Dubai Municipality/Human Resources Department

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Dubai Municipality/Human Resources Department"

Transcription

1 1

2 Table of Contents Introduction... Policy Description General Purpose Scope Definitions... Employee Performance Management Cycle Performance Planning Performance Review Performance Assessment Performance Reward... Maintaining Performance Objectives Probationary Employees Change of Responsibilities Change of Manager... Managing Under-performance... Grievance and Appeal... Roles and Responsibilities Department Director Reviewing Manager Manager Employee Human Resources Government Strategic Human Resources Management... Employee Performance Management System Monitoring and Evaluation... Critical Success Factors Management Commitment and Support Training on Employee Performance Management System Alignment of Objectives Consistency of Treatment... Maintenance of Records List of Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Frequently Asked Questions Dos and Don ts of the Performance Review/Appraisal Meetings.. Common Raters Pitfalls to Avoid Examples on how to fulfill a form of IPP

3 1. Introduction: One of the aims of the Dubai Strategic Plan 2015 is to achieve Government Excellence by strengthening its strategic and forward looking focus and empowering and motivating employees. The use of an employee performance management system is an important mechanism to achieve this objective. It has also been identified as one of the key systems which need to be in place in order to create a high performance culture. This is vital to the Government s success. Employee performance management provides a means to improve organizational performance by linking and aligning individual, team and organizational objectives. It also provides a means to recognize and reward good performance and manage underperformance. This policy reflects the feedback received through an extensive consultation process as well as benchmarking activities. These were solidified by benchmarking against multinationals as well as government organizations around the world. This document is designed for the government organizations in Dubai to assist them in the management of employees performance. 2. Policy Description: 2.1 General Each government organization can customize the Performance Appraisal and Feedback form by selecting the competencies that are appropriate to the job/category of jobs, its strategy and values. However, it is important to ensure the following: Selected format includes between 6 to 8 competencies The competencies are selected from Dubai Government Behavioral Competency Framework. The Human Resources (HR) department in each organization will be responsible for developing the form in consultation with the Department Directors. It is to be noted here that in organizations that have a functional/technical competency framework, competencies will be assigned from both categories i.e. the behavioral and functional/technical. 3

4 2.2 Purpose The purposes of the employee performance management system are to: Foster a performance oriented culture where the individual employee s work is aligned with the strategic directions of the organization Create an environment where progression and reward are based on merit Clarify performance expectations Encourage regular and constructive communication and dialogue between managers and employees Enhance continuous learning and development Provide an equitable and fair framework for evaluating employees performance Acknowledge individual work contributions Identify and rectify underperformance at an early stage Increase job satisfaction, productivity and commitment as employees feel that their work is recognized and valued Focus on accountabilities 2.3 Scope This policy covers all employees in bands. 2.4 Definitions Objectives What the employee must achieve in the coming performance cycle. They must be written according to SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Agreed, Realistic and Time-bound). Competencies Describe the ways in which employees are expected to behave if they are to carry out their roles effectively. Manager The individual who plans and reviews the performance of an employee. Reviewing Manager The individual who verifies the performance plans and reviews done by other managers to ensure equity and consistency. This individual is usually at a higher level in the organization s hierarchy. 4

5 Individual Performance Plan (IPP) The working document that should be actively used throughout the year. It covers all the components of the employee performance management process and is jointly owned by the employee and his/her manager. Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) The short-term action plan that is initiated when an employee s performance does not meet expectations and whose objective is to improve performance of the latter party. Coaching and Feedback This is an ongoing process whereby managers guide or facilitate the continuous improvement of an employee s performance. It includes timely and constructive feedback, recognition, support for learning and development and assisting the employee with self- awareness. 3. Employee Performance Management Cycle: The employee performance management cycle within the Government of Dubai focuses on: 1) The desired results required by all employees 2) The behaviors which all employees need to display in order to achieve these results 3) Development of employees. In essence, it is about the what and the how which will lead to success within the government organizations. The cycle of employee performance management is ongoing throughout the year. In addition to setting objectives and competencies at the beginning of the year, the cycle focuses on a number of interim steps including the mid-cycle review discussion and the end-of-cycle performance appraisal. Review discussions during the cycle can take place more often e.g. on a quarterly basis. However, to ensure that there are no surprises at the end-of-cycle appraisal, a mid-cycle review is mandatory. 5

6 Determine reward Determine learning and development needs Determine Potential/Promotion Rewarding Planning Organization strategy Strategy communication to support cascading of objectives Development of Assessing Reviewing End- of-cycle performance appraisal Assess performance against planned competencies and objectives Ongoing performance feedback Optional quarterly review Mid-cycle performance The key stages in the employee performance management cycle should also take place at certain times each year. The timeline below shows these key areas: Example for 2008/2009 cycle: Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec * Completion of 2008 appraisals by end of February * Planning of 2009 SMART objectives and competenci es by end of February * Completion of 2008 Appraisals * Completion Of 2009 SMART objectives and competencies * Confirmation of increments and performance bonuses for eligible employees (for 2008 assessment) Coaching & Feedback * Payment of increments and performance bonuses for eligible employees (for 2008 assessment) 2009 Mid- Cycle Reviews 2009 Mid- Cycle Reviews Coaching & Feedback 6

7 3.1 Performance Planning Stage 1 of the employee performance management cycle is the planning stage. This will take place at the beginning of each year. The primary purpose of this stage is to cascade organizational objectives to the individual level. The communication of the mission, strategy and values of the organization to everyone at every level is crucial. Everyone should understand how his/her performance contributes to the overall success of the organization. The diagram below illustrates in a simple way how objectives are cascaded to the individual level. Organization Strategy Department Key Performance Indicators (KPI s) Individual Objectives During the month of December, the Department Director and the Section Managers will meet together to review their plans for the coming year in order to: Ensure alignment to the organization strategy Verify possible inter-section contradictions Discuss department level resourcing issues and priorities Strategic/Corporate Planning department will facilitate these meetings. HR could be a participant During the last week of December, the HR department will send an to managers and employees to inform them of the start of the individual performance planning phase (including a reminder of the related procedure and completion date) During the first week of January, the Department Director will meet with the managers to agree on the individual objectives of each one of them The manager will communicate the strategic plans, department s KPI s as well as his/her own annual objectives to his/her employees. 7

8 3.1.5 Keeping in mind the employee s job description/responsibilities, the manager and/or employee will develop a first draft of the objectives. These should be built around the following: Stakeholder Perspective: How will the employee make a difference to the stakeholder by delivering consistently excellent and rewarding service both externally and internally? Financial Perspective: How will the employee add value to stakeholders while containing costs? Internal Process Perspective: How will the employee improve productivity, quality and speed of service? Each department needs to determine who- i.e. employee or manager- should be responsible for completing the first draft of objectives. [Please refer to scenario 1 on page (12) if the manager completes it or scenario 2 on page (13) if the employee completes it]. Each objective should be developed according to S.M.A.R.T criteria, as follows: (S = Specific): Each objective should be written in a way that does not leave room for confusion about what should be achieved. For instance, a vaguely stated objective would be Prepare reports. More details should be added so that the employee knows what is expected of him/her as such: Write monthly reports concerning progress and budgetary status of active contracts. (M = Measurable): Objectives become measurable when performance standards are added. Objectives developed with a measure will be easier to monitor and, as a result, it will be clearer to identify when the objective has been achieved. These measures include the following: Impact: refers to attainment of a standard (quality, level of service etc), changes in behavior (internal and external customers) or innovation. Such measures can, for example, include error rates (such as the number or percentage of errors allowable per unit of work) and customer satisfaction rates (determined through a customer survey). Example: 80% score in customer satisfaction to be achieved by the end of the first quarter and maintained throughout Quantity: addresses how much work the employee or work unit produced/ processed or services provided. Example: 95% of complaints to be resolved within 3 days of report by customer to be achieved by end of the 1st quarter and maintained throughout

9 Timeliness: addresses speed of response or turnaround, achievements compared with timetables, amount of backlog or delivery times. Example: By the end of January 2008, all employees in band 3 and above should have SMART performance objectives. Cost-effectiveness: refers to savings or cost control for the Government. These may include such aspects of performance as maintaining or reducing unit costs, reducing the time it takes to produce or provide a service/product or reducing waste. Example: By the end of 2008, reduce annual recruitment consultancy fees by 20% That said, when developing specific measures, it is important to first determine the general measure/s that are important for each element (i.e. impact, quantity, quality, timeliness or cost-effectiveness). Then identify how to measure the quantity, impact, timeliness and/or cost-effectiveness for the element. If an accomplishment could be measured with numbers, record the form of measurement. A system must exist or be developed to ensure that quantity standards can be accurately tracked and measured. On the other hand, if a performance could only be described (i.e. observe and verify), clarify who will appraise the performance and the factors they will be appraise. Below are examples of measurement tools: Customer Satisfaction Survey Employee Satisfaction Survey/ Engagement Survey Dubai Government Excellence Program (A = Agreed): Both the manager and employee should agree on the set objectives (R= Realistic): Objectives should generally be a stretch to encourage challenge and growth while also being attainable to avoid frustration. (T = Time-bound): Each objective should have a timeframe for completion e.g. monthly, quarterly, semi-annually review dates. 9

10 While objective setting, ensure that: Objectives are vertically aligned with the organization strategy and horizontally with other colleagues where joint efforts are required Each employee has between 3-5 objectives for the year. Objectives should focus on the few but key priorities of an employee s job while covering the full scope of his/her job. Objectives focus on outputs and results rather than inputs and activities. For example, Develops a software program is an activity while Develops a software program that meets requirements and works effectively is an objective that focuses on results Once the objectives are written down, the manager and /or employee will assign a weight to each objective using a % figure at the beginning of the year and the overall weightings should total 100%. The weighting should be determined by the importance of the objective The manager and/or employee will then fill in the objectives under section 1 of the IPP document. (Please refer to related form in Appendix D) The manager will complete Areas for development under section 3. They will also complete the development action plan for achieving each development objective under section 5 of the IPP. The latter section is optional The manager will meet with each of his/her employees to agree on the objectives and competencies. The latter will be extracted from Dubai Government behavioral competency framework. During the meeting, the manager will clarify the behavioral indicators that will be used in assessing each competency. Additionally, they will explain to the employee how the objectives and competencies will be balanced in reaching an overall performance rating. The objectives and competencies represent 70% and 30% respectively of the overall performance rating. It is to be noted here that in organizations that have functional/technical competencies, the manager will assign three competencies for each of the categories i.e. the behavioral and functional/technical The manager will send the IPP to the reviewing manager who is responsible for ensuring equity and consistency with the department s objectives. 10

11 Once agreed by the reviewing manager, both the employee and the manager will sign it off (section 4). The original performance plan will be retained with the manager for continuous feedback and use at mid and end-of-cycle appraisal, with copies given to the employee and HR department for reference during the performance period Both managers and employees should maintain performance files to record performance incidents/data throughout the year. There is no required format for documentation. The content of documentation needs to be appropriate to support descriptive statements of actual performance that include information that is specific, job related and behavior based. This information could be used during the mid/end-of-cycle discussions The manager and employee will agree on the developmental needs and ways in which those needs can be met. The latter may include attendance at internal or external training sessions or seminars as well as activities such as job rotations or on the on-the-job experiences. The manager should complete section 5 of the Performance Appraisal and Feedback form. He/She will also complete the action plan for achieving the development objective/s under section 1 of said form. The latter section is optional. (Please refer to related form in Appendix D) The signature of the employee indicates only that the discussion has taken place and not that there is agreement with content. 11

12 Performance Planning Overview Scenario 1 HR Manager Employee Reviewing Manager Notify managers and employees to start the process Meet with his/her employees to share organization and department plans as well as own objectives Prepare first draft of employee's objectives Contribute Assign a weight to each objective Total = 100% Contribute Complete section 1of the Individual Performance Plan (IPP) Contribute Complete Areas for Development under section 3 of the IPP and development action plan under section 5. The latter is optional. Contribute Meet with each employee to agree on objectives & competencies. Extract the latter from Dubai Government Behavioral Competency Framework Send completed IPP to reviewing manager for approval Sign off Yes Sign the IPP and send it to employee to sign Sign, retain a copy for him/herself and HR and send original manager original No Keep Copy Keep Copy Maintain performance file for each employee Maintain performance file 12

13 Performance Planning Overview - Scenario 2 HR Employee Manager Reviewing Manager Notify managers and employees to start the process Prepare first draft of employee's objectives Assign a weight to each objective Total = 100% Meet with his/her employees to share organization and department plans as well as own objectives Contribute Complete section 1of the Individual Performance Plan (IPP) Contribute Complete Areas for Development under section 3 of the IPP and development action plan under section 5. The latter is optional. Contribute Meet with each employee to agree on objectives & competencies. Extract the latter from Dubai Government Behavioral Competency Framework Send completed IPP to reviewing manager for approval Sign off Yes No Keep copy Sign the IPP, keep a copy for him/ herself and HR and send original to his/her manager Sign the IPP and send it to employee to sign it Maintain performance file Keep copy Maintain performance file for each employee 13

14 3.2 Performance Review Stage 2 of the employee performance management cycle is focused on performance review Managers should continuously coach and provide feedback to their staff on those aspects of performance that are done well and those that need improvement. The amount of time that elapses between coaching sessions can be irregular but should be frequent During the first week of June, the HR department will send an to managers and employees to inform them of the beginning of this stage along with the related procedure and completion date At mid-cycle (June - July), a performance review meeting will take place. It is a joint discussion between the manager and employee to: Review progress towards meeting the objectives and competencies for bands 3 and above and performance expectations for user bands Change/modify any of the objectives if they become unrealistic or if there is a shift in the strategy (This should not be done to protect any employee from poor performance) Identify problems early so they can be corrected as soon as possible Review employee learning and development needs While the objective setting follows a top-down approach, the review process follows a bottom-up approach. Managers should complete the reviews of all their employees before they sit for their review with their respective managers. At least 3 working days before the meeting, the employee must send his/her rating of each objective and competency to the manager. 14

15 3.2.6 During the meeting, the manager must: Rate each objective (section 1 of the IPP) using the applicable 1 4 rating scale. This is not used in the calculation of end-of- cycle rating. Any changes in the objectives should be noted on the form and signed off by the Department Director. Rate each competency (section 2 of the IPP) using the relevant 1 4 rating scale. This is not used in the calculation of end-of- cycle rating. Make comments and sign off (section 4) Send the completed form to the employee to make comments and sign it Forward this form to the reviewing manager for sign-off Keep the original copy and send a copy to employee and HR department The signature of the employee indicates only that the discussion has taken place and not that there is agreement with content. 15

16 Performance Review Overview HR Manager Employee Reviewing Manager Inform managers and employees to start this phase Meet each employee to review progress Send his/her rating of each objective and competency to the manager Rate each objective (section 1 of the IPP) Contribute Rate each competency (section 2 of the IPP) Contribute Make comments and sign under section 4 Send the completed IPP to employee to make comments and sign Send to reviewing manager for signoff Sign off Yes No Sign off Yes No Keep copy Keep original and distribute a copy to employee & HR Keep copy 16

17 3.3 Perfprmance Assessment Stage 3 of the employee performance management cycle is the assessing stage. This is the formal time when the end-of-cycle (January - February) performance appraisal meeting is held between the manager and each of his/her employees to evaluate overall performance. The HR department will send an to managers and employees to notify them of the beginning of this stage along with the related procedure and completion date During the month of January, Strategic/Corporate Planning department will meet with the Director General to discuss the achievements of each department in the organization. Depending on each department s performance, the Director General can award a higher distribution of ratings to one department as long as the overall distribution of the organization lies within the set performance rating parameters. These will be assigned by The Executive Council (TEC) based on the performance of the organization vs. the set KPI s The Director General will inform the Department Directors of the assigned performance rating distributions in their respective areas. They will share this information with HR The Department Directors will discuss the distributions with each manager In preparation to the appraisal meeting, the manager will: Review the employee s performance file and mid-cycle review notes Rate performance vs. individual objectives and competencies Calculate overall rating Consider contributing factors vs. performance Involve reviewing manager to ensure that ratings are appropriate and consistent Agree on logistics -agree date, time and place for meeting with employee (Give sufficient warning - preparation time; one week minimum) The employee will: Review his/her own performance file and mid-cycle review notes Rate performance vs. individual objectives and competencies Send the objectives and competencies ratings to their manager at least 3 working days before the meeting Consider points important for discussion with manager 17

18 3.3.5 During the meeting, the manager will: Discuss objectives and competencies one by one - invite the employee to start the assessment review Discuss the competencies one by one - invite the employee to start the assessment review Ask lots of questions and get clarification to ensure understanding of the employee s point of view Discuss both what was achieved AND how it was achieved Seek proposals for resolving problems. Focus on future performance and ensure that the employee takes responsibility for improvement Give positive recognition for performance that reinforces the goals of the section/department Discuss any matters of concern Identify learning and development needs for next cycle Provide overall assessment Conclude on a positive note After the meeting, the manager will: Complete, sign off and finalize all IPP documentation (For details on calculating the overall performance rating, please refer to point 3.3.7) Send the completed form to the employee to make any comments they might want to add and sign it Forward the form after receiving it from the employee to the reviewing manager who will verify the information in the document, sign it and send back to him/her Retain the original copy and send a copy to the employee and HR department Ensure transition of learning and development needs to new IPP End- of-cycle rating Performance Rating Scale 18

19 Each objective should be rated using the following 1 4 rating scale: Rating 4: Substantially Exceeds Expectations Far exceeds performance expectations Far exceeds the expectations in key objectives Accomplishes more than expected Completes projects effectively and ahead of schedule Embodies and models the organization values at all times and inspires and encourages others to do likewise Rating 3: Exceeds Expectations Usually exceeds performance expectations Exceeds the expectations in key objectives Usually completes work effectively and in a timely manner Takes initiative in asking for additional responsibility Consistently upholds and promotes the organization values Rating 2: Meets Expectations Meets all performance expectations and may occasionally exceed expectations Meets expectations in all areas of performance and exceeds expectations in a few Demonstrates effective performance and is fully qualified to perform his/her job Consistently performs in a reliable manner Generally upholds the organization values Rating 1: Below Expectations Meets most but falls below performance expectations in some areas Falls below expectations in some areas of performance Often requires assistance from managers and /or peers Requires a degree of improvement to measure up to the job standards of his/her department At times the employee has not upheld the organization values 19

20 Each competency should be rated using the 1 4 rating scale thereof: Rating 4 = Substantially Exceeds Expectations: The employee always masters all the required behaviors in any kind of situation and context with great effectiveness and impact; may be considered a role model. Rating 3 = Exceeds Expectations: The employee displays all the required behaviors with frequency, intensity and effectiveness in different situations and with different people. Rating 2 = Meets Expectations: The employee displays the behaviors required and performs them autonomously in his/her own context or in well-known situations. Rating 1 = Below Expectations: The employee displays some of the behaviors required by the level but not on a consistent basis or with efficacy. 20

21 Calculating the Overall Performance Rating a) Section 1 The manager should complete the rating of each objective on the IPP under column 2 The weighted rating (column 3) is produced by multiplying the weighting (column 1) by the rating (column 2). As for the overall performance rating, it is the sum of the weighted ratings Example: Weighting (at the beginning of cycle) Rating At end-of-cycle Weighted Rating at end of-cycle (weighting by rating) Objective 1 30% Objective 2 10% Objective 3 20% Objective 4 30% Objective 5 10% Overall Performance Rating Weighting (1) x by Rating (2) % = (3) b) Section 2 The manager should complete the rating of each competency. The overall rating is the average of the ratings of the competencies. Example: Level Rating at Mid cycle Rating at End of cycle Competency Competency Competency Competency Competency Competency Overall Performance Rating (sum of the ratings of the competencies number of competencies = 1)

22 c) Overall performance level The overall performance rating is equal to the sum of 70% for objectives and 30% for competencies. If the overall rating has a decimal that ranges between 0.1 and 0.49, then it would be rounded down e.g. 3.2 will be 3. However, if the decimal is between 0.5 and 0.99, the overall performance rating would be rounded up e.g. 3.6 will be 4. In the above example, the overall performance rating is calculated as follows: Overall rating of objectives: 3.6 x 70% = 2.52 Overall rating of competencies: 3 x 30% = 0.9 Overall performance rating = 3.42 Since the decimal ranges between 0.1 and 0.49, the overall performance rating will be rounded down to 3. d) The final Overall Performance Rating should be confirmed under section 4 of the IPP. e) In case an employee receives an overall performance rating of Substantially Exceeds Expectations, the manager should include additional comments verifying the same Validation When all performance assessments are finalized, managers have the responsibility of ensuring that ratings for their total staff fall within the percentage parameters assigned to each rating level within their section. This information is then forwarded to the Department Director who completes a statistical profile of assessments for all staff in his/her area. If the profiles exceed the performance rating parameters, the Director will determine the final rating. In this case the Director will take into account individual performance and relativities of performance across the department. Prior to linking the outcome of the employee performance management process to other HR processes, the HR department will review all the performance ratings to ensure that the managers have conformed to the set distribution. The signature of the employee indicates only that the discussion has taken place and not that there is agreement with content. 22

23 Performance Review Overview HR Manager Employee Reviewing Manager Inform managers and employees to start the process Prepare for the meeting with employee Prepare for the meeting Meet employee to discuss objectives, competencies & development goals vs. achievement Send objective & competencies ratings to manager before the meeting Complete IPP, sign and send to employee to make comments and sign Make comments & sign off Yes No Send signed IPP to reviewing manager for sign- off Sign off Yes No Keep copy Keep original and distribute a copy to employee & HR Keep copy Ensure transition of learning and development areas to new IPP form 23

24 3.4 Performance Reward Stage 4 of the employee performance management cycle is the final stage. This stage focuses on linking the outcome of the performance evaluation to other HR processes. These include reward, recognition, promotion as well as learning and development of the employee. The different sections are grouped, as follows: Reward The agreed overall performance rating (1 4) is the most important input into decisions of reward for all employees. Reward is delivered in a way that drives and reinforces a high performance culture striking a balance between fixed and variable compensation; monetary and non-monetary as stipulated in the Reward and Recognition policy. It is to be noted that merit increments and bonuses will be determined in March and payment will take place in April. The increment will be effective from January 1st Merit Increment To be eligible for an annual merit increment, the employee must receive an overall performance rating of at least Meets Expectations. Payments will be distributed as follows: Performance Rating Percent of Staff* Percentage increase Substantially Exceeds Expectations X% 10 % of basic salary Exceeds Expectations X% 7 % of basic salary Meets Expectations X% 5 % of basic salary Below Expectations X% Not eligible *As per the guidelines and performance rating parameters set by TEC. The following limitations apply: The employee who is at or above the pay grade maximum salary for his/her position is not eligible for merit increment Merit increment for the employee who is near the pay grade maximum can only be granted up to the pay grade maximum 24

25 In the above cases, the employee should be awarded a lump sum payment which will not be added to the monthly salary, as follows: Performance Rating Substantially Exceeds Expectations Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Below Expectations Lump sum amount 10 % of annual basic salary 7 % of annual basic salary 5 % of annual basic salary Not eligible Employees whose monthly salary is near the pay grade maximum can receive merit increment to the top of the pay grade and a lump sum reduced by the amount received as a merit increment. Example: If: Employee s grade = 6 Monthly salary = AED 7,700 Performance rating = Exceeds expectations Pay grade maximum salary = AED 7,868 Then: Basic salary = 7,700 x 50% = 3,850 Merit increment = 3,850 x 7% = The difference between pay grade maximum and current salary = 168 In this case, the employee will receive a merit increment of AED 168 per month The difference will be paid as a lump sum which is equivalent to AED 1,218 [( ) x 12] Another Example: If: Employee s grade = 14 Monthly salary = AED 29,500 Pay grade maximum salary = AED 29,783 Performance rating = Exceeds expectations 25

26 Then: Basic salary = 29,500 x 50% = 14,750 Merit increment = 14,750 x 7% = 1,032.5 The difference between pay grade maximum and current salary = 283 In this case, the employee will receive a merit increment of AED 283 per month The difference will be paid as a lump sum which is equivalent to AED 8,994 [(1, ) x 12] Merit Increment for Resigned Employees Employees who have resigned or are serving their resignation notice period are not eligible for a merit increment irrespective of their performance rating Performance Bonus Bonus payment depends on the employee s performance as well as the performance of the department, the organization and the Government as a whole. Only staff whose overall performance rating is at least Meets Expectations will be eligible for a performance bonus. Payments will be distributed as per the below table: Performance Rating Percent of Staff* Bonus Amount* Substantially Exceeds Expectations Up to X% TBD Exceeds Expectations Up to X% TBD Meets Expectations Up to X% TBD *As per the guidelines and performance rating parameters set by TEC Performance Bonus for Resigned Employees Employees who have resigned or are serving their resignation notice period are not eligible for a performance bonus irrespective of their performance rating Recognition Managers are encouraged to recognize incidents of employee performance that are truly outstanding. This should take place as close as possible to the time of occurrence of the incident. It could be monetary or nonmonetary Monetary Reward Organizations may provide rewards to employees throughout the year (e.g. a spot reward). 26

27 Eligibility Employees at all levels are eligible for a spot reward Criteria Granting this reward should be based on outstanding achievements such as: Demonstration of evidence of a special one-time contribution of measurable significance to the department s strategic plans Demonstration of extraordinary creativity, innovation, cost savings or improvements that enhance department/ section efficiency or service to clients Overcoming formidable obstacles Amount The amount of the reward should commensurate with the value of the specific achievement. However, individual rewards should not exceed one month s basic salary. There is no maximum limit on the number of rewards an employee may receive Procedure To maximize the impact of the reward, the recommendation should be made within one month of the event at the latest The concerned manager will forward their recommendation, which should include the rationale for the reward, to the Department Director for approval. The former should discuss the recommendation with their manager prior to sending it to the Department Director, if not the same individual If approved, the Department Director will send it to HR department Within 5 working days, the HR department will issue an appreciation letter and forward it to the Department Director for his/her signature. They will also ensure that payment will take place in the same month s payroll The reward should be publicized at least within the department. This could be done by presenting the reward and appreciation letter during a staff meeting 27

28 Non-monetary Reward Organizations may apply a number of non-monetary recognition rewards. Each organization can design its own policy and procedure to meet its needs. The following aspects could be considered when establishing the policy: 1. Clearly identify what you want to reward, such as: Performance over and above job requirements Contribution to team effectiveness Excellence in customer service Exemplary practice of the organization s values 2. How will you foster informal and formal recognition and reward? Encourage managers and peers to say thank-you - one of the easiest recognition tools Encourage informal recognition on the job, at meetings, etc. Establish formal recognition programs 3. Determine the most effective types of non-monetary recognition and reward. Recognition could include any of the following: - A simple thank-you - Plaque - Gift voucher - Letter of appreciation - Lunch with the Director General - Recognizing good performers as Employee of the Month/Year - Nominations for awards of Dubai Government Excellence Program Establish a budget for rewards Establish reward nomination, decision making process, the documentation required and process timelines 28

29 3.4.3 Promotion There are two types of promotions: Elevation to a higher grade Promotions may be long term rewards that recognize employee s professional growth and capacity to contribute to the organization in a new role. Promotion recommendations need not be linked in terms of timing to the performance appraisal exercise. A manager can submit a promotion recommendation on an ongoing basis as and when any of the following is applicable: There is a vacant position Current position has been re-evaluated to a higher-grade position due to restructuring or to a redistribution of duties and responsibilities A new higher-grade position has been created as a result of restructuring Individual Performance Plan Competency Results Eligibility criteria The employee has: Achieved a minimum performance rating of Exceeds Expectations The potential to handle higher/wider responsibilities Completed the minimum period required in the band, as follows: Band 5 4 years Band 4 3 years Other bands 2 years On the other hand, Director Generals may exceptionally promote distinguished employees to a position higher by two grades. However, employees are eligible for such a promotion only after 4 years of any previous one. Salary alignment on promotion could be either: Standard: In this case, the employee will receive 10% increase on their total salary as long as it does not exceed the maximum of their new grade salary range. Also, one year should elapse before the employee is eligible for another standard promotion. 29

30 Special: The employee will receive 20% increase on their total salary. However, the latter should not exceed the maximum of their new grade salary range. Also, four years should elapse before an employee is eligible for another special increase upon promotion. After consultation with the reviewing manager, the concerned manager will send their promotion proposal to the Department Director for approval. It should detail how the employee is the best fit for the job in terms of job knowledge, skills and competencies. If approved, the Department Director will send it to HR department. HR will prepare a letter communicating the promotion. It will be signed by the Department Director Financial Promotion A financial promotion is an ongoing salary increase given when a department wants to retain a high performing employee but an elevation to a higher grade is not possible. To be eligible for a financial promotion, the employee must receive an overall performance rating of at least Exceeds Expectations. Financial promotion could be either: Standard: In this case, the employee will receive 10% increase on their total salary as long as it does not exceed the maximum of their grade salary range. Also, one year should elapse before the employee is eligible for another standard financial promotion or Exceptional: The employee will receive 20% increase on the total salary. However, the latter should not exceed the maximum of their grade salary range. Additionally, four years should elapse before the employee is eligible for another exceptional financial promotion. After consultation with the reviewing manager, the concerned manager will send their promotion proposal to the Department Director for approval. It should detail the rationale for the promotion. If approved, the Department Director will send it to HR department. HR will prepare a letter communicating the promotion. It will be signed by the Department Director. It is important to note the following: None of the above promotions could be granted to an employee at the same time and/or same year Upon promotion, seniority should not be considered unless performance appraisals are identical Promotion should not be retroactive Learning and Development The employee performance management process encourages the development of employees. The process provides an excellent opportunity to identify learning and development needs. These should focus on both 30

31 the employee s current and future roles. Developing employees is more than just training them. Developing activities include, amongst others, involvement in meetings, attachment to other sections either within the department or another department within the organization or another organization, coaching, mentoring, assignments, projects, e-learning and job rotations. More details are available in the "Learning and Development policy". The HR department will record all learning and development information for the purpose of developing a learning and development plan for the organization. 4. Maintaining Performance Objectives: When employees move into or out of their positions or there is a change of manager, relevant performance information should be communicated in a timely manner. 4.1 Probationary Employees A probationary employee should have an IPP within 30 calendar days from date of employment. Upon completion of his/her probationary period, he/she will have an interim performance appraisal. The manager should complete the related probationary review form. If their employment has been confirmed, the employee will be appraised as part of current year s appraisal cycle. Employees should complete at least 6 months in service to be eligible for an annual increment and performance bonus. These will be prorated as per their performance rating. As for those who have not completed 6 months in service, they will only be eligible for the recognition program. 4.2 Change of Responsibilities An employee whose responsibilities and duties have changed either during their current posting or by transfer to another position (lateral, promotion or demotion) will have a new IPP. Within 30 calendar days of the new assignment, the new manager and employee will agree on objectives and competencies for the remaining period. The releasing manager is responsible for initiating and completing the performance appraisal for the period the employee used to report to him/her if the employee has spent at least 90 calendar days in this position. The manager will: a) Conduct the performance appraisal with the employee prior to the employee s last day of work for the period he/she spent in this position b) Forward the signed IPP to the employee s new manager (The steps detailed under point no. 3.3 should be followed here) 31

32 In case the employee moves to another organization, HR in the releasing organization will send a copy of the signed IPP to HR in the new organization. 4.3 Change of Manager If the manager leaves his/her position after at least 90 calendar days of an employee s performance cycle, he/she will complete an interim performance appraisal for that period. The reviewing manager will ensure that the evaluation documentation is available to the new manager. 5. Managing Under-performance: At any time in the performance cycle that a manager finds that the employee is not meeting the performance expectations of their position and when they are assigned an annual performance rating of 1, it is important that they take the necessary steps to help the employee improve. If the latter s performance does not improve, appropriate action needs to be taken by the manager. The key advice is always to involve HR in discussions before embarking upon a course of action to deal with poor performance. Below are the steps that the manager can initiate: Step 1: Identify and agree the problem with the employee Step 2: Establish the reason/s behind the shortfall in performance while first acknowledging the factors that are not within the employee s control. The causes of poor performance could be because the employee: Did not receive adequate guidance from their manager Was not fully clear about expectations Could not do it - ability Did not know how to do it - skill Would not do it - attitude Is facing personal difficulties or medical problems 32

33 Step 3: Decide and agree on the required actions. These could be: Changing behavior: this depends on whether the employee accepts that he/she needs to alter their behavior Clarifying expectations: job objectives and standards Developing abilities and skills Changing attitudes this is more difficult to change than behavioral pattern as it is deep-rooted. It is best to change behavior first and encourage attitude changes at a later stage Giving the employee appropriate opportunities to deal with personal/medical problems Step 4: Complete the PIP. The employee should be warned of the consequences of not improving and given a period of 4 months before either a reassignment to another position one grade less or termination is considered. (Please refer to the relevant form in Appendix D) Step 5: Provide the required resources in terms of training (classroom and on-the-job), coaching and guidance to enable required actions to take place. Step 6: Follow up: Take steps to monitor performance on a monthly basis, provide feedback and agree on any further actions that may be necessary. The manager should document progress reviews. This documentation must demonstrate that the employee was provided necessary training and coaching and that the manager has clarified the assignments and explained what was needed to be done. Step 7: At the completion of the improvement period, the manager should: Involve the reviewing manager and the Department Director, if different, in the rating Meet with the employee to review and determine whether they have met the requirements for improvement Send the completed form to the employee to sign it and include any comments the latter might want to suggest Forward the signed copy to the reviewing manager for their comments and signature Keep a copy and send one to the employee Send a copy to the Performance Review Committee if the employee s performance does not improve to at least Meets Expectations The committee will comprise of the Deputy or Assistant Director General - to be appointed by the Director General - HR Director and Head of Legal department. The committee will meet within 10 working days of the receipt of the aforementioned document. They may convene a hearing to investigate. 33

34 Within 4 weeks, the committee will determine whether the employee will be demoted by one grade or terminated. HR will prepare a letter communicating the decision. It should be signed by the Director General. The employee should be given 10 working days written notice of the decision. Within this period, the employee could appeal to a central specialized authority determined by the Government for this purpose. Otherwise, the decision of the Performance Review Committee will be considered final and binding on all parties. 6. Grievance and Appeal: The Government is committed to the fair and impartial treatment of all of its employees. The grievance and appeal process describes the steps the employee could take to raise matters stemming from the implementation of the employee performance management process except for his/her salary and grade: a) The employee must first attempt to resolve the grievance through discussions with their manager within 5 working days from the date of receipt of action being grieved. b) If no agreement has been reached, the employee can then send a written grievance to their reviewing manager with 5 working days. The reviewing manager should provide the employee with a written response within 10 working days of receiving the referral and send a copy to the concerned manager. They should involve the Department Director, if not the same individual. c) If the employee is dissatisfied with the reply, they could forward a written grievance to the Grievance and Complaints Committee in their organization within 5 working days from the date of their acknowledgement of the reviewing manager s response. d) The Committee is required to send a written reply to the employee within 4 weeks. The employee may appeal against the decision issued by the Grievance and Complaints Committee to a central specialized authority determined by the Government for this purpose. The appeal must be submitted within a period not exceeding 10 working days of the decision date; otherwise, the decision of the Grievance and Complaints Committee will be considered final and binding on all parties. 34

Federal Authority for Government Human Resources

Federal Authority for Government Human Resources Federal Authority for Government Human Resources Table of Content Introduction 3 I- General Framework 1- Principles 2- Scope 3- Objectives 4- EPMS Foundation 5- Definitions II- Key roles and responsibilities

More information

Yale University Performance Management Guide

Yale University Performance Management Guide Yale University Performance Management Guide Table of Contents Section Page Philosophy and Intent 3 FOCUS Annual Performance Management Cycle 4 Expectations 5 Starting With the End in Mind 5 Important

More information

Chapter 6. Performance Management Program

Chapter 6. Performance Management Program Chapter 6 Performance Management Program This publication supersedes MSNG-HRR, Chapter 6, dated 1 October 2011. Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction 6-1. Purpose 6-2. Explanation of Terms 6-3. Responsibilities

More information

Douglas County School District

Douglas County School District Douglas County School District Performance Evaluation Guidelines for Department Admin Pro/Tech Support Staff Employees 2014/15 School Year 1 Contents DISCLAIMER... 3 OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE... 3 EVALUATION

More information

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR OR RATER S GUIDE

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR OR RATER S GUIDE DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR OR RATER S GUIDE DECEMBER 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page Number Supervisor or Rater s Guide (Scope & Purpose)... 4 Definitions... 4 Statutory/Rule

More information

July/August 2013. 2014 and Beyond. Old Form. New Form. Employee. Manager

July/August 2013. 2014 and Beyond. Old Form. New Form. Employee. Manager Employee Training / June 2013 July/August 2013 2014 and Beyond Manager Employee Old Form New Form 2 As Employees, Each of Us Are Expected to Focus Communicate Strive Engage Refresh Develop 3 Performance

More information

FY 2014 Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Management Training

FY 2014 Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Management Training FY 2014 Senior Executive Service (SES) Management Training HC-40 February 2014 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF HUMAN CAPITAL OFFICER Table of Contents Overview Planning Monitoring and Developing Rating Rewarding Executive

More information

Performance Appraisal Handbook

Performance Appraisal Handbook Working Smarter for America The Department of the Interior s Performance Appraisal Handbook A Guide for Managers/Supervisors and Employees Office of the Secretary Office of Human Resources 10/4/04 #370DM430HB-1

More information

Performance Management in Primary Schools

Performance Management in Primary Schools Performance Management in Primary Schools Handbook for Headteachers and Supervisors DEVELOPED BY QUALITY EDUCATORS PROJECT- UGANDA LITERACY PROMOTING RIGHTS Literacy and Adult Basic Education (LABE) UNATU

More information

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Mission Statement: There is hereby established a University at Pueblo, to be known as Colorado State University Pueblo, which shall be

More information

ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Page 1 The performance appraisal of employees in the AFGE bargaining unit shall he in accordance with this Article and VA Directive 5013 and VA handbook 5013. In the

More information

The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009

The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009 The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009 Background This document provides details of the Department of Regulatory Agencies Performance

More information

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY. For. Section 57 and Non-section 57 Senior Management of Ethekwini Municipality

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY. For. Section 57 and Non-section 57 Senior Management of Ethekwini Municipality INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY For Section 57 and Non-section 57 Senior Management of Ethekwini Municipality Performance Monitoring and Evaluation (PME) Office of the City Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Performance Management and Appraisal Program (PMAP)

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Performance Management and Appraisal Program (PMAP) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Performance Management and Appraisal Program (PMAP) Section 1.0 The Agency retains the right to determine how much of its budget will be allocated for performance awards. Should

More information

Delaware County Human Resources Department Performance Review System Supervisor Guide

Delaware County Human Resources Department Performance Review System Supervisor Guide Supervisors, Managers and Directors, Thank you for reviewing the. This guide is an important source of information regarding the administration of the Performance Review System. The proper application

More information

Performance Management

Performance Management Performance Management WORKSHOP HANDOUTS Facilitated by: Tara Kemes, Vantage Point Knowledge Philanthropist June 2013 Page 1 of 16 Handout 1 Performance Management System Overview What is performance management?

More information

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System Department of the Interior

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System Department of the Interior Senior Executive Service Performance Management System Department of the Interior 1. System Coverage The Department of the Interior (hereafter referred to as the agency) Senior Executive Service (SES)

More information

National Guard Technician Performance Appraisal Program

National Guard Technician Performance Appraisal Program Technician Personnel Regulation 430 Performance Management National Guard Technician Performance Appraisal Program Departments of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau Arlington, VA 22202-3231

More information

Performance Evaluation Workshop February/March 2015

Performance Evaluation Workshop February/March 2015 February/March 2015 Overview Core Curriculum 2 Preparing Meaningful Performance Evaluations 3 1 February/March 2015 Training Topics: Conducting Performance Evaluations What is the purpose of performance

More information

NG Technician Performance Appraisal Program. Writing Effective Critical Elements Using the SMART or MARST Formats

NG Technician Performance Appraisal Program. Writing Effective Critical Elements Using the SMART or MARST Formats NG Technician Performance Appraisal Program Writing Effective Critical Elements Using the SMART or MARST Formats Overview Performance Appraisal Program The Five Rating Level Evaluation Method Performance

More information

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SPECIAL HEALTH AUTHORITY

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SPECIAL HEALTH AUTHORITY NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SPECIAL HEALTH AUTHORITY Performance Management Policy and Procedure 16 March 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Ongoing performance management

More information

U.S. Department of Energy

U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy Supervisory/Non-supervisory Employee Performance Management and Recognition Program Desk Reference U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer October

More information

ADS 421. Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Management System

ADS 421. Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Management System ADS 421 Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Management System Partial Revision Date: 05/21/2014 Responsible Office: HR/ELR File Name: 421_052114 Functional Series 400 Personnel Senior Executive

More information

CHAPTER 9 TECHNICIAN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM. Section I General. 1-2. Basic Requirements. This chapter requires that Performance Plans:

CHAPTER 9 TECHNICIAN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM. Section I General. 1-2. Basic Requirements. This chapter requires that Performance Plans: CHAPTER 9 TECHNICIAN PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM Section I General 1-1. Purpose. This chapter establishes the Performance Appraisal Program for National Guard Technicians and is consistent with Title

More information

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System. [Agency Name]

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System. [Agency Name] 1. System Coverage Senior Executive Service Performance Management System [Agency Name] The [Agency Name] (hereafter referred to as the agency) Senior Executive Service (SES) performance management system

More information

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & PLANNING GUIDE

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & PLANNING GUIDE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL & PLANNING GUIDE FOR EMPLOYEES Rev. 2015 1 P age THE PURPOSE & PRINCIPLES OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Each employee of Baylor University serves an important role in furthering the mission

More information

COLORADO DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2016

COLORADO DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF TRANSPORTATION JANUARY 2016 STATE OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN JANUARY 2016 Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration

More information

PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING

PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING OUTLINE Definition of Performance Appraisal Why Performance Appraisal (Objectives) Benefits Types of Performance Appraisal Appraisal System

More information

User s Guide to Performance Management

User s Guide to Performance Management User s Guide to Performance Management University Human Resources Brown University Table of Contents 1 I. Overview 3 II. The Performance Management Cycle 4 III. Performance Management Forms..6 1. Goal

More information

Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations

Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations Compiled by Human Resources Siemens Hall, Room 211 The research is clear. The outcome is consistent. We know with certainty that the most powerful leadership

More information

University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide

University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees 1. Purpose 2. Overview 3. Performance Planning Supervisor Guide 4. Monitoring Employee Performance: Ongoing

More information

ARKANSAS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND. Policy Type Subject of Policy Policy No. Administrative Personnel Performance Evaluation System 1013

ARKANSAS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND. Policy Type Subject of Policy Policy No. Administrative Personnel Performance Evaluation System 1013 PURPOSE: Pursuant to Act 449 of 2007, the Arkansas School for the Blind (ASB) adopts a Merit Pay Increase System for performance evaluation standards. The Personnel Performance Evaluation System (PPES)

More information

Results Based Performance Management System (RPMS) for DepEd. Lead, Engage, Align & Do! (LEAD)

Results Based Performance Management System (RPMS) for DepEd. Lead, Engage, Align & Do! (LEAD) Results Based Performance Management System (RPMS) for DepEd Lead, Engage, Align & Do! (LEAD) DepEd s Framework Based on DBM s OPIF Inclusive Growth and Poverty Reduction Alignment of Dr. Morato s framework

More information

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Senior Executive Service Performance Management System. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Executive Service Performance Management System U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1. System Coverage The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (hereafter referred to as the agency) Senior Executive Service

More information

Oudtshoorn Municipality. Performance Management Framework / Policy

Oudtshoorn Municipality. Performance Management Framework / Policy Oudtshoorn Municipality Performance Management Framework / Policy July 2011 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Objectives and Benefits of a Performance Management System 5 2.1 Objectives 5 2.2 Benefits

More information

Performance Management Guide For Managers

Performance Management Guide For Managers Performance Management Guide For Managers This guide applies to employees who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement or for whom the agreement contains no provision regarding this subject.

More information

Oregon University System

Oregon University System Oregon University System COMPLETING A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL For Employees in Classified Information Technology Positions Represented by the Oregon Public Employees Union Instructions for Supervisors INTRODUCTION

More information

Royal Insurance Corporation of Bhutan Performance Management System (PMS) User Manual

Royal Insurance Corporation of Bhutan Performance Management System (PMS) User Manual Royal Insurance Corporation of Bhutan Performance Management System (PMS) User Manual RICB Ltd. PMS User Manual 1 P a g e RICB Ltd. PMS User Manual 2 P a g e A Scorecard based Performance Management System

More information

Merit Pay Planning and Implementation Guide

Merit Pay Planning and Implementation Guide Document 3 Merit Pay Planning and Implementation Guide In This Guide Introduction Compensation Principles for Non Academic Staff Key Considerations Prepare Design Implement Related Policies Training Additional

More information

SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM

SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 September 30, 2010 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Purpose 1 Policy 1 Coverage 2 Exclusions 2 Definitions 3 Responsibilities

More information

Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan

Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan Colorado Department of Human Services Performance Management Program Implementation Plan Approved by Department of Personnel and Administration on October 2014 I. INTRODUCTION COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN

More information

Managing Performance Guidelines for the Tasmanian State Service

Managing Performance Guidelines for the Tasmanian State Service Managing Performance Guidelines for the Tasmanian State Service Managing Performance Guidelines for the Tasmanian State Service These guidelines are for use by State Service agencies and authorities which

More information

FANSHAWE COLLEGE POLICY MANUAL TITLE: PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW AND COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 1-B-25

FANSHAWE COLLEGE POLICY MANUAL TITLE: PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW AND COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 1-B-25 1. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SECTION B -HUMAN RESOURCES TITLE: PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW AND COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 1-B-25 POLICY NUMBER: EFFECTIVE: 2012 04

More information

GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS The research is clear. The outcome is consistent. We know with certainty that the most powerful leadership tool for improving productivity and increasing

More information

MONTANA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM STAFF COMPENSATION PLAN Pay Guidelines

MONTANA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM STAFF COMPENSATION PLAN Pay Guidelines MONTANA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM STAFF COMPENSATION PLAN Pay Guidelines Effective Date: PENDING FINAL APPROVAL Approved by: PENDING FINAL APPROVAL Commissioner of Higher Education 1.0 General Principles 1.1 Applicability

More information

Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2.

Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2. Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS Department of the Navy Handbook Version 2.0 September 2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 BACKGROUND 3 WHO IS COVERED?

More information

BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE Performance management is the methodical and organized system for monitoring the results of work activities, collecting information and evaluating performance,

More information

Performance Planning And Evaluation A guide for employees, supervisors and managers

Performance Planning And Evaluation A guide for employees, supervisors and managers THE LIVE IT EVERY DAY Performance Planning And Evaluation A guide for employees, supervisors and managers 1 INTEGRITY We live Integrity by Telling the truth. Being consistent. Doing the right thing even

More information

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System College of Design Merit Pay Rating System Merit Rating System The College of Design will use the Performance Only model of merit pay. Merit rating system and definition a. Merit pay matrix if defined at

More information

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 60L-35.001 Scope and Purpose 60L-35.002 Definitions 60L-35.003 Minimum Requirements 60L-35.004 Career Service 60L-35.005 Selected Exempt Service 60L-35.006 Transitional Provision (Repealed) 60L-35.001

More information

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 Name: Position: Anniversary Date in Position: Department: Supervisor: Appraisal Period: from to PURPOSE Communication about performance between

More information

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Pursuant to the provisions of Rule IX of the Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of Executive Order

More information

Code of Conduct, Statement of Corporate Purpose, Managing Unsatisfactory Performance, SES Performance Management

Code of Conduct, Statement of Corporate Purpose, Managing Unsatisfactory Performance, SES Performance Management Policy Name: Status: Staff Performance Management Policy and Framework Current Policy Number: 4 Version Number: 3 File reference: Compliance Level: Applies to: Category: Summary Related Policies: ADM/3132P02

More information

Performance Management Manual AUBMC

Performance Management Manual AUBMC Manual 6. Reward Performance 1. Mutually develop performance plan 5. Communicate the evaluation AUBMC 2. Monitor and document performance 4. Evaluate Performance 3. Provide Coaching and Development 1 SECTION

More information

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM Civil Service of Jamaica

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM Civil Service of Jamaica VERSION 2.0 January 2006 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM Civil Service of Jamaica GUIDELINES AND REFERENCE FOR GIVING RECOGNITION AND REWARDS Developed and produced by the Rewards & Recognition

More information

Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014

Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014 Staff Performance Evaluation Training Office of Human Resources October 2014 Documents Suggestion: Have copies of the following documents available during this presentation Core Competencies Staff Self-Evaluation

More information

Performance Management Development System (PMDS) for all Staff at NUI Galway

Performance Management Development System (PMDS) for all Staff at NUI Galway Performance Management Development System (PMDS) for all Staff at NUI Galway PMDS.doc 1 1. Introduction The Performance and Development Review System (PMDS) for NUI Galway has its foundation in Sustaining

More information

FY 2015 Senior Professional (SP) Performance Appraisal System Opening Guidance

FY 2015 Senior Professional (SP) Performance Appraisal System Opening Guidance Office of Executive Resources Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer U.S. Department of Energy FY 2015 Senior Professional (SP) Performance Appraisal System Opening Guidance Table of Contents Contents

More information

Performance Management Process Overview Elements of the Performance Management Process

Performance Management Process Overview Elements of the Performance Management Process PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CREATING SMART GOALS: In People Admin, the University will be asking managers and supervisors to focus their Performance Management outcomes by basing employee work plans on SMART

More information

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Aligns employee performance plans with organizational goals Focuses employees on achieving results Requires employee performance plans to include clear performance elements (expectations) with measurable

More information

FY15. EHE Manager s Guide to the Annual Performance Management System

FY15. EHE Manager s Guide to the Annual Performance Management System FY15 EHE Manager s Guide to the Annual Performance Management System Table of Contents I. Goals and Objectives of the Performance Management Process... 2 II. Goal Setting and Employee Development Planning...

More information

Executive Performance Management System

Executive Performance Management System 33 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Executive Performance Management System December 2010 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose... 1 1.2 Policy..2 1.3 Authority 2 1.4 References..

More information

Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations

Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations HRS Human Resource Services-Operations The research is clear. The outcome is consistent. We know with certainty that the most powerful leadership tool for

More information

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor review key responsibilities (from the job

More information

This policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations.

This policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations. Revision Date: First Version Page: 1 of 10 I. SCOPE This policy applies to all salaried operational employees of the College of William and Mary, including the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (hereafter

More information

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP)

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) Revised April 2015 1 Introduction Performance management is an ongoing process of communication between a supervisor and an employee that occurs throughout the year,

More information

The Performance & Learning Plan and Year End Performance Evaluation Process Overview: Employee Guide

The Performance & Learning Plan and Year End Performance Evaluation Process Overview: Employee Guide The Performance & Learning Plan and Year End Performance Evaluation Process Overview: Employee Guide The Performance & Learning Plan (PLP) and Year End Performance Evaluation (YEP) Processes together form

More information

GUIDELINE ON OPEN PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (OPRAS)

GUIDELINE ON OPEN PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (OPRAS) THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA GUIDELINE ON OPEN PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (OPRAS) PRESIDENT S OFFICE PUBLIC SERVICE MANAGEMENT DAR ES SALAAM SEPTEMBER, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS................

More information

Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised 7-22-15. I. Introduction

Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised 7-22-15. I. Introduction Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for Classified Employees Revised 7-22-15 I. Introduction The purpose of the Pueblo Community College Performance Management Program for classified

More information

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2010 Review Date 2015 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous policies Page 1 of 12 Identification HR-4540 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR

More information

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS)

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS) PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS) 1. DATE ISSUED CHAPTER S430_1 2. EMPLOYEES COVERED 3. LAW AND REGULATION 4. SSA DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY 5. SSA POLICY 5.1. Introduction 5.2. Overview

More information

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon Performance Management Handbook City of American Canyon 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background on performance management City Core competencies Performance management model Development of the Core

More information

UC Merced Performance Appraisal Employee Information. Appraisal Ratings. Part One: Core Competencies. Competency Comments: Performance Assessment

UC Merced Performance Appraisal Employee Information. Appraisal Ratings. Part One: Core Competencies. Competency Comments: Performance Assessment UC Merced Performance Appraisal Employee Information Name: Division: Job Title: Department: Supervisor's Name: Title Unit Code: Period Covered By This Appraisal: From: To: Appraisal Ratings Far Exceeds

More information

Individual Development Planning (IDP)

Individual Development Planning (IDP) Individual Development Planning (IDP) Prepared for Commerce Employees U.S. Department of Commerce Office of Human Resources Management Table of Contents Introduction / Benefits of Career Planning 1 Your

More information

Managing Performance An Introduction/Refresher. March 15, 2000

Managing Performance An Introduction/Refresher. March 15, 2000 Managing Performance An Introduction/Refresher March 15, 2000 Agenda The process is a resource to help measure and improve performance. The Performance Management Process & Form Performance Planning Integrating

More information

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS SOURCE: AGENCY ADMINISTRATION; OHIO REVISED CODE 124.34; OHIO ADMINSTRATIVE CODE 123:1-29; 123:3-1-01: OCSEA Contract, Article 22 CONTACT: OFFICE OF EMPLOYEE SERVICES Performance

More information

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT

EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT An evaluation of performance and accomplishments for Year Ending December 2007 Employee Name: Employee ID #: Position Title Grade: Annual Appraisal Schedule TASK COMPLETION DATE SUPERVISOR S INITIALS EMPLOYEE

More information

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Prepared by the Division of Human Resources in the Department of Personnel & Administration. Issued March 17, 2014. GENERAL This document is for use by human resources

More information

DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION

DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington, D.C. 20250 DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION SUBJECT: Performance Management NUMBER: 4040-430 DATE: September 30, 2013 OPI: Office of Human Resources Management Section

More information

HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:

HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can: HUMAN RESOURCES Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10 Policy Statement 3: Performance Management Performance Management Program 1. Purpose To establish a Policy for implementing and managing

More information

Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines. With Behavioral Indicators

Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines. With Behavioral Indicators Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines With Behavioral Indicators Rev. 05/06/2014 Contents PERFORMANCE FACTOR GUIDELINES... 1 Position Expertise... 1 Approach to Work... 2 Quality of Work...

More information

Employee Performance Management Policy and Procedure

Employee Performance Management Policy and Procedure Employee Performance Management Policy and Procedure Document Control Document Ref: HREPM001 Date Created: Sept 2007 Version: 1.4 Date Modified: April 2015 Revision due Author: Jane Milone Sign & Date:

More information

Introduction to Employee Performance Management System

Introduction to Employee Performance Management System Introduction to Employee Performance Management System 1 The Federal Authority for Government Human Resources (FAHR) undertook the responsibility of preparing Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)

More information

Administrative Instruction

Administrative Instruction Administrative Instruction Date: To: From: 26 July 2011 All UNOPS Personnel Pierre Moreau-Peron, Director, HRPG J 1-r AI Reference: Subject: AUHRPG/2011/04 Performance Management and Appraisal for staff

More information

University of Detroit Mercy. Performance Communication System (PCS)

University of Detroit Mercy. Performance Communication System (PCS) Supervisor Manual 1/5/11 Supervisor Manual Table of Contents The 3 The PCS Process 5 Preparing for the Discussion Meeting 7 Tips for Good Communication 7 Performance Expectations 8 Behavioral Competencies

More information

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY Updated July 2010 2007 1 CONTENTS Page 1 Purpose 3 2 Scope of the policy 3 Policy Framework 4 Roles and Responsibilities 5 Introduction to performance management in HelpAge

More information

ANNEXURE 1 Policy for Managing the Performance of Section 57 Employees of the City of Johannesburg

ANNEXURE 1 Policy for Managing the Performance of Section 57 Employees of the City of Johannesburg ANNEXURE 1 Policy for Managing the Performance of Section 57 Employees of the City of Johannesburg August Section 57 Performance Management Policy Table of Contents 1 SECTION 1 - Introduction... 1 1.1

More information

INVESTORS IN PEOPLE REVIEW REPORT

INVESTORS IN PEOPLE REVIEW REPORT INVESTORS IN PEOPLE REVIEW REPORT Lower Farm Primary School Page: 1 of 13 CONTENTS Key Information 3 Assessor Decision 3 Milestone Dates 3 Introduction 4 Assessment Objectives 4 Feedback Against the Assessment

More information

Boston University. 2015 Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt

Boston University. 2015 Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt Boston University 2015 Performance Evaluation Program Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt (excludes staff covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements and Certain Contracts) October 2015 TABLE

More information

CAMP LEJEUNE NONAPPROPRIATED FUND PERFORMANCE PLAN GUIDE

CAMP LEJEUNE NONAPPROPRIATED FUND PERFORMANCE PLAN GUIDE 1 CAMP LEJEUNE NONAPPROPRIATED FUND PERFORMANCE PLAN GUIDE Introduction Providing performance feedback enhances organizational growth and development. When correctly given, feedback helps improve job performance,

More information

SUBCHAPTER 920 EXECUTIVE AND SENIOR PROFESSIONAL PAY AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUBCHAPTER 920 EXECUTIVE AND SENIOR PROFESSIONAL PAY AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCHAPTER 920 EXECUTIVE AND SENIOR PROFESSIONAL PAY AND PERFORMANCE SYSTEM 1 SUBCHAPTER 920 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 PURPOSE 4 2 APPLICABILITY 4 3 DEFINITIONS 5 4 POLICY 10 5 RESPONSIBILITIES

More information

Retaining High Performers. How recognition, rewards and growth opportunities can help schools keep their best teachers.

Retaining High Performers. How recognition, rewards and growth opportunities can help schools keep their best teachers. Retaining High Performers How recognition, rewards and growth opportunities can help schools keep their best teachers. MARCH 2012 For schools to thrive over time, they must retain top teachers and put

More information

Performance Management

Performance Management Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1

More information

5.2 Performance Management Policy

5.2 Performance Management Policy Policy Statement The is committed to supporting the growth and development of employees through effective performance management. A key element of performance management is the translation of government

More information

Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy

Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy Adopted: April 2, 2002 Revised August 4, 2003 I. INTRODUCTION The County of Alexander has recognized the relationship of position classification, job performance,

More information

COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Revised October 1, 2008

COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Revised October 1, 2008 COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Revised October 1, 2008 I. HISTORY Since 1945, classified employees of the State of Colorado have been paid under a grade and step system where salaries

More information

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor establish performance objectives based on

More information

Human Resource Management Report

Human Resource Management Report Washington State Human Resource Management Report Prepared by: Department of Personnel April 2006 (rev 6/06) Updated through FY 2006 1 st & 2 nd Quarters 1 Human Resource Management Report - Reporting

More information

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM GENERAL POLICY It is the policy of Scott County to regularly evaluate the work performance of its employees and provide them with relevant feedback to enable

More information

Performance Management and Staff Development System

Performance Management and Staff Development System Performance Management and Staff Development System Guidelines Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 2 FAMILIARIZING YOURSELF WITH PMSDS... 2 3 FOLLOWING THE PMSDS CYCLE... 3 3.1 DETERMINING THE EXPECTED

More information