiting Times, 18 Weeks, Referral to Treatment (RTT) Time. Page 2 of 38
3 Consultation, Communication Consultation Required Authorised by Date Authorised Comments Analysis of the effects on Amanda Connolly 6 th February 2012 equality External stakeholders PCT Leads, Cluster 6 th February 2012 Leads, GP s, CCG s, SHA Leads Trust staff consultation via intranet Start date: N/A End date: N/A Implementation Plan Describe the implementation plan for the policy (and guidelines if impacts upon policy) (Considerations include: launch event, awareness sessions, communication/training via divisions and other management structures etc This policy will be implemented via: The Trust intranet site Directorate Managers and line managers Global Communication to alert staff, Consultants and junior medical staff of policy update Staff will be made aware of policy when receiving appropriate Systems Training Timeframe for implementation? Submitted for uploading when Policy Approved After Policy is uploaded Continuous RAG Who is responsible for delivery? Assistant Directors Of Operations (Medicine, Surgery, Clinical Support, St Helens Hospital) All Directorate Managers Patient Booking Services Manager Admissions (TCI) Manager Communication to Primary Care Colleagues via SO&P meetings. Information Manager Page 3 of 38
4 Communication to SHA via IST seminars Informatics Manager All staff involved in patient access and waiting list management Performance Management of Policy KPI s (expected outcomes) Describe Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) expected outcomes To ensure that 90% of admitted patients and 95% of non-admitted patients are treated within 18 weeks of referral To ensure that the Trust meets the medians waits and 95 th Percentile requirements across all indicators for admitted patients, non-admitted patients and incomplete pathways How will the KPI be monitored? Regular Audits and Internal and External Reporting Systems Regular Audits and Internal and External Reporting Systems Which committee will monitor this KPI? PTL Meetings Trust Board PTL Meetings Trust Board Frequency of review? Weekly and Monthly Weekly and Monthly Lead ADO for Surgery / Chair of PTL ADO for Surgery / Chair of PTL Performance Management of minimum NHSLA process for this policy Learning from experience Minimum requirement to be monitored Process for monitoring e.g. audit Waiting Times Data Quality / Compliance Responsible individual/ group/committee Data Quality / Directorate Frequency of monitoring Performance management of minimum requirements. Responsible individual / group / committee (plus frequency of review / timescales) for: Weekly / Monthly Review of results Presented at Weekly Development and update of action plan Assistant Directors of Monitoring of action plan and implementation Data Quality Page 4 of 38
5 Audits Managers PTL Meetings Operations / Directorate Managers Who is responsible for producing action plans if deficits in KPI s and associated processes identified Which Committee will monitor these action plans Frequency of review Assistant Directors of Operations Through PTL Meetings Weekly How does learning occur? Who is responsible for implementing and Frequency disseminating learning information? Through continuous audit of performance and policy compliance Assistant Directors of Operations / Directorate Managers As required / Appropriate Archiving including retrieval of archived document In accordance with the Trusts Document Archiving Policy By whom will the policy by archived and retrieved? Assistant Director of Operations St Helens Hospital (Head of Patient Access) Document Version History Date Author Designation Summary of Key changes 1 st April 2010 Director of Operations and Performance 2nd January 2012 Assistant Director of Operations St Helens Hospital Update in line with new performance monitoring standards Update in terminology Addition of planned list management Addition of managing patients who have breached their 18 week RTT time Updated DNA procedure Updated Departmental Standard Operating Procedures Inclusion of a range of standards for Data Quality Audits Page 5 of 38
6 CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: 1. Policy Aim 8 2. Policy Description 8 1. INTRODUCTION POLICY OBJECTIVES DEFINITIONS / ABBREVIATIONS DUTIES, ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES IN MANAGING WAITING LISTS, SCHEDULING & BOOKING KEY PRINCIPLES / PROCESSES OUTPATIENTS (Key Principles) Receiving Referrals New Patients Follow Up DNA s Hospital Cancellations INPATIENTS ELECTIVE ADMISSIONS (Key Principles) Patients on Planned Waiting Lists Selecting Patients for Admission (Key Principles) Cancellation of Admission Patient Initiated Cancellation Hospital Cancellation Hospital Last Minute Cancellation Inpatient / Day Case DNA DIAGNOSTIC WAITING LIST MANAGEMENT Planned Waiting List Management (Radiology Diagnostics) CANCER WEEKS (RTT Pathway) MANAGEMENT OF WELSH /ISLE OF MAN PATIENTS DATA QUALITY AUDITS REVIEWING PATIENTS WHO HAVE WAITED LONGER THAN 18 WEEKS Page 6 of 38
7 CONTENTS (Cont d) Page 6 APPENDICES: Appendix 1: - List of Associated SOP s / Policies - List of Data Quality Audits 34 Appendix 2: - Bibliography / References / Links EQUALITY ANALYSIS (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) TRAINING 38 Page 7 of 38
8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Policy Aim The length of time a patient needs to wait for hospital treatment is an important quality issue and is a visible and public indicator of the quality of the hospital services provided by the Trust. The successful management of patients who are waiting for elective treatment is the responsibility of a number of key individuals and organisations including General Practitioners and other referring agents, Hospital Clinicians, Primary Care Trusts / PCT Clusters / Clinical Commissioning Groups (GP Consortia) and Trust Managers. If patients who are waiting for treatment are to be managed effectively it is essential for everyone involved to have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities. The aim of this policy is to ensure that all patients requiring access to outpatient appointments, elective inpatient treatment, elective day case treatment and diagnostic tests are managed consistently, according to national and local frameworks and definitions. This policy defines those roles and responsibilities and establishes a number of good practice guidelines to assist staff with the effective management of elective patients. The underlying principle of this policy is that patients should be treated with kindness and reasonable steps should be taken to accommodate individual patient circumstances and needs. This is not in conflict with the achievement of national waiting times policy. This policy will be policed through routine Data Quality Audits which will ensure that the Trust and individuals are compliant with the standards contained within this document. NB: This policy should be read in conjunction with the latest guidance from the Department of Health relating to NHS Referral to Treatment (RTT) Consultant-Led Waiting Times Rules National Clock Rules, and in conjunction with the Department of Health publication:the Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2011/12, December 2010 (Gateway 15216), Revision to The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2010/11, June 2010 (Gateway 14374) and The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2012/13, November 2011 (Gateway 16890). 2 Policy Description The policy applies to all staff involved in the management of patient access. The policy will outline good practice, key principles, and identifies the roles and responsibilities of the Trust and its staff in relation to waiting time management. Page 8 of 38
9 1. INTRODUCTION St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is committed to ensuring that patients receive treatment in accordance with national objectives and targets The Patient Access Policy sets out the Trust s local access policy and takes account of guidance from the Department of Health. This policy is intended to support a maximum wait of 18 weeks from referral to first definitive treatment, and is designed to ensure fair and equitable access to hospital services. The overall aim of the policy is to ensure patients are treated in a timely and effective manner, specifically to: Ensure that patients receive treatment according to their clinical priority, with routine patients and those with the same clinical priority treated in chronological order, thereby minimising the time a patient spends on the waiting list and improving the quality of the patient experience. Reduce waiting times for treatment and to ensure patients are treated in accordance with agreed targets. Reduce the number of cancelled operations for non-clinical reasons. Allow patients to maximise their right to patient choice in the care and treatment that they need. Increase the number of patients with a booked outpatient or in-patient / day case appointment, thereby minimising Did Not Attends, (DNA s), cancellations, and improving the patient experience. The purpose of this policy is twofold: it is both a statement of the policy for the management of patients on an 18 week referral to treatment (RTT) pathway and an operational guide for those staff who are involved in the management of these pathways. In conjunction with published Standard Operational Procedures (SOP s), it sets out the roles and responsibilities, processes to be followed and establishes a number of good practice guidelines to assist staff with the effective management of patients who need to come into hospital for treatment as an out-patient, in-patient, day case, or who receive diagnostic treatment. This policy should be read in conjunction with the following key standard operating procedures and operational checklists. These documents are listed on page 27 and can be located on the St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust intranet site and accessed via the following link: Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s These documents comprise: Standard Operating Procedure for Booking Outpatient Appointments (Traditional and Choose and Book) Standard Operating Procedures: Receptions Standard Operating Procedures for Booking Admissions Standard Operating Procedure (PBS), Operational Rules and Escalation procedures Page 9 of 38
10 Standard Operating Procedure for Receiving and Booking an Appointment (Radiology) Standard Operating Procedure for Managing suspected or diagnosed cancer patients Standard Operating Procedures for ADT Standard Operating Procedure for Validating 18 week performance Standard Operating Procedure for external reporting of waiting time targets Cancelled Operations Procedure and Check-list This policy is also closely aligned to the following documents: Trust Annual Leave and Study Leave Policy Commissioning Agreements with Local Commissioning Groups (including PCT s, Clusters and CCG s) Data Quality Audits St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Health Records Policy Implementation of this policy and standard operating procedures ensures that the Trust complies with all directives. 2. POLICY OBJECTIVES Legislative Right The NHS Constitution sets out the following right for patients: You have the right to access services within maximum waiting times, or for the NHS to take reasonable steps to offer you a range of alternative providers if this is not possible. The waiting times are described in the Handbook to the NHS Constitution. This means patients have the right to start consultant-led treatment within 18 weeks from referral, and be seen by a specialist within 2 weeks of GP referral for suspected cancer or, where this is not possible, for the NHS to take all reasonable steps to offer the patient a quicker appointment at a range of alternative providers if the patient makes such a request. This came into force for patients referred on or after 1 st April The NHS Constitution also sets out responsibilities of patients including responsibility to attend appointments. According to the constitution, patients should keep appointments, or cancel within reasonable time 1. Receiving treatment within the maximum waiting times may be compromised unless patients observe this important practice. 1 Reasonable notice is defined in the Definition section page. Page 10 of 38
11 Waiting Times Waiting times for consultant led elective treatment and urgent cancer referrals are already covered by existing operational standards. Previously, the Department of Health (DH) had set out a number of milestones including that: 90% of admitted patients are treated within 18 weeks of referral 95% of non-admitted patients are treated within 18 weeks of referral. The Revision to the Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2010/11, published in June 2010, stated that performance management of the 18 weeks waiting time target by the Department of Health has ceased. However, new statistical measures, the median and 95th percentile RTT waiting times, are currently being published every month to enable a fuller package of measures for the NHS, patients and the public to monitor waiting times for NHS treatment. The median and 95 th percentile targets are outlined in the table below and these indicators are required to be achieved in each individual speciality from March Week Targets Median 95th Percentile Admitted Non Admitted Incomplete Pathways Under the provisions outlined within the Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2012/13, November 2011, the operational standards of 90 per cent for admitted and 95 per cent for non-admitted completed waits (as set out in the NHS Constitution) remain. In order to sustain the delivery of these standards, trusts will need to ensure that 92 per cent of patients on an incomplete pathway should have been waiting no more than 18 weeks, meaning that the backlog must only account for up to 8% of total incomplete pathways. However, the Trust will ensure that all patients breaching their 18 week RTT times across any of the above indicators are managed appropriately in line with the NHS Constitution (please see section 5.80, p32 33). The referral to treatment (RTT) operational standards should be achieved in each specialty by every organisation by March 2012 and this will be monitored monthly. In addition, less than 1 per cent of patients should wait longer than six weeks for a diagnostic test (Please see section 13 Diagnostic Waiting List Management) Cancer timescales The maximum wait for a first outpatient appointment for patients referred by GPs via a Cancer Fast Track Referral Proforma is 2 weeks (14 days).the maximum wait for all cancer patients from the date of decision to treat, to the first definitive treatment should be no more than 31 days (including diagnostics). In total, no cancer patient should wait longer than 62 days from urgent 2 week GP referral to first definitive treatment (including diagnostics). Page 11 of 38
12 Cancer Performance Measures Cancer performance measure - headline measures Operational standard Two week wait urgent GP referral for suspected cancer 93% Two week wait referral with breast symptoms 93% 62 day urgent GP referral to treatment 85% 62 day screening to treatment (bowel, cervical and breast) 90% 62 day consultant upgrades (monitored but no national standard) N/A Cancer performance measure - supporting measures Operational standard 31day decision to treat (DTT) to first treatment 96% 31 day subsequent treatment (surgery) 94% 31 day subsequent treatment (drug treatment) 98% 31 day subsequent treatment (radiotherapy) 94% 3. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS For the purposes of this policy, the following terms have the meanings given below: - Active Monitoring: An 18 Week clock may be stopped where it is clinically appropriate to start a period of monitoring in secondary care without clinical intervention or diagnostic procedures at that stage. A new waiting time clock would start when a decision to treat is made following a period of active monitoring (also known as watchful waiting). Where there is a clinical reason why it is not appropriate to continue to treat the patient at that stage, but to refer the patient back to primary care for ongoing management, then this constitutes a decision not to treat and should be recorded as such and also stops the clock (18 weeks RTT pathway). If a patient is subsequently referred back to a consultant-led service, then this referral starts a new clock (18 week RTT pathway). A new waiting time clock would start when a decision to treat is made following a period of active monitoring (also known as watchful waiting). Where there is a clinical reason why it is not appropriate to continue to treat the patient at that stage, but to refer the patient back to primary care for ongoing management, then this constitutes a decision not to treat and should be recorded as such and also stops the clock (18 weeks RTT pathway). If a patient is subsequently referred back to a consultant-led service, then this referral starts a new clock (18 week RTT pathway). Active Waiting List: Patients awaiting elective admission, for treatment, first outpatient appointment or diagnostic test and are currently available to be called for admission or attendance. Admitted pathway: A pathway which ends in a clock stop upon a therapeutic admission for a day case or inpatient procedure. Page 12 of 38
13 Clock Pause: A patients 18 Week clock may only be paused for non-clinical reasons. A clock may be paused only where a decision to admit has been made, and the patient has declined at least 2 reasonable appointment offers for admission. The clock is paused for the duration of the time between the earliest reasonable offer date and the date from which the patient makes themselves available again for admission. N.B. Clock pauses are not allowed within the outpatient and diagnostic elements of a patient journey. Consultant-led: A consultant retains overall clinical responsibility for the service, team or treatment. The Consultant will not necessarily be physically present for each patient appointment but will take overall clinical responsibility for patient care Day case: Patients who require admission to hospital for treatment but who are not intended to stay in hospital overnight. Did Not Attend (DNA): Patients who agreed their admission date (inpatients/ day cases / diagnostics) or appointment date (outpatients) and who, without notifying the hospital, did not attend for admission/ appointment Directly Booked Patients: Patient s who have booked their outpatient appointment via Choose & Book. First definitive treatment: An intervention intended to manage a patient s disease condition or injury and avoid further intervention. Fully Booked Patients: (Inpatients, Day cases and Outpatients) Patients who have been given the opportunity to agree a date for their elective admission orappointment within 1 working day of the decision to refer or treat. Inpatients: Patients who require admission to hospital for treatment and are intended to remain in hospital for at least one night. Non-admitted pathway: A pathway that results in a clock stop for treatment that does not require an admission. Non responders: Patients who have been invited to contact the Trust to agree a date for admission, an outpatient consultation or a diagnostic event, as part of a partial booking process, and have failed to contact the hospital within the agreed time. Outpatients: Patients referred by a general medical or dental practitioner, another consultant or relevant health professional for clinical advice or treatment. Partially Booked Patients: (Inpatients, Day cases and Outpatients) Patients who have been given the opportunity to agree a date for their elective admission or appointment after 1 working day of the decision to refer or treat. Patient tracking list (PTL): a prospective reporting system to ensure patients are managed within the target waiting/treatment times. Page 13 of 38
14 Planned Admissions: Patients who are to be admitted as part of a planned sequence of treatment or investigation. They may or may not have been given a firm date for their admission. This will include those waiting for tests as part of a screening programme. Reasonable Notice: National rules state that an offer for admission for treatment is considered reasonable when it is for a date more than 3 weeks from the offer date. Local agreement has defined reasonable notice as: outpatients (21 days) diagnostics (7 days), inpatients and day cases(21 days). Reinstatement: If a patient previously referred to the trust is removed for reasons other than treatment, and contacts the trust to reinstate their journey the trust does not require a new referral from the GP or other referrer if the referral letter is less than 3 months old. All reinstatement patients will be booked as an outpatient first, to revalidate their clinical condition. The 18 week clock starts from the date the patient contacts the hospital to reinstate. Referral to Treatment Time: The period of a patients care, from initial referral to the point of first definitive treatment or other 18 week clock stop point Resume Active Monitoring: A new 18-week clock would start when a decision to treat is made following a period of watchful waiting/active monitoring. Self-deferrals: Patients who, on receipt of offer(s) of admission / appointment, notify the hospital that they are unable to attend. Tertiary referrals: Patients referred by another clinician, either within the Trust or another Hospital, for clinical advice or treatment. Waiting List Administrator (WLA): A clerk or receptionist who manages the day to day administration of the waiting lists. War Pensioner / Veterans of the Armed Forces: People who were injured or disabled as a result of service in the armed forces, either before the first war or between 10 th October 1921 and 25 th September 1939 (the inter-war years). Priority treatment now extends to all veterans requiring treatment, whether or not they receive a war pension (or similar compensation). Injuries sustained relating to service and veterans should not need to have first applied to become eligible for a war pension before receiving this treatment. When referring a patient who is known to be an armed forces veteran, GPs have been asked to consider if the condition may be related to the patient s military Service. If the GP decides that a condition is related to Service any referral for treatment should make this clear. It is for the hospital clinician in charge to determine whether a condition is related to Service and to allocate priority. Where hospital clinicians agree that a veteran s condition is likely to be Service-related, they have been asked to prioritise veterans over other patients with the same level of clinical need. However, veterans will not be given priority over patients with more urgent clinical needs. Page 14 of 38
15 Abbreviations CAB Choose and Book (National Electronic Appointment System) CCG Clinical Commissioning Groups DBS Directly Bookable Services DOH Department of Health DOS Directory of Services. Electronic Description of Services available at Trusts. IBS Indirectly Bookable Services PCT Primary Care Trust PPI RTT Patient Pathway Identifier relating to specific 18 week pathway Referral to Treatment Time SCR Summary Care Record SOP Standard Operating Policy UBRN Unique Booking Reference Number (Allocated to a patient by their GP at the time of referral. This is used as a unique patient identifier when booking an appointment via Choose & Book). 4. DUTIES, ACCOUNTABILITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES This section outlines the key responsibilities of key groups of staff within the Trust in relation to this policy. The list is not exhaustive and each group will have other roles and responsibilities that are not listed here. Specific tasks are included in the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP s). Chief Executive The Chief Executive has overall responsibility for delivering access targets as defined in the NHS Plan, NHS Constitution and current Operating Framework. Director of Operations and Performance Board level responsibility lies with the Director of Operations and Performance, who is responsible for ensuring that there are robust systems in place for the audit and management of access targets. These will be monitored and reported to the board. The Director of Operations will ensure this patient access policy is implemented and adhered to. The Director of Operations(or Deputy) will monitor Patient Access via the weekly PTL meeting and review all external reports for verification. Page 15 of 38
16 Director of Informatics Is responsible for ensuring there is a fit for purpose Patient Administration System (PAS) and that staff are appropriately trained in its use and that Data Quality Audits are produced and policed. Senior management responsibility lies with: Assistant Director of Operations (St Helens Care Group) Is responsible for administering the patient access policy and for the administration and governance of the Standard Operating Procedures in Patient Booking Services (Appointments and Receptions), and Outpatient Clinics. Information Manager (Finance Department) Is responsible for administering data required for managing and reporting waiting list activity and ensuring there is a robust Standard Operating Policy for the external reporting of performance. Information Management & Technology (I M &T) Is responsible for the information system trainers will work with users to ensure that training needs are met and underpinned with effective training and documentation. This is to include training manuals and annual updates for all relevant staff The I M & T Department Will ensure that data entries are accurate and comply with national and local data standards. In addition, consistent waiting list reporting must be achieved internally and externally. System changes will be actioned in liaison with suppliers. Software and process changes are to be implemented in liaison with users. Assistant Directors of Operations for Surgery, Medicine and Clinical Support Are responsible for ensuring their respective directorates deliver the activity and capacity required to meet the waiting list targets, and for the necessary governance arrangements required to ensure adherence to the Patient Access Policy and associated Standard Operating Procedures. Consultants Are responsible for managing patient expectation of anticipated waiting times. Individual consultants are responsible for managing their waiting lists as effectively as possible through the application of the principles set out in this policy. Page 16 of 38
17 Individual consultants have a shared responsibility with Trust Managers for managing their patients waiting times in accordance with the maximum guaranteed waiting time. Best practice identifies that where consultants personally review each decision to add a patient to the waiting list this reduces inappropriate listing, particularly when the decision has been made by a junior member of the team. Consultants, along with their Directorate Managers, will regularly review clinic templates to ensure an appropriate demand & capacity fit. Any template changes must take into account the potential for appointment rearrangements and every effort must be taken to prevent this. Requests for template and clinic maintenance changes will only be accepted and actioned if supplied in writing with Directorate Manager sign-off. Consultants and their clinical teams are required to comply with the Trust Annual Leave and Study Leave policy to ensure there is a minimum of six week s notice if they are unable to fulfil their planned clinical programmed activity. Consultants are expected to follow the Trust Standard Operating Procedures and operational checklists (listed on page 9-10). Operational management Managers will be responsible for ensuring all patients receive treatment within national and locally agreed targets, and that all staff and clinicians adhere to the Trust Patient Access Policy and associated Standard Operating Procedures listed on page 6. Managers are to ensure appropriate training programmes are available to support staff, with special regard given to newly recruited staff. All staff involved in the implementation of this policy, clinical and clerical, will undertake initial training and regular updating. Key elements of the roles and responsibilities for each manager and their staff will be included in relevant job descriptions. Roles and responsibilities will be reviewed regularly and updated in response to changes in national and local standards. Health Records Are responsible for ensuring appropriate medical records are available as per the trust s Health Records Policy Head of Patient Booking Will be responsible for maintaining the Directory of Services (DoS) and for ensuring outpatient referral processes are reviewed in line with the requirements of Choose and Book. Page 17 of 38
18 Appointments/Waiting List Clerks Are responsible for following all departmental procedures in their respective areas as outlined in the local Standard Operating procedures for each department. Wards and Departments Must ensure patients are admitted and discharged on the Hospital IT System as per the ADT (Admission, Discharge and Transfer system) Standard Operating Procedures. Theatre/Ward Managers Must follow the cancelled operations procedure and cancelled operations check-list. Primary Care Commissioner Responsibilities (PCT/Clusters/CCG s) The Primary Care Trust and Strategic Health Authorities (Waiting Times) Directive 2010 legally require PCTs to, Make arrangements to ensure providers meet the waiting times standards; Take all reasonable steps to ensure that any patients for whom the 18 week or 2 week waiting time is not met are offered a quicker appointment to start treatment at a range of clinically appropriate alternative providers, if the patient requests this; and Provide patients on 18 weeks and 2 weeks pathways with a dedicated contact point to approach if the maximum waiting time has been, or will be breached, and if they wish to seek an alternative provider. Primary Care Commissioners will: Ensure the principles of this policy are cascaded through primary care and the wider health care community. Adhere to St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust s local Patient Access Policy and associated Standard Operational Procedures. Manage patients and review them as appropriate, when informed by St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust that thepatient has been removed from the waiting list for reasons other than treatment. Manage patients and review them as appropriate, when informed by StHelens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust that thepatient is not clinically fit to have the required procedure at the time of decision to treat. Referring Agent Responsibility: Page 18 of 38
19 Referring agents, (as agreed with Commissioners), may include the following Professions and Services: General practitioners (GPs) General dental practitioners (GDPs) General practitioners (and other practitioners) with a special interest (GPSI s) Optometrists and Orthoptists Accident and Emergency Department (A&E) Minor injuries units (MIU) Walk-in centres (WiC) Sexual Health Clinics National screening programmes Specialist nurses or allied health professionals with explicit authorisation Prison health services Consultants (or Consultant-led services) Referrals should only be sent to the Trust if the patient is willing and able to be treated within the maximum access times target and should not be sent if the referrer knows the patient is unavailable (eg on a tour of duty, extended holiday or work / study commitments). Choose and Book is the Trust s preferred method of GP referral but manual written referrals from GPs and other referrers will be accepted and processed without delay. All referrers have a responsibility to ensure that any referrals reflect the Trust s policy on managing referrals i.e.: that they are clear, concise and addressed via the Appointments department, or are made using Choose and Book. Referral letters will be periodically reviewed through clinical audit, in line with the Trust Recording Keeping Policy. Referrals should also contain the patients NHS number, and information on any special needs of patients including the patient s entitlement to priority treatment in the case of veterans of the armed forces. Responsibilities of all staff To act kindly in the patients best interest To understand and actively support the principles of Waiting List Management. To adhere to the Patient Access Policy and to escalate issues of noncompliance Ensure all local procedures are captured and followed in local Standard Operating Procedures. 5. KEY PRINCIPLES / PROCESSES KEY PRINCIPLES: Patients often find it difficult to engage with health providers. Therefore, this policy will be implemented to facilitate, not hinder, access to healthcare. Page 19 of 38
20 Waiting lists should be managed according to clinical priority. Patients with the same clinical priority should be treated chronologically. Clinically urgent patients (as defined by a Consultant), and cancer / suspected cancer patients will always take priority. Commissioners and the Trust must work together to ensure adherence to national directives on patient access management and to ensure that all patients are treated in compliance with local contractual agreements. In addition, timely regard should be paid to the implementation of Data and Information Set Change Notifications (DSCN s / ISN s),national targets for access times, and any other mandatory requirements relating to patient access. Communication with patients should be informative, clear and concise. In addition, the process of waiting list management should be transparent to the public. Ensure that no equality target group (Black & Minority Ethnic, Age, Gender, Disability, Religion, and Sexual Orientation & Transgender) are discriminated against or disadvantaged by this policy and its associated procedures. To positively promote access for hard to reach communities. This policy covers all elective and planned patients with the exception of Sexual Health Medicine, and Maternity services OUTPATIENTS KEY PRINCIPLES Receiving Referrals (This is the commencement of the patients RTT Clock / 18 week Pathway) Referrals will arise through 2 main routes:- - Choose & Book - Traditional paper/faxed medium The process for administering outpatient bookings for traditional and Choose and Book referrals is contained within the Standard Operating Procedures for Receptions and Booking Outpatient Appointments. This is based on the following: Open (or Dear Doctor ) referrals should be allocated to the consultant with the shortest waiting time within the appropriate speciality. There are three priorities of referral - 2 week rule (suspected cancer - seen within 2 weeks), urgent (seen within 4 weeks) and routine (appointed to next available appointment). Clinicians are required to triage referrals within 3 working days and will have the ability at this point to upgrade the clinical priority i.e. bring forward a patients appointment, redirect to a more appropriate clinic, or reject. C&B Page 20 of 38
21 referrals which are re-directed will be managed by the Patient Booking Services Team which will re-direct the referral to the appropriate clinic / specialitiy. All patients (and referring agents in the case of new appointments), will receive confirmation of their appointment date, location and time in writing Outpatient - New Patients Details on the tasks associated with making a new patient appointment are contained within the Standard Operating Procedures for Booking Outpatient Appointments. The following policy definitions apply; Unless the referral is specified as 2 week rule (suspected cancer), or urgent, the patient will be offered the next available appointment slot for their required specialty. Where possible, patients will be offered the hospital site (i.e. Whiston, Newton or St Helens) closest to their home address. Patients will be offered two alternative dates with at least 21 days notice. On receipt (and following the subsequent decline), of 2 reasonable offers, the patient will be returned to the care of their GP. However, the appointment can be reinstated at a later date Outpatients - Follow-ups The detail for the administration of a follow up appointment is contained within the SOP for Booking Outpatient Appointments. The policy principles are: Follow-up appointment should be kept to a minimum and are regularly reviewed against national benchmarks (via the performance report and weekly PTL Dashboard data) In the event of a patient or the Trust postponing and/ or re-arranging a followup outpatient, alternative dates should be agreed with the patient. It should be remembered, however, that many patients require structured follow-up to detect the need for further treatment at appropriate follow-up intervals for individual clinical conditions. Examples may include patients with diabetic eye disease, or other eye conditions, who need eye examination to detect progression requiring urgent treatment to prevent blindness, or patients with long term conditions who require planned monitoring including those on disease-modifying drugs (such as for rheumatoid arthritis), where both potential side-effects of the drugs and response to treatment must be assessed. Patient Booking Rules and an associated escalation procedure is in place to ensure that patient rearranges are overseen and agreed by a Consultant. Page 21 of 38
22 Patients who rearrange on a second occasion will be brought to the attention of their consultant/clinician in order to agree the appropriate action (i.e offer another appointment or discharge back to primary care). This should not adversely impact on those patients deemed vulnerable or at risk e.g. children, cancer patients and vulnerable adults and therefore must be agreed with the consultant responsible for the patient Outpatients DNA (Did Not Attend) The trust is proactive in the management of DNA s and this is included in the SOP for outpatients administration under the following policy principles; Patient contact details should be checked by the clinical teams via PAS or SCR before enacting the DNA procedure in order to ensure that the patient is not classed as vulnerable or at risk (i.e. children, cancer patients or vulnerable adults) New Routine DNA s should be removed from the waiting list and returned to the care of the patients GP or other referrer (this will be communicated to the patient and to the referrer). In the case of children and vulnerable adults, the treating Consultant must consider whether there is a safeguarding risk in the non attendance and then act accordingly in following any concerns up. It is their responsibility to liaise with the referrer to assess this risk and consider further actions if appropriate. For guidance, please refer to the Trusts Policy: Safeguarding Children and Young People. New Urgent DNA the treating clinician should decide if a further appointment is offered. If the clinical decision is made not to offer a further appointment, the referrer and patient will be informed. Follow up DNAs should be removed from the waiting list and returned to the care of their referrer with the exception of children or other vulnerable patients which will be at the treating Consultants discretion. For guidance, please refer to the Trusts Policy: Safeguarding Children and Young People. An 18 week clock can only be stopped providing that the provider can demonstrate that the appointment was clearly communicated to the patient. Patients will not be considered DNA if reasonable notice has not been given for the appointment (see definitions) Hospital Cancellations Outpatients As is detailed within the Standard Operating Procedure for Booking Outpatients Appointments, the trust will take all reasonable steps to minimise the incidents of cancellations/ clinic reductions, including the enforcement of the 6 week cancellation notice period for annual leave and study leave. Patients should not be hospital rearranged more than once within any six month period (monitored through Data Quality Audits). Page 22 of 38
23 5.20 INPATIENT AND DAY CASE ELECTIVE ADMISSIONS (KEY PRINCIPLES) Details on the procedures associated with creating an inpatient and day case admission are contained within the SOP for booking inpatients/ day cases. The following policy definitions apply The decision to add a patient to a inpatient waiting list must be made by a Consultant or under an arrangement agreed with the Consultant Patients will be added to the waiting list within a maximum of 2 working days from the decision to admit. Consultants leaving the Trust will have their waiting list transferred to another Consultant and patients will retain their original DTA(decision to admit) date. Patients added to the list must be clinically fit to be added to the waiting list on the day that the decision to admit is made (i.e. if there was a bed available the following day in which to admit a patient, would they be considered fit, ready, and able to come in). Patients who are not fit, ready and able to come in should be discharged back to their GP for ongoing care. The GP should be advised to re-refer the patient when they are fit and ready to undergo the procedure and the patient will either be given an outpatient appointment, preadmission assessment appointment, or a date for admission as appropriate. Patients should only be added to the waiting list when they have accepted consultant advice for elective treatment; i.e. if the patient is unsure and wishes to reconsider before proceeding with their treatment, they should not be added to the list. In this circumstance the listing clinician should initiate a period of active monitoring and this would constitute a clock pause in respect of the patients RTT (18 week pathway). Patients requiring bilateral procedures which are not required to be undertaken simultaneously, will be listed for one procedure at a time. The patient should only be listed for their second operation when the first operation has been successful and the recuperation period completed. A new clock will then start when the patient becomes fit and ready for the second procedure Patients on Planned Waiting Lists (Other Than Radiology) Patients who are to be admitted as part of a planned sequence of treatment following previous admissions do not form part of the active waiting list and their RTT clock (18 week pathway) will have stopped at the point of their first definitive treatment. This includes patients waiting for a planned diagnostic test or treatment or a series of procedures carried out as part of a treatment plan which are required for clinical reasons to be carried out at a specific time or repeated at a specific frequency. Examples may include check procedures such as cystoscopies, colonoscopies etc and patients proceeding to the next stage of treatment (i.e. undergoing chemotherapy, removal of metalwork or breast reconstruction following mastectomy). Page 23 of 38
24 Patients on these planned lists should be booked for an appointment at the clinically appropriate time and should not wait for a further period after this time has elapsed. (DOH Gateway 16994: Patients Waiting on Planned Waiting Lists, November 2011). When patients on planned lists are clinically ready for their care to commence, and reach the date for their planned appointment, they should either receive that appointment or be transferred to an active waiting list and a waiting time clock should start (and be reported in the relevant waiting time return). The key principle is that where patients' treatment can be started immediately then they should start treatment or be added to an active waiting list.patients should also be given written confirmation if they are placed on such lists, including the review date. Each Directorate Manager is responsible for reviewing the planned PTL list on a weekly basis to ensure compliance. This review will include checking that patients are being brought in, in accordance with their planned review dates, and have been listed appropriately to the planned PTL list data definition. Where different surgeons working together will perform more than one procedure at one time, the patient should be added to the waiting list of the consultant surgeon for the priority procedure, with any additional procedures noted Selecting Patients For Admission Key Principles The process of selecting patients for admission and subsequent treatment is a complex activity, ensuring that the needs and priorities of the patient are balanced against the available resources of theatre time, staffed beds and surgical expertise. As per DoH and MOD guidance, War Pensioners & Military Personnel should receive priority treatment if their condition is directly attributable to injuries sustained during military service. The Trust should be notified of this by the referring agent(gp etc). A choice of dates should be available to patients. Patients must be informed of the rules of the waiting list policy with regard to the consequences of deferring or not attending on the agreed date for their surgery. This is anticipated to be at the point of referral, and will be reinforced through the patient information leaflets produced by the Trust. All patients are treated in accordance to their clinical priority. Clinically nonurgent patients are managed in chronological order (i.e next in turn / referral date order). Reasonable notice for admission is 21 days, although where waiting times are less, this can be shorter through negotiation and by agreement with the patient. However, where earlier admission dates are offered at less than the 21 Page 24 of 38
25 days notice period, patients will have the opportunity to decline without any adverse effect on their waiting times or 18 week clock (RTT Pathway) Cancellation of Admission Cancellations can be classified into 3 main categories, namely patient cancellation, hospital cancellation or patient did not attend (DNA). It is essential that accurate records are kept within the admissions (TCI) department of all patient and hospital actions during the TCI appointment process Patient Initiated Cancellation / Self Deferral A Patient initiated cancellation occurs when, with reasonable written or verbal notification of an admission date is given, the Trust took account of personal circumstances, and the patient has declined two reasonable offers of admission. Or when a patient has accepted an admission date at short notice (i.e. less than 21 days from date of booking to date of admission), but later declines the offer prior to the admission for whatever reason. In every case where the cancellation/deferral was deemed to be unavoidable, e.g. due to illness or compassionate grounds, every effort should be made to offer the patient a reasonable offer of a new date (i;e within 21 days of the original date). Patients should not be allowed to self-defer their admission on more than one occasion. In such instances the patient will be returned to the care of their GP. This should not adversely impact on those patients deemed vulnerable or at risk e.g. children, cancer patients and vulnerable adults and therefore must be agreed with the consultant responsible for the patient. If the admission is cancelled by the patient on the day of surgery due, for example, to illness (supported by a sick note), every effort should be made to provide the patient with a new admission date as soon as is practicable, and should be within 3 weeks (21 days) of their original date Hospital Cancellation A hospital cancellation is where the patient has agreed a date for admission but the hospital subsequently cancels this. This has no effect on the RTT clock (18 week pathway), which continues from the original decision to admit date (DSCN 37/2003) In any event, a patient s admission should not be cancelled on more than one occasion due to hospital non-clinical reasons Hospital Last Minute Cancellations (on the day) Last minute cancellation is defined as: On the day of planned admission, after admission, or on the day of operation/surgery. Patients who have their surgery cancelled by the hospital at the last minute for non clinical reasons must be rescheduled within 28 calendar days of the cancellation (21 day local target). The Cancelled operations procedure must also be followed and the associated checklist completed. Page 25 of 38
26 5.27 Inpatient / Day Case DNA - Patient DNA s will be recorded when: Reasonable notification of an admission date is provided (21 days) and the patient fails to attend (DNA). Patients who fail to contact the admissions office following two invitation letters, once the demographic details have been checked using PAS and the SCR, and every effort has been made to contact the patient by telephone, should be treated as a DNA. Routine DNA s will be removed from the waiting list and returned to the care of their referrer. Urgent patients will be discussed and a plan agreed with the treating clinician. This should not adversely impact on those patients deemed vulnerable or at risk e.g. children, cancer patients and vulnerable adults and therefore must be agreed with the consultant responsible for the patient DIAGNOSTIC WAITING LIST MANAGEMENT Diagnostic tests are undertaken in a number of settings including x- ray, endoscopy units, urology units, outpatient departments and operating theatres. Target waiting times for all diagnostic tests procedure irrespective of the location in which they are undertaken is a maximum of 6 weeks. However, the trust has set an internal target of3 weeks for diagnostic imaging. Diagnostic procedures include; Imaging (Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI), Computer Tomography(CT),Non-obstetric ultrasound, Barium Enema, DEXA Scan). Physiological Measurements include Audiology, pure tone audiometry, echocardiography, electrophysiology, peripheral neurophysiology, respiratory physiology - sleep studies and urodynamics (pressures & flows). There is a separate target for audiology of 18 weeks referral to fitting. The processes for managing these patients are outlined in the departmental Standard Operational Procedures. The overarching principles and definitions are the same as for in patients/ day case waiting list administration but reasonable notice is defined as 7 days. Patients may be offered the next available appointment and should this be within 7 days, and the patient declines the appointment, then reasonable notice definitions apply and the patient is offered an appointment after 7 days but within three weeks of referral date Planned waiting list management (Radiology diagnostics) Referrals for diagnostic test investigations dated for some point in the future will be recorded and managed on the planned waiting list with an expectation that the booking will be made on or within 3 weeks of the referral date, plus intended future time interval. Referrals on the planned waiting list will be managed in order and processed on a monthly planning cycle as outlined within the Standard Operating Procedure for Receiving and Booking an Appointment within Radiology CANCER The cancer performance measures are outlined on page 12 and the Standard Operating Procedures for patients with suspected or diagnosed cancers outlines the procedures for the management and tracking of cancer patients using the PAS and Somerset Register. Page 26 of 38
27 The following principles apply: Cancer is a scary prospect for many patients, therefore the trust should act reasonably and make necessary adjustments within the national target parameters to manage patient journeys No patient with a suspected or diagnosed cancer will be discharged back to primary care due to non attendance (DNA), without discussion and agreement with a Consultant. Reasonable notice for treatments under the 31 / 62 day Cancer target is 7 working days WEEKS - REFERRAL TO TREATMENT CONSULTANT-LED WAITING TIMES RULES (NATIONAL CLOCK RULES) Clock Starts A waiting time clock starts when any care professional or service permitted by an English NHS commissioner to make such referrals, refers to: a consultant-led service, regardless of setting, with the intention that the patient will be assessed and, if appropriate, treated before responsibility is transferred back to the referring health professional or general practitioner; an interface or referral management or assessment service, which may result in an onward referral to a consultant led service before responsibility is transferred back to the referring health professional or general practitioner. A waiting time clock also starts upon a self referral by a patient to the above services, where these pathways have been agreed locally by commissioners and providers, and once the referral is ratified by a care professional permitted to do so. Upon completion of a consultant-led referral to treatment period, a new waiting time clock only starts: when a patient becomes fit and ready for the second of a consultant-led bilateral procedure; upon the decision to start a substantively new or different treatment that does not already form part of that patient s agreed care plan; upon a patient being re-referred in to a consultant-led; interface; or referral management or assessment service as a new referral; when a decision to treat is made following a period of active monitoring; when a patient rebooks their appointment following a first appointment DNA that stopped and nullified their earlier clock. Page 27 of 38
28 Clock Pauses 4) A clock may be paused only where a decision to admit for treatment has been made, and the patient has declined at least 2 reasonable appointment offers for admission. The clock is paused for the duration of the time between the earliest reasonable offer and the date from which the patient makes themselves available again for admission for treatment. Clock Stops (Clock stops for treatment) 5) A clock stops when: a) First definitive treatment starts. This could be: i) Treatment provided by an interface service; ii) Treatment provided by a consultant-led service; iii) Therapy or healthcare science intervention provided in secondary care or at an interface service, if this is what the consultant-led or interface service decides is the best way to manage the patient s disease, condition or injury and avoid further interventions; b) A clinical decision is made and has been communicated to the patient, and subsequently their GP and/or other referring practitioner without undue delay, to add a patient to a transplant list. Clock Stops (Clock stops for non-treatment) 6) A waiting time clock stops when it is communicated to the patient, and subsequently their GP and/or other referring practitioner without undue delay that: a) It is clinically appropriate to return the patient to primary care for any non consultant-led treatment in primary care; b) A clinical decision is made to start a period of active monitoring; c) A patient declines treatment having been offered it; d) A clinical decision is made not to treat; e) A patient DNAs (does not attend) their first appointment following the initial referral that started their waiting time clock, provided that the provider can demonstrate that the appointment was clearly communicated to the patient f) A patient DNAs any other appointment and is subsequently discharged back to the care of their GP or other referrer, provided that: i) the provider can demonstrate that the appointment was clearly communicated to the patient; Page 28 of 38
29 ii) discharging the patient is not contrary to their best clinical interests; iii) discharging the patient is carried out according to local, publicly available/published, policies on DNAs. iv) These local policies are clearly defined and specifically protect the clinical interests of vulnerable patients (e.g. children, cancer patients or vulnerable adults), and are agreed with clinicians, commissioners, patients and other relevant stakeholders. Where a patient s care is being transferred from another provider, information in accordance with DSCN 44/2007 must be provided by the transferring provider, this is the MDS (minimum data set), using NHS net account. This will include the start date of the patients 18 Week journey and the pathway identifier which must be entered into the Pathway ID field on PAS. If there is not enough information on the MDS, the patient s treatment will not be compromised. The date of receipt will be taken as the 18 week clock start and PBS (Patient Booking Services) will chase the remaining MDS information. Where a patient is referred from one specialty within the Trust to another for a new clinical condition, the clock starts on the day that the clinical decision is made to refer to the other specialty. Where Consultant to consultant referrals are made for the same condition, the 18 week pathway (RTT clock) continues. Patient Choice and Clock Pauses (Tolerances) It is recognised that for some patients, 18 weeks is inconvenient or clinically inappropriate. Specifically, this relates to the following three types of patients: Patient choice patients who choose not to accept the earliest offered appointments along their pathway or choose to delay treatment Co-operation - patients who do not attend appointments along their pathway Clinical exceptions - patients with clinically complex conditions and/or co morbidities who are unsuitable to be treated within 18 weeks These patients are taken into account in a tolerance set as part of the delivery standard. The 18 week pathway (RTT clocks) for admitted patients may be paused to take into account delays introduced because patients turn down offers of admissions (for treatment) made with reasonable notice. Adjustments do not apply to non-admitted pathways, diagnostic admissions and do not apply to admissions which are not related to first definitive treatment. In the event that a patient is unable to attend for their surgery, after being provided with 2 reasonable offers for admission at least 3 weeks (21 days) in advance, the patients 18 week pathway (RTT clock) can be paused. Page 29 of 38
30 The clock is paused for the duration of the time between the earliest reasonable offer and the date from which the patient makes themselves available for admission. Clock Pauses for Social Reasons Clock pauses for social reasons identifies the period in which a patient makes themselves unavailable for an admission and adjusts admitted pathways. This requires the provider to be able to separately identify clock pauses for social reasons from other adjustments. This method should only be used in the short term and providers should move to recording the pause due to a patient turning down two reasonable offers as soon as possible. The Admissions Department and relevant local department booking teams will carry out a weekly review of all such patients and these will be monitored as part of weekly PTL meetings. Pregnancy Patients who become pregnant and the waiting time is such that an offer could be made before the gestation time is complete, should be removed from the waiting list and referred back to their GP, unless the procedure is clinically advisable during pregnancy. The GP should make arrangements to re-refer the patient when they are no longer pregnant and are medically fit. Reinstating To Waiting List Patients wishing to be reinstated to a hospital treatment or endoscopic diagnostic day case waiting list following removal can do so by contacting the relevant department within 3 months of their removal if it is still clinically appropriate. Validation of appropriateness would be expected to take place within the clinical team and the PAS system will then show a new date on list and 18 week clock start from the date of patient contact. Therefore the new clock start (18 week RTT pathway) would be from when the patient agrees the appointment with the hospital. Inter-provider transfers (tertiary referrals) Where patients are transferred between providers, including primary care intermediate services, the standard minimum data set (MDS) form must accompany the referral. The same template must be used when referring patients within the Trust for the same condition. The template is used when there is no other pre-existing template in place i.e. Cancer. This is to ensure national compliance regarding provision of information for tertiary referrals. When a patient is transferred for treatment in the middle of a pathway, the 18 week clock will continue and it will be the joint responsibility of all providers involved to ensure that the patient is managed within 18 weeks. There will also be occasions when a patient is transferred for further treatment of a significantly different condition after the original clock has stopped this information will also need to be shared with the onward provider, hence an MDS form will still be required. In this instance a new 18 week clock will start with the new provider. Page 30 of 38
31 Consultants may also accept a referral to treat a patient referred to them by a Consultant from another hospital for a condition where the 18 week pathway to treat has already commenced. The clock will continue ticking from the date it commenced at the referring hospital MANAGEMENT OF WELSH /ISLE OF MAN PATIENTS The above cohort of patients should be managed in the same way as all other patients on our waiting list, and the Patient Target Times for their local PCT s/ CCG s or commissioners should be applied DATA QUALITY AUDITS Adherence to the Patient Access Policy is monitored through the completion of the following Data Quality Audits. These are reviewed during the weekly PTL meeting and, as a minimum, include; A monthly audit to ensure that all patients are given reasonable notice as follows: Inpatient admission: 21 days Routine outpatient appointment: 21 days Diagnostic appointment: 7 days NB; Patients with suspected cancer should be able to see a specialist within two weeks(14 days) of their GP deciding they need to be seen urgently and requesting an appointment. The hospital appointments department must contact the patient within 1 week of receipt of the referral and offer an appointment for within 2 weeks of receipt of referral. Where a referral has been received and triaged, and in the opinion of the Consultant is considered urgent, the hospital appointments department must contact the patient within 1 week of receipt of the referral and offer an appointment for within 4 weeks of receipt of referral. Audit of Clinic Disposal, i.e. recording the outcome of appointment and closing an outpatient clinic. The target is for 100% of clinics to be closed within 5 working days of the clinics being held. This audit is completed on a weekly basis. Audit that all patients who are recorded as added to WL as the outcome of an outpatient clinic attendance must be added to the relevant TCI (admissions) list within 2 working days. This audit is completed on a weekly basis. Audit that every patient who s RTT clock has been paused has an end date and treatment plan within 28 days of the original clock pause. This audit is to be completed on a weekly basis. Audit of hospital rearrangement of outpatient appointments and inpatient / day case admissions to ensure patients are not cancelled twice within any 6 month period by the hospital. This audit is completed on a monthly basis. Page 31 of 38
32 Audit of adherence to the Standard Operating Procedure for Booking Outpatient clinics. This audit is completed on a weekly basis Spot check audits of coding are completed to ensure that the coding documented in this policy is adhered to. This is undertaken on an ongoing basis REVIEWING PATIENTS WHO HAVE WAITED LONGER THAN 18 WEEKS DOH guidance has set out the benefits of reviewing and reporting on waits longer than 18 weeks - which include understanding the causes of any unnecessary waits and driving further improvement in patients experience of 18 week pathways. The aim of reviewing waits longer than 18 weeks is to differentiate between legitimately longer waits (where it is not in the patient s clinical interest or the patient chooses to wait along the pathway) and unnecessary waits (breaches) of the 18 weeks standard. This policy recommends that monthly reviews be undertaken and reports are to include: the total number of unnecessary waits (breaches) in the month and the distribution of their Referral to Treatment (RTT) waiting times at specialty level - separating those specialities reported in national returns under the Other category and at sub-speciality levels to ensure greater visibility of those specialities a breakdown of waits longer than 18 weeks for legitimate reasons (choice and complexity) and unnecessary waits (breaches). As recommended in the DOH document Reviewing patients who have waited longer than 18 weeks, a sample-based approach will be implemented which will involve undertaking a detailed audit by treatment function on a rotating basis, for example Trauma and Orthopaedics in March, and General Surgery in April. Operational teams will be expected to have a clear rationale for their selection process and this must be supplemented by a variety of existing 18 week performance reports and validation processes. For unnecessary waits (breaches), details of the systemic reasons identified, the total length of RTT waiting time and an estimate of the excess wait caused by the breach Responsibilities for reviewing waits longer than 18 weeks are as follows: The Trust to review waits longer than the 18 week standard on a monthly basis in a way that differentiates between legitimately longer waits and unnecessary waits (breaches) at specialty level. This will initially be reported through weekly PTL meetings and subsequently to the Board and primary care commissioners. Primary care commissioners (PTC s/pct Clusters, CCG s) to report the results of reviews of waits over 18 weeks to their Trust Board and as part of the ongoing commissioning processes to eliminate all unnecessary waits over 18 weeks and address the length of such waits; Page 32 of 38
33 SHAs are to assure themselves at their regular performance meetings that their PCTs/CCG s are reviewing waits over 18 weeks and acting to tackle any unnecessary waits (breaches); SHAs are to raise any substantial issues arising from reviews of waits longer than 18 weeks with the DH at their regular performance meetings. This will include raising issues about disproportionate waits for any particular population group or groups. Page 33 of 38
34 Appendix 1 6. LIST OF ASSOCIATED PROCEDURES / POLICIES SOP Issued Review Date Location SOP: Outpatient Oct 11 Oct 14 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s Appointments SOP: Receptions Oct 11 Oct 14 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s SOP: Admissions Jan 12 Jan 14 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s (IP/DC) SOP: PBS Booking Sept 11 Sept 13 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s Rules and Escalation Procedure SOP: Booking Jun 10 May 12 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s Appointments (Radiology) SOP: Cancer Jan 12 Jan 13 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s Management SOP: ADT Jan 12 Jan 14 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s SOP: 18 Weeks May 10 June 12 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s Reporting SOP: Waiting Time July 10 Aug 12 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s Targets SOP: Cancelled Operations Jan 12 Jan 14 Trust1\groups\GM\shared\SOP s Policy Issued Review Date Location Policy: Annual / Study Leave Policy: Health Records Policy: Safeguarding Children and Young People July 09 July 12 July 11 July 14 Nov 10 June 12 Audit Area Frequency Reporting Responsibility Audit: Reasonable Notice Monthly PTL Meetings Data Quality Audit: Clinic Disposal Weekly PTL Meetings Data Quality Audit: WL Additions Weekly PTL Meetings Data Quality Audit: End Date for Clock Weekly PTL Meetings Data Quality Pauses Audit: Hospital Monthly PTL Meetings Data Quality Rearrangements OP/IP/DC Audit: SOP s PBS Rules Weekly PTL Meetings PBS Manager Audit: Spot checks of Coding Continuous PTL Meetings Data Quality Page 34 of 38
35 Appendix 2; 6.10 BIBLIOGRAPHY / REFERENCES / LINKS DOH The 18 week rules suite definitions, national clock rules and how to guide DOH Step by step guide to 18 weeks DOH Updated 18 Clock rules (Gateway 6468) DSCN Notice 09/2007 Earliest Reasonable Offer Date / DSCN Notice 07/2003 Reasonable Notice to Patients DOH Choice of Scan DOH Diagnostics Frequently asked questions DOH 18 weeks RTT: Frequently asked question Health Service Guidelines (97) 31 priority treatment for war pensioners, NHE Executive, June 1997 DOH Gateway 9222: Access to Health Services for Military Veterans, Dec 2007 DOH Gateway 12620: Reviewing patients who have waited longer than 18 weeks and reporting any unnecessary waits (breaches of the 18 weeks standard), October 2009 DOH NHS Choices, March 2010 DOH Handbook to the NHS Constitution, March 2010 DOH Gateway 14374:Revision to The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2010/11, June 2010 DOH Gateway 16994: Patients Waiting on Planned Waiting Lists, November 2011 DOH Gateway 15216:The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2011/12, December 2010 DOH Gateway 16890: Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2012/13, November 2011 MOD The Armed Forces Covenant: Today and Tomorrow, May LINKS Page 35 of 38
36 7. EQUALITY ANALYSIS / IMPACT ASSESSMENT The Trust has a duty as a public body to publish all completed Equality Analysis Screening and Assessments. Please forward a copy of your completed proforma to [email protected] the Trust Patient and Workforce Equality Lead The Patient and Workforce Equality Lead will conduct an audit on all completed Screening and Assessments every six months. For advice in respect of answering the above questions, please contact the Patient and Workforce Equality Lead (Ext 7609) Equality Analysis Stage 1 Screening Title of Policy Policy Author (s) Lead Executive Policy Sponsor Target Audience Document Purpose Please state how the policy is relevant to the Trusts general equality duties to: Eliminate discrimination Advance equality of opportunity Foster good relations Patient Access Policy Philip Nee Donna McLaughlin Donna McLaughlin Trust Staff, Managers, Consultants, GP s, Junior Medical Staff, PCT s, PCT Clusters, CCG s The purpose of this policy is to ensure that all patients requiring access to outpatient appointments, elective inpatient treatment, elective day case treatment and diagnostic tests are managed consistently, according to national and local frameworks and definitions. This policy defines those roles and responsibilities and establishes a number of good practice guidelines to assist staff with the effective management of elective patients. This policy is intended to ensure that all patients with the same clinical priority are treated chronologically. Clinically urgent patients (as defined by a Consultant), and cancer / suspected cancer patients will always take priority. In addition, this policy will ensure that that no equality target group (Black & Minority Ethnic, Age, Gender, Disability, Religion, and Sexual Orientation & Transgender) are discriminated against or disadvantaged by this policy and it s associated procedures. Page 36 of 38
37 List key groups involved or to be involved in the policy development (e.g. staff side representatives, service users, partner agencies) and how these groups will be engaged Trust Staff, Managers, Consultants, GP s, Junior Medical Staff, PCT s, PCT Clusters, CCG s. These groups have been engaged in developing the original policy. This particular version is an update to the original policy which will be communicated via the methods outlined within the implementation plan Does the policy significantly affect one group less or more favourably than another on the basis of: answer yes/no (please add any qualification or explanation to your answer particularly if you answer yes) Race/ethnicity Disability (includes learning disability, physical or mental disability and sensory impairment) Gender Religion / belief (including non belief) Sexual orientation Age Gender reassignment Pregnancy and maternity Marriage and civil partnership Career status Will the policy affect the human rights of any of the above protected groups? If you have identified potential discrimination, and there are any exceptions valid, legal and or justifiable? If you have identified a negative impact on any of the above protected groups, can the impact be avoided or reduced by taking different action? How will the effect of the policy be reviewed after implementation? Name of the manager completing assessment: (must be one of the authors) Job title of manager completing the assessment Yes/No NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO N/A Philip Nee Assistant Director of Operations / Head of Patient Access Date of completion 5 th February 2012 Comments/Rationale Page 37 of 38
38 8. TRAINING Training on waiting list management (18 weeks) will be undertaken by the SHA s Intensive Support Team. Key individuals will be tasked with ensuring that all new staff members involved in managing access targets and waiting times have the required knowledge and skills necessary to manage RTT performance effectively. These key individuals will also ensure that any future guidance in respect of 18 weeks is cascaded to the appropriate staff members through local inductions and periodic updates in a timely manner, and that any additional training is introduced as required. Page 38 of 38
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY
. PATIENT ACCESS POLICY TITLE Patient Access Policy APPLICABLE TO All administrative / clerical / managerial staff involved in the administration of patient pathway. All medical and clinic staff seeing
Patient Access. UCLH policy
Patient Access UCLH policy Version 3.2 Version Date June 2014 Version Approved By EB Policy Approval Sub-Group Publication Date July 2013 Author Kevin Nicholson Review By Date June 2016 Responsible Director
Patient Access Policy
Patient Access Policy SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1.1. Introduction The principles and definitions of the 18 week target count the referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times in totality. Spire
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY V3
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY V3 State whether the document is: x Trust wide Business Group Local State Document Type: x Policy Standard Operating Procedure Guideline Protocol APPROVAL & VALIDATION Assurance Risk
Inpatient and Outpatient. Waiting Times & Patients Access Policy
Inpatient and Outpatient Waiting Times & Patients Access Policy Authors Piers Young Author s Job Title Interim Planned Care Programme Lead Department Surgery Version number Version 14 Ratifying Committee
Patient Access Referral To Treatment (RTT) Policy
Patient Access Referral To Treatment (RTT) Policy Policy to be agreed by the Operational Implementation Group & 18 Weeks Project Board Last Review Date: December 2009 Next Review Date: December 2010 CONTENTS
Outpatient and Inpatient Waiting Times. & Patients Access Policy
Outpatient and Inpatient Waiting Times & Patients Access Policy Date Approved by Version V2 Procedure/Policy Number Procedure/Policy type Date Equality impact assessment completed: Issue Date September
Patient Access Policy
Patient Access Policy NON-CLINICAL POLICY ACE 522 Version Number: 2 Policy Owner: Lead Director: Assistant Director of Operations Director of Operations Date Approved: Approved By: Management Executive
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY Page 1 of 44 Printed Copies may become out of date. Check online to ensure you have CONTENTS AND PAGE NUMBERS Patient Access Policy... 1 Contents And page numbers... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/
Patient Access User Manual
Patient Access User Manual Table of Contents. 1 Summary 7 2 Key Principles 7 3 Corporate Roles and Responsibilities 9 4 National Access Targets and Standards 10 4.1 Referral to Treatment (RTT) Standard
Patient Access Policy (18 Week Referral to Treatment (RTT) and Cancer Waiting Times)
Patient Access Policy (18 Week Referral to Treatment (RTT) and Cancer Waiting Times) To whom this document applies: All Administrative Staff, Clerical Staff, Clinicians, Clinical Nurse Specialists, Service
REFERRAL TO HOSPITAL ACCESS POLICY INCLUDING DID NOT ATTEND (DNA) AND COULD NOT ATTEND (CNA)
REFERRAL TO HOSPITAL ACCESS POLICY INCLUDING DID NOT ATTEND (DNA) AND COULD NOT ATTEND (CNA) Last Review Date September 2014 Approving Bodies NHS Doncaster Clinical Commissioning Group Doncaster & Bassetlaw
Patient Access, Booking and Choice Policy for Moorfields City Road and all Moorfields satellites
Patient Access, Booking and Choice Policy for Moorfields City Road and all Moorfields satellites Policy Summary This policy is intended to provide guidance on the approved process for managing patients
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY Document Type Policy Document Number Version Number 1.0 Approved by NHS Borders Board on 18 October 2012 Issue date Nov 2012 Review date Nov 2013 Distribution Prepared by Developed
Patient Access Policy. Version 2.0
Version 2.0 November 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Purpose of this Policy/Procedure... 3 3. Scope... 3 4. Definitions / Glossary... 3 5. Ownership and Responsibilities... 4 5.1. Role of
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY Completed Review Date: June 2015 Date for Review June 2016 1 NHS LANARKSHIRE PATIENT ACCESS POLICY 1. BACKGROUND NHS Lanarkshire is required by Scottish Government to deliver a consistent,
Elective Care Guide. Referral to Treatment Pathways: A Guide for Managing Efficient Elective Care. Second edition (January 2014)
Elective Care Guide Referral to Treatment Pathways: A Guide for Managing Efficient Elective Care Second edition (January 2014) Contents page 1. Introduction 1.1. How the guide works and its intended audience
Accessing Outpatient, Inpatient and Day Case Services in Acute Hospitals in Ireland
Accessing Outpatient, Inpatient and Day Case Services in Acute Hospitals in Ireland January 2014 an ciste náisiúnta um cheannach cóireála the national treatment purchase fund Contents Introduction 2 Accessing
Managing and Minimising Appointment Slot Issues
NHS e-referral Service Managing and Minimising Appointment Slot Issues What is an Appointment Slot Issue? When no clinic appointment is available for patients to book in the NHS e-referral Service, the
PATIENT ACCESS POLICY
PATIET ACCESS POLICY This policy can be made available in other formats and languages upon request to the PALS office on 01708 435454 Contents Include: Management of Patients with Suspected or Confirmed
Private Patient Policy. Documentation Control
Documentation Control Reference Date approved Approving Body Trust Board Implementation Date July 2009 NUH Private Patient and Supersedes Overseas Visitor Policy Private Patient Advisory Group, Consultation
How To Ensure That All Patients Get Access To Care
ELECTIVE TREATMENT ACCESS POLICY Policy Title Version: Version 2 Approved by: Elective Treatment Access Policy Trust Board or Committee of the Board Date of approval: 30th January 2014 Policy supersedes:
Type of change. V02 Review Feb 13. V02.1 Update Jun 14 Section 6 NPSAS Alerts
Document Title Reference Number Lead Officer Author(s) (name and designation) Ratified By Central Alerting System (CAS) Policy NTW(O)17 Medical Director Tony Gray Head of Safety and Patient Experience
Improving Emergency Care in England
Improving Emergency Care in England REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 1075 Session 2003-2004: 13 October 2004 LONDON: The Stationery Office 11.25 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed
Cancer Services Operational Policy (Patient Access) Version number 2.1
Cancer Services Operational Policy (Patient Access) V2.1 Cancer Services Operational Policy (Patient Access) Version number 2.1 Lead executive Name / title of author: Chief Operating Officer Karen Blackburn,
Report to the NHS Fife Board on 25 June 2013 NHS FIFE S PATIENT ACCESS POLICY
9.2b Report to the NHS Fife Board on 25 June 2013 NHS FIFE S PATIENT ACCESS POLICY 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 Following NHS Fife s performance against Treatment Time Guarantee (TTG) during the winter months,
Diagnostic Testing Procedures for Ophthalmic Science
V3.0 09/06/15 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Purpose of this Policy... 3 3. Scope... 3 4. Definitions / Glossary... 3 5. Ownership and Responsibilities... 3 5.2. Role of the Managers... 3 5.3.
MID STAFFORDSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
MID STAFFORDSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Report to: Report of: Joint Health Scrutiny Accountability Session Antony Sumara Chief Executive Date: 20 April 2011 Subject: Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust
PROTOCOL THE MANAGEMENT OF OUTPATIENT SERVICES
Outpatient Performance Improvement Programme, 2012-2015 PROTOCOL THE MANAGEMENT OF OUTPATIENT SERVICES JANUARY 2013 EDITION 1.0 Authors DOCUMENT CONTROL PROTOCOL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF OUTPATIENT SERVICES
Patient Choice Strategy
Patient Choice Strategy Page 1 of 14 Contents Page 1 Background 4 2 Putting Patients and the Public at the Heart of Health and 5 Healthcare in West Lancashire 3 Where are we now and where do we need to
PROTOCOL FOR DUAL DIAGNOSIS WORKING
PROTOCOL FOR DUAL DIAGNOSIS WORKING Protocol Details NHFT document reference CLPr021 Version Version 2 March 2015 Date Ratified 19.03.15 Ratified by Trust Protocol Board Implementation Date 20.03.15 Responsible
Frequently Asked Questions on the Referral to Treatment (RTT) data collection
Frequently Asked Questions on the Referral to Treatment (RTT) data collection How to use this document This document contains answers to frequently asked questions on RTT measurement and the RTT data collection.
Fife NHS Board Activity NHS FIFE. Report to the Board 24 February 2015 ACTIVITY REPORT
1 AIM OF THE REPORT NHS FIFE Report to the Board 24 February 2015 ACTIVITY REPORT This report provides a snapshot of the range of activity that underpins the achievement of key National Targets and National
Managing the boundaries of NHS and privately funded healthcare Policy on the separation of private and NHS treatments
South Central Priorities Committees (Oxfordshire PCT) Policy Statement 67a: Managing the boundaries of NHS and privately-funded healthcare Clinical Executive decision: September 2009 Date of Issue: April
National Clinical Programmes
National Clinical Programmes Section 3 Background information on the National Clinical Programmes Mission, Vision and Objectives July 2011 V0. 6_ 4 th July, 2011 1 National Clinical Programmes: Mission
Commissioning Policy (EMSCGP005V2) Defining the boundaries between NHS and Private Healthcare
Commissioning Policy (EMSCGP005V2) Defining the boundaries between NHS and Private Healthcare Although Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and East Midlands Specialised Commissioning Group (EMSCG) were abolished
NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANAGEMENT OF ATTENDANCE AND SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY. Documentation Control
NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANAGEMENT OF ATTENDANCE AND SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY Documentation Control Reference HR/P&C/003 Date approved 4 Approving Body Trust Board
Emergency Care Weekly Situation Report Standard Specification
Title Emergency Care Weekly Situation Report Specification Document ID ISB 1607 Specification Sponsor Sarah Butler, DH Status FINAL Developer Paul Steele Version 1.0 Author Paul Steele Version Date 19/03/2014
North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust. Annual Audit Letter 2005/06. Report to the Directors of the Board
North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust Annual Audit Letter 2005/06 Report to the Directors of the Board 1 Introduction The Purpose of this Letter 1.1 The purpose of this Annual Audit Letter (letter)
AVOIDING UNPLANNED ADMISSIONS ENHANCED SERVICE: PROACTIVE CASE FINDING AND CARE REVIEW FOR VULNERABLE PEOPLE GUIDANCE AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
April 2014 AVOIDING UNPLANNED ADMISSIONS ENHANCED SERVICE: PROACTIVE CASE FINDING AND CARE REVIEW FOR VULNERABLE PEOPLE GUIDANCE AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS A programme of action for general practice and clinical
Process for reporting and learning from serious incidents requiring investigation
Process for reporting and learning from serious incidents requiring investigation Date: 9 March 2012 NHS South of England Process for reporting and learning from serious incidents requiring investigation
Standard QH-IMP-300-1:2016
Specialist outpatient services Standard QH-IMP-300-1:2016 1. Statement The Specialist Outpatient Services Implementation Standard outlines the suite of business rules and processes required to ensure that
SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY. Version:
SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY Version: V4 Policy Author: Shajeda Ahmed Designation: Senior Human Resources Manager Responsible Director of Strategy and Business Support Director: EIA Assessed: 22 November 2012
Consultation on amendments to the Compliance Framework. Dated 31 January 2008
Consultation on amendments to the Compliance Framework Dated 31 January 2008 1. Introduction 1.1. Developing the regulatory framework Monitor continues to develop a regulatory framework within which boards
CONTENTS. What is long term sickness? Page 2. Keeping in Contact during Absence Page 2. Medical Certificates Page 2
CONTENTS What is long term sickness? Page 2 Keeping in Contact during Absence Page 2 Medical Certificates Page 2 The Role of the Occupational Health Service Page 2 Access to Health Records Act (1990) Page
POLICY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ABSENCE DUE TO SICKNESS
Directorate of Organisational Development & Workforce POLICY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ABSENCE DUE TO SICKNESS Reference: OWP007 Version: 1.0 This version issued: 31/05/12 Result of last review: N/A Date approved
MANAGING SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY
MANAGING SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY Policy Devised: March 2013 Adopted on: 5 th December 2013 Review date: December 2014 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 From time to time employees may suffer ill health and it is essential
ATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY
ATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY Recommending Committee: Approving Committee: Signature: Human Resources Directorate Human Resources Council Carole Whewell Designation: Vice Chair Date: September 2008 October
NHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group
NHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group HR Policies Managing Sickness Absence Approved by: Quality and Assurance Group Ratification date: September 2013 Review date: September 2016 Elaine Edwards
Recording and reporting referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times for consultant-led elective care: Frequently Asked Questions
Recording and reporting referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times for consultant-led elective care: Frequently Asked Questions Recording and reporting referral to treatment (RTT) waiting times for consultant-led
A Guide for Managers Managing Planned and Unplanned Absences/Non-Attendance
A Guide for Managers Managing Planned and Unplanned Absences/Non-Attendance Human Resources June 2012 Introduction This guide focuses on planned and unplanned periods of absence e.g. annual leave, accrued
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY
INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY Name of Policy Author: Name of Review/Development Body: Ratification Body: Ruth Drewett Information Governance Steering Group Committee Trust Board : April 2015 Review date:
The CCG Assurance Framework: 2014/15 Operational Guidance. Delivery Dashboard Technical Appendix DRAFT
The CCG Assurance Framework: 2014/15 Operational Guidance Delivery Dashboard Technical Appendix DRAFT 1 NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Operations Patients and Information Nursing
Standard 5. Patient Identification and Procedure Matching. Safety and Quality Improvement Guide
Standard 5 Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Safety and Quality Improvement Guide 5 5 5October 5 2012 ISBN: Print: 978-1-921983-35-1 Electronic: 978-1-921983-36-8 Suggested citation: Australian
Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols
Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols Document Details Title Complaints and Compliments Policy Trust Ref No 1353-29025 Local Ref (optional) N/A Main points the document This policy and procedure
Managing Employees Health in the Workplace Policy (Sickness Absence Management) Version 4.1
Managing Employees Health in the Workplace Policy (Sickness Absence Management) Version 4.1 Previously known as Attendance Management Policy Lead executive Name / title of author: Janet Wilkinson, Director
Guidance on NHS patients who wish to pay for additional private care
Guidance on NHS patients who wish to pay for additional private care DH INFORMATION READER BOX Policy HR / Workforce Management Planning / Clinical Document Purpose Gateway Reference Title Author Publication
Business Continuity Management Policy and Plan
Business Continuity Management Policy and Plan 1 Page No: Contents 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Purpose 3 3.0 Definitions 4 4.0 Roles, Duties & Responsibilities 4 4.1 Legal And Statutory Duties, Responsibilities
Allscripts PAS is a part of our product family that covers all aspects of patient management and care ALLSCRIPTS PATIENT ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM (PAS)
allscripts.com ALLSCRIPTS PATIENT ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM (PAS) Allscripts PAS is a part of our product family that covers all aspects of patient management and care PATIENT ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM (PAS) Allscripts
MANAGERS GUIDE / TOOLKIT
MANAGERS GUIDE / TOOLKIT SECTION 1 - Managing short term sickness absence (+ reporting procedures) SECTION 2 - Managing long term sickness absence SECTION 3 - Guidance on disability discrimination under
Fast Track Pathway Tool for NHS Continuing Healthcare
Fast Track Pathway Tool for NHS Continuing Healthcare DH INFORMATION READER BOX Policy Clinical Estates HR / Workforce Commissioner Development IM & T Management Provider Development Finance Planning /
DRAFT MANAGEMENT OF EMPLOYEE CAPABILITY: ATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY
DRAFT MANAGEMENT OF EMPLOYEE CAPABILITY: ATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY CONTENTS Section Page 1 Introduction 2 2 Scope 2 3 Key Responsibilities 3 4 Definitions used Within the Policy 3 5 Recording & Monitoring
Measuring quality along care pathways
Measuring quality along care pathways Sarah Jonas, Clinical Fellow, The King s Fund Veena Raleigh, Senior Fellow, The King s Fund Catherine Foot, Senior Fellow, The King s Fund James Mountford, Director
Informatics: The future. An organisational summary
Informatics: The future An organisational summary DH INFORMATION READER BOX Policy HR/Workforce Management Planning/Performance Clinical Document Purpose Commissioner Development Provider Development Improvement
HR POLICIES & PROCEDURES (HR/B05)
HR POLICIES & PROCEDURES (HR/B05) REHABILITATION AND TEMPORARY REDEPLOYMENT PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Author: Melanie Saunders, Assistant Director of HR (Operations) This document replaces: All former
Job Description. Line Management of a small team of staff administrating and managing patient and professional feedback and incidents.
Job Description Job Title Pay Band Base Dept./Team Responsible to Accountable to Responsible for Complaints, Incidents and Governance Manager New Alderley House, Macclesfield Eastern Cheshire Clinical
NON-EMERGENCY PATIENT TRANSPORT POLICY AND PROCEDURES
NON-EMERGENCY PATIENT TRANSPORT POLICY AND PROCEDURES Title Non Emergency Patient Transport Policy and Procedures. Policy No TRAN 001 Version 001 Target Audience Authors Name Lead Executive All Staff and
Risk Management Policy and Process Guide
Risk Management Policy and Process Guide Status: pending Next review date: December 2015 Page 1 Information Reader Box Directorate Medical Nursing Patients & Information Commissioning Operations (including
Appointment Non-Attendance (Did Not Attend) Procedure
() Procedure 1. Purpose This Procedure outlines the procedural requirements to be observed by all West Coast District Health Board (WCDHB) staff (excluding Mental Health Service) to ensure all patient
Progress on the System Sustainability Programme. Submitted to: NHS West Norfolk CCG Governing Body, 31 July 2014
Agenda Item: 9.1 Subject: Presented by: Progress on the System Sustainability Programme Dr Sue Crossman, Chief Officer Submitted to: NHS West Norfolk CCG Governing Body, 31 July 2014 Purpose of Paper:
