Programme of Requirements part 3h: Certificate Policy Server certificates Private Services Domain (G3)
|
|
|
- Clifford Cooper
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Programme of Requirements part 3h: Certificate Policy Server certificates Private Services Domain (G3) Appendix to CP Government/Companies (G1) and Organization (G2) domains Datum 27 July 2015 Private Services Domain (G1): Server Page 1 of 37
2 Publisher's imprint Version number 4.1 Contact person Policy Authority of PKIoverheid Organization Logius Street address Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg 52 Postal address P.O. Box JE THE HAGUE T [email protected] Page 2 of 37
3 Contents Contents Introduction to the Certificate Policy Overview Design of the Certificate Policy Status References to this CP User Community Certificate Usage Contact Information Policy Authority Publication and Repository Responsibilities Electronic Repository Publication of CSP Information Access to Published Information Identification and Authentication Naming Initial Identity Validation Identification and Authentication for Re-key Requests Certificate Life-Cycle Operational Requirements Certificate Application Certificate Acceptance Key Pair and Certificate Usage Revocation and Suspension of Certificates Certificate Status Services Facility, Management and Operational Controls Procedural Controls Personnel Controls Audit Loggin Procedures Records Archival Compromise and Disaster Recovery Technical Security Controls Key Pair Generation and Installation Private Key Protection and Cryptographic Module Engineering Controls Other Aspects of Key Pair Management Page 3 of 37
4 6.4 Activation data Computer Security Controls Life Cycle Technical Controls Network Security Controls Certificate, CRL and OSCP profiles Certificate Profile CRL Profile OCSP Profile Compliance Audit and Other Assessments Other Business and Legal Matters Financial Responsibility Intellectual Property Rights Representations and Warranties Limitations of Liability Amendments Dispute Resolution Procedures Governing Law Miscellaneous provisions Appendix A Certificate Profile Revisions Amendments from version 4.0 to New Modifications Editorial Page 4 of 37
5 The Policy Authority (PA) of the PKI for the government supports the Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations in managing the PKI for the government. The PKI for the government is an agreements system. This system enables generic and large-scale use of the electronic signature, and it also facilitates remote identification and confidential communication. The tasks of the PA of PKIoverheid are: contributing towards the development and the maintenance of the framework of standards that underlies the PKI for the government, the Programme of Requirements (PoR); assisting in the process of admittance by Certification Service Providers (CSPs) to the PKI for the government and preparing the administration; supervising and monitoring the activities of CSPs that issue certificates under the root of the PKI for the government. The purpose of the Policy Authority is: Enforcement of a practicable and reliable framework of standards for PKI services that provides an established level of security for the government's communication needs that is transparent to users. Revision control Version Date Description Ratified by the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations December Ratified by the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations July 2015 Page 5 of 37
6 1 Introduction to the Certificate Policy 1.1 Overview This is part 3h of the Programme of Requirements (PoR) for the PKI for the government and is known as the Certificate Policy (CP). Set out in the PoR are the standards for the PKI for the government. This section relates to the requirements laid down for the services of a Certification Service Provider (CSP) within the PKI for the government. Within the PKI for the government, a distinction is made between various root certificates and underlying domains. This document only relates to the private server certificates issued by CSPs in the Private Services domain under the private root certificate. Certificates which are issued under the private root certificate are not publicly trusted by browsers or other applications. The scope of these certificates is primarily a closed usergroup within which an agreement has been reached regarding the use of the PKIoverheid Private Root. This chapter includes a brief explanation of the CP. A more detailed explanation regarding the background and structure of the PKI for the government, as well as the cohesion between the various parts within the PoR is included in part 1 of the PoR. For a list of the definitions and abbreviations used in this section, please refer to part 4 of the PoR Design of the Certificate Policy As stated in part 1 of the PoR, the requirements that form part of the CP consist of requirements 1 : that ensue from the Dutch legal framework in relation to the electronic signature; that ensue from the latest version of the ETSI TS standard where policy NCP is applicable for server certificates (extendedkeyusage client and server authentication).; that are specifically drawn up by and for the PKIoverheid. Incorporated in chapters 2 to 9 inclusive are references to the specific PKIoverheid requirements in the Additional Requirements. The table below shows the structure of the reference to the actualpkioverheid requirement (PKIo requirement). Reference to the paragraph from the structure to which the PKIo requirement relates. is a PKIX framework of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and is the de facto standard for the structure of Certificate Policies and Certification Practice Statements 2. Unique number of the PKIo requirement. In each paragraph, consecutive numbering is used for the PKIo requirements. In combination with the RFC 3647 paragraph number, this forms a unique label for the PKIo requirement. 1 For an explanation regarding the positioning of the requirements applicable within the PKI for the government, please refer to part 1 of the PoR. 2 Chapters 2 to 9 inclusive only include those paragraphs from to which a PKIorequirement applies. Page 6 of 37
7 This CP also includes a number of provisions that are not formulated as PKIo requirements. These provisions do not make any demands on the CSPs within the PKI for the government, but do apply as a policy to the PKI for the government. This concerns provisions from paragraphs 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 8, , , 9.14 and The profiles used within PKIoverheid relating to the services certificates and status information certificate are listed in appendix A. Based on chapters 1 to 9 inclusive, a reference matrix is included in appendix B. In accordance with the structure, the matrix contains a reference to the applicable requirements within the PKI for the government. A distinction is made between the requirements originating from Dutch law, requirements from ETSI TS and the PKIo requirements Status This is version 4.1 of part 3h of the PoR. The current version has been updated up to and including July The PA has devoted the utmost attention and care to the data and information incorporated in this CP. Nevertheless, it is possible that there are inaccuracies and imperfections. The PA accepts no liability for damage resulting from these inaccuracies or imperfections, nor is any liability assumed for damage caused by the use or distribution of this CP, if this CP is used for purposes other than for the use of certificates described in paragraph 1.4 of this CP. 1.2 References to this CP Within the PKI for the government multiple root certificates are in use for the regular publicly trusted root, the TRAIL root, the EV root and the private not publicly trusted root. Each of these root certificates contains a hierarchy consisting of differen domains. Each domain has its own specific domain structure. Furthermore these root certificates often have multiple active generations or versions (g1, g2, g3). In addition the different PKI for the government structures or roots are based both on the SHA-1 algorithm (regular root G1) and the SHA-256 algorithm (regular root G2 and G3). Each type of certificate within PKIoverheid is uniquely identified by an OID. The OIDs of the Certificate Policies of this part of the Programme of Requirements are in accordance with the following schedule. Page 7 of 37
8 Private Services Domain: OID CP for the private server certificate within the Private Services domain, that contains the public key for authenticity and confidentiality. The OID is structured as follows: {joint-iso-itu-t (2). country (16). the Netherlands (528). Dutch organization (1). Dutch government (1003). PKI for the government (1). CP (2). private services domain (8). server (6). version number}. If requirements only apply to one or two types of certificates, this is expressly specified by stating the Object Identifier (OID) referencing the applicable CP or CPs. 1.3 User Community Within the Private Services domain, the user community consists of subscribers who are organizational entities within the government and business community (see PKIo pkio4) and of certificate holders, who also belong to these subscribers. In addition there are relying parties, who act with a reliance on certificates of the relevant certificate holders. The parties within the user community are subscribers, certificate managers, certificate holders and relying parties. A subscriber is a natural or legal personality who enters into an agreement with a CSP on behalf of one or more certificate holders for the certification of public keys. o A certificate holder is an entity, characterized in a certificate as the holder of the private key that is linked to the public key provided in the certificate. The certificate holder is part of an organizational entity, for which a subscriber is the contracting party. Within the Certificate Policy Private Server Certificates, the term certificate holder means a device or a system (a nonnatural person), operated by or on behalf of an organizational entity. A certificate manager is a natural person who performs actions on behalf of the subscriber in respect of the certificate holder's certificate. The subscriber instructs the certificate manager to perform the relevant actions and records these in a certificate manager's testimony. A relying party is every natural or legal personality who is a recipient of a certificate and who acts with a reliance on that certificate. Other than for personal certificates, relying parties mainly derive security from the connection of a service (device or feature) to the organizational entity to which the service belongs. This CP therefore places the emphasis on providing certainty about the connection of a message sent by or a web service provided by a device or system with the relevant organization. In view of this, establishing the identity of the certificate holder (device) is less important than establishing the certificate holder's connection to the organizational entity. Page 8 of 37
9 1.4 Certificate Usage The use of certificates issued under this CP relates to communication from certificate holders who act on behalf of the subscriber. [OID ] Server certificates that are issued under this CP, can be used to secure a connection between a specific client and a server that is part of the organizational entity listed as the subscriber in the relevant certificate. 1.5 Contact Information Policy Authority The PA is responsible for this CP. Questions relating to this CP can be put to the PA; the address can be found at: Page 9 of 37
10 2 Publication and Repository Responsibilities 2.1 Electronic Repository 2.2 Publication of CSP Information 2.2 Publication of CSP Information 2.2-pkio8 2.4 Access to Published Information Page 10 of 37
11 3 Identification and Authentication 3.1 Naming 3.2 Initial Identity Validation Method to prove possession of the private key pkio Authentication of organizational entity pkio Authentication of organizational entity pkio Authentication of individual identity pkio Authentication of individual identity pkio Authentication of individual identity pkio Validation of authority pkio30 Page 11 of 37
12 3.2.5 Validation of authority pkio Authorization of the certificate holder pkio Identification and Authentication for Re-key Requests Page 12 of 37
13 4 Certificate Life-Cycle Operational Requirements 4.1 Certificate Application 4.1 Certificate Application 4.1-pkio Certificate Acceptance 4.5 Key Pair and Certificate Usage 4.9 Revocation and Suspension of Certificates Circumstances for revocation pkio Procedure for revocation request pkio CRL issuance frequency pkio On-line revocation/status checking availability pkio On-line revocation/status checking availability pkio67 Page 13 of 37
14 4.9.9 On-line revocation/status checking availability pkio On-line revocation/status checking availability pkio Certificate Status Services Page 14 of 37
15 5 Facility, Management and Operational Controls 5.2 Procedural Controls 5.3 Personnel Controls Background check procedures pkio Audit Loggin Procedures Types of events recorded pkio Records Archival Types of events recorded pkio Compromise and Disaster Recovery Business continuity capabilities after a disaster pkio86 Page 15 of 37
16 6 Technical Security Controls 6.1 Key Pair Generation and Installation Key pair generation for the CSP sub CA pkio Key pair generation for the CSP sub CA pkio Key pair generation for the certificate holders pkio Key pair generation for the certificate holders pkio Pivate key and SUD delivery to the certificate holder pkio Private Key Protection and Cryptographic Module Engineering Controls Cryptographic module rating pkio Cryptographic module rating pkio Cryptographic module rating pkio107 Page 16 of 37
17 6.3 Other Aspects of Key Pair Management 6.4 Activation data Activation data generation and installation pkio Activation data generation and installation pkio Computer Security Controls 6.6 Life Cycle Technical Controls 6.7 Network Security Controls Page 17 of 37
18 7 Certificate, CRL and OSCP profiles 7.1 Certificate Profile 7.2 CRL Profile 7.3 OCSP Profile 7.3 OCSP profile 7.3-pkio123 Page 18 of 37
19 8 Compliance Audit and Other Assessments All subjects relating to the conformity assessment of the CSPs within the PKI for the government are covered in PoR part 2: Admittance to and Supervision within the PKI for the government. Page 19 of 37
20 9 Other Business and Legal Matters 9.2 Financial Responsibility Insurance coverage pkio Intellectual Property Rights 9.6 Representations and Warranties CA Representations and Warranties by CSPs pkio CA Representations and Warranties by CSPs pkio Limitations of Liability 9.8 Limitations of liability 9.8pkio Amendments 9.13 Dispute Resolution Procedures 9.14 Governing Law Page 20 of 37
21 9.17 Miscellaneous provisions If by judicial decision one or more provisions of this CP are declared to be invalid or not applicable, this does not affect the validity and applicability of all other provisions. Page 21 of 37
22 Appendix A Certificate Profile Profile of server certificates for the Private Services domain Criteria When defining the fields and attributes within a certificate, the following codes are used: V : Compulsory; indicates that the attribute is compulsory and MUST be used in the certificate. O : Optional; indicates that the attribute is optional and MAY be used in the certificate. A : Advised against; indicates that the attribute is advised against and SHOULD NOT be used in the certificate. N : Not allowed; indicates that the use of the attribute in the PKI for the government is not allowed. For the extensions, fields/attributes are used that, in accordance with international standards, are critical, are marked in the 'Critical' column with 'yes' to show that the relevant attribute MUST be checked using a process by means of which a certificate is evaluated. Other fields/attributes are shown with 'no'. Page 22 of 37
23 Criteria Programme of Requirements part 3b: Certificate Policy - Services 8 July 2013 Server certificates Private Services Domain Basic attributes Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference Version V MUST be set at 2 (X.509v3). RFC 5280 Integer Describes the version of the certificate, the value 2 stands for X.509 version 3. Serial V A serial number that MUST uniquely identify the certificate within the publishing CA domain. RFC 5280 Integer All end user certificates have to contain at least 8 bytes of unpredictable random data in the certificate's serial number (Serial). Signature V MUST be created on the algorithm, as RFC 5280, ETSI OID This certificate MUST contain at least a 2048 bit RSA key. stipulated by the PA. TS Issuer V MUST contain a Distinguished Name (DN). PKIo, RFC3739, Attributes other than those mentioned below MUST NOT be used. The The field contains the following attributes: ETSI TS attributes that are used MUST be the same as the corresponding attributes in the Subject field of the CSP certificate (for validation). Issuer.countryName V MUST contain the country code of the ETSI TS101862, Printable String C = NL for CSPs located in the Netherlands. country where the issuing organization of X520, ISO 3166 the certificate is located. Page 23 of 37
24 Criteria Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference Issuer.stateOrProvinceName N Use is not allowed. PKIo UTF8String - Issuer.OrganizationName V Full name in accordance with the accepted document or basic registry ETSI TS UTF8String Issuer. organizationalunitname O Optional specification of an organizational entity. This field MUST NOT include a function indication or similar. It may include, if applicable, the types of certificates that are supported. ETSI TS UTF8String Several instances of this attribute MAY be used. Issuer.localityName N Use is not allowed. PKIo UTF8String - Issuer.serial O MUST be used in accordance with RFC 3739 if required for unambiguous naming RFC 3739 Printable String Issuer.commonName V MUST include the name of the CA in accordance with accepted document or basic registry, MAY include the Domain label and/or the types of certificates that are supported PKIo, RFC 3739 UTF8String The commonname attribute MUST NOT be needed to identify the issuing government body (no part of the Distinguished Name, requirement from RFC 3739) Page 24 of 37
25 Criteria Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference Validity V MUST define the period of validity of the certificate according to RFC RFC 5280 UTCTime MUST include the start and end date for validity of the certificate in accordance with the applicable policy laid down in the CPS. Subject V The attributes that are used to describe PKIo, RFC3739, MUST contain a Distinguished Name (DN). Attributes other than those the subject (service) MUST mention the ETSI TS mentioned below MUST NOT be used. subject in a unique way and include information about the subscriber organization. The field has the following attributes: Subject.countryName V complete C with two-letter country code in RFC 3739, X520, PrintableString The country code that is used in Subject.countryName MUST correspond accordance with ISO If an official ISO 3166, PKIo with the subscriber's address in accordance with the accepted document alpha-2 code is missing, the CSP MAY use or registry. the user-assigned code XX. Subject.commonName A Name that identifies the server. RFC 3739, ETSI UTF8String The subject.commonname MUST contain one or multiple FQDNs. TS , In server certificates the use of this field PKIo It is not permitted to incorporate wildcard FQDNs in this attribute. is advised against. If this field is used, this Furthermore it is not permitted to incorporate FQDNs and gtlds that are MUST contain no more than 1 "fully- not registered in name of the subscriber, but have the characteristics of qualified domain name (FQDN)" (see the an FQDN. Page 25 of 37
26 Criteria Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference definition in part 4). This FQDN MUST also be included in the SubjectAltName.dNSName field. In server certificates the CSP MUST check recognized registers (Stichting Internet Domeinregistratie Nederland (SIDN) or Internet Assigned s Authority (IANA)) to find out whether the subscriber is the domain name owner or whether the subscriber is exclusively authorized by the registered domain name owner to use the domain name on behalf of the registered domain name owner. Subject.Surname N Is not used for server certificates. Server certificates are not personal. The use of this attribute is therefore not allowed, to avoid confusion. Subject.givenName N Is not used for server certificates. Server certificates are not personal. The use of this attribute is therefore not allowed, to avoid confusion. Subject.pseudonym N Pseudonyms may not be used. ETSI TS , RFC 3739, PKIo Subject.organizationName V The full name of the subscriber's organization in accordance with the accepted document or Basic Registry. PKIo UTF8String The subscriber organization is the organization with which the CSP has entered into an agreement and on behalf of which the certificate holder (service / server) communicates or acts. Page 26 of 37
27 Criteria Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference Subject.organizationalUnitName O Optional specification of an organizational entity. This attribute MUST NOT include a function indication or similar. PKIo This attribute MAY appear several times. The field MUST contain a valid name of an organizational entity of the subscriber in accordance with an accepted document or registry. Subject.stateOrProvinceName A The use of this attribute is advised against. If present it MUST include the province of the subscriber's branch, in accordance with the accepted document or Basic registry. PKIo, RFC 3739 UTF8String Name of the province MUST correspond with the address of the subscriber in accordance with the accepted document or registry. Subject.localityName A The use of this attribute is advised against. If present it MUST include the location of the subscriber, in accordance with the accepted document or Basic registry. PKIo, RFC 3739 UTF8String Name of the location MUST correspond with the address of the subscriber in accordance with the accepted document or registry. Subject.postalAddress A The use is advised against. If present, this field MUST contain the postal address of the subscriber in accordance with an PKIo, RFC 3739 UTF8String The address MUST correspond with the address of the subscriber in accordance with the accepted document or registry. Page 27 of 37
28 Criteria Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference accepted document or Basic registry. Subject. Address N Use is not allowed. RFC 5280 IA5String This field MUST NOT be used in new certificates. Subject.serial O The CSP is responsible for safeguarding RFC 3739, X Printable String The number is determined by the CSP and/or the government. The the uniqueness of the subject (service). 520, PKIo number can differ for each domain and can be used for several The Subject.serial MUST be used applications. to identify the subject uniquely. The use of 20 positions is only allowed for OIN and HRN after additional arrangements with Logius. Subject.title N The use of the title attribute is not allowed ETSI TS 102 This attribute is only used in personal certificates and therefore not in for server certificates. 280, RFC 3739, services certificates. RFC 5280 subjectpublickeyinfo V Contains, among other things, the public ETSI TS 102 Contains the public key, identifies the algorithm with which the key can key. 280, RFC 3279 be used. IssuerUniqueIdentifier N Is not used. RFC 5280 The use of this is not allowed (RFC 5280) Page 28 of 37
29 Criteria Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference subjectuniqueidentifier N Is not used. RFC 5280 The use of this is not allowed (RFC 5280) Page 29 of 37
30 Criteria Critical? Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Standard extensions Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference authoritykeyidentifier V No The algorithm to generate the ETSI TS 102 BitString The value MUST contain the SHA-1 hash from the authoritykey AuthorityKey MUST be created on an 280, RFC 5280 (public key of the CSP/CA). algorithm determined by the PA. SubjectKeyIdentifier V No The algorithm to generate the subjectkey MUST be created on an algorithm determined by the PA. RFC 5280 BitString The value MUST contain the SHA-1 hash from the subjectkey (public key of the certificate holder). KeyUsage V Yes The attribute extension specifies the intended purpose of the key incorporated in the certificate. In the PKI for the government, for each certificate type various bits are incorporated in the keyusage extension. RFC 3739, RFC 5280, ETSI TS BitString In server certificates the digitalsignature, keyencipherment and keyagreement bits MUST be incorporated and marked as being essential. Another keyusage MUST NOT be combined with this. Page 30 of 37
31 Criteria Critical? Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference privatekeyusageperiod N Is not used. RFC 5280 CertificatePolicies V No MUST contain the OID of the certificate RFC 3739 OID, String, Reference to the paragraph numbers of the PoR/CP in the user policy (CP), the URI of the certification String notice is advised against because the persistency of this cannot be practice statement (CPS), and a user guaranteed (unlike the OID number of the CP). notice. The applicable PKI for the government OID scheme is described in the CP. PolicyMappings N Is not used. This extension is not used in end user certificates SubjectAltName V No MUST be used and given a worldwide RFC 4043, RFC MUST include a unique identifier in the dnsname attribute for unique number that identifies the server. 5280, PKIo, ETSI server certificates. Attributes other than those mentioned below MUST NOT be used. SubjectAltName.dNSName 3 V Name that identifies the server. RFC2818, IA5String RFC5280 With the use of one or multiple FQDNs the CSP MUST check In server certificates containing a FQDN recognized registers (Stichting Internet Domeinregistratie this field MAY contain multiple "fully- Nederland (SIDN) or Internet Assigned s Authority (IANA)) 3 This field/attribute has to be included in certificates that are issued as from Page 31 of 37
32 Criteria Critical? Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference qualified domain names (FQDNs)" (see the to find out whether the subscriber is the domain name owner or definition in part 4). whether the subscriber is exclusively authorized by the registered domain name owner to use the domain name on behalf of the A server certificate MAY contain multiple registered domain name owner. FQDNs of multiple domains on the condition that these domains are It is not allowed to incorporate wildcard FQDNs in this attribute. registered to the name of the same Furthermore it is not allowed to incorporate a hostname or local subscriber or an authorization of the domain name containing one or more periods, as this might cause subscriber is present. It therefore is NOT the hostname te be interpreted as a FQDN or gtld. permitted to combine multiple FQDNs in one certificate that are both from multiple domains and are registered to the name of multiple owners. SubjectAltName.iPAddress O No MAY include the public IP address of the RFC 5280, RFC Octet string The CSP MUST verify that the subscriber is the owner of the public server of which the subscriber is the owner 791, RFC 2460 IP address or that a supplier may use the public IP address at the or that is hosted by a supplier at the instruction of the subscriber. instruction of the subscriber. Private IP addresses MUST NOT be included in this attribute. SubjectAltName.otherName O May be used containing a unique number PKIo IA5String, Mi- Contains the OID of the CSP and a number, separated by a period Page 32 of 37
33 Criteria Critical? Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference that identifies the certificate holder crosoft UPN, IBM Principal-Name of Permanent- Identifier or hyphen ('-'), that uniquely and persistently identifies the subject (service). It is recommended to use an existing registration number from the backoffice systems in combination with a code for the organization. In combination with the CSP OID number this identifier is globally unique. This number MUST be persistent. SubjectAltName.rfc822Name N Is not used RFC 5280 IA5String IssuerAltName N Is not used. RFC 5280 subjectdirectoryattributes N Is not used. RFC 5280; RFC 3739 This use of this extension is not allowed. BasicConstraints O Yes The "CA" field MUST be set at "FALSE", or be omitted (default value is then "FALSE"). RFC 5280 A (Dutch language) browser can then be seen: Subjecttype = Eindentiteit", "Beperking voor padlengte = Geen ("Subjecttype = End Entity", "Path length constraint = None") NameConstraints N Is not used. RFC 5280 Is not used in end user certificates. PolicyConstraints N Is not used. RFC 5280 Is not used in end user certificates. Page 33 of 37
34 Criteria Critical? Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference CRLDistributionPoints V No MUST include the URI of a CRL distribution point. RFC 5280, ETSI TS The reference MUST be accessible through the http or LDAP protocol. The attribute Reason MUST NOT be used, reference MUST be made to 1 CRL for all types of reasons for revocation. In addition to CRL, other types of certificate status information service MAY be supported. ExtKeyUsage V Yes / No Is only used when needed for a specific service. RFC 5280 KeyPurposeId's In server certificates this extension MUST be included, this extension MUST NOT be labelled critical, this extension MUST include the KeyPurposIds id-kp-serverauth and id-kp-clientauth, additionally the KeyPurposeId id-kp- protection MAY be included, MAY additionally also include every other KeyPurposeId defined in an open or accepted standard that is used to identify a service based on its FQDN and other KeyPurposeIds MUST NOT be included. InhibitAnyPolicy N Is not used. RFC 5280 Is not used in end user certificates. FreshestCRL O No MUST contain the URI of a Delta CRL RFC 5280, PKIo Delta-CRLs are an optional extension. In order to fulfil the Page 34 of 37
35 Criteria Critical? Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference distribution point, if Delta CRLs are used. requirements of PKIoverheid a CSP MUST also publish full CRLs at the required release frequency. Page 35 of 37
36 Criteria Critical? Programme of Requirements part 3h: CP Server certificates Private Services domain July 2015 Private extensions Field / Attribute Description Standard Type Explanation reference authorityinfoaccess O No This attribute MUST include the URI of an OCSP responder if Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) plays a role. This field can optionally be used to reference other additional information about the CSP. SubjectInfoAccess O No RFC 5280 OID, Generalname This field can be used to reference additional information about the subject. BiometricInfo N Are not used in servers certificates. PKIo Biometric information is not advisable in non-personal certificates, such as server certificates. QcStatement N No RFC 3739, ETSI TS , ETSI TS OID This attribute is only used in personal certificates and is not allowed in server certificates. Page 36 of 37
37 10 Revisions 10.1 Amendments from version 4.0 to New Not applicable Modifications Not applicable Editorial Small editorial modificatoin to the following requirements: o Requirement pkio86. Page 37 of 37
TeliaSonera Server Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement
TeliaSonera Server Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement v.1.4 TeliaSonera Server Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement CA name Validation OID TeliaSonera Server CA
Certificate Policy for. SSL Client & S/MIME Certificates
Certificate Policy for SSL Client & S/MIME Certificates OID: 1.3.159.1.11.1 Copyright Actalis S.p.A. All rights reserved. Via dell Aprica 18 20158 Milano Tel +39-02-68825.1 Fax +39-02-68825.223 www.actalis.it
SWITCHaai Metadata CA. Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement
SWITCHaai Metadata CA Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement Version 1.0, OID 2.16.756.1.2.6.7.1.0 July 15, 2008 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...6 1.1 Overview...6 1.2 Document name
Certificate Policy for OCES personal certificates (Public Certificates for Electronic Services)
Certificate Policy for OCES personal certificates (Public Certificates for Electronic Services) - 2 - Contents Rights...4 Preface...5 Introduction...6 1 Overview and scope...7 2 References...8 3 Definitions
CMS Illinois Department of Central Management Services
CMS Illinois Department of Central Management Services State of Illinois Public Key Infrastructure Certification Practices Statement For Digital Signature And Encryption Applications Version 3.3 (IETF
Apple Inc. Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement Worldwide Developer Relations Version 1.14 Effective Date: September 9, 2015
Apple Inc. Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement Worldwide Developer Relations Version 1.14 Effective Date: September 9, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 5 1.1. Trademarks...
THE RSA ROOT SIGNING SERVICE Certification Practice Statement For RSA Certificate Authorities (CAs) Published By: RSA Security Inc.
THE RSA ROOT SIGNING SERVICE Certification Practice Statement For RSA Certificate Authorities (CAs) Last Revision Date: June 28, 2007 Version: 3.0 Published By: RSA Security Inc. Copyright 2002-2007 by
Certificate Policy for OCES Employee Certificates (Public Certificates for Electronic Services) Version 5
Certificate Policy for OCES Employee Certificates (Public Certificates for Electronic Services) Version 5 - 2 - Contents Rights...4 Preface...5 Introduction...6 1 Overview and scope...7 2 References...8
Equens Certificate Policy
Equens Certificate Policy WebServices and Connectivity Final H.C. van der Wijck 11 March 2015 Classification: Open Version 3.0 Version history Version no. Version date Status Edited by Most important edit(s)
Gandi CA Certification Practice Statement
Gandi CA Certification Practice Statement Gandi SAS 15 Place de la Nation Paris 75011 France Version 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.INTRODUCTION...10 1.1.Overview...10 1.2.Document Name and Identification...10
ETSI TS 102 280 V1.1.1 (2004-03)
TS 102 280 V1.1.1 (2004-03) Technical Specification X.509 V.3 Certificate Profile for Certificates Issued to Natural Persons 2 TS 102 280 V1.1.1 (2004-03) Reference DTS/ESI-000018 Keywords electronic signature,
Getronics Certification Certificate of Authentic Trustworthy
Getronics Version 3.0 Effective Date: 15 october, 2008 Getronics Nederland B.V. Fauststraat 1 P.O. Box 9105 7300 HN Apeldoorn The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0)20 570 4511 http://www.pki.getronicspinkroccade.nl
Trusted Certificate Service
TCS Server and Code Signing Personal CA CPS Version 2.0 (rev 15) Page 1/40 Trusted Certificate Service TCS Server CAs, escience Server CA, and Code Signing CA Certificate Practice Statement Version 2.0
Globe Hosting Certification Authority Globe Hosting, Inc. 501 Silverside Road, Suite 105, Wilmington, DE 19809, County of New Castle, United States
Globe Hosting Certification Authority Globe Hosting, Inc. 501 Silverside Road, Suite 105, Wilmington, DE 19809, County of New Castle, United States www.globessl.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
Apple Corporate Email Certificates Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement. Apple Inc.
Apple Inc. Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement Version 2.0 Effective Date: April 10, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 4 1.1. Trademarks... 4 1.2. Table of acronyms... 4 1.3.
apple WWDR Certification Practice Statement Version 1.8 June 11, 2012 Apple Inc.
Apple Inc. Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement Worldwide Developer Relations Version 1.8 Effective Date: June 11, 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 4 1.1. Trademarks... 4 1.2.
SAUDI NATIONAL ROOT-CA CERTIFICATE POLICY
SAUDI NATIONAL ROOT-CA CERTIFICATE POLICY Document Classification: Public Version Number: 2.5 Issue Date: June 25, 2015 National Center for Digital Certification Policies and Regulations Department Digitally
EuropeanSSL Secure Certification Practice Statement
EuropeanSSL Secure Certification Practice Statement Eunetic GmbH Version 1.0 14 July 2008 Wagnerstrasse 25 76448 Durmersheim Tel: +49 (0) 180 / 386 384 2 Fax: +49 (0) 180 / 329 329 329 www.eunetic.eu TABLE
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE CERTIFICATE POLICY. July 2011 Version 2.0. Copyright 2006-2011, The Walt Disney Company
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE CERTIFICATE POLICY July 2011 Version 2.0 Copyright 2006-2011, The Walt Disney Company Version Control Version Revision Date Revision Description Revised
ETSI TR 103 123 V1.1.1 (2012-11)
TR 103 123 V1.1.1 (2012-11) Technical Report Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Guidance for Auditors and CSPs on TS 102 042 for Issuing Publicly-Trusted TLS/SSL Certificates 2 TR 103 123
Public Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement of Chunghwa Telecom (PublicCA CPS) Version 1.5
Public Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement of Chunghwa Telecom (PublicCA CPS) Version 1.5 Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. August 21, 2015 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 OVERVIEW... 1
SSL.com Certification Practice Statement
SSL.com Certification Practice Statement SSL.com Version 1.0 February 15, 2012 2260 W Holcombe Blvd Ste 700 Houston, Texas, 77019 US Tel: +1 SSL-CERTIFICATE (+1-775-237-8434) Fax: +1 832-201-7706 www.ssl.com
Ericsson Group Certificate Value Statement - 2013
COMPANY INFO 1 (23) Ericsson Group Certificate Value Statement - 2013 COMPANY INFO 2 (23) Contents 1 Ericsson Certificate Value Statement... 3 2 Introduction... 3 2.1 Overview... 3 3 Contact information...
Certificate Path Validation
Version 1.4 NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORITY Version 1.4 Certificate Path Validation 19 th November 2006 No.: 1891/2006/IBEP-011 NSA Page 1/27 NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORITY Department of Information Security
ESnet SSL CA service Certificate Policy And Certification Practice Statement Version 1.0
ESnet SSL CA service Certificate Policy And Certification Practice Statement Version 1.0 June 30, 2004 Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 1 Introduction...3 1.1 Overview...3 1.1.1 General Definitions...4
Danske Bank Group Certificate Policy
Document history Version Date Remarks 1.0 19-05-2011 finalized 1.01 15-11-2012 URL updated after web page restructuring. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Policy administration... 4 2.1 Overview...
Certipost Trust Services. Certificate Policy. for Lightweight Certificates for EUROCONTROL. Version 1.2. Effective date 03 May 2012
Certipost Trust Services Version 1.2 Effective date 03 May 2012 Certipost NV ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 13 Definitions : Activation Data Certificate Certificate Holder Certificate Public Registry Certificate
CERTIFICATE POLICY (CP) (For SSL, EV SSL, OSC and similar electronic certificates)
(CP) (For SSL, EV SSL, OSC and similar electronic certificates) VERSION : 09 DATE : 01.12.2014 1. INTRODUCTION... 10 1.1. Overview... 10 1.2. Document Name and Identification... 11 1.3. Participants...
TR-GRID CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY
TR-GRID CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY CERTIFICATE POLICY AND CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT Version 2.3 May 15, 2014 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS:... 2 1. INTRODUCTION... 7 1.1 OVERVIEW... 7 1.2 DOCUMENT
PEXA Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Certification Authority Certificate Policy
PEXA Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Certification Authority Certificate Policy Version: 1.0 Issued: August 2014 Status: Final PEXA Certification Authority Certificate Profile 1. Introduction Property
TC TrustCenter GmbH. Certification Practice Statement
TC TrustCenter GmbH Certification Practice Statement NOTE: The information contained in this document is the property of TC TrustCenter GmbH. This Certification Practice Statement is published in conformance
TR-GRID CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY
TR-GRID CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY CERTIFICATE POLICY AND CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT Version 2.1 January, 2009 Table of Contents: TABLE OF CONTENTS:...2 1. INTRODUCTION...7 1.1 OVERVIEW...7 1.2 DOCUMENT
TACC ROOT CA CERTIFICATE POLICY
TACC ROOT CA CERTIFICATE POLICY AND CERTIFICATE PRACTICES STATEMENT (In RFC 3647 format) January 20, 2009 OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.17940.5.1.1.1 Version 1.2 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 Overview...3 1.2 Document Name
X.509 Certificate Policy for the Australian Department of Defence Root Certificate Authority and Subordinate Certificate Authorities
X.509 Certificate Policy for the Australian Department of Defence Root Certificate Authority and Subordinate Certificate Authorities Version 5.1 May 2014 Notice to all parties seeking to rely Reliance
SwissSign Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement for Gold Certificates
SwissSign Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement for Gold Certificates Version March 2004 Version 2004-03 SwissSign Gold CP/CPS Page 1 of 66 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...9 1.1 Overview...
CA Certificate Policy. SCHEDULE 1 to the SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT
CA Certificate Policy SCHEDULE 1 to the SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT This page is intentionally left blank. 2 ODETTE CA Certificate Policy Version Number Issue Date Changed By 1.0 1 st April 2009 Original
TeliaSonera Public Root CA. Certification Practice Statement. Revision Date: 2006-11-17. Version: Rev A. Published by: TeliaSonera Sverige AB
Document no 1/011 01-AZDA 102 213 TeliaSonera Sverige AB Certification Practice Statement Rev A TeliaSonera Public Root CA Certification Practice Statement Revision Date: 2006-11-17 Version: Rev A Published
TREND MICRO SSL CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT. Version 2.0
TREND MICRO SSL CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT Version 2.0 Effective Date: 14 April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview 1.2 Document name and identification 1.3 PKI participants 1.3.1
VeriSign Trust Network Certificate Policies
VeriSign Trust Network Certificate Policies Version 2.8.1 Effective Date: February 1, 2009 VeriSign, Inc. 487 E. Middlefield Road Mountain View, CA 94043 USA +1 650.961.7500 http//:www.verisign.com - 1-
Symantec Trust Network (STN) Certificate Policy
Symantec Trust Network (STN) Certificate Policy Version 2.8.5 Effective Date: September 8, 2011 Symantec Corporation 350 Ellis Street Mountain View, CA 94043 USA +1 650.527.8000 http//:www.symantec.com
epki Root Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement Version 1.2
epki Root Certification Authority Certification Practice Statement Version 1.2 Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. August 21, 2015 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 OVERVIEW... 1 1.1.1 Certification Practice Statement...
Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement CNRS/CNRS-Projets/Datagrid-fr
Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement CNRS/CNRS-Projets/Datagrid-fr Version 0.3 August 2002 Online : http://www.urec.cnrs.fr/igc/doc/datagrid-fr.policy.pdf Old versions Version 0.2 :
OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AUDIT OF CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES
OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AUDIT OF CERTIFICATION AUTHORITIES Table of contents 1.0 SOFTWARE 1 2.0 HARDWARE 2 3.0 TECHNICAL COMPONENTS 2 3.1 KEY MANAGEMENT
Bugzilla ID: Bugzilla Summary:
Bugzilla ID: Bugzilla Summary: CAs wishing to have their certificates included in Mozilla products must 1) Comply with the requirements of the Mozilla CA certificate policy (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/certs/policy/)
Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement
DigiCert Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement DigiCert, Inc. Version 3.03 March 15, 2007 333 South 520 West Lindon, UT 84042 USA Tel: 1-801-805-1620 Fax: 1-801-705-0481 www.digicert.com
Trusted Certificate Service (TCS)
TCS Personal and escience Personal CA CPS Version 2.0 (rev 15) Page 1/40 Trusted Certificate Service (TCS) TCS Personal CA, escience Personal CA, and Document Signing CA Certificate Practice Statement
e-tuğra CERTIFICATE POLICY E-Tuğra EBG Bilişim Teknolojileri ve Hizmetleri A.Ş. Version: 3.1 Validity Date: September, 2013 Update Date: 30/08/2013
e-tuğra CERTIFICATE POLICY E-Tuğra EBG Bilişim Teknolojileri ve Hizmetleri A.Ş. Version: 3.1 Validity Date: September, 2013 Update Date: 30/08/2013 Ceyhun Atıf Kansu Cad. 130/58 Balgat / ANKARA TURKEY
X.509 Certificate Policy For The Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA) Version 2.24
X.509 Certificate Policy For The Federal Bridge Certification Authority (FBCA) Version 2.24 February 25, 2011 Signature Page Chair, Federal Public Key Infrastructure Policy Authority DATE Revision History
CERTIFICATE POLICY KEYNECTIS SSL CA
CERTIFICATE POLICY KEYNECTIS SSL CA Date: 05/02/2009 KEYNECTIS SSL CA CERTIFICATE POLICY Subject: KEYNECTIS SSL CA Certificate Policy Version number: 1.1 Number of pages: 49 Status of the Project Final
Certification Practice Statement
Certification Practice Statement Revision R1 2013-01-09 1 Copyright Printed: January 9, 2013 This work is the intellectual property of Salzburger Banken Software. Reproduction and distribution require
phicert Direct Certificate Policy and Certification Practices Statement
phicert Direct Certificate Policy and Certification Practices Statement Version 1. 1 Effective Date: March 31, 2014 Copyright 2013-2014 EMR Direct. All rights reserved. [Trademark Notices] phicert is a
Visa Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Policy (CP)
Visa Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Policy (CP) Version 1.7 Effective: 24 January 2013 2010-2013 Visa. All Rights Reserved. Visa Public Important Note on Confidentiality and Copyright The Visa Confidential
CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT UPDATE
CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT UPDATE Reference: IZENPE-CPS UPDATE Version no: v 5.03 Date: 10th March 2015 IZENPE 2015 This document is the property of Izenpe. It may only be reproduced in its entirety.
ING Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Practice Statement. Version 5.3 - June 2015
ING Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Practice Statement Version 5.3 - June 2015 Colophon Commissioned by Additional copies ING Corporate PKI Policy Approval Authority Additional copies of this document
Version 2.4 of April 25, 2008
TC TrustCenter GmbH Certificate Policy for SAFE NOTE: The information contained in this document is the property of TC TrustCenter GmbH. This Certificate Policy is published in conformance with international
RECOMMENDATIONS for the PROCESSING of EXTENDED VALIDATION SSL CERTIFICATES January 2, 2014 Version 2.0
Forum RECOMMENDATIONS for the PROCESSING of EXTENDED VALIDATION SSL CERTIFICATES January 2, 2014 Version 2.0 Copyright 2007-2014, The CA / Browser Forum, all rights reserved. Verbatim copying and distribution
SSL CERTIFICATE POLICY AND CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT
SSL CERTIFICATE POLICY AND CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT Kamu Sertifikasyon Merkezi TÜBİTAK Yerleşkesi, P.K. 74 Gebze 41470 Kocaeli, TURKEY Tel: +90 (0) 262 648 18 18 Fax: +90 (0) 262 648 18 00 www.kamusm.gov.tr
Swiss Government Root CA II. Document OID: 2.16.756.1.17.3.21.1
Swiss Government Root CA II CP/CPS End-user Certificates Swiss Government PKI - Root CA II Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement (CP/CPS) Document OID: 2.16.756.1.17.3.21.1 Project Name:
Fraunhofer Corporate PKI. Certification Practice Statement
Fraunhofer Corporate PKI Certification Practice Statement Version 1.1 Published in June 2012 Object Identifier of this Document: 1.3.6.1.4.1.778.80.3.2.1 Contact: Fraunhofer Competence Center PKI Fraunhofer
- X.509 PKI EMAIL SECURITY GATEWAY. Certificate Policy (CP) & Certification Practice Statement (CPS) Edition 1.1
- X.509 PKI EMAIL SECURITY GATEWAY Certificate Policy (CP) & Certification Practice Statement (CPS) Edition 1.1 Commerzbank AG - Page 1 Document control: Title: Description : RFC Schema: Authors: Commerzbank
California Independent System Operator Certification Practice Statement for Basic Assurance Certification Authority. Version 3.
California Independent System Operator Certification Practice Statement for Basic Assurance Certification Authority Version 3.4 April 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 8 1.1 OVERVIEW... 8 1.2
PKI NBP Certification Policy for ESCB Signature Certificates. OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31995.1.2.2.1 version 1.5
PKI NBP Certification Policy for ESCB Signature Certificates OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31995.1.2.2.1 version 1.5 Security Department NBP Warsaw, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Document
CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT. EV SSL CA Certification Practice Statement
CERTIFICATION PRACTICE STATEMENT EV SSL CA Certification Practice Statement Emmanuel Montacutelli September 1, 2015 OpenTrust_DMS_EV Statement SSL CA Certification Practice Manage d Services Signature
Certificate Policy KEYNECTIS SSL CA CP. Emmanuel Montacutelli 12/11/2014 DMS_CP_KEYNECTIS SSL CA CP_1.2
Certificate Policy KEYNECTIS SSL CA CP Emmanuel Montacutelli 12/11/2014 DMS_CP_KEYNECTIS SSL CA CP_1.2 KEYNECTIS SSL CA CP Version 1.2 Pages 51 Status Draft Final Author Emmanuel Montacutelli OpenTrust
Certification Practice Statement of CERTUM s Certification Services
Certification Practice Statement of CERTUM s Certification Services Appendix 3: Guidelines for the issuance and management of Extended Validation SSL certificates Version 3.2 Date: 9 th of February, 2011
Citizen CA Certification Practice statement
Citizen CA Certification Practice statement OID: 2.16.56.1.1.1.2.2 OID: 2.16.56.1.1.1.2.1 VERSION: 1.1 1/56 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 PRELIMINARY WARNING 5 1.1.1 Trusted Entities ruled by
Advantage Security Certification Practice Statement
Advantage Security Certification Practice Statement Version 3.8.5 Effective Date: 01/01/2012 Advantage Security S. de R.L. de C.V. Prol. Paseo de la Reforma # 625 Int 402, Col Paseo de las Lomas. Del Alvaro
Certificate Policy for the United States Patent and Trademark Office November 26, 2013 Version 2.5
Certificate Policy for the United States Patent and Trademark Office November 26, 2013 Prepared by: United States Patent and Trademark Office Public Key Infrastructure Policy Authority This page is intentionally
KIBS Certification Practice Statement for non-qualified Certificates
KIBS Certification Practice Statement for non-qualified Certificates Version 1.0 Effective Date: September, 2012 KIBS AD Skopje Kuzman Josifovski Pitu 1 1000, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia Phone number:
Neutralus Certification Practices Statement
Neutralus Certification Practices Statement Version 2.8 April, 2013 INDEX INDEX...1 1.0 INTRODUCTION...3 1.1 Overview...3 1.2 Policy Identification...3 1.3 Community & Applicability...3 1.4 Contact Details...3
Certification Practice Statement. Internet Security Research Group (ISRG)
Certification Practice Statement Internet Security Research Group (ISRG) Version 1.0 Updated May 5, 2015 Approved by ISRG Policy Management Authority Web Site: https://letsencrypt.org Page 1 of 11 Copyright
Entrust Managed Services Non-Federal Public Key Infrastructure X.509 Certificate Policy
Entrust Managed Services Non-Federal Public Key Infrastructure X.509 Certificate Policy Version 1.4 September 30, 2010 Signature Page EMS PKI Policy Authority DATE i Revision History Document Version Document
Comodo Certification Practice Statement
Comodo Certification Practice Statement Notice: This CPS should be read in conjunction with the following documents:- * LiteSSL addendum to the Certificate Practice Statement * Proposed Amendments to the
Trustwave Holdings, Inc
Trustwave Holdings, Inc Certificate Policy and Certification Practices Statement Version 2.9 Effective Date: July 13, 2010 This document contains Certification Practices and Certificate Policies applicable
NIST Test Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Cards
NISTIR 7870 NIST Test Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Cards David A. Cooper http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nist.ir.7870 NISTIR 7870 NIST Text Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Cards David A. Cooper
Greek Universities Network (GUnet)
Greek Universities Network (GUnet) H ee l l ee nn i cc A cc aa dd ee mi cc aa nn dd R ee ss ee aa rr cc hh II nn ss tt i tt uu tt i oo nn ss P uu bb l i cc K ee yy II nn ff rr aa ss tt rr uu cc tt uu rr
Land Registry. Version 4.0 10/09/2009. Certificate Policy
Land Registry Version 4.0 10/09/2009 Certificate Policy Contents 1 Background 5 2 Scope 6 3 References 6 4 Definitions 7 5 General approach policy and contract responsibilities 9 5.1 Background 9 5.2
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE EXTERNAL CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY MASTER TEST PLAN VERSION 1.0
DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY JOINT INTEROPERABILITY TEST COMMAND FORT HUACHUCA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE EXTERNAL CERTIFICATION AUTHORITY MASTER TEST PLAN VERSION 1.0
Certification Practice Statement
FernUniversität in Hagen: Certification Authority (CA) Certification Practice Statement VERSION 1.1 Ralph Knoche 18.12.2009 Contents 1. Introduction... 4 1.1. Overview... 4 1.2. Scope of the Certification
Bangladesh Bank Certification Authority (BBCA) Certification Practice Statement (CPS)
[Draft] Bangladesh Bank Certification Authority (BBCA) Certification Practice Statement (CPS) Version: 1.00 August, 2015 Bangladesh Bank Page 2 of 42 Document Reference Title Document Type Bangladesh Bank
TERMS OF USE FOR PUBLIC LAW CORPORATION PERSONAL CERTIFICATES FOR QUALIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE
TERMS OF USE FOR PUBLIC LAW CORPORATION PERSONAL CERTIFICATES FOR QUALIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE Prior to the verification of the electronic certificate, or to access or use the certificate status information
PKI NBP Certification Policy for ESCB Encryption Certificates. OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31995.1.2.3.1 version 1.2
PKI NBP Certification Policy for ESCB Encryption Certificates OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.31995.1.2.3.1 version 1.2 Security Department NBP Warsaw, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Document
REVENUE ON-LINE SERVICE CERTIFICATE POLICY. Document Version 1.2 Date: 15 September 2007. OID for this CP: 1.2.372.980003.1.1.1.1.
REVENUE ON-LINE SERVICE CERTIFICATE POLICY Document Version 1.2 Date: 15 September 2007 OID for this CP: 1.2.372.980003.1.1.1.1.1 No part of this document may be copied, reproduced, translated, or reduced
thawte Certification Practice Statement
thawte Certification Practice Statement Version 3.7.5 Effective Date: 4 June, 2012 (All CA/Browser Forum-specific requirements are effective on July 1, 2012) thawte Certification Practice Statement 2012
E-TUGRA INFORMATIC TECHNOLOGIES AND SERVICES CORP (E-TUGRA)
E-TUGRA INFORMATIC TECHNOLOGIES AND SERVICES CORP (E-TUGRA) QUALIFIED CERTIFICATE POLICY AND PRACTICE STATEMENT (CP-CPS) VERSION 1.0 DATE OF ENTRY INTO FORCE : JUNE, 2008 OID 2.16.792.3.0.4.1.1.2 E-TUGRA
X.509 Certificate Policy for India PKI
X.509 Certificate Policy for India PKI Version 1.4 May 2015 Controller of Certifying Authorities Department of Information Technology Ministry of Communications and Information Technology Document Control
BUYPASS CLASS 3 SSL CERTIFICATES Effective date: 11.06.2013
CERTIFICATE POLICY BUYPASS CLASS 3 SSL CERTIFICATES Effective date: 11.06.2013 PUBLIC Version: 2.0 Document date: 11.05.2013 Buypass AS Nydalsveien 30A, PO Box 4364 Nydalen Tel.: +47 23 14 59 00 E-mail:
Certificate Policies and Certification Practice Statements
Entrust White Paper Certificate Policies and Certification Practice Statements Author: Sharon Boeyen Date: February 1997 Version: 1.0 Copyright 2003 Entrust. All rights reserved. Certificate Policies and
DigiCert. Certificate Policy. DigiCert, Inc. Version 4.03 May 3, 2011
DigiCert Certificate Policy DigiCert, Inc. Version 4.03 May 3, 2011 Suite 200 Canopy Building II 355 South 520 West Lindon, UT 84042 USA Tel: 1 801 877 2100 Fax: 1 801 705 0481 www.digicert.com TABLE OF
Windows Server 2008 PKI and Certificate Security
Windows Server 2008 PKI and Certificate Security Brian Komar PREVIEW CONTENT This excerpt contains uncorrected manuscript from an upcoming Microsoft Press title, for early preview, and is subject to change
Certification Practice Statement for TC TrustCenter Adobe Certified Document Services Certificates
Certification Practice Statement for TC TrustCenter Adobe Certified Document Services Certificates Version 1.0.1 June 22 th, 2010 TC TrustCenter GmbH June 22th, 2010 Page 1 of 27 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION
Internet Security Research Group (ISRG)
Internet Security Research Group (ISRG) Certificate Policy Version 1.0 Updated May 5, 2015 Approved by ISRG Policy Management Authority ISRG Web Site: https://letsencrypt.org Page 1 of 83 Copyright Notice
Ford Motor Company CA Certification Practice Statement
Certification Practice Statement Date: February 21, 2008 Version: 1.0.1 Table of Contents Document History... 1 Acknowledgments... 1 1. Introduction... 2 1.1 Overview... 3 1.2 Ford Motor Company Certificate
Malaysian Identity Federation and Access Management Certification Authority Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement
Malaysian Identity Federation and Access Management Certification Authority Certificate Policy and Certification Practice Statement Version 2.2 Document OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.36355.2.1.2.2 February 2012 Contents
