Part 107 Operating Rules UAV Coach, All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
- Baldwin Morris
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Part 107 Operating Rules 1
2 Goals of This Lecture According to the FAA s UAS Airman Certification Standards, a Remote PIC should be able to demonstrate knowledge of: Registration requirements for suas. The requirement for the suas to be in a condition for safe operation. Medical condition(s) that would interfere with safe operation of an suas. Responsibility and authority of the remote pilot in command. Allowing a person other than the remote PIC to manipulate the flight controls. Regulatory deviation and reporting requirements of in-flight emergencies. Hazardous operations, such as careless or reckless behavior or allowing an object to be dropped. Operating from a moving aircraft or moving land- or water-borne vehicle. Alcohol or drugs and the provisions on prohibition of use. Offenses involving alcohol or drugs. 2
3 Goals of This Lecture According to the FAA s UAS Airman Certification Standards, a Remote PIC should be able to demonstrate knowledge of: The consequences of refusing to submit to a drug or alcohol test or to furnish test results. Daylight operation. Visual line of sight (VLOS) aircraft operations. The requirements when a visual observer is used. The prohibition of operating multiple suas. The prohibition of carrying hazardous material. Staying safely away from other aircraft and right-of-way rules. See and avoid other aircraft and other potential hazard considerations of the remote pilot in command. Operations over human beings. 3
4 Goals of This Lecture According to the FAA s UAS Airman Certification Standards, a Remote PIC should be able to demonstrate knowledge of: Prior authorization required for operation in certain airspace. Operation in the vicinity of airports. Operation in prohibited or restricted areas. Flight restrictions in the proximity of certain areas designated by notice to airmen (NOTAM). Preflight familiarization, inspection, and actions for aircraft operations. Operating limitations for small unmanned aircraft. Maximum ground speed. Altitude limitations. Minimum visibility. Cloud clearance requirements. Flights defined as public aircraft operations. 4
5 Registration Requirements
6 6
7 Foreign Aircraft Permit Required if civil aircraft is: Registered in another country Owned, controlled, or operated by someone who is not a U.S. citizen or permanent resident 7
8 suas must be registered if the total aircraft weight is greater than 0.55 lbs and less than 55 lbs. 8
9 If the owner is less than 13 years of age, then the UA must be registered by a person who is at least 13 years of age. 9
10 Mark Your Aircraft When you register, you will receive a unique registration number valid for three years. After three years, you must renew your aircraft registration. You must mark each aircraft with the assigned unique registration number before it is operated. 10
11 A medical certificate is not required, but the remote PIC, the person manipulating the controls, the visual observer, and anyone else taking part in the suas operation need to be physically and mentally fit. 11
12 Remote PIC
13 While he or she must be designated before each flight, the Remote PIC can change during flight from one Remote PIC to another, as long as both are maintaining visual line-of-sight and control of the UA. 13
14 Role of the Remote PIC The Remote PIC is directly responsible for and is the final authority on the operation of the suas under Part 107. Assessing the operating environment Briefing crew members Ensuring all control links are working Monitoring battery power Monitoring payloads Ensuring all documents are easily accessible 14
15 Checklists are a Remote PIC s best friend. 15
16 Person Manipulating the Controls
17 Operating Requirements You are being directly supervised by a remote PIC who has met the recurrent testing/training requirement. The remote PIC has the ability to immediately take direct control of the suas. 17
18 1) Stand close enough to physically take over the control station. 2) Use a buddy box system with two control stations. 3) Use a pre-programmed safe-mode system with "home" or "hover" functions. 18
19 Visual Observer
20 Operating Conditions The role of a visual observer (VO) is to alert the rest of the crew about potential hazards during suas operations. The use of VOs is optional. The Remote PIC must make certain that all VOs: Are positioned in a location where they are able to see the suas continuously and sufficiently to maintain visual line-of-sight. Possess a means to effectively communicate the suas position and the position of other aircraft to the remote PIC and person manipulating the controls. 20
21 suas Operations
22 In case of an in-flight emergency, the Remote PIC is permitted to deviate from Part 107 to the extent necessary to respond to that emergency. 22
23 Types of Hazardous Operation Operations that interfere with manned aircraft operations Operating an suas over persons not directly participating in the operation Loading the suas beyond its capabilities to the point of losing control Failure to consider weather conditions near structures, trees, or rolling terrain when operating in a densely populated area Flying near emergency responders, firefighters or police during a crisis 23
24 Part 107 permits operation of an suas from a moving land or water-borne vehicle but only if the area is sparsely populated....but operation from a moving aircraft is prohibited. 24
25 Alcohol / Drugs No crewmember operation if: Drank alcohol within the preceding 8 hours Has a blood alcohol concentration of.04 percent or greater Using a drug that affects mental or physical capabilities 25
26 Daylight Operation Part 107 prohibits operation of an suas at night, but you CAN fly from the 30 minutes before official sunrise (morning civil twilight) to the 30 minutes after official sunset (evening civil twilight). During daylight, suas operations are permitted, but if you re flying in that 30-minute civil twilight period, your UA must be equipped with anti-collision lights that are capable of being visible for at least 3 miles in all directions. 26
27 It s required to maintain VLOS under Part
28 To scan for traffic, the crew should systematically focus on different segments of the sky for short intervals. 28
29 Miscellaneous Operating Rules No simultaneous operation of multiple UAs No carriage of hazardous material See and Avoid No interfering with operations and traffic patterns at any airport, heliport, or seaplane base. The Remote PIC also has a responsibility to remain clear of and yield right-of-way to all other aircraft and to avoid other potential hazards that may affect the remote PIC s operation of the aircraft. 29
30 Flying Over People Part 107 prohibits a person from flying a small UA directly over a person who is not under a safe cover, such as a protective structure or a stationary vehicle. However, a small UA may be flown over a person who is directly participating in the operation of the suas. This includes the remote PIC, another person manipulating the controls, a VO, and crewmembers who are necessary for the safety of the suas operation, as assigned and briefed by the remote PIC ahead of time. 30
31 Operations are allowed in Class B, Class C, and Class D airspace, and within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of Class E airspace designated for an airport, but only if the PIC has prior authorization from air traffic control (ATC). 31
32 TFRs and NOTAMs Common TFRs that relate to suas operations include, but are not limited to: Presidential TFRs and NOTAMs Emergency response TFRs and NOTAMs Standing TFRs that go into and out of effect (e.g., stadiums for sporting events) 32
33 No person may operate a small unmanned aircraft in Prohibited or Restricted areas unless that person has permission from the using or controlling agency, as appropriate. 33
34 suas Operating Limitations May not be flown faster than a groundspeed of 87 knots (100 mph) May not be flown higher than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). However, if it s flown within a 400-foot radius of a structure, it can go to a maximum of 400 feet above the structure s immediate uppermost limit. 34
35 Maximum Altitude Limit If UA is flown within a 400-foot radius of a structure, it can go to a maximum of 400 feet above the structure s immediate uppermost limit. 35
36 suas Operating Limitations Minimum visibility, as observed from the location of the Control Station (CS), may not be less than 3 statute miles (sm); and If there are clouds, the UA must be at least 500 feet below the clouds and at least 2,000 feet horizontally from the clouds. 36
37 The content in this course is not legal advice, and if you have any questions about complying under Part 107, or other legal considerations like business formation, release forms, and client contracts, you should seek out a lawyer for professional advice. 37
For the purpose of see-and-avoid, visual observers must be utilized at all times
2009-WSA-92 WARNING: This correspondence may contain Sensitive Security Information and attachments that are controlled under 49 CFR 15 and 1520. No part of this correspondence may be disclosed to persons
Advisory Circular. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (suas) Advisory Circular Date: 6/21/16 AC No: 107-2 Initiated by: AFS-800 Change: The Federal
How To Discuss Unmanned Aircraft System (Uas)
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) for American Association of Port Authorities Administration and Legal Issues Seminar New Orleans, LA April 9, 2015 Briefly about Flight Guardian Our Services: Educating public
Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. DEFINITION 4 3. UAS CLASSIFICATION 6 4. REGULATORY PRINCIPLES 16 5. INTERACTION WITH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 16
FOREWORD Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. DEFINITION 4 3. UAS CLASSIFICATION 6 4. REGULATORY PRINCIPLES 16 5. INTERACTION WITH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 16 6. SENSE AND AVOID ( required for applicants
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
October 30, 2015 Exemption No. 13453 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2819 Ms. Joanne Williamson Hawaiian Electric Companies 820 Ward Avenue Honolulu, HI 96814 Dear Ms. Williamson: This letter is to inform
Ministry of Civil Aviation ECAR Part 103 Egyptian Civil Aviation Authority. Part 103 ULTRALIGHT VEHICLES. Issue 5, Rev. 0 Dated May, 2012 Page 1
Ministry of Civil Aviation ECAR Part 103 Part 103 ULTRALIGHT VEHICLES Issue 5, Rev. 0 Dated May, 2012 Page 1 U U ECAR Part 103 Ministry of Civil Aviation UTABLE OF CONTENTS 0BITEM SUBPART 4B A: 103.1U
October 16, 2015. Exemption No. 11175A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0846
October 16, 2015 Mr. Todd Binion Innovation Manager State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 1 State Farm Plaza Bloomington, IL 61710 Dear Mr. Binion: Exemption No. 11175A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0846
Airspace. Chapter 14. Introduction
Chapter 14 Airspace Introduction The two categories of airspace are: regulatory and nonregulatory. Within these two categories there are four types: controlled, uncontrolled, special use, and other airspace.
VFR Regulations Summary
Gold Seal Online Ground School www.onlinegroundschool.com VFR Regulations Summary Pilot in Command The pilot in command is directly responsible for and the final authority as to the operation of the aircraft.
October 6, 2015. Exemption No. 13100 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2920
October 6, 2015 Exemption No. 13100 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2920 Ms. Denise Martin President and Owner Night Hawk Security and Consulting, LLC 3901 Barrett Drive, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27622 Dear
February 4, 2016. Exemption No. 14672 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 3613
February 4, 2016 Exemption No. 14672 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 3613 Mr. Phil Case Public Surveyor Gourdie-Fraser, Inc. 123 West Front Street Traverse City, MI 49684 Dear Mr. Case: This letter is to
Use of RPAS/Drones in Norway
Use of RPAS/Drones in Norway Publisert: 23 mai 2016 13:05 CEST Oppdatert: 08 jun 2016 09:56 CEST Send på epost About Drones Drones Use of drones, or RPAS (Remotely piloted aircraft system) is regulated
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 1, 2015 Exemption No. 12690 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1352 Ms. Kristen Brumbaugh Blackhound Creative Werks 328 Bluestem Drive Elgin, SC 29045 Dear Ms. Brumbaugh: This letter is to inform
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 10, 2015 Exemption No. 12810 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2346 Mr. Jorge Sosa JOSA Industries, LLC 163 Rue du Belier, Apartment 104 Lafayette, LA 70506 Dear Mr. Sosa: This letter is to inform
SAFETY ADVISOR UAS IN THE USA MANNED & UNMANNED AIRCRAFT FLYING TOGETHER SAFELY
AIR SAFETY INSTITUTE 421 AVIATION WAY, FREDERICK, MD 21701 800.638.3103 AIRSAFETYINSTITUTE.ORG SAFETY ADVISOR A DIVISION OF THE AOPA FOUNDATION UAS IN THE USA MANNED & UNMANNED AIRCRAFT FLYING TOGETHER
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 25, 2015 Exemption No. 12599 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0959 Mr. Donald Lee 22705 Northeast Mountain View Court Ridgefield, WA 98642 Dear Mr. Lee: This letter is to inform you that we have granted
Bridging Document - 14 CFR Part 91 (up to Amd. 91-336) to the GACAR
Bridging Document - 14 CR Part 91 (up to Amd. 91-336) to the ACAR 14 CR Part 91 A eneral 91.1 Applicability. 91.1 A eneral 91.3 Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command. 91.3 A eneral 91.5
CHAPTER 7. AIRSPACE 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
CHAPTER 7. AIRSPACE 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 7.1.1 Definition of Resource Airspace management is defined as directing, controlling, and handling flight operations in the volume of air that overlies the
AIRSPACE EXPLAINED. Separation of Traffic
AIRSPACE EXPLAINED Airspace is an area of aeronautical knowledge that is commonly poorly demonstrated on airman practical tests. Even when airman applicants demonstrate knowledge of the airspace system
Exemption No. 11109 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591
Exemption No. 11109 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591 In the matter of the petition of CLAYCO, INC. Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2014
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
March 26, 2015 Exemption No. 11238 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0719 Mr. Dallas Cormier San Diego Gas & Electric Company 101 Ash Street San Diego, CA 92101 Dear Mr. Cormier: This letter is to inform
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) UAS 101 Presented to: Airports Consultant Council Technical Workshop Presented by: Victoria Wei, Deputy Director Airport Planning and Programming Date: July 16, 2015 FAA
Henry H. Perritt, Jr. Attorney at Law 1131 Carol Lane Glencoe, IL 60022 hperritt@gmail.com (312) 504-5001 12 August 2014
Henry H. Perritt, Jr. Attorney at Law 1131 Carol Lane Glencoe, IL 60022 hperritt@gmail.com (312) 504-5001 12 August 2014 Hon. Michael Huerta Administrator Federal Aviation Administration U. S. Department
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12732 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1831 Mr. Ed Wilke Lockheed Martin 16020 Empire Grade Road Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Dear Mr. Wilke: This letter is to inform you that we
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 22, 2015 Exemption No. 12959 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2721 Mr. Matt Riggs London Offshore Consultants 16800 Imperial Valley Drive, Suite 280 Houston, TX 77060 Dear Mr. Riggs: This letter
Service, Security, Solutions Since 1924. Insurance and Risk Management Considerations for UAS RPAS Symposium, Montreal. March 2015
Service, Security, Solutions Since 1924 Insurance and Risk Management Considerations for UAS RPAS Symposium, Montreal Global Aerospace Begins Spirit of St. Louis First Transatlantic flight by unmanned
FACT SHEET UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS)
FAA News Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC 20591 Updated February 2015 Contact: Les Dorr or Alison Duquette Phone: (202) 267-3883 FACT SHEET UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS) Unmanned aircraft
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 27, 2015 Exemption No. 12640 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2422 Mr. Doug Andriuk Revolution UAS, LLC 14812 North 60th Street Scottsdale, AZ 85254 Dear Mr. Andriuk: This letter is to inform you
Application for Special Flight Operations Certificate Standing Restricted Operator - Complex Application Process File # AA-01012015-01
Application for Special Flight Operations Certificate Standing Restricted Operator - Complex Application Process File # AA-01012015-01 Operator Name Address City, Province Postal Code P 902 555-1212 E
Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
Billing Code 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 21, 43, 45, 47, 61, 91, 101, 107, and 183 [Docket No.: FAA-2015-0150; Notice No. 15-01] RIN 2120 AJ60 Operation
Exemption No. 10513A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1070
January 30, 2013 Exemption No. 10513A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1070 Mr. Alan M. Hoffberg Board Secretary/Director Angel Flight Southeast, Inc., and Mercy Flight Southeast 8864 Airport Boulevard Leesburg,
Department of Transportation
Vol. 80 Monday, No. 35 February 23, 2015 Part III Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 21, 43, 45, et al. Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems;
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
June 8, 2015 Exemption No. 11776 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0928 Mr. Gregory S. Winton, Esq. Counsel for Cardno Limited The Aviation Law Firm 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway Suite 300 Annapolis, MD
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 14, 2015 Exemption No. 12839 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2003 Mr. Ryan Wellvang 723 South Wisconsin Avenue Rice Lake, WI 54868 Dear Mr. Wellvang: This letter is to inform you that we have
Functional Hazard Assessment (FHA) Report for Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Distribution: EUROCONTROL Ebeni Holger Matthiesen Hayley Burdett Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Safety Case Development Chris Machin Joanne Stoker Don Harris Alan Simpson Functional Hazard Assessment (FHA)
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
] September 10, 2015 Exemption No. 12819 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2595 Mr. Jimmy Clark JimmyC LTD 176 Trails End Ranch Cedar Creek, TX 78612 Dear Mr. Clark: This letter is to inform you that we have
Academy of Model Aeronautics. Requirements for the Operation of Remote Control (RC) Aircraft at Full Scale Airshows
1. Background: Academy of Model Aeronautics Requirements for the Operation of Remote Control (RC) Aircraft at Full Scale Airshows Over the years, many AMA member clubs have performed at full-scale airshows.
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
June 16, 2015 Exemption No. 11810 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1082 Ryan P. Corey Vertical Imagery LLC P.O. Box 1345 2275 Dead Indian Memorial Road Ashland, OR 97520 Dear Mr. Corey: This letter is to
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 11, 2015 Exemption No. 12436 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1405 Mr. Terry Lankford Skeye I LLC 4537 513th Avenue Ames, IA 50014 Dear Mr. Lankford: This letter is to inform you that we have granted
Safety Considerations When Performing aerial Imaging Site inspections
September 16, 2015 Exemption No. 12864 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2162 Mr. David B. Churchill Professional Claims Services, Inc. 1235 Holmgrove Drive San Marcos, CA 92078 Dear Mr. Churchill: This letter
Integration of Drones in Civil Airspace
Integration of Drones in Civil Airspace «Game of Drones» Catherine Ronflé-Nadaud February 2016 www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr DGAC /DSNA /DTI French Air Navigation Service Provider is responsible for
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 20, 2015 Exemption No. 12536 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1500 Mr. Marcel Piet 16701 SE. McGillivray, Suite 210 Dear Mr. Piet: This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12729 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1052 Mr. Dan Skaggs Principal HSEarchitects 914 North Broadway Avenue, Suite 200 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Dear Mr. Skaggs: This letter
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 27, 2015 Exemption No. 12628 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1447 Mr. Michael R. Monar Monar Aero 3250 West Crystal Street Unit 3 Chicago, IL 60651 Dear Mr. Monar: This letter is to inform you that
SPORT PILOT TRAINING SYLLABUS
Checked out from the Members Only Library Page 1 of 13 Society of Aviation and Flight Educators www.safepilots.0rg SPORT PILOT TRAINING SYLLABUS LESSON ONE: INTRODUCTORY FLIGHT TIME: 1 hour Ground Instruction;
Airworthiness Certification
October 1, 2015 Exemption No. 13054 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2874 Mr. Edford A. Coffey 1211 Long Branch Road Louisa, KY 41230 Dear Mr. Coffey: This letter is to inform you that we have granted your
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
July 17, 2015 Exemption No. 12070 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1339 Mr. Drew Schulte SDHS, Inc. dba San Diego Home Sales 2683 Via De La Valle, G-227 Del Mar, CA 92014 Dear Mr. Schulte: This letter is
FAR/AIM Sport Pilot Study Guide
This FAR/AIM Study Guide is meant to be used with Sport Pilot Checkride by Paul Hamilton (#ASA-F2F-CKRIDE) to help sport pilot license candidates understand regulations affecting pilots flying LSA. Specific
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 24, 2015 Exemption No. 12564 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2390 Mr. J. August Shoemaker, Esq. Counsel for Pinpoint Services, Inc. 100 North 12th Street, Suite 605 Lincoln, NE 68508 Dear Mr. Shoemaker:
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 20, 2015 Exemption No. 12534 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1364 Mr. John W. Gunnett, P.G. Skelly and Loy, Inc. 449 Eisenhower Boulevard Suite 300 Harrisburg, PA 17111-2302 Dear Mr. Gunnett: This
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
June 25, 2015 Exemption No. 11909 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1253 Mr. Andrew Bernstein GraVoc Associates, Inc. 81 Main Street Peabody, MA 01960 Dear Mr. Bernstein: This letter is to inform you that
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
June 29, 2015 Exemption No. 11937 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1363 Mr. John L. Wright The Law Office of John L. Wright, PC Counsel for Xizmo Media Productions, LLC 11705 Airport Way, Suite 307 Broomfield,
Airworthiness Certification
October 1, 2015 Exemption No. 13052 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2848 Mr. Carey Fujita 16714 Patronella Avenue Torrance, CA 90504 Dear Mr. Fujita: This letter is to inform you that we have granted your
CHAPTER 2 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) NAVPERS 18068-2F CH-64
CHAPTER 2 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) NAVPERS 18068-2F CH-64 Updated: October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER (AC) SCOPE OF RATING GENERAL INFORMATION AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER CONTROL TOWER
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
July 28, 2015 Exemption No. 12179 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1718 Mr. Jeremy Shick Owner Shick Web Design, LLC 230 East Park Avenue, Suite 31 Lake Wales, FL 33853 Dear Mr. Shick: This letter is to
2014 UPDATES. Current Through: 03/06/14
2014 UPDATES Current Through: 03/06/14 The Gleim FAR/AIM is published annually. Gleim keeps you up-to-date with FAA changes via online and email updates. Changes to the FARs can be released by the FAA
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12717 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2512 Mr. Russell A. Graves P.O. Box 68 Childress, TX 79201 Dear Mr. Graves: This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12730 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0791 Mr. Kenneth Shelton Ken Shelton Photography 7546 Trillium Boulevard Sarasota, FL 34241 Dear Mr. Shelton: This letter is to inform
The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 2 Vision +, DJI Inspire 1, and DJI S1000.
August 27, 2015 Exemption No. 12639 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2426 Ms. Carmen P. Gackstetter CEO Raven Executive & Security Services, Inc. 7111 Dixie Highway, #149 Clarkston, MI 48346 Dear Ms. Gackstetter:
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12724 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2506 Mr. Timothy A. Selman Realistic Image 1111 Classic Drive Valrico, FL 33594 Dear Mr. Selman: This letter is to inform you that we
Oral Preparation Questions
Oral Preparation Questions The oral section of the practical test is the time when you need to demonstrate your understanding of the various tasks listed in the practical test standards and the factors
December I 8, 20 14. U.S. Department oftransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
0 K titatd AT SALINA AVIATION :; 0 (I) December I 8, 20 14 U.S. Department oftransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Exemption Request under Section 333
FACTUAL REPORT AVIATION
Location/Time Aircraft Registration Number: Most Critical Injury: Minor Investigated By: NTSB N911BL Nearest /Place Zip Code Local Time Time Zone Las Vegas NV 89032 1600 PDT Airport Proximity: On Airport/Airstrip
Application for Special Flight Operations Certificate File # ABC123. Company Name Address Phone Email
Application for Special Flight Operations Certificate File # ABC123 Company Name Address Phone Email NOTE: This sample is provided as is by flitelab.com It is meant for reference only. It should only be
Exemption No. 11366 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0108
April 17, 2015 Exemption No. 11366 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0108 Mr. Norman Hirsch Florida Aerials, LLC 422 Coral Cove Drive North Palm Beach, FL 33408 Dear Mr. Hirsch: This letter is to inform you
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 11, 2015 Exemption No. 12824 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2577 Mr. Marc Ceres 1397 West Phillips Boulevard Pomona, CA 92021 Dear Mr. Ceres: This letter is to inform you that we have granted
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. National Policy. SUBJ: OpSpec A021, Helicopter Air Ambulance (HAA) Operations
NOTICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION National Policy N 8900.A021 Effective Date: XX/XX/XX Cancellation Date: XX/XX/XX SUBJ: OpSpec A021, Helicopter Air Ambulance (HAA)
EAA SPORT PILOT SOURCEBOOK
EAA SPORT PILOT SOURCEBOOK A NEW AVIATION HORIZON In 2004, the FAA created sport pilot/light-sport aircraft (SP/LSA) regulations. The most significant change in FAA regulations in 50 years, it allows easier
Exemption No. 11188 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591
Exemption No. 11188 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591 In the matter of the petition of STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Using Tactical Unmanned Aerial Systems to Monitor and Map Wildfires
Using Tactical Unmanned Aerial Systems to Monitor and Map Wildfires Michael Tranchitella, Stephen Fujikawa, Tzer Leei Ng, David Yoel, Don Tatum IntelliTech Microsystems, Inc. Bowie, Maryland Philippe Roy,
The Basis for Our Decision
October 31, 2014 Exemption No. 10009C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0702 Mr. Stephen Craven Angel Flight Mid-Atlantic Airlift Hope of America Mercy Medical Airlift 4620 Haygood Road, Suite 1 Virginia
Flight Review. The flight review is required by Federal Aviation Regulations for all pilots who intend to act as pilot in command of an aircraft.
S A F E T Y A D V I S O R Regulations No. 2 Pilot s Guide to the Flight Review This Safety Advisor provides guidance to pilots and flight instructors for the conduct of flight reviews and to convey current
2. APPLICABILITY. This AC provides information for any person who engages in public aircraft operations (PAO) as defined by the statute.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Public Aircraft Operations Date: 2/12/14 Initiated by: AFS-800 AC No: 00-1.1A Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory
Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the status of the safe
STATEMENT OF MARGARET GILLIGAN, ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR AVIATION SAFETY, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA), BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE & TRANSPORTATION, SUBCOMMITTEE ON AVIATION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy
NOTICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Air Traffic Organization Policy N JO 7110.495 Effective Date: January 15, 2009 Cancellation Date: January 14, 2010 SUBJ: Unmanned
8-1 Chapter 8 Radio Operations: Aviation Spoken Here
8-1 Chapter 8 Radio Operations: Aviation Spoken Here Radio Technique 1. [8-2/1/1] Using the radio is no great mystery. When transmitting, hold the radio close to your. A. mouth B. ear C. tongue VHF Transmitions
Exemption No. 11485 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0313
May 5, 2015 Exemption No. 11485 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0313 Mr. Matthew Kenney Technical Program Manager Donan Solutions, LLC 2101 Production Drive Louisville, KY 40299 Dear Mr. Kenney: This letter
Bridging integration THOMPSON WIMMER THE. Unmanned aircraft SyStem test Site/airport GUide STRENGTH INNOVATION
THOMPSON WIMMER THE STRENGTH OF INNOVATION Bridging integration Bridging integration Unmanned aircraft SyStem test Site/airport GUide Distribution Restriction: Proprietary Information Release Statement
Minimum Safety Requirements for Helicopter Landing Areas used on Regular basis.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP SAFDARJANG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 4 AERODROME STANDARDS & LICENSING SERIES 'B' PART
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
September 11, 2015 Exemption No. 12829 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 1974 Mr. Mark C. Pope Site Safety Solutions LLC P.O. Box 1367 Hayesville, NC.28904 Dear Mr. Pope: This letter is to inform you that
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 25, 2015 Exemption No. 12588 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0708 Mr. Dane B. Jaques Counsel for Pacific Gas and Electric Company McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP 1676 International Drive, Penthouse McLean,
The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom 3 Professional and DJI Inspire 1.
October 1, 2015 Exemption No. 13050 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2786 Mr. Bruce Rowley CEO/Principal RSA Marketing 400 South Commerce Wichita, KA 67202 Dear Mr. Rowley: This letter is to inform you that
NAMIBIAN RADIO LICENSE VALIDATION
NAMIBIAN RADIO LICENSE VALIDATION Introduction This procedure is provided as a guide for applicants wishing to complete a Namibian Radio license validation, a requirement of a Namibian Pilot License Validation.
Oregon s Land Use Planning & Air Space Analysis (FAA 7560-1)
Oregon s Land Use Planning & Air Space Analysis (FAA 7560-1) 836.035 Effect of statute on airport zoning. ORS 836.005 to 836.120, 836.200, 836.205, 836.215, 836.220 and 836.240 do not limit any right,
A101 SAFETY/ADM/ORM/CRM
A101 SAFETY/ADM/ORM/CRM References: Air Force Regulations Federal Aviation Regulations FAA-H-8083-25A, Pilot s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, Chapter 17 (pgs 17-1 to 17-6) IFS Local Flying Procedures,
Re: Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Filed with www.regulations.gov January 2, 2015 Re: Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 of the
March 21, 2011. Dear Ranking Member Costello:
U.S. Department of The Inspector General Office of Inspector General Transportation Washington, DC 20590 Office of the Secretary of Transportation March 21, 2011 The Honorable Jerry F. Costello Ranking
Private Pilot Checkride Checklist
Private Pilot Checkride Checklist From the PPSEL/CPSEL Flight Instructor Notebook Bridgette Doremire Gene Hudson PRIVATE PILOT CHECKRIDE CHECKLIST Private Pilot Checkride Checklist Part 61 Student Pilot
THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT (Cap...) THE CIVIL AVIATION (PARACHUTE OPERATIONS) REGULATIONS,... ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS PART I PRELIMINARY
LEGAL NOTICE NO... THE CIVIL AVIATION ACT (Cap...) THE CIVIL AVIATION (PARACHUTE OPERATIONS) REGULATIONS,... ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS Regulation 1. Citation 2. Interpretation 3. Application PART I PRELIMINARY
Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE)
Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE) NPRM Review and Recommendations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Parts 1, 91, 120, and 135 [Docket No. FAA 2010 0982;
LAW ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUSPECTED UNAUTHORIZED UAS OPERATIONS
1 LAW ENFORCEMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUSPECTED UNAUTHORIZED UAS OPERATIONS Issue There is evidence of a considerable increase in the unauthorized use of small, inexpensive Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) by
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
August 25, 2015 Exemption No. 12597 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2183 Mr. Cody Porche Porche Aerial Imagery 5853 East Kayleigh Lane Lake Charles, LA 70605 Dear Mr. Porche: This letter is to inform you
See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.
July 15, 2015 Exemption No. 12064 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 0153 Mr. Scott Eveld Aerial Information Technologies 27543 Ethan Allen Way Menifee, CA 92585 Dear Mr. Eveld: This letter is to inform you
AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE Pressure Altitude And Density Altitude
Performance- Page 67 AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE Pressure Altitude And Density Altitude Pressure altitude is indicated altitude corrected for nonstandard pressure. It is determined by setting 29.92 in the altimeter
LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT CLASS D CONTROLLED AIRSPACE GUIDE
CLASS D CONTROLLED AIRSPACE GUIDE Introduction From the 2 nd of April 2015 London Southend Airport (LSA) will be implementing Class D (CAS). This airspace is made up of a Control Zone (CTR) and Control
Information to VFR pilots
Information to VFR pilots Information to VFR pilots This publication has been prepared by Naviair with the purpose of focusing on flight safety and clarifies topics, which are important to know for VFR
Part 135. Air Operations Helicopters and Small Aeroplanes. CAA Consolidation. 24 September 2015
Part 135 CAA Consolidation 24 September 2015 Air Operations Helicopters and Small Aeroplanes Published by the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand DESCRIPTION Part 135 prescribes the operating requirements
Piloting Times and the FAA Form 8710-1
www.sheppardair.com Piloting Times and the FAA Form 8710-1 How to fill out the FAA Form 8710-1 for your Mil Comp to Commercial Pilot / Instrument rating application, or for your ATP flying program: In
September 2, 2015. Exemption No. 12723 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2126. Mr. Robert Augustine 106 Valleyview Drive Bardstown, KY 40004
September 2, 2015 Exemption No. 12723 Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2015 2126 Mr. Robert Augustine 106 Valleyview Drive Bardstown, KY 40004 Dear Mr. Augustine: This letter is to inform you that we have granted
PART 61 CERTIFICATION: PILOTS, FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND GROUND INSTRUCTORS
Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 61 PART 61 CERTIFICATION: PILOTS, FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND GROUND INSTRUCTORS SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. 73 SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO.