Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry:
|
|
- Job McDaniel
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 INVITED COMMENTARY Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: Overused, Neglected, or Just Misunderstood? Andrew J. Laster Assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) plays a vital role in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and in monitoring a patient s response to drug therapy. This commentary will discuss controversies surrounding the use of DXA for screening and monitoring of BMD in women. The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) has estimated that more than 43.6 million Americans have osteoporosis or osteopenia (low bone mass) [1]. In 2005, 2 million fractures were attributed to osteoporosis, with a direct cost of $17 billion; 71% of these fractures occurred in women [2]. By 2025, costs associated with fractures are projected to increase to $25.3 billion [2]. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the recognized standard for the clinical assessment of skeletal health. DXA allows for the diagnosis of osteoporosis or low bone mass, strongly correlates with mechanical strength [3], is a good predictor of fracture risk [4], and affords excellent accuracy and precision [5] while minimizing patients exposure to ionizing radiation [6]. Moreover, drug therapy has been shown to be cost effective in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [7]. Given that approximately 40% of white women older than 50 years will have an osteoporotic fracture in their lifetime [8], having clear recommendations for screening and monitoring using DXA are essential. Because of the absence of pertinent studies in men, this commentary will only address the evaluation of BMD in women. DXA screening for low bone mass or osteoporosis is well accepted in women aged 65 years or older, regardless of risk factors, and in younger women with risk factors such as rheumatoid arthritis, glucocorticoid use, malabsorption syndromes, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, or gastric bypass surgery. Screening of these individuals is recommended by NOF [1], the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) [9], the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) [10], the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) [11], the American College of Radiology [12], and the North American Menopause Society (NAMS) [13]. Despite the fact that DXA testing has been added to the Welcome to Medicare Exam, only 14% of eligible women had a DXA study in 2010 [14]. Over the 7-year period from 2002 through 2008, 48% of older women did not have a DXA study [14]. Is DXA Testing Overused in Younger Women? Potential misuse of DXA testing is a concern that has been raised by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Committee for Quality Assurance, which have together submitted for public comment a quality measure regarding appropriate use of DXA scans in women under 65 years who do not meet the risk factor profile [15]. The quality measure cites a small, retrospective study of 615 women [16], in which 41.3% of women younger than 65 years who had been sent for DXA screening were found to have been screened inappropriately, based on their lack of any of the recognized risk factors listed in the 2010 NAMS position statement. However, a much larger study performed by Kale and colleagues [17] as part of the National Physicians Alliance Good Stewardship initiative found that DXA tests were ordered inappropriately in only 1.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.9% 2.2%) of all primary care visits by women aged years. This study performed a cross-sectional analysis using 2009 data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which collect data on patient visits to primary care physicians in non federally funded hospital outpatient departments and in non federally funded, non hospitalbased offices, respectively; national estimates were then generated using weighted samples [17]. Given the large size and more rigorous methodology of this study, a critical analysis of the available data fails to support the claim that DXA testing is being misused in women younger than 65 years. Indications for DXA Testing What indications should be considered when determining the need for DXA testing? Table 1 provides a composite list of indications that have been proposed by AACE, ISCD, NAMS, and NOF. Table 2 lists the Medicare beneficiaries for whom CMS will cover DXA testing, based on the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 [18] and a 2006 revision of the relevant regulations [19]; although these guidelines are specific to Electronically published March 11, Address correspondence to Dr. Andrew J. Laster, Arthritis & Osteoporosis Consultants of the Carolinas, 1918 Randolph Rd, Ste 600, Charlotte, NC (alaster@aocc.md). N C Med J. 2014;75(2): by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved /2014/
2 the Medicare population, they are often adopted by private insurers as well. The 2011 updated guidelines from the USPSTF recommend DXA testing for any woman younger than 65 years if her fracture risk is equal to or greater than that of a 65-year-old white woman who has no additional risk factors [9]. This guideline effectively sets the testing threshold at a risk level of 9.3%, which is the 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture for a 65-year-old white woman with a body mass index of 21 kg/m 2 (found using the FRAX fracture risk assessment tool developed by the World Health Organization). To apply this guideline, FRAX is calculated without BMD, and if the 10-year risk for major osteoporotic fracture is at least 9.3%, then DXA testing would be appropriate based on the USPSTF recommendations. However, clinicians should be cautious in how rigorously they adhere to these recommendations, because clinical risk factors are a good predictor of fracture but only a fair predictor of BMD [20]. As the USPSTF points out in their guidelines, clinicians should consider each patient s values and preferences table 1. Women for Whom Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Testing Is Indicated a All women 65 years of age or older, regardless of risk factors Postmenopausal women with a history of fracture(s) without major trauma... after age years (AACE [11])... as an adult (NOF [1], ISCD [10])... after menopause (NAMS [13]) Postmenopausal women with osteopenia identified radiographically (AACE [11]) Postmenopausal women starting or taking long-term ( 3 months) systemic glucocorticoid therapy Perimenopausal or postmenopausal women who have 1 or more of the following risk factors for osteoporosis and who are willing to consider pharmacologic interventions Low body weight (<127 lb) or low body mass index (<20 kg/m 2, AACE [11]; or <21 kg/m 2, NAMS [13]) Ever use of long-term ( 3 months) systemic glucocorticoid therapy Family history of osteoporotic fracture (AACE [11]); history of hip fracture in a parent (NAMS [13]) Early menopause (AACE [11]) Current smoker Excessive consumption of alcohol Rheumatoid arthritis Women with secondary osteoporosis, regardless of age Women being considered for pharmacologic therapy, to monitor treatment effect Women currently receiving pharmacologic therapy, to monitor treatment effect a These recommendations are based on guidelines from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF), the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), and the North American Menopause Society (NAMS). and use clinical judgment when discussing screening with women in this age group (50 64 years) [9]. Repeat DXA Testing Repeat DXA testing is also controversial, both in older women and in those younger than 65 years, whether or not they are receiving drug therapy for low bone mass or osteoporosis. CMS allows for repeat DXA testing every 2 years [19], or more frequently if it is deemed to be medically necessary. Testing more frequently than every 2 years might be medically necessary when identification of rapid bone loss could alter treatment recommendations, such as when a patient has hyperparathyroidism or will be receiving glucocorticoids for 3 months or longer. However, insurers that oversee the administration of Medicare policies within specific states (commonly referred to as local Medicare carriers) have been allowed to define the conditions under which testing is medically necessary, and some have routinely allowed repeat testing at 12-month intervals in all postmenopausal women receiving drug therapy. The literature is divided as to whether repeat DXA testing in untreated postmenopausal women enhances our ability to predict fracture risk. Two studies [21, 22] concluded that repeat DXA testing, which allows calculation of bone density loss, provides little value beyond that of the initial BMD assessment; however, one of these studies [21] looked at a younger cohort of patients in whom the fracture rate was significantly lower and the baseline BMD was much higher. In contrast, 2 other studies [23, 24] demonstrated that bone loss detected by DXA is a predictor of fracture risk independent of baseline BMD. Moreover, we know that individuals who experience rapid bone turnover are at increased risk of fracture independent of their baseline BMD [25]. When a patient has a repeat DXA study performed on the same machine at the same institution (and the precision error is known and the least significant change has been calculated), then significant declines in BMD across several measured sites (spine and hip, or both hips) should influence decisions about drug therapy. Controversy also surrounds the frequency of repeat testing in older women who are not being treated for low bone mass or osteoporosis. A 2012 study in The New England Journal of Medicine [26] examined DXA testing intervals in 4,957 untreated postmenopausal women aged 67 years or older who had had more than 1 DXA study and who had normal BMD or osteopenia at baseline. The primary outcome was the estimated time interval for 10% of participants to develop osteoporosis without experiencing a hip or clinical vertebral fracture or needing to start treatment for osteoporosis. Not unexpectedly, the authors found that a higher baseline BMD was associated with a longer time to develop osteoporosis and that women with normal bone density at age 67 years were unlikely to have subsequent rapid bone loss [26]. However, media reports failed to appreciate that this study excluded women in their early postmenopausal 133
3 table 2. Medicare Beneficiaries for Whom Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Testing Is Covered A woman who has been determined by the physician (or a qualified nonphysician practitioner) treating her to be estrogen-deficient and at clinical risk for osteoporosis, based on her medical history and other findings An individual with vertebral abnormalities as demonstrated by an x-ray to be indicative of osteoporosis, osteopenia, or vertebral fracture An individual receiving (or expecting to receive) glucocorticoid (steroid) therapy equivalent to an average of 5.0 mg of prednisone, or greater, per day for more than 3 months An individual with primary hyperparathyroidism An individual being monitored to assess the response to or efficacy of an FDA-approved osteoporosis drug therapy Note. FDA, US Food and Drug Administration. Source: Reproduced from an article in the Federal Register [19]. years, when accelerated bone loss might require shorter testing intervals, and it also excluded women who had osteoporosis by DXA, those who had prior fractures, and those who were already receiving drug therapy. Additionally, this study did not assess for morphometric vertebral fractures, the presence of which would have established a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis even if densitometric criteria were consistent with osteopenia. While media reports have suggested that frequent DXA testing is a significant problem in clinical practice, the data suggest otherwise. King and Fiorentino demonstrated that during the 7-year span from 2002 through 2008, 25.4% of elderly fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries had only 1 DXA study, 15.4% had 2 studies, 8.1% had 3 studies, 2% had 4 studies, and less than 1% had 5 or more DXA studies. Almost half (47.87%) of the individuals in this group did not have a DXA study [14]. Finally, some researchers have challenged the role of repeat DXA testing in postmenopausal women who are receiving drug therapy. A 2009 study by Bell and colleagues assessed 6,459 women with low BMD who were enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) and were randomized to receive placebo or alendronate [27]. BMD was measured at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 years after randomization. The authors concluded that monitoring BMD in the first 3 years after starting treatment is unnecessary and may be misleading. Performing a secondary analysis of pooled data from the 2 arms of FIT, they determined that more than 97% of treated patients demonstrated an increase in BMD. However, Watts and colleagues [28] pointed out several flaws in the Bell study. First, they noted that the purpose of monitoring is not to document an increase in BMD but to identify people who experience a significant decline in BMD, because these individuals experience a higher rate of fracture compared with individuals whose BMD is stable or increasing. In fact, patients in FIT were dropped from the trial if they had significant bone loss in the lumbar spine or total hip (8% or more over 1 year, 10% or more over 2 years, or 12% or more over 3 years) [29]. Moreover, patients in FIT faced a number of exclusion criteria, which set them apart from a real-world treatment group, and study participants also had significantly greater compliance with alendronate. Conclusion As we sort through these studies and recommendations, we should keep in mind that DXA is not the only tool for assessing fracture risk. The presence of a prior fragility fracture establishes a clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and warrants drug therapy even if a DXA study shows only osteopenia. Vertebral body compression fractures may be detected by a plain radiograph or with Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA), a software addition to DXA that provides either a single-energy or a dual-energy x-ray image of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Anywhere from 16% to 48% of older individuals with osteopenia on DXA have evidence of prevalent vertebral body compression fractures, most of which are low trauma [30-32]. The presence of such fractures changes the clinical diagnosis to osteoporosis and has a significant impact on treatment decisions. Moreover, fracture risk increases as vertebral fractures increase in number and severity [33]. FRAX provides 10-year fracture risk predictions using a number of clinical risk factors in addition to BMD, and NOF provides treatment thresholds specific to the United States for patients with osteopenia [1]. Using the concept of fracture risk thresholds rather than relying solely on BMD, AACE has proposed reasonable guidelines for frequency of DXA testing in patients who are not receiving treatment for osteoporosis or low bone mass (see Table 3) [11]. Despite being a chronic disease in which prevention has been shown to save money, osteoporosis remains underrecognized and undertreated. There is little evidence to support the claim that DXA testing is widely misused in table 3. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Guidelines for Frequency of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Testing Guidelines for testing in women who have not received osteoporosis treatment The frequency of testing depends on the results of the initial test and the likelihood of clinically significant bone loss. For patients approaching an intervention threshold, retesting every 1 2 years is often appropriate. For those whose bone mineral density is borderline-low, retesting every 3 5 years is usually sufficient. Patients who are comfortably above an intervention threshold may not need to undergo reassessment for 5 or 10 years, or ever, unless there is some new indication. Guidelines for testing in women who are undergoing treatment for osteoporosis Repeat testing every 1 2 years until bone density is stable, then reduce testing frequency. Source: Adapted from Watts et al [11]. 134
4 either younger women or in older women who are enrolled in Medicare. A number of studies, some of which have been inaccurately or incompletely covered in the lay press, have created confusion among health care providers and patients regarding the value of DXA testing. Compounding this confusion, there has been a 65% decline in Medicare reimbursement of DXA in the nonfacility setting, from $139 in 2006 to $49 in 2014; at this lower level, providers can no longer cover their operating costs. This has resulted in an 8.3% decline in testing rates in postmenopausal women from 2011 to 2012 (Christopher Hogan, PhD, written communication, July 2013; based on an analysis of data from the Medicare Physician/ Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files, summarized from 5% Standard Analytical Files through 2012), and there has been an 8.1% decline in the number of DXA providers nationally between 2008 and 2011 (Christopher Hogan, PhD, written communication, July 2013; based on counts of unique provider identifiers on 5% sample, Limited Data Set, Standard Analytical Files, ). Twenty-nine states lost more than 10% of their DXA providers, and 9 of those 29 states lost more than 20% of their DXA providers (Alison B. King, PhD, written communication, August 2013; based on counts of unique provider identifiers on 5% sample, Limited Data Set, Standard Analytical Files, ). DXA remains an important tool in the assessment of skeletal health. Critical analysis fails to support the assumption that DXA testing is overused in women less than 65 years of age. In women 65 years of age or older, the challenge is undertesting. Repeat DXA testing may be of clinical utility in untreated individuals who are approaching a fracture threshold and in treated patients to exclude significant bone loss from noncompliance, lack of efficacy, or a secondary cause of metabolic bone disease that was previously unidentified. Andrew J. Laster, MD, FACR, CCD assistant consulting professor, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; and clinical instructor, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Acknowledgment Potential conflicts of interest. A.J.L. is a consultant or member of the speakers bureau for Amgen, Novartis, and Eli Lilly. He is also past president and current chairperson of public policy for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. References 1. National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) Clinician s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: NOF; files/580.pdf. Accessed January 14, Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3): Lotz JC, Cheal EJ, Hayes WC. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part II Nonlinear analysis. J Biomech Eng. 1991;113(4): Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996;312(7041): Mazess R, Chesnut CH 3rd, McClung M, Genant H. Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992;51(1): Njeh CF, Fuerst T, Hans D, Blake GM, Genant HK. Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999;50(1): Schousboe JT, Ensrud KE, Nyman JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Kane RL. Universal bone densitometry screening combined with alendronate therapy for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is highly cost-effective for elderly women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(10): Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;17(5 Suppl):505S-511S. 9. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for osteoporosis: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5): Kendler DL, Borges JL, Fielding RA, et al. The official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: indications of use and reporting of DXA for body composition. J Clin Densitom. 2013;16(4): Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Camacho PM, et al; AACE Osteoporosis Task Force. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract. 2010;16 Suppl 3: American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR-SPR-SSR Practice Guidelines for the Performance of Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) a70b75ee pdf. Accessed January 15, Management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2010;17(1): King AB, Fiorentino DM. Medicare payment cuts for osteoporosis testing reduced use despite tests benefit in reducing fractures. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(12): Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Appropriate Use of DXA Scans in Women Under 65 Years Who Do Not Meet the Risk Factor Profile Public Comment page, CMS Web site. Accessed January 15, Schnatz PF, Marakovits KA, Dubois M, O Sullivan DM. Osteoporosis screening and treatment guidelines: are they being followed? Menopause. 2011;18(10): Kale MS, Bishop TF, Federman AD, Keyhani S. Top 5 lists top $5 billion. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(20): Balanced Budget Act of Pub L No , 4106a. 42 CFR Bone mass measurement: conditions for coverage and frequency standards. Fed Regist. 2006;71(231): ainen.org/index.php?vol=71&page= Accessed January 16, Ribot C, Tremollieres F, Pouilles JM. Can we detect women with low bone mass using clinical risk factors? Am J Med. 1995;98(2A):52S- 55S. 21. Leslie WD, Morin SN, Lix LM; Manitoba Bone Density Program. Rate of bone density change does not enhance fracture prediction in routine clinical practice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4): Hillier TA, Stone KL, Bauer DC, et al. Evaluating the value of repeat bone mineral density measurement and prediction of fractures in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(2): Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA. Femoral neck bone loss predicts fracture risk independent of baseline BMD. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(7): Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD. Rate of forearm bone loss is associated with an increased risk of fracture independently of bone mass in postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(11): Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Chapuy MC, Delmas PD. Increased bone turnover in late postmenopausal women is a major determinant of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11(3): Gourlay ML, Fine JP, Preisser JS, et al. Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in older women. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(3):
5 27. Bell KJ, Hayen A, Macaskill P, et al. Value of routine monitoring of bone mineral density after starting bisphosphonate treatment: secondary analysis of trial data. BMJ. 2009;338:b Watts NB, Lewiecki EM, Bonnick SL, et al. Clinical value of monitoring BMD in patients treated with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(10): Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, et al. Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1998;280(24): Schousboe JT, DeBold CR, Bowles C, Glickstein S, Rubino RK. Prevalence of vertebral compression fracture deformity by X-ray absorptiometry of lateral thoracic and lumbar spines in a population referred for bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom. 2002;5(3): Greenspan SL, von Stetten E, Emond SK, Jones L, Parker RA. Instant vertebral assessment: a noninvasive dual X-ray absorptiometry technique to avoid misclassification and clinical mismanagement of osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom. 2001;4(4): Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Garnero P, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD. Identification of osteopenic women at high risk of fracture: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(10): Siris ES, Genant HK, Laster AJ, Chen P, Misurski DA, Krege JH. Enhanced prediction of fracture risk combining vertebral fracture status and BMD. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(6):
Clinical Policy Guideline
Clinical Policy Guideline Policy Title: Bone Density Testing Policy No: B0215A.00 Effective Date: 01/01/15 Date Reviewed: 03/25/15 I. DEFINITION/BACKGROUND Bone density testing is used to estimate the
More informationOsteoporosis has been identified by the US Surgeon General
New Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis E. Michael Lewiecki, MD, and Nelson B. Watts, MD Abstract: The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX ) and the National
More informationModule 5 - Speaking of Bones Osteoporosis For Health Professionals: Fracture Risk Assessment. William D. Leslie, MD MSc FRCPC
Module 5 - Speaking of Bones Osteoporosis For Health Professionals: Fracture Risk Assessment William D. Leslie, MD MSc FRCPC Case #1 Age 53: 3 years post-menopause Has always enjoyed excellent health with
More information2-1. Osteoporose. Dr. P. Van Wettere Radiologie en medische beeldvorming
2-1 Osteoporose Dr. P. Van Wettere Radiologie en medische beeldvorming 2-2 Osteoporose Definitie Incidentie, mortaliteit, morbiditeit, kost Diagnose Radiologie Botdensitometrie FRAX FractureCascade History
More informationPRACTICAL DENSITOMETRY
PRACTICAL DENSITOMETRY The Challenge of Osteoporosis Osteoporosis is a silent disease that develops over decades Goal: identify patients with osteoporosis before fractures occur Means: measure bone density
More informationBone Basics National Osteoporosis Foundation 2013
When you have osteoporosis, your bones become weak and are more likely to break (fracture). You can have osteoporosis without any symptoms. Because it can be prevented and treated, an early diagnosis is
More informationBone Mineral Density Studies
Bone Mineral Density Studies Policy Number: 6.01.01 Last Review: 5/2015 Origination: 10/1988 Next Review: 5/2016 Policy Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City (Blue KC) will provide coverage for bone
More informationPROTOCOL FOR PATIENTS WITH ABNORMAL LAB AND X-RAY VALUES
PROTOCOL FOR PATIENTS WITH ABNORMAL LAB AND X-RAY VALUES Patients newly diagnosed as osteopenic or osteoporotic on a radiology report or patients receiving abnormal lab values on the following lab tests
More informationBone Densitometry. What is a Bone Density Scan (DXA)?
Scan for mobile link. Bone Densitometry Bone densitometry, also called dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry or DEXA, uses a very small dose of ionizing radiation to produce pictures of the inside of the body
More informationFast Facts on Osteoporosis
Fast Facts on Osteoporosis Definition Prevalence Osteoporosis, or porous bone, is a disease characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility and an
More informationDERBYSHIRE JOINT AREA PRESCRIBING COMMITTEE (JAPC) OSTEOPOROSIS GUIDELINE
DERBYSHIRE JOINT AREA PRESCRIBING COMMITTEE (JAPC) OSTEOPOROSIS GUIDELINE This is an updated guideline It incorporates the latest NICE guidance There are strong recommendations for calcium + vitamin D
More informationOsteoporosis and Vertebral Compression (Spinal) Fractures Fact Sheet
Osteoporosis and Vertebral Compression (Spinal) Fractures Fact Sheet About Osteoporosis Osteoporosis is estimated to affect 200 million women worldwide. 1 Worldwide, osteoporosis causes more than nine
More informationCPT 76977, 77078, 77079, 77080, 77081, 77083, or HCPCS G0130:
Bone Mass Measurements Coverage Information Noridian Administrative Services (NAS), LLC, is providing coverage information regarding Bone Mass Measurements (BMM) in response to multiple provider inquiries.
More informationFRAX Identifying people at high risk of fracture
FRAX Identifying people at high risk of fracture WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, a new clinical tool for informed treatment decisions Authored by Dr. Eugene McCloskey International Osteoporosis Foundation
More informationOsteoporosis/Bone Health in Adults as a National Public Health Priority
Position Statement Osteoporosis/Bone Health in Adults as a National Public Health Priority This Position Statement was developed as an educational tool based on the opinion of the authors. It is not a
More informationBULLETIN. Slovak Republic Ministry of Health
BULLETIN Slovak Republic Ministry of Health Part 51-53 November 13, 2009 No. 57 CONTENTS: 52. Slovak Republic Ministry of Health Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Glucocorticoidinduced Osteoporosis 52. Slovak
More informationOsteoporosis Diagnosis: BMD, FRAX and Assessment of Secondary Osteoporosis. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest Steven T Harris MD 2014-2015
Osteoporosis Diagnosis: BMD, FRAX and Assessment of Secondary Osteoporosis Steven T Harris MD FACP Clinical Professor of Medicine University of California, San Francisco steve.harris@ucsf.edu Disclosure
More informationOsteoporosis Assessment Using DXA and Instant Vertebral Assessment. Working Together For A Healthier Community
Osteoporosis Assessment Using DXA and Instant Vertebral Assessment Working Together For A Healthier Community Osteoporosis The Silent Thief The Facts About Osteoporosis 1 in 2 women will develop osteoporosis
More informationDrug treatment pathway for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
Drug treatment pathway for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women Version 1.0 Ratified by: East Sussex HEMC Date ratified: 26.01.2011 Job title of originator/author Gillian Ells, East Sussex HEMC Pharmacist
More informationJurisdiction Ohio. Retirement Date N/A
If you wish to save the PDF, please ensure that you change the file extension to.pdf (from.ashx). Local Coverage Determination (LCD): BONE Mass Measurement (L31854) Contractor Information Contractor Name
More informationLoss of hip bone mineral density over time is associated with spine and hip fracture incidence in osteoporotic postmenopausal women
Eur J Epidemiol (2009) 24:707 712 DOI 10.1007/s10654-009-9381-4 LOCOMOTOR DISEASES Loss of hip bone mineral density over time is associated with spine and hip fracture incidence in osteoporotic postmenopausal
More informationClinical Practice Guideline for Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment
Clinical Practice Guideline for Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment Osteoporosis is a condition of decreased bone mass, leading to bone fragility and an increased susceptibility to fractures. While osteoporosis
More informationPerformance of Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Tools in Iranian Postmenopausal Women
Int J Endocrinol Metab 2007; 1: 26-32 Performance of Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Tools in Iranian Postmenopausal Women ORIGINAL ARTICLE Dabbaghmanesh MH a, Sabet R b, Aria A a, R Omrani GR a aendocrine
More informationRecent Topics in Treatment of Osteoporosis
Review Article Recent Topics in Treatment of Osteoporosis JMAJ 49(9 10): 309 314, 2006 Satoshi Soen* 1 Abstract It has come to light that osteoporosis-related fractures are more critical than previously
More informationProposed Changes to Existing Measure for HEDIS 1 2015: Osteoporosis Management in Women Who Had a Fracture (OMW)
Draft Document for HEDIS 2015 Public Comment Obsolete After March 19, 2014 1 Proposed Changes to Existing Measure for HEDIS 1 2015: Osteoporosis Management in Women Who Had a Fracture (OMW) NCQA seeks
More informationBONE MINERAL DENSITOMETRY REPORTING
CAR TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR BONE MINERAL DENSITOMETRY REPORTING APPROVED: JANUARY 25, 2013 KERRY SIMINOSKI, MD, FRCPC; MARGARET O'KEEFFE, MD, FRCPC; JACQUES P. BROWN, MD, FRCPC; STEVEN BURRELL, MD, FRCPC;
More informationOST and BMD Risk Assessment in Morocco
DOI 10.1007/s10067-007-0611-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Performance of the osteoporosis risk assessment tool in Moroccan men Mirieme Ghazi & Aziza Mounach & Abderrazak Nouijai & Imad Ghozlani & Loubna Bennani &
More informationFalls and Fracture Risk assessment and management
Falls and Fracture Risk assessment and management Disclosures: Although various guidelines and studies were reviewed, this represents my own personal bias and conclusions. What do we know? 1) Fractures
More informationRecommendations for Bone Mineral Density Reporting in Canada
CAR CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES / DIRECTIVES CLINIQUES DE LA CAR CAR CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES / DIRECTIVES CLINIQUES DE LA CAR Recommendations for Bone Mineral Density Reporting in Canada Kerry Siminoski,
More informationA Treatment Algorithm for Indian Patients of Osteoporosis
Indian Medical Gazette FEBRUARY 2012 67 Symposia Update A Treatment Algorithm for Indian Patients of Osteoporosis Shailendra Mohan Lakhotia, Senior Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon, Kolkata 700 045. Prashant
More informationOsteoporotic fracture risk assessment
steoporotic fracture risk assessment de 24 29/08/2011 13:50 Official reprint from UpToDate www.uptodate.com 2011 UpToDate Osteoporotic fracture risk assessment Author E Michael Lewiecki, MD Disclosures
More informationRole of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis
Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 10, no. 1, 102e110, 2007 Ó Copyright 2007 by The International Society for Clinical Densitometry 1094-6950/07/10:102e110/$32.00 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.11.001 Review
More informationThe Effect of Alendronate on the Age-Specific Incidence of Symptomatic Osteoporotic. Fractures. Maastricht 6
Revised Manuscript The Effect of Alendronate on the Age-Specific Incidence of Symptomatic Osteoporotic Fractures Marc C. Hochberg 1, Desmond E. Thompson 2, Dennis M. Black 3, Sara A. Quandt 4, Jane Cauley
More information16. ARTHRITIS, OSTEOPOROSIS, AND CHRONIC BACK CONDITIONS
16. ARTHRITIS, OSTEOPOROSIS, AND CHRONIC BACK CONDITIONS Goal Reduce the impact of several major musculoskeletal conditions by reducing the occurrence, impairment, functional limitations, and limitation
More informationRequests. Who requests a DXA scan? DXA. DXA Technology. Adequate Clinical Information
Requests Define a protocol for validation and prioritisation of densitometry requests. Registered medical practitioners In writing Include adequate clinical information Unsuitable requests should be discussed
More informationOrthopaedic Issues in Adults with CP: If I Knew Then, What I Know Now
Orthopaedic Issues in Adults with CP: If I Knew Then, What I Know Now Laura L. Tosi, MD Director, Bone Health Program Children s National Medical Center Washington, DC Epidemiology 87-93% of children born
More informationBone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy
Discordance Between Hip and Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement Using DXA: Prevalence and Risk Factors A. Mounach, MD,* D.A. Mouinga Abayi, MD,* M. Ghazi, MD,* I. Ghozlani, MD,* A. Nouijai, MD,* L.
More informationHealthy Aging Lab: Current Research Abstracts
Healthy Aging Lab: Current Research Abstracts Arsenic Exposure and Women s Health Environmental exposure to inorganic arsenic is an indisputable source of increased risk of several human cancers and chronic
More informationNATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION OSTEOPOROSIS CLINICAL UPDATES Bariatric Surgery And Skeletal Health CE APPLICATION FORM
NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION OSTEOPOROSIS CLINICAL UPDATES Bariatric Surgery And Skeletal Health CE APPLICATION FORM First Name: Last Name: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Phone
More informationAuthor's response to reviews
Author's response to reviews Title:The discriminative ability of FRAX, the WHO algorithm, to identify women Authors: Abdellah El Maghraoui (aelmaghraoui@gmail.com) Siham Sadni (sihamsadni@gmail.com) Nabil
More informationClinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada: Background and Technical Report
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada: Background and Technical Report Authors: Alexandra Papaioannou MD MSc 1, Suzanne Morin MD MSc 2, Angela M. Cheung
More informationWHO SCIENTIFIC GROUP ON THE ASSESSMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS AT PRIMARY HEALTH CARE LEVEL
WHO SCIENTIFIC GROUP ON THE ASSESSMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS AT PRIMARY HEALTH CARE LEVEL Summary Meeting Report Brussels, Belgium, 5-7 May 2004 1 World Health Organization 2007 All rights reserved. Publications
More informationMeasure Title X RAY PRIOR TO MRI OR CAT SCAN IN THE EVAULATION OF LOWER BACK PAIN Disease State Back pain Indicator Classification Utilization
Client HMSA: PQSR 2009 Measure Title X RAY PRIOR TO MRI OR CAT SCAN IN THE EVAULATION OF LOWER BACK PAIN Disease State Back pain Indicator Classification Utilization Strength of Recommendation Organizations
More informationCOMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE EVALUATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS IN THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY OSTEOPOROSIS
European Medicines Agency London, 16 November 2006 Doc. Ref. CPMP/EWP/552/95 Rev. 2 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE EVALUATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS IN THE TREATMENT
More informationBone Densitometry and the Treatment of Osteoporosis
Reference Section Bone Densitometry and the Treatment of steoporosis a report by Dr Glen Blake and Professor Ignac Fogelman Senior Lecturer, and Professor of Nuclear Medicine, Guy s, King s and St Thomas
More informationCost Effectiveness Estimate of Bazedoxifene
Article ID: WMC002547 2046-1690 Cost Effectiveness Estimate of Bazedoxifene Corresponding Author: Dr. Ana A Iglesias, pharmacist, Pharmacy Department - Hospital of Manacor - Spain Submitting Author: Dr.
More informationQCT BMD Imaging vs DEXA BMD Imaging
QCT BMD Imaging vs DEXA BMD Imaging by Charles (Chuck) Maack Prostate Cancer Advocate Wichita, Kansas Chapter, Us TOO Intl., Inc. Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) or Quantitative Computerized Tomography
More informationEpidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in Mexico
DOI 10.1007/s11657-010-0042-8 REVIEW Epidemiology, costs and burden of osteoporosis in Mexico Patricia Clark Fernando Carlos José Luis Vázquez Martínez Received: 16 April 2010 /Accepted: 28 June 2010 #
More informationHealth Benchmarks Program Clinical Quality Indicator Specification 2013
Health Benchmarks Program Clinical Quality Indicator Specification 2013 Measure Title USE OF IMAGING STUDIES FOR LOW BACK PAIN Disease State Musculoskeletal Indicator Classification Utilization Strength
More informationHow To Choose A Biologic Drug
North Carolina Rheumatology Association Position Statements I. Biologic Agents A. Appropriate delivery, handling, storage and administration of biologic agents B. Indications for biologic agents II. III.
More information2004 Report of the Surgeon General
The U.S. Experience 2004 Report of the Surgeon General The creation of the NBHA stems from two major activities: 2004: Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General called for public and
More informationCMAJ JAMC. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada
CANADIAN M EDICAL A SSOCIATION J OURNAL J OURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION MÉDICALE CANADIENNE CMAJ JAMC 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada CMAJ 2002;167(10
More informationOral Bisphosphonate and Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Claim Study
J Bone Metab 2015;22:77-81 http://dx.doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2015.22.2.77 pissn 2287-6375 eissn 2287-7029 Original Article Oral Bisphosphonate and Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Claim Study Gi Hyeon
More informationCystic fibrosis and bone health
Cystic fibrosis and bone health Factsheet March 2013 Cystic fibrosis and bone health Introduction As we get older our bones become thinner and weaker, and may become more susceptible to fracture. However
More informationBone Markers in Osteoporosis: Prediction of Fractures & Treatment Monitoring
Bone Markers in Osteoporosis: Prediction of Fractures & Treatment Monitoring Richard Eastell, MD FRCP FRCPath FMedSci, Professor of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Usefulness of
More informationBarriers to Osteoporosis Identification and Treatment Among Primary Care Physicians and Orthopedic Surgeons
334 Original Article Barriers to Osteoporosis Identification and Treatment Among Primary Care Physicians and Orthopedic Surgeons CHRISTINE SIMONELLI, MD; KATHLEEN KILLEEN, MOT; SUSAN MEHLE, BS; AND LEAH
More informationPreventive Care Guideline for Asymptomatic Elderly Patients Age 65 and Over
Preventive Care Guideline for Asymptomatic Elderly Patients Age 65 and Over 1. BMI - Documented in patients medical record on an annual basis up to age 74. Screen for obesity and offer counseling to encourage
More informationNATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION OSTEOPOROSIS CLINICAL UPDATES Rehabilitation of Patients With Fragility-Related Fractures CE APPLICATION FORM
NATIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION OSTEOPOROSIS CLINICAL UPDATES Rehabilitation of Patients With Fragility-Related Fractures CE APPLICATION FORM First Name: Last Name: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip/Postal
More informationOsteoporosis International. Original Article. Calcium Supplement and Bone Medication Use in a US Medicare Health Maintenance Organization
Osteoporos Int (2002) 13:657 662 ß 2002 International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation Osteoporosis International Original Article Calcium Supplement and Bone Medication Use
More informationMeasure #41: Osteoporosis: Pharmacologic Therapy for Men and Women Aged 50 Years and Older National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care
Measure #41: Osteoporosis: Pharmacologic Therapy for Men and Women Aged 50 Years and Older National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY
More informationScreening Mammography for Breast Cancer: American College of Preventive Medicine Practice Policy Statement
Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer: American College of Preventive Medicine Practice Policy Statement Rebecca Ferrini, MD, Elizabeth Mannino, MD, Edith Ramsdell, MD and Linda Hill, MD, MPH Burden
More informationEuropean guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
DOI 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y POSITION PAPER European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women J. A. Kanis & E. V. McCloskey & H. Johansson & C. Cooper & R. Rizzoli
More informationScans and tests and osteoporosis
Scans and tests and osteoporosis What is osteoporosis? Osteoporosis occurs when the struts which make up the mesh-like structure within bones become thin causing them to become fragile and break easily,
More informationThe Diagnosis and Workup of Patients for Osteoporosis or Osteopenia (Low Bone Mass)
The Diagnosis and Workup of Patients for Osteoporosis or Osteopenia (Low Bone Mass) 6 Frank Bonura St. Catherine of Siena Medical Center, Smithtown, NY USA 1. Introduction The rate of screening and treatment
More informationPreventive Medicine and the Need for Routine Hearing Screening in Adults
Preventive Medicine and the Need for Routine Hearing Screening in Adults Brian Taylor Au.D., Director of Practice Development & Clinical Affairs, Unitron, Plymouth, MN Robert Tysoe, Marketing Consultant,
More informationOsteoporosis International. Original Article. The Cost of Treating Osteoporotic Fractures in the United Kingdom Female Population
Osteoporos Int (1998) 8:611 617 ß 1998 European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation Osteoporosis International Original Article The Cost of Treating Osteoporotic Fractures
More informationDensitometric Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA)
Vertebral Fracture Initiative Part III Densitometric Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) Authored by: John T. Schousboe 1, Tamara Vokes 2, Neil Binkley 3, Harry K. Genant 4 1. Division of Health Policy
More informationWhat You Need to Know for Better Bone Health
What You Need to Know for Better Bone Health A quick lesson about bones: Why healthy bones matter The healthier your bones The more active you can be Bone health has a major effect on your quality of life
More informationThe National Center for Health Statistics' Linked Data Files: Resources for Research and Policy. Eric A. Miller National Center for Health Statistics
The National Center for Health Statistics' Linked Data Files: Resources for Research and Policy Eric A. Miller National Center for Health Statistics NCHS Record Linkage Program Links survey data with data
More informationOsteoporosis Update. Laura E. Ryan, MD
Osteoporosis Update Laura E. Ryan, MD Assistant Director for Special Programs Center for Women s Health Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism The Ohio
More informationACR SPR SSR PRACTICE PARAMETER FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DXA)
The American College of Radiology, with more than 30,000 members, is the principal organization of radiologists, radiation oncologists, and clinical medical physicists in the United States. The College
More informationBiochemical markers of bone turnover and osteoporosis management
21 Biochemical markers of bone turnover and osteoporosis management Marius Kraenzlin Summary Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic disease characterised by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration
More informationDoes chronic lymphocytic leukemia increase the risk of osteoporosis?
Does chronic lymphocytic leukemia increase the risk of osteoporosis? Amrita Desai, MD Internal Medicine Residency Program Adam Olszewski, MD Department of Hematology and Oncology Memorial Hospital of Rhode
More informationDEFINITION OF OSTEOPOROSIS
CHAPTER 27 OSTEOPOROSIS AND OSTEOMALACIA DEFINITION OF OSTEOPOROSIS THE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONSEQUENCES OF OSTEOPOROSIS REVIEW OF BONE REMODELING BONE LOSS PATHOGENESIS OF OSTEOPOROSIS DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOPOROSIS
More informationIdentification of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Vertebral Fractures Using Bone Mineral Density and Trabecular Bone Score
Journal of Clinical Densitometry: Assessment of Skeletal Health, vol. -, no. -, 1e7, 2012 Ó Copyright 2012 by The International Society for Clinical Densitometry 1094-6950/-:1e7/$36.00 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.01.007
More informationOsteoporosis is a common and costly systemic disease
OUTCOMES IN PRACTICE Osteoporosis Disease Management: Best Practices from the Penn State Geisinger Health System Eric D. Newman, MD, Ralph H. Starkey, MD, William T. Ayoub, MD, FACP, FACR, Charles M. Davis
More information1 The instrument 2 The patient 3 The operator 4 The report
10 Errors and Artefacts in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Bone densitometry has become internationally accepted for in vivo bone mass measurements over a relatively short period of time. There
More informationProlia 2 shots a year proven to help strengthen bones.
Ask your doctor if Prolia (denosumab) is right for you and visit us at www.prolia.com For women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk for fracture: there s Prolia. Prolia 2 shots a year proven
More informationTreatment of osteoporosis in fragility fractures
Orthogeriatrics Clinical Summary Document Treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fractures Fragility fractures are extremely prevalent in older adults with a staggering cost of treatment. As the population
More informationCompliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis
Maturitas 48 (2004) 271 287 Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis Jeffrey S. McCombs a,, Patrick Thiebaud b, Connie McLaughlin-Miley c, Jinhai Shi c a Department
More informationHow To Determine If A Fall Prevention Program Is Effective
Clinical Policy Title: Medical alert devices and other interventions for vulnerable peoples safety at home Clinical Policy Number: 17.01.02 Effective Date: April 1, 2015 Initial Review Date: January 21,
More informationClinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men
Clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and older men February 2010 Approved by NHMRC on 5 February 2010 The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners,
More informationThe Radiologic Technology Program at Trenholm University
H. Councill Trenholm State Technical College 243 Location: Trenholm Campus Program Information The Radiology Technology program at TrenholmState will provide students with the necessary training to gain
More informationMedications for Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis
1 Medications for Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis Osteoporosis is a disease where the strength of bones is less than normal, making them more susceptible to fracture, or breaking, than normal
More informationClinician s Guide. to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Developed by the National Osteoporosis Foundation
Clinician s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis Developed by the National Osteoporosis Foundation Clinician s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis Developed by the National Osteoporosis
More informationAs you know, the CPT Editorial Panel developed two new codes to describe complex ACP services for CY 2015.
December 30, 2014 SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY VIA http://www.regulations.gov Marilyn Tavenner Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS
More informationOsteoporosis: key concepts. Azeez Farooki, MD Endocrinologist
Osteoporosis: key concepts Azeez Farooki, MD Endocrinologist Outline I) Composition of bone II) Definition & pathophysiology of osteoporosis III) Peak bone mass IV) Secondary osteoporosis V) Vitamin D
More informationHEALTH CARE COSTS 11
2 Health Care Costs Chronic health problems account for a substantial part of health care costs. Annually, three diseases, cardiovascular disease (including stroke), cancer, and diabetes, make up about
More informationSteroid-Induced Osteoporosis: First, Do No Harm. Karen E. Hansen, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Rheumatology Section University of WI
Steroid-Induced Osteoporosis: First, Do No Harm Karen E. Hansen, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Rheumatology Section University of WI This CME program is sponsored by an unrestricted educational
More informationWeight Change over Three Decades and the Risk of Osteoporosis in Men
American Journal of Epidemiology ª The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
More informationOsteoporosis. The inside looks like honeycomb, with blood vessels and bone marrow in the spaces between bone.
Osteoporosis The bones in our skeleton are made of a thick outer shell and a strong inner mesh filled with collagen (protein), calcium salts and other minerals. Osteoporosis The inside looks like honeycomb,
More informationNurse Practitioners, Certified Nurse Midwives, and Physician Assistants in Physician Offices
Nurse Practitioners, Certified Nurse Midwives, and Physician Assistants in Physician Offices Melissa Park, M.P.H.; Donald Cherry, M.S.; and Sandra L. Decker, Ph.D. Key findings Data from the National Ambulatory
More informationAdvanced Quantitative Methods for Health Care Professionals PUBH 742 Spring 2015
1 Advanced Quantitative Methods for Health Care Professionals PUBH 742 Spring 2015 Instructor: Joanne M. Garrett, PhD e-mail: joanne_garrett@med.unc.edu Class Notes: Copies of the class lecture slides
More informationSustaining a High-Quality Breast MRI Practice
Sustaining a High-Quality Breast MRI Practice Christoph Lee, MD, MSHS Associate Professor of Radiology Adjunct Associate Professor, Health Services University of Washington September 11, 2015 Overview
More informationOSTEOPOROSIS OROR OR. Towards a Fracture-Free Future
OSTEOPOROSIS OROR OR Towards a Fracture-Free Future March, 2011 Patients with fragility fractures are at the highest risk of developing new fractures. Interventions can reduce that risk! 1 Executive Summary
More informationHow To Decide If You Should Get A Mammogram
American Medical Women s Association Position Paper on Principals of Breast Cancer Screening Breast cancer affects one woman in eight in the United States and is the most common cancer diagnosed in women
More informationCOLORADO BONE & JOINT NEWSLETTER
COLORADO BONE & JOINT NEWSLETTER A publication of Colorado Center for Arthritis & Osteoporosis, PLLC Copyright 2012 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 1 SPRING 2013 W. Edwards Deming, the father of systems thinking and the
More informationTest Request Tip Sheet
With/Without Contrast CT, MRI Studies should NOT be ordered simultaneously as dual studies (i.e., with and without contrast). Radiation exposure is doubled and both views are rarely necessary. The study
More information2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS, REGISTRY
Measure #317: Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for High Blood Pressure and Follow-Up Documented National Quality Strategy Domain: Community / Population Health 2016 PQRS OPTIONS F INDIVIDUAL MEASURES:
More informationOsteoporosis Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Guideline
Osteoporosis Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Guideline Prevention 2 Screening Recommendations and Tests 2 Diagnosis 4 Treatment Goals 5 Lifestyle Modifications/Non-Pharmacologic Options 5 Pharmacologic
More information