INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

Transcription

1 INTRODUCTION The 5-Year District Facilities Work Program is a very important document. The Department of Education, Legislature, Governor's Office, Division of Community Planning (growth management), local governments, and others use the work program information for various needs including funding, planning, and as the authoritative source for school facilities related information. The district's facilities work program must be a complete, balanced capital outlay plan that is financially feasible. The first year of the work program is the districts capital outlay budget. To determine if the work program is balanced and financially feasible, the "Net Available Revenue" minus the "Funded Projects Costs" should sum to zero for "Remaining Funds". If the "Remaining Funds" balance is zero, then the plan is both balanced and financially feasible. If the "Remaining Funds" balance is negative, then the plan is neither balanced nor feasible. If the "Remaining Funds" balance is greater than zero, the plan may be feasible, but it is not balanced. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only Five Year Revenues Project Costs Difference (Remaining Funds) $453,499 $335,483 $473,498 $458,257 $523,914 $2,244,651 $453,499 $335,483 $473,498 $458,257 $523,914 $2,244,651 District Fiscal Year Range CERTIFICATION By submitting this electronic document, we certify that all information provided in this 5-year district facilities work program is accurate, all capital outlay resources are fully reported, and the expenditures planned represent a complete and balanced capital outlay plan for the district. The district Superintendent of Schools, Chief Financial Officer, and the School Board have approved the information contained in this 5-year district facilities work program; they certify to the Department of Education, Office of Educational Facilities, that the information contained herein is correct and accurate; they also certify that the plan has been developed in coordination with the general purpose local governments as required by (2) F.S. We understand that any information contained in this 5-year district facilities work program is subject to audit by the Auditor General of the State of Florida. Date of School Board Adoption 9/18/2012 Work Plan Submittal Date 8/22/2012 DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DISTRICT POINT-OF-CONTACT PERSON JOB TITLE Lou S. Miller Andrew Barnes Andrew Barnes Director of Business Services PHONE NUMBER ADDRESS andy.barnes@madisonmail.us Page 1 of 15

2 Expenditures Expenditure for Maintenance, Repair and Renovation from 1.50-Mills and PECO Annually, prior to the adoption of the district school budget, each school board must prepare a tentative district facilities work program that includes a schedule of major repair and renovation projects necessary to maintain the educational and ancillary facilities of the district. Item Budget Electrical $15,000 $5,000 $5,076 $15,000 $15,000 $55,076 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, Madison County Excel School(NEW), MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Fire Alarm $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $40,000 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Telephone/Intercom System $50,000 $2,000 $2,000 $50,000 $50,000 $154,000 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Closed Circuit Television $1,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $1,000 $12,000 Locations: MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, MADISON SENIOR HIGH HVAC $125,000 $125,000 $250,000 $125,000 $125,000 $750,000 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, Madison County Excel School(NEW), MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Flooring $20,000 $45,862 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $110,862 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, Madison County Excel School(NEW), MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Roofing $20,000 $30,000 $300,000 $30,000 $20,000 $400,000 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, Madison County Excel School(NEW), MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Safety to Life $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $75,000 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, Madison County Excel School(NEW), MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Fencing $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $1,500 $2,500 $11,500 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, Madison County Excel School(NEW), MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Parking $500 $500 $500 $12,000 $500 $14,000 MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, Madison County Excel School(NEW), MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Paint $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000 Locations: GREENVILLE ELEMENTARY, LEE ELEMENTARY, MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Maintenance/Repair $100,000 $200,000 $100,000 $184,667 $193,489 $778,156 Locations: GREENVILLE ELEMENTARY, LEE ELEMENTARY, MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL, Madison County Excel School(NEW), MADISON SENIOR HIGH, PINETTA ELEMENTARY Sub : $367,000 $448,862 $713,076 $466,167 $455,489 $2,450,594 Page 2 of 15

3 PECO Maintenance Expenditures $0 $0 $72,228 $84,667 $93,489 $250, Mill Sub : $807,000 $448,862 $640,848 $381,500 $362,000 $2,640,210 Other Items Budget Locations MADISON SENIOR HIGH Science Lab/ Classroom remodel $440,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $440,000 : $807,000 $448,862 $713,076 $466,167 $455,489 $2,890,594 Local 1.50 Mill Expenditure For Maintenance, Repair and Renovation Anticipated expenditures expected from local funding sources over the years covered by the current work plan. Item Budget Remaining Maint and Repair from 1.5 Mills $807,000 $448,862 $640,848 $381,500 $362,000 $2,640,210 Maintenance/Repair Salaries $120,000 $120,000 $132,000 $132,000 $132,000 $636,000 School Bus Purchases $308,000 $302,000 $0 $310,000 $310,000 $1,230,000 Other Vehicle Purchases Capital Outlay Equipment $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $40,000 Rent/Lease Payments COP Debt Service Rent/Lease Relocatables Environmental Problems s Debt Service Special Facilities Construction Account Premiums for Property Casualty Insurance (4a,b) $177,000 $177,000 $177,000 $177,000 $177,000 $885,000 Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCB) Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB) Revenue Local Expenditure s: $1,412,000 $1,057,862 $959,848 $1,010,500 $991,000 $5,431, Mill Revenue Source Schedule of Estimated Capital Outlay Revenue from each currently approved source which is estimated to be available for expenditures on the projects included in the tentative district facilities work program. All amounts are NET after considering carryover balances, interest earned, new COP's, and loans, etc. Districts cannot use 1.5-Mill funds for salaries except for those explicitly associated with maintenance/repair projects. ( (5), F.S.) (1) Non-exempt property assessed valuation Item Fund Value $675,519,594 $681,321,201 $704,113,499 $732,460,291 $766,438,612 $3,559,853,197 Page 3 of 15

4 (2) The Millege projected for discretionary capital outlay per s (3) Full value of the 1.50-Mill discretionary capital outlay per s (4) Value of the portion of the Mill ACTUALLY levied $1,134,873 $1,144,620 $1,182,911 $1,230,533 $1,287,617 $5,980, $972,748 $981,103 $1,013,923 $1,054,743 $1,103,672 $5,126,189 (5) Difference of lines (3) and (4) $162,125 $163,517 $168,988 $175,790 $183,945 $854,365 PECO Revenue Source The figure in the row designated "PECO Maintenance" will be subtracted from funds available for new construction because PECO maintenance dollars cannot be used for new construction. Item Fund Budget PECO New Construction 340 $0 $0 $8,181 $2,772 $0 $10,953 PECO Maintenance Expenditures $0 $0 $72,228 $84,667 $93,489 $250,384 $0 $0 $80,409 $87,439 $93,489 $261,337 CO & DS Revenue Source Revenue from Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds. CO & DS Cash Flow-through Distributed CO & DS Interest on Undistributed CO Item Fund Budget 360 $27,210 $27,210 $27,210 $27,210 $27,210 $136, $1,032 $1,032 $1,032 $1,032 $1,032 $5,160 $28,242 $28,242 $28,242 $28,242 $28,242 $141,210 Fair Share Revenue Source All legally binding commitments for proportionate fair-share mitigation for impacts on public school facilities must be included in the 5-year district work program. Nothing reported for this section. Sales Surtax Referendum Specific information about any referendum for a 1-cent or ½-cent surtax referendum during the previous year. Did the school district hold a surtax referendum during the past fiscal year ? No Page 4 of 15

5 Additional Revenue Source Any additional revenue sources Proceeds from a s /15 F.S. Loans District Bonds - Voted local bond referendum proceeds per s.9, Art VII State Constitution Proceeds from Special Act Bonds Estimated Revenue from CO & DS Bond Sale Proceeds from Voted Capital Improvements millage Federal Grants Proportionate share mitigation (actual cash revenue only, not in kind donations) Impact fees received Private donations Grants from local governments or not-forprofit organizations General Capital Outlay Obligated Fund Balance Carried Forward From Fund Balance Carried Forward Capital Outlay Projects Funds Balance Carried Forward From Fund Balance Carried Forward Interest, Including Profit On Investment $2,259 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,259 Revenue from Bonds pledging proceeds from 1 cent or 1/2 cent Sales Surtax Special Facilities Construction Account One Cent - 1/2 Cent Sales Surtax Debt Service From Fund Balance Carried Forward Other Revenue for Other Capital Projects Proceeds from 1/2 cent sales surtax authorized by school board Proceeds from local governmental infrastructure sales surtax Proceeds from Certificates of Participation (COP's) Sale Item Value First Bond proceeds amount authorized in FY for Kids District Equity Recognition Fund Balance Carried Forward $862,250 $383,000 $383,000 $383,000 $383,000 $2,394,250 Subtotal $864,509 $384,000 $383,000 $383,000 $383,000 $2,397,509 Revenue Summary Page 5 of 15

6 Item Name Budget Local 1.5 Mill Discretionary Capital Outlay Revenue Five Year $972,748 $981,103 $1,013,923 $1,054,743 $1,103,672 $5,126,189 PECO and 1.5 Mill Maint and Other 1.5 Mill Expenditures ($1,412,000) ($1,057,862) ($959,848) ($1,010,500) ($991,000) ($5,431,210) PECO Maintenance Revenue $0 $0 $72,228 $84,667 $93,489 $250,384 Available 1.50 Mill for New Construction ($439,252) ($76,759) $54,075 $44,243 $112,672 ($305,021) Item Name Budget Five Year CO & DS Revenue $28,242 $28,242 $28,242 $28,242 $28,242 $141,210 PECO New Construction Revenue $0 $0 $8,181 $2,772 $0 $10,953 Other/Additional Revenue $864,509 $384,000 $383,000 $383,000 $383,000 $2,397,509 Additional Revenue $892,751 $412,242 $419,423 $414,014 $411,242 $2,549,672 Available Revenue $453,499 $335,483 $473,498 $458,257 $523,914 $2,244,651 Project Schedules Capacity Project Schedules A schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory classrooms for the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs. Project Description Location Funded relocatable added to Pinetta elementary PINETTA ELEMENTARY Planned Cost: $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Yes Student Stations: : Gross Sq Ft: 1, ,200 Planned Cost: $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Student Stations: : Gross Sq Ft: 1, ,200 Page 6 of 15

7 Other Project Schedules Major renovations, remodeling, and additions of capital outlay projects that do not add capacity to schools. Project Description Location Budget Reserve for catastrophic maintenance items, chiller, generator, and boiler, roofing repairs MADISON SENIOR HIGH $383,499 $335,483 $473,498 $458,257 $523,914 $2,174,651 Yes $383,499 $335,483 $473,498 $458,257 $523,914 $2,174,651 Funded Additional Project Schedules Any projects that are not identified in the last approved educational plant survey. Project Description Location Num Classroom s Renovation of High School to include update of HVAC, Data/Electical, Plumming and drainage systems MADISON SENIOR HIGH Budget 0 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000,000 No 0 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000,000 Funded Non Funded Growth Management Project Schedules Schedule indicating which projects, due to planned development, that CANNOT be funded from current revenues projected over the next five years. Nothing reported for this section. Page 7 of 15

8 Tracking Capacity Tracking MADISON SENIOR HIGH % % 14 GREENVILLE ELEMENTARY Location Satis. Stu. Sta. MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL FISH Capacity COFTE # Class Rooms Average Class Size Utilization New Stu. Capacity New Rooms to be Added/Re moved COFTE Utilization Class Size % % 10 PINETTA ELEMENTARY % % 14 1,765 1,588 1, % 0 0 1, % 14 LEE ELEMENTARY % % 13 Madison County Excel School(NEW) % % 3 3,509 3,192 2, % 0 1 2, % 13 The COFTE (2,199) for must match the Official Forecasted COFTE (2,199 ) for before this section can be completed. In the event that the COFTE does not match the Official forecasted COFTE, then the Balanced COFTE Table should be used to balance COFTE. COFTE for Elementary (PK-3) 850 Grade Level Type Balanced COFTE for Middle (4-8) 751 High (9-12) 598 2,199 Elementary (PK-3) 0 Middle (4-8) 0 High (9-12) 0 2,199 Relocatable Replacement Number of relocatable classrooms clearly identified and scheduled for replacement in the school board adopted financially feasible 5-year district work program. Location Year 5 Relocatable Replacements: Charter Schools Tracking Information regarding the use of charter schools. Page 8 of 15

9 Nothing reported for this section. Special Purpose Tracking The number of classrooms that will be used for certain special purposes in the current year, by facility and type of classroom, that the district will, 1), not use for educational purposes, and 2), the co-teaching classrooms that are not open plan classrooms and will be used for educational purposes. School School Type # of Elementary K-3 # of Middle 4-8 # of High 9-12 # of ESE # of Combo Educational : School School Type # of Elementary K-3 # of Middle 4-8 # of High 9-12 # of ESE # of Combo PINETTA ELEMENTARY Co-Teaching Co-Teaching : Infrastructure Tracking Necessary offsite infrastructure requirements resulting from expansions or new schools. This section should include infrastructure information related to capacity project schedules and other project schedules (Section 4). Not Specified Proposed location of planned facilities, whether those locations are consistent with the comprehensive plans of all affected local governments, and recommendations for infrastructure and other improvements to land adjacent to existing facilities. Provisions of (12), (13) and (14) and must be addressed for new facilities planned within the 1st three years of the plan (Section 5). Not Specified Consistent with Comp Plan? No Net New The number of classrooms, by grade level and type of construction, that were added during the last fiscal year. List the net new classrooms added in the fiscal year. "" is defined as capacity carrying classrooms that are added to increase capacity to enable the district to meet the Class Size Amendment. List the net new classrooms to be added in the fiscal year. s for fiscal year should match totals in Section 15A. Location # Permanent # Modular # Relocatable # Permanent # Modular # Relocatable Elementary (PK-3) Middle (4-8) Page 9 of 15

10 High (9-12) Relocatable Student Stations Number of students that will be educated in relocatable units, by school, in the current year, and the projected number of students for each of the years in the workplan. Site Year Average MADISON SENIOR HIGH GREENVILLE ELEMENTARY PINETTA ELEMENTARY MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL LEE ELEMENTARY Madison County Excel School(NEW) s for students in relocatables by year number of COFTE students projected by year. 2,392 2,334 2,297 2,236 2,199 2,292 Percent in relocatables by year. 6 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % 4 % Leased Facilities Tracking Exising leased facilities and plans for the acquisition of leased facilities, including the number of classrooms and student stations, as reported in the educational plant survey, that are planned in that location at the end of the five year workplan. Location # of Leased FISH Student Stations Owner # of Leased FISH Student Stations MADISON SENIOR HIGH GREENVILLE ELEMENTARY PINETTA ELEMENTARY MADISON COUNTY CENTRAL LEE ELEMENTARY Madison County Excel School(NEW) Failed Standard Relocatable Tracking Relocatable units currently reported by school, from FISH, and the number of relocatable units identified as Failed Standards. Page 10 of 15

11 Nothing reported for this section. Planning Class Size Reduction Planning Plans approved by the school board that reduce the need for permanent student stations such as acceptable school capacity levels, redistricting, busing, year-round schools, charter schools, magnet schools, public-private partnerships, multitrack scheduling, grade level organization, block scheduling, or other alternatives. Due to declining enrollment the district currently has and expects to continue having excess capacity for students. School Closure Planning Plans for the closure of any school, including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues. There are no school closings planned in the next five years. Page 11 of 15

12 Five Year Survey - Ten Year Capacity Schedule of capital outlay projects projected to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K - 12 programs for the future 5 years beyond the 5-year district facilities work program. No items meet the criteria. Five Year Survey - Ten Year Infrastructure Proposed Location of Planned New, Remodeled, or New Additions to Facilities in 6 thru 10 out years (Section 28). No items meet the criteria. Plans for closure of any school, including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues in the 6 thru 10 out years (Section 29). No items meet the criteria. Page 12 of 15

13 Five Year Survey - Ten Year Maintenance District projects and locations regarding the projected need for major renovation, repair, and maintenance projects within the district in years 6-10 beyond the projects plans detailed in the five years covered by the work plan. No items match the criteria. Five Year Survey - Ten Year Utilization Schedule of planned capital outlay projects identifying the standard grade groupings, capacities, and planned utilization rates of future educational facilities of the district for both permanent and relocatable facilities. Grade Level Projections Elementary - District s Middle - District s High - District s FISH Student Stations FISH Capacity COFTE Utilization new Student Capacity to be added/remove d COFTE Utilization % % % % 2,658 2,303 1, % % Other - ESE, etc % % 3,441 3,086 2, % % Combination schools are included with the middle schools for student stations, capacity, COFTE and utilization purposes because these facilities all have a 90% utilization factor. Use this space to explain or define the grade groupings for combination schools. No comments to report. Page 13 of 15

14 Five Year Survey - Twenty Year Capacity Schedule of capital outlay projects projected to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for the projected student enrollment in K - 12 programs for the future years beyond the 5-year district facilities work program. No items match the criteria. Five Year Survey - Twenty Year Infrastructure Proposed Location of Planned New, Remodeled, or New Additions to Facilities in the 11 through 20 out years (Section 28). No items meet the criteria. Plans for closure of any school, including plans for disposition of the facility or usage of facility space, and anticipated revenues in the 11 through 20 out years (Section 29). No items meet the criteria. Page 14 of 15

15 Five Year Survey - Twenty Year Maintenance District projects and locations regarding the projected need for major renovation, repair, and maintenance projects within the district in years beyond the projects plans detailed in the five years covered by the work plan. No items match the criteria. Five Year Survey - Twenty Year Utilization Schedule of planned capital outlay projects identifying the standard grade groupings, capacities, and planned utilization rates of future educational facilities of the district for both permanent and relocatable facilities. Grade Level Projections FISH Student Stations FISH Capacity COFTE Utilization new Student Capacity to be added/removed COFTE Utilization Elementary - District s Middle - District s High - District s % % % % 2,658 2,303 1, % % Other - ESE, etc % % 3,441 3,086 2, % % Combination schools are included with the middle schools for student stations, capacity, COFTE and utilization purposes because these facilities all have a 90% utilization factor. Use this space to explain or define the grade groupings for combination schools. No comments to report. Page 15 of 15