MARSHALL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM
|
|
- Teresa Amice Quinn
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MARSHALL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Revised: August, 2011
2 All teacher candidates will create a Teacher Candidate Work Sample (TCWS) analyzing a sample of their work and the degree to which their students have learned. They will also make an oral presentation to demonstrate communication skills as they explain the contents of the TCWS. The purpose of the TCWS is to facilitate critical and reflective thinking about the teaching and the degree to which students have learned. The TCWS will also be a part of the assessment of knowledge and performance in relation to the West Virginia Professional Teaching Standards (WVPTS). The oral presentation is an assessment of the presentation skills and the ability to articulate thoughts about the semester. West Virginia Professional Teaching Standards: Standard 1 Curriculum and Planning Function 1A Core Content Function 1B Pedagogy Function 1C Setting Goals and Objectives for Learning Function 1D Designing Instruction Function 1E Student Assessments Standard 2 The Learner and the Learning Environment Function 2A Understanding Intellectual/Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Development Function 2B Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Function 2C Establishing a Culture for Learning Function 2D Implementing Classroom Procedures Function 2E Managing Student Behaviors Function 2F Organizing the Learning Environment Standard 3 Teaching Function 3A Importance of Content Function 3B Communicating with Students Function 3C Questioning and Discussion Techniques Function 3D Student Engagement Function 3E Use of Assessments in Instruction Function 3F Flexibility and Responsiveness Standard 4 Professional Responsibilities for Self-Renewal Function 4A Professional Learning Function 4B Professional Collaborative Practice Function 4C Reflection on Practice Function 4D Professional Contribution Standard 5 Professional Responsibilities for School and Community Function 5A School Mission Function 5B School-wide Activities Function 5C Learner-Centered Culture Function 5D Student Support Systems Function 5E Student Management Systems Function 5F School, Family and Community Connections Function 5G Strategic Planning/Continuous Improvement Function 5H Teacher Leadership Function 5I Ethical Standards
3 GOALS TCWS Standard: The teacher candidate sets realistic goals that he/she would like to accomplish during the student teaching placement. WV Professional Teaching Standards: 1, 4 List 3-5 goals that will enhance your professional growth and teaching performance. Some examples of goals might be: To create a positive learning environment To find ways to integrate technology into my unit and lessons To improve communication skills To address educational needs of diverse learners At least one goal should be directed toward your specific content area. Suggested page length: ½ of a page GOALS Candidate goals are insightful, reasonable and attainable. GOALS OF TEACHING Candidate goals are reasonable and attainable. Candidate goals are reasonable but not attainable. Candidate goals are neither reasonable nor attainable. SCORE
4 CONTEXTUAL FACTORS TCWS Standard: The teacher candidate uses information about the learning-teaching context and student individual differences to set the learning goal and objectives and plan instruction and assessment. WV Professional Teaching Standards: 2, 5 Identify relevant factors and how they may affect the learning-teaching process. Include any supports and challenges that affect instruction and student (Caution: Comments on the community or students that are negative, prejudicial, or stereotypical are not helpful in completing this assignment. Use good judgment in selecting and describing your contextual factors as this document may be reviewed in the licensure process.) Read the scoring rubric in advance and organize your Contextual Factors using the following subheadings: A. Community, District, and School Factors Address topics that could affect teaching and learning, such as geographic location, community and school population, socio-economic profile, race/ethnicity, political climate, community support for education. B. Classroom Factors Address classroom factors that affect teaching and learning such as physical features, availability of technology equipment, the extent of parental involvement, classroom rules and routines, grouping patterns, scheduling, classroom arrangement. C. Student Characteristics Identify student characteristics you must consider as you design instruction and assess Include factors such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, special needs, achievement/developmental levels, culture, language, interests, students skill levels. D. Instructional Implications Using the contextual factors you have recorded in A, B, and C above, identify and prioritize at least 4 implications for your teaching and assessment. In your written description, you may want to number the most important contextual factors and their matching implications to ensure community, district, school, classroom, and student characteristics have been carefully considered in identifying implications. E. Content Specific Factors Identify content specific factors that must be considered as you plan your unit, such as content series, lab instruction, writing across the curriculum. ***For each factor you describe, you must analyze how that factor impacts teaching and Suggested Page Length: 3-4 pages COMMUNITY, DISTRICT & SCHOOL FACTORS CLASSROOM FACTORS STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS INSTRUCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS CONTENT SPECIFIC FACTORS Candidate displays complex of the community and school that may affect Candidate displays complex of the classroom that may affect Candidate displays complex of the students that may affect Candidate provides complex implications for instruction and assessment based on student individual differences and community, school, and classroom characteristics. Candidate displays complex knowledge of the subject matter and how it will affect student CONTEXTUAL FACTORS Candidate displays specific of the community and school that may affect Candidate displays specific of the classroom that may affect Candidate displays specific of the students that may affect Candidate provides specific implications for instruction and assessment based on student individual differences and community, school, and classroom characteristics. Candidate displays specific knowledge of the subject matter and how it will affect student Candidate displays some knowledge or biased knowledge of the characteristics of the community and school. Candidate displays some knowledge or biased knowledge of the characteristics of the classroom. Candidate displays general or minimal understanding of student differences (e.g., culture, development, interests, abilities) that may affect Candidate provides general implications for instruction and assessment based on student individual differences and community, school, and classroom characteristics. Candidate displays minimal or general knowledge of the subject matter and how it will affect student Candidate displays minimal, irrelevant or no knowledge of the community and school. Candidate displays minimal, irrelevant or no knowledge of the classroom. Candidate displays stereotypical, irrelevant or no knowledge of student differences. Candidate provides inappropriate or no implications based on contextual factors. Candidate displays inappropriate or no knowledge of the subject matter and how it will affect student SCORE
5 LEARNING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES TCWS Standard: The teacher candidate sets significant, challenging, varied and appropriate the learning goal and objectives based on state/district content standards. WV Professional Teaching Standards: 1, 2, 3 You will create a framework for your unit to provide and justify objectives that are logically organized and move students toward achieving the learning goal. Read the scoring rubric in advance and use the chart below to provide the following information: A. BIG IDEA Identify a clear unit outcome or learning goal based on the State Core Curriculum (not the activities) that will guide the planning, delivery and assessment of your unit. This goal should define what you expect students to know and be able to do at the end of the unit. B. STANDARDS Cite the state or district standard(s)/objective(s) used as a basis for the unit outcome with all reference numbers. C. STUDENT OBJECTIVES (Measurable skills from the unit KUDs that move the student toward achieving the big idea.) Identify at least three objectives that move students toward achieving the big idea. The objectives should be varied and challenging and reflect levels of Depth of Knowledge. Number each objective so you can reference them later in your Assessment Plan and unit Outline. D. TYPE/LEVEL OF OBJECTIVES Using a relevant critical thinking hierarchy, such as: - Depth of Knowledge (recall, skills/concepts, strategic thinking, extended thinking) - Bloom s Taxonomy (knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation) Label and describe the levels of learning represented in each objective. E. APPROPRIATENESS FOR STUDENTS DEVELOPMENT Explain why each objective is appropriate for students development, pre-requisite knowledge, etc. BIG IDEA: STANDARDS STUDENT OBJECTIVES TYPE/LEVELS OF OBJECTIVES APPROPRIATENESS FOR STUDENTS DEVELOPMENT 1. Expand table as needed. Suggested page Length: 1-2 page BIG IDEA STANDARDS STUDENT OBJECTIVES TYPE/LEVEL OF OBJECTIVES APPROPRIATENESS FOR STUDENTS The big idea is insightful and sets high expectations for what students will know at the end of the unit; aligns with local, state, or national standards. State and national standards are clearly stated with reference numbers. Objectives reinforce learning outcomes (what the students will be able to know, understand, and do) and align with national, state, or local standards. Objectives reflect multiple levels of learning and are significant/challenging. Objectives are consistently appropriate for the development, pre-requisite knowledge, skills, experiences, and other student needs. LEARNING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF UNIT The big idea is clearly stated that defines what you expect students to know at the end of the unit; aligns with local, state, or national standards. Some state and national standards are clearly stated with some reference numbers. Objectives support the learning outcomes (what the students will be able to know, understand, and do) and align with national, state or local standards. Objectives reflect several levels of learning and are significant/challenging. Objectives are adequately appropriate for the development, pre-requisite knowledge, skills, experiences, and other student needs. The big idea is stated, but alignment to local, state, or national standards is not clear. State and national standards are stated but not with reference numbers. Some objectives support the learning outcomes (what the students will be able to know, understand, and do) and align with national, state or local standards. Objectives reflect few levels of learning and lack significance/challenge. Some objectives are appropriate for the development, prerequisite knowledge, skills, experiences, and other student needs. Big idea is not stated clearly and/or is not stated; there is no alignment with local, state, or national standards. State and national standards are not clearly stated or not stated at all; reference numbers are not used. Objectives do not support the learning outcomes and do not align with national, state or local standards. Objectives reflect only one level of Objectives are not appropriate for the development, prerequisite knowledge, skills, experiences, or other student needs. SCORE
6 ASSESSMENT PLAN TCWS Standard: The teacher candidate uses multiple assessment methods aligned with the learning goal and objectives to assess student learning before, during and after instruction. WV Professional Teaching Standards: 1, 2, 3 Using the Assessment Plan Chart (below), you must design an assessment plan used to monitor student objectives. Plan appropriate assessment measures for assessing student learning before instruction (pre-assessments), during instruction (interim or formative assessment), and after instruction (post or summative assessments). Assessment methods may include constructed response, selected response (i.e., multiple-choice tests, true or false), essay (essay examinations, take-home essays, etc.), performance assessment (i.e., reading aloud, performance event, performance task, communicating conversationally in a second language, carrying out a specific motor activity in physical education, delivering a speech, etc.), and personal communications (i.e., questions posed and answered during instruction, interviews, conferences, etc.). Your instructional sequence should include a variety of assessment methods and strategies suited for the developmental level of the students and your learning objectives. You must also state and defend the criteria you will use for determining the accomplishment of each learning objective. The key to writing this section of your Teacher Candidate Work Sample is the alignment between your learning objectives and assessment methods and strategies. You must construct a table that lists 3-5 learning objective (see Learning Goals and Objectives section), the assessments used to assess student performance relative to each learning objective, and a rationale for each assessment that explains why you chose or developed the assessment. Read the scoring rubric in advance and use the chart below to provide the following information: STUDENT OBJECTIVE (DO) 1. Pre- Assessment Formative CONTENT SPECIFIC ASSESSMENTS (Methods matched to outcome types and content area) RATIONALE OF ASSESSMENTS Post- Assessment Expand table as needed. Include copies of assessments, the student directions for the assessments, and criteria for scoring student performance (e.g., scoring rubrics, observation checklists, rating scales, answer keys) in Appendix A: Assessments. Suggested Page Length: 2-3 pages (Assessment Plan) + assessment instruments CONTENT SPECIFIC ASSESSMENTS RATIONALE OF ASSESSMENTS The plan is designed with multiple assessments carefully chosen to fit the content and the student skill level in their complexity (e.g., Bloom). Rationale for assessments is clearly thought out to reflect mastery of the content students will learn. LEARNING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF UNIT The plan includes multiple assessments with a variety of modes that fit the content and the student skill level in their complexity (e.g., Bloom). Rationale for assessments is somewhat thought out to reflect the content students will learn. The plan includes some assessments with a variety of modes that fit the content and the student skill level in their complexity (e.g., Bloom). Rationale for assessments doesn t align with the content that students will learn. Few to no assessments represent a variety of modes that fit the content and the student skill level in their complexity (e.g., Bloom). Rationale for assessments chosen is not included. SCORE
7 DESIGN FOR INSTRUCTION/TEACHING UNIT INSTRUCTIONAL PLANS TCWS Standard: The teacher candidate designs instruction for the specific learning goal and objectives that address characteristics and needs of students, and the learning context. WV Professional Teaching Standards: 1, 2, 3 Design the lessons for your unit based on the learning goal and objectives, students characteristics and learning context. Pre-assessment data must be used to guide development or modification of your unit. Include all lessons in unit plan. After administering the pre-assessment, analyze student performance relative to the objectives. Provide a narrative description of the results and how the results shaped your instruction. Include unit plan with daily lesson plans make sure to include all examples of resources used in this unit. Read the scoring rubric in advance. Suggested Page Length: 2 pages (Pre-Assessment graph with narrative) + unit PRE-ASSESSMENT AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES OVERALL UNIT PLAN DESIGN FOR INSTRUCTION/TEACHING UNIT INSTRUCTIONAL PLANS Pre-assessment data are charted, analyzed, and consistently used to design and delivery instruction. Learning activities are chosen to consistently reflect best practices in the teaching major and are suited to the instructional setting. Lessons are specific and relevant; student interest/engagement is above expectations. Unit/lesson plans and all other resources are included. Pre-assessment data are charted, analyzed, and used to fine tune instructional design and delivery. Learning activities reflect best practices in the teaching major and are suited to the instructional setting. Lessons are logically sequenced; student interest/engagement is high. Unit/lesson plans and all other resources are included. Pre-assessment data are charted, analyzed and some evidence is provided that the data influenced instructional design. Some learning activities reflect best practices in the teaching major. Lessons are somewhat logically sequenced; student interest/engagement would be good. Unit/lesson plans are included, but other resources are not included. Pre-assessment data have not been charted and analyzed or there is no evidence that the information has been used in instructional design. Few learning activities reflect best practices in the teaching major. Lessons are disorganized. Student interest/engagement would be low. Lessons plans and other resources are not included. SCORE
8 INSTRUCTIONAL DECISION-MAKING TCWS Standard: The teacher candidate uses on-going analysis of student learning to make instructional decisions. WV Professional Teaching Standards: 1, 2, 3, 4 Based upon the experiences you gained from teaching your unit, describe a daily instructional strategy/activity and its assessment. Explain how the assessment caused you to modify the next day s plan. Include an example for each day of the unit. Read the scoring rubric in advance and use the chart below to organize your Instructional Decision-Making using the following information: A. INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY/ACTIVITY Identify one instructional strategy/activity for each day of the unit that was used (select a variety of instructional strategies/activities). B. ASSESSMENT Identify the assessment (i.e., written test, observation checklist, interview, lab exercise) that was used to evaluate the students understanding. C. REFLECTIVE ACTION PLAN Based on the analysis of the assessment and content standards, where will you go from this point? What will you do in the next lesson? DAYS TEACHING UNIT Day 1 INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY/ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT REFLECTIVE ACTION PLAN (Where do I go from here?) Expand table as needed. Suggested Page Length: 3-5 pages INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY/ ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT REFLECTIVE ACTION PLAN Instructional strategies/activities were chosen for every day of the unit. Assessments were included for all instructional strategies/activities listed. Candidate provides thoughtful insights for the next action based on the assessment INSTRUCTIONAL DECISION-MAKING Instructional strategies/activities were chosen for most days of the unit. Assessments were included for most of the instructional strategies/activities listed. Candidate provides a complete plan for the next action based on the assessment plan. Instructional strategies/activities were chosen for about half of the days of the unit. Assessments were included for about half of the instructional strategies/activities listed. Candidate some insights for the next action based on the assessment Instructional strategies/activities were chosen for less than half of the days of the unit. Assessments were included for less than half of the instructional strategies/activities listed. Candidate does not provide a plan based on the assessment
9 IMPACT ON STUDENT LEARNING TCWS Standard: The teacher candidate uses assessment data to profile student learning and communicate information about student progress and achievement. WV Professional Teaching Standards: 1, 2, 3 Task Report the results of your assessments, including pre/post assessments and formative assessments to determine students progress related to the learning goal and objectives. Use charts, graphs and narrative to identify the performance of the whole class and two individual students. Read the scoring rubric in advance and organize your Analysis of Student Learning using the following subheadings: A. WHOLE CLASS Create a graph or table that shows every student and his/her performance on pre- and post-assessments on the learning goal and each objective. Summarize what the data show about student learning in the whole class. How many students met the objectives? How many did not? B. TWO INDIVIDUALS Select two students who exhibit divergent performance levels on one learning objective in the unit. Provide a rationale for your selection of these two students. Create a graph or table that shows the performance of the two individuals on pre- and postassessments on one objective. Summarize what these data show about student learning for these individuals. NOTE: You will provide possible reasons for why your students learned (or did not learn) in the next section, Reflection and Self-Evaluation. Suggested Page Length: 2 pages (1 per chart with summary) WHOLE CLASS INDIVIDUAL STUDENTS Profile Clarity Data Summary Impact On Student Learning Profile Clarity Data Summary Impact On Student Learning Provides an in-depth profile of student learning supported by Summary is meaningful and high-level conclusions are drawn from the Extensive evidence is provided on learner achievement and goal and/or each objective. Provides an in-depth profile of student learning supported by Summary is meaningful and high-level conclusions are drawn from the Extensive evidence is provided on who achieved and made goal and/or each objective. IMPACT ON STUDENT LEARNING Provides a clear profile of student learning supported by Summary is meaningful and appropriate conclusions are drawn from the Adequate evidence is provided on learner achievement and goal and/or each objective. Provides a clear profile of student learning supported by Summary is meaningful and appropriate conclusions are drawn from the Adequate evidence is provided on who achieved and made goal and/or each objective. Some parts of the profiles are unclear. Summary includes some meaningful and appropriate conclusions drawn from the Little evidence is provided on learner achievement and goal/objectives. Some parts of the profiles are unclear. Summary includes some meaningful and appropriate conclusions drawn from the Little evidence is provided on who achieved and made goal/objectives. Profile is unclear. Summary is inaccurate or conclusions are missing or not supported by No evidence is provided on learner achievement. Profile is unclear. Summary is inaccurate or conclusions are missing or not supported by No evidence is provided on who achieved and made progress toward the objective.
10 REFLECTION AND SELF-EVALUATION TCWS Standard: The teacher candidate analyzes the relationship between his or her instruction and student learning in order to improve teaching practice. WV Professional Teaching Standards: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Evaluate your performance as a teacher and link your performance to student learning results. Reflect on your performance and identify future action that could improve your teaching and professional growth. Identify the learning activity where your students were most successful and the learning activity where your students were least successful. Read the scoring rubric in advance and organize your Reflection and Self-Evaluation using the following subheadings: A. ANALYSIS OF STUDENT TEACHING GOALS Reflect on the progress you ve made toward each of your student teaching goals. B. INTERPRETATION OF STUDENT LEARNING Identify possible reasons for students success and lack of success based on your assessment results. Consider student characteristics, objectives, instruction, materials and assessment as well as other contextual factors. C. INSIGHTS ON EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT Identify the most successful and least successful learning activities based on student performance. Provide a rational for your selections. D. CONSIDERATION OF CONTENT INSTRUCTION Describe your strengths and challenges in delivering content-specific instruction. E. IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE TEACHING Describe what you did well and what you could differently or better in the future to improve your students performance. F. IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONAL PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT Identify at least two areas for improvement that emerged during this unit. List and describe specific professional activities you will engage in to improve your performance as a teacher in these areas. Suggested Page Length: 3-5 pages INTERPRETATION OF STUDENT LEARNING INSIGHTS ON EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE TEACHING IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONAL PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT Provides thorough reasons for why students met or did not meet the learning goals and objectives. Identifies the most and the least successful activities and assessments and explores plausible, and in-depth reasons for their success or failure. Provides specific and relevant ideas for redesigning instruction and assessment and explains in detail why these changes would improve student Identifies more than two areas for improvement and lists and describes a comprehensive plan to improve these areas. REFLECTION AND SELF-EVALUATION Provides adequate reasons for why students met or did not meet the learning goals and objectives. Identifies the most and the least successful activities and assessments and explores plausible reasons for their success or failure. Provides ideas for redesigning instruction and assessment and explains why these changes would improve student Identifies two areas for improvement and lists and describes specific professional activities to improve in these areas. Provides few reasons for why students met or did not meet the learning goals and objectives. Identifies few activities and provides little rationale for why some activities or assessments were more successful than others. Provides few ideas for redesigning instruction, and assessment or offers an inadequate explanation of why these changes would improve student Identifies areas for improvement and describes general activities to improve in these areas. No evidence or reasons provided to explain students performance. Provides no rationale for why some activities or assessments were more successful than others. Provides inappropriate or no ideas for redesigning instruction, and assessment. Does not clearly identify areas for improvement or provides a poor plan or no plan to improve in these areas.
11 DISPOSITIONS AND QUALITY OF WORK SAMPLE CRITICAL THINKING COMMITMENT TO STUDENTS COMMITMENT TO DIVERSITY COMMITMENT TO TECHNOLOGY COMMITMENT TO PROFESSION MECHANICS OF WRITING ORGANIZATION OVERALL TCWS QUALITY Candidate consistently demonstrates the ability to evaluate, critically analyze, reflect, and problem solve at a higher level of thinking. Candidate consistently demonstrates instructional design that meets the needs, interests and abilities of all students. Descriptions related to diversity exceed expectations for respect, understanding issues of diversity and high expectations. Candidate consistently integrates available technology meaningfully into professional and instructional practices. Candidate critically examines his/her practice through a continuous cycle of on-going professional improvement. There are no spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation, sentence structure, and all other mechanics of writing errors. TCWS is creative and neatly organized according to the table of contents. Required information is clearly presented and easy to find. TCWS reflects mastery in professional thought and effort expected in a culminating teaching assignment. DISPOSITIONS Candidate frequently demonstrates the ability to evaluate, critically analyze, reflect, and problem solve at a higher level of thinking. Candidate frequently demonstrates instructional design that meets the needs, interests and abilities of all students. Descriptions related to diversity show respect, understanding issues of diversity and high expectations. Candidate frequently integrates available technology meaningfully into professional and instructional practices. Candidate examines his/her practice through a continuous cycle of on-going professional improvement. QUALITY OF WORK SAMPLE There are very few spelling, grammar capitalization, punctuation, sentence structure, and all other mechanics of writing errors. Sections are well organized. Required information is clearly presented and easy to find. TCWS reflects the typical professional thought and effort expected in a culminating teaching assignment. Candidate occasionally demonstrates the ability to evaluate, critically analyze, reflect, and problem solve at a higher level of thinking. Candidate occasionally demonstrates instructional design that meets the needs, interests and abilities of some students. Some descriptions related to diversity show respect and understanding issues of diversity. Some expectations are low. Candidate occasionally integrates available technology meaningfully into professional and instructional practices. Candidate inconsistently examines his/her practice through a continuous cycle of on-going professional improvement. There are some spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation, sentence structure, and all other mechanics of writing errors. Some sections are well organized. Some information presented is easy to find. TCWS has sections that should be revised and improved before serving s a culminating assignment. Candidate rarely demonstrates the ability to evaluate, critically analyze, reflect, and problem solve at a higher level of thinking. Candidate rarely demonstrates instructional design that meets the needs, interests and abilities of some students. Descriptions related to diversity do not show respect and in understanding issues of diversity. Expectations are low. Candidate rarely integrates available technology meaningfully into professional and instructional practices. Candidate fails to examine his/her practice through a continuous cycle of on-going professional improvement. There are many spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation, sentence structure, and all other mechanics of writing errors. Few sections are well organized. Some information presented was difficult to find. TCWS does not reflect the typical professional thought and effort expected in a culminating teacher education assignment.
Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool
Greenville City Schools Teacher Evaluation Tool Table of Contents Introduction to Teacher Evaluation 2 Glossary 3 Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities 5 Teacher Evaluation Rubric 6 Self-Assessment 11
More informationFRESNO ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT TEACHERS (FAST, V. 1.2) A MANUAL FOR T. FAST v.1.2. Manual
FRESNO ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT TEACHERS (FAST, V. 1.2) A MANUAL FOR T EACHER CANDIDATES Kremen School of Education and Human Development Office of the Dean 5005 N. Maple Ave. M/S ED1 Fresno, CA 93740-8025
More informationLITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO CANDIDATES: The assessment information in this document is aligned with NBPTS Literacy: Reading Language Arts Standards, Second Edition (for teachers of students ages 3 12). If you
More informationAutism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric
Autism Spectrum Disorder Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria Rubric 1. Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs
More informationRubrics for Assessing Student Writing, Listening, and Speaking High School
Rubrics for Assessing Student Writing, Listening, and Speaking High School Copyright by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Permission is granted to reproduce the material contained herein
More informationCURRICULUM MAP. Elementary and Early Childhood Program: Alignment of Student Learning Outcomes, Standards, and Assessments
CURRICULUM MAP Elementary and Early Childhood Program: Alignment of Student Learning Outcomes, Standards, and Assessments ACEI = Association for Childhood Education International Standards (see below for
More informationIndiana Wesleyan University Differentiated Lesson Plan Physical Education 2008 NASPE Standards
Indiana Wesleyan University Differentiated Lesson Plan Physical Education 2008 NASPE Standards Assignment Description The Indiana Wesleyan University differentiated lesson plan combines elements of the
More informationMississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR Introduction and Process Guide May 2012 2192_05/12 Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose of Teacher Performance Evaluation... 1 Teacher Evaluation Process...
More informationHow To Pass A Queens College Course
Education Unit Assessment Analysis Guide...committed to promoting equity, excellence, and ethics in urban schools and communities 1 Unit Assessment Analysis Guide Introduction Form 1: Education Unit Core
More informationCompleted Formal Classroom Observation Form
Completed Formal Classroom Observation Form (Once participants have filled in and discussed the blank Formal Classroom Observation Form, facilitators should hand out copies of this completed form) August
More informationWriting learning objectives
Writing learning objectives This material was excerpted and adapted from the following web site: http://www.utexas.edu/academic/diia/assessment/iar/students/plan/objectives/ What is a learning objective?
More informationM.S. in Education Assessment in the Major Report 2010. By Dr. Renee Chandler, Program Director Submitted: October 2011
M.S. in Education Assessment in the Major Report 2010 By Dr. Renee Chandler, Program Director Submitted: October 2011 Table of Contents 1. Outcomes of Previous Assessments... 2 2. Questions To Be Answered
More informationDOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT
DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT 1a Demonstrating Knowledge Of Content And Pedagogy In planning
More informationOglala Lakota College Teacher Preparation Program Instructional Unit Scoring Rubric
Oglala Lakota College Teacher Preparation Program Instructional Unit Scoring Rubric Student: Course: Date: Instructor: Center: Semester: Directions: Mark the descriptor that best describes candidate performance
More informationRequirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure
Requirements & Guidelines for the Preparation of the New Mexico Online Portfolio for Alternative Licensure Prepared for the New Mexico Public Education Department Educator Quality Division http://www.ped.state.nm.us/
More informationComparing Sets of Data Grade Eight
Ohio Standards Connection: Data Analysis and Probability Benchmark C Compare the characteristics of the mean, median, and mode for a given set of data, and explain which measure of center best represents
More informationWriting and Presenting a Persuasive Paper Grade Nine
Ohio Standards Connection Writing Applications Benchmark E Write a persuasive piece that states a clear position, includes relevant information and offers compelling in the form of facts and details. Indicator
More informationCritical Components of Lesson Design Guide
Critical Components of Lesson Design Guide There are a variety of lesson plan formats available as many districts have different ways to showcase each lesson plan component. In the 1980 s Madeline Hunter
More informationTOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
More informationMathematics Education Master Portfolio School of Education, Purdue University
Mathematics Education Master Portfolio School of Education, Purdue University Overview: Masters Portfolios are purposeful, thematic collections of selected student work that exhibit to the student and
More informationAssessment Plan. UCO Conceptual Framework II.C. Addresses holistic needs of students
Plan Task: Design an assessment plan to monitor student progress toward learning goal(s). Use multiple assessment modes and approaches aligned with learning goals to assess student learning throughout
More informationStronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System Overview Teacher Effectiveness Student Achievement Student Achievement Stronge Evaluation System Effectiveness is the goal. Evaluation is merely
More informationEDTC Program Assessment Framework
EDTC Program Assessment Framework The University of Delaware s Master of Education in Educational Technology (EDTC) program aligns with both of the international standards bodies that inform the design
More informationKey Assessments School Library Media Specialist
GACE Media Specialist Test I and Test II (Georgia Content Test) Web Folio (Content Knowledge, Planning, Clinical Practice, Effects on Student Learning, Dispositions) Graduate and Employer/Supervisor Surveys
More informationASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching
ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching Course: ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Credit: 9 Semester Credit Hours (Undergraduate),
More informationSchool Social Worker - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
School - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component Developing refers to instructors who have been teaching three years or less 1a. Demonstrating skill in the content of the
More informationTeacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors
Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors This document is intended to inform school communities in recognizing the performance levels for key elements defined in the Teacher Rubric and
More informationDeveloping (3.0 to 3.4 points) (B, B+) 1a.2) Uses language somewhat appropriate to developmental & skill level. developmental & skill level
Teacher Candidate's Name: School Site: Grade Level: Supervisor's Name: Student Teaching/Practicum Observation Rubric Observation #: Course and Section Number: for Early Childhood Education Date: Instructions:
More informationUniversity of North Alabama College of Education and Human Sciences Course Syllabus
Course Title: IL 709 Applied Research II Credit Hours: 3 Instructor: Office: Phone: Email: Office Hours: University of North Alabama College of Education and Human Sciences Course Syllabus (Note: Occasionally
More informationTeacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
More informationSpecial Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric
St. Michael Albertville Independent School District 885 Excellence is Our Tradition Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric Adapted from Danielson, Charlotte. Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework
More informationHow To Teach Literacy
Reading Specialist Program Report SECTION I--CONTEXT 1. Description of any state or institutional policies that may influence the application of SPA standards Texas certifies reading specialists at the
More informationTeacher Performance Evaluation System TPES
Teacher Performance Evaluation System TPES The Code of Virginia 22.1253.13.5 states, in part, the following: B. Consistent with the finding that leadership is essential for the advancement of public education
More informationUnit/Lesson Planning Guide: Key Questions to Consider While Planning
Unit/Lesson Planning Guide: Key Questions to Consider While Planning Following is a guide to unit and lesson planning; it is based on approaches to unit and lesson planning introduced in TE 401 and used
More informationNorth Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina TEACHER evaluation process Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers ( This form should be
More informationEXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program
EXAMPLE FIELD EXPERIENCE PLANNING TEMPLATE CCSU MAT Program Secondary Education (Math, History/Social Studies, Science, World Languages) and Special Education (K-12) Goal: The MAT program focuses on preparing
More informationThe Internship for the. Masters in Educational Administration. Maryville University School of Education
The Internship for the Masters in Educational Administration Maryville University School of Education www.maryville.edu/edgrad Revised 1/13 Page 1 MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNSHIP HANDBOOK
More informationPROGRAM 6 The Role of Assessment in Curriculum Design
PROGRAM 6 The Role of Assessment in Curriculum Design Overview Having laid foundations for their own unit of study in Program 5, the Learner Teams discovered how to build formative and summative assessments
More informationSection Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
More informationGEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Effective 9/01/08) Kelly Henson Executive Secretary Table of Contents Standard 1: Candidate Knowledge,
More informationAPPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM ADMISSION TO TEACHER EDUCATION INTERVIEW INSTRUMENT COMMUNICATION PERFORMANCE ORAL EVALUATIONS
APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION TO TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM ADMISSION TO TEACHER EDUCATION INTERVIEW INSTRUMENT COMMUNICATION PERFORMANCE ORAL EVALUATIONS DISPOSITION ASSESSMENT FORM ADMISSION TO TEACHER EDUCATION
More informationJapanese International School. Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy
Japanese International School Assessment Recording and Reporting Policy 1.0 Philosophy and beliefs Through a positive learning environment, the Japanese International School respects the diversity of its
More informationIACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide
IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide Example of a Research Project Evaluation Rubric International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education 11374 Strang Line Road Lenexa,
More informationWhat are some effective standards-based classroom assessment practices?
How does classroom assessment help teachers and students? Classroom assessments can help teachers plan and implement effective instruction and can help students learn at deeper and higher levels. Assessments
More informationNC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
More informationGifted & Talented Program Description
Gifted & Talented Program Description The purpose of Cedar Unified School District s gifted and talented program is to nurture academic excellence and improve student achievement among all students. To
More informationPossible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches
Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to 1b. Specific Examples 1b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1a. Specific Examples 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of Content and Pedagogy
More informationCampus Instructional Consulting Franklin Hall 004, 855-9023, www.indiana.edu/~teaching. Page 1
Laboratory Notebook Grading Rubric (http://www.rickhershberger.com/bioactivesite/lab/notebook_rubric.htm) For a grade of "C", your notebook should enable you to repeat and interpret your experiment. o
More informationAssessment That Drives Instruction
Improving Instruction Through Assessment Assessment That Drives Instruction Pokey Stanford Stacy Reeves TEACHING Exceptional Children, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 18-22. Copyright 2005 CEC. Two challenging aspects
More informationAppendix A: Annotated Table of Activities & Tools
APPENDIX A Annotated Table of Activities and Tools MODULE 1: Get Ready for Inquiry ( Activities) Activity 1.1 Activity 1.2 Activity 1.3 Activity 1.4 Activity 1.5 How Data Can Help Us in the School Improvement
More informationTEACHNJ ACT. New Evaluation Implementation 2013-14 School Year Required by State of NJ
TEACHNJ ACT New Evaluation Implementation 2013-14 School Year Required by State of NJ Charles Maranzano, Jr., Superintendent Hopatcong Borough Public Schools 1 Evaluation Reform in NJ Evaluation Reform
More informationLanguage Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 5
Language Arts Literacy : Grade 5 Mission: Learning to read, write, speak, listen, and view critically, strategically and creatively enables students to discover personal and shared meaning throughout their
More informationStudy Guide for the Library Media Specialist Test Revised 2009
Study Guide for the Library Media Specialist Test Revised 2009 A PUBLICATION OF ETS Table of Contents Study Guide for the Library Media Specialist Test TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction to the Library
More informationMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Professional Development Self- Assessment Guidebook For Teacher Professional Development Offerings Modified for use by the District and School
More informationCTL 2009 ADVANCED PROGRAM REPORT
CTL 2009 ADVANCED PROGRAM REPORT 1 Because the Office of Undergraduate Studies is now requiring program assessment reports that are similar to CTL program assessment reports; The Office of Research, Evaluation,
More informationColorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
More informationASSESSMENT PLAN. Department of Marketing. College of Business Illinois State University. Integrated Marketing Communication Sequence.
ASSESSMENT PLAN Department of Marketing College of Business Illinois State University Integrated Marketing Communication Sequence Summer 2006 INTRODUCTION This document describes the assessment plan employed
More informationRadford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM
Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING ADMISSION/READMISSION, FIELD PLACEMENT, RETENTION, and PROGRAM COMPLETION Students have a professional obligation to abide
More informationNarrative Literature Response Letters Grade Three
Ohio Standards Connection Writing Applications Benchmark A Write narrative accounts that develop character, setting and plot. Indicator: 1 Write stories that sequence events and include descriptive details
More informationChapter 3 - Alternative Assessments
Chapter 3 - Alternative Assessments Evaluating with Alternative Assessments In the ERIC Digest article "Alternative Assessment and Second Language Study: What and Why?" Charles R. Hancock states "In the
More information1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address the Essential Academic Learning Requirements and the state learning goals.
SCORING RUBRIC Candidate: Supervisor: Cooperating Teacher: School: School District: Grade Level(s): PAA Administration Dates: 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th 1. The teacher candidate sets learning targets that address
More informationTo act as a professional inheritor, critic and interpreter of knowledge or culture when teaching students.
FOUNDATIONS (1, 2) To act as a professional inheritor, critic and interpreter of knowledge or culture when teaching students. Situates the discipline's basic benchmarks and points of understanding (concepts,
More informationLanguage Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 6
Language Arts Literacy : Grade 6 Mission: Learning to read, write, speak, listen, and view critically, strategically and creatively enables students to discover personal and shared meaning throughout their
More informationRevisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University A. A description of how the proposed program has been revisioned to reflect
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE IEP TEAM DATA COLLECTION &
GUIDELINES FOR THE IEP TEAM DATA COLLECTION & Progress Monitoring Decisions about the effectiveness of an intervention must be based on data, not guesswork. Frequent, repeated measures of progress toward
More informationPOWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS Poway Unified School District Teaching Standards Domain I Domain II Domain III Domain IV Domain V Planning and Designing Instruction Element
More informationExplain Yourself: An Expository Writing Unit for High School
Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Understanding by Design: Complete Collection Understanding by Design 2013 Explain Yourself: An Expository Writing Unit for High School Adele Barnett Trinity
More informationMountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation
Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation Appendix A NAME: DATE: Certificated Employees new to the profession are responsible for ten components in the four domains. Second year Certificated
More informationSpeech-Language Pathology Study Guide
Speech-Language Pathology Study Guide A PUBLICATION OF ETS Table of Contents Study Guide for the Praxis Speech-Language Pathology Test TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction to the Speech-Language Pathology
More informationTEACHER DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION HANDBOOK
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT & EVALUATION HANDBOOK College, Career Career & Citizen-Ready! Table of Contents Part 1: Introduction Purpose Part 2: Standards of Effective Teaching Performance Standards Sample Performance
More informationAppendix A. Higher Education Program Masters Higher Education Administrator Evaluation Rubric
Appendix A Higher Education Program Masters Higher Education Administrator Evaluation Rubric Program Objective: Understanding the importance of equity and social justice, graduates of the Masters in Higher
More informationProvidence College Graduate Special Education Student Teaching Program
Providence College Graduate Special Education Student Teaching Program Introduction The Providence College Graduate Special Education program is designed to prepare teachers to teach children with special
More informationNORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Teacher: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents of the
More informationAssessment of Learning Structure for MBA Cluster Programs
Assessment of Learning Structure for MBA Cluster Programs LCOB Mission Statement Overarching Goal for MBA Cluster Programs The Mission of the LCOB is to be a leading state institution for the education
More informationStudy Guide for the Mathematics: Proofs, Models, and Problems, Part I, Test
Study Guide for the Mathematics: Proofs, Models, and Problems, Part I, Test A PUBLICATION OF ETS Table of Contents Study Guide for the Mathematics: Proofs, Models, and Problems, Part I, Test TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSection 3: Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) Resources Pages 14-18
Section 3: Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP) Resources Pages 14-18 IPDP Resources page 1 of 5. Local Professional Development 14 Senior Professional Educator and Lead Professional Educator
More informationStudent Bi-Annual Review. Professional Counseling Programs
Student Bi-Annual Review Professional Counseling Programs Updated Fall 2011 Professional Counseling Programs Student Bi-Annual Review Process Students are required to complete a bi-annual review as a component
More informationPre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08
Please use this assessment in conjunction with the for Teachers guidelines: the rating scale; evaluation questions relating to the standards; and the license-specific questions per standard (b)2c. Candidates
More informationTeacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
More informationNW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM
NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM 1 *For specific online course requirements, please refer to the attached course handout entitled Comprehensive Online Teacher Induction Program and Alternative
More informationMASTER OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ITEC)
MASTER OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY (ITEC) Culminating Activity Revised August 2012 By ITEC Faculty Culminating Activity Candidates in the Master s of Instructional Technology program must complete a Culminating
More informationREADING SPECIALIST STANDARDS
READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS Standard I. Standard II. Standard III. Standard IV. Components of Reading: The Reading Specialist applies knowledge of the interrelated components of reading across all developmental
More informationGraduate Assessment Plan (Master s programs) DUE Dec 15, 2011 to Gita N. Ramaswamy, Director of Assessment
Graduate Assessment Plan (Master s programs) DUE Dec 15, 2011 to Gita N. Ramaswamy, Director of Assessment Directions: Please complete this graduate student learning outcomes assessment plan for each Master
More informationThomas Edison State College W. Cary Edwards School of Nursing Guidelines for Synthesis Paper and MSN e-portfolio Nursing Administration
Thomas Edison State College W. Cary Edwards School of Nursing Guidelines for Synthesis Paper and MSN e-portfolio Nursing Administration I. Purpose: The overall purpose of the MSN Synthesis Paper and e-portfolio
More informationStudy Guide for the Special Education: Core Knowledge Tests
Study Guide for the Special Education: Core Knowledge Tests A PUBLICATION OF ETS Table of Contents Study Guide for the Praxis Special Education: Core Knowledge Tests TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction
More informationADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers
ADEPT Performance Standards for Classroom-Based Teachers Revised ADEPT Performance Standards for Classroom-Based Teachers Introduction Central to the ADEPT system is a set of expectations for what teaching
More informationReading Competencies
Reading Competencies The Third Grade Reading Guarantee legislation within Senate Bill 21 requires reading competencies to be adopted by the State Board no later than January 31, 2014. Reading competencies
More informationPrinciple 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership
Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership 3.A Develop and Adopt Guidelines for Local Teacher and Principal Evaluation and Support Systems This section provides a description of the state
More informationMS Health Care Administration (2014 2015)
MS Health Care Administration (2014 2015) Program Information Point of Contact Alberto Coustasse (coustassehen@marshall.edu) Support for University and College Missions Marshall University is a multi campus
More informationSASED CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE POST OBSERVATION FEEDBACK FORM DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION. Conference Date
DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Nurse Conference Date COMPONENTS UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a. School Nursing School Nurse displays little understanding of prerequisite knowledge
More informationSpecial Education Master s Program OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN 2013-2016
1 Special Education Master s Program OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN 2013-2016 Department of Literacy, Early, Bilingual, and Special Education Mission Statement The mission of the Special Education Program at
More informationArkansas Teaching Standards
Arkansas Teaching Standards The Arkansas Department of Education has adopted the 2011 Model Core Teaching Standards developed by Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) to replace
More informationRUBRICS FOR READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS
RUBRICS FOR READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS SOE STANDARD 1 Disciplinary Foundations Disciplinary foundations: demonstrates interpretive, normative, critical understanding of educational phenomenon through
More informationRATING A TEACHER OBSERVATION TOOL. Five ways to ensure classroom observations are focused and rigorous
2011 RATING A TEACHER OBSERVATION TOOL Five ways to ensure classroom observations are focused and rigorous Contents The Role of Observation Criteria and Tools Assessing Quality of Criteria and Tools: Five
More informationLOURDES UNIVERSITY Graduate School Master of Science in Nursing NUR 698 NURSING CAPSTONE
LOURDES UNIVERSITY Graduate School Master of Science in Nursing NUR 698 NURSING CAPSTONE Credit Hours: 3 semester hours Prerequisites: All graduate nursing courses Capstone Advisors: PhD Prepared nursing
More informationMultiple Subjects Program Assessment Plan Spring 2001
California State University, Sacramento College of Education Multiple Subjects Program Assessment Plan Spring 2001 Contents Multiple Subject Program Group Mission Statement Expected Learning Outcomes (CSTP)
More informationInformal Assessment. I. Advantages of Informal Assessment
Informal I. Advantages of Informal II. Differences between Formal and Informal III. Trends in Informal IV. Observation, Work Sample Analysis, and Task Analysis V. Curriculum-Based Techniques VI. Procedures
More informationAlignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages with the Common Core State Standards
Alignment of the National with the Common Core State Standards Performance Expectations The Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts (ELA) and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science,
More informationGraduate Certification Field Guide
Learning for Tomorrow Teaching for Today School/University Collaboration Graduate Certification Field Guide Block II Student Teaching Boise State University College of Education Fall 2007 2 Table of Contents
More informationTLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers 2012-2013
TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers 0-0 Domain/Relative Weight Dimension Page Classroom Management 0%. Preparation. Discipline. Building-Wide Climate Responsibility. Lesson Plans. Assessment
More information