1 RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses Instructor Name: Course (DEPT, number, title): When using this rubric to evaluate your course, use this guideline and the rubric below to award points. 0 Component is missing 1 Point: Component is present but is hard to understand, is incomplete, or otherwise needs attention 2 Component is present, complete, and easy to understand. 3 Component contains detail and/or elaboration above and the guideline. Use the Notes section to elaborate on points given. For example, if a component is missing, but is also believed not to be necessary or relevant to the particular course, this should be noted. Learner Readiness Information Guideline Needs Attention (1 Point) (If this is missing from the course, award 0 points.) Meets Requirements (2 Point) Exceeds Requirements (3 Points) Points (0-3) & Notes Prerequisite course knowledge and experience are identified. A partial list of skills or course numbers is provided. A list of prerequisite course numbers and abilities/skills is provided. suggestions for review of skills or mastery of remedial skills. Technology proficiencies are clearly identified. Technology proficiencies and skills are incomplete or difficult to understand. A list of technologies used is provided, with links to sources to access them. Link(s) to UND Tech Support are present and easy to locate. tutorials or other materials. Examples may be Blackboard, SPSS, scanners, ability to view Flash or YouTube videos. Link(s) to UND Tech Support are present and easy to locate.
2 A student selfassessment of technology, timemanagement, and study habits is implemented. Self assessments are incomplete or not representative of the technologies, skills, and habits students will be expected to rely on throughout the course. Course includes, as relevant: a pretest, survey, blog/journal/discussion board introductory post, or practice assignment intended to assess students comfort level with technologies and readiness to follow processes that will be used in the course. Includes multiple instances of the Meets Requirements criteria. Information about being an online learner. Information related to online learning is difficult to locate and/or incomplete. Information does not give a clear picture of what will be expected of students. General information related to online learning is provided (e.g., time management skills, deadline awareness). student orientation materials, links to tips and tricks, a selfassessment of student readiness, or other resources which would give students an opportunity to practice the technology/online tools before being evaluated. Average Points for Learner Readiness section (add up points and divide by 4.):
3 Structure, Content, and Ease of Navigation Guideline Needs Attention (1 Point) Meets Requirements (2 Points) Exceeds Requirements (3 Points) Points (0-3) & Notes A comprehensive syllabus. A syllabus is provided, but is missing components as described in Meets Requirements to the right. A syllabus is provided and includes the following: course description; instructor contact information; course prerequisites; course objectives; textbook and other instructional materials; credit hours; grading policy; grade scale/weights; late policies; any special technical requirements; notification of any face to face, synchronous or asynchronous requirements; scholastic honesty; UND Code of Student Life; and ADA/DSS statement. Specific department goals and expectations are included. more comprehensive information including: preferred communication method (with timelines for responses); class etiquette; expectations regarding discussion activities; feedback information; tech support resources. Specific dates for assignments, exams, discussions are provided in the syllabus or on a separate schedule document.
4 Schedules for students that detail what they are to do each week/unit/ module. The schedule or calendar for the course is incomplete, vague, or difficult to locate. A detailed schedule or the Blackboard Calendar is used to display test and quiz dates and due dates for assignments. pertinent information for weekly/unit/module requirements. A welcome message with instructions on how to get started. Directions for how to get started are hard to find or unclear. It is not obvious where students should click first. Instructor provides clear directions on where to find the syllabus and how to get started in the class.. tips for successfully navigating the course. These may be textual or provided in a video or other format. A consistent navigation structure. Course content is difficult to read or is unorganized. Extra menu items or nondescriptive titles may be used. Course uses the Blackboard course menu to organize materials in a consistent manner. use of organizational tools (such as folders) to organize materials in a consistent manner with defined areas for content, activity types, discussion, etc. Course and unit/module/ weekly learning objectives that are measurable and clearly stated. Course and unit/module learning objects are vague, difficult to measure, unreasonable, subjective, or otherwise intangible. Course and unit/module learning objectives are clear, measurable and tangible. Information about writing objectives can be found here: outcomes/ edreading/writingoutcomesbr escianiarticle.pdf the objectives are also actionoriented, reasonable and timebound.
5 Illustrations, media, and examples to explain important concepts. Visuals and examples are minimal or not well-related to the content or subject matter. Course includes visuals such as charts, graphs, images, audio files, videos, case studies, etc. Players required are compatible with multiple systems, images are optimized for efficient loading, and hyperlinks open in appropriate windows. audio and video files are clear, file length is adequate, download-ables are explained, and file types are identified. Examples and stories from instructor experience as a practitioner also may be used to add meaning to the content. A list of university academic resources with links to appropriate websites. Some resource links are provided, but may be difficult to locate or may not be descriptively labeled. Course contains clearly titled, easy-to-locate links to university units such as UND tech support, the library, tutoring center, the writing center, multicultural center, disability services for students, career services, student success center, etc. Links to other relevant online resources such as Smarthinking, Atomic Learning may also be provided. descriptive text about importance of these links. Content- or course- specific resources such as videos, websites, or other materials are provided in addition to the standard UND resources. Average Points for Structure, Content and Nav. section (add up points and divide by 7.):
6 Interactions and Assessments Guideline Needs Attention (1 Point) Meets Requirement (2 Points) Exceeds Requirements (3 Points) Points (0-3) & Notes Student tostudent interaction. Course uses only one method of student-to-student interaction, or interactions are poorly described or confusing. Course uses multiple methods of communication to allow students to interact. Course contains at least 2 of the following: content specific discussion boards, blogs, or wikis; groups; students provide peer feedback; promotes Blackboard IM or other means of communication. Requirements criteria, but with at least 3 methods being used. Student toinstructor interaction. Instructor s statement about feedback points to intention to provide minimal feedback to students, or use only one method of communication. Instructor s office hours are by appointment only, and/or instructor s contact information is difficult to find. Instructor s statement about feedback points to intention to provide timely feedback on assignments/ assessments and respond to s in a timely manner. Instructor posts consistent office hours to be held in person or online. course setup allows instructor to model consistent and deep interactions with students in the discussion boards, blogs, or wikis. Course contains formative assessments.
7 Assessments and activities are aligned with the learning objectives, and identified in a separate document containing a matrix or table.. Course activities and assessments are difficult to match up with some or all of the learning objectives. Course activities and assessments are each aligned to one or more of the learning objectives. a matrix or table is provided to students. This shows the alignment of course activities and assessments with the appropriate learning objectives, allowing students to understand how the activities and assessments contribute to their mastery of the material. Discussion topics stimulate thought and reflection related to course content. Reflection and discussion questions have one correct answer, or allow students to answer yes or no. Questions do not promote interaction or conversation about the topic. Reflection and discussion questions that have one correct answer are avoided. Discussion and reflection questions are not yes or no questions. Discussions ask students to view and discuss podcasts or videos, or to complete activities and then share their reactions as it relates to the course content. Instructions include the quantity and quality of discussion board requirements, blog entries, wiki posts, etc some of the following: students are assigned to take turns facilitating discussions. Blackboard discussion settings may be used to limit viewing other students responses until a student has submitted their own response.
8 Separate discussion forums, blogs or wikis for items related to course content, course questions, and community building. Tools or forums for social interaction, ice-breaking, or similar purposes are not easy to locate or discern from content-related tools or forums, are not promoted in the course, or are not well explained. Tools to encourage social and course-related interaction are available and clearly labeled. For example, discussions on course content, icebreakers, and FAQs should be labeled as such. The instructor promotes the use of FAQ and social spaces as an alternative to questions being ed. guidelines for, and examples of, the use of the tools are provided, including whether and when the instructor will contribute to the different forums or spaces. Clearly articulated group work expectations. Group expectations and processes are poorly or vaguely described, or are hard to locate or understand. Students are informed how groups are chosen. Instructions describe how the groups will work together, expectations of the final product, and how grades will be awarded a rubric is provided to clearly define tasks and participation expectations, provide clear expectations for any final products or deliverables, and clearly articulate any peer evaluation that will occur and if individual as well as group grades will be given. Varied opportunities for students to interact with content. Course content is presented in only one way, or multimedia is used in flashy ways that may confuse, rather than contribute to the learning. Course content is presented in a variety of ways, using at least 2 of the following: written narratives, text based presentations, videos, podcasts, websites, presentations with audio, readings, etc. All multimedia tools are used in a way that promotes learning. Requirements criteria, but with at least 3 methods being used.
9 Ongoing, varied and multiple activities and assessments to assess student learning. These assessments are clearly described. The course contains only one type of assessment and/or assessment expectations and directions are difficult to understand. Rubrics or grading guidelines are not explained well or are incomplete. The course uses at least 2 ways to assess student learning: these may include self assessments, assignments, papers, projects, quizzes, exams, authentic assessments, and others as guided by the course content. The requirements for all assessments in the course are clearly described. Rubrics may be used for grading. Requirements criteria, but with at least 3 methods being used. The description of requirements includes the quantity and quality of discussion board requirements, blog entries, wiki posts, etc. Rubrics are used for grading. Rubrics that will be used to grade course requirements are shared with the students. Grade Center utilization. The Grade Center is not used for all grading. Some assignments are graded by or other methods (excluding publisher gradebooks). Review the FERPA website if needed: n/guid/fpco/ index.html The instructor uses the Grade Center in Blackboard to ensure that points, percentages, and/or letter grades are distributed within a secure setting. the Grade Center is also used to distribute audio or written feedback, graded assignment materials, and other commentary or feedback related to student assessment.
10 A variety of opportunities for students to give course and content related feedback. Classroom assessment techniques and/or feedback opportunities are only done at the end of the semester There are 2 opportunities for students to provide feedback about the ease of navigation in the class, instructor involvement and quality, as well as course content and delivery, with midterm feedback, for example. Requirements criteria, but with at least 3 methods being used. The instructor may use classroom assessment techniques, SGIDs, surveys, etc.. Average Points for Interactions and Assessment section (add up points and divide by 10.): Technology, Support, and Accessibility Guideline Needs Attention (1 Point) Meets Requirement (2 Points) Exceeds Requirements (3 Points) Points (0-3) & Notes Appropriate technology tools to facilitate learning. A technology tool is not used when it seems to be needed, tools are poorly explained and/or difficult to access or navigate. Instructor requires students to purchase a technology that is expensive while a similar/less expensive or freeware option is available. Technology appears to be too complicated for the level and subject matter being taught. Plug-ins, add-ons, or other installations need to be made to view resources, but this is not explained and/or they are difficult to locate or install. Technology tools are used where needed. Software products have a free or trial version or are available via UND resources. Software is Mac and Windows compatible or reasonable options are otherwise provided. Instructions for accessing technology are clear. Technology should help students meet a measurable objective. Technology is enhancing, not hindering the learning. (Technology may hinder the learning if it is complicated, hard to locate, or hard to use.) links to tutorials, examples, or resources are provided.
11 Attention to appropriate copyright and fair use laws. Copyright and fair use are inconsistently addressed in the course. Some materials are not cited, and/or some materials are likely in violation of fair use or copyright guidelines. Permissions for use of materials have been acquired and attributions are made where needed. Review the following pages: and 02.html the following: Copyright and fair use are consistently addressed and respected in relation to the materials presented in the course, modeling this conduct to students. Attention to student accessibility issues. Captioning, transcripts, descriptions, and OCR are not consistently used in the course. Hyperlinks are described as click here with no explanation of where here is. Accessibility in the course is inconsistent. (If the course appears to have no attention to accessibility, award 0 points.) The course includes transcripts for audio files and captioning for video files (an exception is video feedback on assignments). Color is not used to convey meaning. Alternative text or descriptions for images are used, hyperlinks are described in writing. Documents provided in PDF have been run through OCR to allow screen reader accessibility. the following: Accessibility is consistently addressed and respected in relation to the materials presented in the course, modeling this conduct to students. More information can be found in these tutorials: t/ Become familiar with the services provided by DSS and collaborate with them to assist students as needed. Average Points for Tech., Support, and Accessibility section (add up points and divide by 3.):
12 Section Averages Learner Readiness Information Average Score: Structure, Content, and Ease of Navigation Average Score: Interactions and Assessments Average Score: Technology, Support, and Accessibility Average Score: TOTAL AVERAGE SCORE (Total the 4 averages above and divide by 4): A Total Average Score below 2 indicates that there are some components in the course that need work. A Total Average Score at or around 2 indicates that most or all components in the course are satisfactory. A Total Average Score above 2 indicates that some components of the course are exemplary. Overall recommendations and/or notes: The Center for Instructional & Learning Technologies has instructional designers available to discuss your courses and how these guidelines fit with the teaching style and subject matter. To schedule a meeting, call CILT at
13 This information has been compiled from several sources. Credits: Angelo & Cross: Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (Book) Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric (http://blackboard.com/catalyst/) Chuck D. Dziuban Award for Excellence in Online Teaching Rubric (2014, Educause; University of Central Florida) Rubric for Online Instruction from California State University Chico (http://www.csuchico.edu/celt/roi/) Penn State Quality Assurance elearning Design Standards (http://www.sc.edu/cte/larryragan/doc/designstandards.pdf) Texas State University Instructional Technologies Support Online Course Development (http://www.its.txstate.edu/departments/instructional_design/online-course-development.html) o TX State Online Course Checklist (http://gato-docs.its.txstate.edu/instructional-technologies-support/instructional-design/online- Course-Development/OnlineCourseChecklist_v1.doc) o TX State Online Course Best Practices (http://gato-docs.its.txstate.edu/instructional-technologies-support/instructional-design/online- Course-Development/BestPractices_v1.pdf) University of Wisconsin La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines (http://www.uwlax.edu/online/guidelines.pdf)
The UW-L Online Course Evaluation Guidelines are intended to help instructors create and teach well-designed online courses. The Guidelines outline specific features of online courses and recommend ways
SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist Purpose of the SVCC Exemplary Course Checklist The SVCC Exemplary Course Checklist has been created to: guide faculty as they prepare a course for online instruction
THE CHECK A Guide to Online Course Design The Check is a guide to help CEHD instructors create instructionally effective and user-friendly online learning environments for students (online courses, hybrid
Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric Thank you for participating in our online course review process! Your input is extremely valuable to us, and we appreciate the time you are taking to help
HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project and Lake Superior College I. COURSE OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION General Review Standard: The overall design of the course, navigational
Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Hbook Distance Education Course sites must meet Effective Level scores to meet Distance Education Criteria. Distance Education Course Sites will be reviewed a semester
Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses Met Course Development Rubrics The following rubrics should be used as benchmarks to assist faculty with developing and maintaining their online courses.
Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching 1. Instructional Principles Audience Analysis Who are your learners? What is their reason for taking your class? What is their preparation for success
Shawnee Community College Quality Online Course Initiative An institutional assessment tool to assist in the design of online courses and programs. 1 Instructional Design Instructional design refers to
The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design The Check was created by CEHD s Academic Technology Services Team: Treden Wagoner Sheila Hoover Thomas Nechodomu Constance Pepin Lyn DeLorme Melissa Falldin Last
A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses. An Initiative Sponsored By: Illinois Online Network (ION) University of Illinois Quality Online Course Initiative Rubric by
12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1 Getting Started 1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components. 1.2 Students are introduced to the purpose
General Procedures for Developing an Online Course General Procedures for Developing an Online Course Questions to Ask before you Begin Analysis 1. What is your learner audience? Is the course for beginners
Online courses are approved by the University of California in two steps: Online Course Self-Assessment Form 1. Assessment against International Association for K-12 Online Learning (inacol) course standards.
Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines February 10, 2011 The following is intended to serve as a guide to the development of online and hybrid courses at Cedar Crest College. Substantively, the
12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1 Getting Started 1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components. 1.2 Learners are introduced to the purpose
Community College System of New Hampshire What is edesign? edesign is a rubric that defines course quality design standards for 100% online courses offered by CCSNH. To supplement the rubric and support
Online Course Standards Rubric The Online Course Standards Rubric provides a framework for online course design based on the University of New Mexico s online course standards and expectancies for quality
Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template Section I: Blackboard Design This section includes a table that provides a template for setting up a hybrid course s Blackboard site. The guidelines
Introduction: Blended learning is defined as to combine Face-to-Face instruction with computer-mediated instruction Graham 2006. Mixing technology and content does not necessarily yield effective learning.
Course Development Resource Guide Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support Introduction The Course Development Resource Guide provides information to course writers
File Name Format (example): Course Review Course ID Instructor name your initials Faculty Name: Course: Semester: Reviewer: Date: This evaluation is a framework for addressing how a quality course should
Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric The Blackboard Exemplary Course Program(ECP) recognizes course creators whose courses demonstrate best practices in four major areas: Course Design, Interaction
Instructional Design Tips Category 1 Learner Support and Resources Information about being an online/hybrid learner Tips for being an online/hybrid student Quiz to self-assess readiness to be an online/hybrid
Standards For Online Courses The following Standards for Online Courses have been carefully developed to ensure the highest quality and consistency of online course offerings (full online, partial online,
Online Course Design Evaluation This evaluation tool focuses on the design of this online course, NOT the performance of your instructor. Please use the scale from 1 (To little or no extent) to 5 (To a
Writing effective student learning outcomes Attached are three excerpts and sources to help you to develop effective and assessable learning outcomes. Also attached are two syllabi templates: the first
Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed 10-5-15 and 10-6-15 Los Angeles Mission College Distance Education Technical Review Rubric of
Instruction Design Tips for Online Learning Instructional Design Tips for Online Learning was developed by Joan Van Duzer of Humboldt State University to be used in conjunction with the Rubric for Online
Southern Oregon University Best Practices in Online Course Design and Delivery Provided by the SOU Distance Education Center 9/10/2009 Online Course Design and Delivery Southern Oregon University is committed
Rubric for Online Course Design Standards The College Strategic Plan Identifies Goal A as we provide quality instruction in face-to-face, ITV, online and tele delivery methods to our students. As the online
Main Author: Amy Roche, Instructional Designer Contributing Authors: Tricia Clark, Instructional Technologist Mary Ann Mengel, Multimedia Specialist John Shank, Director for the Center for Learning & Teaching
ES4077 Page 1 DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PROCEDURES FACULTY Section: INSTRUCTIONAL ADMINISTRATION Procedure: Application for Award of and Completion of Online Courses Effective
Course: Instructor: Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated. Orientation to Course and LMS Clearly
Maryland Online SYLLABUS Course Description: Prerequisites: The course will explore the online teaching and learning environment by introducing online learning principles and instructor competencies. Participants
MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines The following guidelines were developed by the MiraCosta Online Educators committee to inform online faculty of required elements for Distance Education classes, offer
TIPS FOR NEW ONLINE INSTRUCTORS: DESIGNING A S.M.A.R.T. ONLINE COURSE Hallmarks of an exemplary online course: Vision for what will be learned Structure which supports the vision Strong, dependable communication
ILLINIOS VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE Online and Blended Course Review Online and Blended Course Review The Online and Blended Course Review process has been developed with the goal of maintaining the outstanding
Accessible Course Design As a course designer you hold a pivotal role in ensuring that Learning Environment is accessible to all users, regardless of their learning needs. It is your content that students
ONLINE COURSE EVALUATION TOOL FACULTY CENTER FOR IGNATIAN PEDAGOGY LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO This checklist is intended for use as a formative measure of online course development and/or a summative reflection
Online Course Evaluation Rubric This evaluation tool specifically focuses on course design, rather than on course delivery or course academic content. The rubric is intended to be used for courses that
Exemplary Course Award Sample Submission Form Welcome to the 2014 Blackboard Exemplary Course Program (ECP). Please fill out this form in its entirety to submit your course for the Exemplary Course Program.
CREATING A COURSE? Courses at SNHP At The Lewis School, courses may meet on- campus, online only or hybrid combination of online and on- campus. Synchronous classes require students and instructors meet
Online Student Orientation A Virtual Walk to Class Online Student Orientation Script Slide Slide Title Script 1 Online Student Orientation Welcome to Aurora University! This virtual walk to class is designed
MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT Online courses have on average 10% lower student success across all disciplines. To enhance the teaching and learning experience and help promote student success,
Division of Fine Arts Department of Photography Course Syllabus COURSE TITLE COURSE NUMBER PREREQUISITES Digital Camera Work CRN 10097 PGY 1800C None CREDIT HOURS 3.0 CONTACT HOURS 45 hours online CLASS
If using Firefox, you must download the form. Click the download icon in the top right corner (looks like a down arrow on a sheet of paper). You will then be asked in the pop window if you want to open
1 Quality Guidelines for Course Development The following guidelines are based on the Rubric for Online Instruction (ROI) created by Chico State University and on an adaptation of the instructional design
Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative In order for a course to be offered as a part of the Online Education Initiative (OEI) course exchange, it must meet established standards relating
Distance Education Handbook Pierce Education Technology Committee Introduction and Purpose What is distance learning? Section 51865 of the California Education Code defines distance learning as instruction
Northeastern State University Online Educator Certificate Purpose Beginning in October 1999, the Northeastern State University Distance Learning Advisory Committee (now the Center for Teaching and Learning
HOSTOS ONLINE COURSE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Last Revised: 03-18-2015 THE ONLINE DESIGNATION For a course to be considered online, more than 80% of the instruction has to occur online. The instructor can
GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS CELT and DCS have adapted the 2003-2006 (public domain) versions of the Quality Matters online course design rubric, developed by Maryland Online with
Assuring that the Online Course is Ready for Prime Time Kats Gustafson, Ed.D. Dean, Online and Distributed Learning San Diego Community College District email@example.com One of the tried and true techniques
MathXL Getting Started Guide for Students Copyright Notice Copyright 2013 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
Quality Matters Online Course Development and Guidelines Instructor: First Semester Course will be offered: Course: Credit/Non- Credit: College/School/Department: Degree/Program/Certificate: Development
Middlesex Community College Fall 2015 Course Syllabus Course Information: Social Problems (SOC103 CRN 1320 Section 30) 3 Credits Location: Online Instructor: Carmela Smith, MSW, LCSW Phone: best to contact
Online Learning at Duke: A Planning Guide I. Planning an online program at Duke (for deans, chairs, program directors) II. Teaching an online class at Duke (Faculty, TAs, etc. level) III. Adding online
Requirement III: Academic and Learning Outcomes 3.2 Online Course Readiness (Online Programs Only) Online programs conform to established standards for online learning. Face-to-face programs do not complete
Instructional & Motivational Strategy Plan Anthony Saba Dr. Lisa Dawley Edtech 512: Online Course Design 10/18/2009 2 Table of Contents Instructional Strategy Plan... 3 Orientation to Learning... 3 Instructional
hosted by the We asked Brunel students what they liked about the way their lecturers were using Blackboard Learn. We received over 450 responses! Here s what they said.. Blackboard-Related student nominations
ECU Quality Assurance Guidelines for Online Delivery PURPOSE The purpose of these guidelines is to encompass and improve ECU s existing minimum standards for online units, and to extend ECU s quality assurance
Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy As a form of self-review, you may want to apply this rubric yourself to your online course. Your written
Communication Tools Canvas Tool Blackboard Tool Function Announcements Announcements One- way communication Receive notifications via web services (Facebook, Twitter, etc.); students determine preference
ED 653 Instructional Design 3 Credits Carol Gering, Instructor (firstname.lastname@example.org) Fall 2011 Phone: 907-479-4757 Office hours by appointment: 2175 University Ave. S., Suite 200 Course Description Instructional
COM 561: Multimedia Content Creation 3 Credits Course Overview In the information society, content rules. In this class, students will learn to develop and communicate ideas clearly, concisely, and effectively
INST 5500 Online Course Development Course Syllabus Fall 2015 (Aug 17 Dec 12) 3 GR Semester Hours COURSE DESCRIPTION Designed to synthesize information from educational technology coursework and experiences.
Expectations for Classroom Setup and Online Teaching UMUC is committed to providing the highest-quality online education to its students. UMUC-sponsored research and evaluation data, including the Institute
Teaching large lecture classes online: Reflections on engaging 200 students on Blackboard and Facebook By Marcus Messner, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, VCU School of Mass Communications VCU Online Learning
HCC Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011 Instructor s Name(s): Observer/Supervisor: Course Number: Department: College: Date: This HCC Course Evaluation Rubric is one of several data sources for evaluating
Features of the Online Course Table of Contents Course Interface: Overview... 2 Syllabus... 3 Navigating through the Course Content... 4 Learning Modules... 5 Communicating... 5 Assessments... 6 Assignments...
Teaching Guidelines for Hybrid (Blended or Mix-Modal) course and fully online course at Trinity Western University (Suggested) Category 1- getting ready for teaching online: Welcome message in the course
MathXL Getting Started Guide for Instructors Copyright Notice Copyright 2013 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form
MATH 1050 Syllabus MATH 1050, College Algebra, QL, 4 credits. Functions: graphs, transformations, combinations and inverses. Polynomial, rational, exponential, logarithmic functions and applications. Systems
SLN Course Quality Rubric for Formal Course Review of New Online Faculty/Courses Use this rubric produce formal written course reviews for new online faculty and their courses. ALEANDRA M. PICKETT Associate
California University Online Distance elearning Simplified Student Handbook CONTENTS I. Introduction Welcome Mission Statement II. Open Distance elearning Program Overview Open Distance elearning Defined
Blackboard Learn 9.1 Getting Started Guide For Students Created by the Oregon Tech Online staff Opening Blackboard Web Address: Login to MyOIT or go directly to Blackboard at http://online.oit.edu Username
Instructor Guide Prepared by Dalia Hanna, Manager, Learning and Teaching, Ryerson University 2012. Table of Contents Introduction and objectives 3 Unit 1: Communication 3 Unit 2: Pre-Planning Strategies
Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses Initial Course Development Below are some tips and strategies for initial development and conceptualization of your course: Blueprint your course.
ACADEMIC CONTINUATION PLAN Updated 10/02/2015 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Elements of the Plan... 2 Instruction... 3 Table 1: Possible Alternative Methods for Course Delivery (Internet Available)...
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT BROWNSVILLE College of Education Syllabus Conceptual Framework & Knowledge Base The conceptual framework contains four core concepts, which are themes through which we organize
elearning Instructional Design Guidelines Ministry of Labour Queen s Printer for Ontario ISBN 978-1-4606-4885-8 (PDF) ISBN 978-1-4606-4884-1 (HTML) December 2014 1 Disclaimer This elearning Instructional
Online Development Guidelines and Rubric Introduction and Task Force Recommendations Purpose The guidelines identify the issues that faculty at Michigan community colleges should address when developing
Rubric for Online Instruction Rationale California State University, Chico's first strategic priority is to create and enhance high quality learning environments. Academic technologies, especially online
ED 653 Instructional Design 3 Credits Carol Gering, Instructor (email@example.com) Fall 2011 Phone: 907-479-4757 Office hours by appointment: 2175 University Ave. S., Suite 200 Catalog Description Instructional