1 E-Discovery in Michigan ESI Presented by Angela Boufford
2 DISCLAIMER: This is by no means a comprehensive examination of E-Discovery issues. You will not be an E-Discovery expert after this presentation. The intent of this presentation is to familiarize you with some of the core E-Discovery concepts and rules.
3 What is E-Discovery? What is E-Discovery? Electronic Discovery is still discovery. The goals are the same, and the guidng principles are the same. E-Discovery deals with Electronically Stored Information ( ESI ). In our paperless society, almost every case will have some ESI that needs to be dealt with. 93% (or more) of all new information is stored in digital form. www2.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info-2003
4 Michigan Rules Impacting E-Discovery Michigan rules effective as of: January 1, Substantially follow the 2006 E-discovery amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Address how ESI should be preserved, produced, allocation of e-discovery costs, use of claw back agreements, and form of production. The new rules also include a safe harbor provision intended to protect parties who, in good faith, inadvertently delete ESI relevant to litigation. Michigan is one of approximately 19 states that have added court rules to address e-discovery.
5 Michigan Rules Impacting E-Discovery Two principal differences from the federal rules: MCR 2.302(B)(6) and 2.506(A)(3) more explicitly allow for cost shifting when dealing with ESI that is "not reasonably accessible;" and MCR 2.302(B)(5) and 2.313(E) provide for broader "safe harbor provision when information is lost in good faith subject to routine retention/deletion policy of the responding party.
6 Common E-Discovery Issues Common E-Discovery Issues Accessibility Collection of ESI Determining What to Produce Privilege Form of Production Spoliation
8 Accessibility MCR 2.302(6) Limitation of Discovery of Electronic Materials. A party need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the party identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the party from whom discovery is sought must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of MCR 2.302(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.
9 What is Not Reasonably Accessible? What is Not Reasonably Accessible? Sedona Principle 2: When balancing the cost, burden, and need for electronically stored information, courts and parties should apply the proportionality standard embodied in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C) and its state equivalents, which require consideration of the technological feasibility and realistic costs of preserving, retrieving, reviewing, and producing electronically stored information, as well as the nature of the litigation and the amount in controversy.
10 What is Not Reasonably Accessible? (cont d) Sedona Principle 8: The primary source of electronically stored information for production should be active data and information. Resort to disaster recovery backup tapes and other sources of electronically stored information that are not reasonably accessible requires the requesting party to demonstrate need and relevance that outweigh the costs and burdens of retrieving and processing the electronically stored information from such sources, including the disruption of business and information management activities.
11 Accesibility - Cost Shifting Accesibility - Cost Shifting MCR 2.302(B)(6) and 2.506(A)(3) are more explicit than their Federal counterparts in allowing for cost shifting when dealing with data that is not reaonably accessible
12 COLLECTION OF ESI
13 Collection of ESI Collection of ESI Develop written Collection Plan Choose best collection personnel - Vendor specialist vs. client (IT) collection Select optimal collection technologies -Collect all active files vs. using tool to collect more selectively? Maintain appropriate documentation (e.g., Chain-of-Custody, Collection Tracking Worksheet) Evaluate reports of collected data Every step must be legally defensible
14 Common ESI Collection Pitfalls Common ESI Collection Pitfalls Failing to plan effective collection (poor coordination with custodians, collecting over a network rather than direct) Compromising metadata during collection Over-collection (not using technology or processes to cull irrelevant files at point of collection, if applicable) Under-collection (using flawed searches or missing relevant custodians and sources)
15 DETERMINING WHAT TO PRODUCE
16 Reviewing the Collected ESI Reviewing the Collected ESI Vendors estimate that 80% of E-Discovery cost is tied to the review Start out by defining the scope of the review (typical scope: Sort out responsive documents to produce and privileged documents that should be withheld) At this stage, it is typically a good idea to segregate potentially privileged for later review (we will discuss privilege review later) Determine whether using vendor or in-firm technology or combination (keeping in mind storage space, review software needs, and cost).
17 Responsiveness Review Responsiveness Review Typical considerations during review Establish workflow and milestones Learn all deadlines, and don t forget to factor in time to obtain all docs from client deliver to vendor load into review tool and process train reviewers on case subject-matter train reviewers on review tool review documents QC/audit process documents for production, and QC production
18 Responsiveness Review Responsiveness Review Typical considerations during review (cont.) Assemble the right review team Select good review technology and environment, configure review tool to match review protocol Organize review workflow - First-pass review, second-pass review, who should review documents of particular significance or sensitivity? Analyze opportunities for culling in review tool Search and eliminate junk mail (advertising) Provide effective reviewer protocol
19 Responsiveness Review Responsiveness Review Assemble package of key documents for reviewers, including Complaint and/or Answer, interview memos, sample documents, and document review memo Document review memo should describe: Issues in case, what plaintiff/defendant will try to prove and how, the names and roles of key players, the names and roles of attorneys, what the subject matter tags are and why they should be used, and a decision tree for reviewing documents Assign review sets (if possible, match reviewer with custodian, subject matter, and/or strings)
20 Common Review Pitfalls Common Review Pitfalls Not knowing the data prior to processing Failing to evaluate effective data culling strategies (de-duplication, search terms, date ranges, file types, etc.) Failing to code consistently Not allocating enough time and analysis to keyword search terms Not managing expectations
21 More Pitfalls More Pitfalls Poor document review planning (not calculating required resources to meet given production deadlines) Failing to communicate precise review protocol/ document decisions to review team Failing to supervise the review team Inadequate quality checks and progress monitoring
23 Privilege After potentially privileged documents have been segregated, they need to be reviewed for privilege. Documents that are privileged will need to be logged and the log must be produced. Non-privileged docs that were segregated will need to be part of a supplemental production. Beware of redactions! Make sure to redact the text as well as the image. If you are doing a native file production, you will have to make an exception for partially-privileged docs. Sedona Principle 10: A responding party should follow reasonable procedures to protect privileges and objections in connection with the production of electronically stored information. Federal Rule 26(b)(5)(B); MCR 2.302(7) (inadvertent production)
24 Attorney-Client Privilege Confidential Communication Privleges Between Attorney and Client For Purpose of Giving/Receiving Legal Advice Work Product Protection Prepared by or at request of Attorney Because of/for Use in/would not be created but for Litigation Other Privileges
25 Privilege Log How to establish the right of protection Minimal Contents: Author Recipients Date Description (but don t waive the privilege!) Protection Claimed Log must provide sufficient information to support the claim of privilege or protection Failure to provide an adequate log can waive the privilege
26 Identifying Privileged Documents Knowledge is the Key Who are (and were) the players? What are (and were) their roles? What legal issues/litigation has the client faced? You will need a memo with the names of all attorneys (don t forget your client s legal department), the addresses of all atttorneys, and the domain names of all attorneys (search the domain name to pick up other staff at the law firms who might not be on your list). Also include information regarding the varying roles of the attorneys on the list. Prepare a privilege review protocol.
27 FORM OF PRODUCTION
28 Form of Production Form of Production Types of productions All at once Rolling Forms of production Paper Quasi-Paper Native Quasi-Native
29 Form of Production Form of Production Consult FRCP 26(f)(3) & FRCP 34(b) regarding duty to confer in federal court. MCR states that courts may direct that early scheduling conferences be held, and that during such conferences courts should consider discovery, preservation, and claims of privilege of electronically stored information. Find out what review platform your opponent is using, and what type of load file they need What fields/metadata are being exchanged (work out an agreement re objective data, and always check the final production CD to make sure that only those fields are on the disk you do not want to give away work product!)
30 Form of Production Form of Production Federal Rule 34(b) The request: [ ] may specify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced [ ] [the responding party may lodge] an objection to the requested form for producing electronically stored information the [responding] party must state the form or forms it intends to use.
31 Form of Production (cont d) Form of Production (cont d) Rule 34(b)(2)(E) (ii) If a request does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, a party must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms; and (iii) A party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.
32 Form of Production (cont d) Form of Production (cont d) MCR 2.310(C) - Requests for Production of Documents Amended to require that requests must specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection/production, as well as the form or forms in which ESI is to be produced If the request does not specifiy the form in which ESI is to be produced, it must be produced in a form or forms in which the producing party ordinarily maintains it, or in a reasonably usable form ESI need only be produced in one form
33 Form of Production (cont d) Form of Production (cont d) Sedona Principle 12: Absent party agreement or court order specifying the form or forms of production, production should be made in the form or forms in which the information is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form, taking into account the need to produce reasonably accessible metadata that will enable the receiving party to have the same ability to access, search, and display the information as the producing party where appropriate or necessary in light of the nature of the information and the needs of the case.
35 Spoliation in General Spoliation in General Sedona Principle 14: Sanctions, including spoliation findings, should be considered by the court only if it finds that there was a clear duty to preserve, a culpable failure to preserve and produce relevant electronically stored information, and a reasonable probability that the loss of the evidence has materially prejudiced the adverse party.
36 Spoliation Fed. Rule 37(e) Spoliation Fed. Rule 37(e) Safe Harbor Rule 37(e) Failure to Provide Electronically Stored Information. Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.
37 Spoliation MCR 2.302(B) & 2.313(E) Provide for broader safe harbor when information is lost in good faith subject to routine retention/deletion policy of the responding party Staff comment explains that good faith may be shown by a party s attempts to preserve ESI as part of an e-discovery litigation hold process.
38 TOP TEN WAYS TO CUT COSTS [http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/conference/downloads/ediscovery6.pdf]
39 #10 Cooperate with opposing counsel to develop a multi-tiered discovery plan that concentrates first on review and production of relevant data from the most accessible sources, and avoids review and production of data from less accessible sources unless and until it is shown to be necessary. See Sedona Principles 8 and 9, Rule 26(b)(2)(B)
40 #9 Make specific requests and responses. Nothing wastes more time and energy in discovery than a set of vague, overbroad requests promoting a set of vague, overbroad objections. See Sedona Principle 4
41 #8 Enter into a clawback agreement with opposing counsel to mitigate both parties privilege review risks. See Sedona Principle 10, Rule 26(b)(5)
42 #7 Go beyond agreeing with opposing counsel on the form or forms of production, and consider agreeing on a common litigation support platform and the exchange of standard objective metadata See Sedona Principle 12, Rules 26(f)(3) and 34(b)
43 #6 Use technology to assist in identification, review, and response. Mutually agreed-upon sampling, de-duplication, and keyword searches are good starting points. See Sedona Principle 11
44 #5 Preserve and review potentially responsive data in native format, if possible. If money must be spent on data conversion, spend it later on the small amount of data most likely to be produced to opposing counsel. See Sedona Principle 12
45 #4 Focus on data preservation issues early in the case well before the Rule 26(f) conference. This is a two-way street, for both requesting and responding parties. See Sedona Principle 3
46 #3 Include knowledgeable IT, RM, and business personnel in litigation response planning, conferences, and execution. Effective response is a team effort. See Sedona Principle 6
47 #2 Establish a standard litigation response procedure, just as you would have any other business risk mitigation procedure (fire, flood, earthquake, epidemic, etc.). No well-run business should be without it. See Sedona Principle 5, Rule 37(e) The Sedona Conference Commentary on Legal Holds (public comment version) (2007)
48 #1 Develop and implement a comprehensive e- records management program before any litigation is contemplated. It just makes good business sense. See Sedona Principle 1, Rule 37(e). The Sedona Conference Commentary on Management (2007)
49 Resources The Rules and Committee Notes themselves pdf Managing Discovery of Electronic Information: A Pocket Guide for Judges (FJC: 2007) The Sedona Principles, Second Edition (2007) Conference of Chief Justices Guidelines Fios (vendor) Website free webinars, articles, etc. Applied Discovery (vendor) Website free articles, caselaw, white papers, samples, etc. brary
ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Dawn M. Curry Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP World Trade Center West 155 Seaport Boulevard Boston, Massachusetts 02210 Telephone 617.439.2000 www.nutter.com E-Discovery Facts 93-99% of
2016 CLM Annual Conference April 6-8, 2016 Orlando, FL Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY Understanding e-discovery definitions and concepts is critical to working with vendors,
E-Discovery: New to California 1 Patrick O Donnell and Martin Dean 2 Introduction The New Electronic Discovery Act The new Electronic Discovery Act, Assembly Bill 5 (Evans), has modernized California law
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP Presented by Frank H. Gassler, Esq. Written by Jeffrey M. James, Esq. Over the last few years,
Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Electronic Discovery effective Dec. 1, 2006 Copyright David A. Devine GROH EGGERS, LLC Rules amended: 16, 26, 33, 34, 37 & 45 Sources of information: Rules
SEVENTH CIRCUIT ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PILOT PROGRAM PROPOSED PRINCIPLES FOR DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION Sean M. Hendricks, J.D. Client Services Manager (312) 893-7321 / email@example.com
Electronic Discovery Presented by: Jonathan Adams www.salixdata.com 513-381-2679 Our Goal Explain E-Discovery in layman s terms Equip you to be able to add value to your organization SALIX is the region
125 In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum Retta A. Miller Carl C. Butzer Jackson Walker L.L.P. April 21, 2007 www.pointmm.com I. OVERVIEW OF THE RULES GOVERNING ELECTRONICALLY- STORED INFORMATION
José Ramón González-Magaz firstname.lastname@example.org E-Discovery Best Practices www.steptoe.com November 10, 2010 Importance of E-Discovery 92% of all data is ESI. Source: Berkeley Study. 97 billion e-mails
A BNA, INC. DIGITAL DISCOVERY & E-EVIDENCE! VOL. 7, NO. 11 232-235 REPORT NOVEMBER 1, 2007 Reproduced with permission from Digital Discovery & e-evidence, Vol. 7, No. 11, 11/01/2007, pp. 232-235. Copyright
1 PROFESSIONALS MILLER CANFIELD LAW FIRM B. Jay Yelton III Michigan's New E-Discovery Rules Provide Ways to Reduce the Scope and Burdens of E-Discovery To a large extent Michigan's new e-discovery rules
Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys By Ronald S. Allen, Esq. As technology has evolved, the federal courts have
E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011 This presentation does not present the views of the U.S. Department of Justice. This presentation is not legal advice.
What is ediscovery? Electronic discovery ( ediscovery ) is discovery of electronic information in litigation. ediscovery in California is governed generally by the Civil Discovery Act. In 2009, the California
Electronic Record Retention and ediscovery Peter Pepiton ediscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance Agenda What is all this ediscovery buzz? Email is major focus of ESI Impact of New FRCP rules
Electronic Discovery L. Amy Blum, Esq. UCLA University of California, Los Angeles 1 Topics Not Covered Best practices for E-mail E use and retention in the ordinary course of business Records Disposition
Predictability in E-Discovery Presented by: John G. Roman, Jr. National Manager, Practice Group Technology Services Nixon Peabody LLP Tom Barce Assistant Director of Practice Support Fulbright & Jaworski
Digital Government Institute Managing E-Discovery for Government: Integrating Teams and Technology Larry Creech Program Manager Information Catalog Program Corporate Information Security Information Technology
E-DISCOVERY IN FEDERAL COURT: SIX CHANGES YOU SHOULD MAKE TO YOUR PRACTICE IN THE DISCOVERY PHASE OF THE CASE By Kary Pratt 1. YOU MUST CHANGE THE WAY YOU REQUEST DOCUMENTS - FRCP 34(a) explicitly recognizes
Electronically Stored Information Robert Avery Chief, Laboratory Services MI Dept. Natural Resources and Environment E S Electronically I Stored Information On December 1, 2006, new amendments to the Federal
The Top Ten List (and one) of Changes to the Federal Rules The List (1) The rules now refer to electronically stored information, which is on equal footing with paper. Rules 26(a)(1), 26(b)(2), 26(b)(5)(B),
Case 2:14-cv-02159-KHV-JPO Document 12 Filed 07/10/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KYLE ALEXANDER, and DYLAN SYMINGTON, on behalf of themselves and all those
Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery The tools to craft strategic discovery requests & mitigate the risks and burdens of production. Discussion Outline Part I Strategies for Requesting
COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT (994-001) Professors:Mark Austrian Christopher Racich Fall 2014 Introduction The ubiquitous use of computers, the
A Practical Guide to Understanding ediscovery for Insurance Claims Professionals ediscovery Defined and its Relationship to an Insurance Claim Simply put, ediscovery (or Electronic Discovery) refers to
Patent Litigation at the ITC: Views from the Government, In-House Attorneys and Outside Counsel In-House Panel Sponsored by: THE GIBBONS INSTITUTE OF LAW, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Seton Hall University School
GUIDELINES FOR USE OF THE MODEL AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION Experience increasingly demonstrates that discovery of electronically stored information ( ESI poses challenges
Electronic Discovery Answers to life s enduring questions 1 Electronic Discovery 1. Requirements: What do courts expect? 2. Potential consequences of missteps? Sanctions and unnecessary expense 3. Solutions:
COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA PRACTICE DIRECTION GUIDELINES REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS Introduction While electronic documents are included in the definition of document contained
ediscovery 101 Myth Busting October 29, 2009 Olivia Gerroll ediscovery Solutions Group Director Background Olivia Gerroll, ediscovery Solutions Group Director Over sixteen years of experience in litigation
November 2006 New E-Discovery Rules: Is Your Company Prepared? By Maureen O Neill, Kirby Behre and Anne Nergaard On December 1, 2006, amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( FRCP ) concerning
MDLA TTS August 23, 2013 ediscovery for DUMMIES LAWYERS Kate Burke Mortensen, Esq. email@example.com Scott Polus, Director of Forensic Services firstname.lastname@example.org 1 Where Do I Start??
UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE 1 What is ESI? Information that exists in a medium that can only be read through the use of computers Examples E-mail Word Documents Databases Spreadsheets Multimedia
1 2013 E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS TO THE MASSACHUSETTS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BOSTON E-DISCOVERY SUMMIT 2013 DECEMBER 3, 2013 CONTEXT 2006 FEDERAL COURT E-DISCOVERY AMENDMENTS The 2006 Federal E-Discovery
BEST PRACTICES FOR PREPARING YOUR BUSINESS FOR E-DISCOVERY I. Background The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for document production in the discovery process. Until recently, all types of documents
E-Discovery Guidance for Federal Government Professionals Summer 2014 Allison Stanton Director, E-Discovery, FOIA, & Records Civil Division, Department of Justice Adam Bain Senior Trial Counsel Civil Division,
Electronic Evidence and Discovery: The Changes in the Federal Rules April 25, 2007 Bill Belt Key dates» 2000 Judge Scheindlin coins term ESI in Boston College Law Review Article.» 2000 Chair of the Advisory
CIVIL PRACTICE DIRECTIVE #1 REFERENCE: CIV-PD #1 E-DISCOVERY GUIDELINES Former Reference: Practice Directive #6 issued September 1, 2009 Effective: July 1, 2013 Introduction 1. While electronic documents
Proactive Data Management for ediscovery Simon Taylor Snr. Director Information Management CommVault Systems Inc. Why ediscovery sucks for IT The US Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 34(a), (b) Definition
Article originally appeared in the Fall 2011 issue of The Professional Engineer Electronic Discovery in Litigation By Douglas P. Jeremiah, P.E., Esq. Your firm is involved in litigation and you get the
E-Discovery Basics For the RIM Professional By: Andy Sokol, CEDS, CSDS Adding A New Service Offering For Your Legal & Corporate Clients Learning Objectives What is Electronic Discovery? How Does E-Discovery
PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES What follows are some general, suggested guidelines for addressing different areas
BEYOND THE HYPE: UNDERSTANDING THE REAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE AMENDED FRCP PA G E : 1 BEYOND THE HYPE: Understanding the Real Implications of the Amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Clearwell Systems
3 "C" Words You Need to Know: Custody - Control - Cloud James Christiansen Chief Information Security Officer Evantix, Inc. Bradley Schaufenbuel Director of Information Security Midland States Bank Session
Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010 Presented by Brian Wilkinson, Director of ediscovery & Computer Forensics email@example.com 410-659-3473 Table of Contents Page 1 Electronic
California Electronic Discovery Rules William W. Belt, Jr. July 16, 2009 Today s speaker and some notes... Bill Belt William.Belt@LeClairRyan.com Welcome. With the high number of attendees, please note
Making Sense of E-Discovery: 10 Plain Steps for Producing ESI The following article provides a practical guide to producing electronically stored information (ESI) that lawyers can apply immediately in
Document Retention and Destruction in Oregon What Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents? Timothy W. Snider (503) 294-9557 firstname.lastname@example.org Stoel Rives
ZL UNIFIED ARCHIVE A Project Manager s Guide to E-Discovery ZL TECHNOLOGIES White Paper PAGE 1 A project manager s guide to e-discovery In civil litigation, the parties in a dispute are required to provide
The Law On Discovery and Production of Electronic Evidence: Where Are We Now? Where Are We Going? Glenn A. Smith June 10, 2009 Discovery On January 1, 2010, Rules will be amended by adding the following
Document management solutions Litigation Support glossary of Terms Learn How to Talk the Talk Covering litigation support from A to Z. Designed to help you come up to speed quickly on key terms and concepts,
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of E-Discovery and Depositions in U.S. IP Litigation Naoki Yoshida April 19, 2013 TOPICS E-Discovery in U.S. IP Litigation Depositions in U.S.
ESI: Federal Court An introduction to the new federal rules governing discovery of electronically stored information In September 2005, the Judicial Conference of the United States unanimously approved
Regents of the University of Colorado, The v. Allergan, Inc. et al Doc. 69 Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01562-MSK-NYW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
KNOW THYSELF: Proactively Using Information Governance and Advance Planning to Reduce the Burden and Expense of E-Discovery Jonathan D. Rudolph, General Counsel of Accumen Data Services Jeffrey D. Bukowski,
Everything You Wanted to Know About ESI and E-Discovery but Were Afraid to Ask Jason M. Pistacchio Presented By: Gregory S. Johnson Attorney Attorney/Legal Technologist Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP Paine
E-Discovery in Practice: A Roadmap for Financial Institutions Martha R. Mora Martha R. Mora, Esq. ARHM&F Avila Rodriguez Hernandez Mena & Ferri LLP 2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 1225, Coral Gables, Florida
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read
Acknowledgments Introduction: Welcome to the Labyrinth xi xiii CHAPTER 1 Gathering the Evidence 1 Form 1.1: General Preliminary Electronic Evidence Questions for Your Client 3 Form 1.2: Checklist to Define
Vincent T. Chang, Chair Federal Courts Committee New York County Lawyers Association 14 Vesey Street New York, NY 10007 March 20, 2013 COMMENTS OF THE NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION FEDERAL COURTS
Archiving and The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Understanding the Issues An ArcMail Technology Research Paper ArcMail Technology, Inc. 401 Edwards Street, Suite 1620 Shreveport, Louisiana 71101 www.arcmailtech.com
WhitePaper Concise Guide to E-discovery Contents i. Overview ii. Importance of e-discovery iii. How to prepare for e-discovery? iv. Key processes & issues v. The next step vi. Conclusion Overview E-discovery
A. Principles For Document Management Policies Arthur Anderson, LLD v. U.S., 544 U.S. 696 (2005) ( Document retention policies, which are created in part to keep certain information from getting into the
Florida E-Discovery 2013 Christopher.Hopkins @Akerman.com Palm Beach Bar Association Employment Law Committee Florida E-Discovery 2013 Download This PPT: InternetLawCommentary.com Palm Beach Bar Association
ESI Risk Assessment: Critical in Light of the new E-discovery and notification laws Scott Bailey, CISM Christopher Sobota, J.D. Enterprise Risk Management Group Disclaimer This presentation is for informational
THE IMPACT OF THE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY RULES ON THE EEOC PROCESS Cynthia L. Gibson, Esq. Katz, Teller, Brant & Hild 255 East Fifth Street Suite 2400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 (513) 977-3418 email@example.com
Digital Forensics, ediscovery and Electronic Evidence By Digital Forensics What Is It? Forensics is the use of science and technology to investigate and establish facts in a court of law. Digital forensics
Data Preservation Duties and Protocols November 2008 HOU:2858612.3 Discussion Outline I. The Differences Between Electronic and Paper Discovery II. The Parameters of Electronic Discovery III. Rule 37(e)
E-Discovery Quagmires An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure Rebecca Herold, CISSP, CISA, CISM, FLMI Final Draft for February 2007 CSI Alert While updating the two-day seminar Chris Grillo and
HOT TIPS ABOUT ESI Hot Tips From the Coolest Family Law Attorneys Friday, September 27, 2013 Melissa Fuller Brown 145 King Street, Ste. 405 Charleston, SC 29401 843-722- 8900 melissa@melissa- brown.com
William Mitchell E-Discovery Symposium Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions Mary T. Novacheck, Esq. Partner Bowman and Brooke LLP Outlaw's Motion: Cost Shift Vendor Fees to Willow Prior
EnCase Enterprise/ ediscovery Strategic Consulting EnCase customers now have a trusted expert advisor to meet their discovery goals. NightOwl Discovery offers complete support for the EnCase Enterprise
102 ediscovery Shakedown: Lowering your Risk Long-Term Care Session HCCA Compliance Institute April 27, 2009 Las Vegas, Nevada Presented by: Diane Kissel, Manager IS Risk & Compliance Kindred Healthcare,
Franchise Tax Board ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL Author: Evans Analyst: Deborah Barrett Bill Number: AB 5 See Legislative Related Bills: History Telephone: 845-4301 Introduced Date: December 1, 2008 Attorney:
E-discovery: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and their Implications for Public Sector Corrections Departments Andres De Aguero, Senior Lead, Deloitte Consulting LLP David F. Axelrod, Director, Deloitte
E-Discovery for Paralegals: Definition, Application and FRCP Changes April 27, 2007 IPE Seminar Initial Disclosures ESI Electronically Stored Information FRCP 26(a)(1)(B) all ESI must be disclosed initially
Navigating Information Governance and ediscovery Implementing Processes & Technology to Reduce Downstream ediscovery Cost and Risk Shannon Smith General Counsel, Globanet March 11 12, 2013 Agenda 1 Overview
Metadata, Electronic File Management and File Destruction By David Outerbridge, Torys LLP A. Metadata What is Metadata? Metadata is usually defined as data about data. It is a level of extra information
TM GUIDANCE SOFTWARE EnCASE ediscovery EnCase ediscovery Automatically search, identify, collect, preserve, and process electronically stored information across the network. GUIDANCE SOFTWARE EnCASE ediscovery
Any and all documents Meets Electronically Stored Information: Discovery in the Electronic Age Panel Members Judge Ronald L. Buch, Moderator Panelists The Honorable Paul W. Grimm U.S. District Court for
E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions 11 E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions Introduction Much has been said about
MARCH 7, 2007 E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers By Tara Daub and Christopher Gegwich News of the recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
2015 ANNUAL MEETING Vancouver, BC September 11, 2015 Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A New Scope of Discovery? 2010 DUKE CONFERENCE May 10-11 Duke Law School 200 Participants
Published on Arkansas Judiciary (https://courts.arkansas.gov) Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery. (a) Discovery Methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods:
E-DISCOVERY IN THE US A PRIMER Changing legal requirements and growing volumes of electronically stored information have made the discovery process more daunting and costly than ever before. This article