Theories of International Relations POLM013

Transcription

1 Theories of International Relations POLM013 View Online [1]Baylis J., Smith S., and Owens P., Eds., The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, [2]Mingst K. A. and Snyder J. L., Eds., Essential readings in world politics, vol. The Norton series in world politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, [3]Weber C., International relations theory: a critical introduction. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014 [Online]. Available: [4]Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M., International theory: positivism and beyond. [5]Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M., International theory: positivism and beyond. [6]Dunne T., Kurki M., and Smith S., International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, [7]Rathbun B., A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism, Security Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp , May [8] Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy, World Politics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp , Jan [Online]. Available: [9]Lobell S. E., Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: oala/metadata&dest= View/S [10]Knutsen T. L., A history of international relations theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, [11]Michael W. Doyle, Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3, pp , 1983 [Online]. Available: [12]Gilmore J., Protecting the Other: Considering the process and practice of cosmopolitanism, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 20, no. 3, pp , Sep [13]Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne, Hedley Bull s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 72, no. 1, pp , 1996 [Online]. Available: [14]LITTLE R., The English School s Contribution to the Study of International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, pp , Sep [15]Hall I., Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English school, 1/5

2 International Affairs, vol. 77, no. 4, pp , Oct [16]Buzan B. and Little R., The English patient strikes back: a response to Hall s mis-diagnosis, International Affairs, vol. 77, no. 4, pp , Oct [17]RENGGER N. and THIRKELL-WHITE B., Still critical after all these years? The past, present and future of Critical Theory in International Relations, Review of International Studies, vol. 33, no. S1, Apr [18]Hoffman, Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate, Millenium, vol. 16, pp , 1987 [Online]. Available: [19]Linklater, The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory, Millenium, vol. 21, pp. 7 98, 1992 [Online]. Available: [20]ADLER E., Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no. 3, pp , Sep [21]Roxanne Lynn Doty, Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, pp , 1993 [Online]. Available: [22]Weldes J., Constructing national interests, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 2, no. 3, pp , [23]Dunne T., Kurki M., and Smith S., International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, [24]Edkins J., Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in, vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, [25]Acharya Amitav, Non-Western international relations theory : perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: [26]Barkawi T., Empire and Order in International Relations and Security Studies, The International Studies Encyclopaedia, vol. 3, 2010 [Online]. Available: rity_studies [27]Barkawi T. and Laffey M., Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp , Jan [28]International relations theory for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge, [29]Tickner J. A., You Just Don t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp , Dec [30]Robert O. Keohane, Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations between International Relations and Feminist Theory, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, pp , 1998 [Online]. Available: [31]Dunne T., Hansen L., and Wight C., The end of International Relations theory?, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp , Sep [32]Weber C., International relations theory: a critical introduction. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014 [Online]. Available: [33]Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M., International theory: positivism and beyond. [34]Smith S., Booth K., and Zalewski M., International theory: positivism and beyond. 2/5

3 [35]Dunne T., Kurki M., and Smith S., International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, [36]Waltz K. N., Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, [37]Stephen M. Walt, Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power, International Security, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3 43, 1985 [Online]. Available: [38]Knutsen T. L., A history of international relations theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press, [39]Michael W. Doyle, Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3, pp , 1983 [Online]. Available: [40]Gilmore J., Protecting the Other: Considering the process and practice of cosmopolitanism, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 20, no. 3, pp , Sep [41]Nicholas J. Wheeler and Timothy Dunne, Hedley Bull s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 72, no. 1, pp , 1996 [Online]. Available: [42]LITTLE R., The English School s Contribution to the Study of International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, pp , Sep [43]Hall I., Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English school, International Affairs, vol. 77, no. 4, pp , Oct [44]Review by: Barry Buzan and Richard Little, The English Patient Strikes Back: A Response to Hall s Mis-Diagnosis, International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), vol. 77, no. 4, pp , 2001 [Online]. Available: [45]Booth K., Security and emancipation, Review of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 04, Oct [46]Neufeld M., Pitfalls of Emancipation and Discourses of Security: Reflections on Canada s Security with a Human Face, International Relations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp , Mar [47]Williams P., Security studies: an introduction. Abingdon: Routledge, [48]ADLER E., Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no. 3, pp , Sep [49]Roxanne Lynn Doty, Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, pp , 1993 [Online]. Available: [50]Fierke K. M., Critical approaches to international security. Cambridge: Polity, [51]WELDES J., Constructing National Interests, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 2, no. 3, pp , Sep [52]Edkins J., Poststructuralism & international relations: bringing the political back in, vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers, [53]Dunne T., Kurki M., and Smith S., International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, [54] Empire and Order in International Relations and Security Studies Tarak Barkawi - Academia.edu. [Online]. Available: 3/5

4 rity_studies [55]Barkawi T. and Laffey M., Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp , Jan [56]International relations theory for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge, [57]Acharya Amitav, Non-Western international relations theory : perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, [58]Keohane R. O., Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, pp , Mar [59]Tickner J. A., You Just Don t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp , Dec [60]Dunne T., Hansen L., and Wight C., The end of International Relations theory?, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp , Sep [61] Review of International Studies. [Online]. Available: [62] International Organization. [Online]. Available: [63] International Studies Review. [Online]. Available: [64] International Affairs. [Online]. Available: [65] International Studies Perspectives. [Online]. Available: [66] Project MUSE - International Security. [Online]. Available: [67] Publications: Foreign Affairs: EBSCOhost. [Online]. Available: 5ccfcc%40sessionmgr4005&vid=0&hid=4112&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHNoaWImc2l0Z T1laG9zdC1saXZl#db=bth&jid=FAF [68] Taylor & Francis Online :: Security Studies. [Online]. Available: [69] World Politics. [Online]. Available: &secondredirectindicator=true [70] Taylor & Francis Online :: Critical Studies on Terrorism. [Online]. Available: [71] Taylor & Francis Online :: Geopolitics. [Online]. Available: [72] Environment and Planning D: Society and Space volumes. [Online]. Available: [73] Security Dialogue. [Online]. Available: [74] Millennium - Journal of International Studies. [Online]. Available: [75] International Political Sociology. [Online]. Available: [76] Alternatives, vol , no AD [Online]. Available: 4/5

5 =w [77] b o r d e r l a n d s e-journal home page. [Online]. Available: [78] Politics - University of Surrey - Guildford. [Online]. Available: 5/5