Radiologists Take on Meaningful Use A KLAS-RSNA Report
|
|
- Lilian Allen
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 November 2011 Radiologists Take on Meaningful Use A KLAS-RSNA Report
2 Radiologists Take on Meaningful Use: A KLAS-RSNA Report T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S PAGE SECTION 5 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW RSNA Acknowledgement Worth Knowing Introduction Why Is This Important? Scope of the Project Information Exchange Patient Engagement Clinical Decision Support Measuring and Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures Electronic Image Storage and Display Conclusion EXPANDED RESULTS KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 I 1
3 RSNA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Dear RSNA Member, As you may know, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) has been mandated by the U.S. Federal Government to draw up guidelines for the Meaningful Use of IT in healthcare. Meaningful Use requirements are meant to improve healthcare through the use of IT. They will be tied to reimbursement incentives for healthcare providers who are successful Meaningful Users. The development of these guidelines will directly impact the practice and reimbursement of radiology. RSNA has worked with KLAS, by providing them with a random sample of member address, to conduct a survey that lets radiologists share their opinions about how to make Meaningful Use guidelines beneficial and applicable to radiology. A summary of the results of this survey is presented below. These results will be shared with ONCHIT to help that agency understand radiologists concerns and preferences for Meaningful Use. We encourage you to follow the unfolding of Meaningful Use guidelines and to keep letting your voices be heard on this critical issue. Sincerely, Sarah S. Donaldson, MD Chairman, RSNA Board of Directors 2 I KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price.
4 Executive Overview RSNA was approached by KLAS to assist them in performing a survey on Meaningful Use (MU). Two components of assistance were requested: (1) A comprehensive list of what the RSNA Informatics Committee (RIC) believes to be the important and appropriate criteria for MU of Health Information Technology (HIT) in radiology; and (2) a representative cross section of the RSNA membership from both academia and private practice to be included in the survey. In contradistinction to the existing federal regulations for Phase I that are designed for internal medicine, family practice, and pediatrics, it is hoped and anticipated that specialty appropriate criteria will be included in Phase II for all specialties, not just radiology. Many of the knowledgeable RIC members involved in MU at the federal level provided valuable input to this list of criteria that we encourage you to read about in the following Summary/Executive Report being made available to RSNA members by RSNA and KLAS. David E. Avrin, M.D., Ph.D. RSNA Radiology Informatics Committee Chair KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 I 3
5 WORTH KNOWING TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT OF RADIOLOGISTS said that they are very involved in making decisions regarding meaningful use (MU), but only 6% considered themselves very educated in MU. NEARLY 40% OF RADIOLOGISTS cited concerns about either lack of clarity in MU guidelines or decreased efficiency as the result of adopting MU guidelines. Other concerns were also mentioned, such as reimbursements and lack of hospital support or readiness. PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND RADIATION DOSE TRACKING WERE SEEN AS THE LEAST IMPORTANT CRITERIA. In follow-up discussions, many providers reported that patient engagement would be most beneficial in mammography and interventional radiology. RADIOLOGISTS SAW CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT AS IMPORTANT, ESPECIALLY FOR REFERRING PHYSICIANS. Most saw this as a means to ensure that the correct imaging test is ordered and to reduce the amount of unnecessary and costly imaging. Several physicians mentioned that clinical decision support would assist them while consulting with referring physicians. Planning to Qualify for MU Incentives (n=203) Knowledge of MU (n=196) 1-Not at all Familiar, 5-Very Familiar Yes 28% Considering It 27% 4 16% 5 6% 1 25% No 10% Don't know 35% 3 28% 2 25% 4 I KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price.
6 Executive Overview INTRODUCTION The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Inf ormation Technology (ONCHIT) has been mandated by the federal government to draw up guidelines for the meaningful use (MU) of IT in healthcare. MU requirements are meant to improve healthcare through the use of IT. They will be tied to reimbursement incent ives for healthcare providers who are successful meaningful users. 6% Percent of responding providers who say they are very familiar with MU requirements The development and interpretation of these MU guidelines will directly impact the practice and reimbursement of radiology. Qualifying organizations stand to gain up to $44,000 per physician if they attest. However, those providers that are eligible for incentives but that do not meet the MU standards by 2015 will be hit with penalties through cuts in Medicare reimbursements. Although most radiologists are considered eligible providers (EPs), under current requirements, MU will be hard for radiologists to meet. This is because the guidelines are geared primarily toward primary care physicians. In conjunction with RSNA, KLAS has provided a forum for radiologists to share their opinions about how to make these guidelines beneficial and applicable to radiology. KLAS and RSNA have come together to assess these opinions in an attempt to inform the discussion happening in Washington about how to accommodate subspecialist needs in Stage 2 of MU. WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Almost 60% of surveyed radiologists said they are planning to qualify for MU or they are considering it. Many of the radiologists surveyed reported that they are very involved in making decisions regarding MU for their practice; however, only 5% of participants said they are very familiar with MU. One radiologist said, It is not very clear what steps or process the radiologists need to follow in order to become an eligible provider. They have to hunt for it quite extensively, if they can make any sense of it at all, and spend a lot of time trying to sort it out. Considering these numbers, a brief review of MU is called for. MU has five main goals intended to be met with the adoption of the proposed guidelines. The first goal is to improve healthcare quality, safety, and efficiency. Second is to engage patients and their families in patient care. Third is to improve care coordination. Fourth is to improve public health and reduce health disparities. Last is to ensure privacy and security protections for patients. The Stage 1 MU guidelines proposed by the federal government are meant to promote these goals, and providers must adopt the guidelines in order to qualify for the incentives. While the current requirements are not friendly to radiology, radiologists must still meet guidelines in order to avoid penalties by the 2015 cutoff. KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 I 5
7 Figure 1: Study Participants n=208 Figure 3 SCOPE OF THE PROJECT Many radiologists are concerned that in order to attest for MU dollars, they will be forced to adopt rules that are not applicable to their practice of radiology or beneficial to patients. As one radiologist pointed out: We don t want to spend more money just for the sake of fulfilling meaningful use criteria on things that aren't really going to affect patient care. It seems like meaningful use might be good for certain areas of medicine, but I am not sure it is tailor-made for radiology per se. In light of this fact, KLAS and RSNA gathered feedback from over 200 radiologists who took an online survey where they were asked to rate criteria in terms of benefit to the radiology practice on a scale of one to five (one = not at all beneficial; five = very beneficial). Respondents covered a wide range of backgrounds, from small private practices to large radiology groups to hospitalbased radiologists. Private 60% Academic 18% Hospital 22% For this study, KLAS developed some questions with a focus on vendor preparedness to help providers meet MU. RSNA was not involved in the measurement of any vendors or in developing any vendor-focused questions in this study. The results of those vendorrelated inquiries can be found in the expanded report. RSNA developed questions regarding MU needs and requirements for radiology, which focused on five main areas: (1) information exchange between referring physicians, radiologists, and healthcare institutions; (2) patient engagement; (3) clinical decision support for referring physicians and radiologists; (4) measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures; and (5) electronic image storage and display. Each section will be addressed in this executive summary. INFORMATION EXCHANGE Overall, information exchange is seen as something that would benefit radiology and facilitate better care. One participant said, We are improving patient outcomes as we improve the communication between the physicians who ordered the tests and the physician who reads the test. There are a lot of ways that we can improve it. Although we are low tech, we have an automatic fax to our physicians, and physicians have online access to the images, as well as to the reports. It is not that difficult to do, but it is very important to the future of our field that we stay on top of that." 6 I KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price.
8 Executive Overview Figure 2: Information Exchange between Referring Physicians and Radiologists (1-Least Beneficial, 5-Most Beneficial) Ability of radiology practices to send imaging reports to EMR electronically 4.56 Ability of radiology practices to receive imaging orders electronically 4.30 Ability to maintain database of nonroutine findings and a record of contacts between radiology department and referring physicians for each finding 4.26 Ability to send electronic reminders to referring physicians for imaging follow-up of nonroutine findings (follow-up needed but not critical to finding) 4.22 Ability to transmit structured clinical data as part of the radiology report 3.86 Regarding image exchange with referring physicians, radiologists felt that the ability to send imaging reports to the EMR electronically would be most beneficial criterion. On the other hand, what seemed least beneficial to this group of radiologists was the ability to transmit structured clinical data as part of the report. Looking at information exchange between healthcare institutions, the ability to share prior reports across institutional boundaries was viewed as very beneficial. Information exchange between healthcare institutions would be huge. That would obviously create some areas where it would dramatically reduce the number of radiology studies and the overall number of unnecessary exams, blood work, and pathology performed on individuals. Also important to radiologists were the ability to share images across institutional boundaries, the ability to share prior exam history, and the ability to determine if patient records at two different institutions correspond to the same individual. The ability to share patientspecific radiation dose information across institutional boundaries was clearly considered the least beneficial criterion. PATIENT ENGAGEMENT Overall, patient engagement was not viewed as a hot-button issue and was seen as less beneficial than other criteria discussed in this study. Out of the criteria KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 I 7
9 Figure 3: Patient Engagement presented in this area, the one viewed as most beneficial was the capability to send reminders to patients for imaging followup of nonroutine findings. Many noted that outside of mammography and interventional radiology, radiologists are fairly removed from patient contact. Radiologists are conflicted in that while patients have a right to their images and reports, it is not medically beneficial for them to have access to that information. One radiologist described the potential difficulties for the patient this way: I think that engaging patients is a double-edged sword. Radiologists are not caregivers. We give a service. I rarely interact with patients, and I think that primary care doctors and others who order images would agree that they want to discuss results with their patients and that patients having access to their images will result in a huge amount of unnecessary concern on the part of the patients. I think physicians (1-Least Beneficial, 5-Most Beneficial) would end up spending too much time on the phone with patients explaining normal chest x-rays or things that are non life threatening. On the other hand, maybe patients have a right to see their images, and maybe that could save a life in some rare cases. Some also noted that their referring physicians might not consider this as a benefit. Driving this point home, one radiologist said, I have a slight opinion on making reports available to patients. It is probably not going to make my life too miserable, but I am just thinking of the poor referring doctor. When the patient gets a report full of verbiage, they understand every other word because it is not written for them. It has been a massive headache in the mammography field to get all these sixth grade level letters written to send out to people, which never can really describe the whole situation in all of its appropriate degrees of complexity.... I am all for Capability to send reminders to patients for imaging follow-up of nonroutine findings Use of a reporting system that can store structured clinical information as part of the report Provide patients with the ability to schedule routine imaging exams online 3.66 Use of a reporting system that enables selection from a preselected set of structured options to fill a report field 3.42 Provide patients access to electronic images and reports over the web I KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price.
10 Executive Overview privacy and all for [patients] owning [clinical data],... but the idea of the patient getting this thing and then calling to the poor primary care office and driving him nuts is wrong. CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT Clinical decision support was seen as important, especially for referring physicians. The overall goal is to make sure the correct imaging test is ordered, based on clinically relevant data, and to reduce the amount of unnecessary radiation patients receive. One radiologist spoke to the possible benefits of adopting clinical decision support. We are all really excited about getting clinical decision support for the radiologists, but at the same time, without the support from referring physicians, we will really be under the gun. There has to also be a way to provide radiology-related decision support for the referring physicians. However, if there is strong clinical support for something, that will at least give us more leverage so that we aren't continually fighting the referring physicians. Radiologists felt that clinical decision support would be helpful for referring physicians in two ways. First and seen as most beneficial would be the ability to provide evidence-based advice on appropriate imaging tests to the referring clinician at the time of the imaging order. Following closely behind was the ability to display the patient s imaging history to the referring physician at the time of the imaging order. Reporting of patientspecific radiation dose to the referring clinician at the time of the order was not seen as beneficial. Clinical decision support for radiologists was viewed as relatively unhelpful, with Figure 4: Clinical Decision Support for Referring Physicians Ability to provide evidence-based advice on appropriate imaging test to the referring clinician at the time of the imaging order Ability to display patient imaging history to the referring clinician at the time of imaging order Ability to display patient-specific radiation dose reporting to the referring clinician at the time of imaging order KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 I 9
11 Figure 5: Measuring and Monitoring Clinical Quality Measures (1-Least Beneficial, 5-Most Beneficial) Percentage of critical findings that are communicated to the referring clinician Percentage of exams for which clinically relevant and appropriate history and reason for examination are included in the original electronic order Median time between exam order received and report finalization for stat inpatient orders Median time between exam completion and report finalization Median length of delays for scheduling inpatients and outpatients 3.60 Median patient waiting times in the radiology department 3.50 Percentage of studies undergoing study-specific peer review 3.24 Percentage of studies interpreted by a radiology subspecialist 2.91 Percentage of studies double read 2.69 the exception of a few criteria. Radiologists would like to have access to pertinent recent history, physical and progress notes, as well as lab results and other patient information. However, viewing patient medication lists was not seen as beneficial for radiologists. MEASURING AND MONITORING CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES There are two measures that radiologists felt would be most beneficial to track. One was the percentage of critical findings that are communicated to the referring physician. The other was the percentage of exams for which clinically relevant and appropriate history and reason for examination are included in the original electronic imaging order. Though radiologists felt that these items would be beneficial, one participant pointed out the difficulty of the task. Measuring and monitoring clinical quality measures are really tough to do in radiology because, frequently, patients go back to their primary care providers and we don t know what happens to them unless we are involved in their care at a later stage. We do get some callbacks, like if patients have to go to the OR, the general surgeon will sometimes call and tell us. But there is no official follow-up for a lot of our clinical studies. We are so busy as consulting physicians that we don t have time to look at old studies and look at patients histories and see what happened. We do that sometimes but not for every patient. 10 I KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price.
12 Executive Overview Considered the least beneficial criterion was tracking the percentage of studies that are double read and tracking the percentage of studies interpreted by a radiology subspecialist. ELECTRONIC IMAGE STORAGE AND DISPLAY Due to the fact that the vast majority of radiologists have already adopted the criteria in this section, the radiologists in this study found them to be beneficial. For instance, digital storage and display of imaging studies (e.g., PACS) was considered to be the most beneficial criterion in the entire study. Also considered to be very beneficial were the ability of referring physicians to launch a web viewer of images and reports from the EMR and the ability to accept outside imaging studies into the PACS in the corresponding patient folder, when requested by the referring physician. CONCLUSION Radiologists believe that they have been overlooked when it comes to the current MU legislation, and nearly 20% mentioned concerns about the clarity of the regulations. Radiologists began using advanced information technology long before most primary care physicians and are concerned that they are now being asked to adopt technology and workflows that neither benefit their patients nor apply well to the practice of radiology. The results of this study indicate that radiologists have some concerns as they get ready for MU. Concerns include lack of clarity in the actual guidelines, decreased efficiency as a result of adopting MU guidelines, and lack of hospital support. A few radiologists feel confident and Figure 6: Electronic Image Storage and Display Digital storage and display of imaging studies When requested by a referring physician, accept outside imaging studies into the PACS in the corresponding patient folder Ability of referring physician to launch web viewer of images and reports from EMR 4.49 Ability to create annotated image libraries for use in interdisciplinary conferences, QC activities, teaching, and research KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 I 11
13 knowledgeable about the process, but many are still waiting to see if there will be radiology-specific guidelines announced in Stage 2 or Stage 3 rules. It may be appealing to wait and see what happens, but now is the time for radiology as an industry to become informed and active in this process. 12 I KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 This material is copyrighted. Any organization gaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable to compensate KLAS for the full retail price.
14 Executive Overview Emily Crane REPORT AUTHOR Holly Wallace CHIEF EDITOR TO VIEW OTHER TEAM MEMBERS CLICK HERE: FOR QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT, CONTACT: KLAS 630 E Technology Ave. Orem, UT Ph: Fax: Web: TO PURCHASE THE FULL VERSION OF THIS REPORT, LOG ON TO OUR STORE READER RESPONSIBILITY: This report is a compilation of data gathered from websites, healthcare industry reports, interviews with healthcare provider executives and managers, and interviews with vendor and consultant organizations. Data gathered from these sources includes strong opinions (which should not be interpreted as actual facts) reflecting the emotion of exceptional success and, at times, failure. The information is intended solely as a catalyst for a more meaningful and effective investigation on your organization s part and is not intended, nor should it be used, to replace your organization s due diligence. KLAS data and reports represent the combined opinions of actual people from provider organizations comparing how their vendors, products, and/or services performed when measured against participants' objectives and expectations. KLAS findings are a unique compilation of candid opinions and are real measurements representing those individuals interviewed. The findings presented are not meant to be conclusive data for an entire client base. Significant variables including organization/hospital type (rural, teaching, specialty, etc.), organization size, depth/breadth of software use, software version, role in the organization, provider objectives, and system infrastructure/network impact participants opinions, preclude an exact apples-to-apples vendor/product comparison or a finely tuned statistical analysis. We encourage our clients, friends and partners using KLAS research data to take into account these variables as they include KLAS data in their other due diligence. For frequently asked questions about KLAS methodology, please refer to the KLAS FAQs. COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT WARNING: This report, and its contents, are copyright protected works and are intended solely for your organization. Any other organization, consultant, investment company or vendor enabling or obtaining unauthorized access to this report will be liable for all damages associated with copyright infringement, which may include the full price of the report and/or attorney s fees. For information regarding your specific obligations, please refer to the KLAS Data Use Policy. ABOUT KLAS: For more information about KLAS, please visit our website. OUR MISSION: KLAS mission is to improve the delivery of healthcare technology by independently measuring and reporting on vendor performance. KLAS-RSNA Meaningful Use Study 2011 I 13
Medweb Telemedicine 667 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA 94107 Phone: 415.541.9980 Fax: 415.541.9984 www.medweb.com
Medweb Telemedicine 667 Folsom Street, San Francisco, CA 94107 Phone: 415.541.9980 Fax: 415.541.9984 www.medweb.com Meaningful Use On July 16 2009, the ONC Policy Committee unanimously approved a revised
More informationFind your future in the history
Find your future in the history Is your radiology practice ready for the future? Demands are extremely high as radiology practices move from a fee-for-service model to an outcomes-based model centered
More informationAchieving Meaningful Use in Private Practice. A close examination of Stage 2 requirements
Achieving Meaningful Use in Private Practice A close examination of Stage 2 requirements Abstract As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the Federal Government laid the groundwork
More informationID: HHS-OS-2014-0002 / RIN: 0991-AB92)
April 24, 2014 Attention: 2015 Edition EHR Standards and Certification Criteria Proposed Rule Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Department of Health and Human Services
More informationMeaningful Use Requirements for Patient Education
Published by FierceHealthcare Custom Publishing Patient education and engagement are important requirements for that Holy Grail of health IT: meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs). Meaningful
More informationReal-World Image Sharing for Patient-Centered Care
Real-World Image Sharing for Patient-Centered Care Overview Objectives and speakers CMS and ONC Image Results MU Regulations Radiology efforts Real-world perspective Panel discussion 2 Objectives To bring
More informationINTEROPERABILITY 2015
INTEROPERABILITY 2015 ARE WE LIFTING TOGETHER? OCTOBER 2015 PERFORMANCE REPORT 1 Providers INTEROPERABILITY 2015 ARE WE LIFTING TOGETHER? Interoperability is like moving a piano. It is a team effort, but
More informationMeaningful Use for Radiology Frequently Asked Questions
www.merge.com Meaningful Use for Radiology Frequently Asked Questions What is Meaningful Use? Meaningful Use is broad terminology that refers to a government sponsored initiative that has been designed
More informationKLAS Data Performance Report Generated By Joshua Eads - ClinixMIS on April 22, 2014
KLAS Data Performance Report Generated By Joshua Eads - ClinixMIS on April 22, 2014 ClinixMIS Clinix * CareCloud Central eclinicalworks eclinicalworks ADP Healthcare E Henry Schein Component [C] Superseded
More informationMedical Records Coding Nuance Quantim Coding (QuadraMed) 3M Codefinder OptumInsight Web.Strat/WinStrat *
KLAS Data Performance Report Generated By Regina Hall - Nuance on September 03, 2013 Medical Records Nuance Quantim (QuadraMed) 3M Codefinder OptumInsight Web.Strat/WinStrat * Component [C] Superseded
More informationElectronic Health Records: What it Means for Today s Radiologist By: Anne Reynolds
Electronic Health Records: What it Means for Today s Radiologist By: Anne Reynolds Introduction Program Overview In February of 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
More informationIssue Stories. Imaging Economics - January/February 2009. Vital Connection. by Dan Anderson
Issue Stories Imaging Economics - January/February 2009 Vital Connection by Dan Anderson For ED physicians, an EMR system that integrates with radiology speeds up critical information flow and can help
More informationMeaningful Use Stage 1:
Whitepaper Meaningful Use Stage 1: EHR Incentive Program Information -------------------------------------------------------------- Daw Systems, Inc. UPDATED: November 2012 This document is designed to
More informationContact: Barbara J Stout RN, BSC Implementation Specialist University of Kentucky Regional Extension Center 859-323-4895
Contact: Barbara J Stout RN, BSC Implementation Specialist University of Kentucky Regional Extension Center 859-323-4895 $19.2B $17.2B Provider Incentives $2B HIT (HHS/ONC) Medicare & Medicaid Incentives
More informationIncentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption The passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 provides incentives for eligible professionals (EPs) to adopt and use electronic health records
More informationThe Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive
Feature The Meaningful Use Program: Auditing Challenges and Opportunities Your pathway to providing value By Phyllis Patrick, MBA, FACHE, CHC Meaningful Use is an area ripe for providing value through
More informationSummary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only)
Summary of the Proposed Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Program (Eligible Professionals only) Background Enacted on February 17, 2009, the American Recovery
More informationhospitals within a hospital system for other payment purposes and could easily do so for this program as well.
Statement by Phyllis Teater on Health Information Technology and the Electronic Health Records Incentive Program submitted to the Committee on Ways and Means United States House of Representatives July
More informationBEST IN 2015/2016 GLOBAL SOFTWARE (NON-US) Recognizing the software organizations that excelled in helping providers deliver better patient care
BEST IN 2015/2016 GLOBAL SOFTWARE (NON-US) Recognizing the software organizations that excelled in helping providers deliver better patient care B E S T I N 2015/2016 GLOBAL SOFTWARE (NON-US) Published
More informationFAQs for AMDA Members on the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs, Including Medicare Payment Adjustments
FAQs for AMDA Members on the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record Incentive Programs, Including Medicare Payment Adjustments Long Term Post-Acute Care Providers I am a physician or nurse practitioner
More informationCMS Proposed Electronic Health Record Incentive Program For Physicians
May 7, 2012 Ms. Marilyn Tavenner Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-0044-P Mail Stop C4-26-05 7500 Security Boulevard
More informationRE: Comments on Discussion Draft Ensuring Interoperability of Qualified Electronic Health Records.
April 8, 2015 The Honorable Michael Burgess, MD 2336 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 RE: Comments on Discussion Draft Ensuring Interoperability of Qualified Electronic Health Records.
More informationIU Health Quality Partners
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1) What is IU Health Quality Partners? It is a clinically integrated provider group; it is not a contracted health insurance plan network where physicians receive a set fee for
More informationTHE MYERS GROUP MEDICARE CAHPS RESEARCH SERIES
THE MYERS GROUP MEDICARE CAHPS RESEARCH SERIES Background Each year, CMS rates each Medicare Advantage plan using a five star rating system. While originally developed to provide members with the ability
More informationIncrease Participation Through Partial Incentives
February 26, 2010 Ms. Charlene M. Frizzera Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Attn. CMS-0033-P P.O. Box 8016 Baltimore, MD 21244-8016 Dear Ms. Frizzera, I am writing on behalf
More information4Medapproved Learning Lunch Webinar Series 7.24.13 How to Keep up with Stage 2 MU (Meaningful Use) Questions and Answers
4Medapproved Learning Lunch Webinar Series 7.24.13 How to Keep up with Stage 2 MU (Meaningful Use) Questions and Answers Q: Does transfer of care happen within a health system - say for example primary
More informationI. RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO THE TIMING OF STAGE 2
DRAFT FOR HIT POLICY COMMITTEE APPROVAL Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM National Coordinator for Health Information Technology U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
More informationMeaningful Use - The Basics
Meaningful Use - The Basics Presented by PaperFree Florida 1 Topics Meaningful Use Stage 1 Meaningful Use Barriers: Observations from the field Help and Questions 2 What is Meaningful Use Meaningful Use
More informationDiagnostic Imaging Management
Diagnostic Imaging Management Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) from Providers Updated August 1, 2013 Program Overview Q1. What is AIM Specialty Health SM (AIM)? A1. AIM Specialty Health SM (AIM) is a leading
More informationSelecting and Implementing EHRs
Selecting and Implementing EHRs October 10, 2013 10:30am-11:00am October 11, 2013 10:00am-10:25am Selecting and Implementing EHRs This information is provided as information and education only. EHRs Digitized
More informationState of Maine Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office of MaineCare Services 2010 Maine Medicaid Provider Survey Executive Summary
State of Maine Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office of MaineCare Services 2010 Maine Medicaid Provider Survey Executive Summary Background As part of the environmental assessment of the
More informationINVESTOR PRESENTATION
INVESTOR PRESENTATION November 2012 today s agenda 2 Latest Announcements Merge to Connect to Surescripts Clinical Network Merge Named to EMC Select Program Merge Unveils New Mobile & Internet Platform
More informationNHCHC Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records Resource Catalogue. Meaningful Use Overview
Meaningful Use Overview Meaningful use is the use of a certified electronic health record (EHR) to demonstrate improved quality and safety of health care delivery for a patient population within a clinical
More informationAre Electronic Medical Records Worth the Costs of Implementation?
Research Are Electronic Medical Records Worth the Costs of Implementation? TARA O'NEILL AUGUST 6, 2015 Executive Summary Electronic medical records (EMRs), as a cornerstone of a more intelligent, adaptive,
More informationMeaningful Use Rules Proposed for Electronic Health Record Incentives Under HITECH Act By: Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA
Meaningful Use Rules Proposed for Electronic Health Record Incentives Under HITECH Act By: Cherilyn G. Murer, JD, CRA Introduction On December 30, 2009, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
More informationSection C Implement One (1) Clinical Decision Support Rule
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology c/o Joshua Seidman Mary Switzer Building 330 C Street, SW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20201 Dear Mr. Seidman: On behalf of the American
More informationTexas Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Texas Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Medicaid HIT Team July 23, 2012 Why Health IT? Benefits of Health IT A 2011 study* found that 92% of articles published from July 2007 to February 2010 reached conclusions
More informationPreparing the content for your website
By: Linda Walker Preparing the content for your website Practice Managers Resource & Networking Community http://www.billerswebsite.com a division of: K&L Media, LLC http://www.klmediallc.com Email: linda@billerswebsite.com
More informationHow To Prepare For A Patient Care System
Preparing for Online Communication with Your Patients A Guide for Providers This easy-to-use, time-saving guide is designed to help medical practices and community clinics prepare for communicating with
More informationMeaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements
Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements ONC State HIE / NILA Workgroup August 20, 2013 What is an EHR? Electronic Health Record Information system used by healthcare providers to store and manage patient
More informationUsing Automation to Attain
Using Automation to Attain Meaningful Use Stage 2 Preventative Care Reminder Objectives DECEMBER 2014 Copyright 2014. Vital Interaction. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In order to qualify for an incentive payment through
More informationMarch 15, 2010. Dear Dr. Blumenthal:
March 15, 2010 David Blumenthal, MD, MPP National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) Department of Health and Human Services ATTN: HITECH Initial
More informationJune 15, 2015. Submitted electronically via www.regulations.gov
June 15, 2015 Marilyn Tavenner, R.N. Administrator Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services P.O. Box 8013 Baltimore, MD 21244-8013 Submitted electronically via
More informationApril 3, 2015. Dear Dr. DeSalvo:
April 3, 2015 Karen DeSalvo, MD, MPH, MSc National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology U.S. Department of Health and Human
More informationMay 28, 2015. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
May 28, 2015 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Subject: (CMS-3310-P; 80 FR 16731) Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
More information2008 Wisconsin Ambulatory Health Information Technology Survey
2008 Wisconsin Ambulatory Health Information Technology Survey March 31, 2009 State of Wisconsin Governor s ehealth Care Quality and Patient Safety Board Department of Health Services P-00831 (03/09) -
More informationIncreasing Productivity with Mobile Integration.
1 Mobile Medicine: Increasing Productivity with Mobile Integration. Executive Summary Mobile devices smartphone or tablet computers are everywhere increasing effectiveness and efficiency in everyday life.
More informationMay 28, 2015. Dear Mr. Slavitt:
May 28, 2015 The Honorable Andy Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Ave,
More informationMEANINGFUL USE. stoltenberg consulting inc. Meeting Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements. simplifying healthcare technology. www.stoltenberg.
Meeting Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements No matter what form the final rule of Stage 2 MU takes, HCOs can t afford to bide their time Despite the growing number of MU attestations and the impressive
More informationA Long Way to Go for EMR Usability By: Jessica Green
Topic Overview & Introduction: A Long Way to Go for EMR Usability By: Jessica Green With the ever increasing implementation of Electronic Medical and Health Records (EMR and EHR) systems into hospitals,
More informationOverview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now 1 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Adoption Rates of HIT 4. Overview of Stage 2 Rules 5. Overview of Issues 6. Trend in Standards: Recommendations v.
More information19 June 2014. 888.879.7302 www.greenwayhealth.com
Meaningful Use Timeline Changes and Penalties Explained By: Adele Allison, National Director of Industry and Government Affairs Greenway Health On May 20, 2014, CMS issued a proposed rule offering flexibility
More information2011 CMIO and Physician IT Survey Report
2011 CMIO and Physician IT Survey Report Facts, Salaries and Advice from Physician IT Leaders Factors Demanding Clinical IT Leadership Federal money and mandate tied to Meaningful Use Clinical automation
More informationMain Question 1: How and where do you or your family use the Internet - whether on a computer or a cell phone? Follow up questions for INTERNET USERS
TABLE 1: Current Internet use Main Question 1: How and where do you or your family use the Internet - whether on a computer or a cell phone? Follow up questions for INTERNET USERS 1. What do you use to
More informationMEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY On August 24, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the much anticipated final rule for Stage
More informationThe Road to Robust Use of HIT: Navigating Meaningful Use and Beyond. by Jennifer McAnally, tnrec Director
The Road to Robust Use of HIT: Navigating Meaningful Use and Beyond by Jennifer McAnally, tnrec Director Presentation Objectives Participants will be able to: Verbalize the role Regional Extension Centers
More informationMEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.
More informationA Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives
A Guide to Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful Use Incentives A White Paper by DrFirst Copyright 2000-2012 DrFirst All Rights Reserved. 1 Table of Contents Understanding and Qualifying for Meaningful
More informationMeaningful Use, EHRs & Imaging
Meaningful Use, EHRs & Imaging Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Program Director 2010, Arizona Telemedicine Program Meaningful Use Improving health through use & efficiency of healthcare Improve quality, safety,
More informationC A LIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION. s n a p s h o t The State of Health Information Technology in California
C A LIFORNIA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION s n a p s h o t The State of Health Information Technology in California 2011 Introduction The use of health information technology (HIT), defined as the software used
More informationAdopting an EHR & Meaningful Use
Adopting an EHR & Meaningful Use Learn how to qualify for the EHR Incentive Program The materials in this presentation, or prepared as part of this presentation, are provided for informational purposes
More informationExplore New Roads Gap Medical. May Insurance Broker Meeting September 2015
Explore New Roads Gap Medical May Insurance Broker Meeting September 2015 1 Why Explore New Roads? The New Road Marketplace changes Broker opportunities Customer needs Timely solutions ACA unfolding Shrinking
More informationEHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor
EHR Incentive Program Updates Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906-0123. Step 2: Enter code 2071585#. Step 3: Mute your
More informationMeaningful Use. Goals and Principles
Meaningful Use Goals and Principles 1 HISTORY OF MEANINGFUL USE American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 2009 Two Programs Medicare Medicaid 3 Stages 2 ULTIMATE GOAL Enhance the quality of patient care
More informationWHITE PAPER GROWING YOUR RADIOLOGY PRACTICE: THE ROLE OF SEARCH-DRIVEN ANALYTICS
GROWING YOUR RADIOLOGY PRACTICE: THE ROLE OF SEARCH-DRIVEN ANALYTICS 2 Background 1. How does radiologist turn-around-time for inpatient head MRI procedures, from exam completion to report finalized, vary
More informationHCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS
HCAHPS Survey SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS You should only fill out this survey if you were the patient during the hospital stay named in the cover letter. Do not fill out this survey if you were not the patient.
More informationThe American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Public Health Clients
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Meaningful Use and the Impact on Netsmart s Public Health Clients Updated November 2011 Netsmart Note: The Health Information Technology for Economic
More informationHow To Help Your Health Care System With Ehr
Karen E. Edison, M.D. Chair, Department of Dermatology Director, Center for Health Policy University of Missouri Health System Reduced need to fill out the same forms at each office visit Reliable point-of-care
More informationPhysician Practice Connections Patient Centered Medical Home
Physician Practice Connections Patient Centered Medical Home Getting Started Any practice assessing its ability to achieve NCQA Physician Recognition in PPC- PCMH is taking a bold step toward aligning
More informationMay 7, 2012. Re: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program-- Stage 2 Proposed Rule CMS- 0044-P RIN 0938-AQ84
May 7, 2012 Marilyn Tavenner Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Room 445-G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue, SW
More informationAPPENDIX E DATA REPORTING REGULATIONS
APPENDIX E DATA REPORTING REGULATIONS DATA REPORTING REGULATION Section 4602(e) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 authorizes the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to require
More informationMeaningful Use and Electronic Health Record. May 16, 2012
Meaningful Use and Electronic Health Record May 16, 2012 Who is Promedica? 2 Who is Promedica? ProMedica is a mission-based, not-for-profit healthcare organization formed in 1986. ProMedica has more than
More informationSome Tout CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Definition for Use of Electronic Health Records As Too Ambitious
Some Tout CMS Proposed Meaningful Use Definition for Use of Electronic Health Records As Too Ambitious By Craig A. Conway, J.D., LL.M. (Health Law) caconway@central.uh.edu Just in time for the New Year,
More informationELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS. Selecting and Utilizing an Electronic Medical Records Solution. A WHITE PAPER by CureMD.
ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS Selecting and Utilizing an Electronic Medical Records Solution A WHITE PAPER by CureMD CureMD Healthcare 55 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 Overview United States of America
More informationMEDICARE EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM ENROLLMENT LEARNING WEBINAR
MEDICARE EHR INCENTIVE PROGRAM ENROLLMENT LEARNING WEBINAR PRESENTERS: MAUREEN SANDBERG & ROXANNE FLETCHER DE REC HIT PRACTICE COORDINATORS THE PRESENTATION WILL BEGIN IN A FEW MOMENTS For more information
More informationMay 8, 2013. The Honorable Fred Upton Chairman House Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20151
May 8, 2013 The Honorable Dave Camp Chairman House Committee on Ways and Means United States House of Representatives Washington D.C. 20515 The Honorable Fred Upton Chairman House Committee on Energy and
More informationWhat GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF
What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF Disclosures Joel V. Brill, MD AGAF AGA Registry Executive
More informationThe now tips, the how tools, and the must timing for your MU path in 2014.
Meaningful Use in 2014 - Window of Opportunity The now tips, the how tools, and the must timing for your MU path in 2014. Inside you will find: CLICK ON TITLES TO NAVIGATE MU 2014 updates; Must know changes!
More informationProfessional Clinical Ladder Program Application
Professional Clinical Ladder Program Application Table of Contents Introduction Letter 2 New Applicant Process 3 Getting Started 4 Application Process Diagram 5 Demographic Profile 6 How to Write a Narrative
More informationClinical Decision Support: Standardized Processes for 2017 Deadlines. Background and Steps Forward
Clinical Decision Support: Standardized Processes for 2017 Deadlines Background and Steps Forward Disclosure Liz Quam, Executive Director, CDI Quality Institute Julie Pekarek, VP Solutions Management,
More informationAdvanced Clinical Decision Support Software. tools for Nurses
Advanced Clinical Decision Support Software tools for Nurses PowerForm Search Measurements Height / Weight / Allergy Advisor Why did we develop this software? Why did we develop this software? This software
More informationMEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:
Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) MEANINGFUL USE HITECH s goal is not adoption alone but meaningful use of EHRs that is, their
More informationT he Health Information Technology for Economic
A BNA, INC. HEALTH IT! LAW & INDUSTRY REPORT Reproduced with permission from Health IT Law & Industry Report, 2 HITR 23, 01/18/2010. Copyright 2010 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372- 1033)
More informationAn Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs
An Overview of Meaningful Use: FAQs On Feb. 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) into law. This new law includes provisions (known as the HITECH Act)
More informationAchieving Meaningful Use
ARRA INCENTIVE FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS On July 13, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) issued the
More informationEstablishment of a Temporary and Permanent Testing Program
April 9, 2010 David Blumenthal, MD, MPP Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) Attn: Certification Programs Proposed Rule Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Suite 729D
More informationMeaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Medicare and Medicaid Table of Contents What is Meaningful Use?... 1 Table 1: Patient Benefits... 2 What is an EP?... 4 How are Registration and Attestation Being Handled?... 5 What are
More informationEHR Meaningful Use Guide
EHR Meaningful Use Guide for Stage I (2011) HITECH Attestation Version 2.0 Updated May/June 2014 in partnership with 1-866-866-6778 platinum@medicfusion.com www.medicfusion.com/platinum Medicfusion EMR
More informationCMS ehealth Summit UW Medicine
CMS ehealth Summit UW Medicine David Chou, MD, MS CTO, IT Services, UW Medicine Professor, Lab Medicine, University of Washington Meaningful Use Executive Co-Chair Baltimore, December 6. 2013 UW Medicine
More informationRethinking Radiology Workflow Automating Workflow Processes
Available at: http://www.corepointhealth.com/whitepapers/rethinking-radiology-workflow Rethinking Radiology Workflow Automating Workflow Processes Executive Summary Imaging centers are targeting both internal
More informationFederal EHR Incentives part 1
Federal EHR Incentives part 1 An Introduction to the Implementation & Meaningful Use of EHR Systems Top Facts: EHR Incentives The HITECH Act of 2009 provides more than $20 billion in incentives to encourage
More informationENGAGING PHARMACISTS IN 1305
ENGAGING PHARMACISTS IN 1305 UTAH EXAMPLES NICOLE BISSONETTE, MPH, MCHES EPICC PROGRAM MANAGER UTAH PROJECTS INVOLVING PHARMACISTS Prior to 1305 Select Health Pharmacist Hypertension Management Team Based
More informationWelcome to Crozer-Keystone Health Network Primary Care
Welcome to Crozer-Keystone Health Network Primary Care A Guide to Your CKHN Patient-Centered Medical Home: What you can expect from us... What we will need from you......so you can gain the full benefits
More informationRe: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 3 (CMS-3310-P)
May 29, 2015 Mr. Andrew Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 445 G 200 Independence Avenue,
More informationWorkflow and Process Analysis for CCC
Section 3.6 Design Workflow and Process Analysis for CCC This tool introduces the importance of workflow and process improvement in a community-based care coordination (CCC) program, describes the value
More informationSurvey Finds Physicians Very Wary of Doctor Ratings By Carrie Johnson
Special Report: Do Doctors Measure Up? Survey Finds Physicians Very Wary of Doctor Ratings By Carrie Johnson In this article Check out the results of an ACPE survey that looks at physician leaders views
More informationMEANINGFUL USE Stages 1 & 2
MEANINGFUL USE Stages 1 & 2 OVERVIEW Meaningful Use is the third step in the journey to receive funds under the CMS EHR Incentive Programs. Meaningful Use (MU) is the utilization of certified electronic
More informationRhode Island HIT Survey: 2014 Results and Trends. October 2014
Rhode Island HIT Survey: 2014 Results and Trends October 2014 Survey Objectives 1. To measure presence (structural measures) and use (process measures) of HIT by clinicians caring for Rhode Island patients
More informationto the Medicare and Medicaid
With the changes made in the final rule, earning the EHR incentive is still not easy, but at least it s easier. A Physician s Guide to the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs: The Basics David
More informationMeeting Meaningful Use Core Objectives with Technology-Enabled Patient Engagement
Meeting Meaningful Use Core Objectives with Technology-Enabled Patient Engagement ACPE Annual Meeting April 25, 2014 Chicago, Illinois Presented By: Dennis P.H. Mihale, MD, MBA Copyright 2014 CPT codes,
More information