Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry- Exit & Registered Traveller Systems

Transcription

1 European Commission DG Justice, Freedom and Security Framework Contract Quality Assurance JLSB Service Order: so 30 EntryExit Costing Study Final Report Cost Analysis of Entry Exit & Registered Traveller Systems (CBESO30REP003) Abstract This document is the Final Report of the cost analysis of the EntryExit and Registered Traveller Systems Document information AUTHOR Unisys OWNER ISSUE DATE VERSION 1.30 APPROVAL STATUS Document History VER DATE AUTHOR DESCRIPTION ACTION* PG /01/10 Huijgens Initial draft /02/10 Huijgens Tavano Updated based on feedback from COM. Identified scenarios and described the methodology /02/10 Tavano Revised text, tables, pictures /02/10 Tavano Updated based on feedback from COM /03/10 Huijgens Tavano European Commission DG JLS Submitted Revised text, tables, pictures. Updated based on feedback from COM /03/10 Huijgens Revised text, tables, pictures /03/10 Huijgens Revised text, tables, pictures /03/10 Huijgens, Dalamanga, Wiersma /03/10 Huijgens, Dalamanga, Wiersma I U IR IR IR IR IR All All All All All All Final version IR All Final version addressing COM comments IR All, Printed 4/25/2012, p. 1/137

2 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VER DATE AUTHOR DESCRIPTION ACTION* PG /03/10 Huijgens, Dalamanga, Wiersma Final version IR All /04/10 Huijgens Final version, removed disclaimer Changed Semi Automated to SemiManual Action: I = Insert, R = Replace R 3 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 2/137

3 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 2 INTRODUCTION 10 3 METHODOLOGY AND COST ANALYSIS STRUCTURE IDENTIFYING THE COST ELEMENTS TOOLS The Cost Model Function Point Analysis CostXpert Infrastructure Design and Sizing Accuracy 14 4 USE CASES THIRD COUNTRY NATIONAL BORDER CROSSING ENTRY THIRD COUNTRY NATIONAL BORDER CROSSING EXIT REGISTERED TRAVELLER BORDER CROSSING ENTRY REGISTERED TRAVELLER BORDER CROSSING EXIT REGISTERED TRAVELLER ENROLMENT DATA DICTIONARY TABLE OF INTERFACES 35 5 ASSUMPTIONS FOR SYSTEM AND COST MODELS GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS ANTICIPATED SYSTEM LOAD SYSTEM MODEL PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS 38 6 SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE CENTRALISED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Member State Technical Infrastructure Central Technical Infrastructure DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE Member State Distributed Technical Architecture 53 7 COST ANALYSIS HOW TO USE THE EXCEL COST MODEL Input Presentation Sizing Estimating costs using the Model COST ANALYSIS PRESENTATION Cost elements Costs General Remarks CENTRALISED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE A1C CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM, NO BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables A1D DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM, NO BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables 69 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 3/137

4 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.6 A2C CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM, WITH BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables A2D DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM, WITH BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables A3C CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM, BIOMETRICS ADDED LATER Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables A3D DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM, BIOMETRICS ADDED LATER Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables B0 TOKENBASED RTS ONLY Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables B1C TOKENBASED RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITHOUT BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables B1D TOKENBASED RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITHOUT BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables B2C TOKENBASED RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables B2D TOKENBASED RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables B3C TOKENBASED RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS ADDED LATER Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables B3D TOKENBASED RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS ADDED LATER Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables C0 TOKENLESS RTS ONLY Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables C1C TOKENLESS RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITHOUT BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables C1D TOKENLESS RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITHOUT BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables C2C TOKENLESS RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables C2D TOKENLESS RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS 116 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 4/137

5 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables C3C TOKENLESS RTS AND CENTRALISED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS ADDED LATER Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables C3D TOKENLESS RTS AND DISTRIBUTED ENTRYEXIT SYSTEM WITH BIOMETRICS ADDED LATER Scenario Parameters Cost Summary Tables SUMMARY TABLE COMPARISON OF THE COSTS FOR VIS COLOCATION (NO VIS CONNECTION) COMPARISON OF THE COSTS FOR VIS CONNECTION REFERENCE AND APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS REFERENCE DOCUMENTS TERMINOLOGY AND ANNEXES ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS ANNEX 1 COST MODEL BUILDING BLOCKS ANNEX 2 COST XPERT INPUT REPORTS 137 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 5/137

6 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Tables Table 1: Comparison of the costs VIS colocation (no VIS connection)... 8 Table 2: Comparison of costs VIS colocation... 9 Table 3: Costing Scenarios...10 Table 4: Cost Items vs. Solution Scenarios...11 Table 5: EES Anticipated System load...37 Table 6: RTS Anticipated System load...38 Table 7: Business parameters...38 Table 8: Cost Parameters...39 Table 9: Member State Technical Architecture Building Blocks...44 Table 10: Central Infrastructure Building Blocks...47 Table 11: Central System Building Blocks...51 Table 12: Distributed architecture building blocks...54 Table 13: Cost elements...61 Table 14: Cost parameters...61 Table 15: Example of MS Administrative Costs...64 Table 15: Comparison of the costs VIS colocation (no VIS connection) Table 16: Comparison of costs VIS connection Table 17: Applicable Documents Table 18: Reference Documents Table 19: Acronyms & Abbreviations Figures Figure 1: Spreadsheet Costing Workbook Structure...13 Figure 2: TCN Border Crossing Systems Map Entry...16 Figure 3: TCN Border Crossing Systems Map Exit...20 Figure 4: RT Border Crossing Systems Map Entry...23 Figure 5: RT Border Crossing Systems Map Exit...27 Figure 6: RT Enrolment...30 Figure 7: Centralised System Architecture...42 Figure 8: Member State Technical Architecture...44 Figure 9: Central Technical Architecture...47 Figure 10: Collaboration architecture...50 Figure 11: Base distributed system architecture...50 Figure 12: Central RTS system in distributed architecture...51 Figure 13: Member State distributed architecture...54 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 6/137

7 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The objective of this study was to carry out a thorough assessment of the costs connected to establishing an Entry/Exit System and a Registered Traveller System taking into account the various options and suboptions identified during the preparation of the legal proposals of the two systems. The study complements the Impact Assessments accompanying those proposals. The study was carried out based on the details in this document and, to a limited extent, on the Entry Exit Feasibility Study Final report 1. All cost estimates have been based on the documentary material provided by COM and the SPECIFICATIONS FOR A COST ANALYSIS STUDY as reported in the document _EES_RT_IA_Cost_ToR_lang. To correctly estimate the costs, various techniques were used: Sizing o Hardware sizing based on simplified process models from the Feasibility Study and forecasted numbers of Entries/Exits and RT travel events. o Software development sizing based on information in the Feasibility Study and completed with Function Point Analysis when necessary. o Network sizing based on predictions of the eventual expected system load Costing o Parametric cost analysis techniques were used to estimate development efforts and maintenance costs to support the introduction of a new software product. o Parametric cost estimation is based on the functional size of the solution, the level of reusability of existing products and the proportion of COTS products that are used. Obvious parameters are the hourly rates and skill levels of the development team at specified reference rates. Less obvious parameters are associated with the development environment and project governance. The parameters that we propose to use for the estimations have been discussed and agreed with the COM. o Estimates of the costs of third party hardware, software and network products were based on list prices of popular and appropriate COTS products. o For estimating operational costs, we assumed a harmonised model, in which we adopted the rates given in the specifications as average rates to be used across Member States. We also assumed the same business hours throughout the Union, as well as the same number of holidays. Planning o The initial planning was produced by the parametric costing tool (CostXpert). This includes specification, design, realisation, testing and implementation and the first phase of deployment, where any defects have been detected. o The manual intervention and adjustments of the schedule is necessary, as CostXpert assumes unlimited resources to be available, which means that the planning needs to be adjusted to make it fit the actual situation. Two basic architectures have been considered: Central architecture Distributed (fullmeshed) architecture. In addition to the above considerations, other features considered were the existence or not of a Registered Traveller System. Based on the analysis presented in the current study, the following tables present a summary of the costs for the different scenarios and for the two variables considered (colocation with VIS, VIS connection): 1 CAB38FR004, Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 7/137

8 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Table 1: Comparison of the costs VIS colocation (no VIS connection) Scenario, no VIS connection A1C Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention EU onetime costs MS onetime Costs EU in 2014 MS in 2014 EU in 2020 MS in ,028, ,216,654 6,202, ,063,562 6,467, ,626,820 A2C Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 27,543, ,948,404 (3,335,536) 125,568,865 7,652, ,457,900 A3C Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B0 TokenBased RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B1C TokenBased RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B2C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B3C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C0 TokenLess RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C1C TokenLess RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C2C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C3C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention A1D Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 27,790, ,491,869 (3,304,561) 125,516,924 7,683, ,405,959 21,028, ,216,654 6,202, ,063,562 6,467, ,626,820 25,042, ,809,796 6,633, ,293,997 6,897, ,857,255 34,686, ,186,811 (1,555,916) 129,580,236 8,260, ,773,514 34,940, ,763,172 (1,530,520) 129,537,872 8,285, ,731,150 30,255, ,713,446 (149,470) 129,367,775 11,006, ,787,550 34,454, ,635,674 (1,577,548) 129,625,122 8,175, ,018,098 34,454, ,641,325 (1,577,548) 129,865,124 7,790, ,377,884 34,719, ,198,498 (1,551,003) 129,820,841 7,816, ,333,601 13,320, ,488,995 4,755, ,907,808 4,979, ,338,725 A2D Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 17,315, ,570,976 5,276, ,376,886 5,457, ,171,805 A3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 17,884, ,425,584 5,333, ,262,347 5,457, ,171,805 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 8/137

9 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Scenario, with VIS connection A1C Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Table 2: Comparison of costs VIS colocation EU onetime costs MS onetime Costs EU in 2014 MS in 2014 EU in 2020 MS in ,708, ,508,919 4,548, ,969,552 6,549, ,841,787 A2C Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 27,477, ,948,404 (3,391,917) 125,568,865 7,538, ,457,900 A3C Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B0 TokenBased RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 27,724, ,491,869 (3,360,942) 125,516,924 7,569, ,405,959 20,984, ,216,654 6,148, ,063,562 6,420, ,626,820 B1C TokenBased RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 24,998, ,809,796 6,578, ,293,997 6,850, ,857,255 B2C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B3C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics added later, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C0 TokenLess RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C1C TokenLess RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 34,627, ,186,811 (1,613,234) 129,580,236 8,146, ,773,514 34,881, ,763,172 (1,587,839) 129,537,872 8,172, ,731,150 30,207, ,713,446 (232,510) 129,367,775 10,651, ,787,550 34,395, ,635,674 (1,635,336) 129,625,122 8,062, ,018,098 C2C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 34,395, ,641,325 (1,635,336) 129,865,124 7,677, ,377,884 C3C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics added later, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention A1D Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention A2D Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention A3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 34,660, ,198,498 (1,608,790) 129,820,841 7,703, ,333,601 13,276, ,488,995 4,724, ,907,808 4,932, ,338,725 17,271, ,570,976 5,245, ,376,886 5,410, ,171,805 17,840, ,425,584 5,302, ,262,347 5,410, ,171,805 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 9/137

10 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 2 INTRODUCTION Table 3 contains the identifications of all costing scenarios that are described in this document. For easy navigation, the references to the scenarios contain hyper links to the relevant sections. Table 3: Costing Scenarios EE No/Biometrics EE w/biometrics EE Later/Biometrics No EE Central Distributed Central Distributed Central Distributed No RTS N/A A1C A1D A2C A2D A3C A3D RTS Token Based RTS Tokenless 2 B0 B1C B1D B2C B2D B3C B3D C0 C1C C1D C2C C2D C3C C3D As described in the Terms of Reference [R1] document, the costs for the EntryExit System (EES) are estimated in two forms; as a centralised system with national interfaces and as a distributed system with a consultation mechanism active between Member States. These scenarios end up being remarkably different from a technical standpoint, making it appropriate to identify them as two separate alternatives, whereby 20 alternative scenarios are defined and analysed in total. 2 The tokenless and tokenbased Registered Traveller systems refer to centralised systems that serve all the Member States. Only the EES can be either centralised or distributed architecture. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 10/137

11 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 3 METHODOLOGY AND COST ANALYSIS STRUCTURE 3.1 Identifying the Cost Elements For each applicable scenario, cost elements as mentioned in the Terms of Reference [R1] are calculated, based on the expected yearly volumes of thirdcountry national (TCN) travellers. As several commonalities can be found among the various cost scenarios, it is therefore appropriate to introduce wellidentified cost building blocks to be reused in order to rationalise the cost model and reduce inherent complexity. Cost items pertain to the so called Central System (CS) scenario which is to be run by under responsibility of the Management Authority and to Member States distributed systems. For tangible cost elements such as hardware, networking, software and facilities costs have been estimated using a bottomup approach, detailing the actual a BillofMaterials (BOM) of each individual system component. Furthermore, cost values are projected over time up to 2020, so that estimates for 2013, 2015 and 2020 can be extracted as requested by ToR [R1]. Table 2 below provides a complete overview of all cost categories and applicable options. Table 4: Cost Items vs. Solution Scenarios Cost Category Hardware Software Other Capital Expenditure Project Management Quality Assurance Administration Training Central System Distributed System Options Development Operations Development Operations Purchase Maintain Purchase Maintain Deploy Grow Deploy Grow Purchase Maintain Purchase Maintain Develop Grow Develop Grow Deploy Deploy Purchase Deploy Provide Procure Contract Control Plan Deliver Maintain Grow Control Procure Contract Plan Deliver Purchase Deploy Provide Procure Contract Control Plan Deliver Maintain Grow Control Procure Contract Plan Deliver Operating Manage Manage Applicable options are: 1. Architecture a. EE is a selfcontained system, thoroughly independent from SIS/VIS b. EE is interfaced with VIS, leverages BMS features, including database and biometric matcher 2. Retention Time a. 1 year b. 5 years c. 1 year for EE details, 5 years for traveller details 3. RTS Enrolment site Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 11/137

12 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems a. Consular post b. At Schengen border control points (BCP) c. Both a) and b) above 4. Border Control mode for RTS users a. Fullyautomated b. Semimanual 5. Housing of EES / RTS a. Colocation with SIS / VIS b. Location independent from SIS / VIS 3.2 Tools Actual costs are calculated by identifying the elementary cost units that are specific or typical of each cost category, such as: Development / Management / Administration o Labour Facilities o Required space o Power o Bandwidth Operations o HW Maintenance o SW Maintenance / Licensing o Labour The Cost Model Microsoft Excel is the tool of choice for elaborating the cost structure that eventually allows calculating solutions cost for the various scenarios. This structure is designed topdown, starting from the ToR [R1] and the supporting documentation. Starting from the business requirements, that quantify system functionality and behaviour, the mostlikely solution architectures have been determined inclusive of technical and software elements based on the findings of [R6] and also taking into account further developments since the publication of that report. The sizing of the system infrastructure is calculated from the expected system load. Sizing in this context comes down to actually determine which of building blocks are required for which scenarios, thus calculating the actual horsepower needed to meet the required performance. Business requirements per se are necessary but not sufficient in order to be able to properly size the solution. In fact, detailed technical assumptions are made to achieve this goal. The starting point is that most costs were as far as possible estimated irrelevant of any particular commercial product. However, infrastructure cost estimates were based on average list prices for popular products, such that cost values are as realistic as possible and drawn from public sources. All relevant assumptions are duly documented in this report, the technical assumptions required for system sizing being implemented as variable parameters in the Excel structure so that they can be changed if and when necessary. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 12/137

13 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Actual costs are calculated bottomup, aggregating all costs that are captured for each building block. Aggregation to conform to scenarios is then done via the optionbased scenario specifications. Figure 1 shows the spreadsheet workbook structure. EES/RTS Costing Study Final Report Business Requirements (ToR) Feasibility Study Legal Draft etc Costing info Business requirements sizing Scenario parameters Technical Parameters Design assumptions Unisys Team General parameters General Parameters Assumptions Scenario Costs BOM Specification Costs EESRTS Scenario XnC/D EESRTS Sizing EESRTS Parameters Scenario Parameters Building Block info Building Block info Scenario Parameters Building Block info Scenario Parameters Building Block info Scenario Parameters Building Block Building Block Building Block Building Block Pricing details Pricing details Pricing details Pricing details Public Domain Figure 1: Spreadsheet Costing Workbook Structure Function Point Analysis FunctionPoint Analysis (FPA) was used to estimate the effort required to develop the custommade software components. FPA is a wellknown and accepted technique that allows estimating the functional size of the system, describing it as a number of Function Points. In summary, the technique is based on analysing the data that is stored and managed by the system, its interactions with the users and other systems that store external data. The level of complexity of the data to be handled and the required operations on the data represent a reliable measure of the functional size of the system. As system sizing is fully based on system functionality as perceived from the user s perspective, this technique is well suited for this cost analysis as only the functional behaviour of the EES and RTS systems are known at this time. The results from FPA do not represent cost, or project schedule. They are treated as input data into the CostXpert cost analysis tool (see below). For each required scenario, an FPA estimation was performed, which led to a single spreadsheet containing the results and documenting all parameters. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 13/137

14 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems CostXpert 3 CostXpert is a parametric tool capable of estimating development costs and planning of a software development project. The tool relies on industry best practice data that are gathered by researchers in this area. The Cost Xpert Tool Suite represents the latest standard of the Integrated Methodology driven Estimation (IME) and is an intuitive operated standard tool for the realistic estimation of effort, time, resources and cost to complete a project, as well as an estimate of potential risk, defects, and documentation page count for the entire IT application life cycle. Our solution is based on scientifically published methods and models, industry standards and best practice approaches. It is the most comprehensive approach, covering any project situation no matter if it is feasibility phase, development or maintenance. The intelligent consideration of all relevant elements including project types, process models, hard facts, soft facts, quality and risk factors and constraints ensures the accurate estimation. The intuitive workflow and precalibrations of our expert system, as well as a wizard guided assessment enables the effective use of methods even without the necessarily need to become a methodology expert first. 4 CostXpert supports a wide variety of estimation algorithms and methods. One all important input parameter is the actual size of the solution, but the tool also caters for such characteristic elements as the development environment, development methodology and maturity and quality of the development organisation. CostXpert also provides a highlevel project plan, inclusive of a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), estimating the project s efficiency and throughput time. Based on proper hourly rates, it can thus provide a reliable estimate of development costs. Lastly, it is worth observing that the calculated values include costs associated with the early phase immediately following the system s deployment, as the model also allows estimates of the number and nature of system infancy defects and incidents that need resolution Infrastructure Design and Sizing Designing the system infrastructure is mandatory, as it is needed to estimate infrastructure costs and also to understand the impact in terms of required storage space, network capacity and power. This design was done assuming an Enterprise Data Centre Architecture (EDCA) model, while using Queuing Theory to estimate the physical size of the infrastructure in combination with the expected system loads. Again, a spreadsheet was used to capture all this information Accuracy Given the many assumptions made given the level of uncertainty on the final solution, and the many options proposed the described approach led to estimates that we consider realistic, if not real, as we consider overall accuracy to fall in the surroundings of 20% to 30%. This is well in line with industry s best practices and historical data. In fact, the relevant amount of options, alternative scenarios and undefined constraints make it impossible to provide estimates much closer to the final figures. Therefore, all cost values in the following of this report should be considered a median value, considering circa 25% as confidence range, plus or minus. 3 The Estimation Company. 4 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 14/137

15 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 4 USE CASES The Use Cases that are described in this section represent the basis for estimating the functional requirements of the solution system(s). These requirements serve then as an input to the FPA phase. These Use Cases are examples of the information that is presented in the Technical Feasibility Study [R6] and in the proposal for the foreseen implementation [R5], though the information from these sources is used to perform the analysis. The described processes are without prejudice to the final technical implementation at central or national level. 4.1 Third Country National Border Crossing Entry 5 CONTEXT BRIEF DESCRIPTION ACTORS STAKEHOLDERS & INTEREST PRECONDITIONS TCN travellers crossing external EU borders to enter the Schengen area This process is triggered when a TCN Traveller wishes to cross the border to enter the EU Schengen area He/she must undergo a border check procedure. Border Officer National Border Check System (NBCS) TCN Traveller The stakeholders are the EES, VIS, SIS, other national systems/databases The interest of these stakeholders is to support the border check procedure and, for EES, to record the entry record of TCN travellers BCP is open and accepting travellers Border Officer is available TCN Traveller presents herself at a border checkbooth 5 Note that this use case does not take into account RTS, which is described in section 4.3. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 15/137

16 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Figure 2: TCN Border Crossing Systems Map Entry Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 16/137

17 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems A Border Officer gathers information from the TCN s travel document and inserts it in the NBCS Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks Travel Travel MRZ Scan MRZ_Validity_Status_OK Credential Credential Reader MRZ Read Pax_Details Travel_Credential_Details Pax_Details Travel_Credential_Details Write Entry_Data_Record INBCS NBCS B NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases, possibly in parallel) to confirm document validity validate the travellers identity help assess her entry eligibility Specifically, EES confirms that TCN Traveller has not previously overstayed, returns the allowed number of days for the present stay and sends the result to the NBCS NBCS returns any relevant information found SIS ISIS Entry_Data_Record Check Blacklist SIS_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS EES IEES Entry_Data_Record Check EE History EE_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers Entry_Data_Record Check Blacklist Other_Sys_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers Entry_Data_Record Check Other_Sys_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS NBCS *_Entry_Status Assessment & Clearance Entry_Status_OK Display NBCS C Border Officer helps and supervises the traveller while capturing her fingerprints NBCS verifies the quality of the fingerprints and stores them temporarily for later processing Border Officer allows the TCN to enter the Schengen area and inserts his decision in the NBCS Traveller Fingerprint Fingerprints Scan Fingerprint_Image INBCS NBCS scanner Fingerprint_Template NBCS Fingerprint_Image Check Quality Level Fingerprint_Quality_Status NBCS Fingerprint_Template NBCS INBCS Fingerprint_Quality_Status *_Entry_Status Decision on Entry Decision_on_Entry_OK Border Officer Interactive Dialogue Procedural_Q&A Decision on Entry Decision_on_Entry_OK INBCS NBCS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 17/137

18 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems D NBCS creates an EES record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process NBCS purges any temporary data stored Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks NBCS Pax_Details Write EE_Data_Record IEES EES Fingerprint_Image Fingerprint_Template Decision_on_Entry_OK Date&Time_Stamp BCP NBCS *_Temporary_Data Delete If TCN holds a valid entry visa, the following event applies. E Border Officer additionally gathers information from the visa sticker and inserts it in the NBCS NBCS additionally interrogates VIS to validate the traveller s identity and visa to help assess eligibility to entry Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks TCN Visa Visa Reader Visa_Data Scan Visa_Data INBCS NBCS VIS IVIS Visa_Data Check Visa Validity Visa_Validity_OK INBCS NBCS In case TCN needs to be redirected to secondline checks, the following event applies. Border Officer cancels the procedure F NBCS purges any unneeded information TCN is directed to secondline checks Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks NBCS Interactive *_Temporary_Data Delete In the case the TCN is not granted entry to the Schengen zone, the following event applies. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 18/137

19 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems G Border Officer enters recording of refusal of entry in the national system (This point is referred here for completeness, but is out of scope for the current cost study). Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks Refuse_Entry Write Interactive NBCS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 19/137

20 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 4.2 Third Country National Border Crossing Exit CONTEXT BRIEF DESCRIPTION ACTORS STAKEHOLDERS & INTEREST PRECONDITIONS TCN travellers crossing external EU borders to exit the Schengen area This process is triggered when a TCN Traveller wishes to cross the border to exit the EU Schengen area He/she must undergo a border check procedure. Border Officer National Border Check System (NBCS) Automated Exit Gate (egate) TCN Traveller The stakeholders are the EES, VIS, SIS, other national systems/databases The interest of these stakeholders is to support the border exit procedure and, for EES, to record the exit record of TCN travellers BCP is open and accepting travellers Border Officer is available, or Automated Gate (egate) is available under Border Officer supervision TCN Traveller presents herself at a border checkbooth Figure 3: TCN Border Crossing Systems Map Exit Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 20/137

21 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems A Automated Gate (egate) or Border Officer provides instructions to the TCN Traveller to help her scan her travel document and to capture her fingerprints. EGate (Border Officer) processes and dispatches all data to NBCS Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks EGate Video screen E_Gate_Instructions_to_Tra veller Display Travel Credential Travel Credential Reader MRZ Scan MRZ_Validity_Status_OK MRZ Read Pax_Details Travel_Credential_Details Pax_Details Write Exit_Data_Record INBCS NBCS Travel_Credential_Details Traveller Fingerprint Fingerprints Scan Fingerprint_Image INBCS NBCS scanner Fingerprint_Template NBCS Fingerprint_Image Check Quality Level Fingerprint_Quality_Status NBCS Fingerprint_Template NBCS INBCS Fingerprint_Quality_Status Decision on Exit Decision_on_Exit_OK *_Exit_Status Border Officer Interactive Dialogue Procedural_Q&A Decision on Exit Decision_on_Exit_OK INBCS NBCS B NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases, possibly in parallel) to confirm document validity validate the travellers identity help assess her entry eligibility Specifically, EES confirms that TCN Traveller has not previously overstayed, returns the allowed number of days for the present stay and sends the result to the NBCS NBCS returns any relevant information found SIS ISIS Exit_Data_Record Check Blacklist SIS_Exit_Status INBCS NBCS EES IEES Exit_Data_Record Check EE History EE_Exit_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers Exit_Data_Record Check Blacklist Other_Sys_Exit_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers Exit_Data_Record Check Other_Sys_Exit_Status INBCS NBCS NBCS *_Exit_Status Assessment & Clearance Exit_Status_OK Display NBCS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 21/137

22 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems C EES confirms that TCN is exiting within the allowed number of days (no overstaying) and sends the result back to NBCS NBCS creates an EES record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process NBCS purges any temporary data stored Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks NBCS Pax_Details Write EE_Data_Record IEES EES Fingerprint_Image Fingerprint_Template Decision_on_Exit_OK Date&Time_Stamp BCP NBCS *_Temporary_Data Delete When Exception handlings are required, such as: Travel document cannot be read/scanned at egate Fingerprints do not meet required quality levels EES or other critical system is unavailable TCN Traveller is recognised as a threat to security and/or public health TCN Traveller is flagged by EES as having overstayed her permit/visa TCN is to be redirected to secondline checks, whereby the following event applies. D Border Officer takes control of the procedure NBCS purges any unneeded information Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks NBCS Interactive *_Temporary_Data Manual handling Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 22/137

23 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 4.3 Registered Traveller Border Crossing Entry CONTEXT BRIEF DESCRIPTION ACTORS STAKEHOLDERS & INTEREST PRECONDITIONS Registered travellers crossing external EU borders to enter the Schengen area This process is triggered when a Registered Traveller (RT) wishes to cross the border to enter the EU Schengen area He/she must undergo a border check procedure. Border Officer National Border Check System (NBCS), Registered Traveller System (RTS) Automated Gate (egate) Registered Traveller (RT) The stakeholders are the EES, RTS, VIS, SIS, other national databases The role of the RT system is to make sure verification occurs that the traveller was previously enrolled and therefore entitled to use the automated border crossing facility The role of all systems is to support the border check procedure and, for EES, to record the entry record of Registered Travellers BCP is open and accepting travellers EGate is available 6 Border Officer is available for supervision and backup RT presents herself at a BCP egate Figure 4: RT Border Crossing Systems Map Entry 6 Egate might not be available at all BCPs but in this case the RT holder could still benefit from a facilitated check. The same processes would take place, but without the egate. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 23/137

24 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems A egate (Border Officer) provides instructions to the Traveller to help her scan her travel document and to capture her fingerprints EGate processes and dispatches all data to NBCS RTS final validation is required only after NBCS has verified effective rights of entry, also replacing mandatory Q&A interaction with the Border Officer Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks EGate Video screen EGate_Instructions_to_Trav eller Display Travel Credential Travel Credential Reader MRZ Scan MRZ_Validity_Status_OK MRZ Read Pax_Details Travel_Credential_Details Pax_Details Write Entry_Data_Record INBCS NBCS Travel_Credential_Details Traveller Fingerprint Fingerprints Scan Fingerprint_Image INBCS NBCS scanner Fingerprint_Template NBCS Fingerprint_Image Check Quality Level Fingerprint_Quality_Status NBCS Fingerprint_Template NBCS INBCS Fingerprint_Quality_Status Decision on Entry Decision_on_Entry_OK IRTS RTS *_Entry_Status Fingerprint_Quality_Status *_Entry_Status RTS Travel_Credential_Details Fingerprint_Image Fingerprint_Template Check RTS Decision_on_Entry_OK INBCS NBCS B NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases in parallel) to: o confirm document validity o validate the travellers identity o help assess her entry eligibility Specifically, EES confirms that RT has not previously overstayed, returns the allowed number of days for the present stay and sends the result to the NBCS NBCS returns any relevant information found SIS ISIS Entry_Data_Record Check Blacklist SIS_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS EES IEES Entry_Data_Record Check EE History EE_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers Entry_Data_Record Check Blacklist Other_Sys_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers Entry_Data_Record Check Other_Sys_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS NBCS *_Entry_Status Assessment & Clearance Entry_Status_OK Display NBCS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 24/137

25 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems C NBCS creates an EES record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process NBCS purges any temporary data stored Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks NBCS Pax_Details Fingerprint_Image Fingerprint_Template Decision_on_Entry_OK Date&Time_Stamp BCP Write EE_Data_Record IEES IRTS NBCS *_Temporary_Data Delete EES RTS If RT holds a valid entry visa, the following event applies. D NBCS additionally interrogates VIS to validate the traveller s identity and visa to help assess eligibility to entry Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks TCN Visa Travel Visa_Data Scan Visa_Data INBCS NBCS Credential Reader VIS IVIS Visa_Data Check Visa Validity Visa_Validity_OK INBCS NBCS In case RT needs to be redirected to secondline checks, the following event holds. E Border Officer cancels the procedure NBCS purges all information no more needed RT is directed to secondline checks Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks NBCS Interactive *_Temporary_Data Delete In the case RT is not granted entry to the Schengen zone, the following event applies. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 25/137

26 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems F Border Officer enters recording of refusal of entry in the national system (This point is referred here for completeness, but is out of scope for the current cost study).). Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks Refuse_Entry Write Interactive NBCS NBCS Write Refuse_Entry IRTS RTS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 26/137

27 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 4.4 Registered Traveller Border Crossing Exit CONTEXT BRIEF DESCRIPTION ACTORS STAKEHOLDERS & INTEREST PRECONDITIONS Registered travellers crossing external EU borders to enter the Schengen area This process is triggered when a Registered Traveller (RT) wishes to cross the border to exit the EU Schengen area He/she must undergo a border check procedure. Border Officer National Border Check System (NBCS) Registered Traveller System (RTS) Automated Gate (egate) Registered Traveller (RT) The stakeholders are the EES, RTS, VIS, SIS, other national databases The role of the RT system is to make sure verification occurs that the traveller was previously enrolled and therefore entitled to use the automated border crossing facility, if available. A facilitated check could be carried out manually in case an automated border crossing system is not available. The role of all systems is to support the border check procedure and, for EES, to record the exit record of Registered Travellers BCP is open and accepting travellers EGate is available Border Officer is available for supervision and backup RT presents herself at a BCP egate Figure 5: RT Border Crossing Systems Map Exit Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 27/137

28 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems A egate (Border Officer) provides instructions to the Traveller to help her scan her travel document and to capture her fingerprints EGate processes and dispatches all data to NBCS RTS final validation is required only after NBCS has verified effective rights of exit, and replaces the mandatory Q&A interaction with the Border Officer Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks EGate Video screen EGate_Instructions_to_Trav eller Display Travel Credential Travel Credential Reader MRZ Scan MRZ_Validity_Status_OK MRZ Read Pax_Details Travel_Credential_Details Pax_Details Write Exit_Data_Record INBCS NBCS Travel_Credential_Details Traveller Fingerprint Fingerprints Scan Fingerprint_Image INBCS NBCS scanner Fingerprint_Template NBCS Fingerprint_Image Check Quality Level Fingerprint_Quality_Status NBCS Fingerprint_Template NBCS INBCS Fingerprint_Quality_Status Decision on Exit Decision_on_Exit_OK IRTS RTS *_Exit_Status Fingerprint_Quality_Status *_Exit_Status RTS Travel_Credential_Details Fingerprint_Image Fingerprint_Template Check RTS Decision_on_Exit_OK INBCS NBCS B NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases, possibly in parallel) to o confirm document validity o validate the travellers identity o help assess her exit eligibility Specifically, EES confirms that RT has not previously overstayed, returns the allowed number of days for the present stay and sends the result to NBCS NBCS returns any relevant information found SIS ISIS Exit_Data_Record Check Blacklist SIS_Exit_Status INBCS NBCS EES IEES Exit_Data_Record Check EE History EE_Exit_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers Exit_Data_Record Check Blacklist Other_Sys_Exit_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers Exit_Data_Record Check Other_Sys_Exit_Status INBCS NBCS NBCS *_Exit_Status Assessment & Clearance Exit_Status_OK Display NBCS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 28/137

29 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems C NBCS creates an EES record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process NBCS purges any temporary data stored Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks NBCS Pax_Details Fingerprint_Image Fingerprint_Template Decision_on_Exit_OK Date&Time_Stamp BCP Write EE_Data_Record IEES IRTS NBCS *_Temporary_Data Delete EES RTS When Exception handlings are required, such as: Travel document cannot be read/scanned at egate Fingerprints do not meet required quality levels EES or other critical system is unavailable RT Traveller is recognised as a threat to security and/or public health RT Traveller is flagged by EES as having overstayed her permit/visa RT is to be redirected to secondline checks, whereby the following event applies. D Border Officer takes control of the procedure NBCS purges all information no more needed Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks NBCS Interactive *_Temporary_Data Manual handling Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 29/137

30 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 4.5 Registered Traveller Enrolment CONTEXT BRIEF DESCRIPTION ACTORS STAKEHOLDERS & INTEREST PRECONDITIONS (TCN) Travellers seeking cleared status of Registered Traveller in order to benefit from fast processing at semi /automated facilities when crossing external EU borders upon entry to or exit from the Schengen area This process is triggered when a traveller wishes to enrol as a Registered Traveller and gain Registered Traveller status He/she must undergo a preliminary background check procedure and willingly provide her biometric details. Border/Enrolment Officer Registered Traveller System (RTS) Traveller applying for RT status The stakeholders are the EES, VIS, SIS, other national databases The role of the RTS is to make sure verification occurs that the traveller is suitable for enrolment and therefore can be entitled to use semi/automated border crossing facilities The role of all systems is to support the enrolment procedure and, for EES, to return previous border crossing records, including a qualitative assessment of the traveller s overstay history, if applicable RTS is operational Border/Enrolment Officer is available Traveller presents herself at a Registered Traveller System Enrolment Facility (RTSEF) Figure 6: RT Enrolment Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 30/137

31 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems A Border/Enrolment Officer drives the process, providing instructions to the Traveller, helping her while scanning travel document and capturing fingerprints RTS processes and dispatches all data to NBCS 7 NBCS polls all relevant backoffice systems to carry out background checks and vet traveller s application RTS final validation is required only after NBCS has verified effective rights of entry, and replaces the mandatory Q&A interaction with the Border Officer 8 on arrival at BCP Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks Travel Credential Travel Credential Reader MRZ Scan MRZ_Validity_Status_OK MRZ Read Pax_Details Travel_Credential_Details Pax_Details Write Entry_Data_Record IRTS RTS Travel_Credential_Details Traveller Fingerprint Fingerprints Scan Fingerprint_Image IRTS RTS scanner Fingerprint_Template Traveller Camera Face 9 Scan Face_Image IRTS RTS RTS Fingerprint_Image Fingerprint_Template RTS IRTS Fingerprint_Quality_Status *_RT_Status RTS IRTS Travel_Credential_Details Fingerprint_Image Fingerprint_Template Check Quality Level Fingerprint_Quality_Status RTS Decision on Application RT_Status_OK Check NBCS RT_Data_Record INBCS NBCS B NBCS interrogates various databases (EES, SIS and national databases, possibly in parallel) to o confirm document validity o validate the travellers identity o help assess her entry eligibility Specifically, EES returns Traveller s history of previous stays and dispatches the result to the NBCS NBCS returns any relevant information found to RTS 7 Please note that the enrolment would most likely take place using a direct interface to the RTS, though also this structure could/would be used in some MS depending on the national implementation. 8 The application processing procedure is described in the Draft proposal. 9 Optional feature Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 31/137

32 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems SIS ISIS RT_Data_Record Check Blacklist SIS_RT_Status INBCS NBCS EES IEES RT_Data_Record Check EE History RT_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers RT_Data_Record Check Blacklist RT_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS Other Syt s IOthers RT_Data_Record Check RT_Entry_Status INBCS NBCS NBCS *_Entry_Status Assessment & Clearance RT_Status_OK Display NBCS NBCS RT_Data_Record *_RT_Status RTStatus_OK Write NBCS_Assessment_Data *_RT_Status IRTS RTS C RTS creates a RT record, inclusive of biographic and biometric data gathered earlier in the process Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks RTS RT_Data_Record Write RT_Data_Record RTS NBCS_Assessment_Data *_RT_Status NBCS *_Temporary_Data Delete If RT holds a valid entry visa, the following event applies. D Border/Enrolment Officer additionally gathers information from the visa sticker and inserts it in the RTS Border/Enrolment Officer additionally interrogates VIS to validate the traveller s identity and visa to help assess eligibility to entry Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks TCN Visa Visa Reader Visa_Data Scan Visa_Data INBCS NBCS VIS IVIS Visa_Data Check Visa Validity Visa_Validity_OK INBCS NBCS In the case RT is not granted RT status, the following event applies. E Border/Enrolment Officer enters refusal of RT status in the RTS Source Interface Input Data Process Output Data Interface Storage Hyperlinks Refuse_Enrolment Write Interactive RTS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 32/137

33 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 4.6 Data Dictionary Data Item Description Format *_Entry_Status *_Exit_Status *_RT_Status *_Temporary_Data BCP All flags associated to an Entry event All flags associated to an Exit event All flags associated to an RT event All temporary data used by systems Border Crossing (Control) Point data record Array Array Array Data set Data field Date&Time_Stamp Date and Time of event Date_Time field Decision_on_Entry_OK Flag Digit Decision_on_Exit_OK Flag Digit EE_Data_Record Data associated to EE event Data set EE_Entry_Status Flag Digit EE_Exit_Status Flag Digit EGate_Instructions_to_Traveller Operating instructions for traveller Multimedia content Entry_Data_Record Data associated to Entry event Data set Entry_Status_OK Flag Digit Exit_Data_Record Data associated to Exit event Data set Exit_Status_OK Flag Digit Face Data associated to biometric capture event Data set Face_Image Result of face capture JPEG Fingerprint_Image Result of fingerprint capture WSQ Fingerprint_Quality_Status Flag Digit Fingerprint_Template Fingerprints MRZ Result from fingerprint capture, elaborated Data associated to biometric capture event Machinereadable zone of passport or ID Proprietary file Data set Data set MRZ_Validity_Status_OK Flag Digit NBCS_Assessment_Data Flag Digit NBCS_Entry_Status Flag Digit NBCS_Exit_Status Flag Digit Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 33/137

34 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Data Item Description Format Other_Sys_Entry_Status Flag Digit Other_Sys_Exit_Status Flag Digit Pax_Details Procedural_Q&A All biographical data describing traveller Questions to traveller, Answers given by traveller Data set Data set Refuse_Enrolment Flag Data set Refuse_Entry Flag Data set RT_Data_Record Data associated the traveller when registered Data set RT_Entry_Status Flag Digit RT_Status_OK Flag Digit RT_Sys_Entry_Status Flag Digit RTS_Instructions_to_Traveller Operating instructions for traveller Multimedia content SIS_Entry_Status Flag Digit SIS_Exit_Status Flag Digit SIS_RT_Status Flag Digit Travel_Credential_Details Visa_Data Data associated to traveller s credentials Data associated to traveller s visa Data set Data set Visa_Validity_OK Flag Digit Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 34/137

35 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 4.7 Table of Interfaces Interface Connects... With Camera Traveller RTS Fingerprint Scanner Traveller NBCS RTS IEES EES NBCS INBCS NBCS NBCS RTS SIS EES NPS VIS Other Systems Border Officer INPS NPS NBCS IRTS RTS Traveller Border/Enrolment Officer NBCS ISIS SIS II NBCS IVIS VIS NBCS Travel Credential Reader Travel Credential NBCS IOthers Other Systems NBCS Video Screen Traveller NBCS RTS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 35/137

36 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 5 ASSUMPTIONS FOR SYSTEM AND COST MODELS 5.1 General Assumptions In order to be able to properly size the infrastructure components and to be able to estimate their cost, the following assumptions hold. ID Assumption Remark 1 Every border crossing is assumed to pertain to a new traveller, so that a complete EES record is captured and stored. This allows for scaling in the future. 2 To estimate the network and system load, we assume that there are 20 business hours per day, 365 days per year. This caters for extra capacity at peak time and for system maintenance. 3 The amount of data handled by the EES is calculated based on the draft legal proposal (art. 11, 12, 13 and 14) Based on [R14], which specifies the record contents. The number of fingerprint searches 4 (identification mode) on all biometric data requires definition. We have assumed this parameter to be searches in year 1 up to searches at the end of the period of time considered. This parameter has a huge impact on the size of the AFIS and therefore on its costs, which are exponentially dependent on both the number of travellers and the data retention time. This is a sensitive parameter in the cost estimation model. The number of facial searches 5 (identification mode) on all biometric data requires definition. We have assumed this parameter to be searches in year 1 up to searches at the end of the period of time considered. This is an optional system feature. This parameter has a huge impact on the size on the Facial Matching Engine (FME) and therefore on its costs, which are exponentially dependent on both the number of travellers and the data retention time. This is a sensitive parameter in the cost estimation model. 6 The response time for biometric (fingerprint and/or face) verification shall be less than 3 seconds (similar to VIS) This parameter is used to calculate the number of verificationmatching CPUs as per Queuing Theory. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 36/137

37 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7 The response time for fingerprint searches (identification mode) shall be less than 15 minutes This parameter is used to calculate the number of identificationmatching CPUs as per Queuing Theory. The response time for facial searches 8 (identification mode) shall be less than 15 minutes. This is an optional system feature. This parameter is used to calculate the number of identificationmatching CPUs as per Queuing Theory. 5.2 Anticipated System Load Table 5 specifies the parameters for the system load and the data which is captured during the process. The anticipated Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is 10%. Actually, figures from the Commission highlight a value around 7%. In this case, we take a safe margin in assessing systems capacity and size. Table 5: EES Anticipated System load EES Parameter Border Crossings TCNVH Crossings (million) IN TCVNE Crossings (million) IN Total Crossings IN (million) TCVNH Crossings (million) OUT TCVNE Crossings (million) OUT Total Crossings (million) OUT 296 Total Crossings (million) Percentage of Photos captured at BCP Percentage of new travellers (%) 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% (%) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Table 6 shows the parameters that drive the costs for the RTS, when applicable. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 37/137

38 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Table 6: RTS Anticipated System load RTS Parameter Yearly Registrations (million) RT IN (million) RT OUT (million) Applications Consular Posts (million) Applications at external BCP (million) BCP Enrolments (%) 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% Percentage of revocations/extensions Average number or RT travels per yr (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% (n) The actual distribution of RTS enrolments over the Border Control Points (BCP) and Consular Posts of the Member States is an option in the applicable scenarios. 5.3 System Model Parameters and Assumptions Table 7: Business parameters Business Parameter Value Unit Description First year 2013 The first year in the analysis. By changing this, the project can be moved in time by full years EES Initial TCNVH IN 67 million The number of TCNVH travellers as specified by COM EES Initial TCNVH OUT 67 million The number of TCNVH travellers as specified by COM EES Initial TCNVE IN 100 million The number of TCNVE travellers as specified by COM EES Initial TCNVE OUT 100 million The number of TCNVE travellers as specified by COM Initial nr of RT registrations 5 million The initial number of RTS members in the first year as specified by COM RT enrolment growth rate 0% The rate at which the number of enrolees of RTS grows Yearly growth rate EES Passengers 10% CAGR The growth of the number of travellers that are handled by the EES per year Percentage FP Searches 0 1/million The number of TCN per million travellers that are biometrically (fingerprint) searched against the database Percentage Facial Searches 0 1/million The number of TCN per million travellers that are biometrically (face) searched against the database Initial annual FP Searches 0,50 million The fixed number of TCN that are biometrically (fingerprint) searched against the database in the first year Initial annual Facial Searches 0,50 million The fixed number of TCN that are biometrically (face) searched against the database in the first year Annual growth Fingerprint searches 10% The annual growth of the fixed number of fingerprint searches (only applicable in case of fixed number based calculation) 10% The annual growth of the fixed number of facial searches (only applicable in case of fixed number based calculation) Annual growth Facial searches Verification response time 1,00 seconds Biometric verification response time, specified by COM Biometric search response time Exact text search response time 2,00 hours Biometric search response time, specified by COM 3,00 seconds Exact text search response time, specified by COM Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 38/137

39 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Business Parameter Value Unit Description Number of overstayers 3,5 million Expected number of overstayers that may need investigations by means of biometric searches. Provided by COM Overstayers annual growth 5% Expected annual growth of the expected number of overstayers. Provided by COM Investigated overstayers 100% Percentage of overstayers that are actually biometrically searched in the database Business days per year 365 days Business hours per day 20 hours Facial Matching Yes Logical, when Yes, facial matching capabilities are included Fingerprint matching Yes Logical, when Yes, fingerprint matching capabilities are included TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes When Yes, 100Mbps TESTA connections are preferred way to interface with TESTA TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect No Yes When Yes, 1Gbps TESTA connections are preferred way to interface with TESTA, depends on the availability of 1Gbps lines When Yes, 100Mbps VIS/BMS connections are preferred way to interface with VIS/BMS. Only applicable in case of independent housing VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No When Yes, 1Gbps VIS/BMS connections are preferred way to interface with VIS/BMS. Only applicable in case of independent housing RT Renewal rate 50% The rate at which RTS members whose membership has expired, will reenrol after the expiry date (not implemented yet) RT Validity time 5 years The lifetime of the RT membership, after which the membership data is removed (not implemented yet) Number of Fingerprints for EES 4 The number of fingerprint images captured for EES. These are flat prints. Number of Fingerprints for RTS 10 The number of fingerprint images captured for RTS. These are flat prints. Average Fingerprint image size (WSQ) bytes The average size of fingerprint images compressed using WSQ with a ratio of 1:15. Actual size varies (1220k) Average Fingerprint template size bytes The size of a fingerprint template. This may differ from vendor to vendor, this size is sufficient for the major algorithms Average photo image size bytes The average size of fingerprint images compressed using JPEG or JPEG2000 Peak Load factor 4 The peak factor to determine the peak load Initial number of incidents 300 The number of incidents per month that require helpdesk per month Incident decrease percentage per year 50% The speed at which the number of incidents decreases per month Average helpdesk repair time 60 min The time required for the helpdesk to find a workaround for the incident Project Meeting Frequency 4 per year Table 8: Cost Parameters Cost Parameter Name Value Unit Description Average installation cost rate 10% Is included in the calculation of the costs associated to hardware Technical Lifecycle 10 year Intended to automatically calculate hardware replacements. This is not used yet Power costs per kwh 0,06 To calculate energy costs NetGross HW space factor 6 To calculate the required datacentre floor space based on calculated equipment space Office space per workstation 10 m2 to calculate the required amount of office space for staff Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 39/137

40 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Parameter Name Value Unit Description Number of servers per FTE 100 The span of control for system engineers Max. nr of technical support staff Number of databases per DBA Cost per year per m2 (datacentre), colocated Cost per year per m2 (datacentre), independently located Oneof costs per m2 for colocation Oneof costs per m2 for independentlocation 25 3 The span of control for DBA's 500 Estimation of the cost per sqr metre for datacentre space, when colocated with VIS 600 Estimation of the cost per sqr metre for datacentre space, when located independently from VIS 300 Estimation of costs required to acquire the required datacentre space when colocated with VIS (establishing the room, airco, power, network etc) 700 Estimation of costs required to acquire the required datacentre space when independently located from VIS (establishing the room, airco, power, network etc) 500 Estimation of the cost per sqr metre for office space at the Management Authority 900 Estimation of the oneoff cost per sqr metre to setup the office space at the Management Authority 8% The industry average standard for Hardware maintenance fees (replacement, repair) 20% The industry average standard for Software maintenance fees (replacement, repair) 74 Provided by COM Cost per year per m2 (office), MA Oneoff cost per year per m2 (office), MA Hardware Yearly maintenance costs Software Yearly Maintenance costs Hourly rate for Management Authority staff Average hourly rate for EU 26 Provided by COM 27 and Schengen associated country staff Working hours per day 7,5 Provided by COM Working days per month 20 Provided by COM Working days per year 220 Provided by COM Working hours per year 1650 Calculated from the above Span of control Team/leader 5 Determines the number of team Leaders Admin support 20% The percentage of admin support FTE related to the operational staff Contractor Average rate 85 The industry average standard for developer fees (average hourly rate) Yearly development effort 10% Effort to continue developments on the custom software (proactive maintenance, new/changing functionality, etc) Training percentage 10% The amount of training effort to be invested, related to the maintenance Price per Gbyte TESTA Estimate of the data transmission costs over TESTA. To be provided by COM Communication costs per month As per quote Orange via COM MS average technical space costs MS average oneoff space costs Average costs per Monthly progress meeting Average costs per Quarterly meeting 350 The average price per square meter per year in the Member States for technical space to accommodate data centres, border control gates and enrolment systems 500 Estimation of costs required to acquire the required space for the Member States (establishing the room, airco, power, network etc). This includes space for data centres, border control gates and enrolment systems Operational Cost parameters Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 40/137

41 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Parameter Name Value Unit Description 24*7 Helpdesk support factor 4 The factor used to calculate the required FTE for the helpdesk relative to the size of the helpdesk FTEs for office hours MA Development effort 11% The percentage f the time spent by the MA, relative to the contractor effort MS Development effort 12% The percentage f the time spent by the MA, relative to the contractor effort Automated Border Control officers per gate 2,73 officers per million travellers per year records (from feasibility study) Semi Automated BC officers 5 Between manual and automated Manual BC officers per 7,68 from feasibility study, pg 208 million travellers per gate BC Officer control 10 BC Officer span of control for automated gates automated BC Officer control semiautomated 3 BC Officer span of control for semiautomated gates BC Officer control Manual 1 BC Officer span of control for manual gates Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 41/137

42 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 6 SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE Two main architectural alternatives are considered in the following namely, a centralised systems design where all peripheral connections rely on a common hub and a decentralised system where a network of national subsystems is built to cooperate in a peertopeer, manytomany mode. Each solution may present advantages and shortcomings, depending upon the technical, cost and political (e.g., ownership) choices. In this chapter we present these alternatives from a technical viewpoint only, while the following chapter will provide insight on the various cost scenarios associated to these architectures. 6.1 Centralised System Architecture The highlevel system architecture for the Centralised solution is presented in Figure 7. This shows all components of the solution, regardless of the various scenarios. The goal of the picture is to define and identify all subsystems that take part in the solution. This picture is fully based on [R6] (CAB38FR004) and [R1] ( _EES_RT_IA_Cost_ToR_lang.doc). Figure 7: Centralised System Architecture Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 42/137

43 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Only the parts marked in red on the figure below fall within the scope of this cost analysis; namely: EntryExit System Central Unit (EESCU) Registered Traveller System Central Unit (RTSCU) BMS Central Unit Expansion EntryExit System Backup Central Unit (EESBCU) Registered Traveller System Backup Central Unit (RTSBCU) BMS Backup Central Unit Expansion RTS Enrolment Consular Post RTS Enrolment Border Control Point (BCP) Manual/Assisted Border Control System (semi)automated Border Control System The blue parts highlight relevant existing central systems that need to be integrated with the EES and RTS, depending on the option. These are: Visa Information System Central Unit (VISCU) Biometric Matching System Central Unit (BMSCU) Visa Information System Backup Central Unit (VISBCU) Biometric Matching System Backup Central Unit (BMSBCU) The grey components represent national (Member State) components that must be integrated with the EES and RTS in order to deploy the functionality. For most Member States, these are: National Border Control System (NBCS) National Information Systems (NIS) National Visa Information System (NVIS) Albeit complete, this view is not sufficient to provide an estimate of infrastructure costs. For this reason a highlevel technical design was developed, enabling the identification of all required infrastructure components and their sizing, thus allowing an estimate of the associated costs. The technical architecture of the Centralised system covers also national components that are to be implemented in the Member States, besides the strictly central system. These are described in sections and respectively Member State Technical Infrastructure Figure 8 shows the Member State technical architecture for the Centralised solution, identifying by N1 means of circular marks the elements whose costs need being estimated. The national technical architecture will need to be implemented in all Member States, the major differences among Member States from the perspective of this study being represented by the size of the country as relates to number of end users and connections required the number of border crossing points The number of travellers. Infrastructure costs per Member State are assumed to be proportional to the actual number of Border Crossing Points (BCP) and Consular Posts (CP). For labourrelated cost estimates, average hourly rates were used, as provided by COM. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 43/137

44 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Systems that fall within the scope of this study show a tag associated with them, while their base colour is red (or dark grey when printed in black/white). The tagged systems represent the building blocks used to estimate system costs, and are briefly described in Table 9 below. Figure 8: Member State Technical Architecture Table 9: Member State Technical Architecture Building Blocks 10 ID Building Block name Description Remarks N1 National RTS The local system for managing the RTS applications and tokens at national level. N2 National EES The local system that manages entry/exit records for the Member State. N3 Consular Post RTS Enrolment System The enrolment system to capture RT applicant details at one Member State s consular posts N4 NI.RTS The National Interface to Basically contains a copy of the lists of existing enrolees to avoid duplicate tokens being issued It should be possible to reuse enrolment equipment already in use for Visa and epassports 10 All possible elements are included in the picture, irrelevant of applicable options. An actual implementation scenario might not include some components, e.g., printers for token production. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 44/137

45 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems the Central RTS. N5 NI.EES The National Interface to the Central EES. N6 N7 N8 BCP RTS Enrolment system Automated Border Control System Semimanual Border Control System The enrolment system for registration of RTS member at the Border Control Points Automated Border Control system that supports RTS tokens and epassports. The process is automated and assumes supervision of the Border Control Authorities, who can intervene when deemed necessary. EES records are automatically generated. Semimanual Border Control system that supports RTS tokens and epassports, where the ID verification based on RTS tokens and epassports is automated and the Border Control Authority manually controls the process. EES records are automatically generated. N9 Manual/Assisted Manual Border Control system that supports RTS tokens and epassports, where the ID verification based on RTS tokens and epassports is performed manually and the Border Control Authority manually controls the process. EES records are manually entered into the system N10 National EESRTS Database Server National Database Server that manages a copy of the relevant data of the central EES and RTS systems N11 National Storage The actual storage device that physically stores the data. It should be possible to reuse enrolment equipment already in use for Visa and the same enrolment system as in N3. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 45/137

46 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Central Technical Infrastructure Figure 9 depicts the technical architecture for the Central Unit (CU) of the EES and RTS systems for the Centralised solution, identifying by means of circular designators C1 the elements for which costs need to be estimated. The architecture assumes the existence of a Central National Interface (CNI) and a Central System (CS). A layered network architecture is considered in order to provide the required levels of security, commanding the deployment of firewalls. The CU has a backup facility (Backup Central Unit, BCU) that makes the overall system redundant for disaster recovery purposes. This BCU is essentially a copy of the CU, and it is therefore not explicitly shown. Note that CUBCU interconnect is necessary to allow for data replication between the CU and BCU and to enable the switchover from CU to BCU and switchback from BCU to CU when needed. The systems that are in the scope of this study have a tag associated with them. They are grouped together in architectural entities indicated by the yellow boxes: Central National Interface (CNI) Central System (CS) Biometric Matcher RTS Token Management System. When possible, components are put together to form a composite building block featuring more than one function. These composite building blocks are marked by means of a grey rectangle. Systems thus tagged constitute the building blocks used for cost estimate purposes and briefly described in Table 4 below. Please note that not all elements are necessarily applied, as their use depends on the choices made at configuration level. They are reported here for the sake of completeness. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 46/137

47 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Figure 9: Central Technical Architecture Table 10: Central Infrastructure Building Blocks ID Building Block Description Remarks C1 TESTA Interface This is the physical interface to the TESTA network, consisting of firewall and WAN access routers. C2 Web Server These web servers convey EES and RTS services to the Member States. C3 RTS Token Directory This is the server that provides token revocation lists to Member States. The RTS Token Directory is provisioned by the RTS Token Management System. It is assumed that this directory is copied daily by Member States so that they can perform revocation checks independently from the Central RTS system. C4 CU/BCU Cluster The highspeed connection Failover and failback Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 47/137

48 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems C5 Interconnect Supporting Servers between the CU and BCU that is sized to support replication of the EES and RTS databases and provides the cluster interconnect. These are the supporting servers required to run the CU/BCU and being able to maintain them. They consist of Message, DNS, DHCP, Management, Backup, and directory servers. C6 Database Server This database server will run the RDBMS that will support the databases for the EES, RTS and biometric systems, if applicable. Data is physically stored in the appropriate SAN components. C7 Logging Server The logging server takes care of logging all transactions for system auditing. C8 C9 C10 RTS Application Server EES Application Server Biometric Storage This is the server that runs the RTS Central Application. This is the server that runs the EES Central Application. This is the SAN server that stores all biometric data for EES and RTS if applicable. This storage is kept separate from the other data to optimise protection of personal data. C11 RTS Storage This is the SAN server that physically stores the RTS database. C12 EES Storage This is the SAN server that physically stores the EES database. C13 Backup & Archive This Backup & Archive is the facility that takes care of backing up and archiving the EES and RTS data according to the policies. must be fast. Sizing depends on data size and retention time Independent from the Database Server to limit the impact on the EES and RTS performance. Options: EES only EES / RTS EES only, TCNVH in VIS EES / RTS, TCNVH in VIS Retention time (1 yr, 5 yr, variable) Member information Options: Tokenbased Tokenless Retention time (1 yr, 5 yr, variable) Backup facility Variants: EES only EES/RTS, with Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 48/137

49 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems C14 FP Matcher The fingerprint matcher facility that can do 1:n fingerprint identifications searches and 1:1 verification comparisons to support EES and RTS functionality. This building block can be regarded as either a standalone system, or as an expansion of the BMS. C15 Facial Matcher The facial matcher facility that can do facial 1:n identification searches and 1:1 verification comparisons to support EES and RTS functionality. This building block can be regarded as either a standalone system, or as an expansion to the BMS. C16 C17 RTS Token Management System VIS/BMS Interconnect The RTS token management system manages the lifecycle of RTS tokens or virtual tokens. The VIS/BMS interconnect provides the network connection over the internal LAN to the VIS and BMS systems. biometrics EES/RTS, no biometrics Includes 1:1 and 1:n matching. Options: EES FP Matcher BMS FP Matcher Expansion RTS FP Matcher Based on templates only Based on images (optional) Optional, includes both 1:1 matching 1:n matching Variants: Token based Tokenless 6.2 Distributed System Architecture Essentially the distributed architecture means that when a Member State looks for information, they would have to send a request to all other Member States. Consequently, Member States also receive requests every time a MS searches information on a TCN crossing external borders. This is why it can also be referred to as collaboration architecture, represented graphically Figure 10 below. For the Data Storage, it is assumed that no tape backup devices will be used, but instead modern archiving technology. The latter is based on high available disk arrays, where data will be archived to cheaper, lower speed disks, and it then becomes nearline storage. The advantage is that the data will be always online, no hassle with tapes. The storage systems will need to be configured properly to assure that the data is secure. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 49/137

50 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Figure 10: Collaboration architecture The highlevel system architecture for the Centralised solution is presented in Figure 11. This shows all components of the solution, regardless of the various scenarios. Internal LAN Internal LAN Figure 11: Base distributed system architecture Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 50/137

51 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Figure 12: Central RTS system in distributed architecture presents the central part in the EESRTS distributed architecture: Figure 12: Central RTS system in distributed architecture The architecture for the central system in the distributed architecture is basically the same as for the central architecture, the difference is that is does not provide EES systems and storage. This means that the size is smaller and the costs will be lower. Table 11: Central System Building Blocks ID Building Block Description Remarks C1 TESTA Interface This is the physical interface to the TESTA network, consisting of firewall and WAN access routers. C2 Web Server These web servers convey RTS services to the Member States. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 51/137

52 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems C3 C4 C5 RTS Token Directory CU/BCU Cluster Interconnect Supporting Servers This is the server that provides token revocation lists to Member States. The RTS Token Directory is provisioned by the RTS Token Management System. The highspeed connection between the CU and BCU that is sized to support replication of the RTS databases and provides the cluster interconnect. These are the supporting servers required to run the CU/BCU and being able to maintain them. They consist of Message, DNS, DHCP, Management, Backup, and directory servers. C6 Database Server This database server will run the RDBMS that will support the databases for the RTS and biometric systems, if applicable. Data is physically stored in the appropriate SAN components. C7 Logging Server The logging server takes care of logging all transactions for system auditing. C8 C10 RTS Application Server Biometric Storage This is the server that runs the RTS Central Application. This is the SAN server that stores all biometric data for RTS if applicable. This storage is kept separate from the other data to optimise protection of personal data. C11 RTS Storage This is the SAN server that physically stores the RTS database. C13 Backup & Archive This Backup & Archive is the facility that takes care of backing up and archiving the RTS data according to the policies. It is assumed that this directory is copied daily by Member States so that they can perform revocation checks independently from the Central RTS system. Failover and failback must be fast. Sizing depends on data size and retention time Independent from the Database Server to limit the impact on the RTS performance. Options: RTS Retention time (1 yr, 5 yr, variable) Member information Options: Tokenbased Tokenless Retention time (1 yr, 5 yr, variable) Backup facility Variants: Tokenless RTS Tokenbased RTS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 52/137

53 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems C14 FP Matcher The fingerprint matcher facility that can do 1:n fingerprint identifications searches and 1:1 verification comparisons to support RTS functionality. This building block can be regarded as either a standalone system, or as an expansion of the BMS. C15 Facial Matcher The facial matcher facility that can do facial 1:n identification searches and 1:1 verification comparisons to support RTS functionality. This building block can be regarded as either a standalone system, or as an expansion to the BMS. C16 C17 RTS Token Management System VIS/BMS Interconnect The RTS token management system manages the lifecycle of RTS tokens or virtual tokens. The VIS/BMS interconnect provides the network connection over the internal LAN to the VIS and BMS systems. Includes 1:1 and 1:n matching. Options: BMS FP Matcher Expansion RTS FP Matcher Based on templates only Optional, includes both 1:1 matching 1:n matching Variants: Token based Tokenless Member State Distributed Technical Architecture The figure below presents the Member State distributed architecture for the distributed architecture solution. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 53/137

54 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Figure 13: Member State distributed architecture Distributed architecture building blocks are listed in the table below: Table 12: Distributed architecture building blocks ID Building Block Description Remarks N1 National RTS The local system for managing the RTS applications and tokens at national level N2 National EES The local system that manages entry/exit records for the Member State. N3 Consular post RTS Enrolment system The enrolment system to capture RT applicant details at one Member State s consular posts N4 NI.RTS The National Interface to the Central RTS. N5 NI.EES The National Interface to the EES systems of other Member States, This forms the secure collaboration and communication infrastructure. N6 BCP RTS Enrolment system The enrolment system for registration of RTS member at the Border Control Points Basically contains a copy of the lists of existing enrolees to avoid duplicate tokens being issued It provides the same functionality as the Central EES, but is smaller in size, while it is more complex on the other side, as it interfaces with all other MS National EESs It should be possible to reuse enrolment equipment already in use for Visa and epassports This interface relies on the capacity and security of the (TESTA) network. It should be possible to reuse enrolment equipment already in use for Visa Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 54/137

55 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems N7 N8 N9 Automated Border Control system Semimanual Border Control system Manual/ Assisted Border control system Automated Border Control system that supports RTS tokens and epassports. The process is automated and assumes supervision of the Border Control Authorities, who can intervene when deemed necessary. EES records are automatically generated. Semimanual Border Control system that supports RTS tokens and epassports, where the ID verification based on RTS tokens and epassports is automated and the Border Control Authority manually controls the process. EES records are automatically generated. Manual Border Control system that supports RTS tokens and epassports, where the ID verification based on RTS tokens and epassports is performed manually and the Border Control Authority manually controls the process. EES records are manually entered into the system N10 Database server This database server will run the RDBMS that will support the databases for the EES, RTS and biometric systems, if applicable. Data is physically stored in the appropriate SAN components. N11 EES/RTS Storage The physical data storage, which holds all data. N12 Testa interface This is the physical interface to the TESTA network, consisting of firewall and WAN access routers. N13 National EES/RTS (Face matcher) The facial matcher facility that can do facial 1:n identification searches and 1:1 verification comparisons to support EES and RTS functionality. Sizing depends on the number of TCN travellers that travel via a specific country, the data size and the retention time This storage includes Backup and Archiving functionality. Optional, includes both 1:1 matching 1:n matching Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 55/137

56 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems N14 National EES/RTS AFIS The fingerprint matcher facility that can do 1:n fingerprint identifications searches and 1:1 verification comparisons to support EES and RTS functionality. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 56/137

57 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7 COST ANALYSIS This section provides the cost estimates for the different options that are looked at in the current study (Table 3). Due to the fact that the variables for each scenario are numerous (retention time, use of biometrics, architecture, etc), after agreement with the Commission, this section only presents the cost estimates for the following possible options: o Separate architecture colocated with VIS, but not connected to VIS o Architecture connected to VIS. Note that the above cost estimations are presented for the option of 5 year retention time. Using the model that has been developed in the framework of the current study it is possible to estimate the costs of the scenarios for all other different parameters that are possible. The following sections therefore include the 21 different costing scenarios (see Table 3). Each section is structured in the same way in order to enable easier comparison between the costs of the different scenarios and parameters. The structure used is the following: Listing of scenario parameters Cost estimates for: o Independent from VIS o With connection to VIS 7.1 How to use the Excel cost model The tables in the report are generated using a cost calculation model based on Excel (2003) Input The model takes the input parameters from the file Parameters.xls and configures the Building Blocks that are required to implement the required functionality. This configuration is done in two different Excel workbooks: Scenario EES Distributed Architecure.xls for the solution based on the distributed architecture and Scenario EES Central Architecure.xls. These workbooks create the actual Bill Of Material (BOM) for the scenario in the sheets BOM 1yr, BOM 5yr and BOM var, which are specific for the different retention times. In these sheets, the costs are assigned three attributes: Phase, Cost Category and Allocation. The values of these attributes are described in section Presentation These attributes are used to present the costs in the EU Cost model, which was specified by COM. If required, the detailed cost items in the BOM sheets are accessible and can be studied in detail, the BOM provides the lowest level of cost items calculated by the cost model. It is possible to create pivot tables using this information to create the required view. As the model calculates the costs per calendar year, it is possible to retrieve information which is not shown on the EU Cost Model. The exhaustive list of the building blocks / cost line items used in the BOM is provided in Annex I Cost Model Building Blocks. In those cases that the BOM does not provide sufficient information, this can be found in the underlying worksheets. Costs associated with hardware, software and infrastructure can be found in: Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 57/137

58 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Hardware Costs 1yr 11 specifies the hardware and network components Hardware Costs 5yr 12 Hardware Costs var 13 Servers 1yr 11 specifies the number of servers, used to calculate license, such as OS, DB, AFIS etc Servers 5yr 12 Servers var 13 Power 1yr 11 specifies the power consumption per year Power 5yr 12 Power 5yr 13 Space 1yr 11 specifies the net space required in the data centre Space 5yr 12 Space var 13 Software Costs 1yr 11 specifies the software costs (COTS) per year Software Costs 5yr 12 Software Costs variable 13 These sheets contain the detailed information per building block and also aggregations for the Management Authority and the Member States. Details about development costs and associated mantime can be found in the sheet: Development Costs specifies the development effort for realising the solution; Contractor development for MA, Management Authority development, Contractor development, for MS Member State development, This includes training, testing and project management. In the Development Cost sheet all estimated administrative efforts are specified per year and it will show the amount of time and the associated costs. These costs of these detailed line items are visible in the BOM. The mantime input is provided by CostXpert. In these estimates, project management meetings for the development of the solution are included. However, the quarterly meetings and monthly meetings with the Member States and the Management Authority are added separately under the Administrative costs The costs of all development costs items are visible in the BOM. Details about the Administrative Costs are to be found in the sheet: o Admin Costs specifies the admin mantime effort, required office space (m2), meetings, infra costs, power, COTS HW/SW maintenance, Border Control Staffing, communication costs In this sheet all estimated administrative efforts are specified per year and it will show the amount of time and the associated costs. These costs of these detailed line items are visible in the BOM. 11 Denotes 1 year data retention time 12 Denotes 5 year data retention time 13 Denotes variable data retention time (5 year for personal data, 1 year for entryexit data) Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 58/137

59 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Sizing The actual required sizing of the solution is calculated by the sizing workbooks Scenario Distributed Sizing.xlsm and Scenario Sizing.xlsm for the Distributed and Centralised architecture respectively. These files take as input the configuration specific data provided by the Scenario worksheets, and calculate the required capacity of the various building blocks. This is based on the Queuing Theory, which allows us to estimate the number of servers and CPUs. Next to that the specification of the data and the system load is used, not only for the CPU sizing, but also for the network bandwidth Estimating costs using the Model The Building Block files that specify the functionality, capacity, costs, power consumption, necessary space and manpower are common for both the Distributed and Central architectures and are located in a subdirectory of the Central Architecture. The calculation of manpower effort is kept with the scenario worksheets, as explained above, since it contains the result of a calculation done using CostXpert. The output is a file with the name CX Labor xxx.xls, where xxx denotes the scenario name. This sheet provides both the required development effort for the scenario and the estimated project schedule in months. The CostXpert input file contains all the parameters used to create the project estimation, and it also contains the project schedule and the estimated effort, specified per project role. The costs in CostXpert are based on US$, and that can not be changed, the tool only supports US$. However, the pricing information is not used in the Cost Model, only the mantime effort is used and the rates as provided by COM are applied. The labour Costs in CostXpert are irrelevant. The Cost model implements an estimation of the number of incidents after delivery of the solution, similar to CostXpert. Based on this input, it is possible to estimate the 1 st and 2 nd line support. The directory also contains a file provided by COM, which specifies the number of entries and exits of travellers for the various countries in the EU. This information is used to calculate the participation of the individual Member States, and is important for the sizing of the national systems in both the Centralised and Distributed architectures. To estimate the costs for a certain scenario, it is required to create a subdirectory within the structure and to copy the abovementioned files to a subdirectory within the structure (or use an existing one) to open all the files simultaneously. The following actions should then be performed: 1) The proper parameters should be entered in the Parameters.xls workbook, including the name of the scenario (sheets Business Parameters and Cost Parameters ); 2) The worksheet Scenario (Distributed) Sizing.xls should be used to calculate the biometric sizing by clicking the Calculate! button at the top of the sheet EES AFIS Sizing or EES Face Match Sizing ; 3) Then, the configurator file Scenario EES Distributed/Central Architecure.xls should be used in order to check that the output in the EU Cost Model represents the input. Especially the title should be the same as the title in the Paramaters.xls file. Open this file and calculate the contents of the EU Cost Model by clicking the Calculate button at the top of the sheet EU Cost Model ; 4) Finally, the output generator sheet, called XXX Document Output.xls needs to be updated. These files are actually used to provide the information that is used in this document. 5) It is recommended simultaneously to open the following files for each scenario (subdirectory), make the changes as described above and save and close all files when done; Parameters.xls, Scenario (Distributed) Sizing.xls, Scenario EES Distributed/Central Architecure.xls and XXX Document Output.xls. The other available files ( CX Labor.xls and sammanstallning lander xls ) can also be opened, but these typically do not change and thus this will have no effect. Note that it is not possible to open files from different directories, as this will create incorrect links between the various workbooks and the result will not be correct. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 59/137

60 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.2 Cost analysis presentation It is important at this point to briefly describe the way the cost estimates are presented in the following sections. The costs are displayed in the form of tables displayed as shown in the table below: Scenario Code VIS colocation / connection 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number Incurring of actions costs in 2020 in 2014 Total one time costs No Type of Description Obligatio of required Target Groups EU MS n action Cost elements The cost elements estimated and displayed on the cost tables are listed below: The number (No) is a unique identifier for the element / required action whose cost is being estimated. This is the same across all scenarios. Description of the Type of Obligation and its cost impact. More specifically, this describes what obligations are mentioned in a legal proposal and their costs, such as administration costs and operating the system, as well as monitoring. The description of the required action includes the list of elements for which costs are being estimated in the tables. It concerns costs for the Management Authority, costs for the Member States and costs for the Border Check Points, as shown the table below. Finally, target groups are other stakeholders for which the costs and required actions are relevant, such as for example banks. However, other target groups are not involved at this stage of the costing exercise. Border Control Costs In addition, to the above, the Cost table contains the costs for the various border check point (BCP) systems; automated, semimanual and manual. Only that cost of the variant that is actually selected is shown. These costs contain the hardware/software required to implement physical BCP systems in all Member States. The quantity is based on the number of passengers and the number of BCP in the various countries. The number is calculated based on Queuing Theory. The costs for the Border Control Staff is also estimated, based on the number of passengers crossing the border, applying the parameters provided by COM. In the background, the costs for all types of BCP systems and associated staff is calculated based on the same information and parameters,, in order to assess the impact of implementing one or the other, comparing it with manual BCP systems. These costs are not shown, as they are no part of the estimate. However, the details can be found in the underlying sheets. The above listed cost elements are shown in detail in the table below: Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 60/137

61 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Table 13: Cost elements No Type of Obligation Description of required action Target Groups 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 5 Management Authority software 6 Management Authority Admin 7 Management Authority Office Space 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 9 Subtotal MA 10 Member States 11 Member States Hardware 12 Member States Other (training, meetings) 13 Member States Infrastructure 14 Member States software 15 Member States Admin 16 Member States Office Space 17 Member States Contractor Development 18 Subtotal MS Member States Border Check Points 21 Automated Border Check Points 21 SemiAutomated Border Check Points 22 Manual Border Check Points 23 Border Control Staff Automated Check Points 23 Border Control Staff SemiAutomated Check Points 24 Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 22 Subtotal Border Check Points The cost elements listed in the above table are calculated in an Excel sheet. The following attributes have been used in order to group the cost elements and present the data consistently: Project phase to which the cost parameters are relevant (e.g. DEV, OPE etc) Operational phase identifier (e.g. hardware, software etc) Allocation for Management Authority or Member States. Table 14: Cost parameters Cost Parameter Name Value Unit Description Development Cost Identifier DEV Value used to identify costs during development phase Operation Cost Identifier OPE Value used to identify Operational costs during operational phase Admin Cost Identifier ADM Value used to identify Administrative costs Hardware Cost HW Value used to identify Hardware costs Software Cost SW Value used to identify Software costs Infra Cost Identifier INF Value used to identify Infrastructure costs Contractor Cost Identifier CONTR Value used to identify Contractor costs (if applicable) Office Cost Identifier OFFICE Value used to reserved to identify Office Space costs Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 61/137

62 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Parameter Name Value Unit Description Border Check Systems identifier ABORDER Value used to reserved to identify Automated Border Control costs Border Check Systems identifier SBORDER Value used to identify Semi Automated Border Control costs (if applicable) Border Check Systems identifier MBORDER Value used to identify Semi Manual Border Control costs (if applicable) Border Check Systems identifier ENROL Value used to identify Semi Manual Border Control costs (if applicable) Border Officers Identifier BOFFICERA Value used to identify Semi Manual Border Control costs (if applicable) Border Officers Identifier BOFFICERS Value used to identify Semi Manual Border Control costs (if applicable) Border Officers Identifier OTH Value used to identify Semi Manual Border Control costs (if applicable) Border Officers Identifier BOFFICER M Value used to identify Semi Manual Border Control costs (if applicable) Management Authority MA Value used to identify the Management Authority Member States MS Value used to identify Member States Costs The following figure presents the different costs / other values that are being estimated for each of the elements described above. Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) (per action or equip) in 2014 (per action or equip) in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs Tariff ( per hour) and time per hour are used in order to calculate manpower costs. For example, the costs of trainings and meetings in Member States and Management Authority, tariff ( per hour) and time per hour are calculated. Price per action or equipment in 2014 estimates the annual cost of all cost elements in Similarly, the price per action or equipment in 2020 provides the estimated annual cost for The cost estimates for the two years enables the reader to understand how the cost develops within the period between 2014 and The following 3 values are multipliers taken into account for the estimation of the total incurring costs. o Frequency per year presents the value of how the costs develop. o Number of entities is relevant for infrastructure, hardware and software costs. For example, the number of entities for the development costs is 2 due to the fact that there is a development for CU and BCU. Note that Member States are considered as a whole. This is why the number of entities is 1 and not 27. o Total number of actions is always 1 as the Cost Model assumes that the costs instance occur only once during the project. Total incurring costs in 2014 presents the calculated price based on: Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 62/137

63 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems o the price per action or equipment by 2014 multiplied by: the number of entities, the total number of actions and The frequency per year. Total incurring costs in 2020 presents the calculated price based on o the price per action or equipment by 2020 multiplied by: the number of entities, the total number of actions and The frequency per year. Total one time costs presents the costs for the Management Structure, one time costs for hardware and other costs. In addition to the costs presented above, the tables also include some additional information specific to the scenario, the cost of which is displayed. More specifically, the business parameters that define the scenario are presented, i.e.: Scenario RTS EES EES/RTS built together Scenario options Architecture vs. VIS RTS Enrolment RTS Border Check Mode Housing Biosearches based on Finally, a number of assumptions that are relevant for the specific scenario investigated are also displayed in the costs tables, such as the impact of deploying (semi)automated border check systems General Remarks In the various cost sheets, the following should be noted: 1. Meeting Costs: As part of the Management Authority Admin costs, it is assumed that there are monthly progress meetings, to update everybody involved. The costs for these meetings are assumed to be 30,000. These meetings occur 10 times per annum (not during holiday and Christmas season). The costs for the Quarterly Meetings with the Member States are assumed to be 50,000. These Quarterly meetings occur 4 times per annum. These costs include rental of space and travel for the Management Authority, it is assumed that the Member State Delegates cover their own costs. 2. In most scenarios, there is quite a large sum for Administrative Costs for the Member States. These costs are high, as they are the sum of the Admin Costs for all Member States. The admin costs comprise the following items, as presented in the following example: Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 63/137

64 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Table 15: Example of MS Administrative Costs Description Phase Category Allocated MS Power Costs per year OPE ADM MS 1,632,138 1,787,193 1,969,282 2,145,452 2,145,452 2,612,664 2,851,993 3,155,732 MS Technical system managers OPE ADM MS 20,571,408 20,571,408 20,571,408 20,571,408 20,888,868 20,888,868 20,888,868 20,888,868 MS DBA OPE ADM MS 3,174,600 3,174,600 3,174,600 3,174,600 3,174,600 3,174,600 3,174,600 3,174,600 MS Admin support OPE ADM MS 4,749,690 4,749,690 4,749,690 4,749,690 4,810,740 4,810,740 4,810,740 4,810,740 MS Team leader/planner OPE ADM MS 5,699,140 5,699,140 5,699,140 5,699,140 5,774,842 5,774,842 5,774,842 5,774,842 MS helpdesk & Incident Management OPE ADM MS 6,349,200 3,174,600 1,587, , , ,413 99,206 99,206 MS Helpdesk OPE ADM MS 260, ,000 65,000 35,000 20,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 MS Technical support OPE ADM MS 33,606,720 14,002,800 14,002,800 14,002,800 14,188,800 14,188,800 14,188,800 14,188,800 MS Hardware Maintenance, 1yr retention OPE ADM MS 61,977,936 68,080,592 73,963,584 81,954,240 89,711,328 97,519,024 97,519,024 MS COTS Software Maintenance, 1yr retention OPE ADM MS 8,750,460 9,033,700 9,288,900 9,393,380 9,593,580 9,672,180 9,672,180 MS EES Development DEV ADM MS 3,432,363 MS EES Development OPE ADM MS 343, , , , , ,236 MS RTS Development DEV ADM MS MS RTS Development OPE ADM MS MS EES/RTS Development DEV ADM MS MS EES/RTS Development OPE ADM MS MS Testing DEV ADM MS 7,694,661 MS Testing OPE ADM MS 769, , , , , ,466 This example is extracted from the worksheet BOM 1yr in the workbook Scenario EES Central Architecture.xls, where only the Administrative costs for the Member States are selected. As shown, many cost types are included, and these costs are calculated per calendar year. In this way, it is possible to view the details associated for each cost type. The large number of Member States causes these costs to be so high. It must be noted though, that the Member State costs are calculated for the individual Member States when possible based on the relative portion of passengers being managed by those states. After that, the costs are aggregated. However, this mechanism does not allow to accurately assign the costs per individual Member State. This mechanism only makes sure that the figures are realistic for the total number of travellers. 7.3 Centralised System Architecture 7.4 A1C Centralised EntryExit System, no biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario A1C RTS EES No Yes Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES No Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS No Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching No TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred No TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 64/137

65 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect No VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect Yes Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 65/137

66 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) A1C Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 14, ,000 3,322,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 13, , , ,003,256 1,003,256 1,032,565 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 825, , ,650,000 1,870,000 10,450,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 14, , , , ,871 1,046,811 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 27, , , , ,744 2,367, Subtotal MA 3,540,719 3,680,843 6,202,947 6,467,072 21,028, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 173, , , ,948 1,739, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,469, ,006, ,469, ,006,693 72,279, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 515, , , ,479 5,154, Subtotal MS 129,063, ,626, ,063, ,626, ,216, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 21,028, ,800,226 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES None EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 66/137

67 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection A1C Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 14, ,000 2,764,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,004,452 1,004,452 1,044,522 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 935, ,870,000 3,168,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 36, , , , ,968 2,694,657 7 Management Authority Office Space (9,000) (9,000) 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 38, , , , ,669 3,236, Subtotal MA 2,710,409 3,737,663 4,548,235 6,549,689 15,708, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 12, ,000 12,000 23,070, Member States Other (training, meetings) 157, , , ,075 1,570, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 715, , , ,000 41,159, Member States Admin 110,289, ,867, ,289, ,867,150 71,826, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 780, , , ,762 7,807, Subtotal MS 125,969, ,841, ,969, ,841, ,508, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 15,708, ,092,492 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES No Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 67/137

68 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.5 A1D Distributed EntryExit System, no biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario A1D RTS EES No Yes (no biometrics) Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES No Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS No Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching No TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 68/137

69 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIScolocation (no VIS connection) A1D Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 23,800 42, ,600 84, ,400 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,783 1,000,000 1,087,828 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,310,400 1,310, ,620,800 2,620,800 2,620,800 5 Management Authority software 440, ,000 1,164,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 16, , , , ,270 1,219,174 7 Management Authority Office Space ,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 75, , ,506 6,385, Subtotal MA 2,916,709 2,687,070 4,755,301 4,979,870 13,320, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 81, ,000 30,213, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,590 1,548, ,548,535 15,485, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software ,800, Member States Admin 26 2,741, ,969, ,254, ,969, ,254,925 71,268, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,002, ,002,800 14,002,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development ,118 1,386, ,386,504 13,865, Subtotal MS 125,907, ,338, ,907, ,338, ,488, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 13,320, ,237,068 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES No Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 69/137

70 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection A1D Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 23,800 42, ,600 84, ,400 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,783 1,000,000 1,087,828 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,310,400 1,310, ,620,800 2,620,800 2,620,800 5 Management Authority software 440, ,000 1,164,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 15, , , , ,384 1,174,966 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 75, , ,506 6,385, Subtotal MA 2,885,410 2,640,184 4,724,002 4,932,984 13,276, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 81, ,000 30,213, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,590 1,548, ,548,535 15,485, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software ,800, Member States Admin 26 2,741, ,969, ,254, ,969, ,254,925 71,268, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,002, ,002,800 14,002,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development ,118 1,386, ,386,504 13,865, Subtotal MS 125,907, ,338, ,907, ,338, ,488, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 13,276, ,237,068 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES No Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 70/137

71 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.6 A2C Centralised EntryExit System, with biometrics This section includes the cost estimations for the option whereby there is a centralised EntryExit system and database with biometrics for verification of TCN crossing the EU borders. In this scenario, the Registered Traveller System is not taken into account Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario A2C RTS EES No With biometrics Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS No Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 71/137

72 7.6.2 Cost Summary Tables Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS colocation (no VIS connection) A2C Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215,000 14, ,000 28,000 3,748,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,007,373 1,007,373 1,073,732 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (4,400,000) 935, (8,800,000) 1,870,000 11,990,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 34, ,864 1,489, ,864 1,489,215 2,562,743 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 63, , , , ,027 5,360, Subtotal MA (989,822) 4,838,729 (3,335,536) 7,652,216 27,543, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 12, ,000 12,000 23,070, Member States Other (training, meetings) 115, , , ,852 1,158, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 715, , , ,000 41,159, Member States Admin 110,135, ,729, ,135, ,729,389 70,727, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 575, , , ,859 5,758, Subtotal MS 125,568, ,457, ,568, ,457, ,948, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 27,543, ,531,977 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 72/137

73 VIS connection Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems A2C Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215,000 14, ,000 28,000 3,748,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,007,373 1,007,373 1,073,732 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (4,400,000) 935, (8,800,000) 1,870,000 11,990,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 33, ,483 1,375, ,483 1,375,790 2,504,941 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 63, , , , ,027 5,360, Subtotal MA (1,046,203) 4,725,304 (3,391,917) 7,538,791 27,477, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 12, ,000 12,000 23,070, Member States Other (training, meetings) 115, , , ,852 1,158, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 715, , , ,000 41,159, Member States Admin 110,135, ,729, ,135, ,729,389 70,727, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 575, , , ,859 5,758, Subtotal MS 125,568, ,457, ,568, ,457, ,948, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 27,477, ,531,977 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 73/137

74 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.7 A2D Distributed EntryExit System, with biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario A2D RTS EES No Yes, with biometrics Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS No Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 74/137

75 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no connection to VIS) A2D Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 80, , , , ,200 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,013,545 1,000,000 1,135,448 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,310,400 1,310, ,620,800 2,620,800 2,620,800 5 Management Authority software 440, ,000 1,164,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 22, , , , ,974 1,647,822 7 Management Authority Office Space ,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,695 9,846, Subtotal MA 3,378,789 2,957,374 5,276,562 5,457,774 17,315, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 54,000 54, ,000 54,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,658 1,176, ,176,912 11,769, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 880, ,000 67,500, Member States Admin 26 2,872, ,205, ,115, ,205, ,115,005 74,693, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,002, ,002,800 14,002,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,455 1,057, ,057,867 10,578, Subtotal MS 130,376, ,171, ,376, ,171, ,570, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 17,315, ,319,049 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 75/137

76 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection A2D Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 80, , , , ,200 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,013,545 1,000,000 1,135,448 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,310,400 1,310, ,620,800 2,620,800 2,620,800 5 Management Authority software 440, ,000 1,164,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 21, , , , ,088 1,603,614 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,695 9,846, Subtotal MA 3,347,490 2,910,488 5,245,263 5,410,888 17,271, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 54,000 54, ,000 54,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,658 1,176, ,176,912 11,769, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 880, ,000 67,500, Member States Admin 26 2,872, ,205, ,115, ,205, ,115,005 74,693, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,002, ,002,800 14,002,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,455 1,057, ,057,867 10,578, Subtotal MS 130,376, ,171, ,376, ,171, ,570, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 17,271, ,319,049 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 76/137

77 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.8 A3C Centralised EntryExit System, biometrics added later Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario A3C RTS EES No Biometrics added later Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS No Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 77/137

78 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) A3C Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215,000 14, ,000 28,000 3,748,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,007,748 1,007,748 1,077,478 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (4,400,000) 935, (8,800,000) 1,870,000 11,990,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 34, ,234 1,492, ,234 1,492,586 2,533,578 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 66, , , , ,256 5,632, Subtotal MA (959,035) 4,869,516 (3,304,561) 7,683,190 27,790, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 12, ,000 12,000 23,070, Member States Other (training, meetings) 110, , , ,567 1,105, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 715, , , ,000 41,159, Member States Admin 110,114, ,709, ,114, ,709,006 70,586, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 549, , , ,586 5,495, Subtotal MS 125,516, ,405, ,516, ,405, ,491, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 27,790, ,075,442 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together No No Specification later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 78/137

79 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection A3C Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215,000 14, ,000 28,000 3,748,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,007,748 1,007,748 1,077,478 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (4,400,000) 935, (8,800,000) 1,870,000 11,990,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 33, ,854 1,379, ,854 1,379,161 2,475,776 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 66, , , , ,256 5,632, Subtotal MA (1,015,416) 4,756,092 (3,360,942) 7,569,765 27,724, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 12, ,000 12,000 23,070, Member States Other (training, meetings) 110, , , ,567 1,105, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 715, , , ,000 41,159, Member States Admin 110,114, ,709, ,114, ,709,006 70,586, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 549, , , ,586 5,495, Subtotal MS 125,516, ,405, ,516, ,405, ,491, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 27,724, ,075,442 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together No No Specification later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 79/137

80 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.9 A3D Distributed EntryExit System, biometrics added later Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario A3D RTS EES No Biometrics added later Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS No Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 80/137

81 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) A3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 80, , , , ,200 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,014,233 1,000,000 1,142,328 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,310,400 1,310, ,620,800 2,620,800 2,620,800 5 Management Authority software 440, ,000 1,164,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 23, , , , ,974 1,709,746 7 Management Authority Office Space ,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development ,731 1,034, ,034,715 10,347, Subtotal MA 3,435,346 2,957,374 5,333,462 5,457,774 17,884, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 54,000 54, ,000 54,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,006 1,123, ,123,216 11,232, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 880, ,000 67,500, Member States Admin 26 2,867, ,192, ,115, ,192, ,115,005 74,567, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,002, ,002,800 14,002,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,777 1,009, ,009,603 10,096, Subtotal MS 130,262, ,171, ,262, ,171, ,425, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 17,884, ,173,657 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 81/137

82 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection A3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 80, , , , ,200 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,014,233 1,000,000 1,142,328 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,310,400 1,310, ,620,800 2,620,800 2,620,800 5 Management Authority software 440, ,000 1,164,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 22, , , , ,088 1,665,538 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development ,731 1,034, ,034,715 10,347, Subtotal MA 3,404,047 2,910,488 5,302,163 5,410,888 17,840, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 54,000 54, ,000 54,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,006 1,123, ,123,216 11,232, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 880, ,000 67,500, Member States Admin 26 2,867, ,192, ,115, ,192, ,115,005 74,567, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,002, ,002,800 14,002,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,777 1,009, ,009,603 10,096, Subtotal MS 130,262, ,171, ,262, ,171, ,425, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 17,840, ,173,657 ve costs Scenario RTS None EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 82/137

83 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.10 B0 TokenBased RTS only Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario B0 RTS EES Yes tokenbased No Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES No Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect No VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 83/137

84 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) B0 TokenBased RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 14, ,000 3,322,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 13, , , ,003,256 1,003,256 1,032,565 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 825, , ,650,000 1,870,000 10,450,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 14, , , , ,871 1,046,811 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 27, , , , ,744 2,367, Subtotal MA 3,540,719 3,680,843 6,202,947 6,467,072 21,028, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 173, , , ,948 1,739, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,469, ,006, ,469, ,006,693 72,279, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 515, , , ,479 5,154, Subtotal MS 129,063, ,626, ,063, ,626, ,216, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 21,028, ,800,226 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES None EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 84/137

85 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection B0 TokenBased RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 14, ,000 3,322,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 13, , , ,003,256 1,003,256 1,032,565 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 825, , ,650,000 1,870,000 10,450,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 13, , , , ,985 1,012,310 7 Management Authority Office Space (9,000) (9,000) 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 27, , , , ,744 2,367, Subtotal MA 3,486,305 3,633,957 6,148,533 6,420,185 20,984, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 173, , , ,948 1,739, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,469, ,006, ,469, ,006,693 72,279, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 515, , , ,479 5,154, Subtotal MS 129,063, ,626, ,063, ,626, ,216, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 20,984, ,800,226 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES None EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 85/137

86 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.11 B1C TokenBased RTS and Centralised EntryExit System without biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario B1C RTS EES Yes tokenbased Yes (no biometrics) Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES No Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect No VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect Yes Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 86/137

87 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) B1C TokenBased RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 14, ,000 3,322,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,460 1,008,460 1,084,597 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 825, , ,650,000 1,870,000 10,450,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 16, , , , ,700 1,226,305 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 72, , , , ,012 6,150, Subtotal MA 3,968,417 4,108,542 6,633,247 6,897,371 25,042, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 144, , , ,501 1,445, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,500, ,037, ,500, ,037,657 72,877, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 744, , , ,398 7,443, Subtotal MS 129,293, ,857, ,293, ,857, ,809, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 25,042, ,393,369 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 87/137

88 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection B1C TokenBased RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 14, ,000 3,322,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,460 1,008,460 1,084,597 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 825, , ,650,000 1,870,000 10,450,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 16, , , , ,813 1,191,804 7 Management Authority Office Space (9,000) (9,000) 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 72, , , , ,012 6,150, Subtotal MA 3,914,003 4,061,655 6,578,833 6,850,485 24,998, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 144, , , ,501 1,445, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,500, ,037, ,500, ,037,657 72,877, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 744, , , ,398 7,443, Subtotal MS 129,293, ,857, ,293, ,857, ,809, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 24,998, ,393,369 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 88/137

89 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.12 B1D TokenBased RTS and Distributed EntryExit System without biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario B1D RTS EES Yes tokenbased Yes (no biometrics) Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES No Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 89/137

90 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) B1D Distributed EES no biometrics, TokenBased RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 23,800 70, , ,600 2,017,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,013,423 1,000,000 1,134,232 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 12,772,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 22, , , , ,124 1,666,268 7 Management Authority Office Space ,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,855 9,758, Subtotal MA 4,664,640 2,963,524 7,740,751 5,309,924 30,148, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,645,000 54, ,645,000 54,000 30,213, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,308 1,186, ,186,401 11,864, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 54,660, ,660,400 37,800, Member States Admin 26 2,914, ,611, ,363, ,611, ,363,477 75,779, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development ,024 1,105, ,105,201 11,052, Subtotal MS 340,976, ,344, ,976, ,344, ,565, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 30,148, ,313,436 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Based later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 90/137

91 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection B1D Distributed EES no biometrics, TokenBased RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 23,800 70, , ,600 2,017,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,013,423 1,000,000 1,134,232 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 12,772,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 22, , , , ,238 1,632,848 7 Management Authority Office Space ,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,855 9,758, Subtotal MA 4,634,163 2,916,638 7,710,275 5,263,038 30,114, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,645,000 54, ,645,000 54,000 30,213, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,308 1,186, ,186,401 11,864, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 54,660, ,660,400 37,800, Member States Admin 26 2,914, ,611, ,363, ,611, ,363,477 75,779, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development ,024 1,105, ,105,201 11,052, Subtotal MS 340,976, ,344, ,976, ,344, ,565, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 30,114, ,313,436 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Based later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 91/137

92 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.13 B2C TokenBased RTS and Centralised EntryExit System with biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario B2C RTS EES Yes tokenbased With biometrics Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 92/137

93 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) B2C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215, , , ,000 4,306,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,189 1,008,189 1,081,895 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 17, ,327 1,591, ,327 1,591,251 1,264,057 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 70, , , , ,368 5,953, Subtotal MA (41,610) 5,223,514 (1,555,916) 8,260,409 34,686, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 148, , , ,314 1,483, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,762, ,930, ,762, ,930,458 73,020, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 764, , , ,042 7,640, Subtotal MS 129,580, ,773, ,580, ,773, ,186, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,686, ,770,383 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 93/137

94 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection B2C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215, , , ,000 4,306,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,189 1,008,189 1,081,895 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 16, ,008 1,477, ,008 1,477,826 1,205,224 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 70, , , , ,368 5,953, Subtotal MA (98,929) 5,110,089 (1,613,234) 8,146,984 34,627, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 148, , , ,314 1,483, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,762, ,930, ,762, ,930,458 73,020, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 764, , , ,042 7,640, Subtotal MS 129,580, ,773, ,580, ,773, ,186, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,627, ,770,383 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 94/137

95 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.14 B2D TokenBased RTS and Distributed EntryExit System with biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario B2D RTS EES Yes tokenbased Yes with biometrics Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 95/137

96 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) B2D Distributed EES with biometrics, TokenBased RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 100,600 14, ,200 28,000 3,295,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,013,007 1,000,000 1,130,070 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 28,612,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 22, , , , ,980 1,653,815 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,596 9,455, Subtotal MA 4,861,453 3,255,580 8,014,157 5,545,180 46,956, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,753,000 54, ,753,000 54,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,801 1,218, ,218,883 12,188, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,088, ,002, ,015, ,002, ,015,221 80,297, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,584 1,135, ,135,460 11,354, Subtotal MS 353,417, ,996, ,417, ,996, ,370, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 46,956, ,118,924 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Based later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 96/137

97 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection B2D Distributed EES with biometrics, TokenBased RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 100,600 14, ,200 28,000 3,295,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,013,007 1,000,000 1,130,070 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 28,612,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 21, , , , ,999 1,615,760 7 Management Authority Office Space ,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,596 9,455, Subtotal MA 4,812,289 3,170,599 7,964,992 5,460,199 46,909, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,753,000 54, ,753,000 54,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,801 1,218, ,218,883 12,188, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,088, ,002, ,015, ,002, ,015,221 80,297, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,584 1,135, ,135,460 11,354, Subtotal MS 353,417, ,996, ,417, ,996, ,370, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 46,909, ,118,924 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Based later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 97/137

98 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.15 B3C TokenBased RTS and Centralised EntryExit System with biometrics added later Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario B3C RTS EES Yes tokenbased With biometrics added later Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 98/137

99 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) B3C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215, , , ,000 4,306,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,497 1,008,497 1,084,965 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 17, ,091 1,594, ,091 1,594,015 1,291,694 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 72, , , , ,692 6,176, Subtotal MA (16,369) 5,248,756 (1,530,520) 8,285,804 34,940, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 143, , , ,980 1,439, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,747, ,914, ,747, ,914,753 72,863, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 741, , , ,717 7,417, Subtotal MS 129,537, ,731, ,537, ,731, ,763, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,940, ,346,745 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 99/137

100 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection B3C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics added later, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215, , , ,000 4,306,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,497 1,008,497 1,084,965 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 16, ,772 1,480, ,772 1,480,590 1,232,861 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 72, , , , ,692 6,176, Subtotal MA (73,687) 5,135,331 (1,587,839) 8,172,379 34,881, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 143, , , ,980 1,439, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,747, ,914, ,747, ,914,753 72,863, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 741, , , ,717 7,417, Subtotal MS 129,537, ,731, ,537, ,731, ,763, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,881, ,346,745 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together No No Specification Based later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 100/137

101 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.16 B3D TokenBased RTS and Distributed EntryExit System with biometrics added later Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario B3D RTS EES Yes tokenbased With biometrics added later Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 101/137

102 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) B3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, TokenBased RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 100,600 14, ,200 28,000 3,295,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,013,007 1,000,000 1,130,070 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 28,612,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 22, , , , ,980 1,653,815 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,596 9,455, Subtotal MA 4,861,453 3,255,580 8,014,157 5,545,180 46,956, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,753,000 54, ,753,000 54,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,801 1,218, ,218,883 12,188, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,088, ,002, ,015, ,002, ,015,221 80,297, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,584 1,135, ,135,460 11,354, Subtotal MS 353,417, ,996, ,417, ,996, ,370, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 46,956, ,118,924 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Based later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 102/137

103 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection B3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, TokenBased RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 100,600 14, ,200 28,000 3,295,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,013,007 1,000,000 1,130,070 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 28,612,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 21, , , , ,999 1,615,760 7 Management Authority Office Space ,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,596 9,455, Subtotal MA 4,812,289 3,170,599 7,964,992 5,460,199 46,909, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,753,000 54, ,753,000 54,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,801 1,218, ,218,883 12,188, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,088, ,002, ,015, ,002, ,015,221 80,297, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,584 1,135, ,135,460 11,354, Subtotal MS 353,417, ,996, ,417, ,996, ,370, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 46,909, ,118,924 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Based later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 103/137

104 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.17 C0 Tokenless RTS only Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario C0 RTS EES Yes tokenless No Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES No Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect No VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 104/137

105 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) C0 TokenLess RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 1,016, , ,032, ,000 4,152,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 13, , , ,002,724 1,002,724 1,027,237 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,546,000) 935, (7,092,000) 1,870,000 19,250,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 14,016 1,020,594 4,764, ,020,594 4,764,513 1,037,148 7 Management Authority Office Space 18, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 23, , , , ,013 1,980, Subtotal MA 543,568 7,984,488 (149,470) 11,006,450 30,255, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 181, , , ,467 1,814, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,744, ,138, ,744, ,138,217 72,484, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 537, , , ,167 5,371, Subtotal MS 129,367, ,787, ,367, ,787, ,713, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 30,255, ,297,018 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES None EES/RTS built together No No Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 105/137

106 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection C0 TokenLess RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 1,016, , ,032, ,000 4,152,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 13, , , ,002,724 1,002,724 1,027,237 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,546,000) 935, (7,092,000) 1,870,000 19,250,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 13, ,553 4,409, ,553 4,409, ,013 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 27,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 23, , , , ,013 1,980, Subtotal MA 460,528 7,629,562 (232,510) 10,651,523 30,207, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 181, , , ,467 1,814, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,744, ,138, ,744, ,138,217 72,484, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 537, , , ,167 5,371, Subtotal MS 129,367, ,787, ,367, ,787, ,713, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 30,207, ,297,018 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES None EES/RTS built together No No Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 106/137

107 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.18 C1C Tokenless RTS and Centralised EntryExit System without biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario C1C RTS EES Yes tokenless No biometrics Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES No Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect No VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect Yes Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 107/137

108 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) C1C TokenLess RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215, , , ,000 4,340,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,007,864 1,007,864 1,078,641 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 16, ,673 1,554, ,673 1,554,837 1,237,559 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 67, , , , ,714 5,717, Subtotal MA (63,080) 5,151,084 (1,577,548) 8,175,616 34,454, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 152, , , ,906 1,529, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,779, ,146, ,779, ,146,797 73,186, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 787, , , ,695 7,876, Subtotal MS 129,625, ,018, ,625, ,018, ,635, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,454, ,219,246 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 108/137

109 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection C1C TokenLess RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215, , , ,000 4,340,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,007,864 1,007,864 1,078,641 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 15, ,886 1,441, ,886 1,441,413 1,178,212 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 67, , , , ,714 5,717, Subtotal MA (120,868) 5,037,659 (1,635,336) 8,062,191 34,395, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 152, , , ,906 1,529, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 112,779, ,146, ,779, ,146,797 73,186, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 787, , , ,695 7,876, Subtotal MS 129,625, ,018, ,625, ,018, ,635, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,395, ,219,246 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 109/137

110 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.19 C1D Tokenless RTS and Distributed EntryExit System without biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario C1D RTS EES Yes tokenless Yes, no biometrics Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES No Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect No VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect Yes Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 110/137

111 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) C1D Distributed EES no biometrics, TokenLess RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 6,238,600 14, ,477,200 28,000 14,809,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,699 1,000,000 1,086,991 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,237, , ,474, ,000 29,086,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 25,638 3,835,766 8,849, ,835,766 8,849,002 1,897,244 7 Management Authority Office Space 45, ,000 72,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 74, , ,417 6,324, Subtotal MA 13,828,732 11,138,602 23,144,282 13,428,202 56,049, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,699, ,699,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,104 1,555, ,555,072 15,550, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,177, ,211, ,418, ,211, ,418,949 82,603, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,428 1,448, ,448,639 14,486, Subtotal MS 386,222, ,345, ,222, ,345, ,170, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 56,049, ,918,862 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES No Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 111/137

112 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection C1D Distributed EES no biometrics, TokenLess RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 6,238,600 14, ,477,200 28,000 14,809,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,699 1,000,000 1,086,991 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,237, , ,474, ,000 29,086,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 23,619 3,584,535 8,205, ,584,535 8,205,688 1,747,833 7 Management Authority Office Space 36, ,000 63,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 74, , ,417 6,324, Subtotal MA 13,568,502 10,495,288 22,884,051 12,784,888 55,890, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,699, ,699,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,104 1,555, ,555,072 15,550, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,177, ,211, ,418, ,211, ,418,949 82,603, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,428 1,448, ,448,639 14,486, Subtotal MS 386,222, ,345, ,222, ,345, ,170, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 55,890, ,918,862 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES No Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 112/137

113 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.20 C2C Tokenless RTS and Centralised EntryExit System with biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario C2C RTS EES Yes tokenless With biometrics Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 113/137

114 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) C2C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215,000 14, ,000 28,000 4,340,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,007,864 1,007,864 1,078,641 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 16, ,673 1,591, ,673 1,591,253 1,237,559 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 67, , , , ,714 5,717, Subtotal MA (63,080) 4,976,700 (1,577,548) 7,790,432 34,454, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 152, , , ,906 1,529, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 113,019, ,506, ,019, ,506,583 73,192, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 787, , , ,695 7,876, Subtotal MS 129,865, ,377, ,865, ,377, ,641, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,454, ,224,897 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 114/137

115 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection C2C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215,000 14, ,000 28,000 4,340,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,007,864 1,007,864 1,078,641 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 15, ,886 1,477, ,886 1,477,828 1,178,212 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 67, , , , ,714 5,717, Subtotal MA (120,868) 4,863,275 (1,635,336) 7,677,007 34,395, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 152, , , ,906 1,529, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 113,019, ,506, ,019, ,506,583 73,192, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 787, , , ,695 7,876, Subtotal MS 129,865, ,377, ,865, ,377, ,641, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,395, ,224,897 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together No No Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 115/137

116 F inal Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.21 C2D Tokenless RTS and Distributed EntryExit System with biometrics Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario C2D RTS EES Yes tokenless Yes, with biometrics Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 116/137

117 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) C2D Distributed EES with biometrics, TokenLess RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 6,238,600 14, ,477,200 28,000 20,947,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,012,039 1,000,000 1,120,388 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 29,140,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 34,093 4,685,170 10,335, ,685,170 10,335,278 2,522,910 7 Management Authority Office Space 45, ,000 90,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,210 8,752, Subtotal MA 14,895,600 12,624,878 24,185,819 14,914,478 65,346, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,699, ,699,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,861 1,294, ,294,440 12,944, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,108, ,319, ,418, ,319, ,418,949 80,816, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,864 1,205, ,205,846 12,058, Subtotal MS 360,827, ,345, ,827, ,345, ,348, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 65,346, ,096,670 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 117/137

118 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection C2D Distributed EES with biometrics, TokenLess RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 6,238,600 14, ,477,200 28,000 20,947,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,012,039 1,000,000 1,120,388 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 29,140,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 34,093 4,685,170 10,335, ,685,170 10,335,278 2,522,910 7 Management Authority Office Space 45, ,000 90,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,210 8,752, Subtotal MA 14,895,600 12,624,878 24,185,819 14,914,478 65,346, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,699, ,699,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,861 1,294, ,294,440 12,944, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,108, ,319, ,418, ,319, ,418,949 80,816, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,864 1,205, ,205,846 12,058, Subtotal MS 360,827, ,345, ,827, ,345, ,348, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 65,346, ,096,670 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES With Biometrics EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Less Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 118/137

119 Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.22 C3C Tokenless RTS and Centralised EntryExit System with biometrics added later Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario C3C RTS EES Yes tokenless With biometrics added later Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 119/137

120 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) C3C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215,000 14, ,000 28,000 4,340,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,185 1,008,185 1,081,851 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 17, ,562 1,594, ,562 1,594,142 1,266,448 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 70, , , , ,050 5,950, Subtotal MA (36,695) 5,003,085 (1,551,003) 7,816,977 34,719, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 148, , , ,376 1,483, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 113,003, ,490, ,003, ,490,166 73,028, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 764, , , ,360 7,643, Subtotal MS 129,820, ,333, ,820, ,333, ,198, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,719, ,782,070 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together No No Specification Less later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 120/137

121 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection C3C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics added later, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 215,000 14, ,000 28,000 4,340,000 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 14, , , ,008,185 1,008,185 1,081,851 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,360, ,671,200 2,721,600 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software (3,569,000) 935, (7,138,000) 1,870,000 19,272,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 16, ,775 1,480, ,775 1,480,717 1,207,101 7 Management Authority Office Space 9, ,000 36,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development 85 70, , , , ,050 5,950, Subtotal MA (94,483) 4,889,660 (1,608,790) 7,703,552 34,660, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 24,000 36, ,000 36,000 23,094, Member States Other (training, meetings) 148, , , ,376 1,483, Member States Infrastructure Member States software 1,878, , ,878, ,900 41,874, Member States Admin 113,003, ,490, ,003, ,490,166 73,028, Member States Office Space 14,002,800 14,188, ,002,800 14,188,800 34,074, Member States Contractor Development 764, , , ,360 7,643, Subtotal MS 129,820, ,333, ,820, ,333, ,198, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points 11,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points 26 10, , , , , , Subtotal Border Check Points 11,967,050 24,984,264 11,967,050 24,984, ,583,572 Total of administrati 34,660, ,782,070 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together No No Specification Less later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with Biosearches Colocated with Interfaced with VIS VIS based on VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 64% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying SemiAutomated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 25.9 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 121/137

122 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 7.23 C3D Tokenless RTS and Distributed EntryExit System with biometrics added later Scenario Parameters The following parameters and values apply. Scenario C3D RTS EES Yes tokenless Yes, with biometrics added later Biometric Data specification Fingerprint images in EES No Fingerprint templates in EES Yes Fingerprint images in RTS No Fingerprint templates in RTS Yes Facial Matching No Fingerprint matching Yes TESTA 100 Mbps connections preferred Yes TESTA 1 Gbps connections preferred No VIS/BMS 100 Mbps Interconnect Yes VIS/BMS 1Gbps Interconnect No Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 122/137

123 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Cost Summary Tables VIS colocation (no VIS connection) C3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, TokenLess RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 6,238,600 14, ,477,200 28,000 20,947,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,012,530 1,000,000 1,125,302 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 29,140,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 34,691 4,689,592 10,335, ,689,592 10,335,278 2,567,135 7 Management Authority Office Space 45, ,000 90,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,934 9,109, Subtotal MA 14,935,991 12,624,878 24,226,456 14,914,478 65,752, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,699, ,699,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,112 1,256, ,256,092 12,560, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,098, ,657, ,418, ,657, ,418,949 80,552, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,661 1,170, ,170,122 11,701, Subtotal MS 357,090, ,345, ,090, ,345, ,344, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 65,752, ,092,889 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Less later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 123/137

124 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems VIS connection C3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, TokenLess RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Tariff Time Price Price Freq ( per hour) (hour) in 2014 in 2020 (per year) Nbr of Entities Total Number of actions in 2014 in 2020 Total one time costs No Type of Target Obligation Description of required action Groups EU MS 1 Management Authority 2 Management Authority Hardware 6,238,600 14, ,477,200 28,000 20,947,800 3 Management Authority Other (training, meetings) 74 15, , , ,012,530 1,000,000 1,125,302 4 Management Authority Infrastructure 1,335,600 1,335, ,671,200 2,671,200 2,773,200 5 Management Authority software 1,210, , ,420, ,000 29,140,000 6 Management Authority Admin 74 34,691 4,689,592 10,335, ,689,592 10,335,278 2,567,135 7 Management Authority Office Space 45, ,000 90,000 8 Management Authority Contractor Development , , ,934 9,109, Subtotal MA 14,935,991 12,624,878 24,226,456 14,914,478 65,752, Member States 15 Member States Hardware 3,699, ,699,000 35,748, Member States Other (training, meetings) ,112 1,256, ,256,092 12,560, Member States Infrastructure ,782, Member States software 55,540, ,540,400 67,500, Member States Admin 26 3,098, ,657, ,418, ,657, ,418,949 80,552, Member States Office Space 19,767,600 20,926, ,767,600 20,926,800 36,499, Member States Contractor Development ,661 1,170, ,170,122 11,701, Subtotal MS 357,090, ,345, ,090, ,345, ,344, Member States Border Check Points 28 Automated Border Check Points SemiManual Border Check Points Manual Border Check Points ,673,600 24,464, ,673,600 24,464, ,316, Border Control Staff Automated Check Points Border Control Staff SemiManual Check Points Border Control Staff Manual Check Points ,049 15,658,107 24,764, ,658,107 24,764,314 14,431, Subtotal Border Check Points 27,331,707 49,228,714 27,331,707 49,228, ,748,073 Total of administrati 65,752, ,092,889 ve costs Scenario RTS Token EES Biometrics added EES/RTS built together Yes Yes Specification Less later Scenario Options Architecture vs VIS Self Contained RTS Enrolment at both RTS Border Check mode Manual Housing Colocated with VIS Biosearches based on Colocated with VIS Deploying Automated Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 35% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying Automated Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 85% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems increases the one time costs by 157% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the yearly operational costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Deploying semimanual Border Check Systems decreases the total costs by 87% compared to Manual Border Check Systems Other Costs in clude training and attending meetings Project Schedule is 29.8 months Back to Introduction, Table 3: Costing Scenarios Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 124/137

125 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 8 SUMMARY TABLE The tables below summarises the cost estimates for all the different scenarios that were presented in section 7 of this report. For the easier comparison, there are three tables in this section: 1. Comparison of the costs for VIS colocation (no VIS connection) 2. Comparison of the costs for VIS connection. Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 125/137

126 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 8.1 Comparison of the costs for VIS colocation (no VIS connection) Scenario, no VIS connection Table 16: Comparison of the costs VIS colocation (no VIS connection) A1C Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention EU onetime costs MS onetime Costs EU in 2014 MS in 2014 EU in 2020 MS in ,741, ,844,599 6,220, ,532,953 6,035, ,939,594 A2C Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 31,840, ,699,133 (3,156,308) 125,904,137 6,644, ,052,092 A3C Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B0 TokenBased RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B1C TokenBased RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B2C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B3C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C0 TokenLess RTS, No EES, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C1C TokenLess RTS, EES no biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C2C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C3C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics added later, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention A1D Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 32,228, ,980,228 (3,107,532) 125,822,345 6,644, ,052,092 22,741, ,844,599 6,220, ,532,953 6,035, ,939,594 29,062, ,928,019 6,898, ,895,819 6,035, ,939,594 38,579, ,519,267 (1,360,213) 129,200,082 7,121, ,605,800 38,978, ,852,164 (1,320,224) 129,133,371 7,121, ,605,800 31,723, ,624,462 (271,459) 128,860,361 9,370, ,625,889 38,192, ,226,091 (1,398,670) 129,270,764 7,078, ,610,089 38,192, ,231,742 (1,398,670) 129,510,766 6,694, ,228,147 38,610, ,534,423 (1,356,869) 129,441,034 6,694, ,228,147 13,703, ,105,549 4,759, ,753,063 4,932, ,145,325 A2D Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 17,606, ,279,550 5,264, ,231,344 5,380, ,978,405 A3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B1D Distributed EES no biometrics, TokenBased RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B2D Distributed EES with biometrics, TokenBased RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, TokenBased RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C1D Distributed EES no biometrics, TokenLess RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C2D Distributed EES with biometrics, TokenLess RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, TokenLess RTS, not connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 18,162, ,147,454 5,319, ,118,134 5,380, ,978,405 30,148, ,565,363 7,654, ,457,191 5,156, ,722,677 46,139, ,370,851 7,818, ,314,693 5,110, ,785,621 46,139, ,370,851 7,818, ,314,693 5,110, ,785,621 42,877, ,306,433 7,466, ,861,788 5,092, ,235,749 45,639, ,348,597 7,742, ,644,763 5,092, ,067,749 46,045, ,344,816 7,782, ,908,277 5,092, ,067,749 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 126/137

127 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 8.2 Comparison of the costs for VIS connection Scenario, with VIS connection A1C Central EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention Table 17: Comparison of costs VIS connection EU onetime costs MS onetime Costs EU in 2014 MS in 2014 EU in 2020 MS in ,897, ,305,874 4,645, ,539,826 6,029, ,041,492 A2C Central EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 31,773, ,699,133 (3,212,688) 125,904,137 6,531, ,052,092 A3C Central EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B0 TokenBased RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 32,162, ,980,228 (3,163,913) 125,822,345 6,531, ,052,092 22,698, ,844,599 6,166, ,532,953 5,989, ,939,594 B1C TokenBased RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 29,019, ,928,019 6,843, ,895,819 5,989, ,939,594 B2C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B3C TokenBased RTS, EES with biometrics added later, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C0 TokenLess RTS, No EES, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C1C TokenLess RTS, EES no biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 38,520, ,519,267 (1,417,532) 129,200,082 7,007, ,605,800 38,920, ,852,164 (1,377,542) 129,133,371 7,007, ,605,800 31,674, ,624,462 (354,499) 128,860,361 9,015, ,625,889 38,132, ,226,091 (1,456,457) 129,270,764 6,965, ,610,089 C2C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 38,132, ,231,742 (1,456,457) 129,510,766 6,581, ,228,147 C3C TokenLess RTS, EES with biometrics added later, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention A1D Distributed EES no biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention A2D Distributed EES with biometrics, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention A3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, no RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B1D Distributed EES no biometrics, TokenBased RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B2D Distributed EES with biometrics, TokenBased RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention B3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, TokenBased RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 38,550, ,534,423 (1,414,656) 129,441,034 6,581, ,228,147 13,659, ,105,549 4,727, ,753,063 4,885, ,145,325 17,562, ,279,550 5,233, ,231,344 5,333, ,978,405 18,118, ,147,454 5,288, ,118,134 5,333, ,978,405 30,114, ,565,363 7,623, ,457,191 5,109, ,722,677 46,096, ,370,851 7,772, ,314,693 5,063, ,785,621 46,096, ,370,851 7,772, ,314,693 5,063, ,785,621 C1D Distributed EES no biometrics, TokenLess RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 42,833, ,306,433 7,420, ,861,788 5,045, ,235,749 C2D Distributed EES with biometrics, TokenLess RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention C3D Distributed EES with biometrics added later, TokenLess RTS, connected to VIS, colocated with VIS, 5 year retention 45,595, ,348,597 7,696, ,644,763 5,045, ,067,749 46,045, ,344,816 7,782, ,908,277 5,092, ,067,749 Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 127/137

128 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 9 REFERENCE AND APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 9.1 Applicable documents ID Reference Title Version A1 CBCPQP001 Project Quality Plan 1.10 A2 Call for Tender JLSB N/A A3 Framework Contract JLSB N/A Table 18: Applicable Documents 9.2 Reference documents ID Reference Title Version R1 R2 R3 R4 R _EES _RT_IA_Cost_T or_lang.doc _EES _RT_IA_Cost_R oadmap.doc Specifications For A Cost Analysis Study, EU Commission, 10 November 2009 Cost Analysis Study/Roadmap , P. Nokelainen et all, 10 November 2009 Impact Assessment Guidelines SEC (2009) 92 Draft proposal for a Regulation establishing a Registered Traveller Programme Draft proposal for a Regulation establishing the Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data of third country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union R6 CAB38FR004 EntryExit Feasibility Study, Final report CAB38FR004, , in particular Chapters 7 and 8 as well as the data tables R7 Migrapol 222, ; R8 Migrapol 234, R9 SEC(2009) 837 Commission staff working document accompanying the Proposal for a Regulation of the EP and the Council establishing an Agency for the operational management of largescale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice and the Proposal for a Council decision conferring upon the Agency established by Regulation XX tasks Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 128/137

129 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems ID Reference Title Version regarding the operational management of SIS II and VIS in application of Title VI of the EU Treaty, R10 COM(2009) 292 final R11 COM(2009) 293 final R12 Communication from the Commission on a legislative package establishing an Agency for the operational management of largescale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice Proposal for a Regulation of the EP and the Council establishing an Agency for the operational management of largescale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice Proposal for a Council decision conferring upon the Agency established by Regulation XX tasks regarding the operational management of SIS II and VIS in application of Title VI of the EU Treaty N/A N/A N/A R13 CBESO30 REP003 Inception Report on Cost Study on EntryExit System and Registered Traveller System 1.00 R14 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL As provided by COM Table 19: Reference Documents Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 129/137

130 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 10 TERMINOLOGY AND ANNEXES 10.1 Acronyms & Abbreviations Acronym or Abbreviation AFIS BMS BCP BCU BOM CAGR CMS CNI COM COTS CP CPUs CS CU DHCP DNS EDCA EE EES egate FPA FPMatcher HW KMS LAN MS MRZ NBCS NI.RTS NI.EES NIS NPS NVIS Meaning Automated Fingerprint Information System Biometric Matching System Border Control Point Backup Central Unit BillofMaterials Compound Annual Growth Rate Card Management System Central National Interface The European Commission (DG JLS) Custom Of The Shelf Consular Post Central Processing Unit Central System Central Unit Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Domain Name Service Enterprise Data Centre Architecture EntryExit EntryExit System Automated Gate FunctionPoint Analysis Fingerprints matcher Hardware Key Management System Local Area Network Member State(s) Machine Readable Zone National Border Control System National Interface to the Central RTS. National Interface to the Central EES National Information Systems National Police System National Visa Information System Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 130/137

131 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems Q&A RDBMS RT RTS SAN SIS SW TCN TCVNE TCVNH Testa ToR UIS VIS WAN WBS Questions and Answers Relational database Management System Registered Traveller Registered Traveller System Storage Area Network Schengen Information System Software ThirdCountry National ThirdCountry National Visa Exempt Third Country National Visa Holder Trans European Services for Telematics between Administrations Terms of Reference Unisys Visa Information System Wide Area Network Work Break Down Structure Table 20: Acronyms & Abbreviations Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 131/137

132 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 11 ANNEX 1 COST MODEL BUILDING BLOCKS ID Building Block Description Phase Category Allocated C1 TESTA interface (100 Mbps links), yearly investments DEV INF MA C1 TESTA interface (100 Mbps links), yearly investments OPE INF MA C1 TESTA interface (1 Gbps links), yearly investments DEV INF MA C1 TESTA interface (1 Gbps links), yearly investments OPE INF MA C2 WEBSERVER, yearly investments DEV HW MA C2 WEBSERVER, yearly investments OPE HW MA C3 RTS Directory Server, yearly investments DEV HW MA C3 RTS Directory Server, yearly investments OPE HW MA C4 CUBCU Interconnect, yearly investments DEV HW MA C4 CUBCU Interconnect, yearly investments OPE HW MA C5 Supporting Servers, yearly investments DEV HW MA C5 Supporting Servers, yearly investments OPE HW MA C6 Database Server, 1 yr retention, yearly investments DEV HW MA C6 Database Server, 1 yr retention, yearly investments OPE HW MA C7 Logging Server, 1 yr retention, yearly investments DEV HW MA C7 Logging Server, 1 yr retention, yearly investments OPE HW MA C8 EES Application Server, yearly investments DEV HW MA C8 EES Application Server, yearly investments OPE HW MA C9 RTS Application Server, yearly investments DEV HW MA C9 RTS Application Server, yearly investments OPE HW MA C1013 EES RTS Data Storage, 1 yr retention, yearly investments DEV HW MA C1013 EES RTS Data Storage, 1 yr retention, yearly investments OPE HW MA C14 C14 C15 C15 HARDWARE for Facial Matching 1 year retention of biometric data, yearly investments HARDWARE for Facial Matching 1 year retention of biometric data, yearly investments HARDWARE for Fingerprint matching 1 year retention of biometric data, yearly investments HARDWARE for Fingerprint matching 1 year retention of biometric data, yearly investments DEV HW MA OPE HW MA DEV HW MA OPE HW MA C16 CMS & KMS HARDWARE, yearly investments DEV HW MA C16 CMS & KMS HARDWARE, yearly investments OPE HW MA C17 VIS/BMS Interconnect, colocated, yearly investments DEV HW MA C17 VIS/BMS Interconnect, colocated, yearly investments OPE HW MA C17 C17 VIS/BMS Interconnect, independently located, STM1, yearly investments VIS/BMS Interconnect, independently located, STM1, yearly investments DEV HW MA OPE HW MA Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 132/137

133 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems ID Building Block Description Phase Category Allocated C17 C17 VIS/BMS Interconnect, independently located, STM4, yearly investments VIS/BMS Interconnect, independently located, STM4, yearly investments DEV HW MA OPE HW MA N1 MS RTS Application Server, yearly investments DEV HW MS N1 MS RTS Application Server, yearly investments OPE HW MS N2 MS EES Application Server, yearly investments DEV HW MS N2 MS EES Application Server, yearly investments OPE HW MS N3 Consular Post RTS enrolment, yearly investments DEV ENROL MS N3 Consular Post RTS enrolment, yearly investments OPE ENROL MS N4 NI.RTS Server, yearly investments DEV HW MS N4 NI.RTS Server, yearly investments OPE HW MS N5 NI.EES Server, yearly investments DEV HW MS N5 NI.EES Server, yearly investments OPE HW MS N6 Border Control Point RTS enrolment, yearly investments DEV ENROL MS N6 Border Control Point RTS enrolment, yearly investments OPE ENROL MS N7 N7 N8 N8 Automated RTS Border Control Point, yearly investments Automated RTS Border Control Point, yearly investments Semimanual RTS Border Control Point, yearly investments Semimanual RTS Border Control Point, yearly investments DEV ABORDER MS OPE ABORDER MS DEV SBORDER MS OPE SBORDER MS N9 Manual Border Control Point, yearly investments DEV MBORDER MS N9 Manual Border Control Point, yearly investments OPE MBORDER MS N10 MS EES RTS Database Server, yearly investments DEV HW MS N10 MS EES RTS Database Server, yearly investments OPE HW MS N11 MS National Storage, 1 yr retention, yearly investments DEV HW MS N11 MS National Storage, 1 yr retention, yearly investments OPE HW MS N12 MS TESTA Interface, yearly investments DEV INF MS N12 MS TESTA Interface, yearly investments OPE INF MS N13 N13 N14 N14 MS HARDWARE for Facial Matching 1 year retention of biometric data, yearly investments MS HARDWARE for Facial Matching 1 year retention of biometric data, yearly investments MS HARDWARE for Fingerprint matching 1 year retention of biometric data, yearly investments MS HARDWARE for Fingerprint matching 1 year retention of biometric data, yearly investments DEV HW MS OPE HW MS DEV HW MS OPE HW MS OS Operating System licenses, yearly investments DEV SW MA Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 133/137

134 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems ID Building Block Description Phase Category Allocated OS Operating System licenses, yearly investments OPE SW MA MSG Messaging Software licensing, yearly investments DEV SW MA MSG Messaging Software licensing, yearly investments OPE SW MA DB Database Software licenses, yearly investments DEV SW MA DB Database Software licenses, yearly investments OPE SW MA DIRECTORY Directory Server software licenses, yearly investments DEV SW MA DIRECTORY Directory Server software licenses, yearly investments OPE SW MA CMS & KMS CMS & KMS OTHER SOFTWAR E OTHER SOFTWAR E Token Management and Key Management Software, yearly investments Token Management and Key Management Software, yearly investments DEV SW MA OPE SW MA Supporting Server Software, yearly investments DEV SW MA Supporting Server Software, yearly investments OPE SW MA AFIS AFIS SOFTWARE, yearly investments DEV SW MA AFIS AFIS SOFTWARE, yearly investments OPE SW MA FACE MATCH FACE MATCH Face Matching Software, yearly investments DEV SW MA Face Matching Software, yearly investments OPE SW MA MSOS MS Operating System licenses, yearly investments DEV SW MS MSOS MS Operating System licenses, yearly investments OPE SW MS MSMSG MSMSG MS Messaging Software (application servers), yearly investments MS Messaging Software (application servers), yearly investments DEV SW MS OPE SW MS MSDB MS Database Software, yearly investments DEV SW MS MSDB MS Database Software, yearly investments OPE SW MS AFIS MS AFIS Software 1yr, yearly investments DEV SW MS AFIS MS AFIS Software 1yr, yearly investments OPE SW MS FACE MATCH FACE MATCH MS Face Match Software 1yr, yearly investments DEV SW MS MS Face Match Software 1yr, yearly investments OPE SW MS Management Authority Power costs per year OPE ADM MA MS Power Costs per year OPE ADM MS MA Technical system managers OPE ADM MA MA DBA OPE ADM MA MA Admin support OPE ADM MA Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 134/137

135 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems ID Building Block Description Phase Category Allocated MA Team leader/planner OPE ADM MA MA Central site helpdesk & Incident Management OPE ADM MA MA Helpdesk OPE ADM MA MA Technical support OPE ADM MA MA Helpdesk oneoff Office Space OPE OFFICE MA MA Technical office space OPE OFFICE MA MA EES Communication Costs OPE INF MA MA RTS Communication Costs OPE INF MA MS Technical system managers OPE ADM MS MS DBA OPE ADM MS MS Admin support OPE ADM MS MS Team leader/planner OPE ADM MS MS helpdesk & Incident Management OPE ADM MS MS Helpdesk OPE ADM MS MS Technical support OPE ADM MS MS Helpdesk oneoff Office Space OPE OFFICE MS MS Technical office space OPE OFFICE MS MA Hardware Maintenance, 1yr retention OPE ADM MA MA COTS Software Maintenance, 1yr retention OPE ADM MA MS Hardware Maintenance, 1yr retention OPE ADM MS MS COTS Software Maintenance, 1yr retention OPE ADM MS Automated Border Control Staff OPE BOFFICERA MS Semimanual Border Control Staff OPE BOFFICERS MS Manual Border Control Staff OPE BOFFICERM MS TESTA 600Mbps monthly costs (MA) (1yr) OPE INF MA TESTA 600Mbps monthly costs (MS)(1yr) OPE INF MA Contractor EES Development DEV CONTR MA Contractor EES Development OPE CONTR MA Contractor RTS Development DEV CONTR MA Contractor RTS Development OPE CONTR MA Contractor EES/RTS Development DEV CONTR MA Contractor EES/RTS Development OPE CONTR MA Contractor Testing DEV CONTR MA Contractor Testing OPE CONTR MA Contractor Training development DEV CONTR MA Contractor Training development OPE CONTR MA Contractor EES Development DEV CONTR MS Contractor EES Development OPE CONTR MS Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 135/137

136 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems ID Building Block Description Phase Category Allocated Contractor RTS Development DEV CONTR MS Contractor RTS Development OPE CONTR MS Contractor EES/RTS Development DEV CONTR MS Contractor EES/RTS Development OPE CONTR MS Contractor Testing DEV CONTR MS Contractor Testing OPE CONTR MS Contractor Training development DEV CONTR MS Contractor Training development OPE CONTR MS MA EES Project Management & QA DEV ADM MA MA EES Project Management & QA OPE ADM MA MA RTS Project Management & QA DEV ADM MA MA RTS Project Management & QA OPE ADM MA MA EES/RTS Project management & QA DEV ADM MA MA EES/RTS Project management & QA OPE ADM MA MA Testing DEV ADM MA MA Testing OPE ADM MA MA Training DEV OTH MA MA Training OPE OTH MA MS EES Project Management DEV ADM MA MS EES Project Management OPE ADM MA MS RTS Project Management DEV ADM MA MS RTS Project Management OPE ADM MA MS EES/RTS Project Management DEV ADM MS MS EES/RTS Project Management OPE ADM MS MS Testing DEV ADM MS MS Testing OPE ADM MS MS Training DEV OTH MS MS Training OPE OTH MS MA Monthly Progress meetings OPE OTH MA MA Quarterly Meetings OPE OTH MA Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 136/137

137 Final Report Cost Analysis of EntryExit & Registered Traveller Systems 12 ANNEX 2 COST XPERT INPUT REPORTS For the Annexes see separate zip file delivered with the report (EntryExit&RegisteredTraveller Annex2.v.1.10). *** End of CBE30REP003 *** Quality Assurance, JLSB , CBEso30REP003_1 30_Entry Exit Cost Study_Final Report.doc, p. 137/137