Practicalities. Yves Gigase. Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 1

Transcription

1 Practicalities Yves Gigase Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 1

2 Calls 2 Calls Research Innovation Action (RIA) Innovation Action (IA) Call Type Type equivalence TRL focus ECSEL ECSEL Researchand Innovation Action (RIA) Innovation Action (IA) Industrial/Applied Research projects Experimental development projects Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 2

3 Schedule When? What? 24/06/2014 EoI Deadline 09/07/2014 Launch of two ECSEL JU calls 10/09/2014 FPP Deadline 6-10/10/2014 Evaluation of FPP Begin november Selection of projects: communication to coordinators November Mid December Change requests procedure Finalisation of change requests and Funding decision Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 3

4 Work Plan Topics: no decision yet EU funding percentages: no decision yet Indicative budget: 135mio Euro EU 65mio Euro National (some important countries missing) National criteria and funding percentages Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 4

5 Electronic tools COMPASS: Worklflow EPS: Electronic Proposal System SyGMa: System for Grant Management Use of electronic signature Paperless Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 5

6 Information H2020 Participant Portal: tal/desktop/en/home.html Online manual: cs/h2020-funding-guide/index_en.htm Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 6

7 Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 7

8 Proposal submission Register your company (PIC number) Use the portal to register your proposal (coordinator) Proposal consists of: Part A: consortium information including financial information (cost, funding) Part B: Pdf with technical description Part C: Country specific information required Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 8

9 In Part A tick boxes: Tick boxes Set of boxes to allow (or not) industry associations to access the proposal Main area of the proposal (3 boxes, one or more or none) design technologies, process and integration, equipment, materials and manufacturing for micro- and nanoelectronics while targeting miniaturisation, diversification and differentiation, heterogeneous integration processes, methods, tools and platforms, reference designs and architectures, for software and/or control-intensive embedded/cyber-physical systems, addressing seamless connectivity and interoperability, functional safety, high availability, and security for professional and consumer type applications, and connected services; multi-disciplinary approaches for smart systems, supported by developments in holistic design and advanced manufacturing to realise self-reliant and adaptable smart systems having sophisticated interfaces and offering complex functionalities based on e.g. the seamless integration of sensing, actuating, processing, energy provision and networking. Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 9

10 Two Budgets!! Budget according to H2020 rules Budget according to national rules x% of DC JU Funding 25% of DC Indirect cost Other direct cost Equipment, Travel Materials, etc Direct cost: Subcontracting Direct cost: Personnel National Funding Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 10

11 Evaluation Submission of Full Project Proposal Start of JU GA preparation Admissibility and JU eligibilty check PAB decision on change requests Evaluation by experts Handling of change requests) Score of proposals (under/above threshold) Communication to coordinator Discussion in PAB, funding, synergy with EU and national policies Final ranking, Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 11

12 Admissibility criteria To be considered admissible, a proposal must be: electronic submission system before the deadline; Readable, accessible and printable. The proposals must be inenglish. Proposals shall include a draft plan for the exploitation and dissemination. Page limits will apply to proposals. The limits will be clearly set out in the electronic submission system. If a submitted proposal exceeds the limits, the applicant will receive an automatic warning, and will be advised to resubmit a version that conforms. After the relevant call deadline, excess pages in any over-long proposals will be automatically overprinted with a "watermark". Expert evaluators will be instructed to disregard these excess pages. Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 12

13 Admissibility criteria Incomplete proposals may be considered inadmissible. This includes the requested administrative data, the proposal description, and any supporting documents specified in the call. The following supporting documents will be required to determine the operational capacity, unless otherwise specified: A curriculum vitae or description of the profile of the persons who will be primarily responsible for carrying out the proposed research and/or innovation activities; A list of up to five relevant publications, and/or products, services (including widelyused datasets or software), or other achievements relevant to the call content; A list of up to five relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal; A description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work; A description of any third parties that are not represented as project partners, but who will nonetheless be contributing towards the work (e.g. providing facilities, computing resources) Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 13

14 Eligibility criteria Eligibility criteria The content corresponds, wholly or in part, to the topic description against which it is submitted, in the relevant work plan part; At least three legal entities. Each of the three shall be established in a different Participating State. All three legal entities shall be independent of each other. NATIONAL eligibility criteria Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 14

15 Evaluation criteria and scores Excellence: The following aspects will be taken into account, to the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the topic description in the work plan. 1. Clarity and pertinence of the objectives; 2. Credibility of the proposed approach. 3. Soundness of the concept, including trans-disciplinary considerations, where relevant; 4. Extent that proposed work is ambitious, has innovation potential, and is beyond the state of the art (e.g. groundbreaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches) 5. Xtra for pilot lines? Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 15

16 Evaluation criteria and scores Impact: The extent to which the outputs of the project should contribute at the European and/or International level to: 1. The expected impacts are listed in the MASP for each relevant topic under the title Expected Achievements/ Innovation Foreseen 2. Enhancing innovation capacity and integration of new knowledge; 3. Strengthening the competitiveness and growth of companies by developing innovations meeting the needs of European and global markets; and, where relevant, by delivering such innovations to the markets; 4. Any other environmental and socially important impacts (not already covered above); 5. Effectiveness of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results (including management of IPR), to communicate the project, and to manage research data where relevant. (Plan for dissemination and exploitation) Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 16

17 Evaluation criteria and scores Quality and efficiency of the implementation: The following aspects will be taken into account: 1. Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources; 2. Complementarity of the participants within the consortium (when relevant); 3. Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management. Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 17

18 Evaluation criteria and scores Criteria Range Weight Threshold Excellence Impact 0-5 RIA: 1 IA: 1.5 Quality, efficiency Total 0-15 (17.5) 10 0 The proposal fails to address the criterion or cannot be assessed due to missing/incomplete information. 1 Poor. The criterion is inadequately addressed, or there are serious inherent weaknesses. 2 Fair. The proposal broadly addresses the criterion, but there are significant weaknesses. 3 Good. The proposal addresses the criterion well, but a number of shortcomings are present. 4 Very Good. The proposal addresses the criterion very well, but a small number of shortcomings are present. 5 Excellent. The proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the criterion. Any shortcomings are minor. 3 Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 18

19 Capacity criteria Capacity Criteria Financial capacity: In line with the Financial Regulation and the Rules for Participation. At the proposal stage, coordinators will be invited to complete a self-assessment using an on-line tool. Operational capacity: As a distinct operation, carried out during the evaluation of the award criterion 'Quality and efficiency of the implementation', experts will indicate whether the participants meet the selection criterion related to operational capacity, to carry out the proposed work, based on the competence and experience of the individual participant(s) Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 19

20 JU GA ECSEL JU GA very similar to H2020 JU GA except for: Funding % Partners from entrusting states Contains amongst others: Explanation on H2020 funding rules Look up the annotated JU GA a/h2020-amga_en.pdf Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 20

21 LEAR Electronic signature requires the appointment of a LEAR The LEAR (Legal Entity Appointed Representative) must be authorised to manage the legal and financial information about his/her organisation on the Participant Portal, and to manage access rights of persons in his/her organisation and to appoint representatives of his/her organisation to electronically sign grant agreements or financial statements via the Participant Portal. Validation of company Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 21

22 Role of coordinator Handles the payment of the JU contribution of the partners Prepares the reporting: technical and financial Discusses the amendments to the JU GA Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 22

23 Questions? Presentation Context (name) - DATE! 23