Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)
|
|
|
- Sharon Stephanie Campbell
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) 2013 Workshop for project funding in 2017 and 2018
2 Introductions Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) program Administered by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) MnDOT District 4 staff: Jane Butzer District Program Coordinator Bridget Miller District Planning Director Merle Early State Aid Manager MnDOT District 8 staff: Jarrett Hubbard District Planner Patrick Weidemann District Planning Director Todd Broadwell Acting State Aid Engineer Stu Peterson State Aid Engineer
3 Introductions TE program continued... Local planning assistance provided by Regional Development Organizations (RDO) and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) Lindsey Knutson Upper Minnesota Valley Regional Development Commission (UMVRDC)
4 Agenda Overview TAP Overview Overview of the Local Process Application Requirements Q & A
5 TAP Overview
6 TAP Overview TAP is a program of the Federal Highway Administration The TAP provides funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; recreational trail program projects; [and] safe routes to school projects FHWA web site
7 TAP Overview Funded through Federal transportation bill (MAP-21) Significant Changes From SAFETEA-LU Program Consolidation Funding Reduction funding split for ALL projects, including SRTS
8 TAP Overview
9 TAP Overview $30.0 TAP Funding Reduction $25.0 $20.0 $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 $- $27.69 Past Federal Investment $15.04 MAP-21 Distribution
10 TAP Overview District 4 and 8 funding levels for TE were similar to new TAP funding levels HOWEVER... this now includes the former TE Program, SRTS and Scenic Byways Overall funding decrease of approximately 40%
11 TAP Overview Eligible Activities Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities Safe Routes for Non-Drivers Conversion of Abandoned Railway Corridors to Trails Scenic Turnouts and Overlooks
12 TAP Overview Eligible Activities continued... Community Improvement Activities Outdoor Advertising Management Historic Preservation & Rehab of Historic Transportation Facilities Vegetation Management Archaeological Activities Environmental Mitigation Activities Stormwater Mitigation Wildlife Management
13 On-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation Transportation projects to achieve Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 compliance Safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs. Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors
14 Construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities Archaeological activities
15 Vegetation management to improve roadway safety Vegetation management to provide erosion control Reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality or restore/maintain habitat connectivity Environmental mitigation to address storm water management
16 Recreational trails program (DNR) Safe Routes to School
17 Transportation activities no longer eligible for TAP funding: Scenic easements Transportation museums Visitor centers Marketing and marketing plans Interpretive plans Scenic Byway corridor management plans Bicycling and pedestrian safety and education programs for adults Adult safety and education programs are eligible under the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and the Surface Transportation Program (STP)
18 TAP Overview Relationship to Surface Transportation is REQUIRED for all projects The TAP project sponsor must illustrate the project's relationship to surface transportation in the project proposal. NTAC web site Bear in mind that the [state] DOT can impose guidelines on project eligibility more restrictive than those put forth by the FHWA. NTAC web site Eligibility does not necessarily equate to priority
19 TAP Overview Applying for funding is a lengthy and timeconsuming but worthwhile process Need to make sure you have a local champion to see the project through to completion Also need broad support from a variety of individuals and groups in your community Local match is required for all projects Engineering and Right-of-Way are not eligible Finding local match funding can be challenging
20 Overview of the Local Process
21 Overview of the Local Process MnDOT Administers Program in Minnesota Project ranking is done at the MnDOT District level Funds are distributed by MnDOT at the State level District 4 TAP allocation is ~$600,000 in 2017 and 2018, and District 8 ATP allocation is ~$300,000 in those years RDOs/MPOs assist with application process
22 Timeline October 3, 2013 TAP project solicitation announcement October 28, 2013 RDC Workshop/Forum October-November 2013 Consultation with RDO/MPO and field reviews conducted November 15, 2013 Letter of Intent deadline Feb. 1, 2014 Full grant application deadline February-March Application review and applicant presentations(?) to TAP Subcommittee April 15, 2014 TAP award recipients announced Fall 2014 Final STIP is approved
23 Consultation with Local Planners Discuss your project with local planner at your RDO/MPO Your local planner will: help you determine project eligibility provide guidance on developing a competitive application ensure that your application is complete Schedule field review of project prior to completion of application Better to schedule early before the snow flies Project field reviews are not required, but are Highly Recommended Discuss your project with your local planner EARLY and OFTEN
24 Application Requirements
25 Application Requirements Section 1: General Information Section 2: Project Budget Section 3: Sponsoring Agency Resolution Section 4: Resolution Agreeing to Maintain Facility Section 5: ATP Project Evaluation Section 6: Application Checklist
26 Section 1: General Information Project Name Project Location Brief Project Description Sponsoring Agency Project Applicant Contact Person Signatures
27 Section 2: Project Budget Project Budget Page Should be fairly detailed It is recommended that you work with your local engineer to develop the budget Eligible Work/Construction Items Non eligible Items Engineering and Right-of-Way costs are NOT eligible for TAP funding Project award minimum of $50,000 for D8, recommended minimum of $100,000 for D4
28 Sections 3 & 4: Resolutions Section 3: Sponsoring Agency Resolution County or State-Aid City (pop ) Section 4: Resolution Agreeing to Maintain Facility County or State-Aid City (pop ) If applicant is not a county or state aid city, they can still include above resolution(s) Not required, but recommended
29 Section 5: ATP Project Evaluation The information provided in this section is what the TAP review committee will use to judge how your project ranks against other applications This is where you should make your case that your project should be funded More detailed answers should be provided in this section Staying within the stated application limits
30 Section 5: ATP Project Evaluation District 4: 1. Project relationship in a larger context 2. Project Impact or Benefit 3. The project funding and schedule must be realistic and achievable 4. Physical Design District 8: 1. Project description and overview 2. Planning and community context 3. Serves a transportation purpose 4. Ensure project deliverability Additional Points
31 Section 6: Application Checklist
32 Additional Information There is additional information included in the application materials, including... Detailed info on the eligible activities Contact information for Local Planners and MnDOT contacts Federal Program Requirements ADA Requirements, Anti-Discrimination Laws, Davis- Bacon & Copeland Acts
33 More info online MnDOT TAP: FHWA TAP: NTAP Clearinghouse (archive):
34 Questions??? Thanks for your attention! We can now spend some time answering your questions. For future questions, contact Lindsey Knutson at or x7.
Competitive Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) 2017 2018
General Information Session Competitive Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) 2017 2018 DVRPC Office of Project Implementation PENNDOT Project Management Welcome Transportation Alternatives Moving
GENERAL. This manual addresses five local programs that are funded under the current Highway Act:
OVERVIEW The Local Public Agency Manual published by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) is intended to be used as a guide for cities and counties that sponsor projects utilizing federal
KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET. Department of Rural and Municipal Aid. Office of Local Programs
KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET Department of Rural and Municipal Aid Office of Local Programs Office of Local Programs Transportation Enhancements Safe Routes to School Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
Transportation Alternatives Program Guide
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Alternatives Program Guide August 2015 Capital Trail Richmond VA Contents Program Background.. 1 Program Structure Funding... 2 Eligible Activities...
Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan
RAMSEY COMMUNITIES COUNTYWIDE Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan PRIMER: LEGAL FRAMEWORK PRIMER: LEGAL FRAMEWORK Walking and Biking for All e 2 CHAPTER 2: Walking and Biking for All This page intentionally left
Update on Previous Related Transportation Enhancement Grants
ROUND 16 ROUND 16 Update on Previous Related Transportation Enhancement Grants Pima County and City of Tucson staff are implementing the Pima County-Tucson Safe Routes to Schools Pilot Program. This program
REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources
REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources THIS DOCUMENT IS IN TEXT ONLY FORMAT - A FULLY FORMATTED DOCUMENT WITH GRAPHICS IS AVAILABLE AT THE CT DOT WEBSITE
Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding
MPC 5.f Attachment 1 STP-U Eligibility Guidelines Page 1 of 5 Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES PERIOD AVAILABLE: FY + 3 Years FUND: Highway
Implementation Strategy
Implementation Strategy 6 The following implementation strategy defines strategic points of intervention for complete streets programming, including visioning, goal-setting, local agency plans, coordination
Summary of MAP-21 Matrix
Summary of MAP-21 Matrix Overview On July 6, 2012, President Obama signed into law P.L. 112-141, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Funding surface transportation programs
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS October 2015 Background The Surface Transportation Program (STP) was originally established as Section 133 of
Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects
Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Economic Stimulus Program) Application Packet for: Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects APPLICATIONS DUE
St. Cloud Area Planning Organization TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES
St. Cloud Area Planning Organization TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES A regular meeting of the St. Cloud Area Planning Organization s (APO) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was held on Wednesday,
Sponsor's Guide To Non-Traditional Transportation Project Implementation
Sponsor's Guide To Non-Traditional Transportation Project Implementation Published By: Read this guide before starting your project. Transportation Project Implementation December 2015 Page intentionally
STAFF REPORT. COUNCIL Agenda # MEETING OF November 9, 2004
COUNCIL Agenda # MEETING OF November 9, 2004 STAFF REPORT Resolution for the Authorization to Apply for Federal Surface Transportation Program Funds Administered by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission
CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)
Local Assistance Program Guidelines Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) CONTENTS Section Subject Page Number 4.1 INTRODUCTION... 4-1 4.2 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA... 4-1 General... 4-1
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century:
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century: IMPLICATIONS FOR OREGON OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Implications for Oregon December 2012 Oregon Department
New Jersey Department of Transportation. Division of Local Aid & Economic Development. Federal Aid Handbook
New Jersey Department of Transportation Division of Local Aid & Economic Development Federal Aid Handbook Prepared by: Federal Aid Quality Improvement Team May 2010 Chris Christie Governor James S. Simpson
GUIDELINES FOR SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT FUNDING PROGRAM Revised December 2009
GUIDELINES FOR SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT FUNDING PROGRAM Revised December 2009 INTRODUCTION In July 2002, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CFDA 20.205 CFDA 20.219 CFDA 23.003 HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION (Federal-Aid Highway Program) RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM I. PROGRAM
2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results
SURVEY BACKGROUND The 2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey was distributed in September in an effort to obtain feedback about the level of support for various priorities identified in the draft Comprehensive
AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
5 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 5.1 AGENCY COORDINATION As part of the planning process for the Oregon Avenue Final EA, DDOT conducted an agency coordination program. This coordination included
Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization. Certification Review Report. April 2012
Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization Certification Review Report April 2012 Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Tennessee Division Office Region 4 404 BNA Drive,
2012-2013 Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act
C h a p t e r 9 - F i n a n c i a l P l a n a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s f o r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t s A major component of the Plan (T2040)
RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS
RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS Please provide the following information when applying to RPA 14/ATURA for Surface Transportation Program (STP) funding for projects
Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000
1 of 8 12/27/2013 8:21 AM U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 MAP-21 - Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
3.1 Historical Considerations
3. Recommended Scope of Bridge improvements 3.1 Historical Considerations In the fall of 2000, an outside consultant, Fraser Design, suggested that the existing 4 th St. Bridge is potentially eligible
REPORT ON CERTIFICATION THAT THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
REPORT ON CERTIFICATION THAT THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS 2014 Prepared by: Assistance by: Reviews: Lincoln City-Lancaster County Planning Department
Koser Field. 7th St SE 2.25
Submited on: 1/31/2014 Managing Entity: Contact Information: Watford City Park District PO Box 13 Watford City, ND 58854 Robin Arndt PO Box 13 Watford City, ND 58854 PHONE : Email: [email protected]
William M. Lyons Volpe Center/Office of the Secretary/USDOT
Metropolitan Area Transportation Planning for Healthy Communities TRB Transportation Planning, Land Use, and Air Quality Conference Developing Healthy and Livable Communities William M. Lyons Volpe Center/Office
Village of Spring Valley Comprehensive Plan 2009-2029
Chapter 8: Intergovernmental Cooperation Introduction Intergovernmental communication, coordination, and cooperation can make a significant difference in the implementation and administration of a comprehensive
APPLICATION FOR STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN
APPLICATION FOR STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN for the Construction of Wastewater Treatment Facilities (Revised 02/2015) A completed application must be submitted for each proposed project. If any information
2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST
2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 806 CITICENTER BUILDING 146 SOUTH HIGH STREET AKRON, OHIO 44308 December 2012 This report was prepared by the Akron Metropolitan
CHAPTER 29 Landscape Architecture Table of Contents
Chapter 29 Landscape Architecture Table of Contents CHAPTER 29 Landscape Architecture Table of Contents CHAPTER 29 Landscape Architecture... 29-5 SECTION 1 General... 29-5 Introduction... 29-5 Aesthetic,
Update on the Development of MAP 21 Performance Measures
Update on the Development of MAP 21 Performance Measures TPB Technical Committee February 6, 2015 Eric Randall Department of Transportation Planning Item 9 MAP 21 Rulemaking National Goals Rulemaking Overview
SCOPE OF WORK for High Speed Rail and Intercity Passenger Rail Program Federal Grant Application Development
Draft 06162009 SCOPE OF WORK for High Speed Rail and Intercity Passenger Rail Program Federal Grant Application Development The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) requires the services of
Chapter 5 Financial Plan
The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA_LU) requires that the MTP incorporate a financial plan for the planning period. The MTP is required to
Red Wing Bridge Project. PAC #5/TAC #8 Meeting July 18, 2013
Red Wing Bridge Project PAC #5/TAC #8 Meeting July 18, 2013 Alternatives Analysis Agenda Overview of Past Progress Progress Since April PAC Bridge 9103 Rehabilitation Study Bridge 9040 Rehab vs. Replacement
Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Surface Transportation Program Direct Attributable Project Submittal Guide Fiscal Year 2016
Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Surface Transportation Program Direct Attributable Project Submittal Guide Fiscal Year 2016 Date of Release: September 14, 2015 Pre application
Chapter 13: Implementation Plan
Chapter 13: 13.1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the implementation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan is to set forth the actions that the City will take to ensure that the plans, programs and policies set
ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS Beaver Bank Bypass Highway 101 to the Beaver Bank Road Halifax County,
Goals, Strategies, and Tasks
Goals, Strategies, and Tasks Goals are the broadest expressions of a community's desires. Goals give direction to the plan as a whole. Goals are concerned with the long term, and often describe ideal situations
REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Chapter 10 Bicycle and Pedestrian SAFETEA-LU legislation requires that non-motorized users be considered in the LRTP. The legislation allows for bicycle and pedestrian safety to be incorporated into the
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)
Streets and Freeways Subcommittee Meeting Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) September 20, 2012 Metro s America Fast Forward Proposal Included in MAP-21 Act Enhances Transportation
Assessing Paved Trails for Compliance with Standards and Best Practices
Assessing Paved Trails for Compliance with Standards and Best Practices Session Presenters: Kristin Maravilla, Planner/Designer Masters in Landscape Architecture (UC Berkeley) Masters in City and Regional
Montana Business Process to Link Planning Studies and NEPA/MEPA Reviews
Montana Business Process to Link Planning Studies and NEPA/MEPA Reviews Planning Project Development final report Montana Business Process to Link Planning Studies and NEPA/MEPA Reviews prepared for Montana
Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures
Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures The next step in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) process is to develop goals, objectives, and performance measures.
Task 1 Project Management and Project Organization Work Plan
City of Palmdale Active Transportation Program Plan Scope of Work At their January 22, 2015 meeting, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) allocated funding for the above-referenced project as
Transportation Improvement Program FY 2006-2008
Transportation Improvement Program FY 2006-2008 Hidalgo County Metropolitan Planning Organization Adopted By Policy Committee: March 24, 2005 Public Meeting Date: March 1, 2005 Public Meeting Date: April
Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.
Chapter 5 Transportation Chapter 5: Transportation Introduction The transportation system forms the backbone of a community. I-74 connects Decatur County with the large metropolitan areas of Cincinnati
Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program. Ohio Department of Transportation
Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program Ohio Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Program Overview Program Administration.........2
