Score Report. Test Administered WAIS-IV (6/9/2010) Age at Testing 19 years 1 month Retest? No. WIAT III (6/15/2010) 19 years 1 month No

Transcription

1 Report Examinee Name Date of Report 4/9/2011 Examinee ID Grade 12 Date of Birth 5/3/1991 Home Language English Gender Male Handedness Left Race/Ethnicity White Examiner Name Amy Gabel Test Administered WAIS-IV (6/9/2010) Age at Testing 19 years 1 month Retest? No WAIS IV Comments Thinking of college- WIAT III Comments WIAT III (6/15/2010) 19 years 1 month No Composite Summary Scale Sum of s Composite 95% Confidence Interval Qualitative Description Verbal Comprehension 39 VCI High Average Perceptual Reasoning 38 PRI High Average Working Memory 15 WMI Low Average Processing Speed 14 PSI Low Average Full Scale 106 FSIQ Average General Ability 77 GAI High Average Confidence Intervals are based on the Overall Average SEMs. Values reported in the SEM column are based on the examinee s age. The GAI is an optional composite summary score that is less sensitive to the influence of working memory and processing speed. Because working memory and processing speed are vital to a comprehensive evaluation of cognitive ability, it should be noted that the GAI does not have the breadth of construct coverage as the FSIQ. Page 1 of 12

2 Composite Profile The vertical bars represent the standard error of measurement (SEM). Composite s and Standard Error of Measurement Composite SEM VCI PRI WMI PSI FSIQ GAI Index Level Discrepancy Comparisons Comparison 1 2 Critical Value.05 Y / N Base Rate Overall Sample VCI - PRI N 48.2 VCI - WMI Y 1.5 VCI - PSI Y 2.6 PRI - WMI Y 1.7 PRI - PSI Y 2.3 WMI - PSI N 45.7 FSIQ - GAI Y 0.2 Base rate by overall sample. Statistical significance (critical value) at the.05 level. Page 2 of 12

3 Verbal Comprehension s Summary Reference Group SEM Similarities Vocabulary Information Perceptual Reasoning s Summary Reference Group Block Design Matrix Reasoning Visual Puzzles Working Memory s Summary Reference Group Digit Span Arithmetic (Letter-Number Seq.) Processing Speed s Summary Reference Group Symbol Search Coding Level Discrepancy Comparisons Comparison 1 2 Critical Value.05 Y / N Digit Span - Arithmetic Y 16.9 Symbol Search - Coding Y 8 Statistical significance (critical value) at the.05 level. SEM SEM SEM Base Rate Page 3 of 12

4 Profile The vertical bars represent the standard error of measurement (SEM) Determining Strengths and Weaknesses s Between and Overall Mean of s Mean Critical Value.05 Strength or Weakness Base Rate Block Design >25% Similarities % Digit Span W 2-5% Matrix Reasoning % Vocabulary S 2-5% Arithmetic >25% Symbol Search >25% Visual Puzzles >25% Information >25% Coding W 1-2% Overall: Mean = 10.6, Scatter = 10, Base rate = 8.9. Base Rate for Intersubtest Scatter is reported for 10 Full Scale s. Statistical significance (critical value) at the.05 level. Page 4 of 12

5 Working Memory Process Summary Process Base Rate Digit Span Forward Digit Span Backward Digit Span Sequencing Longest Digit Span Forward Longest Digit Span Backward Longest Digit Span Sequence Process Level Discrepancy Comparisons Process Comparison 1 2 Critical Value.05 Y / N Digit Span Forward - Digit Span Backward Y 3.4 Digit Span Forward - Digit Span Sequencing Y 4.6 Digit Span Backward - Digit Span Sequencing N Longest DS Forward - Longest DS Backward Longest DS Forward - Longest DS Sequence Longest DS Backward - Longest DS Sequence Statistical significance (critical value) at the.05 level. SEM Base Rate Page 5 of 12

6 WIAT III Results Summary Standard 95% Confidence Interval Normal Curve Equiv. Stanine Grade Equiv. Age Equiv. Listening Comprehension >12.9 >19:11 Reading Comprehension 32* :0 Math Problem Solving >12.9 >19:11 Sentence Composition :8 Word Reading :0 Essay Composition :1 Pseudoword Decoding :4 Numerical Operations >12.9 >19:11 Oral Expression :2 Spelling >19:11 Math Fluency Addition >12.9 >19:11 Math Fluency Subtraction >12.9 >19:11 Math Fluency Multiplication >12.9 >19:11 Indicates a subtest with multiple raw scores (shown in the Component Summary). * Indicates a raw score that is converted to a weighted raw score (not shown). Indicates that a raw score is based on a below grade level item set. Page 6 of 12

7 Profile Note. The vertical bars represent the confidence interval at 95%. Supplemental Summary Name Standard 95% Confidence Interval Normal Curve Equiv. Stanine Grade Equiv. Age Equiv. Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics :4 * Indicates a raw score that is converted to a weighted raw score (not shown). Page 7 of 12

8 Component Summary Component Listening Comprehension Standard Normal Curve Equivalent Stanine Qualitative Description Receptive Vocabulary Above Average Oral Discourse Comprehension Average Sentence Composition Sentence Combining Average Sentence Building Below Average Essay Composition Word Count Below Average Theme Development and Text Organization Average Oral Expression Expressive Vocabulary Average Oral Word Fluency Below Average Sentence Repetition Average Composite Summary Sum of 95% Normal Standard Standard Confidence Curve Qualitative Composite s Interval Equiv. Stanine Description Oral Language Average Basic Reading Average Written Expression Average Mathematics Above Average Math Fluency Average Page 8 of 12

9 Composite Profile Note. The vertical bars represent the confidence interval at 95%. Page 9 of 12

10 s Between Composite Standard s Comparison Critical Value (Significance Level.05) Y/N Base Rate Oral Language vs. Basic Reading N >15% Oral Language vs. Written Expression N >15% Oral Language vs. Mathematics Y 5% Oral Language vs. Math Fluency Y >15% Basic Reading vs. Written Expression N >15% Basic Reading vs. Mathematics Y 5% Basic Reading vs. Math Fluency Y >15% Written Expression vs. Mathematics Y 1% Written Expression vs. Math Fluency Y 15% Mathematics vs. Math Fluency Y >15% Note. A negative difference indicates that the second composite has a higher score than the first composite listed in the comparison. s Between Standard s Comparison Critical Value (Significance Level.05) Y/N Base Rate Listening Comprehension vs. Reading Comprehension Y 10% Oral Expression vs. Essay Composition N >15% Word Reading vs. Reading Comprehension N >15% Math Problem Solving vs. Numerical Operations Y >15% Note. A negative difference indicates that the second subtest has a higher score than the first subtest listed in the comparison. Page 10 of 12

11 Ability Achievement Discrepancy Analysis Ability Type: WAIS IV GAI Ability : 118 Predicted Method WIAT III Predicted WIAT III Actual WIAT III Expected Critical Value.05 Y / N Base Rate Standard Deviation Discrepancy 1 SD Listening Comprehension N N/A N/A Reading Comprehension Y 5% Y Math Problem Solving N N/A N/A Sentence Composition Y 5% Y Word Reading Y 10% Y Essay Composition Y 15% Y Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics Y 5% Y Pseudoword Decoding Y 10% Y Numerical Operations Y * N/A N/A Oral Expression Y 1% Y Spelling Y >15% N Math Fluency Addition N >15% N Math Fluency Subtraction N N/A N/A Math Fluency Multiplication N N/A N/A WIAT III Composite Oral Language Y 5% Y Basic Reading Y 10% Y Written Expression Y 5% Y Mathematics Y * N/A N/A Math Fluency N N/A N/A Note. Base rates and standard deviation discrepancies are not reported when the achievement score equals or exceeds the ability scores. * Indicates that the achievement score exceeds the ability score. Page 11 of 12

12 Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis Area of Achievement Weakness WIAT III Reading Comprehension: 90 Area of Processing Weakness WAIS IV PSI: 84 Area of Processing Strength WAIS IV VCI: 116 Comparison Relative Strength Relative Weakness Critical Value.05 Y / N Supports SLD hypothesis? Yes / No Processing Strength / A Achievement Weakness Y Yes Processing Strength / B Processing Weakness Y Yes The PSW model is intended to help practitioners generate hypotheses regarding clinical diagnoses. This analysis should always be used within a comprehensive evaluation that incorporates multiple sources of information. Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses Model A. Discrepant? Yes Achievement Weakness WIAT III Reading Comprehension SS = 90 Processing Strength WAIS IV Verbal Comprehension Index SS = 116 B. Discrepant? Yes Processing Weakness WAIS IV Processing Speed Index SS = 84 Page 12 of 12