e-docs and Forensics in the New e-discovery Era

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "e-docs and Forensics in the New e-discovery Era"

Transcription

1 ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION e-docs and Forensics in the New e-discovery Era

2 FRAMEWORK Overview of the Rule Changes Pre-Litigation Planning IT Audit Document Retention Policies Planning Discovery Conducting Discovery Costs Privilege

3 OVERVIEW Changes go into effect December 1, 2006 Rules changes deal with a new category of information: electronically stored information (ESI) ESI is distinct from documents or things Focus is on accessible ESI Attempt to balance need for information versus cost and time of discovery Safe harbor provisions for inadvertent production of privilege

4 HAS ANYTHING REALLY CHANGED? ESI has been the focus of much discovery in previous years Numerous state and federal jurisdictions already have specific rules in place to address e-discovery or have begun to work on such rules BUT, official recognition of both importance of ESI and difficulties in dealing with it

5 JURISDICTIONS IMPLEMENTING SPECIFIC RULES

6 RULE CHANGES Rule 16/Form 35 Rule 26 Rule 33 Rule 34 Rule 37

7 RULE 16(b) CASE MANAGEMENT (b).the scheduling order also may include (5) provisions for disclosure or discovery of electronically stored information; (6) any agreements the parties reach for asserting claims of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material after production; Form 35 also provides specific provisions for addressing ESI

8 RULE 26(a)(1)(B) DISCOVERY IN GENERAL (a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. (1) Initial Disclosures. Except in categories of proceedings specified in Rule 26(a)(1)(E), or to the extent otherwise stipulated or directed by order, a party must, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to other parties:. (B) a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things that are in the possession, custody, or control of the party and that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses, unless solely for impeachment;

9 RULE 26(b)(2)(B) LIMITATIONS (b) Discovery Scope and Limits. Unless otherwise limited by order of the court in accordance with these rules, the scope of discovery is as follows:. (2) Limitations.. (B) A party need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the party from whom discovery is sought must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.

10 RULE 26(b)(5)(B) - PRIVILEGE (5) Claims of Privilege or Protection of Trial-Preparation Materials.. (B) Information Produced. If information is produced in discovery that is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the party making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has and may not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved. A receiving party may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. If the receiving party disclosed the information before being notified, it must take reasonable steps to retrieve it. The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved.

11 RULE 26(f) CASE MANAGEMENT (f) Conference of Parties; Planning for Discovery. [T] he parties must confer to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties views and proposals concerning:. (3) any issues relating to disclosure or discovery of electronically stored information, including the form or forms in which it should be produced; (4) any issues relating to claims of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, including if the parties agree on a procedure to assert such claims after production whether to ask the court to include their agreement in an order;.

12 RULE 33(d) - INTERROGATORIES (d) Option to Produce Business Records. Where the answer to an interrogatory may be derived or ascertained from the business records, including electronically stored information, of the party upon whom the interrogatory has been served or from an examination, audit or inspection of such business records, including a compilation, abstract or summary thereof, and the burden of deriving or ascertaining the answer is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party served, it is a sufficient answer to such interrogatory to specify the records from which the answer may be derived or ascertained and to afford to the party serving the interrogatory reasonable opportunity to examine, audit or inspect such records and to make copies, compilations, abstracts, or summaries. A specification shall be in sufficient detail to permit the interrogating party to locate and to identify, as readily as can the party served, the records from which the answer may be ascertained.

13 RULE 34(a) ESI PRODUCTION (a) Scope. Any party may serve on any other party a request (1) to produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on the requestor s behalf, to inspect, copy, test, or sample any designated documents or electronically stored information including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, images, and other data or data compilations stored in any medium from which information can be obtained translated, if necessary, by the respondent into reasonably usable form, or to inspect, copy, test, or sample any designated tangible things which constitute or contain matters within the scope of Rule 26(b) and which are in the possession, custody or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or (2) to permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the scope of Rule 26(b).

14 RULE 34(b) FORM OF ESI PRODUCTION (b) (i) (ii) (iii) Procedure..The request may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced.the response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, including an objection to the requested form or forms for producing electronically stored information, stating the reasons for the objection.if objection is made to the requested form or forms for producing electronically stored information or if no form was specified in the request the responding party must state the form or forms it intends to use. Unless the parties otherwise agree, or the court otherwise orders: a party who produces documents for inspection shall produce them as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond with the categories in the request; if a request does not specify the form or forms for producing electronically stored information, a responding party must produce the information in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a form or forms that are reasonably usable; and a party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.

15 RULE 37(f) - SANCTIONS (f) Electronically Stored Information. Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.

16 DO THE NEW RULES CLARIFY MY OBLIGATIONS? Reasonably accessible Undue burden or cost Good cause Routine operation Good faith

17 WHAT IS ESI?

18 WHY DISTINGUISH ESI? Exponentially greater volume Do you know your terabytes?

19 SHOULD IT BE CALLED A TERROR-BYTE? Varies by type of document, but if , then roughly 40,000 boxes

20 WHY DISTINGUISH ESI? Exponentially greater volume Do you know your terabytes? Dynamic nature of ESI Are you improperly altering metadata? ESI may be incomprehensible when separated from the system that created it Native format or hard copy? - Advisory Committee Report at 18

21 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS WITH ESI Need to collect from more numerous locations Redundancy/Duplicability Disposal Obsolescence Cost Privilege

22 FRAMEWORK Overview of the Rule Changes Pre-Litigation Planning IT Audit Document Retention Policies Planning Discovery Conducting Discovery Costs Privilege

23 PRE-LITIGATION PLANNING In-house counsel: Conduct an IT Autopsy NOW Why now instead of when litigation is imminent? Outside counsel: Learn your clients systems NOW How do I justify this to the client? Document retention/destruction policy NOW Create or revise

24 WHY SHOULD I GO TO ALL THIS TROUBLE? Severity of misconduct SANCTIONS Severity of sanction Monetary sanctions Exclusion of evidence Adverse instruction Dismissal

25 CONGRATULATIONS YOU RE NOW AN IT PROFESSIONAL Backups Legacy Data Automatic Programs Why? Who? What? When? How? Where? Do I have it? Why? Archival Defragmenting Temp clean

26 CONGRATULATIONS YOU RE NOW AN IT PROFESSIONAL How many? Procedures for storage on personal hard drives? How many? Procedures for storage on personal hard drives? Any policies governing use? Portable hard drives USB keys CD/DVD Backups? Backups?

27 DOCUMENT RETENTION/ DESTRUCTION POLICY Destruction of documents does not equate to spoliation Do I really have to have one? YES! Having one may be evidence of good faith, so long as it is entered for the right reasons and is reasonable Can t you just give me a form policy? NO! No such thing as one size fits all Individual industries and regulations have a significant impact

28 DOCUMENT RETENTION/ DESTRUCTION POLICY Considerations What should be covered? How long? Who is in charge? Policing? Suspend for litigation hold?

29 WHAT DO I DO ABOUT TAPE BACKUPS? Remember, key is routine good faith operation of the system Consider good faith alternatives E.g., If you keep a copy of the backups existing at the time the litigation hold commences, can you then continue the recycling program afterwards and still assure that not relevant documents will be lost? The only completely safe solution is to end recycling when litigation hold commences

30 WHY IS THIS QUESTION SO DIFFICULT? The case law, committee notes and commentaries are singularly unhelpful It can be difficult to interrupt the routine There is CONSIDERABLE operation It of is computer unrealistic UNCERTAINTY systems to expect to parties as isolate and to to stop whether such routine a The party proposed preserve particularly rule Must a discrete also operation a recognizes party that corporation, parts of their that upon of the computer produces recognizing information systems large the they amounts as soon as of they threat of suspending information overwrite, interrupting [automatic deletion] litigation, NONETHELESS delete, anticipate preserve or update litigation. every shred HAS an It is of ongoing TO also paper, INTERRUPT undesirable; basis, the every THE result features can without be prohibitively expensive and OPERATION or creating would electronic OF THE problems be even document, ELECTRONIC greater for and the accumulation every larger backup INFORMATION system of duplicative and tape? burdensome, again in ways irrelevant that have data no that must be reviewed, making The answer is clearly no. Such a rule would counterpart SYSTEMS to managing it is using hard to discovery copy avoid information. any loss of information because -more Advisory expensive Committee Report and at time 83 consuming of the possibility cripple that large it corporations that might be sought are in almost discovery, always OR RISK involved in litigation. SEVERE SANCTIONS - Advisory Committee Report at 83 - Advisory Committee Report at 83 -Zubulake v.ubs Warburg LLC Advisory F.R.D. 212, Committee 217 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) Report at 83

31 FRAMEWORK Overview of the Rule Changes Pre-Litigation Planning IT Audit Document Retention Policies Planning Discovery Conducting Discovery Costs Privilege

32 RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE Must balance need for information against need to minimize disruption of routine operations critical to ongoing activities. - Advisory Committee Report at 34 Seek agreement regarding: Form of Production of Documents Native format? Duty of preservation Accessible and inaccessible information Search Terms Privilege Issues Cost sharing

33 THE RULE 16 CONFERENCE A complete and thorough Rule 26(f) conference is key The easier you make it for the court, the more likely the court is to adopt your plan Consider previewing the likely points of dispute Definitely address limitations, especially with respect to inaccessible data

34 FRAMEWORK Overview of the Rule Changes Pre-Litigation Planning IT Audit Document Retention Policies Planning Discovery Conducting Discovery Costs Privilege

35 CONDUCTING DISCOVERY UNDER REVISED RULES Preservation of Information Requesting & Responding to Discovery Form of Production Cost Shifting Privilege Issues Sanctions/Safe Harbor

36 DUTY TO PRESERVE Duty to preserve documents arises as soon as party knows or should know about litigation, or if litigation is reasonably anticipated in the future. Duty varies district-by-district

37 HOW DO I COMPLY WITH MY DUTY TO PRESERVE? Counsel should issue Litigation Hold to employees as soon as litigation begins-- ASAP Only those with litigation holds will likely be able to seek protection from sanctions under Rule 37(f) s new safe harbor provisions more later Periodically reissue Litigation Hold to all employees so that new employees are also aware of it

38 ASSESS THE SCOPE OF THE DUTY Make direct contact with key players Interview Importance of preservation Consider imaging hard drives Contact IT personnel Importance of preservation IT infrastructure Accessibility of Information Can it be found elsewhere? May need to preserve inaccessible, potentially relevant information Organize team of point persons in each department

39 COMMUNICATION IS KEY Contact opposing counsel immediately Scope of preservation Form of production Preservation letter? Seek guidance from Court

40 INITIAL DISCLOSURES Rule 26(a)(1)(B) substitutes Electronically Stored Information ( ESI ) for data compilations Must disclose description by category and location of documents & ESI relevant to claim or defense Should search available electronic systems for relevant information Disclose existence of documents in paper & electronic form Consider disclosing IT personnel or 30(b)(6) witness

41 DRAFTING/RESPONDING TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS New Rule 26(b)(2)(B): Limitations. A party need not provide discovery of ESI from sources that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. Responding party bears burden of showing ESI is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost Information may still be ordered produced if Requesting Party shows good cause - Committee Notes to Proposed Amendments at 14

42 DRAFTING/RESPONDING TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS New Rule 26(b)(2)(B): Limitations. Court may set conditions (cost-shifting) Committee Notes: The responding party must also identify, by category or type, the sources containing potentially responsive information that it is neither searching nor producing. Detailed enough so that others can evaluate burdens, costs, likelihood of relevance May still need to preserve inaccessible ESI - Committee Notes to Proposed Amendments at 14

43 ACCESSIBILITY OF DATA Examples of data identified in the Committee Report as present[ing] particular problems in terms of accessibility: Back up tapes intended for disaster recovery purposes that are often not indexed, organized or susceptible to electronic searching Legacy data remaining from obsolete systems, which is unintelligible to current systems Deleted data (including fragmentary data) that requires forensics for recovery Databases designed to create information in certain ways that cannot readily create that information in other ways - Advisory Committee Report at 42

44 ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION Active, online data (hard drives) Near-Line data (computer accessible optical drives) Offline storage/archives (indexed by custodian name organized back up tapes) Offline storage/archives (disaster recovery tapes) Erased or fragmented data (not intended to be saved, capable of restoration) Legacy data/back up tapes for systems no longer supported More accessible Less accessible

45 REVISED RULES FOR DISCOVERY REQUESTS Rule 34 Document Requests Adds Electronically Stored Information ( ESI ) as category of information may be produced Rule 33(d) Interrogatories Relying on Business Records Adds ESI (replaced data compilation) ESI is proper type of information to rely upon in interrogatory answers May have to provide additional information to make equally accessible to requesting party Rule 45 (Subpoenas) revised to include ESI as appropriate information to seek

46 FORM OF PRODUCTION Entitled to specify form of production (paper vs. pdf, etc.) If not specified, responding party may produce in any form that is reasonably usable OR in that which ESI is ordinarily maintained ; Rule 34(b)(ii) If form specified, responding party must state whether they object to that form & what form they intend to produce Also must disclose if other forms available, even if requester only asks for one form. In re Bristol- Myers Squibb Sec. Litig., 2005 F.R.D. 437 (D. N.J. 2002); Storch v. IPCO Safety Products, Inc., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (E.D. Pa. Jul. 16, 1997). Only need produce one form for documents Rule 34(b)(iii)

47 DOCUMENT REQUEST DRAFTING/RESPONDING Broad requests in = Broad production out Consider narrowing to specific person s files and date ranges More productive, more likely to stand up If object to searching or producing ESI because unduly burdensome, must disclose what is not being searched and where it is Communicate with counsel Metadata? Quick Peek /Clawback

48 HOW DO I RESOLVE DISPUTES ABOUT THE SCOPE OF MY SEARCH? Requesting party should evaluate information from accessible sources before asking responding party to search and produce information from not reasonably accessible sources. If they still want you to search, parties should confer regarding burdens and costs of accessing/retrieving information, needs to support good cause showing, and limitations that should be imposed. If still in dispute Motion to Compel Motion for Protective Order - Committee Notes to Proposed Amendments at

49 HOW WILL COURTS RESOLVE DISPUTES REGARDING SCOPE OF SEARCH? Court balances burden and costs against particular circumstances in case. Committee notes cite these considerations: 1. Specificity of discovery request 2. Quantity of information available from other and more easily accessed sources 3. Failure to produce relevant information that seems likely to have existed but is no longer available on more easily accessed sources 4. Likelihood of finding relevant, responsive information that cannot be obtained from other, more easily accessed sources 5. Predictions as to the importance and usefulness of information 6. Importance of issues at stake in litigation 7. Parties resources - Committee Notes to Proposed Amendments at 17

50 HOW WILL COURTS RESOLVE DISPUTES REGARDING SCOPE OF SEARCH? If dispute regarding accessibility, Court may order sampling of offline data to determine relevance Zubulake I, 217 F.R.D. 309, 324 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (ordered defendant to search and produce five backup tapes out of ninety-four backup tapes to determine whether relevant information existed on the backup tapes that was not present elsewhere) Delta Financial Corp. v. Morrison, 2006 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2232 (S. Ct. N.Y. August 17, 2006) (ordered plaintiff to do sample searches to determine whether relevant information existed on backup tapes; costshifted entire test run, including review, to defendant)

51 COST SHIFTING Traditional approach Responding party pays for response Limited by 26(c): Unduly burdensome, labor intensive, significant financial burden. New Rules 26(b)(2)(B) A party need not provide discovery of ESI from sources that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If court finds something not reasonably accessible may still get it if prove good cause, but may have to share in costs. Cost of compliance may or may not include attorney review time Committee Notes to Proposed Amendments at 17: Suggests that cost of restoration can be cost shifted, unclear on attorney review time (although does note that the producing party s burden in reviewing information for relevance and privilege may be weighed by the Court when determining good cause) Zubulake: Court excluded attorney time

52 COST SHIFTING Zubulake factors Hierarchy of importance: 1. Extent to which request specifically tailored to discover relevant information 2. Availability of such information from other sources 3. Total cost of production, compared to the amount in controversy 4. Total cost of production, compared to the resources available to each party 5. Relative ability of each party to control costs and incentives to do so 6. Importance of the issues at stake in the litigation 7. Relative benefits to the parties of obtaining the information - Zubulake v. UBS, 217 F.R.D. 309, 322 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

53 COST SHIFTING Zubulake factors followed by: ND Illinois (Wigington, additional factor importance of the requested discovery in resolving the issues in the litigation ) ED Wisconsin (Hagemeyer) ND California (OpenTV) Zubulake not followed in these jurisdictions: ND Texas Supreme Court of NY, Nassau County

54 ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS Rule 34(a) includes inspection, copying, testing Rule 33(d) Could permit court to allow direct access to ESI In practice, access only permitted if bad faith (noncompliance with discovery) Direct access only if that is necessary to afford requesting party an adequate opportunity to derive or ascertain an answer to the interrogatory ; Committee Notes to Proposed Amendments at 28.

55 PRIVILEGE ISSUES New Rules 26(b)(5) & 45(d)(2)(B) establish procedure only for addressing inadvertent disclosure of privileged materials Does not change substantive privilege law (i.e. whether production results in waiver)

56 PRIVILEGE ISSUES New Procedure (Rule 26(b)(5)) for retrieving inadvertently-produced material protected by privilege or work product Privilege holder notifies receiving party immediately upon becoming aware of disclosure After being notified, receiving party must return, sequester, or destroy Receiving party cannot use or disclose information (if already used or disclosed, must take reasonable steps to retrieve) Receiving party may promptly present information to court under seal for determination of claim Whether material privileged still substantive law issue

57 PRIVILEGE ISSUES Proposed FRE 502 Formalize subject matter waiver of AC/WP privilege for voluntary disclosure, exception: inadvertent disclosure 502(a): Subject Matter Waiver Requires production of similar information 502(b): Exception: Inadvertent disclosure if holder of privilege/wp took reasonable precautions to prevent disclosure, AND took reasonably prompt measures to rectify the error (pursuant to F.R.C.P. 25(b)(5)(B). Comment period ending Feb

58 SANCTIONS RULE 37 Situations that may warrant sanctions: 1. willful destruction of evidence 2. failure to preserve information on backup tapes 3. unreasonably or inconsistently enforced document retention policy 4. negligence in production 5. purposeful sluggishness in production 6. incomplete & inaccurate Rule 26 disclosures

59 SANCTIONS RULE 37 Modified to add safe harbor provision 37(f): Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide ESI lost as a result of routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system. Good faith requires litigation hold. If no hold, probably no safe harbor for inadvertent deletion. Intervention with deletion may be required; consider availability elsewhere, potential relevance Committee Notes: ordinary computer use results in routine alteration & deletion of information for reasons unrelated to litigation

60 WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN? Learn what systems and types of information you will be dealing with as soon as possible Put guidelines in place now to streamline production issues in the future a little extra work on the front end may significantly reduce costs later Be prepared to address all e-discovery issues very early in the litigation process; have plans for your preferred methods of dealing with production issues Until further case law develops, err on the side of retention Always remember that demonstrable good faith is extremely important

61 SELECTED RESOURCES Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, available at Report of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States (May 2005), available at

62 QUESTIONS?

63 THANK YOU

64 S. Richard Carden Jennifer M. Kurcz MBHB 300 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois phone fax

65 INTERESTING NEW CASES In re NTL, Inc. Securities Litigation, 2007 WL (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (granting adverse instruction, costs and fees for failure to properly implement litigation hold) Hutchens v. Hutchens-Collins, 2007 WL (D.Or. 2007) (cost shifting does not apply to accessible ESI) Miller v. Holzman, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2987 (D.D.C. 2007) (applying Sedona Conference principles in addressing litigation hold) In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2650 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (requiring production of metadata for future productions in existing case) Quinby v. WestLB AG, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2955 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (addressing cost shifting in restoration of backup tapes) February 8, 2007

66 INTERESTING NEW CASES Ameriwood Indus., Inc. v. Liberman, 2006 U.S. Dist LEXIS (E.D. Mo. 2006) (conducting good cause analysis in granting request for imaging of hard drives) Zurich American Insurance Co. v. ACE American Reinsurance Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (granting sampling of opaque data storage system intentionally used by sophisticated company) Kentucky Speedway, LLC, v. Nat l Ass n of Stock Car Auto Racing, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (E.D. Ky. 2006) (citing Sedona Conference and commentator in endorsing a presumption against the production of metadata) Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co., 2006 WL (D. Kan. 2006) (denying production of s in native format where parties had previously agreed to production in other format) Flexsys Americas LP v. Kumho Tire U.S.A., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (N.D. Ohio 2006) (creating e-discovery plan for parties when they had not reached agreement on one) February 8, 2007

In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum

In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum 125 In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum Retta A. Miller Carl C. Butzer Jackson Walker L.L.P. April 21, 2007 www.pointmm.com I. OVERVIEW OF THE RULES GOVERNING ELECTRONICALLY- STORED INFORMATION

More information

Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys

Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys By Ronald S. Allen, Esq. As technology has evolved, the federal courts have

More information

Electronic Evidence and Discovery: The Changes in the Federal Rules. April 25, 2007 Bill Belt

Electronic Evidence and Discovery: The Changes in the Federal Rules. April 25, 2007 Bill Belt Electronic Evidence and Discovery: The Changes in the Federal Rules April 25, 2007 Bill Belt Key dates» 2000 Judge Scheindlin coins term ESI in Boston College Law Review Article.» 2000 Chair of the Advisory

More information

DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP

DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP Presented by Frank H. Gassler, Esq. Written by Jeffrey M. James, Esq. Over the last few years,

More information

A PRIMER ON THE NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROVISIONS IN THE ALABAMA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

A PRIMER ON THE NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROVISIONS IN THE ALABAMA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE A PRIMER ON THE NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROVISIONS IN THE ALABAMA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Effective February 1, 2010, the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to provide for and accommodate

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682. Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682. Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read

More information

Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. electronically stored information. 6 Differences from Paper Documents

Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. electronically stored information. 6 Differences from Paper Documents Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Electronic Discovery effective Dec. 1, 2006 Copyright David A. Devine GROH EGGERS, LLC Rules amended: 16, 26, 33, 34, 37 & 45 Sources of information: Rules

More information

REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Steven M. Gruskin Carl J. Pellegrini Sughrue Mion, PLLC 2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20037 www.sughrue.com On December 1, 2006, the Federal

More information

grouped into five different subject areas relating to: 1) planning for discovery and initial disclosures; 2)

grouped into five different subject areas relating to: 1) planning for discovery and initial disclosures; 2) ESI: Federal Court An introduction to the new federal rules governing discovery of electronically stored information In September 2005, the Judicial Conference of the United States unanimously approved

More information

Friday 31st October, 2008.

Friday 31st October, 2008. Friday 31st October, 2008. It is ordered that the Rules heretofore adopted and promulgated by this Court and now in effect be and they hereby are amended to become effective January 1, 2009. Amend Rules

More information

Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5

Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5 Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5 An act to amend Sections 2016.020, 2031.010, 2031.020, 2031.030, 2031.040, 2031.050, 2031.060, 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, 2031.250, 2031.260, 2031.270, 2031.280,

More information

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California What is ediscovery? Electronic discovery ( ediscovery ) is discovery of electronic information in litigation. ediscovery in California is governed generally by the Civil Discovery Act. In 2009, the California

More information

Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery

Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery 1 PROFESSIONALS MILLER CANFIELD LAW FIRM B. Jay Yelton III Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery To a large extent Michigan's new e-discovery rules

More information

The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules

The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules The List (1) The rules now refer to electronically stored information, which is on equal footing with paper. Rules 26(a)(1), 26(b)(2), 26(b)(5)(B),

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE TENNESSEE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Filed: June 20, 2008 ORDER The Advisory Commission on the Rules of Practice & Procedure annually

More information

PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES

PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES What follows are some general, suggested guidelines for addressing different areas

More information

UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE. 99 Park Avenue, 16 th Floor New York, New York 10016 www.devoredemarco.com

UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE. 99 Park Avenue, 16 th Floor New York, New York 10016 www.devoredemarco.com UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE 1 What is ESI? Information that exists in a medium that can only be read through the use of computers Examples E-mail Word Documents Databases Spreadsheets Multimedia

More information

FEDERAL PRACTICE. In some jurisdictions, understanding the December 1, 2006 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is only the first step.

FEDERAL PRACTICE. In some jurisdictions, understanding the December 1, 2006 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is only the first step. A BNA, INC. DIGITAL DISCOVERY & E-EVIDENCE! VOL. 7, NO. 11 232-235 REPORT NOVEMBER 1, 2007 Reproduced with permission from Digital Discovery & e-evidence, Vol. 7, No. 11, 11/01/2007, pp. 232-235. Copyright

More information

Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS. MDLA TTS August 23, 2013

Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. Xact Data Discovery. ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS. MDLA TTS August 23, 2013 MDLA TTS August 23, 2013 ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS Kate Burke Mortensen, Esq. kburke@xactdatadiscovery.com Scott Polus, Director of Forensic Services spolus@xactdatadiscovery.com 1 Where Do I Start??

More information

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods. Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination

More information

Best Practices in Electronic Record Retention

Best Practices in Electronic Record Retention A. Principles For Document Management Policies Arthur Anderson, LLD v. U.S., 544 U.S. 696 (2005) ( Document retention policies, which are created in part to keep certain information from getting into the

More information

Electronic Discovery

Electronic Discovery Electronic Discovery L. Amy Blum, Esq. UCLA University of California, Los Angeles 1 Topics Not Covered Best practices for E-mail E use and retention in the ordinary course of business Records Disposition

More information

ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Dawn M. Curry

ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Dawn M. Curry ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Dawn M. Curry Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Telephone 617.439.2000 www.nutter.com E-Discovery Facts 93-99% of

More information

E-Discovery Best Practices

E-Discovery Best Practices José Ramón González-Magaz jrgonzalez@steptoe.com E-Discovery Best Practices www.steptoe.com November 10, 2010 Importance of E-Discovery 92% of all data is ESI. Source: Berkeley Study. 97 billion e-mails

More information

E-Discovery: New to California 1

E-Discovery: New to California 1 E-Discovery: New to California 1 Patrick O Donnell and Martin Dean 2 Introduction The New Electronic Discovery Act The new Electronic Discovery Act, Assembly Bill 5 (Evans), has modernized California law

More information

E-DISCOVERY: BURDENSOME, EXPENSIVE, AND FRAUGHT WITH RISK

E-DISCOVERY: BURDENSOME, EXPENSIVE, AND FRAUGHT WITH RISK E-DISCOVERY: BURDENSOME, EXPENSIVE, AND FRAUGHT WITH RISK If your company is involved in civil litigation, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding preservation and production of electronic documents

More information

SAMPLING: MAKING ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY MORE COST EFFECTIVE

SAMPLING: MAKING ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY MORE COST EFFECTIVE SAMPLING: MAKING ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY MORE COST EFFECTIVE Milton Luoma Metropolitan State University 700 East Seventh Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55337 651 793-1246 (fax) 651 793-1481 Milt.Luoma@metrostate.edu

More information

Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery

Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery The tools to craft strategic discovery requests & mitigate the risks and burdens of production. Discussion Outline Part I Strategies for Requesting

More information

Predictability in E-Discovery

Predictability in E-Discovery Predictability in E-Discovery Presented by: John G. Roman, Jr. National Manager, Practice Group Technology Services Nixon Peabody LLP Tom Barce Assistant Director of Practice Support Fulbright & Jaworski

More information

New E-Discovery Rules: Is Your Company Prepared?

New E-Discovery Rules: Is Your Company Prepared? November 2006 New E-Discovery Rules: Is Your Company Prepared? By Maureen O Neill, Kirby Behre and Anne Nergaard On December 1, 2006, amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( FRCP ) concerning

More information

E-DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL COURT: SIX CHANGES YOU SHOULD MAKE TO YOUR PRACTICE IN THE DISCOVERY PHASE OF THE CASE By Kary Pratt

E-DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL COURT: SIX CHANGES YOU SHOULD MAKE TO YOUR PRACTICE IN THE DISCOVERY PHASE OF THE CASE By Kary Pratt E-DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL COURT: SIX CHANGES YOU SHOULD MAKE TO YOUR PRACTICE IN THE DISCOVERY PHASE OF THE CASE By Kary Pratt 1. YOU MUST CHANGE THE WAY YOU REQUEST DOCUMENTS - FRCP 34(a) explicitly recognizes

More information

Cyber Tech & E-Commerce

Cyber Tech & E-Commerce MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Cyber Tech & E-Commerce The Duty To Preserve Data Stored Temporarily In Ram: Is The Sky Really Falling? by J. Alexander Lawrence Morrison & Foerster New York, New York A commentary

More information

ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL

ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL Franchise Tax Board ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL Author: Evans Analyst: Deborah Barrett Bill Number: AB 5 See Legislative Related Bills: History Telephone: 845-4301 Introduced Date: December 1, 2008 Attorney:

More information

2013 E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS TO THE MASSACHUSETTS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BOSTON E-DISCOVERY SUMMIT 2013 DECEMBER 3, 2013

2013 E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS TO THE MASSACHUSETTS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BOSTON E-DISCOVERY SUMMIT 2013 DECEMBER 3, 2013 1 2013 E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS TO THE MASSACHUSETTS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BOSTON E-DISCOVERY SUMMIT 2013 DECEMBER 3, 2013 CONTEXT 2006 FEDERAL COURT E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS The 2006 Federal E-Discovery

More information

BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARING YOUR BUSINESS FOR E-DISCOVERY

BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARING YOUR BUSINESS FOR E-DISCOVERY BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARING YOUR BUSINESS FOR E-DISCOVERY I. Background The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for document production in the discovery process. Until recently, all types of documents

More information

NAVIGATING THE NEW WORLD OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY

NAVIGATING THE NEW WORLD OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY NAVIGATING THE NEW WORLD OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY By David S. Curcio March 7, 2007 HISTORY OF THE NEW RULES Liberal discovery was first ushered in by the 1938 amendments to the federal rules, with expansions

More information

Patent Litigation at the ITC: Views from the Government, In-House Attorneys and Outside Counsel

Patent Litigation at the ITC: Views from the Government, In-House Attorneys and Outside Counsel Patent Litigation at the ITC: Views from the Government, In-House Attorneys and Outside Counsel In-House Panel Sponsored by: THE GIBBONS INSTITUTE OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Seton Hall University School

More information

COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT (994-001) Fall 2014

COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT (994-001) Fall 2014 COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT (994-001) Professors:Mark Austrian Christopher Racich Fall 2014 Introduction The ubiquitous use of computers, the

More information

Archiving and The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Understanding the Issues

Archiving and The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Understanding the Issues Archiving and The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Understanding the Issues An ArcMail Technology Research Paper ArcMail Technology, Inc. 401 Edwards Street, Suite 1620 Shreveport, Louisiana 71101 www.arcmailtech.com

More information

California Electronic Discovery Rules. William W. Belt, Jr.

California Electronic Discovery Rules. William W. Belt, Jr. California Electronic Discovery Rules William W. Belt, Jr. July 16, 2009 Today s speaker and some notes... Bill Belt William.Belt@LeClairRyan.com Welcome. With the high number of attendees, please note

More information

E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE. Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011

E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE. Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011 E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011 This presentation does not present the views of the U.S. Department of Justice. This presentation is not legal advice.

More information

WHOSE NEEDLE? WHOSE HAYSTACK?: COST ALLOCATION IN ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Stephen F. McKinney, Esq. Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.

WHOSE NEEDLE? WHOSE HAYSTACK?: COST ALLOCATION IN ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. Stephen F. McKinney, Esq. Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. WHOSE NEEDLE? WHOSE HAYSTACK?: COST ALLOCATION IN ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Stephen F. McKinney, Esq. Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. Introduction By now, most all of us have been on the receiving end of a request

More information

California Enacts New E-Discovery Rules that Mirror Federal Court E-Discovery Rules - with One Exception

California Enacts New E-Discovery Rules that Mirror Federal Court E-Discovery Rules - with One Exception A Timely Analysis of Legal Developments A S A P In This Issue: July 2009 On June 30, 2009 California became the 22nd state to enact separate rules that specifically address electronic discovery. The new

More information

Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production

Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production April 27, 2010 Daniel Munsch, Assistant General Counsel John Lerchey, Coordinator for Incident Response 0 E-Discovery Rules Federal

More information

The Intrusive Nature of Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation

The Intrusive Nature of Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation The Intrusive Nature of Discovery in U.S. Patent Litigation October 16, 2014 Jeffrey R. Schaefer jschaefer@ulmer.com All patent infringement litigation in the U.S. takes place in federal courts. Cases

More information

E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions

E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions 11 E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions Introduction Much has been said about

More information

Electronic Discovery: Understanding Preservation Obligations, the Potential for Cost-Shifting, and Current Developments

Electronic Discovery: Understanding Preservation Obligations, the Potential for Cost-Shifting, and Current Developments Electronic Discovery: Understanding Preservation Obligations, the Potential for Cost-Shifting, and Current Developments Electronic Discovery - What s All The Talk About? November 2004 1313 North Market

More information

Elements of a Good Document Retention Policy. Discovery Services WHITE PAPER

Elements of a Good Document Retention Policy. Discovery Services WHITE PAPER Elements of a Good Document Retention Policy Discovery Services WHITE PAPER Document retention especially the retention of electronic data has become a hot topic in the legal industry. In the wake of several

More information

The Rules have Changed

The Rules have Changed The Rules have Changed The management of electronic research records is more important than ever before Michael H Elliott Published in Scientific Computing May 2007 A patent provides rights to an inventor

More information

E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers

E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers MARCH 7, 2007 E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers By Tara Daub and Christopher Gegwich News of the recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

More information

www.salixdata.com 513-381-2679

www.salixdata.com 513-381-2679 Electronic Discovery Presented by: Jonathan Adams www.salixdata.com 513-381-2679 Our Goal Explain E-Discovery in layman s terms Equip you to be able to add value to your organization SALIX is the region

More information

Presented By: Attorney/Legal Technologist Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP. Paine Hamblen LLP 805 SW Broadway, 8 th Floor

Presented By: Attorney/Legal Technologist Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP. Paine Hamblen LLP 805 SW Broadway, 8 th Floor Everything You Wanted to Know About ESI and E-Discovery but Were Afraid to Ask Jason M. Pistacchio Presented By: Gregory S. Johnson Attorney Attorney/Legal Technologist Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP Paine

More information

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery.

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery. Published on Arkansas Judiciary (https://courts.arkansas.gov) Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery. (a) Discovery Methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods:

More information

2004 E-Discovery Developments: Year in Review

2004 E-Discovery Developments: Year in Review 2004 E-Discovery Developments: Year in Review Sean Foley, Esq., Legal Consultant Michele C.S. Lange, Esq., Staff Attorney, Legal Technologies January 20, 2005 Presenters Sean Foley, Esq., Legal Consultant

More information

Discovery. Metadata and E-Discovery A THOMSON WEST REPORT. Reprinted From E-Discovery: A Thomson West Report

Discovery. Metadata and E-Discovery A THOMSON WEST REPORT. Reprinted From E-Discovery: A Thomson West Report Discovery A THOMSON WEST REPORT COMMENTARY Reprinted From E-Discovery: A Thomson West Report Metadata and E-Discovery By Ralph C. Losey, Esq. What is metadata? Literally it means data about data. Many

More information

CALIFORNIAS NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY ACT ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 5

CALIFORNIAS NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY ACT ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 5 E-MAIL LINKS DATABASES SEARCH FIRMS MEMBER PROFILES FORUM VENDORS CALENDAR SEARCH My Dashboard My Messages (1) Firm Menu My Articles My Expert Witnesses My Links My Mediators / Arbiters My News / Updates

More information

and ediscovery Peter Pepiton ediscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance

and ediscovery Peter Pepiton ediscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance Electronic Record Retention and ediscovery Peter Pepiton ediscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance Agenda What is all this ediscovery buzz? Email is major focus of ESI Impact of New FRCP rules

More information

E-DISCOVERY IN THE US

E-DISCOVERY IN THE US E-DISCOVERY IN THE US A PRIMER Changing legal requirements and growing volumes of electronically stored information have made the discovery process more daunting and costly than ever before. This article

More information

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE Proposed Recommendation No. 249 Proposed Amendment of Rules 4009.1, 4009.11, 4009.12, 4009.21, 4009.23, and 4011 Governing Discovery of Electronically

More information

Rule 34. Production of Documents and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes

Rule 34. Production of Documents and Things and Entry Upon Land for Inspection and Other Purposes PURSUANT TO RULE 27(f) OF THE MISSISSIPPI RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, THE RULES COMMITTEE ON PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE SEEKS COMMENTS FROM THE BENCH, THE BAR AND THE PUBLIC ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO

More information

REINHART. Labor & Employment E-News E-NEWSLETTER ATTORNEYS:

REINHART. Labor & Employment E-News E-NEWSLETTER ATTORNEYS: REINHART E-NEWSLETTER ATTORNEYS: ROBERT K. SHOLL, CHAIR JEFFREY P. CLARK JOHN H. ZAWADSKY LYNN M. STATHAS DAVID J. SISSON CHRISTOPHER P. BANASZAK ROBERT J. MUTEN DARYLL J. NEUSER SUSAN B. WOODS JENNIFER

More information

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA PRACTICE DIRECTION GUIDELINES REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS

COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA PRACTICE DIRECTION GUIDELINES REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA PRACTICE DIRECTION GUIDELINES REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS Introduction While electronic documents are included in the definition of document contained

More information

THE IMPACT OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY RULES ON THE EEOC PROCESS

THE IMPACT OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY RULES ON THE EEOC PROCESS THE IMPACT OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY RULES ON THE EEOC PROCESS Cynthia L. Gibson, Esq. Katz, Teller, Brant & Hild 255 East Fifth Street Suite 2400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 (513) 977-3418 cgibson@katzteller.com

More information

E- DISCOVERY RULES FEDERAL COURT 2007

E- DISCOVERY RULES FEDERAL COURT 2007 E- DISCOVERY RULES FEDERAL COURT 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. THE GENESIS AND NEED FOR THOSE AMENDMENTS...1 III. A Case Study Zubulake...3 Facts of Zubulake...4 Discovery of Records on

More information

Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY

Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY 2016 CLM Annual Conference April 6-8, 2016 Orlando, FL Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY Understanding e-discovery definitions and concepts is critical to working with vendors,

More information

COMING: NEW FEDERAL RULES ON E-DISCOVERY

COMING: NEW FEDERAL RULES ON E-DISCOVERY COMING: NEW FEDERAL RULES ON E-DISCOVERY By: M. Sean Fosmire Garan Lucow Miller, P.C. Executive Summary Now that e-filing is up and running, the federal courts have moved on to e-discovery and have adopted

More information

General Items Of Thought

General Items Of Thought ESI PROTOCOLS & CASE LONG BUDGETS General Items Of Thought What s a GB =??? What Are Sources Of Stored Data? What s BYOD mean??? The Human Factor Is At Play! Litigation Hold Duty Arises When? Zubulake

More information

E-Discovery in Michigan. Presented by Angela Boufford

E-Discovery in Michigan. Presented by Angela Boufford E-Discovery in Michigan ESI Presented by Angela Boufford DISCLAIMER: This is by no means a comprehensive examination of E-Discovery issues. You will not be an E-Discovery expert after this presentation.

More information

I. INTRODUCTION. 220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) ( Zubulake IV ); 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) ( Zubulake V ).

I. INTRODUCTION. 220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) ( Zubulake IV ); 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) ( Zubulake V ). Electronic Discovery and Document Retention Guidelines for Government Attorneys and Administrators Prepared by Colin Jorgensen, Arkansas Attorney General s Office, June 2015 I. INTRODUCTION Advancing computer

More information

E-Discovery Guidance for Federal Government Professionals Summer 2014

E-Discovery Guidance for Federal Government Professionals Summer 2014 E-Discovery Guidance for Federal Government Professionals Summer 2014 Allison Stanton Director, E-Discovery, FOIA, & Records Civil Division, Department of Justice Adam Bain Senior Trial Counsel Civil Division,

More information

INTERNET ISSUES: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS NEW E-DISCOVERY RULES. William R. Denny Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP September 26, 2006

INTERNET ISSUES: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS NEW E-DISCOVERY RULES. William R. Denny Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP September 26, 2006 INTERNET ISSUES: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS NEW E-DISCOVERY RULES William R. Denny Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP September 26, 2006 Agenda What is a Trade Secret? Tracking Down the Anonymous Blogger Strategies

More information

Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010

Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010 Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010 Presented by Brian Wilkinson, Director of ediscovery & Computer Forensics brian.wilkinson@us.pwc.com 410-659-3473 Table of Contents Page 1 Electronic

More information

Ethics and ediscovery

Ethics and ediscovery Ethics and ediscovery John Mansfield and Devon Newman January 6, 2012 1 2013, MansfieldLaw ediscovery basics We will cover: Preservation and spoliation Searching and producing documents Supervising lawyers

More information

What Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents?

What Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents? Document Retention and Destruction in Oregon What Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents? Timothy W. Snider (503) 294-9557 twsnider@stoel.com Stoel Rives

More information

Set out below are our comments, which are quite minor, on each of the specific guidelines.

Set out below are our comments, which are quite minor, on each of the specific guidelines. Vincent T. Chang, Chair Federal Courts Committee New York County Lawyers Association 14 Vesey Street New York, NY 10007 March 20, 2013 COMMENTS OF THE NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION FEDERAL COURTS

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-199 HOUSE BILL 380

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-199 HOUSE BILL 380 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-199 HOUSE BILL 380 AN ACT TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURE FOR DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND TO MAKE CONFORMING CHANGES TO

More information

Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions

Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions William Mitchell E-Discovery Symposium Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions Mary T. Novacheck, Esq. Partner Bowman and Brooke LLP Outlaw's Motion: Cost Shift Vendor Fees to Willow Prior

More information

Electronic Discovery: Lessons from Zubulake

Electronic Discovery: Lessons from Zubulake Electronic Discovery: Lessons from Zubulake Bruce J. Douglas Daniel J. Ballintine Presented November 29, 2006 to Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1 Introduction What is a Zubulake, anyway, and how do

More information

4/23/2014. E-Discovery. What is ESI? Discovery. Electronically Stored Information. The downside. Discovery generally. E-Discovery

4/23/2014. E-Discovery. What is ESI? Discovery. Electronically Stored Information. The downside. Discovery generally. E-Discovery E-Discovery Emily Keimig Lori Philips 303.299.8240 404.567.4377 ekeimig@shermanhoward.com lphillips@shermanhoward.com What is ESI? Electronically Stored Information The downside Discovery Discovery generally

More information

Discovery Services WHITE PAPER. Electronic Discovery Best Practices. The Secret to Success

Discovery Services WHITE PAPER. Electronic Discovery Best Practices. The Secret to Success Discovery Services WHITE PAPER Electronic Discovery Best Practices The Secret to Success The concept of electronic discovery is still somewhat intimidating to many attorneys, but those who have learned

More information

(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp

(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,

More information

Data Preservation Duties and Protocols

Data Preservation Duties and Protocols Data Preservation Duties and Protocols November 2008 HOU:2858612.3 Discussion Outline I. The Differences Between Electronic and Paper Discovery II. The Parameters of Electronic Discovery III. Rule 37(e)

More information

PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS

PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS PROCEDURE 4040P Community Relations PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS Electronic Discovery Committee To help meet its obligations, the WSD uses an Electronic Discovery Committee, made up

More information

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION Experience increasingly demonstrates that discovery of electronically stored information ( ESI poses challenges

More information

BEYOND THE HYPE: Understanding the Real Implications of the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Clearwell Systems White Paper

BEYOND THE HYPE: Understanding the Real Implications of the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Clearwell Systems White Paper BEYOND THE HYPE: UNDERSTANDING THE REAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE AMENDED FRCP PA G E : 1 BEYOND THE HYPE: Understanding the Real Implications of the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Clearwell Systems

More information

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation On January 1, 2012, new rules approved by the Colorado Supreme Court entitled the Civil Access Pilot Project ( CAPP

More information

Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover. Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover. Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP September 25, 2009 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure: Yours to

More information

RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK

RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK 10.1 General. A Judge of the District Court may order that any monies in actions pending before the Court be invested in any local financial institution for safe keeping.

More information

Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page1 of 6 EXHIBITM. To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED

Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page1 of 6 EXHIBITM. To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page1 of 6 EXHIBITM To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page2

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC11-1542 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. PER CURIAM. [July 5, 2012] The Florida Bar s Civil Procedure Rules Committee (Committee)

More information

Metadata, Electronic File Management and File Destruction

Metadata, Electronic File Management and File Destruction Metadata, Electronic File Management and File Destruction By David Outerbridge, Torys LLP A. Metadata What is Metadata? Metadata is usually defined as data about data. It is a level of extra information

More information

LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES

LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES INSERT YOUR NAME HERE Place logo or logotype here, Otherwise delete this text box. AGENDA.. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure What is a legal hold? What are

More information

E-Discovery and Electronically Stored Information (ESI):

E-Discovery and Electronically Stored Information (ESI): E-Discovery and Electronically Stored Information (ESI): How Can It Help or Hinder a Case? Rosevelie Márquez Morales Harris Beach PLLC New York, NY Rosevelie Márquez Morales is a partner at Harris Beach

More information

November/December 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN INNS OF COURT. rofessionalism. Ethics Issues. and. Today s. Technology. www.innsofcourt.

November/December 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN INNS OF COURT. rofessionalism. Ethics Issues. and. Today s. Technology. www.innsofcourt. November/December 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN INNS OF COURT rofessionalism and Ethics Issues in Today s Technology www.innsofcourt.org Transparency in E-Discovery: No Longer a Novel Approach By Michael

More information

Record Retention Issues

Record Retention Issues Record Retention Issues for Human Resources Rodney A. Satterwhite Introduction Human resources records are changing. Less than five years ago, the most common type of HR record was a paper personnel file,

More information

How to Win the Battle Over Electronic Discovery in Employment Cases. By Philip L. Gordon, Esq.

How to Win the Battle Over Electronic Discovery in Employment Cases. By Philip L. Gordon, Esq. How to Win the Battle Over Electronic Discovery in Employment Cases By Philip L. Gordon, Esq. IMPORTANT NOTICE This publication is not a do-it-yourself guide to resolving employment disputes or handling

More information

Federal Rule Changes Affecting E-Discovery Are Almost Here - Are You Ready This Time?

Federal Rule Changes Affecting E-Discovery Are Almost Here - Are You Ready This Time? Federal Rule Changes Affecting E-Discovery Are Almost Here - Are You Ready This Time? An Overview of the Rules, History and Commentary Absent congressional action to reject, modify or defer proposed amendments

More information

2015 ANNUAL MEETING Vancouver, BC September 11, 2015. Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A New Scope of Discovery?

2015 ANNUAL MEETING Vancouver, BC September 11, 2015. Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A New Scope of Discovery? 2015 ANNUAL MEETING Vancouver, BC September 11, 2015 Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A New Scope of Discovery? 2010 DUKE CONFERENCE May 10-11 Duke Law School 200 Participants

More information

Overview of E-Discovery and Depositions in U.S. IP Litigation

Overview of E-Discovery and Depositions in U.S. IP Litigation Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of E-Discovery and Depositions in U.S. IP Litigation Naoki Yoshida April 19, 2013 TOPICS E-Discovery in U.S. IP Litigation Depositions in U.S.

More information