PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR FEDERAL AID COUNTY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS
|
|
- Mervyn Lewis Taylor
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Any Federal Aid county bridge replacement project shall be processed in accordance with the following guidelines. The County Engineer shall prepare the necessary documents and submit them to the Bureau of County Transportation, through the Division. The transmittal letter submitting the initial information should state when the project is to be let to contract The date requested should be a minimum of six (6) months from the time the resolution and supporting data are submitted to the Bureau of County Transportation. Any bridge being replaced with Federal Aid Bridge Replacement Funds MUST be on the Bridge Inventory, MUST have a sufficiency rating less than 50.0, and MUST be either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. This is not a requirement when Federal Aid Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds are used. The county's special work authorization (SWA) account will be used to pay for preliminary engineering costs incurred by State personnel. If the balance drops below $1,000.00, the county will be invoiced the amount required to bring the balance back up to $2, If the project has not been authorized within three (3) years of the date of the resolution, all of the following data must be resubmitted. 1. The following information should be SUBMITTED TOGETHER: a) RESOLUTION (one with original signatures for the Bureau of County Transportation, one copy for the Division) of the county governing body setting up the project include complete structure number, bridge identification number (BIN), sufficiency rating, status, creek name, location, and county route number in the project description. Attach a letter size legible location map (1: scale official Alabama Department of Transportation county map). Examples on pages and b) Two (2) letter size portions of a 7½" USGS map showing the project location. Example on page c) Four (4) prints (one copy for the division) (1: scale location map and 7½" USGS map showing project location attached to each print) of a plan/profile sheet along with a request for an on-site hydraulic review. (Request for Bridge Hydraulic Design Form; example on pages and 12.56) Three (3) color photographs (upstream channel, downstream channel, and present structure) must be provided to the Bureau of County Transportation. 3.1
2 Plan/Profile Sheet 1) Plan view with in-place and proposed horizontal alignment shown (show geometric data). ALSO, SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE DOWNSTREAM FLOODPLAIN CROSS-SECTION. (distances, angles, stations, etc. as related to the roadway alignment.) 2) Profile view with in-place and proposed vertical alignment shown (show geometric data). Also show profile alignment under in-place bridges. 3) Profile view shall also show the floodplain cross-section taken downstream of the proposed structure. THIS SECTION SHOULD BE TAKEN FAR ENOUGH DOWNSTREAM TO ENSURE THE CROSS-SECTION IS TAKEN IN THE NATURAL FLOODPLAIN AND STREAMBED. This section should be taken ninety degrees to the floodplain which is not always parallel to the proposed structure or roadway alignment. 4) Streambed profile 500 feet (150 meters) upstream and 500 feet (150 meters) downstream of the proposed structure, for all sites with a drainage area of less than 20 square miles (50 square kilometers). REQUESTS FOR HYDRAULIC SITE INSPECTIONS WILL NOT BE FORWARDED TO THE BRIDGE BUREAU UNTIL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS RECEIVED. For bridge replacement projects that will not require bridge size structures, no plan/profile sheets are required. However, the county will submit hydraulic data showing the size structure required, flow, etc. See examples on pages d) Project Review Consultation Form (Alabama Historical Commission). See example on pages and (one copy for the Bureau of County Transportation and one copy for Division). e) LETTER OF INTENT to use Federal Aid funds signed by the chairman of the county governing body with a letter size location map attached (one copy for Division, one copy for Bureau of County Transportation). Example on page f) LETTER OF INVOLVEMENT (4-F LANDS, ETC.) stating whether or not there is any involvement with lands from a public park, recreation area, wildlife refuge, historical site, navigable water, airport, or railroad (one copy for Division, one copy for Bureau of County Transportation). Example on page
3 If an airport is located within 2 miles (3.2 kilometers) of the project a letter, similar to the example on page 12.1, should be submitted (one copy for Bureau of County Transportation, one copy for Division). If the project significantly increases the elevation of the roadway in relation to the airport, you should contact the Bureau of County Transportation for the proper procedures to follow. If the bridge replacement project involves a structure over a railroad, a Railroad Agreement shall be required. See Section 8 for railroad procedures. g) RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) RECORDING DATA LETTER stating the basic width of the existing right-of-way, the date it was acquired, recording information (location of recording, deed book, and page), and whether or not additional right-of-way is required. Example on page If no recorded right-of-way exists, submit a letter stating this and state how much right-of-way will be required (one copy for Division, one copy for the Bureau of County Transportation). Preliminary Relocation Assistance Analysis is required if any additional right-of-way is necessary; use the ROW-RA-1 Form (one copy for Division, one copy for Bureau of County Transportation). Example on pages 6.11 and h) PLACE AN ADVERTISEMENT in a local newspaper stating that the county intends to apply for Federal Aid funds to construct the project. This advertisement should be published on all Federal Aid projects, whether additional right-of-way is required or not. No publisher's affidavit is required. After publication, furnish the Bureau of County Transportation one copy as it appears in the paper and one copy for the Division. Example on page i) VIEWS AND COMMENTS LETTER is prepared and sent to the review agencies listed on pages and This letter is prepared and circulated only for those projects for which additional right-of-way is required. Example on page As soon as the Bureau of County Transportation receives the above information, an up-to-date traffic count will be requested from the Transportation Planning Bureau or provided by the county in accordance with the Standards for Traffic Volume and Classification Counts as shown on page The latest accident data on record will also be requested from the Multimodal Bureau. The County Engineer should not proceed with any plan work until this information is received. 3.3
4 3. The Bureau of County Transportation will furnish the plan/profile sheet(s) to the Bridge Bureau, along with a request for a site inspection. 4. As soon as the site inspection has been made, the traffic count has been received, and the required reviews of other agencies completed, the County Engineer will be advised to prepare the categorical exclusion. An up-to-date example of the categorical exclusion will be furnished by the Bureau of County Transportation at this time. This example should be followed as closely as possible changing only the project description and information pertinent to your particular project. If additional right-of-way is required, a Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Form AD-1006 (shown on page 12.9) must be attached to each copy of the categorical exclusion. When the Form AD-1006 is initiated by the county, in addition to completing Parts I and III, also use the Alabama Department of Transportation Assessment Criteria (shown on pages ) to complete Part VI. If the total site assessment points from Part VI is less than 60, the form WILL NOT have to be sent to the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and will be ready to accompany the submission of the categorical exclusion for the project. If the assessment is 60 points or greater, the form WILL have to be forwarded to the SCS for evaluation and processing. 5. The County Engineer will prepare the categorical exclusion (in most cases the county projects will be categorical exclusions) and submit the original and four (4) originally signed copies to this office, through the Division. The County Engineer must sign the categorical exclusion. DO NOT SEND THIS LETTER OR A COPY TO FHWA. The letter will be reviewed and forwarded to the Environmental Technical Section for their review and approval. After the approval of the Environmental Technical Section, the letter will be forwarded to the Office Engineer for further review and submission to the Federal Highway Administration for approval. Approved copies of this document are distributed to the County Engineer, Division Engineer, Environmental Technical Section, and the Bureau of County Transportation for permanent filing. THE COUNTY ENGINEER SHOULD NOT PROCEED WITH FINAL PLAN PREPARATION OR RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION UNTIL THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION IS APPROVED. ACQUISITION OF RIGHT- OF-WAY PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WILL MAKE THE PROJECT INELIGIBLE FOR FEDERAL FUNDS. 6. In the event the project is determined not to be a categorical exclusion, the County Engineer, assisted by the Bureau of County Transportation, in consultation with the Environmental Technical Section, shall prepare the necessary documents and process the project as required. 7. If the County wants the Bridge Bureau to design the required structure(s), a request must be sent to the Bureau of County Transportation with six (6) copies of the title sheet, typical section(s), plan/profile sheet(s) and a three-line profile. The Bureau of County Transportation will contact the Bridge Bureau and 3.4
5 request a cost estimate for the foundation investigation and bridge plan preparation. Once this estimate has been received, the county will be invoiced this amount. No design work will be performed until the funding for this cost has been added to the county's SWA account. 8. PRELIMINARY BRIDGE SUBMITTAL PLANS BY COUNTY OR CONSULTANT If the county utilizes consultant contract services or county personnel for the design of the required structure, a preliminary bridge layout should be submitted to the Bridge Bureau for concurrence prior to beginning work on the final bridge plans. This transmittal should include the following: a) A roadway plan & profile drawing that provides sufficient information to establish the geometrics of the proposed structure. b) A preliminary bridge layout showing the type, size, and location (TS&L) of the proposed structure. The TS&L drawing should include proposed span lengths, type(s) of girder(s), girder spacing, alignment information, stationing of abutment and bents, skew (if applicable), groundline (three line profiles) information, and profile grade data. c) Proposed foundation type along with justification for the type of foundations being proposed. d) A contact person and telephone number (also recommend furnishing address). This applies to all bridge projects (with the exception of ALDOT standard precast structures) that are to be reviewed and approved by the ALDOT Bridge Engineer. 9. FINAL BRIDGE PLANS PLANS BY COUNTY OR CONSULTANT Once the preliminary layout has been approved by the Bridge Bureau, the County/Consultant may begin work on the final bridge plans. One set of prints of the final bridge plans, including title sheet and typical section should be submitted to the Bridge Bureau at least 24 weeks prior to the requested letting date. This transmittal should include a stamped copy of the bridge design calculations and a copy of the foundation report. The Bridge Bureau will review the submitted prints and return a set of marked up prints to the County/Consultant with review comments and corrections. Once the County/Consultant has addressed all the Bridge Bureau review comments, the following items should be transmitted to the Bridge Bureau. 3.5
6 a) One set of final bridge plans on Mylar for final approval. All required signatures and seals should be affixed (i.e. County Engineer and designer of record). b) The original check prints with review comments. c) One set of revised prints for the HS-20 and operating ratings. d) Under separate cover letter (example shown on page 12.40) submit one set of revised prints to the Bureau of County Transportation for overtopping elevation data. This submittal should include a copy of the plan & profile sheet, the bridge general plan and elevation sheet, and any additional bridge sheets necessary to calculate the actual low girder elevation. Include the new BIN if available. 10. POLICY FOR COUNTY BRIDGES WITH SPAN LENGTHS OF 41 FEET OR LESS USING PILE BENT CONSTRUCTION HP 12x53 piling will be the minimum pile size used on all bridges. HP 10x42 piling will no longer be allowed in any locations. Piling used in the wire rope abutment anchor assemblies and wing piles shall be driven to refusal or 20, whichever is less. Abutment and bent piles shall be driven to refusal or to the minimum tip elevation shown on the plans. The minimum penetration for any pile shall not be less than 10 feet into natural ground and not less than 1/3 the length of the pile. If at least 10 feet of pile penetration cannot be obtained, then concrete pedestals or pilot holes shall be used. A minimum of one (1) core boring for foundation design will be required and shown on the plans with sufficient data obtained to conduct a scour analysis and a static analysis to determine minimum and estimated pile tip elevations. If the scour analysis indicates the scour depth could extend within 10 feet of the minimum tip elevation for the piling, the county will have the option of plating the entire footprint of the structure with rip-rap, even if the recommended bridge is greater than 5 spans, or considering a different foundation design with longer spans. A comparative cost analysis should be prepared by the County and approved by the State to determine which option should be used. OR Representative samples of soil defining the bed material size, gradation and distribution will be obtained from the stream bed and overbank under the proposed bridge for the purpose of performing a scour analysis as outlined in FHWA s HEC-18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges. These samples shall be furnished to 3.6
7 an independent certified lab, Division Materials Lab or Materials and Tests Lab for them to furnish the County a D-50 to be furnished with the plan-profile sheet and other required data submitted for a hydraulic site inspection. This D-50 will be used to calculate scour. If the scour analysis indicates that the area is highly susceptible to scour or if excessive velocities, (greater than 5 ft/sec.) are calculated, the site report will indicate that the entire footprint of the bridge shall be plated with rip-rap in accordance with current standard drawings. The county will have the option of plating the entire footprint of the structure with rip-rap, even if the recommended bridge is greater than 5 spans, or considering a different foundation design with longer spans. A comparative cost analysis should be prepared by the County and approved by the State to determine which option should be used. If this option is chosen and the recommended bridge is 5 spans or less, piling shall be driven to refusal as defined by the specifications and no core boring is required. If the site inspection determines that a structure longer than five (5) spans is required, then at least one core boring will be required for foundation design and scour analysis. More that one core boring is desirable for bridges longer than 5 spans. A load test will be included as a pay item on all short span (41 ft. length spans or less) county bridges. The purpose of the load test is to confirm pile bearing capacity therefore a pile driving hammer approval will be waived. 11. The County Engineer prepares a materials report and submits it to the Division for review by the Division materials Engineer. To avoid a possible delay in letting the project, this report should be submitted to the Division as soon as possible. Any requested waivers to the material specifications should be included in the materials report. The report must be signed by the County Engineer. The materials report will be reviewed and approved at the Division level by the Division Materials Engineer. A copy of the approved materials report will be sent by the Division to the Bureau of County Transportation and the Construction Bureau. Example on pages The County Engineer should contact the Division when the plans and cost estimate are complete and arrange for a PS&E review. The Bureau of County Transportation shall be notified, in writing, of the time, date, and location of the PS&E review. The Bureau of County Transportation shall be notified, in writing, of the time, date, and location of the PS& E review. A PS&E report should be prepared by the Division County Transportation Engineer and submitted to the Bureau of County Transportation with the plans (example on pages ). The Division County Transportation Engineer should be sure the final plans conform to the recommendations made in the PS&E inspection and the approved 3.7
8 categorical exclusion. PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES FOR FEDERAL AID 13. The following information should be submitted to the appropriate Division for review and approval at least 16 weeks prior to the letting date: ITEM EXAMPLE PAGE NO. Final Plans.. -- *County Cost Estimate (See note below).. -- Acquired ROW Recording Data Letter, if applicable 6.13 Earthwork Summary Submittal Sheet, if applicable 12.6 BI-1 Form (BIN Assignment Card) for Proposed Structure if applicable. -- Engineering and Inspection (E&I) Reduction Letter if applicable Engineering Personnel and Equipment Certification 12.8 Hydraulic Data Sheet, if applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Certification Plan Checklist Right-of-Way Certification Right-of-Way Encroachment Certification Utility Agreements, if applicable Utility Certificate *The county will generate a project cost estimate utilizing AASHTO-ware and submit an electronic file and a hard copy to the Division with the plans. The Division will be responsible for converting the estimate to Proposal and Estimate System (PES) format and verifying unique item numbers, quantities, and unit bid prices. This estimate should be passed electronically to the Bureau of County Transportation along with a hard copy to be submitted with the final plans. 14. Final plans and supporting data should be submitted to The Bureau of County Transportation at least 14 weeks prior to the letting date. The plan checklist, which has been used by the county and Division to check the various items, must be submitted with the plans. If the checklist does not accompany the plan assembly, the plans will be returned to the Division. Plans are checked by the Bureau of County Transportation for accuracy. Project detail drawings that are not included, or modified from the current ALDOT Special and Standard Drawing Book, are added to the plans. The plans and supporting data are submitted to the Construction Bureau for review at least 10 weeks prior to the letting date. This review is made to ensure the plans conform to Federal and State requirements. The Construction Bureau also recommends special provisions to be included in the bid proposal. Any comments made by the Construction Bureau 3.8
9 must be resolved during the first 4 weeks of this 10 week period. 15. A design risk assessment is required on all Federal Aid bridge replacement projects involving waterways or drainage relief structures. This form should be prepared and submitted to the Bureau of County Transportation after the county has received the overtopping flood data provided by the Bureau of County Transportation. Example on pages 12.3 and Minor changes and corrections in the plans will be made by the Bureau of County Transportation. Any major changes or corrections will require the plans to be returned to the county (copy of letter to the Division). After the county has addressed all changes or corrections, the plans should be resubmitted to the Division County Transportation Engineer for review and approval. The Division will then forward the revised plans to the Bureau of County Transportation. All changes have to be made and the project has to be ready to go to contract at least 6 weeks prior to the letting date. 16. The Bureau of County Transportation will prepare a project agreement approximately 4 weeks prior to the scheduled letting date for contract projects. These agreements must be approved by all parties prior to award of the contract. All material is submitted to the Federal Highway Administration requesting authorization 4 weeks prior to the letting date. 17. As soon as possible after the letting date, invoices will be prepared and sent to the county. The county's portion of the project cost and the award of the contract must be done within 30 days (4 weeks) of the letting date. IF THE COUNTY'S CHECK IS NOT RECEIVED BY THE BUREAU OF COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BY THIS DEADLINE, THE BIDS WILL HAVE TO BE REJECTED AND THE COUNTY'S FEDERAL FUNDS WILL REVERT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. After the award is made, the contractor has 15 days to return the contract to the Department of Transportation, and then the Transportation Director and the Governor have 20 days to sign the contract. After the contract is signed by all parties, the Office Engineer has 15 days to issue the work order. After the work order is issued, the contractor has 15 days to begin work unless modified by a special provision. 3.9
Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology
Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology Abutment A retaining wall supporting the ends of a bridge, and, in general, retaining or supporting the approach embankment. Approach The part of the bridge that carries
More informationHighway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting
Highway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting MnDOT Contract No. 1003249 General Project Overview This work is located along Trunk Highway (TH) 23, for State Project (SP) 7305-124.
More informationChapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES
Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES Final SCDOT GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL August 2008 Table of Contents Section Page 4.1 Introduction...4-1 4.2 Subsurface Investigation...4-2 4.2.1 Preliminary
More informationUtility Coordination Procedures for Hillsborough County Construction Projects within County Rights-of-Way
Public Works Department Utility Coordination Procedures for Hillsborough County Construction Projects within County Rights-of-Way October 2015 HillsboroughCounty.org HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY Office of the County
More informationWork Breakdown Structure Element Dictionary. Final Design
Initiation FD 4.1 Initiation encompasses deliverables associated with the development, implementation and control of the project s schedule, budget and scope. The lead office develops these project parameters
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Engineering Design Services for the Preliminary (Design) Engineering 1. Imlay City Road Imlay City Road at Wilder Road (signal modernization), Lapeer Township 2. Imlay City Road Imlay
More informationENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES. for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS
ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES for SUBDIVISIONS OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS City of Birmingham Department of Planning, Engineering and Permits Engineering Division Office of the City Engineer 2008 TABLE
More informationThe checklist utilized by the Authority will be similar to that which is shown below. Project Name: Location: Consulting Engineering Firm:
Page 1 of 6 Section 1. PURPOSE This policy is an Engineering checklist of the Local Review Program for sanitary sewer improvement projects by the Bedford Regional Water Authority ( Authority ). Section
More informationLAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT. Developer Extension Agreement Application
Applicant shall indicate that the required information has been provided or is not applicable to the project by placing the appropriate mark in the first column of this checklist. Missing or incomplete
More informationBRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are
Chapter 10 Bridges Chapter 10 Bridges Bridg Bridges -- usually the best, but most expensive drainage crossing structure. Protect bridges against scour. BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are the
More informationAppendix A Alternative Contracting General Engineering Consultant RFP. Appendix A
Appendix A 1 1.0 Requirements and Minimum Qualifications This section outlines requirements and minimum qualifications for the GEC. It is anticipated that the GEC will be used to support and supplement
More informationColorado Off-System Bridge Program Description and Guidelines for Selecting Bridges for Rehabilitation or Replacement Funding
C Colorado Off-System Bridge Program Description and Guidelines for Selecting Bridges for Rehabilitation or Replacement Funding These guidelines are intended to provide assistance in selecting OFF-SYSTEM
More informationWork Type Definition and Submittal Requirements
Work Type: Highway Materials Testing Geotechnical Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Laboratory Testing, Standard Penetration (SPT) & Rock Coring, Cone Penetration Test, Solid Stem Auger Drilling, and Materials
More informationSECTION 5 DRAFTING STANDARDS
SECTION 5 DRAFTING STANDARDS 1 SECTION FIVE TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page TABLE OF CONTENTS... 5-2 GENERAL... 5-3 DRAFTING STANDARDS... 5-5 DRAFTING MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS HANDOUT... 5-8 2 GENERAL 1.
More informationCHECKLIST TO DESIGNATE AREAS OF EVALUATION FOR REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
Michigan Department Of Transportation 5100B (05/13) CHECKLIST TO DESIGNATE AREAS OF EVALUATION FOR REQUESTS FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Page 1 of 2 REQUISITION NUMBER DUE DATE TIME DUE MDOT PROJECT MANAGER JOB
More informationHow To Check For Scour At A Bridge
Case Studies Bridge Scour Inspection and Repair Edward P. Foltyn, P.E. Senior Hydraulic Engineer ODOT Bridge Unit 2013 PNW Bridge Inspectors Conference April 2013 REFERENCES Stream Stability at Highway
More informationSERVICES THAT MAY ONLY BE PERFORMED BY A NEW JERSEY PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
SERVICES THAT MAY ONLY BE PERFORMED BY A NEW JERSEY PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 1. ANY MAP OR PLAN THAT SHOWS: Property Lines. NJSA 45:8-28(e), NJAC 13:40-1.3, 13:40-5.1 Locations of Existing Buildings
More informationSECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Page 1 of 6 SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. SCOPE OF WORK: The work to be performed under the provisions of these documents and the contract based thereon includes furnishing all labor, equipment, materials,
More informationCONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES
Chapter 8 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES SCDOT BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL April 2006 Table of Contents Section Page 8.1 PROGRAMMING ESTIMATES...8-1 8.1.1 Bridge Replacement Projects...8-1 8.1.2 Other Projects...8-1
More informationGENERAL. This manual addresses five local programs that are funded under the current Highway Act:
OVERVIEW The Local Public Agency Manual published by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) is intended to be used as a guide for cities and counties that sponsor projects utilizing federal
More informationTENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS FOR WATERBODIES CROSSED BY CONNECTICUT PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT CONNECTICUT LOOP Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company,
More informationCHAPTER 12 Revised January 1, 2013 SIGNING AND SEALIN OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY DELIVERABLES
CHAPTER 12 Revised January 1, 2013 SIGNING AND SEALIN OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY DELIVERABLES Chapter Contents Sec. 12.01 Sec. 12.02 Sec. 12.03 Sec. 12.04 Sec. 12.05 Sec. 12.06 Introduction Business & Legal
More information05-15-98 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE, 7246
CITY OF LOS ANGELES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CLASS SPECIFICATION POSTED JUNE 1999 05-15-98 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE, 7246 Summary of Duties: Performs professional civil engineering work in researching,
More informationLand Use Series. Check List # 1I For Adoption of an Amendment to a Plan. December 22, 2010. Bringing Knowledge to Life!
Land Use Series Bringing Knowledge to Life! Thirty seven million acres is all the Michigan we will ever have. Former Governor William G. Milliken Michigan State University Extension Land Use Team http://ntweb11a.ais.msu.
More informationCITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL
CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL Book 2 (SW) SW9 June 2015 SW9.01 Purpose This Chapter provides information for the design of open channels for the conveyance of stormwater in the City of Fort Wayne.
More informationURBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA
URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA I. Introduction This division contains guidelines for drainage system design and establishes a policy for recognized and established engineering design of storm drain facilities
More informationALABAMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ALABAMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR COUNTY AND CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS PROJECTS TOTALLY FUNDED WITH LOCAL FUNDS AND SUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Thomas R. Bice,
More informationSample DEQ Plan Submitter s Checklist for Stormwater Management Plans
APPENDIX IV Version: February 2, 2015 Sample DEQ Plan Submitter s Checklist for Stormwater Management Plans Please fill in all blanks and please reference the plan sheets/pages where the information may
More informationSECTION 08000 STORM DRAINAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 08000 STORM DRAINAGE 08010 DESIGN A. Location B. Sizing TABLE OF CONTENTS 08020 MATERIALS A. Pipe Materials B. Structure Materials C. Installation D. Inlets and Outlets 08030 INSPECTIONS AND TESTING
More informationP. ALTERNATE TECHNICAL CONCEPTS FOR CONSTRUCTION, STAGING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL
P. ALTERNATE TECHNICAL CONCEPTS FOR CONSTRUCTION, STAGING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL 1.0 Description. 1.1 This specification allows bidders the opportunity to include in their overall bid proposal, pricing for
More informationStructures Construction Pre-Work Checklist PRE-WORK SHEET FOR PROJECT MANAGERS
Structures Construction Pre-Work Checklist PRE-WORK SHEET FOR PROJECT MANAGERS 1 Proposal & Plans Received? 2 Review Proposal, highlight important facts. Know proposal well to be able to find answers quickly.
More informationQuality Control and Quality Assurance Guide
Quality Control and Quality Assurance Guide Bridge Division, Design Section October 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1 About this Guide... 3 Chapter 2 Goals and Objectives... 5 Chapter 3 Participants...
More informationFloodplain Development Land Use Review
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 490 333 Broadalbin Street SW Albany, OR 97321 Phone 541-917-7550 Fax 541-791-0150 www.cityofalbany.net Floodplain Development Land Use Review
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS CROSS SLOPE VERIFICATION:
September 22, 2009 Updated November 16, 2009 SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS CROSS SLOPE VERIFICATION: 1. DESCRIPTION: The cross slopes of the roadway are to be constructed as detailed in the plans and within
More information2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, 2014. DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement.
2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, 2014 DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement Mary Ann Triska 2015 HDR, all rights reserved. Presentation Outline Project
More informationCity of Colleyville Community Development Department. Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet
City of Colleyville Community Development Department Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet Development Application Fees City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville TX 76034 817.503.1050 Zoning Zoning
More informationEI 08-002 ENGINEERING INSTRUCTION
To: New York State Department of Transportation ENGINEERING INSTRUCTION EI 08-002 Title: REVISED PLAN SHEET GUIDANCE Distribution: Approved: Manufacturers (18) Surveyors (33) Local Govt. (31) Consultants
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS
July 14, 2015 1.0 GENERAL BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS This work shall consist of furnishing all materials, equipment, labor, and incidentals necessary for conducting bi-directional
More informationBRIDGE SCOUR INVESTIGATION: DEVELOPING A SCREENING AND HYDRAULIC VULNERABILITY RATING SYSTEM FOR BRIDGES B.HERON 1 & C.BOWE 2
BRIDGE SCOUR INVESTIGATION: DEVELOPING A SCREENING AND HYDRAULIC VULNERABILITY RATING SYSTEM FOR BRIDGES B.HERON 1 & C.BOWE 2 1 O Connor Sutton Cronin Consulting Engineers, Dublin, Ireland 2 Iarnród Éireann,
More informationHigh Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts
Supplemental Technical Specification for High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts SCDOT Designation: SC-M-712 (9/15) September 3, 2015 1.0 GENERAL This work shall consist of performing high-strain
More informationQUALITY ASSURANCE. and QUALITY CONTROL PROCESS GUIDE. for PROJECT MANAGERS
QUALITY ASSURANCE and QUALITY CONTROL PROCESS GUIDE for PROJECT MANAGERS MDOT Trunkline Projects January 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Discussion.. 2 Scope Verification Meeting..... 3 Overview 3 Procedure...
More information2014/2015 PAVING PROJECT MILLING AND PATCHING BID DOCUMENTS JASPER COUNTY, GEORGIA
2014/2015 PAVING PROJECT MILLING AND PATCHING BID DOCUMENTS JASPER COUNTY, GEORGIA Issued on January 7, 2015 1 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS 2014/2015 ROADWAY PATCHING PROJECT JASPER COUNTY, GEORGIA Separate,
More informationExhibit A Scope of Work
Exhibit A Scope of Work The agreement for S.P. 3116-142 (T.H. 169-Cross Range Expressway) includes final design plans for a 1.55 mile length of a 2 lane to 4 lane expansion project located 0.66 miles SW
More informationProcedures for No-Rise Certification For Proposed Developments in the Regulatory Floodway
US Department of Homeland Security Region X 130 228 th Street, SW Bothell, WA 98021 Procedures for No-Rise Certification For Proposed Developments in the Regulatory Floodway Section 60.3 (d) (3) of the
More informationBridge Office Policies and Procedures BOPP 2014
Bridge Office Policies and Procedures BOPP 2014 Nebraska Department of Roads Bridge Division Last updated: October 2014 Introduction Page I Purpose The BRIDGE OFFICE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES manual (BOPP)
More informationCHAPTER 9 CHANNELS APPENDIX A. Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow
CHAPTER 9 CHANNELS APPENDIX A Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow SEPTEMBER 2009 CHAPTER 9 APPENDIX A Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow Introduction The Equations presented
More informationPolk Commerce Centre CRA Spine Road Alignment Study
Polk Commerce Centre CRA Spine Road Alignment Study Florida Polytech Pace Road (LIMIT) Berkley Road Williams DRI Proposed Alignment Polk Commerce Centre CRA Boundary Braddock Road (LIMIT) Lake Myrtle Sports
More informationGeneral Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]
General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title] Purpose These rules set forth the conditions under which a person may, without an individual removal-fill permit
More informationProject Management On-line Guide
Project Management On-line Guide Project Life Cycle Processes Flowchart Department Policy Memorandum Project Management Policy To support the Project Management Initiative, respond to Policy Agreement
More informationSection 11.5 TESTING AND CORRECTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE DEFICIENCIES
Section 11.5 TESTING AND CORRECTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE DEFICIENCIES 11.5.1 Purpose To provide a uniform procedure for determining that the last structural layer meets the applicable straightedge
More informationThe Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA
The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA April 17, 2013 Goal To develop a basic understanding of PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and US Army Corps of Engineers
More informationAppendix 4-C. Open Channel Theory
4-C-1 Appendix 4-C Open Channel Theory 4-C-2 Appendix 4.C - Table of Contents 4.C.1 Open Channel Flow Theory 4-C-3 4.C.2 Concepts 4-C-3 4.C.2.1 Specific Energy 4-C-3 4.C.2.2 Velocity Distribution Coefficient
More informationProject Delivery Process Overview
New Jersey Department of Transportation Project Delivery Process Overview Presented by the Program Management Office January, 2012 Project Delivery Process Overview The New Jersey Department of Transportation
More informationGLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY
GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY AUTHORIZED PILE LENGTHS - (a.k.a. Authorized Pile Lengths letter) Official letter stating Engineer's recommended length of concrete piles to be cast for construction of foundation.
More informationInformational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project
Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Project WV Department of Transportation Division of Highways in Cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration State Project S310-13-0.02 00 Federal
More informationELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND POLICIES
ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND POLICIES Recommended by the Illinois Department of Agriculture The following electric line construction standards and policies are recommended by the
More informationBRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL
BRIDGE DESIGN MANUAL 2003 Edition (U.S. Customary Units) State of Connecticut Department of Transportation Revisions: 7/04, 11/04, 1/05, 3/05, 1/09, 3/09, 2/11 PREFACE The Connecticut Department of Transportation
More informationNORTHERN LIGHTS, INC. SINGLE PHASE APPLICATION CHECKLIST
NORTHERN LIGHTS, INC. SINGLE PHASE APPLICATION CHECKLIST SUBDIVISIONS, MULTI-FAMILY, LARGE COMMERCIAL AND 3-PHASE PROJECTS NEED TO USE OUR DEVELOPER S APPLICATION ITEMS NEEDED BEFORE PROJECT IS ENGINEERED:
More informationCHAPTER 7 STORM WATER DESIGN
CITY OF BOULDER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS CHAPTER 7 STORM WATER DESIGN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 7.01 GENERAL...4 (A) INTENT... 4 (B) STORM WATER AND GREENWAYS MASTER PLANS... 4 (C) REFERENCE
More informationCASS COUNTY COMMISSION POLICY MANUAL 38.07 ADOPTED DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1998 PAGE 1 OF 9
CASS COUNTY COMMISSION POLICY MANUAL 38.07 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE #1998-2 (FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION) ADOPTED DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1998 PAGE 1 OF 9 NORTH DAKOTA COUNTY OF CASS ORDINANCE #1998-2 Be it ordained and
More information3.1 Historical Considerations
3. Recommended Scope of Bridge improvements 3.1 Historical Considerations In the fall of 2000, an outside consultant, Fraser Design, suggested that the existing 4 th St. Bridge is potentially eligible
More informationState of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS
State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS While its use is not required, this checklist has been prepared to provide the field inspector a summary
More informationFederal Emergency Management Agency Region IV 3003 Chamblee-Tucker Road Atlanta, GA 30341
Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV 3003 Chamblee-Tucker Road Atlanta, GA 30341 GUIDANCE FOR "NO-RISE / NO-IMPACT" CERTIFICATION FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS IN REGULATORY FLOODWAYS The National
More informationPTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE
FORM A PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE The following suggested specifications are written as a guide to assist the specifier in writing his own specifications. Specific circumstances
More informationHarris County Flood Control District. Policy, Criteria, and Procedure Manual
Harris County Flood Control District Policy, Criteria, and Procedure Manual For Approval and Acceptance of Infrastructure General Review October 10, 2003 Draft Please Provide Written Comments to the HCFCD
More informationSECTION 02845 GUARDRAILS
SECTION 02845 GUARDRAILS PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SCOPE OF WORK A. Furnish all labor, materials, equipment and incidentals necessary and repair, replace or install all types of guardrails as specified herein
More informationSTORM DRAINS CHAPTER 7
CHAPTER 7 Chapter 7 - Storm Drains A storm drain is a drainage system that conveys water or stormwater, consisting of two or more pipes in a series connected by one or more structures. Storm drains collect
More informationSmall Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory
Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory What would happen if your dam were to fail? This is a question that most dam owners hope they will never have to answer. However it is a question you, as a responsible
More informationControl filling, grading, dredging, and other development which may increase erosion or flood damage; and
ARTICLE 16. FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION Section 16-1: Findings of Fact The flood hazard areas of the Town of Lillington are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and property, health
More informationDEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES
DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES Bylaw No. 2444 and amendments thereto CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY This is a consolidation of the bylaws listed below. The amending bylaws have been consolidated
More informationNote: All terms which are defined and which are used throughout this document appear in italicized text beginning with a CAPITAL letter.
SCHEDULE OF CONSULTANT S SERVICES Note: All terms which are defined and which are used throughout this document appear in italicized text beginning with a CAPITAL letter. Project (Insert name and description
More informationAPPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF ALBERTA TRANSPORTATION 1.0 Application Procedures 2.0
More informationPrattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location
Prattsville Berm Removal Project 1.0 Project Location The project site is located between the New York State Route 23 Bridge over the Schoharie Creek and the Schoharie Reservoir. The restoration plan encompassed
More informationElectronic Signature and Fee Payment Confirmation
Jeff Levine, AICP, Director Planning & Urban Development Department Electronic Signature and Fee Payment Confirmation Notice: Your electronic signature is considered a legal signature per state law. By
More informationClean Water Revolving Funds (SRF & SWQIF) Loan Application Instructions for Completing the Project Cost Worksheet
Clean Water Revolving Funds (SRF & SWQIF) Loan Application Instructions for Completing the Project Cost Worksheet 1. Entering Cost Figures To complete the Project Cost Worksheet, enter costs incurred to
More informationDESCRIPTION OF WORK:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF HENRICO P.O. BOX 27032 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23273 PERMIT NO. One (1) copy of application and four (4) copies of plans are hereby made to the Director of Public Works
More informationFIBER-OPTIC CABLE PLAN CHECK
Engineering Division 201 North Broadway, Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 839-4651, FAX (760) 839-4597 FIBER-OPTIC CABLE PLAN CHECK To: Date: Project: Project No. Address: Check No. Attn: Via: The attached plans
More informationMCRC Project No.: 459-014-150332 459-014-150333
MCRC Project No.: 459-014-150332 459-014-150333 MONROE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION AGREEMENT DESIGN SERVICES FOR HIGH FRICTION SURFACE TREATMENT RESURFACING Sylvania Petersburg Road and Deerfield Road THIS
More informationCONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. Procedures
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Procedures Check the Capital Project Delivery web site to ensure this is the current version. Index Section Page Introduction 1 Contract Administration Final Design PS&E / Advertising
More informationRight-of-Way Permit Application Process (Plans that affect District owned or maintained right-of-way)
Flood Control District of Maricopa County (District) 2801 W. Durango Street Phoenix, AZ 85009 Telephone: 602-506-4583 or 602-506-5476 Fax: 602-506-1663 Right-of-Way Permit Application Process (Plans that
More informationGENERAL PERMIT BWEW-GP-11 MAINTENANCE, TESTING, REPAIR, REHABILITATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF WATER OBSTRUCTIONS AND ENCROACHMENTS
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATERWAYS ENGINEERING AND WETLANDS GENERAL PERMIT BWEW-GP-11 MAINTENANCE, TESTING, REPAIR, REHABILITATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF
More information1. It would create hazardous effects of storm water run-off. 3. It would increase hazardous driving conditions on the public road.
SECTION 6: REQUIREMENTS FOR A DRIVEWAY CONNECTION A. Required information. The application shall be accompanied by a sketch of the proposed driveway which at a minimum shall indicate: 1. Geometric information
More informationNational Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) Metrics
Table of Contents National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) Metrics NATIONAL BRIDGE INSPECTION STANDARDS (NBIS) METRICS TABLE OF CONTENTS...1 Metric #1: 23 CFR 650.307 Bridge inspection organization...2
More informationCHAPTER 7: QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE ***DRAFT***
CHAPTER 7: QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE ***DRAFT*** CHAPTER 7: QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE... 1 SECTION 7.1 INTRODUCTION... 2 Subsection 7.1.1 Purpose... 2 Subsection 7.1.2 Scope... 2 Subsection
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013 NAME LOCATION Audubon Properties, LLC. 4700 & 4960 Dauphin Island Parkway West side of Dauphin Island Parkway, 580
More informationCCU Engineering Specifications. Section 003300 PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS
CCU Engineering Specifications Section 003300 Effective Date: Nov. 1st, 2011 Page 1 of 5 PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS PART 1 - GENERAL The following specification is intended for use for the design, selection
More informationDOUGLAS COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 87-38 CITY OF LAWRENCE RESOLUTION NO. 5094
DOUGLAS COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 87-38 CITY OF LAWRENCE RESOLUTION NO. 5094 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNING BODIES OF DOUGLAS COUNTY AND THE CITY OF LAWRENCE CONCERNING THE SOUTH LAWRENCE TRAFFICWAY;
More informationSECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN
SECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN 5.01 GENERAL Sanitary sewer improvements shall be designed to serve the ultimate level of City development as defined in the General Plan and the Wastewater Facilities
More informationInstructions and Helpful Hints. for Preparation of. Emergency Action Plans
Instructions and Helpful Hints for Preparation of Emergency Action Plans using the fillable form electronic template for the NRCS sample EAP June 25, 2007 Introduction Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) are
More informationSANITARY SEWER SPECIFICATIONS
SANITARY SEWER SPECIFICATIONS OCTOBER 2003 HARVEST-MONROVIA WATER, SEWER, AND FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY SECTION 1.00 1.10 Purpose The purpose of this document is to assemble the sewer specifications, policies,
More informationLOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PLANS QUALITY CONTROL / QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION PLANS QUALITY CONTROL / QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 - Introduction... 3 1.1 Defining Plan Quality...
More informationSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Project Name: Site Plan No.:
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST 5/12/05 Rev.3/14/06 Project Name: Site Plan No.: REVIEW CRITERIA Plans: A site development plan (signed and sealed) shall be on a 24 x 36 sheet at a scale that is no smaller
More informationTOURIST ATTRACTION SIGNS GENERAL INFORMATION & APPLICATION
TOURIST ATTRACTION SIGNS GENERAL INFORMATION & APPLICATION Dear Applicant: Enclosed is a copy of MassDOT - Highway Division's Tourist Attraction Signs General Information and Application. Please refer
More informationDesign of Encroachments on Flood Plains Using Risk Analysis HEC 17 April 1981
Design of Encroachments on Flood Plains Using Risk Analysis HEC 17 April 1981 Welcome to HEC 17 - Design of Enroachments on Flood Plains Using Risk Analysis Table of Contents Preface Acknowledgements Author(s):
More information5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology
I-70 East Final EIS 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology This section discusses floodplain and drainage/hydrology resources and explains why they are important
More informationROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND
ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND The Rose Creek Watershed (RCW) consists of three planning
More informationSanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Incident Report Form
Submit completed form to EHS. Date of SSO spill: Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Incident Report Form Identify the SSO category (check one): Category 1 SSO Spills of any volume that reach surface water Category
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Section / Article Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section / Article Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose................ 6 1.2 Definitions................ 6 1.3 Guidelines and References............ 7 2. AGREEMENTS 2.1 Applicant and Contractor
More informationFlorida s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) Shop Drawing Review Process for Design Bid Build (Conventional) Projects
General: Florida s Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) Shop Drawing Review Process for Design Bid Build (Conventional) Projects The information outlined within this document, depicts a portion of Florida s Turnpike
More information1. INTRODUCTION 5. THE PERMIT PROCESS
1. INTRODUCTION Laws of the United States and the State of Iowa have assigned the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources with specific and different regulatory roles designed
More information