1 Collaborative Open-Source software: the case of e-learning at University Fernando Pessoa Feliz Gouveia, Luís Borges Gouveia CEREM Abstract We present the elearning project at University Fernando Pessoa (UFP). We briefly present some of the current issues, review the terminology and the techniques, and present the main guidelines we adopted for choosing an elearning platform. We present the overall approach that has been taken at UFP, together with the short and medium term goals that we aim to achieve. Introduction We briefly present some of the current issues, review the terminology and the techniques, and present the main guidelines we adopted for choosing an elearning platform. We present the overall approach that has been taken at University Fernando Pessoa, together with the short and medium term goals that we aim to achieve. By elearning platform we mean a generic software and hardware infrastructure that can be used to deliver different kinds of computer mediated learning: at a distance, blended, partially in the classroom, and as an add-on to classroom only classes. We are here mainly concerned by what we can have right now to support an elearning initiative and what are the relevant issues to consider when making a decision. We are here not concerned by elearning concepts, trends, or techniques. The elearning project at UFP was defined by the following characteristics: a large majority of courses taught at UFP are in the Social Sciences and Health Sciences areas, and only four courses in the Science and Technology areas; this means the vast majority of users (learners and instructors) is not technologyoriented, and so we should expect a wider range of adoption questions;
2 the platform should support regular university courses, graduation courses, and several formats of training courses; the platform should not constrain instructors to follow a rigid pedagogical model; it should on the contrary be also a tool for research, by allowing several configurations and functions to be tested and included as needed; the platform should be open in the sense of being able to integrate with the existing student and course rosters. New features and requirements, not known beforehand, should also be easily included in the system; this was a major requirement, as UFP didn t want to rely solely on commercial vendors to integrate the system with legacy software and to add functions; features such as localization were secondary in a first stage, although the system should allow in the future to support a multi-language interface. The elearning project had a timeline of for requirements identification, tests, and candidate selection (the current phase we are now), for a medium scale pilot, and for a full implementation. The first stage consisted of literature review, technical literature review and gathering of experiences from commercial elearning systems including visits and interviews at Portuguese and Spanish institutions that had deployed in production such systems. This paper is mainly about the issues that are currently being addressed and those that will be addressed in a near future. The next section discusses some of the current issues related to elearning systems; then we briefly characterize a Learning Management System, and present in the next section what we selected as important to choose; them we present the selected system, and close with some final remarks about this project. Current issues Blico et al (2004) identify three technology categories that have to be considered when talking web elearning systems implementation: infrastructure that is specially designed to support elearning;
3 infrastructure that is not elearning specific but it is essential in deploying elearning systems; more widely deployed infrastructure that may be useful to support elearning, although not required in any way. In the first category we find specific authoring and content management software, and computing and communications infrastructure. The second category provides authentication, security, file upload and download, , and other tools and techniques. The third category provides for example more options of communication links (e.g. wireless), medium (e.g. TV or video), distributed servers, and load balancing applications. Following the web trend of closer interconnection and interoperation, the elearning infrastructure will certainly be scattered among an institution s several and increasingly omnipresent web services and it will certainly not be a single system. As higher education institutions offer more learning and training options, the learners needs and goals are different for example, adult education, skills acquisition, training, refresher modules. It is already a trend seen in current commercial and open source elearning systems, and a trend that will certainly be reinforced in the short term. Service Oriented Architectures see for example (W3C, 2004) can provide the foundation to develop software that has to be used by different profiles, with different content, with different service requirements. Elearning systems will probably evolve to service managers, adopting their interface (the services they offer) to the profile of the learners; otherwise, the current level of integration complexity will kill any serious large scale elearning effort. Other technological advances are making their way, although their adoption in elearning contexts has not been as expected. The newer generation of learners, an internet generation, will probably contribute to a widespread adoption of new techniques and tools, such as instant messaging, mobile devices, collaborative software, blogs, use of digital libraries and digital content repositories, gaming, and more interaction. On the other hand, other players, from the content side (the major scientific publishers), are packaging their content (adopted and recommended books) to be used inside the major elearning systems. Once again, the choice of open standards seems the only
4 reasonable way to go. Content production is the most time and cost expensive activity in an elearning setting, and reusability is the key factor. Finally, different styles are adopted by instructors, and an elearning system should not constrain them to all use the same set of techniques, learning design, and methods. Learning Management Systems Learning Management Systems (or LMS for short) should provide the following five functions: Managing access to the system; this function should control password-based access, identification of groups of users and their rights, and a list of courses and registration policies. Most of the time, these functions are accomplished with a high degree of customization, for example by connecting the system with a roster of students and courses. Services such as single-sign on using a variety of techniques for example Yale Central Authentication Service (CAS) (Mazurek 2004), or LDAP providers allow for a smoother integration with legacy systems. Content assignment and management; this function should display course catalogs, targeted to specific audiences, allow for registration, and allow for synchronous and asynchronous content distribution, assessment creation and delivery, syllabus creation, and the management of personalized learning paths. It is expected that most of these services should get information from external providers, such as rosters of students and courses. Scheduling functions can also be added. Communication; the third function deals with establishing, and maintaining communication between learners and instructors. Several options exist for online, offline, synchronous, asynchronous, one to one or broadcast communication. The choice of a specific technique should maximize people engagement, and allow for the expected impact to take place. Tracking and reporting; this function should allow for tracking of student progress, and for reporting on studied materials (compulsory, optional). Should
5 also report on study paths, student preferences, and study styles. Besides collecting information on what, when, how and for how long, this function should include institution s specific requirements concerning tracking and reporting. Content development; this function allows for in house content development, and should help instructors with templates, import/export facilities, and easy editing. Compliance with industry standards for example the Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) (ADL, 2004), IEEE LTSC (IEEE 2005), IMS (IMS, 2005) and OKI (2005) helps with course creation, import and export of courses, and integration with other materials (for example book materials). Furthermore, the trend to move to Web services, eportfolios and LMS and portals integration adds to the distributed nature of learning content. Another important issue deals with content copyright and licensing: the new Creative Commons licensing scheme should play a major role here. The last function, Content development, is often used to distinguish between LMS and L(Content)MS, or LCMS, depending on their sophistication. It is mainly a managerial and technical question if content is going to be produced in the same system that is delivering it, or rather using more sophisticated tools. As such we used either LMS ore LCMS, meaning elearning platform. In the next section we list and discuss some of the tools, or services, that a LMS/LCMS or a combination of both should present. Tools and functions From a survey of existing LMS we could identify the following tools and functions that we would like (and in some cases require) our system to have. Most are summarized in (Wilson et al, 2004): Course management: supports creation and management of courses, modules and other units of learning; Assessment: supports the creation, delivery and scoring of assessments; Grading: supports grading of units of work and evaluation;
6 eportfolio: supports recording information about the learners, such as achievements, work, and artefacts; Drop-box: supports two-way exchange of documents between learner and instructor; Reporting: provides output such as reports for supervising bodies (such as the Ministry of Education); Resources: allows the creation of lists or pools of resources in various digital formats; Learning flow: allows for the definition of learning paths; Alert: allows for the dissemination of news, alerts and announcements; Archiving: allows for the long term archival of courses (exporting and importing functions); Authentication: verifies the identity of a given user, can be provided by an external source (CAS or LDAP provider); Authorization: establishes a realm for deciding which user which actions; Audio/Video conferencing: includes one to one or broadcast audio and video conferencing; Scheduling, calendars: allows for personal calendar management; Chat: supports multi-user chat rooms; supports access to an tool or integrates an tool; Digital Rights Management: provides facilities for Digital Rights Management, managing access to resources depending on the user s profile; Logging: provides logging facilities for applications; Membership: provides for membership of users in groups, or courses;
7 Messaging: provides for broadcast or one to one messaging services; Metadata management: supports metadata management for resources; Presence: allows for some kind of presence tool; Profile: provides for online basic information about users; Roles: supports the definition of roles such as security realms and organizational roles; Search: supports the search of any kind of information within the system; Whiteboard: provides some sort of collaborative function where users share materials and ideas. These were the most important tools and services we selected in the first phase, and that would guide the selection of the elearning platform. Either these tools would be present or it should be possible to include them without major modifications to the system and to the code. Choosing a LMS In this section we give an overview of the additional criteria we used to select an LMS (the generic name we are giving to an e-learning platform), besides the tools and services list we presented in the last section. By looking for the features underlying the tools and services described, we the most important issue we have identified so far has been open standards compliance (not proprietary standards compliance). But other issues are important in an higher-education context: the cost trade-off of the buy-build dilemma; there is evidence (at least in the US) that locally built software is being replaced (Lambert, 2004); the level of open standards compliance; for an anecdotic example of exporting data from an existing system see (Wheeler, 2004);
8 the level to which the system adapts to the university culture and values; Lambert (2004) pointed out that although universities are asked to be run as businesses, they have different values than normal businesses. Innovation, sharing, research, collaboration are intrinsic higher education values, and these do not fit the commercial software offer. So, why not use these values as the foundation for scholarly information systems as Lambert calls them? The UFP choice The Sakai project (Hardin 2004, Sakai, 2005) is a collaborative open source software development project, led by Stanford University, MIT, Michigan State University and Indiana University, being also financed by the Andrew-Mellon Foundation. Sakai started with the ambitious goal of being commercially competitive by the end of Sakai relied on previous efforts and systems by the founding institutions that realised they all were doing the same. Sakai is defined as a collaboration and learning environment, the best of refactoring of the existing systems (Hardin, 2004) presenting most of the tools and services we listed before. As interesting features we could name: it will integrate with portal software, according to the JSR-168 specification (JCP 2005); it will be based on WSRP (Web Services for Remote Portals); it will be based on open standards (IMS-QTI, OKI); it has an open-open licensing scheme (open for deploy and open for commercial use); As for version 1.5.x (now a couple of months old), Sakai offers: a syllabus tool; a quiz and test tool; integration with course and user providers;
9 a calendar tool; an announcement tool; a resources tool; a archiving tool; an assessment tool; a drop box tool; a gradebook (still under development); a profile tool (still under development). These tools and services are currently being tested in a small pilot involving around 500 students, 70 instructors and 80 Sakai sites, corresponding to courses, research projects, and interest groups. The same platform can be used for any collaborative activity, which allowed for instructors to choose their approach strategy to the system: by creating course pages with support material, managing assessments, managing the schedule, among other creative ways. No one felt pressed to use a LMS, and to learn in a short period of time how to do e-learning. Final remarks Although the Sakai project has gathered funding and institutional support until the end of 2005, there remains to be seen what will happen beyond that date. Will the collaborative effort have gained momentum and can remain organized? Will the governance rules established or implicit so far keep the community together? Will this open source choice prove economically viable in the long run? We hope the answers are positive, and that the encouraging results we had so far in a limited pilot could be extended to the production phase. References ADL Advanced Distributed Learning (2004), SCORM 2004 Conformance Requirements Version 1.2, December 2004.
10 Blinco K., Mason J., McLean N., Wilson S. (2004), Trends and Issues in E-learning Infrastructure Development, White Paper, alt-i-lab 2004, July , California, Creative Commons (2005), available at [visited 20 April 2005]. Hardin, J (2004), Sakai project overview, Educause, Denver, Colorado, October 19-22, IEEE, Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC) (2005), available at [visited 20 April 2005]. IMS, Global Learning Consortium Inc (2005), available at [visited 20 April 2005]. JCP, Java Community Process (2005), JSR 168: Portlet Specification, available at [visited 20 April 2005]. Lambert, H. D. (2004), Collaborative Open-Source Software: Panacea or Pipe Dream for Higher Education?, Educause, Denver, Colorado, October 19-22, Mazurek, D. (2004), uportal and the Yale Central Authentication Service, JA-SIG Summer Conference 04, Denver, Colorado, June 21, OKI (2005), Open Knowledge Initiative, available at [visited 20 April 2005]. Sakai (2005), available at [visited 20 April 2005]. W3C (2004), Web Services Architecture, W3C Working Group Note 11, February Wilson S., Blinco K., Rehak D., An e-learning Framework A Summary, alt-i-lab 2004, July , California, Wheeler, B., Why Open Source is good for interoperability, alt-i-lab 2004, July , California, 2004.
Communication Software Laboratory Academic Year 2007-2008 E-learning Platforms. Moodle and Dokeos. Group 95 Homero Canales Guenaneche 100031592 Fernando García Radigales 100039032 Index 1. Introduction...
Solution Brief for Education Adobe Solutions for Learning Management Systems (LMS) Discover exciting, new ways to create and deliver high-impact elearning content and provide interactive online learning
ISSN 1392 124X INFORMACINĖS TECHNOLOGIJOS IR VALDYMAS, 2004, Nr.4(33) DISTANCE EDUCATION DELIVERY USING THE LOTUS LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Jelena Stankevič, Irma Šileikienė Vilnius Gediminas Technical
What s The Difference Between an LMS and an LCMS? The Important Software Components of Both and The Specific Differences Between the Two By Vantage Path Table Of Contents The Best Learning Management System
Corporate Training and Education Technology Standards The 10th International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis: ISAS 2004 and International Conference on Cybernetics and Information
Athabasca University CENTRE FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION Online Software Evaluation Report TITLE : Contrasting LMS marketing approaches REPORT # : R42/0410 AUTHOR(S) : Brian Carriere, Carl Challborn, James Moore,
Comparison of Moodle and ATutor LMSs Péter Lengyel - Miklós Herdon - Róbert Szilágyi University of Debrecen CAS-FAERD Contents Introduction (Moodle, ATutor) Evaluation aspects Technical flexibility Learning
2012 International Conference on Education Technology and Computer (ICETC2012) IPCSIT vol.43 (2012) (2012) IACSIT Press, Singapore Application of Project-driven Teaching Practice Based on Sakai Wang Lin
EQUELLA One Central Repository for a Diverse Range of Content www.equella.com What is EQUELLA? EQUELLA, our web-based platform, provides one central location for the delivery of a diverse range of content
NHS Shared Learning Quality Assurance Checklists for Evaluating Learning Objects and Online Courses February 2009 Page 1 Note This document provides an outline of the Resource workflow within NHS Shared
ICT Innovations 2012 Web Proceedings ISSN 1857-7288 501 Cloud e-university services Kiril Kiroski, Marjan Gusev, Magdalena Kostoska, and Sasko Ristov University Ss Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Computer
The Blackboard Academic Suite Overview of Product Capabilities OVERVIEW The Blackboard Academic Suite provides learning institutions with powerful capabilities to achieve their e-learning goals. Blackboard
Building Effective Blended Learning Programs Harvey Singh Introduction The first generation of e-learning or Web-based learning programs focused on presenting physical classroom-based instructional content
FEATURES OR CRITERIA Tool Feature function Specified performance criteria Admin Tools Admin Tools Admin Tools Admin Tools copy a course into multiple sections Enroll in multiple courses at once Apply templates
U of S Course Tools List of Tools Available (Definitions) For Instructors August, 2012 Background: Tool availability allows the instructor to control what tools can be used and by which users. Tools are
Online Class* Development Guidelines Middlesex Community College March 11, 2015 I. Online Class Proposal: Submission and Review** The proposal to develop a new online course should start six months before
Information and Communication Technologies in Education Learning Management Systems (L.M.S.) K. Vassilakis / M. Kalogiannakis Learning Management Systems (LMS) - Contents Terminology, descriptions, definitions
A Guide to Selecting a Learning Content Management Solution www.amvonet.com Page 1 of 7 A Guide to Selecting a Learning Content Management Solution Since the 1990s, e-learning has grown tremendously in
Desire2Learn Integrations and Customizations ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT This document has been designed for prospective Desire2Learn clients whose organization is interested in understanding the various integrations
Dearborn Public Schools elearning Platform Communicate. Learn. Collect. See what you can do. 1 COMMUNICATE / LEARN / COLLECT elearning Platform A Quick Introduction Dearborn Public Schools offers teachers
The People Process Product Continuum in E-Learning: The E-Learning P3 Model Badrul H. Khan Contributing Editor In e-learning, people are involved in the process of creating e-learning materials and making
The System Architecture and Tools of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Juliette Siegfried March 2015 The System Architecture and Tools of the Partnership for Assessment
by Bob Little Introduction In the corporate world at least, organizations believe that financial measures indicate and determine - their state of health. This has tended to mean that firms favor accountants
Faculty Handbook for Online Instruction Effective Fall 2011 Updated 1/2013 Preface The Handbook for Online Instruction has been created to provide faculty of online courses new and experienced, full-time
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE for MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY ONLINE for MASTERING HEALTHCARE TERMINOLOGY, Third Edition Module 7: Male Reproductive System OVERVIEW Module 7 in Medical Terminology Online accompanies Chapter
Knowledge conomy Skill Development -learning xcellence Learning Management System K-LMS K-LMS empowers your organizational learning culture through Learning Management System (K-LMS), a software package
ELIS Managing Enterprise Level Learning Programs with Moodle Mike Churchward Remote-Learner.net, USA/Canada/UK, email@example.com Abstract Moodle as a learning management system does a superior job
Sakai CLE Executive Summary The Sakai Collaboration and Learning Environment (Sakai CLE) serves as an education management system and is used by many institutions. Unlike UC Irvine s Electronic Educational
SUNY Learning Network Faculty Development Workshop Descriptions 2012-2013 Overview of SLN workshops SLN is committed to delivering workshops that help faculty develop and deliver high-quality instruction
SOA REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE: WEB TIER SOA Blueprint A structured blog by Yogish Pai Web Application Tier The primary requirement for this tier is that all the business systems and solutions be accessible
LearningServer for.net Implementation Guide This document outlines recommended steps for planning and implementing a LearningServer solution. A successful installation and implementation requires the completion
Core Solutions of Microsoft Lync Server 2013 Course 20336B: 5 days Instructor Led About this Course This instructor-led course teaches IT professionals how to plan, design, deploy, configure, and administer
Five Technological Considerations When Choosing an E-Learning Solution By By Karl M. Kapp, Assistant Director and Associate Professor of the Institute for Interactive Technologies, Bloomsburg University,
Course Syllabus Fall 2015 S652 Digital Libraries Indiana University- Purdue University at Indianapolis (IUPUI) School of Informatics and Computing - Dept. of Library and Information Science From schools
Why NetDimensions Learning Quick To Implement Lower overall costs NetDimensions Learning can be deployed faster and with fewer implementation services than almost any other learning system in the market.
Utilise one central repository for a diverse range of content EQUELLA C O N T E N T P L A T F O R M www.equella.com What is EQUELLA? EQUELLA, our web-based platform provides one central location for the
Web Conferencing Product Comparison There are a variety of web conferencing solutions designed for use with different types of meetings: from less formal on-the-fly get-togethers to carefully structured
offers a range of web conferencing solutions designed for use with different types of meetings: from less formal on-the-fly get-togethers to carefully structured company-wide conferences or training sessions.
Overview of available elearning Platforms (focusing on freeware) Work Package 4 of the Project Blended Learning Quality-Concepts Optimized for Adult Education Compiled and edited by Multilateral Grundtvig
A Content inacol Standards of Quality for Online Courses The course goals and objectives are measurable and clearly state what the participants will know or be able to do at the end of the course. Course
Blackboard 8 Interface Welcome to Tarleton State University's Blackboard 8! Blackboard is the online Learning Management System (LMS) of Tarleton State University. Blackboard enables the teacher to provide
REACH Distance Learning Program Center Handbook Introduction Distance learning is an educational delivery method where students work on their own and communicate with faculty and other students through
Course 20336A: Core Solutions of Microsoft Lync Server 2013 Length: Audience(s): 5 Days Level: 300 IT Professionals Technology: Microsoft Lync Server 2013 Type: Delivery Method: Course Instructor-led (classroom)
E-learning and Student Management System: toward an integrated and consistent learning process Matteo Bertazzo 1, Franca Fiumana 2 1 CINECA, Information and Knowledge Management Services Department, via
Policies and Procedures Guide for Online Students Olathe Public Schools eacademy 2014 2015 http://eacademy.olatheschools.com General Information Students within the Olathe District attendance boundaries
Abstract Improving Distance Education Through Student Online Orientation Classes Scott Mensch Indiana University of Pennsylvania When offering an online class the academic institution s major concern should
SCORM Users Guide for Instructional Designers Version 8 September 15, 2011 Brief Table of Contents Chapter 1. SCORM in a Nutshell... 6 Chapter 2. Overview of SCORM... 15 Chapter 3. Structuring Instruction...
http://www.atrixware.com/ 1.866.696.8709 Request for Proposal for a Cloud Based Learning Management Solution Sample Questions for a Learning Management System (LMS) General Is your product 100% web based
Features of the Online Course Table of Contents Course Interface: Overview... 2 Syllabus... 3 Navigating through the Course Content... 4 Learning Modules... 5 Communicating... 5 Assessments... 6 Assignments...
www.apereo.org/uportal Enterprise Portal Built by and for Higher Education Now Responsive for All Devices along with Native App Experience There is a growing demand for higher education institutions to
Totara LMS Achieve your business objectives through effective learning and development with our game-changing Learning Management System (LMS). Today, more than ever, the achievement of your business objectives
Sakai and uportal Integration Options Cris J. Holdorph Unicon, Inc. 2008 JA-SIG Conference April 27 30, 2008 Copyright Unicon, Inc., 2008. This work is the intellectual property of Unicon, Inc. Permission
Comparison Paper 1 Table of contents Introduction... 3 User interface... 4 Ease of use... 5 Features... 6 Cost... 7 Summary... 10 2 Introduction MATRIX is a simple, powerful, cloud-hosted LMS for businesses
Learning paths in open source e-learning environments D.Tuparova *,1, G.Tuparov 1,2 1 Dept. of Informatics, South West University, 66 Ivan Michailov Str., 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria 2 Dept. of Software
Blackboard Version 9.1 - Interactive Tools Contents Edit mode... 2 Selecting the Interactive Tools... 2 Posting an Announcement... 3 Discussion Boards, Blogs, Journals, and Wikis What s the Difference?...
Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Distance Learning and Web Engineering, Beijing, China, September 15-17, 2007 310 E-learning Grid - An Online Learning Network FH CHOO, KL GAY, H
Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching 1. Instructional Principles Audience Analysis Who are your learners? What is their reason for taking your class? What is their preparation for success
Course 20336B: Core Solutions of Microsoft Lync Server 2013 Duration: 5 Days What you will learn This instructor-led course teaches IT professionals how to plan, design, deploy, configure, and administer
Microsoft Technology Practice Capability document Overview Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) and Windows SharePoint Services (WSS) facilitate rapid website creation that supports specific content
The Common Cartridge Alliance Freedom to Innovate! Freedom to Migrate! Freedom to Interoperate! http://www.imsglobal.org/cc/jointhealliance.cfm Page 1 Agenda What is a Common Cartridge? How does Common
Infinite Media - ilms Learning Management System - Integrated Learning Solutions The Infinite Media Learning Management System (ilms) is a web-based solution giving learners the ability to access training
Blackboard Version 9.1 - Interactive Tools Contents Edit mode... 2 Selecting the Interactive Tools... 2 Posting an Announcement... 3 Creating a Blog... 4 Creating Blog Posts... 4 How to Comment on a Blog
2007 Final Report Course Management System Subcommittee Flagship Information Technology Strategic Plan: Action Item 7.01 Louisiana State University and A & M 9/14/2007 Final Report of the Course Management
Examining Blended and Online Learning in the 6-12 Setting Keisha Dubuclet Plain Talk About Reading February 9-11, 2015 New Orleans About the Presenter Keisha Dubuclet Keisha Dubuclet, Ph.D., is CDL s director
Learning Together on the Fronter Platform A Complete Range of Online Tools Fronter is a learning platform used by millions of teachers and learners, at thousands of learning institutions around the world.
How Content Management Problem of a Remote Laboratory System can be handled by integrating an open source learning management system? Problems and solutions Burcu ÖZDOĞRU Bilkent University Ankara, Turkey
AC 2012-3818: FACULTY PERCEPTIONS AND USE OF A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AT AN URBAN, RESEARCH INSTITUTION Julie M. Little-Wiles M.S.M., Ph.D. (A.B.D.), Purdue University, West Lafayette Julie M. Little-Wiles
"Gone with the Video" Integration of a Videoconferencing System into uportal Université Pierre et Marie Curie Yves Epelboin Director ICT Yves.Epelboin@upmc.fr www.upmc.fr Grégory Denis, Caltech, USA Agnès
1 Operating at the Middle East Technical University TECHNOPOLIS, DamaSistem is a research and development company focusing on design and development of educational software. Also providing training and
Technology Enhanced Learning Introduction to Sulis Collaborative Learning Environment for Teaching and Learning What is it? Sakai is often referred as a learning platform virtual learning environment (VLE)
Scholar Basics I: Introduction and Site Creation 1 Contents What is Scholar?... 2 Scholar at Virginia Tech... 2 Types of Sites: Project, Course, and eportfolio... 2 1. Project sites... 2 2. Course sites...
Page 1 of 8 Western Michigan University E-Learning Standards Approved 10/25/2010 by the Western Michigan University Faculty Senate Committee on Extended University Programs Reviewed and Supported by the
Comparison Paper 1 Table of contents Introduction... 3 User interface... 4 Ease of use... 5 Features... 6 Cost... 7 Summary... 9 2 Introduction NEO is a simple, powerful, cloud-hosted LMS for use by individual
Comparison of Moodle and ATutor LMSs Péter Lengyel, Miklós Herdon, Róbert Szilágyi University of Debrecen Centre of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Department.
Rubric for Online Course Design Standards The College Strategic Plan Identifies Goal A as we provide quality instruction in face-to-face, ITV, online and tele delivery methods to our students. As the online
Training Services Course Catalog TRAINING SERVICES DESIRE2LEARN TRAINING SERVICES Desire2Learn will help you achieve your goals by teaching you how to use Desire2Learn products and develop more effective
Ex Libris Rosetta: A Digital Preservation System Product Description CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION The information herein is the property of Ex Libris Ltd. or its affiliates and any misuse or abuse will result
InterCall offers a range of web conferencing solutions designed for use with different types of meetings: from less formal on-the-fly get-togethers to carefully structured company-wide conferences or training
1 Operating at the Middle East Technical University TECHNOPOLIS, DamaSistem is a research and development company focusing on development of educational software. Also providing training and consultancy,
WOMEN S FLAT TRACK DERBY ASSOCIATION WFTDA GAMES DATA SYSTEM REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Issue Date: April 29, 2014 Due Date: May 12, 2014 WFTDA GAMES DATA SYSTEM REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The Women s Flat Track Derby
1 IACET Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS IACET INTRODUCTION... 3 WHAT DOES THE STANDARD MEASURE?...... 3-4 SOLE PROVIDER of IACET CEUs... 5 ESTABLISHING RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL... 5-6 AWARDING CEUs... 5
BLACKBOARD LEARNING SYSTEM FROM INFORMATION TO EDUCATION The Blackboard Learning System has proven to be an excellent solution for Duke University. Our faculty, despite widely varying experience with computers,
QUEEN S UNIVERSITY BELFAST e-learning and Distance Learning Policy 2009-2012 1 Introduction The University defines e-learning as learning facilitated and supported through the use of information and communication
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.