Technical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings
|
|
|
- Jocelin Hudson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Technical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings Overview of HCAHPS Star Ratings As part of a new initiative to add five-star quality ratings to its Compare Web sites, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will add HCAHPS Star Ratings to the Hospital Compare Web site in April Star ratings will make it easier for consumers to use the information on the Compare Web sites and spotlight excellence in healthcare quality. Twelve HCAHPS Star Ratings will appear on Hospital Compare: one for each of the 11 publicly reported HCAHPS measures, plus the new HCAHPS Summary Star Rating. HCAHPS Star Ratings will be the first star ratings to appear on Hospital Compare; CMS plans to update the HCAHPS Star Ratings each quarter. HCAHPS Star Ratings are based on the same data that are used to create the HCAHPS measures publicly reported on the Hospital Compare Web site. The first public reporting of the HCAHPS Star Ratings in April 2015 will be based on patients discharged between July 1, 2013 through June 30, The cut points and information in the Appendices of this document cover the data from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, which is a dry run for hospitals to view their HCAHPS Star Ratings for informational purposes. HCAHPS Measures Receiving HCAHPS Stars HCAHPS Star Ratings will be applied to each of the 11 publicly reported HCAHPS measures, which are created from specific questions on the HCAHPS Survey, as noted: HCAHPS Composite Measures 1. Communication with Nurses (Q1, Q2, Q3) 2. Communication with Doctors (Q5, Q6, Q7) 3. Responsiveness of Hospital Staff (Q4, Q11) 4. Pain Management (Q13, Q14) 5. Communication about Medicines (Q16, Q17) 6. Discharge Information (Q19, Q20) 7. Care Transition (Q23, Q24, Q25) HCAHPS Individual Items 8. Cleanliness of Hospital Environment (Q8) 9. Quietness of Hospital Environment (Q9) HCAHPS Global Items 10. Overall Hospital Rating (Q21) 11. Recommend the Hospital (Q22) 100 Survey Minimum for HCAHPS Star Ratings In order to receive HCAHPS Star Ratings, hospitals must have at least 100 completed HCAHPS Surveys over a given fourquarter period. In addition, hospitals must be eligible for public reporting of HCAHPS measures. Hospitals with fewer than 100 completed HCAHPS Surveys will not receive Star Ratings; however their HCAHPS measure scores will be publicly reported on Hospital Compare. I: Construction and Adjustment of HCAHPS Linear Scores CMS employs all survey responses in the construction of the HCAHPS Star Ratings. The responses to the survey items used in each HCAHPS measure (shown below) are combined and converted to a linear-scaled score ( Linear Score ). The Linear Score used in HCAHPS Star Ratings is closely related to the top-box, middle-box and bottombox scores publicly reported on the Hospital Compare Web site. Responses to the HCAHPS Survey are converted to Linear Scores in the following manner: Never = 0; Sometimes = 33 1/3; Usually = 66 2/3; and Always = 100 o For HCAHPS Survey items 1-9, 11, 13-14, and No = 0; and Yes = 100 o For items 19 and 20 1
2 Overall Rating 0 = 0; Overall Rating 1 = 10; Overall Rating 2 = 20; ; Overall Rating 10 = 100 o For item 21 Definitely No = 0; Probably No = 33 1/3; Probably Yes = 66 2/3; and Definitely Yes = 100 o For item 22 Strongly Disagree = 0; Disagree = 33 1/3; Agree = 66 2/3; and Strongly Agree = 100 o For items 23, 24, and 25 The linear-scaled HCAHPS scores are then adjusted for the effects of patient mix, survey mode, and quarterly weighting through a series of steps, as follows. First, CMS applies the patient-mix adjustment (PMA) to quarterly HCAHPS scores to account for the tendency of certain patient sub-groups to respond more positively or negatively to the HCAHPS Survey. PMA allows for fair comparisons across hospitals by adjusting hospital scores as if all hospitals had an identical mix of patient characteristics. The patientmix adjustment table can be found in Appendix A, Table 1, while Appendix A, Table 2 contains the national means for patient-mix variables. Additional information about the application of the HCAHPS patient-mix adjustments, including the definition of the PMA factors, can be found in the documents on the HCAHPS On-Line Web site, under the Mode & Patient-Mix Adj navigation button. Second, HCAHPS Linear Scores are adjusted for the effect of mode of survey administration (mail, telephone, mixed mode or Interactive Voice Response). CMS derived the survey mode adjustments from a large-scale, randomized mode experiment. The mode adjustments for the HCAHPS Linear Scores are included in Appendix B. For detailed information about the mode experiment and survey mode adjustment, please see Next, the four-quarter averages of HCAHPS linear scores are weighted proportionately to the number of eligible patients seen by the hospital in each quarter of the reporting period. Specifically, each quarter s score has a quarterly weight equal to that quarter s eligible discharge size divided by the total eligible discharge size for the four quarters that make up the reporting period. Finally, four-quarter averages of HCAHPS linear scores are rounded to integer values using standard rounding rules, as follows: Let X represent the unrounded four-quarter average for an HCAHPS linear score. If X is less than [X.5], then round down to nearest whole integer. If X is equal to or greater than [X.5], then round up to nearest whole integer. II: Conversion of Linear Scores into HCAHPS Star Ratings for the 11 HCAHPS Measures Next, CMS assigns 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 whole stars (only whole stars are assigned; partial stars are not used) for each HCAHPS measure by applying statistical methods that utilize relative distribution and clustering. The Star Rating for each of the 11 HCAHPS measures is determined by applying a clustering algorithm to the individual measure scores. Conceptually, the clustering algorithm identifies the gaps in the data and creates five categories (one for each star rating) such that scores of hospitals in the same score category (star rating) are as similar as possible, and scores of hospitals in different categories are as different as possible. This clustering algorithm is the same one employed by CMS to determine Medicare Part C and Part D Star Ratings. The variance in measure scores is separated into within-cluster and between-cluster sum of squares components. The algorithm develops clusters that minimize the variance of measure scores within the clusters. More specifically, the clustering algorithm minimizes the within-cluster sum of squares for each of the Star Ratings levels. The cut points (boundaries) for star assignments are derived from the range of individual measure Star Ratings per cluster. The star 2
3 levels associated with each cluster are determined by ordering the means of each cluster. The cut points for HCAHPS Star Ratings are shown in Appendix C. Additional information about the clustering method can be found in Appendix D. III: HCAHPS Summary Star Rating In addition to Star Ratings for the 11 HCAHPS measures, CMS is introducing a new metric, the HCAHPS Summary Star Rating, which is the average of all of the Star Ratings of the HCAHPS measures. The HCAHPS Summary Star Rating is constructed from the following components: The 7 Star Ratings from each of the 7 HCAHPS composite measures o Communication with Nurses, Communication with Doctors, Responsiveness of Hospital Staff, Pain Management, Communication about Medicines, Discharge Information, and Care Transition. A single Star Rating for the HCAHPS Individual Items o The average of the Star Ratings assigned to Cleanliness of Hospital Environment and Quietness of Hospital Environment. A single Star Rating for the HCAHPS Global Items o The average of the Star Ratings assigned to Overall Hospital Rating and Recommend the Hospital. The 9 Star Ratings (7 composite measure Star Ratings + Star Rating for Individual Items + Star Rating for Global Items) are combined as a simple average to form the HCAHPS Summary Star Rating. In the final step, normal rounding rules are applied to the 9-measure average to arrive at the HCAHPS Summary Star Rating (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 stars). An example of the calculation of the HCAHPS Summary Star Rating The following is an example of how to calculate the HCAHPS Summary Star Rating. Suppose a hospital has Star Ratings for each of the 11 HCAHPS measures as shown in following table. 11 HCAHPS Measure Star Ratings 9 Star Ratings Used in HCAHPS Summary Star Rating HCAHPS Composite Measures Communication with Nurses 4 4 Communication with Doctors 3 3 Responsiveness of Hospital Staff 4 4 Pain Management 5 5 Communication about Medicines 4 4 Discharge Information 4 4 Care Transition 3 3 HCAHPS Individual Items Cleanliness of Hospital Environment 5 (5+5)/2 Quietness of Hospital Environment 5 HCAHPS Global Items = 5 Overall Hospital Rating 4 (4+3)/2 Recommend the Hospital 3 = Measure HCAHPS Summary Star Rating Average (unrounded) ( )/9 = HCAHPS Summary Star Rating (rounded) 4 Step 1: Calculate a Star Rating for HCAHPS Individual Items by averaging the Star Ratings for Cleanliness of Hospital Environment and Quietness of Hospital Environment. In this example, the Star Rating for HCAHPS Individual Items = (5+5)/2 = 5. 3
4 Step 2: Calculate a Star Rating for HCAHPS Global Items by averaging the Star Ratings for Overall Hospital Rating and Recommend the Hospital. In this example, the Star Rating for HCAHPS Global Items = (4+3)/2 = 3.5. Note: Do not round this average. Step 3: Calculate the HCAHPS Summary Star Rating as the average of the 7 composite measure Star Ratings, the Star Rating for HCAHPS Individual Items, and the Star Rating for HCAHPS Global Items. In this example, the HCAHPS Summary Star Rating = ( )/9 = Step 4: Lastly, round the 9-Measure HCAHPS Summary Star Rating Average using the rounding table below. In this example, the hospital s HCAHPS Summary Star Rating rounds to 4 stars. CMS uses standard rounding rules for the assignment of HCAHPS Summary Stars, as follows: 9-Measure HCAHPS Summary Star Rating Average HCAHPS Summary Star Rating Assignment 1.00 and < Star 1.50 and < Stars 2.50 and < Stars 3.50 and < Stars 4.50 and Stars 4
5 Appendix A, Table 1: HCAHPS Patient-Mix Adjustments of Linear Scores for Patients Discharged Between Quarter 1, 2013 and Quarter 4, 2013 (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013) -- For use in the Dry Run of HCAHPS Star Ratings included in the December 2014 Hospital Compare Preview Reports. Patient-Mix Adjustment (PMA) Comm. with Nurses Comm. with Doctors Responsiveness of Hosp. Staff Pain Management Comm. About Medicines Cleanliness of Hosp. Env. Quietness of Hosp. Env. Discharge Information Care Transition Overall Hospital Rating Recommend the Hospital Education (per level; 1=8th grade or less and 6=More than 4-year college degree) Self-Rated Health (per level; 1=Excellent and =Poor) Response Percentile (per 1% of response percentile) LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME (1Q13 to 4Q13) Non-English English (REFERENCE) LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME (4Q13 only) Spanish Chinese R/V/O English (REFERENCE) AGE Age Age Age Age Age Age Age Age 85+ (REFERENCE) SERVICE LINE Maternity Surgical Medical (REFERENCE) INTERACTIONS Surgical Line * Age Maternity Line * Age Age takes on the values of 1 to 8 as follows: (1: 18 to 24); (2: 25 to 34); (3: 35 to 44); (4: 45 to 54); (5: 55 to 64); (6: 65 to 74); (7: 75 to 84); and (8: 85+). 5
6 Appendix A, Table 2: National Means of PMA Variables for Patients Discharged Between Quarter 1, 2013 and Quarter 4, 2013 (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013) -- For use in the Dry Run of HCAHPS Star Ratings included in the December 2014 Hospital Compare Preview Reports. Patient-Mix Adjustment (PMA) Education (per level; 1=8th grade or less and 6=More than 4-year college degree) Self-Rated Health (per level; 1=Excellent and 5=Poor) National Mean Response Percentile 15.5% LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME Non-English 6.7% English (REFERENCE) 93.2% Spanish 4.6% Chinese 0.4% R/V/O 1.8% English (REFERENCE) 93.2% AGE Age % Age % Age % Age % Age % Age % Age % Age 85+ (REFERENCE) 7.1% SERVICE LINE Maternity 13.8% Surgical 35.6% Medical (REFERENCE) 50.6% INTERACTIONS Surgical Line * Age Maternity Line * Age Age takes on the values of 1 to 8 as follows: (1: 18 to 24); (2: 25 to 34); (3: 35 to 44); (4: 45 to 54); (5: 55 to 64); (6: 65 to 74); (7: 75 to 84); and (8: 85+). 6
7 Appendix B: Survey Mode Adjustments of HCAHPS Linear Scores to Adjust to a Reference of Mail Mode -- For use in the Dry Run of HCAHPS Star Ratings included in the December 2014 Hospital Compare Preview Reports. Phone Only Mixed Active IVR HCAHPS Composite Measures Communication with Nurses Communication with Doctors Responsiveness of Hospital Staff Pain Management Communication about Medicines Discharge Information Care Transition HCAHPS Individual Items Cleanliness of Hospital Environment Quietness of Hospital Environment HCAHPS Global Items Overall Hospital Rating Recommend the Hospital
8 Appendix C: HCAHPS Star Rating Cut Points for Patients Discharged Between Quarter 1, 2013 and Quarter 4, 2013 (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013) -- For use in the Dry Run of HCAHPS Star Ratings included in the December 2014 Hospital Compare Preview Reports. 1 Star 2 Stars 3 Stars 4 Stars 5 Stars HCAHPS Composite Measures Communication with Nurses <88 88 to <90 90 to <92 92 to <95 95 Communication with Doctors <90 90 to <92 92 to <94 94 to <96 96 Responsiveness of Hospital Staff <78 78 to <82 82 to <86 86 to <92 92 Pain Management <83 83 to <85 85 to <88 88 to <90 90 Communication about Medicines <74 74 to <78 78 to <82 82 to <86 86 Discharge Information <79 79 to <83 83 to <87 87 to <91 91 Care Transition <78 78 to <80 80 to <82 82 to <85 85 HCAHPS Individual Items Cleanliness of Hospital Environment <81 81 to <85 85 to <89 89 to <93 93 Quietness of Hospital Environment <74 74 to <80 80 to <83 83 to <87 87 HCAHPS Global Items Overall Hospital Rating <81 81 to <87 87 to <90 90 to <92 92 Recommend the Hospital <83 83 to <87 87 to <89 89 to <
9 Appendix D: Additional Information on the Clustering Method Used to Create the HCAHPS Star Ratings Appendix D outlines the sequence of steps taken in the clustering methodology to develop the 11 HCAHPS Star Ratings. For each HCAHPS linear measure, the clustering method: 1. Produces the individual measure distance matrix. 2. Groups the measure scores into an initial set of clusters. 3. Selects the final set of clusters. Step 1. Produce the individual measure distance matrix. For each pair of hospitals j and k (j>=k) among the n hospitals with measure score data, the Euclidian distance of the measure scores (e.g., the absolute value of the difference between the two measure scores) is computed. The clustering method then enters this distance in row j and column k of a distance matrix with n rows and n columns. This matrix is produced using the DISTANCE procedure in SAS. Step 2. Create a tree of cluster assignments. The distance matrix calculated in Step 1 is the input to the clustering procedure. The stored distance algorithm is implemented to compute cluster assignments. The following process is implemented by the CLUSTER procedure in SAS: a. The input measure score distances are squared. b. The clusters are initialized by assigning each hospital to its own cluster. c. In order to determine which pair of clusters to merge, Ward s minimum variance method is used to separate the variance of the measure scores into within-cluster and between-cluster sum of squares components. d. From the existing clusters, two clusters are selected for merging to minimize the within-cluster sum of squares over all possible sets of clusters that might result from a merge. e. Steps b and c are repeated to reduce the number of clusters by one until a single cluster containing all hospitals results. Step 3. Select the final set of clusters from the tree of cluster assignments. The process outlined in Step 2 produces a tree of cluster assignments from which the five final clusters (which represent the five star rating categories) are selected using the TREE procedure in SAS. 9
Technical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings
Overview of HCAHPS Star Ratings Technical Notes for HCAHPS Star Ratings As part of the initiative to add five-star quality ratings to its Compare Web sites, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Mode Adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey
of the CAHPS Hospital Survey December 21, 2006 Abstract A randomized Experiment of 27,229 discharges from 45 hospitals was used to develop adjustments for the effects of survey mode (Mail Only, Telephone
Mode and Patient-mix Adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey (HCAHPS)
Mode and Patient-mix Adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey (HCAHPS) April 30, 2008 Abstract A randomized Mode Experiment of 27,229 discharges from 45 hospitals was used to develop adjustments for the
Patient Survey (HHCAHPS) Star Ratings Frequently Asked Questions
Patient Survey (HHCAHPS) Star Ratings Frequently Asked Questions General 1. What is the purpose of Patient Survey (HHCAHPS) Star Ratings? The Affordable Care Act calls for transparent and easily understood
Understanding Patient Satisfaction Reporting in the Era of HCAHPS Robert J. Ogden
Understanding Patient Satisfaction Reporting in the Era of HCAHPS Robert J. Ogden Consultant, HealthStream Research HCAHPS & Patient Satisfaction Reporting Robert J. Ogden, Jr. Consultant HealthStream
Quality Star Ratings on Medicare.gov
Quality Star Ratings on Medicare.gov August 2015 2015 CMS National Training Program Workshop August 10 11 St. Louis, MO Quality Star Ratings Part of a larger effort at DHHS to transform our health care
Under Medicare s value-based purchasing (VBP) program,
RESEARCH HCAHPS survey results: Impact of severity of illness on hospitals performance on HCAHPS survey results James I. Merlino, MD, FACS, FASCRS a, Carmen Kestranek b, Daniel Bokar b, Zhiyuan Sun, MS,
HCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS
HCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS You should only fill out this survey if you were the patient during the hospital stay named in the cover letter. Do not fill out this survey if you were not the patient.
Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes. First Plan Preview DRAFT
Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes First Plan Preview Updated 08/05/2015 Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision Date - Initial release of the 2016 Part C
HCAHPS Survey: Patients Perspectives of Care
National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems October 2008 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 950 Washington, DC 20004 202 585 0100 tel / 202 585 0101 fax www.naph.org HCAHPS Survey: Patients
Medicare 2015 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes DRAFT
Medicare 2015 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes Updated 09/03/2014 Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision Date - Initial release of the preliminary 2015 Part C & D Star
Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes
Medicare 2016 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes Updated 09/30/2015 Document Change Log Previous Version of Change Revision Date - Release of the final 2016 Part C & D Star Ratings Technical Notes
HCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS
HCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS You should only fill out this survey if you were the patient during the hospital stay named in the cover letter. Do not fill out this survey if you were not the patient.
HCAHPS Active Interactive Voice Response Script
HCAHPS Active Interactive Voice Response Script Overview This active interactive voice response (IVR) interview script is provided to assist operators while attempting to reach the respondent. The script
Patient Experience/ Satisfaction What s at Stake? Customer Service at UAMS
Patient Experience/ Satisfaction What s at Stake? Customer Service at UAMS Why Do We Care? We started measuring patient satisfaction about 11 years ago because we care what our patients are saying. We
It s Time for Medicare
It s Time for Medicare med-waageinbook-1214 Medicare What you need to know. You re turning 65. Or you re already 65 and getting ready to retire and lose your healthcare coverage. You re almost ready for
CAHPS Hospital Survey (HCAHPS) Quality Assurance. Guidelines. Version 4.0. February 2009
CAHPS Hospital Survey (HCAHPS) QA Guidelines Quality Assurance Version.0 February 009 CAHPS HOSPITAL SURVEY (HCAHPS) QUALITY ASSURANCE GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS These Quality Assurance Guidelines were
Value-Based Purchasing Program Overview. Maida Soghikian, MD Grand Rounds Scripps Green Hospital November 28, 2012
Value-Based Purchasing Program Overview Maida Soghikian, MD Grand Rounds Scripps Green Hospital November 28, 2012 Presentation Overview Background and Introduction Inpatient Quality Reporting Program Value-Based
Patient Experience. The Cleveland Clinic Journey. American Medical Group Association Orlando, Florida March 14, 2013
Patient Experience The Cleveland Clinic Journey American Medical Group Association Orlando, Florida March 14, 2013 James Merlino, MD Chief Experience Officer Overview How did Cleveland Clinic change their
Preview of the Attestation System for the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program
Preview of the Attestation System for the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program The Medicare EHR Incentive Program provides incentive payments to eligible professionals, eligible hospitals
Three-Star Composite Rating Method
Three-Star Composite Rating Method CheckPoint uses three-star composite ratings to enable consumers to more quickly and easily interpret information about hospital quality measures. Composite ratings combine
Home Health Care CAHPS Survey
Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Patricia Jump, MA, PHN, RN, COS-C President Training & Consulting www.acorns.com What is CAHPS? Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey to collect data
and the implementation of a training program for staff. The process and progress to-date has been gratifying, and the commitment to ongoing
RD 5 Results of the Patient Satisfaction Survey over the last four years. Describe trends, interventions implemented and the impact on nursing practice. From 2001 through December 2006, Massachusetts General
The Star Treatment: Estimating the Impact of Star Ratings on Medicare. Advantage Enrollments. Appendices
The Star Treatment: Estimating the Impact of Star Ratings on Medicare Advantage Enrollments. Appendices Michael Darden Department of Economics Tulane University Ian M. McCarthy Department of Economics
Medical Information Management & Mining. You Chen Jan,15, 2013 [email protected]
Medical Information Management & Mining You Chen Jan,15, 2013 [email protected] 1 Trees Building Materials Trees cannot be used to build a house directly. How can we transform trees to building materials?
Medicare Part C & D Star Ratings: Update for 2016. August 5, 2015 Part C & D User Group Call
Medicare Part C & D Star Ratings: Update for 2016 August 5, 2015 Part C & D User Group Call Session Overview 2016 Star Ratings Changes announced in Call Letter. HPMS Plan Previews. 2016 Display Measures.
THE TRILLION DOLLAR CONUNDRUM: COMPLEMENTARITIES AND HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
ONLINE APPENDIX TO THE TRILLION DOLLAR CONUNDRUM: COMPLEMENTARITIES AND HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY By David Dranove, Chris Forman, Avi Goldfarb, and Shane Greenstein NOT FOR PUBLICATION Appendix Table
6.4 Normal Distribution
Contents 6.4 Normal Distribution....................... 381 6.4.1 Characteristics of the Normal Distribution....... 381 6.4.2 The Standardized Normal Distribution......... 385 6.4.3 Meaning of Areas under
Key Concept. Density Curve
MAT 155 Statistical Analysis Dr. Claude Moore Cape Fear Community College Chapter 6 Normal Probability Distributions 6 1 Review and Preview 6 2 The Standard Normal Distribution 6 3 Applications of Normal
National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program
National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program Fiscal Year 2016 Overview for Beneficiaries, Providers and Stakeholders Cindy Tourison, MSHI Lead, Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting
CMS Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program
Handbook II: CMS Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program This training handbook is a resource for the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Home Health Care CAHPS Survey. Protocols and Guidelines Manual. Version 7.0
Home Health Care CAHPS Survey Protocols and Guidelines Manual Version 7.0 January 2015 This page intentionally left blank. COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR THE HOME HEALTH CARE CAHPS SURVEY Home
Justin Pestrue, Director Clinical Analytics and Business Intelligence Akron General Health System
Using Predictive Analytics to Maximize HCAHPS Results Justin Pestrue, Director Clinical Analytics and Business Intelligence Akron General Health System Special Thanks Luke MacAdam, Manager
CMS 5-Star Quality Rating. Reviewing How, Why and What are OUR Stars!
CMS 5-Star Quality Rating Reviewing How, Why and What are OUR Stars! FIVE - STAR Fact, Fiction & Strategies Discussion for OCAHF June 25, 2014 By Chris Jung, ehealth Data Solutions What is 5-Star Quality
Five Star Rating System Tip Sheet
Five Star Rating System Tip Sheet In December 2008, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) enhanced its Nursing Home Compare public reporting site to include a set of quality ratings for each
Standardization and Its Effects on K-Means Clustering Algorithm
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 6(7): 399-3303, 03 ISSN: 040-7459; e-issn: 040-7467 Maxwell Scientific Organization, 03 Submitted: January 3, 03 Accepted: February 5, 03
CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS
CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS CALCULATION OF SCORES Conversion of 1-5 scale to 0-100 scores When you look at your report, you will notice that the scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, even though respondents
Data Mining Cluster Analysis: Basic Concepts and Algorithms. Lecture Notes for Chapter 8. Introduction to Data Mining
Data Mining Cluster Analysis: Basic Concepts and Algorithms Lecture Notes for Chapter 8 Introduction to Data Mining by Tan, Steinbach, Kumar Tan,Steinbach, Kumar Introduction to Data Mining 4/8/2004 Hierarchical
Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities (IPF) Quality Reporting Program
Keys to Successful FY 2016 Reporting Questions and Answers Moderator/Speaker: Evette Robinson, MPH Project Lead, Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting (IPFQR) Program Value, Incentives, and
Medicare 2014 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes
Medicare 2014 Part C & D Star Rating Technical Notes Updated 09/27/2013 Document Change Log Previous Version Description of Change Revision Date - Initial release of the Final 2014 Part C & D Star Ratings
Integrated Health Partnerships (IHP) Quality Measurement
Integrated Health Partnerships (IHP) Quality Measurement 2014 Principles Overview Potential Shareable Savings Based on Quality Measurement Measure Categories and Weighting Data Measures Scoring Example
Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008
Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization December 2008 Duke University Hospital: Organizational and Tactical Strategies to Enhance Patient Satisfaction Sha r o n Si l o w-ca r r o l l, M.B.A.,
Cluster Analysis using R
Cluster analysis or clustering is the task of assigning a set of objects into groups (called clusters) so that the objects in the same cluster are more similar (in some sense or another) to each other
Introduction to Statistical Computing in Microsoft Excel By Hector D. Flores; [email protected], and Dr. J.A. Dobelman
Introduction to Statistical Computing in Microsoft Excel By Hector D. Flores; [email protected], and Dr. J.A. Dobelman Statistics lab will be mainly focused on applying what you have learned in class with
H-CAHPS Quality Plus-Hospital Patient Experience Survey Massachusetts General Hospital
H-CAHPS Quality Plus-Hospital Patient Experience Survey Massachusetts General Hospital Introduction Hi, my name is [InterviewerFirstName] [InterviewerLastName], and I'm calling on behalf of Massachusetts
Chapter 5: Normal Probability Distributions - Solutions
Chapter 5: Normal Probability Distributions - Solutions Note: All areas and z-scores are approximate. Your answers may vary slightly. 5.2 Normal Distributions: Finding Probabilities If you are given that
Canadian Patient Experiences Survey Inpatient Care: Frequently Asked Questions
September 2014 Canadian Patient Experiences Survey Inpatient Care: Frequently Asked Questions Background... 3 1. What is the Canadian Patient Experiences Survey Inpatient Care?... 3 2. What factors were
Medicare Final Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Regulations Effective January 1, 2012 Median Savings of $470 Million over 4 Years
October 20, 2011 CIT Healthcare, John M. Cousins, SVP Healthcare Intelligence [email protected] Tel: 850-668-2907 Cell: 716-867-9965 Medicare Final Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Regulations Effective
Final Report. TRICARE Inpatient Satisfaction Survey
September 22, 2010 TRICARE Inpatient Satisfaction Survey Survey Results of Hospital Inpatients in Army Military Treatment Facilities (MTFs): July September 2009 Final Report Prepared for Office of the
MATH BOOK OF PROBLEMS SERIES. New from Pearson Custom Publishing!
MATH BOOK OF PROBLEMS SERIES New from Pearson Custom Publishing! The Math Book of Problems Series is a database of math problems for the following courses: Pre-algebra Algebra Pre-calculus Calculus Statistics
What is an ACO? What forms of organizations may become an ACO? IAMSS 30 th Annual Education Conference Pearls of Wisdom
IAMSS 30 th Annual Education Conference Pearls of Wisdom The Impact of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and Health Care Reform on Credentialing, Privileging and Peer Review April 28-29, 2011 Michael
HCAHPS, Value-Based Purchasing and A Culture of Always
Objectives HCAHPS, Value-Based Purchasing and A Culture of Always Karen Cook, RN BSN www.studergroup.com 1. Describe the history and current usage of the CAHPS family of surveys and other relevant outpatient
IBM SPSS Statistics 20 Part 4: Chi-Square and ANOVA
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LOS ANGELES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES IBM SPSS Statistics 20 Part 4: Chi-Square and ANOVA Summer 2013, Version 2.0 Table of Contents Introduction...2 Downloading the
MEASURES OF VARIATION
NORMAL DISTRIBTIONS MEASURES OF VARIATION In statistics, it is important to measure the spread of data. A simple way to measure spread is to find the range. But statisticians want to know if the data are
Steven M. Ho!and. Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2501
CLUSTER ANALYSIS Steven M. Ho!and Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2501 January 2006 Introduction Cluster analysis includes a broad suite of techniques designed to find groups
Hospital Value-based Purchasing Specifications 2016 Updated August 2015
Description Methodology Measurement Period Allowable Exclusions Total Performance Score Individual measures CMS incentive program for PPS hospitals. The purpose is to achieve value by tying payment to
CAHPS Hospice Survey. What the Heck Does That Mean? What we will discuss today. Direction of CMS Policy THE ROAD TO PUBLIC REPORTING IN HOSPICE
CAHPS Hospice Survey What the Heck Does That Mean? Charlene Ross, MBA, MSN, RN Consultant/Educator R&C Healthcare Solutions & Hospice Fundamentals 602-740-0783 [email protected] 1 What
The Science and Art of Market Segmentation Using PROC FASTCLUS Mark E. Thompson, Forefront Economics Inc, Beaverton, Oregon
The Science and Art of Market Segmentation Using PROC FASTCLUS Mark E. Thompson, Forefront Economics Inc, Beaverton, Oregon ABSTRACT Effective business development strategies often begin with market segmentation,
Cluster Analysis. Isabel M. Rodrigues. Lisboa, 2014. Instituto Superior Técnico
Instituto Superior Técnico Lisboa, 2014 Introduction: Cluster analysis What is? Finding groups of objects such that the objects in a group will be similar (or related) to one another and different from
STT315 Chapter 4 Random Variables & Probability Distributions KM. Chapter 4.5, 6, 8 Probability Distributions for Continuous Random Variables
Chapter 4.5, 6, 8 Probability Distributions for Continuous Random Variables Discrete vs. continuous random variables Examples of continuous distributions o Uniform o Exponential o Normal Recall: A random
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions Medicare Shared Savings Program Contents General Questions... 1 *NEW* Assignment... 5 ACO Participant List... 5 *UPDATED* Form CMS-588 Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT)... 7 Governing
The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) Summary of SGR Repeal and Replacement Provisions
ACOG Government Affairs May 2015 The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) Summary of SGR Repeal and Replacement Provisions This landmark bipartisan legislation, signed into law
Review Jeopardy. Blue vs. Orange. Review Jeopardy
Review Jeopardy Blue vs. Orange Review Jeopardy Jeopardy Round Lectures 0-3 Jeopardy Round $200 How could I measure how far apart (i.e. how different) two observations, y 1 and y 2, are from each other?
CMS Office of Public Affairs 202-690-6145 MEDICARE PROPOSES NEW HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROGRAM
For Immediate Release: Friday, January 07, 2011 Contact: CMS Office of Public Affairs 202-690-6145 MEDICARE PROPOSES NEW HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROGRAM OVERVIEW: Today the Centers for Medicare
FORM FRAMEWORX. SharePoint 2013 App
FORM FRAMEWORX SharePoint 2013 App Contents 1. To Create New Form Step By Step Guide:... 2 2. To Create New Form using existing Template Step By Step Guide:... 7 3. To Fill a Form Step by Step Guide:...
Hospital Performance Differences by Ownership
100 TOP HOSPITALS RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS This paper evaluates whether hospital ownership is associated with differing levels of performance on Truven Health 100 Top Hospitals balanced scorecard measures.
Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Some Basics and Algorithms
Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Some Basics and Algorithms Nethra Sambamoorthi CRMportals Inc., 11 Bartram Road, Englishtown, NJ 07726 (NOTE: Please use always the latest copy of the document. Click on this
Quality drives productivity and growth
Quality. Compassion. Care. Quality drives productivity and growth Introduction to Capio January, 216 Capio today About 12,4 employees and 4.6 million patient visits in Sweden, Norway, France and Germany
2015 Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Adult Medicaid Health Plan CAHPS Report
2015 State of Michigan Department of Health and Human Services 2015 Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Adult Medicaid Health Plan CAHPS Report September 2015 Draft Draft 3133 East Camelback
Unit 11 Fractions and decimals
Unit 11 Fractions and decimals Five daily lessons Year 4 Spring term (Key objectives in bold) Unit Objectives Year 4 Use fraction notation. Recognise simple fractions that are Page several parts of a whole;
The right edge of the box is the third quartile, Q 3, which is the median of the data values above the median. Maximum Median
CONDENSED LESSON 2.1 Box Plots In this lesson you will create and interpret box plots for sets of data use the interquartile range (IQR) to identify potential outliers and graph them on a modified box
CY2015 MA HSD Provider and Facility Specialties and Network Adequacy Criteria Guidance Table of Contents
CY2015 MA HSD Provider and Facility Specialties and Network Adequacy Criteria Guidance Table of Contents Summary of Significant Changes to the CY2015 MA Provider and MA Facility Criteria... 1 HSD Provider
How To Understand And Solve Algebraic Equations
College Algebra Course Text Barnett, Raymond A., Michael R. Ziegler, and Karl E. Byleen. College Algebra, 8th edition, McGraw-Hill, 2008, ISBN: 978-0-07-286738-1 Course Description This course provides
Using Medicare s Website to Choose a Medicare-Approved Drug Plan 2016. Prepared by Senior PharmAssist (rev 10.07.2015)
TIPS AND HINTS: Using Medicare s Website to Choose a Medicare-Approved Drug Plan 2016 Prepared by Senior PharmAssist (rev 10.07.2015) IT PAYS TO COMPARE. The plan that was the cheapest for you in 2015
OCM and SCIP Measure Data Submission Process: How to Submit Data through the QualityNet Secure Portal
OCM and SCIP Measure Data Submission Process: How to Submit Data through the QualityNet Secure Portal Henrietta Hight, BA, BSN, RN, CCM, CDMS, CPHQ PCHQR Support Coordinator Inpatient Value, Incentives,
Lecture 10: Regression Trees
Lecture 10: Regression Trees 36-350: Data Mining October 11, 2006 Reading: Textbook, sections 5.2 and 10.5. The next three lectures are going to be about a particular kind of nonlinear predictive model,
Automated SEO. A Market Brew White Paper
Automated SEO A Market Brew White Paper Abstract In this paper, we use the term Reach to suggest the forecasted traffic to a particular webpage or website. Reach is a traffic metric that describes an expected
Collaborative Forecasting
Collaborative Forecasting By Harpal Singh What is Collaborative Forecasting? Collaborative forecasting is the process for collecting and reconciling the information from diverse sources inside and outside
Classifying Large Data Sets Using SVMs with Hierarchical Clusters. Presented by :Limou Wang
Classifying Large Data Sets Using SVMs with Hierarchical Clusters Presented by :Limou Wang Overview SVM Overview Motivation Hierarchical micro-clustering algorithm Clustering-Based SVM (CB-SVM) Experimental
Overview of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2017
Overview of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Bethany Wheeler Hospital VBP Program Support Contract Lead HSAG February 17, 2015 2 p.m. ET Purpose This event will provide an
