1 Electronic Discovery Presented by: Jonathan Adams
2 Our Goal Explain E-Discovery in layman s terms Equip you to be able to add value to your organization
3 SALIX is the region s leading E-Discovery Provider and Litigation Support Company 3 Locations 30 employees 2,500 customers All the local Fortune 500 companies 23 out of the largest 25 law firms in Cinti 9 out of the largest 10 law firms in Dayton Over 100 cases involving E-Discovery last year SERVICE-ACHIEVEMENT-LEADERSHIP-I I NTEGRITY-EXPERTISEEXPERTISE
4 What is E-Discovery? Paper-Based Discovery- Which file cabinets contain information pertaining to Jon Adams human resource file? What custodians have information in their possession that may pertain to Jon Adams human resource file? Electronic Discovery- What computer systems contain information pertaining to Jon Adams human resource file? What custodians may have information on their computer, laptop, cell phone, , file server, Facebook page, etc. that pertains to Jon Adams human resource file?
5 Why Amend the Federal & Ohio Rules of Civil Procure? It was amended to provide a framework for handling electronically stored information as evidence.
6 What is ESI? ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION , word documents, excel spreadsheets, PDAs, Blackberrys, text messaging, blogs, twitter, web surfing histories, Facebook, MySpace, instant messages, pictures, videos, printer memory, video files, audio files, server data, log files, back-up tapes, PDF images, TIFF, JPEG, BITMAP ANY ELECTRONIC INFORMATION
7 Paper-Based Discovery Model Paper-Based Discovery Identify ypotentially relevant information Copy the files Review the boxes of paper Determine confidentiality and privilege Copy, bates label, copy Produce to the other side Prepare for and present in trial
8 Electronic information is growing exponentially if if you have not dealt with E-discovery- you will.
9 New Role: Legal Technologist It is necessary to thoroughly understand the responding party s computer systems both with respect to active and inactive data (Zubulake) I can t imagine how counsel who is responsible cannot seek relevant electronic information (Judge Preska, author of Metropolitain Opera) Counsel must understand the clients Data Retention Architecture (Zubulake)
11 Types of Data Active Data (App files and ) Inactive Data (back-ups) Deleted eeted Files Metadata
12 Types of Data Metadata
13 Types of Data Active Data (App files and ) Inactive Data (back-ups) Deleted eeted Files Metadata
14 What is the big deal? NEWORK DIAG
15 Paper-Based Discovery Model Electronic Discovery Model
16 What is the benefit of EDRM? Electronic Discovery Reference Model provides a framework of processes and educational materials to help you address the challenges of ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY.
17 Stages of EDRM
18 Information (Records) Management Review Policies (Retention, Legal Hold, , etc.) Most policies are inadequate Creates risk Sarbanes-Oxley Act, FACTA, HIPAA, GLB, and other regulations cover corporate data responsibility. "Document retention ti policies, lii which hihare created tdin part tto keep certain ti information if from getting into the hands of others, including the Government, are common in business... It is, of course, not wrongful for a manager to instruct his employees to comply with a valid document retention policy under ordinary circumstances." Arthur Andersen v. U.S., 125 S.Ct. 2129, 2135 (U.S. May 31, 2005). Legal Hold policy needs to be clear, implemented quickly, regular communicationdefensible Amended ORCP 37 (f)- No sanctions for ESI lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.
19 ORCP 37 (f)- Safe Harbor Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system. The court may consider the following factors in determining whether to impose sanctions under this division: 1. Whether and when any obligation to preserve the information was triggered; 2. Whether the information was lost as a result of the routine alteration or deletion of information that attends the ordinary use of the system in issue; 3. Whether the party intervened in a timely fashion to prevent the loss of information; 4. Any steps taken to comply with any court order or party agreement requiring preservation of specific information; 5. Any other facts relevant to its determination i under this division. i i
20 Good Compliance Cuts Legal Costs, Information Management, Jan/Feb 2009
21 Stages of EDRM
22 High Level overview of E-Discovery Identify Preserve & Capture Search & Cull Review Produce
23 Identification The process of learning the location of all data which you or your client may have a duty to preserve and potentially disclose in a pending or prospective legal proceeding. Steps in Determining Scope of Responsive Data Likely custodians of relevant information Where and how is data stored? Backed-up? Differences between actual practice and written procedures Casting a Broad Net Amended ORCP 26(B) (4)- The party is not required to provide ESI if production is too burdensome or expensive compared to the potential value of the discovery. Potentially limits i scope
24 ORCP 26 (B) (4) Electronically stored information. A party need not provide discovery of electronically stored information when the production imposes undue burden or expense. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the part from whom electronically stored information is sought must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or expense. If a showing of undue burden or expense is made, the court may nonetheless order production of electronically ll stored information if the requesting party shows good cause. The court shall consider the following factors when determining if good cause exists:
25 ORCP 26 (B) (4) cont. (a) (b) (c) (d) Whether the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative; Whether the information sought can be obtained from some other source that is less burdensome, or less expensive; Whether the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain the information sought; and Whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs the likely benefit, taking into account the relative importance in the case of the issues on which electronic discovery is sought, the amount in controversy, the parties d th i t f th d di i l i th i resources, and the importance of the proposed discovery in resolving the issues. In ordering production of electronically stored information, the court may specify the format, extent, timing, allocation of expenses and other conditions for the discovery of the electronically stored information.
26 Preservation Enormous challenge for organizations Must begin as soon as litigation is reasonably anticipated ORCP 37 (F)(1) & (3) The importance of the Meet and Confer FRCP- required; ORCP- discretionary Manage the Legal Hold Process Written instructions to possible custodians and stakeholders not to delete relevant information Issue communication early and reminders often Case law Amended ORCP 37 (f)- No sanctions for ESI lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.
27 What is the big deal? NEWORK DIAG
28 Collection The acquisition of electronic information marked as potentially relevant in a pending litigation. It should be collected in a manner that is comprehensive, maintains it content integrity and preserves its form. Metadata If it needs to be produced, do not alter (open, copy, etc.) Options for Collections Forensic Collection Live Collection Chain of Custody Document collection activity, document access, document personnel Hashing ESI- creating a fingerprint to confirm that data has not be altered
29 High Level overview of E-Discovery Identify Preserve & Collect Search & Cull Review Produce
30 Processing Culling- the process of programmatically removing content that is irrelevant Deduplication System Files/Known File Types National Institute of Standards and Technologies Searching- the process of identifying content that is most likely relevant and will require review Keyword Search Custodian List Timeframe/Date Range File Type More than 90% of collected electronic content can be non-responsive
31 High Level overview of E-Discovery Identify Preserve & Capture Search & Cull Review Produce
32 Review Technology that enhances the process Online Review Tools In-House Review Tools Native v. TIFF/PDF Review Native : (Excel), cost, original state TIFF/PDF Review: Redaction
33 Analysis The process of evaluating a collection of electronic discovery materials to determine relevant summary information, i such as key topics of the case important people specific vocabulary and jargon important individual document Brief overview of analytic tools that are available
34 Analytic Tools Analytic tools helps clients pare down review sets, find key documents, identify confidential or privileged documents, remove spam and analyze large document populations. p Cut Review Costs with Key Document Clustering. Identify key documents and use them to find similar documents from the larger population. Cluster documents based on concepts. Segregate spam and other irrelevant content to reduce review populations. Target Review through Predictive Ranking. Use initial tagging as a base to find other potentially responsive documents for more efficient review. Rank by likely l relevance. Drill into Results Sets by Key Concepts. Analyze search results by concepts and drill down dynamically into your document population. Review Threads and Near Dupes. Cut through redundant data and group similar documents.
35 Produce Paper- ESI is printed to paper and paper is produced to the other side Images- ESI is produced as.tif or.pdf files, along with the associated metadata and full text Quasi-native- For example, an IBM AS400 database would be produced as an ASCII, comma-delimited file with associated file and field structural information Native- ESI is produced as it is maintained and used Amended ORCP Rule 34(B) and 34(B)(3) ) Request may specify the form or forms in which ESI is to be produced. Best Practice: Attempt to agree in advance on production formats Qualcomm, Inc v. Broadcom Corp. (S.D. Cal. January 7, 2008) Amended ORCP Rule 26(B) (6)(b) Clawback provision
36 Qualcomm, Inc v. Broadcom Corp. (S.D. Cal. January 7, 2008) 21 s found Over 200,000 more pages of s eventually located--- AFTER the trial Counsel failed to follow-up on indications that additional responsive ESI existed. Over $8 million in sanctions Responsibility to produce responsive ESI is a continuing one.
37 ORCP 34 (B) Procedure. Without leave of court, the request may be served upon the plaintiff after commencement of the action and upon any other party with or after service of the summons and complaint upon the part. The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts. The request may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced, but may not require the production of the same information in more than one form.
38 ORCP 34 (B) (3) If a request does not specify the form or forms for producing electronically stored information, a responding party may produce the information in a form of forms in which the information is ordinarily maintained if that form is reasonably useable, or in any form that is reasonably useable. Unless ordered by the court or agreed to by the parties, a party need not produce the same electronically ll stored information in more than one form.
39 ORCP 26 (B) (6) (b)- Clawback Provision Information Produced: If information is produced in discovery that is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material, the party making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a receiving party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies within the party s possession, custody or control. A party may not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved. A receiving gparty may ypromptly p ypresent the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material. If the receiving party disclosed the information before being notified, it must take reasonable steps to retrieve it. The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved.
40 High Level overview of E-Discovery Identify Preserve & Capture Search & Cull Review Produce
41 Stages of EDRM
42 Presentation Using ESI in Depositions, Hearings & Trial Printed copy Electronic presentation PowerPoint, Trial Director, Sanction
43 Key Takeaways The EDRM starts with good records management Studies show that real dollars can be saved Get you arms around the legal hold process Most attorneys are not legal technologists Don t be intimidated Importance of Meet & Confer- How can you help? # of relevant custodians File types & locations Accessible vs. inaccessible ESI Format of production Reasonable timeframe
ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Dawn M. Curry Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Telephone 617.439.2000 www.nutter.com E-Discovery Facts 93-99% of
MDLA TTS August 23, 2013 ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS Kate Burke Mortensen, Esq. firstname.lastname@example.org Scott Polus, Director of Forensic Services email@example.com 1 Where Do I Start??
2016 CLM Annual Conference April 6-8, 2016 Orlando, FL Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY Understanding e-discovery definitions and concepts is critical to working with vendors,
E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011 This presentation does not present the views of the U.S. Department of Justice. This presentation is not legal advice.
125 In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum Retta A. Miller Carl C. Butzer Jackson Walker L.L.P. April 21, 2007 www.pointmm.com I. OVERVIEW OF THE RULES GOVERNING ELECTRONICALLY- STORED INFORMATION
Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys By Ronald S. Allen, Esq. As technology has evolved, the federal courts have
What is ediscovery? Electronic discovery ( ediscovery ) is discovery of electronic information in litigation. ediscovery in California is governed generally by the Civil Discovery Act. In 2009, the California
E-Discovery in Michigan ESI Presented by Angela Boufford DISCLAIMER: This is by no means a comprehensive examination of E-Discovery issues. You will not be an E-Discovery expert after this presentation.
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP Presented by Frank H. Gassler, Esq. Written by Jeffrey M. James, Esq. Over the last few years,
GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION Experience increasingly demonstrates that discovery of electronically stored information ( ESI poses challenges
1 PROFESSIONALS MILLER CANFIELD LAW FIRM B. Jay Yelton III Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery To a large extent Michigan's new e-discovery rules
Patent Litigation at the ITC: Views from the Government, In-House Attorneys and Outside Counsel In-House Panel Sponsored by: THE GIBBONS INSTITUTE OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Seton Hall University School
UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE 1 What is ESI? Information that exists in a medium that can only be read through the use of computers Examples E-mail Word Documents Databases Spreadsheets Multimedia
California Electronic Discovery Rules William W. Belt, Jr. July 16, 2009 Today s speaker and some notes... Bill Belt William.Belt@LeClairRyan.com Welcome. With the high number of attendees, please note
Everything You Wanted to Know About ESI and E-Discovery but Were Afraid to Ask Jason M. Pistacchio Presented By: Gregory S. Johnson Attorney Attorney/Legal Technologist Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP Paine
E-Discovery: New to California 1 Patrick O Donnell and Martin Dean 2 Introduction The New Electronic Discovery Act The new Electronic Discovery Act, Assembly Bill 5 (Evans), has modernized California law
José Ramón González-Magaz firstname.lastname@example.org E-Discovery Best Practices www.steptoe.com November 10, 2010 Importance of E-Discovery 92% of all data is ESI. Source: Berkeley Study. 97 billion e-mails
ESI: Federal Court An introduction to the new federal rules governing discovery of electronically stored information In September 2005, the Judicial Conference of the United States unanimously approved
Electronic Discovery L. Amy Blum, Esq. UCLA University of California, Los Angeles 1 Topics Not Covered Best practices for E-mail E use and retention in the ordinary course of business Records Disposition
A Practical Guide to Understanding ediscovery for Insurance Claims Professionals ediscovery Defined and its Relationship to an Insurance Claim Simply put, ediscovery (or Electronic Discovery) refers to
POOLING PROVISIONS The E-Discovery Process A publication of Nevada Public Agency Insurance Pool The e- discovery process the search of electronic records for use as legal evidence can cost thousands of
COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT (994-001) Professors:Mark Austrian Christopher Racich Fall 2014 Introduction The ubiquitous use of computers, the
Article originally appeared in the Fall 2011 issue of The Professional Engineer Electronic Discovery in Litigation By Douglas P. Jeremiah, P.E., Esq. Your firm is involved in litigation and you get the
Friday 31st October, 2008. It is ordered that the Rules heretofore adopted and promulgated by this Court and now in effect be and they hereby are amended to become effective January 1, 2009. Amend Rules
Data Preservation Duties and Protocols November 2008 HOU:2858612.3 Discussion Outline I. The Differences Between Electronic and Paper Discovery II. The Parameters of Electronic Discovery III. Rule 37(e)
1 2013 E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS TO THE MASSACHUSETTS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BOSTON E-DISCOVERY SUMMIT 2013 DECEMBER 3, 2013 CONTEXT 2006 FEDERAL COURT E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS The 2006 Federal E-Discovery
Managing the E-Discovery Process: Guidance for Federal Agencies Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Message from the Associate Attorney General Message from Magistrate Judge Paul
A BNA, INC. DIGITAL DISCOVERY & E-EVIDENCE! VOL. 7, NO. 11 232-235 REPORT NOVEMBER 1, 2007 Reproduced with permission from Digital Discovery & e-evidence, Vol. 7, No. 11, 11/01/2007, pp. 232-235. Copyright
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read
E-Discovery Basics For the RIM Professional By: Andy Sokol, CEDS, CSDS Adding A New Service Offering For Your Legal & Corporate Clients Learning Objectives What is Electronic Discovery? How Does E-Discovery
Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Electronic Discovery effective Dec. 1, 2006 Copyright David A. Devine GROH EGGERS, LLC Rules amended: 16, 26, 33, 34, 37 & 45 Sources of information: Rules
Electronic Record Retention and ediscovery Peter Pepiton ediscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance Agenda What is all this ediscovery buzz? Email is major focus of ESI Impact of New FRCP rules
Case 2:14-cv-02159-KHV-JPO Document 12 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KYLE ALEXANDER, and DYLAN SYMINGTON, on behalf of themselves and all those
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE TENNESSEE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Filed: June 20, 2008 ORDER The Advisory Commission on the Rules of Practice & Procedure annually
PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES What follows are some general, suggested guidelines for addressing different areas
E-discovery: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and their Implications for Public Sector Corrections Departments Andres De Aguero, Senior Lead, Deloitte Consulting LLP David F. Axelrod, Director, Deloitte
SEVENTH CIRCUIT ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PILOT PROGRAM PROPOSED PRINCIPLES FOR DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION Sean M. Hendricks, J.D. Client Services Manager (312) 893-7321 / email@example.com
Franchise Tax Board ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL Author: Evans Analyst: Deborah Barrett Bill Number: AB 5 See Legislative Related Bills: History Telephone: 845-4301 Introduced Date: December 1, 2008 Attorney:
THE IMPACT OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY RULES ON THE EEOC PROCESS Cynthia L. Gibson, Esq. Katz, Teller, Brant & Hild 255 East Fifth Street Suite 2400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 (513) 977-3418 firstname.lastname@example.org
CLIENT MEMORANDUM Hong Kong High Court Procedure E-Discovery: Practice Direction Effective September 1, 2014 August 28, 2014 Mandatory application of e-discovery Mandatory application of e-discovery to
102 ediscovery Shakedown: Lowering your Risk Long-Term Care Session HCCA Compliance Institute April 27, 2009 Las Vegas, Nevada Presented by: Diane Kissel, Manager IS Risk & Compliance Kindred Healthcare,
BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARING YOUR BUSINESS FOR E-DISCOVERY I. Background The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for document production in the discovery process. Until recently, all types of documents
Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination
How E-Discovery Will Affect Your Life as a Storage Professional David Stevens, Carnegie Mellon University SNIA Legal Notice The material contained in this tutorial is copyrighted by the SNIA. Member companies
Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery The tools to craft strategic discovery requests & mitigate the risks and burdens of production. Discussion Outline Part I Strategies for Requesting
How E-Discovery Will Impact Your Life as a Storage Professional David Stevens, Carnegie Mellon University SNIA Legal Notice The material contained in this tutorial is copyrighted by the SNIA. Member companies
E-Discovery Guidance for Federal Government Professionals Summer 2014 Allison Stanton Director, E-Discovery, FOIA, & Records Civil Division, Department of Justice Adam Bain Senior Trial Counsel Civil Division,
ediscovery 101 Myth Busting October 29, 2009 Olivia Gerroll ediscovery Solutions Group Director Background Olivia Gerroll, ediscovery Solutions Group Director Over sixteen years of experience in litigation
E-Discovery Toolkit for Educational Institutions The e-discovery process the search of electronic records for use as legal evidence can cost educational institutions thousands of dollars and hours. The
The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules The List (1) The rules now refer to electronically stored information, which is on equal footing with paper. Rules 26(a)(1), 26(b)(2), 26(b)(5)(B),
University of California, Merced Measures Regarding Litigation Holds and Preservation of Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Responsible Officials: Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost Vice Chancellor
KNOW THYSELF: Proactively Using Information Governance and Advance Planning to Reduce the Burden and Expense of E-Discovery Jonathan D. Rudolph, General Counsel of Accumen Data Services Jeffrey D. Bukowski,
Predictability in E-Discovery Presented by: John G. Roman, Jr. National Manager, Practice Group Technology Services Nixon Peabody LLP Tom Barce Assistant Director of Practice Support Fulbright & Jaworski
A. Principles For Document Management Policies Arthur Anderson, LLD v. U.S., 544 U.S. 696 (2005) ( Document retention policies, which are created in part to keep certain information from getting into the
E-DISCOVERY IN THE US A PRIMER Changing legal requirements and growing volumes of electronically stored information have made the discovery process more daunting and costly than ever before. This article
E-Discovery for Paralegals: Definition, Application and FRCP Changes April 27, 2007 IPE Seminar Initial Disclosures ESI Electronically Stored Information FRCP 26(a)(1)(B) all ESI must be disclosed initially
Digital Forensics, ediscovery and Electronic Evidence By Digital Forensics What Is It? Forensics is the use of science and technology to investigate and establish facts in a court of law. Digital forensics
LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES INSERT YOUR NAME HERE Place logo or logotype here, Otherwise delete this text box. AGENDA.. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure What is a legal hold? What are
REINHART E-NEWSLETTER ATTORNEYS: ROBERT K. SHOLL, CHAIR JEFFREY P. CLARK JOHN H. ZAWADSKY LYNN M. STATHAS DAVID J. SISSON CHRISTOPHER P. BANASZAK ROBERT J. MUTEN DARYLL J. NEUSER SUSAN B. WOODS JENNIFER
Developing an Integrated e-discovery and Corporate Records Management Program Presented by: Janeine Charpiat Information Security Professional What is ediscovery? any process in which electronic data is
Any and all documents Meets Electronically Stored Information: Discovery in the Electronic Age Panel Members Judge Ronald L. Buch, Moderator Panelists The Honorable Paul W. Grimm U.S. District Court for
Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,
Ethics and ediscovery John Mansfield and Devon Newman January 6, 2012 1 2013, MansfieldLaw ediscovery basics We will cover: Preservation and spoliation Searching and producing documents Supervising lawyers
WhitePaper Concise Guide to E-discovery Contents i. Overview ii. Importance of e-discovery iii. How to prepare for e-discovery? iv. Key processes & issues v. The next step vi. Conclusion Overview E-discovery
ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION e-docs and Forensics in the New e-discovery Era www.aplf.org FRAMEWORK Overview of the Rule Changes Pre-Litigation Planning IT Audit Document Retention Policies Planning
COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA PRACTICE DIRECTION GUIDELINES REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS Introduction While electronic documents are included in the definition of document contained
ZL UNIFIED ARCHIVE A Project Manager s Guide to E-Discovery ZL TECHNOLOGIES White Paper PAGE 1 A project manager s guide to e-discovery In civil litigation, the parties in a dispute are required to provide
A Timely Analysis of Legal Developments A S A P In This Issue: July 2009 On June 30, 2009 California became the 22nd state to enact separate rules that specifically address electronic discovery. The new
Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page1 of 6 EXHIBITM To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Case3:11-cv-00167-SI Document62-14 Filed02/04/11 Page2
Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010 Presented by Brian Wilkinson, Director of ediscovery & Computer Forensics email@example.com 410-659-3473 Table of Contents Page 1 Electronic
REED COLLEGE ediscovery GUIDELINES FOR PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION... 1 B. THE LANDSCAPE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS SYSTEMS... 1 1. Email Infrastructure...
WHITE PAPER: THE ediscovery BALANCING ACT The ediscovery Balancing Act Striking the Right Mix of In-House and Outsourced Expertise The ediscovery Balancing Act Contents Introduction...........................................
MARCH 7, 2007 E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers By Tara Daub and Christopher Gegwich News of the recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
ESI Risk Assessment: Critical in Light of the new E-discovery and notification laws Scott Bailey, CISM Christopher Sobota, J.D. Enterprise Risk Management Group Disclaimer This presentation is for informational
PROCEDURE 4040P Community Relations PRESERVATION AND PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS Electronic Discovery Committee To help meet its obligations, the WSD uses an Electronic Discovery Committee, made up
Electronic Discovery e-discovery: A Primer Mauricio Perry, CRM, CEDS Mauricio Perry, CEDS, CRM 1 Disclaimer I am not a lawyer The ideas exposed here are not to be construed as legal advice but are educational
E-Discovery and Electronically Stored Information (ESI): How Can It Help or Hinder a Case? Rosevelie Márquez Morales Harris Beach PLLC New York, NY Rosevelie Márquez Morales is a partner at Harris Beach
Sponsored by ediscovery: The New Information Management Battleground Developments in the Law and Best Practices Kahn Consulting Inc. (847) 266-0722 firstname.lastname@example.org Introduction The following
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of E-Discovery and Depositions in U.S. IP Litigation Naoki Yoshida April 19, 2013 TOPICS E-Discovery in U.S. IP Litigation Depositions in U.S.
TM GUIDANCE SOFTWARE EnCASE ediscovery EnCase ediscovery Automatically search, identify, collect, preserve, and process electronically stored information across the network. GUIDANCE SOFTWARE EnCASE ediscovery
E-Discovery in Practice: A Roadmap for Financial Institutions Martha R. Mora Martha R. Mora, Esq. ARHM&F Avila Rodriguez Hernandez Mena & Ferri LLP 2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 1225, Coral Gables, Florida
William Mitchell E-Discovery Symposium Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions Mary T. Novacheck, Esq. Partner Bowman and Brooke LLP Outlaw's Motion: Cost Shift Vendor Fees to Willow Prior
1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this policy is to: Identify the types of College-related electronic information, including the location of the information; Identify what departments or individuals are
E-Discovery Quagmires An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure Rebecca Herold, CISSP, CISA, CISM, FLMI Final Draft for February 2007 CSI Alert While updating the two-day seminar Chris Grillo and
Robert S. Bernstein, Moderator Panelists: Douglas Cherry, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP Karl Schieneman, Review Less Robert Bernstein Douglas Cherry Karl Schieneman Lean member Doug is a Partner in the
INTERNET ISSUES: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS NEW E-DISCOVERY RULES William R. Denny Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP September 26, 2006 Agenda What is a Trade Secret? Tracking Down the Anonymous Blogger Strategies