Radiological Closure of a Nuclear Weapon Accident Site with Plutonium Contamination
|
|
|
- Gavin Reeves
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Radiological Closure of a Nuclear Weapon Accident Site with Plutonium Contamination J. Hackett, PE, CHP, J.J. Weismann, CHP, M. Tepperman, RG Cabrera Services, Inc., 473 Silver Lane, E. Hartford, CT S.E. Rademacher, PhD, CHP U.S. Air Force Safety Center 9700 Avenue G, SE, Kirtland AFB, NM ABSTRACT An explosion and fire in a BOMARC-missile launching pad in June 1960 resulted in the direct release of weapons grade plutonium (WGP) within the confines of an Air Force site in central New Jersey. The site had undergone a large-scale remediation and final status survey (FSS) in 2002 to 2004 that resulted in over 20,000 cubic yards (yd 3 ) of plutonium-contaminated soil being excavated. However, it was later discovered that the prior investigation did not address all impacted areas of the site. Several years after the initial remediation project was completed, plutonium contamination in the form of discrete particles was discovered at the site in areas excluded from the previous investigation. Emergency response activities following the fire, while following standard practices of the day, resulted in the initial spread of contamination beyond the expected fate and transport pathways that were addressed during the initial project. Routine maintenance and site operational activities at the site also contributed to further spread of contamination beyond what was expected. Cabrera Services, Inc. (CABRERA) completed several phases of site characterization, radiological remediation, and final status survey (FSS) at the site in accordance with the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM) [1] to address the discrete particle issues at the site. CABRERA also conducted a thorough plutonium particle speciation study in coordination with the University of Nevada at Las Vegas as part of the development of a radiological conceptual site model. Details of this study are being presented in a separate publication. The WGP contamination throughout the site presented unique challenges in terms of site characterization and remediation. Specific technical challenges included the field detection of discrete high-activity plutonium particles over a 200-acre site and designing survey and sampling approaches to ensure compliance with the protocols outlined in the MARSSIM. CABRERA utilized innovative technologies and approaches to achieve these goals, including a large-area sodium-iodide (NaI) gamma scanning spectrometry system, in situ gamma spectroscopy with high-purity germanium detectors, and multipledepth soil sampling methods to identify locations with contamination exceeding ROD criteria (8 picocuries per gram [pci/g] plutonium-239/240 [Pu-239/240]). The large area scanning system was a driveover-based multi-channel analyzer system with integrated Global Positioning System units to quickly identify, locate, and map areas of concern. The driveover data was post-processed using regions of interest and background subtraction to improve detection sensitivity with 241 Am region of interest data correlated with soil concentration data obtained from an on site gamma spectroscopy laboratory. Remediation activities ranged from individual discrete particle removal to bulk soil excavation in several areas of the site. Over 60 yd 3 of additional contaminated soils were required to be excavated to ensure that all survey units would meet FSS requirements. In 2007, CABRERA completed field characterization and remediation activities at the Site, and in 2008 issued the FSS report recommending that the site was suitable for closure in accordance with the
2 requirements of the published Record of Decision (ROD). [2] The results were subsequently approved by the US Air Force Safety Center and the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. INTRODUCTION Cabrera Services, Inc. (CABRERA), under contract to the U.S. Air Force, successfully completed the radiological release of a former Boeing Michigan Aeronautical Research Center (BOMARC) missile accident site. The eventual release was the culmination of a multi-phase investigation performed under the framework of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the MARSSIM. The BOMARC Site occupies approximately 218 acres (882,000 square meters [m 2 ]) on a military reservation in Central New Jersey. The facility is located on land permitted to the Air Force. Completion of this FSS and Spot Remediation project was an integral part of the overall site closure strategy for achieving unrestricted radiological release of the overall Site impacted area from the United States Air Force Safety Center (AFSC), which has regulatory authority for the plutonium under Section 91(b) of the US Atomic Energy Act of To accomplish this objective, a comprehensive, adaptive site closure strategy was implemented that included characterization, remove of any discrete Pu particles or localized Pu particle concentrations found, and final status survey of all areas in order to meet the BOMARC RW-01 Accident Site ROD signed into effect in November, [2] The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) served in a consultation and advisory role throughout the CERCLA investigations performing reviews of site planning documents, field operations and reports. SITE BACKGROUND On June 7, 1960, at approximately 1500 hours, sensors in Shelter 204 at the BOMARC Site detected a fire caused by an explosion. The shelter was unattended at the time and the missile was in a ready state. Local firefighters responded to the alarm within 3 to 5 minutes. The fire continued to burn intensely, consuming most of the fuel, until approximately 1600 hours when Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) personnel entered the area to check the status of the missile. The fire was brought under control by 1615, and continued to burn at a low intensity until approximately 1830 hours; the order to cease operations and leave lines charged was given at approximately 2000 hours. Water continued to be sprayed into the shelter for an additional 8 hours. The approximate 30,000 gallons of water used to extinguish the fire flowed out from under the door of the shelter, down the asphalt apron and west down the street, where it entered a drainage culvert [3]. The explosion and fire in Shelter 204 at the BOMARC missile installation resulted in the release of Weapons grade plutonium (WGP), along with small quantities of weapons grade uranium (WGU) and depleted uranium (DU), within the confines of the site. An initial cleanup of the remaining missile components was performed immediately following the incident. The USAF and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared an unclassified report that estimated the upper limit of Pu left on the BOMARC Site after the initial cleanup at 300 grams (g). Throughout the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, numerous radiological surveys and investigations were performed to monitor residual levels of Pu-239, Americium-241 (Am-241), and other non-radioactive contaminants at the Site (Figure 2-3). In addition to scanning surveys, surface soil, subsurface soil, vegetation, groundwater, potable water, and surface runoff water samples were intermittently collected and analyzed along with smears (for removable radioactive contamination) and direct radiation measurements.
3 The BOMARC site was voluntarily investigated by the USAF using processes delineated by CERCLA. The site did not screen high enough during the Preliminary Assessment to warrant inclusion on the National Priorities List as a Superfund site. A Remedial Investigation (RI), Feasibility Study (FS) and Baseline Risk Assessment were performed between 1989 and 1992 to determine the extent of radioactive contamination at the Site, resulting risks to human health and the environment, and the need for and extent of remedial actions. [4] The RI included a geophysical investigation, field measurements, and collection and analysis of samples. Samples included groundwater, surface water, concrete and asphalt cores, surface soil, subsurface soil, wipe, and ambient air. The geophysical survey was performed using magnetic profiling and ground penetrating radar. The USAF decided to pursue the Offsite Disposal alternative from the FS with disposal of radioactive contaminated waste at an offsite radioactive waste disposal facility. The selected remedy for the Site addresses source control (remediation of on-site contaminant sources) of radioactive wastes in order to eliminate or reduce the risks posed by the site to levels that are protective of human health and the environment. The major components of the selected remedy included: Excavation of source soils containing greater than 8 pci/g of Pu. This will limit maximum risk to any future resident of the site to a level on the order of one in 10,000 (10-4 ) excess cancer risk, a level considered acceptable by the EPA; Excavation and sectioning of contaminated portions of the concrete apron, utility bunkers and the missile shelter; Excavation and removal (if found) of the missile launcher; Containerization, transport, and disposal of radioactive materials in an offsite facility designed for long-term management of radioactive materials; Restoration of the site by back filling with clean fill as needed, followed by grading and revegetation of the site with indigenous plant species. In addition, strict engineering controls will be applied during the excavation phase to prevent any possible exposures to workers or to offsite populations. These include dust suppression, and runoff/sedimentation control measures. The Record of Decision (ROD) decision was based on information contained in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on May 22, 1992 [4], the RI/FS dated May 1992 [5], and the administrative record for the BOMARC Missile Accident Site. Summary of Prior Investigations Based on the 1992 RI/FS, 1992 ROD, and 1996 site characterization [6], a remedial action was from 2002 to 2004 to remove Pu contaminated soil and building materials from the area around Shelter 204 and along the drainage path to the southwest. Remedial activities began in March 2002 and were completed in June Over 20,000 cubic meters (m 3 ) of Pu contaminated soil and debris was excavated and shipped to an offsite disposal facility. It is believed that the remediation effort removed over 99 percent of the radiological contamination left on site following the BOMARC missile accident. [7] Following remedial activities, final status surveys (FSS) were performed in all remediated areas. The surveys included scanning 100 percent of the survey area with FIDLER detectors, systematic soil sampling, and biased surface soil sampling based on scan results. Some additional remediation was documented as being required based on results of the scan surveys and soil sample results. It was later discovered that the prior investigation did not address all impacted areas of the site. Several years after the initial remediation project was completed, plutonium contamination in the form of discrete
4 particles was discovered at the site in areas excluded from the original remedial action. It is postulated that emergency response activities following the fire, while following standard practices of the day, resulted in the initial spread of contamination beyond the expected fate and transport pathways that were addressed during the initial project. Contamination was generally located at three following types of locations: Areas directly associated with the 1960 incident response activities Accumulation points from precipitation-related events since the 1960 incident Areas with contamination tracked in by other activities since the 1960 incident The locations of the particle contamination found at the BOMARC site are shown in Fig. 1. The areas with the highest occurrence of particle contamination were those that were believed to be directly associated with the response to the 1960 release incident. These areas include the restroom facility at Building 159, the vehicle wash-down area near Building 28 (Maintenance Building/Fire Station), the refueling area near Building 36, and the guard station at the entrance to the Shelter area. Particle contamination was also found at collection points, such as road intersections, where runoff from asphalt areas would accumulate. The collection of particles discovered at the southern portion of the Site (notated near the storm water runoff label on Fig. 1) is also believed to be due in part from snow removal activities performed on the adjacent asphalt parking areas during winter months. Finally, areas of contamination were found at seemingly random locations. It is postulated that these areas are the result of contamination tracking from one of the primary areas, although the true mechanism for transport is not precisely known. In 2005, CABRERA performed a Phase I Characterization Investigation on the discrete particles using surface and subsurface soil sampling, downhole gamma measurements, and in situ gamma spectroscopy. Included in this investigation was a particle speciation study at the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV). This study was commissioned to study the chemical and physical forms of the Pu particles for use in environmental fate and transport modeling as well as human health risk assessment evaluations. A summary of their experimental results included: Electron microscopy showed that the discrete particles had relatively large physical dimensions ( micrometers in diameter); The Pu particles are chemically and physically stable, and could remain in the environment in their current form without significant environmental weathering from normal conditions; and The large particle size and form make them non-respirable and highly insoluble, meaning that the potential dose consequence from either inhalation or ingestion was not significant.
5 Fig. 1. Map of Residual Particle Locations Discovered at the BOMARC Site. The Footprint of the Former Remediation Effort is Shown as Crosshatch. The MARSSIM Classification Scheme of the New FSS is also Overlaid for Reference. SCOPE OF ADAPTIVE CLOSURE PROJECT Overview Field activities conducted as part of this closure project involved the characterization, remediation, and FSS of all BOMARC Site in accordance with MARSSIM criteria. The objectives of the radiological characterization and remediation of the BOMARC Site were to:
6 Determine the extent of Pu contamination in soil and asphalt with radioactive concentrations above the ROD remediation goal of 8 pci/g; Remediate areas contaminated radiologically above the ROD clean-up level; Verify the adequacy of the remediation; and Demonstrate through the FSS process that the BOMARC Site is suitable for unrestricted radiological release, per the requirements of the ROD. [2] Radionuclides of Concern The radionuclides of concern (ROC) present in WGP are primarily Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240, and Am-241 from the decay of Pu-241 (half-life of 14.7 yr). The estimated alpha particle activity fractions for the WGP at the BOMARC Site in 2005 as provided by AFSC are: Pu-238: 0.014, Pu-239: 0.68, Pu-240: 0: 0.15: and Am-241: AFSC estimated the total Pu to total U activity ratio at 469:1 based on previous characterization studies [6]. Table I. Radionuclides of Concern for BOMARC Site FSS Investigation Radionuclide Half-life (yr) Principal Mode of Decay and approximate energies [in megaelectron volts (MeV)] Pu E04 Alpha: 5.16, 5.14 Pu E03 Alpha: 5.17, 5.12 Am E02 Alpha: 5.49, 5.44 Gamma: U E05 Alpha: 4.78, 4.72 Of the radionuclides listed above, Am-241 has the most favorable photon emission characteristics with a 59.5 kev gamma-ray with an emission frequency of 36 percent. This photon is of sufficient energy to afford reasonable measurement sensitivity in high-resolution gamma spectrometry counting systems. Plutonium-239/240 has direct photon emissions, but the energy is very low (14 kev x-ray), making measurement difficult due to attenuation in the soil. A Pu-239/240 to Am-241 ratio of 5.4 to 1 was established based on the review of numerous environmental investigations performed over a 38-year period. The Review of the 239/240 Pu to 241 Am Activity Ratio Analysis for Work Related to Remediation of the BOMARC Missile Accident Site [8] documents 5.4 to 1 as the best estimate of the Pu-239/240 to Am- 241 ratio for soils at the BOMARC site For purposes of the FSS, a surrogate ratio derived concentration guideline level (DCGL SR ) of 1.5 pci/g Am-241 was used to represent the clean-up level established in the ROD. The radionuclide 241 Am was used as a surrogate for Pu, specifically Pu-239/240, which comprises over 95% of the Pu activity. Adaptive Survey Design The BOMARC site survey was designed to be adaptive in the sense that all surveys were designed in accordance with the project data quality objectives (DQOs) and survey considerations given in MARSSIM such that the data could be used to support decisions regarding suitability for unrestricted radiological release of the Site. If the data collected in a particular area met the requirements for release
7 in accordance with the MARSSIM FSS design, then it was considered released. Conversely, if discrete particles or a was discovered during either scan surveys or soil sampling, that area was investigated, remediated as required, then re-surveyed to verify compliance with the DQOs. The entire Site investigation area was divided into either MARSSIM Class 1, 2, or 3 survey areas, depending on the locations of previously identified discrete particles and information uncovered during Historical Site Assessment research. The layout of the survey areas planned for the Site FSS are shown in Fig. 1. The classification scheme is color-coded for easy identification of each particular area. Table II. Area Breakdown for Each MARSSIM FSS Classification Type Survey Implementation Survey Area Classification Total Area (acres) Total Area (m 2 ) Class ,109 Class ,201 Class ,905 Total ,215 Surface scanning measurements, soil sampling at both and biased locations, and spot remediation with confirmatory surveys were all utilized to accomplish these stated survey objectives. Each of these survey actitivities are described in more detail below. Surface Scans Surface scan measurements in all survey areas were performed using CABRERA s Large Area Scanning System (CLASS). CLASS is designed as a turn-key system to rapidly measure, spatially correlate, and GIS map radioactivity concentrations in support of environmental characterization, remediation, and site closure activities. The CLASS is designed to mount to a variety of mobile survey platforms and is ruggedized to operate in a variety of environmental conditions. The system was front-mounted on an allterrain vehicle for the scan surveys at the BOMARC Site. A photograph of the mounted system is shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 2. CABRERA Large Area Scanning System (CLASS) Front-Mounted on ATV
8 The CLASS consists of an RSI RS-701 integrated controller and data acquisition system, an digital gamma ray spectrometer/multi-channel analyzer (MCA), a data controller, one to four RSX liter (256 cubic inch) sodium-iodide (thallium activated) (NaI(Tl)) gamma scintillation detectors, and internal GPS. An external high resolution Trimble Pro XH GPS receiver can also be incorporated for better spatial correlation of collection radiation data. Radiation and location information is collected by the system at a very high data transfer rate (nominally one data point every second), and stored in an uncorruptible data file for real-time feedback and data validation/post-processing. The system operator receives real-time feedback using waterfall plots of total and radioisotope specific response and georeferenced mapping of relative radiation concentrations. The data can also be transferred through a wireless network back to our data management center for real-time processing, and for conversion into GIS maps and data presentation formats. The digital interface enables the user to pre-set multiple regions of interest (ROIs) within the energy spectrum to identify and track specific gamma radiation emissions from gamma-emitting ROCs. Using an ROI for field scanning is advantageous as it greatly reduces the detector background, which in turn reduces the scan minimum detectable concentration (MDC). For the BOMARC Site, four independent ROIs were programmed into the RSI for data collection: Raw Am-241 peak (55 65 kiloelectron volts [kev]), Background subtracted Am-241 peak, Raw Total Counts ( kev), and Backgroundsubtracted Total Counts ( kev). Background subtraction is accomplished in the RSI software through entry of counts (or count rates) measured in target ROIs at the established background reference areas. The discrete particle scan MDC was developed based on the most-limiting elevated measurement comparison (EMC) area (80 m 2 ). This area corresponded to the largest unsampled area within the triangular systematic grid spacing pattern of a Class 1 survey unit. The CLASS system was shown to be able to detect an elevated area of discrete contamination that satisfied this DCGL EMC. The CLASS also utilizes internal energy gain stabilization to ensure the ROIs remain centered on the corresponding energy peaks. The CLASS can operate with one to four large volume (4L) NaI detectors and can be set up to collect data independently from each detector or in a serial collection mode. The independent data collection allows for better spatial sensitivity while the serial or summed collection mode allows for overall maximum detection sensitivity. The serial collection mode can operate effectively due to the digital gain stabilization which maintains consistent response over the survey interval. Areas identified by gamma surface scan measurements with contours of z-scores (number of standard deviations from the mean) greater than 3.0 were investigated. Sample locations with results that exceeded the investigation levels were further surveyed to determine the extent of the elevated residual radioactivity. In-situ gamma scanning using field instrument for the detection of low-energy radiation (FIDLER) detectors was used to investigate areas suspected of elevated residual radioactivity and to identify discrete particles. Remediated areas of elevated residual radioactivity were resurveyed by collecting surface soil samples and performing surface scans over 100% of the accessible area. Soil Sampling and Analysis Soil samples were collected to a depth of approximately 6 inches using hand shovels to remove the sample of soil. Asphalt samples were dislodged from roadways and parking areas by using jackhammers. Samples from over 3,000 soil and asphalt locations were collected for analysis. The locations of the Class 1 and Class 2 MARSSIM-design FSS samples are shown in Fig. 3. An onsite gamma spectroscopy laboratory, equipped with two high-purity germanium (HPGe) detectors, was used to provide near real time analytical results for soil and asphalt samples. This reduced turnaround time was especially useful to support the adaptive sampling protocols, specifically with regard
9 to quickly determining lateral and vertical extent of elevated residual radioactivity in identified areas. The chosen sample geometry was a 400-gram cylindrical cup with a height of approximately 6.3 centimeters (2.5 in). This geometry was chosen to allow for tandem counting of both sides of the cylinder to reduce the impact of heterogeneity issues that could result from single particles of low-energy (i.e., 59.5 kev) 241 Am photons. [9] Each sample was counted for a total of 20 minutes, with the first 10 on the first side, followed by a sample flip and continuing the count for another 10 minutes. The resported result is thus the composite average of the container over the total 20 minute counting period. Radiological data were reported as pci/g dry weight along with estimated counting uncertainty and peak MDC in pci/g dry weight. Fig. 3. Map of Class 1 and Class Systematic FSS Soil Samples. Random Samples within the Class 3 Survey Area Are Not Shown.
10 Spot Remediation and Waste Management Remediation activities consisted of either manual removal of small, localized areas with particle contamination, or mechanical removal of larger areas of particle contamination. Removals continued until measurements with FIDLER detectors indicated that radioactivity levels were at or close to ambient background levels. However, post-removal soil sampling provided the confirmation that the location met the ROD requirements. Remediated particle contamination and surrounding matrices (sand and asphalt) from small area footprints were loaded into lined, 1-cubic yard (CY) soft-sided containers for temporary storage until final loading for offsite disposal occurred. Local restrictions precluded the use of these soft-sided containers as the final shipping containers. Therefore, they had to trans-loaded into 20 CY intermodal containers and shipped via rail. All LLRW from the BOMARC Site was shipped to and disposed at the Energy Solutions, Inc. facility in Clive, Utah. A total of 65 CY of LLRW materials from the BOMARC Site were placed in four intemodal containers and shipped via CSX Railroad to the Energy Solutions facility. FSS RESULTS Driveover gamma radiation scanning was used initially to identify potential areas with contamination, which then underwent secondary investigation, sampling, and if necessary, remediation. As discussed previously, post-removal driveover scanning was performed at locations where contamination was identified and then manually and/or mechanically removed. The success of these incremental activities was shown using before and after figures that depict the integrated pre-removal and post-removal driveover scanning data, systematic soil sampling results, and particle contamination locations. An example of a before and after plot is provided in Fig. 4. Fig. 4. CLASS Survey Output Map Showing Pre-and Post-Removal of Pu Particle Contamination. The Data Shown in Both Plots Represents the Am-241 ROI (Approximately kev)
11 A summary of the pre-removal sampling results (i.e., systematic, biased, and subsurface samples) is presented in Table III. A total of 2,779 systematic surface soil samples were collected in the Class 1 and Class 2 areas. Of the 1,956 Class 1 systematic surface soil samples, 144 samples had detections of Am- 241 i.e., the result exceeded the analytical minimum detectable activity. Only 14 of 823 Class 2 systematic surface soil samples had detections of Am-241 over the Onsite Lab minimum detectable concentration. Table III. Summary Table of Soil Sample Results Collected As Part of BOMARC Site FSS. Sample Type Number of Samples Number of Detections (1) Minimum Concentration (pci/g) (2) Average Concentration (pci/g) Maximum Concentration (pci/g) Class 1 Systematic Class 2 Systematic Biased Subsurface Totals a Analyte considered detected if analytical result exceeded the reported minimum detectable activity. b pci/g = picocuries per gram. Minimum, average, and maximum include all results, including those below the minimum detectable activity. The results summarized in Table III were tested on a survey unit basis using the Sign statistical test and elevated measurement criteria as defined in the MARSSIM. All Class 1 and Class 2 survey units were shown to pass all MARSSIM FSS criteria developed for the Site. CONCLUSIONS CABRERA, under contract to the US Air Force, completed field characterization and remediation activities at a former BOMARC missile accident site with residual plutonium discrete particle contamination.. In 2008, the Site was approved for radiological closure by in accordance with the requirements of the published ROD [2] by the US Air Force Safety Center and the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The final release was the culmination of a multi-phase investigation performed under the framework of CERCLA and the MARSSIM. The WGP contamination throughout the site presented unique challenges in terms of site characterization and remediation. Specific technical challenges included the field detection of discrete high-activity plutonium particles over a 218-acre site and designing survey and sampling approaches to ensure compliance with the protocols outlined in the MARSSIM. CABRERA utilized innovative technologies and approaches to achieve these goals, including a large-area NaI gamma scanning spectrometry system, in situ gamma spectroscopy with high-purity germanium detectors, and multiple-depth soil sampling methods to identify locations with contamination exceeding ROD criteria (8 pci/g Pu-239). Scan surveys over 200 acres were completed and over 3,000 surface and subsurface samples were collected to accomplish this objective of final Site closure. The FSS was designed using a comprehensive, adaptive site closure strategy was implemented that included characterization, remove of any discrete plutonium (Pu) particles or localized Pu particle concentrations found, and final status survey of all areas.
12 REFERENCES Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Multi Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM). EPA-402-R , Rev. 1. United States Environmental Protection Agency. August. Labat-Anderson, Inc Record of Decision for the BOMARC Missile Accident Site, McGuire Air Force Base, New Jersey. Omaha, Nebraska. November. CABRERA. 2006a. Final Historical Site Assessment for BOMARC Missile Site, McGuire Air Force Base, New Egypt, New Jersey. Cabrera Services, Inc. April. Earth Technology Company Final Environmental Impact Statement, RW-01. Volumes 1-3, April. Earth Technology Company, Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study, Stage 2: BOMARC Missile Accident Site Report. May. OHM Remediation Services, Corp Final Report, BOMARC Missile Accident Site, RW-01, McGuire AFB, BOMARC Facility, Plumsted Township, Ocean County, New Jersey. Linden, New Jersey. June. Duratek, Inc. and Shaw E & I Final Status Survey Report for the Release of the BOMARC Missile Site, McGuire AFB, New Jersey. Revision 0. Oak Ridge, Tennessee. March. Air Force Safety Center (AFSC) Review of the Pu-239/240 to Am-241 Activity Ratio Analysis for Work Related to Remediation of the BOMARC Missile Accident Site. Weapons, Space, and Nuclear Safety Division, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. December. Rademacher, S.E The Influence of Heterogeneity in Gamma Spectroscopy Analysis of Soil Contaminated with Weapons Grade Plutonium. Air Force Institute for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health Risk Analysis, Brooks AFB TX. IERA-SD-BR-SR October. AUTHOR BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES John R. Hackett is a Health Physicist for Cabrera Services. John has over 10 years experience in operational Health Physics and Environmental Engineering. He received Environmental Engineering degrees from Northwestern University (BS, 1996) and Clemson University (MS, 1999). He has a Professional Engineer license in Colorado and is a Certified Health Physicist. Joseph J. Weismann is Health Physics Program Manager for Cabrera Services, Inc. He received his Bachelor of Nuclear Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He has 17 years experience in applied and environmental health physics, specializing in environmental restoration and facility decommissioning. He has a comprehensive certification by the American Board of Health Physics.
13 Mark Tepperman, PG. is an Operations Manager for Cabrera Services, Inc. in San Antonio, TX. He holds a BA in Earth Science from Washington University and MS in Geology from West Virginia University. Mr. Tepperman served as the Project Manager for the BOMARC Particle Removal and Final Status Survey. He has over 30 years experience in project management and the application of earth sciences for mineral extraction, contamination evaluation, and environmental remediation involving petroleum, organic compounds, metals, and radioactive materials. Mr. Tepperman is a member of SAME and AAPG. Steven Rademacher is Chief, Radioactive Materials Licensing and Safety, USAF Safety Center. He received a Bachelor of Biomedical Engineering from Marquette University, Master of Science in Health Physics from Texas A&M University, and a PhD is Radiological Health Sciences from Colorado State University. He has 23 years of experience in general industrial hygiene and broad-based health physics in the US Air Force. He is a certified health physicist.
Activities at temporary job site utilizing U.S. NRC Radioactive Material License #06-30556-01 Amendment 03 0303531(,
CABRERA SERVICES RADIOLOGICAL. ENGINEERING. REMEDIATION May 17,2011 Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475 Allendale Road King ofprussia, P A 19406 ATTN: Director, Division
Inventory of Performance Monitoring Tools for Subsurface Monitoring of Radionuclide Contamination
Inventory of Performance Monitoring Tools for Subsurface Monitoring of Radionuclide Contamination H. Keith Moo-Young, Professor, Villanova University Ronald Wilhelm, Senior Scientist, U.S. EPA, Office
APPENDIX N. Data Validation Using Data Descriptors
APPENDIX N Data Validation Using Data Descriptors Data validation is often defined by six data descriptors: 1) reports to decision maker 2) documentation 3) data sources 4) analytical method and detection
WM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
ABSTRACT Comparison of Activity Determination of Radium 226 in FUSRAP Soil using Various Energy Lines - 12299 Brian Tucker*, Jough Donakowski**, David Hays*** *Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Stoughton,
Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup
July 2013 Risk-Based Decision Making for Site Cleanup The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) has adopted a risk based decision making process to provide a framework for determining cleanup
Risk Management Procedure For The Derivation and Use Of Soil Exposure Point Concentrations For Unrestricted Use Determinations
Risk Management Procedure For The Derivation and Use Of Soil Exposure Point Concentrations For Unrestricted Use Determinations Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (303) 692-3300 First Edition
An Innovative Method for Dead Time Correction in Nuclear Spectroscopy
An Innovative Method for Dead Time Correction in Nuclear Spectroscopy Upp, Daniel L.; Keyser, Ronald M.; Gedcke, Dale A.; Twomey, Timothy R.; and Bingham, Russell D. PerkinElmer Instruments, Inc. ORTEC,
A Comparison of an HPGe-based and NaI-based Radionuclide Identifier (RID) for Radioactive Materials
Illicit Trafficking, Sub/cross-national threats, Poster presentation A Comparison of an HPGe-based and NaI-based Radionuclide Identifier (RID) for Radioactive Materials Ronald M. Keyser, Timothy R. Twomey,
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USEFULNESS OF THE ISOCS MATHEMATICAL EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION FOR LARGE RECTANGULAR 3 x5 x16 NAI DETECTORS
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USEFULNESS OF THE ISOCS MATHEMATICAL EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION FOR LARGE RECTANGULAR 3 x5 x16 NAI DETECTORS Frazier L. Bronson CHP Canberra Industries, Inc. 800 Research Parkway,
FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM
-_-~---- _.l~- _^--._.---..^- FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM ELIMINATION REPORT FOk FORMER QUALITY HARDWARE AND MACHINE COMPANY; 5823/5849 NORTH RAVENSWOOD AVENUE; CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JULY
Radiological mapping and characterization at the Barsebäck nuclear power plant
Radiological mapping and characterization at the Barsebäck nuclear power plant Leif Spanier, Scandpower AB Lars Håkansson, Barsebäck Kraft AB Radiological Characterisation for Decommissioning Workshop
Questionnaire for NORM service providers
Questionnaire for NORM service providers This questionnaire is intended for institutes and companies providing services relevant for NORM industries in Belgium. Its objective is to give to Belgian NORM
FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION
FINAL PLAN OF REMEDIAL ACTION 1000 FRENCH STREET SITE Wilmington, Delaware DE 1115 June 1999 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division of Air and Waste Management Site Investigation
Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan
Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Taiwan Introduction: Ching-Chung Huang Radiation Monitoring Center, Atomic Energy Council 823, Cherng-Ching Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan cchuang @ trmc.aec.gov.tw Chemical,
8 INTERPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS
8 INTERPRETATION OF SURVEY RESULTS 8.1 Introduction This chapter discusses the interpretation of survey results, primarily those of the final status survey. Interpreting a survey s results is most straightforward
Environmental Remediation Examples and Remediation Strategic Planning
Environmental Remediation Examples and Remediation Strategic Planning Yasuo Onishi ([email protected]) October 16, 2011 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Washington State University, Civil
Overview of Nuclear Detection Needs for Homeland Security. Abstract
Overview of Nuclear Detection Needs for Homeland Security Timothy E. Valentine * Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37831, USA Abstract The need for advanced and improved
MEMORANDUM. Further discussion regarding the Community s solid waste facility is described further in this memorandum.
MEMORANDUM File: Sanikiluaq Improvement of the Existing Wastewater Treatment Facility To: Government of Nunavut Department of Community and Government Services Attention: Mr. Grigor Hope,, Project Officer
New Cumberland Army Depot Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Marsh Run Park Site Restoration Community Meeting
New Cumberland Army Depot Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS) Marsh Run Park Site Restoration Community Meeting Fairview Township, York County, Pennsylvania April 23, 2013 N US Army Corps of Engineers Depot
NRC INSPECTION MANUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURE 88045
NRC INSPECTION MANUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURE 88045 NMSS/FCSS EFFLUENT CONTROL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM APPLICABILITY: 2600 88045-01 INSPECTION OBJECTIVES The objectives of this procedure are
Waste Management 04 Conference, February 29 - March 4, 2004, Tucson, AZ Copyright WM Symposia, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with permission.
RADIOLOGICAL FALSE POSITIVES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SOIL AND GROUNDWATER DATA FROM COMMERCIAL LABORATORIES Walter Kubilius Westinghouse Savannah River Company Thomas Coffey, Paul Mark EXR, Inc. Allen Volesky
Tutorial 4.6 Gamma Spectrum Analysis
Tutorial 4.6 Gamma Spectrum Analysis Slide 1. Gamma Spectrum Analysis In this module, we will apply the concepts that were discussed in Tutorial 4.1, Interactions of Radiation with Matter. Slide 2. Learning
A Review of Emerging Gamma Detector Technologies for Airborne. Radiation Monitoring
A Review of Emerging Gamma Detector Technologies for Airborne Steven Bell ANSRI Dublin 2015 12-14 January Radiation Monitoring Airborne radiation Particulates: sub-μm to sub-mm contaminated with fission
Antoine Henri Becquerel was born in Paris on December 15, 1852
Discovery Antoine Henri Becquerel was born in Paris on December 15, 1852 Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. Analytical Laboratories 3310 Win Street Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 Fax: 1-330-253-4489 Call
Cancer Cluster Investigation French Limited Superfund Site, Harris County, Texas
Cancer Cluster Investigation French Limited Superfund Site, Harris County, Texas Time Period: 1995-2011 Prepared by the Texas Department of State Health Services Summary Some residents living in the vicinity
NRC s Program for Remediating Polluted Sites J.T. Greeves, D.A. Orlando, J.T. Buckley, G.N. Gnugnoli, R.L. Johnson US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NRC s Program for Remediating Polluted Sites J.T. Greeves, D.A. Orlando, J.T. Buckley, G.N. Gnugnoli, R.L. Johnson US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Background The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND RADIATION SAFETY
Page 1 of 7 ISSUED: 5/00 REVISED: 08/06 1. Potential Releases of Radioactive Materials to Unrestricted Areas The Environmental Health and Safety Department (EHRS) must be notified immediately if an emergency
Characteristics of an Integrated Germanium Detector Based Gamma-Ray Spectrometer for Monitoring Systems
Characteristics of an Integrated Germanium Detector Based Gamma-Ray Spectrometer for Monitoring Systems Ronald M. Keyser, Timothy R. Twomey, Sam Hitch ORTEC 801 South Illinois Avenue Oak Ridge, TN, 37831
BECHTEL JACOBS COMPANY ORR WASTE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM DOCUMENT CONTROL SYSTEM
BECHTEL JACOBS COMPANY ORR WASTE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM DOCUMENT CONTROL SYSTEM If you print the following document, this page must be attached to the front of the document and you must fill in the information
Use of Alternate Concentration Limits (ACLs) to Determine Cleanup or Regulatory Levels Under RCRA and CERCLA
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance ACL Information Brief DOE/EH-413-9912 (December 1999) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY UN ITED STATES OF AMERICA Use of Alternate Concentration
Performance Management for Environmental Remediation Projects. William C. Lattin, PMP US Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office
Performance Management for Environmental Remediation Projects William C. Lattin, PMP US Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office Course Objectives Awareness of the types of cost estimating used to
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN TEMPLATE. 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1.1 Project Name and Location Date
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN TEMPLATE Disclaimer: This template was developed for guidance purposes only in an effort to assist Construction Storm Water permit applicants in meeting state and local
SECTION TWO PACKAGING, TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
SECTION TWO PACKAGING, TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this section, participants will be able to: Identify three types of packaging for radioactive
Experiment 10. Radioactive Decay of 220 Rn and 232 Th Physics 2150 Experiment No. 10 University of Colorado
1 Radioactive Decay of 220 Rn and 232 Th Physics 2150 Experiment No. 10 University of Colorado Introduction Some radioactive isotopes formed billions of years ago have half- lives so long that they are
SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BIOSPHERE MODEL TO ESTIMATE RADIOLOGICAL DOSE IN THE GOLDSIM ENVIRONMENT
SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BIOSPHERE MODEL TO ESTIMATE RADIOLOGICAL DOSE IN THE GOLDSIM ENVIRONMENT Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Prepared by
REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH. REGULATORY GUIDE 4.15 (Draft was issued as DG-4010, dated November 2006)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION July 2007 Revision 2 REGULATORY GUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH REGULATORY GUIDE 4.15 (Draft was issued as DG-4010, dated November 2006) QUALITY ASSURANCE
Radioactive Waste Storage Facility and Tank System Design Criteria Standards
UCRL-AR-133355 Rev 1 Radioactive Waste Storage Facility and Tank System Design Criteria Standards John Wood Rich Michalik Karen Doiron May 1999 DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work
National Radiation Air Monitoring Network National Environmental Monitoring Conference San Antonio -- August 6, 2013
National Radiation Air Monitoring Network National Environmental Monitoring Conference San Antonio -- August 6, 2013 Dan Askren & Scott Telofski National Analytical Radiation Environmental Laboratory Montgomery,
NORM MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES & PRINCIPLES
Introducing NORM NORM MANAGEMENT Three is glad to present some basic hints about NORM that should be taken onto consideration whilst dealing with these matters The acronym NORMmeans all Naturally Occurring
Innovative Technology Verification Report
United States Office of Research and EPA/600-R-03/149 Environmental Protection Development May 2004 Agency Washington DC 20460 Innovative Technology Verification Report Field Measurement Technology for
Base Realignment and Closure Program Management Office West 1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92108-4310 FINAL EXECUTION PLAN
Base Realignment and Closure Program Management Office West 1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900 San Diego, California 92108-4310 CONTRACT NO. N62473-10-D-0809 CTO NO. 0012 FINAL EXECUTION PLAN DCN: RMAC-0809-0012-0007
United States of America Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards William F. Kane, Director
DD-01-01 United States of America Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards William F. Kane, Director In the Matter of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Docket No. 030-28641
What Constitutes Environmental Due Diligence?
What Constitutes Environmental Due Diligence? Different Levels of Due Diligence for Different Types of Acquisitions: Green Fields, Brownfields, Operating Terminals and Leases By Gail A. Corrigan, Corrigan
Emergencies Involving Radiation
Page 1-1 Section 1 Emergencies Involving Radiation Contents A. Emergency Phone Numbers...1-2 1. Campus... 1-2 a. Radiation Safety Office 543-0463... 1-2 b. University Police 9-911... 1-2 2. Off Campus...
Radioanalytical Data Validation Issues and Solutions
Radioanalytical Data Validation Issues and Solutions Presented by: Terry McKibbin and Kevin Harmon Validata Chemical Services, Inc. Purpose of Data Validation The Presentation is Based on this Goal for
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Ground Water Extraction System Subsurface Performance Checklist
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Ground Water Extraction System Subsurface Performance Checklist Installation Name Site Name / I.D. Evaluation Team Site Visit Date This checklist is meant to aid in evaluating
GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WELL LOGGING OPERATIONS IN KENTUCKY
GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WELL LOGGING OPERATIONS IN KENTUCKY Radiation Control Cabinet for Human Resources 275 East Main Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40621 JANUARY
Chemical and Isotopic Signatures for Environmental Remediation and Nuclear Forensic Analysis
Chemical and Isotopic Signatures for Environmental Remediation and Nuclear Forensic Analysis Sue B. Clark Washington State University, Department of Chemistry, Pullman, WA 99163 [email protected] Abstract
ERP Update. Columbus Air Force Base (AFB) is. The Environmental Restoration Program. Rail Spur RS034. History & Mission of Columbus AFB
COLUMBUS AIR FORCE BASE ERP Update JUNE 2015 The Environmental Restoration Program Columbus Air Force Base (AFB) is committed to being a responsible steward of the environment and to conducting the base
Comparison of natural radioactivity removal methods for drinking water supplies: A review
Comparison of natural radioactivity removal methods for drinking water supplies: A review E. Esmeray, M. E. Aydin Selcuk University Environmental Engineering Department, Konya Turkey e-mail: [email protected]
Draft ABCA : USEPA 2015 Brownfields Cleanup Grant Application for Former Hudepohl Brewery Site by Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority
Analysis of Brownfield Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA) for Hudepohl Brewery Site Introduction & History The Port of Greater Cincinnati Development Authority (Port Authority) has developed a draft proposal
Turnkey Solutions for Radiation Protection in PET Laboratories R A D I A T I O N P R O T E C T I O N
Turnkey Solutions for Radiation Protection in PET Laboratories R A D I A T I O N P R O T E C T I O N Berthold Technologies has more than 60 years experience in manufacturing radiation protection measuring
Site Description and History
1300 Northwest 31 st Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida County: Broward District: Southeast Site Lead: EPA Placed on National Priorities List: October 4, 1989 HWC # 085 Site Description and History The Wingate
San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil
INTRODUCTION San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil This guidance relates to the on-site reuse of non-hazardous petroleum hydrocarbon impacted
Appendix 1: Units of Measure Used in the Lead-Based Paint Field
Appendix 1: Units of Measure Used in the Lead-Based Paint Field Many of the units, terms, and concepts used in these Guidelines are new to the users. Most of the measures cited are in the Metric System
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE S MACROENCAPSULATION PROCESSING OF LESS THAN 3700 BQ/GM1 TRU ISOTOPIC MIXED WASTE FOR DISPOSAL AT THE NEVADA TEST SITE
SAVANNAH RIVER SITE S MACROENCAPSULATION PROCESSING OF LESS THAN 3700 BQ/GM1 TRU ISOTOPIC MIXED WASTE FOR DISPOSAL AT THE NEVADA TEST SITE ABSTRACT Glenn W. Siry, Luke T. Reid Washington Savannah River
Reclamation Plants, Separation Facilities & Stationary Treatment Facilities
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Reclamation Plants, Separation Facilities & Stationary Treatment Facilities Grant Chambless, P.G. Manager, Environmental Permits & Support Oil & Gas Division 1 Disclaimer These
ANNUAL FIRE PROTECTION SUMMARY INFORMATION REPORTING GUIDE Revised: May 2011
ANNUAL FIRE PROTECTION SUMMARY INFORMATION REPORTING GUIDE Revised: May 2011 Organizations responsible for maintaining property under stewardship of DOE and the Administrator, NNSA, will seek concurrence
Extraction Oil and Gas, LLC. Diamond Valley Central Oil Terminal Waste Management Plan
Extraction Oil and Gas, LLC. Diamond Valley Central Oil Terminal Waste Management Plan Scope: This Extraction Oil and Gas Waste Management Plan has been prepared to provide operations personnel at the
FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT MASON COUNTY LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE LUDINGTON, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY, 2001
FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT MASON COUNTY LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE LUDINGTON, MICHIGAN FEBRUARY, 2001 I. INTRODUCTION Section 121(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
PCB Cleanups. Kurt Limesand EPA Region 7 Waste Remediation and Permitting. 5/1/13 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1
PCB Cleanups Kurt Limesand EPA Region 7 Waste Remediation and Permitting 5/1/13 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1 40 CFR Part 761 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Subpart D: Storage and disposal 761.61
Chapter 5: Spills Response
Chapter 5: Spills Response When printing materials are spilled, the response required by the owner or operator depends on what is spilled and the quantity. The entities who must be informed of a spill
CRIIRAD report N. 10-07. Analyses of atmospheric radon 222 / canisters exposed by Greenpeace in Niger (Arlit/Akokan sector)
CRIIRAD Commission de Recherche et d Information Indépendantes sur la Radioactivité Site : www.criirad.org Tel : + 33 (0)4 75 41 82 50 Fax : + 33 (0)4 75 81 26 48 E-mail : [email protected] Valence,
WM2012 Conference, February 26-March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Radioactive Waste Characterization Strategies; Comparisons Between AK/PK, Dose to Curie Modeling, Gamma Spectroscopy, and Laboratory Analysis Methods- 12194 Steven J. Singledecker, Scotty W. Jones, Alison
PART N REGULATION AND LICENSING OF TECHNOLOGICALLY ENHANCED NATURALLY OCCURRING RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL (TENORM)
Sec. N.1 - N.3 SSRCR Volume I - April 2004 PART N REGULATION AND LICENSING OF TECHNOLOGICALLY ENHANCED NATURALLY OCCURRING RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL (TENORM) Sec. N.1 - Purpose. This Part establishes radiation
V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. Hazardous Materials
E. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS An Environmental Site Assessment Phase I Update was performed on the subject properties by California Environmental Inc. in March 2000 1. This report is included in Appendix E of
BOSTON COLLEGE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY LABORATORY GUIDE FOR RENOVATIONS, REMODELS, MOVES AND TERMINATIONS
BOSTON COLLEGE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY LABORATORY GUIDE FOR RENOVATIONS, REMODELS, MOVES AND TERMINATIONS I. Policy for Termination of Laboratory Use of Hazardous Materials The Principal Investigator
RADIATION DETECTION & ANALYSIS SYSTEMS FOR WATER
RADIATION DETECTION & ANALYSIS SYSTEMS FOR WATER On Line Remote Sensing Systems On-line remote monitoring of gamma radiation in seawater using spectroscopy and gross monitoring detectors with remote command
Azeri, Chirag & Gunashli Full Field Development Phase 3 Environmental & Socio-economic Impact Assessment. A10.1 Introduction...
APPENDIX 10 Normally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) Contents A10.1 Introduction... A10/3 A10.2 Occurrence & Concentration of NORM in Oil and Gas Operations... A10/4 A10.2.1 Probability of NORM formation
The decay of progeny continues until stable, non-radioactive progeny are formed. At each step in the decay process, radiation is released.
Radon What is radon? Radon is a radioactive gas. It is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and chemically inert. Unless you test for it, there is no way of telling how much is present. Radon is formed by the
consulting engineers and scientists
consulting engineers and scientists Incorporating Sustainable Principles into Cleanups June 2014 Presented by: Rich Truax, PE GEI Consultants, 650 Personnel Nationwide Rich Truax, P.E. Sr. Program Manager
PROCESS PARTICLE COUNTER (PPC) SENSOR/CONTROLLER FOR OPTIMIZING POWER RECOVERY EXPANDER AND GAS TURBINE PERFORMANCE
PROCESS PARTICLE COUNTER (PPC) SENSOR/CONTROLLER FOR OPTIMIZING POWER RECOVERY EXPANDER AND GAS TURBINE PERFORMANCE APPLICATIONS NOTE FOR MEASUREMENTS AT THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT OF A THIRD STAGE SEPARATOR
LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY MENDIS ROAD, HUDSON CREEK DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR A PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY MENDIS ROAD, HUDSON CREEK DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR A PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Introduction The purpose of this Public Environmental Report (PER) is to provide the Government
Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi Ni-H reactor.
Report on heat production during preliminary tests on the Rossi Ni-H reactor. Dr. Giuseppe Levi In this first and preliminary document are reported the heat production measures done during two short tests
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS REGULATORY GUIDE
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS REGULATORY GUIDE PORTAL MONITORING SYSTEMS Radioactive Materials Unit 625 Robert Street North PO Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975 August 2007 REGULATORY GUIDE FOR PORTAL MONITORING
Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility
1 Hazard Classification of the Remote Handled Low Level Waste Disposal Facility Abstract Boyd D. Christensen Battelle Energy Alliance, Idaho National Laboratory P.O. Box 1625 Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 208
IAC 7/2/08 Agriculture and Land Stewardship[21] Ch 44, p.1
IAC 7/2/08 Agriculture and Land Stewardship[21] Ch 44, p.1 CHAPTER 44 ON-SITE CONTAINMENT OF PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND SOIL CONDITIONERS [Prior to 7/27/88, see 21 Ch 9] PESTICIDES 21 44.1(206) Definitions.
Prepared for the Department of Energy Office of Transportation and Emergency Management. 02B00215-13.p65
TEPP Planning Products e for Medical Examiner/Cor on the Handling of a Body/Human Remains that are Potentially Radiologically Contaminated 02B00215-13.p65 Prepared for the Department of Energy Office of
SAMPLE FRACTION MITIGATION CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR DIRECTIONAL DRILLING
SAMPLE FRACTION MITIGATION CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR DIRECTIONAL DRILLING 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction and Purpose 3 2.0 Description of Work 3 3.0 Site Supervisor/Foremen Responsibilities 4 4.0 Equipment
