Lee Harvey Oswald, the Patsy
|
|
- Janel Adams
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Digital Georgia Law Popular Media Faculty Scholarship Lee Harvey Oswald, the Patsy Donald E. Wilkes Jr. University of Georgia School of Law, wilkes@uga.edu Repository Citation Wilkes, Donald E. Jr., "Lee Harvey Oswald, the Patsy" (2013). Popular Media. Paper This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Popular Media by an authorized administrator of Digital Georgia Law. For more information, please contact tstriepe@uga.edu.
2 Lee Harvey Oswald, the Patsy An Objective Review of the Evidence Concludes That Oswald Was Framed By Donald E. Wilkes, Jr. [I]t is not unreasonable to doubt the Warren Commission s conclusion that Oswald, acting alone, fired three shots from the sixth-floor of the Texas School Book Depository building in Dealey Plaza in Dallas and assassinated President Kennedy. Joseph Lazzaro I m just a patsy! Lee Harvey Oswald Oswald the Assassin? Last month Secretary of State John Kerry, commenting in an interview on the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, said: To this day, I have serious doubts that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I certainly have doubts that he was motivated by himself, I mean I m not sure if anybody else was involved... John Kerry takes it for granted that Oswald shot and killed JFK, leaving open only the question of whether others were involved with Oswald. Many articles in the print and electronic media marking the passage of a half century since the tragic murder of our 35th president also take the view that it was Oswald who shot President Kennedy. One article is entitled Why d Oswald Do It?, while the subtitle of another references Lee Harvey Oswald s bizarre path after killing JFK. The authors of many of these articles contend that Oswald was the lone assassin and regard the case as closed (although some of them admit that Oswald s motive is unknown). Other authors believe, like John Kerry, that Oswald may have acted with the encouragement or assistance of unknown persons. Not every recent article on the JFK assassination embraces the theory that Oswald, whether by himself or with the aid of others, murdered Kennedy. Some articles advance reasons for questioning Oswald s guilt and for believing that the assassination resulted from a conspiracy involving conspirators whose identities remain unknown to this day. In one of these articles assassination researcher David Talbot not only advances plausible reasons for thinking that there was a conspiracy, but also reminds us that
3 defenders of the Oswald-was-the-lone-assassin thesis frequently seem more interested in ridiculing and marginalizing even the most credible conspiracy researchers than in getting at the truth. Those who say Oswald was the sole assassin think that the judgment of history is on their side. Richard Mosk asserts: The history books now seem reconciled to the fact that Oswald, acting alone, assassinated the president. Similarly, Jill Abramson writes: The historical consensus seems to be settled on Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin. However, it is emphatically not true that there is an historical consensus that Oswald was the sole assassin. [T]here is no such consensus, David Talbot notes, only a fractious ongoing debate. The truth is that leading responsible assassination investigators including academic historians with a Ph.D. such as history professors Michael L. Kurtz and Gerald D. McKnight reject the theory that Oswald was the lone killer and conclude that the Kennedy assassination resulted from a conspiracy, with the identity of the conspirators being unknown. Public opinion polls demonstrate that at all times since 1964 a majority of the American people have believed that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. Currently, 59 percent suspect multiple persons conspired to kill Kennedy, while only 24 percent think Oswald assassinated the president by himself. Possible Scenarios In assessing whether Lee Harvey Oswald shot President Kennedy, there are four possible scenarios. The first is that he was the lone assassin and that he acted entirely on his own. Under this view, Oswald, without prompting or assistance from anyone else, and using a 20-year old, bolt-action military-surplus 6.5 mm Italian Mannlicher Carcano carbine, fired from the sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository all the shots directed at the presidential limousine, killing JFK, seriously wounding Texas Gov. John Connally, and grazing the cheek of bystander James Tague. The second scenario is that Oswald performed all these acts but did them with the encouragement or assistance of others. The third scenario is that Oswald was part of a conspiracy to murder JFK, which would mean that he probably did fire shots from the sixth-floor but that he was not the only shooter that day (regardless of which shooter actually killed the president). The final possible scenario is that Lee Harvey Oswald was an innocent person who either was framed or (like numerous other innocent persons erroneously believed to be guilty of a crime they did not commit) was the victim of a body of incriminating circumstantial evidence that misleadingly indicated his guilt. If Oswald was framed, the frame-up must have been principally the work of the unknown conspirators responsible for the assassination. The most probable of these scenarios, I shall show, is that Lee Harvey Oswald was an innocent man framed for a murder he did not commit that, as Oswald himself shouted while under arrest (and before he was murdered in the presence of 70 police officers while a handcuffed prisoner), he was a patsy. The assassination therefore most likely resulted from a conspiracy, with Oswald not being one of the conspirators.
4 Yes, there was evidence of Oswald s guilt. But it was designed to mislead. When an innocent person is framed that is, when evidence, whether fabricated or not, is planted or arranged so as to falsely incriminate an innocent person the result is that there exists what appears to be persuasive evidence of his guilt. The books are full of cases where an innocent person was found guilty of a crime he didn t commit on the basis of what appeared to be strong incriminating evidence which later turned out to be bogus or erroneously indicative of guilt. Those who accuse Lee Harvey Oswald of shooting JFK insist that there was overwhelming evidence he did it. They are wrong. The Warren Report The notion that Oswald fired the shots that killed Kennedy dates back to the 1964 Warren Report, the official report of the Warren Commission, the blue-ribbon government body appointed by President Lyndon B. Johnson a week after the assassination to investigate the murder. It is hardly necessary to point out that today among serious assassination investigators both the Warren Commission and its final report are largely discredited. [T]he Warren Commission, in the words of Prof. McKnight, went through the motions of an investigation that was little more than an improvised exercise in public relations. The government did not want to delve into the heart of darkness of the Kennedy assassination because it feared what it might uncover: the brutal truth... that [the] assassination was carried out by powerful and irrational forces within his own government. As for the Warren Report itself, it was, as David Talbot phrases it, the result of massive political cunning and investigative fraud and remains a notorious symbol of official coverup. Apologists for the Warren Report used to insist that the Warren Commission did a thorough job of investigation and that because it got the facts right, its conclusions were correct; but now they have retreated to the backup position that while it is true that the Commission botched its investigative job in important respects, the conclusions reached in its Report remain correct. The Warren Report could not adduce any credible reason why Lee Harvey Oswald would want to murder President Kennedy and was obliged to engage in Freudian musing about Oswald being some sort of sociopathic misfit. The respective assassins who murdered presidents Lincoln in 1865, Garfield in 1881, and McKinley in 1901, each had a motive and after the deed each proudly proclaimed what he had done. Oswald, on the other hand, had no known motive and denied the deed. Every scrap of relevant evidence suggests that Oswald admired JFK. Nor have the apologists for the Warren Report been able to come up with a good reason why Oswald would assassinate JFK, although they have advanced a number of ridiculous ones. Their latest ploy is to claim that pro-castroites who met up with Oswald at a Mexican twist party (yes, a Mexican twist party!!) during his mysterious trip to Mexico City two months before the assassination told him things that induced him to decide to murder the president out of love for Fidel Castro. The many problems with this droll story include that there is no adequate proof that Oswald attended such a party, or that Oswald was so stupid or gullible that he would fall for the story allegedly fed him by the Fidelistas, or that Oswald was in fact a Castro lover (indeed, Oswald s leftist activities were all for show;
5 he associated with or worked for American intelligence or law enforcement officials and his so-called pro-communist leanings amounted to what in intelligence parlance is called a legend, a cover story created to mask the real activities or the real purpose of a person involved in covert activities). Circumstantial Evidence The Warren Report cited a number of pieces of circumstantial evidence in support of its key conclusion that Oswald fired at the limousine from the sixth-floor window with the Mannlicher Carcano carbine found hidden among some cartons on that floor by police. This evidence is not overwhelming. The six allegedly most incriminating pieces of circumstantial evidence which the Report thought proof of Oswald s guilt were these: 1. The carbine found on the sixth-floor was owned by and in the possession of Oswald. 2. Oswald carried the carbine into the Book Depository on the morning of the assassination. 3. Oswald was present at the sixth-floor window when the shots were fired. 4. A rifleman with Oswald s capabilities could have used the sixth-floor carbine to commit the assassination. 5. Three expended cartridge cases found near the sixth-floor window were fired from that carbine to the exclusion of all other weapons. 6. A nearly whole bullet found on Gov. Connally s stretcher at the hospital and two bullet fragments found in the limousine were fired from that carbine to the exclusion of all other weapons. Let us begin our analysis of this so-called evidence of Oswald s culpability by belaboring the obvious: the evidence was entirely circumstantial; no one saw Oswald fire the weapon and Oswald himself denied guilt; and even if all this evidence is trustworthy, it fails to prove that Oswald was the person who fired any of the shots. Furthermore, this evidence is just as compatible with Oswald being framed as it is with his being guilty. The evidence is exactly the type of evidence you would expect if conspirators who murdered a president were covering their tracks by arranging or planting evidence that would falsely incriminate someone who in the lingo of the intelligence community is known as a false sponsor (a person who will be publicly blamed for a covert operation after it takes place, thereby diverting attention away from the real culprits). As a former defector to the Soviet Union and putatively a leftist extremist, Oswald was the ideal candidate for a frame-up. Let us now turn to the Warren Report s claim that the sixth-floor carbine was owned by and in the possession of Oswald, a claim that is unsubstantiated and unreliable. There are many reasons to doubt that the carbine on the sixth floor was Oswald s. Assassination investigators have demonstrated that there are legitimate suspicions about the paperwork purporting to show that Oswald purchased a Mannlicher Carcano through the mail and about whether, if he did, it was delivered to him. Neither the FBI nor the Dallas police found Oswald s fingerprints on the sixth-floor
6 carbine. Although a Dallas policeman did claim to have lifted Oswald s palmprint from the underside of the carbine s barrel, the FBI could find no trace of this print and a number of suspicious circumstances suggest that the palmprint claim was fabricated. Most importantly, the sixth-floor carbine cannot be proved to be the same carbine allegedly mailed to Oswald. Both the sixth-floor carbine and the carbine supposedly sent to Oswald bore the serial number C2766. The Warren Report states that the rifle [sic] in question is the only of its type bearing that serial number. This was blatantly false. A document provided the Warren Commission by the FBI reveals that Mannlicher Carcanos were manufactured in Italy from 1891 to 1941; that in the 1930s all Italian arms factories were ordered to manufacture Mannlicher Carcanos; and that [s]ince many concerns were manufacturing the same weapon, the same serial number appears on weapons manufactured by more than one concern. In short, the carbine found on the sixth-floor had a non-unique serial number! Therefore, it is impossible to prove that the weapon allegedly sent in the mail to Oswald was the weapon found on the sixth-floor. Therefore, it is impossible to prove that the sixth-floor weapon was Oswald s. Assassination scholar Sylvia Meagher understated things when she wrote years ago: The fact that a considerable number of Mannlicher Carcano rifles [sic] may bear serial number C2766 clearly weakens the case against Oswald. (Of course, even if the weapon was Oswald s this does not prove that he used it to shoot JFK.) The Warren Report s claim that Oswald carried the carbine into the Book Depository on the morning of the assassination is also unproven. According to the Report, Oswald took the disassembled carbine into the building concealed in a bulky paper bag or wrapping found later on the sixth floor. However, the only witnesses who saw Oswald with the paper bag that morning the man who gave Oswald a ride to work and his sister repeatedly testified that the sixth-floor bag definitely was longer than the bag they saw Oswald carrying. A Depository employee who saw Oswald enter the back of the building that morning testified positively that Oswald had nothing in his hands. The Warren Report s claim that Oswald was present at the sixth-floor window when the shots were fired also is unproven. The Depository employee on whom the Commission relied as a witness and he did not actually say that he saw or knew that Oswald was on the sixth-floor at the time the president was shot was of doubtful credibility; several other employees saw Oswald in or near the second floor lunchroom at a time when the Report says he was on the sixth-floor; and an employee who ate a chicken lunch on the sixth-floor until 10 minutes before the assassination did not see Oswald there (which means that Oswald would have had 10 minutes to reassemble and load the carbine, stack around the so-called sniper s perch a shield of 24 cartons each weighing about 50 pounds, and prepare himself to shoot an American president). The Report s claim that a rifleman with Oswald s capabilities could have used the sixth-floor carbine to commit the assassination is, true enough, theoretically possible, but breathtakingly unlikely, to say the least. This will be explained at length below. The Report s assertion that the three empty cartridge cases found near the sixth-floor window were fired from the sixth-floor carbine to the exclusion of all other weapons is demonstrably false. A letter to
7 the Warren Commission from the FBI and signed by J. Edgar Hoover states that the extractor and ejector marks on [the three cartridge cases] did not possess sufficient characteristics for identifying the weapon which produced them. Thus, as assassination researcher Sylvia Meagher writes, the Warren Report misrepresented the nature of the markings on the cartridge shells. Of course, even if the cartridge cases had been ejected from the carbine, this would not be proof that Oswald had done the shooting, or proof that the cases had been ejected from the carbine at the time of the assassination. The cases might have been planted. What about the Warren Report s claim that a nearly whole bullet found on Gov. Connally s stretcher at the hospital and two bullet fragments found in the limousine were fired from the sixth-floor carbine to the exclusion of all other weapons? As for the stretcher bullet, Ms. Meagher s careful review of the testimony given to the Warren Commission shows that it is highly unlikely that the bullet came from Connally s stretcher; and it is also highly unlikely that this bullet, which was practically whole and only slightly deformed, and which had no blood or clothing fibers on it, had, as the Report claims, perforated the bodies of both JFK and Connally, inflicting seven nonfatal wounds on the two men. (The injuries suffered by Connally included a fractured rib and a shattering of the radius of his right wrist.) As for the limousine bullet fragments, the likelihood is either that the fragments were planted or that they were fired not from the carbine but from a different, larger weapon firing bullets fitted with a sabot, which permits smaller caliber slugs to be fired from a larger shell casing. At any rate, even if all this ballistics evidence genuinely pointed to the carbine as the weapon that fired at the limousine, this still does not prove that Oswald was the person who did the shooting. Now, having exposed weaknesses in the Warren Report s circumstantial case against Lee Harvey Oswald, let us turn to each of the four possible scenarios regarding Oswald that were set forth above. Evaluating the Possible Scenarios Under the first scenario, which was embraced by the Warren Report, Oswald did all the shooting with an old, flimsy, second-hand, carbine which, as Sylvia Meagher explains, had a difficult bolt, eccentric trigger, maladjusted scope, and disintegrating firing pin, and which fired small caliber medium velocity bullets around 20 years old. According to this scenario, these were the facts: Although the carbine could hold seven cartridges (six in the clip, and one in the chamber), Oswald prepared to shoot the president with only four rounds in the weapon. (A live round was found in the chamber of the carbine and three spent cartridges were found on the floor.) Oswald fired three shots. One of these shots struck the seated JFK in the back of his shoulder or neck, exited his throat, and then went through Connally s body from back to front (although the Report did acknowledge the possibility that the two men were hit by separate bullets). Another shot, presumably the last, struck JFK squarely in the back of the head and killed him. At the time the shots were fired the limousine was moving at 11 mph downhill and away from and at an angle to the sixth-floor window (which was 60 feet above street level). At the time of the fatal headshot the
8 limousine was 88 yards (265 feet) from the window. All the shots were fired within the space of 5.6 seconds. This scenario, while of course theoretically possible, may be ruled out as practically impossible. Here are some of the reasons. Oswald was a poor shot. There was no evidence that Oswald ever practiced firing the carbine. The ammunition used by the carbine had not been manufactured since The Mannlicher Carcano carbine found on the sixth floor had been manufactured before 1942, possibly in the 1930s. The FBI firearms expert who testified before the Warren Commission after examining the carbine described it twice as a cheap old weapon. Strangely, neither the Dallas police nor the FBI performed a routine swab test of the inside of the carbine s barrel. There is no proof, therefore, that the weapon had recently been fired. The owner of The Gun Shop in Dallas told the FBI in March 1964 that Mannlicher Carcanos were a very cheap rifle and could have been purchased for $3.00 each in lots of 25. The retail price of the Mannlicher Carcano carbine equipped with a scope that was allegedly shipped to Oswald was $19.95 (without the scope the weapon was sold retail for $12.78). The carbine allegedly shipped to Oswald had previously been part of a shipment of rifles that was the subject of a legal proceeding to collect payment for the shipment of rifles claimed to be defective. It was unusually difficult to work the bolt on the sixth-floor carbine. The pressure to open the bolt was so great that, in the absence of proficiency with the weapon, it tended to move the weapon off the target. Unlike most rifles, the sixth-floor carbine had a two-stage trigger which required getting use to. The firing pin of the sixth-floor carbine was worn and there was rust on it and its spring. In fact, before their firing tests with the carbine, the master riflemen who performed the tests did not even pull the trigger, out of fear that they might break the firing pin. (These tests are discussed below.) The sixth-floor carbine s scope was defective, causing shots fired from the weapon to land a few inches high and to the right of the target. The scope could not be properly aligned with the target because the sight reached the limit of its adjustment before reaching accurate alignment. The shooting tests using the sixth-floor carbine, arranged by the Warren Commission with the expectation that they would prove that Oswald could have assassinated JFK with that carbine, ended up
9 proving, on the contrary, that it was nearly impossible for Oswald (or anyone else) to have used the weapon to shoot Kennedy. The shooting tests were performed by three master riflemen whose shooting skills far exceeded Oswald s. Each of the riflemen fired two series of three shots using the carbine s scope, for a total of 18 shots. The conditions of the shooting tests differed materially from the conditions prevailing in Dealey Plaza at the time of the assassination. The tests involved firing at stationary rather than moving targets. The target area for the master riflemen was considerably larger than the alleged sixth-floor assassin s target area. The tests were from a height of 30 feet, half that of the sixth-floor window. The angles to the targets were different from the angles of the sixth-floor window to the moving limousine. The riflemen, unlike alleged assassin Oswald, were given as much time as they wanted before firing the first shot. Before the riflemen engaged in their firing tests with the carbine, shims were inserted to improve the weapon s scope; thus, during the tests the experts used a rebuilt scope rather than the one allegedly used by Oswald (assuming that he used the scope rather than the iron sights). Even though the difficulties facing the riflemen were far less than those of the alleged assassin, two of the three riflemen were unable to shoot as fast at stationary targets as Oswald supposedly had at a moving target; not one of the riflemen struck the head or neck on the target even once (even though Oswald supposedly did this twice); and of the 18 total shots, the riflemen missed 5 collectively (more than 25%), whereas the alleged assassin hit the target at least 2 out of 3 times (67%). The first scenario the scenario adopted in the Warren Report that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, assassinated President Kennedy, may, therefore, whatever the theoretical possibilities, be ruled out. Based on the evidence, it is unreasonable to believe that Oswald shot the president from the Book Depository with the carbine found on the sixth floor. For Oswald to have possessed the superlative marksmanship required under this scenario is a practical impossibility. Since the second scenario the scenario John Kerry thinks is possible involves Oswald assassinating JFK using the Mannlicher Carcano under the same circumstances as in the first scenario, it too may be ruled out. The third scenario under which Oswald conspired with others (whose identity is unknown) to assassinate JFK and presumably used the Mannlicher Carcano to fire at the president is absurd and therefore must be rejected. There is, of course, ample evidence that a conspiracy was behind the assassination. Without attempting to summarize this vast mass of evidence, it is certain that numerous witnesses in Dealey Plaza heard shots fired from the grassy knoll area in front and to the right of the limousine, while other witnesses there saw puffs of smoke arising from the knoll area or smelled gunpowder. After the fatal headshot, the Zapruder film shows Kennedy reacting as if shot in the right temple from the front and right: his head jerks violently backward and to the left. And in 1979, it should be remembered, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Assassinations concluded, after reinvestigating the JFK assassination, that it resulted from a conspiracy.
10 But no professional conspiracy to murder a president would use a Mannlicher Carcano to effect the assassination. No plotters and murderers so dangerous, so ruthless, so calculating, and so fiendishly cold-blooded that they could successfully plan and carry out a presidential assassination and then elude investigators would have any conceivable use for the sixth-floor carbine unless it was being utilized to confuse investigators and diabolically throw the blame on some hapless dupe, i.e., Lee Harvey Oswald. Which, of course, would fit neatly into the fourth scenario. There are good reasons for rejecting the first three scenarios. There are no good reasons for rejecting the fourth scenario. Of the four scenarios, the fourth is the only one that is not highly improbable. The fourth scenario is therefore the scenario most likely to have occurred and most worthy of belief. The balance of probabilities is that Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot President Kennedy and that he was framed by the unknown conspirators who murdered Kennedy and escaped scot-free. Conclusion To discuss the Kennedy assassination by phrasing the questions in terms of whether Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone or why he killed JFK is fallacious. It borders on the frivolous to assert that Oswald shot the president. The carbine and the other evidence found on the sixth floor must have been planted. Oswald was a patsy, framed by unknown conspirators who planned and carried out the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. In regard to the JFK assassination, therefore, the correct questions to ask are: Who were the conspirators behind the assassination? What were their motives? And how could it happen that they escaped justice after murdering a president? (This last question could equally be phrased: Why was the investigation of a presidential murder botched?) The answers to these questions are beyond the purview of this article. Donald E. Wilkes, Jr. is a Professor of Law Emeritus at the UGA School of Law. This is his 35th JFK assassination article.
Professor Researches a Possible Georgia Connection in JFK Death
Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Popular Media Faculty Scholarship 2-5-1987 Professor Researches a Possible Georgia Connection in JFK Death Donald E. Wilkes Jr. University of Georgia School of Law, wilkes@uga.edu
More informationA Philadelphia Lawyer Analyzes the Shots, Trajectories, and Wounds
This document is online at: http://ratical.org/ratville/jfk/hwnau/ A Philadelphia Lawyer Analyzes the Shots, Trajectories, and Wounds by Vincent J. Salandria Originally published in Liberation, IX, No.
More informationJesus and the Counsellor in John s Gospel
Jesus and the Counsellor in John s Gospel In Jesus farewell speech, recorded in John s Gospel (chapters 13-17) Jesus introduces the disciples to one he calls the Counsellor. This Counsellor (the name itself
More informationDecided: May 11, 2015. S15A0308. McLEAN v. THE STATE. Peter McLean was tried by a DeKalb County jury and convicted of the
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: May 11, 2015 S15A0308. McLEAN v. THE STATE. BLACKWELL, Justice. Peter McLean was tried by a DeKalb County jury and convicted of the murder of LaTonya Jones, an
More informationContract on Camelot: New Books Cast More Light on JFK Assassination
Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Popular Media Faculty Scholarship 11-22-2000 Contract on Camelot: New Books Cast More Light on JFK Assassination Donald E. Wilkes Jr. University of Georgia School of Law,
More informationhttp://guninfo.tnet.com
Reconstructed Manual for a PA-63 Double Action Semi-Automatic Pistol 9x18mm Makarov More Gun Info can be found at: http://guninfo.tnet.com The contents of this manual were reconstructed from graphical
More informationAnalysis of the shooting of Barbara Scharton
Summary Analysis of the shooting of Barbara Scharton 1. After gaining entry on the first floor in the Lyons/Scharton home, the assailants discovered Barbara Scharton in a bedroom on that floor. Assailant
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
FOR PUBLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 1 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, Plaintiff, v. AMBROSIO T. OGUMORO, Defendant. DPS CASE NO. 0-00
More informationSURVIVING AN ACTIVE SHOOTER / / FULL TRANSCRIPT
SURVIVING AN ACTIVE SHOOTER / / FULL TRANSCRIPT (music playing) Male News Reporter: A morning that began like any other turned tragic today, when an employee opened fire on his supervisor and fellow co-workers.
More informationGLOCK INSTRUCTION FOR USE
GLOCK INSTRUCTION FOR USE for the Safe Action self-loading pistol TAKE NOTE: Always assume that the GLOCK pistol or any other firearm is loaded is capable of being discharged until you the user, have been
More informationHow To Decide A Case In The Uk
1 THE COURT: You have been selected and sworn to determine the facts and render a verdict in the case of the Commonwealth / 1 of Pennsylvania versus Robert Greene, who is charged with one count of robbery,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA-COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1. Mock Trial Script: The Case of a Stolen Car
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA-COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1 Mock Trial Script: The Case of a Stolen Car SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA-COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 2 Mock Trial Script BAILIFF: All rise. Department One
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed and Opinion filed November 8, 2001. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-00880-CR JOHN CARROLL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from 248th District Court Harris County,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 557 U. S. (2009) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES IN RE TROY ANTHONY DAVIS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS No. 08 1443. Decided August 17, 2009 JUSTICE SCALIA, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS
More informationNORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 19 October 2004. v. Onslow County Nos. 02 CRS 56365-67, DALLAS EUGENE CLARK 56470
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationWhat are you. worried about? Looking Deeper
What are you worried about? Looking Deeper Looking Deeper What are you worried about? Some of us lie awake at night worrying about family members, health, finances or a thousand other things. Worry can
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:14-cr-00295-SRN-JSM Document 44 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA United States of America, Case No. 14-cr-295 (SRN/JSM) Plaintiff, v. Martel Javell Einfeldt,
More informationPUBLIC OPINION ON THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN TRINIDAD A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS OF A SURVEY. Roger Hood and Florence Seemungal
PUBLIC OPINION ON THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN TRINIDAD A SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS OF A SURVEY Roger Hood and Florence Seemungal A Report for the Death Penalty Project and the Rights Advocacy Project
More informationIN RE: : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA CALVIN BUTLER, JR. : POLICE ADVISORY COMMISSION. : No. 95-0192 PANEL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RE: : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA CALVIN BUTLER, JR. : POLICE ADVISORY COMMISSION : No. 95-0192 Before: Uyehara, Ray and Savitt, Commissioners PANEL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION I. INTRODUCTION Calvin Butler,
More informationThe Police Have Left Word That They Want to Speak With You
The Police Have Left Word That They Want to Speak With You What Does it Mean and What Should You Do? Don A. Murray, Esq. Shalley & Murray 125-10 Queens Blvd., Suite 10 Kew Gardens, NY 11415 273 Sea Cliff
More informationJesus Trial and Peter s Denial John 18:12-27 Part Three
Sermon Transcript Jesus Trial and Peter s Denial John 18:12-27 Part Three We are once again returning to our study of the Gospel of John and are presently focusing our attention on John 18:12-27 and the
More informationEXTENDED BALLISTIC DATA FOR THE FEDERAL.308 MATCH ROUND:
EXTENDED BALLISTIC DATA FOR THE FEDERAL.308 MATCH ROUND: All the data you wanted but couldn't find -- wind, moving targets, trajectories, etc. By Maj. John L. Plaster, USAR (Ret.) After nearly a decade
More informationP22 Cal..22L.R. Operating Instructions. Semi-Automatic pistol USA. anl_us~1.qxd 13.08.2002 07:52 Seite 1. extractor
anl_us~1.qxd 13.08.2002 07:52 Seite 1 manual safety extractor stabilizer frontsight slide Loaded chamber indicator rear sight hammer barrel trigger lock muzzle trigger mounting rail manual safety slide
More informationTable of Contents: Safety Rules... 1. Safety Selector... 1. Loading the Magazine... 2. Loading Magazine into Rifle... 2. Chambering a Round...
OWNERS MANUAL Table of Contents: Safety Rules... 1 Safety Selector... 1 Loading the Magazine... 2 Loading Magazine into Rifle... 2 Chambering a Round... 3 Chambering a Round (with Carrier in Battery)...
More informationThe Shield of Faith. Pre-Session Warm Up. Opening Prayer. Memory Verse. Lesson
Pre-Session Warm Up The Shield of Faith (Ephesians 6:16) Would you believe me if I told you that if you fell backward into my arms, I would catch you and not let you hit the floor? [Teacher, have several
More informationA Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System
A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System The Bartholomew County Prosecutor s Office Victim Assistance Program Prosecutor: William Nash 234 Washington Street Columbus, IN 47201 Telephone:
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. Mock Trial Script. The Case of a Stolen Car
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Mock Trial Script The Case of a Stolen Car This mock trial is appropriate for middle and high school students. The script includes a role for a narrator,
More informationREGICIDE: Are We Closing in on the Whole Truth about JFK?*
Book Reviews / REGICIDE REGICIDE: Are We Closing in on the Whole Truth about JFK?* James H. Fetzer [Editor's Note: In this fascinating book, Gregory Douglas, who has previously published studies of Hitler's
More informationExample: Persuasive writing
Example: Persuasive writing Overleaf is a newspaper article by Mick North about arms trading. The writer is using the mode of the persuasion essay. Read the article and then answer the following questions.
More informationUNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 2477. September Term, 2014 NAMAR RICE STATE OF MARYLAND
UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2477 September Term, 2014 NAMAR RICE v. STATE OF MARYLAND Woodward, Friedman, Thieme, Raymond G., Jr. (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ. Opinion
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL ACTION H-00-0000 DEFENDANT(S) JURY INSTRUCTIONS I. General A. Introduction Members of the Jury:
More information1. Matleb Ali...Accused person
IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, 1 ST CLASS, Sonitpur GR Case No 2171/05 State -v- 1. Matleb Ali.....Accused person PRESENT : Panchali Shyam, Judicial Magistrate, 1 st Class, Sonitpur In appearance
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37. Appellant No. 307 WDA 2014
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. AARON BRANDON LINGARD Appellant No. 307 WDA 2014 Appeal from the
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS RAYMOND C. ATWOOD, IV, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 20, 2015 v No. 318556 MCAC CON WAY FREIGHT INCORPORATED and LC No. 12-000085 INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII. J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII August 8, 2011 J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT United States District Judge GENERAL FEDERAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES INDEX 1 DUTY OF JUDGE 2
More informationCriminal investigation - what to do?
Rechtsauskunft Anwaltskollektiv Rechtsauskunft ohne Voranmeldung Criminal investigation - what to do? The minimum you need to know: the bulletin to download, print off and refer to A robbery in the department
More informationSpontaneous Discharge of a Firearm in an MR Imaging Environment
QUICK SEARCH: [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Go HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS Year: Vol: Page: AJR 2002; 178:1092-1094 American Roentgen Ray Society Spontaneous Discharge
More informationHOVEN V. WALGREEN CO.: PRIVATE- EMPLOYER RESTRICTIONS ON SELF-DEFENSE IN THE WORKPLACE
HOVEN V. WALGREEN CO.: PRIVATE- EMPLOYER RESTRICTIONS ON SELF-DEFENSE IN THE WORKPLACE In Michigan, employment relationships are presumed to be terminable at will. 1 At-will employment became widely accepted
More informationBeing Legal in the Czech Republic: One American s Bureaucratic Odyssey
February 2008 Being Legal in the Czech Republic: One American s Bureaucratic Odyssey Abstract: This article is the first-person testimony of an American citizen living in the Czech Republic for over ten
More informationThere is an inherent flaw in the United States criminal justice system. The
The Problem of Truth: Discussion of a Lawyer s Duty There is an inherent flaw in the United States criminal justice system. The adversarial nature of formal dispute resolution upon which our common law
More informationPlease scroll down and continue reading for my response to the government s motion that I be examined by a government expert
My detractors on the internet, of which I have many, largely made up of tax lawyers who try to discredit me because I represent a threat their livelihood, and certain people whose ideas on the income tax
More informationPD-102R-92 Forensic Firearms Analyst II I. A. PRIMARY PURPOSE OF ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF STATE PERSONNEL POSITION DESCRIPTION FORM (POLICE DEPARTMENT-102R-92) APPROVED CLASSIFICATION: EFFECTIVE DATE: ANALYST: (This space for Personnel Department Use Only)
More informationPUSD High Frequency Word List
PUSD High Frequency Word List For Reading and Spelling Grades K-5 High Frequency or instant words are important because: 1. You can t read a sentence or a paragraph without knowing at least the most common.
More informationSHOOT/DON T SHOOT STUDY GUIDE 2010
SHOOT/DON T SHOOT STUDY GUIDE 2010 This study guide is designed to provide the law enforcement Explorer with basic principles. The guide is not all inclusive, and does not delineate specific techniques
More informationBEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
BEFORE THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO JEFF HASH, Claimant, IC 2007-039976 2007-015227 v. FINDINGS OF FACT, RIVERSIDE, INC., CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND RECOMMENDATION Employer, Filed December
More informationBBC LEARNING ENGLISH 6 Minute English Conspiracy theories
BBC LEARNING ENGLISH 6 Minute English Conspiracy theories This is not a word-for-word transcript Hello and welcome to 6 Minute English. I'm And I'm., I read in the paper recently that the substance called
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ANTONIO M. JOHNSON Appellant No. 2271 MDA 2013 Appeal from the
More informationUSE OF FORCE. Attorney General's Use of Force Policy. Issued April 1985 Revised June 2000
USE OF FORCE Attorney General's Use of Force Policy Issued April 1985 Revised June 2000 Preface The provisions of this revised policy are a product of the collective efforts and judgment of the New Jersey
More information*Reference Material For information only* The following was put together by one of our classmates! Good job! Well Done!
From: "We The People for Independent Texas" Subject: No contract - No case. *Reference Material For information only* The following was put together by one of our classmates! Good job! Well Done! Courts
More information6Would Happen When. If you ve decided to carry a firearm for self-defense, THINGS YOU DIDN T KNOW. The Police Arrive
THINGS YOU DIDN T KNOW 6Would Happen When The Police Arrive If you ve decided to carry a firearm for self-defense, you ve undoubtedly thought about the reality of having to use it. You ve thought about
More informationMain Point: God gives each of us gifts and abilities. We should use them to glorify Him.
The Ten Talents Matthew 18:21-35 PPT Title The Ten Talents Main Point: God gives each of us gifts and abilities. We should use them to glorify Him. Key Verse: God s gifts of grace come in many forms. Each
More informationShooting Uphill and Downhill. Major John L. Plaster, USAR (ret) Of all the ways a precision rifleman must compensate when firing such as for distance,
Shooting Uphill and Downhill By Major John L. Plaster, USAR (ret) Of all the ways a precision rifleman must compensate when firing such as for distance, for wind and for target movement the most confounding
More informationIN RE KING: IS REHABILITATION FROM SERIOUS CRIMES POSSIBLE?
IN RE KING: IS REHABILITATION FROM SERIOUS CRIMES POSSIBLE? Suzanne Diaz INTRODUCTION To be admitted to practice law in Arizona, an applicant must prove he or she possesses the appropriate character and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-KA-02082-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-KA-02082-COA MICHAEL MARTIN APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/20/2010 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT
More informationA MURDER SCENE EXCEPTION TO THE 4TH AMENDMENT WARRANT REQUIREMENT?
A MURDER SCENE EXCEPTION TO THE 4TH AMENDMENT WARRANT REQUIREMENT? Bryan R. Lemons Senior Legal Instructor It is firmly ingrained in our system of law that searches conducted outside the judicial process,
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch
Case 1:12-cv-02555-RPM Document 37 Filed 11/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 Civil Action No. 12-cv-02555-RPM STEPHEN BERKEN, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
More informationAn edited version of this article was published in the London Review of Books 37 (10), 21 May 2015, p.38 (www.lrb.co.uk)
An edited version of this article was published in the London Review of Books 37 (10), 21 May 2015, p.38 (www.lrb.co.uk) Spoofing Donald MacKenzie On April 21, the west London financial trader, Navinder
More informationTranscript of Press Conference Announcing Indictment of Roy Belfast Jr. aka Chuckie Taylor on Torture Charges
Transcript of Press Conference Announcing Indictment of Roy Belfast Jr. aka Chuckie Taylor on Torture Charges December 6, 2006 3:08 P.M. EST WASHINGTON, D.C. MS. FISHER: Good afternoon. My name is Alice
More informationMedical Record Documentation and Legal Aspects Appropriate to Nursing Assistants
We hope you enjoy this course. Most folks print a copy of the test and circle the answers while reading through the course. You can then log into your account (if you created one), enter your answers online,
More informationCalifornia Legal Handguns
California Legal Handguns Just when you thought that California s gun control laws had finally stabilized our legislature changes the rules again! Effective January 1, 2001, it is illegal for a gun dealer
More informationThe Norwood Builder and Other Stories
MACMILLAN READERS INTERMEDIATE LEVEL SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE The Norwood Builder and Other Stories Retold by F H Cornish MACMILLAN THE NORWOOD BU ILDER 1 The Most Unhappy Man T he case which I call The
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
No. 293 June 24, 2015 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JEREMY MICHAEL HAYES, Defendant-Appellant. Jackson County Circuit Court 093367FE; A148649
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE T. HENLEY GRAVES SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE RESIDENT JUDGE 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 (302) 856-5257 December 16, 2014 Natalie S. Woloshin, Esquire
More informationHow To Defend Yourself In A Tax Court
Escape Conviction when Prosecuted for a Federal Tax Crime Court, DOJ, IRS no jurisdiction without specific Section of Title 26 quoted Why, in a "Federal District Court" when charged with a "tax crime"
More informationModel Policy on Eyewitness Identification
Model Policy on Eyewitness Identification I. Purpose The purpose of this model policy is to outline proper protocol for eyewitness identification procedures for photographic, show-up, and live lineup identifications
More informationH o w t o W r i t e a J u d g e m e n t
H o w t o W r i t e a J u d g e m e n t A) Function of a Judgement: Being the final result of a legal procedure a judgement shall provide a balanced conflict solution. An ideal judgement enables both conflict
More informationHow Adam was Framed. By Laine
How Adam was Framed By Laine Cast of Characters HAMILTON, sixteen year old boy from Salt Lake City, Utah HAMILTON, s thirty-one year old mother JOHN WALKER, s sixteen year old best friend that lives two
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1625 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ronald
More informationMorini CM 162EI. Technical Data
Morini CM 162EI Technical Data Caliber: Weight: Total Length: Total Height: Total Width: Length of Sight Line: Barrel Length: Type of Barrel: Number of Riflings: Functioning: Trigger: Path: Arrest Point:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-KA-01700-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2003-KA-01700-COA TOMMY BANKS A/K/A TOMMY EARL BANKS (HARRY) APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: 5/27/2003 TRIAL
More information2016 IL App (1st) 141101-U. No. 1-14-1101 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2016 IL App (1st) 141101-U SIXTH DIVISION June 30, 2016 No. 1-14-1101 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationHere are several tips to help you navigate Fairfax County s legal system.
Since 2004, I ve been a daily presence in the Fairfax County Courthouse and have handled hundreds of drug cases as both a Prosecutor and a Defense Attorney. I have spent the last decade analyzing the legal
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For defendant-appellant: : : DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION : MAY 25, 2006
[Cite as State v. Ellington, 2006-Ohio-2595.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 86803 STATE OF OHIO JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee AND vs. OPINION DAVID ELLINGTON, JR.
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114
WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] AND: APPELLANT WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT AND: WORKER EMPLOYEE DECISION #114 Appellant
More informationTIPPMANN. A-5 Owner s Manual CO2 POWERED PAINTBALL MARKER
TIPPMANN PNEUMATICS, INC. Get Your ur Heart t Pound unding With h A Tippmann! WARNING: This paintball marker/gun is not a toy nor is it intended for unsupervised use by persons under the age of 18 years.
More informationRole Preparation. Preparing for a Mock Trial
Civil Law Mock Trial: Role Preparation This package contains: PAGE Preparing for a Mock Trial 1-5 Time Chart 6 Etiquette 7-8 Role Preparation for: Plaintiff and Defendant Lawyers 9-12 Judge 13 Jury 13
More informationSelf-Defense and Predominant Aggressor Training Materials
Self-Defense and Predominant Aggressor Training Materials Self Defense and Defense of Self; There is a Difference The following materials provide an outline of topics to cover by someone in your community
More informationJURY INSTRUCTIONS. 2.4 Willful Maintenance of Monopoly Power
JURY INSTRUCTIONS PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS 1. ANTITRUST CLAIMS 2. Elements of Monopoly Claim 2.1 Definition of Monopoly Power 2.2 Relevant Market 2.3 Existence of Monopoly Power 2.4 Willful Maintenance
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. Case no: 868/2011 Not Reportable
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT In the matter between Case no: 868/2011 Not Reportable JABULANI KENNY SITHOLE Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Neutral citation: Sithole v S (868/11)
More informationCitation: W. W. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2015 SSTAD 924 W. W. and. Canada Employment Insurance Commission. and
Citation: W. W. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2015 SSTAD 924 Date: July 27, 2015 File number: AD-14-272 APPEAL DIVISION Between: W. W. Appellant and Canada Employment Insurance Commission
More informationGRADER'S GUIDE *** QUESTION: ESSAY QUESTION NO. 3 *** SUBJECT: TORTS
GRADER'S GUIDE *** QUESTION: ESSAY QUESTION NO. 3 *** QUESTION NO. 1 (30 Points) Battery SUBJECT: TORTS John potentially has a battery claim against the guard. Battery is the intentional unlawful touching
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Strathclyde Police
Case reference: PIRC/00007/13/SP February 2014 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Strathclyde Police under section 35(1) of the Police Public Order and Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act
More informationCRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008
CRIMINAL LAW & YOUR RIGHTS MARCH 2008 1 What are your rights? As a human being and as a citizen you automatically have certain rights. These rights are not a gift from anyone, including the state. In fact,
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JOSHUA ALLEN KURTZ Appellant No. 1727 MDA 2014 Appeal from the
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,539 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JANA BOOR, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 112,539 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JANA BOOR, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Reversed. Appeal from Sedgwick District
More informationA GUIDE TO THE CORONER S INQUEST SYSTEM. Nigel S. Meadows H.M. Coroner Plymouth and S.W. Devon
A GUIDE TO THE CORONER S INQUEST SYSTEM Nigel S. Meadows H.M. Coroner Plymouth and S.W. Devon Introduction Members of the public are only likely to come into contact with the Coroner and his office in
More informationYou will by now not be surprised that a version of the teleological argument can be found in the writings of Thomas Aquinas.
The design argument The different versions of the cosmological argument we discussed over the last few weeks were arguments for the existence of God based on extremely abstract and general features of
More informationThe HIDDEN COST Of Proving Your Innocence
The HIDDEN COST Of Proving Your Innocence Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year, or about 6,850 times per day. This means that each
More informationNO. COA13-614 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 3 December 2013. v. Buncombe County No. 11 CRS 59792 DANNY DALE GOSNELL
NO. COA13-614 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 3 December 2013 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. Buncombe County No. 11 CRS 59792 DANNY DALE GOSNELL 1. Homicide first-degree murder not guilty verdict jury
More informationTOP TEN TIPS FOR WINNING YOUR CASE IN JURY SELECTION
TOP TEN TIPS FOR WINNING YOUR CASE IN JURY SELECTION PRESENTED BY JEFF KEARNEY KEARNEY & WESTFALL 2501 PARKVIEW STREET, SUITE 300 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 336-5600 LUBBOCK CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS
More informationOn March 7, 2010, Judge Linda Van Davis of Orleans Parish Criminal District Court ordered
I. Description of Misconduct On March 7, 2010, Judge Linda Van Davis of Orleans Parish Criminal District Court ordered a new trial for Michael Anderson because prosecutorial misconduct had tainted his
More information2 Newton s First Law of Motion Inertia
2 Newton s First Law of Motion Inertia Conceptual Physics Instructor Manual, 11 th Edition SOLUTIONS TO CHAPTER 2 RANKING 1. C, B, A 2. C, A, B, D 3. a. B, A, C, D b. B, A, C, D 4. a. A=B=C (no force)
More informationFIREARMS, TOOL MARKS, AND OTHER IMPRESSIONS
FIREARMS, TOOL MARKS, AND OTHER IMPRESSIONS 15-1 Introduction Structural variations and irregularities caused by scratches, nicks, breaks, and wear may permit the criminalist to relate: A bullet to a gun
More informationDIAMOND LEE JAMAL GRIFFIN
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin District Court Fourth Judicial District CCT LIST CHARGE STATUTE ONLY MOC GOC 1 609.19 H2313 X 2 609.19 H2313 A 3 609.222 A2223 X 4 609.19 H2313 A 5 609.222 A2423 X
More informationArrests/Convictions/IFBs. First Half 2011 2013. The Insurance Frauds Bureau posted 215 arrests during the first half of 2013.
Arrests/Convictions/IFBs First Half 2011 2013 The Insurance Frauds Bureau posted 215 arrests during the first half of 2013. Number of Arrests 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 356 377 215 The following
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MARK LEE GIBSON, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D01-497 STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationSTATEMENT OF DALJEET SINGH
STATEMENT OF DALJEET SINGH 1. My name is Daljeet Singh. I submit the below statement in support of my request that criminal charges be brought against Tianna Lynn DeCamp for filing a false police report
More informationThere are ten mistakes in this account. Underline them and correct them. were dead. Aramis told him that his mother was alive.
1The Bastille, Paris There are ten mistakes in this account. Underline them and correct them. It was a cool autumn night in 1660. Aramis went to the Bastille prison and told the guard of the prison that
More information